Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012

OR

o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number 001-16625

BUNGE LIMITED

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Bermuda |  | 98-0231912
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |  | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

50 Main Street, White Plains, New York |  | 10606
(Address of principal executive offices) |  | (Zip Code)

(914) 684-2800

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer x |  | Accelerated filer o
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |  | Smaller reporting company o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Yes o No x

As of July 27, 2012 the number of shares issued of the registrant was:

Common shares, par value $.01 per share: 146,055,782

Table of Contents

BUNGE LIMITED

TABLE OF CONTENTS

|  | Page
PART I— FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
Item 1. | Financial Statements (Unaudited): |
| Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 | 2
| Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 | 3
| Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 | 4
| Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 | 5
| Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 | 6
| Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | 7
| Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements | 31
Item 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 31
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | 48
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures | 50
PART II — INFORMATION |
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings | 51
Item 1A. | Risk Factors | 51
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds | 51
Item 3. | Defaults upon Senior Securities | 51
Item 4. | Mine Safety Disclosures | 51
Item 5. | Other Information | 51
Item 6. | Exhibits | 51
Signatures | S-1
Exhibit Index | E-1

Table of Contents

PART I— FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

BUNGE LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(Unaudited)

(U.S. dollars in millions, except per share data)

|  | Three Months Ended |  | Six Months Ended |
|  | June 30, |  | June 30, |
|  | 2012 |  | 2011 |  | 2012 |  | 2011 |
Net sales |  | $ | 15,090 |  | $ | 14,488 |  | $ | 28,536 |  | $ | 26,682 |
Cost of goods sold |  | (14,430 | ) | (13,841 | ) | (27,355 | ) | (25,396 | )
Gross profit |  | 660 |  | 647 |  | 1,181 |  | 1,286 |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |  | (396 | ) | (383 | ) | (815 | ) | (727 | )
Interest income |  | 21 |  | 23 |  | 47 |  | 44 |
Interest expense |  | (82 | ) | (70 | ) | (144 | ) | (142 | )
Foreign exchange gain (loss) |  | 18 |  | 77 |  | 84 |  | 119 |
Other income (expense) — net |  | (8 | ) | 1 |  | (37 | ) | (7 | )
Gain on sale of investments in affiliates |  | 85 |  | 37 |  | 85 |  | 37 |
Gain on acquisition of controlling interest |  | 36 |  | — |  | 36 |  | — |
Income before income tax |  | 334 |  | 332 |  | 437 |  | 610 |
Income tax expense |  | (68 | ) | (20 | ) | (82 | ) | (63 | )
Net income |  | 266 |  | 312 |  | 355 |  | 547 |
Net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interest |  | 8 |  | 4 |  | 11 |  | 1 |
Net income attributable to Bunge |  | 274 |  | 316 |  | 366 |  | 548 |
Convertible preference share dividends |  | (9 | ) | (9 | ) | (17 | ) | (17 | )
Net income available to Bunge common shareholders |  | $ | 265 |  | $ | 307 |  | $ | 349 |  | $ | 531 |
Earnings per common share — basic (Note 19) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Earnings to Bunge common shareholders |  | $ | 1.82 |  | $ | 2.08 |  | $ | 2.39 |  | $ | 3.61 |
Earnings per common share — diluted (Note 19) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Earnings to Bunge common shareholders |  | $ | 1.78 |  | $ | 2.02 |  | $ | 2.37 |  | $ | 3.51 |
Dividends per common share |  | $ | 0.27 |  | $ | 0.25 |  | $ | 0.52 |  | $ | 0.48 |

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

2

Table of Contents

BUNGE LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

(Unaudited)

(U.S. dollars in millions)

|  | Three Months Ended |  | Six Months Ended |
|  | June 30, |  | June 30, |
|  | 2012 |  | 2011 |  | 2012 |  | 2011 |
Net income |  | $ | 266 |  | $ | 312 |  | $ | 355 |  | $ | 547 |
Other comprehensive income (loss): |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Foreign exchange translation adjustment |  | (1,133 | ) | 361 |  | (798 | ) | 658 |
Unrealized gains (losses) on commodity futures and foreign exchange contracts designated as cash flow hedges, net of tax (expense) benefit of $12 and $8 in 2012, $(7) and $(7) in 2011 |  | (25 | ) | 9 |  | (16 | ) | 13 |
Unrealized gains (losses) on investments, net of tax (expense) benefit of $1 and $(6) in 2012, $(2) and $(2) in 2011 |  | (2 | ) | 3 |  | 11 |  | 3 |
Reclassification of realized net losses (gains) to net income, net of tax expense (benefit) of $(1) and $0 in 2012, $7 and $7 in 2011 |  | 21 |  | (13 | ) | 21 |  | (13 | )
Pension adjustment, net of tax (expense) benefit of nil in all periods |  | — |  | — |  | 1 |  | (2 | )
Total other comprehensive income (loss) |  | (1,139 | ) | 360 |  | (781 | ) | 659 |
Total comprehensive income (loss) |  | (873 | ) | 672 |  | (426 | ) | 1,206 |
Less: comprehensive (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest |  | 47 |  | (6 | ) | 37 |  | (17 | )
Total comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Bunge |  | $ | (826 | ) | $ | 666 |  | $ | (389 | ) | $ | 1,189 |

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

Table of Contents

BUNGE LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)

(U.S. dollars in millions, except share data)

|  | June 30, |  | December 31, |
|  | 2012 |  | 2011 |
ASSETS |  |  |  |  |
Current assets: |  |  |  |  |
Cash and cash equivalents |  | $ | 467 |  | $ | 835 |
Trade accounts receivable (less allowances of $117 and $113) (Note 13) |  | 2,805 |  | 2,459 |
Inventories (Note 4) |  | 7,930 |  | 5,733 |
Deferred income taxes |  | 394 |  | 305 |
Other current assets (Note 5) |  | 4,764 |  | 3,796 |
Total current assets |  | 16,360 |  | 13,128 |
Property, plant and equipment, net |  | 5,596 |  | 5,517 |
Goodwill (Note 6) |  | 880 |  | 893 |
Other intangible assets, net |  | 306 |  | 220 |
Investments in affiliates (Note 7) |  | 278 |  | 600 |
Deferred income taxes |  | 1,276 |  | 1,211 |
Other non-current assets (Note 8) |  | 2,017 |  | 1,706 |
Total assets |  | $ | 26,713 |  | $ | 23,275 |
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |  |  |  |  |
Current liabilities: |  |  |  |  |
Short-term debt |  | $ | 2,332 |  | $ | 719 |
Current portion of long-term debt (Note 12) |  | 315 |  | 14 |
Trade accounts payable |  | 3,048 |  | 3,173 |
Deferred income taxes |  | 275 |  | 152 |
Other current liabilities (Note 10) |  | 3,704 |  | 2,889 |
Total current liabilities |  | 9,674 |  | 6,947 |
Long-term debt (Note 12) |  | 4,247 |  | 3,348 |
Deferred income taxes |  | 155 |  | 134 |
Other non-current liabilities |  | 765 |  | 771 |
Commitments and contingencies (Note 16) |  |  |  |  |
Equity (Note 17): |  |  |  |  |
Convertible perpetual preference shares, par value $.01; authorized, issued and outstanding: 2012 and 2011 — 6,900,000 shares (liquidation preference $100 per share) |  | 690 |  | 690 |
Common shares, par value $.01; authorized — 400,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding: 2012 — 146,035,349 shares, 2011 — 145,610,029 shares |  | 1 |  | 1 |
Additional paid-in capital |  | 4,868 |  | 4,829 |
Retained earnings |  | 7,190 |  | 6,917 |
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (Note 17) |  | (1,365 | ) | (610 | )
Treasury shares, at cost - 1,933,286 shares |  | (120 | ) | (120 | )
Total Bunge shareholders’ equity |  | 11,264 |  | 11,707 |
Noncontrolling interest (Note 18) |  | 608 |  | 368 |
Total equity |  | 11,872 |  | 12,075 |
Total liabilities and equity |  | $ | 26,713 |  | $ | 23,275 |

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

Table of Contents

BUNGE LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

(U.S. dollars in millions)

|  | Six Months Ended |
|  | June 30, |
|  | 2012 |  | 2011 |
OPERATING ACTIVITIES |  |  |  |  |
Net income |  | $ | 355 |  | $ | 547 |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by (used for) operating activities: |  |  |  |  |
Gain on sale of investments in affiliates |  | (85 | ) | (37 | )
Gain on acquisition of controlling interest |  | (36 | ) | — |
Foreign exchange loss (gain) on debt |  | (49 | ) | (78 | )
Bad debt expense |  | 29 |  | 9 |
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |  | 264 |  | 247 |
Stock-based compensation expense |  | 31 |  | 26 |
Deferred income taxes |  | (108 | ) | (136 | )
Other, net |  | — |  | (7 | )
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, excluding the effects of acquisitions: |  |  |  |  |
Trade accounts receivable |  | (434 | ) | (64 | )
Inventories |  | (2,513 | ) | (86 | )
Prepayments and advances to suppliers |  | (687 | ) | (239 | )
Trade accounts payable and accrued liabilities |  | 186 |  | (431 | )
Net unrealized gain/loss on derivative contracts |  | 214 |  | 129 |
Margin deposits |  | (63 | ) | 390 |
Other, net |  | 197 |  | (6 | )
Cash provided by (used for) operating activities |  | (2,699 | ) | 264 |
INVESTING ACTIVITIES |  |  |  |  |
Payments made for capital expenditures |  | (473 | ) | (454 | )
Acquisitions of businesses (net of cash acquired) |  | (277 | ) | (83 | )
Proceeds from sale of investments in affiliates |  | 483 |  | 70 |
Payments for investments in affiliates |  | (89 | ) | (10 | )
Other, net |  | 73 |  | 37 |
Cash provided by (used for) investing activities |  | (283 | ) | (440 | )
FINANCING ACTIVITIES |  |  |  |  |
Net change in short-term debt with maturities of 90 days or less |  | 1,618 |  | (294 | )
Proceeds from short-term debt with maturities greater than 90 days |  | 369 |  | 439 |
Repayments of short-term debt with maturities greater than 90 days |  | (367 | ) | (983 | )
Proceeds from long-term debt |  | 2,761 |  | 1,377 |
Repayments of long-term debt |  | (1,638 | ) | (440 | )
Proceeds from sale of common shares |  | 10 |  | 16 |
Dividends paid |  | (89 | ) | (85 | )
Other, net |  | — |  | 28 |
Cash provided by (used for) financing activities |  | 2,664 |  | 58 |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |  | (50 | ) | 10 |
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |  | (368 | ) | (108 | )
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |  | 835 |  | 578 |
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |  | $ | 467 |  | $ | 470 |

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

5

Table of Contents

BUNGE LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY

(Unaudited)

(U.S. dollars in millions, except share data)

|  | Convertible |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Accumulated |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  | Preference |  |  |  | Additional |  |  |  | Other |  |  |  | Non |  |  |
|  | Shares |  | Common Shares |  | Paid-in |  | Retained |  | Comprehensive |  | Treasury |  | Controlling |  | Total |
|  | Shares |  | Amount |  | Shares |  | Amount |  | Capital |  | Earnings |  | Income (Loss) |  | Shares |  | Interest |  | Equity |
Balance, January 1, 2011 |  | 6,900,000 |  | $ | 690 |  | 146,635,083 |  | $ | 1 |  | $ | 4,793 |  | $ | 6,153 |  | $ | 583 |  | $ | — |  | $ | 334 |  | $ | 12,554 |
Net income |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | 548 |  | — |  | — |  | (1 | ) | 547 |
Other comprehensive income (loss) |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | 641 |  |  |  | 18 |  | 659 |
Dividends on common shares |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | (71 | ) | — |  | — |  | — |  | (71 | )
Dividends on preference shares |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | (17 | ) | — |  | — |  | — |  | (17 | )
Dividends to noncontrolling interest on subsidiary common stock |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | (12 | ) | (12 | )
Capital contributions from noncontrolling interest |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | 53 |  | 53 |
Stock-based compensation expense |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | 26 |  | — |  | — |  |  |  | — |  | 26 |
Issuance of common shares |  | — |  | — |  | 709,526 |  | — |  | 12 |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | 12 |
Balance, June 30, 2011 |  | 6,900,000 |  | $ | 690 |  | 147,344,609 |  | $ | 1 |  | $ | 4,831 |  | $ | 6,613 |  | $ | 1,224 |  | $ | — |  | $ | 392 |  | $ | 13,751 |
|  | Convertible |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Accumulated |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  | Preference |  |  |  |  |  | Additional |  |  |  | Other |  |  |  | Non |  |  |
|  | Shares |  | Common Shares |  | Paid-in |  | Retained |  | Comprehensive |  | Treasury |  | Controlling |  | Total |
|  | Shares |  | Amount |  | Shares |  | Amount |  | Capital |  | Earnings |  | Income (Loss) |  | Shares |  | Interest |  | Equity |
Balance, January 1, 2012 |  | 6,900,000 |  | $ | 690 |  | 145,610,029 |  | $ | 1 |  | $ | 4,829 |  | $ | 6,917 |  | $ | (610 | ) | $ | (120 | ) | $ | 368 |  | $ | 12,075 |
Net income |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | 366 |  | — |  | — |  | (11 | ) | 355 |
Other comprehensive income (loss) |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | (755 | ) | — |  | (26 | ) | (781 | )
Dividends on common shares |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | (76 | ) | — |  | — |  | — |  | (76 | )
Dividends on preference shares |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | (17 | ) | — |  | — |  | — |  | (17 | )
Dividends to noncontrolling interest on subsidiary common stock |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | (6 | ) | (6 | )
Capital contributions from noncontrolling interest |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | 10 |  | 10 |
Noncontrolling interest at acquisition |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | 273 |  | 273 |
Stock-based compensation expense |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | 31 |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | 31 |
Issuance of common shares |  | — |  | — |  | 425,320 |  | — |  | 8 |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | 8 |
Balance, June 30, 2012 |  | 6,900,000 |  | $ | 690 |  | 146,035,349 |  | $ | 1 |  | $ | 4,868 |  | $ | 7,190 |  | $ | (1,365 | ) | $ | (120 | ) | $ | 608 |  | $ | 11,872 |

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

6

Table of Contents

BUNGE LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Bunge Limited (Bunge), its subsidiaries and variable interest entities (VIEs) in which it is considered the primary beneficiary. The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP) for interim financial information and the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act) and include the assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses of all entities in which Bunge has a controlling financial interest or is otherwise deemed to be the primary beneficiary. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) rules. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation have been included. The condensed consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2011 has been derived from Bunge’s audited consolidated financial statements at that date. Operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the year ending December 31, 2012. The financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2011, forming part of Bunge’s 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 27, 2011.

As described in Note 3, Bunge acquired an asset management business in Europe on March 19, 2012. Based on the accounting requirements of Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 810-10, Consolidation, Bunge concluded that restrictions on certain subsidiaries of this asset management business that serve as general partners in certain investment funds managed by that business to sell, transfer or encumber their partnership interests without advance approval of specified majorities of limited partner investors, and similar restrictions on such limited partner investors to sell, transfer or encumber their interests in the funds without prior approval of the general partner, result in a potential de facto principal/agency relationship as defined under accounting requirements and therefore Bunge is required to consolidate these investment funds, although it does not have significant equity at risk in these investment funds. The consolidation of these investment funds into Bunge’s financial statements impacts primarily investments, long-term debt and noncontrolling interest in Bunge’s condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2012 in the amounts of $335 million, $92 million and $253 million, respectively. Bunge does not provide performance guarantees and has no financial obligation to provide funding to these investment funds.

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation (see Notes 6 and 20).

2. NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

Adoption of New Accounting Pronouncements— In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) amended the guidance in ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurement. This guidance is intended to result in convergence between U.S. GAAP and IFRS requirements for measurement of, and disclosures about, fair value. The amendment clarifies or changes certain fair value measurement principles and enhances the disclosure requirements particularly for Level 3 fair value measurements. The adoption of this standard on January 1, 2012 did not have a material impact on Bunge’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

3. BUSINESS ACQUISITIONS

In June 2012, Bunge acquired sugarcane milling assets in Brazil in its sugar and bioenergy segment for $61 million in cash. The preliminary purchase price allocation includes $10 million of biological assets, $43 million of property, plant and equipment, $1 million of finite-lived intangible assets and $7 million of goodwill.

In May 2012, Bunge acquired an additional 63.5% interest in a wheat mill and bakery dry mix operation in North America in its milling products segment for $102 million, net of cash acquired. Bunge had an existing 31.5% interest in the entity which was accounted for as an equity method investment. Upon completion of the transaction,

7

Table of Contents

Bunge has a 95% interest in the entity which it consolidates. Upon assuming control of the entity Bunge recorded a non-cash gain of $36 million to adjust its previously existing noncontrolling interest to its fair value of $52 million. The preliminary purchase price allocation includes $19 million of inventories, $35 million of other current assets, $71 million of property, plant and equipment, $32 million of finite-lived intangible assets, $21 million of other liabilities, $27 million of deferred tax liabilities, $6 million of noncontrolling interest and $51 million of goodwill (see Notes 7 and 18).

In March 2012, Bunge acquired an asset management business in Europe in its agribusiness segment for $9 million, net of cash acquired. The preliminary purchase price allocation includes $25 million of current assets, $346 million of long-term investments, $21 million of other finite-lived intangible assets, $25 million of other liabilities, $94 million of debt and $264 million of noncontrolling interest. Of these amounts, $14 million of other net assets, $344 million of long-term investments, $94 million of long-term debt and $264 million of noncontrolling interest are attributed to certain managed investment funds, which Bunge consolidates as it is deemed to be the primary beneficiary.

In February 2012, Bunge acquired an edible oils and fats business in India in its edible oils segment for $94 million, net of cash acquired. The purchase price consisted of $77 million in cash and $17 million of acquired debt. The preliminary purchase price allocation includes $15 million of inventories, $4 million of current assets, $27 million of property, plant and equipment, $53 million of intangible assets (primarily trademark and brands) and $5 million of other liabilities.

Also in 2012, Bunge acquired finite-lived intangible assets and property, plant and equipment in two transactions in North America in its agribusiness segment for $24 million in cash.

4. INVENTORIES

Inventories by segment are presented below. Readily marketable inventories refers to inventories that are readily convertible to cash because of their commodity characteristics, widely available markets and international pricing mechanisms.

|  | June 30, |  | December 31, |
(US$ in millions) |  | 2012 |  | 2011 |
Agribusiness (1) |  | $ | 5,902 |  | $ | 4,080 |
Sugar and bioenergy (2) |  | 422 |  | 465 |
Edible oil products (3) |  | 618 |  | 489 |
Milling products (4) |  | 151 |  | 130 |
Fertilizer (4) |  | 837 |  | 569 |
Total |  | $ | 7,930 |  | $ | 5,733 |

(1) Includes readily marketable agricultural commodity inventories at fair value of $5,574 million and $3,724 million at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. All other agribusiness segment inventories are carried at lower of cost or market.

(2) Includes readily marketable sugar inventories of $85 million and $139 million at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. Of these sugar inventories, $57 million and $83 million are carried at fair value at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, in Bunge’s trading and merchandising business. Sugar and ethanol inventories in Bunge’s industrial production business are carried at lower of cost or market.

(3) Edible oil products inventories are generally carried at lower of cost or market, with the exception of readily marketable inventories of bulk soybean oil which are carried at fair value in the aggregate amount of $217 million and $212 million at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.

(4) Milling products and fertilizer inventories are carried at lower of cost or market.

5. OTHER CURRENT ASSETS

Other current assets consist of the following:

8

Table of Contents

|  | June 30, |  | December 31, |
(US$ in millions) |  | 2012 |  | 2011 |
Prepaid commodity purchase contracts (1) |  | $ | 835 |  | $ | 206 |
Secured advances to suppliers, net (2) |  | 337 |  | 349 |
Unrealized gains on derivative contracts at fair value |  | 1,624 |  | 1,283 |
Recoverable taxes, net |  | 495 |  | 528 |
Margin deposits (3) |  | 417 |  | 352 |
Marketable securities |  | 69 |  | 50 |
Deferred purchase price receivable (4) |  | 156 |  | 192 |
Prepaid expenses |  | 368 |  | 369 |
Restricted cash (5) |  | — |  | 43 |
Other |  | 463 |  | 424 |
Total |  | $ | 4,764 |  | $ | 3,796 |

(1) Prepaid commodity purchase contracts represent advance payments against fixed price contracts for future delivery of specified quantities of agricultural commodities. These contracts are recorded at fair value based on prices of the underlying agricultural commodities.

(2) Bunge provides cash advances to suppliers, primarily Brazilian farmers of soybeans, to finance a portion of the suppliers’ production costs. Bunge does not bear any of the costs or risks associated with the related growing crops. The advances are largely collateralized by future crops and physical assets of the suppliers, carry a local market interest rate and settle when the farmer’s crop is harvested and sold. The secured advances to farmers are reported net of allowances of $4 million at June 30, 2012 and $3 million at December 31, 2011.

Interest earned on secured advances to suppliers of $5 million for both the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and $13 million and $12 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, is included in net sales in the condensed consolidated statements of income.

(3) Margin deposits include U.S. treasury securities at fair value and cash.

(4) Deferred purchase price receivable represents additional credit support for the investment conduits in Bunge’s accounts receivables sales program (see Note 13) and is recognized at its estimated fair value.

(5) Restricted cash at December 31, 2011, includes an escrowed cash deposit related to an equity investment, which was completed in the first quarter of 2012.

6. GOODWILL

The table below summarizes the carrying amount of goodwill by segment.

|  |  |  | Sugar and |  | Edible Oil |  | Milling |  |  |  |  |
(US$ in millions) |  | Agribusiness |  | Bioenergy |  | Products |  | Products |  | Fertilizer |  | Total |
Balance, December 31, 2010 |  | $ | 215 |  | $ | 631 |  | $ | 80 |  | $ | 7 |  | $ | 1 |  | $ | 934 |
Acquired goodwill |  | 34 |  | — |  | 41 |  | — |  | — |  | 75 |
Reallocation of acquired goodwill |  | (5 | ) | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | (5 | )
Tax benefit on goodwill amortization (3) |  | (7 | ) | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | (7 | )
Foreign exchange translation |  | (21 | ) | (71 | ) | (11 | ) | (1 | ) | — |  | (104 | )
Balance, December 31, 2011 |  | $ | 216 |  | $ | 560 |  | $ | 110 |  | $ | 6 |  | $ | 1 |  | $ | 893 |
Acquired goodwill (1) |  | — |  | 7 |  | — |  | 51 |  | — |  | 58 |
Reallocation of acquired goodwill (2) |  | (1 | ) | — |  | (13 | ) | — |  | 1 |  | (13 | )
Tax benefit on goodwill amortization (3) |  | (3 | ) | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | (3 | )
Foreign exchange translation |  | (11 | ) | (40 | ) | (1 | ) | (3 | ) | — |  | (55 | )
Balance, June 30, 2012 |  | $ | 201 |  | $ | 527 |  | $ | 96 |  | $ | 54 |  | $ | 2 |  | $ | 880 |

(1) See Note 3.

(2) Beginning in the first quarter of 2012, the management responsibilities for certain Brazilian port facilities were moved from the agribusiness segment to the fertilizer segment. Accordingly, $1 million of goodwill attributable to these port facilities was reclassified to conform to the 2012 segment presentation. Also in the first quarter of 2012, the purchase price allocation for the 2011 edible oil products acquisition was revised resulting in a reduction of goodwill of $13 million, a reduction of inventories of $6 million, an increase in finite-lived intangibles of $14 million and a reduction of deferred tax liabilities of $5 million.

9

Table of Contents

(3) Bunge’s Brazilian subsidiary’s tax deductible goodwill is in excess of its book goodwill. For financial reporting purposes, for goodwill acquired prior to 2009, the tax benefits attributable to the excess tax goodwill are first used to reduce associated goodwill and then other intangible assets to zero, prior to recognizing any income tax benefit in the condensed consolidated statements of income.

7. INVESTMENTS IN AFFILIATES

In June 2012, Bunge entered into a joint venture agreement for the construction and operation of a corn wet mill in Argentina. Bunge has a 50% interest in this joint venture for $14 million. Bunge accounts for this equity method investment in its sugar and bioenergy segment. Also during the six months ended June 30, 2012, Bunge made contributions of $18 million and $15 million to its North American biofuels and Paraguay oilseed processing facility joint ventures, respectively.

In May 2012, Bunge completed the acquisition of an additional 63.5% voting interest in a North American wheat mill and bakery dry mix operations (see Note 3) in which it previously had a 31.5% interest, and which it reported as an equity method investment in its milling products segment. Upon completion of the transaction, Bunge began to consolidate this entity in its consolidated financial statements. Upon assuming control of this entity, Bunge recognized a non-cash gain of $36 million to adjust its previously existing investment to fair value.

In April 2012, Bunge sold its 28.06% interest in The Solae Company (Solae) to E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company for $448 million in cash exclusive of a special cash dividend of $35 million. Bunge recognized a pre-tax gain of $85 million in its agribusiness segment related to this transaction.

In January 2012, Bunge completed the acquisition in its agribusiness segment of a 35% interest in PT Bumiraya Investindo, an Indonesian palm plantation company, for $43 million which is reported as an equity method investment.

8. OTHER NON-CURRENT ASSETS

Other non-current assets consist of the following:

|  | June 30, |  | December 31, |
(US$ in millions) |  | 2012 |  | 2011 |
Recoverable taxes, net |  | $ | 473 |  | $ | 386 |
Long-term receivables from farmers in Brazil, net |  | 225 |  | 284 |
Judicial deposits |  | 162 |  | 167 |
Income taxes receivable |  | 462 |  | 565 |
Affiliate loans receivable |  | 80 |  | 63 |
Long-term investments |  | 417 |  | 37 |
Other |  | 198 |  | 204 |
Total |  | $ | 2,017 |  | $ | 1,706 |

Recoverable taxes — Recoverable taxes are reported net of valuation allowances of $36 million and $41 million at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.

Long-term receivables from farmers in Brazil — Bunge provides financing to farmers in Brazil, primarily through secured advances against farmer commitments to deliver agricultural commodities (primarily soybeans) upon harvest of the then-current year’s crop and through credit sales of fertilizer to farmers.

10

Table of Contents

The table below summarizes Bunge’s recorded investment in long-term receivables from farmers in Brazil for amounts in the legal collection process and renegotiated amounts.

|  | June 30, |  | December 31, |
(US$ in millions) |  | 2012 |  | 2011 |
Legal collection process (1) |  | $ | 313 |  | $ | 358 |
Renegotiated amounts: |  |  |  |  |
Current on repayment terms |  | 110 |  | 125 |
Total |  | $ | 423 |  | $ | 483 |

(1) All amounts in legal process are considered past due upon initiation of legal action.

The average recorded investment in long-term receivables from farmers in Brazil for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and the year ended December 31, 2011 was $485 million and $561 million, respectively. The table below summarizes Bunge’s recorded investment in long-term receivables from farmers in Brazil and the related allowance amounts.

|  | June 30, 2012 |  | December 31, 2011 |
|  | Recorded |  |  |  | Recorded |  |  |
(US$ in millions) |  | Investment |  | Allowance |  | Investment |  | Allowance |
For which an allowance has been provided: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Legal collection process |  | $ | 157 |  | $ | 143 |  | $ | 162 |  | $ | 147 |
Renegotiated amounts |  | 68 |  | 55 |  | 64 |  | 52 |
For which no allowance has been provided: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Legal collection process |  | 156 |  | — |  | 196 |  | — |
Renegotiated amounts |  | 42 |  | — |  | 61 |  | — |
Total |  | $ | 423 |  | $ | 198 |  | $ | 483 |  | $ | 199 |

The table below summarizes the activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts related to long-term receivables from farmers in Brazil.

|  | Three Months Ended |  | Six Months Ended |
|  | June 30, |  | June 30, |
(US$ in millions) |  | 2012 |  | 2011 |  | 2012 |  | 2011 |
Beginning balance |  | $ | 215 |  | $ | 205 |  | $ | 199 |  | $ | 201 |
Bad debt provisions |  | 11 |  | 3 |  | 26 |  | 4 |
Recoveries |  | (5 | ) | (4 | ) | (9 | ) | (5 | )
Write-offs |  | (1 | ) | — |  | (1 | ) | — |
Transfers (1) |  | — |  | 2 |  | — |  | 2 |
Foreign exchange translation |  | (22 | ) | 9 |  | (17 | ) | 13 |
Ending balance |  | $ | 198 |  | $ | 215 |  | $ | 198 |  | $ | 215 |

(1) Represents reclassifications from allowance for doubtful accounts — current for secured advances to suppliers.

Judicial deposits — Judicial deposits are funds that Bunge has placed on deposit with the courts in Brazil. These funds are held in judicial escrow relating to certain legal proceedings pending legal resolution and bear interest at the SELIC rate (benchmark rate of the Brazilian central bank).

11

Table of Contents

Income taxes receivable — Income taxes receivable at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 includes overpayments of current income taxes plus accrued interest. These income tax prepayments are expected to be utilized for settlement of future income tax obligations. Income taxes receivable in Brazil bear interest at the SELIC rate.

Affiliate loans receivable — Affiliate loans receivable are primarily interest bearing receivables from unconsolidated affiliates with an initial maturity of greater than one year.

Long-term investments— Long-term investments primarily relate to investments held by certain managed investment funds (see Note 1) for which Bunge has been deemed the primary beneficiary, resulting in Bunge’s consolidation of the associated entities.

9. INCOME TAXES

Income tax expense is provided on an interim basis based upon management’s estimate of the annual effective income tax rate and includes the tax effects of certain discrete items, such as changes in tax laws or tax rates or other unusual or nonrecurring tax adjustments, in the interim period in which they occur. In addition, jurisdictions with a projected loss for the year or a year-to-date loss where no tax benefit can be recognized are excluded from the estimated annual effective tax rate. The effective tax rate is highly dependent upon the geographic distribution of Bunge’s worldwide earnings or losses and tax regulations in each jurisdiction. Management regularly monitors the assumptions used in estimating its annual effective tax rate and adjusts estimates accordingly. If actual results differ from management’s estimates, reported income tax expense in future periods could be materially affected.

As a global enterprise, Bunge files income tax returns that are subject to periodic examination and challenge by federal, state and foreign tax authorities. In many jurisdictions, income tax examinations, including settlement negotiations or litigation, may take several years to finalize. While it is often difficult to predict the final outcome or timing of resolution of any particular matter with the various tax authorities, management believes that the condensed consolidated financial statements reflect the largest amount of tax benefit that will be more likely than not be realized. There were no material changes to uncertain tax positions for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011. It is reasonably possible that the amount of unrecognized tax benefit will increase or decrease during the next 12 months; however, management does not expect a material effect on results of operations or financial position.

During the first quarter 2012, the Brazilian tax authorities proposed certain adjustments to the income tax returns for one of Bunge’s Brazilian subsidiaries for the years 2008 and 2009. The proposed adjustments totaled approximately $62 million plus applicable interest and penalties. Management, in consultation with external legal advisors, has reviewed and responded to the proposed adjustments and believes that it is more likely than not that it will prevail and therefore, has not recorded an uncertain tax liability.

In 2011, the Brazilian tax authorities commenced an examination of the income tax returns of one of Bunge’s Brazilian subsidiaries for the years 2005 to 2009 and proposed adjustments totaling approximately $160 million plus applicable interest and penalties. Management, in consultation with external legal advisors, has reviewed and responded to the proposed adjustments and believes that it is more likely than not that it will prevail and therefore, has not recorded an uncertain tax liability.

In 2010, the Brazilian tax authorities had proposed certain significant adjustments to the income tax returns of one of Bunge’s Brazilian subsidiaries for the years 2005 to 2007. The proposed adjustments totaled approximately $525 million plus applicable interest and penalties. In the fourth quarter of 2011, Bunge received a decision from the Tax Inspector that dismissed approximately $170 million of this tax claim against Bunge. Management is appealing the remainder of the case, and has not changed its position that it is more likely than not that it will prevail and therefore, has not recorded an uncertain tax liability.

12

Table of Contents

10. OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES

Other current liabilities consist of the following:

|  | June 30, |  | December 31, |
(US$ in millions) |  | 2012 |  | 2011 |
Accrued liabilities |  | $ | 1,179 |  | $ | 1,179 |
Unrealized losses on derivative contracts at fair value |  | 1,907 |  | 1,370 |
Advances on sales |  | 567 |  | 283 |
Other |  | 51 |  | 57 |
Total |  | $ | 3,704 |  | $ | 2,889 |

11. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

Bunge’s various financial instruments include certain components of working capital such as cash and cash equivalents, trade accounts receivable and trade accounts payable. Additionally, Bunge uses short and long-term debt to fund operating requirements. Cash and cash equivalents, trade accounts receivable, trade accounts payable and short-term debt are stated at their carrying value, which is a reasonable estimate of fair value. See Note 13 for deferred purchase price receivable (DPP) related to sales of trade receivables. See Note 8 for long-term receivables from farmers in Brazil, net and see Note 12 for long-term debt. Bunge’s financial instruments also include derivative instruments and marketable securities, which are stated at fair value.

Fair value is the expected price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in Bunge’s principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Bunge determines the fair values of its readily marketable inventories, derivatives, and certain other assets based on the fair value hierarchy established in ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. Observable inputs are inputs based on market data obtained from sources independent of Bunge that reflect the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Unobservable inputs are inputs that are developed based on the best information available in circumstances that reflect Bunge’s own assumptions based on market data and on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. The standard describes three levels within its hierarchy that may be used to measure fair value.

Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 1 assets and liabilities include exchange traded derivative contracts.

Level 2: Observable inputs, including Level 1 prices (adjusted); quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are less active than traded exchanges; and other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. Level 2 assets and liabilities include readily marketable inventories and over-the-counter (OTC) commodity purchase and sale contracts and other OTC derivatives whose value is determined using pricing models with inputs that are generally based on exchange traded prices, adjusted for location specific inputs that are primarily observable in the market or can be derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are a significant component of the fair value of the assets or liabilities. In evaluating the significance of fair value inputs, Bunge gives consideration to items that individually, or when aggregated with other inputs, generally represent more than 10% of the fair value of the assets or liabilities. For such identified inputs which are primarily related to inland transportation costs, judgments are required when evaluating both quantitative and qualitative factors in the determination of significance for purposes of fair value level classification and disclosure. Level 3 assets and liabilities include assets and liabilities whose value is determined using proprietary pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, as well as assets and liabilities for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation. Bunge believes a change in these inputs would not result in a significant change in the fair values.

The majority of Bunge’s exchange traded agricultural commodity futures are settled daily generally through its clearing subsidiary and therefore, such futures are not included in the table below. Assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is a significant component of the fair value measurement. The lowest level of input is considered Level 3. Bunge’s assessment of the significance of a

13

Table of Contents

particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment, and may affect the classification of fair value assets and liabilities within the fair value hierarchy levels. The following table sets forth, by level, Bunge’s assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis.

|  | Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date |
|  | June 30, 2012 |  | December 31, 2011 |
(US$ in millions) |  | Level 1 |  | Level 2 |  | Level 3 |  | Total |  | Level 1 |  | Level 2 |  | Level 3 |  | Total |
Assets: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Readily marketable inventories (Note 4) |  | $ | — |  | $ | 4,028 |  | $ | 1,820 |  | $ | 5,848 |  | $ | — |  | $ | 3,736 |  | $ | 283 |  | $ | 4,019 |
Unrealized gain on designated derivative contracts (1): |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Foreign exchange |  | — |  | 3 |  | — |  | 3 |  | — |  | 13 |  | — |  | 13 |
Unrealized gain on undesignated derivative contracts (1): |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Foreign exchange |  | — |  | 262 |  | — |  | 262 |  | — |  | 451 |  | 1 |  | 452 |
Commodities |  | 157 |  | 849 |  | 333 |  | 1,339 |  | 75 |  | 586 |  | 125 |  | 786 |
Freight |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | 5 |  | — |  | 1 |  | 6 |
Energy |  | 12 |  | 4 |  | 4 |  | 20 |  | 11 |  | 13 |  | 2 |  | 26 |
Deferred purchase price receivable (Note 13) |  | — |  | 156 |  | — |  | 156 |  | — |  | 192 |  | — |  | 192 |
Other (2) |  | 248 |  | 46 |  | — |  | 294 |  | 146 |  | 34 |  | — |  | 180 |
Total assets |  | $ | 417 |  | $ | 5,348 |  | $ | 2,157 |  | $ | 7,922 |  | $ | 237 |  | $ | 5,025 |  | $ | 412 |  | $ | 5,674 |
Liabilities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Unrealized loss on designated derivative contracts (3): |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Foreign exchange |  | $ | — |  | $ | 32 |  | $ | — |  | $ | 32 |  | $ | — |  | $ | 45 |  | $ | — |  | $ | 45 |
Unrealized loss on undesignated derivative contracts (3): |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Interest rate |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | 2 |  | — |  | 2 |
Foreign exchange |  | — |  | 580 |  | — |  | 580 |  | — |  | 617 |  | — |  | 617 |
Commodities |  | 200 |  | 914 |  | 142 |  | 1,256 |  | 147 |  | 417 |  | 116 |  | 680 |
Freight |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | 1 |  | — |  | — |  | 1 |
Energy |  | 30 |  | — |  | 8 |  | 38 |  | 4 |  | 6 |  | 15 |  | 25 |
Total liabilities |  | $ | 230 |  | $ | 1,526 |  | $ | 150 |  | $ | 1,906 |  | $ | 152 |  | $ | 1,087 |  | $ | 131 |  | $ | 1,370 |

(1) Unrealized gains on designated and undesignated derivative contracts are generally included in other current assets. There are no such amounts included in other non-current assets at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

(2) Other assets include primarily the fair values of U.S. Treasury securities held as margin deposits and other marketable securities.

(3) Unrealized losses on designated and undesignated derivative contracts are generally included in other current liabilities. There are no such amounts included in other non-current liabilities at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

Derivatives — Exchange traded futures and options contracts are valued based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets and are classified within Level 1. Bunge’s forward commodity purchase and sale contracts are classified as derivatives along with other OTC derivative instruments relating primarily to freight, energy, foreign exchange and interest rates, and are classified within Level 2 or Level 3 as described below. Bunge estimates fair values based on exchange quoted prices, adjusted as appropriate for differences in local markets. These differences are generally valued using inputs from broker or dealer quotations, or market transactions in either the listed or OTC markets. In such cases, these derivative contracts are classified within Level 2. Changes in the fair values of these contracts are recognized in the condensed consolidated financial statements as a component of cost of goods sold,

14

Table of Contents

foreign exchange gains (losses), interest income (expense), other income (expense), net or other comprehensive income (loss).

OTC derivative contracts include swaps, options and structured transactions that are valued at fair value generally determined using quantitative models that require the use of multiple market inputs including quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets which are not highly active, other observable inputs relevant to the asset or liability, and market inputs corroborated by correlation or other means. These valuation models include inputs such as interest rates, prices and indices to generate continuous yield or pricing curves and volatility factors. Where observable inputs are available for substantially the full term of the asset or liability, the instrument is categorized in Level 2. Certain OTC derivatives trade in less active markets with less availability of pricing information and certain structured transactions can require internally developed model inputs that might not be observable in or corroborated by the market. When unobservable inputs have a significant impact on the measurement of fair value, the instrument is categorized in Level 3.

Bunge’s policy is to only classify exchange traded or cleared derivative contracts in Level 1, thus transfers of assets and liabilities into and/or out of Level 1 occur infrequently. Transfers into Level 1 would generally only be expected to occur when an exchange-cleared derivative contract historically valued using a valuation model as the result of a lack of observable inputs becomes sufficiently observable, resulting in the valuation price being essentially the exchange traded price. There were no significant transfers into or out of Level 1 during the periods presented.

Bunge may designate certain derivative instruments as either fair value hedges or cash flow hedges and assesses, both at inception of the hedge and on an ongoing basis, whether derivatives that are designated as hedges are highly effective in offsetting changes in the hedged items or anticipated cash flows.

Readily marketable inventories — The majority of Bunge’s readily marketable commodity inventories are valued at fair value. These agricultural commodity inventories are readily marketable, have quoted market prices and may be sold without significant additional processing. Changes in the fair values of these inventories are recognized in the condensed consolidated statements of income as a component of cost of goods sold.

Readily marketable inventories reported at fair value are valued based on commodity futures exchange quotations, broker or dealer quotations, or market transactions in either listed or OTC markets with appropriate adjustments for differences in local markets where Bunge’s inventories are located. In such cases, the inventory is classified within Level 2. Certain inventories may utilize significant unobservable data related to local market adjustments to determine fair value. In such cases, the inventory is classified as Level 3.

If Bunge used different methods or factors to determine fair values, amounts reported as unrealized gains and losses on derivative contracts and readily marketable inventories at fair value in the condensed consolidated balance sheets and condensed consolidated statements of income could differ. Additionally, if market conditions change subsequent to the reporting date, amounts reported in future periods as unrealized gains and losses on derivative contracts and readily marketable inventories at fair value in the condensed consolidated balance sheets and condensed consolidated statements of income could differ.

Level 3 Valuation — Bunge’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment and may affect the classification of assets and liabilities within the fair value hierarchy. In evaluating the significance of fair value inputs, Bunge gives consideration to items that individually, or when aggregated with other inputs, represent more than 10% of the fair value of the asset or liability. For such identified inputs, judgments are required when evaluating both quantitative and qualitative factors in the determination of significance for purposes of fair value level classification and disclosure. Because of differences in the availability of market pricing data over their terms, inputs for some assets and liabilities may fall into any one of the three levels in the fair value hierarchy or some combination thereof. While FASB guidance requires Bunge to classify these assets and liabilities in the lowest level in the hierarchy for which inputs are significant to the fair value measurement, a portion of that measurement may be determined using inputs from a higher level in the hierarchy.

The significant unobservable inputs resulting in Level 3 classification relate to freight in the interior of Brazil and the lack of market corroborated information in Canada. In both situations, Bunge uses proprietary information such as purchase and sale contracts and contracted prices for freight, premiums and discounts to value

15

Table of Contents

its contracts. Movements in the price of these unobservable inputs alone would not have a material effect on Bunge’s financial statements as these contracts do not typically exceed one future crop cycle.

Transfers in and/or out of Level 3 represent existing assets or liabilities that were either previously categorized as a higher level for which the inputs to the model became unobservable or assets and liabilities that were previously classified as Level 3 for which the lowest significant input became observable during the period. Bunge’s policy regarding the timing of transfers between levels is to record the transfers at the beginning of the reporting period.

Level 3 Derivatives — Level 3 derivative instruments utilize both market observable and unobservable inputs within the fair value measurements. These inputs include commodity prices, price volatility factors, interest rates, volumes and locations. In addition, with the exception of the exchange cleared instruments where Bunge clears trades through an exchange, Bunge is exposed to loss in the event of the non-performance by counterparties on over-the-counter derivative instruments and forward purchase and sale contracts. Adjustments are made to fair values on occasions when non-performance risk is determined to represent a significant input in Bunge’s fair value determination. These adjustments are based on Bunge’s estimate of the potential loss in the event of counterparty non-performance. Bunge did not have significant allowances related to non-performance by counterparties at June 30, 2012.

Level 3 Readily marketable inventories — Readily marketable inventories are considered Level 3 when at least one significant assumption or input is unobservable. These assumptions or unobservable inputs include certain management estimations regarding costs of transportation and other local market or location-related adjustments.

The tables below present reconciliations for all assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) during the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011. Level 3 instruments presented in the tables include readily marketable inventories and derivatives. These instruments were valued using pricing models that, in management’s judgment, reflect the assumptions that would be used by a marketplace participant to determine fair value.

|  | Level 3 Instruments: |
|  | Fair Value Measurements |
|  | Three Months Ended June 30, 2012 |
|  |  |  | Readily |  |  |
|  | Derivatives, |  | Marketable |  |  |
(US$ in millions) |  | Net (1) |  | Inventories |  | Total |
Balance, April 1, 2012 |  | $ | 62 |  | $ | 677 |  | $ | 739 |
Total gains and (losses) (realized/unrealized) included in cost of goods sold |  | 172 |  | 190 |  | 362 |
Total gains and (losses) (realized/unrealized) included in foreign exchange gains (losses) |  | — |  | — |  | — |
Purchases |  | 1 |  | 511 |  | 512 |
Sales |  | 1 |  | (351 | ) | (350 | )
Issuances |  | (1 | ) | — |  | (1 | )
Settlements |  | (101 | ) | — |  | (101 | )
Transfers into Level 3 |  | 55 |  | 802 |  | 857 |
Transfers out of Level 3 |  | (2 | ) | (9 | ) | (11 | )
Balance, June 30, 2012 |  | $ | 187 |  | $ | 1,820 |  | $ | 2,007 |

(1) Derivatives, net include Level 3 derivative assets and liabilities.

16

Table of Contents

|  | Level 3 Instruments: |
|  | Fair Value Measurements |
|  | Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 |
|  |  |  | Readily |  |  |
|  | Derivatives, |  | Marketable |  |  |
(US$ in millions) |  | Net (1) |  | Inventories |  | Total |
Balance, April 1, 2011 |  | $ | 237 |  | $ | 796 |  | $ | 1,033 |
Total gains and (losses) (realized/unrealized) included in cost of goods sold |  | (76 | ) | 130 |  | 54 |
Total gains and (losses) (realized/unrealized) included in foreign exchange gains (losses) |  | (1 | ) | — |  | (1 | )
Purchases |  | 34 |  | 614 |  | 648 |
Sales |  | — |  | (962 | ) | (962 | )
Issuances |  | (33 | ) | — |  | (33 | )
Settlements |  | (6 | ) | — |  | (6 | )
Transfers into Level 3 |  | 10 |  | 157 |  | 167 |
Transfers out of Level 3 |  | (31 | ) | (13 | ) | (44 | )
Balance, June 30, 2011 |  | $ | 134 |  | $ | 722 |  | $ | 856 |

(1) Derivatives, net include Level 3 derivative assets and liabilities.

The tables below present reconciliations for all assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) during the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011. Level 3 instruments presented in the tables include readily marketable inventories and derivatives. These instruments were valued using pricing models that, in management’s judgment, reflect the assumptions that would be used by a marketplace participant to determine fair value.

|  | Level 3 Instruments: |
|  | Fair Value Measurements |
|  | Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 |
|  |  |  | Readily |  |  |
|  | Derivatives, |  | Marketable |  |  |
(US$ in millions) |  | Net (1) |  | Inventories |  | Total |
Balance, January 1, 2012 |  | $ | (2 | ) | $ | 283 |  | $ | 281 |
Total gains and (losses) (realized/unrealized) included in cost of goods sold |  | 246 |  | 230 |  | 476 |
Purchases |  | 3 |  | 1,276 |  | 1,279 |
Sales |  | 1 |  | (876 | ) | (875 | )
Issuances |  | (3 | ) | — |  | (3 | )
Settlements |  | (83 | ) | — |  | (83 | )
Transfers into Level 3 |  | 41 |  | 981 |  | 1,022 |
Transfers out of Level 3 |  | (16 | ) | (74 | ) | (90 | )
Balance, June 30, 2012 |  | $ | 187 |  | $ | 1,820 |  | $ | 2,007 |

(1) Derivatives, net include Level 3 derivative assets and liabilities.

17

Table of Contents

|  | Level 3 Instruments: |
|  | Fair Value Measurements |
|  | Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 |
|  |  |  | Readily |  |  |
|  | Derivatives, |  | Marketable |  |  |
(US$ in millions) |  | Net (1) |  | Inventories |  | Total |
Balance, January 1, 2011 |  | $ | 307 |  | $ | 264 |  | $ | 571 |
Total gains and (losses) (realized/unrealized) included in cost of goods sold |  | (119 | ) | 92 |  | (27 | )
Purchases |  | 71 |  | 1,486 |  | 1,557 |
Sales |  | — |  | (1,362 | ) | (1,362 | )
Issuances |  | (58 | ) | — |  | (58 | )
Settlements |  | (57 | ) | — |  | (57 | )
Transfers into Level 3 |  | 14 |  | 274 |  | 288 |
Transfers out of Level 3 |  | (24 | ) | (32 | ) | (56 | )
Balance, June 30, 2011 |  | $ | 134 |  | $ | 722 |  | $ | 856 |

(1) Derivatives, net include Level 3 derivative assets and liabilities.

The table below summarizes changes in unrealized gains or (losses) recorded in earnings during the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 for Level 3 assets and liabilities that were held at June 30, 2012 and 2011.

|  | Level 3 Instruments: |
|  | Fair Value Measurements |
|  | Three Months Ended |
|  |  |  | Readily |  |  |
|  | Derivatives, |  | Marketable |  |  |
(US$ in millions) |  | Net (1) |  | Inventories |  | Total |
Changes in unrealized gains and (losses) relating to assets and liabilities held at June 30, 2012 |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Cost of goods sold |  | $ | 145 |  | $ | 600 |  | $ | 745 |
Foreign exchange gains (losses) |  | $ | — |  | $ | — |  | $ | — |
Changes in unrealized gains and (losses) relating to assets and liabilities held at June 30, 2011 |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Cost of goods sold |  | $ | 21 |  | $ | 459 |  | $ | 480 |
Foreign exchange gains (losses) |  | $ | (1 | ) | $ | — |  | $ | (1 | )

(1) Derivatives, net include Level 3 derivative assets and liabilities.

The table below summarizes changes in unrealized gains or (losses) recorded in earnings during the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 for Level 3 assets and liabilities that were held at June 30, 2012 and 2011.

|  | Level 3 Instruments: |
|  | Fair Value Measurements |
|  | Six Months Ended |
|  |  |  | Readily |  |  |
|  | Derivatives, |  | Marketable |  |  |
(US$ in millions) |  | Net (1) |  | Inventories |  | Total |
Changes in unrealized gains and (losses) relating to assets and liabilities held at June 30, 2012 |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Cost of goods sold |  | $ | 193 |  | $ | 1,473 |  | $ | 1,666 |
Foreign exchange gains (losses) |  | $ | — |  | $ | — |  | $ | — |
Changes in unrealized gains and (losses) relating to assets and liabilities held at June 30, 2011 |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Cost of goods sold |  | $ | 24 |  | $ | 578 |  | $ | 602 |
Foreign exchange gains (losses) |  | $ | — |  | $ | — |  | $ | — |

18

Table of Contents

(1) Derivatives, net include Level 3 derivative assets and liabilities.

Derivative Instruments

Interest rate derivatives — Interest rate swaps used by Bunge as hedging instruments are recorded at fair value in the condensed consolidated balance sheets with changes in fair value recorded contemporaneously in earnings. Certain of these swap agreements may be designated as fair value hedges. The carrying amount of the associated hedged debt is also adjusted through earnings for changes in the fair value arising from changes in benchmark interest rates. Ineffectiveness is recognized to the extent that these two adjustments do not offset. Bunge may enter into interest rate swap agreements for the purpose of managing certain of its interest rate exposures. Bunge may also enter into interest rate basis swap agreements that do not qualify as hedges for accounting purposes. Changes in fair value of such interest rate basis swap agreements are recorded in earnings.

Foreign exchange derivatives — Bunge uses a combination of foreign exchange forward, swap and option contracts in certain of its operations to mitigate the risk from exchange rate fluctuations in connection with certain commercial and balance sheet exposures. The foreign exchange forward and option contracts may be designated as cash flow hedges. Bunge may also use net investment hedges to partially offset the translation adjustments arising from the remeasurement of its investment in certain of its foreign subsidiaries.

Bunge assesses, both at the inception of the hedge and on an ongoing basis, whether the derivatives that are used in hedge transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in the hedged items.

The table below summarizes the notional amounts of open foreign exchange positions.

|  | June 30, 2012 |
|  | Exchange Traded |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  | Net (Short) |  | Non-exchange Traded |  | Unit of |
(US$ in millions) |  | & Long (1) |  | (Short) (2) |  | Long (2) |  | Measure |
Foreign Exchange: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Options |  | $ | — |  | $ | (341 | ) | $ | 99 |  | Delta |
Forwards |  | 103 |  | (4,913 | ) | 14,305 |  | Notional |
Swaps |  | — |  | (39 | ) | 32 |  | Notional |

(1) Exchange traded futures and options are presented on a net (short) and long position basis.

(2) Non-exchange traded swaps, options and forwards are presented on a gross (short) and long position basis.

Commodity derivatives — Bunge uses derivative instruments to manage its exposure to movements associated with agricultural commodity prices. Bunge generally uses exchange traded futures and options contracts to minimize the effects of changes in the prices of agricultural commodities on its agricultural commodity inventories and forward purchase and sale contracts, but may also from time to time enter into OTC commodity transactions, including swaps, which are settled in cash at maturity or termination based on exchange-quoted futures prices. Changes in fair values of exchange traded futures contracts representing the unrealized gains and/or losses on these instruments are settled daily generally through Bunge’s wholly-owned futures clearing subsidiary. Forward purchase and sale contracts are primarily settled through delivery of agricultural commodities. While Bunge considers these exchange traded futures and forward purchase and sale contracts to be effective economic hedges, Bunge does not designate or account for the majority of its commodity contracts as hedges. Changes in fair values of these contracts and related readily marketable agricultural commodity inventories are included in cost of goods

19

Table of Contents

sold in the condensed consolidated statements of income. The forward contracts require performance of both Bunge and the contract counterparty in future periods. Contracts to purchase agricultural commodities generally relate to current or future crop years for delivery periods quoted by regulated commodity exchanges. Contracts for the sale of agricultural commodities generally do not extend beyond one future crop cycle.

The table below summarizes the volumes of open agricultural commodities derivative positions.

|  | June 30, 2012 |
|  | Exchange Traded |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  | Net (Short) & |  | Non-exchange Traded |  | Unit of |
|  | Long (1) |  | (Short) (2) |  | Long (2) |  | Measure |
Agricultural Commodities |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Futures |  | (8,544,856 | ) | — |  | — |  | Metric Tons |
Options |  | 323,271 |  | (5,299 | ) | — |  | Metric Tons |
Forwards |  | — |  | (25,165,822 | ) | 32,391,195 |  | Metric Tons |
Swaps |  | — |  | (5,403,523 | ) | — |  | Metric Tons |

(1) Exchange traded futures and options are presented on a net (short) and long position basis.

(2) Non-exchange traded swaps, options and forwards are presented on a gross (short) and long position basis.

Ocean freight derivatives — Bunge uses derivative instruments referred to as freight forward agreements, or FFAs, and FFA options, to hedge portions of its current and anticipated ocean freight costs. A portion of the ocean freight derivatives may be designated as fair value hedges of Bunge’s firm commitments to purchase time on ocean freight vessels. Changes in the fair value of the ocean freight derivatives that are qualified, designated and highly effective as a fair value hedge, along with the gain or loss on the hedged firm commitments to purchase time on ocean freight vessels that is attributable to the hedged risk, are recorded in earnings. Changes in the fair values of ocean freight derivatives that are not designated as hedges are also recorded in earnings.

The table below summarizes the open ocean freight positions.

|  | June 30, 2012 |
|  | Exchange Cleared |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  | Net (Short) & |  | Non-exchange Cleared |  | Unit of |
|  | Long (1) |  | (Short) (2) |  | Long (2) |  | Measure |
Ocean Freight |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
FFA |  | (2,079 | ) | — |  | — |  | Hire Days |
FFA Options |  | (833 | ) | — |  | — |  | Hire Days |

(1) Exchange cleared futures and options are presented on a net (short) and long position basis.

(2) Non-exchange cleared options and forwards are presented on a gross (short) and long position basis.

Energy derivatives — Bunge uses derivative instruments for various purposes including to manage its exposure to volatility in energy costs. Bunge’s operations use substantial amounts of energy, including natural gas, coal and fuel oil, including bunker fuel.

The table below summarizes the open energy positions.

20

Table of Contents

|  | June 30, 2012 |
|  | Exchange Traded |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  | Net (Short) & |  | Non-exchange Cleared |  | Unit of |
|  | Long (1) |  | (Short) (2) |  | Long (2) |  | Measure (3) |
Natural Gas (3) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Futures |  | (778,610 | ) | — |  | — |  | MMBtus |
Swaps |  | — |  | — |  | 822,085 |  | MMBtus |
Options |  | (33,422 | ) | — |  | — |  | MMBtus |
Energy—Other |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Futures |  | 78,891 |  | — |  | — |  | Metric Tons |
Forwards |  | — |  | (2,274,718 | ) | 6,477,976 |  | Metric Tons |
Swaps |  | 195,000 |  | (11,000 | ) | 6,139 |  | Metric Tons |
Options |  | (2,114,818 | ) | (218,919 | ) | 220,883 |  | Metric Tons |

(1) Exchange traded and exchange cleared futures and options are presented on a net (short) and long position basis.

(2) Non-exchange cleared swaps, options and forwards are presented on a gross (short) and long position basis.

(3) Million British Thermal Units (MMBtus) are the standard unit of measurement used to denote an amount of natural gas.

The Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income

The table below summarizes the effect of derivative instruments that are designated as fair value hedges and also derivative instruments that are undesignated on the condensed consolidated statements of income for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011.

|  |  |  | Gain or (Loss) Recognized in |
|  |  |  | Income on Derivative Instruments |
|  |  |  | Six Months Ended June 30, |
(US$ in millions) |  | Location |  | 2012 |  | 2011 |
Designated Derivative Contracts: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Interest Rate |  | Interest income/Interest expense |  | $ | — |  | $ | — |
Interest Rate |  | Interest income/Interest expense |  | — |  | — |
Foreign Exchange |  | Cost of goods sold |  | — |  | — |
Commodities |  | Cost of goods sold |  |  | — |  |  | 28 |
Freight |  | Cost of goods sold |  | — |  | — |
Energy |  | Cost of goods sold |  | — |  | — |
Total |  |  |  | $ | — |  | $ | 28 |
Undesignated Derivative Contracts: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Interest Rate |  | Interest income/Interest expense |  | $ | — |  | $ | 1 |
Interest Rate |  | Other income (expense)-net |  | — |  | — |
Foreign Exchange |  | Foreign exchange gains (losses) |  | (72 | ) | 14 |
Foreign Exchange |  | Cost of goods sold |  | (26 | ) | 32 |
Commodities |  | Cost of goods sold |  | (578 | ) | 104 |
Freight |  | Cost of goods sold |  | (9 | ) | 86 |
Energy |  | Cost of goods sold |  | (8 | ) | 7 |
Total |  |  |  | $ | (693 | ) | $ | 244 |

The table below summarizes the effect of derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges on the condensed consolidated statement of income for the six months ended June 30, 2012.

