|
Note 7. Embedded Derivative Liability.
|
3 Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Jun. 30, 2012
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities Disclosure [Text Block] |
7.
EMBEDDED
DERIVATIVE LIABILITY.
As
described in Note 4, the Company issued convertible debt
notes in October 2009 and March 2010. The notes
are convertible at $0.50 per share, or $0.40 per share upon a
change in control of the Company. Based on the
alternative conversion options, the Company determined that
the conversion options in the notes should be accounted for
as derivatives. The Company used the Black-Scholes
model to determine the fair value of each of the conversion
options as of June 30, 2012, assigning a probability of
occurrence to each conversion option. The final
fair value of each of the derivative liabilities considered
the likelihood of conversion at the separate conversion
prices.
October
2009 notes:
The
table below summarizes the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model
range of inputs used to calculate the fair market values on
the date of the amendment (June 24, 2011) and then at the end
of each quarter afterwards.
2009
Convertible Debt Notes
March
2010 notes:
The
table below summarized the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model
information used to calculate the fair market values on the
date of the amendment (June 24, 2011) and then at the end of
each quarter afterwards.
2010
Convertible Debt Notes
For
the three-month period ended June 30, 2012 the Company
recorded an aggregate loss of approximately $1,002,000; and
for the three-month period June 30, 2011, the Company
recorded an aggregate gain of approximately $225,000, as a
result of these transactions.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||