v3.4.0.3

Commitments and Contingencies | 12 Months Ended
--- | ---
Dec. 31, 2015
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract] |
Commitments and Contingencies |
NOTE 10 | COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
FACILITIES Our agriculture group headquarters are located in Alpharetta, Georgia. The Alpharetta lease had a one year term that terminated on January 2016, at which time the lease was extended by another year. The monthly lease payment is $1,664. For the agriculture group, the total rent for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 was $21,257 and $22,500, respectively. Our apparel operations are based in Chatsworth, California. The Chatsworth lease has a three year term that terminates in January 2019. The monthly lease payment is $4,300. For the apparel group, the total rent for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 was $38,674 and $44,021, respectively. INFRINGEMENT On October 13, 2009, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) issued U.S. Patent No. 7,601,858, titled “Method of Processing Ethanol Byproducts and Related Subsystems” (the ‘858 Patent) to GS CleanTech Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of GreenShift Corporation. On October 27, 2009, the PTO issued U.S. Patent No. 7,608,729, titled “Method of Freeing the Bound Oil Present in Whole Stillage and Thin Stillage” (the ‘729 Patent) to GS CleanTech. Both the ‘858 Patent and the ‘729 Patent relate to GreenShift’s corn oil extraction technologies. GS CleanTech Corporation, our wholly-owned subsidiary, subsequently filed legal actions in multiple jurisdictions alleging infringement by various persons and entities. Multiple additional related suits and countersuits were filed. On May 6, 2010, we submitted a “Motion to Transfer Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407 for Consolidated Pretrial Proceedings” to the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (the “Panel”) located in Washington, D.C. In this motion, we moved the Panel to transfer and consolidate all pending suits involving infringement of our patents to one federal court for orderly and efficient review of all pre-trial matters. On August 6, 2010, the Panel ordered the consolidation and transfer of all pending suits in the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana for pretrial proceedings (the “MDL Case”). In October 2014, the District Court in Indiana ruled in favor of the defendants in our pending patent infringement matter on their motions for summary judgment alleging that our corn oil extraction patents were invalid, including US Pat. Nos. 7,601,858 and 8,168,037. The summary judgment ruling was not final and there are additional issues in the MDL Case that can be expected to be resolved this year. We disagree with the court’s ruling and intend to mount a vigorous appeal at the appropriate time. OTHER MATTERS GreenShift is party to an action entitled Max v. GS AgriFuels Corp., et al. in the Supreme Court, New York County, in which the plaintiffs are asserting claims to money damages against GreenShift and other defendants, arising from a series of Share Purchase Agreements dated March 6, 2007, under which the individual plaintiffs sold their shares in Sustainable Systems, Inc., to GS AgriFuels Corporation, a former subsidiary of GreenShift. In their Amended Complaint, plaintiffs asserted claims for breach of contract, fraud and negligent misrepresentation, and sought money damages in the amount of $6 million. On March 19, 2013, the Court granted in part the defendants’ motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint, and dismissed all but the breach of contract claims asserted against GreenShift and certain other corporate defendants. On April 1, 2015, GreenShift entered into a settlement agreement pursuant to which the plaintiff s are to receive $25,000 in cash and a convertible debenture in the amount of $300,000. In the event that the plaintiffs have not converted the debenture in full at the expiration of three years, the plaintiffs may request the remaining amount be paid in full at that time. While the settlement agreement has not yet been implemented by the payment of the specified cash and the issuance of the specified debenture, the action has been marked “disposed” by the court. On September 10, 2012, Long Side Ventures commenced an action entitled Long Side Ventures and Sunny Isles Ventures, LLC, LLC v. GreenShift et. al., in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, alleging breach of contract and other causes of action for which the plaintiff seeks damages of about $250,000 plus costs. On February 24, 2015, GreenShift entered into a settlement agreement pursuant to which the plaintiff is to receive $150,000 in cash and securities in the amount of $250,000. GreenShift accrued the entire $400,000 judgment on its books as of the year ended December 31, 2014. During the six months ended June 30, 2014, GreenShift issued a debenture to Long Side Ventures in the amount of $250,000 (see Note 9, Debt Obligations, above). GreenShift has already paid the $150,000 due in cash under the settlement agreement. Nevertheless, there is a current dispute with the plaintiffs as to whether GreenShift and the other defendants have performed their obligations under the settlement agreement, and whether the plaintiffs have the right to declare a default under the settlement agreement. GreenShift has taken the position that it has fully performed and intends to vigorously contest any alleged default. Upon the performance of the terms of the Settlement Agreement, the Action will be dismissed against GreenShift and the other defendants. On October 10, 2013, Golden Technology Management, LLC, and other plaintiffs commenced an action entitled Golden Technology Management, LLC, et al. v. NextGen Acquisition, Inc. et al. in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, alleging breach of contract and other causes of action against GreenShift in connection with the acquisition of NextGen Fuel, Inc. by a former subsidiary. Plaintiffs seek damages in excess of $5,200,000 plus prejudgment interest and costs. On December 22, 2014, the court granted summary judgment as to the former subsidiary’s liability for payment of the sum of $3.2 million, plus prejudgment interest and costs. The plaintiffs’ have asserted a claim for alter ego liability for that amount against GreenShift and the other defendants. The litigation is proceeding and GreenShift intends to vigorously defend this action. At this stage of the proceedings, we cannot evaluate the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome in excess of the amounts previously accrued. GreenShift is also involved in various collection matters for which vendors are seeking payment for services rendered and goods provided. GreenShift and its subsidiaries are party to numerous matters pertaining to outstanding amounts alleged to be due. Management is unable to characterize or evaluate the probability of any outcome at this time. Under GreenShift’s insurance programs, coverage is obtained for catastrophic exposures, as well as those risks required to be insured by law or contract. There is a $2,500 deductible per occurrence for environmental impairments. Environmental liability insurance is carried with policy limits of $1,000,000 per occurrence and $2,000,000 aggregate. GreenShift is party to an employment agreement with Kevin Kreisler, GreenShift’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, which agreement includes terms for reimbursement of expenses, periodic bonuses, four weeks’ vacation and participation in any employee benefits provided to all employees of GreenShift Corporation. GreenShift’s Articles of Incorporation provide that GreenShift shall indemnify its officers, directors, employees and agents to the full extent permitted by Delaware law. GreenShift’s Bylaws include provisions to indemnify its officers and directors and other persons against expenses (including attorney’s fees, judgments, fines and amounts paid for settlement) incurred in connection with actions or proceedings brought against them by reason of their serving or having served as officers, directors or in other capacities. GreenShift does not, however, indemnify them in actions in which it is determined that they have not acted in good faith or have acted unlawfully. GreenShift is further subject to various indemnification agreements with various parties pursuant to which GreenShift has agreed to indemnify and hold such parties harmless from and against expenses and costs incurred (including attorney’s fees, judgments, fines and amounts paid for settlement) in connection with the provision by such parties of certain financial accommodations to GreenShift. Such parties indemnified by GreenShift include FLUX Carbon Corporation, EXO Opportunity Fund LLC, Minority Interest Fund (II) LLC, Acutus Capital LLC, and various family members of GreenShift’s chairman that have provided GreenShift with cash investments. Prior to December 31, 2015, Viridis was subject to guaranty and pledge agreements in favor of YA Global, pursuant to which Viridis pledged its equity in GreenShift and other assets to secure GreenShift ‘s payment obligations under its prior agreements with YA Global. To cure various defaults of GreenShift’s debt to YA Global in 2007, 2009 and 2010, YA Global liquidated about $1.8 million of stock owned by Viridis, the proceeds of which were applied by YA Global to the reduction of amounts due from GreenShift. In addition, as a further requirement of YA Global to cure debt defaults in 2007 and 2008, an affiliate of Viridis agreed to eliminate about $2.2 million in debt and exchange another $800,000 in debt for restricted common shares; which shares were subject to restrictions on transfer required by YA Global. Each of the foregoing transactions triggered tax consequences and GreenShift’s associated agreements to indemnify. During the year ended December 31, 2015, GreenShift incurred a total of about $1 million in other expenses related to indemnification expenses in satisfaction of its obligations under relevant agreements, which is disclosed in Other Expenses within the accompanying Statement of Operations.

X
- References No definition available. + Details
Name: | us-gaap_CommitmentsAndContingenciesDisclosureAbstract
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | xbrli:stringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition The entire disclosure for commitments and contingencies. + References Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 825 -SubTopic 20 -Section 50 -Paragraph 1 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6449706&loc=d3e16207-108621 Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 460 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 8 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=68068213&loc=d3e12565-110249 Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 450 -SubTopic 20 -Section 50 -Paragraph 4 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=25496072&loc=d3e14435-108349 Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 210 -SubTopic 10 -Section S99 -Paragraph 1 -Subparagraph (SX 210.5-02.25) -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6877327&loc=d3e13212-122682 Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 440 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 2 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=73718637&loc=d3e25287-109308 + Details
Name: | us-gaap_CommitmentsAndContingenciesDisclosureTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | nonnum:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration