v3.5.0.2

Commitments and Contingencies | 6 Months Ended
--- | ---
Jun. 30, 2016
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract] |
Commitments and Contingencies |
NOTE 12 | COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
INFRINGEMENT On October 13, 2009, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) issued U.S. Patent No. 7,601,858, titled “Method of Processing Ethanol Byproducts and Related Subsystems” (the ‘858 Patent) to GS CleanTech Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of GreenShift Corporation. On October 27, 2009, the PTO issued U.S. Patent No. 7,608,729, titled “Method of Freeing the Bound Oil Present in Whole Stillage and Thin Stillage” (the ‘729 Patent) to GS CleanTech. Both the ‘858 Patent and the ‘729 Patent relate to the Company’s corn oil extraction technologies. GS CleanTech Corporation, our wholly-owned subsidiary, subsequently filed legal actions in multiple jurisdictions alleging infringement by various persons and entities. Multiple additional related suits and countersuits were filed. On May 6, 2010, we submitted a “Motion to Transfer Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407 for Consolidated Pretrial Proceedings” to the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (the “Panel”) located in Washington, D.C. In this motion, we moved the Panel to transfer and consolidate all pending suits involving infringement of our patents to one federal court for orderly and efficient review of all pre-trial matters. On August 6, 2010, the Panel ordered the consolidation and transfer of all pending suits in the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana for pretrial proceedings (the “MDL Case”). In October 2014, the District Court in Indiana ruled in favor of the defendants in our pending patent infringement matter on their motions for summary judgment alleging that our corn oil extraction patents were invalid, including US Pat. Nos. 7,601,858 and 8,168,037. The summary judgment ruling is not a final judgment. We disagree with the court’s ruling and intend to mount a vigorous appeal at the appropriate time. In addition, a trial on the Defendants’ claims of inequitable conduct in connection with several of the asserted patents was conducted in October, 2015. We are awaiting a decision from the Court, which we expect to issue in 2016. OTHER MATTERS GreenShift is party to an action entitled Max v. GS AgriFuels Corp., et al. in the Supreme Court, New York County, in which the plaintiffs are asserting claims to money damages against GreenShift and other defendants, arising from a series of Share Purchase Agreements dated March 6, 2007, under which the individual plaintiffs sold their shares in Sustainable Systems, Inc., to GS AgriFuels Corporation, a former subsidiary of GreenShift. In their Amended Complaint, plaintiffs asserted claims for breach of contract, fraud and negligent misrepresentation, and sought money damages in the amount of $6 million. On March 19, 2013, the Court granted in part the defendants’ motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint, and dismissed all but the breach of contract claims asserted against GreenShift and certain other corporate defendants. On April 1, 2015, GreenShift entered into a settlement agreement pursuant to which the plaintiffs are to receive $25,000 in cash and a convertible debenture in the amount of $300,000. In the event that the plaintiffs have not converted the debenture in full at the expiration of three years, the plaintiffs may request the remaining amount be paid in full at that time. While the settlement agreement has not yet been implemented by the payment of the specified cash and the issuance of the specified debenture, the action has been marked “disposed” by the court. On September 10, 2012, Long Side Ventures commenced an action entitled Long Side Ventures and Sunny Isles Ventures, LLC, LLC v. GreenShift et. al., in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, alleging breach of contract and other causes of action for which the plaintiff seeks damages of about $250,000 plus costs. On February 24, 2015, GreenShift entered into a settlement agreement pursuant to which the plaintiff is to receive $150,000 in cash and securities in the amount of $250,000. GreenShift accrued the entire $400,000 judgment on its books as of the year ended December 31, 2014. During the six months ended June 30, 2014, GreenShift issued a debenture to Long Side Ventures in the amount of $250,000 (see Note 7, Debt Obligations, above). GreenShift has already paid the $150,000 due in cash under the settlement agreement. Nevertheless, there is a current dispute with the plaintiffs as to whether GreenShift and the other defendants have performed their obligations under the settlement agreement, and whether the plaintiffs have the right to declare a default under the settlement agreement. GreenShift has taken the position that it has fully performed and intends to vigorously contest any alleged default. Upon the performance of the terms of the Settlement Agreement, the Action will be dismissed against GreenShift and the other defendants. On October 10, 2013, Golden Technology Management, LLC, and other plaintiffs commenced an action entitled Golden Technology Management, LLC, et al. v. NextGen Acquisition, Inc. et al. in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, alleging breach of contract and other causes of action against GreenShift in connection with the acquisition of NextGen Fuel, Inc. by a former subsidiary. Plaintiffs seek damages in excess of $5,200,000 plus prejudgment interest and costs. On December 22, 2014, the court granted summary judgment as to the former subsidiary’s liability for payment of the sum of $3.2 million, plus prejudgment interest and costs. The plaintiffs’ have asserted a claim for alter ego liability for that amount against GreenShift and the other defendants. The litigation is proceeding and GreenShift intends to vigorously defend this action. At this stage of the proceedings, we cannot evaluate the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome in excess of the amounts previously accrued. Effective as of December 31, 2015, GreenShift entered into a series of agreements providing for contingent participation payments involving use of GreenShift’s extraction technologies. Collectively, these agreements resulted in an aggregate of $26,720,059 in debt extinguishment for amounts that had been due, payable and accrued as of December 31, 2015, as well as a reduction in GreenShift’s continuing costs of sales, legal expenses and interest expense moving forward. First, GreenShift and YA Global Investments, L.P. (“YA Global”) entered into an agreement pursuant to which GreenShift agreed to pay 15% of all payments received by GreenShift from any new licensees issued in connection with its intellectual properties, including any amounts awarded in GreenShift’s pending and future infringement matters, net of any legal fees and expenses incurred in obtaining the settlement or award (see Note 7, Debt Obligations, above). Next, Cantor Colburn LLP (“Cantor”) and GreenShift entered into an amended agreement pursuant to which Cantor agreed to accept 15% of any recoveries from GreenShift’s pending patent litigation in excess of $3.6 million per year in exchange for all services rendered to date and moving forward. GreenShift recognized an $8,433,388 gain on extinguishment of debt upon the write-off of all accrued legal fees. Finally, CWT and GreenShift entered into an amended agreement pursuant to which CWT agreed to accept 20% of GreenShift’s net cash receipts deriving from use of GreenShift’s extraction technologies, after payment in full of all litigation costs and expenses (including attorneys’ fees and expenses). Under the amended CWT agreement, no amount shall accrue or be due and payable to CWT until the earlier to occur of the date on which all such litigation costs and expenses have been paid on a current basis, the date on which GreenShift has successfully appealed the October 2014 summary judgment ruling in GreenShift’s pending infringement litigation, and all applicable appeal periods in connection therewith have expired, or the date on which GreenShift has entered into new license agreements corresponding to an additional $1,000,000 in annualized revenue. On December 31, 2015, Bitzio entered into a $2.9 million loan transaction with TCA Global Credit Master Fund, LP (“TCA”), pursuant to which Bitzio drew $2.5 million for use in its acquisition of 100,000 shares of GreenShift’s Series G Preferred Stock (see Note 9, Shareholders’ Equity, above). The TCA loan was made pursuant to a Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”), under which TCA may lend to Bitzio up to $5.0 million. GreenShift and each of its subsidiaries, as well as each of the other subsidiaries of Bitzio, has executed a Guaranty Agreement in favor of TCA on December 31, 2015. FCC, GreenShift, and each of its subsidiaries, as well as each of the other subsidiaries of Bitzio, has executed a Guaranty Agreement dated December 31, 2015, in favor of TCA, pursuant to which GreenShift and its subsidiaries guaranteed payment of all amounts due to TCA under the Credit Agreement. By separate agreements, the Company and each subsidiary pledged all of its assets to secure the guaranty to TCA. The Company is also involved in various collection matters for which vendors are seeking payment for services rendered and goods provided. The Company and its subsidiaries are party to numerous matters pertaining to outstanding amounts alleged to be due. Management is unable to characterize or evaluate the probability of any outcome at this time. Under GreenShift’s insurance programs, coverage is obtained for catastrophic exposures, as well as those risks required to be insured by law or contract. There is a $2,500 deductible per occurrence for environmental impairments. Environmental liability insurance is carried with policy limits of $1,000,000 per occurrence and $2,000,000 aggregate. GreenShift is party to an employment agreement with Kevin Kreisler, GreenShift’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, which agreement includes terms for reimbursement of expenses, periodic bonuses, four weeks’ vacation and participation in any employee benefits provided to all employees of GreenShift Corporation. GreenShift’s Articles of Incorporation provide that GreenShift shall indemnify its officers, directors, employees and agents to the full extent permitted by Delaware law. GreenShift’s Bylaws include provisions to indemnify its officers and directors and other persons against expenses (including attorney’s fees, judgments, fines and amounts paid for settlement) incurred in connection with actions or proceedings brought against them by reason of their serving or having served as officers, directors or in other capacities. GreenShift does not, however, indemnify them in actions in which it is determined that they have not acted in good faith or have acted unlawfully. GreenShift is further subject to various indemnification agreements with various parties pursuant to which GreenShift has agreed to indemnify and hold such parties harmless from and against expenses and costs incurred (including attorney’s fees, judgments, fines and amounts paid for settlement) in connection with the provision by such parties of certain financial accommodations to GreenShift. Such parties indemnified by GreenShift include YA Global Investments, L.P., YA Corn Oil Systems, LLC, Viridis Capital LLC, Minority Interest Fund (II) LLC, Acutus Capital LLC, and various family members of GreenShift’s chairman that have provided GreenShift with cash investments.

X
- References No definition available. + Details
Name: | us-gaap_CommitmentsAndContingenciesDisclosureAbstract
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | xbrli:stringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition The entire disclosure for commitments and contingencies. + References Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 825 -SubTopic 20 -Section 50 -Paragraph 1 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6449706&loc=d3e16207-108621 Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 460 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 8 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=68068213&loc=d3e12565-110249 Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 450 -SubTopic 20 -Section 50 -Paragraph 4 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=25496072&loc=d3e14435-108349 Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 210 -SubTopic 10 -Section S99 -Paragraph 1 -Subparagraph (SX 210.5-02.25) -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6877327&loc=d3e13212-122682 Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 440 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 2 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=73718637&loc=d3e25287-109308 + Details
Name: | us-gaap_CommitmentsAndContingenciesDisclosureTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | nonnum:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration