XML 46 R30.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT
v3.10.0.1

Note 20 - New Authoritative Accounting Pronouncements | 12 Months Ended
--- | ---
Dec. 31, 2018
Notes to Financial Statements |
New Accounting Pronouncements and Changes in Accounting Principles [Text Block] | 20. New Authoritative Accounting Pronouncements Accounting Standards Adopted in 2018: In February 2018, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2018 - 02, “Income Statement – Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220 ).” As a result of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “TCJA”), concerns arose regarding the guidance which requires deferred tax assets and liabilities to be adjusted for the effect of a change in tax laws or rates with the effect included in income from continuing operations in the reporting period that includes the enactment date. The amendments in this ASU require a reclassification for stranded tax effects from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings, furthermore eliminating the stranded tax effects resulting from the TCJA. The amount of the reclassification is the difference between the previous corporate income tax rate of 35% and the newly enacted corporate income tax rate of 21%. The amendments of this ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted in any interim period or fiscal year before the effective date. We have elected to early adopt this guidance as of January 1, 2018. Our Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition reflect adoption of this ASU and reclassification of $2.1 million in stranded tax effects from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings. See Note 10 “Income Taxes” for additional information. In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016 - 15 “Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments”, to clarify how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statements of cash flows. The amendments are intended to reduce diversity in practice by clarifying whether the following items should be categorized as operating, investing or financing in the statement of cash flows: (i) debt prepayments and extinguishment costs, (ii) settlement of zero -coupon debt, (iii) settlement of contingent consideration, (iv) insurance proceeds, (v) settlement of corporate-owned life insurance (COLI) and bank-owned life insurance (BOLI) policies, (vi) distributions from equity method investees, (vii) beneficial interests in securitization transactions, and (viii) receipts and payments with aspects of more than one class of cash flows. The ASU will be effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted. If an entity early adopts the amendments in an interim period, any adjustments should be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes that interim period. An entity that elects early adoption must adopt all of the amendments in the same period. This ASU was adopted on January 1, 2018 and did not have a significant impact on the presentation of our cash flows . In January 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016 - 01 “Financial Instruments” which requires an entity to: (i) measure equity investments at fair value through net income, with certain exceptions; (ii) present in other comprehensive income the changes in instrument-specific credit risk for financial liabilities measured using the fair value option; (iii) present financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset; (iv) calculate the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes based on an exit price and; (v) assess a valuation allowance on deferred tax assets related to unrealized losses of available for sale debt securities in combination with other deferred tax assets. The ASU provides an election to subsequently measure certain nonmarketable equity investments at cost less any impairment and adjusted for certain observable price changes. The ASU also requires a qualitative impairment assessment of such equity investments and amends certain fair value disclosure requirements. This ASU became effective for us on January 1, 2018. The adoption of the guidance resulted in a cumulative-effect adjustment totaling $0.8 million and did not have a significant impact on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows . In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014 - 09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606 )”. This ASU establishes a comprehensive revenue recognition standard for virtually all industries under GAAP, including those that previously followed industry-specific guidance such as real estate, construction and software industries. The revenue standard’s core principle is built on the contract between a vendor and a customer for the provision of goods and services. It attempts to depict the exchange of rights and obligations between the parties in the pattern of revenue recognition based on the consideration to which the vendor is entitled. The guidance in this ASU for public companies is effective for the annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods therein. In August 2015, the FASB approved a one -year delay of the effective date of this standard to reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. This ASU allows for either full retrospective adoption or modified retrospective adoption. This ASU became effective for us on January 1, 2018. We adopted this standard through the modified retrospective transition method . The modified retrospective method requires application of ASU 2014 - 09 to uncompleted contracts at the date of adoption; however, periods prior to the date of adoption have not been retrospectively revised as the impact of the new standard on uncompleted contracts as the date of adoption was not material as such a cumulative effective adjustment to opening retained earnings was not deemed necessary. Topic 606 does not apply to the majority of our revenue streams which are primarily comprised of interest and dividend income and associated fees within those revenue streams. The revenue streams derived by the Company that are within the scope of Topic 606 are primarily certain banking service fees, including wire transfer fees, ATM fees, account maintenance fees, overdraft fees and other deposit fees. We generally satisfy our performance obligations on contracts with customers as services are rendered, and the transaction prices are typically fixed and charged either on a periodic basis or based on activity. Being that performance obligations are satisfied as services are rendered and the transaction prices are fixed, there is little judgment involved in applying Topic 606 that significantly affects the determination of the amount and timing of revenue from contracts with customers. Additionally, the Company will receive revenue from the sale of investment products through a third party as part of a revenue sharing agreement. This revenue is included in “Other Income” in the Consolidated Statements of Income. These fees are remitted to the Company monthly as our performance obligation is satisfied. We have evaluated the nature of our contracts with customers and determined that further disaggregation of revenue from contracts with customers into more granular categories beyond what is present in the Consolidated Statements of Income was not necessary. Accounting Standards Pending Adoption: In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018 - 14, “Compensation – Retirement Benefits – Defined Benefit Plans – General (Subtopic 715 - 20 )” providing targeted improvements to the disclosures required for Defined Benefit Plans. The amendments in in this Update are effective for fiscal years ended after December 15, 2020. Early adoption is permitted. The amendments are to be applied on a retrospective basis to all periods presented. We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting this new guidance on our disclosures. In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018 - 13, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820 )”. The amendments in this Update modify the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements in Topic 820. The amendments in in this Update are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted. The amendments are to be applied on a retrospective basis to all periods presented. We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting this new guidance on our disclosures. In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017 - 12, “Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815 )” providing targeted improvements to the accounting for hedging activities, which is effective January 1, 2019, with early adoption permitted in any interim period or fiscal year before the effective date. The guidance introduces a number of amendments, several of which are optional, that are designed to simplify the application of hedge accounting, improve financial statement transparency and more closely align hedge accounting with an entity’s risk management strategies. This ASU eliminates the requirement to separately measure and report hedge ineffectiveness and changes the presentation so that all items that affect earnings are in the same income statement line as the hedged item. The guidance is not expected to have an impact on the Company's financial positions, results of operations or disclosures. In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017 - 08, “Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities” which shortens the amortization period for premiums on purchased callable debt securities to the earliest call date, rather than amortizing over the full contractual term. The ASU does not change the accounting for securities held at a discount. The amendments in this ASU require companies to reset the effective yield using the payment terms of the debt security if the call option is not exercised on the earliest call date. If the security has additional future call dates, any excess of the amortized cost basis over the amount repayable by the issuer at the next call date should be amortized to the next call date. The amendments in this update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. If an entity early adopts the amendments in an interim period, any adjustments should be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes that interim period. The guidance is not expected to have an impact on the Company's financial positions, results of operations or disclosures. In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017 - 04, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350 ): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment.” The ASU simplifies the subsequent measurement of goodwill and eliminates Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. Under this ASU, the Company should perform its goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. An impairment charge should be recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit's fair value. The impairment charge is limited to the amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. The amendments in this update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted for goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. The guidance is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company's financial positions, results of operations or disclosures. In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016 - 13, “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses” which sets forth a “current expected credit loss” (“CECL”) model which requires the Company to measure all expected credit losses for financial instruments held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions and reasonable supportable forecasts. This replaces the existing incurred loss model and will apply to the measurement of credit losses on financial assets measured at amortized cost and to some off-balance sheet credit exposures. This ASU will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company has been collecting and evaluating data and system requirements to implement this standard. Management has developed inter-departmental steering and working committees to evaluate and implement CECL. We have chosen a vendor solution to model CECL results and are in the beginning stages of implementing this solution. The adoption of this update could have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations and financial condition. The extent of the impact is still unknown and will depend on many factors, such as the composition of the Company’s loan portfolio and expected loss history at adoption. In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016 - 02, “Leases” which requires lessees to recognize leases on-balance sheet, makes targeted changes to lessor accounting, and disclose key information about leasing arrangements. Topic 842 was subsequently amended by ASU No. 2018 - 01, Land Easement Practical Expedient for Transition to Topic 842; ASU No. 2018 - 10, Codification Improvements to Topic 842, Leases; and ASU No. 2018 - 11, Targeted Improvements. ASC 842 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 31, 2018. A modified retrospective transition approach is required, applying the new standard to all leases existing at the date of initial application. An entity may choose to use either ( 1 ) the effective date or ( 2 ) the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements as its date of initial application. The Company has elected to use the effective date, January 1, 2019, as the date of initial application. Consequently, financial information will not be updated and the disclosures required under the new standard will not be provided for dates and periods before January 1, 2019. From the lessee's perspective, the new standard establishes a right-of-use (“ROU”) model that requires a lessee to recognize a ROU asset and a corresponding lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months, subject to a policy election. The Company has elected the short-term lease recognition exemption such that the Company will not recognize ROU assets or lease liabilities for leases with a term of less than 12 months from the commencement date. Leases will be classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the income statement for a lessee. Additionally, the ASU expands quantitative and qualitative disclosures to help financial statement users better understand the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. The new leasing standard provides a number of optional practical expedients in transition. The Company has elected the “package of practical expedients”, which permits the Company not to reassess prior conclusions about lease identification, lease classification and initial direct costs. The Company does not expect to elect the use-of-hindsight or the practical expedient pertaining to land easements; the latter not being applicable to the Company. ASC 842 also provides certain accounting policy elections for an entity’s ongoing accounting. For operating leases wherein the Company is the lessee, the Company has elected the practical expedient to not separate lease and non-lease components. Under legacy lease accounting, all of the Company’s leases, which primarily relate to office space and bank branches, were classified as operating leases and, as such, are not recognized on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet for periods prior to the adoption of ASC 842. The Company currently estimates recognizing lease liabilities ranging from $40 million to $50 million, with corresponding ROU assets of the same amount, decreasing the Bank’s and Company’s regulatory capital ratios approximately one to six basis points, due to an increase in total assets and risk-weighted assets. The Company does not expect material changes to the recognition of operating lease expense as presented in Occupancy and Equipment expense in its Consolidated Statements of Income.

X
- References No definition available. + Details
Name: | us-gaap_DisclosureTextBlockAbstract
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | xbrli:stringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition The entire disclosure of changes in accounting principles, including adoption of new accounting pronouncements, that describes the new methods, amount and effects on financial statement line items. + References Reference 1: http://fasb.org/us-gaap/role/ref/legacyRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 250 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/topic&trid=2122394 + Details
Name: | us-gaap_NewAccountingPronouncementsAndChangesInAccountingPrinciplesTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | nonnum:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration