Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10‑Q

☒ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2016
OR
☐ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 001‑34691

ATLANTIC POWER CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

British Columbia, Canada (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | 55‑0886410 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
3 Allied Drive, Suite 220 Dedham, MA (Address of principal executive offices) | 02026 (Zip code)

(617) 977‑2400

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S‑T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non‑accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b‑2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer ☐ | Accelerated filer ☒ | Non‑accelerated filer ☐ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b‑2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s Common Stock as of May 2, 2016 was 122,083,528.

Table of Contents

ATLANTIC POWER CORPORATION

FORM 10‑Q

THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2016

Index

| General: |  | 3
| PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION |  |
ITEM 1. | CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES |  |
| Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2016 (unaudited) and December 31, 2015 |  | 4
| Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and March 31, 2015 (unaudited) |  | 5
| Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and March 31, 2015 (unaudited) |  | 6
| Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and March 31, 2015 (unaudited) |  | 7
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) |  | 8
ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |  | 33
ITEM 3. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |  | 49
ITEM 4. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |  | 49
| PART II—OTHER INFORMATION |  | 51
ITEM 1. | LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |  | 51
ITEM 1A. | RISK FACTORS |  | 51
ITEM 6. | EXHIBITS |  | 52

Table of Contents

GENERA L

In this Quarterly Report on Form 10‑Q, references to “Cdn$” and “Canadian dollars” are to the lawful currency of Canada and references to “$” and “US$” and “U.S. dollars” are to the lawful currency of the United States. All dollar amounts herein are in U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated.

Unless otherwise stated, or the context otherwise requires, references in this Quarterly Report on Form 10‑Q to “we,” “us,” “our,” “Atlantic Power” and the “Company” refer to Atlantic Power Corporation, those entities owned or controlled by Atlantic Power Corporation and predecessors of Atlantic Power Corporation.

3

Table of Contents

ATLANTIC POWER CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET S

(in millions of U.S. dollars)

|  | March 31, |  | December 31, |
|  | 2016 |  | 2015 |
|  |  | (unaudited) |  |  |  |
Assets |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Current assets: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Cash and cash equivalents |  | $ | 64.3 |  | $ | 72.4 |
Restricted cash |  |  | 10.0 |  |  | 15.2 |
Accounts receivable |  |  | 40.0 |  |  | 39.6 |
Current portion of derivative instruments asset (Note 7 and 8) |  |  | 0.2 |  |  | — |
Inventory |  |  | 14.1 |  |  | 16.9 |
Prepayments |  |  | 8.7 |  |  | 8.3 |
Income taxes receivable |  |  | 3.2 |  |  | 3.5 |
Other current assets |  |  | 2.6 |  |  | 4.4 |
Total current assets |  |  | 143.1 |  |  | 160.3 |
Property, plant, and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $255.6 million and $236.3 at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively |  |  | 777.8 |  |  | 777.7 |
Equity investments in unconsolidated affiliates (Note 4) |  |  | 292.6 |  |  | 286.2 |
Power purchase agreements and intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $257.2 million and $238.0 million at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively |  |  | 299.9 |  |  | 308.9 |
Goodwill |  |  | 134.5 |  |  | 134.5 |
Derivative instruments asset (Notes 7 and 8) |  |  | 0.4 |  |  | 0.3 |
Other assets |  |  | 11.7 |  |  | 6.7 |
Total assets |  | $ | 1,660.0 |  | $ | 1,674.6 |
Liabilities |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Current liabilities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Accounts payable |  | $ | 4.1 |  | $ | 6.9 |
Accrued interest |  |  | 6.8 |  |  | 1.6 |
Other accrued liabilities |  |  | 25.3 |  |  | 28.8 |
Current portion of long-term debt (Note 5) |  |  | 15.7 |  |  | 15.8 |
Current portion of derivative instruments liability (Note 7 and 8) |  |  | 35.5 |  |  | 36.7 |
Other current liabilities |  |  | 1.7 |  |  | 2.5 |
Total current liabilities |  |  | 89.1 |  |  | 92.3 |
Long-term debt, net of unamortized deferred financing costs (Note 5) |  |  | 666.9 |  |  | 682.7 |
Convertible debentures, net of unamortized deferred financing costs (Note 5 and 6) |  |  | 271.4 |  |  | 277.7 |
Derivative instruments liability (Note 7 and 8) |  |  | 26.5 |  |  | 20.8 |
Deferred income taxes (Note 9) |  |  | 85.5 |  |  | 85.7 |
Power purchase and fuel supply agreement liabilities, net of accumulated amortization of $14.9 million and $14.0 million at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively |  |  | 27.4 |  |  | 27.0 |
Other long-term liabilities |  |  | 55.0 |  |  | 53.2 |
Total liabilities |  |  | 1,221.8 |  |  | 1,239.4 |
Equity |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Common shares, no par value, unlimited authorized shares; 122,083,528 and 122,153,082 issued and outstanding at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 |  |  | 1,290.2 |  |  | 1,290.6 |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (Note 2) |  |  | (121.2) |  |  | (139.3) |
Retained deficit (Note 12) |  |  | (952.1) |  |  | (937.4) |
Total Atlantic Power Corporation shareholders’ equity |  |  | 216.9 |  |  | 213.9 |
Preferred shares issued by a subsidiary company (Note 12) |  |  | 221.3 |  |  | 221.3 |
Total equity |  |  | 438.2 |  |  | 435.2 |
Total liabilities and equity |  | $ | 1,660.0 |  | $ | 1,674.6 |

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

4

Table of Contents

ATLANTIC POWER CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATION S

(in millions of U.S. dollars, except per share amounts)

(Unaudited)

|  | Three Months Ended March 31, |  |
|  | 2016 |  | 2015 |  |
Project revenue: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Energy sales |  | $ | 52.5 |  | $ | 54.0 |  |
Energy capacity revenue |  |  | 31.9 |  |  | 33.5 |  |
Other |  |  | 22.0 |  |  | 23.8 |  |
|  |  | 106.4 |  |  | 111.3 |  |
Project expenses: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Fuel |  |  | 38.9 |  |  | 46.2 |  |
Operations and maintenance |  |  | 21.2 |  |  | 21.5 |  |
Development |  |  | — |  |  | 1.1 |  |
Depreciation and amortization |  |  | 24.8 |  |  | 28.0 |  |
|  |  | 84.9 |  |  | 96.8 |  |
Project other income: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Change in fair value of derivative instruments (Notes 7 and 8) |  |  | (1.2) |  |  | (1.7) |  |
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates (Note 4) |  |  | 10.7 |  |  | 10.8 |  |
Interest expense, net |  |  | (2.1) |  |  | (2.1) |  |
Other income, net |  |  | (0.2) |  |  | — |  |
|  |  | 7.2 |  |  | 7.0 |  |
Project income |  |  | 28.7 |  |  | 21.5 |  |
Administrative and other expenses (income): |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Administration |  |  | 6.1 |  |  | 9.4 |  |
Interest, net |  |  | 16.6 |  |  | 25.7 |  |
Foreign exchange loss (gain) (Note 8) |  |  | 19.8 |  |  | (32.2) |  |
Other income, net (Note 6) |  |  | (2.5) |  |  | (1.4) |  |
|  |  | 40.0 |  |  | 1.5 |  |
(Loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes |  |  | (11.3) |  |  | 20.0 |  |
Income tax expense (benefit) (Note 9) |  |  | 1.6 |  |  | (4.6) |  |
Loss (income) from continuing operations |  |  | (12.9) |  |  | 24.6 |  |
Net loss from discontinued operations, net of tax (Note 13) |  |  | — |  |  | (12.3) |  |
Net (loss) income |  |  | (12.9) |  |  | 12.3 |  |
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests |  |  | — |  |  | (7.5) |  |
Net income attributable to preferred shares dividends of a subsidiary company |  |  | 2.0 |  |  | 2.3 |  |
Net (loss) income attributable to Atlantic Power Corporation |  | $ | (14.9) |  | $ | 17.5 |  |
Basic and diluted (loss) income per share: (Note 11) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
(Loss) income from continuing operations attributable to Atlantic Power Corporation |  | $ | (0.12) |  | $ | 0.17 |  |
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax |  |  | — |  |  | (0.03) |  |
Net (loss) income attributable to Atlantic Power Corporation |  | $ | (0.12) |  | $ | 0.14 |  |
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding: (Note 11) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Basic |  |  | 121.9 |  |  | 121.5 |  |
Diluted |  |  | 121.9 |  |  | 122.4 |  |
Dividends per common share: |  | $ | 0.0 |  | $ | 0.02 |  |

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

5

Table of Contents

ATLANTIC POWER CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

(in millions of U.S. dollars)

(Unaudited)

|  | Three Months Ended March 31, |  |
|  | 2016 |  | 2015 |  |
Net (loss) income |  | $ | (12.9) |  | $ | 12.3 |  |
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Unrealized loss on hedging activities |  | $ | (0.5) |  | $ | (0.5) |  |
Net amount reclassified to earnings |  |  | 0.2 |  |  | 0.2 |  |
Net unrealized loss on derivatives |  |  | (0.3) |  |  | (0.3) |  |
Foreign currency translation adjustments |  |  | 18.5 |  |  | (35.1) |  |
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax |  |  | 18.2 |  |  | (35.4) |  |
Comprehensive income (loss) |  |  | 5.3 |  |  | (23.1) |  |
Less: Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests |  |  | 2.0 |  |  | (5.2) |  |
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Atlantic Power Corporation |  | $ | 3.3 |  | $ | (17.9) |  |

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

6

Table of Contents

ATLANTIC POWER CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in millions of U.S. dollars)

(Unaudited)

|  | Three months ended |
|  | March 31, |
|  | 2016 |  | 2015 |
Cash provided by operating activities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Net (loss) income |  | $ | (12.9) |  | $ | 12.3 |
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by operating activities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Depreciation and amortization |  |  | 24.8 |  |  | 38.1 |
Gain on purchase and cancellation of convertible debentures |  |  | (2.5) |  |  | (1.4) |
Loss on disposal of fixed assets |  |  | 0.2 |  |  | — |
Stock-based compensation expense |  |  | 0.6 |  |  | 0.4 |
Equity in earnings from unconsolidated affiliates |  |  | (10.7) |  |  | (9.9) |
Distributions from unconsolidated affiliates |  |  | 4.3 |  |  | 7.2 |
Unrealized foreign exchange loss (gain) |  |  | 20.1 |  |  | (32.8) |
Change in fair value of derivative instruments |  |  | 1.2 |  |  | 9.0 |
Change in deferred income taxes |  |  | 0.1 |  |  | (3.9) |
Change in other operating balances |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Accounts receivable |  |  | (0.5) |  |  | 6.0 |
Inventory |  |  | 2.8 |  |  | 3.6 |
Prepayments, refundable income taxes and other assets |  |  | (10.4) |  |  | 4.3 |
Accounts payable |  |  | 1.4 |  |  | (5.5) |
Accruals and other liabilities |  |  | 10.9 |  |  | 7.7 |
Cash provided by operating activities: |  |  | 29.4 |  |  | 35.1 |
Cash provided by investing activities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Change in restricted cash |  |  | 5.2 |  |  | 9.7 |
Capitalized development costs |  |  | — |  |  | (0.8) |
Reimbursement of costs for third-party construction project |  |  | 4.7 |  |  | — |
Purchase of property, plant and equipment |  |  | (0.7) |  |  | (1.3) |
Cash provided by investing activities |  |  | 9.2 |  |  | 7.6 |
Cash used in financing activities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Common share repurchases |  |  | (0.9) |  |  | — |
Repayment of corporate and project-level debt |  |  | (27.5) |  |  | (32.8) |
Repayment of convertible debentures |  |  | (16.3) |  |  | (5.7) |
Dividends paid to common shareholders |  |  | — |  |  | (2.9) |
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests |  |  | — |  |  | (2.7) |
Dividends paid to preferred shareholders |  |  | (2.0) |  |  | (2.3) |
Cash used in financing activities |  |  | (46.7) |  |  | (46.4) |
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |  |  | (8.1) |  |  | (3.7) |
Less cash at discontinued operations |  |  | — |  |  | (6.2) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period at discontinued operations |  |  | — |  |  | 3.9 |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |  |  | 72.4 |  |  | 106.1 |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |  | $ | 64.3 |  | $ | 100.1 |
Supplemental cash flow information |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Interest paid |  | $ | 8.9 |  | $ | 11.7 |
Income taxes paid, net |  | $ | 0.9 |  | $ | 0.4 |
Accruals for construction in progress |  | $ | 1.0 |  | $ | — |

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

7

Table of Contents

ATLANTIC POWER CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in millions U.S. dollars, except per‑share amounts)

(Unaudited)

1. Nature of business

General

Atlantic Power owns and operates a diverse fleet of power generation assets in the United States and Canada. Our power generation projects sell electricity to utilities and other large commercial customers largely under long‑term power purchase agreements (“PPAs”), which seek to minimize exposure to changes in commodity prices. As of March 31, 2016, our power generation projects in operation had an aggregate gross electric generation capacity of approximately 2,138 megawatts (“MW”) in which our aggregate ownership interest is approximately 1,500 MW. Our current portfolio consists of interests in twenty-three operational power generation projects across eleven states in the United States and two provinces in Canada. Eighteen of our projects are majority‑owned subsidiaries.