21

Table of Contents

|  | Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Amount of Gain (Loss) |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Recognized in Income on |
|  |  |  | Gain or |  | Gain or (Loss) |  | Derivative (Ineffective |
|  |  |  | (Loss) |  | Reclassified from |  | Portion and Amount |
|  |  |  | Recognized in |  | Accumulated OCI into |  | Excluded from |
|  | Notional |  | Accumulated |  | Income (1) |  | Effectiveness Testing) |
(US$ in millions) |  | Amount |  | OCI (1) |  | Location |  | Amount |  | Location |  | Amount (2) |
Cash Flow Hedge: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  |  |  |  |  | Cost of |  |  |  | Cost of |  |  |
Foreign Exchange (3) |  | $ | 475 |  | $ | (16 | ) | goods sold |  | $ | (2 | ) | goods sold |  | $ | — |
|  |  |  |  |  | Cost of |  |  |  | Cost of |  |  |
Commodities |  | — |  | — |  | goods sold |  | — |  | goods sold |  | — |
Total |  | $ | 475 |  | $ | (16 | ) |  |  | $ | (2 | ) |  |  | $ | — |
Net Investment Hedge : |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  |  |  |  |  | Foreign |  |  |  | Foreign |  |  |
|  |  |  |  |  | exchange |  |  |  | exchange |  |  |
Foreign Exchange |  | $ | — |  | $ | — |  | gains (losses) |  | $ | — |  | gains (losses) |  | $ | — |
Total |  | $ | — |  | $ | — |  |  |  | $ | — |  |  |  | $ | — |

(1) The gain or (loss) recognized relates to the effective portion of the hedging relationship. At June 30, 2012, Bunge expects to reclassify into income in the next 12 months $18 million after tax losses related to its foreign exchange cash flow hedges. As of June 30, 2012, there were no designated commodities cash flow hedges.

(2) There was no gain or loss recognized in income relating to the ineffective portion of the hedging relationships or relating to amounts excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness.

(3) The foreign exchange contracts mature at various dates in 2012 and 2013.

The table below summarizes the effect of derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as cash flow and net investment hedges on the condensed consolidated statement of income for the six months ended June 30, 2011.

|  | Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Amount of Gain (Loss) |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Recognized in Income on |
|  |  |  | Gain or |  | Gain or (Loss) |  | Derivative (Ineffective |
|  |  |  | (Loss) |  | Reclassified from |  | Portion and Amount |
|  |  |  | Recognized in |  | Accumulated OCI into |  | Excluded from |
|  | Notional |  | Accumulated |  | Income (1) |  | Effectiveness Testing) |
(US$ in millions) |  | Amount |  | OCI (1) |  | Location |  | Amount |  | Location |  | Amount (2) |
Cash Flow Hedge: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  |  |  |  |  | Cost of |  |  |  | Cost of |  |  |
Foreign Exchange (3) |  | $ | 90 |  | $ | 2 |  | goods sold |  | $ | — |  | goods sold |  | $ | — |
|  |  |  |  |  | Cost of |  |  |  | Cost of |  |  |
Commodities |  | — |  | 12 |  | goods sold |  | 13 |  | goods sold |  | 5 |
Total |  | $ | 90 |  | $ | 14 |  |  |  | $ | 13 |  |  |  | $ | 5 |
Net Investment Hedge (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  |  |  |  |  | Foreign |  |  |  | Foreign |  |  |
|  |  |  |  |  | exchange |  |  |  | exchange |  |  |
Foreign Exchange |  | $ | 577 |  | $ | (2 | ) | gains (losses) |  | $ | — |  | gains (losses) |  | $ | — |
Total |  | $ | 577 |  | $ | (2 | ) |  |  | $ | — |  |  |  | $ | — |

22

Table of Contents

(1) The gain or (loss) recognized relates to the effective portion of the hedging relationship. At June 30, 2011, Bunge expected to reclassify into income in the next 12 months approximately $4 million of after tax gains related to its agricultural commodities cash flow hedges and no after tax gains related to its foreign exchange cash flow and net investment hedges.

(2) The amount of gain recognized in income is $5 million as of June 30, 2011 which relates to the ineffective portion of the hedging relationships, and zero, which relates to the amount excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness.

(3) The changes in the market value of such futures contracts have historically been, and are expected to continue to be, highly effective at offsetting changes in price movements of the hedged items. The forward exchange forward contracts mature at various dates in 2011 and 2012.

(4) Bunge pays Euros and receives U.S. dollars, offsetting the translation adjustment of its net investment in Euro assets. The swaps mature at various dates in 2011 and 2012.

12. DEBT

In June 2012, Bunge completed the sale of $600 million aggregate principal amount of senior unsecured notes (senior notes) bearing interest at 3.20%, maturing on June 15, 2017. The senior notes were issued by Bunge’s 100% owned finance subsidiary, Bunge Limited Finance Corp., and are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Bunge Limited. The offering was made pursuant to a registration statement filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The net proceeds of $595 million were used for general corporate purposes, including, but not limited to, the repayment of outstanding indebtedness, which includes indebtedness under its revolving credit facilities.

In March 2012, Bunge acquired and consolidated an asset management company including certain investment funds for which Bunge has been deemed to be the primary beneficiary. This resulted in an increase in long-term debt attributable to these investment funds of $92 million as of June 30, 2012.

The fair value of Bunge’s long-term debt is based on interest rates currently available on comparable maturities to companies with credit standing similar to that of Bunge. The carrying amounts and fair value of long-term debt are as follows:

|  | June 30, 2012 |  | December 31, 2011 |
|  | Carrying |  | Fair Value |  | Carrying |  | Fair Value |
(US$ in millions) |  | Value |  | (Level 2) |  | Value |  | (Level 2) |
Long-term debt, including current portion |  | $ | 4,562 |  | $ | 4,908 |  | $ | 3,362 |  | $ | 3,676 |

13. TRADE RECEIVABLES SECURITIZATION PROGRAM

Bunge accounts for its trade receivables securitization program (the “Program”) under the provisions of ASC Topic 860, Transfers and Servicing. The securitization program terminates on June 1, 2016. However, each committed purchaser’s commitment to fund trade receivables sold under the securitization program will terminate on May 29, 2013 unless extended for additional 364-day periods in accordance with the terms of the receivables transfer agreement.

As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, $805 million and $836 million, respectively, of receivables sold under the Program were derecognized from Bunge’s condensed consolidated balance sheets. Proceeds received in cash related to transfers of receivables under the program totaled $6,454 million and $401 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. In addition, cash collections from customers on receivables previously sold were $6,643 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012. There were no collections for the six months ended June 30, 2011 as this was the first month of the program. As this is a revolving facility, cash collections from customers are reinvested to fund new receivable sales. Gross receivables sold under the program for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 were $6,656 million and $840 million, respectively. These sales resulted in discounts of $4 million and $1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, which were included in SG&A in the condensed consolidated statements of income. Discounts were $2 million and $1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Servicing fees under the program were not significant in any period.

Bunge’s risk of loss following the sale of the accounts receivable is limited to the deferred purchase price receivable, which was $156 million and $192 million at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, and is

23

Table of Contents

included in other current assets in the condensed consolidated balance sheets (see Note 5). The deferred purchase price will be repaid in cash as receivables are collected, generally within 30 days. Delinquencies and credit losses on accounts receivable sold under the program during the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 were insignificant. Bunge has reflected all cash flows under the securitization program as operating cash flows in the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, including changes in the fair value of the deferred purchase price of $2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012. As the Program was entered into in June 2011, there was no change in the fair value of the deferred purchase price as of June 30, 2011.

14. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Bunge purchased commodities and commodity products and fertilizer products from certain of its investees, totaling $200 million and $217 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and $350 million and $413 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Bunge also sold commodities and commodity products to certain of its investees, totaling $155 million and $119 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and $264 million and $200 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

15. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

|  | U.S.-Pension Benefits |  | Foreign-Pension Benefits |
|  | Three Months Ended |  | Three Months Ended |
|  | June 30, |  | June 30, |
(US$ in millions) |  | 2012 |  | 2011 |  | 2012 |  | 2011 |
Service cost |  | $ | 5 |  | $ | 4 |  | $ | 3 |  | $ | 2 |
Interest cost |  | 7 |  | 6 |  | 2 |  | 2 |
Expected return on plan assets |  | (7 | ) | (6 | ) | (2 | ) | (2 | )
Amortization of prior service cost |  | 1 |  | — |  | — |  | — |
Amortization of net loss (gain) |  | 2 |  | 1 |  | — |  | — |
Net periodic benefit cost |  | $ | 8 |  | $ | 5 |  | $ | 3 |  | $ | 2 |

|  | U.S.-Pension Benefits |  | Foreign-Pension Benefits |
|  | Six Months Ended |  | Six Months Ended |
|  | June 30, |  | June 30, |
(US$ in millions) |  | 2012 |  | 2011 |  | 2012 |  | 2011 |
Service cost |  | $ | 9 |  | $ | 8 |  | $ | 4 |  | $ | 4 |
Interest cost |  | 13 |  | 13 |  | 3 |  | 3 |
Expected return on plan assets |  | (13 | ) | (13 | ) | (3 | ) | (3 | )
Amortization of prior service cost |  | 1 |  | 1 |  | — |  | — |
Amortization of net loss (gain) |  | 5 |  | 2 |  | — |  | — |
Net periodic benefit cost |  | $ | 15 |  | $ | 11 |  | $ | 4 |  | $ | 4 |

|  | U.S.-Postretirement |  | Foreign-Postretirement |
|  | Healthcare Benefits |  | Healthcare Benefits |
|  | Three Months Ended |  | Three Months Ended |
|  | June 30, |  | June 30, |
(US$ in millions) |  | 2012 |  | 2011 |  | 2012 |  | 2011 |
Service cost |  | $ | — |  | $ | — |  | $ | — |  | $ | — |
Interest cost |  | — |  | $ | — |  | 3 |  | 3 |
Amortization of prior service cost |  | — |  | — |  | (1 | ) | — |
Net periodic benefit cost |  | $ | — |  | $ | — |  | $ | 2 |  | $ | 3 |

24

Table of Contents

|  | U.S.-Postretirement |  | Foreign-Postretirement |
|  | Healthcare Benefits |  | Healthcare Benefits |
|  | Six Months Ended |  | Six Months Ended |
|  | June 30, |  | June 30, |
(US$ in millions) |  | 2012 |  | 2011 |  | 2012 |  | 2011 |
Service cost |  | $ | — |  | $ | — |  | $ | — |  | $ | 1 |
Interest cost |  | — |  | 1 |  | 5 |  | 5 |
Amortization of prior service cost |  | — |  | — |  | (1 | ) | (1 | )
Amortization of net loss (gain) |  | — |  | — |  | 1 |  | 1 |
Net periodic benefit cost |  | $ | — |  | $ | 1 |  | $ | 5 |  | $ | 6 |

In the six months ended June 30, 2012, Bunge made contributions of $3 million and $8 million to its U.S. and foreign defined benefit pension plans, respectively. In the six months ended June 30, 2011, Bunge made contributions of $2 million and $7 million to its U.S. and foreign defined benefit pension plans, respectively.

In the six months ended June 30, 2012, Bunge made contributions of less than $1 million to its U.S. postretirement plans and $6 million to its foreign postretirement benefit plans, respectively. In the six months ended June 30, 2011, Bunge made contributions of less than $1 million to its U.S. postretirement benefit plans and $5 million to its foreign postretirement benefit plans, respectively.

16. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Bunge is party to a large number of claims and lawsuits, primarily tax and labor claims in Brazil, arising in the normal course of business. Bunge records liabilities related to its general claims and lawsuits when the exposure item becomes probable and can be reasonably estimated. In addition Bunge periodically updates its evaluation and adjusts its estimated exposure based on these evaluations. After taking into account the recorded liabilities for these matters, management believes that the ultimate resolution of such matters will not have a material effect on Bunge’s condensed consolidated financial statements taken as a whole. Included in other non-current liabilities are the following:

|  | June 30, |  | December 31, |
(US$ in millions) |  | 2012 |  | 2011 |
Tax claims |  | $ | 71 |  | $ | 70 |
Labor claims |  | 79 |  | 77 |
Civil and other claims |  | 98 |  | 76 |
Total |  | $ | 248 |  | $ | 223 |

Tax claims - The tax claims relate principally to claims against Bunge’s Brazilian subsidiaries, primarily value-added tax claims (ICMS, IPI, PIS and COFINS). The determination of the manner in which various Brazilian federal, state and municipal taxes apply to the operations of Bunge is subject to varying interpretations arising from the complex nature of Brazilian tax law.

The Argentine tax authorities have been conducting a review of income and other taxes paid by exporters and processors of cereals and other agricultural commodities in the country. In that regard, in October 2010, the Argentine tax authorities carried out inspections at several of Bunge’s locations in Argentina relating to allegations of income tax evasion covering the periods from 2007 to 2009. In July 2011, Bunge received a preliminary income tax audit report from the Argentine tax authorities relating to fiscal years 2006 and 2007 with an estimated claim of approximately $100 million. Additionally, in April 2011, the Argentine tax authorities conducted inspections of Bunge’s locations and those of several other grain exporters with respect to allegations of evasion of liability for value-added taxes. Also during 2011, Bunge paid $112 million of accrued export tax obligations in Argentina under protest while reserving all of Bunge’s rights in respect of such payment. In the first quarter 2012, the Argentine tax authorities assessed Bunge interest on these paid export taxes in an amount totaling approximately $80 million. Bunge believes that these allegations and claims are without merit and intends to vigorously defend itself against them. However, management is, at this time, unable to predict their outcome.

25

Table of Contents

Labor claims - The labor claims relate principally to claims against Bunge’s Brazilian subsidiaries. The labor claims primarily relate to dismissals, severance, health and safety, salary adjustments and supplementary retirement benefits.

Civil and other - The civil and other claims relate to various disputes with third parties, including suppliers and customers and includes $27 million relating to a legacy environmental claim in Brazil from 1998, which was recorded in the first quarter of 2012.

Guarantees - Bunge has issued or was a party to the following guarantees at June 30, 2012:

|  | Maximum |
|  | Potential |
|  | Future |
(US$ in millions) |  | Payments |
Customer financing (1) |  | $ | 38 |
Unconsolidated affiliates financing (2) |  | 25 |
Residual value guarantee (3) |  | 69 |
Total |  | $ | 132 |

(1) Bunge has issued guarantees to third parties in Brazil related to amounts owed to these third parties by certain of Bunge’s customers. The terms of the guarantees are equal to the terms of the related financing arrangements, which are generally one year or less, with the exception of guarantees issued under certain Brazilian government programs, primarily from 2006 and 2007, where terms are up to five years. In the event that the customers default on their payments to the third parties and Bunge would be required to perform under the guarantees, Bunge has obtained collateral from the customers. At June 30, 2012, Bunge had approximately $25 million of tangible property that had been pledged to Bunge as collateral against certain of these financing arrangements. Bunge evaluates the likelihood of customer repayments of the amounts due under these guarantees based upon an expected loss analysis and records the value of such guarantees as an obligation in its condensed consolidated financial statements. Bunge’s recorded obligation related to these outstanding guarantees was $15 million at June 30, 2012.

(2) Bunge issued guarantees to certain financial institutions related to debt of certain of its unconsolidated joint ventures. The terms of the guarantees are equal to the terms of the related financings which have maturity dates in 2012, 2014 and 2017. There are no recourse provisions or collateral that would enable Bunge to recover any amounts paid under these guarantees. At June 30, 2012, Bunge had no outstanding recorded obligation related to these guarantees.

(3) Bunge issued guarantees to certain financial institutions which are party to certain operating lease arrangements for railcars and barges. These guarantees provide for a minimum residual value to be received by the lessor at conclusion of the lease term. These leases expire in 2016. At June 30, 2012, Bunge’s recorded obligation related to these guarantees was $5 million.

In addition, Bunge Limited has provided full and unconditional parent level guarantees of the indebtedness outstanding under certain senior credit facilities and senior notes entered into, or issued by, its 100% owned subsidiaries. At June 30, 2012, Bunge’s condensed consolidated balance sheet includes debt with a carrying amount of $5,432 million related to these guarantees. This debt includes the senior notes issued by two of Bunge’s 100% owned finance subsidiaries, Bunge Limited Finance Corp. and Bunge N.A. Finance L.P. There are no significant restrictions on the ability of Bunge Limited Finance Corp., Bunge N.A. Finance L.P. or any other Bunge subsidiary to transfer funds to Bunge Limited.

17. EQUITY

Share repurchase program — Bunge has established a program for the repurchase of up to $700 million of Bunge’s issued and outstanding common shares. The program runs through December 31, 2012. There were no share repurchases under the program during the six months ended June 30, 2012 or 2011. Total repurchases under the program from inception through June 30, 2012 were 8,647,859 shares for $474 million.

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Bunge — The following table summarizes the balances of related after tax components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Bunge:

26

Table of Contents

|  |  |  |  |  | Pension |  |  |  |  |
|  | Foreign |  | Deferred |  | And Other |  | Unrealized |  | Accumulated |
|  | Exchange |  | Gain (Loss) |  | Postretirement |  | Gain (Loss) |  | Other |
|  | Translation |  | on Hedging |  | Liability |  | on |  | Comprehensive |
(US$ in millions) |  | Adjustment |  | Activities |  | Adjustments |  | Investments |  | Income (Loss) |
Balance, December 31, 2011 |  | $ | (460 | ) | $ | (24 | ) | $ | (124 | ) | $ | (2 | ) | $ | (610 | )
Other comprehensive income (loss) |  | (772 | ) | (2 | ) | 1 |  | 17 |  | (756 | )
Income tax benefit (expense) |  | — |  | 7 |  | — |  | (6 | ) | 1 |
Balance, June 30, 2012 |  | $ | (1,232 | ) | $ | (19 | ) | $ | (123 | ) | $ | 9 |  | $ | (1,365 | )

|  |  |  |  |  | Pension |  |  |  |  |
|  | Foreign |  | Deferred |  | And Other |  | Unrealized |  | Accumulated |
|  | Exchange |  | Gain (Loss) |  | Postretirement |  | Gain (Loss) |  | Other |
|  | Translation |  | on Hedging |  | Liability |  | on |  | Comprehensive |
(US$ in millions) |  | Adjustment |  | Activities |  | Adjustments |  | Investments |  | Income (Loss) |
Balance, December 31, 2010 |  | $ | 670 |  | $ | (2 | ) | $ | (83 | ) | $ | (2 | ) | $ | 583 |
Other comprehensive income (loss) |  | 640 |  | — |  | (2 | ) | 5 |  | 643 |
Income tax benefit (expense) |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | (2 | ) | (2 | )
Balance, June 30, 2011 |  | $ | 1,310 |  | $ | (2 | ) | $ | (85 | ) | $ | 1 |  | $ | 1,224 |

18. TRANSFERS (TO) FROM NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS

Bunge has a 51% controlling interest in a joint venture with two third party companies related to a grain terminal in Longview, Washington, U.S., which it consolidates. During the six months ended June 30, 2012, Bunge and the noncontrolling interest holders, which have a 49% interest, made proportionate capital contributions, resulting in no ownership percentage change. The total contribution from the noncontrolling interest holders was $6 million.

In May 2012, Bunge acquired an additional 63.5% ownership interest of a wheat mill and bakery dry mix operation in North America resulting in Bunge having a 95% controlling interest in the entity. Upon consolidation, Bunge recognized noncontrolling interest of $6 million representing the fair value of the noncontrolling interest (see Note 3).

Bunge has a 50% controlling interest in a joint venture in South Africa. In May 2012, Bunge and the noncontrolling interest holders made proportionate capital contributions resulting in no ownership percentage change. The total contribution from the noncontrolling interest holder was $4 million.

In March 2012, Bunge consolidated an acquired asset management company and recorded $267 million of noncontrolling interest related to certain managed investment funds (see Note 1) in which the management company was determined to be the primary beneficiary.

19. EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share.

27

Table of Contents

|  | Three Months Ended |  | Six Months Ended |
|  | June 30, |  | June 30, |
(US$ in millions, except for share data) |  | 2012 |  | 2011 |  | 2012 |  | 2011 |
Net income attributable to Bunge |  | $ | 274 |  | $ | 316 |  | $ | 366 |  | $ | 548 |
Convertible preference share dividends |  | (9 | ) | (9 | ) | (17 | ) | (17 | )
Net income available to Bunge common shareholders |  | $ | 265 |  | $ | 307 |  | $ | 349 |  | $ | 531 |
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Basic |  | 145,974,965 |  | 147,281,549 |  | 145,846,544 |  | 147,063,364 |
Effect of dilutive shares: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
—Stock options and awards |  | 917,117 |  | 1,348,059 |  | 963,943 |  | 1,338,085 |
—Convertible preference shares |  | 7,583,790 |  | 7,547,220 |  | 7,583,790 |  | 7,547,220 |
Diluted (1) |  | 154,475,872 |  | 156,176,828 |  | 154,394,277 |  | 155,948,669 |
Earnings per common share: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Basic |  | $ | 1.82 |  | $ | 2.08 |  | $ | 2.39 |  | $ | 3.61 |
Diluted |  | $ | 1.78 |  | $ | 2.02 |  | $ | 2.37 |  | $ | 3.51 |

(1) Approximately 4 million outstanding stock options and contingently issuable restricted stock units were not dilutive and not included in the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively. Approximately 1 million and 2 million outstanding stock options and contingently issuable restricted stock units were not dilutive and not included in the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively.

20. SEGMENT INFORMATION

Bunge has five reportable segments—agribusiness, sugar and bioenergy, edible oil products, milling products and fertilizer—which are organized based upon similar economic characteristics and are similar in nature of products and services offered, the nature of production processes, the type and class of customer and distribution methods. The agribusiness segment is characterized by both inputs and outputs being agricultural commodities and thus high volume and low margin. The sugar and bioenergy segment involves sugarcane growing and milling in Brazil, sugar merchandising in various countries, as well as sugarcane-based ethanol production and corn-based ethanol investments and related activities. The edible oil products segment involves the manufacturing and marketing of products derived from vegetable oils. The milling products segment involves the manufacturing and marketing of products derived primarily from wheat and corn.

Beginning in the first quarter of 2012, the management responsibilities for certain Brazilian port facilities were moved from the agribusiness segment to the fertilizer segment. Accordingly, amounts for prior periods presented have been reclassified to conform to the current period segment presentation.

The “Unallocated” column in the following table contains the reconciliation between the totals for reportable segments and Bunge consolidated totals, which consist primarily of corporate items not allocated to the operating segments and inter-segment eliminations. Transfers between the segments are generally valued at market. The revenues generated from these transfers are shown in the following table as “Inter-segment revenues segments or inter-segment eliminations.”

28

Table of Contents

(US$ in millions)

|  |  |  |  |  | Edible |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Three Months Ended |  |  |  | Sugar and |  | Oil |  | Milling |  |  |  |  |  |  |
June 30, 2012 |  | Agribusiness |  | Bioenergy |  | Products |  | Products |  | Fertilizer |  | Unallocated (1) |  | Total |
Net sales to external customers |  | $ | 10,580 |  | $ | 1,079 |  | $ | 2,331 |  | $ | 421 |  | $ | 679 |  | $ | — |  | $ | 15,090 |
Inter—segment revenues |  | 1,340 |  | — |  | 33 |  | — |  | 16 |  | (1,389 | ) | — |
Gross profit |  | 478 |  | 15 |  | 91 |  | 43 |  | 33 |  | — |  | 660 |
Foreign exchange gains (losses) |  | 20 |  | (5 | ) | (2 | ) | — |  | 5 |  | — |  | 18 |
Noncontrolling interest (1) |  | 5 |  | 3 |  | 1 |  | — |  | (1 | ) | — |  | 8 |
Other income (expense) — net |  | 4 |  | (4 | ) | — |  | (1 | ) | (7 | ) | — |  | (8 | )
Gain on sale of investments in affiliates |  | 85 |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | 85 |
Gain on acquisition of controlling interest |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | 36 |  | — |  | — |  | 36 |
Segment EBIT (2) |  | 386 |  | (28 | ) | 2 |  | 44 |  | (1 | ) | — |  | 403 |
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |  | (56 | ) | (45 | ) | (23 | ) | (6 | ) | (14 | ) | — |  | (144 | )
Total assets |  | 16,777 |  | 3,925 |  | 2,737 |  | 846 |  | 2,428 |  | — |  | 26,713 |

Three Months Ended |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
June 30, 2011 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Net sales to external customers |  | $ | 9,624 |  | $ | 1,420 |  | $ | 2,200 |  | $ | 491 |  | $ | 753 |  | $ | — |  | $ | 14,488 |
Inter—segment revenues |  | 1,300 |  | — |  | 14 |  | 23 |  | 11 |  | (1,348 | ) | — |
Gross profit |  | 401 |  | 47 |  | 114 |  | 54 |  | 31 |  | — |  | 647 |
Foreign exchange gains (losses) |  | 69 |  | 12 |  | — |  | — |  | (4 | ) | — |  | 77 |
Noncontrolling interest (1) |  | (5 | ) | — |  | — |  | — |  | (1 | ) | 10 |  | 4 |
Other income (expense) — net |  | (3 | ) | 3 |  | (1 | ) | (3 | ) | 5 |  | — |  | 1 |
Gain on sale of investments in affiliates |  | 37 |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | 37 |
Segment EBIT (2) |  | 308 |  | 18 |  | 30 |  | 22 |  | (5 | ) | — |  | 373 |
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |  | (47 | ) | (54 | ) | (21 | ) | (7 | ) | (14 | ) | — |  | (143 | )
Total assets |  | 15,518 |  | 4,710 |  | 2,475 |  | 854 |  | 2,743 |  | 208 |  | 26,508 |

|  |  |  |  |  | Edible |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Six Months Ended |  |  |  | Sugar and |  | Oil |  | Milling |  |  |  |  |  |  |
June 30, 2012 |  | Agribusiness |  | Bioenergy |  | Products |  | Products |  | Fertilizer |  | Unallocated (1) |  | Total |
Net sales to external customers |  | $ | 19,897 |  | $ | 1,960 |  | $ | 4,552 |  | $ | 848 |  | $ | 1,279 |  | $ | — |  | $ | 28,536 |
Inter—segment revenues |  | 2,400 |  | — |  | 64 |  | — |  | 34 |  | (2,498 | ) | — |
Gross profit |  | 830 |  | 23 |  | 204 |  | 99 |  | 25 |  | — |  | 1,181 |
Foreign exchange gains (losses) |  | 74 |  | — |  | (3 | ) | — |  | 13 |  | — |  | 84 |
Noncontrolling interest (1) |  | 3 |  | 4 |  | 1 |  | — |  | (1 | ) | 4 |  | 11 |
Other income (expense) — net |  | 11 |  | (7 | ) | 2 |  | 1 |  | (44 | ) | — |  | (37 | )
Gain on sale of investments in affiliates |  | 85 |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | 85 |
Gain on acquisition of controlling interest |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | 36 |  | — |  | — |  | 36 |
Segment EBIT (2) |  | 583 |  | (61 | ) | 23 |  | 71 |  | (75 | ) | — |  | 541 |
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |  | (105 | ) | (72 | ) | (47 | ) | (13 | ) | (27 | ) | — |  | (264 | )
Total assets |  | 16,777 |  | 3,925 |  | 2,737 |  | 846 |  | 2,428 |  | — |  | 26,713 |

Six Months Ended |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
June 30, 2011 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Net sales to external customers |  | $ | 17,726 |  | $ | 2,481 |  | $ | 4,216 |  | $ | 991 |  | $ | 1,268 |  | $ | — |  | $ | 26,682 |
Inter—segment revenues |  | 2,458 |  | — |  | 36 |  | 49 |  | 22 |  | (2,565 | ) | — |
Gross profit |  | 801 |  | 79 |  | 228 |  | 111 |  | 67 |  | — |  | 1,286 |
Foreign exchange gains (losses) |  | 103 |  | 23 |  | (1 | ) | — |  | (6 | ) | — |  | 119 |
Noncontrolling interest (1) |  | (10 | ) | (2 | ) | (4 | ) | — |  | (2 | ) | 19 |  | 1 |
Other income (expense) — net |  | (8 | ) | 2 |  | (2 | ) | 1 |  | — |  | — |  | (7 | )
Gain on sale of investments in affiliates |  | 37 |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | 37 |
Segment EBIT (2) |  | 557 |  | 20 |  | 64 |  | 55 |  | (6 | ) | — |  | 690 |
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |  | (91 | ) | (74 | ) | (41 | ) | (14 | ) | (27 | ) | — |  | (247 | )
Total assets |  | 15,518 |  | 4,710 |  | 2,475 |  | 854 |  | 2,743 |  | 208 |  | 26,508 |

29

Table of Contents

(1) Includes noncontrolling interest share of interest and tax to reconcile to consolidated noncontrolling interest.

(2) Total segment earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) is an operating performance measure used by Bunge’s management to evaluate segment operating activities. Bunge’s management believes total segment EBIT is a useful measure of operating profitability, since the measure allows for an evaluation of the performance of its segments without regard to its financing methods or capital structure. In addition, EBIT is a financial measure that is widely used by analysts and investors in Bunge’s industries.

A reconciliation of total segment EBIT to net income attributable to Bunge follows:

|  | Three Months Ended |  | Six Months Ended |
|  | June 30, |  | June 30, |
(US$ in millions) |  | 2012 |  | 2011 |  | 2012 |  | 2011 |
Total segment EBIT |  | $ | 403 |  | $ | 373 |  | $ | 541 |  | $ | 690 |
Interest income |  | 21 |  | 23 |  | 47 |  | 44 |
Interest expense |  | (82 | ) | (70 | ) | (144 | ) | (142 | )
Income tax (expense) benefit |  | (68 | ) | (20 | ) | (82 | ) | (63 | )
Noncontrolling interest share of interest and tax |  | — |  | 10 |  | 4 |  | 19 |
Net income attributable to Bunge |  | $ | 274 |  | $ | 316 |  | $ | 366 |  | $ | 548 |

30

Table of Contents

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward Looking Statements

This report contains both historical and forward looking statements. All statements, other than statements of historical fact are, or may be deemed to be, forward looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act). These forward looking statements are not based on historical facts, but rather reflect our current expectations and projections about our future results, performance, prospects and opportunities. We have tried to identify these forward looking statements by using words including “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “plan,” “intend,” “estimate,” “continue” and similar expressions. These forward looking statements are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause our actual results, performance, prospects or opportunities to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, these forward looking statements. The following important factors, among others, could affect our business and financial performance, industry conditions, including fluctuations in supply, demand and prices for agricultural commodities and other raw materials and products used in our business, fluctuations in energy and freight costs and competitive developments in our industries; the effects of weather conditions and the outbreak of crop and animal disease on our business; global and regional agricultural, economic, financial and commodities market, political, social and health conditions; the outcome of pending regulatory and legal proceedings; our ability to complete, integrate and benefit from acquisitions, dispositions, joint ventures and strategic alliances; our ability to achieve the efficiencies, savings and other benefits anticipated from our cost reduction, margin improvement and other business optimization initiatives; changes in government policies, laws and regulations affecting our business, including agricultural and trade policies, tax regulations and biofuels legislation; and other factors affecting our business generally.

The forward looking statements included in this report are made only as of the date of this report, and except as otherwise required by federal securities law, we do not have any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances.

You should refer to “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, filed with the SEC on February 27, 2012, and “Part II — Item 1A. Risk Factors” in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for a more detailed discussion of these factors.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Second Quarter 2012 Overview

You should refer to “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Factors Affecting Operating Results” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 for a discussion of key factors affecting operating results in each of our business segments.

Beginning in the first quarter of 2012, management responsibilities for certain Brazilian port facilities were moved from the agribusiness segment to the fertilizer segment. Accordingly, amounts for prior periods presented have been reclassified to conform to the current period segment presentation.

Segment Overview

Agribusiness — Agribusiness segment results in the second quarter of 2012 were higher than the second quarter of 2011 primarily due to strong results in oilseed processing and grain merchandising in our South American operations. Total agribusiness volumes increased 19% compared to the same period last year. This increase resulted from increased grain merchandising business in Europe, due to increased supplies and the addition of a new port terminal facility in the Black Sea, as well as in North America, as our Pacific Northwest port terminal and related grain origination facilities were in operation. Oilseed volumes also increased, in part due to our additional oilseed processing capacity in Asia. Included in the second quarter of 2012 was a gain of $85 million on the sale of our noncontrolling interest in Solae, a North American soy ingredients joint venture. The same period of 2011 included a gain of $37 million on the sale of our noncontrolling interest in a European oilseed processing joint venture.

31

Table of Contents

Sugar and Bioenergy — The Sugar and Bioenergy segment experienced losses in the second quarter of 2012 compared with a profit of $18 million in the second quarter of 2011. This quarter’s losses were caused by wet weather conditions which interrupted milling operations and reduced the sugar content of harvested sugarcane. This led to higher unitary costs of production. The decrease in total volumes compared to the same period of 2011 is primarily attributed to lower merchandising volumes.

Edible oil products — Edible oil products segment results in the second quarter of 2012 were lower than the second quarter of 2011 as volatile raw material prices in the quarter resulted in reduced margins, and we recorded an impairment charge of approximately $5 million related to the closing of a European margarine plant as part of a facilities consolidation program to improve efficiency.

Milling products — Milling products segment results in the second quarter of 2012 were $44 million compared to $22 million in the second quarter of 2011. Results for the second quarter of 2012 included a $36 million gain related to the adjustment to fair value of the previously-held noncontrolling interest in a North American wheat milling operation upon acquisition of a controlling interest in that business. Overall, wheat milling margins were lower than the same period of last year and the business experienced continued challenges related to the completed implementation of a new SAP system in Brazil that impacted volumes and margins. Corn milling performed well, but was slightly below a strong 2011 quarter.

Fertilizer — Fertilizer segment results for the second quarter of 2012 were lower than the second quarter of 2011 as higher volumes were more than offset by lower margins. Although margins were lower, they improved throughout the quarter as high cost inventories acquired prior to a decline in international prices earlier in the year were utilized. Results for the second quarter of 2011 included net charges of approximately $17 million related to inventory adjustments and bad debts in our Brazilian distribution business.

Segment Results

A summary of certain items in our condensed consolidated statements of income and volumes by reportable segment for the periods indicated is set forth below.

|  | Three Months Ended |  | Six Months Ended |
|  | June 30, |  | June 30, |
(US$ in millions, except volumes) |  | 2012 |  | 2011 |  | 2012 |  | 2011 |
Volumes (in thousands of metric tons): |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Agribusiness |  | 34,723 |  | 29,290 |  | 65,373 |  | 53,501 |
Sugar and Bioenergy |  | 1,804 |  | 2,262 |  | 3,135 |  | 3,700 |
Edible oil products |  | 1,634 |  | 1,453 |  | 3,184 |  | 2,863 |
Milling products |  | 1,087 |  | 1,138 |  | 2,133 |  | 2,381 |
Fertilizer |  | 1,425 |  | 1,384 |  | 2,526 |  | 2,366 |
Total |  | 40,673 |  | 35,527 |  | 76,351 |  | 64,811 |
Net sales: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Agribusiness |  | $ | 10,580 |  | $ | 9,624 |  | $ | 19,897 |  | $ | 17,726 |
Sugar and Bioenergy |  | 1,079 |  | 1,420 |  | 1,960 |  | 2,481 |
Edible oil products |  | 2,331 |  | 2,200 |  | 4,552 |  | 4,216 |
Milling products |  | 421 |  | 491 |  | 848 |  | 991 |
Fertilizer |  | 679 |  | 753 |  | 1,279 |  | 1,268 |
Total |  | $ | 15,090 |  | $ | 14,488 |  | $ | 28,536 |  | $ | 26,682 |
Cost of goods sold: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Agribusiness |  | $ | (10,102 | ) | $ | (9,223 | ) | $ | (19,067 | ) | $ | (16,925 | )
Sugar and Bioenergy |  | (1,064 | ) | (1,373 | ) | (1,937 | ) | (2,402 | )
Edible oil products |  | (2,240 | ) | (2,086 | ) | (4,348 | ) | (3,988 | )
Milling products |  | (378 | ) | (437 | ) | (749 | ) | (880 | )
Fertilizer |  | (646 | ) | (722 | ) | (1,254 | ) | (1,201 | )
Total |  | $ | (14,430 | ) | $ | (13,841 | ) | $ | (27,355 | ) | $ | (25,396 | )

32

Table of Contents

Gross profit: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Agribusiness |  | $ | 478 |  | $ | 401 |  | $ | 830 |  | $ | 801 |
Sugar and Bioenergy |  | 15 |  | 47 |  | 23 |  | 79 |
Edible oil products |  | 91 |  | 114 |  | 204 |  | 228 |
Milling products |  | 43 |  | 54 |  | 99 |  | 111 |
Fertilizer |  | 33 |  | 31 |  | 25 |  | 67 |
Total |  | $ | 660 |  | $ | 647 |  | $ | 1,181 |  | $ | 1,286 |
Selling, general and administrative expenses: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Agribusiness |  | $ | (205 | ) | $ | (191 | ) | $ | (420 | ) | $ | (366 | )
Sugar and Bioenergy |  | (37 | ) | (44 | ) | (81 | ) | (82 | )
Edible oil products |  | (89 | ) | (83 | ) | (181 | ) | (157 | )
Milling products |  | (34 | ) | (29 | ) | (65 | ) | (57 | )
Fertilizer |  | (31 | ) | (36 | ) | (68 | ) | (65 | )
Total |  | $ | (396 | ) | $ | (383 | ) | $ | (815 | ) | $ | (727 | )
Foreign exchange gains (losses): |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Agribusiness |  | $ | 20 |  | $ | 69 |  | $ | 74 |  | $ | 103 |
Sugar and Bioenergy |  | (5 | ) | 12 |  | — |  | 23 |
Edible oil products |  | (2 | ) | — |  | (3 | ) | (1 | )
Milling products |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |
Fertilizer |  | 5 |  | (4 | ) | 13 |  | (6 | )
Total |  | $ | 18 |  | $ | 77 |  | $ | 84 |  | $ | 119 |
Noncontrolling interest: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Agribusiness |  | $ | 5 |  | $ | (5 | ) | $ | 3 |  | $ | (10 | )
Sugar and Bioenergy |  | 3 |  | — |  | 4 |  | (2 | )
Edible oil products |  | 1 |  | — |  | 1 |  | (4 | )
Milling products |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |
Fertilizer |  | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | (2 | )
Total |  | $ | 8 |  | $ | (6 | ) | $ | 7 |  | $ | (18 | )
Other income (expense): |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Agribusiness |  | $ | 4 |  | $ | (3 | ) | $ | 11 |  | $ | (8 | )
Sugar and Bioenergy |  | (4 | ) | 3 |  | (7 | ) | 2 |
Edible oil products |  | — |  | (1 | ) | 2 |  | (2 | )
Milling products |  | (1 | ) | (3 | ) | 1 |  | 1 |
Fertilizer |  | (7 | ) | 5 |  | (44 | ) | — |
Total |  | $ | (8 | ) | $ | 1 |  | $ | (37 | ) | $ | (7 | )
Gain on sale of agribusiness investments in affiliates |  | $ | 85 |  | $ | 37 |  | $ | 85 |  | $ | 37 |
Gain on acquisition of milling business controlling interest |  | $ | 36 |  | $ | — |  | $ | 36 |  | $ | — |
Segment earnings before interest and tax: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Agribusiness |  | $ | 386 |  | $ | 308 |  | $ | 583 |  | $ | 557 |
Sugar and Bioenergy |  | (28 | ) | 18 |  | (61 | ) | 20 |
Edible oil products |  | 2 |  | 30 |  | 23 |  | 64 |
Milling products |  | 44 |  | 22 |  | 71 |  | 55 |
Fertilizer |  | (1 | ) | (5 | ) | (75 | ) | (6 | )
Total (1) |  | $ | 403 |  | $ | 373 |  | $ | 541 |  | $ | 690 |
Depreciation, depletion and amortization: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Agribusiness |  | $ | (56 | ) | $ | (47 | ) | $ | (105 | ) | $ | (91 | )
Sugar and Bioenergy |  | (45 | ) | (54 | ) | (72 | ) | (74 | )
Edible oil products |  | (23 | ) | (21 | ) | (47 | ) | (41 | )
Milling products |  | (6 | ) | (7 | ) | (13 | ) | (14 | )
Fertilizer |  | (14 | ) | (14 | ) | (27 | ) | (27 | )
Total |  | $ | (144 | ) | $ | (143 | ) | $ | (264 | ) | $ | (247 | )

33

Table of Contents

(1) Total segment earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) is an operating performance measure used by Bunge’s management to evaluate segment operating activities. Bunge’s management believes total segment EBIT is a useful measure of operating profitability, since the measure allows for an evaluation of the performance of its segments without regard to its financing methods or capital structure. In addition, EBIT is a financial measure that is widely used by analysts and investors in Bunge’s industries. Total segment EBIT is not a measure of consolidated operating results under U.S. GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative to net income or any other measure of consolidated operating results under U.S. GAAP.

A reconciliation of total segment EBIT to net income attributable to Bunge follows:

|  | Three Months Ended |  | Six Months Ended |
|  | June 30, |  | June 30, |
(US$ in millions) |  | 2012 |  | 2011 |  | 2012 |  | 2011 |
Total segment EBIT |  | $ | 403 |  | $ | 373 |  | $ | 541 |  | $ | 690 |
Interest income |  | 21 |  | 23 |  | 47 |  | 44 |
Interest expense |  | (82 | ) | (70 | ) | (144 | ) | (142 | )
Income tax (expense) benefit |  | (68 | ) | (20 | ) | (82 | ) | (63 | )
Noncontrolling share of interest and tax |  | — |  | 10 |  | 4 |  | 19 |
Net income attributable to Bunge |  | $ | 274 |  | $ | 316 |  | $ | 366 |  | $ | 548 |

Three Months Ended June 30, 2012 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2011

Agribusiness Segment. Agribusiness segment net sales in the second quarter of 2012 increased 10% over the same period of 2011 driven by a 19% increase in volumes, primarily in grain merchandising and oilseed processing in Europe, North America and Asia. 2011 volumes in Europe were adversely affected by the 2010 drought in Eastern Europe that reduced grain availability in the region during the second quarter of 2011. The impact of these volume increases in 2012 was partially offset by the impact of lower average prices for corn and wheat during the second quarter of 2012 compared with the same period of 2011.

Cost of goods sold for the second quarter of 2012 increased 10%, similarly to net sales, primarily as a result of the above-mentioned increase in volumes, partially offset by the lower average corn and wheat market prices.

Gross profit in the second quarter of 2012 increased to $478 million compared to $401 million in the same period of 2011. Higher volumes in merchandising as well as improved oilseed processing margins in 2012 were the principal driver of the increase.

SG&A expenses in the second quarter of 2012 increased 7% largely due to the additional U.S. and Asia facilities noted above as well as higher employee related costs in South America and increased bad debt expenses in Europe, when compared to the same period of 2011. These increases were partially offset by the favorable impact of weaker global currencies on functional currency costs when translated to U.S. dollars.

Foreign exchange gains in the second quarter of 2012 and 2011 were $20 million and $69 million, respectively, related primarily to the volatility of global currencies relative to the U.S. dollar during the second quarters of both years.

Gain on sale of investments in affiliates of $85 million in the second quarter of 2012 related to the gain on the sale of our noncontrolling interest in Solae, a North American soy ingredients joint venture. Gain on sale of investments in affiliates of $37 million in the second quarter of 2011 related to the gain on the sale of our noncontrolling interest in a European oilseed processing facility joint venture.

Noncontrolling interest included $5 million of losses attributable to noncontrolling interests in the second quarter of 2012 compared to $5 million of profits attributable to noncontrolling interests in the second quarter of 2011 and represents the noncontrolling interest share of period (income) loss of consolidated entities, primarily in our North American operations.

34

Table of Contents

Segment EBIT in the second quarter of 2012 increased by $78 million to $386 million from $308 million in the second quarter of 2011 primarily due to the $85 million gain on sale of our interest in a North American soy ingredients joint venture. Increased gross profit in the second quarter of 2012 compared to the same period of 2011 was more than offset by increased SG&A costs and lower foreign exchange gains in 2012.

Sugar and Bioenergy Segment. Sugar and Bioenergy segment net sales for the second quarter of 2012 decreased 24% when compared to the second quarter of 2011 primarily due to lower average ethanol prices compared to last year and a 20% decrease in volumes as a result of lower sugar merchandising volumes.

Cost of goods sold decreased 23% in the second quarter of 2012 compared to the same period of 2011 driven by lower volumes in our merchandising business, partially offset by higher industrial volumes and increased unitary costs of sugar and ethanol produced in our mills as a result of low sucrose content in the sugarcane due to the heavy rains which delayed the harvest.

Gross profit decreased to $15 million in the second quarter of 2012 from $47 million in the comparable period of 2011 primarily as a result of the weather related higher unitary industrial costs and lower ethanol prices.

SG&A expenses decreased to $37 million in the second quarter of 2012 from $44 million in the comparable period of 2011 primarily due to the favorable impact of a weaker Brazilian real on functional currency expenses when translated to U.S. dollars.

Foreign exchange losses in the second quarter of 2012 were $5 million compared to gains of $12 million in the second quarter of 2011 and resulted primarily from the depreciation of the Brazilian real in 2012 compared to appreciation in the second quarter of 2011.

Other income (expenses)-net was a loss of $4 million in the second quarter of 2012 compared to a gain of $3 million in the same quarter of 2011 primarily due to lower equity in earnings of affiliates in our North American bioenergy investments.

Noncontrolling interest was $3 million in the second quarter of 2012 and nil in the same quarter of 2011 and represents the noncontrolling interest share of period losses from our non-wholly owned Brazilian sugar cane mills.

Segment EBIT decreased by $46 million to a loss of $28 million in the second quarter of 2012 from income of $18 million in the second quarter of 2011 due to the impact of heavy rains on our gross profit with the delayed harvest and reduced sucrose content in the sugarcane processed. Lower ethanol prices also reduced gross profit. EBIT was also reduced by foreign exchange losses with the depreciation of the real and lower results from our North American bioenergy investments.

Edible Oil Products Segment. Edible oil products segment net sales increased 6% in the second quarter of 2012 compared to the second quarter of 2011 driven by a volume increase of 12% primarily in North America and India, the addition of volumes from our expanded operations in China and improved volumes in Europe. These increases were partially offset by the impact on prices of the depreciation of currencies relative to the U.S. dollar in Brazil, India and Europe.

Cost of goods sold in the second quarter of 2012 increased 7% when compared to the same period of 2011 primarily due to the increase in volumes, a $5 million impairment charge related to the closure of a European facility and inventory adjustments in the U.S. These increases were partially offset by the impact of currency depreciations on cost of goods sold.

Gross profit decreased 20% when compared to the second quarter of 2011 primarily due to lower margins resulting primarily from volatile raw material prices during the quarter and changes in overall product mix as well as the $5 million impairment charge in Europe and inventory adjustments in the U.S.

35

Table of Contents

SG&A expenses increased 7%, primarily as a result of higher advertising expenditures, costs associated with an SAP implementation in Brazil, and the impacts of the acquisitions and the expansions in Asia. These increases were partially offset by the impact of currency devaluations noted above.

Foreign exchange results in the second quarters of 2012 and 2011 were a loss of $2 million and nil, respectively.

Noncontrolling interest was $1 million in the second quarter of 2012 and nil in the same period of 2011, and represents the noncontrolling interest share of period loss, primarily in our European operations.

Segment EBIT decreased 93% as a result of the lower gross profit and higher SG&A costs.

Milling Products Segment. Milling products segment net sales decreased 14%, primarily as a result of lower wheat and corn prices, as well as lower volumes. Volumes decreased 4% primarily due to lost sales opportunities in wheat milling in Brazil due to continued challenges following the completion of an SAP implementation. Volumes were also slightly lower in U.S. corn milling during the period, but this reduction was largely offset by increased U.S. rice milling volumes with higher exports to Asia and the acquisition of a controlling interest in a North American wheat milling business. Sales also declined as a result of the impact of the devaluation of the Brazilian real on sales in Brazil when translated into U.S. dollars.

Cost of goods sold decreased 14% primarily as a result of lower raw material prices as average wheat prices for the second quarter of 2012 declined by approximately 17% from the same period of 2011 and average corn prices declined by approximately 15%. Volumes also declined when compared to the second quarter of 2011 and the currency devaluation in Brazil reduced costs when translated into U.S. dollars as noted above.

Gross profit decreased 20% compared with the second quarter of 2011 as weak volumes and margins in wheat milling in Brazil and lower volumes in corn milling more than offset improved corn milling margins that benefited from higher yields. The recently acquired wheat milling business in North America contributed positively to EBIT.

SG&A expenses increased from $29 million to $34 million during the second quarter of 2012 when compared to the second quarter of 2011, primarily resulting from higher selling costs as well as increased expenses and costs associated with new distribution centers in Brazil partially offset by the impact of the devaluation of the Brazilian real as noted above.

Gain on acquisition of controlling interest of $36 million in the second quarter of 2012 relates to the adjustment to fair value of the previously held noncontrolling interest in a North American wheat milling operation upon assuming control of that operation in the second quarter of 2012.

Segment EBIT increased 100% to $44 million in the second quarter of 2012 from $22 million in the second quarter of 2011 primarily as a result of the $36 million gain related to the acquisition of a controlling interest in a North American wheat mill partially offset by lower gross profit and higher SG&A expenses.

Fertilizer Segment. Fertilizer segment net sales decreased 10% in the second quarter of 2012 when compared to the second quarter of 2011 primarily due to lower selling prices which were partially offset by a 3% increase in volumes. Fertilizer sales in Brazil were also impacted by the currency depreciation.

Cost of goods sold decreased 11% primarily as a result of lower raw material costs driven by lower international fertilizer prices in the second quarter of 2012 when compared to the second quarter of 2011. The second quarter of 2011 also included charges for certain inventory valuation adjustments. Cost of goods sold also declined as a result of the currency depreciation in Brazil.

Gross profit increased to $33 million in the second quarter of 2012 from $31 million in the comparable period of 2011. The increase in gross profit was primarily driven by the impact of higher volumes and improved margins.

36

Table of Contents

SG&A decreased to $31 million in the second quarter of 2012 from $36 million in the comparable period of 2011 primarily as a result of lower bad debt expenses in the second quarter of 2012 when compared to the same period of 2011 and the devaluation of the Brazilian real.

Foreign exchange gains were $5 million in the second quarter of 2012 compared to a loss of $4 million in the second quarter of 2011 and related primarily to the translation of net monetary liabilities.

Other income (expenses)-net was a loss of $7 million in the second quarter of 2012 compared to a gain of $5 million in the second quarter of 2011 primarily due to lower results in our Moroccan phosphate joint venture as a result of lower margins driven by declines in international fertilizer prices during the first half of the second quarter of 2012.

Noncontrolling interest in the second quarter of 2012 was $1 million compared to $1 million in 2011 which represented the noncontrolling interest share of period income.

Segment EBIT for the second quarter of 2012 was a loss of $1 million compared to a loss of $5 million in the same period of 2011 due to higher gross profit and lower SG&A expenses, partially offset by lower results from our Moroccan joint venture.

Interest. A summary of consolidated interest income and expense for the periods indicated follows:

|  | Three Months Ended |
|  | June 30, |
(US$ in millions) |  | 2012 |  | 2011 |
Interest income |  | $ | 21 |  | $ | 23 |
Interest expense |  | (82 | ) | (70 | )

Higher income from interest bearing receivables was more than offset by lower average interest bearing cash balances. Interest expense increased when compared to the same period last year, as higher working capital usage more than offset lower average borrowing costs.

Income Tax Expense. In the quarter ended June 30, 2012, we recorded income tax expense of $68 million compared to income tax expense of $20 million in the quarter ended June 30, 2011. The effective tax rate in the second quarter of 2012 increased to 20% compared to 7% in the second quarter of 2011 driven by increased earnings in high tax jurisdictions, primarily Brazil. Included in the effective tax rate in the second quarter of 2012 was $31 million of income tax expense related to the gain on the sale of our noncontrolling interest in Solae.

Net Income Attributable to Bunge. For the quarter ended June 30, 2012, net income attributable to Bunge decreased to $274 million from $316 million in the quarter ended June 30, 2011. This decrease was primarily the result of higher interest and income tax expense which more than offset higher segment EBIT which included a gain of $85 million on the sale of our noncontrolling interest in Solae and a gain of $36 million related to the acquisition of a controlling interest in a North American wheat milling business.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2011

Agribusiness Segment. Agribusiness segment net sales in the six months ended June 30, 2012 increased by 12% when compared to the same period of 2011 driven by a 22% increase in volumes, primarily in grain merchandising and oilseed processing in Europe and the impact of our acquired North American grain origination facilities supporting our newly constructed port terminal in the U.S. Pacific Northwest and our acquired Ukraine port facility. Additional oilseed processing capacity in Asia also contributed to the increase. In Europe, 2011 volumes were affected by the 2010 drought in Eastern Europe that reduced grain availability there last year. South American volumes were consistent with the very strong prior year period. The 2012 volume increases were partially offset by lower average commodity prices during the first six months of 2012 compared with the same period of 2011.

Cost of goods sold in the six months ended June 30, 2012 increased 13% primarily as a result of the increase in volumes and other related costs with the expansions of our business mentioned above.

37

Table of Contents

Gross profit increased in the six months ended June 30, 2012 by 4% compared to an especially strong first half of 2011 and were driven by strong grain merchandising margins in South America, which benefited from the smaller 2011 U.S. grain harvests. These increases were partially offset by weaker oilseed processing margins in the U.S. and Europe.

SG&A expenses in the six months ended June 30, 2012 increased 15% largely due to the additional U.S. and Asia facilities noted above as well as higher employee related costs in South America and increased bad debt expenses in Brazil and Europe, when compared to the same period of 2011.

Foreign exchange gains in the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 were $74 million and $103 million, respectively, and related primarily to the volatility of global currencies relative to the U.S. dollar during the six months ended June 30, 2012.

Gain on sale of investments in affiliates in the six months ended June 30, 2012 of $85 million was related to the sale of our investment in Solae, a North American soy ingredients joint venture. Gain on sale of investments in affiliates of $37 million in the same quarter of 2011 was related to the sale of our interest in a European oilseed processing joint venture.

Noncontrolling interest in the six months ended June 30, 2012 was $3 million compared to $(10) million in the comparable period of 2011 and represents the noncontrolling interest share of period (income) loss.

Segment EBIT increased by $26 million to $583 million in the six months ended June 30, 2012 from $557 million in the comparable period of 2011 primarily due to the gain on the sale of our investment in Solae. This increase was partially offset by lower foreign exchange gains and higher SG&A expenses, the combination of which more than offset the 4% increase in gross profit.

Sugar and Bioenergy Segment. Sugar and Bioenergy segment net sales for the six months ended June 30, 2012 decreased 21% when compared to the same period of 2011 primarily due to a 15% decrease in sugar merchandising volumes and lower average ethanol prices compared to last year.

Cost of goods sold decreased 19% in the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the same period of 2011 driven by lower volumes in our merchandising business partially offset by higher industrial volumes and higher industrial costs in the second quarter of 2012 due to weather-related processing delays. Cost of goods sold for the first six months of 2011 included counterparty valuation adjustments of $20 million.

Gross profit in the six months ended June 30, 2012 was $23 million, down from $79 million in the comparable period of 2011, primarily as a result of lower ethanol margins and increased average costs in our industrial business. These decreases were partially offset by improved margins in our sugar merchandising business during the first six months of 2012 compared with weak performance in the first six months of 2011 resulting from weaker 2011 margins and counterparty valuation adjustments of $20 million.

SG&A expenses decreased slightly to $81 million in the six months ended June 30, 2012 from $82 million in the comparable period of 2011 as increased overhead costs in 2012 were largely offset by the favorable impact of the weaker Brazilian real on functional currency costs when translated to U.S. dollars.

Foreign exchange gains in the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 were nil and $23 million, respectively, and resulted primarily from movements of the Brazilian real.

Other income (expenses)-net was a loss of $7 million in the six months ended June 30, 2012, compared to a gain of $2 million in the comparable period of 2011 primarily due to lower equity in earnings of affiliates in our North American bioenergy investments.

Noncontrolling interest was $4 million in the six months ended June 30, 2012 and $(2) million in the comparable period of 2011 and represents the noncontrolling interest share of period (income) loss from our non-wholly owned Brazilian sugar cane mills.

38

Table of Contents

Segment EBIT decreased by $81 million to a loss of $61 million in the first six months of 2012 from income of $20 million in the first six months of 2011 due to lower gross profit driven by lower ethanol margins and higher average industrial costs due to weather related processing delays.

Edible Oil Products Segment. Edible oil products segment net sales increased 8% in the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the same period of 2011, driven by a volume increase of 11%, primarily in Europe and acquisitions in the U.S., Brazil and India.

Cost of goods sold in the six months ended June 30, 2012 increased 9% when compared to the same period of 2011 primarily due to the increase in volumes as well as $5 million related to the impairment of a European edible oils facility and certain inventory adjustments in the U.S.

Gross profit decreased 11% in the six months ended June 30, 2012 when compared to the same period of 2011 primarily due to lower margins resulting from volatile raw material prices during the six months and changes in overall product mix as well as the impairment charge in Europe and inventory adjustments in the U.S.

SG&A expenses in the six months ended June 30, 2012 increased 15% when compared to the same period of 2011 primarily as a result of increased advertising expenditures, costs associated with an SAP implementation in Brazil as well as the impact of our acquisitions in India and North America.

Foreign exchange results in the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 were losses of $3 million and $1 million, respectively.

Noncontrolling interest was $1 million in the six months ended June 30, 2012 and $(4) million in the same period of 2011, and represented the noncontrolling interest share of period (income) loss, primarily in our European operations.

Segment EBIT in the six months ended June 30, 2012 decreased to $23 million from $64 million in the comparable period of 2011 as a result of lower margins and higher SG&A costs.

Milling Products Segment. Milling products segment net sales in the six months ended June 30, 2012 decreased 14% when compared to the same period of 2011, primarily due to lower volumes in wheat milling as a result of lost sales opportunities due to challenges with an SAP implementation in Brazil, and lower average wheat and corn prices.

Cost of goods sold in the six months ended June 30, 2012 decreased 15% primarily as a result of lower wheat milling volumes and lower average wheat and corn prices when compared to the same period of 2011.

Gross profit in the six months ended June 30, 2012 decreased 11% when compared to the same period of 2011 as lower margins in wheat milling more than offset improved margins in corn milling resulting from higher milling yields.

SG&A expenses in the six months ended June 30, 2012 increased to $65 million from $57 million for the comparable period of 2011, primarily resulting from increased expenses and costs associated with the implementation of SAP as well as costs associated with new distribution centers in Brazil.

Gain on acquisition of controlling interest in the six months ended June 30, 2012 was $36 million related to the fair value adjustment of a minority investment in a North American wheat milling operation upon acquisition of a controlling interest in that business in the second quarter of 2012.

Segment EBIT increased 29% to $71 million in the six months ended June 30, 2012 from $55 million in the first six months of 2011 primarily as a result of the $36 million gain on acquisition of controlling interest, which was partially offset by lower gross profit and higher SG&A costs, both primarily in wheat milling in Brazil.

Fertilizer Segment. Fertilizer segment net sales in the six months ended June 30, 2012 increased 1% compared to the same period of 2011 primarily due to a 7% increase in volumes which was largely offset by a decrease in international fertilizer prices.

39

Table of Contents

Cost of goods sold in the six months ended June 30, 2012 increased 4% when compared to the same period of 2011, primarily as a result of higher volumes and high raw material costs driven by inventories purchased prior to the decline in international fertilizer prices during the first quarter of 2012.

Gross profit decreased to $25 million in the six months ended June 30, 2012 from $67 million in the comparable period of 2011. The decrease in gross profit was primarily driven by the impact of high cost inventories in a declining price environment.

SG&A increased to $68 million in the six months ended June 30, 2012 from $65 million in the comparable period of 2011 primarily as a result of bad debt expenses in the first six months of 2012 compared to the same period of 2011 which included small recoveries of defaulted receivables.

Foreign exchange gains were $13 million in the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to a loss of $6 million in the same period of 2011.

Other income (expenses)-net was a loss of $44 million in the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to nil in the same period of 2011 primarily due to lower results in our Moroccan phosphate joint venture as a result of lower international prices and scheduled maintenance downtime. In addition, a $27 million provision for a legacy environmental claim from 1998 in Brazil was recorded in the first quarter of 2012.

Noncontrolling interest in the six months ended June 30, 2012 was $1 million compared to $2 million in 2011 which represented the noncontrolling interest share of period income.

Fertilizer segment EBIT was a loss of $75 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to a loss of $6 million in the same period of 2011 due to lower gross profit, higher SG&A expenses, lower results from our Moroccan joint venture and the $27 million provision for a legacy environmental claim.

Interest. A summary of consolidated interest income and expense for the periods indicated follows:

|  | Six Months Ended |
|  | June 30, |
(US$ in millions) |  | 2012 |  | 2011 |
Interest income |  | $ | 47 |  | $ | 44 |
Interest expense |  | (144 | ) | (142 | )

Interest income was $47 million and $44 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Higher income from interest bearing receivables was offset by lower average interest bearing cash balances. Interest expense increased slightly when compared to the same period last year, as higher working capital usage more than offset lower average borrowing costs.

Income Tax Expense. In the six months ended June 30, 2012, we recorded income tax expense of $82 million compared to income tax expense of $63 million in the six months ended June 30, 2011. The effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2012 was 19%, compared to 10% for the six months ended June 30, 2011 driven by increased earnings in higher tax jurisdictions, primarily Brazil. Included in the effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2012 was $31 million related to the gain on sale of our noncontrolling interest in Solae. Included in the effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2011 were approximately $21 million of discrete tax charges in the first quarter of 2011 related to certain non-deductible expenses and the provision of a valuation allowance for a subsidiary that management intends to liquidate as part of an internal reorganization.

Net Income Attributable to Bunge. For the six months ended June 30, 2012, net income attributable to Bunge decreased to $349 million from $548 million in the quarter ended June 30, 2011. This decrease was primarily the result of lower segment EBIT, driven by lower results in the sugar and bioenergy and fertilizer segments. The six months ended June 30, 2012 also included a gain of $85 million on the sale of our noncontrolling interest in Solae and a gain of $36 million related to the acquisition of a controlling interest in a North American wheat mill. Net income was also reduced by the higher effective tax rate compared to the same period of last year.

40

Table of Contents

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity

Our primary financial objective is to maintain sufficient liquidity, balance sheet strength and financial flexibility in order to fund the requirements of our business efficiently. We generally finance our ongoing operations with cash flows generated from operations, issuance of commercial paper, borrowings under various revolving credit facilities and term loans, as well as proceeds from the issuance of senior notes. Acquisitions and long-lived assets are generally financed with a combination of equity and long-term debt.

Our current ratio, which is a widely used measure of liquidity and is defined as current assets divided by current liabilities, was 1.69 and 1.89 at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.

Cash and Cash Equivalents — Cash and cash equivalents were $467 million at June 30, 2012 and $835 million at December 31, 2011. Cash balances are managed in accordance with our investment policy, the objectives of which are to preserve capital, maximize liquidity and provide appropriate returns. Under our policy, cash balances have been primarily invested in bank time deposits with highly-rated financial institutions and U.S. government securities.

Readily Marketable Inventories — Readily marketable inventories are agricultural commodity inventories such as soybeans, soybean meal, soybean oil, corn, wheat and sugar that are readily convertible to cash because of their commodity characteristics, widely available markets and international pricing mechanisms. Readily marketable inventories in our agribusiness segment are reported at fair value and were $5,574 million and $3,724 million at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. The sugar and bioenergy segment included readily marketable sugar inventories of $85 million and $139 million at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. Of these readily marketable sugar inventories, $57 million and $83 million were inventories carried at fair value at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, in our trading and merchandising business. Sugar inventories in our industrial production business are readily marketable, but are carried at lower of cost or market. Readily marketable inventories at fair value in the aggregate amount of $217 million and $212 million at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, were included in our edible oil products segment inventories.

We recorded interest expense on debt financing readily marketable inventories of $50 million and $60 million in the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Financing Arrangements and Outstanding Indebtedness — We conduct most of our financing activities through a centralized financing structure that enables us and our subsidiaries to borrow more efficiently. This structure includes a master trust facility, the primary assets of which consist of intercompany loans made to Bunge Limited and its subsidiaries. Certain of Bunge Limited’s 100% owned finance subsidiaries, Bunge Limited Finance Corp., Bunge Finance Europe B.V., and Bunge Asset Funding Corp., fund the master trust with short and long-term debt obtained from third parties, including through our commercial paper program and certain credit facilities, as well as the issuance of senior notes. Borrowings by these finance subsidiaries carry full, unconditional guarantees by Bunge Limited.

Revolving credit facilities. At June 30, 2012, we had approximately $3,276 million of aggregate committed borrowing capacity under our commercial paper program and revolving credit facilities, of which $2,130 million was unused and available. The following table summarizes these facilities as of the periods presented:

|  |  |  | Total |  |  |  |  |
Commercial Paper |  |  |  | Availability |  | Borrowings Outstanding |
Program and Revolving |  |  |  | June 30, |  | June 30, |  | December 31, |
Credit Facilities |  | Maturities |  | 2012 |  | 2012 |  | 2011 |
|  |  |  | (US$ in millions) |
Commercial paper |  | 2016 |  | $ | 526 |  | $ | 471 |  | $ | 73 |
Long-term revolving credit facilities (1) |  | 2014-2016 |  | 2,750 |  | 675 |  | 250 |
Total |  |  |  | $ | 3,276 |  | $ | 1,146 |  | $ | 323 |

41

Table of Contents

(1) Borrowings under the revolving credit facilities that have maturities greater than one year from the date of the condensed consolidated balance sheets are classified as long-term debt, consistent with the long-term maturity of the underlying facilities. However, individual borrowings under the revolving credit facilities are generally short-term in nature, bear interest at variable rates and can be repaid or renewed as each such individual borrowing matures.

Our commercial paper program is supported by committed back-up bank credit lines (the liquidity facility) equal to the amount of the commercial paper program provided by lending institutions that are required to be rated at least A-1 by Standard & Poor’s and P-1 by Moody’s Investor Services. The cost of borrowing under the liquidity facility would typically be higher than the cost of borrowing under our commercial paper program. At June 30, 2012, $471 million was outstanding under the commercial paper program and no amounts were outstanding under the liquidity facility. The minimum short-term debt rating requirement only applies to banks participating in the liquidity facility. Our commercial paper program is our only revolving credit facility that requires lenders to maintain minimum credit ratings.

On June 22, 2012, Moody’s Investor Services downgraded the credit ratings of certain financial institutions, including two banks with an aggregate commitment of $74 million under our $600 million liquidity facility. As these banks no longer met the minimum ratings required to participate in the liquidity facility following the downgrades, these banks’ commitments under the liquidity facility were terminated and the amount available under the facility was reduced by $74 million to $526 million. Consequent to the reduction of the liquidity facility, the size of our commercial paper program was also simultaneously reduced to $526 million.

We had $250 million of borrowings outstanding at June 30, 2012 under our $1,000 million revolving credit facility that matures on November 17, 2016. Borrowings under this credit facility bear interest at LIBOR plus an applicable margin ranging from 1.125% to 1.75%, based on the credit ratings of our long-term senior unsecured debt. Amounts under the credit facility that remain undrawn are subject to commitment fees payable each quarter based on the average undrawn portion of the credit facility at rates ranging from 0.125% to 0.275% per annum, based generally on the credit ratings of our long-term senior unsecured debt.

In addition, we had $425 million of borrowings outstanding at June 30, 2012 under our $1,750 million revolving credit facility that matures on April 19, 2014. Borrowings under this credit facility bear interest at LIBOR plus an applicable margin ranging from 1.30% to 2.75% per annum, based on the credit ratings of our unsecured senior long-term debt. Amounts under the credit facility that remain undrawn are subject to a commitment fees payable quarterly on the average undrawn portion of the credit facility at 35% of the applicable margin.

In addition to the committed facilities discussed above, from time-to-time, we enter into bilateral short-term credit lines as necessary based on our financing requirements. At June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, $1,325 million and $400 million, respectively were outstanding under these bilateral short-term credit lines.

Short and long-term debt. Our short and long-term debt increased by $2,813 million at June 30, 2012 from December 31, 2011, primarily due to higher working capital financing requirements. For the six months ended June 30, 2012, our average short and long-term debt outstanding was $5,237 million compared to $5,079 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011. Long-term debt balance was $4,562 million at June 30, 2012 compared to $3,362 million at December 31, 2011. The following table summarizes our short-term debt activity at June 30, 2012:

|  |  |  | Weighted |  |  |  |  |  | Weighted |
|  |  |  | Average |  | Highest |  |  |  | Average |
|  |  |  | Interest |  | Balance |  | Average |  | Interest |
|  | Outstanding |  | Rate at |  | Outstanding |  | Balance |  | Rate |
|  | Balance at |  | Quarter |  | During |  | During |  | During |
(US$ in millions) |  | Quarter End (1) |  | End (1) |  | Quarter (2) |  | Quarter (2) |  | Quarter |
Bank borrowings |  | $ | 1,861 |  | 3.91 | % | $ | 1,861 |  | $ | 1,304 |  | 3.48 | %
Commercial paper |  | 471 |  | 0.52 | % | 471 |  | 212 |  | 0.45 | %
Total |  | $ | 2,332 |  | 3.23 | % | $ | 2,332 |  | $ | 1,516 |  | 3.06 | %

(1) Includes $317 million of local currency borrowings in certain Eastern European, South American and Asian countries at a weighted average interest rate of 13.59% as of June 30, 2012.

(2) Based on monthly balances.

42

Table of Contents

In June 2012, we completed the sale of $600 million aggregate principal amount of unsecured senior notes bearing interest at 3.20% and maturing on June 15, 2017. The senior notes were issued by our 100% owned finance subsidiary, Bunge Limited Finance Corp., and are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Bunge Limited. The net proceeds of $595 million were used for general corporate purposes, including the repayment of outstanding indebtedness, which includes indebtedness under our revolving credit facilities.

The following table summarizes our short and long-term indebtedness:

|  | June 30, |  | December 31, |
(US$ in millions) |  | 2012 |  | 2011 |
Short-term debt: |  |  |  |  |
Short-term debt (1) |  | $ | 2,332 |  | $ | 719 |
Current portion of long-term debt |  | 315 |  | 14 |
Total short-term debt |  | 2,647 |  | 733 |
Long-term debt (2) |  |  |  |  |
Revolving credit facility expiry 2014 |  | 425 |  | — |
Revolving credit facility expiry 2016 |  | 250 |  | 250 |
3.32% Term loan due 2013 |  | 300 |  | 300 |
5.875% Senior Notes due 2013 |  | 300 |  | 300 |
5.35% Senior Notes due 2014 |  | 500 |  | 500 |
5.10% Senior Notes due 2015 |  | 382 |  | 382 |
4.10% Senior Notes due 2016 |  | 500 |  | 500 |
5.90% Senior Notes due 2017 |  | 250 |  | 250 |
3.20% Senior Notes due 2017 |  | 600 |  | — |
8.50% Senior Notes due 2019 |  | 600 |  | 600 |
BNDES loans, variable interest rate indexed to TJLP plus 3.20% payable through 2016 (3)(4) |  | 47 |  | 64 |
Other |  | 408 |  | 216 |
Subtotal |  | 4,562 |  | 3,362 |
Less: Current portion of long-term debt |  | (315 | ) | (14 | )
Total long-term debt excluding investment fund debt |  | 4,247 |  | 3,348 |
Consolidated non-recourse investment fund debt due 2014 (5) |  | 92 |  | — |
Total debt |  | $ | 6,986 |  | $ | 4,081 |

(1) Includes $317 million of local currency borrowings in certain Eastern European, South American and Asian countries at a weighted average interest rate of 13.59% as of June 30, 2012 and $97 million at a weighted average interest rate of 22.72% as of December 31, 2011.

(2) Includes secured debt of $129 million and $66 million at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.

(3) Industrial development loans provided by BNDES, an agency of the Brazilian government.

(4) TJLP is a long-term interest rate published by the BNDES on a quarterly basis; TJLP as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 was 6.00% per annum for both periods.

(5) Long-term debt of consolidated investment funds as of June 30, 2012 with no recourse to Bunge.

Credit Ratings. Bunge’s debt ratings and outlook by major credit rating agencies at June 30, 2012 were as follows:

|  | Short-term |  | Long-term |  |  |
|  | Debt |  | Debt |  | Outlook |
Standard & Poor’s |  | A-1 |  | BBB- |  | Positive |
Moody’s |  | P-1 |  | Baa2 |  | Stable |
Fitch |  | Not Rated |  | BBB |  | Negative |

43

Table of Contents

Our debt agreements do not have any credit rating downgrade triggers that would accelerate the maturity of our debt. However, credit rating downgrades would increase our borrowing costs under our credit facilities and, depending on their severity, could impede our ability to obtain credit facilities or access the capital markets in the future on favorable terms. A significant increase in our borrowing costs could impair our ability to compete effectively in our business relative to competitors with higher credit ratings.

Our credit facilities and certain senior notes require us to comply with specified financial covenants, including minimum net worth, minimum current ratio, a maximum debt to capitalization ratio and limitations on secured indebtedness. We were in compliance with these covenants as of June 30, 2012.

Equity

Total equity was $11,872 million at June 30, 2012, as set forth in the following table:

|  | June 30, |  | December 31, |
(US$ in millions) |  | 2012 |  | 2011 |
Equity: |  |  |  |  |
Convertible perpetual preference shares |  | $ | 690 |  | $ | 690 |
Common shares |  | 1 |  | 1 |
Additional paid-in capital |  | 4,868 |  | 4,829 |
Retained earnings |  | 7,190 |  | 6,917 |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |  | (1,365 | ) | (610 | )
Treasury shares, at cost - 1,933,286 |  | (120 | ) | (120 | )
Total Bunge shareholders’ equity |  | 11,264 |  | 11,707 |
Noncontrolling interest |  | 608 |  | 368 |
Total equity |  | $ | 11,872 |  | $ | 12,075 |

Total Bunge shareholders’ equity decreased to $11,264 million at June 30, 2012 from $11,707 million at December 31, 2011. The decrease in shareholders’ equity was due primarily to foreign currency translation adjustments of $772 million, related primarily to the Brazilian real and declared dividends to common and preferred shareholders of $76 million and $17 million, respectively. These decreases were partially offset by net income attributable to Bunge for the six months ended June 30, 2012 of $366 million.

Noncontrolling interest increased to $608 million at June 30, 2012 from $368 million at December 31, 2011 due primarily to the consolidation of a certain variable interest entity in conjunction with the acquisition of an asset management business in the first quarter of 2012.

As of June 30, 2012, we had 6,900,000 4.875% cumulative convertible perpetual preference shares outstanding with an aggregate liquidation preference of $690 million. Each convertible perpetual preference share has an initial liquidation preference of $100, which will be adjusted for any accumulated and unpaid dividends. The convertible perpetual preference shares carry an annual dividend of $4.875 per share payable quarterly. As a result of adjustments made to the initial conversion price because cash dividends paid on Bunge Limited’s common shares exceeded certain specified thresholds, each convertible perpetual preference share is convertible, at the holder’s option, at any time into 1.0991 Bunge Limited common shares, based on the conversion price of $90.9802 per share, subject to certain additional anti-dilution adjustments. At any time on or after December 1, 2012, if the closing price of our common shares equals or exceeds 130% of the conversion price for 20 trading days during any consecutive 30 trading days (including the last trading day of such period), we may elect to cause the convertible perpetual preference shares to be automatically converted into Bunge Limited common shares at the then prevailing conversion price. The convertible perpetual preference shares are not redeemable by us at any time.

Cash Flows

Our cash flow from operations varies depending on, among other items, the market prices and timing of the purchase and sale of our inventories. Generally, during periods when commodity prices are rising, our agribusiness operations require increased use of cash to support working capital to acquire inventories and fund daily settlement requirements on exchange traded futures that we use to minimize price risk related to our inventories. With an already tight global supply/demand balance in the first six months of 2012 made even tighter by a severe U.S. drought, market prices of key agricultural commodities, particularly corn and soybeans, rose further in July from levels already at or near historical highs in June. This price environment continues to increase our working capital funding requirements and consequently our debt levels have risen as well.

44

Table of Contents

For the six months ended June 30, 2012, our cash and cash equivalents decreased by $368 million, reflecting the net effect of cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities. This compares to a decrease of $108 million in cash and cash equivalents for the six months ended June 30, 2011.

Cash used for operating activities was $2,699 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to cash generated of $264 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The cash flow used from operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2012 was principally due to higher working capital requirements, partially offset by net income. The positive cash flow from operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2011 was primarily due to net income.

Certain of our operating subsidiaries are funded with U.S. dollar-denominated debt. The functional currency of our operating subsidiaries is generally the local currency and the financial statements are calculated in the functional currency and translated into U.S. dollars. These U.S. dollar-denominated loans are remeasured into their respective functional currencies at exchange rates at the applicable balance sheet date. The resulting gain or loss is included in our condensed consolidated statements of income as a foreign exchange gain or loss. For the six months ended June 30, 2012 and June 30, 2011, we had gains of $49 million and $78 million, respectively, on debt denominated in U.S. dollars at our subsidiaries, which were included as adjustments to reconcile net income to cash used for operating activities in the line item “Foreign exchange loss (gain) on debt” in our condensed consolidated statements of cash flows. This adjustment is required because the cash flow impacts of these gains or losses are recognized as financing activities when the subsidiary repays the underlying U.S. dollar-denominated debt and therefore have no impact on cash flows from operations.

Cash used for investing activities was $283 million in the six months ended June 30, 2012, compared to cash used of $440 million in the six months ended June 30, 2011. During the first six months of 2012, we acquired an edible oils and fats business in India for $94 million net of cash acquired consisting of $77 million in cash and debt acquired of $17 million. In addition, we acquired an asset management company for $9 million net of cash acquired, a controlling interest in a North American wheat milling business for $102 million net of cash acquired, intellectual property assets for $22 million and sugarcane milling related biological assets and equipment for $61 million. We also entered into joint ventures and acquired other investments totalling $89 million. Cash used during the six months ended June 30, 2012 was net of $448 million proceeds received from the sale of our interest in Solae, a soy ingredients joint venture. We also received a special cash dividend of $35 million from Solae in connection with the sale of our investment. Payments made for capital expenditures of $473 million in the six months ended June 30, 2012 primarily included investments in property, plant and equipment related to the expansion of our sugar business in Brazil, investments in an edible oil refining and packaging facility in the U.S. and construction of a refining facility in India. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, we paid $100 million to acquire a port facility in Ukraine, $8 million related to the formation of a joint venture to purchase a fertilizer storage terminal in the U.S. and entered into a joint venture to construct a grain elevator in the U.S. for $3 million. In addition, we received $16 million from the sale of a cost method investment in Russia and $54 million for the sale of our investment in a European oilseed processing facility joint venture.

