UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark one)
x Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011
¨ Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the transition period from ______________ to _____________
Commission File Number: 001-34407
DEER CONSUMER PRODUCTS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada |  | 20-5526104
(State of or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |  | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

Area 2, 1/F, Building M-6, Central High-Tech Industrial Park, Nanshan, Shenzhen, China 518057
(Address of principal executive offices)
(86) 755-8602-8285
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class |  | Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, $.001 par value |  | Nasdaq Global Select Market

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes ¨ No x
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
Yes ¨ No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ¨ | Accelerated filer x
Non-accelerated filer ¨ | Smaller reporting company ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).
Yes ¨ No x
At June 30, 2011, the aggregate market value of the registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $138,700,975, based on the last sale price of the registrant’s common stock. For the purposes of the foregoing calculation only, all of the registrant’s directors, executive officers and holders of ten percent or greater of the registrant’s outstanding common stock have been excluded in that such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This determination of affiliate status is not a determination for other purposes.
At March 28, 2012, there were 33,592,562 shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
None.

Deer Consumer Products, Inc.
Table of Contents

|  | Page
PART I
Item 1. | Business | 1
Item 1A. | Risk Factors | 9
Item 1B. | Unresolved Staff Comments | 21
Item 2. | Properties | 21
Item 3. | Legal Proceedings | 22
Item 4. | Mine Safety Disclosures | 22
PART II
Item 5. | Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities | 23
Item 6. | Selected Financial Data | 26
Item 7. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 27
Item 7A. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk | 36
Item 8. | Financial Statements and Supplementary Data | 36
Item 9. | Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure | 36
Item 9A. | Controls and Procedures | 37
Item 9B. | Other Information | 38
PART III
Item 10. | Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance | 39
Item 11. | Executive Compensation | 42
Item 12. | Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters | 47
Item 13. | Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence | 48
Item 14. | Principal Accounting Fees and Services | 48
PART IV
Item 15. | Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules | 49
| Financial Statements | F-1

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
In this report, the terms “Deer,” the “Company,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to Deer Consumer Products, Inc. and its subsidiaries. This report contains forward-looking statements regarding Deer that include, but are not limited to, statements concerning our projected revenues, expenses, gross profit and income, mix of revenue, demand for our products, the benefits and potential applications for our products, the need for additional capital, our ability to obtain and successfully perform additional new contract awards and the related funding and profitability of such awards, the competitive nature of our business and markets and product qualification requirements of our customers. These forward-looking statements are based on our current expectations, estimates and projections about our industry, management’s beliefs, and certain assumptions made by us. Words such as “anticipates,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “predicts,” “potential,” “believes,” “seeks,” “hopes,” “estimates,” “should,” “may,” “will,” “with a view to” and variations of these words or similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Therefore, our actual results could differ materially and adversely from those expressed in any forward-looking statements as a result of various factors. Such factors include, but are not limited to the following:

| • | our goals and strategies;
| • | our expansion plans;
| • | our future business development, financial conditions and results of operations;
| • | the expected growth of the market for our products;
| • | our expectations regarding demand for our products;
| • | our ability to expand the Deer brand in China;
| • | our expectations regarding keeping and strengthening our relationships with key customers;
| • | our ability to stay abreast of market trends and technological advances;
| • | competition in our industry in China;
| • | general economic and business conditions in the regions in which we sell our products;
| • | relevant government policies and regulations relating to our industry; and
| • | market acceptance of our products.

Additionally, this report contains statistical data we obtained from various publicly available government publications and industry-specific third party reports. Statistical data in these publications also include projections based on a number of assumptions. The changing nature of our customers' industries results in significant uncertainties in any projections or estimates relating to the growth prospects or future condition of our market. Furthermore, if any one or more of the assumptions underlying the market data is later found to be incorrect, actual results may differ from the projections based on these assumptions. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements.
Unless otherwise indicated, information in this report concerning economic conditions and our industry is based on information from independent industry analysts and publications, as well as our estimates. Except where otherwise noted, our estimates are derived from publicly available information released by third party sources, as well as data from our internal research, and are based on such data and our knowledge of our industry, which we believe to be reasonable. None of the independent industry publication market data cited in this report was prepared on our or our affiliates’ behalf.
We do not undertake any obligation to revise or update publicly any forward-looking statements for any reason, except as required by law. Additional information on the various risks and uncertainties potentially affecting our operating results are discussed below and are contained in our publicly filed documents available through the SEC’s website (www.sec.gov) or upon written request to our corporate secretary at: Area 2, 1/F, Building M-6, Central High-Tech Industrial Park, Nanshan, Shenzhen, China.

PART I
Item 1. Business
General
We are a leading Chinese designer, manufacturer and seller of quality small home and kitchen electric appliances. We develop, promote, manufacture and sell a broad range of stylish, safe and easy to use products including blenders, juicers and soy milk makers that are designed to make today’s lifestyles simpler and healthier. Our products are sold in the China domestic and export markets. In the China domestic market, our products target China’s growing middle class and are sold primarily under the Deer brand name (德尔) as well as under one store brand for a retailer’s private label program. In the export market, we manufacture our products for leading overseas consumer products companies which sell them under brand names including Black & Decker® and Betty Crocker Kitchens, as well as store brands for retailer’s private label programs.
While we have traditionally generated the majority of our sales in the export market, urbanization, rising family incomes and higher living standards have spurred demand for small appliances in China. To capture this market opportunity, we introduced the Deer brand (德尔) of appliances to the China domestic market in April 2008. We believe the Deer brand (德尔) will continue to grow significantly as the domestic demand for our products increases in China with increased living standards. We sell our products to distributors as well as directly to customers and our products are found worldwide.
We believe Deer is positioned to become a leading brand in China’s rapidly growing small home and kitchen electric appliance sector and will continue to be a leading international Original Design Manufacturer (“ODM”) and Original Equipment Manufacturer (“OEM”). We believe we will be able to maintain our revenue growth because of our ability to deliver products on time, the quality reputation of our ODM and OEM products, our excellent relationships with our large customers and our aggressive expansion in China.
Historically, we have served as an ODM and OEM for leading international consumer product companies. In 2011, 32% of our revenues were from the export market. Since inception, we have focused on establishing and growing relationships with our leading international customer base including Focus Electrics Group, which offers Back to Basics and West Bend products, Applica Incorporated, which offers Black & Decker® products, and Sattar. Our experience in the export business has also enabled us to develop the scale, manufacturing efficiencies and design expertise that serves as the foundation for us to aggressively pursue the highly attractive domestic market opportunity.
We were incorporated in Nevada on July 8, 2006, under the name of Tag Events Corp., as a musical event organization and promotion company with minimal operations. On September 3, 2008, we changed our name to Deer Consumer Products, Inc. and entered into and consummated a series of agreements that resulted in the acquisition of all of the ordinary shares of Deer International Group Ltd., a corporation organized under the laws of the British Virgin Islands (“Deer International”), parent of its wholly owned subsidiaries, Winder Electric Group Ltd. (“Winder”), which is a wholly foreign-owned enterprise (“WFOE”) and responsible for research, production and delivery of goods, and Delta International Limited (“Delta”), a subsidiary for Winder responsible for marketing operations.
The acquisition of Deer International’s ordinary shares was accomplished pursuant to the terms of a Share Exchange Agreement and Plan of Reorganization, dated September 3, 2008 (the “Share Exchange Agreement”), by and between Deer International and the Company. Pursuant to the Share Exchange Agreement, we acquired from Deer International 50,000 ordinary shares, consisting of all of its issued and outstanding capital stock, for the issuance of 15,695,706 shares of our common stock to the shareholders of Deer International (the “Share Exchange”). Concurrently with the closing of the transactions contemplated by the Share Exchange Agreement and as a condition thereof, we entered into an agreement with Crescent Liu, our former Director and Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to which he returned 5,173,914 shares of our common stock to us for cancellation. Mr. Liu was not compensated in any way for the cancellation of his shares of our common stock. Upon completion of the foregoing transactions, we had 19,652,226 shares of common stock issued and outstanding.
We plan to continue to target the China domestic market by expanding our production and manufacturing facilities in 2012. We incorporated two new subsidiaries of Deer International, Deer Technology (AnHui) Co., Ltd. (“Deer Technology”) and Anlin Technology (AnHui) Co., Ltd. (“Anlin Technology”), on April 30, 2010, for the purpose of establishing a new factory in the Wuhu area of AnHui Province in central China. Wuhu is located on the banks of the Yangtze River within hours from Shanghai and Nanjing, which are some of China’s most populous and economically developed regions. This central location will improve our ability to deliver our products to customers located throughout China. The new factory, which will increase our production capacity by 40%, and distribution center, will allow us to target the neighboring population of more than 400 million as we continue to grow our business in the China domestic market. We completed the construction of fencing, sewage system, water pipes, gas and utilities, the factory’s main entrance and leveling the land during the last quarter of 2011, and we plan to complete the construction of certain workshops and the warehouse in 2012. We anticipate using our new facilities in AnHui to fulfill China domestic orders, and the pace of construction will be determined by the pace of our expansion in the China domestic market. Once operations commence at the AnHui factory, we plan to transition our current facilities in Yangjiang, Guangdong province in south China, which do not operate at full capacity currently, to be used primarily for fulfilling export orders. These two facilities are about 1,000 miles apart and management anticipates needing the additional capacity at the new facilities in AnHui over the next few years. This additional capacity will be brought online incrementally in accordance with our domestic expansion strategy.
1

Our principal offices are located at Area 2, 1/F, Building M-6, Central High-Tech Industrial Park, Nanshan, Shenzhen, China 518057. Our telephone number is (86) 755-8602-8285. Our website is www.deerinc.com. Copies of our annual, quarterly and current reports and any amendments to these reports filed with or furnished to the SEC are available free of charge through our website at www.deerinc.com as soon as reasonably practicable after filing with the SEC. We make available free of charge on our website our Code of Conduct and charters of our Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.
Products
We are a U.S. holding company with no material assets other than the stock of our wholly owned subsidiaries, including Winder, our operating subsidiary that manufactures our small home and kitchen electric appliances for the consumer market in China and for export markets. In 2011, blenders were our largest selling product, accounting for 33% of our revenues, with no other product accounting for more than 10% of revenues. In 2010 and 2009, our largest selling products were blenders and juice extractors, which accounted for 49% and 22% of our revenues in 2010, respectively, and 51% and 21% of our revenues in 2009, respectively. Our other principal products include soy milk makers, food processors, popcorn makers, meat grinders, coffee machines and hot water kettles. Our product portfolio has included over 250 different product varieties in the last 10 years. We plan to expand our product lines further into growing appliance segments, such as our introduction of rice cookers and toasters in 2011, and humidifiers and dehumidifiers in 2010. In 2012, we plan to offer such new products as vacuum cleaners, waters purifiers and complete, integrated kitchen, bathroom and household systems.
We offer Original Brand Manufacturing (“OBM”), ODM and OEM products for the China domestic market and export market. OBM products are designed, manufactured and sold by us under the Deer brand name (德尔). These products are sold primarily to domestic Chinese retailers for sale in China. We have traditionally acted as both an ODM and OEM for the export market. Under ODM agreements, we design and manufacture products primarily for large, international consumer products companies who in turn sell the products under brand names such as Black & Decker®. We provide our ODM customers with a research, design and development solution to address their home and kitchen electronic appliance needs. Our research and development team can work alone or in tandem with a customer’s product design group to create new designs. We own all the tooling and own or have an exclusive perpetual license to use all of the intellectual property and designs for our ODM products. Because of our design and development solution, our rights to use the product design and ownership of the tooling, customers that purchase ODM products tend to be less likely to switch suppliers relative to customers that purchase OEM products. Most of our international customers are ODM customers and we have ongoing dialogue with them regarding potential new products. Many of these customers pay for the tooling and thus are incentivized financially to continue to buy the products from us. OEM products are outsourced by electrical appliance manufacturers to us for production. We produce appliances for these clients, which consist of both China domestic retailers and international consumer products companies, based on their custom specifications and designs.
Our products have obtained the requisite safety approvals for sale in China and our principal export markets, including: CE (European Union), GS (Germany), ETL/UL/CUL (North America) and CB (International). Management believes that, domestically, our products retail for significantly less than the price of imports of comparable quality and at slight discount to the products of other domestic brands because of our cost-saving ability to produce components in-house. We offer an extensive array of products with varying sizes, functionality, price points and applications. This strategy enables us to reach a broad range of customers with our products in both the China domestic market and export market.
Industry Overview
Small electric appliances are classified into three sectors: (i) kitchen, which includes blenders, juicers, microwave ovens, coffee makers and rice cookers; (ii) living, which includes electric fans, humidifiers, electric heaters, vacuums; and (iii) personal care, which includes hairdryers, electric shavers and massagers. Our products primarily fall into the kitchen sector. According to Bloomfield Consulting, average gross profit margins for small household electric appliances are approximately 30%, which are higher than that of traditional home appliances such as televisions and air conditioners, which generally have gross margins of less than 10%.
According to the China Household Electrical Appliances Association, the China domestic market maintained steady growth in 2011, with an increase in high-end products sales and sales through e-commerce platforms. The overall appliance industry reached a record high in 2011, with industry sales output of $169 billion in 2011, up 17% over 2010. In addition, small appliance production increased in 2011, with a 9% increase in sales of electric fans, a 3% increase in vacuum cleaners and an 8% increase in rice cooker sales. Further development in the industry is expected in 2012 as urbanization trends in China continue and domestic consumption continues to rise. According to the China Household Electrical Appliances Association, the average household in China owns less than 10 small electric appliances, which is far less than the average household in a developed country with almost 40 electric appliances, highlighting the vast potential of the market in China. The expansion of the China domestic market is due, in part, to the country’s rapid economic growth. According to the International Monetary Fund, China’s real gross domestic product, or GDP, has grown an average of 10.9% annually since 2006. China has a large population, including a rapidly expanding middle class and younger, urban consumer bases, which offers a large pool of potential consumers. China’s market population of middle class and affluent consumers is projected to grow to more than 400 million by 2020 from 150 million, according to the Boston Consulting Group. Economic growth in China has led to greater levels of personal disposable income and increased spending among China’s expanding middle class consumer base. We continue to target this growing China domestic market, and have increased our sales to the China domestic market significantly over the past three years.
2

Production
We operate 13 tooling houses, 291 injection-molding machines, 27 production lines and possess an estimated annual production capacity of 14 million units. We anticipate expanding our production and manufacturing capabilities by building a new factory in the Wuhu area of central China, which will improve our ability to deliver our products to customers located throughout China. The new factory, which will increase our production capacity by 40%, and attendant distribution center, will allow us to target the neighboring population of more than 400 million as we continue to grow our business in the China domestic market. We completed the construction of fencing, sewage system, water pipes, gas and utilities, the factory’s main entrance and leveling the land during the last quarter of 2011, and we plan to complete the construction of certain workshops and the warehouse in 2012. The pace of construction will be determined by the pace of our China domestic market expansion. We anticipate transitioning our factory located in Yangjiang, Guangdong province in south China, which currently does not operate at full capacity, to be used primarily for fulfilling export orders whereas we anticipate using our new facilities in Anhui to fulfill China domestic orders. These two facilities are about 1,000 miles apart and management anticipates needing the additional capacity at the new facilities in AnHui over the next few years. This additional capacity will be brought on line incrementally in accordance with our domestic expansion strategy.
As part of our manufacturing best practices, as well as our contribution to environmental improvement, our manufacturing department recycles and reuses plastic scraps, defects, waste and quality rejects as raw materials. At current manufacturing levels, approximately 100 tons of our waste is recycled and reused in our manufacturing monthly. Our manufacturing capacity is fully integrated, with in-house capabilities to produce everything from internal components, including electrical motors, to exterior components and final assembly. Our facilities are largely automated, which helps to ensure consistent product quality and lower our labor costs. We believe that our vertically integrated and automated manufacturing capabilities provide us with a competitive advantage as it enables us to consistently produce low-cost, high-quality products for our customers, while contributing to our ability to generate attractive gross margins. Furthermore, we believe our in-house production of motors used in our products gives us a significant cost advantage over our competitors.
We implemented a cost control program that continues to improve productivity by automating or consolidating manual assembly operations while increasing workflow safety, quality and efficiency. To determine which components can be produced by us at lowest cost, we evaluate third-party suppliers of components or of products from time to time. Based on our research, we determine if components used in our products would be produced more efficiently at our facilities or outsourced to a third party. From time to time we use third party manufacturers in order to offer a broader range of products in SKUs we do not already produce, which allows us to rapidly expand our product offerings and further enhance our retail store presence in the China domestic market. To date, all our production agreements with third party manufacturers are short-term in nature.
Sales and Marketing
Our marketing strategy continues to emphasize the following goals:

· | Aggressively expand sales of our Deer brand (德尔) products in the China domestic market by increasing advertising and continuing to enter large retail appliance chains and department stores;

· | Expand exports of our products and increase our ODM and OEM export business; and

· | Pursue deeper penetration and development of our customer base in the emerging South America, Southeast Asia, Africa and Middle East markets.

During 2011, we increased sales and distribution of our Deer brand (德尔) products to the China domestic market by establishing a direct sales channel presence at domestic retail stores across China, including Gome, SuNing and Rainbow Department Stores. We also commenced sales through Taobao, a Chinese-language third party shopping website. The offering of our products by these large and well-known nationwide retailers provided our products with a high degree of visibility throughout China. We also hire promoters at the retail stores to introduce our products directly to in-store customer traffic. In addition, we engaged in direct advertising of our products in subways, taxi stations, commercial building elevators and industry magazines in highly populated cities of China, including Beijing and Guangzhou, and renovated our product showroom in Shenzhen. Our Deer brand (德尔) products currently are our principal product line, but we also sell products in the China domestic market under other registered brand names for which we own or have user rights, including: Kyowa, D&R, Blendermate, K-tec, Blendtec, NOWAKE, 万灵winder, MJ-176NR, Bartec’ and aiders.
Due to the slower than expected worldwide economic recovery, we experienced an overall decrease in customer orders from North America, South America, Asia, Africa and the Middle East. We also turned away certain orders from these areas that did not meet our profit margin requirements and instead focused on sales of our higher margin products, including those manufactured under the Deer brand (德尔). We are seeking to recover and refocus these sales by continuing to market our products through various channels, including our participating in exhibitions such as the Canton Fair, the largest import and export trade fair in China and a leading venue for Chinese exporters to exhibit and sell their goods to the international markets. The Canton Fair is a significant source of export-oriented new business for us each year. We also maintain regular contacts with current and new international customers to solicit repeat orders and obtain new orders. In addition, we commenced sales to a new customer, a leading franchiser in the U.S., in April 2011. We expect our U.S. revenues to recover in 2012 as the economic recovery progresses and we continue to engage new large U.S. customers that meet our profit margin requirements.
3

As of December 31, 2011, our sales and marketing department consisted of 453 employees, including in-store promoters dedicated primarily to increasing our brand awareness among the Chinese consumer. From time to time, we hire part-time marketing personnel to help market our products at trade shows and third-party sales agents who introduce new customers to the Company. Our target customer in the China domestic market is the middle class urban consumer whose socioeconomic status is improving along with China’s growing GDP and whose disposable income is improving in-line with their quality of life. Our sales team plans to achieve greater brand awareness by expanding our product distribution across the major regions of China and by establishing new sales channels with local and national distributors and retailers, including establishing a direct channel presence at retail locations. Our products currently are available in approximately 4,000 store locations in China.
All of these marketing efforts resulted in an increase of our sales through traditional and non-traditional channels. Our sales through traditional channels, including retail stores in China such as Gome and SuNing, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Song Qiao, expanded to $122.6 million in 2011 from $58.7 million in 2010 and $11.5 million in 2009. In addition, our sales through non-traditional channels, such as hospitality, restaurant and commercial channels, increased to $30.9 million in 2011 from $18.2 million in 2010 and $2.9 million in 2009. We provide heavy-duty commercial blenders and juicers to bars, hotels, restaurants and coffee houses for preparing drink concoctions and smoothies. In addition, we also provide small appliances such as hot water kettles for use in hotel guest rooms. Major appliance retailers have used our products as a complimentary gift for customers who buy large-ticket items. China’s postal offices offer reward point systems that allow their customers to redeem their points for our products. We plan to continue to expand in these sales channels in 2012.
Suppliers
Our major raw material purchases include petroleum-based resins and chemicals for plastic production such as AS, PP and ABS resins, and silicon steel sheets and copper. Currently, less than 20% of our raw materials are imported, with the majority sourced domestically in China through various local suppliers using cost and availability selection criteria. More than half of these domestic materials can be purchased within the Pearl River Delta region near our Yangjiang production facilities. Our principal suppliers are: Hong Bo, Zhong Hua (Sino-Chem), Hua Mei, Chuanggao, Feng Shun, Jinhu, Xinyide, JiaJing and Ming Gang.
We seek to maintain two or more quality suppliers for each type of raw material purchased. By maintaining relationships with more than one supplier, we benefit from a more stable supply chain and more competitive prices. We hold our suppliers to strict quality and delivery specifications.
We do not maintain fixed supply contracts. Components and raw materials are ordered when needed to meet production needs. If a change of suppliers is necessary, we believe we can quickly fulfill supplies from another source without impacting production. Strategic materials are purchased from several suppliers and we have no sole source suppliers. We are backward-integrated and depend on suppliers mainly for raw materials. We produce most of our product components in-house, including manufacturing our own micro-motors, a key component used in our blenders and juicers, thereby further reducing our reliance on outside suppliers.
Customers
We sell our products in the export market to consumer product companies which in turn offer products worldwide under numerous high-quality brand names such as Black & Decker®, Disney and Betty Crocker Kitchens. In the China domestic market, we sell our products to retail stores through agents acting as intermediaries and distributors. Our three largest customers in 2011, Gome, Reed Sea and Suyi accounted for 38%, 13% and 11% of our revenues, respectively. Our other top customers in 2011 included: SuNing, Focus Electric, Novel, Sattar, Corbeta, Yunqing and Tianhong.
China Domestic Market
Our sales to the China domestic market have increased significantly over the past 3 years, representing 68%, 43% and 18% of our revenues in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. We anticipate that a majority of our revenues will continue to come from sales to the China domestic market. We believe that retail consumers in the China domestic market seek quality, convenience and price. We currently sell our products to retail stores through agents, as we do not yet operate our own distribution center in China. We anticipate commencing operations of our distribution center in the Wuhu area of central China in 2012, thereby reducing our reliance on third party agents for distribution of our products in China. Agents buy our products and hold the inventory for various retail locations, serving as an intermediary between us and the store. Since 2010, our Deer brand (德尔) products have been sold through Gome, one of China’s largest domestic retailers, and many other retail locations across China. We also sold our products to SuNing, a prominent national electric appliance chain in China and wholly owned subsidiary of Song Qiao, under a private label arrangement. Our products currently are available in approximately 4,000 store locations in China. In addition, we have commenced sales through Taobao, a prominent Chinese-language e-commerce website.
4

Export Market
Sales to customers outside of China accounted for 32%, 57% and 82% of our revenues in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. In the export market we serve primarily as an ODM for large overseas appliance brands with sales made both directly and indirectly to consumer product companies. We believe most international ODM and OEM customers look for high quality and stylish products from a reliable manufacturer which can meet their specifications on time and at their price points. Since inception, we have focused on establishing stable and positive customer relationships and have developed a loyal and strong customer base with foreign export clients such as Focus Electrics Group, which offers Back to Basics and West Bend products, Applica Incorporated, which offers Black & Decker® products, and Sattar. Although we generally do not enter into fixed agreements as to sales quantities on a monthly or annual basis, our customers generally provide us with their annual sales forecast, often with a specific monthly breakdown. These forecasts allow us to better plan for our raw material and labor needs in the upcoming year to meet our customers’ requirements. While this is not a fixed contract, the arrangement benefits our customers by establishing a source of appliances for their retail consumers and provides us with a good indication of demand for our products. In the past, their forecasts have been consistent with their purchases in the following year. We believe the majority of our customers in the export market view us as a strategic long-term supplier and value the quality of our products, our timely delivery and sophisticated design capabilities.
Competition
China Domestic Market
In the China domestic market, we face competition from premium-priced foreign brands as well as from other Chinese appliance manufacturers. These include companies such as Midea, Hisense, Galanz, Supor, Elec-Tech and Tsann Kuen (Taiwan) that offer products priced comparably with our products. We believe that we are able to expand aggressively in the China retail market because of the following competitive factors:

| o | Reputation as a High-Quality Producer—Many Chinese consumers desire appliances that are safe, stylish and priced reasonably. We are known for our extensive ODM production for global consumer product goods companies and Chinese consumers associate the Deer brand (德尔) with the same safety and style as these foreign brands at a better price.

| o | Varied Product Menu—We offer products with varying size, functionality, price points and applications to reach a broad customer base.

| o | Experience—We have extensive experience designing and manufacturing blender and juicer products. Many of the competing domestic brands outsource design and manufacturing to small domestic factories with limited experience in designing and manufacturing blender and juicer products.

| o | Limitation of Foreign Brands—Many foreign brands with design capabilities typically retail at significantly higher prices than our products. On the other hand, foreign brands without design capabilities do not own the rights to the designs and hence cannot sell their products in China.

Export Market
In the export market, we compete against other ODM and OEM manufacturers located mostly in China. More recently, we have experienced increased competition from other ODM and OEM manufacturers operating in regions with low labor costs such as Eastern Europe and other Southeast Asian countries. In order to compete effectively, we employ the following practices:

| o | ODM capabilities—It is less efficient for customers with multiple product lines to maintain in-house research and design capabilities for kitchen appliances. As an ODM, we maintain an engineering staff that researches and designs products to meet the stylistic and functional needs of our customers. Our ODM capabilities are highly valued by our customers;

| o | Experience—We design quality and stylish products on a timely basis. We believe our experience and proven performance provide a competitive edge over other manufacturers;

5

| o | Vertical Integration—We produce almost all of our product components in-house, allowing us to capture the profit margin and taxes that we would otherwise pay to a supplier if the components were sourced externally. Through vertical integration, we also achieve greater product standardization and we are better able to manage our supply chain; and

| o | Customer Service—Our sales managers maintain close contact with our customers to be responsive to any special modifications or product needs to best fit their respective markets. In addition, our sales directors often travel to meet with customers during the year.

Intellectual Property
We and our subsidiaries have historically licensed the right to use patents from various parties, including from our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Ying He, his brother, FaMin He, Shenzhen De Mei Long Electric Appliances Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Kafu Industrial Co., Ltd. In December 2008, we entered into transfer agreements that intended to transfer the ownership of patents and trademarks used by us from Messrs. He and He, Shenzhen De Mei Long Electric Appliances Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Kafu Industrial Co., Ltd., to Winder. Winder entered into a supplemental agreement to these transfer agreements to clarify that Winder has a license to use the patents and trademarks which will continue on a perpetual, exclusive, world-wide and royalty-free basis, and which may not be cancelled by the licensor or grantor until the registration of the ownership transfers of the patents and trademarks becomes effective. We have been relying on this license, which is sufficient to grant all rights necessary for us to conduct our operations, we have not taken any steps to register the transfer of the above mentioned patents and trademarks, nor do we intend to do so.
We own or use seven trademarks, including Deer, Kyowa, D&R, Blendermate, K-tec, Blendtec and NOWAKE, and one copyright, each of which is registered with the China Trademark Office under the State Administration for Industry & Commerce of the PRC. Of the trademarks, three expire in 2013, one expires in 2014 and three expire in 2017.
Research and Development
To maintain our competitive edge, we consistently invest in research and development to keep pace with new technologies and improve efficiencies in design and cost. We have a team of 63 research and development and technical employees that continuously improve our products and enable us to compete with other manufacturers. We spent $188,658, $777,783 and $602,550 on research and development in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. While we have no formal written alliances, we work with several household electric associations who consult for us intermittently.
Governmental and Environmental Regulation
General
Our business and company registrations are in compliance in all material respects with the laws and regulations of the municipal and provincial authorities of Guangdong Province and the PRC. Our products have obtained the requisite safety approvals to sell in export markets allowing us to label products with the marks of CE (European Union), GS (Germany), ETL/UL/CUL (North America) and CB (International). We have also obtained the necessary licenses and certifications to manufacture and sell our products in the China domestic market.
Business License
A company that conducts business in the PRC must have a business license that prescribes the scope of business to be conducted. The business licenses of our PRC subsidiaries cover our present business of manufacturing small home and kitchen electric appliances for sales overseas and domestically. If we were to expand our business beyond the scope of our business licenses, we would be required to apply for and receive approval from the PRC government.
Consumer Product Regulations
In order to produce small home and kitchen electric appliances, we must obtain China Compulsory Product Certification, or CCC authentication, for all our products. CCC authentication is a product conformity assessment system performed by the Chinese government based on the WTO agreement and prevailing international rules, with the purpose of protecting consumers, the safety of personal and animal life, the environment and national security. Products must be tested before receiving CCC authentication, and can be exported, imported and sold only after they pass such tests. All of our products have received CCC authentication.
Export Laws and Regulations
We are subject to various governmental regulations related to exportation. The major export regulations applicable to us include the Customs Law of the PRC and the Regulation of the PRC on the Administration of the Import and Export of Goods.
These laws and regulations set out standards and requirements for various aspects of export and import of goods, custom registration, sanitary registration and inspection. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations may result in confiscation of our products and proceeds from the sales of non-compliant products, order for correction, fines, revocation of licenses, and, in extreme cases, criminal liability. We believe we are in material compliance with all applicable laws and regulations related to the export of our products.
6

Environmental Regulations
We are subject to the national environmental regulations of the PRC as well as local laws regarding pollutant discharge, air, water and noise pollution, including the Environmental Protection Law of the PRC, the Environmental Impact Appraisal Law of the PRC, the Law of the PRC on the Prevention and Control of Water Pollution, the Law of the PRC on Prevention and Control of Environmental Pollution Caused by Solid Waste, the Law of the PRC on Prevention and Control of Air Pollution and the Law of the PRC on Prevention and Control of Environmental Noise Pollution. The Environmental Protection Law of the PRC sets out the legal framework for environmental protection in the PRC. The Ministry of Environmental Protection of the PRC, or the MEP, is primarily responsible for the supervision and administration of environmental protection work nationwide and formulating national waste discharge limits and standards. Local environmental protection authorities at the county level and above are responsible for environmental protection in their jurisdictions. Companies that discharge contaminants must report and register with the MEP or the relevant local environmental protection authorities. Companies discharging contaminants in excess of the discharge limits prescribed by the central or local authorities must pay discharge fees for the excess in accordance with applicable regulations and are also responsible for the treatment of the excessive discharge. Companies that directly or indirectly discharge industrial wastewater into the water or are required by law to obtain the pollutant discharge permit before discharging wastewater or sewage shall also obtain the pollutant discharge permit.
We currently do not incur any material costs in connection with our compliance with the applicable PRC environmental laws as our manufacturing processes generate minimal discharge and we recycle and reuse much of our manufacturing waste materials. Furthermore, the cost of maintaining compliance with such environmental laws has not, and we believe, in the future, will not, have a material adverse effect on our business, consolidated results of operations and consolidated financial condition.
Labor Regulations
In June 2007, the National People’s Congress of the PRC enacted the Labor Contract Law (“LCL”), which became effective on January 1, 2008. To clarify certain details in connection with the implementation of the LCL, the State Council promulgated the Implementing Rules for the LCL, or the Implementing Rules, on September 18, 2008 which came into effect immediately. The LCL provides various rules regarding employment contracts that will likely have a substantial impact on employment practices in China. The LCL imposes severe penalties on employers that fail to timely enter into employment contracts with employees. The employer is required to pay a double salary to the employee if it does not enter into a written contract with the employee within one month of the employment, and a non-fixed-term contract is assumed if a written contract is not executed after one year of the employment. Additionally, the LCL sets a limit of two fixed-term contracts regardless of the length of each term, after which the contract must be renewed on a non-fixed-term basis should the parties agree to a further renewal unless otherwise required by the respective employee. This requirement curtails the common practice of continuously renewing short-term employment contracts. The Implementing Rules appear to further tighten this rule by suggesting that an employee has the right to demand a non-fixed-term contract upon the completion of the second fixed term regardless of whether the employer agrees to a contract renewal. A non-fixed-term contract does not have a termination date and it is generally difficult to terminate such a contract because termination must be based on limited statutory grounds. The employer can no longer supplement such statutory grounds through an agreement with the employee. In addition, the LCL requires the payment of statutory severance upon the termination of an employment contract in most circumstances, including the expiration of a fixed-term employment contract.
Under the LCL, employers can only impose a post-termination non-competition provision on employees who have access to their confidential information for a maximum period of two years. If an employer intends to maintain the enforceability of a post-termination non-competition provision, the employer has to pay the employee compensation on a monthly basis post-termination of the employment. Under the LCL, a “mass layoff” is defined as termination of more than 20 employees or more than 10% of the workforce. The LCL expands the circumstances under which a mass layoff can be conducted, such as when a company undertakes a restructuring pursuant to the PRC Enterprise Bankruptcy Law, suffers serious difficulties in business operations, changes its line of business, performs significant technology improvements, changes operating methods, or where there has been a material change in the objective economic circumstances relied upon by the parties at the time of the conclusion of the employment contract, thereby making the performance of such employment contract impractical. The employer must follow specific procedures in conducting a mass layoff. There is little guidance on what penalties an employer will suffer if it fails to follow the procedural requirements in conducting the mass layoff. Finally, the LCL requires that the employer discuss the company’s internal rules and regulations that directly affect the employees’ material interests (such as employees’ salary, work hours, leave, benefits, and training, etc.) with all employees or employee representative assemblies and consult with the trade union or employee representatives on such matters before making a final decision.
All of our employees based exclusively within the PRC are covered by the new laws. As there has been little guidance and precedents as to how the LCL and its Implementing Rules shall be enforced by the relevant PRC authorities, there remains uncertainty as to their potential impact on our business and results of operations. The implementation of the LCL and its Implementing Rules may increase our operating expenses, in particular our personnel expenses and labor service expenses. The compensation and procedures required under the LCL may add substantial costs and cause logistical burdens to us. Prior to the new law such compensation was often structured as part of the employee’s salary during employment, and was not an additional compensation cost. In the event that we decide to terminate employees or otherwise change our employment or labor practices, the LCL and its Implementing Rules may also limit our ability to effect these changes in a manner we believe to be cost-effective or desirable, which could adversely affect our business and results of operations. In particular, our ability to adjust the size of our operations when necessary in periods of recession or less severe economic downturns such as the recent financial turmoil may be affected. In addition, during periods of economic decline when mass layoffs become more common, local regulations may tighten the procedures by, among other things, requiring the employer to obtain approval from the relevant local authority before conducting any mass layoff. Such regulations can be expected to exacerbate the adverse effect of the economic environment on our results of operations and financial condition. We believe we are in material compliance with all applicable laws and regulations related to our employees.
7

Regulation of Work Safety
On June 29, 2002, the Work Safety Law of the PRC was adopted by the Standing Committee of the 9th National People’s Congress and came into effect on November 1, 2002, as amended on August 27, 2009. The Work Safety Law provides general work safety requirements for entities engaging in manufacturing and business activities within the PRC. We believe we are in material compliance with all applicable laws and regulations related to work safety.
Foreign Currency Exchange
The principal regulation governing foreign exchange in the PRC is the Foreign Currency Administration Rules (IPPS), as amended. Under these rules, the Renminbi, the PRC’s currency, is freely convertible for trade and service-related foreign exchange transactions (such as normal purchases and sales of goods and services from providers in foreign countries), but not for direct investment, loan or investment in securities outside of China unless the prior approval of the SAFE is obtained. Foreign-Invested Enterprises (FIEs) are required to apply to the SAFE for “Foreign Exchange Registration Certificates for FIEs.” With such registration certificates, FIEs are allowed to open foreign currency accounts including a “current account” and “capital account.” Further, the currency conversion is classified as “current item” and “capital item” according to its nature. Currency conversion within the scope of the “current items,” such as remittance of foreign currencies for payment of dividends, can be effected without requiring the approval of the SAFE, but such transactions are subject to the consent of banks authorized by the SAFE to review “current items” currency transactions, and it is possible that such banks would not consent to our making such payments. However, conversion of currency under the “capital items,” including capital items such as direct investment, loans and securities, still require approval of the SAFE.
On October 21, 2005, SAFE issued a public notice named Notice on Relevant Issues Concerning Foreign Exchange Administration for PRC Residents to Engage in Financing and Return Investments via Overseas Special Purpose Vehicles, or the Circular 75, requiring PRC residents, including both legal persons and natural persons, to register with an appropriate local SAFE branch before establishing or controlling any company outside of China, referred to as an “offshore special purpose company,” for the purpose of acquiring any assets of or equity interest in PRC companies and raising funds from overseas. When a PRC resident contributes the assets or equity interests it holds in a PRC company into the offshore special purpose company, or engages in overseas financing after contributing such assets or equity interests into the offshore special purpose company, such PRC resident shall modify its SAFE registration in light of its interest in the offshore special purpose company and any change thereof. In addition, any PRC resident that is the shareholder of an offshore special purpose company is required to amend his or her SAFE registration with the local SAFE branch, with respect to that offshore special purpose company in connection with any increase or decrease of capital, transfer of shares, merger, division, long-term equity investment or creation of any security interest. To further clarify the implementation of Circular 75, SAFE issued Circular 106 on May 29, 2007. Under Circular 106, PRC subsidiaries of an offshore special purpose company are required to coordinate and supervise the filing in a timely manner of SAFE registrations by the offshore holding company’s shareholders who are PRC residents. If these shareholders fail to comply, the PRC subsidiaries can report to the local SAFE authorities to be exempted from liabilities. In the event of a failure to comply with the above SAFE registration requirements, the PRC subsidiaries may be prohibited from distributing their profits and proceeds from any reduction in capital, share transfer or liquidation to their offshore parent company and the offshore parent company may be restricted in its ability to contribute additional capital into its PRC subsidiaries. Moreover, failure to comply with the above SAFE registration requirements could result in liabilities under PRC laws for evasion of foreign exchange restrictions. We believe we are in material compliance with Circular 75 as we were permitted to distribute the profits of our PRC subsidiaries to our offshore parent company, and convert the same into USD, in connection with the payment of quarterly dividends to our shareholders in 2011. We also believe we are in compliance with Circular 106.
On August 29, 2008, SAFE promulgated a notice, or Circular 142, regulating the conversion by an FIE of foreign currency into Renminbi by restricting how the converted Renminbi may be used. Circular 142 requires that the registered capital of an FIE settled in Renminbi converted from foreign currencies may only be used for purposes within the business scope approved by the applicable governmental authority and may not be used for equity investments within the PRC unless specifically provided for otherwise. In addition, SAFE strengthened its oversight of the flow and use of the registered capital of an FIE settled in Renminbi converted from foreign currencies. The use of such Renminbi capital may not be changed without SAFE’s approval, and may not in any case be used to repay Renminbi loans if the proceeds of such loans have not been used for purposes within the FIE’s approved business scope. Violations of Circular 142 will result in severe penalties, including substantial fines as set forth in the PRC Foreign Exchange Administration Regulations. We believe we are in compliance with Circular 142.
8

Taxation
On March 16, 2007, the National People’s Congress approved and promulgated the Enterprise Income Tax (EIT) Law. The EIT Law took effect on January 1, 2008. Under the EIT Law, FIEs and domestic companies are subject to a uniform tax rate of 25%. The EIT Law provides a five-year transition period starting from its effective date for those enterprises which were established before the promulgation date of the EIT Law and which were entitled to a preferential lower tax rate under the then-effective tax laws or regulations. For the enterprises whose applicable tax rate was 24%, the tax rate was changed to 25% from January 1, 2008. For those enterprises which are enjoying tax holidays, such tax holidays may continue until their expiration, but where the tax holiday has not yet started because of losses, such tax holiday shall be deemed to commence from the first effective year of the EIT Law. While the EIT Law equalizes the tax rates for FIEs and domestic companies, preferential tax treatment would continue to be given to companies in certain encouraged sectors and to entities classified as high-technology companies supported by the PRC government, whether FIEs or domestic companies. According to the EIT Law, entities, such as the Company, that qualify as high-technology especially supported by the PRC government are expected to benefit from a tax rate of 15% as compared to the uniform tax rate of 25%. Nevertheless, there can be no assurances the Company will continue to qualify as a high technology company supported by the PRC government in the future, and benefit from such preferential tax rate.
Backlog
We sell our products primarily through standard purchase orders for delivery under master contracts with our customers. These contracts and industry practice generally allow for our customers to change or defer orders with limited advance notice prior to shipment. We schedule production of our products based upon order backlog and informal customer forecasts. Our backlog consists of products for which customer purchase orders have been received and that are scheduled or in the process of being scheduled for shipment. Because of the possibility of customer changes in product scheduling and seasonality issues, our backlog as of any particular date may not be an indicator of revenue for any succeeding period. Accordingly, we do not believe that backlog is a reliable indicator of future revenue levels or financial performance.
Seasonality
We typically experience stronger third and fourth calendar quarters as our products are subject to significant seasonality and fluctuations in demand typical of the consumer goods industry in China and generally caused by our customers preparing for the major national holiday seasons worldwide.
Employees
As of December 31, 2011, we had 890 employees, consisting of full and part-time employees. We believe we maintain strong ties with our employees and retention has been stable. We enter into standard labor contracts as required by the PRC government, and all employee contracts adhere to both state and provincial employment regulations and all social security regulations. We do not have collective bargaining agreements with our employees.
Generally, our employees’ salaries are classified into five categories: hourly, piecework, length of service, overtime including holiday pay and awards. Awards include production awards, marketing awards and annual bonuses, and employees are eligible for grants of awards of our common stock pursuant to our 2009 Equity Incentive Plan. We provide our employees with all social insurance required by state and local laws, living quarters, transportation for employees Monday through Friday to and from nearby suburbs and accidental injury insurance.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Our business and an investment in our securities are subject to a variety of risks. The following risk factors describe the most significant events, facts or circumstances that could have a material adverse effect upon our business, financial condition, results of operations, ability to implement our business plan, and the market price for our securities. Many of these events are outside of our control. If any of these risks actually occurs, our business, financial condition or results of operation may be materially adversely affected. In such case, the trading price of our common stock could decline and investors in our common stock could lose all or part of their investment.
9

Risks Related to Our Business
We are a major purchaser of certain goods and raw materials that we use in the manufacturing process of our products, and price changes for the commodities we depend on may adversely affect our profitability.
Our largest raw materials purchases consist of plastics (AS, PP and ABS resins, which are derived from petroleum), stainless steel and copper. As such, fluctuations in the price of oil, steel and copper on the international markets will impact our operating costs and related profits. International oil prices have risen recently. The price of most plastics moves in relation to oil prices and all electrical appliance manufacturers are affected by cost increases and benefit from decreases.
Our profitability depends in part upon the margin between the cost to us of certain raw materials used in the manufacturing process, as well as our fabrication costs associated with converting such raw materials into assembled products, compared to the selling price of our products, and the overall supply of raw materials. We do not engage in hedging transactions to protect against raw material fluctuations, but attempt to mitigate the short-term risks of price swings by purchasing raw materials in advance. It is our intention to base the selling prices of our products in part upon the associated raw materials costs to us. However, we may not be able to pass all increases in raw material costs and ancillary acquisition costs associated with taking possession of the raw materials through to our customers. Although we are currently able to obtain adequate supplies of raw materials, it is impossible to predict future availability or pricing. The inability to offset price increases of raw materials by sufficient product price increases, and our inability to obtain raw materials, would have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Fluctuation in exchange rates could adversely affect our business and the value of our securities.
The value of our common stock will be indirectly affected by the foreign exchange rate between U.S. dollars and the Renminbi and between those currencies and other currencies in which our revenue may be denominated. Because a portion of our sales are currently made in the export market, and all of our earnings and cash assets are denominated in Renminbi, fluctuations in the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the Renminbi will affect our financial results reported in U.S. dollar terms without giving effect to any underlying change in our business, financial condition or results of operations. Fluctuations in the exchange rate will also affect the relative value of any dividend.
Since July 2005, the Renminbi has not been pegged to the U.S. dollar. Although the People’s Bank of China, which is the central bank of China, regularly intervenes in the foreign exchange market to prevent significant short-term fluctuations in the exchange rate, the Renminbi may appreciate or depreciate significantly in value against the U.S. dollar in the medium to long term. Moreover, it is possible that in the future the PRC authorities may lift restrictions on fluctuations in the Renminbi exchange rate and lessen intervention in the foreign exchange market.
We currently do not engage in forward foreign exchange agreements or other hedging transactions in an effort to reduce our exposure to foreign currency exchange risk. Hedging transactions that we may enter into in the future may have limited effectiveness, and we may not be able to successfully hedge our exposure at all. In addition, our foreign currency exchange losses may be magnified by PRC exchange control regulations that restrict our ability to convert Renminbi into foreign currencies.
Loss of or failure to renew any or all of our licenses and permits may result in a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
In accordance with the laws and regulations of the PRC, we are required to maintain various licenses and permits in order to operate our electrical appliance products manufacturing business. We must maintain a Business License, Certificate of Approval for Establishment for Enterprises with Foreign Investment in the PRC and Organization Code Certificates for each of our PRC subsidiaries. Collectively, the Business Licenses of our PRC subsidiaries permits us to operate our electric appliance products manufacturing business and to sell our products domestically and internationally. In addition, all of our products must maintain China Compulsory Product Certifications, or CCC Authentications, which certifications are required before our products may be sold in China. We are also required to comply with applicable PRC hygiene and safety standards in relation to our production processes. Our production processes are subject to periodic inspections by PRC regulatory authorities for compliance with applicable regulations. While we currently maintain and intend to renew all required licenses before expiration, the loss of or failure to renew such licenses and production permits could result in the temporary or permanent suspension of some or all of our production or distribution operations and could adversely affect our revenues and profitability.
We may experience material disruptions to our manufacturing operations, which could negatively impact our financial results.
While we seek to operate our facilities in compliance with applicable rules and regulations and take measures to minimize the risks of disruption at our facilities, a material disruption at one of our manufacturing facilities could prevent us from meeting customer demand, reduce our sales and negatively impact our financial results. Any of our manufacturing facilities, or any of our machines within an otherwise operational facility, could cease operations unexpectedly due to a number of events, including prolonged power failures; equipment failures; disruptions in the transportation infrastructure including roads, bridges, railroad tracks; and fires, floods, earthquakes, acts of war or other catastrophes.
10

We cannot be certain that our product innovations and marketing successes will continue, which could adversely affect our business.
We believe our past performance has been based on, and our future success will depend, in part, upon our ability to continue to improve our existing products through product innovation and to develop, market and produce new products. We cannot assure you we will be successful in introducing, marketing and producing any new products or product innovations, or that we will develop and introduce in a timely manner innovations to our existing products which satisfy customer needs or achieve market acceptance. Our failure to develop new products and introduce them successfully and in a timely manner could harm our ability to grow our business and could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We may not be able to keep pace with rapid technological changes and competition in our industry, which could reduce our sales and cause us to lose market share.
While we believe we have hired or engaged personnel and outside consultants who have the experience and ability necessary to keep pace with advances in technology, and while we continue to seek out and develop “next generation” technology through our research and development efforts, there is no guarantee we will be able to keep pace with technological developments and market demands in this evolving industry and market. In addition, our industry is highly competitive. We face competition from other manufacturers of products similar to our products, often from competitors with substantially more capital and other resources. Some of our competitors’ advantages over us in both the areas of products, marketing, and services include the following:

 | substantially greater revenues and financial resources;

 | stronger brand names and consumer recognition;

 | the capacity to leverage marketing expenditures across a broader portfolio of products;

 | pre-existing relationships with potential customers;

 | more resources to make acquisitions;

 | lower labor and development costs; and

 | broader geographic presence.

We will face different market dynamics and competition as we expand our market to new countries. In some export markets, our future competitors would have greater brand recognition and broader distribution than we currently enjoy. We may not be as successful as our competitors in generating revenues in those markets due to our inability to provide products that are attractive to the market in those countries, the lack of recognition of our brand, and other factors. As a result, any new expansion efforts could be more costly and less profitable than our efforts in our existing markets. If we are not as successful as our competitors in our target markets, our sales could decline, our margins could be negatively impacted and we could lose market share, any of which could materially harm our business.
Our products may contain defects, which could adversely affect our reputation and cause us to incur significant costs.
Despite testing by us, defects may be found in existing or new products. Any such defects could cause us to incur significant return and exchange costs, re-engineering costs, divert the attention of our engineering personnel from product development efforts, and cause significant customer relations and business reputation problems. Any such defects could force us to undertake a product recall program, which could cause us to incur significant expenses and could harm our reputation and that of our products. If we deliver defective products, our credibility and the market acceptance and sales of our products could be harmed.
Our position in the marketplace could be negatively impacted if we experience delays in launching our products.
We may experience delays in bringing new products to market, due to design, manufacturing or distribution problems. Such delays could adversely affect our ability to compete effectively and may adversely affect our relationship with our customers. Any such delays would adversely affect our revenues and profitability.
11

If we are not able to manage our growth, we may not be profitable.
Our success will depend on our ability to expand and manage our operations and facilities. There can be no assurance that we will be able to manage our growth, meet the staffing requirements for our business or for additional collaborative relationships or successfully assimilate and train new employees. In addition, to manage our growth effectively, we may be required to expand our management base and enhance our operating and financial systems. If we continue to grow, there can be no assurance our management skills and systems currently in place will be adequate. Moreover, there can be no assurance we will be able to manage any additional growth effectively. Failure to achieve any of these goals could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Our inability to successfully manage the inherent risks in our domestic and export activities could adversely affect our business. Because of the risks associated with conducting such operations, including the risks listed above, there can be no assurances that any new market expansion will be successful.
We and our subsidiaries only have a perpetual, exclusive, worldwide and royalty-free license to use certain patents and trademarks used in our business, which could require us to litigate or arbitrate to retain such license rights if the licensors contest the license agreement.
We and our subsidiaries have historically licensed the right to use patents and trademarks from various parties, including from our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Ying He, his brother, FaMin He, Shenzhen De Mei Long Electric Appliances Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Kafu Industrial Co., Ltd. In December 2008, we entered into transfer agreements that intended to transfer patents and trademarks used by us from Messrs. He and He, Shenzhen De Mei Long Electric Appliances Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Kafu Industrial Co., Ltd., to Winder. Any transfer of the ownership of patents and trademarks in China requires that the transfer agreements be registered with the State Intellectual Property Office of the PRC and the China Trademark Office under the State Administration of Industry and Commerce of the PRC, respectively. In the absence of such registration, the transfers would be ineffective under PRC law. To clarify the transfer and safeguard our right to use these patents and trademarks, Winder has entered into a supplemental agreement to such transfer agreements whereby the original intellectual property holders clarified that a transfer of ownership was intended and that Winder has a license to use the patents and trademarks which will continue on a perpetual, exclusive, worldwide and royalty-free basis, and which may not be cancelled by the licensor or grantor until such time as the ownership of such patents and trademarks are effectively transferred to Winder. This license is set forth in a supplemental agreement entered into between the Company and the aforementioned licensors on November 19, 2009, and filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on November 20, 2009. Because we have been relying on such license, which is sufficient to grant all rights necessary for us to conduct operations, we have not taken any steps to register the transfer of the above-mentioned patents and trademarks, nor do we intend to do so. However, if any of the licensors contests the supplemental agreement, our business may be adversely affected as Winder may have to litigate or arbitrate to retain such license rights.
We may not be able to protect our technology and other proprietary rights adequately, and litigation to protect our proprietary rights may be costly.
Our success will depend in part on our ability to obtain and protect our products, methods, processes and other technologies, to preserve our trade secrets and to operate without infringing on the proprietary rights of third parties both domestically and abroad. Despite our efforts, any of the following occurrences may reduce the value of our owned and used intellectual property:

| o | issued patents and trademarks that we own or have the right to use may not provide us with any competitive advantages;

| o | our efforts to protect our intellectual property rights may not be effective in preventing misappropriation of our technology or that of those from whom we license our rights to use;

| o | our efforts may not prevent the development and design by others of products or technologies similar to, competitive with or superior to those we use or develop; or

| o | another party may obtain a blocking patent and we or our licensors would need to either obtain a license or design around the patent in order to continue to offer the contested feature or service in our products.

Effective protection of intellectual property rights may be unavailable or limited in China or certain other countries. If we are unable to protect our proprietary rights adequately, it would have a negative impact on our operations.
12

We or the owners of the intellectual property rights licensed to us may be subject to claims that we or such licensors have infringed the proprietary rights of others, which could require us and our licensors to obtain a license or change designs.
Although we do not believe that any of our products infringe upon the proprietary rights of others, there is no assurance that infringement or invalidity claims, or claims for indemnification resulting from infringement claims, will not be asserted or prosecuted against us or those from whom we have licenses or that any such assertions or prosecutions will not have a material adverse effect on our business. Regardless of whether any such claims are valid or can be asserted successfully, defending against such claims could cause us to incur significant costs and could divert resources away from our other activities. In addition, assertion of infringement claims could result in injunctions that prevent us from distributing our products. If any claims or actions are asserted against us or those from whom we have licenses, we may seek to obtain a license to the intellectual property rights that are in dispute. Such a license may not be available on reasonable terms, or at all, which could force us to change our designs.
We face risks associated with managing international operations, any of which could adversely affect our business.
Almost all of our operations are conducted in China. There are a number of risks inherent in doing business in such market, including the following:

o | unfavorable political or economic factors;

o | fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates;

o | potentially adverse tax consequences;

o | unexpected legal or regulatory changes;

o | lack of sufficient protection for intellectual property rights;

o | difficulties in recruiting and retaining personnel, and managing international operations; and

o | less developed infrastructure

Our inability to manage the inherent risks in our domestic activities successfully could adversely affect our business.
We face risks associated with a purported securities class action lawsuit, which if successful, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and could harm our reputation.
On April 29, 2011, a purported securities class action lawsuit on behalf of the purchasers of the Company’s common stock between March 31, 2009, and March 21, 2011, James Rose v. Deer Consumer Products, Inc. et al, was filed against the Company and certain of its current and former officers and directors in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The court has not yet certified the class action status. The complaint alleges violations of Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 of the Exchange Act, as well as, in the case of the individual defendants, the Section 20(a) control person provisions of the Exchange Act. The factual assertions in the complaint consist primarily of allegations that the defendants made materially false or misleading public statements concerning the Company’s financial condition in 2010 and 2009. The complaint seeks unspecified damages and other relief relating to the purported inflation in the price of the Company’s common stock during the class period. Any adverse decision in this action, requiring the Company to pay substantial damages to the plaintiffs could result in a material adverse effect on our results of operations and could harm our reputation. Please see Item 3 “Legal Proceedings” for additional information with respect to this matter.
13

Our bank accounts are not insured or protected against loss.
We maintain our cash with various national banks located in China. Our cash accounts are not insured or otherwise protected. Should any bank holding our cash deposits become insolvent, or if we are otherwise unable to withdraw funds, we would lose the cash on deposit with that particular bank.
We have limited business insurance coverage and may incur losses due to business interruptions resulting from natural and man-made disasters, and our insurance may not be adequate to cover liabilities resulting from accidents or injuries that may occur.
The insurance industry in China is still in an early stage of development and insurance companies located in China offer limited business insurance products. In the event of damage or loss to our properties, our insurance may not provide as much coverage as if we were insured by insurance companies in the United States. We currently carry property and casualty insurance for our buildings, plant and equipment but cannot assure you that the coverage will be adequate to fully replace damage to any of the foregoing. Should any natural catastrophes such as earthquakes, floods or any acts of terrorism occur where our primary operations are located and most of our employees are based, or elsewhere, we might suffer not only significant property damage, but also loss of revenues due to interruptions in our business operations. The occurrence of a significant event for which we are not fully insured or indemnified, or the failure of a party to meet its underwriting or indemnification obligations, could materially and adversely affect our operations and financial condition. Moreover, no assurance can be given that we will be able to maintain adequate insurance in the future at rates we consider reasonable.
Our business could be subject to environmental liabilities in China, which could result in our incurring significant remediation costs, fines and loss of our business license.
As is the case with manufacturers of similar products, we use certain hazardous substances in our operations. Currently, our business is subject to the National Environmental Protection Law of the PRC as well as local laws regarding pollutant discharge, air, water and noise pollution. Although we believe we are in compliance in all material respects with the environmental laws and regulations of the municipal and provincial authorities in Shenzhen and the PRC, if it is determined that we are in violation of these regulations, we could be subject to financial penalties as well as the loss of our business license. Furthermore, if the national or local government adopts more stringent environmental regulations, we may incur significant costs in complying with such regulations. If we fail to comply with present or future environmental regulations, we may be required to pay substantial fines, suspend production or cease operations and may be subject to adverse publicity. We currently do not incur any material costs in connection with our compliance with environmental laws as our manufacturing processes generate minimal discharge and we recycle and reuse much of our manufacturing waste materials. However, the risk of environmental liability and charges associated with maintaining compliance with environmental laws is inherent in the nature of our business, and there is no assurance that material environmental liabilities and compliance charges will not arise in the future.
We may not be able to obtain regulatory approvals for our products, which could result in unexpected expenses and adversely affect our business.
The PRC and local provincial governments regulate the manufacture and sale of our products in China, and our products for export markets are subject to product labeling standards of certain international agencies. Although our licenses and regulatory filings in China are up-to-date, the uncertain legal environment in China and our industry may be vulnerable to local government agencies or other parties who wish to renegotiate the terms and conditions of, or terminate their agreements or other understandings with us. Failure to obtain or maintain, or any delay in obtaining, any of these licenses, product safety approvals and regulatory filings may subject us to fines, penalties or business interruption, and therefore could have a material adverse effect on our business and prospects.
If we lose our key personnel, or are unable to attract and retain additional qualified personnel, the quality of our services may decline and our business may be adversely affected.
We rely heavily on the expertise, experience and continued services of our senior management, including our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Ying He. Loss of his services could adversely affect our ability to achieve our business objectives. Mr. He is a key factor in our success at developing and introducing new products and establishing new customer relationships because of his industry experience and reputation. The continued development of our business depends upon the continued employment of Mr. He. We have entered into standard China domestic labor contracts with Mr. He and our Chief Financial Officer, Zongshu Nie, which contain provisions prohibiting competition by Messrs. He and Nie following their employment with us. Mr. He’s labor contract expires March 2, 2013, and Mr. Nie’s labor contract expires April 30, 2012.
We believe our future success will depend upon our ability to retain key employees and our ability to attract and retain other skilled personnel. The rapid growth of the economy in China has caused intense competition for qualified personnel. We cannot guarantee that any employee will remain employed by us for any definite period of time or that we will be able to attract, train or retain qualified personnel in the future. Such loss of personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business and company. Moreover, qualified employees periodically are in great demand and may be unavailable in the time frame required to satisfy our customers’ requirements. We need to employ additional personnel to expand our business. There is no assurance that we will be able to attract and retain sufficient numbers of highly skilled employees in the future. The loss of personnel or our inability to hire or retain sufficient personnel at competitive rates could impair the growth of our business.
14

If we fail to maintain an effective system of internal controls, we may not be able to report financial results accurately or prevent fraud.
Effective internal controls are necessary to provide reliable financial reports and to assist in the effective prevention of fraud. Any inability to provide reliable financial reports or prevent fraud could harm our business. We must evaluate our internal procedures annually to satisfy the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which requires management and auditors to assess the effectiveness of our internal controls. If we fail to remedy or maintain the adequacy of our internal controls, as such standards are modified, supplemented or amended from time to time, we could be subject to regulatory scrutiny, civil or criminal penalties or shareholder litigation.
In addition, failure to maintain effective internal controls could result in financial statements that do not accurately reflect our financial condition or results of operations. There can be no assurance that we will be able to maintain a system of internal controls that fully complies with the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 or that our management and independent registered public accounting firm will conclude that our internal controls are effective in the future.
We are a holding company that depends on cash flow from our wholly owned subsidiaries to meet our obligations, and any inability of our subsidiaries to pay us dividends or make other payments to us when needed could disrupt or have a negative impact on our business.
After the Share Exchange, we became a holding company with no material assets other than the stock of our wholly owned subsidiaries. Accordingly, all our operations are conducted by our wholly owned subsidiaries in China: Winder, which is responsible for research, production and delivery of goods; Delta, which transferred its material former operations to Winder and conducts marketing operations; and Deer Technology and Anlin Technology, which have yet to commence operations. Although we currently expect that the earnings and cash flow of our subsidiaries will primarily be retained and used by us in their operations, we rely on dividends paid by our subsidiaries for our cash needs, including the funds necessary to pay dividends and other cash distributions to our shareholders, to service any debt we may incur and to pay some of our operating expenses. China has currency and capital transfer regulations that require us to comply with complex regulations for the movement of capital. Regulations in China currently permit payment of dividends only out of accumulated profits as determined in accordance with accounting standards and regulations in China. We also are required to set aside at least 10% of our net income after taxes based on China’s accounting standards each year to statutory surplus reserves until the cumulative amount of such reserves reaches 50% of registered capital. At December 31, 2011, we had set aside $9.2 million for statutory reserve and $4.6 million as development fund reserve. Statutory reserve is a mandatory reserve, after making up cumulative prior years’ losses, and to be reserved at least 10% of income after tax, until the reserve amounts to 50% of our registered capital. Development fund is a discretionary surplus reserve; we allocate 5% of income after tax as development fund. The development fund is for enlarging its business and increasing capital. These reserves are not distributable as cash dividends. Our PRC subsidiaries also may allocate a portion of their after-tax profits to their staff welfare and bonus funds, which may not be distributed to equity owners except in the event of liquidation. In addition, if any of our subsidiaries incur debt, the instruments governing the debt may restrict their ability to pay dividends or make other distributions to us. Accordingly, if our subsidiaries are unable to pay us dividends and make other payments to us when needed because of regulatory restrictions or otherwise, we may be materially and adversely limited in our ability to make investments or acquisitions that could be beneficial to our business, pay dividends or otherwise fund and conduct our business.
Risks Related to Business in China
We are subject to international economic and political risks over which we have little or no control and may be unable to alter our business practice in time to avoid the possibility of reduced revenues.
Our business is conducted in China. Doing business outside the United States, particularly in China, subjects us to various risks, including changing economic and political conditions, major work stoppages, exchange controls, currency fluctuations, armed conflicts and unexpected changes in United States and foreign laws relating to tariffs, trade restrictions, transportation regulations, foreign investments and taxation. We have no control over most of these risks and may be unable to anticipate changes in international economic and political conditions and, therefore, unable to alter our business practice in time to avoid the possibility of reduced revenues as a result of any of these risks materializing.
China’s economic policies could affect our business.
Substantially all of our assets are located in China and all of our revenue is derived from our operations in China. Accordingly, our results of operations and prospects are subject, to a significant extent, to the economic, political and legal developments in China.
While China’s economy has experienced significant growth in the past twenty years, such growth has been uneven, both geographically and among various sectors of the economy. The PRC government has implemented various measures to encourage economic growth and guide the allocation of resources. Some of these measures benefit the overall economy of China, but they may also have a negative effect on us. For example, operating results and financial condition may be adversely affected by the government control over capital investments or changes in tax regulations. The economy of China has been transitioning from a planned economy to a more market-oriented economy. In recent years, the PRC government has implemented measures emphasizing the utilization of market forces for economic reform and the reduction of state ownership of productive assets, and the establishment of corporate governance in business enterprises; however, a substantial portion of productive assets in China are still owned by the PRC government. In addition, the PRC government continues to play a significant role in regulating industry development by imposing industrial policies. It also exercises significant control over China’s economic growth through the allocation of resources, the control of payment of foreign currency-denominated obligations, the setting of monetary policy and the provision of preferential treatment to particular industries or companies. Any adverse change in the economic conditions or government policies in China could have a material adverse effect on the overall economic growth in China, which in turn could lead to reduced demand for our products and consequently have a material adverse effect on our business.
15

Tax laws and regulations in China are subject to substantial revision, some of which may adversely affect our profitability.
The PRC corporate tax regime continues to undergo substantial revision. Tax benefits we presently enjoy may not be available to us in the wake of these changes, and we could incur tax obligations to the PRC government that are significantly higher than currently anticipated. These increased tax obligations could negatively impact our financial condition and our revenues, gross margins, profitability and results of operations may be adversely affected as a result.
Certain preferential tax treatment that we presently enjoy in China is scheduled to expire over the next several years, and if we are unable to renew such treatment, our net income may be adversely affected.
As a substantial portion of our operations are located in a privileged economic zone, we are entitled to certain tax benefits. The Company’s operating subsidiary Winder, operates in the Yangjiang Hi-Tech Industry Development Zone, while Deer Technology and Anlin Technology operate in the Wuhu Hi-Tech Industry Development Zone. When these exemptions expire, our income tax expenses will increase, reducing our net income below what it would be if we continued to enjoy these exemptions. Since 2009, we have been granted a special tax rate of 15% for our efforts to automate production at our factory. The tax authority and government entities examine productivity per employee and other operating metrics to determine our eligibility for special tax treatment. Our tax treatment was approved for renewal for another three years, expiring on December 31, 2014, and can be renewed prior to expiration following a re-assessment of our efforts in automating production and determination of future eligibilities for special tax treatment. We would pay the common 25% corporate income tax rate instead of the special 15% corporate income tax rate if the special tax treatment is not renewed. Our current special tax may be renewed by filing an application for a renewal with the Tax Bureau of the Hi-Tech Industry Development Zone. Whether or not renewal is granted depends upon the Tax Bureau’s assessment of our efforts in automating production at our factory and our productivity per employee.
If relations between the United States and China worsen, investors may be unwilling to hold or buy our stock and our stock price may decrease.
At various times during recent years, the United States and China have had significant disagreements over political and economic issues. Controversies may arise in the future between these two countries. Any political or trade controversies between the United States and China, whether or not directly related to our business, could reduce the price of our common stock.
China could change its policies toward private enterprise or even nationalize or expropriate private enterprises.
Our business is subject to significant political and economic uncertainties and may be affected by political, economic and social developments in China. Over the past several years, the PRC government has pursued economic reform policies including the encouragement of private economic activity and greater economic decentralization. The PRC government may not continue to pursue these policies or may significantly alter them to our detriment from time to time with little, if any, prior notice.
Changes in policies, laws and regulations or in their interpretation or the imposition of confiscatory taxation, restrictions on currency conversion, restrictions or prohibitions on dividend payments to shareholders, or devaluations of currency could cause a decline in the price of our common stock. Nationalization or expropriation could even result in the total loss of your investment.
The nature and application of many laws of China create an uncertain environment for business operations and they could have a negative effect on us.
The legal system in China is a civil law system. Unlike the common law system, the civil law system is based on written statutes in which decided legal cases have little value as precedents. In 1979, China began to promulgate a comprehensive system of laws and has since introduced many laws and regulations to provide general guidance on economic and business practices in China and to regulate foreign investment. Progress has been made in the promulgation of laws and regulations dealing with economic matters such as corporate organization and governance, foreign investment, commerce, taxation and trade. The promulgation of new laws, changes of existing laws and the abrogation of local regulations by national laws could cause a decline in the price of our common stock. In addition, as these laws, regulations and legal requirements are relatively recent, their interpretation and enforcement involve significant uncertainty.
Furthermore, the political, governmental and judicial systems in China are sometimes impacted by corruption. There is no assurance we will be able to obtain recourse in any legal disputes with suppliers, customers or other parties with whom we conduct business, if desired, through China’s poorly developed and sometimes corrupt judicial systems.
16

As we import goods into and export goods out of China, fluctuation of the Renminbi may affect our financial condition by affecting the volume of cross-border money flow.
Although we use the U.S. dollar for financial reporting purposes, most of the transactions effected by our operating subsidiaries are denominated in China’s Renminbi. The value of the Renminbi fluctuates and is subject to changes in China’s political and economic conditions. Future movements in the exchange rate of the Renminbi could adversely affect our financial condition as we may suffer financial losses when transferring money raised outside of China into the country or paying vendors for services performed outside of China.
It will be extremely difficult to acquire jurisdiction and enforce liabilities against our officers, directors and assets based in China.
As our executive officers and several of our directors, including the Chairman of our Board of Directors, are PRC citizens, it may be difficult, if not impossible, to acquire jurisdiction over these persons. Also, because our operating subsidiaries and assets are located in China, it may be extremely difficult or impossible for individuals to access those assets to enforce judgments rendered against us or our directors or executive offices by United States courts. In addition, the courts in China may not permit the enforcement of judgments arising out of United States federal and state corporate, securities or similar laws. Accordingly, United States investors may not be able to enforce judgments against us for violation of United States securities laws.
PRC regulations relating to mergers, offshore companies and PRC shareholders, if applied to us, may limit our ability to operate our business as we see fit.
PRC regulations govern the process by which we may participate in an acquisition of assets or equity interests. Depending on the structure of the transaction, these regulations require involved parties to make a series of applications and supplemental applications to various government agencies. In some instances, the application process may require the presentation of economic data concerning a transaction, including appraisals of the target business and evaluations of the acquirer, which are designed to allow the government to assess the transaction. Government approvals will have expiration dates by which a transaction must be completed and reported to the government agencies. Compliance with these regulations is likely to be time consuming and expensive as the government can exert control over the combination of two businesses. Accordingly, due to PRC regulations, our ability to engage in business combination transactions in China through our PRC subsidiaries is significantly complicated, time consuming and expensive, and we may not be able to negotiate transactions that are acceptable to us or sufficiently protective of our interests.
We operate in the PRC through our WFOE status initially approved by the local office of the PRC Ministry of Commerce. However, we cannot warrant that such approval procedures will continue to be considered completely satisfied should there be changes in laws or government interpretations. If we lose our WFOE status for any reason, our business in China may be negatively impacted.
Our operating entities in the PRC have received initial approval for WFOE status from the Yangjiang Administration for Industry & Commerce, or MOFCOM’s Local Counterpart. We believe that we currently are in compliance with the MOFCOM’s requirements to maintain the WFOE status of our PRC subsidiaries and we are not aware of any change in interpretations or differences in understandings with respect to WFOE approval procedures that would jeopardize such approvals. However, we cannot assure you that such approval procedures or understanding will not change in the future.
If in the future our PRC subsidiaries lose their WFOE status, we would have to find a way to re-establish control of our PRC operations through a series of contractual arrangements rather than an outright purchase. We cannot assure you that any such contractual arrangements will be protected by PRC law or that we can receive as complete or effective economic benefit and overall control of our PRC subsidiaries. In addition, we cannot assure you that any such contractual arrangements can be successfully effected under PRC law. If we cannot put in place or enforce relevant contractual arrangements as an alternative and equivalent means of control of our PRC subsidiaries, our business and financial performance will be materially and adversely affected.
The acquisition by Deer International of Winder in 2008 may require further approval, and failure to receive such approval could adversely affect our business and financial performance.
On April 1, 2008, Deer International acquired 100% of the equity interest in Winder from 50HZ Electric Limited. While we believe that the April 2008 acquisition of Winder by Deer International did not require approval from the PRC Ministry of Commerce, or MOFCOM, the application and implementation of the Regulation on Mergers and Acquisition of Domestic Companies by Foreign Investors, or M&A Regulations, is unclear and subject to differing interpretations. The M&A Regulations have a particular provision which requires MOFCOM’s approval if a PRC domestic non-foreign-invested enterprise or natural person acquires an affiliated PRC company in the name of an offshore enterprise established or controlled by such enterprise or person. Ying He, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, his brother FaMin He and Bao Zhi Li, shareholders of the Company, simultaneously controlled Deer International and 50HZ Electric Limited at the time of Deer International’s acquisition of Winder from 50HZ Electric Limited.
We obtained a legal opinion from our PRC counsel, GuangDong Tuo Jin Law Firm, stating that MOFCOM approval of the April 2008 acquisition of Winder by Deer International was not required. In addition, the transaction was approved by the Economic Development Bureau of Yangjiang High-tech Industry Development Zone. If it is subsequently determined that that approval of MOFCOM is required, the approval that 50HZ Electric Limited obtained from the Yangjiang Hi-Tech Zone may be deemed incomplete and the transferee, namely Deer International, may need to obtain further approval from MOFCOM.
17

MOFCOM could also invalidate the April 2008 acquisition of Winder by Deer International, in which case, we would have to find a way for Deer International to re-establish control of Winder’s business operations through a series of contractual arrangements rather than an outright purchase. We cannot assure you that any such contractual arrangements will be protected by PRC law or that Deer International can receive as complete or effective economic benefit and overall control of Winder equivalent to Deer International having direct ownership of Winder. In addition, we cannot assure you that any such contractual arrangements can be successfully effected under PRC law. If we cannot obtain MOFCOM or CSRC approval if required by the PRC regulatory authorities to do so, and if we cannot put in place or enforce relevant contractual arrangements as an alternative and equivalent means of control of Winder, our business and financial performance will be materially adversely affected.
The acquisition by Deer International of Winder in 2008 may face PRC tax authority challenges and be subject to transfer pricing adjustment.
The acquisition of 100% of Winder’s equity interests by Deer International on April 1, 2008, was free of any consideration and of any conditions. Under applicable PRC tax rules, any transaction between related parties shall be priced on an arm’s length basis. The tax authority has the right to investigate any related party transaction and to make adjustment if it finds the price not on an arm’s length basis. The PRC tax authority would make adjustment by applying a deemed arm’s length price to the transaction. Given that 50HZ Electric Limited and Deer International had certain related parties, there is a possibility that the consideration-free transfer may be challenged and investigated by the PRC tax authority. If the deemed arm’s length price determined by the PRC tax authority during such investigation is higher than the original cost that 50HZ Electric Limited paid to get 100% equity interest of Winder, such excess amount would be subject to a 20% PRC income tax. Although we believe 50HZ Electric Limited would be responsible for the possible PRC income tax, we understand that it is common practice for the PRC tax authority to enforce the tax collection on the entity at issue, which in this case would be Winder, and we may be required to pay the possible PRC income tax on behalf of 50HZ Electric Limited.
If the CSRC or another PRC regulatory agency determines that its approval is required in connection with our public offerings, we may become subject to penalties.
On August 8, 2006, six PRC regulatory agencies, including the China Securities Regulatory Commission, or CSRC, MOFCOM, the State-Owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission, or SASAC, the State Administration of Taxation, or SAT, the State Administration for Industry and Commerce, or SAIC, and SAFE jointly promulgated the Regulation on Mergers and Acquisitions of Domestic Companies by Foreign Investors, or the M&A Regulations, which became effective on September 8, 2006, and was amended on June 22, 2009. The M&A Regulations, among other things, have certain provisions that require offshore special purpose vehicles, or SPVs, formed or controlled for the purpose of overseas listing of interests of PRC domestic non-foreign-invested companies controlled by PRC domestic non-foreign invested companies or individuals, to obtain the approval of the CSRC prior to listing their securities on an overseas stock exchange. We believe, based on the opinion of our PRC legal counsel, the GuangDong Tuo Jin Law Firm, that while the CSRC generally has jurisdiction over overseas listings of companies like us, CSRC’s approval is not required for the offerings of our securities because our current corporate structure was established before the new regulations became effective. However, there remains some uncertainty as to how these regulations will be interpreted or implemented in the context of an overseas offering. If the CSRC or another PRC regulatory agency subsequently determines that its approval is required for our public offerings, we may face sanctions by the CSRC or another PRC regulatory agency. If this happens, these regulatory agencies may impose fines and penalties on our operations in the PRC, limit our operating privileges in the PRC, delay or restrict the repatriation of the proceeds from our offerings into the PRC, restrict or prohibit payment or remittance of dividends by our PRC subsidiaries to us or take other actions that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, reputation and prospects, as well as the trading price of our common stock.
In addition, Under Circular 10, captioned as “Regulation on Mergers and Acquisition of Domestic Enterprises by Foreign Investors,” which became effective on September 6, 2006, an offshore special purpose vehicle, or SPV, formed for purposes of overseas listing of equity interests in China-based companies and controlled directly or indirectly by Chinese companies or individuals must obtain the approval of the CSRC prior to the listing of such SPV’s securities on an overseas stock exchange. Circular 10 also requires approval from MOFCOM for “round-trip” investment transactions in which a China-based company or a PRC resident, or Acquirer, using an offshore entity controlled by the Acquirer, acquires any PRC local company that is an affiliate of the Acquirer. Because Winder was a wholly foreign owned enterprise at the time of the acquisition by Deer International and prior to the effective date of Circular 10, we believe that it does need to initiate an application for retroactive recognition by the CSRC for its shares to be listed and traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market.
PRC regulations relating to the establishment of offshore special purpose companies by PRC residents and registration requirements for PRC resident shareholders owning shares in offshore companies as well as registration requirements of employee stock ownership plans or share option plans may subject our PRC resident shareholders to personal liability and limit our ability to acquire companies in China or to inject capital into our operating subsidiaries in China, limit our subsidiaries’ ability to distribute profits to us or otherwise materially and adversely affect us.
SAFE issued a public notice in October 2005 (“Circular 75”) requiring PRC residents, including both legal persons and natural persons, to register with the competent local SAFE branch before establishing or controlling any company outside of China, referred to as an “offshore special purpose company,” for the purpose of acquiring any assets of or equity interest in PRC companies and raising funds from overseas. In addition, any PRC resident who is the shareholder of an offshore special purpose company is required to amend his or her SAFE registration with the local SAFE branch, with respect to that offshore special purpose company in connection with any increase or decrease of capital, transfer of shares, merger, division, equity investment or creation of any security interest over any assets located in China. If any PRC resident who is the shareholder of an offshore special purpose company fails to comply with the SAFE registration requirements, the PRC subsidiaries of the offshore special purpose company may be prohibited from distributing their profits and proceeds from any reduction in capital, share transfer or liquidation to their offshore parent company and the offshore parent company may be restricted in its ability to contribute additional capital into its PRC subsidiaries. Moreover, failure to comply with the SAFE registration requirements could result in liabilities under PRC laws for evasion of foreign exchange restrictions. We cannot predict fully how Circular 75 will affect our business operations or future strategies because of ongoing uncertainty over how Circular 75 will be interpreted and implemented, and how or whether SAFE will apply it to us. Although we believe that our PRC subsidiaries are in compliance with these regulations, should these regulations or the interpretation of them by courts or regulatory agencies change, we may not be able to pay dividends outside of China. We do not believe that we have incurred a liability because of noncompliance with Circular 75 under SAFE registration procedures, however.
18

Our PRC resident beneficial owners, including our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, have registered with the local SAFE branch as required under SAFE regulations in connection with their equity interests in us and our acquisitions of equity interests in our PRC subsidiaries. We cannot provide any assurances that the existing registrations of these PRC resident beneficial owners have fully complied with all applicable registrations or required approvals. We have little control over either our present or prospective direct or indirect PRC resident beneficial owners or the outcome of such registration procedures. The failure or inability of our PRC resident beneficial owners to comply with the applicable SAFE registration requirements may subject these beneficial owners or us to fines, legal sanctions and restrictions described above.
On March 28, 2007, SAFE released detailed registration procedures for employee stock ownership plans or share option plans to be established by overseas listed companies and for individual plan participants. Any failure to comply with the relevant registration procedures may affect the effectiveness of our employee stock ownership plans or share option plans and subjects the plan participants, the companies offering the plans or the relevant intermediaries, as the case may be, to penalties under PRC foreign exchange regime. These penalties may subject us to fines and legal sanctions, prevent us from being able to make distributions or pay dividends, as a result of which our business operations and our ability to distribute profits could be materially and adversely affected.
PRC regulation of direct investment by offshore holding companies to PRC entities may delay or prevent us from transferring the net proceeds from future offerings to our PRC subsidiaries.
On August 29, 2008, SAFE promulgated the Circular on the Relevant Operating Issues Concerning the Improvement of the Administration of the Payment and Settlement of Foreign Currency Capital of Foreign Invested Enterprises, or SAFE Circular 142, regulating the conversion by a foreign-invested enterprise of foreign currency registered capital into Renminbi by restricting how the converted Renminbi may be used. SAFE Circular 142 provides that the Renminbi capital converted from foreign currency registered capital of a foreign-invested enterprise may only be used within the business scope approved by the applicable governmental authority and may not be used for equity investments within the PRC, unless specifically provided for otherwise in its business scope. In addition, SAFE strengthened its oversight of the flow and use of the Renminbi capital converted from foreign currency registered capital of a foreign-invested company. The use of such Renminbi capital may not be altered without SAFE approval, and such Renminbi capital may not in any case be used to repay Renminbi loans if the proceeds of such loans have not been used. If we raise any funds in the United States in the future, we expect that if we convert the net proceeds into Renminbi pursuant to SAFE Circular 142, our use of Renminbi funds will be for purposes within the approved business scope of our PRC subsidiaries. Such business scope permits our PRC subsidiaries to operate our electrical appliance products manufacturing business. However, if it is subsequently determined that our use of Renminbi funds are not within our approved business scope, or the applicable rules change, we may experience delays in transferring the proceeds from any future offerings to our PRC subsidiaries, which would adversely and materially affect our liquidity and ability to expand our business.
Our PRC subsidiaries have taken the position that they do not have to contribute to a statutory housing fund for their employees and if that position turns out to be wrong, they may face penalties imposed by the PRC government.
PRC laws require employers contribute to a statutory housing fund for their employees holding urban resident status and that those employees contribute equal amounts to the same housing fund. Failure to do so may trigger penalties by the competent government authorities in addition to making up the deficiencies within a time limit prescribed by the PRC government. We believe our PRC subsidiaries do not have to pay into a statutory housing fund for their employees because of their exempt status. However, if that belief turns out to be wrong, they may face penalties imposed by the PRC government for their noncompliance.
Our compliance with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act may put us at a competitive disadvantage, while our failure to comply with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act may result in substantial penalties.
We are required to comply with the United States Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (the “FCPA”), which prohibits U.S. companies from engaging in bribery or other prohibited payments to foreign officials for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. Although we inform our personnel that such practices are illegal, we cannot assure you that our employees or other agents will not engage in such conduct for which we might be held responsible. If our employees or other agents are found to have engaged in such practices, we could suffer severe penalties. Non-U.S. companies, including some of our competitors, are not subject to the provisions of the FCPA. Corruption, extortion, bribery, pay-offs, theft and other fraudulent practices occur from time to time in mainland China. If our competitors engage in these practices, they may receive preferential treatment from personnel of some companies, giving our competitors an advantage in securing business or from government officials who might give them priority in obtaining new licenses, which would put us at a disadvantage.
19

Risks Related to Our Securities
The market price for our common stock has been and may be volatile, which could make it more difficult or impossible for you to sell our common stock for a positive return on your investment.
The trading price of our common stock has and may continue to fluctuate widely in response to various factors, some of which are beyond our control. These factors include, but not limited to, our quarterly operating results or the operating results of other companies in our industry, announcements by us or our competitors of acquisitions, new products, product improvements, commercial relationships, intellectual property, legal, regulatory or other business developments and changes in financial estimates or recommendations by stock market analysts regarding us or our competitors. In addition, the stock market in general, and the market for companies based in China in particular, has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations. This volatility has had a significant effect on the market prices of securities issued by many companies for reasons unrelated or disproportionate to their operating performance. These broad market fluctuations may materially affect our stock price, regardless of our operating results. Further, the market for our common stock is limited and we cannot assure you that a larger market will ever be developed or maintained. Market fluctuations and volatility, as well as general economic, market and political conditions, could reduce our market price. As a result, these factors may make it more difficult or impossible for you to sell our common stock for a positive return on your investment.
Our quarterly results may be volatile, which could materially affect the per share price of our common stock.
Our operating results have varied quarterly during our operating history and are likely to fluctuate significantly in the future. Many factors, including the risk factors incorporated by reference herein, could cause our revenues and operating results to vary significantly in the future. Many of these factors are outside of our control. Accordingly, we believe that quarter-to-quarter comparisons of our operating results are not necessarily meaningful. Investors should not rely on the results of one quarter as an indication of our future performance. If our results of operations in any quarter do not meet analysts’ expectations, our stock price could materially decrease.
Future sales of shares of our common stock by our shareholders could cause our stock price to decline.
Future sales of shares of our common stock could adversely affect the prevailing market price of our stock. If our significant shareholders sell a large number of shares, or if we issue a large number of shares, the market price of our stock could decline significantly. Moreover, the perception in the public market that shareholders might sell shares of our stock could depress the market for our shares. Our shareholders who received shares of our common stock issued in the Share Exchange are subject to lockup agreements that prohibit their sale of all shares of our common stock held currently or acquired by them in the future to the general public until January 17, 2013, except in the event of a change of control or sale of the company. Upon the termination of these lockup agreements the existence of such shares could create a circumstance commonly referred to as an “overhang,” in anticipation of which the market price of our common stock could fall. The existence of an overhang, whether or not sales have occurred or are occurring, also could make it more difficult for us to raise additional financing through the sale of equity or equity-related securities in the future at a time and price that we deem reasonable or appropriate.
20

We may issue additional shares of our capital stock or debt securities to raise capital or complete acquisitions, which would reduce the equity interest of our shareholders.
Our articles of incorporation authorize the issuance of up to 75,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $.001 per share. As of December 31, 2011, there were 40,907,438 authorized and unissued shares of our common stock available for future issuance, based on 33,592,562 shares of our common stock outstanding and our reservation of 500,000 shares of our common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding options and available for grants pursuant to our 2009 Equity Incentive Plan. Although we have no commitments as of this date to issue our securities in connection with an acquisition or to raise capital, we may do so in the future. The issuance of additional shares of our common stock may significantly reduce the equity interest of our existing shareholders and adversely affect prevailing market prices for our common stock.
Our principal shareholder has the ability to exert significant control in matters requiring a shareholder vote and could delay, deter or prevent a change of control in our company.
As of December 31, 2011, Ying He, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and our largest shareholder, beneficially owned 25.45% of our outstanding shares. Mr. He possesses significant influence over us, giving him the ability, among other things, to exercise significant control over the election of all or a majority of the Board of Directors and to approve significant corporate transactions. Such stock ownership and control may also have the effect of delaying or preventing a future change in control, impeding a merger, consolidation, takeover or other business combination, or discouraging a potential acquirer from making a tender offer or otherwise attempting to obtain control of our company. Without the consent of Mr. He, we could be prevented from entering into potentially beneficial transactions if they conflict with his interests. The interests of Mr. He may differ from the interests of our other shareholders.
Provisions in our articles of incorporation and bylaws could make it very difficult for you to bring any legal actions against our directors or officers for violations of their fiduciary duties or could require us to pay any amounts incurred by our directors or officers in any such actions.
Pursuant to our articles of incorporation, members of our Board of Directors and our officers will have no liability for breaches of their fiduciary duty of care as a director or officer, except in limited circumstances. Accordingly, you may be unable to prevail in a legal action against our directors or officers even if they have breached their fiduciary duty of care. In addition, our bylaws allow us to indemnify our directors and officers from and against any and all costs, charges and expenses resulting from their acting in such capacities with us. This means that if you were able to enforce an action against our directors or officers, in all likelihood we would be required to pay any expenses they incurred in defending the lawsuit and any judgment or settlement they otherwise would be required to pay.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
Item 2. Properties
Our principal offices are located in leased office space in Nanshan, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China. The office space is approximately 2689 square meters in size and is adequate to meet our needs for a principal executive office.
We have obtained land use rights for four parcels of land, each valid for fifty years from the date of purchase. The first two land use rights are located in Yangjing, Guangdong Pronvince, are owned by Winder and are approximately 86,325 square meters in aggregate size. These parcels of land hold our manufacturing facilities, auxiliary offices and employee dorms. These facilities are adequate to meet our current production needs and have a capacity of approximately 14 million units. We acquired the remaining two parcels of land located in the Wuhu area of Anhui Province, and comprising approximately 439,640 square meters, in 2010. Our new manufacturing facilities are currently being constructed on these parcels of land, the pace of construction which will be determined by the pace of our domestic market expansion.
In general, our properties are well maintained, considered adequate and being utilized for their intended purposes. See Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements contained herein, which discloses amounts invested in land usage rights, buildings and machinery and equipment.
21

Item 3. Legal Proceedings
We may become involved in various lawsuits and legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. Litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties and an adverse result in these or other matters that may arise from time to time could have an adverse effect on our business, financial conditions or operating results. Other than the following pending suits, we are currently not aware of any such legal proceedings or claims that will have, individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or operating results.
On March 28, 2011, we filed suit in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, captioned Deer Consumer Products, Inc. v. Alfred Little, et al., Index No. 650823/2011, against a certain blogger, “Alfred Little,” the website SeekingAlpha.com and others. Our claims in this action allege the publishing of false and defamatory statements by the defendants as part of an orchestrated scheme to manipulate and depress the market for our common stock. We are claiming compensatory and punitive damages totaling at least $11 million, not including claims for attorneys’ fees, and other equitable remedies, including disgorgement of any illicit trading profits received by the defendants in connection with the alleged market manipulation scheme. On August 29, 2011, we obtained a Court order allowing us to effect service of the summons and complaint upon defendant Alfred Little via email and related notice. We effected service on Alfred Little pursuant to that order and on September 29, 2011, Alfred Little filed motions to dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction and for permission to appear anonymously as a party in the litigation. In addition, on August 31, 2011, the Court granted defendant SeekingAlpha.com’s motion to dismiss our claim against it on the ground that a Federal statute, the Communications Decency Act, 47 U.S.C. § 230, precluded the claim against SeekingAlpha.com. On September 29, 2011, the Company filed a notice of appeal of this decision. If the Company decides to go through with the appeal, it must file a brief “perfecting” the appeal no later than June 29, 2012. On January 27, 2012, the Court denied in part Alfred Little’s motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction and permitted the Company to conduct discovery on the issue of personal jurisdiction after a confidentiality agreement was reached between the parties. The court also requested that Alfred Little submit to the Court evidence corroborating his allegations of potential risks of physical harm for in camera review. On February 17, 2012, the parties reached a confidentiality agreement. On February 23, 2012, after an in camera review of the evidence presented by Alfred Little, the Court permitted Alfred Little to proceed anonymously until the Court decides the jurisdictional issue and re-directed that the parties proceed with jurisdictional discovery pursuant to the previously ordered confidentiality agreement. The Company has commenced discovery on the jurisdictional issue.
On April 29, 2011, a purported securities class action lawsuit on behalf of the purchasers of our common stock between March 31, 2009, and March 21, 2011, James Rose v. Deer Consumer Products, Inc. et al, was filed against us and certain of our current and former officers and directors in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The court has not yet certified the class action status. The complaint alleges violations of Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 of the Exchange Act, as well as, in the case of the individual defendants, the Section 20(a) control person provisions of the Exchange Act. The factual assertions in the complaint, based expressly on the published statements at issue in the Alfred Little suit described above, consist primarily of allegations that the defendants made materially false or misleading public statements concerning our financial condition in fiscal years 2010 and 2009. The complaint seeks unspecified damages and other relief relating to the purported inflation in the price of our common stock during the class period. A consolidated amended complaint was filed on September 6, 2011, with essentially the same allegations. We filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit, which motion is fully briefed and has been taken under submission by the Court. We strongly deny the allegations in the complaint. We believe this lawsuit is frivolous and without merit and will contest it vigorously. We plan to pursue all legal remedies available to us if the complaint is not withdrawn in its entirety.
We maintain directors and officers liability insurance, which provides the protection of certain insurance coverage for both the company and our officers and directors. We can provide no assurance as to the outcome of these cases. Regardless of the outcomes, such litigation may require significant attention and resources of management.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.
Not applicable.
22

PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Market Information
Our common stock trades on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “DEER.” The following table sets forth the range of the high and low sales prices of our common stock for each quarterly period within the two most fiscal years as reported on the NASDAQ Global Market from January 1, 2010, to April 21, 2010, and on the NASDAQ Global Select Market thereafter.

|  | High |  |  | Low |
Year ended December 31, 2010 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
First Quarter |  | $ | 13.80 |  |  | $ | 8.51 |
Second Quarter |  | $ | 12.45 |  |  | $ | 7.6 |
Third Quarter |  | $ | 9.80 |  |  | $ | 6.98 |
Fourth Quarter |  | $ | 13.00 |  |  | $ | 9.58 |
Year ended December 31, 2011 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
First Quarter |  | $ | 11.70 |  |  | $ | 7.26 |
Second Quarter |  | $ | 10.29 |  |  | $ | 5.07 |
Third Quarter |  | $ | 7.79 |  |  | $ | 4.03 |
Fourth Quarter |  | $ | 5.74 |  |  | $ | 4.10 |

Holders of Record
As of March 28, 2012, there were 15 shareholders of record of our common stock. Many of our shares of common stock are held in street or nominee name by brokers and other institutions on behalf of shareholders and we are unable to estimate the total number of shareholders represented by these record holders.
Dividends
On March 9, 2011, our Board of Directors declared a first quarter dividend payable from future earnings only in the amount of $0.05 per share payable on April 14, 2011, to the shareholders of record as of March 31, 2011. On May 9, 2011, our Board of Directors declared a second quarter dividend payable from future earnings only in the amount of $0.05 per share payable on July 15, 2011, to shareholders of record as of June 30, 2011. On August 9, 2011, our Board of Directors declared a third quarter dividend payable from future earnings only in the amount of $0.05 per share payable on October 15, 2011, to shareholders of record as of September 30, 2011. On November 8, 2011, our Board of Directors declared a fourth quarter dividend payable from future earnings only in the amount of $0.05 per share payable on January 13, 2012, to shareholders of record as of December 30, 2011.
Our policy is to pay out a reasonable share of net cash provided by operating activities as dividends while maintaining debt ratios within what we believe to be prudent and generally acceptable limits. The future payment of dividends is within the discretion of our Board of Directors. We anticipated that dividends will be payable from future earnings only and the decision to declare any dividends depend on our profitability, capital requirements, financial condition, debt levels, growth projects, business opportunities and other factors that our Board of Directors deems relevant. We are not a party to any contracts or agreements that currently materially limit our ability to pay dividends.
Our ability to pay dividends may be affected by the complex currency and capital transfer regulations in China that restrict the payment of dividends to us by our subsidiaries in China. PRC regulations currently permit payment of dividends only out of accumulated profits as determined in accordance with accounting standards and regulations in China. We also are required to set aside at least 10% of our net income after taxes based on China’s accounting standards each year to statutory surplus reserves until the cumulative amount of such reserves reaches 50% of registered capital. These reserves are not distributable as cash dividends. Our PRC subsidiaries also may be required to allocate a portion of their after-tax profits to their staff welfare and bonus funds, which may not be distributed to equity owners except in the event of liquidation. If our subsidiaries incur debt, the instruments governing the debt may restrict their ability to pay dividends or make other distributions to us.
In addition, Circular 75 requires PRC residents, including both legal persons and natural persons, to register with the competent local SAFE branch before establishing or controlling any company outside of China. If the PRC subsidiaries of an offshore parent company do not report the need for their PRC investors to register to the local SAFE authorities, they may be prohibited from distributing their profits and proceeds from any reduction in capital, share transfer or liquidation to their offshore parent company. Although we believe that our subsidiaries are in compliance with these regulations, should these regulations or the interpretation of them by PRC courts or regulatory agencies change, we may not be able to pay dividends outside of China.
23

Securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans
The following table sets forth information regarding all equity compensation plans, including individual compensation arrangements, under which our equity securities are authorized for issuance as of December 31, 2011.
Equity Compensation Plan Information

|  | Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights |  |  | Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights |  |  | Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) |
Plan category |  | (a) |  |  | (b) |  |  | (c) |
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
2009 Equity Incentive Plan |  |  | 50,000 |  |  | $ | 10.96 |  |  |  | 450,000 |
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |
Total |  |  | 50,000 |  |  | $ | 10.96 |  |  |  | 450,000 |

Stock Performance Graph
The following graph compares total shareholder return on our common stock from September 19, 2008, through December 31, 2011, with the cumulative total return of (a) the NASDAQ Composite index and (b) the Dow Jones Global Consumer Goods Index. An investment of $100 (with reinvestment of all dividends) is assumed to have been made in our common stock and in each index on September 19, 2008, the date when the first trade our common stock occurred through the facilities of the OTCBB. The stock performance shown on the graph below is based on historical data and not indicative of, or intended to forecast, possible future performance of our common stock.
24

25

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
None.
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
None.
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
The following tables set forth our selected financial data as of and for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010, 2009, 2008 and 2007. The selected financial data set forth below has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto where applicable for the respective fiscal years. You should read this selected consolidated financial data together with the consolidated financial statements and related notes contained in this Annual Report and in our prior and subsequent reports filed with the SEC, as well as the section of this Annual Report and our other reports entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”
Consolidated Statement of Income Data

|  | Years Ended December 31, |
|  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |  |  | 2009 |  |  | 2008 |  |  | 2007 |
Revenue |  | $ | 226,748,885 |  |  |  | 175,846,887 |  |  | $ | 81,342,680 |  |  | $ | 43,784,935 |  |  | $ | 33,476,259 |
Cost of revenue |  |  | 157,538,033 |  |  |  | 125,274,479 |  |  |  | 61,176,610 |  |  |  | 34,125,019 |  |  |  | 26,249,009 |
Gross profit |  |  | 69,210,852 |  |  |  | 50,572,408 |  |  |  | 20,166,070 |  |  |  | 9,659,916 |  |  |  | 7,227,250 |
Total operating expenses |  |  | 20,982,372 |  |  |  | 13,724,256 |  |  |  | 5,936,408 |  |  |  | 5,421,580 |  |  |  | 3,306,507 |
Income from operations |  |  | 48,228,480 |  |  |  | 36,848,152 |  |  |  | 14,229,662 |  |  |  | 4,238,336 |  |  |  | 3,920,743 |
Total non-operating income (expenses), net |  |  | 690,585 |  |  |  | (850,689) |  |  |  | 251,782 |  |  |  | 420,493 |  |  |  | 116,417 |
Income before income tax |  |  | 48,919,065 |  |  |  | 35,997,463 |  |  |  | 14,481,444 |  |  |  | 4,658,829 |  |  |  | 4,037,160 |
Income tax expense |  |  | 9,113,436 |  |  |  | 5,648,426 |  |  |  | 2,112,382 |  |  |  | 1,302,045 |  |  |  | 615,568 |
Net income |  | $ | 39,805,629 |  |  |  | 30,349,037 |  |  | $ | 12,369,062 |  |  | $ | 3,356,784 |  |  | $ | 3,421,592 |
Other comprehensive income – foreign currency translation |  |  | 8,454,482 |  |  |  | 3,980,259 |  |  |  | (10,482) |  |  |  | 1,041,966 |  |  |  | 822,146 |
Comprehensive income |  |  | 48,260,111 |  |  |  | 34,329,296 |  |  |  | 12,358,580 |  |  |  | 4,398,750 |  |  |  | 4,243,738 |
Earnings per share – basic |  | $ | 1.18 |  |  |  | 0.91 |  |  | $ | 0.54 |  |  | $ | 0.20 |  |  | $ | 0.19 |
Earnings per share – diluted |  | $ | 1.18 |  |  |  | 0.90 |  |  | $ | 0.53 |  |  | $ | 0.20 |  |  | $ | 0.19 |

26

Consolidated Balance Sheet Data

|  | December 31, |
|  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |  |  | 2009 |  |  | 2008 |  |  | 2007 |
Cash & equivalents |  | $ | 13,961,434 |  |  |  | 33,956,591 |  |  | $ | 79,333,729 |  |  | $ | 2,782,026 |  |  | $ | 1,511,545 |
Total assets |  |  | 204,403,164 |  |  |  | 188,642,302 |  |  |  | 136,008,298 |  |  |  | 37,730,068 |  |  |  | 24,275,282 |
Total liabilities |  |  | 19,023,942 |  |  |  | 44,907,305 |  |  |  | 26,576,855 |  |  |  | 22,452,475 |  |  |  | 10,261,460 |
Total stockholders’ equity |  |  | 185,379,222 |  |  |  | 143,734,997 |  |  |  | 109,431,443 |  |  |  | 15,277,593 |  |  |  | 14,013,822 |

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Safe Harbor Declaration
The comments made throughout this Annual Report should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and the notes thereto, and other financial information appearing elsewhere in this document. In addition to historical information, the following discussion and other parts of this document contain certain forward-looking information. When used in this discussion, the words, “believes,” “anticipates,” “expects” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ materially from projected results, due to a number of factors beyond our control. We do not undertake to publicly update or revise any of these forward-looking statements, even if experience or future changes show that the indicated results or events will not be realized. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. Readers are also urged to carefully review and consider our discussions regarding the various factors that affect our business, which are described in this section and elsewhere in this report.
Overview
We are engaged in the manufacture, marketing, distribution and sale of small home and kitchen electric appliances. We develop, promote, manufacture and sell a broad range of stylish, safe and easy to use products including blenders, juicers and soy milk makers that are designed to make today’s lifestyles simpler and healthier. We currently manufacture our products in Yangjiang, China and have corporate functions in Nanshan, Shenzhen, China.
On September 3, 2008, we entered into and consummated a series of agreements that resulted in the acquisition of all of the ordinary shares of Deer International, a corporation organized under the laws of the British Virgin Islands on December 3, 2007, parent of its wholly owned subsidiary Winder since March 11, 2008, and Delta, a wholly owned subsidiary of Winder. Winder and Delta were incorporated in the Guangdong Province of the PRC on July 20, 2001, and February 23, 2006, respectively.
Pursuant to the share exchange agreement, we acquired from Deer International 50,000 ordinary shares, consisting of all of its issued and outstanding capital stock for 15,695,706 shares of our common stock.
Concurrently with the closing of the transactions contemplated by the share exchange agreement and as a condition thereof, we entered into an agreement with Crescent Liu, our former Director and Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to which he returned 5,173,914 shares of our common stock for cancellation. Mr. Liu was not compensated for the cancellation of his shares of our common stock. Upon completion of the foregoing transactions, we had 19,652,226 shares of common stock issued and outstanding. In connection with the above transaction, we changed our name to Deer Consumer Products, Inc. on September 3, 2008. For accounting purposes, the exchange of shares with Deer International and concurrent transactions described above were treated as a reverse acquisition and recapitalization of Deer International, with Deer International being treated as the continuing entity, because the Deer International shareholders owned a majority of our outstanding common stock after the transactions and exercise significant influence over the operating and financial policies of the consolidated entity.
We operate through our wholly owned subsidiaries in China. Our U.S. holding company, Deer Consumer Products, Inc., owns 100% of Deer International Group Ltd., a BVI entity, which owns our three wholly foreign owned enterprises, Winder, Deer Technology (AnHui) Co., Ltd. and Anlin Technology (Anhui) Co., Ltd. Delta, which transferred its material former operations to Winder in 2009, is 100% owned by Winder and is currently engaged in marketing operations. Winder is located in Guangdong Province and is engaged in the research, production and delivery of our goods. Deer Technology and Anlin Technology were both incorporated in the AnHui Province on April 30, 2010. Deer Technology and Anlin Technology will also be engaged in the manufacture and sale of household electric appliances and were formed for the purpose of establishing production and distribution facilities located in the Wuhu area of AnHui Province.
27

28

Each of our wholly owned foreign enterprises, Winder, Deer Technology and Anlin Technology, are authorized by their respective business licenses to operate our electrical appliance manufacturing business. Delta transferred all of its material former operations to Winder in 2009 to improve the Company’s operating efficiency. Currently, Delta only conducts marketing operations for the Company.
On April 30, 2010, we incorporated Deer Technology and Anlin Technology in AnHui Province. As of December 31, 2011, we have invested $39.8 million in Deer Technology and $10.2 million in Anlin Technology. Deer Technology and Anlin Technology are engaged in the manufacture and sale of household electric appliances and were formed for the purpose of establishing a new factory located in the Wuhu area of AnHui Province. In 2010, the Company paid approximately $35 million to purchase two parcels of land in the Wuhu area of Anhui Province.
The purchase price paid by the Company for the land use rights in Anhui Province was determined through a public bidding process with the PRC government, as is the case with all acquisitions of land use rights in the PRC. Typically, once a bidder wins a land auction a public notification stating the bidder’s name, the size of the land and the price paid are available to the public on the PRC government’s Ministry of Land and Resources website. After the bidder makes the full payment on the land an official land use rights certificate is granted.
The PRC government bases the price of the land use rights on a number of factors including the land’s location, size, condition, proposed use, need for improvement, degree of surface leveling, close proximity to utilities and logistics, availability of other land in the local market, the financial position of the bidder, the competitive bidding positions of other bidders, general market conditions and local government policies at the time of the land auction. The prices for land use rights can vary significantly based on these factors.
We traditionally have acted as an ODM and OEM for the export market and, in recent years, have aggressively expanded sales of our Deer brand (德尔) of appliances in the China domestic market. We will continue to target the China domestic market by expanding our production and manufacturing facilities by building a new factory in the Wuhu area of central China. Wuhu is located on the banks of the Yangtze River within hours from Shanghai and Nanjing, which are some of China’s most populous and economically developed regions. This central location will improve our ability to deliver our products to customers located throughout China. The new factory, which will increase our production capacity by 40%, and distribution center will allow us to target the neighboring population of more than 400 million as we continue to grow our business in the China domestic market. We completed the construction of fencing, sewage system, water pipes, gas and utilities, the factory’s main entrance and leveling the land during the last quarter of 2011. We plan to complete the construction of certain workshops and the warehouse in 2012. The pace of construction will be determined by the pace of the Company’s China domestic market expansion. While our current factory located in Yangjiang, Guangdong province in south China does not operate a full capacity, we plan to use these facilities primarily for fulfilling export orders whereas we anticipate using our new facilities in Anhui to fulfill China domestic orders. These two facilities are about 1,000 miles apart and management anticipates needing the additional capacity at the new facilities in AnHui over the next few years. This additional capacity will be brought on line incrementally in accordance with our domestic expansion strategy.
Critical Accounting Policies
Presented below are those accounting policies we believe require subjective and complex judgments that could potentially affect our reported results.
Use of Estimates. Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our financial statements, which were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“US GAAP”). The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to impairment of long-lived assets and allowance for doubtful accounts. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions; however, we believe that our estimates, including those for the above-described items, are reasonable.
Areas that require estimates and assumptions include valuation of accounts receivable and inventory, determination of useful lives of property and equipment, estimation of certain liabilities and sales returns.
Accounts Receivable. We maintain reserves for potential credit losses on accounts receivable. Management reviews the composition of accounts receivable and analyzes historical bad debts, customer concentrations, customer credit worthiness, current economic trends and changes in customer payment patterns to evaluate the adequacy of these reserves.
29

Long-Lived Assets. We periodically assess potential impairments to our long-lived assets. We perform an impairment review whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be fully recoverable. Factors we considered include, but are not limited to: significant underperformance relative to expected historical or projected future operating results; significant changes in the manner of use of the acquired assets or the strategy for our overall business; and significant negative industry or economic trends. When we determine the carrying value of a long-lived asset may not be recoverable based upon the existence of one or more of the above indicators of impairment, we estimate the future undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition. If the sum of the expected future undiscounted cash flows and eventual disposition is less than the carrying amount of the asset, we recognize an impairment loss. An impairment loss is reflected as the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair market value of the asset, based on the fair market value if available, or discounted cash flows. To date, there has been no impairment of long-lived assets.
Revenue Recognition. Our revenue recognition policies are in compliance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) 104. Sales revenue is recognized at the date of shipment to customers when the price is fixed or determinable, when no other significant obligations exist and collectability is reasonably assured. Payments received before all of the relevant criteria for revenue recognition are satisfied are recorded as unearned revenue.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-08, "Testing Goodwill for Impairment." ASU 2011-08 will allow companies to assess qualitative factors to determine if it is more-likely-than-not that goodwill might be impaired and whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test required under current accounting standards. ASU 2011-08 will be effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for annual reporting period beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating this guidance, but does not expect the adoption will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05, "Comprehensive Income: Presentation of Comprehensive Income." ASU 2011-05 will require companies to present the components of net income and other comprehensive income either as one continuous statement or as two consecutive statements. ASU 2011-05 eliminates the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders' equity. ASU 2011-05 does not change the items which must be reported in other comprehensive income, how such items are measured or when they must be reclassified to net income. ASU 2011-05 will be effective for the first interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. Further, in December 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-12, "Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05." The Company believes the adoption of this guidance concerns disclosure only and will not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2011-04, "Fair Value Measurement: Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs." ASU 2011-04 changes the wording used to describe the requirements in generally accepted accounting principles in the United States ("U.S. GAAP") for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements in order to improve consistency in the application and description of fair value between U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS"). ASU 2011-04 clarifies how the concepts of highest and best use and valuation premise in a fair value measurement are relevant only when measuring the fair value of nonfinancial assets and are not relevant when measuring the fair value of financial assets or of liabilities. In addition, ASU 2011-04 expanded the disclosures for the unobservable inputs for Level 3 fair value measurements, requiring quantitative information to be disclosed related to (1) the valuation processes used, (2) the sensitivity of the fair value measurement to changes in unobservable inputs and the interrelationships between those unobservable inputs, and (3) use of a nonfinancial asset in a way that differs from the asset's highest and best use. ASU 2011-04 will be effective for the first interim and annual reporting period beginning after December 15, 2011 and early adoption is prohibited. The Company is currently evaluating the future impact of this new accounting update on its consolidated financial statements.
Results of Operations
Year Ended December 31, 2011, Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2010

|  |  |  |  | $ |  |  | % |
|  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |  |  | Change |  |  | Change |
Revenue |  | $ | 226,748,885 |  |  | $ | 175,846,887 |  |  | $ | 50,901,998 |  |  |  | 28.9 |
Cost of revenue |  |  | 157,538,033 |  |  |  | 125,274,479 |  |  |  | 32,263,554 |  |  |  | 25.8 |
Gross profit |  |  | 69,210,852 |  |  |  | 50,572,408 |  |  |  | 18,638,444 |  |  |  | 36.9 |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |  |  | 20,982,372 |  |  |  | 13,724,256 |  |  |  | 7,258,116 |  |  |  | 52.9 |
Interest and financing (costs) income, net |  |  | 140,859 |  |  |  | 335,755 |  |  |  | (194,896 | ) |  |  | (58.0) |
Other income, net (including subsidy) |  |  | 1,068,569 |  |  |  | 67,263 |  |  |  | 1,001,306 |  |  |  | 1488.6 |
Foreign exchange transaction loss |  |  | (518,843 | ) |  |  | (1,253,707 | ) |  |  | 734,864 |  |  |  | (58.6) |
Income tax expense |  |  | 9,113,436 |  |  |  | 5,648,426 |  |  |  | 3,465,010 |  |  |  | 61.3 |
Net income |  | $ | 39,805,629 |  |  | $ | 30,349,037 |  |  | $ | 9,456,592 |  |  |  | 31.2 |

30

Revenues
Our revenues for the year ended December 31, 2011, were $226.7 million, an increase of $50.9 million or 29% from $175.8 million for 2010. The increase in revenues resulted from our continued sales expansion in the China domestic market. In addition, the average selling price of our products increased 26% compared to 2010, conforming to our strategy of maintaining healthy profit margins across our product lines. We increased our China domestic market sales to $153.5 million in 2011, from $76.9 million in 2010, a 100% increase. Our products currently are available in 4,000 stores as of December 31, 2011. Our customers include SuNing, which together with its wholly-owned subsidiary Song Qiao, is a prominent national electric appliance retail chain in China with more than 1,000 stores, through which we sell our products under a private label arrangement, and Gome, another prominent national electronic appliance retail chain in China with approximately 1,400 stores. In 2011, we also increased our sales to Reed Sea Company, an internet sales operator in China that owns over 100 networked sales channels and who is now one of our largest customers. We also added retail locations in other channels such as regional electric appliance retailers, wholesalers and department stores. We increased our product sales over internet portals, into hotels and restaurants, and via reward programs with large banks, telecommunication firms and postal offices in China. These results are on pace with our plan to capture the fast growth being experienced in the China domestic small appliance market.
Our sales in South America were $15.4 million for 2011, a $9.3 million or 38% decrease from 2010. We believe the decrease in sales in South America was mainly due to the continued weak economic growth of emerging markets on that continent. Our sales in Asia, excluding sales to China, were $33.2 million for 2011, an $8.8 million or 36% increase over 2010. We believe our increase in sales in Asia reflect our continued efforts to obtain new orders from international customers through our participation in exhibitions such as the Canton Fair, the largest import and export trade fair in China, and by maintaining contacts with our current international customers.
Our sales in Europe were $7.8 million for 2011, a $10.1 million or 56% decrease from 2010. Our sales in the Middle East were $10.6 million for 2011, a $10.8 million or 51% decrease from 2010. Our sales in Africa were $1.7 million for 2011, a $0.4 million or 19% decrease over 2010. We believe the decrease in sales in these regions was mainly due to weak consumer demand as a result of the continued effects of the world-wide financial crisis in these regions and management’s strategy to focus on China domestic sales, which offer higher profit margins. We believe that as the effects of the crisis fade, demand for our products will increase in these regions. We also plan to continue our sales and marketing efforts internationally to find new customers that meet our profit margin requirements.
Our sales in the U.S. were $4.6 million for 2011 a $4.0 million or 46% decrease over 2010, as we have from time to time turned away orders that do not meet our profit margin requirements. The economic recovery in the U.S. has been slower than anticipated and, as expected, our U.S. customers placed orders based on the slow recovery. We commenced sales to a new customer, a leading franchiser in the U.S., and started shipments to this customer in April 2011. We expect our U.S. revenues to recover in 2012 as the economic recovery progresses and we continue to engage new large U.S. customers that meet our profit margin requirements.
Cost of Revenue
We include expenses in either cost of revenue or selling, general and administrative expenses based upon the natural classification of the expenses. Cost of revenue includes expenses associated with the acquisition, inspection, manufacturing and receiving of materials for use in the manufacturing process. These costs include inbound freight charges, purchasing and receiving costs, inspection costs, warehousing costs, internal transfer costs as well as depreciation, amortization, wages, benefits and other costs that are incurred directly or indirectly to support the manufacturing process. Our cost of revenue for 2011 was $157.5 million, an increase of $32.3 million or 26% from $125.2 million for 2010. The increased cost of revenue in 2011 was due primarily to our increase in sales. Our cost of revenue as a percentage of revenue decreased nearly 2% due to our increased domestic sales which have higher margins than export sales.
Gross Profit
Our gross profit was $69.2 million for 2011, compared to $50.6 million for 2010, an increase of 37%. Our gross margin was 31% for 2011, compared to 29% for 2010, an increase of 2%. Our increase in gross profit was attributable to higher gross margins in the China domestic market, where we experienced a significant growth in sales, as compared to gross margins in the export market. Products generally sell for higher prices at retail and wholesale in China and our gross margin is in line with other comparable companies specializing in small household and kitchen appliances in the China domestic market. In addition, we have continued to improve the efficiency of our manufacturing operations through in-house production of motors and other primary components of our products, providing benefits from economies of scale.
31

Operating Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) includes expenses associated with the distribution of our products, sales efforts, including commissions payable to in-store promotional staff, administration costs and other costs that are not incurred to support the manufacturing process. We record distribution costs associated with the sale of inventory as a component of SG&A expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Income. These expenses include warehousing costs, outbound freight charges, insurance and costs associated with distribution personnel. SG&A expenses for 2011 were $21.0 million, an increase of $7.3 million or 53% from $13.7 million for 2010. Selling expenses for 2011 increased by $7.1 million, or 7.1% in comparison to 2010, due to our increase in sales. Associated selling expenses include advertising to expand our market share, increase brand awareness and to help generate the significant increase in sales. As expected, our direct advertising expenses remained minimal during 2011 because we hire factory representatives and in-store promoters to promote our products directly to consumers at retail locations. We believe this direct in-store promotion approach, a standard practice in the small household appliances industry in China, is highly effective in marketing to consumers in the unique Chinese retail environment as compared to traditional mass media advertising channels, which can cause significant television and other mass media advertising expense without target customer interaction. Our in-store promoters market our products exclusively and directly to in-store customer traffic. According to a survey in the 2010 China Small Electronics Market Research Report, approximately 60% of Chinese consumers surveyed purchased small household appliances after being introduced to the product by in-store promoters. In 2011, our salary expense increased $3.3 million, or 96% compared to 2010, due to our hiring of additional employees to work as in-store promoters in the China domestic market, and increased bonus expense payable to these in-store promoters due to our increased sales. General and administrative expenses for 2011 increased by $0.1 million, or 3%, a slight increase attributable to our increase in sales and expansion of our business.
Interest and Financing (Costs) Income, net
Interest and financing (costs) income, net, for 2011, was a net gain of $140,859, which was a decrease of $194,896 or 58% from a net gain of $335,755 for 2010. The change was due principally to interest income decreasing from $484,527 in 2010 to $243,876 in 2011 as our cash position decreased due to expenses incurred to expand our production capacity in preparation for future expansion of our business and to fulfill our general working capital needs.
Other Income, net
Other income, net, in 2011 was $1,068,569 compared to a $67,263 for 2010, an increase of $1,001,306. The increase was due mainly to grants and rewards totaling $1,080,448 which we received from various PRC governments in 2011.
Foreign Exchange Transaction Gain (Loss)
Foreign exchange transaction loss for 2011 was $518,843 compared to foreign exchange transaction loss of $1,253,707 for 2010, a decrease of $734,864. The decrease was due principally to foreign exchange rate fluctuations and our decreased international sales during 2011.
Income Tax Expense
Our effective tax rate for 2011 was 18.6% compared to 15.7% for 2010. The PRC government granted us this special tax rate effective as of 2009 for Winder because of our high tech enterprise status. The special tax benefit lasted for three years until December 31, 2011, and has been renewed until 2014.
Year Ended December 31, 2010, Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2009

|  |  |  |  | $ |  |  | % |
|  | 2010 |  |  | 2009 |  |  | Change |  |  | Change |
Revenue |  | $ | 175,846,887 |  |  | $ | 81,342,680 |  |  | $ | 94,504,207 |  |  |  | 116.2 |
Cost of revenue |  |  | 125,274,479 |  |  |  | 61,176,610 |  |  |  | 64,097,869 |  |  |  | 104.8 |
Gross profit |  |  | 50,572,408 |  |  |  | 20,166,070 |  |  |  | 30,406,338 |  |  |  | 150.8 |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |  |  | 13,724,256 |  |  |  | 5,936,408 |  |  |  | 7,787,848 |  |  |  | 131.2 |
Interest and financing costs, net |  |  | 335,755 |  |  |  | (250,920 | ) |  |  | 586,675 |  |  |  | (233.8 | )
Other income, net (including subsidy) |  |  | 67,263 |  |  |  | 364,418 |  |  |  | (297,155 | ) |  |  | (81.5 | )
Foreign exchange gain (loss) |  |  | (1,253,707 | ) |  |  | 138,284 |  |  |  | (1,391,991 | ) |  |  | (1006.6 | )
Income tax expense |  |  | 5,648,426 |  |  |  | 2,112,382 |  |  |  | 3,536,044 |  |  |  | 167.4 |
Net income |  | $ | 30,349,037 |  |  | $ | 12,369,062 |  |  | $ | 17,979,975 |  |  |  | 145.4 |

32

Revenues
Our revenues for 2010 were $175.8 million, an increase of $94.5 million or 116% from $81.3 million in 2009. The increase in revenues was a result of our expansion of sales in the China domestic market and increasing our market share in the Asian, South American, Middle East and European markets. The average selling price of our products increased 5.87% compared to 2009. We increased our China domestic market sales to $76.9 million in 2010 from $14.3 million in 2009, a 437% increase. Beginning in the latter half of 2009, we increased sales of our products to SuNing under a private label arrangement, which together with its wholly-owned subsidiary Song Qiao, is a prominent national electric appliance retail chain in China with more than 1,000 stores. In the first quarter of 2010, we began ramping up sales of our brand name products to Gome, another prominent national electronic appliance retail chain in China with approximately 1,400 stores, in addition to many other retail locations across China. We also added retail locations in other channels such as regional electric appliance retailers and department stores. We increased our product sales over internet portals, into hotels and restaurants, and via reward programs with large banks, telecommunication firms and postal offices in China. In addition, we introduced new product lines in 2010, such as humidifiers and dehumidifiers, bringing our current product offerings up to approximately 250 different product varieties from 189 in 2009. These results were on pace with management’s plan to capture the fast growth being experienced in the China domestic small appliance market.
Our sales in South America were $24.7 million for 2010, a $12.4 million or 100.4% increase over 2009. Our sales in Asia were $24.5 million for 2010, a $15.1 million or 162.4% increase over 2009. We believe the increase in sales in South America and Asia were due largely to the growth in the economies of these regions, which led to an increase in consumers’ disposable income, as well as our sales and marketing efforts.
Our sales in Europe were $17.8 million for 2010, a $6.3 million or 54.8% increase over 2009. Our sales in the Middle East were $21.4 million for 2010, a $10.4 million or 93.8% increase over 2009. Our sales gains in Europe and the Middle East were due largely to our attainment of increased market share during this time. Our sales in the U.S. were $8.5 million for 2010, a $13.7 million or 61.7% decrease over 2009. The economic recovery in the U.S. was slower than anticipated during this period and our U.S. customers placed orders as expected based on the slow recovery.
After the financial crisis, we believe many smaller suppliers with limited capital resources went out of business, leading to further consolidation in the industry. In addition, we noticed that buyers increasingly favored companies with financial strength, higher quality products, sufficient plant capacity and a track record of prompt delivery. Buyers placed greater emphasis on being able to source quality supplies without delays or interruptions. We utilized this market opportunity to add new accounts and increase sales volume with our existing customers.
Cost of Revenue
We include expenses in either cost of revenue or selling, general and administrative expenses based upon the natural classification of the expenses. Cost of revenue includes expenses associated with the acquisition, inspection, manufacturing and receiving of materials for use in the manufacturing process. These costs include inbound freight charges, purchasing and receiving costs, inspection costs, warehousing costs, internal transfer costs as well as depreciation, amortization, wages, benefits and other costs that are incurred directly or indirectly to support the manufacturing process. Our cost of revenue for 2010 was $125.3 million, an increase of $64.1 million or 105% from $61.2 million for 2009. The increased cost of revenue in 2010 was due to our increase in sales.
Gross Profit
Our gross margin for 2010 was 29% compared to 25% for 2009. The increase in gross margin for 2010 compared to 2009 was due to increased sales in the China domestic market, which offers higher margins. Our gross margin is higher in the China domestic market because our branded products are sold directly to agents for domestic retail locations. We continued to improve the efficiency of our manufacturing operations through in-house production of motors and other primary components used in our products, thereby providing benefits from economies of scale due to increased sales volume.
Operating Expenses
SG&A expenses for 2010 were $13.7 million, an increase of $7.8 million or 131.2% from $5.9 million for 2009. Selling expenses for 2010 increased by 157.7% or $5.6 million in comparison to 2009 due to our significant increase in revenue. Associated selling costs include advertising to expand our market share, increase brand awareness and to help generate the significant increase in revenue. General and administrative expenses for 2010 increased by 91.7% or $2.2 million in comparison to 2009 due to the hiring of additional employees to support our growth, an increase in research and development to improve our product quality and our introduction of new products at trade shows to support our marketing efforts.
Interest and Financing (Costs) Income, net
Interest and financing costs, net, for 2010 was a net gain of $335,755, an increase of $586,675 or 233.8% from a net loss of $250,920 for 2009. The change is due principally to interest income increasing from $94,986 in 2009 to $484,527 in 2010 and no interest expense in 2010 compared to $122,299 in 2009. Financial expense also decreased from $223,607 in 2009 to $148,772 in 2010.
33

Other Income, net
Other income for 2010 was $67,263 compared to $364,418 for 2009, a decrease of $297,155. The decrease was due mainly to a grant received in 2009 of $326,334, compared to $54,134 received in 2010, from the PRC government for our high tech enterprise status and our hiring of a large number of local workers.
Foreign Exchange Gain (Loss)
Foreign exchange loss for 2010 was $1.25 million compared to foreign exchange gain of $0.1 million for 2009, a decrease of $1.35 million. The change is due principally to foreign exchange rate fluctuations and our increased international sales during 2010.
Income Tax Expense
Our effective tax rate for 2010 was 15.7% compared to 14.6% for 2009. The PRC government granted us this special tax rate effective as of 2009 because of our high tech enterprise status. The special tax benefit lasted for three years until December 31, 2011, and was renewed until 2014.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
There were no off-balance sheet arrangements as of December 31, 2011, that have, or are reasonably likely to have, a current or future effect on our financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to our interests.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
On December 17, 2009, we completed an underwritten public offering led by William Blair & Company and BMO Capital Markets of 6,900,000 shares of our common stock at $11.00 per share, including overallotment, for gross proceeds of $75,900,000.
During 2010, certain warrant holders exercised warrants to purchase 1,759,114 shares of our common stock that resulted in gross proceeds of $6,964,510.
In May 2010, we announced a $20 million share buyback program. We purchased 798,300 shares of our common stock on the open market during 2010 for $6,945,950 and returned such shares to the treasury for cancelation. We may purchase additional shares of our common stock from time to time on the open market pursuant to the buyback program.
Cash Flows
As of December 31, 2011, we had $13.96 million in cash and equivalents on hand. Our principal demands for liquidity are to help increase our sales in China by adding capacity, purchasing inventory and for sales distribution infrastructure and general corporate purposes. We anticipate that the amount of cash we have on hand as of December 31, 2011, as well as the cash that we will generate from operations, will satisfy these requirements.
At December 31, 2011, other current assets were $95.6 million and current liabilities were $19.0 million. Working capital was $90.5 million. The current ratio was 5.76:1.
The following is a summary of cash provided by or used in each of the indicated types of activities during the year ended December 31, 2011 and 2010:

|  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |
Cash provided by (used in): |  |  |  |  |  |
Operating activities |  | $ | 5,968,640 |  |  | $ | 11,076,019 |
Investing activities |  |  | (22,238,255) |  |  |  | (57,390,977 | )
Financing activities |  |  | (5,038,884) |  |  |  | (301,440 | )

34

Net cash flows provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2011, was $6.0 million compared to net cash provided by operating activities of $11.1 million for 2010. The decreased cash inflows from operating activities despite the significant improvement in our accounts receivable, was attributed principally to the large decrease in our current liabilities, including payments for accounts payable, taxes payable, notes payable and other payables, and increased inventory of $36 million. The increase in our inventory is within our expectations and consistent with our strategy as we anticipate continued sales increases in the China domestic market.
Net cash flows used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2011, was $22.2 million compared to net cash used of $57.4 million for 2010. The decrease of cash outflow from investing activities in 2011 was principally from the return of a $10.5 million deposit for land use rights that we did not receive, and $33.2 million for purchase of property and equipment and payments for construction in progress of our new building and workshop.
Net cash flows used in financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2011, was $5.0 million, compared to $0.3 million for the same period of 2010. The increase in cash outflows from financing activities was attributed principally to dividends paid totaling $5.0 million, as compared to the 2010 period, during which we paid $0.3 million in offering costs, received $6.9 million from exercise of warrants and paid approximately $7.0 million for the purchase of treasury shares.
At December 31, 2010, we had $33.96 million in cash and equivalents on hand. Other current assets were $83.2 million and current liabilities were $44.91 million. Working capital was $72.2 million. The current ratio was 2.61:1 at December 31, 2010.
The following is a summary of cash provided by or used in each of the indicated types of activities during the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009:

|  | 2010 |  |  | 2009 |
Cash provided by (used in): |  |  |  |  |  |
Operating activities |  | $ | 11,076,019 |  |  | $ | 384,221 |
Investing activities |  |  | (57,390,977 | ) |  |  | (4,110,610 | )
Financing activities |  |  | (301,440 | ) |  |  | 80,233,859 |

Net cash flows provided by operating activities for 2010 was $11.1 million compared to cash provided by operating activities of $0.4 million for 2009. The cash flows from operating activities was attributed principally to the net income generated during 2010, an increase in accounts payables, tax payable and bank acceptance outstanding, offset by an increase in our accounts receivable and advances to suppliers. The increase in account receivable was within our expectations as we continued to increase sales rapidly in the China domestic market, which typically have longer receivable requirements. Our strongest quarters seasonally are our third and fourth quarters, which is common for the consumer products industry in China. The higher margins in the China domestic market typically require payment terms for as long as seven to eight months from the date of shipment. We historically have not experienced significant bad debts from our customers; therefore, we believe our current receivables are manageable and within expectations.
We used $57.4 million in investing activities during 2010, principally for the purchase of land use rights (intangible assets) for our new production and manufacturing facility that will be located in the Wuhu area of central China and for the purchase of other fixed assets of $10.1 million during 2010.
Cash used in financing activities for 2010 was $0.3 million, which included proceeds from the exercise of warrants of $6.96 million offset by $320,000 in payment of offering costs and the purchase of treasury shares for $6.95 million.
We sell our products in the China domestic market through a broad range of distribution outlets including regional and national wholesalers and third party distributors. Our standard terms for accounts receivable for several of our large and established China domestic retailers is 180 days from the close of the billing cycle, which is 30 – 45 days after our products are delivered. These terms are customary for large and established China domestic retailers. Historically, we have not experienced late payments or bad debts under such terms from these retailers. The term for accounts receivable for our other domestic customers is 30 – 90 days from the close of the billing cycle. We sell our products to overseas customers in the export markets under letters of credit, prepaid arrangements, certain short credit terms or direct customer purchase orders. Our export sales-related account receivables typically are less than three months, depending on customer shipment schedules. Historically, we have not experienced significant bad debts from export sales. For 2011, we had accounts receivable turnover of 6.19 on an annualized basis, with sales outstanding of 59 days. For 2010, we had accounts receivable turnover of 5.04 on an annualized basis, with sales outstanding of 72 days. We experienced significant improvements in our accounts receivable collection in 2011, compared to 2010. As we continue to focus on our expansion in the China domestic markets, our sales in the China domestic market will continue to represent a larger percentage of our total revenue. We anticipate our accounts receivable will remain in line with standard industry practice relating to accounts receivable in China, which could be up to seven months.
35

Pending Litigation
On March 28, 2011, we filed suit in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, captioned Deer Consumer Products, Inc. v. Alfred Little, et al., Index No. 650823/2011, against a certain blogger, “Alfred Little,” the website SeekingAlpha.com and others. Our claims in this action allege the publishing of false and defamatory statements by the defendants as part of scheme to manipulate and depress the market for our common stock. We are claiming compensatory and punitive damages totaling at least $11 million, not including claims for attorneys’ fees, and other equitable remedies, including disgorgement of any illicit trading profits received by the defendants in connection with the alleged market manipulation scheme. On August 29, 2011, we obtained a Court order allowing us to effect service of the summons and complaint upon defendant Alfred Little via email and related notice. We effected service on Alfred Little pursuant to that order and on September 29, 2011, Alfred Little filed motions to dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction and for permission to appear anonymously as a party in the litigation. In addition, on August 31, 2011, the Court granted defendant SeekingAlpha.com’s motion to dismiss our claim against it on the ground that a Federal statute, the Communications Decency Act, 47 U.S.C. § 230, precluded the claim against SeekingAlpha.com. On September 29, 2011, we filed a notice of appeal of this decision. If we decide to go through with the appeal, it must file a brief “perfecting” the appeal no later than June 29, 2012. On January 27, 2012, the Court denied in part Alfred Little’s motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction and permitted us to conduct discovery on the issue of personal jurisdiction after a confidentiality agreement was reached between the parties. The court also requested that Alfred Little submit to the Court evidence corroborating his allegations of potential risks of physical harm for in camera review. On February 17, 2012, the parties reached a confidentiality agreement. On February 23, 2012, after an in camera review of the evidence presented by Alfred Little, the Court permitted Alfred Little to proceed anonymously until the Court decides the jurisdictional issue and re-directed that the parties proceed with jurisdictional discovery pursuant to the previously ordered confidentiality agreement. We have commenced discovery on the jurisdictional issue.
On April 29, 2011, a purported securities class action lawsuit on behalf of the purchasers of our common stock between March 31, 2009, and March 21, 2011, James Rose v. Deer Consumer Products, Inc. et al, was filed against us and certain of our current and former officers and directors in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The court has not yet certified the class action status. The complaint alleges violations of Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 of the Exchange Act, as well as, in the case of the individual defendants, the Section 20(a) control person provisions of the Exchange Act. The factual assertions in the complaint, based expressly on the published statements at issue in the Alfred Little suit described above, consist primarily of allegations that the defendants made materially false or misleading public statements concerning our financial condition in 2010 and 2009. The complaint seeks unspecified damages and other relief relating to the purported inflation in the price of our common stock during the class period. A consolidated amended complaint was filed on September 6, 2011, with essentially the same allegations. We filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit, which motion is fully briefed and has been taken under submission by the Court. We strongly deny the allegations in the complaint. We believe this lawsuit is frivolous and without merit and will contest it vigorously. We plan to pursue all legal remedies available to us if the complaint is not withdrawn in its entirety.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
While our operations are in China and our functional currency is the Renminbi, a significant percentage of our sales are made in the export market and may be denominated in currencies other than Renminbi. In 2011, approximately 32% of our revenues were from the export market. Fluctuations in the exchange rate between the Renminbi and the U.S. dollar, Euro and other currencies could result in exchange losses and affect our sales and profitability as we may suffer financial losses when transferring money received outside of China into the country or paying vendors for services performed outside of China. Moreover, fluctuations in the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the Renminbi will affect our financial results reported in U.S. dollar terms without giving effect to any underlying change in our business, financial condition or results of operations. We currently do not engage in forward foreign exchange agreements or other hedging transactions in an effort to reduce our exposure to foreign currency exchange risk. Hedging transactions that we may enter into in the future may have limited effectiveness, and we may not be able to successfully hedge our exposure at all. In addition, our foreign currency exchange losses may be magnified by PRC exchange control regulations that restrict our ability to convert Renminbi into foreign currencies.
We are exposed to the price risk that the rising cost of commodities has on certain of our raw materials, including plastics, which are derived from petroleum, stainless steel and copper. We monitor the commodities markets for pricing trends and changes, but we do not engage in hedging transactions to protect against raw material fluctuations. Instead, we attempt to mitigate the short-term risks of price swings by purchasing raw materials in advance.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Our financial statements, together with the report thereon, appear in a separate section of this Annual Report beginning on page F-1.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.
36

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, respectively, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act as of the end of the period covered by this report. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of December 31, 2011, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of such date because of the material weakness identified in our internal control over financial reporting identified below. Notwithstanding this material weakness, our management has concluded that our consolidated financial statements for the periods covered by and included in this report are prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and fairly present, in all material respects, our financial position, results of operations and cash flows for each of the periods presented herein.
Report of Management on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act. Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:

· | pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company;

· | provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and

· | provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect all misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Therefore, internal control over financial reporting determined to be effective provides only reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparations of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
Our management carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in “Internal Control – Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based upon this evaluation, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of December 31, 2011.
Based on the COSO criteria, management identified control deficiencies that constituted a material weakness. A “material weakness” is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is more than a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Management identified the following material weakness:

a. | We lack technical accounting expertise among our financial staff regarding the requirements of U.S. GAAP and the PCAOB Accounting Standard No. 5 and COSO in the assessment of internal control over financial reporting.

37

Remediation of Technical Accounting Expertise and Requirements of Section 404 of Sarbanes-Oxley
We employ accountants in the United States to assist with the preparation of our financials in accordance with US GAAP and consultants in the PRC to comply with the requirements of the PCAOB Account Standard No. 5 and COSO in the assessment of internal control over financial reporting. Notwithstanding this common practice for U.S. public companies with substantially all of their operations in China, we concluded that in certain instances we did not maintain sufficient staff in the PRC with technical accounting expertise regarding these requirements. We plan to hire additional credentialed professional staff and consulting professionals with greater knowledge of US GAAP in our domestic operations and the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 to oversee our financial reporting process in order to ensure our compliance with US GAAP and the relevant securities laws. In addition, we plan to provide additional training to our accounting staff on US GAAP, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the requirements of the PCAOB, regarding the preparation of financial statements.
We believe the measures described above will facilitate remediation of the material weakness we have identified and will continue to strengthen our internal control over financial reporting. We are committed to continually improving our internal control processes and will diligently and vigorously review our financial reporting controls and procedures. As we continue to evaluate and work to improve our internal control over financial reporting, we may determine that additional measures are necessary to address control deficiencies.
Our independent registered public accounting firm, Goldman Kurland & Mohidin, LLP (“GKM”), who also audited our consolidated financial statements, independently audited our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011, as stated in their report, which is included elsewhere herein.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act) during the quarter ended December 31, 2011, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Item 9B. Other Information
None.
38

PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Our current executive officers and directors, certain significant employees, and their ages, positions and biographical information, are as follows:

Name |  | Position |  | Age
Ying He |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |  | 43
Zongshu Nie |  | Chief Financial Officer & Director |  | 33
Edward Hua |  | Director |  | 58
Arnold Staloff |  | Director |  | 67
Qi Hua Xu |  | Director |  | 49
Yongmei Wang |  | President |  | 36

Our executive officers are appointed by, and serve at the discretion of, our Board of Directors. Each executive officer is a full time employee. Our directors hold office for one-year terms or until their successors have been elected and qualified. There are no family relationships between any of our directors, executive officers or other key personnel and any other of our directors, executive officers or key personnel. There are no arrangements or understandings between any of our directors or executive officers and any other persons pursuant to which such director or executive officer was selected in that capacity.
Mr. Ying He, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Mr. He was appointed as our Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President on September 3, 2008, and, as of September 28, 2009, serves exclusively as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. He was one of the original founders of Winder in 2001, which is now our wholly owned subsidiary. From June 2006, Mr. He served as the Director of Winder. From July 2001 to August 2006, Mr. He served as the Chairman of Winder. Prior to that time, from August 1999 to June 2001, Mr. He worked independently to establish the initial business plan for Winder, including arrangements with future customers, suppliers, vendors and site determination. Prior to that time, from March 1996 to July 1999, Mr. He served as Chief Executive Officer of Dongguan Xin Dao Mould. From March 1993 to December 1995, Mr. He served as the Senior Manager of Hong Kong Dongjiang Group, Inc. Mr. He obtained his MBA from Zhongshan University in 2005. On September 28, 2009, Mr. He voluntarily resigned as our President. Mr. He was one of our original founders and has been a director and executive officer of the company for over nine years. He brings extensive knowledge of our operations and long-term strategy to the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors believes that Mr. He’s vision, leadership and extensive knowledge about us is essential to our future growth. His skills include operations, marketing, business strategy and product development.
Mr. Zongshu Nie, Chief Financial Officer and Director
Mr. Nie was appointed as our Chief Financial Officer on August 20, 2009. Mr. Nie has been one of our directors since April 29, 2009. From May 2008 to the present time, Mr. Nie has been our Financial Controller. From 1998 to May 2008, Mr. Nie was the Chief Financial Officer at Xian Tai Plastics Co., Ltd, a manufacturer and exporter of plastics-based materials. Mr. Nie received a bachelor’s degree in accounting from the ShaanXi College of Finance and Economics in 1998. Mr. Nie brings to the Board of Directors extensive knowledge of the operations and long-term strategy of both us and our industry, in addition to his financial and oversight experience, through his service as our Financial Controller and 10 years of experience as the Chief Financial Officer of Xian Tai Plastics Co., Ltd. His particular skills include financial analysis, industry analysis and operations.
Mr. Edward Hua, Director
Mr. Hua was appointed to our Board of Directors on April 29, 2009. Mr. Hua serves currently as the Chairman of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and member of our Audit Committee and Compensation Committee. Mr. Hua has held various management positions at the Bank of China from 1994 to the present time, and is currently the General Manager of the Treasury Department of the Boc Shenzhen Branch. Mr. Hua holds a master’s degree in World Economics from Fudan University and a Senior Economist Certificate from the Bank of China. Mr. Hua brings to the Board of Directors extensive operations and financial experience based on his 17 years of managerial experience with the Bank of China.
39

Mr. Arnold Staloff, Director
Mr. Staloff was appointed to our Board of Directors on April 29, 2009, and serves currently as the Chairman of our Audit Committee and member of our Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Mr. Staloff brings to the Board of Directors a long and successful business career, with extensive experience at both the management and board levels. Mr. Staloff has served as a director and the Chairman of the Audit Committee at NASDAQ-listed SmartHeat Inc., a plate heat exchange system manufacturer, since 2008, and NASDAQ-listed CleanTech Innovations, Inc., a manufacturer of structural towers for megawatt-class wind turbines, since 2010. From 2007 until his resignations in July 2010, Mr. Staloff served as a director and the Chairman of the Audit Committee at NASDAQ-listed Shiner International, Inc., a packaging and anti-counterfeit plastic film company, and NASDAQ-listed AgFeed Industries, Inc., a feed and commercial hog producer. Mr. Staloff served as a director for Lehman Brothers Derivative Products Inc. from 1994 until October 2008. From December 2005 to May 2007, Mr. Staloff served as Chairman of the Board of SFB Market Systems, Inc., a New Jersey-based company that provided technology solutions for the management and generation of options series data. From June 1990 to March 2003, Mr. Staloff served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Bloom Staloff Corporation, an equity and options market-making firm and foreign currency options floor broker. During 1989 and 1990, Mr. Staloff served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Commodity Exchange, Inc., or COMEX. Mr. Staloff started his professional career in 1968 at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Mr. Staloff has been credited with the introduction of Options on Foreign Currencies and the precursor to Spydrs. His skills include financial analysis and accounting expertise.
Mr. Qi Hua Xu, Director
Mr. Xu, PhD., was appointed to our Board of Directors on September 28, 2009. Mr. Xu serves currently as the Chairman of our Compensation Committee and member of our Audit Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Mr. Xu has had a distinguished professional and academic career, bringing to the Board of Directors extensive business and engineering experience. Mr. Xu has been a professor of Aerospace Automation at the China Northwestern Industrial University for over 20 years. Mr. Xu received a bachelor’s degree from China Northwestern Industrial University in Aerospace Automation in July 1980 and a doctorate of Aerospace Automation in July 1987. His skills include long-range planning and development, especially as applied to manufacturing automation and systems design.
Mrs. Yongmei Wang, President
Mrs. Wang was appointed as our President on May 26, 2010. Previously, Mrs. Wang served as our Corporate Secretary and Head of International Sales since September 3, 2008. Mrs. Wang joined Winder upon its inception in 2001 as Assistant General Secretary. Mrs. Wang obtained her bachelor’s degree in International Trade from Xian Foreign Language Institute in July 1995.
Legal Proceedings
During the past ten years, none of our directors or executive officers has been:

| · | the subject of any bankruptcy petition filed by or against any business of which such person was a general partner or executive officer either at the time of the bankruptcy or within two years prior to that time;

| · | convicted in a criminal proceeding or is subject to a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses);

| · | subject to any order, judgment or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting his involvement in any type of business, securities or banking activities;

| · | found by a court of competent jurisdiction (in a civil action), the SEC or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law, that has not been reversed, suspended, or vacated;

| · | subject of, or a party to, any order, judgment, decree or finding, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, relating to an alleged violation of a federal or state securities or commodities law or regulation, law or regulation respecting financial institutions or insurance companies, law or regulation prohibiting mail or wire fraud or fraud in connection with any business entity; or

| · | subject of, or a party to, any sanction or order, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any self-regulatory organization, any registered entity or any equivalent exchange, association, entity or organization that has disciplinary authority over its members or persons associated with a member.

None of our directors, officers or affiliates, or any beneficial owner of 5% or more of our common stock, or any associate of such persons, is an adverse party in any material proceeding to, or has a material interest adverse to, us or any of our subsidiaries.
40

Audit Committee and Audit Committee Financial Expert
We have established a separately-designated standing audit committee in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act. Our Audit Committee consists of Messrs. Hua, Staloff and Xu, each of whom is an independent director, as independence for audit committee members is defined in NASDAQ’s listing standards. The Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Staloff, Chairman of the Audit Committee, is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined under Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K. The purpose of the Audit Committee is to represent and assist our Board of Directors in its general oversight of our accounting and financial reporting processes, audits of the financial statements and internal control and audit functions. As more fully described in its charter, a copy of which is available on our website at www.deerinc.com, the functions of the Audit Committee include the following:

| · | appointment of independent auditors, determination of their compensation and oversight of their work;

| · | review the arrangements for and scope of the audit by independent auditors;

| · | review the independence of the independent auditors;

| · | consider the adequacy and effectiveness of the internal controls over financial reporting;

| · | pre-approve audit and non-audit services;

| · | establish procedures regarding complaints relating to accounting, internal accounting controls, or auditing matters;

| · | review and approve any related party transactions;

| · | discuss with management our major financial risk exposures and our risk assessment and risk management policies; and

| · | discuss with management and the independent auditors our draft quarterly interim and annual financial statements and key accounting and reporting matters.

Procedures for Shareholder Recommendations of Nominees to the Board of Directors
During 2011, there were no material changes to the procedures described in our proxy statement relating to the 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders by which shareholders may recommend nominees to our Board of Directors.
Code of Ethics
Our Board of Directors has adopted a Code of Conduct, which applies to all directors, officers and employees, that constitutes our “code of ethics” within the meaning of Section 406 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and our “code of conduct” within the meaning of the listing standards of NASDAQ. The purpose of the Code of Conduct is to promote honest and ethical conduct. The Code of Conduct is posted on our website located at www.deerinc.com and is available in print, without charge, upon written request to Corporate Secretary, Deer Consumer Products, Inc. at Area 2, 1/F, Building M-6, Central High-Tech Industrial Park, Nanshan, Shenzhen, China 518057. We intend to disclose any future amendments to our Code of Conduct, and any waivers of provisions of the Code of Conduct required to be disclosed under the rules of the SEC or listing standards of NASDAQ, on our website.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our executive officers and directors and persons who own more than 10% of our common stock to file reports regarding ownership of, and transactions in, our securities with the Commission and to provide us with copies of those filings. Based solely on our review of the copies received by us and on the written representations of certain reporting persons, we believe that all such reports were filed on a timely basis during 2011.
41

Item 11. Executive Compensation
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis describes the material elements of compensation paid to our named executive officers in 2011 as well as the objectives and material factors underlying our compensation policies and decisions for these executive officers.
The Compensation Committee, which we refer to in this discussion as the Committee, of our Board of Directors has responsibility for establishing, implementing and monitoring adherence with our compensation philosophy. The Committee ensures that the total compensation paid to our “named executive officers” is fair, reasonable and competitive. Our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer reviews and revises individual compensation, assists the Committee with its understanding of the employment market in the regions of the PRC in which we conduct operations and presents his recommendations to the Committee for its ultimate review and approval. Our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer is not involved in decisions relating to his own compensation.
The information in this discussion explains how the Committee made its compensation decisions for our named executive officers in 2011. For 2011, our named executive officers were: Ying He, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; and Zongshu Nie, Chief Financial Officer.
Oversight of Our Executive Compensation Program
The Committee oversees the compensation of our named executive officers and is composed of Messrs. Hua, Staloff and Xu, each an independent director as defined under the listing standards of NASDAQ. The Committee has adopted a charter, a copy of which is posted on our website at www.deerinc.com, which sets forth the responsibilities and powers of the Committee. The Committee is responsible for the design, review, recommendation and approval of compensation arrangements for our named executive officers and for the administration of our equity incentive plans, including the approval of grants under such plans to our named executive officers. The Committee also reviews the performance of our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer in light of our business goals and objectives and recommends the compensation of our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer for approval by all independent directors serving on the Board of Directors. The Committee also considered the results of our most recent shareholder advisory vote on executive compensation, held on September 22, 2011, in which our shareholders approved the fiscal year 2010 compensation awarded to our named executive officers. The Committee maintained the same compensation policies from 2010 in the 2011 fiscal year, and currently anticipates maintaining such policies in 2012, following the shareholder vote.
Objectives and Philosophy of Our Compensation Program
Our compensation program is designed to attract, motivate and retain key employees and to align the long-term interests of the named executive officers with those of our shareholders. The philosophy that the Committee uses to set executive compensation levels and structures is based on the following principles:

· | Retain and attract qualified executives – The compensation of our executives must be competitive with the organizations with which we compete for talent so that we may attract and retain talented and experienced executives.

· | Reward outstanding performance – A significant portion of our executives’ compensation should be subject to corporate performance measures and therefore be “at risk.” Performance-based compensation can vary widely from year to year depending on an executive’s performance and the economic tensions relating to our business.

· | Align compensation with our strategic business objectives – We believe that a component of our executives’ compensation should be related to the degree to which we meet or exceed both our short and long-term strategic business objectives.

· | Align the interests of our executives with those of our stockholders – Equity-based awards can be an effective means of aligning an executive’s financial interests with those of our stockholders by providing value to the executive only if the market price of our stock increases.

In addition, we believe that compensation programs for our named executive officers should be tailored appropriately to encourage employees to grow our business, but not encourage them to do so in a way that poses unnecessary or excessive material risk to us.
42

The Role of Our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer in Determining Executive Compensation
The Committee, working with our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, evaluates and approves the compensation regarding our Chief Financial Officer, who reports directly to our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, who supervises his day-to-day performance. Accordingly, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer establishes the criteria and any targets used to determine bonuses, including the Chief Financial Officer’s individual performance and company-based performance factors, and makes recommendations to the Committee regarding his salary, bonus and equity awards. Our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer is not involved in decisions relating to his own compensation.
Compensation Consultant
The Committee has the exclusive authority to hire compensation, accounting, legal or other advisors. In connection with any such hiring, the Committee can determine the scope of the consultant’s assignments and their fees. The scope of a consultant’s services may include providing the Committee with data regarding compensation trends, assisting the Committee in the preparation of market surveys or tally sheets or otherwise helping it evaluate compensation decisions. The Committee did not retain an outside compensation consultant in 2011.
Components of Compensation
The principal components of compensation and employment arrangements during 2011 included:

· | Base salary;

· | and other personal benefits.

These components were selected because the Committee believes that a combination of salary and benefits is necessary to help us attract and retain the executive talent upon which our success depends. We have no pre-established policy or target for the allocation between either cash and non-cash or short and long-term incentive compensation. Rather, the Committee reviews our performance and that of each executive and determines the appropriate level and mix of compensation elements.
Base Salary
We use base salary to compensate our named executive officers fairly and competitively based upon the particular executive’s experience and historical performance and on a number of other factors, including: informal data regarding salaries for comparable positions at other companies; geographic location and cost of living; the scope of the executive’s responsibilities and the size and importance of the executive’s business unit; and considerations of internal pay parity. This is the most stable component of our compensation program, as this amount is not at risk. The salaries of our named executive officers were originally determined in the course of negotiations over their labor contracts and based, in part, on their beneficial ownership of our common stock. Through 2011, Mr. He has not had an increase in his base salary (as denominated in U.S. dollars) since 2007. Because the base salary compensation of our named executive officers are governed by labor contracts, the Committee’s decisions regarding the compensation of our named executive officers, other than any discretionary compensation and equity awards, are limited by the terms of such labor contracts. In 2011, we did not award any cash bonuses to our named executive officers.
Long-term Equity Awards
We believe that equity awards provide a strong alignment between the interests of our named executive officers and our shareholders. The equity compensation component allows the Committee to promote the retention of our named executive officers and provide an incentive for our named executive officers to balance their focus on short and long-term strategic goals appropriately. Our long-term equity awards consist principally of grants of options to purchase our common stock made pursuant to our 2009 Equity Incentive Plan as approved by our shareholders. Typically, an executive is granted options upon beginning employment and remains eligible for periodic grants thereafter. When making its equity award decisions, the Committee determines the size of each grant after receiving advice from our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and after taking into account a number of factors, including the grantee’s current beneficial ownership of our common stock. To ensure that any grants made provide for retention and both short and long-term incentives, a typical grant vests over a period of at least two years in equal annual increments, subject to the continued employment of the executive. Stock options are granted with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of shares of our common stock on the grant date. The exercise price is based on the closing price per share of our common stock as reported on the NASDAQ on the grant date. For holders of greater than 10% of our common stock outstanding, the exercise price for any stock option grant will be 110% of the closing price of our common stock on the grant date. We do not intend to grant options while in possession of material non-public information, except on the date of hire to newly hired executive officers. The Committee made no grants of equity awards in 2011.
The Committee believes that Messrs. He and Nie each currently own or hold a sufficient amount of our common stock to provide appropriate long-term incentives. As of December 31, 2011, Mr. He beneficially owned 25.45% of our common stock outstanding, which makes him our largest beneficial owner. As of December 31, 2011, Mr. Nie beneficially owned 4.67% of our common stock outstanding. The Committee believes that the significant beneficial ownership of Messrs. He and Nie encourages a long-term focus on our sustainable performance and aligns their interests with those of our shareholders.
43

Other Personal Benefits
The labor contracts entered into by each of our named executive officers provide for social insurance as required by state and provincial regulations, including pension, unemployment, basic medical and workplace injury insurance. We do not maintain health and welfare plans for our named executive officers other than those generally available to all of our salaried employees pursuant to their labor contracts. Certain executives, including our named executive officers, receive additional benefits, including reimbursement of business-related expenses.
The labor contracts entered into by each of our named executive officers specify the conditions under which the contracts may be terminated and set forth minimum severance payments pursuant to the relevant PRC employment contract laws, which generally equal one month’s salary for each year of employment in cases where termination is initiated other than for “cause.” We do not have any other existing arrangements providing for payments or benefits in connection with the resignation, severance, retirement or other termination of any of our named executive officers, or a change in control of the company or a change in the named executive officer’s responsibilities following a change in control.
Tax and Accounting Considerations
We account for stock-based compensation in accordance with the requirements of ASC 718. We also take into consideration ASC 718 and other generally accepted accounting principles in determining changes to policies and practices for our stock-based compensation.
Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m) generally disallows a tax deduction to reporting companies for compensation over $1,000,000 paid to each of the company’s chief executive officer and the four other most highly compensated officers, except for compensation that is “performance-based.” Non-performance-based compensation paid to our named executive officers during 2011 did not exceed the $1.0 million limit per officer, and we do not expect the non-performance-based compensation to be paid to our named executive officers during 2011 to exceed that limit. Because it is unlikely that the cash compensation payable to any of our named executive officers in the foreseeable future will approach the $1.0 million limit, we do not expect to take any action to limit or restructure the elements of cash compensation payable to our named executive officers so as to qualify that compensation as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m). We will reconsider this decision should the individual cash compensation of any named executive officer ever approach the $1.0 million level.
Risks Associated with Our Compensation Policies and Practices
We believe that our compensation policies and practices for all employees, including our named executive officers, do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on us.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
During the year ended December 31, 2011, Messrs. Hua, Staloff and Xu served as members of our Compensation Committee. None of these individuals has ever served as an officer or employee of the company or any of our subsidiaries. None of our executive officers has served as a director or member of the compensation committee of another entity at which an executive officer of such entity is also a director of our company.
Compensation Committee Report
The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors has reviewed and discussed with management the foregoing Compensation Discussion and Analysis and, based on such review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Annual Report.
Respectfully submitted,
THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
Qi Hua Xu, Chairman
Edward Hua
Arnold Staloff
44

Executive Compensation
The following table sets forth information concerning the compensation for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, of each of our named executive officers.

Summary Compensation Table |
Name and Principal Position |  | Year |  | Salary |  |  | Bonus |  |  | Stock Awards |  |  | Option Awards |  |  | Nonequity Incentive Plan Compensation |  |  | Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings |  |  | All Other Compensation |  |  | Total |
|  |  |  | ($) |  |  | ($) |  |  | ($) |  |  | ($) |  |  | ($) |  |  | ($) |  |  | ($) |  |  | ($) |
Ying He |  | 2011 |  |  | 24,660 |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  | 24,660 |
Chairman and Chief |  | 2010 |  |  | 24,660 |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  | 24,660 |
Executive Officer |  | 2009 |  |  | 24,660 |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  | 24,660 |
Zongshu Nie (1) |  | 2011 |  |  | 22,800 |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  | 22,800 |
Chief Financial Officer |  | 2010 |  |  | 22,800 |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  | 22,800 |
|  | 2009 |  |  | 22,800 |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  | 22,800 |

(1) | Mr. Nie was appointed our Chief Financial Officer on August 20, 2009. Mr. Nie has served on our Board of Directors since April 29, 2009.

Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table
Grants of Plan-Based Awards
We made no grants of plan-based awards to any of our executive officers during 2011.
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End for 2011
There were no outstanding equity awards held by any of our named executive officers at December 31, 2011.
Employment Agreements
Neither we nor our subsidiaries currently have employment agreements with their respective officers. We have entered into labor contracts that are standard for China domestic companies with Ying He, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and Zongshu Nie, our Chief Financial Officer, which contain provisions prohibiting competition by Messrs. He and Nie following their employment with us. Mr. He’s labor contract expires March 2, 2013, and Mr. Nie’s labor contract expires April 30, 2012.
Change-In-Control and Separation Agreements
The standard labor contracts we entered into with Messrs. He and Nie specify the conditions under which the contracts may be terminated and set forth minimum severance payments pursuant to the relevant PRC employment contract laws, which generally equal one month’s salary for each year of employment in cases where termination is initiated other than for “cause.”
We do not have any other existing arrangements providing for payments or benefits in connection with the resignation, severance, retirement or other termination of any of our named executive officers, or a change in control of the company or a change in the named executive officer’s responsibilities following a change in control.
Equity Incentive Plans
On November 6, 2009, our shareholders approved our 2009 Equity Incentive Plan authorizing the issuance of up to 500,000 shares of our common stock. We can grant awards under the Plan to our officers, directors and employees pursuant to the guidelines set forth in the Plan. We made no grants of options to our named executive officers under the Plan during 2011.
45

Option Exercises and Stock Vested
There were no options exercised by or stock awards vesting to any of our named executive officers during 2011.
Pension Benefits
We currently do not have any defined pension plan for our named executive officers. Pursuant to their labor contracts, we shall provide to such officers all the necessary insurances and social welfares, including but not limited to medical, work injury, maternity, retirement and unemployment insurance and housing fund, according to our policies and the relevant laws and regulations of local governmental authorities and the PRC.
Nonqualified Defined Contribution and Other Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans
We currently do not have nonqualified defined contribution or other plans that provides for the deferral of compensation for our named executive officers nor do we currently intend to establish any such plan.
Compensation of Directors
The following table sets forth information concerning the compensation of our directors for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Director Compensation Table for 2011 |
|  | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash |  |  | Stock Awards |  |  | Option Awards |  |  | Total |
Name and principal position |  | ($) |  |  | ($) |  |  | ($) |  |  | ($) |
Ying He, Chairman |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |
Zongshu Nie |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |
Edward Hua |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |
Arnold Staloff |  |  | 50,000 |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 50,000 |
Qi Hua Xu |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |

Narrative Disclosure to Director Compensation Table
We do not compensate our non-independent directors, such as Messrs. He and Nie, for serving as our directors, although they are entitled to reimbursements for reasonable expenses incurred in connection with attending our board meetings.
Mr. Staloff receives compensation of $50,000 per annum, payable in quarterly installments. Messrs. Hua, Staloff and Xu, as independent directors, are eligible to receive grants of options to purchase our common stock under the 2009 Equity Incentive Plan.
We do not maintain medical, dental or retirement benefits plans for our directors.
46

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
The following sets forth information as of March 28, 2012, regarding the number of shares of our common stock beneficially owned by (i) each person that we know beneficially owns more than 5% of our outstanding common stock, (ii) each of our named executive officers, (iii) each of our directors and (iv) all of our named executive officers and directors as a group. The amounts and percentages of our common stock beneficially owned are reported on the basis of SEC rules governing the determination of beneficial ownership of securities. Under the SEC rules, a person is deemed to be a “beneficial owner” of a security if that person has or shares “voting power,” which includes the power to vote or to direct the voting of such security, or “investment power,” which includes the power to dispose of or to direct the disposition of such security. A person is also deemed to be a beneficial owner of any securities of which that person has the right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days through the exercise of any stock option, warrant or other right. Under these rules, more than one person may be deemed a beneficial owner of the same securities and a person may be deemed to be a beneficial owner of securities as to which such person has no economic interest. Unless otherwise indicated, each of the shareholders named in the table below, or his or her family members, has sole voting and investment power with respect to such shares of our common stock. As of March 28, 2012, there were 33,592,562 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding.
Except as otherwise indicated, the address of each of the shareholders listed below is: c/o Deer Consumer Products, Inc. Area 2, 1/F, Building M-6, Central High-Tech Industrial Park, Nanshan, Shenzhen, China 518057.

Name of beneficial owner |  | Number of shares |  | Percent of class
5% Shareholders |  |  |  |  |
Wei Tian Yi Kinwick Centre, 32 Hollywood Road Central, Hong Kong |  | 2,117,243 | (1) | 6.30 | %
Sino Unity Limited(2) |  | 1,687,284 |  | 5.02 | %
Directors and Named Executive Officers |  |  |  |  |
Ying He, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer(3) |  | 8,550,980 |  | 25.45 | %
Zongshu Nie, Chief Financial Officer(4) |  | 1,569,566 |  | 4.67 | %
Arnold Staloff, Director |  | 50,000 | (5) | * | %
All Directors and Named Executive Officers as a Group (5 Persons) |  | 9,870,546 |  | 30.12 | %

(1) | Disclosed on the Schedule 13D for Wei Tian Yi filed on September 20, 2010.

(2) | Sino Unity Limited is 100% owned by YuHai Deng, our Manager of Purchasing.

(3) | Ying He holds his shares through Achieve On Limited, which is 100% owned by him.

(4) | Zongshu Nie holds his shares through True Olympic Limited, which is 100% owned by him.

(5) | Consists of options to purchase 50,000 shares of our common stock that are immediately exercisable.

* Represents less than 1% of shares outstanding.
We are not aware of any arrangements that could result in a change in control of the company.
The disclosure of securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans required by Item 201(d) of Regulation S-K is set forth in Item 5 herein.
47

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
There were no transactions with any related persons (as that term is defined in Item 404 in Regulation S-K) during 2011, or any currently proposed transaction, in which we were or are to be a participant and the amount involved was in excess of $120,000 and in which any related person had a direct or indirect material interest.
Our written policy for related party transactions provides that we will enter into or ratify a transaction with a related party only when our Board of Directors, acting through the Audit Committee, determines that the transaction is in the best interests of the company and our shareholders. The policy requires the review and approval by our Audit Committee for any transaction in which (i) the aggregate amount involved will or may be expected to exceed $120,000 in any fiscal year, (ii) we are a participant and (iii) any related person has or will have a direct or indirect interest. Related persons include our executive officers, directors, director nominees, persons known to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our outstanding common stock or immediate family members of any of the foregoing persons. In determining whether to approve or ratify a transaction with a related party, the Audit Committee will take into account, among other relevant factors, whether the transaction is on terms no less favorable than terms generally available to an unaffiliated third party under the same or similar circumstances. If advance approval of a transaction is not feasible, the Audit Committee may approve and ratify the transaction in accordance with the policy. Any member of the Audit Committee who is a related party with respect to a transaction under review may not participate in the deliberations or vote on the approval of the transaction.
Director Independence
Subject to certain exceptions, under the listing standards of NASDAQ, a listed company’s board of directors must consist of a majority of independent directors. Currently, our Board of Directors has determined that each of Messrs. Hua, Staloff and Xu are independent directors for purposes of the NASDAQ listed company standards currently in effect and all applicable rules and regulations of the SEC. We have established the following standing committees of the Board of Directors: Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. All members of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee satisfy the “independence” standards applicable to members of each such committee. The Board of Directors made this affirmative determination regarding these directors’ independence based on discussions with the directors and on its review of the directors’ responses to a standard questionnaire regarding employment and compensation history; affiliations, family and other relationships; and transactions between us and the directors, if any. The Board of Directors considered relationships and transactions between each director, or any member of his or her immediate family, and our company, our subsidiaries and our affiliates. The purpose of the Board of Director’s review with respect to each director was to determine whether any such relationships or transactions were inconsistent with a determination that the director is independent under NASDAQ rules.
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services
Our Audit Committee selected GKM as the independent registered certified public accounting firm to audit the books and accounts of our company and our subsidiaries for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2011. GKM has served as our independent accountant since September 3, 2008. The following table presents the aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by GKM for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010.

|  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |
Audit fees |  | $ | 244,750 |  |  | $ | 217,500 |
Audit-related fees |  |  | 0 |  |  |  | 2,500 |
Tax fees |  |  | 0 |  |  |  | 0 |
All other fees |  |  | 0 |  |  |  | 0 |

In the above table, “audit fees” are fees billed for services provided related to the audit of our annual financial statements, quarterly reviews of our interim financial statements and services normally provided by the independent accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for those fiscal periods. “Audit-related fees” are fees not included in audit fees that are billed by the independent accountant for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements. “Tax fees” are fees billed by the independent accountant for professional services rendered for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning. “All other fees” are fees billed by the independent accountant for products and services not included in the foregoing categories.
Audit Committee’s Pre-Approval Policy
The Audit Committee pre-approves all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by the independent accountants. These services may include audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other services. The Audit Committee has adopted a written policy for the pre-approval of services provided by the independent accountants, under which policy the Audit Committee generally pre-approves services for up to one year and any pre-approval is detailed as to the particular service or category of services and is subject to a specific budget. In addition, the Audit Committee may also pre-approve particular services on a case-by-case basis. For each proposed service, the independent accountant is required to provide detailed back-up documentation at the time of approval. The Audit Committee may delegate pre-approval authority to one or more of its members. Such a member must report any decisions to the Audit Committee at the next scheduled meeting.
48

PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
The following documents are filed as part of or are included in this Annual Report:

1. | Financial statements listed in the Index to Financial Statements, filed as part of this Annual Report beginning on page F-1; and

2. | Exhibits listed in the Exhibit Index filed as part of this Annual Report.

49

Deer Consumer Products, Inc and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
Index to Financial Statements

| Page
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | F-2
Financial Statements |
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 | F-3
Consolidated Statements of Income and Other Comprehensive Income years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 | F-4
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 | F-5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 | F-6
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | F-7

F-1

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Deer Consumer Products, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Deer Consumer Products, Inc. (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the related consolidated statements of income and other comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule listed in Note 18 to the financial statements presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. We also have audited Deer Consumer Products, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Deer Consumer Products, Inc.‘s management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards required that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding on internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Company's annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. The following material weaknesses were identified:

· | Lack of technical accounting expertise among financial staff regarding (a) US GAAP (b) requirements of the PCAOB Auditing Standard No 5 and COSO in the assessment of internal control over financial reporting.

The material weaknesses were considered in determining the nature, timing, and extent of audit tests applied in our audit of the 2011 consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the year ended December 31, 2011.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Deer Consumer Products, Inc. as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the consolidated results of its operations and its consolidated cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Also in our opinion, the effect of the aforementioned material weaknesses on the achievement of the objectives of the internal control criteria, Deer Consumer Products, Inc., did not maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011 based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Our opinion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting does not affect our opinion on the consolidated financial statements.
Goldman Kurland Mohidin LLP
Encino, California
March 28, 2012
F-2

DEER CONSUMER PRODUCTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
DECEMBER 31, 2011 AND 2010

|  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |
ASSETS |  |  |  |  |  |
CURRENT ASSETS |  |  |  |  |  |
Cash & equivalents |  | $ | 13,961,434 |  |  | $ | 33,956,591 |
Restricted cash |  |  | 127,235 |  |  |  | 1,347,385 |
Accounts receivable |  |  | 20,553,235 |  |  |  | 52,686,494 |
Deposits |  |  | 1,153,019 |  |  |  | - |
Advances to suppliers |  |  | 2,920,746 |  |  |  | 3,018,531 |
Other receivables |  |  | 287,824 |  |  |  | 125,580 |
VAT receivable |  |  | 8,562,076 |  |  |  | 2,839,718 |
Prepaid expense |  |  | 952,902 |  |  |  | 159,583 |
Inventories |  |  | 61,017,231 |  |  |  | 23,015,850 |
Total current assets |  |  | 109,535,702 |  |  |  | 117,149,732 |
NON-CURRENT ASSETS |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Advance for equipment purchase |  |  | 844,964 |  |  |  | - |
Deposit for land use right |  |  | 847,646 |  |  |  | 4,619,405 |
Property and equipment, net |  |  | 36,137,609 |  |  |  | 20,453,404 |
Construction in progress |  |  | 21,141,715 |  |  |  | 8,913,181 |
Intangible assets, net |  |  | 35,895,528 |  |  |  | 37,502,010 |
Other assets |  |  | - |  |  |  | 4,570 |
Total noncurrent assets |  |  | 94,867,462 |  |  |  | 71,492,570 |
TOTAL ASSETS |  | $ | 204,403,164 |  |  | $ | 188,642,302 |
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
CURRENT LIABILITIES |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Accounts payable |  | $ | 7,977,167 |  |  | $ | 26,247,453 |
Advance from customers |  |  | 1,056,442 |  |  |  | 1,759,792 |
Income tax payable |  |  | 4,864,267 |  |  |  | 5,536,646 |
Other payables and accrued expenses |  |  | 2,753,617 |  |  |  | 3,001,716 |
Dividend payable |  |  | 1,679,628 |  |  |  | - |
Notes payable |  |  | 692,821 |  |  |  | 8,361,698 |
Total current liabilities |  |  | 19,023,942 |  |  |  | 44,907,305 |
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Common Stock, $0.001 par value; 75,000,000 shares authorized; 33,592,562 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively |  |  | 33,593 |  |  |  | 33,593 |
Paid-in capital |  |  | 91,187,584 |  |  |  | 91,084,958 |
Statutory reserve |  |  | 9,157,606 |  |  |  | 6,127,639 |
Development fund |  |  | 4,578,803 |  |  |  | 3,063,819 |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |  |  | 14,769,957 |  |  |  | 6,315,475 |
Retained earnings |  |  | 65,651,679 |  |  |  | 37,109,513 |
Total stockholders' equity |  |  | 185,379,222 |  |  |  | 143,734,997 |
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |  | $ | 204,403,164 |  |  | $ | 188,642,302 |

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-3

DEER CONSUMER PRODUCTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

|  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |  |  | 2009 |
Revenue |  | $ | 226,748,885 |  |  | $ | 175,846,887 |  |  | $ | 81,342,680 |
Cost of revenue |  |  | 157,538,033 |  |  |  | 125,274,479 |  |  |  | 61,176,610 |
Gross profit |  |  | 69,210,852 |  |  |  | 50,572,408 |  |  |  | 20,166,070 |
Operating expenses |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Selling |  |  | 16,281,137 |  |  |  | 9,161,068 |  |  |  | 3,555,547 |
General and administrative |  |  | 4,701,235 |  |  |  | 4,563,188 |  |  |  | 2,380,861 |
Total operating expenses |  |  | 20,982,372 |  |  |  | 13,724,256 |  |  |  | 5,936,408 |
Income from operations |  |  | 48,228,480 |  |  |  | 36,848,152 |  |  |  | 14,229,662 |
Non-operating income (expenses) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Interest income |  |  | 243,876 |  |  |  | 484,527 |  |  |  | 94,986 |
Interest expense |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | (122,299 | )
Financial expense |  |  | (103,017 | ) |  |  | (148,772 | ) |  |  | (223,607 | )
Exchange gain (loss) |  |  | (518,843 | ) |  |  | (1,253,707 | ) |  |  | 138,284 |
Other income, net |  |  | 20,825 |  |  |  | 69,030 |  |  |  | 38,084 |
Subsidy income |  |  | 1,080,448 |  |  |  | 54,134 |  |  |  | 326,334 |
Other expenses |  |  | (32,704 | ) |  |  | (55,901 | ) |  |  | - |
Total non-operating income (expenses), net |  |  | 690,585 |  |  |  | (850,689 | ) |  |  | 251,782 |
Income before income tax |  |  | 48,919,065 |  |  |  | 35,997,463 |  |  |  | 14,481,444 |
Income tax expense |  |  | 9,113,436 |  |  |  | 5,648,426 |  |  |  | 2,112,382 |
Net income |  |  | 39,805,629 |  |  |  | 30,349,037 |  |  |  | 12,369,062 |
Other comprehensive item |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Foreign currency translation |  |  | 8,454,482 |  |  |  | 3,980,259 |  |  |  | (10,482 | )
Comprehensive Income |  | $ | 48,260,111 |  |  | $ | 34,329,296 |  |  | $ | 12,358,580 |
Basic weighted average shares outstanding |  |  | 33,592,562 |  |  |  | 33,210,969 |  |  |  | 22,782,200 |
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding |  |  | 33,592,562 |  |  |  | 33,651,767 |  |  |  | 23,190,286 |
Basic earnings per share |  | $ | 1.18 |  |  | $ | 0.91 |  |  | $ | 0.54 |
Diluted earnings per share |  | $ | 1.18 |  |  | $ | 0.90 |  |  | $ | 0.53 |

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-4

DEER CONSUMER PRODUCTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

|  | Common stock |  |  | Paid-in |  |  | Statutory |  |  | Development |  |  | Accumulated other comprehensive |  |  | Retained |  |  |  |
|  | Shares |  |  | Amount |  |  | capital |  |  | reserves |  |  | fund |  |  | income (loss) |  |  | earnings |  |  | Total |
Balance at January 1, 2009 |  |  | 19,652,226 |  |  | $ | 19,652 |  |  | $ | 9,329,371 |  |  | $ | 1,085,403 |  |  | $ | 542,701 |  |  | $ | 2,345,698 |  |  | $ | 1,954,768 |  |  | $ | 15,277,593 |
Sale of common stock |  |  | 12,810,890 |  |  |  | 12,811 |  |  |  | 93,565,189 |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 93,578,000 |
Offering costs |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | (12,407,007 | ) |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | (12,407,007 | )
Exercise of warrants |  |  | 168,632 |  |  |  | 169 |  |  |  | 290,721 |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 290,890 |
Stock-based compensation |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 333,387 |  |  |  | - |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 333,387 |
Net income |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 12,369,062 |  |  |  | 12,369,062 |
Transfer to statutory reserve and development fund |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 1,286,315 |  |  |  | 643,158 |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | (1,929,473 | ) |  |  | - |
Foreign currency translation loss |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | (10,482 | ) |  |  | - |  |  |  | (10,482 | )
Balance at December 31, 2009 |  |  | 32,631,748 |  |  |  | 32,632 |  |  |  | 91,111,661 |  |  |  | 2,371,718 |  |  |  | 1,185,859 |  |  |  | 2,335,216 |  |  |  | 12,394,357 |  |  |  | 109,431,443 |
Exercise of warrants |  |  | 1,759,114 |  |  |  | 1,759 |  |  |  | 6,962,751 |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 6,964,510 |
Net income |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 30,349,037 |  |  |  | 30,349,037 |
Offering costs paid |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | (320,000 | ) |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | (320,000 | )
Purchase of treasury stock |  |  | (798,300 | ) |  |  | (798 | ) |  |  | (6,945,152 | ) |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | (6,945,950 | )
Stock-based compensation |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 275,698 |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 275,698 |
Transfer to statutory reserve and development fund |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 3,755,921 |  |  |  | 1,877,960 |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | (5,633,881 | ) |  |  | - |
Foreign currency translation gain |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 3,980,259 |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 3,980,259 |
Balance at December 31, 2010 |  |  | 33,592,562 |  |  |  | 33,593 |  |  |  | 91,084,958 |  |  |  | 6,127,639 |  |  |  | 3,063,819 |  |  |  | 6,315,475 |  |  |  | 37,109,513 |  |  |  | 143,734,997 |
Net income |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 39,805,629 |  |  |  | 39,805,629 |
Transfer to statutory reserve and development fund |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 3,029,967 |  |  |  | 1,514,984 |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | (4,544,951 | ) |  |  | - |
Stock-based compensation |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 102,626 |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 102,626 |
Dividend declared |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | (6,718,512 | ) |  |  | (6,718,512 | )
Foreign currency translation gain |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 8,454,482 |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 8,454,482 |
Balance at December 31, 2011 |  |  | 33,592,562 |  |  | $ | 33,593 |  |  | $ | 91,187,584 |  |  | $ | 9,157,606 |  |  | $ | 4,578,803 |  |  | $ | 14,769,957 |  |  | $ | 65,651,679 |  |  | $ | 185,379,222 |

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-5

DEER CONSUMER PRODUCTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011 2010 AND 2009

|  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |  |  | 2009 |
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Net income |  | $ | 39,805,629 |  |  | $ | 30,349,037 |  |  | $ | 12,369,062 |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Depreciation and amortization |  |  | 2,965,616 |  |  |  | 1,640,882 |  |  |  | 1,449,186 |
Provision for inventory losses |  |  | 154,257 |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |
Stock-based compensation |  |  | 102,626 |  |  |  | 275,698 |  |  |  | 333,387 |
(Increase) decrease in current assets: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Accounts receivable |  |  | 35,182,509 |  |  |  | (34,354,325 | ) |  |  | (8,512,633 | )
Advances to suppliers |  |  | 1,072,711 |  |  |  | 887,765 |  |  |  | - |
Other receivables, prepayments, and deposits |  |  | (566,181 | ) |  |  | (491,041 | ) |  |  | (5,019 | )
Due from stockholder |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 331,064 |
Due from related party |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 1,715,320 |
Tax rebate receivable |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 283,706 |
Inventories |  |  | (36,079,878 | ) |  |  | (4,329,707 | ) |  |  | (10,374,062 | )
Increase (decrease) in current liabilities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Accounts payable |  |  | (19,131,367 | ) |  |  | 12,532,257 |  |  |  | 4,084,515 |
Advance from customers |  |  | (773,834 | ) |  |  | (10,106 | ) |  |  | (1,585,231 | )
Taxes payable |  |  | (8,220,308 | ) |  |  | 1,777,120 |  |  |  | (670,218 | )
Notes payable |  |  | (7,898,004 | ) |  |  | 1,924,203 |  |  |  | - |
Due to related party |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | (274,636 | )
Other payables and accrued expenses |  |  | (649,823 | ) |  |  | 858,495 |  |  |  | 1,221,679 |
Increase in noncurrent assets: |  |  | 4,687 |  |  |  | 15,741 |  |  |  | 18,100 |
Net cash provided by operating activities |  |  | 5,968,640 |  |  |  | 11,076,019 |  |  |  | 384,221 |
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Change in restricted cash |  |  | 1,257,452 |  |  |  | (1,282,217 | ) |  |  | 164,297 |
Acquisition of property & equipment |  |  | (10,444,879 | ) |  |  | (10,095,861 | ) |  |  | (1,474,527 | )
Acquisition of intangible asset |  |  | (4,325,011 | ) |  |  | (36,441,355 | ) |  |  | - |
Refund of deposit on land use right |  |  | 10,513,006 |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |
Deposit for land use right |  |  | (826,923 | ) |  |  | (4,601,917 | ) |  |  | - |
Advance for equipment purchase |  |  | (824,307 | ) |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |
Sale of short-term investments |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 29,322 |
Construction in progress |  |  | (17,587,593 | ) |  |  | (4,969,627 | ) |  |  | (2,829,702 | )
Net cash used in investing activities |  |  | (22,238,255 | ) |  |  | (57,390,977 | ) |  |  | (4,110,610 | )
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Proceeds from issuance of notes payable |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 3,055,687 |
Proceeds from sale of common stock |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 93,578,000 |
Dividends paid |  |  | (5,038,884 | ) |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |
Offering costs paid |  |  | - |  |  |  | (320,000 | ) |  |  | (12,407,007 | )
Proceeds from exercise of warrants |  |  | - |  |  |  | 6,964,510 |  |  |  | 290,890 |
Purchase of treasury stock |  |  | - |  |  |  | (6,945,950 | ) |  |  | - |
Payment on short-term loans |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | (3,550,661 | )
Payment on long-term loans |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | (733,050 | )
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |  |  | (5,038,884 | ) |  |  | (301,440 | ) |  |  | 80,233,859 |
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGE ON CASH & EQUIVALENTS |  |  | 1,313,342 |  |  |  | 1,239,260 |  |  |  | 44,233 |
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH & EQUIVALENTS |  |  | (19,995,157 | ) |  |  | (45,377,138 | ) |  |  | 76,551,703 |
CASH & EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF YEAR |  |  | 33,956,591 |  |  |  | 79,333,729 |  |  |  | 2,782,026 |
CASH & EQUIVALENTS, END OF YEAR |  | $ | 13,961,434 |  |  | $ | 33,956,591 |  |  | $ | 79,333,729 |
Supplemental Cash flow data: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Income tax paid |  | $ | 10,846,615 |  |  | $ | 3,620,873 |  |  | $ | 567,226 |
Interest paid |  | $ | - |  |  | $ | - |  |  | $ | 119,996 |
Supplemental Disclosure of Non-Cash Financing Activities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Transfer from construction in progress to fixed assets |  | $ | 6,102,099 |  |  | $ | - |  |  | $ | - |

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-6

DEER CONSUMER PRODUCTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2011 AND 2010
Note 1 – Organization and Basis of Presentation
Organization and Line of Business
Deer Consumer Products, Inc., formerly known as Tag Events Corp., (hereinafter referred to as the “Company” or “Deer”) was incorporated in the State of Nevada on July 18, 2006.
On September 3, 2008, the Company entered into a share exchange agreement and plan of reorganization with Deer International Group Ltd. (“Deer International”), a corporation organized under the laws of the British Virgin Islands on December 3, 2007, and acquired 100% of the shares of Winder Electric Group Ltd. (“Winder”) on March 11, 2008. Winder has a 100% owned subsidiary, Delta International Limited (“Delta”). Winder and Delta were formed and incorporated in the Guangdong Province of the People Republic of China (“PRC”) on July 20, 2001, and February 23, 2006, respectively.
Pursuant to the share exchange agreement, the Company acquired from Deer International 50,000 ordinary shares, consisting of all of its issued and outstanding capital stock, for 15,695,706 shares of the Company’s common stock. Concurrently with the closing of the transactions contemplated by the share exchange agreement and as a condition thereof, the Company entered into an agreement with Crescent Liu, its former Director and Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to which he returned 5,173,914 shares of the Company’s common stock to the Company for cancellation. Mr. Liu was not compensated for the cancellation of his shares of the Company’s common stock. Upon completion of the foregoing transactions, the Company had 19,652,226 shares of common stock issued and outstanding. In connection with the above transaction, the Company changed its name to Deer Consumer Products, Inc. on September 3, 2008.
The exchange of shares with Deer International was recorded as a reverse acquisition under the purchase method of accounting because Deer International obtained control of the Company. Accordingly, the merger of Deer International into the Company was recorded as a recapitalization of Deer International, with Deer International being treated as the continuing entity. The historical financial statements presented are the consolidated financial statements of Deer International. The share exchange agreement was treated as a recapitalization and not as a business combination; therefore, no pro forma information is disclosed. At the date of this transaction, the net liabilities of the legal acquirer were $0.
The Company is engaged in the manufacture, marketing, distribution and sale of small home and kitchen electric appliances (blenders, food processors, choppers, juicers, etc.). The Company manufactures its products in YangJiang, China and has corporate functions in Nanshan, Shenzhen, China.
Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Areas that require estimates and assumptions include valuation of accounts receivable and inventory, determination of useful lives of property and equipment, estimation of certain liabilities and sales returns.
Cash and Equivalents
Cash and equivalents include cash in hand and cash in time deposits, certificates of deposit and all highly liquid debt instruments with original maturities of three months or less.
Restricted Cash
Restricted cash consists of monies restricted by the Company’s lender and monies restricted under letters of credit and bank acceptances.
F-7

DEER CONSUMER PRODUCTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2011 AND 2010
Accounts Receivable
The Company maintains reserves for potential credit losses on accounts receivable. Management reviews the composition of accounts receivable and analyzes historical bad debts, customer concentrations, customer credit worthiness, current economic trends and changes in customer payment patterns to evaluate the adequacy of these reserves. The Company has not incurred any bad debts to date. If the Company finds there is a possibility that the Company may incur a bad debt, the Company will accrue the appropriate allowance based on the aging of our accounts receivables. The Company’s policy is to accrue the full amount of account receivables when their aging exceeds one year. Based on historical collection activity, the Company did not record any bad debt allowance at December 31, 2011 and 2010.
The Company sells products in the China domestic market through a range of distribution outlets including regional and national wholesalers and third party distributors. The standard term of payment of accounts receivables for several of the Company’s large and established China domestic retailer customers is 180 days from the close of the billing cycle, which is 30 – 45 days after the Company’s products are delivered to the customer. This accounts receivable term is customary for large and established China domestic retailers. Historically, the Company has not experienced late payments or bad debts under such terms from these retailers. The term of payment of accounts receivable for the Company’s other China domestic customers is 30 – 90 days from the close of the billing cycle. The Company provides its major customers with payment terms based on their payment history, amount they have purchased in the past, and upon any strategic agreement the Company may have with them.
As the Company continues to focus on expanding sales to the China domestic market, the Company’s sales to the China domestic market may represent a larger percentage of the Company’s total revenue. The Company anticipates that its accounts receivable will remain in line with standard industry practice relating to accounts receivable in China, which could be up to seven months.
The Company sells products to overseas customers in the export markets under letters of credit, prepaid arrangements, certain short credit terms or direct customer purchase orders. As of December 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, approximately 43% and 29%, respectively, of its accounts receivable was from overseas customers. The Company's export sales-related accounts receivable typically are less than three months, depending on customer shipment schedules. Historically, the Company has not experienced significant bad debts from export sales. The Company also maintains a substantial amount of export insurance that covers losses arising from customers’ rejection of its products, political risk, losses arising from business credit and other credit risks including bankruptcy, insolvency and delay in payment.
The Company believes its accounts receivable will be collected in the ordinary course of business within seven months as the Company has established relationships with many of its major customers. In addition, the Company’s domestic customers typically pay according to the Company’s payment terms and the Company maintains insurance for its accounts receivable with respect to its international customers.
The table below provides account receivable roll forward schedules for our three largest clients----SuNing, Gome and Reed Sea. Song Qiao is a wholly-owned subsidiary of SuNing.

Client Name |  | 2010 Receivable |  |  | 2011 Sales |  |  | 2011 collection |  |  | Bad debt allowance |  |  | 2011 Receivable |
Gome |  | $ | 16,980,623 |  |  | $ | 87,022,062 |  |  | $ | 101,199,864 |  |  |  | - |  |  | $ | 2,802,821 |
Song Qiao |  | $ | 14,994,927 |  |  | $ | 11,898,273 |  |  | $ | 26,893,200 |  |  |  | - |  |  | $ | - |
Reed Sea |  | $ | 2,297,135 |  |  | $ | 30,490,629 |  |  | $ | 28,551,227 |  |  |  | - |  |  | $ | 4,236,537 |

VAT Receivables
VAT receivables are VAT rebates which arise from our purchase of raw materials. VAT receivables are returned to the Company or offset against VAT payable. The Company anticipates collecting its VAT receivables within one year. The Company does not experience credit losses with respect to VAT receivables because they are owed to the Company by the government. The Company classifies VAT receivables as a current asset because it is an asset that is reasonably expected to be realized (or sold or consumed) within one year or within the Company’s normal operating cycle.
Advances to Suppliers
The Company makes advances to certain vendors to purchase material and equipment. The advances are interest-free and unsecured.
Inventories
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost (determined on a weighted average basis) or market. The Company compares the cost of inventories with their market value and allowance is made to write down inventories to their market value, if lower.
F-8

DEER CONSUMER PRODUCTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2011 AND 2010
Notes Receivable
The Company sold goods to its customers and received commercial notes (bank acceptance) from them in lieu of payments for accounts receivable. The Company discounted the commercial notes with the bank or endorsed the commercial notes to vendors for payment of their own obligations or to get cash from third parties. Most of the commercial notes have a maturity of less than six months. At December 31, 2011, Winder transferred commercial notes to vendors in lieu of payment. If the original remitters fail to pay the notes, Winder will be responsible for making the payment, and there was contingent liability of RMB 262.12 million ($41.6 million) for Winder at December 31, 2011.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to earnings as incurred; additions, renewals and betterments are capitalized. When property and equipment are retired or otherwise disposed of, the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the respective accounts, and any gain or loss is included in operations. Depreciation of property and equipment is provided using the straight-line method for substantially all assets with estimated lives as follows:

Buildings | 5-20 years
Equipment | 5-10 years
Vehicles | 5 years
Office equipment | 5-10 years

The following are the details of property and equipment at December 31, 2011 and 2010:

|  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |
Building |  | $ | 21,254,566 |  |  | $ | 9,274,909 |
Equipment |  |  | 25,072,857 |  |  |  | 18,928,495 |
Vehicle |  |  | 454,267 |  |  |  | 485,421 |
Office equipment |  |  | 566,054 |  |  |  | 220,800 |
Total |  |  | 47,347,744 |  |  |  | 28,909,625 |
Less accumulated depreciation |  |  | (11,210,135 | ) |  |  | (8,456,221 | )
Property & equipment, net |  | $ | 36,137,609 |  |  | $ | 20,453,404 |

Depreciation for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, was $2,265,269, $1,490,855 and 1,439,751, respectively.
Construction in Progress
Construction in progress consists of costs for the construction of workshops, mold and a video monitoring installation for Winder. The construction work for workshops, installation of video monitoring and construction of some of the molds was completed and transferred to property, plant and equipment as of December 31, 2011. Other molds under construction amounted to $3.12 million as of December 31, 2011, with no major additional costs to be incurred. The Company completed its final inspection of the workshop construction in December 2011, and put the workshops into operation for product manufacturing.
Construction in progress also includes costs for the construction of a new plant, office building and power distribution station for Deer Technology. Total estimated cost for this project is $36.23 million. As of December 31, 2011, construction in progress was $18.02 million. This phase of construction is anticipated to be completed in September 2012.
Long-Lived Assets
The Company applies the provisions of ASC Topic 360, “Property, Plant, and Equipment,” which addresses financial accounting and reporting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets. ASC 360 requires impairment losses to be recorded on long-lived assets used in operations when indicators of impairment are present and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the assets’ carrying amounts. In that event, a loss is recognized based on the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the long-lived assets. Loss on long-lived assets to be disposed of is determined in a similar manner, except that fair values are reduced for the cost of disposal. Based on its review, the Company believes that as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, there was no significant impairment of its long-lived assets.
F-9

DEER CONSUMER PRODUCTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2011 AND 2010
Intangible Assets
Intangible assets consist of rights to use land and computer software. The Company evaluates intangible assets for impairment at least annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable from its estimated future cash flows. Recoverability of intangible assets is measured by comparing their net book value to the related projected undiscounted cash flows from these assets, considering a number of factors including past operating results, budgets, economic projections, market trends and product development cycles. If the net book value of the asset exceeds the related undiscounted cash flows, the asset is considered impaired and a second test is performed to measure the amount of impairment loss.
The following are the details of intangible assets at December 31, 2011and 2010:

|  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |
Right to use land |  | $ | 36,834,817 |  |  | $ | 37,712,643 |
Computer software |  |  | 83,201 |  |  |  | 79,158 |
Total |  |  | 36,918,018 |  |  |  | 37,791,801 |
Less accumulated amortization |  |  | (1,022,490 | ) |  |  | (289,791 | )
Intangibles, net |  | $ | 35,895,528 |  |  | $ | 37,502,010 |

Pursuant to PRC regulations, the PRC government owns all land. The Company recorded the amounts paid for the land use rights as an intangible asset. The Company amortizes these rights over their respective periods, which range from 45 to 50 years. Computer software is amortized over 1 to 2 years.
In 2010, Deer Technology acquired the land use rights for two parcels of land with a total of 439,640 square meters located in east central China in the city of Wuhu, AnHui Province. The purchase price of the land use rights for these two parcels of land was approximately $35 million, a price of RMB 4.95 million ($743,000) per hectare and including a 4% PRC government land transfer tax and other government charges. The use right for the first parcel of land covering 289,416 square meters was purchased for approximately RMB 149 million ($22.74 million). The land use right for the second parcel of land covering 150,224 square meters was purchased for RMB 77.37 million ($11.8 million). The Company received the land use right certificates from the PRC government on these two parcels of land.
The deposit of $10.5 million (RMB 67,901,400) paid in 2010 to acquire a land use right was returned to the Company in the first quarter of 2011, as it failed to win the auction for the land. The Company paid an additional $4.3 million (RMB 27,934,381) in first quarter of 2011 to make payment in full for the land use rights it acquired in December 2010. As of December 31, 2010, the Company prepaid (RMB 22,300,000) $3,367,207 for land use rights acquired in December 2010. This prepayment was transferred into intangible assets in the first quarter of 2011 when the Company received the land use right certificate.
A summary of Company’s land use right acquisitions follows:

Name |  | Site use right Phase I |  |  | Site use right Phase II |  |  | Land use right |  |  | Land use right |
Size (In Square Meters) |  | 33,728 |  |  | 52,597 |  |  | 289,416 |  |  | 150,224 |
Location |  | Yangjiang City |  |  | Yangjiang City |  |  | Wuhu City |  |  | Wuhu City |
Owner |  | Winder |  |  | Winder |  |  | Deer Technology |  |  | Deer Technology |
Useful life in months |  | 600 |  |  | 600 |  |  | 600 |  |  | 600 |
Purpose |  | Plant and workshop |  |  | Plant and workshop |  |  | Plant and workshop |  |  | Plant and workshop |
Purchase date |  | November 2002 |  |  | June 2005 & March 2010 |  |  | September 2010 |  |  | December 2010 |
Price in RMB/USD |  | RMB 1.7 million ($0.3 million) |  |  | RMB 3.9 million ($0.6 million) |  |  | RMB 149.1 million ($23 million) |  |  | RMB 77.4 million ($12 million) |
As of 12/31/2011 |  | Paid in full |  |  | Paid in full |  |  | Paid in full |  |  | Paid in full |
Payment due date |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |

F-10

DEER CONSUMER PRODUCTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2011 AND 2010
In addition, as of December 31, 2011, the Company prepaid RMB 5.34 million ($0.8 million) for the land use rights for 60,000 square meters of land in Yangjiang City, or Site use right Phase III. The total cost for the land use rights is approximately RMB 21.3 million ($3.3 million), which the Company is required to pay in full in 2012.
There are no regulatory deadlines or commitments to develop the land.
Amortization for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, was $700,347 $150,027 and $9,435, respectively.
The following table summarizes the expected amortization over the next five years as of December 31, 2011:

Year ended December 31, |  | Amount |
2012 |  | $ | 719,145 |
2013 |  |  | 719,145 |
2014 |  |  | 719,145 |
2015 |  |  | 719,145 |
2016 |  |  | 719,145 |
Thereafter |  |  | 32,299,803 |
Total |  | $ | 35,895,528 |

Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Certain of the Company’s financial instruments, including cash and equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued liabilities and short-term loans and notes payable, have carrying amounts that approximate their fair values due to their short maturities.
ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” requires disclosure of the fair value of financial instruments held by the Company. ASC Topic 825, “Financial Instruments,” defines fair value and establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosures of fair value measurement that enhances disclosure requirements for fair value measures. The carrying amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheets for receivables and current liabilities each qualify as financial instruments and are a reasonable estimate of their fair values because of the short period of time between the origination of such instruments and their expected realization and their current market rate of interest. The three levels of valuation hierarchy are defined as follows:

| ● | Level 1 inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

| ● | Level 2 inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.

| ● | Level 3 inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.

The Company analyzes all financial instruments with features of both liabilities and equity under ASC Topic 480, “Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity,” and ASC Topic 815, “Derivatives and Hedging.”
As of December 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, the Company did not identify any assets and liabilities that are required to be presented on the balance sheet at fair value.
Concentration of Credit Risk
Cash includes cash on hand and demand deposits in accounts maintained within China. Certain financial instruments, which subject the Company to concentration of credit risk, consist of cash. Balances at financial institutions within China are not covered by insurance. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts.
Revenue Recognition
The Company’s revenue recognition policies are in compliance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) 104 (codified in FASB ASC Topic 480).
F-11

DEER CONSUMER PRODUCTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2011 AND 2010
Sales revenue from export customers is recognized at the date of shipment when the price is fixed or determinable, no other significant obligations of the Company exist and collectability is reasonably assured. The Company records payments for goods before all relevant criteria for revenue recognition are satisfied as unearned revenue.
Sales revenue from domestic customers is recognized at FOB destination when the price is fixed or determinable, no other significant obligations of the Company exist and collectability is reasonably assured. Company pays for the cost of freight and insurance and risk of loss passes when customers receive the goods. The Company records payments for goods before all relevant criteria for revenue recognition are satisfied as unearned revenue.
Sales revenue is the invoiced value of goods, net of value-added tax. All of the Company’s products sold in the PRC are subject to a VAT of 17% of the gross sales price. This VAT may be offset by the VAT paid by the Company on raw materials and other materials included in the cost of producing the Company’s finished product. The Company recorded VAT payable and VAT receivable net of payments in the financial statements. The VAT tax return is filed offsetting the payables against the receivables.
Sales and purchases are recorded net of VAT collected and paid as the Company acts as an agent for the government. VAT taxes are not affected by the income tax holiday.
Sales returns and allowances were $0 for the year ended December 31, 2011 and 2010. The Company does not provide a right of unconditional return, price protection or any other concessions to its customers.
Cost of Revenue and Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
The Company includes expenses in either cost of revenue or selling, general and administrative expenses based upon the natural classification of the expenses. Cost of revenue includes expenses associated with the acquisition, inspection, manufacturing and receiving of materials for use in the manufacturing process. These costs include inbound freight charges, purchasing and receiving costs, inspection costs, warehousing costs, internal transfer costs as well as depreciation, amortization, wages, benefits and other costs that are incurred directly or indirectly to support the manufacturing process. Selling, general and administrative expenses includes expenses associated with the distribution of our products, sales efforts including commissions payable to in store promotional staff, administration costs and other costs that are not incurred to support the manufacturing process. The Company records distribution costs associated with the sale of inventory as a component of selling, general and administrative expenses in the Statements of Consolidated Income. These expenses include warehousing costs, outbound freight charges, insurance and costs associated with distribution personnel.
Advance from Customers
The Company records payments received from customers in advance of their future orders to an advance account. These orders are normally delivered within a reasonable period of time based upon contract terms with the customers.
Advertising Costs
The Company expenses the cost of advertising as incurred or, as appropriate, the first time the advertising takes place. Advertising costs for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 and 2009 were $105,954, $222,648 and $45,361, respectively.
Research and Development
The Company expenses its research and development costs as incurred. Research and development costs for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, were $188,658 and $777,783 and $602,550 respectively. Research and development costs are included in general and administrative expenses.
Subsidy Income
The Company was awarded grants from local government bureaus to encourage the development of its business. As a general policy of municipal governments in the PRC, local government bureaus commonly provide grants to leading local companies in order to encourage greater economic development and employment. The grants are typically based on certain standards that are reviewed periodically. The grants set forth below were awarded to the Company based on its progress in technological innovation and building of a standardized plant and factory. As the exact amount of a grant is uncertain until the local government makes its final determination, the Company records income only when the grant is received or approved. The grants set forth below were made without any conditions and restrictions, and were not required to be repaid.
F-12

DEER CONSUMER PRODUCTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2011 AND 2010
Set forth below are the grants recorded in the year end ended December 31, 2011.

Item |  | Amount in ($) |
Development fund from Yangjiang Hi-Tech Industrial Development Zone |  |  | 264,839 |
Reward from Yangjiang Finance Bureau for acting as a lead role model of demonstrating standardized factory construction |  |  | 692,620 |
Reward of proprietary brand and market development from Yangjiang Finance Bureau |  |  | 45,892 |
From Yangjiang Hi-Tech Industrial Development Zone for business development reward |  |  | 26,833 |
Others |  |  | 50,264 |
Total |  | $ | 1,080,448 |

The above subsidy income attributable to the grants specified was received in full and could be used without restriction.
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company records stock-based compensation in accordance with ASC Topic 718 & 505, “Compensation – Stock Compensation.” ASC 718 requires companies to measure compensation cost for stock-based employee compensation at fair value at the grant date and recognize the expense over the employee’s requisite service period. The Company recognizes in its statement of operations the grant-date fair value of stock options and other equity-based compensation issued to employees and non-employees. There were 50,000 options outstanding as of December 31, 2011.
Income Taxes
The Company utilizes Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” (codified in FASB ASC Topic 740), which requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for expected future tax consequences of events included in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred income taxes are recognized for the tax consequences in future years of differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts at each period end based on enacted tax laws and statutory tax rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. Valuation allowances are established, when necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.
The Company follows FASB Interpretation No. 48 (“FIN 48”), Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (codified in FASB ASC Topic 740). When tax returns are filed, it is likely that some positions taken would be sustained upon examination by the taxing authorities, while others are subject to uncertainty about the merits of the position taken or the amount of the position that would be ultimately sustained. The benefit of a tax position is recognized in the financial statements in the period during which, based on all available evidence, management believes it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including the resolution of appeals or litigation processes, if any. Tax positions taken are not offset or aggregated with other positions. Tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold are measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that is more than 50 percent likely of being realized upon settlement with the applicable taxing authority. The portion of the benefits associated with tax positions taken that exceeds the amount measured as described above is reflected as a liability for unrecognized tax benefits in the accompanying balance sheets along with any associated interest and penalties that would be payable to the taxing authorities upon examination.
Interest associated with unrecognized tax benefits is classified as interest expense and penalties are classified as selling, general and administrative expense in the statements of income. At December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company had not taken any significant uncertain tax position on its tax return for 2010 and prior years or in computing its tax provision for 2011.
F-13

DEER CONSUMER PRODUCTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2011 AND 2010
Foreign Currency Transactions and Comprehensive Income
The financial statements’ accounts of the Company’s PRC subsidiaries were translated into USD in accordance with SFAS No. 52, “Foreign Currency Translation” (codified in FASB ASC Topic 830), with the RMB as the Company’s China subsidiaries’ functional currency. According to SFAS No. 52 (codified in FASB ASC Topic 830), all assets and liabilities were translated at the exchange rate on the balance sheet date, stockholders’ equity are translated at the historical rates and statement of operations items are translated at the average exchange rate for the year. The resulting translation adjustments are reported under other comprehensive income in accordance with SFAS No. 130, “Reporting Comprehensive Income” (codified in FASB ASC Topic 220).
Currency Hedging
The Company from time to time may enter into forward exchange agreements with the Bank of China, whereby the Company agrees to sell U.S. dollars to the Bank of China at certain rates. At December 31, 2011and 2010, the Company had no outstanding forward exchange contracts.
Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share
Earnings per share are calculated in accordance with the ASC Topic 260, “Earnings per Share.” Basic earnings per share are based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share are based on the assumption that all dilutive convertible shares and stock options were converted or exercised. Dilution is calculated by applying the treasury stock method. Under this method, options and warrants are assumed to be exercised at the beginning of the period (or at the time of issuance, if later), and as if funds obtained thereby were used to purchase common stock at the average market price during the period.
The following is a reconciliation of the number of shares (denominator) used in the basic and diluted earnings per share calculations:

Years Ended December 31, | 2011 |  | 2010 |  | 2009 |
| Shares |  | Per Share Amount |  | Shares |  | Per Share Amount |  | Shares |  | Per Share Amount |
Basic earnings per share |  |  | 33,592,562 |  |  | $ | 1.18 |  |  |  | 33,210,969 |  |  | $ | 0.91 |  |  |  | 22,782,200 |  |  | $ | 0.54 |
Effect of dilutive warrants and stock options |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 440,798 |  |  |  | (0.01 | ) |  |  | 408,086 |  |  |  | (0.01 | )
Diluted earnings per share |  |  | 33,592,562 |  |  | $ | 1.18 |  |  |  | 33,651,767 |  |  | $ | 0.90 |  |  |  | 23,190,286 |  |  | $ | 0.53 |

Statement of Cash Flows
In accordance with ASC Topic 230, “Statement of Cash Flows,” cash flows from the Company’s operations are calculated based upon the local currencies using the average translation rates. As a result, amounts related to assets and liabilities reported on the consolidated statements of cash flows will not necessarily agree with changes in the corresponding balances on the consolidated balance sheets.
Registration Rights Agreement
The Company accounts for payment arrangements under a registration rights agreement in accordance with ASC Topic 825, “Financial Instruments,” which requires the contingent obligation to make future payments or otherwise transfer consideration under a registration payment arrangement, whether issued as a separate agreement or included as a provision of a financial instrument or other agreement, be recognized separately and measured in accordance with ASC Topic 450, “Contingencies.”
Segment Reporting
SFAS No. 131, “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information” (codified in FASB ASC Topic 280) requires use of the “management approach” model for segment reporting. The management approach model is based on the way a company's management organizes segments within the company for making operating decisions and assessing performance. Reportable segments are based on products and services, geography, legal structure, management structure or any other manner in which management disaggregates a company.
SFAS No. 131 has no effect on the Company's financial statements as substantially all of the Company's operations are conducted in one industry segment. All of the Company's assets are located in the PRC.
F-14

DEER CONSUMER PRODUCTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2011 AND 2010
Reclassifications
The Company reclassified intangible assets to deposit of $806,458 for land use right as of December 31, 2010 to conform to the manner of presentation in the current period.
Recent Pronouncements
In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-08, "Testing Goodwill for Impairment." ASU 2011-08 will allow companies to assess qualitative factors to determine if it is more-likely-than-not that goodwill might be impaired and whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test required under current accounting standards. ASU 2011-08 will be effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for annual reporting period beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating this guidance, but does not expect the adoption will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05, "Comprehensive Income: Presentation of Comprehensive Income." ASU 2011-05 will require companies to present the components of net income and other comprehensive income either as one continuous statement or as two consecutive statements. ASU 2011-05 eliminates the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders' equity. ASU 2011-05 does not change the items which must be reported in other comprehensive income, how such items are measured or when they must be reclassified to net income. ASU 2011-05 will be effective for the first interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. Further, in December 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-12, "Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05." The Company believes the adoption of this guidance concerns disclosure only and will not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2011-04, "Fair Value Measurement: Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs." ASU 2011-04 changes the wording used to describe the requirements in generally accepted accounting principles in the United States ("U.S. GAAP") for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements in order to improve consistency in the application and description of fair value between U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS"). ASU 2011-04 clarifies how the concepts of highest and best use and valuation premise in a fair value measurement are relevant only when measuring the fair value of nonfinancial assets and are not relevant when measuring the fair value of financial assets or of liabilities. In addition, ASU 2011-04 expanded the disclosures for the unobservable inputs for Level 3 fair value measurements, requiring quantitative information to be disclosed related to (1) the valuation processes used, (2) the sensitivity of the fair value measurement to changes in unobservable inputs and the interrelationships between those unobservable inputs, and (3) use of a nonfinancial asset in a way that differs from the asset's highest and best use. ASU 2011-04 will be effective for the first interim and annual reporting period beginning after December 15, 2011 and early adoption is prohibited. The Company is currently evaluating the future impact of this new accounting update on its consolidated financial statements.
Note 3 – Inventories
Inventories consisted of the following at December 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010:

|  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |
Raw material |  | $ | 23,080,165 |  |  | $ | 7,979,205 |
Work in process |  |  | 10,265,880 |  |  |  | 11,914,475 |
Finished goods |  |  | 27,829,309 |  |  |  | 3,122,170 |
Allowance for inventory impairment |  |  | (158,123) |  |  |  | - |
Total |  | $ | 61,017,231 |  |  | $ | 23,015,850 |

F-15

DEER CONSUMER PRODUCTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2011 AND 2010
Note 4 – Other Payables and Accrued Expenses
Other payables and accrued expenses consisted of the following at December 31, 2011and 2010:

|  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |
Accrued expenses |  | $ | 113,695 |  |  | $ | 1,010,591 |
Accrued wages |  |  | 975,071 |  |  |  | 996,542 |
Welfare payable |  |  | 20,353 |  |  |  | 21,303 |
Other payables |  |  | 1,644,498 |  |  |  | 973,280 |
Total |  | $ | 2,753,617 |  |  | $ | 3,001,716 |