Atlantic Power is a corporation established under the laws of the Province of Ontario on June 18, 2004 and continued to the Province of British Columbia on July 8, 2005. Our shares trade on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol “ATP” and on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “AT.” Our registered office is located at 215-10451 Shellbridge Way, Richmond, British Columbia V6X 2W8 Canada and our headquarters is located at 3 Allied Drive, Suite 220, Dedham, Massachusetts 02026, USA. Our telephone number in Dedham is (617) 977‑2400 and the address of our website is www.atlanticpower.com. Information contained on Atlantic Power’s website or that can be accessed through its website is not incorporated into and does not constitute a part of this Quarterly Report on Form 10‑Q. We have included our website address only as an inactive textual reference and do not intend it to be an active link to our website. We make available on our website, free of charge, our Annual Report on Form 10‑K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10‑Q, Current Reports on Form 8‑K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Additionally, we make available on our website our Canadian securities filings, which are not incorporated by reference into our Exchange Act filings.

Basis of presentation

The interim consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10‑Q have been prepared in accordance with the SEC regulations for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10‑Q. The following notes should be read in conjunction with the accounting policies and other disclosures as set forth in the notes to our financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10‑K for the year ended December 31, 2015. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year.

In our opinion, the accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements present fairly our consolidated financial position as of March 31, 2016, the results of operations and comprehensive income (loss) for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, and our cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 in accordance with U.S generally accepted accounting policies. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals and other adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included.

Use of estimates

The preparation of financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the year. Actual results could differ from those estimates. During the periods presented, we have made a number of estimates and valuation assumptions, including the fair values of acquired assets, the useful lives and recoverability of property, plant and equipment, valuation of goodwill, intangible

8

Table of Contents

ATLANTIC POWER CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in millions U.S. dollars, except per‑share amounts)

(Unaudited)

assets and liabilities related to PPAs and fuel supply agreements, the recoverability of equity investments, the recoverability of deferred tax assets, tax provisions, the fair value of financial instruments and derivatives, pension obligations, asset retirement obligations and equity based compensation. In addition, estimates are used to test long lived assets and goodwill for impairment and to determine the fair value of impaired assets. These estimates and valuation assumptions are based on present conditions and our planned course of action, as well as assumptions about future business and economic conditions. See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates” in our Annual Report on Form 10 K for the year ended December 31, 2015. As better information becomes available or actual amounts are determinable, the recorded estimates are revised. Should the underlying valuation assumptions and estimates change, the recorded amounts could change by a material amount.

Recently issued accounting standards

Adopted

In January 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued changes to the presentation of extraordinary items. Such items are defined as transactions or events that are both unusual in nature and infrequent in occurrence, and, currently, are required to be presented separately in an entity’s statement of operations, net of income tax, after income from continuing operations. The changes eliminate the concept of an extraordinary item and, therefore, the presentation of such items will no longer be required. Notwithstanding this change, an entity will still be required to present and disclose a transaction or event that is both unusual in nature and infrequent in occurrence in the notes to the financial statements. These changes became effective for us on January 1, 2016. The adoption of these changes did not have an impact on the consolidated financial statements.

In February 2015, the FASB issued changes to the analysis that an entity must perform to determine whether it should consolidate certain types of legal entities. These changes (i) modify the evaluation of whether limited partnerships and similar legal entities are variable interest entities or voting interest entities, (ii) eliminate the presumption that a general partner should consolidate a limited partnership, (iii) affect the consolidation analysis of reporting entities that are involved with variable interest entities, particularly those that have fee arrangements and related party relationships, and (iv) provide a scope exception from consolidation guidance for reporting entities with interests in legal entities that are required to comply with or operate in accordance with requirements that are similar to those in Rule 2a-7 of the Investment Company Act of 1940 for registered money market funds. These changes became effective for us on January 1, 2016. The adoption of these changes did not have an impact on the consolidated financial statements.

In April 2015, the FASB issued changes to the presentation of debt issuance costs. Currently, such costs are required to be presented as a noncurrent asset in an entity’s balance sheet and amortized into interest expense over the term of the related debt instrument. The changes require that debt issuance costs be presented in an entity’s balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying value of the related debt liability. The amortization of debt issuance costs remains unchanged. These changes became effective for us on January 1, 2016. As a result, we have presented $39.5 million and $42.5 million of deferred financing costs as a direct deduction from long-term debt and convertible debentures for the periods ended March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.

In September 2015, the FASB issued new guidance on adjustments to provisional amounts recognized in a business combination, which are currently recognized on a retrospective basis. Under the new requirements, adjustments will be recognized in the reporting period in which the adjustments are determined. The effects of changes in depreciation, amortization, or other income arising from changes to the provisional amounts, if any, are included in earnings of the reporting period in which the adjustments to the provisional amounts are determined. An entity is also required to present separately on the face of the statement of operations or disclose in the notes the portion of the amount recorded in current-period earnings by line item that would have been recorded in previous reporting periods if the

9

Table of Contents

ATLANTIC POWER CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in millions U.S. dollars, except per‑share amounts)

(Unaudited)

adjustment to the provisional amounts had been recognized as of the acquisition date. The new requirements became effective for us beginning January 1, 2016. We will apply this new guidance to any future business combinations

Issued

In May 2014, the FASB issued new recognition and disclosure requirements for revenue from contracts with customers, which supersedes the existing revenue recognition guidance. The new recognition requirements focus on when the customer obtains control of the goods or services, rather than the current risks and rewards model of recognition. The core principle of the new standard is that an entity will recognize revenue when it transfers goods or services to its customers in an amount that reflects the consideration an entity expects to be entitled to for those goods or services. The new disclosure requirements will include information intended to communicate the nature, amount, timing and any uncertainty of revenue and cash flows from applicable contracts, including any significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from the costs to obtain or fulfill a contract. Entities will generally be required to make more estimates and use more judgment under the new standard. The new requirements will be effective for us beginning January 1, 2018, and may be implemented either retrospectively for all periods presented, or as a cumulative-effect adjustment as of January 1, 2018. Early adoption is permitted, but not before January 1, 2017. Management is currently evaluating the potential impact of this new guidance on our consolidated financial statements and which implementation approach to select.

In July 2015, the FASB issued changes to the subsequent measurement of inventory. Currently, an entity is required to measure its inventory at the lower of cost or market, whereby market can be replacement cost, net realizable value, or net realizable value less an approximately normal profit margin. The changes require that inventory be measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value, thereby eliminating the use of the other two market methodologies. Net realizable value is defined as the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. These changes become effective for us on January 1, 2017. Management has determined that the adoption of these changes will not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

In November 2015, the FASB issued changes to the balance sheet classification of deferred taxes. These changes simplify the presentation of deferred income taxes by requiring all deferred income tax assets and liabilities, along with any related valuation allowance, to be classified as noncurrent in a classified balance sheet. The current requirement that deferred tax assets and liabilities of a tax-paying component of an entity be offset and presented as a single amount is not affected by these changes. The new guidance will be effective for us in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016 and is not expected to have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued authoritative guidance intended to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing lease assets and liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. Under the new guidance, lessees will be required to recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability, measured on a discounted basis, at the commencement date for all leases with terms greater than twelve months. Additionally, this guidance will require disclosures to help investors and other financial statement users to better understand the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases, including qualitative and quantitative requirements. The guidance should be applied under a modified retrospective transition approach for leases existing at the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the adoption-period financial statements. Any leases that expire before the initial application date will not require any accounting adjustment. This guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. We are currently evaluating the potential impact on our financial position and results of operations upon adoption of this guidance.

10

Table of Contents

ATLANTIC POWER CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in millions U.S. dollars, except per‑share amounts)

(Unaudited)

In March 2016, the FASB issued authoritative guidance intended to simplify and improve several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions. The new guidance includes amendments to share-based accounting for income taxes, including adjustments to how excess tax benefits and a company's payments for tax withholdings should be classified in the statement of cash flows. This guidance is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, with early adoption permitted. We are currently evaluating the potential impact on our financial position and results of operations upon adoption of this guidance.

2. Changes in accumulated other comprehensive loss by component

The changes in accumulated other comprehensive loss by component were as follows:

|  | Three Months Ended March 31, |
|  | 2016 |  | 2015 |
Foreign currency translation |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Balance at beginning of period |  | $ | (139.1) |  | $ | (66.3) |
Other comprehensive income (loss): |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Foreign currency translation adjustments(1) |  |  | 18.4 |  |  | (35.1) |
Balance at end of period |  | $ | (120.7) |  | $ | (101.4) |
Pension |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Balance at beginning of period |  | $ | (0.4) |  | $ | (2.1) |
Other comprehensive income (loss): |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Unrecognized net actuarial gain (loss) |  |  | — |  |  | — |
Tax benefit (expense) |  |  | — |  |  | — |
Total Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications, net of tax |  |  | — |  |  | — |
Amortization of net actuarial loss |  |  | — |  |  | — |
Tax benefit |  |  | — |  |  | — |
Total amount reclassified from Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax |  |  | — |  |  | — |
Total Other comprehensive (loss) income |  |  | — |  |  | — |
Balance at end of period |  | $ | (0.4) |  | $ | (2.1) |
Cash flow hedges |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Balance at beginning of period |  | $ | 0.2 |  | $ | 0.1 |
Other comprehensive income (loss): |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Net change from periodic revaluations |  |  | (0.8) |  |  | (0.9) |
Tax benefit |  |  | 0.3 |  |  | 0.4 |
Total Other comprehensive income before reclassifications, net of tax |  |  | (0.5) |  |  | (0.5) |
Net amount reclassified to earnings: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Interest rate swaps(2) |  |  | 0.3 |  |  | 0.3 |
Sub-total |  |  | 0.3 |  |  | 0.3 |
Tax benefit |  |  | (0.1) |  |  | (0.1) |
Total amount reclassified from Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax |  |  | 0.2 |  |  | 0.2 |
Total Other comprehensive income |  |  | (0.3) |  |  | (0.3) |
Balance at end of period |  | $ | (0.1) |  | $ | (0.2) |

| (1) |  | In all periods presented, there were no tax impacts related to rate changes and no amounts were reclassified to earnings (loss).

| (2) |  | This amount was included in Interest expense, net on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

11

Table of Contents

ATLANTIC POWER CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in millions U.S. dollars, except per‑share amounts)

(Unaudited)

3. Assets held for sale and discontinued operations

On June 26, 2015, Atlantic Power Transmission, Inc. (“APT”), our wholly-owned, direct subsidiary, sold our Wind Projects under a definitive agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with TerraForm AP Acquisition Holdings, LLC (“TerraForm”), an affiliate of SunEdison, Inc. (an affiliate of TerraForm Power, Inc.). The sale was completed for aggregate cash proceeds of approximately $335 million after transaction fees, exclusive of transaction-related taxes. We recorded a $46.8 million gain on sale, which is included as a component of income from discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2015.

Terraform acquired from APT, 100% of APT’s direct membership interests in a holding company formed to facilitate the sale, thereby acquiring our indirect interests in our portfolio of Wind Projects consisting of five operating wind projects in Idaho and Oklahoma and representing 521 MW net ownership: Goshen (12.5% economic interest), Idaho Wind (27.6% economic interest), Meadow Creek (100% economic interest); Rockland Wind Farm (50% economic interest, but consolidated on a 100% basis); and Canadian Hills (99% economic interest).As a result of the sale, we deconsolidated approximately $249 million of project debt (or approximately $274 million as adjusted for our proportional ownership of Rockland, Goshen North and Idaho Wind) and approximately $224 million of non-controlling interest related to tax equity interests at Canadian Hills and the minority ownership interests at Rockland and Canadian Hills.

The Wind Projects were designated as assets held for sale and discontinued operations on March 31, 2015, the date we established a firm commitment to a plan to sell the wind assets. Our determination to designate the Wind Projects as discontinued operations was based on the impact the sale would have on our operations and financial results and because the Wind Projects made up the entirety of our Wind reportable Segment. We stopped depreciating the property, plant and equipment of the Wind Projects on the designation date.

The following table summarizes the revenue and income (loss) from operations of the Wind Projects for the three months ended March 31, 2015:

|  | Three months
|  | ended
|  | March 31,
|  | 2015
Revenue |  | $ | 16.7
Project expenses: |  |  |
Operations and maintenance |  |  | 5.6
Depreciation and amortization |  |  | 10.1
|  |  | 15.7
Project other expense: |  |  |
Change in fair value of derivatives |  |  | (7.3)
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates |  |  | (0.9)
Interest expense, net |  |  | (3.4)
Gain (loss) on sale of asset |  |  | —
|  |  | (11.6)
Loss from operations of discontinued businesses |  |  | (10.6)
Income tax expense |  |  | 1.7
Loss from operations of discontinued businesses, net of tax |  |  | (12.3)
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests of discontinued businesses |  |  | (7.5)
Loss from operations of discontinued businesses, net of noncontrolling interests |  | $ | (4.8)

12

Table of Contents

ATLANTIC POWER CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in millions U.S. dollars, except per‑share amounts)

(Unaudited)

Basic and diluted loss per share related to loss from discontinued operations for the Wind Projects was $(0.03) for the three months ended March 31, 2015.

The following table summarizes the operating and investing cash flows of the Wind Projects for the three months ended March 31, 2015:

| Three months |
| ended |
| March 31, |
| 2015 |
Cash provided by operating activities | $ | 10.8 |
Cash provided by investing activities |  | 1.4 |

The following table summarizes the March 31, 2015 financial position of the Wind Projects that were classified as assets held for sale:

|  | March 31, |
|  | 2015 |
Current assets: |  |  |  |
Cash and cash equivalents |  | $ | 6.2 |
Accounts receivable |  |  | 11.2 |
Other current assets |  |  | 2.4 |
|  |  | 19.8 |
Non-current assets: |  |  |  |
Property, Plant & Equipment |  |  | 700.5 |
Equity investments in unconsolidated affiliates |  |  | 36.5 |
Other intangible assets, net |  |  | 4.3 |
Restricted cash |  |  | 17.9 |
Other assets |  |  | 1.8 |
Assets held for sale |  | $ | 780.8 |
Current liabilities: |  |  |  |
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities |  | $ | 7.7 |
Current portion of long-term debt |  |  | 6.4 |
Current portion of derivative instruments liability |  |  | 4.8 |
|  |  | 18.9 |
Long term liabilities |  |  |  |
Long-term debt |  |  | 242.4 |
Derivative instruments liability |  |  | 15.7 |
Other long-term liabilities |  |  | 4.1 |
Liabilities held for sale |  | $ | 281.1 |
Noncontrolling interests held for sale |  |  | 228.8 |

13

Table of Contents

ATLANTIC POWER CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in millions U.S. dollars, except per‑share amounts)

(Unaudited)

4. Equity method investments in unconsolidated affiliates

The following summarizes the operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, for our equity method investments:

|  | Three Months Ended March 31, |
Operating results |  | 2016 |  | 2015 |
Revenue |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Chambers |  | $ | 12.7 |  | $ | 15.4 |
Frederickson |  |  | 5.1 |  |  | 4.7 |
Orlando |  |  | 13.4 |  |  | 12.8 |
Other(1) |  |  | 1.8 |  |  | 4.9 |
|  |  | 33.0 |  |  | 37.8 |
Project expenses |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Chambers |  |  | 8.8 |  |  | 11.4 |
Frederickson |  |  | 4.5 |  |  | 4.1 |
Orlando |  |  | 6.6 |  |  | 6.6 |
Other(1) |  |  | 1.9 |  |  | 4.5 |
|  |  | 21.8 |  |  | 26.6 |
Project other income (expense) |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Chambers |  |  | (0.5) |  |  | (0.5) |
Frederickson |  |  | — |  |  | — |
Orlando |  |  | — |  |  | — |
Other(1) |  |  | — |  |  | 0.1 |
|  |  | (0.5) |  |  | (0.4) |
Project income (loss) |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Chambers |  | $ | 3.4 |  | $ | 3.5 |
Frederickson |  |  | 0.6 |  |  | 0.6 |
Orlando |  |  | 6.8 |  |  | 6.2 |
Other(1) |  |  | (0.1) |  |  | 0.5 |
|  |  | 10.7 |  |  | 10.8 |

| (1) |  | Includes equity method investments that individually do not exceed 10% of consolidated total assets or income (loss) before income taxes.

14

Table of Contents

ATLANTIC POWER CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in millions U.S. dollars, except per‑share amounts)

(Unaudited)

5. Long‑term debt

Long‑term debt consists of the following:

|  | March 31, |  | December 31, |  |  |  |  |
|  | 2016 |  | 2015 |  | Interest Rate |
Recourse Debt: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Senior secured term loan facility, due 2021 |  | $ | 447.9 |  | $ | 473.2 |  | LIBOR(1) | plus | 3.75 | %
Senior unsecured notes, due June 2036 (Cdn$210.0) |  |  | 161.7 |  |  | 151.7 |  |  |  | 5.95 | %
Non-Recourse Debt: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Epsilon Power Partners term facility, due 2019 |  |  | 18.0 |  |  | 19.5 |  | LIBOR | plus | 3.125 | %
Cadillac term loan, due 2025 |  |  | 28.9 |  |  | 29.5 |  | LIBOR | plus | 1.37 | %
Piedmont term loan, due 2018 |  |  | 59.0 |  |  | 59.0 |  | LIBOR | plus | 3.50 | %
Other long-term debt |  |  | 0.3 |  |  | 0.4 |  | 5.50 | % - | 6.70 | %
Less: unamortized deferred financing costs |  |  | (33.2) |  |  | (34.8) |  |  |  |  |
Less: current maturities |  |  | (15.7) |  |  | (15.8) |  |  |  |  |
Total long-term debt |  | $ | 666.9 |  | $ | 682.7 |  |  |  |  |

Current maturities consist of the following:

|  | March 31, |  | December 31, |  |  |  |  |
|  | 2016 |  | 2015 |  | Interest Rate |
Current Maturities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Senior secured term loan facility, due 2021 |  | $ | 4.5 |  | $ | 4.7 |  | LIBOR(1) | plus | 3.75 | %
Epsilon Power Partners term facility, due 2019 |  |  | 6.0 |  |  | 6.0 |  | LIBOR | plus | 3.125 | %
Cadillac term loan, due 2025 |  |  | 2.6 |  |  | 2.5 |  | LIBOR | plus | 1.37 | %
Piedmont term loan, due 2018 |  |  | 2.4 |  |  | 2.4 |  | LIBOR | plus | 3.50 | %
Other short-term debt |  |  | 0.2 |  |  | 0.2 |  | 5.50 | % - | 6.70 | %
Total current maturities |  | $ | 15.7 |  | $ | 15.8 |  |  |  |  |

| (1) |  | LIBOR cannot be less than 1.00%. On May 5, 2014, we entered into interest rate swap agreements to mitigate the exposure to changes in LIBOR for $199.0 million notional amount ($1 40.4 million at March 31, 2016) of the $600.0 million ($447.9 million at March 31, 2016) outstanding aggregate borrowings under our senior secured term loan facility. See Note 8, Accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities for further details.

New Credit Facilities

On April 13, 2016, APLP Holdings Limited Partnership (“APLP Holdings”), our wholly-owned subsidiary, entered into new senior secured credit facilities, comprising $700 million in aggregate principal amount of senior secured term loan facilities (“the “New Term Loans”) and $200 million in aggregate principal amount of senior secured revolving credit facilities (the “New Revolver” and together with the New Term Loans, the “New Credit Facilities”). On the same date, $700 million was drawn under the New Term Loan, bearing interest at the Adjusted Eurodollar Rate plus the applicable margin of 5.00%, and letters of credit in an aggregate face amount of $105.8 million were issued (but not drawn) pursuant to the revolving commitments under the New Revolver and used (i) to fund a debt service reserve in an amount equivalent to six months of debt service (approximately $25.3 million), and (ii) to support contractual credit support obligations of APLP Holdings and its subsidiaries and of certain other affiliates of the Company. The New Revolver matures in April 2021 and the New Term Loans mature in April 2023. We received $679.0 million in proceeds after an original issue discount of 3% ($21.0 million).

15

Table of Contents

ATLANTIC POWER CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in millions U.S. dollars, except per‑share amounts)

(Unaudited)

As of May 2, 2016, we have used the proceeds from the New Term Loans to:

 redeem in whole, at a price equal to par plus accrued interest, APLP’s existing senior secured term loan, maturing in February 2021, in an aggregate principal amount outstanding of $447.9 million (see “Senior Secured Credit Facilities” below);

 deposit proceeds with the trustee for the redemption in whole on May 13, 2016, at a price equal to par plus accrued interest (i) our outstanding Cdn$67.2 million 6.25% Convertible Unsecured Subordinated Debentures, Series A, maturing in March 2017 (the “Series A Debentures”) and (ii) our outstanding Cdn$75.8 million 5.60% Convertible Unsecured Subordinated Debentures, Series B, maturing in June 2017 (the “Series B Debentures”) (total US$ equivalent of $111.8 million); and

 pay transaction costs and expenses of approximately $14.4 million.

We may use the remaining proceeds of approximately $105.0 million for any corporate purpose, which may include, at our discretion, taking into account available funds, market conditions and other relevant factors, repurchase of all or a portion of our $105.3 million of 5.75% Convertible Unsecured Subordinated Debentures, Series C, due June 2019, all or a portion of our Cdn$81.0 million of 6.00% Convertible Unsecured Subordinated Debentures, Series D, due December 2019 and a portion of our preferred and common equity or other potential initiatives to reshape our capital structure.

We accounted for the redemption of the Senior Secured Credit Facilities as an extinguishment of debt and wrote off $30.0 million of deferred financing costs to interest expense in April 2016.

Borrowings under the New Credit Facilities are available in U.S. dollars and Canadian dollars and bear interest at a rate equal to the Adjusted Eurodollar Rate, the Base Rate or the Canadian Prime Rate as applicable, plus an applicable margin between 4.00% and 5.00% that varies depending on whether the loan is a Eurodollar Rate Loan, Base Rate Loan, or Canadian Prime Rate Loan. The New Term Loans include a 3% original issue discount, and matures on April 12, 2023. The revolving commitments under the New Revolver terminate on April 12, 2021. Letters of credit are available to be issued under the New Revolver until 30 days prior to the Letter of Credit Expiration Date under, and as defined in, the Credit Agreement. In addition to paying interest on outstanding principal under the New Credit Facilities, APLP Holdings is required to pay a commitment fee with respect to the revolving commitments under the New Revolver that is equal to 0.75% times the average of the daily difference between (A) the revolving commitments and (B) drawings, if any and all outstanding reimbursement obligations with respect to drawn letters of credit.

The New Credit Facilities are secured by a pledge of the equity interests in APLP Holdings and certain of its subsidiaries, guaranties from certain of the subsidiaries of APLP Holdings (the “Subsidiary Guarantors”), a downstream guarantee from the Company, a limited recourse guaranty from Atlantic Power GP II, Inc., the entity that holds all of the APLP Holdings equity, a pledge of certain material contracts and certain mortgages over material real estate rights, an assignment of all revenues, funds and accounts of APLP Holdings and its subsidiaries (subject to certain exceptions), and certain other assets. The New Credit Facilities also have the benefit of a debt service reserve account, which is required to be funded and maintained at the debt service reserve requirement, equal to six months of debt service. Atlantic Power Limited Partnership (“APLP”), a wholly-owned, indirect subsidiary of the Company, is a party to an existing indenture governing its Cdn$210 million aggregate principal amount of 5.95% Medium Term Notes due June 23, 2036 (the “MTNs”) that prohibits APLP (subject to certain exceptions) from granting liens on its assets (and those of its material subsidiaries) to secure indebtedness, unless the MTNs are secured equally and ratably with such other indebtedness. Accordingly, in connection with the execution of the Credit Agreement, APLP Holdings has granted an equal and ratable security interest in the collateral package securing the New Credit Facilities in favor of the trustee under the indenture governing the MTNs for the benefit of the holders of the MTNs.

16

Table of Contents

ATLANTIC POWER CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in millions U.S. dollars, except per‑share amounts)

(Unaudited)

The Credit Agreement contains customary representations, warranties, terms and conditions, and covenants. The negative covenants include a requirement that APLP Holdings and its subsidiaries maintain a Leverage Ratio (as defined in the Credit Agreement) ranging from 6.00:1.00 in 2016 to 4.25:1.00 from June 30, 2020, and an Interest Coverage Ratio (as defined in the Credit Agreement) ranging from 2.75:1.00 in 2016 to 4.00:1.00 from June 30, 2022. In addition, the Credit Agreement includes customary restrictions and limitations on APLP Holdings’ and its subsidiaries’ ability to (i) incur additional indebtedness, (ii) grant liens on any of their assets, (iii) change their conduct of business or enter into mergers, consolidations, reorganizations, or certain other corporate transactions, (iv) dispose of assets, (v) modify material contractual obligations, (vi) enter into affiliate transactions, (vii) incur capital expenditures, and (viii) make dividend payments or other distributions, in each case subject to certain exceptions and other customary carve-outs and various thresholds.

