Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2013

OR

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number 001-16625

BUNGE LIMITED

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Bermuda |  | 98-0231912
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |  | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
50 Main Street, White Plains, New York |  | 10606
(Address of principal executive offices) |  | (Zip Code)

(914) 684-2800
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer x |  | Accelerated filer o |  | Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |  | Smaller reporting company o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Yes o No x

As of October 30, 2013 the number of shares issued of the registrant was:

Common shares, par value $.01 per share: 147,607,510

Table of Contents

BUNGE LIMITED

TABLE OF CONTENTS

|  | Page
PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
Item 1. | Financial Statements (Unaudited) |
| Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 | 2
| Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 | 3
| Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 | 4
| Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 | 5
| Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity and Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 | 6
| Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | 7
| Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements | 32
Item 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 32
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | 49
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures | 51
PART II — INFORMATION |
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings | 51
Item 1A. | Risk Factors | 52
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds | 52
Item 3. | Defaults upon Senior Securities | 52
Item 4. | Mine Safety Disclosures | 52
Item 5. | Other Information | 52
Item 6. | Exhibits | 52
Signatures | 53
Exhibit Index | E-1

Table of Contents

PART I— FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

BUNGE LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(Unaudited)

(U.S. dollars in millions, except per share data)

|  | Three Months Ended |  | Nine Months Ended |
|  | September 30, |  | September 30, |
|  | 2013 |  | 2012 |  | 2013 |  | 2012 |
Net sales |  | $ | 14,701 |  | $ | 16,543 |  | $ | 44,972 |  | $ | 43,951 |
Cost of goods sold |  | (14,013 | ) | (15,700 | ) | (43,022 | ) | (41,928 | )
Gross profit |  | 688 |  | 843 |  | 1,950 |  | 2,023 |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |  | (382 | ) | (396 | ) | (1,116 | ) | (1,163 | )
Interest income |  | 27 |  | 5 |  | 47 |  | 43 |
Interest expense |  | (103 | ) | (77 | ) | (264 | ) | (214 | )
Foreign exchange gain (loss) |  | 49 |  | 15 |  | 7 |  | 86 |
Other income (expense) — net |  | 16 |  | (9 | ) | 61 |  | (10 | )
Gain on sale of investment in affiliate |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | 85 |
Gain on acquisition of controlling interest |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | 36 |
Income from continuing operations before income tax |  | 295 |  | 381 |  | 685 |  | 886 |
Income tax expense |  | (591 | ) | (82 | ) | (702 | ) | (197 | )
Income (loss) from continuing operations |  | (296 | ) | 299 |  | (17 | ) | 689 |
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax (including pre-tax gain on disposal of $148 million in 2013) (Note 4) |  | 103 |  | 2 |  | 94 |  | (33 | )
Net income (loss) |  | (193 | ) | 301 |  | 77 |  | 656 |
Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests |  | 45 |  | (4 | ) | 91 |  | 7 |
Net income (loss) attributable to Bunge |  | (148 | ) | 297 |  | 168 |  | 663 |
Convertible preference share dividends and other obligations |  | (17 | ) | (8 | ) | (53 | ) | (25 | )
Net income (loss) available to Bunge common shareholders |  | $ | (165 | ) | $ | 289 |  | $ | 115 |  | $ | 638 |
Earnings per common share—basic (Note 17) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Net income (loss) from continuing operations |  | $ | (1.82 | ) | $ | 1.96 |  | $ | 0.14 |  | $ | 4.59 |
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations |  | 0.69 |  | 0.01 |  | 0.64 |  | (0.22 | )
Net income (loss) attributable to Bunge common shareholders |  | $ | (1.13 | ) | $ | 1.97 |  | $ | 0.78 |  | $ | 4.37 |
Earnings per common share—diluted (Note 17) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Net income (loss) from continuing operations |  | $ | (1.82 | ) | $ | 1.91 |  | $ | 0.14 |  | $ | 4.50 |
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations |  | 0.69 |  | 0.01 |  | 0.64 |  | $ | (0.21 | )
Net income (loss) attributable to Bunge common shareholders |  | $ | (1.13 | ) | $ | 1.92 |  | $ | 0.78 |  | $ | 4.29 |
Dividends per common share |  | $ | 0.30 |  | $ | 0.27 |  | $ | 0.87 |  | $ | 0.79 |

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

2

Table of Contents

BUNGE LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

(Unaudited)

(U.S. dollars in millions)

|  | Three Months Ended |  | Nine Months Ended |
|  | September 30, |  | September 30, |
|  | 2013 |  | 2012 |  | 2013 |  | 2012 |
Net income (loss) |  | $ | (193 | ) | $ | 301 |  | $ | 77 |  | $ | 656 |
Other comprehensive income (loss): |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Foreign exchange translation adjustment |  | (77 | ) | 67 |  | (835 | ) | (731 | )
Unrealized gains (losses) on foreign exchange contracts designated as cash flow or net investment hedges, net of tax (expense) benefit of nil and $6 in 2013, $(10) and $(2) in 2012 |  | (28 | ) | 19 |  | (2 | ) | 3 |
Unrealized gains (losses) on investments, net of tax (expense) benefit of nil and $(2) in 2013, $1 and $(5) in 2012 |  | — |  | (2 | ) | 4 |  | 9 |
Reclassification of realized net losses (gains) to net income, net of tax expense (benefit) of $(6) and $(5) in 2013, $(11) and $(11) in 2012 |  | (37 | ) | 1 |  | (40 | ) | 22 |
Pension adjustment, net of tax (expense) benefit of nil and $(1) in 2013, nil in 2012 |  | (1 | ) | — |  | 1 |  | 1 |
Total other comprehensive income (loss) |  | (143 | ) | 85 |  | (872 | ) | (696 | )
Total comprehensive income (loss) |  | (336 | ) | 386 |  | (795 | ) | (40 | )
Less: comprehensive (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests |  | 37 |  | (32 | ) | 83 |  | 5 |
Total comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Bunge |  | $ | (299 | ) | $ | 354 |  | $ | (712 | ) | $ | (35 | )

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

Table of Contents

BUNGE LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)

(U.S. dollars in millions, except share data)

|  | September 30, |  | December 31, |
|  | 2013 |  | 2012 |
ASSETS |  |  |  |  |
Current assets: |  |  |  |  |
Cash and cash equivalents |  | $ | 1,482 |  | $ | 569 |
Time deposits under trade structured finance program (Note 5) |  | 4,596 |  | 3,048 |
Trade accounts receivable (less allowances of $114 and $125) (Note 13) |  | 2,337 |  | 2,471 |
Inventories (Note 6) |  | 5,886 |  | 6,590 |
Deferred income taxes |  | 118 |  | 108 |
Current assets held for sale (Note 4) |  | — |  | 660 |
Other current assets (Note 7) |  | 5,024 |  | 3,818 |
Total current assets |  | 19,443 |  | 17,264 |
Property, plant and equipment, net |  | 5,859 |  | 5,888 |
Goodwill |  | 331 |  | 351 |
Other intangible assets, net |  | 296 |  | 295 |
Investments in affiliates |  | 276 |  | 273 |
Deferred income taxes |  | 689 |  | 1,213 |
Non-current assets held for sale (Note 4) |  | 38 |  | 250 |
Other non-current assets (Note 8) |  | 1,568 |  | 1,746 |
Total assets |  | $ | 28,500 |  | $ | 27,280 |
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |  |  |  |  |
Current liabilities: |  |  |  |  |
Short-term debt |  | $ | 2,040 |  | $ | 1,598 |
Current portion of long-term debt (Note 12) |  | 876 |  | 719 |
Letter of credit obligations under trade structured finance program (Note 5) |  | 4,596 |  | 3,048 |
Trade accounts payable |  | 3,415 |  | 3,319 |
Deferred income taxes |  | 169 |  | 86 |
Current liabilities held for sale (Note 4) |  | — |  | 297 |
Other current liabilities (Note 10) |  | 3,020 |  | 2,494 |
Total current liabilities |  | 14,116 |  | 11,561 |
Long-term debt (Note 12) |  | 3,169 |  | 3,532 |
Deferred income taxes |  | 71 |  | 84 |
Non-current liabilities held for sale (Note 4) |  | — |  | 13 |
Other non-current liabilities |  | 813 |  | 797 |
Commitments and contingencies (Note 15) |  |  |  |  |
Redeemable noncontrolling interests |  | 33 |  | 38 |
Equity (Note 16): |  |  |  |  |
Convertible perpetual preference shares, par value $.01; authorized, issued and outstanding: 2013 and 2012 — 6,900,000 shares (liquidation preference $100 per share) |  | 690 |  | 690 |
Common shares, par value $.01; authorized — 400,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding: 2013 — 147,493,014 shares, 2012 — 146,348,499 shares |  | 1 |  | 1 |
Additional paid-in capital |  | 4,945 |  | 4,909 |
Retained earnings |  | 6,807 |  | 6,792 |
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (Note 16) |  | (2,290 | ) | (1,410 | )
Treasury shares, at cost - 1,933,286 shares |  | (120 | ) | (120 | )
Total Bunge shareholders’ equity |  | 10,033 |  | 10,862 |
Noncontrolling interests |  | 265 |  | 393 |
Total equity |  | 10,298 |  | 11,255 |
Total liabilities and equity |  | $ | 28,500 |  | $ | 27,280 |

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

Table of Contents

BUNGE LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

(U.S. dollars in millions)

|  | Nine Months Ended |
|  | September 30, |
|  | 2013 |  | 2012 |
OPERATING ACTIVITIES |  |  |  |  |
Net income |  | $ | 77 |  | $ | 656 |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by (used for) operating activities: |  |  |  |  |
Gain on sale of Brazilian fertilizer distribution business |  | (148 | ) | — |
Gain on sale of investment in affiliate |  | — |  | (85 | )
Gain on acquisition of controlling interest |  | — |  | (36 | )
Foreign exchange loss (gain) on debt |  | 43 |  | (75 | )
Bad debt expense |  | 19 |  | 40 |
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |  | 423 |  | 414 |
Stock-based compensation expense |  | 34 |  | 44 |
Deferred income taxes |  | 533 |  | (54 | )
Other, net |  | 22 |  | 46 |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, excluding the effects of acquisitions: |  |  |  |  |
Trade accounts receivable |  | 35 |  | (1,233 | )
Inventories |  | 182 |  | (2,665 | )
Prepayments and advances to suppliers |  | (442 | ) | (395 | )
Trade accounts payable and accrued liabilities |  | 286 |  | 947 |
Net unrealized gain/loss on derivative contracts |  | (119 | ) | (79 | )
Margin deposits |  | (100 | ) | (53 | )
Other, net |  | 53 |  | (344 | )
Cash provided by (used for) operating activities |  | 898 |  | (2,872 | )
INVESTING ACTIVITIES |  |  |  |  |
Payments made for capital expenditures |  | (720 | ) | (667 | )
Acquisitions of businesses (net of cash acquired) |  | (11 | ) | (287 | )
Proceeds from investments |  | 72 |  | 53 |
Payments for investments |  | (43 | ) | (40 | )
Proceeds from the sale of Brazilian fertilizer distribution business |  | 750 |  | — |
Proceeds from sale of investment in affiliate |  | — |  | 483 |
Payments for investments in affiliates |  | (26 | ) | (111 | )
Other, net |  | 120 |  | 43 |
Cash provided by (used for) investing activities |  | 142 |  | (526 | )
FINANCING ACTIVITIES |  |  |  |  |
Net change in short-term debt with maturities of 90 days or less |  | 106 |  | 1,751 |
Proceeds from short-term debt with maturities greater than 90 days |  | 755 |  | 1,421 |
Repayments of short-term debt with maturities greater than 90 days |  | (630 | ) | (491 | )
Proceeds from long-term debt |  | 4,784 |  | 4,505 |
Repayments of long-term debt |  | (4,933 | ) | (3,761 | )
Proceeds from sale of common shares |  | 26 |  | 13 |
Dividends paid |  | (149 | ) | (138 | )
Return of capital to noncontrolling interests |  | (50 | ) | — |
Other, net |  | (4 | ) | (2 | )
Cash provided by (used for) financing activities |  | (95 | ) | 3,298 |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |  | (32 | ) | (45 | )
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |  | 913 |  | (145 | )
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |  | 569 |  | 835 |
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |  | $ | 1,482 |  | $ | 690 |

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

5

Table of Contents

BUNGE LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY AND REDEEMABLE NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS

(Unaudited)

(U.S. dollars in millions, except share data)

|  |  |  |  | Convertible |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Accumulated |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  | Redeemable |  |  | Preference |  |  |  |  |  | Additional |  |  |  | Other |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  | Noncontrolling |  |  | Shares |  | Common Shares |  | Paid-in |  | Retained |  | Comprehensive |  | Treasury |  | Noncontrolling |  | Total |
|  | Interests |  |  | Shares |  | Amount |  | Shares |  | Amount |  | Capital |  | Earnings |  | Income (Loss) |  | Shares |  | Interests |  | Equity |
Balance, January 1, 2012 |  | $ | — |  |  | 6,900,000 |  | $ | 690 |  | 145,610,029 |  | $ | 1 |  | $ | 4,829 |  | $ | 6,917 |  | $ | (610 | ) | $ | (120 | ) | $ | 368 |  | $ | 12,075 |
Net income (loss) |  | (2 | ) |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | 663 |  | — |  | — |  | (7 | ) | 656 |
Other comprehensive income (loss) |  | — |  |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | (696 | ) | — |  | 2 |  | (694 | )
Dividends on common shares |  | — |  |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | (115 | ) | — |  | — |  | — |  | (115 | )
Dividends on preference shares |  | — |  |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | (25 | ) | — |  | — |  | — |  | (25 | )
Dividends to noncontrolling interests on subsidiary common stock |  | — |  |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | (6 | ) | (6 | )
Capital contributions from noncontrolling interests |  | 1 |  |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | 11 |  | 11 |
Noncontrolling interest at acquisition |  | 48 |  |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | 40 |  | 40 |
Stock-based compensation expense |  | — |  |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | 44 |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | 44 |
Issuance of common shares |  | — |  |  | — |  | — |  | 498,573 |  | — |  | 23 |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | 23 |
Balance, September 30, 2012 |  | $ | 47 |  |  | 6,900,000 |  | $ | 690 |  | 146,108,602 |  | $ | 1 |  | $ | 4,896 |  | $ | 7,440 |  | $ | (1,306 | ) | $ | (120 | ) | $ | 408 |  | $ | 12,009 |

|  |  |  |  | Convertible |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Accumulated |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  | Redeemable |  |  | Preference |  |  |  |  |  | Additional |  |  |  | Other |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  | Noncontrolling |  |  | Shares |  | Common Shares |  | Paid-in |  | Retained |  | Comprehensive |  | Treasury |  | Noncontrolling |  | Total |
|  | Interests |  |  | Shares |  | Amount |  | Shares |  | Amount |  | Capital |  | Earnings |  | Income (Loss) |  | Shares |  | Interests |  | Equity |
Balance, January 1, 2013 |  | $ | 38 |  |  | 6,900,000 |  | $ | 690 |  | 146,348,499 |  | $ | 1 |  | $ | 4,909 |  | $ | 6,792 |  | $ | (1,410 | ) | $ | (120 | ) | $ | 393 |  | $ | 11,255 |
Net income (loss) |  | (33 | ) |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | 168 |  | — |  | — |  | (91 | ) | 77 |
Accretion of noncontrolling interests |  | 28 |  |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | (28 | ) | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | (28 | )
Other comprehensive income (loss) |  | — |  |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | (880 | ) | — |  | 8 |  | (872 | )
Dividends on common shares |  | — |  |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | (128 | ) | — |  | — |  | — |  | (128 | )
Dividends on preference shares |  | — |  |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | (25 | ) | — |  | — |  | — |  | (25 | )
Dividends to noncontrolling interests on subsidiary common stock |  | — |  |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | (3 | ) | (3 | )
Return of capital to noncontrolling interests |  | — |  |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | (8 | ) | — |  | — |  | — |  | (42 | ) | (50 | )
Reversal of uncertain tax positions |  | — |  |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | 12 |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | 12 |
Stock-based compensation expense |  | — |  |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | 34 |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | 34 |
Issuance of common shares |  | — |  |  | — |  | — |  | 1,144,515 |  | — |  | 26 |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | 26 |
Balance, September 30, 2013 |  | $ | 33 |  |  | 6,900,000 |  | $ | 690 |  | 147,493,014 |  | $ | 1 |  | $ | 4,945 |  | $ | 6,807 |  | $ | (2,290 | ) | $ | (120 | ) | $ | 265 |  | $ | 10,298 |

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

6

Table of Contents

BUNGE LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Bunge Limited (Bunge), its subsidiaries and variable interest entities (VIEs) in which it is considered the primary beneficiary, and as a result, include the assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses of all entities over which Bunge exercises control. The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) for interim financial information and the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) rules. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation have been included. The condensed consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2012 has been derived from Bunge’s audited consolidated financial statements at that date. Operating results for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the year ending December 31, 2013. The financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2012, forming part of Bunge’s 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 1, 2013.

Equity investments in which Bunge has the ability to exercise significant influence but does not control are accounted for by the equity method of accounting. Investments in which Bunge does not exercise significant influence are accounted for by the cost method of accounting. Intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated. Bunge consolidates VIEs in which it is considered the primary beneficiary and reconsiders such conclusion at each reporting period. An enterprise is determined to be the primary beneficiary if it has a controlling financial interest under GAAP, defined as (a) the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’s business and (b) the obligation to absorb losses of or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE’s operations. Performance of that analysis requires the exercise of judgment. Where Bunge has an interest in an entity that has qualified for the deferral of the consolidation rules, it follows consolidation rules prior to January 1, 2010. Bunge’s consolidated financial statements include certain private equity and other investment funds (the consolidated funds) related to an asset management business acquired in 2012. The consolidated funds are, for GAAP purposes, investment companies and therefore are not required to consolidate their majority owned and controlled investments. Rather, Bunge reflects these investments at fair value. In addition, certain of these consolidated funds have limited partner investors with investments in the form of equity, which are accounted for as noncontrolling interests and investments in the form of debt for which Bunge has elected the fair value option.

Noncontrolling interests related to Bunge’s ownership of less than 100% are reported as noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries in the condensed consolidated balance sheets. The noncontrolling interests in Bunge’s earnings, net of tax, are reported as net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests in the condensed consolidated statements of income.

Discontinued Operations — In determining whether a group of assets disposed (or to be disposed) of should be presented as discontinued operations, Bunge makes a determination of whether the group of assets being disposed of comprises a component of the entity; that is, whether it has historical operations and cash flows that can be clearly distinguished (both operationally and for financial reporting purposes). Bunge also determines whether the cash flows associated with the group of assets have been significantly (or will be significantly) eliminated from the ongoing operations of Bunge as a result of the disposal transaction and whether Bunge has no significant continuing involvement in the operations of the group of assets after the disposal transaction. If these determinations can be made affirmatively, the results of operations of the group of assets being disposed of (as well as any gain or loss on the disposal transaction) are aggregated for separate presentation apart from the continuing operations of the Company for all periods presented in the condensed consolidated financial statements (see Note 4).

7

Table of Contents

2. NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

Adoption of New Accounting Pronouncements — In December 2011 and January 2013, Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) amended the guidance in ASC Topic 210, Balance Sheet. This amendment requires an entity to disclose both gross and net information about financial instruments that are eligible for offset in the statement of financial position and/or subject to a master netting arrangement or similar agreement. Bunge’s derivative assets and liabilities are presented on a gross basis in its condensed consolidated balance sheets. The adoption of this amendment on January 1, 2013 did not have a significant impact on Bunge’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

In February 2013, FASB amended the guidance in ASC Topic 220, Comprehensive Income. This amendment requires an entity to disclose on a prospective basis the impact on income statement line items for significant items reclassified from other comprehensive income to net income during the period. The adoption of this amendment expanded Bunge’s disclosures in its condensed consolidated financial statements.