Accrued expenses were for electricity and freight fees. Other payables were for government charges, payable to the local construction management department, and payable for employees’ education fund and labor union fund, etc.
Note 5 – Notes Payable
Notes payable at December 31, 2011 and 2010, were for multiple bankers’ acceptances from the Bank of China. The terms of the notes range from 3-6 months, bear no interest and pay the bank 0.05% of the note balance as an acceptance fee. The Company deposits a certain percentage of the notes’ par value with the Bank of China, refundable when the notes are re-paid and accounted for as restricted cash in the accompanied consolidated financial statements.
Note 6 – Dividend Payable
On March 9, 2011, the Company’s Board of Directors (“BOD”) declared a first quarter dividend payable from future earnings, of $0.05 per share which was paid on April 14, 2011. On May 9, 2011, the Company’s BOD declared a second quarter dividend of $0.05 per share, payable from future earnings on July 15, 2011, to the shareholders of record as of June 30, 2011. On August 9, 2011, the Company’s BOD declared a third quarter dividend of $0.05 per share, payable from future earnings on October 15, 2011, to the shareholders of record as of September 30, 2011. On November 8, 2011, the Company’s BOD declared a fourth quarter dividend of $0.05 per share, payable from future earnings on January 13, 2012, to the shareholders of record as of December 30, 2011. Dividend payable at December 31, 2011, was $1,679,628 and was paid on January 10, 2012. Declaration and payment of future quarterly dividends will be made at the discretion of the BOD.
Note 7 – Stockholders’ Equity
On March 31, 2009, the Company completed a private placement of 810,690 units, each unit consisting of 1 share of the Company’s common stock and a 3-year warrant to purchase 15% of 1 share of the Company’s common stock at $1.73 per share, at $0.92 per unit for $746,000. The Company issued warrants to purchase 121,660 shares of its common stock to the investors in the private placement. The Company also issued warrants to purchase 81,090 shares of its common stock to the placement agents.
In May 2009, the Company completed two private placements of units consisting of 1 share of the Company’s common stock and a 3-year warrant to purchase 15% of 1 share of the Company’s common stock at $1.73 per share, pursuant to which the Company sold 2,100,000 units at $0.92 per unit for $1,932,000. The Company issued warrants to purchase 315,000 shares of its common stock to the investors in the private placement. The Company also issued warrants to purchase 210,000 shares of its common stock to the placement agents.
In connection with the private placements described above, the Company issued a registration rights agreement requiring the Company to file a registration statement covering the shares of its common stock issued in the private placement and the shares of its common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants issued in the private placement. The registration statement with respect to such securities was declared effective on June 3, 2009, and a post-effective amendment to the registration statement was declared effective on June 30, 2010. Subject to certain grace periods, the registration statement must remain effective and available for use until the purchasers can sell all of the securities covered by the registration statement without restriction pursuant to Rule 144. If the Company fails to meet the filing or effectiveness requirements of the registration statement, it is required to pay liquidated damages of 1% of the aggregate purchase price paid by such purchaser for any registerable securities then held by such purchaser on the date of such failure and on each anniversary of the date of such failure until such failure is cured.
F-16

DEER CONSUMER PRODUCTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2011 AND 2010
On September 21, 2009, the Company completed a private placement offering of 3,000,000 units, each unit consisting of 1 share of the Company’s common stock and a 3-year warrant to purchase 30% of 1 share of the Company’s common stock at $5.00 per share, at $5.00 per unit for $15,000,000 to non-U.S. investors. The Company issued warrants to purchase 900,000 shares of its common stock to the investors in the offering. A non-U.S. advisor to the Company received fees of 9% of the gross proceeds and warrants to purchase 300,000 shares of the Company’s common stock on the same terms as the investors. The Company paid an additional 3% advisory fee in connection with this private placement offering. The investors received registration rights. The Company issued the shares pursuant to an exemption from registration under Regulation S promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
On December 17, 2009, the Company completed a public offering of 6,900,000 shares of its common stock at $11.00 per share for $75,900,000. The Company paid commissions and fees associated with this offering of $9,931,296. The Company also paid offering cost of $320,000 related to this offering in 2010.
Stock Options
Following is a summary of the activity of options to an independent director:

|  | Options outstanding |  |  | Weighted Average Exercise Price |  |  | Weighted average remaining contractual life |  |  | Aggregate Intrinsic Value |
Outstanding, December 31, 2009 |  |  | 130,000 |  |  | $ | 10.96 |  |  |  | 4.98 |  |  | $ | 45,500 |
Exercisable, December 31, 2009 |  |  | 56,666 |  |  | $ | 10.96 |  |  |  | 4.98 |  |  | $ | 19,833 |
Granted |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Forfeited |  |  | 80,000 |  |  |  | - |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Exercised |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Outstanding, December 31, 2010 |  |  | 50,000 |  |  | $ | 10.96 |  |  |  | 3.98 |  |  | $ | 14,000 |
Exercisable, December 31, 2010 |  |  | 33,332 |  |  | $ | 10.96 |  |  |  | 3.98 |  |  | $ | 9,333 |
Outstanding, December 31, 2011 |  |  | 50,000 |  |  | $ | 10.96 |  |  |  | 2.98 |  |  | $ | - |
Exercisable, December 31, 2011 |  |  | 50,000 |  |  | $ | 10.96 |  |  |  | 2.98 |  |  | $ | - |

The exercise price for options outstanding at December 31, 2011, is as follows:

Number of Options |  |  | Exercise Price |
| 50,000 |  |  | $ | 10.96 |

The assumptions used in calculating the fair value of options granted using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model are as follows:

Risk-free interest rate |  |  | 2.25 | %
Expected life of the options |  | 3 to 3.5 years
Expected volatility |  |  | 80 | %
Expected dividend yield |  |  | 0 | %

During 2011, 2010 and 2009, the Company recorded $102,626, $275,698 and $333,387 as stock option expense, respectively.
Warrants
At the end of 2010, all warrants were exercised. No new warrants were granted during the year ended December 31, 2011.
Note 8 – Employee Welfare Plan
Expense for employee common welfare was $21,773, $112,154 and $51,160 for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The Company is not required to establish welfare and common welfare reserves.
F-17

DEER CONSUMER PRODUCTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2011 AND 2010
Note 9 – Statutory Reserve and Development Fund
As stipulated by the Company Law of the PRC, net income after taxation can only be distributed as dividends after appropriation has been made for the following:

| i. | Making up cumulative prior years’ losses, if any;

| ii. | Allocations to the “statutory surplus reserve” of at least 10% of income after tax, as determined under PRC accounting rules and regulations, until the fund amounts to 50% of the Company’s registered capital;

| iii. | Allocations of 5-10% of income after tax, as determined under PRC accounting rules and regulations, to the Company’s “statutory common welfare fund,” which is established for the purpose of providing employee facilities and other collective benefits to the Company’s employees; and

| iv. | Allocations to the discretionary surplus reserve, if approved in the stockholders’ general meeting. The Company allocates 5% of income after tax as development fund. The fund is for enlarging the Company’s business and increasing capital.

Pursuant to the new Corporate Law effective on January 1, 2006, there is now only one “statutory surplus reserve” requirement. The reserve is 10% of income after tax, not to exceed 50% of registered capital.
The Company appropriated $3,029,967, $3,755,921 and $1,286,315 as reserve for the statutory surplus reserve, and $1,514,984, $1,877,960 and $643,158 as reserve for development fund, for 2011, 2010 and 2009 respectively.
Note 10 – Income Tax
The Company is subject to income taxes by entity on income arising in or derived from the tax jurisdiction in which each entity is domiciled.
Deer, the U.S. parent company, was incorporated in the U.S. and has net operating losses (NOL) for income tax purposes. During the year ended December 31, 2011, the U.S. parent company utilized 100% of its NOL against the dividend income received from Winder as earnings repatriation.
Deer International was incorporated in the BVI and there is no income tax for a company domiciled in the BVI. Accordingly, the Company’s consolidated financial statements do not present any income tax provisions related to the BVI tax jurisdiction where Deer International is domiciled.
Local PRC Income Tax
Pursuant to the tax laws of China, general enterprises are subject to income tax at an effective rate of 25%. Winder enjoys a 15% preferential income tax effective as of 2009 until expiration on December 31, 2011, as a result of its status as a high tech enterprise. Winder has received approval for the renewal of its 15% preferential income tax rate for another three years after 2011.
The following is a reconciliation of tax at the U.S. federal statutory rate to the provision for income tax recorded in the consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009:

|  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |  |  | 2009 |
Tax provision at U.S. statutory rate |  |  | 34.0 | % |  |  | 34.0 | % |  |  | 34.0 | %
US tax on dividend from foreign subsidiary |  |  | 3.2 | % |  |  | - | % |  |  | - | %
Foreign tax rate difference |  |  | (8.0 | )% |  |  | (9.2 | )% |  |  | (9.0 | )%
Valuation allowance |  |  | 0.5 | % |  |  | 1.3 | % |  |  | 1.0 | %
Effect of tax holiday |  |  | (10.4 | )% |  |  | (10.4 | )% |  |  | (11.0 | )%
NOL utilized |  |  | (0.7 | )% |  |  | - | % |  |  | - | %
Tax per financial statement |  |  | 18.6 | % |  |  | 15.7 | % |  |  | 15.0 | %

The effect of the change of tax status was recorded in accordance with ASC Topic 740-10, which states that the effect of a change in tax status is computed as of the date of change and is included in the tax provision for continuing operations. Management believes the local tax authorities would not have waived past taxes had it not been for the change in the tax status of the Company’s subsidiary.
F-18

DEER CONSUMER PRODUCTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2011 AND 2010
If Winder had not been granted high-tech enterprise status, income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, would have been increased by $5,083,249, $3,755,779 and $1,697,000, respectively, and earnings per share would have been reduced by $0.15, $0.11 and $0.07, respectively.
Foreign pretax earnings approximated $50,954,000 and $36,874,000 for 2011 and 2010, respectively. Pretax earnings of a foreign subsidiary are subject to U.S. taxation when effectively repatriated. The Company provides income taxes on the undistributed earnings of non-U.S. subsidiaries except to the extent that such earnings are invested indefinitely outside of the U.S. At December 31, 2011, approximately $72,653,000 of accumulated undistributed earnings of non-U.S. subsidiaries was invested indefinitely. At the existing U.S. federal income tax rate, additional taxes of $13,843,000 would have to be provided if such earnings were remitted currently.
Note 11 – Geographical Sales
Geographical distribution of sales is as follows:

|  | Years Ended December 31 |
Geographical Areas |  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |  |  | 2009 |
China |  |  | 153,488,207 |  |  |  | 76,897,106 |  |  |  | 14,313,485 |
South America |  |  | 15,370,208 |  |  |  | 24,663,627 |  |  |  | 12,305,666 |
Asia |  |  | 33,244,670 |  |  |  | 24,454,857 |  |  |  | 9,319,581 |
Europe |  |  | 7,778,784 |  |  |  | 17,837,267 |  |  |  | 11,488,707 |
Middle East |  |  | 10,612,481 |  |  |  | 21,439,859 |  |  |  | 11,064,745 |
North America |  |  | 4,601,112 |  |  |  | 8,516,523 |  |  |  | 22,217,528 |
Africa |  |  | 1,653,423 |  |  |  | 2,037,648 |  |  |  | 632,968 |
|  |  | 226,748,885 |  |  |  | 175,846,887 |  |  |  | 81,342,680 |

Note 12 – Operating Risks
The Company’s operations in the PRC are subject to specific considerations and significant risks not typically associated with companies in North America and Western Europe. These include risks associated with, among others, the political, economic and legal environments of the PRC and PRC rules and regulations regarding foreign currency exchange. The Company’s results may be adversely affected by changes in governmental policies with respect to laws and regulations, anti-inflationary measures, currency conversion and remittance abroad, and rates and methods of taxation, among other things.
The Company’s sale, purchase and expense transactions are denominated in RMB and all of the Company’s assets and liabilities are also denominated in RMB. The RMB is not freely convertible into foreign currencies under current PRC law. Foreign exchange transactions are required by law to be carried out only by authorized financial institutions. Remittances in currencies other than RMB may require certain supporting documentation in order to effect the remittance.
Note 13 – Commitments
Winder has a registered capital of $57.2 million. At December 31, 2011, the Company has contributed $36.7 million to Winder’s registered capital and is committed to contribute an additional $20.5 million by April 2013.
On September 1, 2010, the Company entered into a 2-year lease, expiring August 30, 2012, for a show room in Panyu, Guangdong Province with monthly rent, inclusive of property management fees, of $5,500 (RMB 37,000). The Company has the option to renew this lease upon expiration. At December 31, 2011, the Company’s future minimum rental payments required under this operating lease for 2012 were as follows:

2012 |  | $ | 44,000 |

F-19

DEER CONSUMER PRODUCTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2011 AND 2010
Note 14 – Major Customers and Vendors
For the year ended December 31, 2011, three customers accounted for approximately 38%, 13% and 11% of sales, respectively. At December 31, 2011, the total accounts receivable balance due from these three customers was $14,960,215.
For the year ended December 31, 2011, no supplier accounted for 10% or more of the Company’s raw material purchases.
For the year ended December 31, 2010, two customers accounted for 14% and 10% of sales, respectively. At December 31, 2010, the total receivable balance due from these customers was $31,975,551. There was no major customer in 2009.
For the year ended December 31, 2010, one vendor accounted for 12% of the Company’s purchases of raw materials. At December 31, 2010, the total payable to this vendor was approximately $1,464,061. There was no major vendor in 2009.
Note 15 – Contingencies
Acquisition of Winder
On April 1, 2008, Deer International acquired 100% of the equity interest in Winder from 50HZ Electric Limited (“50HZ”). At the time of such acquisition, Deer International was an offshore enterprise controlled by some of the Company’s shareholders who are PRC residents. Certain of these shareholders also owned or controlled 50HZ at the time of such acquisition, which made Winder an affiliated PRC company of such shareholders. In October 2008, such shareholders transferred their ownership interests in 50HZ to an unrelated third party, after which 50HZ was no longer a related party of the Company. The transaction was approved by the Economic Development Bureau of Yangjiang High-Tech Industry Development Zone (the “Yangjiang High-Tech Zone”).
The acquisition of 100% of Winder’s equity interests by Deer International on April 1, 2008, was free of any consideration and conditions. Under applicable PRC tax rules, any transaction between related parties shall be priced on an arm’s length basis. The tax authority has the right to investigate any related party transaction and to make adjustment if it finds the price not on an arm’s length basis. The PRC tax authority would make adjustment by applying a deemed arm’s length price to the transaction. Given that 50HZ and Deer International had certain related parties at the time of the Winder acquisition, there is a possibility the consideration-free transfer may be challenged and investigated by the PRC tax authority. If the deemed arm’s length price determined by the PRC tax authority during such investigation is higher than the original cost that 50HZ paid to get 100% equity interest of Winder, such excess amount would be subject to additional PRC income tax. Although the Company believes 50HZ would be responsible for the possible PRC income tax, the Company understands it is common practice for PRC tax authority to enforce the tax collection on the entity at issue, which in this case would be Winder, and the Company may be required to pay the possible PRC income tax on behalf of 50HZ. According to the M&A Regulations, the acquisition of Winder might require the approval of Ministry of Commence People’s Republic of China (“MOFCOM”). As the interpretation and implementation of the M&A Regulations are unclear, if the approval of MOFCOM is required, the approval that 50HZ obtained from the Yangjiang High-Tech Zone may be deemed incomplete and the transferee, namely Deer International, may need to obtain further approval from MOFCOM.
Pending Litigation
On March 28, 2011, the Company filed suit in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, captioned Deer Consumer Products, Inc. v. Alfred Little, et al., Index No. 650823/2011, against a certain blogger, “Alfred Little,” the website SeekingAlpha.com and others. The Company claims in this action allege the publishing of false and defamatory statements by the defendants as part of scheme to manipulate and depress the market for our common stock. The Company is claiming compensatory and punitive damages totaling at least $11 million, not including claims for attorneys’ fees, and other equitable remedies, including disgorgement of any illicit trading profits received by the defendants in connection with the alleged market manipulation scheme. On August 29, 2011, the Company obtained a Court order allowing us to effect service of the summons and complaint upon defendant Alfred Little via email and related notice. We effected service on Alfred Little pursuant to that order and on September 29, 2011, Alfred Little filed motions to dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction and for permission to appear anonymously as a party in the litigation. In addition, on August 31, 2011, the Court granted defendant SeekingAlpha.com’s motion to dismiss our claim against it on the ground that a Federal statute, the Communications Decency Act, 47 U.S.C. § 230, precluded the claim against SeekingAlpha.com. On September 29, 2011, the Company filed a notice of appeal of this decision. If the Company decides to go through with the appeal, it must file a brief “perfecting” the appeal no later than June 29, 2012. On January 27, 2012, the Court denied in part Alfred Little’s motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction and permitted the Company to conduct discovery on the issue of personal jurisdiction after a confidentiality agreement was reached between the parties. The court also requested that Alfred Little submit to the Court evidence corroborating his allegations of potential risks of physical harm for in camera review. On February 17, 2012, the parties reached a confidentiality agreement. On February 23, 2012, after an in camera review of the evidence presented by Alfred Little, the Court permitted Alfred Little to proceed anonymously until the Court decides the jurisdictional issue and re-directed that the parties proceed with jurisdictional discovery pursuant to the previously ordered confidentiality agreement. The Company has commenced discovery on the jurisdictional issue.
F-20

DEER CONSUMER PRODUCTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2011 AND 2010
On April 29, 2011, a purported securities class action lawsuit on behalf of the purchasers of the Company’s common stock between March 31, 2009, and March 21, 2011, James Rose v. Deer Consumer Products, Inc. et al, was filed against the Company and certain of its current and former officers and directors in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The court has not yet certified the class action status. The complaint alleges violations of Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 of the Exchange Act, as well as, in the case of the individual defendants, the Section 20(a) control person provisions of the Exchange Act. The factual assertions in the complaint, based expressly on the published statements at issue in the Alfred Little suit described above, consist primarily of allegations that the defendants made materially false or misleading public statements concerning the Company’s financial condition in 2010 and 2009. The complaint seeks unspecified damages and other relief relating to the purported inflation in the price of the Company’s common stock during the class period. A consolidated amended complaint was filed on September 6, 2011, with essentially the same allegations. The Company filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit, which motion is fully briefed and has been taken under submission by the Court. The Company strongly denies the allegations in the complaint. The Company believes this lawsuit is frivolous and without merit and will contest it vigorously. The Company plans to pursue all legal remedies available to it if the complaint is not withdrawn in its entirety.
Note 16 – Condensed Financial Information of U.S. Parent
Deer Consumer Products, Inc. is a U.S. holding company and owns no operating assets and has no significant operations independent of its subsidiaries. Set forth below are condensed financial statements for Deer Consumer Products, Inc. (parent) on a stand-alone, unconsolidated basis as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009.
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS

|  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |
ASSETS |
Cash and equivalents |  | $ | 2,215,212 |  |  | $ | 397,872 |
Investment in subsidiaries |  |  | 187,555,050 |  |  |  | 143,012,293 |
Other current assets |  |  | 1,313,220 |  |  |  | 474,902 |
TOTAL ASSETS |  | $ | 191,083,482 |  |  | $ | 143,885,067 |
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY |
Advances from subsidiaries |  | $ | 2,594,067 |  |  | $ | 150,070 |
Tax Payable |  |  | 1,430,565 |  |  |  | - |
Dividend payable |  |  | 1,679,628 |  |  |  | - |
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Common stock |  |  | 33,593 |  |  |  | 33,593 |
Additional paid-in capital |  |  | 91,187,584 |  |  |  | 91,084,958 |
Development funds |  |  | 4,578,803 |  |  |  | 3,063,819 |
Statutory reserve |  |  | 9,157,606 |  |  |  | 6,127,639 |
Other comprehensive income |  |  | 14,769,957 |  |  |  | 6,315,475 |
Retained earnings |  |  | 65,651,679 |  |  |  | 37,109,513 |
Total stockholders' equity |  |  | 185,379,222 |  |  |  | 143,734,997 |
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY |  | $ | 191,083,482 |  |  | $ | 143,885,067 |

F-21

DEER CONSUMER PRODUCTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2011 AND 2010
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

|  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |  |  | 2009 |
Operating expenses |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
General and administrative expenses |  | $ | 1,109,749 |  |  | $ | 890,285 |  |  | $ | 657,327 |
Loss from operations |  |  | (1,109,749 | ) |  |  | (890,285 | ) |  |  | (657,327) |
Non operating income |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Other income (expenses) |  |  | (29,151) |  |  |  | 13,656 |  |  |  | 10,189 |
Equity income in subsidiaries |  |  | 42,440,952 |  |  |  | 31,225,666 |  |  |  | 13,016,230 |
Dividend income from Chinese subsidiary |  |  | 6,352,678 |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |
Total non-operating income |  |  | 48,764,479 |  |  |  | 31,239,322 |  |  |  | 13,026,419 |
Income before income tax |  |  | 47,654,730 |  |  |  | 30,349,037 |  |  |  | 12,369,092 |
Income tax |  |  | 1,496,424 |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |
Net income |  | $ | 46,158,306 |  |  | $ | 30,349,037 |  |  | $ | 12,369,092 |

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

|  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |  |  | 2009 |
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Net income |  | $ | 46,158,306 |  |  | $ | 30,349,037 |  |  | $ | 12,369,092 |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
used in operating activities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Stock-based compensation |  |  | 102,626 |  |  |  | 275,698 |  |  |  | 333,387 |
Equity income in subsidiaries |  |  | (42,440,952 | ) |  |  | (31,225,666 | ) |  |  | (13,016,230 | )
Increase in other assets |  |  | 3,036,244 |  |  |  | (463,060 | ) |  |  | (12,500) |
Net cash used in operating activities |  |  | 6,856,224 |  |  |  | (1,063,991 | ) |  |  | (326,251) |
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Investment in subsidiaries |  |  | - |  |  |  | (1,400,000 | ) |  |  | (78,122,399) |
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Proceeds from sale of common stock, net |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 81,461,883 |
Increase in advances from related party |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 150,070 |
Offering costs paid |  |  | - |  |  |  | (320,000) |  |  |  | - |
Proceeds from the exercise of warrants |  |  | - |  |  |  | 6,964,510 |  |  |  | - |
Dividend paid |  |  | (5,038,884) |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |
Purchased of treasure shares |  |  | - |  |  |  | (6,945,950) |  |  |  | - |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |  |  | (5,038,884 | ) |  |  | (301,440) |  |  |  | 81,611,953 |
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH & EQUIVALENTS |  |  | 1,817,340 |  |  |  | (2,765,431) |  |  |  | 3,163,303 |
CASH & EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING BALANCE |  |  | 397,872 |  |  |  | 3,163,303 |  |  |  | - |
CASH & EQUIVALENTS, ENDING BALANCE |  | $ | 2,215,212 |  |  | $ | 397,872 |  |  | $ | 3,163,303 |

F-22

DEER CONSUMER PRODUCTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2011 AND 2010 (AUDITED)
Note 17 – Selected Quarterly Data (unaudited)

|  | Quarterly Periods Ended |
|  | December 31, |  |  | September 30, |  |  | June 30, |  |  | March 31, |
|  | 2011 |  |  | 2011 |  |  | 2011 |  |  | 2011 |
Net revenue |  | $ | 73,948,714 |  |  | $ | 72,996,341 |  |  | $ | 45,127,684 |  |  | $ | 34,676,146 |
Gross profit |  |  | 23,850,652 |  |  |  | 22,254,355 |  |  |  | 13,148,900 |  |  |  | 9,956,945 |
Income from operation |  |  | 16,970,270 |  |  |  | 15,956,904 |  |  |  | 9,202,424 |  |  |  | 6,098,882 |
Other income (expense) |  |  | 17,391 |  |  |  | (94,076 | ) |  |  | (140,076) |  |  |  | 907,346 |
Net income |  | $ | 13,416,973 |  |  | $ | 13,248,179 |  |  | $ | 7,346,531 |  |  | $ | 5,793,946 |
Earnings per share (basic) |  | $ | 0.40 |  |  | $ | 0.39 |  |  | $ | 0.22 |  |  | $ | 0.17 |

|  | Quarterly Periods Ended |
|  | December 31, |  |  | September 30, |  |  | June 30, |  |  | March 31, |
|  | 2010 |  |  | 2010 |  |  | 2010 |  |  | 2010 |
Net revenue |  | $ | 62,230,434 |  |  | $ | 55,263,309 |  |  | $ | 34,450,687 |  |  | $ | 23,902,457 |
Gross profit |  |  | 17,967,075 |  |  |  | 15,845,832 |  |  |  | 9,881,653 |  |  |  | 6,877,848 |
Income from operation |  |  | 13,493,233 |  |  |  | 11,608,527 |  |  |  | 6,971,574 |  |  |  | 4,774,818 |
Other income (expense) |  |  | (418,084) |  |  |  | (596,617) |  |  |  | 149,532 |  |  |  | 14,480 |
Net income |  | $ | 11,025,850 |  |  | $ | 9,265,624 |  |  | $ | 6,020,540 |  |  | $ | 4,037,023 |
Earnings per share (basic) |  | $ | 0.33 |  |  | $ | 0.28 |  |  | $ | 0.18 |  |  | $ | 0.12 |

Note 18 – Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
Allowance for Inventory

|  | Balance at Beginning of Year |  |  | Charged to Costs and Expenses |  |  | Deductions From Reserves |  |  | Balance at End of Year |
Years Ended December 31, |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
2009 |  | $ | - |  |  | $ | - |  |  | $ | - |  |  | $ | - |
2010 |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |
2011 |  | $ | - |  |  | $ | 158,123 |  |  | $ | - |  |  | $ | 158,123 |

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts of Accounts Receivable

|  | Balance at |  |  | Charged to |  |  | Deductions |  |  | Balance at |
|  | Beginning |  |  | Costs and |  |  | From |  |  | End |
|  | of Year |  |  | Expenses |  |  | Reserves |  |  | of Year |
Years Ended December 31, |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
2009 |  | $ | - |  |  | $ | - |  |  | $ | - |  |  | $ | - |
2010 |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |
2011 |  | $ | - |  |  | $ | - |  |  | $ | - |  |  | $ | - |

F-23

SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

|  | DEER CONSUMER PRODUCTS, INC.
|  | (Registrant)
Date: March 29, 2012 | By: | /s/ Ying He
|  | Ying He Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

Power of Attorney
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Ying He his attorney-in-fact for him in any and all capacities, to sign any amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and to file the same, with exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact, or his substitute or substitutes, may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature |  | Title |  | Date
/s/ Ying He |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |  | March 29, 2012
Ying He |  | (Principal Executive Officer) |  |
/s/ Zongshu Nie |  | Chief Financial Officer and Director |  | March 29, 2012
Zongshu Nie |  | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |  |
/s/ Edward Hua |  | Director |  | March 29, 2012
Edward Hua |  |  |  |
/s/ Arnold Staloff |  | Director |  | March 29, 2012
Arnold Staloff |  |  |  |
/s/ Qi Hua Xu |  | Director |  | March 29, 2012
Qi Hua Xu |  |  |  |

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit No. | Description
2.1 | Share Exchange Agreement and Plan of Reorganization by and between Deer International Group Limited and TAG Events Corp., dated September 3, 2008. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 333-140545) filed on September 5, 2008)
2.2 | Return to Treasury Agreement by and between the Company and Crescent Liu, dated August 26, 2008. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 333-140545) filed on September 5, 2008)
3.1 | Articles of Incorporation (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form SB-2 (File No. 333-140545) filed on February 8, 2007)
3.2 | By-Laws (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Form SB-2 (File No. 333-140545) filed on February 8, 2007)
3.3 | Articles of Exchange of Deer International Group Limited and TAG Events Corp. filed September 3, 2008. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 333-140545) filed on September 5, 2008)
3.4 | Articles of Merger between Deer Consumer Products, Inc. and TAG Events Corp. amending the Articles of Incorporation filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Nevada on September 3, 2008. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 333-140545) filed on September 5, 2008)
4.1 | Specimen Stock Certificate (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (File No. 333-140545) filed on March 31, 2009)
10.1 | Supplemental Agreement by and between Winder Electric Group Ltd., Ying He, Fa’min He, Shenzhen De Mei Long Electric Appliances Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Kafu Industrial Co., Ltd., dated November 19, 2009 (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-34407) filed on November 20, 2009)
10.2 | Form of prior Patent Transfer Agreement by and between Winder Electric Group Ltd., Ying He, Fa’min He, Shenzhen De Mei Long Electric Appliances Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Kafu Industrial Co., Ltd. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-34407) filed on November 20, 2009)
10.3 | Form of prior Copyright and Trademark Transfer Agreement by and between Winder Electric Group Ltd., Ying He, Fa’min He, Shenzhen De Mei Long Electric Appliances Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Kafu Industrial Co., Ltd. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-34407) filed on November 20, 2009)
10.4 | Distribution Agreement by and between Winder Electric Group Ltd. and Suning Nanjing Purchasing Center, dated December 1, 2009 (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-34407) filed on December 4, 2009)
10.5 | Form of Stock Option Agreement for use with stock options granted pursuant to the Deer Consumer Products, Inc. 2009 Equity Incentive Plan (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-34407) filed on December 24, 2009)
10.6 | Distribution Agreement by and between Guangdong Deer Consumer Products, Inc. and Gome Home Appliance Co., Ltd., dated January 15, 2010 (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to Amendment No. 1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-34407) filed on April 30, 2010)
10.7 | Deer Consumer Products, Inc. 2009 Equity Incentive Plan (Incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A (File No. 001-34407) filed on October 6, 2009)
10.8 | Lockup Agreement between Achieve On Limited, Ying He and Deer Consumer Products, Inc., dated March 23, 2010 (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-34407) filed on March 29, 2010)
10.9 | Lockup Agreement between Sino Unity Limited, Yu Hai Deng and Deer Consumer Products, Inc., dated March 23, 2010 (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-34407) filed on March 29, 2010)
10.10 | Lockup Agreement between True Olympic Limited, Zong Zhu Nie and Deer Consumer Products, Inc., dated March 23, 2010 (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-34407) filed on March 29, 2010)
10.11 | Lockup Agreement between Great Scale Holdings Limited, Fa Min He and Deer Consumer Products, Inc., dated March 23, 2010 (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-34407) filed on March 29, 2010)
10.12 | Lockup Agreement between New Million Holdings Limited, Bao Zhi Li and Deer Consumer Products, Inc., dated March 23, 2010 (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-34407) filed on March 29, 2010)
10.13 | Lockup Agreement between Tiger Castle Limited, Jing Wu Chen and Deer Consumer Products, Inc., dated March 23, 2010 (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-34407) filed on March 29, 2010)
10.14 | Lockup Agreement between Sourceland Limited, Yong Mei Wang and Deer Consumer Products, Inc., dated March 23, 2010 (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-34407) filed on March 29, 2010)
†21 | Subsidiaries of Deer Consumer Products, Inc.
†23.1 | Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
†24.1 | Power of Attorney (Included on the Signature Page of this Annual Report on Form 10-K)
†31.1 | Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
†31.2 | Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
†32.1 | Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as signed by the Chief Executive Officer
†32.2 | Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as signed by the Chief Financial Officer
†101.INS | XBRL Instance Document
†101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
†101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
†101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
†101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
†101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

† Filed herewith