Our financing activities generated cash of $2,664 million in the six months ended June 30, 2012, compared to cash generated of $58 million in the six months ended June 30, 2011. In the six months ended June 30, 2012, we had a net increase of $2,743 million in borrowings due to higher working capital requirements, largely related to higher commodity prices. In the six months ended June 30, 2011, we had a net increase of $99 million in borrowings due to higher working capital. Dividends paid to our common and preferred shareholders in the six months ended June 30, 2012 and June 30, 2011 were $89 million and $85 million, respectively.

Trade Receivable Securitization Program — Our trade receivable securitization program entered into in June 2011, provides us with an additional source of liquidity. The program provides funding for up to $700 million against receivables sold into the program. The securitization program terminates on June 1, 2016. However, each committed purchaser’s commitment to fund trade receivables sold under the securitization program will terminate on May 29, 2013 unless extended for additional 364-day periods in accordance with the terms of the receivables transfer agreement.

45

Table of Contents

Brazilian Farmer Credit

Background — We advance funds to farmers, primarily in Brazil, through secured advances to suppliers and prepaid commodity purchase contracts. We also sell fertilizer to farmers, primarily in Brazil, on credit as described below.

Because Brazilian farmer credit exposures are denominated in local currency, reported values are impacted by movements in the value of the Brazilian real when translated into U.S. dollars. From December 31, 2011 to June 30, 2012, the Brazilian real depreciated by 8%, decreasing the reported farmer credit exposure balances when translated into U.S. dollars.

Brazilian Fertilizer Trade Accounts Receivable — In our Brazilian fertilizer operations, customer accounts receivable are intended to be short-term in nature, and are expected to be repaid either in cash or through delivery to Bunge of agricultural commodities when the related crop is harvested. As the farmer’s cash flow is seasonal and is typically generated after the crop is harvested, the actual due dates of the accounts receivable are individually determined based upon when a farmer purchases our fertilizer and the anticipated date for the harvest and sale of the farmer’s crop. These receivables may also be secured by the farmer’s crop. We initiate legal proceedings against customers to collect amounts owed which are in default. In some cases, we have renegotiated amounts that were in legal proceedings to secure the subsequent year’s crop.

In addition to our fertilizer trade accounts receivable, we issue guarantees to third parties in Brazil relating to amounts owed these third parties by certain of our customers. These guarantees are discussed under the heading “Guarantees”.

The table below details our Brazilian fertilizer trade accounts receivable balances and the related allowances for doubtful accounts as of the dates indicated:

|  | June 30, |  | December 31, |
(US$ in millions, except percentages) |  | 2012 |  | 2011 |
Trade accounts receivable (current) |  | $ | 154 |  | $ | 178 |
Allowance for doubtful accounts (current) |  | 1 |  | 1 |
Trade accounts receivable (non-current) (1) (2) |  | 201 |  | 230 |
Allowance for doubtful accounts (non-current) (1) |  | 128 |  | 129 |
Total trade accounts receivable (current and non-current) |  | 355 |  | 408 |
Total allowance for doubtful accounts (current and non-current) |  | 129 |  | 130 |
Total allowance for doubtful accounts as a percentage of total trade accounts receivable |  | 36 | % | 32 | %

(1) Included in other non-current assets in the condensed consolidated balance sheets.

(2) Includes certain amounts related to defaults on customer financing guarantees.

Secured Advances to Suppliers and Prepaid Commodity Contracts — We purchase soybeans through prepaid commodity purchase contracts (advance cash payments to suppliers against contractual obligations to deliver specified quantities of soybeans in the future) and secured advances to suppliers (advances to suppliers against commitments to deliver soybeans in the future), primarily in Brazil. These financing arrangements are typically secured by the farmer’s future crop and mortgages on the farmer’s land, buildings and equipment, and are generally settled after the farmer’s crop is harvested and sold.

Interest earned on secured advances to suppliers of $5 million and $13 million and $5 million and $12 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, is included in net sales in the condensed consolidated statements of income.

The table below shows details of prepaid commodity contracts and secured advances to suppliers outstanding at our Brazilian operations as of the dates indicated. See Note 5 and Note 8 of the notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements for more information.

46

Table of Contents

|  | June 30, |  | December 31, |
(US$ in millions) |  | 2012 |  | 2011 |
Prepaid commodity contracts |  | $ | 726 |  | $ | 180 |
Secured advances to suppliers (current) |  | 329 |  | 349 |
Total (current) |  | 1,055 |  | 529 |
Soybeans not yet priced (1) |  | (13 | ) | (346 | )
Net |  | 1,042 |  | 183 |
Secured advances to suppliers (non-current) |  | 222 |  | 253 |
Total (current and non-current) |  | $ | 1,264 |  | $ | 436 |
Allowance for uncollectible advances (current and non-current) |  | $ | (75 | ) | $ | (73 | )

(1) Soybeans delivered by suppliers that are yet to be priced are reflected at prevailing market prices at June 30, 2012.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Guarantees - We have issued or were a party to the following guarantees at June 30, 2012:

|  | Maximum |
|  | Potential |
|  | Future |
(US$ in millions) |  | Payments |
Customer financing (1) |  | $ | 38 |
Unconsolidated affiliates financing (2) |  | 25 |
Residual value guarantee (3) |  | 69 |
Total |  | $ | 132 |

(1) We have issued guarantees to third parties in Brazil related to amounts owed to these third parties by certain of our customers. The terms of the guarantees are equal to the terms of the related financing arrangements, which are generally one year or less, with the exception of guarantees issued under certain Brazilian government programs, primarily from 2006 and 2007, where terms are up to five years. In the event that the customers default on their payments to the third parties and we would be required to perform under the guarantees, we have obtained collateral from the customers. At June 30, 2012, we had approximately $25 million of tangible property that had been pledged as collateral against certain of these refinancing arrangements. We evaluate the likelihood of customer repayments of the amounts due under these guarantees based upon an expected loss analysis and record the fair value of such guarantees as an obligation in our condensed consolidated financial statements. Bunge’s recorded obligation related to these outstanding guarantees was $15 million at June 30, 2012.

(2) We issued guarantees to certain financial institutions related to debt of certain of our unconsolidated joint ventures. The terms of the guarantees are equal to the terms of the related financings which have maturity dates in 2012, 2014 and 2017. There are no recourse provisions or collateral that would enable us to recover any amounts paid under these guarantees. At June 30, 2012, Bunge had no outstanding obligation related to these guarantees.

(3) Bunge issued guarantees to certain financial institutions which are party to certain operating lease arrangements for railcars and barges. These guarantees provide for a minimum residual value to be received by the lessor at the conclusion of the lease term. These leases expire in 2018. At June 30, 2012, Bunge’s recorded obligation related to these guarantees was $5 million.

In addition, Bunge Limited has provided full and unconditional parent level guarantees of the indebtedness outstanding under certain senior credit facilities and senior notes entered into or issued by its 100% owned subsidiaries. At June 30, 2012, debt with a carrying amount of $5,432 million related to these guarantees is included in our condensed consolidated balance sheet. This debt includes the senior notes issued by two of our 100% owned finance subsidiaries, Bunge Limited Finance Corp. and Bunge N.A. Finance L.P. There are no significant restrictions on the ability of Bunge Limited Finance Corp., Bunge N.A. Finance L.P. or any other of our subsidiaries to transfer funds to Bunge Limited.

Dividends

We paid a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.25 per share on June 4, 2012 to common shareholders of record on May 21, 2012. In addition, we paid a quarterly dividend of $1.21875 per share on our cumulative convertible perpetual preference shares on June 1, 2012 to shareholders of record on May 15, 2012. On May 24, 2012, we announced that our Board of Directors had approved a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.27 per

47

Table of Contents

common share. The dividend will be payable on September 4, 2012 to common shareholders of record on August 21, 2012. We also announced on May 24, 2012 that we will pay a quarterly cash dividend of $1.21875 per share on our cumulative convertible perpetual preference shares on September 1, 2012 to shareholders of record on August 15, 2012.

Critical Accounting Policies

Critical accounting policies are defined as those policies that are both important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations and require management to exercise significant judgment. For a complete discussion of our accounting policies, see our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. There were no material changes to Bunge’s critical accounting policies during the six months ended June 30, 2012.

Adoption of New Accounting Pronouncements— In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) amended the guidance in ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurement. This guidance is intended to result in convergence between U.S. GAAP and IFRS requirements for measurement of, and disclosures about, fair value. The amendment clarifies or changes certain fair value measurement principles and enhances the disclosure requirements particularly for Level 3 fair value measurements. The adoption of this standard on January 1, 2012 did not have a material impact on Bunge’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Risk Management

As a result of our global operating and financing activities, we are exposed to changes in, among other things, agricultural commodity prices, transportation costs, foreign currency exchange rates, interest rates and energy costs which may affect our results of operations and financial position. We actively monitor and manage these various market risks associated with our business activities. Our risk management decisions take place in various locations but exposure limits are centrally set and monitored. We have a corporate risk management group which analyzes and monitors various risk exposures globally. Additionally, our Board of Directors’ finance and risk policy committee oversees and reviews our overall risk management policies and limits.

We use derivative instruments for the purpose of managing the exposures associated with commodity prices, transportation costs, foreign currency exchange rates, interest rates and energy costs and for positioning our overall portfolio relative to expected market movements in accordance with established policies and procedures. We enter into derivative instruments primarily with major financial institutions, commodity exchanges in the case of commodity futures and options, or approved exchange clearing shipping companies in the case of ocean freight. While these derivative instruments are subject to fluctuations in value, for hedged exposures those fluctuations are generally offset by the changes in fair value of the underlying exposures. The derivative instruments that we use for hedging purposes are intended to reduce the volatility on our results of operations, however, they can occasionally result in earnings volatility, which may be material. See Note 11 of the notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for a more detailed discussion of the derivative instruments that we used.

Credit and Counterparty Risk

Through our normal business activities, we are subject to significant credit and counterparty risks that arise through normal commercial sales and purchases, including forward commitments to buy or sell, and through various other over-the-counter (OTC) derivative instruments that we utilize to manage risks inherent in our business activities. We define credit and counterparty risk as a potential financial loss due to the failure of a counterparty to honor its obligations. The exposure is measured based upon several factors, including unpaid accounts receivable from counterparties and unrealized gains from OTC derivative instruments (including forward purchase and sale contracts). Credit and counterparty risk also includes sovereign credit risk. We actively monitor credit and counterparty risk through credit analysis by local credit staffs and review by various local and corporate committees which monitor counterparty performance. We record provisions for counterparty losses from time to time as a result of our credit and counterparty analysis.

During periods of tight conditions in global credit markets, downturns in regional or global economic conditions, and/or significant price volatility, credit and counterparty risks are heightened. This increased risk is

48

Table of Contents

monitored through, among other things, increased communication with key counterparties, management reviews and specific focus on counterparties or groups of counterparties that we may determine as high risk. In addition, we have limited new credit extensions in certain cases and reduced our use of nonexchange-cleared derivative instruments.

Commodities Risk

We operate in many areas of the food industry, from agricultural raw materials to the production and sale of branded food ingredients. As a result, we purchase and produce various materials, many of which are agricultural commodities, including soybeans, soybean oil, soybean meal, softseeds (including sunflower seed, rapeseed and canola) and related oil and meal derived from them, wheat and corn. In addition, we grow and purchase sugarcane to produce sugar, ethanol and electricity. Agricultural commodities are subject to price fluctuations due to a number of unpredictable factors that may create price risk. As described above, we are also subject to the risk of counterparty non-performance under forward purchase or sale contracts. From time-to-time, we have experienced instances of counterparty non-performance, including as a result of significant declines in counterparty profitability under these contracts due to significant movements in commodity prices between the time the contracts were executed and the contractual forward delivery period.

We enter into various derivative contracts with the primary objective of managing our exposure to adverse price movements in the agricultural commodities used and produced in our business operations. We have established policies that limit the amount of unhedged fixed price agricultural commodity positions permissible for our operating companies, which are generally a combination of volume and value-at-risk (VaR) limits. We measure and review our net commodities position on a daily basis.

Our daily net agricultural commodity position consists of inventory, forward purchase and sale contracts, over-the-counter and exchange traded derivative instruments, including those used to hedge portions of our production requirements. The fair value of that position is a summation of the fair values calculated for each agricultural commodity by valuing all of our commodity positions at quoted market prices for the period where available or utilizing a close proxy. VaR is calculated on the net position and monitored at the 95% and 99% confidence intervals. In addition, scenario analysis and stress testing are performed. For example, one measure of market risk is estimated as the potential loss in fair value resulting from a hypothetical 10% adverse change in prices. The results of this analysis, which may differ from actual results, are as follows:

|  | Six Months Ended |  | Year Ended |
|  | June 30, 2012 |  | December 31, 2011 |
|  |  |  | Market |  |  |  | Market |
(US$ in millions) |  | Fair Value |  | Risk |  | Fair Value |  | Risk |
Highest long position |  | $ | 1,720 |  | $ | 172 |  | $ | 1,993 |  | $ | (199 | )
Highest short position |  | (149 | ) | (15 | ) | (551 | ) | (55 | )

Ocean Freight Risk

Ocean freight represents a significant portion of our operating costs. The market price for ocean freight varies depending on the supply and demand for ocean vessels, global economic conditions and other factors. We enter into time charter agreements for time on ocean freight vessels based on forecasted requirements for the purpose of transporting agricultural commodities. Our time charter agreements generally have terms ranging from two months to approximately five years. We use financial derivatives, generally freight forward agreements, to hedge portions of our ocean freight costs. The ocean freight derivatives are included in other current assets and other current liabilities on the condensed consolidated balance sheets at fair value.

Energy Risk

We purchase various energy commodities such as bunker fuel, electricity and natural gas that are used to operate our manufacturing facilities and ocean freight vessels. The energy commodities are subject to price risk. We use financial derivatives, including exchange traded and OTC swaps and options for various purposes, including to manage our exposure to volatility in energy costs. These energy derivatives are included in other current assets and other current liabilities on the condensed consolidated balance sheets at fair value.

49

Table of Contents

Currency Risk

Our global operations require active participation in foreign exchange markets. Our primary foreign currency exposures are the Brazilian real, the Euro and other European currencies, the Argentine peso and the Chinese yuan/renminbi. To reduce the risk arising from foreign exchange rate fluctuations, we enter into derivative instruments, such as forward contracts and swaps, and foreign currency options. The changes in market value of such contracts have a high correlation to the price changes in the related currency exposures. The potential loss in fair value for such net currency position resulting from a hypothetical 10% adverse change in foreign currency exchange rates as of June 30, 2012 was not material.

When determining our exposure, we exclude intercompany loans that are deemed to be permanently invested. The repayments of permanently invested intercompany loans are not planned or anticipated in the foreseeable future and therefore are treated as analogous to equity for accounting purposes. As a result, the foreign exchange gains and losses on these borrowings are excluded from the determination of net income and recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the condensed consolidated balance sheets. Included in other comprehensive income (loss) are foreign exchange losses of $266 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and $548 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 related to permanently invested intercompany loans.

Interest Rate Risk

We have debt in fixed and floating rate instruments. We are exposed to market risk due to changes in interest rates. We may enter into interest rate swap agreements to manage our interest rate exposure related to our debt portfolio.

The aggregate fair value of our short and long-term debt, based on market yields at June 30, 2012, was $7,240 million with a carrying value of $6,894 million. There was no significant change in our interest rate risk at June 30, 2012.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures — As of June 30, 2012 we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as that term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the fiscal quarter covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Internal Control Over Financial Reporting — In connection with the restructuring and consolidation of Bunge’s operations in Brazil and related commercial, organizational and personnel changes, management has been and continues to review and, in some cases, implement new or enhanced systems and procedures that have led, or are expected to lead, to changes in internal control over financial reporting in Bunge’s Brazilian operations.

Except as described above, there has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the first fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2012 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

50

Table of Contents

PART II.
INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

The Argentine tax authorities have been conducting a review of income and other taxes paid by exporters and processors of cereals and other agricultural commodities in the country. In that regard, in October 2010, the Argentine tax authorities carried out inspections at several of our locations in Argentina relating to allegations of income tax evasion covering the periods from 2007 to 2009. In July 2011, we received a preliminary income tax audit report from the Argentine tax authorities relating to fiscal years 2006 and 2007 with an estimated claim of approximately $100 million. Additionally, in April 2011, the Argentine tax authorities conducted inspections of our locations and those of several other grain exporters with respect to allegations of evasion of liability for value-added taxes and an inquest proceeding has been initiated in the first quarter of 2012 to determine whether there is any potential criminal culpability relating to these matters. Also during 2011, we paid $112 million of accrued export tax obligations in Argentina under protest while reserving all of our rights in respect of such payment. In the first quarter of 2012, the Argentine tax authorities assessed Bunge interest on these paid export taxes in an amount totaling approximately $80 million. We believe that these allegations and claims are without merit and intend to vigorously defend ourself against them. However, management is, at this time, unable to predict their outcome.

From time-to-time, we are involved in litigation that we consider to be ordinary and incidental to our business. While the outcome of pending legal actions cannot be predicted with certainty, we believe the outcome of these proceedings, net of established reserves, will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing our Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

None.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

(a) The exhibits in the accompanying Exhibit Index on page E-1 are filed or furnished as part of this Quarterly Report.

51

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

| BUNGE LIMITED
Date: August 1, 2012 | By: | /s/ ANDREW J. BURKE
|  | Andrew J. Burke
|  | Chief Financial Officer and Global Operational Excellence Officer
|  | /s/ KAREN D. ROEBUCK
|  | Karen D. Roebuck
|  | Controller and Principal
|  | Accounting Officer

S-1

Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX

10.1 |  | First Amendment to Receivables Transfer Agreement, dated May 24, 2012, among Bunge Securitization B.V., as Seller, Bunge Finance B.V., as Master Servicer, the persons from time to time party thereto as Conduit Purchasers, the persons from time to time party thereto as Committed Purchasers, the persons from time to time party thereto as Purchaser Agents, Coöperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank B.A., as Administrative and Purchaser Agent, and Bunge Limited, as Performance Undertaking Provider
10.2 |  | First Amendment to Performance and Indemnity Agreement, dated May 24, 2012, between Bunge Limited, as Performance Undertaking Provider and Coöperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank B.A., as Administrative Agent
10.3 |  | First Amendment to U.S. Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated June 15, 2012, among Bunge North America, Inc., Bunge Oils, Inc., Bunge North America (East), LLC, Bunge Milling, Inc., Bunge North America (OPD West), Inc., each as a Seller, respectively, Bunge Finance B.V., as Seller Agent, and Bunge North America Capital, Inc., as the Buyer
10.4 |  | First Amendment to U.S. Intermediate Transfer Agreement, dated June 15, 2012, among Bunge North America Capital, Inc., as the Transferor, Bunge Finance B.V., as the Transferor Agent, and Bunge Securitization B.V., as the Transferee
31.1 |  | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002
31.2 |  | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002
32.1 |  | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002
32.2 |  | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002
101 |  | The following financial information from Bunge Limited’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012 formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income, (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) (iii) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iv) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, (v) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity, and (vi) the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.*

* | Users of this interactive data file are advised pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T that this interactive data file is deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, is deemed not filed for purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.

E-1