New Accounting Pronouncements — In March 2013, FASB amended existing guidance of ASC Topic 830, Foreign Currency Matters (Topic 830). This amended guidance is related to the transfer of currency translation adjustments from other comprehensive income into net income in certain circumstances. The amended guidance aims to resolve diversity in practice as to whether ASC Topic 810, Consolidation or Topic 830 applies to the release of the cumulative translation adjustment into net income when a parent either sells a part or all of its investment in a foreign entity, or no longer holds a controlling financial interest in a subsidiary or group of assets that is a nonprofit activity or a business. Bunge will be required to apply the amended guidance prospectively. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on Bunge’s consolidated financial statements.

In July 2013, the FASB issued guidance in ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes (Topic 740). Topic 740 provided guidance regarding the presentation of an unrecognized tax benefit when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exist at the reporting date. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on Bunge’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

3. BUSINESS ACQUISITIONS

In January 2013, Bunge acquired two biodiesel facilities adjacent to existing Bunge facilities from its European biodiesel joint venture for $11 million in cash, net of cash acquired. The preliminary purchase price allocation resulted in $4 million of inventory, $17 million of other current assets, $10 million of property, plant and equipment, $19 million of other current liabilities and $1 million of long-term deferred taxes. There were no changes to the joint venture ownership or governance structure as a result of this transaction.

4. BUSINESS DIVESTITURES

On December 6, 2012, Bunge entered into a definitive agreement with Yara International ASA (Yara), under which Yara would acquire Bunge’s Brazilian fertilizer distribution business, including blending facilities, brands and warehouses, for $750 million in cash. As a result of the transaction, which closed on August 8, 2013, Bunge will no longer have significant ongoing cash flows related to the Brazilian fertilizer business or any significant ongoing participation in the operations of this business. Bunge received cash proceeds of the Brazilian real equivalent of $750 million upon closing the transaction, resulting in recognition of a gain of $148 million ($112 million net of tax) which is included in discontinued operations in our condensed consolidated statements of income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013. Included in the gain are approximately $7 million of transaction costs incurred in connection with the divestiture and $41 million release of the cumulative translation adjustment associated with the disposed business.

The results of the Brazilian fertilizer distribution business and the tax impact are reported in discontinued operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 and are summarized as follows:

8

Table of Contents

|  | Three Months Ended September 30, |
(US$ in millions) |  | 2013 |  | 2012 |
Net sales |  | $ | 149 |  | $ | 750 |
Cost of goods sold |  | (139 | ) |  | (734 | )
Gross profit |  | 10 |  | 16 |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |  | (14 | ) | (19 | )
Interest income |  | 8 |  | 8 |
Interest expense |  | — |  | (9 | )
Foreign exchange gain (loss) |  | (13 | ) | 5 |
Other income (expenses)—net |  | 1 |  | — |
Gain on sale of Brazilian fertilizer business |  | 148 |  | — |
Income (loss) from discontinued operations before income tax |  | 140 |  | 1 |
Income tax (expense) benefit |  | (37 | ) | 1 |
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax |  | $ | 103 |  | $ | 2 |

|  | Nine Months Ended September 30, |
(US$ in millions) |  | 2013 |  | 2012 |
Net sales |  | $ | 1,217 |  | $ | 1,878 |
Cost of goods sold |  | (1,141 | ) | (1,861 | )
Gross profit |  | 76 |  | 17 |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |  | (58 | ) | (68 | )
Interest income |  | 14 |  | 17 |
Interest expense |  | (9 | ) | (16 | )
Foreign exchange gain (loss) |  | (14 | ) | 18 |
Other income (expenses)—net |  | (12 | ) | (36 | )
Gain on sale of Brazilian fertilizer business |  | 148 |  | — |
Income (loss) from discontinued operations before income tax |  | 145 |  | (68 | )
Income tax (expense) benefit |  | (51 | ) | 35 |
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax |  | $ | 94 |  | $ | (33 | )

Approximately $7 million of transaction costs are included as a component of cash used for operating activities in Bunge’s condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2013. Gross proceeds of $750 million and cash disposed of $4 million related to the sale of the Brazilian fertilizer distribution business are included as a component of cash provided by investing activities in Bunge’s condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2013.

The assets and liabilities classified as held for sale related to the fertilizer divestiture in the condensed consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2012 consisted of the following:

|  | December 31, |
(US$ in millions) |  | 2012 |
Assets: |  |  |
Cash and cash equivalents |  | $ | 2 |
Trade accounts receivable (less allowance of $2) |  | 189 |
Inventories |  | 402 |
Other current assets |  | 67 |
Current assets held for sale |  | $ | 660 |
Property, plant and equipment, net |  | $ | 218 |
Deferred income taxes |  | 40 |
Other non-current assets |  | (8 | )
Non-current assets held for sale |  | $ | 250 |
Liabilities: |  |  |
Trade accounts payable |  | $ | 157 |
Other current liabilities |  | 140 |
Current liabilities held for sale |  | $ | 297 |
Other non-current liabilities |  | 13 |
Non-current liabilities held for sale |  | $ | 13 |

9

Table of Contents

5. TRADE STRUCTURED FINANCE PROGRAM

Bunge engages in various trade structured finance activities to leverage the value of its trade flows across its operating regions. These activities include a program under which a Bunge entity generally obtains U.S. dollar-denominated letters of credit (LCs) based on an underlying commodity trade flow from financial institutions, as well as foreign exchange forward contracts and time deposits denominated in the local currency of the financial institution counterparties, all of which are subject to legally enforceable set-off agreements. The LCs and foreign exchange contracts are presented within the line item “Letter of credit obligations under trade structured finance program” on the condensed consolidated balance sheets. The net return from activities under this Program, including fair value changes, is included as a reduction of cost of goods sold in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of income.

At September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, time deposits (with weighted-average interest rates of 8.45% and 8.95%, respectively) and LCs (including foreign exchange contracts) totaled $4,596 million and $3,048 million, respectively. In addition, at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the fair values of the time deposits (Level 2 measurements) totaled approximately $4,596 million and $3,048 million, respectively, and the fair values of the LCs (Level 2 measurements) totaled approximately $4,885 million and $3,024 million, respectively. The fair values approximate the carrying amounts of the related financial instruments due to their short-term nature. The fair values of the foreign exchange forward contracts (Level 2 measurements) are a gain of $289 million and a loss of $24 million at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, total proceeds from issuances of LCs were $7,702 million and $3,230 million, respectively. These cash inflows are offset by the related cash outflows resulting from placement of the time deposits and repayment of the LCs.

6. INVENTORIES

Inventories by segment are presented below. Readily marketable inventories refers to inventories that are readily convertible to cash because of their commodity characteristics, widely available markets and international pricing mechanisms.

|  | September 30, |  | December 31, |
(US$ in millions) |  | 2013 |  | 2012 |
Agribusiness (1) |  | $ | 4,550 |  | $ | 5,240 |
Sugar and Bioenergy (2) |  | 511 |  | 488 |
Edible Oil Products (3) |  | 508 |  | 617 |
Milling Products (4) |  | 224 |  | 184 |
Fertilizer (4) (5) |  | 92 |  | 61 |
Total |  | $ | 5,886 |  | $ | 6,590 |

(1) Includes readily marketable agricultural commodity inventories at fair value of $4,305 million and $4,892 million at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. Of these amounts $3,330 million and $3,442 million can be attributable to merchandising activities at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. All other agribusiness segment inventories are carried at lower of cost or market.

(2) Includes readily marketable sugar inventories of $170 million and $199 million at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. Of these, $114 million and $144 million, respectively, are carried at fair value, in Bunge’s trading and merchandising business. Sugar and ethanol inventories in Bunge’s industrial production business are carried at lower of cost or market.

(3) Edible oil products inventories are generally carried at lower of cost or market, with the exception of readily marketable inventories of bulk soybean oil which are carried at fair value in the aggregate amount of $74 million and $176 million at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

10

Table of Contents

(4) Milling products and fertilizer inventories are carried at lower of cost or market.

(5) Fertilizer inventories exclude amounts classified as held for sale (see Note 4).

7. OTHER CURRENT ASSETS

Other current assets consist of the following:

|  | September 30, |  | December 31, |
(US$ in millions) |  | 2013 |  | 2012 |
Prepaid commodity purchase contracts (1) |  | $ | 549 |  | $ | 299 |
Secured advances to suppliers, net (2) |  | 493 |  | 390 |
Unrealized gains on derivative contracts at fair value |  | 1,733 |  | 1,230 |
Recoverable taxes, net |  | 483 |  | 465 |
Margin deposits (3) |  | 462 |  | 363 |
Marketable securities |  | 148 |  | 105 |
Deferred purchase price receivable (4) |  | 104 |  | 134 |
Prepaid expenses |  | 289 |  | 314 |
Other |  | 763 |  | 518 |
Total |  | $ | 5,024 |  | $ | 3,818 |

(1) Prepaid commodity purchase contracts represent advance payments against fixed price contracts for future delivery of specified quantities of agricultural commodities.

(2) Bunge provides cash advances to suppliers, primarily Brazilian farmers of soybeans and sugarcane, to finance a portion of the suppliers’ production costs. Bunge does not bear any of the costs or risks associated with the related growing crops. The advances are largely collateralized by future crops and physical assets of the suppliers, carry a local market interest rate and settle when the farmer’s crop is harvested and sold. The secured advances to farmers are reported net of allowances of $19 million and $12 million at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

Interest earned on secured advances to suppliers of $7 million and $5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and $22 million and $18 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, is included in net sales in the condensed consolidated statements of income.

(3) Margin deposits include U.S. treasury securities at fair value and cash.

(4) Deferred purchase price receivable represents additional credit support for the investment conduits in Bunge’s accounts receivables sales program (see Note 13) and is recognized at its estimated fair value.

8. OTHER NON-CURRENT ASSETS

Other non-current assets consist of the following:

|  | September 30, |  | December 31, |
(US$ in millions) |  | 2013 |  | 2012 |
Recoverable taxes, net |  | $ | 279 |  | $ | 309 |
Long-term receivables from farmers in Brazil, net |  | 134 |  | 164 |
Judicial deposits |  | 166 |  | 169 |
Other long-term receivables |  | 43 |  | 60 |
Income taxes receivable |  | 315 |  | 431 |
Long-term investments |  | 389 |  | 414 |
Affiliate loans receivable, net |  | 41 |  | 59 |
Other |  | 201 |  | 140 |
Total |  | $ | 1,568 |  | $ | 1,746 |

11

Table of Contents

Recoverable taxes, net — Recoverable taxes are reported net of valuation allowances of $53 million and $47 million at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

Long-term receivables from farmers in Brazil, net — Bunge provides financing to farmers in Brazil, primarily through secured advances against farmer commitments to deliver agricultural commodities (primarily soybeans) upon harvest of the then-current year’s crop and through credit sales of fertilizer to farmers.

The table below summarizes Bunge’s recorded investment in long-term receivables from farmers in Brazil for amounts in the legal collection process and renegotiated amounts.

|  | September 30, |  | December 31, |
(US$ in millions) |  | 2013 |  | 2012 |
Legal collection process (1) |  | $ | 247 |  | $ | 269 |
Renegotiated amounts (2) |  | 97 |  | 119 |
Total |  | $ | 344 |  | $ | 388 |

(1) All amounts in legal process are considered past due upon initiation of legal action.

(2) All renegotiated amounts are current on repayment terms.

The average recorded investment in long-term receivables from farmers in Brazil for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and the year ended December 31, 2012 was $373 million and $444 million, respectively. The table below summarizes Bunge’s recorded investment in long-term receivables from farmers in Brazil and the related allowance amounts.

|  | September 30, 2013 |  | December 31, 2012 |
|  | Recorded |  |  |  | Recorded |  |  |
(US$ in millions) |  | Investment |  | Allowance |  | Investment |  | Allowance |
For which an allowance has been provided: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Legal collection process |  | $ | 160 |  | $ | 151 |  | $ | 178 |  | $ | 165 |
Renegotiated amounts |  | 61 |  | 59 |  | 67 |  | 59 |
For which no allowance has been provided: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Legal collection process |  | 87 |  | — |  | 91 |  | — |
Renegotiated amounts |  | 36 |  | — |  | 52 |  | — |
Total |  | $ | 344 |  | $ | 210 |  | $ | 388 |  | $ | 224 |

The table below summarizes the activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts related to long-term receivables from farmers in Brazil.

|  | Three Months Ended |  | Nine Months Ended |
|  | September 30, |  | September 30, |
(US$ in millions) |  | 2013 |  | 2012 |  | 2013 |  | 2012 |
Beginning balance |  | $ | 209 |  | $ | 198 |  | $ | 224 |  | $ | 199 |
Bad debt provisions |  | 3 |  | 8 |  | 16 |  | 34 |
Recoveries |  | (3 | ) | (7 | ) | (14 | ) | (16 | )
Write-offs |  | (1 | ) | (8 | ) | (2 | ) | (9 | )
Transfers (1) |  | 3 |  | — |  | 5 |  | — |
Foreign exchange translation |  | (1 | ) | — |  | (19 | ) | (17 | )
Ending balance |  | $ | 210 |  | $ | 191 |  | $ | 210 |  | $ | 191 |

12

Table of Contents

(1) Represents reclassifications from allowance for doubtful accounts-current for secured advances to suppliers.

Judicial deposits — Judicial deposits are funds that Bunge has placed on deposit with the courts in Brazil. These funds are held in judicial escrow relating to certain legal proceedings pending legal resolution and bear interest at the SELIC rate (the benchmark rate of the Brazilian central bank).

Income taxes receivable — Income taxes receivable includes overpayments of current income taxes plus accrued interest. These income tax prepayments are expected to be utilized for settlement of future income tax obligations. Income taxes receivable in Brazil bear interest at the SELIC rate (the benchmark rate of the Brazilian central bank).

Long-term investments — Long-term investments represent investments held by managed investment funds and other investments including available for sale securities included in Bunge’s condensed consolidated financial statements. The consolidated funds are, for GAAP purposes, investment companies and therefore are not required to consolidate their majority owned and controlled investments. Bunge reflects these investments at fair value. The fair values of these investments (Level 3 measurements) totals $325 million and $349 million at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

Affiliate loans receivable, net — Affiliate loans receivable, net includes primarily interest bearing receivables from unconsolidated affiliates with an initial maturity of greater than one year.

9. INCOME TAXES

Income tax expense is provided on an interim basis based on management’s estimate of the annual effective income tax rate and includes the tax effects of certain discrete items, such as changes in tax laws or tax rates or other unusual or nonrecurring tax adjustments in the interim period in which they occur. In addition, jurisdictions with a projected loss for the year or a year-to-date loss where no tax benefit can be recognized are excluded from the estimated annual effective tax rate. The effective tax rate is highly dependent on the geographic distribution of Bunge’s worldwide earnings or losses and tax regulations in each jurisdiction. Management regularly monitors the assumptions used in estimating its annual effective tax rate and adjusts estimates accordingly. If actual results differ from management’s estimates, reported income tax expense in future periods could be materially affected.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, income tax expense related to continuing operations was $702 million and $197 million, respectively. The increase in tax expense over the prior year results primarily from discrete tax items as discussed in the following paragraph.

As a global enterprise, Bunge files income tax returns that are subject to periodic examination and challenge by federal, state and foreign tax authorities. In many jurisdictions, income tax examinations, including settlement negotiations or litigation, may take several years to finalize. While it is often difficult to predict the final outcome or timing of resolution of any particular matter, management believes that the condensed consolidated financial statements reflect the largest amount of tax benefit that will be more likely than not realized. During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, Bunge increased its liability for uncertain tax positions by $19 million and recorded an income tax expense primarily as a result of recently published litigation precedents in Brazil. Of this amount, $22 million is included in income from continuing operations and $17 million is included in discontinued operations, net of tax.

13

Table of Contents

During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, Bunge recorded income tax expense of $496 million related to other discrete tax items including $464 million related to the recording of a full valuation allowance on deferred tax assets in its industrial sugar business in Brazil. Management’s establishment of a valuation allowance resulted from a combination of matters, including increasing cumulative book and tax net losses in the business (including financing costs), the absence of available independent evidence that such losses will not continue given Brazil’s existing energy policy, and the market environment and outlook for the industry and management’s intent to explore strategic options related to the future of this business.

In 2013, the Brazilian tax authorities commenced an examination of the income tax return of one of Bunge’s Brazilian subsidiaries for the year 2009 and proposed adjustments totalling approximately $121 million plus applicable interest and penalties. Management, in consultation with external legal advisors, has reviewed and responded to the proposed adjustments and believes that it is more likely than not that it will prevail and therefore has not recorded any additional uncertain tax liability.

During 2011, the Brazilian tax authorities commenced an examination of the income tax returns of one of Bunge’s Brazilian subsidiaries for the years 2005-2009 and proposed adjustments totaling approximately $160 million plus applicable interest and penalties. Management, in consultation with external legal advisors, has reviewed and responded to the proposed adjustments and believes that it is more likely than not that it will prevail and therefore has, apart from the above mentioned liability for uncertain tax positions related to the recently published litigation precedents, not recorded any additional uncertain tax liability.

In 2010, the Brazilian tax authorities proposed certain significant adjustments to the income tax returns for one of Bunge’s Brazilian subsidiaries for the years 2005 to 2007. The proposed adjustments totaled approximately $525 million plus applicable interest and penalties. In late 2011, Bunge received a decision from the Tax Inspector that dismissed approximately $170 million of the claim against Bunge. Management is appealing the remainder of the case and has not changed its position that it is more likely than not that it will prevail and therefore has, apart from the above mentioned liability for uncertain tax positions related to the recently published litigation precedents, not recorded any additional uncertain tax liability.

10. OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES

Other current liabilities consist of the following:

|  | September 30, |  | December 31, |
(US$ in millions) |  | 2013 |  | 2012 |
Accrued liabilities |  | $ | 1,175 |  | $ | 1,069 |
Unrealized losses on derivative contracts at fair value |  | 1,528 |  | 1,185 |
Advances on sales |  | 305 |  | 223 |
Other |  | 12 |  | 17 |
Total |  | $ | 3,020 |  | $ | 2,494 |

11. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

Bunge’s various financial instruments include certain components of working capital such as cash and cash equivalents, trade accounts receivable and trade accounts payable. Additionally, Bunge uses short and long-term debt to fund operating requirements. Cash and cash equivalents, trade accounts receivable, trade accounts payable and short-term debt are stated at their carrying value, which is a reasonable estimate of fair value. See Note 13 for deferred purchase price receivable (DPP) related to sales of trade receivables. See Note 8 for long-term receivables from farmers in Brazil, net and other long-term investments and Note 12 for long-term debt. Bunge’s financial instruments also include derivative instruments and marketable securities, which are stated at fair value.

Fair value is the expected price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Bunge determines the fair values of its readily marketable inventories, derivatives, and certain other assets based on the fair value hierarchy established in ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. Observable inputs are inputs based on market data obtained from sources independent of Bunge that reflect the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Unobservable inputs are inputs that are developed based on the best information available in circumstances that reflect Bunge’s own assumptions based on market data and on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. The topic describes three levels within its hierarchy that may be used to measure fair value.

Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 1 assets and liabilities include exchange traded derivative contracts.

14

Table of Contents

Level 2: Observable inputs, including Level 1 prices (adjusted), quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are less active than traded exchanges and other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. Level 2 assets and liabilities include readily marketable inventories and over-the-counter (OTC) commodity purchase and sale contracts and other OTC derivatives whose value is determined using pricing models with inputs that are generally based on exchange traded prices, adjusted for location specific inputs that are primarily observable in the market or can be derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are a significant component of the fair value of the assets or liabilities. In evaluating the significance of fair value inputs, Bunge gives consideration to items that individually or when aggregated with other inputs, generally represent more than 10% of the fair value of the assets or liabilities. For such identified inputs which are primarily related to inland transportation costs, judgments are required when evaluating both quantitative and qualitative factors in the determination of significance for purposes of fair value level classification and disclosure. Level 3 assets and liabilities include assets and liabilities whose value is determined using proprietary pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques; as well as, assets and liabilities for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation. Bunge believes a change in these inputs would not result in a significant change in the fair values.

The majority of Bunge’s exchange traded agricultural commodity futures are settled daily generally through its clearing subsidiary and, therefore, such futures are not included in the table below. Assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is a significant component of the fair value measurement. The lowest level of input is considered Level 3. Bunge’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment and may affect the classification of fair value assets and liabilities within the fair value hierarchy levels. The following table sets forth, by level, Bunge’s assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis.

15

Table of Contents

|  | Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date |
|  | September 30, 2013 |  | December 31, 2012 |
(US$ in millions) |  | Level 1 |  | Level 2 |  | Level 3 |  | Total |  | Level 1 |  | Level 2 |  | Level 3 |  | Total |
Assets: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Readily marketable inventories (Note 6) |  | $ | — |  | $ | 3,639 |  | $ | 854 |  | $ | 4,493 |  | $ | — |  | $ | 4,776 |  | $ | 436 |  | $ | 5,212 |
Unrealized gain on designated derivative contracts (1) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Foreign exchange |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | 1 |  | — |  | 1 |
Unrealized gain on undesignated derivative contracts (1) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Foreign exchange |  | — |  | 557 |  | — |  | 557 |  | — |  | 194 |  | — |  | 194 |
Commodities |  | 280 |  | 708 |  | 111 |  | 1,099 |  | 61 |  | 697 |  | 264 |  | 1,022 |
Freight |  | 58 |  | — |  | — |  | 58 |  | — |  | — |  | 1 |  | 1 |
Energy |  | 13 |  | — |  | 6 |  | 19 |  | 9 |  | 2 |  | 1 |  | 12 |
Deferred purchase price receivable (Note 13) |  | — |  | 104 |  | — |  | 104 |  | — |  | 134 |  | — |  | 134 |
Other (2) |  | 271 |  | 56 |  | — |  | 327 |  | 234 |  | 32 |  | — |  | 266 |
Total assets |  | $ | 622 |  | $ | 5,064 |  | $ | 971 |  | $ | 6,657 |  | $ | 304 |  | $ | 5,836 |  | $ | 702 |  | $ | 6,842 |
Liabilities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Unrealized loss on designated derivative contracts (3) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Foreign exchange |  | $ | — |  | $ | 30 |  | $ | — |  | $ | 30 |  | $ | — |  | $ | — |  | $ | — |  | $ | — |
Unrealized loss on undesignated derivative contracts (3) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Foreign exchange |  | 1 |  | 387 |  | — |  | 388 |  | 1 |  | 119 |  | — |  | 120 |
Commodities |  | 307 |  | 555 |  | 116 |  | 978 |  | 153 |  | 667 |  | 180 |  | 1,000 |
Freight |  | 73 |  | — |  | 10 |  | 83 |  | 3 |  | — |  | — |  | 3 |
Energy |  | 33 |  | — |  | 16 |  | 49 |  | 42 |  | — |  | 20 |  | 62 |
Total liabilities |  | $ | 414 |  | $ | 972 |  | $ | 142 |  | $ | 1,528 |  | $ | 199 |  | $ | 786 |  | $ | 200 |  | $ | 1,185 |

(1) Unrealized gains on designated and undesignated derivative contracts are generally included in other current assets. There are no such amounts included in other non-current assets at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

(2) Other assets include primarily the fair values of U.S. Treasury securities held as margin deposits and other marketable securities.

(3) Unrealized losses on designated and undesignated derivative contracts are generally included in other current liabilities. There are no such amounts included in other non-current liabilities at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

Derivatives — Exchange traded futures and options contracts are valued based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets and are classified within Level 1. Bunge’s forward commodity purchase and sale contracts are classified as derivatives along with other OTC derivative instruments relating primarily to freight, energy, foreign exchange and interest rates, and are classified within Level 2 or Level 3 as described below. Bunge estimates fair values based on exchange quoted prices, adjusted as appropriate for differences in local markets. These differences are generally valued using inputs from broker or dealer quotations, or market transactions in either the listed or OTC markets. In such cases, these derivative contracts are classified within Level 2. Changes in the fair values of these contracts are recognized in the condensed consolidated financial statements as a component of cost of goods sold, foreign exchange gains (losses), interest income (expense), other income (expense)-net or other comprehensive income (loss).

OTC derivative contracts include swaps, options and structured transactions that are valued at fair value generally determined using quantitative models that require the use of multiple market inputs including quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets which are not highly active, other observable inputs relevant to the asset or liability, and market inputs corroborated by correlation or other means. These valuation models include inputs such as interest rates, prices and indices to generate continuous yield or pricing curves and volatility factors. Where observable inputs are available

16

Table of Contents

for substantially the full term of the asset or liability, the instrument is categorized in Level 2. Certain OTC derivatives trade in less active markets with less availability of pricing information and certain structured transactions can require internally developed model inputs that might not be observable in or corroborated by the market. When unobservable inputs have a significant impact on the measurement of fair value, the instrument is categorized in Level 3.

Bunge’s policy is to only classify exchange traded or cleared derivative contracts in Level 1, thus transfers of assets and liabilities into and/or out of Level 1 occur infrequently. Transfers into Level 1 would generally only be expected to occur when an exchange cleared derivative contract historically valued using a valuation model as the result of a lack of observable inputs becomes sufficiently observable, resulting in the valuation price being essentially the exchange traded price. There were no significant transfers into or out of Level 1 during the periods presented.

Bunge may designate certain derivative instruments as either fair value hedges or cash flow hedges and assesses, both at inception of the hedge and on an ongoing basis, whether derivatives that are designated as hedges are highly effective in offsetting changes in the hedged items or anticipated cash flows.

Readily marketable inventories — The majority of Bunge’s readily marketable commodity inventories are valued at fair value. These agricultural commodity inventories are readily marketable, have quoted market prices and may be sold without significant additional processing. Changes in the fair values of these inventories are recognized in the condensed consolidated statements of income as a component of cost of goods sold.

Readily marketable inventories reported at fair value are valued based on commodity futures exchange quotations, broker or dealer quotations, or market transactions in either listed or OTC markets with appropriate adjustments for differences in local markets where Bunge’s inventories are located. In such cases, the inventory is classified within Level 2. Certain inventories may utilize significant unobservable data related to local market adjustments to determine fair value; in such cases, the inventory is classified as Level 3.

If Bunge used different methods or factors to determine fair values, amounts reported as unrealized gains and losses on derivative contracts and readily marketable inventories at fair value in the condensed consolidated balance sheets and condensed consolidated statements of income could differ. Additionally, if market conditions change subsequent to the reporting date, amounts reported in future periods as unrealized gains and losses on derivative contracts and readily marketable inventories at fair value in the condensed consolidated balance sheets and condensed consolidated statements of income could differ.

Level 3 Valuation — Bunge’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment and may affect the classification of assets and liabilities within the fair value hierarchy. In evaluating the significance of fair value inputs, Bunge gives consideration to items that individually, or when aggregated with other inputs, represent more than 10% of the fair value of the asset or liability. For such identified inputs, judgments are required when evaluating both quantitative and qualitative factors in the determination of significance for purposes of fair value level classification and disclosure. Because of differences in the availability of market pricing data over their terms, inputs for some assets and liabilities may fall into any one of the three levels in the fair value hierarchy or some combination thereof. While FASB guidance requires classification of these assets and liabilities in the lowest hierarchy level for which inputs are significant to the fair value measurement, a portion of that measurement may be determined using inputs from a higher hierarchy level.

The significant unobservable inputs resulting in Level 3 classification relate to freight in the interior of Brazil and the lack of market corroborated information in Canada. In both situations, Bunge uses proprietary information such as purchase and sale contracts and contracted prices for freight, premiums and discounts to value its contracts. Movements in the price of these unobservable inputs alone would not have a material effect on Bunge’s financial statements as these contracts do not typically exceed one future crop cycle.

Transfers in and/or out of Level 3 represent existing assets or liabilities that were either previously categorized as a higher level for which the inputs to the model became unobservable or assets and liabilities that were previously classified as Level 3 for which the lowest significant input became observable during the period. Bunge’s policy regarding the timing of transfers between levels is to record the transfers at the beginning of the reporting period.

17

Table of Contents

Level 3 Derivatives — Level 3 derivative instruments utilize both market observable and unobservable inputs within the fair value measurements. These inputs include commodity prices, price volatility, interest rates, volumes and locations. In addition, with the exception of the exchange cleared instruments, Bunge is exposed to loss in the event of the non-performance by counterparties on over-the-counter derivative instruments and forward purchase and sale contracts. Adjustments are made to fair values on occasions when non-performance risk is determined to represent a significant input in Bunge’s fair value determination. These adjustments are based on Bunge’s estimate of the potential loss in the event of counterparty non-performance. Bunge did not have significant adjustments related to non-performance by counterparties at September 30, 2013.

Level 3 Readily marketable inventories — Readily marketable inventories are considered Level 3 when at least one significant assumption or input is unobservable. These assumptions or unobservable inputs include certain management estimations regarding costs of transportation and other local market or location-related adjustments.

The tables below present reconciliations for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) during the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012. Level 3 instruments presented below include readily marketable inventories and derivatives. These instruments were valued using pricing models that management believes reflect assumptions that would be used by a marketplace participant.

|  | Level 3 Instruments |
|  | Fair Value Measurements |
|  | Three Months Ended September 30, 2013 |
|  |  |  | Readily |  |  |
|  | Derivatives, |  | Marketable |  |  |
(US$ in millions) |  | Net (1) |  | Inventories |  | Total |
Balance, July 1, 2013 |  | $ | 89 |  | $ | 1,220 |  | $ | 1,309 |
Total gains and (losses) (realized/unrealized) included in cost of goods sold |  | (50 | ) | (103 | ) | (153 | )
Purchases |  | — |  | 385 |  | 385 |
Sales |  | — |  | (905 | ) | (905 | )
Issuances |  | (2 | ) | — |  | (2 | )
Settlements |  | (40 | ) | — |  | (40 | )
Transfers into Level 3 |  | 2 |  | 265 |  | 267 |
Transfers out of Level 3 |  | (24 | ) | (8 | ) | (32 | )
Balance, September 30, 2013 |  | $ | (25 | ) | $ | 854 |  | $ | 829 |

|  | Level 3 Instruments |
|  | Fair Value Measurements |
|  | Three Months Ended September 30, 2012 |
|  |  |  | Readily |  |  |
|  | Derivatives, |  | Marketable |  |  |
(US$ in millions) |  | Net (1) |  | Inventories |  | Total |
Balance, July 1, 2012 |  | $ | 187 |  | $ | 1,820 |  | $ | 2,007 |
Total gains and (losses) (realized/unrealized) included in cost of goods sold |  | 93 |  | (176 | ) | (83 | )
Purchases |  | — |  | 361 |  | 361 |
Sales |  | 2 |  | (904 | ) | (902 | )
Issuances |  | (1 | ) | — |  | (1 | )
Settlements |  | (93 | ) | — |  | (93 | )
Transfers into Level 3 |  | 4 |  | 197 |  | 201 |
Transfers out of Level 3 |  | 85 |  | (171 | ) | (86 | )
Balance, September 30, 2012 |  | $ | 277 |  | $ | 1,127 |  | $ | 1,404 |

(1) Derivatives, net include Level 3 derivative assets and liabilities.

18

Table of Contents

The tables below present reconciliations for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012. Level 3 instruments presented in the tables include readily marketable inventories and derivatives. These instruments were valued using pricing models that management believes reflect the assumptions that would be used by a marketplace participant.

|  | Level 3 Instruments |
|  | Fair Value Measurements |
|  | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013 |
|  |  |  | Readily |  |  |
|  | Derivatives, |  | Marketable |  |  |
(US$ in millions) |  | Net (1) |  | Inventories |  | Total |
Balance, January 1, 2013 |  | $ | 66 |  | $ | 436 |  | $ | 502 |
Total gains and (losses) (realized/unrealized) included in cost of goods sold |  | 49 |  | (185 | ) | (136 | )
Purchases |  | — |  | 1,598 |  | 1,598 |
Sales |  | 1 |  | (1,410 | ) | (1,409 | )
Issuances |  | (4 | ) | — |  | (4 | )
Settlements |  | (222 | ) | — |  | (222 | )
Transfers into Level 3 |  | 102 |  | 575 |  | 677 |
Transfers out of Level 3 |  | (17 | ) | (160 | ) | (177 | )
Balance, September 30, 2013 |  | $ | (25 | ) | $ | 854 |  | $ | 829 |

(1) Derivatives, net include Level 3 derivative assets and liabilities.

|  | Level 3 Instruments |
|  | Fair Value Measurements |
|  | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 |
|  |  |  | Readily |  |  |
|  | Derivatives, |  | Marketable |  |  |
(US$ in millions) |  | Net (1) |  | Inventories |  | Total |
Balance, January 1, 2012 |  | $ | (2 | ) | $ | 283 |  | $ | 281 |
Total gains and (losses) (realized/unrealized) included in cost of goods sold |  | 339 |  | 54 |  | 393 |
Purchases |  | 3 |  | 1,638 |  | 1,641 |
Sales |  | 3 |  | (1,780 | ) | (1,777 | )
Issuances |  | (4 | ) | — |  | (4 | )
Settlements |  | (177 | ) | — |  | (177 | )
Transfers into Level 3 |  | 46 |  | 1,177 |  | 1,223 |
Transfers out of Level 3 |  | 69 |  | (245 | ) | (176 | )
Balance, September 30, 2012 |  | $ | 277 |  | $ | 1,127 |  | $ | 1,404 |

(1) Derivatives, net include Level 3 derivative assets and liabilities.

The table below summarizes changes in unrealized gains or (losses) recorded in earnings during the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 for Level 3 assets and liabilities that were held at September 30, 2013 and 2012.

19

Table of Contents

|  | Level 3 Instruments |
|  | Fair Value Measurements |
|  | Three Months Ended |
|  |  |  | Readily |  |  |
|  | Derivatives, |  | Marketable |  |  |
(US$ in millions) |  | Net (1) |  | Inventories |  | Total |
Changes in unrealized gains and (losses) relating to assets and liabilities held at September 30, 2013 |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Cost of goods sold |  | $ | (55 | ) | $ | 145 |  | $ | 90 |
Changes in unrealized gains and (losses) relating to assets and liabilities held at September 30, 2012 |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Cost of goods sold |  | $ | 159 |  | $ | (628 | ) | $ | (469 | )

(1) Derivatives, net include Level 3 derivative assets and liabilities.

The table below summarizes changes in unrealized gains or (losses) recorded in earnings during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 for Level 3 assets and liabilities that were held at September 30, 2013 and 2012.

|  | Level 3 Instruments |
|  | Fair Value Measurements |
|  | Nine Months Ended |
|  |  |  | Readily |  |  |
|  | Derivatives, |  | Marketable |  |  |
(US$ in millions) |  | Net (1) |  | Inventories |  | Total |
Changes in unrealized gains and (losses) relating to assets and liabilities held at September 30, 2013 |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Cost of goods sold |  | $ | 56 |  | $ | 548 |  | $ | 604 |
Changes in unrealized gains and (losses) relating to assets and liabilities held at September 30, 2012 |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Cost of goods sold |  | $ | 280 |  | $ | 734 |  | $ | 1,014 |

(1) Derivatives, net include Level 3 derivative assets and liabilities.

Derivative Instruments

Interest rate derivatives — Interest rate swaps used by Bunge as hedging instruments are recorded at fair value in the condensed consolidated balance sheets with changes in fair value recorded contemporaneously in earnings. Certain of these swap agreements may be designated as fair value hedges. The carrying amount of the associated hedged debt is also adjusted through earnings for changes in the fair value arising from changes in benchmark interest rates. Ineffectiveness is recognized to the extent that these two adjustments do not offset. Bunge may enter into interest rate swap agreements for the purpose of managing certain of its interest rate exposures. Bunge may also enter into interest rate basis swap agreements that do not qualify as hedges for accounting purposes. Changes in fair value of such interest rate basis swap agreements are recorded in earnings.

Foreign exchange derivatives — Bunge uses a combination of foreign exchange forward, swap and option contracts in certain of its operations to mitigate the risk from exchange rate fluctuations in connection with certain commercial and balance sheet exposures. The foreign exchange forward and option contracts may be designated as cash flow hedges. Bunge may also use net investment hedges to partially offset the translation adjustments arising from the remeasurement of its investment in certain of its foreign subsidiaries.

Bunge assesses, both at the inception of the hedge and on an ongoing basis, whether the derivatives that are used in hedge transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in the hedged items.

The table below summarizes the notional amounts of open foreign exchange positions.

20

Table of Contents

|  | September 30, 2013 |
|  | Exchange Traded |  | Non-exchange Traded |  |  |
|  | Net (Short) |  |  |  | Unit of |
(US$ in millions) |  | & Long (1) |  | (Short) (2) |  | Long (2) |  | Measure |
Foreign Exchange |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Options |  | $ | (4 | ) | $ | (11 | ) | $ | 7 |  | Delta |
Forwards |  | (16 | ) | (16,730 | ) | 25,390 |  | Notional |
Swaps |  | — |  | (37 | ) | 32 |  | Notional |

(1) Exchange traded futures and options are presented on a net (short) and long position basis.

(2) Non-exchange traded swaps, options and forwards are presented on a gross (short) and long position basis.

Commodity derivatives — Bunge uses derivative instruments to manage its exposure to movements associated with agricultural commodity prices. Bunge generally uses exchange traded futures and options contracts to minimize the effects of changes in the prices of agricultural commodities on its agricultural commodity inventories and forward purchase and sale contracts, but may also from time to time enter into OTC commodity transactions, including swaps, which are settled in cash at maturity or termination based on exchange-quoted futures prices. Changes in fair values of exchange traded futures contracts representing the unrealized gains and/or losses on these instruments are settled daily generally through Bunge’s wholly-owned futures clearing subsidiary. Forward purchase and sale contracts are primarily settled through delivery of agricultural commodities. While Bunge considers these exchange traded futures and forward purchase and sale contracts to be effective economic hedges, Bunge does not designate or account for the majority of its commodity contracts as hedges. Changes in fair values of these contracts and related readily marketable agricultural commodity inventories are included in cost of goods sold in the condensed consolidated statements of income. The forward contracts require performance of both Bunge and the contract counterparty in future periods. Contracts to purchase agricultural commodities generally relate to current or future crop years for delivery periods quoted by regulated commodity exchanges. Contracts for the sale of agricultural commodities generally do not extend beyond one future crop cycle.

The table below summarizes the volumes of open agricultural commodities derivative positions.

|  | September 30, 2013 |
|  | Exchange Traded |  | Non-exchange Traded |  |  |
|  | Net (Short) & |  |  |  | Unit of |
|  | Long (1) |  | (Short) (2) |  | Long (2) |  | Measure |
Agricultural Commodities |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Futures |  | (11,030,989 | ) | — |  | — |  | Metric Tons |
Options |  | (418,578 | ) | (3,000 | ) | — |  | Metric Tons |
Forwards |  | — |  | (34,005,787 | ) | 26,654,031 |  | Metric Tons |
Swaps |  | 65,000 |  | (923,706 | ) | — |  | Metric Tons |

(1) Exchange traded futures and options are presented on a net (short) and long position basis.

(2) Non-exchange traded swaps, options and forwards are presented on a gross (short) and long position basis.

Ocean freight derivatives — Bunge uses derivative instruments referred to as freight forward agreements, or FFAs, and FFA options, to hedge portions of its current and anticipated ocean freight costs. Changes in the fair value of the ocean freight derivatives that are qualified, designated and highly effective as a fair value hedge, along with the gain or loss on the hedged firm commitments to purchase time on ocean freight vessels that is attributable to the hedged risk, are recorded in earnings. Changes in the fair values of ocean freight derivatives that are not designated as hedges are also recorded in earnings.

The table below summarizes the open ocean freight positions.

21

Table of Contents

|  | September 30, 2013 |
|  | Exchange Cleared |  | Non-exchange Cleared |  |  |
|  | Net (Short) & |  |  |  | Unit of |
|  | Long (1) |  | (Short) (2) |  | Long (2) |  | Measure |
Ocean Freight |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
FFA |  | (1,010 | ) | — |  | — |  | Hire Days |
FFA Options |  | (1,418 | ) | — |  | — |  | Hire Days |

(1) Exchange cleared futures and options are presented on a net (short) and long position basis.

(2) Non-exchange cleared options and forwards are presented on a gross (short) and long position basis.

Energy derivatives — Bunge uses derivative instruments for various purposes including to manage its exposure to volatility in energy costs. Bunge’s operations use substantial amounts of energy, including natural gas, coal and fuel oil, including bunker fuel.

The table below summarizes the open energy positions.

|  | September 30, 2013 |
|  | Exchange Traded |  | Non-exchange Traded |  |  |
|  | Net (Short) & |  |  |  | Unit of |
|  | Long (1) |  | (Short) (2) |  | Long (2) |  | Measure (3) |
Natural Gas (3) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Futures |  | 1,957,287 |  | — |  | — |  | MMBtus |
Swaps |  | — |  | — |  | 984,455 |  | MMBtus |
Options |  | (7,002,691 | ) | — |  | — |  | MMBtus |
Energy—Other |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Futures |  | 2,149,391 |  | — |  | — |  | Metric Tons |
Forwards |  | — |  | (60,287 | ) | 40,436,785 |  | Metric Tons |
Swaps |  | 77,000 |  | — |  | — |  | Metric Tons |
Options |  | 95,415 |  | — |  | — |  | Metric Tons |

(1) Exchange traded futures and options are presented on a net (short) and long position basis.

(2) Non-exchange traded swaps, options and forwards are presented on a gross (short) and long position basis.

(3) Million British Thermal Units (MMBtus) are the standard unit of measurement used to denote an amount of natural gas.

The Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income

The table below summarizes the effect of derivative instruments that are undesignated on the condensed consolidated statements of income for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012. There was no effect on the condensed consolidated statements of income from derivatives designated as fair value hedges.

|  |  |  | Gain or (Loss) Recognized in |
|  |  |  | Income on Derivative Instruments |
|  |  |  | Nine Months Ended September 30 |
(US$ in millions) |  | Location |  | 2013 |  | 2012 |
Undesignated Derivative Contracts: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Foreign Exchange |  | Foreign exchange gains (losses) |  | $ | (131 | ) | $ | (88 | )
Foreign Exchange |  | Cost of goods sold |  | 156 |  | 23 |
Commodities |  | Cost of goods sold |  | 299 |  | (689 | )
Freight |  | Cost of goods sold |  | (31 | ) | 7 |
Energy |  | Cost of goods sold |  | 2 |  | (8 | )
Total |  |  |  | $ | 295 |  | $ | (755 | )

22

Table of Contents

The table below summarizes the effect of derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as cash flow and net investment hedges on the condensed consolidated statement of income for the nine months ended September 30, 2013.

|  | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013 |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Amount of Gain (Loss) |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Recognized in Income on |
|  |  |  | Gain or |  | Gain or (Loss) |  | Derivative (Ineffective |
|  |  |  | (Loss) |  | Reclassified from |  | Portion and Amount |
|  |  |  | Recognized in |  | Accumulated OCI into |  | Excluded from |
|  | Notional |  | Accumulated |  | Income (1) |  | Effectiveness Testing) |
(US$ in millions) |  | Amount |  | OCI (1) |  | Location |  | Amount |  | Location |  | Amount (2) |
Cash Flow Hedge: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Foreign Exchange (3) |  | $ | 323 |  | $ | (11 | ) | Cost of goods sold |  | $ | (10 | ) | Cost of goods sold |  | $ | — |
Total |  | $ | 323 |  | $ | (11 | ) |  |  | $ | (10 | ) |  |  | $ | — |
Net Investment Hedge: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Foreign Exchange (3) |  | $ | 885 |  | $ | 8 |  | Foreign exchange gains (losses) |  | $ | — |  | Foreign exchange gains (losses) |  | $ | — |
Total |  | $ | 885 |  | $ | 8 |  |  |  | $ | — |  |  |  | $ | — |

(1) The gain or (loss) recognized relates to the effective portion of the hedging relationship. At September 30, 2013, Bunge expects to reclassify into income in the next 12 months $1 million after-tax gain related to its foreign exchange cash flow hedges. At September 30, 2013, Bunge expects to reclassify into income in the next 12 months $29 million after-tax loss related to its foreign exchange net investment hedges.

(2) There was no gain or loss recognized in income relating to the ineffective portion of the hedging relationships or relating to amounts excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness.

(3) The foreign exchange contracts mature at various dates in 2013 and 2014.

The table below summarizes the effect of derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges on the condensed consolidated statement of income for the nine months ended September 30, 2012.

|  | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Amount of Gain (Loss) |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Recognized in Income on |
|  |  |  | Gain or |  | Gain or (Loss) |  | Derivative (Ineffective |
|  |  |  | (Loss) |  | Reclassified from |  | Portion and Amount |
|  |  |  | Recognized in |  | Accumulated OCI into |  | Excluded from |
|  | Notional |  | Accumulated |  | Income (1) |  | Effectiveness Testing) |
(US$ in millions) |  | Amount |  | OCI (1) |  | Location |  | Amount |  | Location |  | Amount (2) |
Cash Flow Hedge: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Foreign Exchange (3) |  | $ | 684 |  | $ | 3 |  | Cost of goods sold |  | $ | (3 | ) | Cost of goods sold |  | $ | — |
Total |  | $ | 684 |  | $ | 3 |  |  |  | $ | (3 | ) |  |  | $ | — |

23

Table of Contents

(1) The gain or (loss) recognized relates to the effective portion of the hedging relationship. At September 30, 2012, Bunge expected to reclassify into income in the next 12 months approximately $3 million after-tax losses related to its foreign exchange cash flow hedges.

(2) There was no gain or loss recognized in income relating to the ineffective portion of the hedging relationships or to amounts excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness.

(3) The foreign exchange contracts mature at various dates in 2012 and 2013.

12. DEBT

On May 30, 2013, Bunge entered into an unsecured $665 million five-year syndicated revolving credit agreement with CoBank, ACB, as administrative agent and certain lenders party thereto. Under the terms of the agreement, the Lenders will initially make available up to $368 million of loans, which will increase to $665 million in December 2013 concurrent with the scheduled repayment in full of Bunge’s obligations under an existing term loan facility under which $300 million of principal amount remains outstanding. Borrowings under the revolving credit agreement will bear interest at LIBOR plus a margin, which will vary between 1.050% and 1.675% per annum, based on the credit ratings of our long-term senior unsecured debt. Amounts under the revolving credit agreement that remain undrawn are subject to a commitment fee at rates ranging from 0.125% to 0.275% per annum based likewise on the ratings of our long-term senior unsecured debt.

On June 24, 2013, Bunge entered into an unsecured $200 million three-year revolving credit agreement with a certain lender. Borrowings under the credit agreement bear interest at LIBOR plus a margin ranging from 0.90% to 1.55%, based on the credit ratings of our long-term senior unsecured debt. Amounts under the credit agreement that remain undrawn are subject to a commitment fee at a rate of 0.25%.

Bunge’s commercial paper program is supported by an identical amount of committed back-up bank credit lines (the Liquidity Facility) provided by banks that are rated at least A-1 by Standard & Poor’s Financial Services and P-1 by Moody’s Investors Service. In January 2013, Bunge agreed with the Liquidity Facility banks for the amount of aggregate commitments under the Liquidity Facility to be increased from $526 million to $600 million, and simultaneously increased the size of its commercial paper program to $600 million. The Liquidity Facility, which matures in November 2016, permits Bunge, at its option, to set up direct borrowings or issue commercial paper. The cost of borrowing under the Liquidity Facility would typically be higher than the cost of borrowing under Bunge’s commercial paper program. At September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, there were no borrowings outstanding under the commercial paper program and the Liquidity Facility.

The fair value of Bunge’s long-term debt is based on interest rates currently available on comparable maturities to companies with credit standing similar to that of Bunge. The carrying amounts and fair value of long-term debt are as follows:

|  | September 30, 2013 |  | December 31, 2012 |
|  | Carrying |  | Fair Value |  | Fair Value |  | Carrying |  | Fair Value |  | Fair Value |
(US$ in millions) |  | Value |  | (Level 2) |  | (Level 3) |  | Value |  | (Level 2) |  | (Level 3) |
Long-term debt, including current portion |  | $ | 4,045 |  | $ | 4,067 |  | $ | 237 |  | $ | 4,251 |  | $ | 4,322 |  | $ | 259 |

13. TRADE RECEIVABLES SECURITIZATION PROGRAM

Bunge accounts for its trade receivables securitization program (the Program) under the provisions of ASC Topic 860, Transfers and Servicing. The securitization program terminates on June 1, 2016. However, each committed purchaser’s commitment to fund trade receivables sold under the securitization program will terminate on May 28, 2014 unless extended for additional 364-day periods in accordance with the terms of the receivables transfer agreement.

At September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, $759 million and $772 million, respectively, of receivables sold under the Program were derecognized from Bunge’s condensed consolidated balance sheets. Proceeds received in cash related to transfers of receivables under the program totaled $9,126 million and $9,727 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. In addition, cash collections from customers on receivables previously sold were $9,240 million and $9,886 million, respectively. As this is a revolving facility, cash collections from customers are reinvested to fund new receivable sales. Gross receivables sold under the program for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 were $9,285 million and $9,921

24

Table of Contents

million, respectively. These sales resulted in discounts of $2 million and $6 million for the three and nine month periods, respectively, ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, which were included in SG&A in the condensed consolidated statements of income. Servicing fees under the program were not significant in any period.

Bunge’s risk of loss following the sale of the accounts receivable is limited to the deferred purchase price receivable, which at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, had a fair value of $104 million and $134 million respectively, and is included in other current assets in the condensed consolidated balance sheets (see Note 7). The deferred purchase price will be repaid in cash as receivables are collected, generally within 30 days. Delinquencies and credit losses on accounts receivable sold under the program during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 were insignificant. Bunge has reflected all cash flows under the securitization program as operating cash flows in the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012.

14. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS INCLUDING CHANGES IN EQUITY METHOD INVESTMENTS

Bunge purchased commodities and commodity products and fertilizer products from certain of its investees, totaling $128 million and $190 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and $413 million and $540 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Bunge also sold commodities and commodity products to certain of its investees, totaling $108 million and $150 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and $463 million and $414 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

On September 5, 2013, Bunge entered into a definitive agreement with its joint venture partner, OCP Group (OCP) whereby OCP will acquire Bunge’s 50% ownership interest in its fertilizer joint venture in Morocco. This venture is accounted for by the equity method. The transaction is expected to close in the fourth quarter of 2013, subject to customary closing conditions, including regulatory approval in Morocco. The equity in earnings of the joint venture are reported in continuing operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013.

15. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Bunge is party to a large number of claims and lawsuits, primarily tax and labor claims in Brazil and tax claims in Argentina, arising in the normal course of business. The ability to predict the ultimate outcome of such matters involves judgments, estimates and inherent uncertainties. Bunge records liabilities related to its general claims and lawsuits when the exposure item becomes probable and can be reasonably estimated. The range of possible losses for such matters cannot be reasonably estimated and could differ materially from amounts already accrued by the Company. After taking into account the recorded liabilities for these matters, management believes that the ultimate resolution of such matters will not have a material effect on Bunge’s financial condition, results of operations or liquidity. Included in other non-current liabilities at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 are the following amounts related to these matters:

|  | September 30, |  | December 31, |
(US$ in millions) |  | 2013 |  | 2012 |
Tax claims |  | $ | 63 |  | $ | 70 |
Labor claims |  | 79 |  | 75 |
Civil and other claims |  | 101 |  | 109 |
Total |  | $ | 243 |  | $ | 254 |

Tax claims — The tax claims relate principally to claims against Bunge’s Brazilian subsidiaries, primarily value-added tax claims (ICMS, IPI, PIS and COFINS). The determination of the manner in which various Brazilian federal, state and municipal taxes apply to the operations of Bunge is subject to varying interpretations arising from the complex nature of Brazilian tax law. Bunge monitors the Brazilian federal and state governments’ responses to recent Brazilian Supreme Court decisions invalidating certain ICMS incentives and benefits granted by various states on constitutional grounds. While Bunge was not a recipient of any of the incentives and benefits that were the

25

Table of Contents

subject of the Supreme Court decisions, it has received certain similar tax incentives and benefits. Bunge has not received any tax assessment related to the validity of ICMS incentives or benefits it has received and, based on its assessment of the matter under the provisions of GAAP, no liability has been recorded in the condensed consolidated financial statements.

The Argentine tax authorities have been conducting a review of income and other taxes paid by exporters and processors of cereals and other agricultural commodities in the country. In that regard, in October 2010, the Argentine tax authorities carried out inspections at several of Bunge’s locations in Argentina relating to allegations of income tax evasion covering the periods from 2007 to 2009. In December 2012, Bunge’s Argentine subsidiary received an income tax assessment relating to fiscal years 2006 and 2007 with a claim of approximately 436 million pesos (approximately $75 million as of September 30, 2013), plus previously accrued interest on the outstanding amount due of approximately 711 million pesos (approximately $123 million as of September 30, 2013). Bunge’s Argentine subsidiary has appealed this assessment before the National Tax Court. Fiscal years 2008 and 2009 are currently being audited by the tax authorities. It is likely that the tax authorities will also audit fiscal years 2010-2012, although no notice has been rendered to Bunge’s Argentine subsidiary. Additionally, in April 2011, the Argentine tax authorities conducted inspections of Bunge’s locations and those of several other grain exporters with respect to allegations of evasion of liability for value-added taxes and an inquest proceeding has been initiated in the first quarter of 2012 to determine whether there is any potential criminal culpability relating to these matters. Also during 2011, Bunge paid $112 million of accrued export tax obligations in Argentina under protest while reserving all of its rights in respect of such payment. In the first quarter of 2012, the Argentine tax authorities assessed interest on these paid export taxes, which as of September 30, 2013, would total approximately $140 million. Additionally, in April 2012, the Argentine government suspended Bunge’s Argentine subsidiary from a registry of grain traders and, in October 2012, the government excluded Bunge’s subsidiary from this registry in connection with the income tax allegations. These actions primarily result in additional administrative requirements and increased logistical costs on domestic grain shipments within Argentina. While the suspension and exclusion have not had a material adverse effect on Bunge’s business in Argentina, Bunge is challenging the exclusion from the grain registry in the Argentine courts. Management believes that these tax-related allegations and claims are without merit and intends to vigorously defend against them. However, management is, at this time, unable to predict their outcome.

In December, 2012, the Brazilian tax authorities concluded an examination of the PIS COFINS tax returns of one of Bunge’s Brazilian subsidiaries for the years 2004-2007 and proposed adjustments totaling approximately $140 million plus applicable interest and penalties. Management, in consultation with external legal advisors, has reviewed and responded to the proposed adjustments. In conjunction with this review, management has established appropriate reserves for potential exposures.

Labor claims — The labor claims relate principally to claims against Bunge’s Brazilian subsidiaries. The labor claims primarily relate to dismissals, severance, health and safety, salary adjustments and supplementary retirement benefits.

Civil and other — The civil and other claims relate to various disputes with third parties, including suppliers and customers.

Guarantees — Bunge has issued or was a party to the following guarantees at September 30, 2013:

26

Table of Contents

|  | Maximum |
|  | Potential |
|  | Future |
(US$ in millions) |  | Payments |
Customer financing (1) |  | $ | 12 |
Unconsolidated affiliates financing (2) |  | 47 |
Residual value guarantee (3) |  | 69 |
Total |  | $ | 128 |

(1) Bunge has issued guarantees to third parties in Brazil related to amounts owed to these third parties by certain of Bunge’s customers. The terms of the guarantees are equal to the terms of the related financing arrangements, which are generally one year or less, with the exception of guarantees issued under certain Brazilian government programs, primarily from 2006 and 2007, where terms are up to five years. In the event that the customers default on their payments to the third parties and Bunge would be required to perform under the guarantees, Bunge has obtained collateral from the customers. At September 30, 2013, Bunge had approximately $10 million of tangible property that had been pledged to Bunge as collateral against certain of these financing arrangements. Bunge evaluates the likelihood of customer repayments of the amounts due under these guarantees based upon a historical loss analysis and records the value of such guarantees as an obligation in its condensed consolidated financial statements. Bunge’s recorded obligation related to these outstanding guarantees was $2 million at September 30, 2013.

(2) Bunge issued guarantees to certain financial institutions related to debt of certain of its unconsolidated joint ventures. The terms of the guarantees are equal to the terms of the related financings which have maturity dates in 2014 through 2017. There are no recourse provisions or collateral that would enable Bunge to recover any amounts paid under these guarantees. At September 30, 2013, Bunge had no outstanding recorded obligation related to these guarantees.

(3) Bunge issued guarantees to certain financial institutions which are party to certain operating lease arrangements for railcars and barges. These guarantees provide for a minimum residual value to be received by the lessor at conclusion of the lease term. These leases expire in 2016. At September 30, 2013, Bunge’s recorded obligation related to these guarantees was $4 million.

In addition, Bunge Limited has provided full and unconditional parent level guarantees of the indebtedness outstanding under certain senior credit facilities and senior notes entered into, or issued by, its 100% owned subsidiaries. At September 30, 2013, Bunge’s condensed consolidated balance sheet includes debt with a carrying amount of $4,207 million related to these guarantees. This debt includes the senior notes issued by two of Bunge’s 100% owned finance subsidiaries, Bunge Limited Finance Corp. and Bunge N.A. Finance L.P. There are no significant restrictions on the ability of Bunge Limited Finance Corp., Bunge N.A. Finance L.P. or any other Bunge subsidiary to transfer funds to Bunge Limited.

16. EQUITY

Share repurchase program — Bunge has established a program for the repurchase of up to $975 million of Bunge’s issued and outstanding common shares. The program runs indefinitely. There were no share repurchases under the program during the nine months ended September 30, 2013. Total repurchases under the program from its inception on June 8, 2010 through September 30, 2013 were 8,647,859 shares for $474 million.

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Bunge — The following table summarizes the balances of related after-tax components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Bunge:

|  |  |  |  |  | Pension |  |  |  |  |
|  | Foreign |  | Deferred |  | and Other |  | Unrealized |  | Accumulated |
|  | Exchange |  | Gain (Loss) |  | Postretirement |  | Gain (Loss) |  | Other |
|  | Translation |  | on Hedging |  | Liability |  | on |  | Comprehensive |
(US$ in millions) |  | Adjustment |  | Activities |  | Adjustments |  | Investments |  | Income (Loss) |
Balance, July 1, 2013 |  | $ | (2,023 | ) | $ | 29 |  | $ | (155 | ) | $ | 10 |  | $ | (2,139 | )
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassification |  | (85 | ) | (28 | ) | (1 | ) | — |  | (114 | )
Amount reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income |  | (4 | ) | (27 | ) | — |  | (6 | ) | (37 | )
Net-current period other comprehensive income |  | (89 | ) | (55 | ) | (1 | ) | (6 | ) | (151 | )
Balance, September 30, 2013 |  | $ | (2,112 | ) | $ | (26 | ) | $ | (156 | ) | $ | 4 |  | $ | (2,290 | )

27

Table of Contents

|  |  |  |  |  | Pension |  |  |  |  |
|  | Foreign |  | Deferred |  | and Other |  | Unrealized |  | Accumulated |
|  | Exchange |  | Gain (Loss) |  | Postretirement |  | Gain (Loss) |  | Other |
|  | Translation |  | on Hedging |  | Liability |  | on |  | Comprehensive |
(US$ in millions) |  | Adjustment |  | Activities |  | Adjustments |  | Investments |  | Income (Loss) |
Balance, January 1, 2013 |  | $ | (1,265 | ) | $ | 3 |  | $ | (157 | ) | $ | 9 |  | $ | (1,410 | )
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassification |  | (843 | ) | (2 | ) | 1 |  | 4 |  | (840 | )
Amount reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income(1) |  | (4 | ) | (27 | ) | — |  | (9 | ) | (40 | )
Net-current period other comprehensive income |  | (847 | ) | (29 | ) | 1 |  | (5 | ) | (880 | )
Balance, September 30, 2013 |  | $ | (2,112 | ) | $ | (26 | ) | $ | (156 | ) | $ | 4 |  | $ | (2,290 | )

(1) Certain items were reclassified to gain on sale of the Brazilian fertilizer distribution business in the condensed consolidated statements of income as a result of the substantial liquidation arising from the sale of that business during the three months ended September 30, 2013. Such items included $4 million of cumulative translation adjustments related to that business as well as $37 million of gains related to net investment hedges related to that business.

17. EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share.

|  | Three Months Ended |  | Nine Months Ended |
|  | September 30, |  | September 30, |
(US$ in millions, except for share data) |  | 2013 |  | 2012 |  | 2013 |  | 2012 |
Income (loss) from continuing operations |  | $ | (296 | ) | $ | 299 |  | $ | (17 | ) | $ | 689 |
Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests |  | 45 |  | (4 | ) | 91 |  | 7 |
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to Bunge |  | (251 | ) | 295 |  | 74 |  | 696 |
Other redeemable obligations (1) |  | (9 | ) | — |  | (28 | ) | — |
Convertible preference share dividends |  | (8 | ) | (8 | ) | (25 | ) | (25 | )
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax |  | 103 |  | 2 |  | 94 |  | (33 | )
Net income (loss) available to Bunge common shareholders |  | $ | (165 | ) | $ | 289 |  | $ | 115 |  | $ | 638 |
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Basic |  | 147,349,175 |  | 146,074,712 |  | 147,044,232 |  | 145,921,603 |
Effect of dilutive shares: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
–stock options and awards |  | — |  | 986,835 |  | 981,920 |  | 1,029,573 |
–convertible preference shares |  | — |  | 7,583,790 |  | — |  | 7,583,790 |
Diluted (2) |  | 147,349,175 |  | 154,645,337 |  | 148,026,152 |  | 154,534,966 |
Basic earnings per common share: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Net income (loss) from continuing operations |  | $ | (1.82 | ) | $ | 1.96 |  | $ | 0.14 |  | $ | 4.59 |
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations |  | 0.69 |  | 0.01 |  | 0.64 |  | (0.22 | )
Net income (loss) attributable to Bunge common shareholders—basic |  | $ | (1.13 | ) | $ | 1.97 |  | $ | 0.78 |  | $ | 4.37 |
Diluted earnings per common share: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Net income (loss) from continuing operations |  | $ | (1.82 | ) | $ | 1.91 |  | $ | 0.14 |  | $ | 4.50 |
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations |  | 0.69 |  | 0.01 |  | 0.64 |  | (0.21 | )
Net income (loss) attributable to Bunge common shareholders—diluted |  | $ | (1.13 | ) | $ | 1.92 |  | $ | 0.78 |  | $ | 4.29 |

(1) Accretion of redeemable noncontrolling interests of $9 million and $28 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 relates to a non-fair value variable put arrangement whereby the noncontrolling interest holder may require Bunge to purchase the remaining shares of an oilseed processing operation in Eastern Europe. Accretion for the respective periods includes the effect of losses incurred by the operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013.

(2) Weighted-average common shares outstanding-diluted for the three months ended September 30, 2013 exclude the dilutive effect of approximately 3 million of outstanding stock options and contingently issuable restricted stock units and the dilutive effect of approximately 1 million incremental common shares and 7.6 million weighted average common shares that would be issuable upon conversion of Bunge’s convertible preference shares because the effects of these conversions would not have been dilutive. Weighted-average common shares outstanding-diluted for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 exclude the dilutive effect of approximately 3 million of outstanding stock options and contingently issuable restricted stock units and the dilutive effect of approximately 7.6 million weighted average common shares that would be issuable upon conversion of Bunge’s convertible preference shares because the effects of these conversions would not have been dilutive.

28

Table of Contents

Weighted-average common shares outstanding-diluted for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 exclude the dilutive effect of approximately 4 million of outstanding stock options and contingently issuable restricted stock units because the effect of conversion would not have been dilutive. Weighted-average common shares outstanding-diluted for the three and nine months ended nine months ended September 30, 2012 include the dilutive effect of 7.6 million weighted average common shares that would be issuable upon conversion of Bunge’s convertible preference shares.

18. SEGMENT INFORMATION

Bunge has five reportable segments—agribusiness, sugar and bioenergy, edible oil products, milling products and fertilizer—which are organized based upon similar economic characteristics and are similar in nature of products and services offered, the nature of production processes, the type and class of customer and distribution methods. The agribusiness segment is characterized by both inputs and outputs being agricultural commodities and thus high volume and low margin. The sugar and bioenergy segment involves sugarcane growing and milling in Brazil, sugar merchandising in various countries, as well as sugarcane-based ethanol production and corn-based ethanol investments and related activities. The edible oil products segment involves the manufacturing and marketing of products derived from vegetable oils. The milling products segment involves the manufacturing and marketing of products derived primarily from wheat and corn. Following the classification of the Brazilian fertilizer distribution and North American fertilizer businesses as discontinued operations (see Note 4), the activities of the fertilizer segment include its port operations in Brazil, its operations in Argentina and Bunge’s 50% equity interest in a Morocco joint venture. On September 5, 2013 Bunge and OCP Group have reached an agreement for OCP to acquire Bunge’s 50% ownership interest in our Moroccan fertilizer joint venture.

The “Discontinued Operations & Unallocated” column in the following table contains the reconciliation between the totals for reportable segments and Bunge consolidated totals, which consist primarily of amounts attributable to discontinued operations, corporate items not allocated to the operating segments and inter-segment eliminations. Transfers between the segments are generally valued at market. The revenues generated from these transfers are shown in the following table as “Inter-segment revenues segments or inter-segment eliminations.”

(US$ in millions)

|  |  |  |  |  | Edible |  |  |  |  |  | Discontinued |  |  |
Three Months Ended |  |  |  | Sugar and |  | Oil |  | Milling |  |  |  | Operations & |  |  |
September 30, 2013 |  | Agribusiness |  | Bioenergy |  | Products |  | Products |  | Fertilizer |  | Unallocated (1) |  | Total |
Net sales to external customers |  | $ | 10,718 |  | $ | 1,133 |  | $ | 2,225 |  | $ | 487 |  | $ | 138 |  | $ | — |  | $ | 14,701 |
Inter-segment revenues |  | 1,230 |  | 28 |  | 37 |  | — |  | 4 |  | (1,299 | ) | — |
Gross profit |  | 484 |  | (2 | ) | 127 |  | 61 |  | 18 |  | — |  | 688 |
Foreign exchange gains (losses) |  | 38 |  | 2 |  | 7 |  | (1 | ) | 3 |  | — |  | 49 |
Noncontrolling interests (1) |  | 2 |  | 2 |  | (2 | ) | — |  | (2 | ) | 45 |  | 45 |
Other income (expense) – net |  | 10 |  | 1 |  | 1 |  | — |  | 4 |  | — |  | 16 |
Segment EBIT (2) |  | 326 |  | (37 | ) | 43 |  | 24 |  | 15 |  | — |  | 371 |
Discontinued operations (3) |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | 103 |  | 103 |
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |  | (63 | ) | (54 | ) | (25 | ) | (6 | ) | (5 | ) | — |  | (153 | )
Total assets |  | 19,904 |  | 3,695 |  | 2,514 |  | 875 |  | 513 |  | 999 |  | 28,500 |

Three Months Ended |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
September 30, 2012 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Net sales to external customers |  | $ | 11,993 |  | $ | 1,522 |  | $ | 2,395 |  | $ | 485 |  | $ | 148 |  | $ | — |  | $ | 16,543 |
Inter-segment revenues |  | 1,369 |  | — |  | 33 |  | — |  | 15 |  | (1,417 | ) | — |
Gross profit |  | 594 |  | 50 |  | 113 |  | 60 |  | 26 |  | — |  | 843 |
Foreign exchange gains (losses) |  | 32 |  | (15 | ) | (2 | ) | 1 |  | (1 | ) | — |  | 15 |
Noncontrolling interests (1) |  | (13 | ) | — |  | 1 |  | — |  | (1 | ) | 9 |  | (4 | )
Other income (expense) – net |  | (1 | ) | (13 | ) | — |  | (1 | ) | 6 |  | — |  | (9 | )
Segment EBIT (2) |  | 406 |  | (47 | ) | 29 |  | 30 |  | 22 |  | — |  | 440 |
Discontinued operations (3) |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | 2 |  | 2 |
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |  | (55 | ) | (52 | ) | (22 | ) | (8 | ) | (5 | ) | — |  | (142 | )
Total assets |  | 18,685 |  | 3,878 |  | 2,787 |  | 921 |  | 494 |  | 1,870 |  | 28,635 |

29

Table of Contents

|  |  |  |  |  | Edible |  |  |  |  |  | Discontinued |  |  |
Nine Months Ended |  |  |  | Sugar and |  | Oil |  | Milling |  |  |  | Operations & |  |  |
September 30, 2013 |  | Agribusiness |  | Bioenergy |  | Products |  | Products |  | Fertilizer |  | Unallocated (1) |  | Total |
Net sales to external customers |  | $ | 33,058 |  | $ | 3,185 |  | $ | 6,898 |  | $ | 1,531 |  | $ | 300 |  | $ | — |  | $ | 44,972 |
Inter-segment revenues |  | 3,886 |  | 28 |  | 96 |  | 9 |  | 42 |  | (4,061 | ) | — |
Gross profit |  | 1,252 |  | 89 |  | 380 |  | 185 |  | 44 |  | — |  | 1,950 |
Foreign exchange gains (losses) |  | (5 | ) | 2 |  | 6 |  | (1 | ) | 5 |  | — |  | 7 |
Noncontrolling interests (1) |  | 32 |  | 5 |  | (3 | ) | — |  | (3 | ) | 60 |  | 91 |
Other income (expense) – net |  | 7 |  | 3 |  | 9 |  | 5 |  | 37 |  | — |  | 61 |
Segment EBIT (2) |  | 686 |  | (17 | ) | 115 |  | 89 |  | 60 |  | — |  | 933 |
Discontinued operations (3) |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | 94 |  | 94 |
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |  | (181 | ) | (133 | ) | (74 | ) | (21 | ) | (14 | ) | — |  | (423 | )
Total assets |  | 19,904 |  | 3,695 |  | 2,514 |  | 875 |  | 513 |  | 999 |  | 28,500 |

Nine Months Ended |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
September 30, 2012 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Net sales to external customers |  | $ | 31,890 |  | $ | 3,482 |  | $ | 6,947 |  | $ | 1,333 |  | $ | 299 |  | $ | — |  | $ | 43,951 |
Inter-segment revenues |  | 3,769 |  | — |  | 96 |  | — |  | 49 |  | (3,914 | ) | — |
Gross profit |  | 1,424 |  | 73 |  | 317 |  | 159 |  | 50 |  | — |  | 2,023 |
Foreign exchange gains (losses) |  | 106 |  | (15 | ) | (5 | ) | 1 |  | (1 | ) | — |  | 86 |
Noncontrolling interests (1) |  | (10 | ) | 4 |  | 2 |  | — |  | (2 | ) | 13 |  | 7 |
Other income (expense) – net |  | 10 |  | (20 | ) | 2 |  | — |  | (2 | ) | — |  | (10 | )
Gain on sale of investments in affiliates |  | 85 |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | 85 |
Gain on acquisition of controlling interest |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | 36 |  | — |  | — |  | 36 |
Segment EBIT (2) |  | 989 |  | (108 | ) | 52 |  | 101 |  | 17 |  | — |  | 1,051 |
Discontinued operations (3) |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | (33 | ) | (33 | )
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |  | (160 | ) | (124 | ) | (69 | ) | (21 | ) | (14 | ) | — |  | (388 | )
Total assets |  | 18,685 |  | 3,878 |  | 2,787 |  | 921 |  | 494 |  | 1,870 |  | 28,635 |

(1) Includes noncontrolling interests share of interest and tax to reconcile to consolidated noncontrolling interest.

(2) Total segment earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) is an operating performance measure used by Bunge’s management to evaluate segment operating activities. Bunge’s management believes total segment EBIT is a useful measure of operating profitability, since the measure allows for an evaluation of the performance of its segments without regard to its financing methods or capital structure. In addition, EBIT is a financial measure that is widely used by analysts and investors in Bunge’s industries.

(3) Represents net income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax including Bunge’s 2013 third quarter sale of its Brazilian fertilizer distribution business and recognized a pre-tax gain of $148 million on this transaction (see Note 4).

A reconciliation of total segment EBIT to net income attributable to Bunge follows:

|  | Three Months Ended |  | Nine Months Ended |
|  | September 30, |  | September 30, |
(US$ in millions) |  | 2013 |  | 2012 |  | 2013 |  | 2012 |
Total segment EBIT |  | $ | 371 |  | $ | 440 |  | $ | 933 |  | $ | 1,051 |
Interest income |  | 27 |  | 5 |  | 47 |  | 43 |
Interest expense |  | (103 | ) | (77 | ) | (264 | ) | (214 | )
Income tax expense |  | (591 | ) | (82 | ) | (702 | ) | (197 | )
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax |  | 103 |  | 2 |  | 94 |  | (33 | )
Noncontrolling interests’ share of interest and tax |  | 45 |  | 9 |  | 60 |  | 13 |
Net income (loss) attributable to Bunge |  | $ | (148 | ) | $ | 297 |  | $ | 168 |  | $ | 663 |

30

Table of Contents

19. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On October 23, 2013, Bunge announced that it has agreed to buy the wheat milling business of Grupo Altex S.A. de C.V. in Mexico. In addition to the mills, Bunge is acquiring Grupo Altex’s product brands and its innovation center. The purchase is expected to close in the fourth quarter of 2013 subject to regulatory approval and customary closing conditions.

On October 23, 2013, management became aware of certain financial difficulties of a Brazilian distributor customer in its agribusiness segment and, accordingly, a pre-tax charge of approximately $17 million has been reflected in the condensed consolidated statements of income for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, reflecting the balance outstanding at that date.

31

Table of Contents

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward Looking Statements

This report contains both historical and forward looking statements. All statements, other than statements of historical fact are, or may be deemed to be, forward looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act). These forward looking statements are not based on historical facts, but rather reflect our current expectations and projections about our future results, performance, prospects and opportunities. We have tried to identify these forward looking statements by using words including “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “plan,” “intend,” “estimate,” “continue” and similar expressions. These forward looking statements are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause our actual results, performance, prospects or opportunities to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, these forward looking statements. The following important factors, among others, could affect our business and financial performance, industry conditions, including fluctuations in supply, demand and prices for agricultural commodities and other raw materials and products used in our business, fluctuations in energy and freight costs and competitive developments in our industries; the effects of weather conditions and the outbreak of crop and animal disease on our business; global and regional agricultural, economic, financial and commodities market, political, social and health conditions; the outcome of pending regulatory and legal proceedings; our ability to complete, integrate and benefit from acquisitions, dispositions, joint ventures and strategic alliances; our ability to achieve the efficiencies, savings and other benefits anticipated from our cost reduction, margin improvement and other business optimization initiatives; changes in government policies, laws and regulations affecting our business, including agricultural and trade policies, tax regulations and biofuels legislation; and other factors affecting our business generally.

The forward looking statements included in this report are made only as of the date of this report, and except as otherwise required by federal securities law, we do not have any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances.

You should refer to “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, filed with the SEC on March 1, 2013, and “Part II — Item 1A. Risk Factors” in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for a more detailed discussion of these factors.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Third Quarter 2013 Overview

You should refer to “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Factors Affecting Operating Results” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 for a discussion of key factors affecting operating results in each of our business segments.

As a result of our entrance into an agreement with Yara International ASA under which Yara would acquire our Brazilian fertilizer distribution business on December 6, 2012 and our announcement of the sale of our interest in our U.S. fertilizer distribution to our partner in that venture, GROWMARK, these businesses have been reported within discontinued operations, net of tax, in our consolidated statements of income beginning in the fourth quarter of 2012 and have been excluded from segment results for all periods presented.

Segment Overview

Agribusiness — Our Agribusiness segment performed well in the third quarter of 2013, though EBIT of $326 million was well below the record year-ago third quarter EBIT of $406 million. Strong margins and volumes in our Brazilian processing and merchandising operations were the primary driver of results for the quarter. In Argentina, oilseed processing results improved with a larger soybean crop and a pick-up in farmer selling, but did not fully offset lower earnings in grain merchandising, which was negatively impacted by the poor wheat crop. Results in Europe and Asia were similar to last year. Oilseed processing capacity utilization in North America was low for both soybeans and canola, impacted by last year’s drought which reduced available raw material. U.S. grain

32

Table of Contents

exports were also low, reflecting the impact of last summer’s extreme drought on corn production and the delay to this year’s harvests caused by late planting. Our teams managed global supply lines and market volatility well in a challenging environment. Results in the third quarter of 2013 included an $8 million gain related to the sale of our investment in a U.S. biofuels company.

Sugar and Bioenergy — Sugar and bioenergy segment EBIT for the third quarter of 2013 was a loss of $37 million compared to a loss of $47 million in the third quarter of 2012. Results for the third quarter of 2013 were driven by a loss in our Brazilian sugarcane milling business. Lower unit costs from higher crushing volume and productivity improvements were more than offset by lower sugar prices, as well as costs related to land where we did not harvest or plant this year due to wet weather. Compared to our expectations, third quarter milling results were substantially below target, primarily due to lower sucrose content in the cane (ATR) across all of our mills resulting from wet weather and frost, lower sugarcane crushing volume due to excessive rain and the impact of mark-to-market losses in forward sugar hedges as sugar futures rallied in late September. Our global trading & merchandising business performed well, continuing to grow in volume and market share. Results in U.S. biofuels were higher primarily due to improved margins in our ethanol joint venture. EBIT in the third quarter of 2013 included provisions of approximately $18 million related to equipment and machinery held for sale. Results in the third quarter of 2012 included an impairment charge of $39 million related to a North American corn ethanol joint venture.

Edible oil products — Edible oil products segment EBIT of $43 million in the third quarter of 2013 was higher than the $29 million reported in the third quarter of 2012 due to improved volumes and margins benefiting from our portfolio diversification across product mix and geographies. Lower results in Brazil and in the U.S. were more than offset by good performances in Europe, Canada and Asia which were driven by continuing cost reduction programs, improved category innovation and pricing.

Milling products — Milling products EBIT for the third quarter of 2013 declined to $24 million compared to $30 million in the same period of 2012. Results for the third quarter of 2013 included a $7 million charge related to transactional tax credits in Brazil. Performance in our Brazilian and Mexican wheat milling operations improved compared with the same period of last year, more than offsetting lower results in corn milling which, after a strong first half of the year, experienced softer volumes as some customers delayed purchases until the arrival of new crop. Contributing to the improved wheat milling results were a combination of lower industrial costs and higher margins. In Brazil, margins also benefitted from good raw material procurement strategies in a market of tight wheat supplies and high flour prices. Rice milling results were similar to last year.

Fertilizer — Fertilizer segment EBIT for the third quarter of 2013 declined to $15 million compared to $22 million in the same period of 2012. Higher results in our Brazilian fertilizer port operation more than offset lower results in Argentina which was impacted by lower volumes from reduced corn and wheat planting.

Segment Results

A summary of certain items in our condensed consolidated statements of income and volumes by reportable segment for the periods indicated is set forth below.

33

Table of Contents

|  | Three Months Ended |  | Nine Months Ended |
|  | September 30, |  | September 30, |
(US$ in millions, except volumes) |  | 2013 |  | 2012 |  | 2013 |  | 2012 |
Volumes (in thousands of metric tons): |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Agribusiness |  | 35,472 |  | 35,770 |  | 101,273 |  | 101,143 |
Sugar and Bioenergy |  | 3,005 |  | 2,855 |  | 7,329 |  | 5,990 |
Edible oil products |  | 1,779 |  | 1,692 |  | 5,187 |  | 4,876 |
Milling products |  | 1,010 |  | 1,097 |  | 3,052 |  | 3,230 |
Fertilizer |  | 293 |  | 322 |  | 622 |  | 622 |
Net sales: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Agribusiness |  | $ | 10,718 |  | $ | 11,993 |  | $ | 33,058 |  | $ | 31,890 |
Sugar and Bioenergy |  | 1,133 |  | 1,522 |  | 3,185 |  | 3,482 |
Edible oil products |  | 2,225 |  | 2,395 |  | 6,898 |  | 6,947 |
Milling products |  | 487 |  | 485 |  | 1,531 |  | 1,333 |
Fertilizer |  | 138 |  | 148 |  | 300 |  | 299 |
Total |  | $ | 14,701 |  | $ | 16,543 |  | $ | 44,972 |  | $ | 43,951 |
Cost of goods sold: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Agribusiness |  | $ | (10,234 | ) | $ | (11,399 | ) | $ | (31,806 | ) | $ | (30,466 | )
Sugar and Bioenergy |  | (1,135 | ) | (1,472 | ) | (3,096 | ) | (3,409 | )
Edible oil products |  | (2,098 | ) | (2,282 | ) | (6,518 | ) | (6,630 | )
Milling products |  | (426 | ) | (425 | ) | (1,346 | ) | (1,174 | )
Fertilizer |  | (120 | ) | (122 | ) | (256 | ) | (249 | )
Total |  | $ | (14,013 | ) | $ | (15,700 | ) | $ | (43,022 | ) | $ | (41,928 | )
Gross profit: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Agribusiness |  | $ | 484 |  | $ | 594 |  | $ | 1,252 |  | $ | 1,424 |
Sugar and Bioenergy |  | (2 | ) | 50 |  | 89 |  | 73 |
Edible oil products |  | 127 |  | 113 |  | 380 |  | 317 |
Milling products |  | 61 |  | 60 |  | 185 |  | 159 |
Fertilizer |  | 18 |  | 26 |  | 44 |  | 50 |
Total |  | $ | 688 |  | $ | 843 |  | $ | 1,950 |  | $ | 2,023 |
Selling, general and administrative expenses: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Agribusiness |  | $ | (208 | ) | $ | (206 | ) | $ | (600 | ) | $ | (626 | )
Sugar and Bioenergy |  | (40 | ) | (69 | ) | (116 | ) | (150 | )
Edible oil products |  | (90 | ) | (83 | ) | (277 | ) | (264 | )
Milling products |  | (36 | ) | (30 | ) | (100 | ) | (95 | )
Fertilizer |  | (8 | ) | (8 | ) | (23 | ) | (28 | )
Total |  | $ | (382 | ) | $ | (396 | ) | $ | (1,116 | ) | $ | (1,163 | )
Foreign exchange gains (losses): |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Agribusiness |  | $ | 38 |  | $ | 32 |  | $ | (5 | ) | $ | 106 |
Sugar and Bioenergy |  | 2 |  | (15 | ) | 2 |  | (15 | )
Edible oil products |  | 7 |  | (2 | ) | 6 |  | (5 | )
Milling products |  | (1 | ) | 1 |  | (1 | ) | 1 |
Fertilizer |  | 3 |  | (1 | ) | 5 |  | (1 | )
Total |  | $ | 49 |  | $ | 15 |  | $ | 7 |  | $ | 86 |
Noncontrolling interests: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Agribusiness |  | $ | 2 |  | $ | (13 | ) | $ | 32 |  | $ | (10 | )
Sugar and Bioenergy |  | 2 |  | — |  | 5 |  | 4 |
Edible oil products |  | (2 | ) | 1 |  | (3 | ) | 2 |
Milling products |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |
Fertilizer |  | (2 | ) | (1 | ) | (3 | ) | (2 | )
Total |  | $ | — |  | $ | (13 | ) | $ | 31 |  | $ | (6 | )
Other income (expense) - net: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Agribusiness |  | $ | 10 |  | $ | (1 | ) | $ | 7 |  | $ | 10 |
Sugar and Bioenergy |  | 1 |  | (13 | ) | 3 |  | (20 | )
Edible oil products |  | 1 |  | — |  | 9 |  | 2 |
Milling products |  | — |  | (1 | ) | 5 |  | — |
Fertilizer |  | 4 |  | 6 |  | 37 |  | (2 | )
Total |  | $ | 16 |  | $ | (9 | ) | $ | 61 |  | $ | (10 | )
Gain on sale of agribusiness investment in affiliate |  | $ | — |  | $ | — |  | $ | — |  | $ | 85 |
Gain on acquisition of milling business controlling interest |  | $ | — |  | $ | — |  | $ | — |  | $ | 36 |
Segment earnings before interest and tax: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Agribusiness |  | $ | 326 |  | $ | 406 |  | $ | 686 |  | $ | 989 |
Sugar and Bioenergy |  | (37 | ) | (47 | ) | (17 | ) | (108 | )
Edible oil products |  | 43 |  | 29 |  | 115 |  | 52 |
Milling products |  | 24 |  | 30 |  | 89 |  | 101 |
Fertilizer |  | 15 |  | 22 |  | 60 |  | 17 |
Total (1) |  | $ | 371 |  | $ | 440 |  | $ | 933 |  | $ | 1,051 |
Depreciation, depletion and amortization: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Agribusiness |  | $ | (63 | ) | $ | (55 | ) | $ | (181 | ) | $ | (160 | )
Sugar and Bioenergy |  | (54 | ) | (52 | ) | (133 | ) | (124 | )
Edible oil products |  | (25 | ) | (22 | ) | (74 | ) | (69 | )
Milling products |  | (6 | ) | (8 | ) | (21 | ) | (21 | )
Fertilizer |  | (5 | ) | (5 | ) | (14 | ) | (14 | )
Total |  | $ | (153 | ) | $ | (142 | ) | $ | (423 | ) | $ | (388 | )

34

Table of Contents

(1) Total segment earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) is an operating performance measure used by Bunge’s management to evaluate segment operating activities. Bunge’s management believes total segment EBIT is a useful measure of operating profitability, since the measure allows for an evaluation of the performance of its segments without regard to its financing methods or capital structure. In addition, EBIT is a financial measure that is widely used by analysts and investors in Bunge’s industries. Total segment EBIT is not a measure of consolidated operating results under U.S. GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative to net income or any other measure of consolidated operating results under U.S. GAAP.

A reconciliation of total segment EBIT to net income attributable to Bunge follows:

|  | Three Months Ended |  | Nine Months Ended |
|  | September 30, |  | September 30, |
(US$ in millions) |  | 2013 |  | 2012 |  | 2013 |  | 2012 |
Total segment EBIT |  | $ | 371 |  | $ | 440 |  | $ | 933 |  | $ | 1,051 |
Interest income |  | 27 |  | 5 |  | 47 |  | 43 |
Interest expense |  | (103 | ) | (77 | ) | (264 | ) | (214 | )
Income tax (expense) benefit |  | (591 | ) | (82 | ) | (702 | ) | (197 | )
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax |  | 103 |  | 2 |  | 94 |  | (33 | )
Noncontrolling interests’ share of interest and tax |  | 45 |  | 9 |  | 60 |  | 13 |
Net income (loss) attributable to Bunge |  | $ | (148 | ) | $ | 297 |  | $ | 168 |  | $ | 663 |

Three Months Ended September 30, 2013 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2012

Agribusiness Segment — Agribusiness segment net sales decreased 11% to $11 billion in the third quarter of 2013 from $12 billion in the third quarter of 2012. Volumes were essentially flat and prices declined on all major agricultural commodities compared to last year’s third quarter. Volume declines in North America resulted from last year’s drought and were offset by volume increases in South America, particularly Brazil origination, resulting from strong South American harvests. Merchandising volumes in Asia were higher, but were largely offset by lower merchandising volumes in Europe. Prices of agricultural commodities were lower across the spectrum as the strong South American harvests reduced the North American drought impact on global supply and demand.

Cost of goods sold decreased 10% primarily as a result of the decline in global commodity prices mentioned above, which reduced commodity input costs.

Gross profit of $484 million in the third quarter of 2013 decreased 19% compared to the third quarter of 2012. Oilseed processing margins were lower across the regions, with the exception of Brazil and Argentina, where this business performed well with record harvests. Margins were particularly low in North America as a result of the reduced capacity utilization and in some cases interim plant shutdowns due to a lack of raw materials to process.

35

Table of Contents

Merchandising gross profit was generally lower with the exception of Brazil origination and EMEA oilseeds merchandising. Ports in South America contributed well to overall gross profit, as did our commodity trade flow structured finance activities. Risk management also performed well during the period.

SG&A expenses were $208 million in the third quarter of 2013 compared to $206 million in the third quarter of 2012. The increase from last year resulted primarily from higher bad debt charges, mainly in Brazil, and the favorable impact of the devaluation of the Brazilian real and Argentine peso on the translation of local currency costs into U.S. dollars.

Foreign exchange gains were $38 million in the third quarter of 2013 compared to gains of $32 million in the same period of 2012. These foreign exchange gains relate primarily to the weakness in the Brazilian real during the quarter.

Other income (expenses)-net was income of $10 million in the third quarter of 2013 compared to a loss of $1 million in the same period of 2012. The income in the third quarter of 2013 relates primarily to a gain of $8 million on the sale of our investment in a biofuels company in North America.

Noncontrolling interests represents (income) loss attributed to the noncontrolling interest holders in joint venture operations that are consolidated in our financial statements.

Segment EBIT decreased by $80 million to $326 million in the third quarter of 2013 from $406 million in the third quarter of 2012 as a result primarily of the 19% lower gross profit.

Sugar and Bioenergy Segment — Sugar and Bioenergy segment net sales decreased $389 million (26%) compared to the third quarter of 2012. The decline in sales was driven by a significant decline in prices, particularly sugar. Sugar production volumes in our industrial operations also contributed to the lower net sales with lower ATR (sugar content in the processed cane) during the period although crushing volumes increased. Merchandising volumes were 6% higher than last year’s third quarter.

Cost of goods sold decreased 23% in the third quarter of 2013 compared to the same period of 2012 driven by the impact of the decline in average sugar prices on our trading and merchandising business. Cost of goods sold in 2013 includes approximately $15 million of charges relating to land that we did not harvest or plant this year due to the wet weather conditions.

Gross profit decreased by $52 million to $(2) million in the third quarter of 2013 from $50 million in the comparable period of 2012 primarily as a result of lower sugar prices and charges during the quarter related to land that we did not harvest or plant this year due to wet weather. Gross profit benefited from solid risk management performance in our merchandising business.

SG&A expenses were $40 million in the third quarter of 2013 compared to $69 million in the third quarter of 2012. SG&A for the third quarter of 2012 included a $29 million charge for impairment of a loan receivable from a North American corn ethanol joint venture.

Foreign exchange gains (losses) in the third quarters of 2013 and 2012 was a gain of $2 million and loss of $15 million, respectively, and related primarily to the Brazilian real.

Other income (expenses)-net was a gain of $1 million in the third quarter of 2013 compared to a loss of $(13) million in the same quarter of 2012. Other income (expense), net for the third quarter of 2012 included a $10 million charge for impairment of an equity investment in a North American corn ethanol joint venture.

Noncontrolling interests were $2 million in the third quarter of 2013 compared with nil in the third quarter of 2012 and represents the noncontrolling interests’ share of period loss from our non-wholly owned Brazilian sugarcane mills.

Segment EBIT improved by $10 million to a loss of $37 million in the third quarter of 2013 from a loss of $47 million in the third quarter of 2012. Segment EBIT in the third quarter of 2012 included $39 million of impairment charges in SG&A and Other income (expense) related to a North American corn ethanol joint venture. Industrial results were weaker in the third quarter of 2013 compared to last year as a result of lower sucrose content

36

Table of Contents

in the harvested sugarcane, low sugar and ethanol prices, and provisions of $18 million for the impairment of certain assets held for sale.

Edible Oil Products Segment — Edible oil products segment net sales decreased by approximately 7% in the third quarter of 2013 compared to the third quarter of 2012, resulting from lower average selling prices which more than offset a 5% increase in volumes, primarily in Europe. Argentina and Asia also reported volume increases.

Cost of goods sold in the third quarter of 2013 decreased 8% when compared to the same period of 2012 as the increase in sales volumes in 2013 was more than offset by lower raw material costs in which average soybean oil futures prices declined approximately 19% in the third quarter of 2013 compared with the same period of 2012.

Gross profit increased to $127 million in the third quarter of 2013 compared to $113 million in the third quarter of 2012. The increase was driven by higher margins, with improved pricing policy management primarily in Brazil, but margins also increased in Asia and the U.S. Increased volumes also contributed to higher gross profit.

SG&A expenses increased 8%, primarily as a result of increased advertising and other selling expenditures consistent with the 2013 volume increases and improved pricing management and product mix initiatives.

Foreign exchange results in the third quarters of 2013 and 2012 were a gain of $7 million and loss of $2 million, respectively.

Segment EBIT increased to $43 million in the third quarter of 2013 compared to $29 million in the third quarter of 2012, as a result of higher gross profit which was partially offset by higher SG&A costs.

Milling Products Segment — Milling products segment net sales for the third quarter of 2013 were flat compared with the same period of 2012. Volumes declined by 8%, primarily in Brazil wheat milling and U.S. corn milling. In Brazil, the reduction related to our termination of a local selling alliance and an effort to maintain margin levels. The U.S. reduction related primarily to customer delays in building inventories until new crop corn prices are available. Volume declines, primarily in Brazil, were essentially offset by local currency price increases, although prices translated to U.S. dollar equivalents are flat relative to last year.

Cost of goods sold was flat for the third quarter of 2013 compared with the same quarter of 2012 as both volumes and commodity prices declined in US Dollar equivalents. Improved raw material procurement practices, particularly in Brazil, benefited local currency cost of goods sold in 2013 compared to the third quarter of 2012.

Gross profit was $61 million for the third quarter of 2013 compared with $60 million in the third quarter of 2012, and related primarily to improved margins in our Brazilian wheat milling operations that translated into fewer U.S. dollar improvements as the Brazilian real weakened relative to the comparative period. Gross profit was slightly higher in Mexico wheat milling and was lower in U.S. corn milling as a result primarily of lower volumes as customers delayed purchases pending new crop arrival.

SG&A expenses increased by $6 million or 20% for the third quarter of 2013 compared to the third quarter of 2012, primarily due to a provision of $7 million for recoverable tax assets in a Brazilian state where we no longer have significant activities. Excluding this item, expenses benefited from the effect of the weaker Brazilian real on translated costs in Brazil.

Other income (expenses)-net was nil in the third quarter of 2013 compared to a loss of $1 million in the comparable period of 2012.

Segment EBIT in the third quarter of 2013 was $24 million compared to $30 million in the third quarter of 2012. Lower results in our Brazilian wheat milling and U.S. corn milling businesses were only partially offset by higher contributions from our Mexico wheat milling business and consistent performance by U.S. rice milling. Margins in Brazil were stronger than the same period of last year as a result of the tight South American supply, but results were reduced by a $7 million provision for recoverable taxes.

Fertilizer Segment — Fertilizer segment net sales decreased 7% to $138 million in the third quarter of 2013 when compared to $148 million in the third quarter of 2012 primarily due to lower volumes in Argentina as a result of reduced corn and wheat planting.

37

Table of Contents

Cost of goods sold for the third quarter of 2013 was 2% lower than the third quarter of 2012 and related primarily to the decline in volumes in Argentina.

Gross profit decreased to $18 million in the third quarter of 2013 from $26 million in the comparable period of 2012. The decrease in gross profit was primarily driven by lower margins, primarily in Argentina in the third quarter of 2013 which more than offset the impact of higher throughput volumes and improved margins in our Brazilian port operations.

SG&A was $8 million in the third quarter of 2013 and equal to the comparable period of 2012.

Foreign exchange gains were $3 million in the third quarter of 2013 compared to $1 million loss in the third quarter of 2012.

Other income (expenses)-net was income of $4 million in the third quarter of 2013 compared to income of $6 million in the third quarter of 2012.

Segment EBIT was $15 million compared to $22 million in the same period of 2012 driven by lower volumes in Argentina and related lower gross profit.

Interest — A summary of consolidated interest income and expense for the periods indicated follows:

|  | Three Months Ended |
|  | September 30, |
(US$ in millions) |  | 2013 |  | 2012 |
Interest income |  | $ | 27 |  | $ | 5 |
Interest expense |  | (103 | ) | (77 | )

Interest income increased when compared to the same period of 2012 as a result of higher average interest bearing cash balances, largely in Brazil. Interest expense also increased when compared to the same period last year primarily due to higher average local borrowings and borrowing rates.

Income Tax Expense — In the quarter ended September 30, 2013, income tax expense for continuing operations was $591 million compared to income tax expense of $82 million in the quarter ended September 30, 2012. Income tax expense for the third quarter of 2013 included $464 million related to the recording of a full valuation allowance for net deferred tax assets in our industrial sugar business in Brazil as a result of continuing cumulative net operating losses and $14 million related to a full valuation allowance for deferred tax assets in our agribusiness and edible oils operations in Romania.

Discontinued Operations — Discontinued operations results were income of $103 million, net of tax, in the third quarter of 2013 and $2 million in the comparable period of 2012. A pre-tax gain of $148 million ($112 million, net of tax) is included in net income from discontinued operations for the third quarter of 2013 related to the sale of our Brazilian fertilizer distribution business to Yara.

Net Income Attributable to Bunge — For the quarter ended September 30, 2013, net loss attributable to Bunge was $148 million compared with net income of $297 million in the quarter ended September 30, 2012. This decrease primarily resulted from the $464 million of income tax valuation allowances noted in Income Tax Expense above, partially offset by the net gain of $112 million on the sale of our Brazilian fertilizer distribution business included in Discontinued Operations.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012

Agribusiness Segment — Agribusiness segment net sales increased 4% to $33 billion in the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to $32 billion in the nine months ended September 30, 2012. Volumes were flat compared to the same period last year. Price increases in the first half of the year account for essentially all of the increase and were partially offset by price declines in the third quarter of 2013 compared to the year-ago period. The third quarter was a transition period in the commodities market where the market was moving from a deficit position resulting from the 2012 U.S. drought to one of surplus with strong harvests in South America in 2013 followed by solid North American crops.

38

Table of Contents

Cost of goods sold also increased 4% primarily as a result of the higher global commodity prices in the first half of 2013. These increases were partially offset by the favorable impact of the devaluation of the Brazilian real and Argentine peso relative to the U.S. dollar on the valuation of U.S. dollar-denominated inventories.

Gross profit decreased in the nine months ended September 30, 2013 by 12% compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2012 driven by lower grain origination and merchandising margins in nearly all regions and particularly in the third quarter in North America as a result of lower capacity utilization from lack of raw material supply.

SG&A expenses were $600 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to $626 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The reduction of 4% resulted largely from the favorable impact of the devaluation of the Brazilian real and Argentine peso when compared to the U.S. dollar on local currency costs, overall G&A cost reduction efforts during 2013 and lower bad debt expenses and higher bad debt recoveries in Brazil.

Foreign exchange losses were $5 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to gains of $106 million in 2012 related primarily to the weakening of global currencies, particularly the Brazilian real and Argentine peso, relative to the U.S. dollar during the nine months ended September 30, 2013.

Other income (expenses)-net was income of $7 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared with income of $10 million in the comparable period of 2012. For 2013, the income relates primarily to a gain of $8 million from the sale during the third quarter of an investment in a North American biofuels company, a gain of $16 million related to the first quarter sale of certain legal claims in Brazil, offset by first half losses of $17 million in the investment funds acquired in 2012. The 2012 amount of $10 million gain related primarily to our share of earnings from our North American soy ingredients joint venture in the first half of 2012.

Gain on sale of investment in affiliate of $85 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2012 related to the gain on the sale of our noncontrolling interest in Solae, a North American soy ingredients joint venture.

Noncontrolling interests represent period (income) loss attributed to the noncontrolling interests and was $32 million of losses in the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to $10 million of income in the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The losses in the nine months ended September 30, 2013 primarily reflected $17 million of losses in the investment funds acquired in 2012 as well as losses in our European and North American oilseed processing joint ventures.

Segment EBIT decreased by $303 million to $686 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2013 from $989 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2012 as a result of lower gross profit and the foreign exchange losses compared with comparable 2012 period gains. In addition, the nine months ended September 30, 2012 included a gain of $85 million related to the sale of our noncontrolling interest in Solae.

Sugar and Bioenergy Segment — Sugar and Bioenergy segment net sales decreased $297 million (9%) compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The decreased sales were driven by a significant decline in prices, particularly sugar, during the third quarter of 2013 compared with the same period of 2012, as well as a reduction in our production volumes during the third quarter of 2013 as a result of lower ATR (sugar content in the cane). The impact of these third quarter price declines were higher volumes in our trading and merchandising business in 2013.

Cost of goods sold decreased by $313 million (9%) in the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to the same period of 2012 driven primarily by the third quarter where costs decreased by 24% as the result of decline in average sugar prices compared to the third quarter of 2012. While average sugar prices were also lower in the first half of 2013 compared with the same period of 2012, first half volume increases, primarily in our trading and merchandising business where volumes nearly doubled, offset the price declines. Trading and merchandising volumes were only slightly higher in the third quarter of 2013 than they were in the same period of 2012.

Gross profit increased to $89 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2013 from $73 million in the comparable period of 2012 primarily as a result of increased production (cane crushing) volumes, which improved

39

Table of Contents

capacity utilization and reduced unitary costs, and strong trading volumes and good risk management performance in our trading and merchandising business.

SG&A expenses decreased to $116 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2013 from $150 million in the comparable period of 2012, which included a $29 million charge for impairment of a loan receivable from a North American corn ethanol joint venture. SG&A also benefited from the weakening of the Brazilian real in 2013 compared with 2012.

Foreign exchange in the first nine months of 2013 yielded gains of $2 million compared with losses of $15 million for the same period of 2012, and related to movements of the Brazilian real.

Equity of earnings in affiliates was a loss of $2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared with losses of $24 million for the same period of 2012, which included a charge of $10 million related to the write-down of an investment in a North American bioenergy joint venture.

Other income (expenses)-net was a gain of $3 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to a loss of $20 million in the same nine months of 2012 primarily due to improved results in our North American bioenergy investments.

Noncontrolling interests were $5 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and $4 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and represent the noncontrolling interests’ shares of period losses from our non-wholly owned Brazilian sugarcane mills.

Segment EBIT improved by $91 million to a loss of $17 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2013 from a loss of $108 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2012. Included in the 2012 period were $39 million of charges related to write-downs of an investment in and loan receivable from a North American biofuels company. Higher gross profit for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 combined with improved performance in our North American bioenergy investments and foreign exchange gains in the period were primary contributors to the improvement.

Edible Oil Products Segment — Edible oil products segment net sales were down 1% for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to the same period last year, as a result of lower selling prices in 2013 that were only partially offset by the 6% increase in volumes, primarily in Europe and Asia.

Cost of goods sold in the nine months ended September 30, 2013 decreased 2% from the same period of 2012 primarily from lower raw material prices, particularly in the third quarter of 2013 when compared with the same period of 2012. The nine months ended September 30, 2012 included a $5 million impairment in Europe and an inventory valuation adjustment in the U.S.

Gross profit increased 20% compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The increase was driven by higher margins in Brazil, driven by tight soybean processing supplies in the domestic market from harvest delays in the first half of 2013, and in Asia from our Amrit acquisition in India. The nine months ended September 30, 2012 included a $5 million impairment in Europe and an inventory valuation adjustment in the U.S.

SG&A expenses increased 5%, primarily as a result of increased advertising and other selling expenditures consistent with the volume increases. These were partially offset by the favorable impact of the weakening of the Brazilian real relative to the U.S. dollar during the nine months ended September 30, 2013.

Foreign exchange results in the first nine months of 2013 and 2012 were gains of $6 million and losses of $5 million, respectively.

Other income (expenses)-net was income of $9 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to income of $2 million in the comparable period of 2012. The nine months ended September 30, 2013 included a $9 million gain on the sale of certain legal claims in Brazil.

Segment EBIT increased $63 million to $115 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2013 from $52 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2012 as a result of higher gross profit, the gain on the sale of certain legal claims in Brazil and foreign exchange gains in 2013.

40

Table of Contents

Milling Products Segment — Milling products segment net sales increased 15% to $1.5 billion. This increase was primarily in the first half of 2013 compared to the same period of 2012 and was related to increased average commodity prices of 29% compared to the prior year period. Prices were relatively flat in the third quarter of 2013 compared with 2012 as the market moved to one of surplus from one of deficit. These price movements were partially offset by a 6% decline in volumes, primarily in Brazilian wheat milling and U.S. corn milling.

Cost of goods sold also increased by 15% in the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared with the same period of 2012 primarily as a result of increased raw material costs from higher commodity prices when compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2012.

Gross profit was $185 million compared with $159 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2012, primarily due to our Brazilian wheat milling operations largely recovering from difficulties associated with a 2012 ERP implementation and from our consolidation of our 2012 acquisition of a controlling interest in a wheat milling business in Mexico where we formerly had a Noncontrolling interest.

SG&A expenses were $100 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to $95 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2012. Additional costs resulting from inclusion of our wheat milling business in Mexico were more than offset by the favorable impact of the weakening of the Brazilian real relative to the U.S. dollar. SG&A for the third quarter of 2013 included a $7 million charge related to recoverable taxes in Brazil.

Other income (expenses)-net was income of $5 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to nil in the comparable period of 2012. The nine months ended September 30, 2013 included a $6 million gain on the sale of certain legal claims in Brazil.

Gain on acquisition of controlling interest of $36 million in the third quarter of 2012 relates to the adjustment to fair value of the previously held noncontrolling interest in a North American wheat milling operation upon assuming control of that operation in the second quarter of 2012.

Segment EBIT in the nine months ended September 30, 2013 was $89 million compared to $101 million in the comparable period of 2012. The result for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 was driven by higher gross profit. The nine months ended September 30, 2012 included a gain on acquisition of controlling interest of $36 million.

Fertilizer Segment — Fertilizer segment net sales were flat at $300 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to $299 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2012. First half sales increased compared with last year by 11% as a result of higher volumes, but third quarter sales were lower on reduced corn and wheat planting in Argentina. Average fertilizer selling prices were slightly higher during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared with 2012.

Cost of goods sold increased 3%, primarily as a result of the volume increases discussed above.

Gross profit decreased to $44 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2013 from $50 million in the comparable period of 2012. The decrease in gross profit was primarily driven by lower 2013 margins, primarily in Argentina.

SG&A decreased to $23 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared with $28 million in the same period of 2012 and resulted largely from the favorable impact of the devaluation of the Brazilian real and Argentine peso on local currency costs.

Foreign exchange gains were $5 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to $1 million loss in the nine months ended September 30, 2012.

Other income (expenses)-net was income of $37 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to a loss of $2 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The improved results were primarily due to a $32 million gain on the sale of certain legal claims in Brazil and improved results in our Moroccan phosphate joint venture.

41

Table of Contents

Segment EBIT was $60 million compared to $17 million in the same period of 2012 driven by the $32 million gain on the sale of certain legal claims in Brazil and improved results in our Moroccan joint venture.

Interest — A summary of consolidated interest income and expense for the periods indicated follows:

|  | Nine Months Ended |
|  | September 30, |
(US$ in millions) |  | 2013 |  | 2012 |
Interest income |  | $ | 47 |  | $ | 43 |
Interest expense |  | (264 | ) | (214 | )

Interest income increased when compared to the same period of 2012 as a result of higher average interest bearing cash balances. Interest expense increased when compared to the same period last year primarily due to higher average local borrowings and borrowing rates.

Income Tax Expense — In the nine months ended September 30, 2013, income tax expense from continuing operations was $702 million compared to income tax expense of $197 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The effective tax rate in the nine months ended September 30, 2013 increased to 103% compared to 21% in the nine months ended September 30, 2012 primarily due to full valuation allowances of $464 million recorded in the third quarter of 2013 related to our Brazil sugar operations and to other discrete income tax charges of 32 million in that period.

Discontinued Operations — Discontinued operations results in the nine months ended September 30, 2013 were income of $94 million, net of tax, compared to a loss of $33 million, net of tax, in the nine months ended September 30, 2012. Results in 2013 were driven by the gain on the sale of the fertilizer distribution business of $112 million, net of tax. Results in the nine months ended September 30, 2012 included a $27 million provision for a legacy environmental claim in Brazil.

Net Income Attributable to Bunge — In the nine months ended September 30, 2013, net income attributable to Bunge decreased to $168 million from $663 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2012. This decrease primarily resulted from the income tax valuation allowances of $464 million recorded in the third quarter of 2013, offset partially by the discontinued operations gain on the sale of our fertilizer distribution business of $112 million, net of tax. The nine months ended September 30, 2012 included a pre-tax gain of $85 million on the sale of our noncontrolling interest in Solae and a pre-tax gain of $36 million related to the acquisition of a controlling interest in a North American wheat milling operation.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity

Our primary financial objective is to maintain sufficient liquidity, balance sheet strength and financial flexibility in order to fund the requirements of our business efficiently. We generally finance our ongoing operations with cash flows generated from operations, issuance of commercial paper, borrowings under various revolving credit facilities and term loans, as well as proceeds from the issuance of senior notes. Acquisitions and long-lived assets are generally financed with a combination of equity and long-term debt.

Our current ratio, which is a widely used measure of liquidity and is defined as current assets divided by current liabilities, was 1.38 and 1.50 at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

Cash and Cash Equivalents — Cash and cash equivalents were $1,482 million and $569 million at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. Cash balances are managed in accordance with our investment policy, the objectives of which are to preserve capital, maximize liquidity and provide appropriate returns. Under our policy, cash balances have been primarily invested in bank time deposits with highly-rated financial institutions and U.S. government securities.

Readily Marketable Inventories — Readily marketable inventories are agricultural commodity inventories such as soybeans, soybean meal, soybean oil, corn, wheat and sugar that are readily convertible to cash because of

42

Table of Contents

their commodity characteristics, widely available markets and international pricing mechanisms. Readily marketable inventories in our agribusiness segment are reported at fair value and were $4,305 million and $4,892 million at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. Of these amounts $3,330 million and $3,442 million can be attributable to merchandising activities at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. The sugar and bioenergy segment included readily marketable sugar inventories of $170 million and $199 million at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. Of these, $114 million and $144 million were inventories carried at fair value at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, in our trading and merchandising business. Sugar inventories in our industrial production business are readily marketable, but are carried at lower of cost or market. Readily marketable inventories at fair value in the aggregate amount of $74 million and $176 million at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, were included in our edible oil products segment inventories.

We recorded interest expense on debt financing readily marketable inventories of $59 million and $95 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Financing Arrangements and Outstanding Indebtedness — We conduct most of our financing activities through a centralized financing structure that enables us and our subsidiaries to borrow more efficiently. This structure includes a master trust facility, the primary assets of which consist of intercompany loans made to Bunge Limited and its subsidiaries. Certain of Bunge Limited’s 100% owned finance subsidiaries, Bunge Limited Finance Corp., Bunge Finance Europe B.V., and Bunge Asset Funding Corp., fund the master trust with short and long-term debt obtained from third parties, including through our commercial paper program and certain credit facilities, as well as the issuance of senior notes. Borrowings by these finance subsidiaries carry full, unconditional guarantees by Bunge Limited.

Revolving credit facilities — At September 30, 2013, we had approximately $4,003 million of aggregate committed borrowing capacity under our commercial paper program and revolving credit facilities, of which $3,703 million was unused and available. The following table summarizes these facilities as of the periods presented:

|  |  |  | Total |  |  |  |  |
Commercial Paper |  |  |  | Availability |  | Borrowings Outstanding |
Program and Revolving |  |  |  | September 30, |  | September 30, |  | December 31, |
Credit Facilities |  | Maturities |  | 2013 |  | 2013 |  | 2012 |
|  |  |  | (US$ in millions) |
Commercial paper |  | 2016 |  | $ | 600 |  | $ | — |  | $ | — |
Long-term revolving credit facilities (1) |  | 2014-2018 |  | 3,103 |  | 300 |  | — |
Total |  |  |  | $ | 3,703 |  | $ | 300 |  | $ | — |

(1) Borrowings under the revolving credit facilities that have maturities greater than one year from the date of the condensed consolidated balance sheets are classified as long-term debt, consistent with the long-term maturity of the underlying facilities. However, individual borrowings under the revolving credit facilities are generally short-term in nature, bear interest at variable rates and can be repaid or renewed as each such individual borrowing matures.

On May 30, 2013, we entered into an unsecured $665 million five-year syndicated revolving credit agreement with CoBank, ACB, as administrative agent and certain lenders party thereto. Under the terms of the agreement, the Lenders will initially make available up to $368 million of loans, which will increase to $665 million in December 2013 concurrent with the scheduled repayment in full of our obligations under an existing term loan facility under which $300 million of principal amount remains outstanding. Borrowings under the revolving credit agreement will bear interest at LIBOR plus a margin, which will vary between 1.050% and 1.675% per annum, based on the credit ratings of our long-term senior unsecured debt. Amounts under the revolving credit agreement that remain undrawn are subject to a commitment fee at rates ranging from 0.125% to 0.275% per annum based likewise on the ratings of our long-term senior unsecured debt. There was $100 million outstanding under this credit agreement at September 30, 2013.

On June 24, 2013, we entered into an unsecured $200 million three-year revolving credit agreement with a certain lender. Borrowings under the credit agreement bear interest at LIBOR plus a margin ranging from 0.90% to 1.55%, based on the credit ratings of our long-term senior unsecured debt. Amounts under the credit agreement that

43

Table of Contents

remain undrawn are subject to a commitment fee at a rate of 0.25%. There was $200 million outstanding under this credit agreement at September 30, 2013.

Our commercial paper program is supported by committed back-up bank credit lines (the Liquidity Facility) equal to the amount of the commercial paper program provided by lending institutions that are required to be rated at least A-1 by Standard & Poor’s and P-1 by Moody’s Investor Services. The cost of borrowing under the Liquidity Facility would typically be higher than the cost of borrowing under our commercial paper program. In January 2013, we increased the commitments under the Liquidity Facility by $74 million to $600 million and therefore simultaneously increased the size of our commercial paper program to $600 million. At September 30, 2013, there were no borrowings outstanding under the commercial paper program or the Liquidity Facility. Our commercial paper program is our only revolving credit facility that requires lenders to maintain minimum credit ratings.

We had no borrowings outstanding at September 30, 2013 under our $1,085 million revolving credit facility that matures on November 17, 2016. Borrowings under this credit facility bear interest at LIBOR plus an applicable margin ranging from 1.125% to 1.75%, based on the credit ratings of our long-term senior unsecured debt. Amounts under the credit facility that remain undrawn are subject to commitment fees payable each quarter based on the average undrawn portion of the credit facility at rates ranging from 0.125% to 0.275% per annum, based generally on the credit ratings of our long-term senior unsecured debt.

We had no borrowings outstanding at September 30, 2013 under our $1,750 million revolving credit facility that matures on April 19, 2014. Borrowings under this credit facility bear interest at LIBOR plus an applicable margin ranging from 1.30% to 2.75% per annum, based on the credit ratings of our long-term senior unsecured debt. Amounts under the credit facility that remain undrawn are subject to a commitment fee payable quarterly on the average undrawn portion of the credit facility at 35% of the applicable margin.

In addition to the committed facilities discussed above, from time-to-time, we enter into bilateral short-term credit lines as necessary based on our financing requirements. At September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, $1,025 million and $1,000 million, respectively, were outstanding under these bilateral short-term credit lines.

Short and long-term debt — Our short and long-term debt increased by $236 million at September 30, 2013 from December 31, 2012, primarily due to higher working capital financing requirements. For the nine months ended September 30, 2013, our average short and long-term debt outstanding was $6,661 million compared to $6,215 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. Our long-term debt balance was $4,045 million at September 30, 2013 compared to $4,251 million at December 31, 2012. The following table summarizes our short-term debt activity at September 30, 2013:

|  |  |  | Weighted |  |  |  |  |  | Weighted |
|  |  |  | Average |  | Highest |  |  |  | Average |
|  |  |  | Interest |  | Balance |  | Average |  | Interest |
|  | Outstanding |  | Rate at |  | Outstanding |  | Balance |  | Rate |
|  | Balance at |  | Quarter |  | During |  | During |  | During |
(US$ in millions) |  | Quarter End |  | End |  | Quarter (1) |  | Quarter (1) |  | Quarter |
Bank borrowings |  | $ | 2,040 |  | 6.00 | % | $ | 2,480 |  | $ | 2,253 |  | 5.25 | %
Commercial paper |  | — |  | 0.00 | % | 550 |  | 245 |  | 0.38 | %
Total |  | $ | 2,040 |  | 6.00 | % | $ | 3,030 |  | $ | 2,498 |  | 4.77 | %

(1) Based on monthly balances.

The following table summarizes our short and long-term indebtedness:

|  | September 30, |  | December 31, |
(US$ in millions) |  | 2013 |  | 2012 |
Short-term debt: |  |  |  |  |
Short-term debt (1)(6) |  | $ | 2,040 |  | $ | 1,598 |
Current portion of long-term debt |  | 876 |  | 719 |
Total short-term debt |  | 2,916 |  | 2,317 |
Long-term debt (2) |  |  |  |  |
Revolving credit facilities |  | 300 |  | — |
Term loan due 2013—fixed interest rate of 3.32% (Tranche A) |  | 300 |  | 300 |
Term loan due 2013—variable interest rate of LIBOR plus 1.38% (Tranche B) |  | — |  | 100 |
5.875% Senior Notes due 2013 |  | — |  | 300 |
5.35% Senior Notes due 2014 |  | 500 |  | 500 |
5.10% Senior Notes due 2015 |  | 382 |  | 382 |
4.10% Senior Notes due 2016 |  | 500 |  | 500 |
3.20% Senior Notes due 2017 |  | 600 |  | 600 |
5.90% Senior Notes due 2017 |  | 250 |  | 250 |
8.50% Senior Notes due 2019 |  | 600 |  | 600 |
BNDES loans, variable interest rate indexed to TJLP plus 3.20% payable through 2016 (3)(4) |  | 30 |  | 42 |
Other |  | 346 |  | 323 |
Subtotal |  | 3,808 |  | 3,897 |
Less: Current portion of long-term debt |  | (876 | ) | (719 | )
Total long-term debt excluding investment fund debt |  | 2,932 |  | 3,178 |
Consolidated non-recourse investment fund debt (5) |  | 237 |  | 354 |
Total debt |  | $ | 6,085 |  | $ | 5,849 |

44

Table of Contents

(1) Includes $585 million of local currency borrowings in certain Eastern European, South American and Asian countries at a weighted-average interest rate of 16.98% as of September 30, 2013 and $378 million at a weighted-average interest rate of 18.78% as of December 31, 2012.

(2) Includes secured debt of $72 million and $130 million at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

(3) Industrial development loans provided by BNDES, an agency of the Brazilian government.

(4) TJLP is a long-term interest rate published by the BNDES on a quarterly basis; TJLP was 5.00% per annum as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

(5) As of September 30, 2013, consolidated investment fund debt totaled $333 million of which $96 million was classified as current portion of long-term debt. Consolidated investment fund debt matures at various dates through 2017 with no recourse to Bunge.

(6) Includes secured debt of $1 million at September 30, 2013.

Credit Ratings — Bunge’s debt ratings and outlook by major credit rating agencies at September 30, 2013 were as follows:

|  | Short-term |  | Long-term |  |  |
|  | Debt |  | Debt |  | Outlook |
Standard & Poor’s |  | A-1 |  | BBB- |  | Positive |
Moody’s |  | P-1 |  | Baa2 |  | Negative |
Fitch |  | Not Rated |  | BBB |  | Stable |

Our debt agreements do not have any credit rating downgrade triggers that would accelerate the maturity of our debt. However, credit rating downgrades would increase our borrowing costs under our credit facilities and, depending on their severity, could impede our ability to obtain credit facilities or access the capital markets in the future on favorable terms. A significant increase in our borrowing costs could impair our ability to compete effectively in our business relative to competitors with higher credit ratings.

Our credit facilities and certain senior notes require us to comply with specified financial covenants including minimum net worth, minimum current ratio, a maximum debt to capitalization ratio and limitations on secured indebtedness. We were in compliance with these covenants as of September 30, 2013.

45

Table of Contents

Equity

Total equity was $10,298 million at September 30, 2013, as set forth in the following table:

|  | September 30, |  | December 31, |
(US$ in millions) |  | 2013 |  | 2012 |
Equity: |  |  |  |  |
Convertible perpetual preference shares |  | $ | 690 |  | $ | 690 |
Common shares |  | 1 |  | 1 |
Additional paid-in capital |  | 4,945 |  | 4,909 |
Retained earnings |  | 6,807 |  | 6,792 |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |  | (2,290 | ) | (1,410 | )
Treasury shares, at cost - 1,933,286 |  | (120 | ) | (120 | )
Total Bunge shareholders’ equity |  | 10,033 |  | 10,862 |
Noncontrolling interest |  | 265 |  | 393 |
Total equity |  | $ | 10,298 |  | $ | 11,255 |

Total Bunge shareholders’ equity decreased to $10,033 million at September 30, 2013 from $10,862 million at December 31, 2012. The decrease in shareholders’ equity was due primarily to cumulative translation losses in other comprehensive income which were partially offset by net income attributable to Bunge for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 of $168 million.

Noncontrolling interest decreased to $265 million at September 30, 2013 from $393 million at December 31, 2012 due primarily to losses in the investment funds which are consolidated in our financial statements.

As of September 30, 2013, we had 6,900,000 4.875% cumulative convertible perpetual preference shares outstanding with an aggregate liquidation preference of $690 million. Each convertible perpetual preference share has an initial liquidation preference of $100, which will be adjusted for any accumulated and unpaid dividends. The convertible perpetual preference shares carry an annual dividend of $4.875 per share payable quarterly. As a result of adjustments made to the initial conversion price because cash dividends paid on Bunge Limited’s common shares exceeded certain specified thresholds, each convertible perpetual preference share is convertible, at the holder’s option, at any time into 1.1059 Bunge Limited common shares, based on the conversion price of $90.4265 per share, subject to certain additional anti-dilution adjustments (which represents 7,630,710 Bunge Limited common shares at September 30, 2013). At any time on or after December 1, 2012, if the closing price of our common shares equals or exceeds 130% of the conversion price for 20 trading days during any consecutive 30 trading days (including the last trading day of such period), we may elect to cause the convertible perpetual preference shares to be automatically converted into Bunge Limited common shares at the then prevailing conversion price. The convertible perpetual preference shares are not redeemable by us at any time.

Cash Flows

Our cash flow from operations varies depending on, among other items, the market prices and timing of the purchase and sale of our inventories. Generally, during periods when commodity prices are rising, our agribusiness operations require increased use of cash to support working capital to acquire inventories and fund daily settlement requirements on exchange traded futures that we use to minimize price risk related to our inventories.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2013, our cash and cash equivalents increased by $913 million, reflecting the net effect of cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities. This compares to a decrease of $145 million in cash and cash equivalents for the nine months ended September 30, 2012.

Cash provided by operating activities was $898 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to cash used of $2,872 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The cash flow provided by operating activities in the nine months ended September 30, 2013 was principally due to net income adjusted for non-cash charges, including an income tax valuation allowance of $464 million related to our industrial sugar business in Brazil. The increase in net operating assets and liabilities for the first nine months of 2013 represented a smaller increase than last year as commodity prices generally fell during the current year period. The net cash

46

Table of Contents

outflows for operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 were principally due to significant increases in commodity prices during that period as a result of the North American drought.

Cash provided by investing activities was $142 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to cash used of $526 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The significantly lower utilization for investing activities in the 2013 period resulted from $750 million of cash proceeds from the sale of our Brazilian fertilizer distribution business to Yara, which offset capital expenditures during the period as well as our purchases of two biodiesel facilities adjacent to our plants in Europe from our joint venture for $11 million (net of cash acquired). During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, we acquired an edible oils and fats business in India for $94 million net of cash acquired consisting of $77 million in cash and debt acquired of $17 million. In addition, we acquired an asset management company for $9 million net of cash acquired, a controlling interest in a North American wheat milling business for $102 million net of cash acquired, intellectual property assets for $22 million and sugarcane milling related biological assets and equipment for $61 million. We also entered into joint ventures and acquired other investments totalling $111 million. Cash used during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 was net of $448 million proceeds received from the sale of our interest in Solae, a soy ingredients joint venture. We also received a special cash dividend of $35 million from Solae in connection with the sale of our investment. Payments made for capital expenditures of $667 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2012 primarily included investments in property, plant and equipment related to the expansion of our sugar business in Brazil, investments in an edible oil refining and packaging facility in the U.S. and construction of a refining facility in India.

Cash used for financing activities was $95 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2013, compared to cash provided of $3,298 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2012. In the nine months ended September 30, 2013, we had a minimal net increase in borrowings to meet working capital requirements as operating cash inflows in a declining commodity price environment and the cash collected from the sale of our Brazilian fertilizer distribution business reduced our financing requirements. In the nine months ended September 30, 2012, we had a net increase of $3,425 million in borrowings due to higher working capital requirements, largely related to higher commodity prices. Dividends paid in the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 were $149 million and $138 million, respectively.

Trade Receivable Securitization Program — Our trade receivable securitization program entered into in June 2011 provides us with an additional source of liquidity. The program provides funding for up to $700 million against receivables sold into the program. The securitization program terminates on June 1, 2016. However, each committed purchaser’s commitment to fund trade receivables sold under the securitization program will terminate on May 28, 2014 unless extended for additional 364-day periods in accordance with the terms of the receivables transfer agreement.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Guarantees — We have issued or were a party to the following guarantees at September 30, 2013:

|  | Maximum |
|  | Potential |
|  | Future |
(US$ in millions) |  | Payments |
Customer financing (1) |  | $ | 12 |
Unconsolidated affiliates financing (2) |  | 47 |
Residual value guarantee (3) |  | 69 |
Total |  | $ | 128 |

(1) We have issued guarantees to third parties in Brazil related to amounts owed to these third parties by certain of our customers. The terms of the guarantees are equal to the terms of the related financing arrangements, which are generally one year or less, with the exception of guarantees issued under certain Brazilian government programs, primarily from 2006 and 2007, where terms are up to five years. In the event that the customers default on their payments to the third parties and we would be required to perform under the guarantees, we have obtained collateral from the customers. At September 30, 2013, we had approximately $10 million of tangible property that had been pledged as collateral against certain of these refinancing arrangements. We evaluate the likelihood of customer repayments of the amounts due under these guarantees based upon an expected loss analysis and record the fair value of such guarantees as an obligation in our

47

Table of Contents

condensed consolidated financial statements. Our recorded obligation related to these outstanding guarantees was $2 million at September 30, 2013.

(2) We issued guarantees to certain financial institutions related to debt of certain of our unconsolidated joint ventures. The terms of the guarantees are equal to the terms of the related financings which have maturity dates in 2014 through 2017. There are no recourse provisions or collateral that would enable us to recover any amounts paid under these guarantees. At September 30, 2013, we had no outstanding obligation recorded related to these guarantees.

(3) We issued guarantees to certain financial institutions which are party to certain operating lease arrangements for railcars and barges. These guarantees provide for a minimum residual value to be received by the lessor at the conclusion of the lease term. These leases expire in 2016. At September 30, 2013, our recorded obligation related to these guarantees was $4 million.

In addition, Bunge Limited has provided full and unconditional parent level guarantees of the indebtedness outstanding under certain senior credit facilities and senior notes entered into or issued by its 100% owned subsidiaries. At September 30, 2013, debt with a carrying amount of $4,207 million related to these guarantees is included in our condensed consolidated balance sheet. This debt includes the senior notes issued by two of our 100% owned finance subsidiaries, Bunge Limited Finance Corp. and Bunge N.A. Finance L.P. There are no significant restrictions on the ability of Bunge Limited Finance Corp., Bunge N.A. Finance L.P. or any other of our subsidiaries to transfer funds to Bunge Limited.

Dividends

We paid a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.30 per share on September 3, 2013 to common shareholders of record on August 20, 2013. We paid a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.27 per share on June 3, 2013 and March 4, 2013 to common shareholders of record on May 20, 2013 and February 15, 2013, respectively. On August 7, 2013, we announced that our Board of Directors had approved a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.30 per common share. This dividend will be payable on December 2, 2013 to common shareholders of record on November 18, 2013.

In addition, we paid a quarterly dividend of $1.21875 per share on our cumulative convertible perpetual preference shares on September 1, 2013, June 1, 2013 and March 1, 2013 to shareholders of record on August 15, 2013, May 15, 2013 and February 15, 2013, respectively. We also announced on August 7, 2013 that we will pay a quarterly cash dividend of $1.21875 per share on our cumulative convertible perpetual preference shares on December 1, 2013 to shareholders of record on November 15, 2013.

Critical Accounting Policies

Critical accounting policies are defined as those policies that are both important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations and require management to exercise significant judgment. For a complete discussion of our accounting policies, see our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. There were no material changes to our critical accounting policies during the nine months ended September 30, 2013.

Adoption of New Accounting Pronouncements — In December 2011 and January 2013, FASB amended the guidance in ASC Topic 210, Balance Sheet. This amendment requires an entity to disclose both gross and net information about financial instruments that are eligible for offset in the statement of financial position and/or subject to a master netting arrangement or similar agreement. Our derivative assets and liabilities are presented on a gross basis in our condensed consolidated balance sheets. The adoption of this amendment on January 1, 2013 did not have a significant impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements.

In February 2013, FASB amended the guidance in ASC Topic 220, Comprehensive Income. This amendment requires an entity to disclose on a prospective basis the impact on income statement line items for significant items reclassified from other comprehensive income to net income during the period. The adoption of this amendment expanded our disclosures in our condensed consolidated financial statements.

New Accounting Pronouncements — In March 2013, FASB amended existing guidance of ASC Topic 830, Foreign Currency Matters (Topic 830). This amended guidance is related to the transfer of currency translation adjustments from other comprehensive income into net income in certain circumstances. The amended guidance aims to resolve diversity in practice as to whether ASC Topic 810, Consolidation or Topic 830 applies to the release of the cumulative translation adjustment into net income when a parent either sells a part or all of its investment in a foreign entity, or no longer holds a controlling financial interest in a subsidiary or group of assets that is a nonprofit

48

Table of Contents

activity or a business. We will be required to apply the amended guidance prospectively. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements.

In July 2013, the FASB issued guidance in ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes (Topic 740). Topic 740 provided guidance regarding the presentation of an unrecognized tax benefit when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exist at the reporting date. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Risk Management

As a result of our global operating and financing activities, we are exposed to changes in, among other things, agricultural commodity prices, transportation costs, foreign currency exchange rates, interest rates and energy costs which may affect our results of operations and financial position. We actively monitor and manage these various market risks associated with our business activities. Our risk management decisions take place in various locations but exposure limits are centrally set and monitored. We have a corporate risk management group which analyzes and monitors various risk exposures globally. Additionally, our Board of Directors’ Finance and Risk Policy committee oversees and reviews our overall risk management policies and limits.

We use derivative instruments for the purpose of managing the exposures associated with commodity prices, transportation costs, foreign currency exchange rates, interest rates and energy costs and for positioning our overall portfolio relative to expected market movements in accordance with established policies and procedures. We enter into derivative instruments primarily with major financial institutions, commodity exchanges in the case of commodity futures and options, or approved exchange clearing shipping companies in the case of ocean freight. While these derivative instruments are subject to fluctuations in value, for hedged exposures those fluctuations are generally offset by the changes in fair value of the underlying exposures. The derivative instruments that we use for hedging purposes are intended to reduce the volatility on our results of operations, however, they can occasionally result in earnings volatility, which may be material. See Note 11 of the notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for a more detailed discussion of our derivative instruments.

Credit and Counterparty Risk

Through our normal business activities, we are subject to significant credit and counterparty risks that arise through normal commercial sales and purchases, including forward commitments to buy or sell, and through various other over-the-counter (OTC) derivative instruments that we utilize to manage risks inherent in our business activities. We define credit and counterparty risk as a potential financial loss due to the failure of a counterparty to honor its obligations. The exposure is measured based upon several factors, including unpaid accounts receivable from counterparties and unrealized gains from OTC derivative instruments (including forward purchase and sale contracts). Credit and counterparty risk also includes sovereign credit risk. We actively monitor credit and counterparty risk through credit analysis by local credit staffs and review by various local and corporate committees which monitor counterparty performance. We record provisions for counterparty losses from time to time as a result of our credit and counterparty analysis.

During periods of tight conditions in global credit markets, downturns in regional or global economic conditions, and/or significant price volatility, credit and counterparty risks are heightened. This increased risk is monitored through, among other things, increased communication with key counterparties, management reviews and specific focus on counterparties or groups of counterparties that we may determine as high risk. In addition, we have limited new credit extensions in certain cases and reduced our use of non-exchange cleared derivative instruments.

Commodities Risk

We operate in many areas of the food industry, from agricultural raw materials to the production and sale of branded food ingredients. As a result, we purchase and produce various materials, many of which are agricultural commodities, including soybeans, soybean oil, soybean meal, softseeds (including sunflower seed, rapeseed and canola) and related oil and meal derived from them, wheat and corn. In addition, we grow and purchase sugarcane to produce sugar, ethanol and electricity. Agricultural commodities are subject to price fluctuations due to a number

49

Table of Contents

of unpredictable factors that may create price risk. As described above, we are also subject to the risk of counterparty non-performance under forward purchase or sale contracts. From time-to-time, we have experienced instances of counterparty non-performance, including as a result of significant declines in counterparty profitability under these contracts due to significant movements in commodity prices between the time the contracts were executed and the contractual forward delivery period.

We enter into various derivative contracts with the primary objective of managing our exposure to adverse price movements in the agricultural commodities used and produced in our business operations. We have established policies that limit the amount of unhedged fixed price agricultural commodity positions permissible for our operating companies, which are generally a combination of volume and value-at-risk (VaR) limits. We measure and review our net commodities position on a daily basis.

Our daily net agricultural commodity position consists of inventory, forward purchase and sale contracts, over-the-counter and exchange traded derivative instruments, including those used to hedge portions of our production requirements. The fair value of that position is a summation of the fair values calculated for each agricultural commodity by valuing all of our commodity positions at quoted market prices for the period where available or utilizing a close proxy. VaR is calculated on the net position and monitored at the 95% and 99% confidence intervals. In addition, scenario analysis and stress testing are performed. For example, one measure of market risk is estimated as the potential loss in fair value resulting from a hypothetical 10% adverse change in prices. The results of this analysis, which may differ from actual results, are as follows:

|  | Nine Months Ended |  | Year Ended |
|  | September 30, 2013 |  | December 31, 2012 |
|  |  |  | Market |  |  |  | Market |
(US$ in millions) |  | Fair Value |  | Risk |  | Fair Value |  | Risk |
Highest long position |  | $ | 154 |  | $ | (15 | ) | $ | 2,500 |  | $ | (250 | )
Highest short position |  | (1,849 | ) | (185 | ) | (129 | ) | (13 | )

Ocean Freight Risk

Ocean freight represents a significant portion of our operating costs. The market price for ocean freight varies depending on the supply and demand for ocean vessels, global economic conditions and other factors. We enter into time charter agreements for time on ocean freight vessels based on forecasted requirements for the purpose of transporting agricultural commodities. Our time charter agreements generally have terms ranging from two months to approximately seven years. We use financial derivatives, generally freight forward agreements, to hedge portions of our ocean freight costs. The ocean freight derivatives are included in other current assets and other current liabilities on the condensed consolidated balance sheets at fair value.

Energy Risk

We purchase various energy commodities such as bunker fuel, electricity and natural gas that are used to operate our manufacturing facilities and ocean freight vessels. The energy commodities are subject to price risk. We use financial derivatives, including exchange traded and OTC swaps and options for various purposes, including to manage our exposure to volatility in energy costs. These energy derivatives are included in other current assets and other current liabilities on the condensed consolidated balance sheets at fair value.

Currency Risk

Our global operations require active participation in foreign exchange markets. Our primary foreign currency exposures are the Brazilian real, the Euro and other European currencies, the Argentine peso and the Chinese yuan/renminbi. To reduce the risk arising from foreign exchange rate fluctuations, we enter into derivative instruments, such as forward contracts and swaps, and foreign currency options. The changes in market value of such contracts have a high correlation to the price changes in the related currency exposures. The potential loss in fair value for such net currency position resulting from a hypothetical 10% adverse change in foreign currency exchange rates as of September 30, 2013 was not material.

When determining our exposure, we exclude intercompany loans that are deemed to be permanently invested. The repayments of permanently invested intercompany loans are not planned or anticipated in the

50

Table of Contents

foreseeable future and therefore are treated as analogous to equity for accounting purposes. As a result, the foreign exchange gains and losses on these borrowings are excluded from the determination of net income and recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the condensed consolidated balance sheets. Included in other comprehensive income (loss) are foreign exchange losses of $247 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and foreign exchange losses of $295 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 related to permanently invested intercompany loans.

Interest Rate Risk

We have debt in fixed and floating rate instruments. We are exposed to market risk due to changes in interest rates. We may enter into interest rate swap agreements to manage our interest rate exposure related to our debt portfolio.

The aggregate fair value of our short and long-term debt including non-recourse investment fund debt, based on market yields at September 30, 2013, was $6,343 million with a carrying value of $6,085 million. There was no significant change in our interest rate risk at September 30, 2013.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures — As of September 30, 2013 we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as that term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the fiscal quarter covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Internal Control Over Financial Reporting — In connection with the restructuring and consolidation of Bunge’s operations in Brazil and related commercial, organizational and personnel changes, management has been and continues to review and, in some cases, implement new or enhanced systems and procedures that have led, or are expected to lead, to changes in internal control over financial reporting in Bunge’s Brazilian operations.

Except as described above, there has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the third fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2013 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II.

INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

From time to time, we are involved in litigation that we consider to be ordinary and incidental to our business. While the outcome of pending legal actions cannot be predicted with certainty, we believe the outcome of these proceedings, net of established reserves, will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

The Argentine tax authorities have been conducting a review of income and other taxes paid by exporters and processors of cereals and other agricultural commodities in the country. In that regard, in October 2010, the Argentine tax authorities carried out inspections at several of our locations in Argentina relating to allegations of income tax evasion covering the periods from 2007 to 2009. In December 2012, our Argentine subsidiary received an income tax assessment relating to fiscal years 2006 and 2007 with a claim of approximately 436 million pesos (approximately $75 million as of September 30, 2013), plus previously accrued interest on the outstanding amount due of approximately 711 million pesos (approximately $123 million as of September 30, 2013). Our Argentine subsidiary has appealed this assessment before the National Tax Court. Fiscal years 2008 and 2009 are currently being audited by the tax authorities. It is likely that the tax authorities will also audit fiscal years 2010-2012, although no notice has been rendered to our Argentine subsidiary. Additionally, in April 2011, the Argentine tax authorities conducted inspections of our locations and those of several other grain exporters with respect to allegations of evasion of liability for value-added taxes and an inquest proceeding has been initiated in the first quarter of 2012 to determine whether there is any potential criminal culpability relating to these matters. Also during

51

Table of Contents

2011, we paid $112 million of accrued export tax obligations in Argentina under protest while reserving all of our rights in respect of such payment. In the first quarter of 2012, the Argentine tax authorities assessed interest on these paid export taxes, which as of September 30, 2013, would total approximately $140 million. Additionally, in April 2012, the Argentine government suspended our Argentine subsidiary from a registry of grain traders and, in October 2012, the government excluded our subsidiary from this registry in connection with the income tax allegations. These actions primarily result in additional administrative requirements and increased logistical costs on domestic grain shipments within Argentina. While the suspension and exclusion have not had a material adverse effect on our business in Argentina, we are challenging the exclusion from the grain registry in the Argentine courts. Management believes that these tax-related allegations and claims are without merit and intends to vigorously defend against them. However, management is, at this time, unable to predict their outcome.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing our Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

None.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

(a) The exhibits in the accompanying Exhibit Index on page E-1 are filed or furnished as part of this Quarterly Report.

52

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

| BUNGE LIMITED
Date: November 8, 2013 | By: | /s/ Andrew J. Burke
|  | Andrew J. Burke
|  | Chief Financial Officer and Global Operational Excellence Officer
|  | /s/ Karen D. Roebuck
|  | Karen D. Roebuck
|  | Controller and Principal Accounting Officer

53

Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX

31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002
32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002
32.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002
101 | The following financial information from Bunge Limited’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2013 formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income, (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss), (iii) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iv) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, (v) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity and Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests, and (vi) the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements*

* Users of this interactive data file are advised pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T that this interactive data file is deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, is deemed not filed for purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.

E-1