Under the Credit Agreement, if a Change of Control (as defined in the Credit Agreement) occurs, unless APLP Holdings elects to make a voluntary prepayment of the term loans under the New Credit Facilities, it will be required to offer each electing lender to prepay such lender’s term loans under the New Credit Facilities at a price equal to 101% of par. In addition, in the event that APLP Holdings elects to repay, prepay, refinance or replace all or any portion of the term loan facilities within one year from the initial funding date under the Credit Agreement, it will be required to do so at a price of 101% of the principal amount so repaid, prepaid, refinanced or replaced.

The Credit Agreement also contains a mandatory amortization feature and other mandatory prepayment provisions, including prepayments:

 from the proceeds of asset sales (except from the sale proceeds of certain excluded projects), insurance proceeds, and incurrence of indebtedness, in each case subject to applicable thresholds and customary carve-outs; and

 in respect of excess cash flow, to be determined by using the greater of (i) 50% of the cash flow of APLP Holdings and its subsidiaries that remains after the application of funds, in accordance with a customary priority, to operations and maintenance expenses of APLP Holdings and its subsidiaries, debt service on the New Credit Facilities and the MTNs, funding of the debt service reserve account, debt service on other permitted debt of APLP Holdings and its subsidiaries, capital expenditures permitted under the Credit Agreement, and payment on the preferred equity issued by Atlantic Power Preferred Equity Ltd., a subsidiary of APLP Holdings or (ii) such other amount up to 100% of the cash flow described in clause (i) above that is required to reduce the aggregate principal amount of New Term Loans outstanding to achieve a target principal amount that declines quarterly based on a pre-determined specified schedule. Failure to achieve the specified target principal amount for any quarter does not constitute a default by APLP Holdings.

Under certain conditions the lending commitments under the Credit Agreement may be terminated by the lenders and amounts outstanding under the Credit Agreement may be accelerated. Such events of default include failure to pay any principal, interest or other amounts when due, failure to comply with covenants, breach of representations or warranties in any material respect, non-payment or acceleration of other material debt of APLP Holdings and its subsidiaries, bankruptcy, material judgments rendered against APLP Holdings or certain of its subsidiaries, certain ERISA or regulatory events, solely with respect to the New Revolver, a Change of Control of APLP Holdings, or defaults under certain guaranties and collateral documents securing the New Credit Facilities, in each case subject to various exceptions and notice, cure and grace periods.

17

Table of Contents

ATLANTIC POWER CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in millions U.S. dollars, except per‑share amounts)

(Unaudited)

Senior Secured Credit Facilities

As noted above in “New Credit Facilities”, our senior secured credit facilities were redeemed on April 13, 2016. The redemption and extinguishment was recorded in April 2016 and will be presented in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016.

Notes of Atlantic Power Corporation

On July 26, 2015, we redeemed all of our outstanding $310.9 million aggregate principal amount of 9.0% Senior Unsecured Notes due November 2018 (the “Notes”) with the cash proceeds received from the sale of the Wind Projects. The Notes were redeemed at a price equal to 104.5 percent of the principal amount of the 9.0% notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date. We paid $330.4 million to fund the full redemption of the Notes, which includes $14.0 million in make-whole premiums and $5.5 million in accrued interest. The make whole premiums, accrued interest and the $9.0 million of deferred financing costs related to the Notes were recorded in interest expense in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015.

Non‑Recourse Debt

Project level debt of our consolidated projects is secured by the respective project and its contracts with no other recourse to us. Project level debt generally amortizes during the term of the respective revenue generating contracts of the projects. The loans have certain financial covenants that must be met in order to distribute available cash to Atlantic Power. At March 31, 2016, all of our projects with the exception of Piedmont were in compliance with the covenants contained in project level debt. Projects that do not meet their debt service coverage ratios are limited from making distributions, but the debt is not callable or subject to acceleration under the terms of their debt agreements. We do not expect our Piedmont project to meet its debt service coverage ratio covenants or to make distributions before the project’s debt maturity in 2018 at the earliest.

6. Convertible debentures

Convertible debentures consist of the following:

|  | March 31, |  | December 31, |
|  | 2016 |  | 2015 |
6.25% Debentures due March 2017 (Cdn$67.2 million) |  | $ | 51.8 |  | $ | 48.6 |
5.60% Debentures due June 2017 (Cdn$75.8 million) |  |  | 58.3 |  |  | 54.8 |
5.75% Debentures due June 2019 |  |  | 105.3 |  |  | 117.0 |
6.00% Debentures due December 2019 (Cdn$81.0 million) |  |  | 62.3 |  |  | 65.0 |
Less: Unamortized deferred financing costs |  |  | (6.3) |  |  | (7.7) |
Total convertible debentures |  | $ | 271.4 |  | $ | 277.7 |

On November 11, 2014, we commenced a normal course issuer bid (“NCIB”) for our convertible debentures. Under the NCIB, we entered into a pre-defined automatic securities purchase plan with our broker in order to facilitate purchases of our convertible debentures which expired on November 10, 2015. As of December 31, 2015, we had repurchased and cancelled $24.8 million of convertible debentures and recorded a gain of $3.1 million in the consolidated statement of operations related to these transactions.

On December 29, 2015, we commenced a new NCIB, which will expire on December 28, 2016. The actual amount of convertible debentures that may be purchased under the NCIB is approximately $28.5 million and is further

18

Table of Contents

ATLANTIC POWER CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in millions U.S. dollars, except per‑share amounts)

(Unaudited)

limited to 10% of the public float of our convertible debentures. Since inception of the NCIB in the fourth quarter of 2015 and through March 31, 2016, we repurchased and canceled $18.8 million of convertible debentures and recorded a gain of $2.5 million in the consolidated statement of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2016.

On April 13, 2016, we deposited a portion of the proceeds from the issuance of the New Credit Facilities, for the redemption in whole on May 13, 2016 at a price equal to par plus accrued interest (i) the outstanding Cdn$67.2 million 6.25% Debentures due March 2017 and (ii) the outstanding Cdn$75.8 million 5.60% Debentures due June 2017 (total US$ equivalent of $111.8 million as of April 13, 2016). Deferred financing costs related to the debentures of $1.3 million were written off and recorded to interest expense in April 2016.

7. Fair value of financial instruments

The following represents the recurring measurements of fair value hierarchy of our financial assets and liabilities that were recognized at fair value as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015. Financial assets and liabilities are classified based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

|  | March 31, 2016 |
|  | Level 1 |  | Level 2 |  | Level 3 |  | Total |
Assets: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Cash and cash equivalents |  | $ | 64.3 |  | $ | — |  | $ | — |  | $ | 64.3 |
Restricted cash |  |  | 10.0 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 10.0 |
Derivative instruments asset |  |  | — |  |  | 0.6 |  |  | — |  |  | 0.6 |
Total |  | $ | 74.3 |  | $ | 0.6 |  | $ | — |  | $ | 74.9 |
Liabilities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Derivative instruments liability |  | $ | — |  | $ | 62.0 |  | $ | — |  | $ | 62.0 |
Total |  | $ | — |  | $ | 62.0 |  | $ | — |  | $ | 62.0 |

|  | December 31, 2015 |
|  | Level 1 |  | Level 2 |  | Level 3 |  | Total |
Assets: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Cash and cash equivalents |  | $ | 72.4 |  | $ | — |  | $ | — |  | $ | 72.4 |
Restricted cash |  |  | 15.2 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 15.2 |
Derivative instruments asset |  |  | — |  |  | 0.3 |  |  | — |  |  | 0.3 |
Total |  | $ | 87.6 |  | $ | 0.3 |  | $ | — |  | $ | 87.9 |
Liabilities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Derivative instruments liability |  | $ | — |  | $ | 57.5 |  | $ | — |  | $ | 57.5 |
Total |  | $ | — |  | $ | 57.5 |  | $ | — |  | $ | 57.5 |

The fair values of our derivative instruments are based upon trades in liquid markets. Valuation model inputs can generally be verified and valuation techniques do not involve significant judgment. The fair values of such financial instruments are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. We use our best estimates to determine the fair value of commodity and derivative contracts we hold. These estimates consider various factors including closing exchange prices, time value, volatility factors and credit exposure. The fair value of each contract is discounted using a risk free interest rate.

We also adjust the fair value of financial assets and liabilities to reflect credit risk, which is calculated based on our credit rating and the credit rating of our counterparties. As of March 31, 2016, the credit valuation adjustments resulted in a $5.1 million net increase in fair value, which consists of a $0.5 million pre‑tax gain in other comprehensive income and a $4.6 million gain in change in fair value of derivative instruments. As of December 31, 2015, the credit

19

Table of Contents

ATLANTIC POWER CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in millions U.S. dollars, except per‑share amounts)

(Unaudited)

valuation adjustments resulted in a $3.8 million net increase in fair value, which consists of a $0.4 million pre‑tax gain in other comprehensive income and a $3.4 million gain in change in fair value of derivative instruments.

The carrying amounts for cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash approximate fair value due to their short-term nature.

8. Accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities

We recognize all derivative instruments on the balance sheet as either assets or liabilities and measure them at fair value in each reporting period. We have one contract designated as a cash flow hedge, and we defer the effective portion of the change in fair value of the derivatives in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), until the hedged transactions occur and are recognized in earnings (loss). The ineffective portion of a cash flow hedge is immediately recognized in earnings (loss). For our other derivatives that are not designated as cash flow hedges, the changes in the fair value are immediately recognized in earnings (loss). These guidelines apply to our natural gas swaps, interest rate swaps, and foreign exchange contracts.

Gas purchase agreements

Gas purchase agreements to purchase gas forward at our North Bay, Kapuskasing and Nipigon projects do not qualify for the normal purchase normal sales (“NPNS”) exemption and are accounted for as derivative financial instruments. The gas purchase agreements at North Bay and Kapuskasing satisfy all of the forecasted fuel requirements for these projects through their expiration in the fourth quarter of 2016. The gas purchase agreement for Nipigon satisfies the majority of forecasted fuel requirements through December 31, 2022. These derivative financial instruments are recorded in the consolidated balance sheets at fair value and the changes in their fair market value are recorded in the consolidated statements of operations.

In June 2014, Atlantic Power Limited Partnership (the “Partnership”) entered into contracts for the purchase of 2.9 million Gigajoules (“Gj”) of future natural gas purchases beginning on November 1, 2014 and expiring on December 31, 2017 for our projects in Ontario. These contracts effectively fix the price of approximately 100% of our expected uncontracted gas requirements for 2015 and 35% and 30% of our expected uncontracted gas requirements for 2016 and 2017, respectively. These contracts are accounted for as derivative financial instruments and are recorded in the consolidated balance sheet at fair value. Changes in the fair market value of these contracts are recorded in the consolidated statement of operations.

We have entered into various natural gas sales and purchase agreements for approximately 450,000 MMBtu to effectively mitigate seasonal fluctuation of future natural gas price at Morris from April 2016 through February 2017. These contracts are accounted for as derivative financial instruments and are recorded in the consolidated balance sheet at fair value at March 31, 2016. Changes in the fair market value of these contracts are recorded in the consolidated statement of operations.

Natural gas swaps

Our strategy to mitigate future exposure to changes in natural gas prices at our projects consists of periodically entering into financial swaps that effectively fix the price of natural gas expected to be purchased at these projects. These natural gas swaps are derivative financial instruments and are recorded in the consolidated balance sheets at fair value and the changes in their fair market value are recorded in the consolidated statements of operations.

We have entered into various natural gas swaps to effectively fix the price of 7.7 million Mmbtu of future natural gas purchases at Orlando, which is approximately 95% of our share of the expected natural gas purchases at the project through 2017. These contracts are accounted for as derivative financial instruments and are recorded in the

20

Table of Contents

ATLANTIC POWER CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in millions U.S. dollars, except per‑share amounts)

(Unaudited)

consolidated balance sheet at fair value at March 31, 2016. Changes in the fair market value of these contracts are recorded in the consolidated statement of operations.

Interest rate swaps

On May 5, 2014, the Partnership entered into interest rate swap agreements to mitigate exposure to changes in the Adjusted Eurodollar Rate for $199.0 million notional amount ($140.4 million at March 31, 2016) of the $600 million aggregate principal amount of borrowings ($447.9 million of borrowings at March 31, 2016) under the Term Loan Facility. Borrowings under the $600 million Term Loan Facility bear interest at a rate equal to the Adjusted Eurodollar Rate plus an applicable margin of 3.75%. Based on the terms of the Credit Agreement, the Adjusted Eurodollar Rate cannot be less than 1.00% resulting in a minimum of a 4.75% all-in rate on the Term Loan Facility. As a result of entering into the swap agreements, the all-in rate for $199.0 million of the Term Loan Facility cannot be less than 4.91% if the Adjusted Eurodollar Rate is equal to or greater than 1.00%. If the Adjusted Eurodollar Rate is below 1.00%, we will pay interest at a rate equivalent to the minimum 4.75% all-in rate plus any difference between the actual Adjusted Eurodollar Rate and 1.16%. The interest rate swap agreements were effective June 30, 2014 and terminate on December 29, 2017. The interest rate swap agreements are not designated as hedges and changes in their fair market value will be recorded in the consolidated statements of operations.

The Piedmont project has interest rate swap agreements to economically fix its exposure to changes in interest rates related to its variable‑rate debt. The interest rate swap agreement effectively converts the floating rate debt to a fixed interest rate of 1.7% plus an applicable margin ranging from 3.5% to 3.8% through February 29, 2016. From February 2016 until the maturity of the debt in August 2018, the fixed rate of the swap is 4.47% and the applicable margin is 4.0%, resulting in an all‑in rate of 8.5%. The swap continues at the fixed rate of 4.47% until November 2030. Prior to conversion of the Piedmont construction loan facility to a term loan, the notional amounts of the interest rate swap agreements matched the estimated outstanding principal balance of Piedmont’s construction loan facility. The interest rate swaps were executed on October 21, 2010 and November 2, 2010 and expire on February 29, 2016 and November 30, 2030, respectively. As a result of the Piedmont term loan conversion on February 14, 2014, these swap agreements were amended to reduce the notional amounts to match the outstanding $68.5 million principal of the term loan. The interest rate swap agreements are not designated as hedges, and changes in their fair market value are recorded in the consolidated statements of operations.

The Cadillac project has an interest rate swap agreement that effectively fixes the interest rate at 6.0% through February 15, 2015, 6.1% from February 16, 2015 to February 15, 2019, 6.3% from February 16, 2019 to February 15, 2023, and 6.4% thereafter. The notional amount of the interest rate swap agreement matches the outstanding principal balance over the remaining life of Cadillac’s debt. This swap agreement, which qualifies for and is designated as a cash flow hedge, is effective through June 2025 and the effective portion of the changes in the fair market value is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss.

Volume of forecasted transactions

We have entered into derivative instruments in order to economically hedge the following notional volumes of forecasted transactions as summarized below, by type, excluding those derivatives that qualified for the NPNS exemption at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015:

|  |  |  | March 31, |  | December 31, |
|  | Units |  | 2016 |  | 2015 |
Natural gas swaps |  | Natural Gas (Mmbtu) |  | 6.7 |  | 2.8 |
Gas purchase agreements |  | Natural Gas (Gigajoules) |  | 22.4 |  | 25.0 |
Interest rate swaps |  | Interest (US$) |  | 228.9 |  | 302.3 |

21

Table of Contents

ATLANTIC POWER CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in millions U.S. dollars, except per‑share amounts)

(Unaudited)

Fair value of derivative instruments

We have elected to disclose derivative instrument assets and liabilities on a trade‑by‑trade basis and do not offset amounts at the counterparty master agreement level. The following table summarizes the fair value of our derivative assets and liabilities:

|  | March 31, 2016 |
|  | Derivative |  | Derivative |
|  | Assets |  | Liabilities |
Derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Interest rate swaps current |  | $ | — |  | $ | 1.0 |
Interest rate swaps long-term |  |  | — |  |  | 3.2 |
Total derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges |  |  | — |  |  | 4.2 |
Derivative instruments not designated as cash flow hedges: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Interest rate swaps current |  |  | — |  |  | 2.4 |
Interest rate swaps long-term |  |  | — |  |  | 10.0 |
Natural gas swaps current |  |  | 0.2 |  |  | 3.8 |
Natural gas swaps long-term |  |  | 0.4 |  |  | — |
Gas purchase agreements current |  |  | — |  |  | 28.3 |
Gas purchase agreements long-term |  |  | — |  |  | 13.3 |
Total derivative instruments not designated as cash flow hedges |  |  | 0.6 |  |  | 57.8 |
Total derivative instruments |  | $ | 0.6 |  | $ | 62.0 |

|  | December 31, 2015 |
|  | Derivative |  | Derivative |
|  | Assets |  | Liabilities |
Derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Interest rate swaps current |  | $ | — |  | $ | 1.0 |
Interest rate swaps long-term |  |  | — |  |  | 2.7 |
Total derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges |  |  | — |  |  | 3.7 |
Derivative instruments not designated as cash flow hedges: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Interest rate swaps current |  |  | — |  |  | 2.0 |
Interest rate swaps long-term |  |  | 0.3 |  |  | 7.8 |
Natural gas swaps current |  |  | — |  |  | 5.0 |
Natural gas swaps long-term |  |  | — |  |  | — |
Gas purchase agreements current |  |  | — |  |  | 28.7 |
Gas purchase agreements long-term |  |  | — |  |  | 10.3 |
Total derivative instruments not designated as cash flow hedges |  |  | 0.3 |  |  | 53.8 |
Total derivative instruments |  | $ | 0.3 |  | $ | 57.5 |

22

Table of Contents

ATLANTIC POWER CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in millions U.S. dollars, except per‑share amounts)

(Unaudited)

Accumulated other comprehensive income

The following table summarizes the changes in the accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (“OCI”) balance attributable to derivative financial instruments designated as a hedge, net of tax:

|  | Interest Rate |
Three Months Ended March 31, 2016 |  | Swaps |
Accumulated OCI balance at January 1, 2016 |  | $ | 0.0 |
Change in fair value of cash flow hedges |  |  | (0.5) |
Realized from OCI during the period |  |  | 0.2 |
Accumulated OCI balance at March 31, 2016 |  | $ | (0.3) |
|  | Interest Rate |
Three Months Ended March 31, 2015 |  | Swaps |
Accumulated OCI balance at January 1, 2015 |  | $ | 0.1 |
Change in fair value of cash flow hedges |  |  | (0.5) |
Realized from OCI during the period |  |  | 0.2 |
Accumulated OCI balance at March 31, 2015 |  | $ | (0.2) |

Impact of derivative instruments on the consolidated statements of operations

The following table summarizes realized loss (gain) for derivative instruments not designated as cash flow hedges:

|  | Classification of loss (gain) |  | Three Months Ended March 31, |
|  | recognized in income |  | 2016 |  | 2015 |
Gas purchase agreements |  | Fuel |  | $ | 11.6 |  | $ | 1.3 |
Natural gas swaps |  | Fuel |  |  | 2.0 |  |  | 12.0 |
Interest rate swaps |  | Interest, net |  |  | 0.6 |  |  | (1.0) |

The following table summarizes the unrealized loss (gain) resulting from changes in the fair value of derivative financial instruments that are not designated as cash flow hedges:

|  | Classification of gain (loss) |  | Three Months Ended March 31, |
|  | recognized in income |  | 2016 |  | 2015 |
Natural gas swaps |  | Change in fair value of derivatives |  | $ | 1.8 |  | $ | (0.6) |
Gas purchase agreements |  | Change in fair value of derivatives |  |  | (0.2) |  |  | 1.6 |
Interest rate swaps |  | Change in fair value of derivatives |  |  | (2.8) |  |  | (2.7) |
|  |  |  | $ | (1.2) |  | $ | (1.7) |

23

Table of Contents

ATLANTIC POWER CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in millions U.S. dollars, except per‑share amounts)

(Unaudited)

9. Income taxes

|  | Three Months Ended March 31,
|  | 2016 |  | 2015
Current income tax expense |  | $ | 1.5 |  | $ | 1.1
Deferred tax expense (benefit) |  |  | 0.1 |  |  | (5.7)
Total income tax expense (benefit), net |  | $ | 1.6 |  | $ | (4.6)

For the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015

Income tax expense for the three months ended March 31, 2016 was $1.6 million. Expected income tax benefit for the same period, based on the Canadian enacted statutory rate of 26% was $3.0 million. The primary items impacting the tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2016 were $2.8 million relating to a change in the valuation allowance, $2.5 million related to foreign exchange, $0.6 million relating to dividend withholding and other taxes and $0.2 million of other permanent differences. These items were partially offset by $1.1 million relating to operating in higher tax rate jurisdictions and $0.4 million related to capital loss on intercompany notes.

Income tax benefit for the three months ended March 31, 2015 was $4.6 million. Expected income tax expense for the same period, based on the Canadian enacted statutory rate of 26% was $5.2 million. The primary items impacting the tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2015 were $2.9 million relating to a change in the valuation allowance, $2.4 million relating to operating in higher tax rate jurisdictions, $1.8 million relating to foreign exchange and $2.7 million of other permanent differences.

As of March 31, 2016, we have recorded a valuation allowance of $178.1 million. The amount is comprised primarily of provisions against Canadian and U.S. net operating loss carryforwards. In assessing the recoverability of our deferred tax assets, we consider whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon projected future taxable income in the United States and in Canada and available tax planning strategies.

10. Equity compensation plans

Long‑term incentive plan (“LTIP”)

The following table summarizes the changes in outstanding LTIP notional units during the three months ended March 31, 2016:

|  |  |  | Grant Date |
|  |  |  | Weighted-Average |
|  | Units |  | Fair Value per Unit |
Outstanding at December 31, 2015 |  | 1,298,401 |  | $ | 2.88 |
Granted |  | 1,594,954 |  |  | 1.81 |
Vested and redeemed |  | (697,742) |  |  | 2.92 |
Forfeitures |  | (7,431) |  |  | 2.71 |
Outstanding at March 31, 2016 |  | 2,188,182 |  | $ | 2.08 |

Certain awards have a market condition based on our total shareholder return during the performance period as compared to a group of peer companies and, in some cases, Project Adjusted EBITDA per common share compared to budget. Compensation expense for notional units granted is recorded net of estimated forfeitures. See Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10‑K for the year ended December 31, 2015 for further details. Cash payments made for vested notional units for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 were $0.1

24

Table of Contents

ATLANTIC POWER CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in millions U.S. dollars, except per‑share amounts)

(Unaudited)

million and $0.2 million, respectively. Compensation expense for LTIP was $0.2 million and $0.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Transition Equity Participation Agreement

We also have 539,904 transition notional shares outstanding at March 31, 2016 under the Transition Equity Participation Agreement with James J. Moore, Jr. Fifty percent of the transition notional shares granted with respect to fiscal year 2015 will vest upon the four-year anniversary of the date of grant and the remaining portion will vest on or any time after the two-year anniversary of the grant if the weighted average Canadian dollar closing price of our common shares on the TSX for at least three consecutive calendar months has exceeded the market price per common share determined as of January 22, 2015 ($2.58) by at least 50%.

11. Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share

Basic earnings (loss) per share is calculated by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average common shares outstanding during their respective period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is computed including dilutive potential shares as if they were outstanding shares during the year. Dilutive potential shares include the weighted average number of shares, as of the date such notional units were granted, that would be issued if the unvested notional units outstanding under the LTIP were vested and redeemed for shares under the terms of the LTIP.

Because we reported a loss for the three months ended March 31, 2016, diluted earnings per share are equal to basic earnings per share as the inclusion of potentially dilutive shares in the computation is anti-dilutive.

The following table sets forth the diluted net income and potentially dilutive shares utilized in the per share calculation for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015:

|  | 2016 |  | 2015 |
Numerator: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
(Loss) gain from continuing operations attributable to Atlantic Power Corporation |  | $ | (14.9) |  | $ | 22.3 |
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax |  |  | — |  |  | (4.8) |
Net (loss) income attributable to Atlantic Power Corporation |  | $ | (14.9) |  | $ | 17.5 |
Denominator: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Weighted average basic shares outstanding |  |  | 121.9 |  |  | 121.5 |
Dilutive potential shares: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Convertible debentures |  |  | — |  |  | — |
LTIP notional units |  |  | 0.2 |  |  | 0.9 |
Potentially dilutive shares |  |  | 122.1 |  |  | 122.4 |
Diluted (loss) earnings per share from continuing operations attributable to Atlantic Power Corporation |  | $ | (0.12) |  | $ | 0.17 |
Diluted (loss) per share from discontinued operations |  |  | — |  |  | (0.03) |
Diluted (loss) earnings per share attributable to Atlantic Power Corporation |  | $ | (0.12) |  | $ | 0.14 |

The dilutive effect of our convertible debentures is calculated using the “if-converted method.” Under the if-converted method, the debentures are assumed to be converted at the beginning of the period, and the resulting common shares are included in the denominator of the diluted EPS calculation for the entire period being presented. Interest expense, net of any income tax effects, is added back to the numerator for purposes of the if-converted calculation. Potentially dilutive shares from convertible debentures of 21.6 million and 23.5 million have been excluded from fully

25

Table of Contents

ATLANTIC POWER CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in millions U.S. dollars, except per‑share amounts)

(Unaudited)

diluted shares in the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, because their impact would be anti-dilutive. Potentially dilutive shares from convertible debentures are anti-dilutive for the three months ended March 31, 2016 because we recorded a net loss. For the three months ended March 31, 2015, adding back the related interest expense, net of tax, under the if-converted method results in potentially dilutive shares from convertible debentures being anti-dilutive.

Potentially dilutive shares from LTIP notional units have been excluded from fully diluted shares in the three months ended March 31, 2016 because we recorded a net loss.

12. Equity

The following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending equity attributable to shareholders of Atlantic Power Corporation, preferred shares issued by a subsidiary company, noncontrolling interests and total equity for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015:

|  | Three months ended March 31, 2016 |
|  | Total Atlantic |  | Preferred shares |  |  |  |
|  | Power Corporation |  | issued by a subsidiary |  |  |  |
|  | Shareholders’ Equity |  | company |  | Total Equity |
Balance at January 1 |  | $ | 213.9 |  | $ | 221.3 |  | $ | 435.2 |
Net income (loss) |  |  | (14.9) |  |  | 2.0 |  |  | (12.9) |
Realized and unrealized loss on hedging activities, net of tax |  |  | (0.3) |  |  | — |  |  | (0.3) |
Foreign currency translation adjustment |  |  | 18.5 |  |  | — |  |  | 18.5 |
Common share repurchases |  |  | (0.9) |  |  | — |  |  | (0.9) |
Stock-based compensation |  |  | 0.6 |  |  | — |  |  | 0.6 |
Dividends declared on preferred shares of a subsidiary company |  |  | — |  |  | (2.0) |  |  | (2.0) |
Balance at March 31 |  | $ | 216.9 |  | $ | 221.3 |  | $ | 438.2 |

|  | Three months ended March 31, 2015 |
|  | Total Atlantic |  | Preferred shares |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  | Power Corporation |  | issued by a subsidiary |  | Noncontrolling |  |  |  |
|  | Shareholders’ Equity |  | company |  | Interests |  | Total Equity |
Balance at January 1 |  | $ | 356.2 |  | $ | 221.3 |  | $ | 239.0 |  | $ | 816.5 |
Net income (loss) |  |  | 17.5 |  |  | 2.3 |  |  | (7.5) |  |  | 12.3 |
Realized and unrealized gain on hedging activities, net of tax |  |  | (0.3) |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (0.3) |
Foreign currency translation adjustment |  |  | (35.1) |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (35.1) |
Stock-based compensation |  |  | 0.4 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 0.4 |
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interest |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (2.7) |  |  | (2.7) |
Dividends declared on common shares |  |  | (2.9) |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (2.9) |
Dividends declared on preferred shares of a subsidiary company |  |  | — |  |  | (2.3) |  |  | — |  |  | (2.3) |
Balance at March 31 |  | $ | 335.8 |  | $ | 221.3 |  | $ | 228.8 |  | $ | 785.9 |

13. Segment and geographic information

We have four reportable segments: East U.S., West U.S., Canada and Un-Allocated Corporate. We revised our reportable business segments in the second quarter of 2015 as the result of significant asset sales and in order to align

26

Table of Contents

ATLANTIC POWER CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in millions U.S. dollars, except per‑share amounts)

(Unaudited)

with changes in management’s structure, resource allocation and performance assessment in making decisions regarding our operations. The Wind Projects, which made up the entirety of the former Wind segment, were sold in June 2015 and are designated as discontinued operations for the three months ended March 31, 2015. We analyze the performance of our operating segments based on Project Adjusted EBITDA which is defined as project income (loss) plus interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (including non-cash impairment charges) and changes in fair value of derivative instruments. Project Adjusted EBITDA is not a measure recognized under GAAP and does not have a standardized meaning prescribed by GAAP and is therefore unlikely to be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies. We use Project Adjusted EBITDA to provide comparative information about project performance without considering how projects are capitalized or whether they contain derivative contracts that are required to be recorded at fair value. Our equity investments in unconsolidated affiliates are presented as proportionately consolidated based on our ownership percentage in the reconciliation of Project Adjusted EBITDA to project income (loss).

A reconciliation of Project Adjusted EBITDA to project income (loss) for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 reflecting our revised reportable business segments is included in the table below:

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Un-Allocated |  |  |  |
|  | East U.S. |  | West U.S. |  | Canada |  | Corporate |  | Consolidated |
Three Months Ended March 31, 2016 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Project revenues |  | $ | 39.4 |  | $ | 19.1 |  | $ | 47.7 |  | $ | 0.2 |  | $ | 106.4 |
Segment assets |  |  | 802.5 |  |  | 340.4 |  |  | 439.4 |  |  | 77.7 |  |  | 1,660.0 |
Project Adjusted EBITDA |  | $ | 30.3 |  | $ | 7.5 |  | $ | 24.8 |  | $ | (0.1) |  | $ | 62.5 |
Change in fair value of derivative instruments |  |  | 0.7 |  |  | — |  |  | (0.4) |  |  | 0.9 |  |  | 1.2 |
Depreciation and amortization |  |  | 11.0 |  |  | 9.9 |  |  | 8.8 |  |  | 0.2 |  |  | 29.9 |
Interest, net |  |  | 2.5 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 2.5 |
Other project expense |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 0.2 |  |  | 0.2 |
Project income (loss) |  |  | 16.1 |  |  | (2.4) |  |  | 16.4 |  |  | (1.4) |  |  | 28.7 |
Administration |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 6.1 |  |  | 6.1 |
Interest, net |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 16.6 |  |  | 16.6 |
Foreign exchange loss |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 19.8 |  |  | 19.8 |
Other income, net |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (2.5) |  |  | (2.5) |
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes |  |  | 16.1 |  |  | (2.4) |  |  | 16.4 |  |  | (41.4) |  |  | (11.3) |
Income tax expense |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 1.6 |  |  | 1.6 |
Net income (loss) from continuing operations |  | $ | 16.1 |  | $ | (2.4) |  | $ | 16.4 |  | $ | (43.0) |  | $ | (12.9) |

27

Table of Contents

ATLANTIC POWER CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in millions U.S. dollars, except per‑share amounts)

(Unaudited)

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Un-Allocated |  |  |  |
|  | East U.S. |  | West U.S. |  | Canada |  | Corporate |  | Consolidated |
Three Months Ended March 31, 2015 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Project revenues |  | $ | 37.6 |  | $ | 23.0 |  | $ | 50.4 |  | $ | 0.3 |  | $ | 111.3 |
Segment assets |  |  | 861.5 |  |  | 386.3 |  |  | 618.3 |  |  | 91.2 |  |  | 1,957.3 |
Project Adjusted EBITDA |  | $ | 26.7 |  | $ | 10.0 |  | $ | 23.7 |  | $ | (1.8) |  | $ | 58.6 |
Change in fair value of derivative instruments |  |  | 2.6 |  |  | — |  |  | (1.6) |  |  | 0.7 |  |  | 1.7 |
Depreciation and amortization |  |  | 10.7 |  |  | 9.7 |  |  | 12.3 |  |  | 0.2 |  |  | 32.9 |
Interest, net |  |  | 2.5 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 2.5 |
Other project expense (income) |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |
Project income (loss) |  |  | 10.9 |  |  | 0.3 |  |  | 13.0 |  |  | (2.7) |  |  | 21.5 |
Administration |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 9.4 |  |  | 9.4 |
Interest, net |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 25.7 |  |  | 25.7 |
Foreign exchange gain |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (32.2) |  |  | (32.2) |
Other income, net |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (1.4) |  |  | (1.4) |
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes |  |  | 10.9 |  |  | 0.3 |  |  | 13.0 |  |  | (4.2) |  |  | 20.0 |
Income tax benefit |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (4.6) |  |  | (4.6) |
Net income (loss) from continuing operations |  | $ | 10.9 |  | $ | 0.3 |  | $ | 13.0 |  | $ | 0.4 |  | $ | 24.6 |

The table below provides information, by country, about our consolidated operations for each of the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 and Property, Plant & Equipment as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. Revenue is recorded in the country in which it is earned and assets are recorded in the country in which they are located.

|  | Project Revenue Three Months Ended March 31, |  | Property, Plant and Equipment, net of accumulated depreciation
|  | 2016 |  | 2015 |  | March 31, 2016 |  | December 31, 2015
United States |  | $ | 58.7 |  | $ | 60.8 |  | $ | 517.4 |  | $ | 529.6
Canada |  |  | 47.7 |  |  | 50.5 |  |  | 260.4 |  |  | 248.1
Total |  | $ | 106.4 |  | $ | 111.3 |  | $ | 777.8 |  | $ | 777.7

Independent Electricity System Operator (“IESO”), BC Hydro and Niagara Mohawk provided 38.1%, 14.2%, and 9.9%, respectively, of total consolidated revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2016. IESO, San Diego Gas & Electric and BC Hydro provided 33.7%, 14.4% and 11.7%, respectively, of total consolidated revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2015. IESO purchases electricity from the Calstock, Kapuskasing, Nipigon and North Bay projects in the Canada segment, San Diego Gas & Electric purchases electricity from the Naval Station, Naval Training Center, and North Island projects in the West U.S. segment, BC Hydro purchases electricity from the Mamquam, Moresby Lake, and Williams Lake projects in the Canada segment and Niagara Mohawk purchases electricity from the Curtis Palmer project in the East U.S. segment.

14. Guarantees

We and our subsidiaries enter into various contracts that include indemnification and guarantee provisions as a routine part of our business activities. Examples of these contracts include asset purchases and sale agreements, including the Purchase Agreement to sell the Wind Projects, joint venture agreements, operation and maintenance agreements, and other types of contractual agreements with vendors and other third parties, as well as affiliates. These

28

Table of Contents

ATLANTIC POWER CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in millions U.S. dollars, except per‑share amounts)

(Unaudited)

contracts generally indemnify the counterparty for tax, environmental liability, litigation and other matters, as well as breaches of representations, warranties and covenants set forth in these agreements.

In connection with the Purchase Agreement for the sale of the Wind Projects, on March 31, 2015, we entered into a guaranty agreement (the “Guaranty Agreement”), under which we agreed to guarantee the full and prompt payment of all payment obligations of APT under the Purchase Agreement as and when they shall become due. APT and TerraForm have agreed to utilize the representation and warranty insurance for coverage of certain indemnification obligations, subject to a cap and certain exclusions.

15. Contingencies

Shareholder class action lawsuits

On March 19, 2013, April 2, 2013 and May 10, 2013, three notices of action relating to Canadian securities class action claims against the Proposed Defendants were also issued by alleged investors in Atlantic Power common shares, and in one of the actions, holders of Atlantic Power convertible debentures, with the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in the Province of Ontario. On April 8, 2013, a similar claim issued by alleged investors in Atlantic Power common shares seeking to initiate a class action against the Proposed Defendants was filed with the Superior Court of Quebec in the Province of Quebec (the “Canadian Actions”).

On August 30, 2013, the three Ontario actions were succeeded by one action with an amended claim being issued on behalf of Jacqeline Coffin and Sandra Lowry. This claim named the Company, Barry E. Welch and Terrence Ronan as Defendants. The Plaintiffs sought leave to commence an action for statutory misrepresentation under the Ontario Securities Act and asserted common law claims for misrepresentation.

The Plaintiffs’ motions for leave and certification were heard on May 20-21, 2015.

On July 24, 2015, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice issued a decision denying the Plaintiffs’ motion for leave and certification. The Superior Court granted leave to reconstitute a claim for debenture holders but required that there be a debenture holder as plaintiff, that the claim be amended and that the Plaintiffs pay the Defendants partial indemnity costs of responding to the Plaintiffs’ motion.

The Plaintiffs appealed the July 24 decision on leave and certification to the Ontario Court of Appeal.

The appeal was subsequently abandoned by the Plaintiffs, and the Ontario action was dismissed by Order dated December 2, 2015, the Defendants agreeing not to claim costs from the Plaintiffs.

The proposed Quebec class action was suspended by the Superior Court of Quebec pending the outcome of the motions for leave and certification of the Ontario action as a class proceeding. On April 19, 2016, the Superior Court of Quebec authorized the discontinuance of the action.

Other

In addition to the matters listed above, from time to time, Atlantic Power, its subsidiaries and the projects are parties to disputes and litigation that arise in the normal course of business. We assess our exposure to these matters and record estimated loss contingencies when a loss is likely and can be reasonably estimated. There are no matters pending which are expected to have a material adverse impact on our financial position or results of operations or have been reserved for as of March 31, 2016.

29

Table of Contents

FORWARD‑LOOKING INFORMATION

Certain statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10‑Q constitute “forward‑looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward‑looking statements generally can be identified by the use of forward‑looking terminology such as “outlook,” “objective,” “may,” “will,” “expect,” “intend,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “should,” “plans,” “continue,” or similar expressions suggesting future outcomes or events. Examples of such statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10‑Q include, but are not limited to, statements with respect to the following:

| · |  | our ability to generate sufficient cash flow to service our debt obligations or implement our business plan, including financing internal or external growth opportunities;

| · |  | the outcome or impact of our business plan, including the objective of enhancing the value of our existing assets through optimization investments and commercial activities, delevering our balance sheet to improve our cost of capital, improving our cost structure and reducing overhead;

| · |  | our ability to access liquidity for the ongoing operation of our business and the execution of our business plan or any potential options, which may involve one or more of the use of cash on hand, the issuance of additional corporate debt or equity securities and the incurrence of privately‑placed bank or institutional non‑recourse operating level debt;

| · |  | our ability to renew or enter into new power purchase agreements on favorable terms or at all after the expiration of our current agreements;

| · |  | our ability to meet the financial covenants under our New Credit Facilities and other indebtedness;

| · |  | expectations regarding maintenance and capital expenditures; and

| · |  | the impact of legislative, regulatory, competitive and technological changes.

Such forward‑looking statements reflect our current expectations regarding future events and operating performance and speak only as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10‑Q. Such forward‑looking statements are based on a number of assumptions which may prove to be incorrect, including, but not limited to the assumption that the projects will operate and perform in accordance with our expectations. Many of these risks and uncertainties can affect our actual results and could cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in any forward‑looking statement made by us or on our behalf.

Forward‑looking statements involve significant risks and uncertainties, should not be read as guarantees of future performance or results, and will not necessarily be accurate indications of whether or not or the times at or by which such performance or results will be achieved. In addition, a number of factors could cause actual results to differ materially from the results discussed in the forward‑looking statements, including, but not limited to, the factors included in the filings Atlantic Power makes from time to time with the SEC and the risk factors described under “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10‑K for the year ended December 31, 2015 and in this Quarterly Report on Form 10‑Q. To the extent any risk factors in our Annual Report on Form 10‑K for the year ended December 31, 2015 relate to the factual information disclosed elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10‑Q, including with respect to our business plan and any updates to our business strategy, such risk factors should be read in light of such information. Our business is both highly competitive and subject to various risks.

These risks include, without limitation:

| · |  | our ability to service our debt obligations or generate sufficient cash flow to pay preferred dividends;

| · |  | our ability to access liquidity for the ongoing operation of our business and the execution of our business plan or any potential options, which may involve one or more of the use of cash on hand, the issuance of additional corporate debt or equity securities and the incurrence of privately‑placed bank or institutional non‑recourse operating level debt;

30

Table of Contents

| · |  | our indebtedness and financing arrangements and the terms, covenants and restrictions included in our New Credit Facilities;

| · |  | exchange rate fluctuations;

| · |  | the impact of downgrades in our credit rating or the credit rating of our outstanding debt securities, and changes in our creditworthiness;

| · |  | unstable capital and credit markets;

| · |  | the expiration or termination of power purchase agreements and our ability to renew or enter into new power purchase agreements on favorable terms or at all;

| · |  | the dependence of our projects on their electricity and thermal energy customers;

| · |  | exposure of certain of our projects to fluctuations in the price of electricity or natural gas;

| · |  | the dependence of our projects on third‑party suppliers;

| · |  | projects not operating according to plan;

| · |  | the effects of weather, which affects demand for electricity and fuel as well as operating conditions;

| · |  | U.S., Canadian and/or global economic conditions and uncertainty;

| · |  | risks beyond our control, including but not limited to geopolitical crisis, acts of terrorism or related acts of war, natural disasters or other catastrophic events;

| · |  | the adequacy of our insurance coverage;

| · |  | the impact of significant energy, environmental and other regulations on our projects;

| · |  | the impact of impairment of goodwill or long‑lived assets;

| · |  | increased competition, including for acquisitions;

| · |  | our limited control over the operation of certain minority‑owned projects;

| · |  | transfer restrictions on our equity interests in certain projects;

| · |  | risks inherent in the use of derivative instruments;

| · |  | labor disruptions;

| · |  | the impact of hostile cyber intrusions;

| · |  | the impact of our failure to comply with the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and/or Canadian Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act;

| · |  | our ability to retain, motivate and recruit executives and other key employees; and

| · |  | our ability to remediate the reported material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting.

Material factors or assumptions that were applied in drawing a conclusion or making an estimate set out in the forward‑looking information include third‑party projections of regional fuel and electric capacity and energy prices that are based on assumptions about future economic conditions and courses of action. Although the forward‑looking

31

Table of Contents

statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10‑Q are based upon what are believed to be reasonable assumptions, investors cannot be assured that actual results will be consistent with these forward‑looking statements, and the differences may be material. Certain statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10‑Q may be considered “financial outlook” for the purposes of applicable securities laws, and such financial outlook may not be appropriate for purposes other than this Quarterly Report on Form 10‑Q. These forward‑looking statements are made as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10‑Q and, except as expressly required by applicable law, we assume no obligation to update or revise them to reflect new events or circumstances.

32

Table of Contents

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion of the financial condition and results of operations of Atlantic Power should be read in conjunction with the interim consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10‑Q. All dollar amounts discussed below are in millions of U.S. dollars except per share amounts, or unless otherwise stated. The interim financial statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP.

OVERVIEW

Atlantic Power owns and operates a diverse fleet of power generation assets in the United States and Canada. Our power generation projects sell electricity to utilities and other large commercial customers largely under long‑term power purchase agreements (“PPAs”), which seek to minimize exposure to changes in commodity prices. As of March 31, 2016, our power generation projects in operation had an aggregate gross electric generation capacity of approximately 2,138 megawatts (“MW”) in which our aggregate ownership interest is approximately 1,500 MW. Our current portfolio consists of interests in twenty‑three operational power generation projects across eleven states in the United States and two provinces in Canada. Eighteen of our projects are majority‑owned subsidiaries.

We sell the majority of the capacity and energy from our power generation projects under PPAs to a variety of utilities and other parties. Under the PPAs, we receive payments for electric energy sold to our customers (known as energy payments), in addition to payments for electric generation capacity (known as capacity payments). Our PPAs have expiration dates ranging from December 31, 2017 to December 31, 2037, and approximately 25% of our PPAs on a MW‑weighted basis are scheduled to expire over the next five years. Our weighted average remaining PPA life is approximately 8 years. We also sell steam from a number of our projects to industrial purchasers under steam sales agreements. Sales of electricity are generally higher during the summer and winter months, when temperature extremes create demand for either summer cooling or winter heating.

The majority of our natural gas, coal and biomass power generation projects have long‑term fuel supply agreements, typically accompanied by fuel transportation arrangements. In most cases, the term of the fuel supply and transportation arrangements correspond to the term of the relevant PPAs and many of the PPAs and steam sales agreements provide for the indexing or pass‑through of fuel costs to our customers. In cases where there is no pass‑through of fuel costs, we often attempt to mitigate the market price risk of changing commodity costs through the use of hedging strategies.

We directly operate and maintain eighteen of our power generation projects. We also partner with recognized leaders in the independent power industry to operate and maintain our other projects. Under these operation, maintenance and management agreements, the operator is typically responsible for operations, maintenance and repair services.

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

New Credit Facilities

On April 13, 2016, APLP Holdings, our wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, entered into new senior secured credit facilities, comprising $700 million in aggregate principal amount of senior secured term loan facilities (“the “New Term Loans”) and $200 million in aggregate principal amount of senior secured revolving credit facilities (the “New Revolver” and together with the New Term Loans, the “New Credit Facilities”). We received $679.0 million in proceeds after an original issue discount of 3% ($21.0 million). See Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, Long-Term Debt for further discussion of the terms of the New Credit Facilities.

As of May 2, 2016, we have used the proceeds from the New Term Loans to:

 redeem in whole, at a price equal to par plus accrued interest, APLP’s existing senior secured term loan, maturing in February 2021, in an aggregate principal amount outstanding of $447.9 million;

 deposit proceeds with the trustee for the redemption in whole on May 13, 2016, at a price equal to par plus accrued interest (i) our outstanding Cdn$67.2 million 6.25% Convertible Unsecured Subordinated Debentures, Series A, maturing in March 2017 and (ii) our outstanding Cdn$75.8 million 5.60%

33

Table of Contents

Convertible Unsecured Subordinated Debentures, Series B, maturing in June 2017 (total US$ equivalent of $111.8 million); and

 pay transaction costs and expenses of approximately $14.4 million.

We may use the remaining proceeds of approximately $105.0 million for any corporate purpose, which may include, at our discretion, taking into account available funds, market conditions and other relevant factors, repurchase of all or a portion of our $105.3 million of 5.75% Convertible Unsecured Subordinated Debentures, Series C, due June 2019, all or a portion of our Cdn$81.0 million of 6.00% Convertible Unsecured Subordinated Debentures, Series D, due December 2019 and a portion of our preferred and common equity or other potential initiatives to reshape our capital structure.

Concurrent with the closing of the New Credit facilities, two other indirect, wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company — Atlantic Power Transmission, Inc. and Atlantic Power Generation, Inc. — were contributed to APLP Holdings.

OUR POWER PROJECTS

The table below outlines our portfolio of power generating assets in operation as of May 2, 2016, including our interest in each facility. Management believes the portfolio is well diversified in terms of electricity and steam buyers, fuel type, regulatory jurisdictions and regional power pools, thereby partially mitigating exposure to market, regulatory or environmental conditions specific to any single region. Our customers are generally large utilities and other parties with investment‑grade credit ratings, as measured by Standard & Poor’s (“S&P”). For customers rated by Moody’s, we substitute the corresponding S&P rating in the table below. Customers that have assigned ratings at the top end of the range of investment‑grade have, in the opinion of the rating agency, the strongest capability for payment of debt or payment of claims, while customers at the lower end of the range of investment‑grade have weaker capacity. Agency ratings are subject to change, and there can be no assurance that a ratings agency will continue to rate the customers, and/or maintain their current ratings. A security rating may be subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the rating

34

Table of Contents

agency, and each rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating. We cannot predict the effect that a change in the ratings of the customers will have on their liquidity or their ability to pay their debts or other obligations.

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Customer |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Power |  |  | Credit |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Economic |  |  | Net |  |  |  |  |  | Contract |  |  | Rating |
Project |  |  | Location |  |  | Type |  |  | MW |  |  | Interest |  |  | MW |  |  | Primary Electric Purchasers |  |  | Expiry |  |  | (S&P) |
East U.S. Segment |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Orlando(1) |  |  | Florida |  |  | Natural Gas |  |  | 129 |  |  | 50.00 | % |  | 65 |  |  | Progress Energy Florida |  |  | December, 2023 |  |  | A– |
Piedmont |  |  | Georgia |  |  | Biomass |  |  | 55 |  |  | 100.00 | % |  | 55 |  |  | Georgia Power |  |  | December, 2032 |  |  | A– |
Morris |  |  | Illinois |  |  | Natural Gas |  |  | 177 |  |  | 100.00 | % |  | 120 |  |  | Merchant |  |  | N/A |  |  | NR |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 57 |  |  | Equistar Chemicals, LP(2) |  |  | December, 2034 |  |  | BBB+ |
Cadillac |  |  | Michigan |  |  | Biomass |  |  | 40 |  |  | 100.00 | % |  | 40 |  |  | Consumers Energy |  |  | December, 2028 |  |  | BBB+ |
Chambers(1) |  |  | New Jersey |  |  | Coal |  |  | 262 |  |  | 40.00 | % |  | 89 |  |  | Atlantic City Electric(3) |  |  | March, 2024 |  |  | BBB+ |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 16 |  |  | Chemours |  |  | March, 2024 |  |  | BB- |
Kenilworth |  |  | New Jersey |  |  | Natural Gas |  |  | 29 |  |  | 100.00 | % |  | 29 |  |  | Merck & Co., Inc. |  |  | September, 2018 |  |  | AA |
Curtis Palmer(4) |  |  | New York |  |  | Hydro |  |  | 60 |  |  | 100.00 | % |  | 60 |  |  | Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation |  |  | December, 2027 |  |  | A– |
Selkirk(1) |  |  | New York |  |  | Natural Gas |  |  | 345 |  |  | 17.70 | % |  | 61 |  |  | Merchant |  |  | N/A |  |  | NR |
West U.S. Segment |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Naval Station |  |  | California |  |  | Natural Gas |  |  | 47 |  |  | 100.00 | % |  | 47 |  |  | San Diego Gas & Electric(5) |  |  | December, 2019 |  |  | A |
Naval Training Center |  |  | California |  |  | Natural Gas |  |  | 25 |  |  | 100.00 | % |  | 25 |  |  | San Diego Gas & Electric(5) |  |  | December, 2019 |  |  | A |
North Island |  |  | California |  |  | Natural Gas |  |  | 40 |  |  | 100.00 | % |  | 40 |  |  | San Diego Gas & Electric(5) |  |  | December, 2019 |  |  | A |
Oxnard |  |  | California |  |  | Natural Gas |  |  | 49 |  |  | 100.00 | % |  | 49 |  |  | Southern California Edison |  |  | May, 2020 |  |  | BBB+ |
Manchief |  |  | Colorado |  |  | Natural Gas |  |  | 300 |  |  | 100.00 | % |  | 300 |  |  | Public Service Company of Colorado |  |  | April, 2022 |  |  | A– |
Frederickson(1) |  |  | Washington |  |  | Natural Gas |  |  | 250 |  |  | 50.15 | % |  | 50 |  |  | Benton Co. PUD |  |  | August, 2022 |  |  | AA– |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 45 |  |  | Grays Harbor PUD |  |  | August, 2022 |  |  | A+ |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 30 |  |  | Franklin, Co. PUD |  |  | August, 2022 |  |  | A+ |
Koma Kulshan(1) |  |  | Washington |  |  | Hydro |  |  | 13 |  |  | 49.80 | % |  | 6 |  |  | Puget Sound Energy |  |  | December, 2037 |  |  | BBB |
Canada Segment |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Mamquam |  |  | British Columbia |  |  | Hydro |  |  | 50 |  |  | 100.00 | % |  | 50 |  |  | British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority |  |  | September, 2027 |  |  | AAA |
Moresby Lake |  |  | British Columbia |  |  | Hydro |  |  | 6 |  |  | 100.00 | % |  | 6 |  |  | British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority |  |  | August, 2022 |  |  | AAA |
Williams Lake |  |  | British Columbia |  |  | Biomass |  |  | 66 |  |  | 100.00 | % |  | 66 |  |  | British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority |  |  | March, 2018 |  |  | AAA |
Calstock |  |  | Ontario |  |  | Biomass |  |  | 35 |  |  | 100.00 | % |  | 35 |  |  | Independent Electricity System Operator |  |  | June, 2020 |  |  | AA |
Kapuskasing |  |  | Ontario |  |  | Natural Gas |  |  | 40 |  |  | 100.00 | % |  | 40 |  |  | Independent Electricity System Operator |  |  | December, 2017 |  |  | AA |
Nipigon |  |  | Ontario |  |  | Natural Gas |  |  | 40 |  |  | 100.00 | % |  | 40 |  |  | Independent Electricity System Operator |  |  | December, 2022 |  |  | AA |
North Bay |  |  | Ontario |  |  | Natural Gas |  |  | 40 |  |  | 100.00 | % |  | 40 |  |  | Independent Electricity System Operator |  |  | December, 2017 |  |  | AA |
Tunis(6) |  |  | Ontario |  |  | Natural Gas |  |  | 40 |  |  | 100.00 | % |  | 40 |  |  | Independent Electricity System Operator |  |  | NA |  |  | AA |

| (1) |  | Unconsolidated entities for which the results of operations are reflected in equity earnings of unconsolidated affiliates.

| (2) |  | Represents the credit rating of LyondellBasell, the parent company of Equistar Chemicals, as Equistar is not rated.

| (3) |  | The base PPA with Atlantic City Electric (“ACE”) makes up the majority of the revenue from the 89 Net MW. For sales of energy and capacity not purchased by ACE under the base PPA and sold to the spot market, profits are shared with ACE under a separate power sales agreement.

| (4) |  | The Curtis Palmer PPA expires at the earlier of December 2027 or the provision of 10,000 GWh of generation. From January 6, 1995 through March 31, 2016, the facility has generated 6,792 GWh under its PPA.

| (5) |  | Our land leases with the U.S. Navy expire in February 2018 along with the associated energy sales agreements. We have initiated communications with the U.S. Navy to extend the leases through at least the expiration date of the PPAs in December 2019.

35

Table of Contents

| (6) |  | On January 20, 2015, we entered into an agreement with the Ontario Power Authority and its successor, the Independent Electricity System Operator (“IESO”), for the future operations of the Tunis facility. Subject to meeting certain technical modifications to the plant, gas delivery and other requirements, Tunis will operate under a 15‑year agreement with the IESO commencing between November 2017 and June 2019. The new contract will require the plant to become fully dispatchable as opposed to its current baseload configuration. As such, Tunis will provide electricity to the Ontario grid only when required, thereby assisting to reduce the incidents of surplus baseload generation in the market. The new agreement provides the Tunis project with a fixed monthly payment which escalates annually according to a pre‑defined formula while allowing it to earn additional energy revenues for those periods during which it is called upon to operate.

Consolidated Overview and Results of Operations

Performance highlights

The following table provides a summary of our consolidated results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, which are analyzed in greater detail below:

|  | Three months |  |
|  | ended |  |
|  | March 31, |  |
|  | 2016 |  | 2015 |  |
Project revenue |  | $ | 106.4 |  | $ | 111.3 |  |
Project income |  | $ | 28.7 |  | $ | 21.5 |  |
(Loss) income from continuing operations |  | $ | (12.9) |  | $ | 24.6 |  |
Loss from discontinued operations |  | $ | — |  | $ | (12.3) |  |
Net (loss) income attributable to Atlantic Power Corporation |  | $ | (14.9) |  | $ | 17.5 |  |
(Loss) earnings per share from continuing operations attributable to Atlantic Power Corporation—basic and diluted |  | $ | (0.12) |  | $ | 0.17 |  |
Loss per share from discontinued operations—basic and diluted |  |  | — |  |  | (0.03) |  |
(Loss) earnings per share attributable to Atlantic Power Corporation—basic and diluted |  | $ | (0.12) |  | $ | 0.14 |  |
Project Adjusted EBITDA(1) |  | $ | 62.5 |  | $ | 58.6 |  |

| (1) |  | See reconciliation and definition in Supplementary Non‑GAAP Financial Information.

Revenue decreased from $111.3 million in the three months ended March 31, 2015 to $106.4 million, a decrease of 4.4% from the comparable 2015 period. The primary drivers of the decrease are as follows:

| · |  | Impact of lower fuel costs – energy revenue pricing at several of our projects is impacted by changes in fuel cost. Lower fuel prices during 2016 resulted in a $4.9 million decrease in revenue from 2015. These decreases in revenue are offset by lower fuel expense so the net impact on project income is not material; and

| · |  | Currency – an approximate $5.5 million impact at our Canadian projects resulting from fluctuations of the Canadian Dollar against the U.S. dollar. The decrease in revenue due to currency is partially offset by the benefit of lower expenses also from currency at our Canadian projects. Currency had a net negative impact of $4.9 million on consolidated project income from the comparable 2015 period.

These decreases were partially offset by:

| · |  | Hydrological conditions – a $6.0 million increase from higher water flows at our hydro projects.

Consolidated project income was $28.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2016, an increase of $7.2 million from the comparable 2015 period. The primary drivers of the increase are as follows:

| · |  | Fuel expense – fuel expense decreased from $46.2 million in the three months ended March 31, 2015 to $38.9 million in the three months ended March 31, 2016 primarily due to lower natural gas prices; and

36

Table of Contents

| · |  | Depreciation and amortization – depreciation and amortization decreased $3.2 million from the comparable 2015 period due to lower property, plant and equipment resulting from a $76.6 million long-lived asset impairment recorded in the fourth quarter of 2015.

These increases in project income were partially offset by decreases in project income resulting from:

| · |  | Revenue – revenue decreased $4.9 million as discussed above.

A detailed discussion of project income (loss) by segment is provided in Consolidated Overview and Results of Operations below. The discussion of Project Adjusted EBITDA by segment begins on page 42.

We have four reportable segments: East U.S., West U.S., Canada and Un‑Allocated Corporate. We revised our reportable business segments in the second quarter of 2015 as the result of recent significant asset sales and in order to align with changes in management’s structure, resource allocation and performance assessment in making decisions regarding our operations. The Wind Projects, which made up the entirety of the former Wind segment, were sold in June 2015 and are designated as discontinued operations for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2016. Our financial results for the three months ended March 31, 2015 have been revised to reflect these changes in operating segments. The segment classified as Un‑allocated Corporate includes activities that support the executive and administrative offices, capital structure, costs of being a public registrant, costs to develop future projects and intercompany eliminations. These costs are not allocated to the operating segments when determining segment profit or loss. Project income (loss) is the primary GAAP measure of our operating results and is discussed below by reportable segment.

37

Table of Contents

Three months ended March 31, 2016 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2015

The following table provides our consolidated results of operations:

|  | Three months ended March 31, |
|  | 2016 |  | 2015 |  | $ change |  | % change |
Project revenue: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Energy sales |  | $ | 52.5 |  | $ | 54.0 |  | $ | (1.5) |  | (2.8) | %
Energy capacity revenue |  |  | 31.9 |  |  | 33.5 |  |  | (1.6) |  | (4.8) | %
Other |  |  | 22.0 |  |  | 23.8 |  |  | (1.8) |  | (7.6) | %
|  |  | 106.4 |  |  | 111.3 |  |  | (4.9) |  | (4.4) | %
Project expenses: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Fuel |  |  | 38.9 |  |  | 46.2 |  |  | (7.3) |  | (15.8) | %
Operations and maintenance |  |  | 21.2 |  |  | 21.5 |  |  | (0.3) |  | (1.4) | %
Development |  |  | — |  |  | 1.1 |  |  | (1.1) |  | (100.0) | %
Depreciation and amortization |  |  | 24.8 |  |  | 28.0 |  |  | (3.2) |  | (11.4) | %
|  |  | 84.9 |  |  | 96.8 |  |  | (11.9) |  | (12.3) | %
Project other income: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Change in fair value of derivative instruments |  |  | (1.2) |  |  | (1.7) |  |  | 0.5 |  | (29.4) | %
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates |  |  | 10.7 |  |  | 10.8 |  |  | (0.1) |  | (0.9) | %
Interest expense, net |  |  | (2.1) |  |  | (2.1) |  |  | — |  | — |
Other income, net |  |  | (0.2) |  |  | — |  |  | (0.2) |  | NM |
|  |  | 7.2 |  |  | 7.0 |  |  | 0.2 |  | NM |
Project income |  |  | 28.7 |  |  | 21.5 |  |  | 7.2 |  | 33.5 | %
Administrative and other expenses (income): |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Administration |  |  | 6.1 |  |  | 9.4 |  |  | (3.3) |  | (35.1) | %
Interest, net |  |  | 16.6 |  |  | 25.7 |  |  | (9.1) |  | (35.4) | %
Foreign exchange loss (gain) |  |  | 19.8 |  |  | (32.2) |  |  | 52.0 |  | (161.5) | %
Other income, net |  |  | (2.5) |  |  | (1.4) |  |  | (1.1) |  | 78.6 | %
|  |  | 40.0 |  |  | 1.5 |  |  | 38.5 |  | NM |
(Loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes |  |  | (11.3) |  |  | 20.0 |  |  | (31.3) |  | (156.5) | %
Income tax expense (benefit) |  |  | 1.6 |  |  | (4.6) |  |  | 6.2 |  | (134.8) | %
(Loss) income from continuing operations |  |  | (12.9) |  |  | 24.6 |  |  | (37.5) |  | (152.4) | %
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax |  |  | — |  |  | (12.3) |  |  | 12.3 |  | (100.0) | %
Net (loss) income |  |  | (12.9) |  |  | 12.3 |  |  | (25.2) |  | NM |
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests |  |  | — |  |  | (7.5) |  |  | 7.5 |  | (100.0) | %
Net income attributable to Preferred share dividends of a subsidiary company |  |  | 2.0 |  |  | 2.3 |  |  | (0.3) |  | (13.0) | %
Net (loss) income attributable to Atlantic Power Corporation |  | $ | (14.9) |  | $ | 17.5 |  | $ | (32.4) |  | (185.1) | %

38

Table of Contents

|  | Three months ended March 31, 2016 |  |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Un-Allocated |  | Consolidated |  |
|  | East U.S. |  | West U.S. |  | Canada |  | Corporate |  | Total |  |
Project revenue: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Energy sales |  | $ | 22.4 |  | $ | 6.5 |  | $ | 23.6 |  | $ | — |  | $ | 52.5 |  |
Energy capacity revenue |  |  | 11.8 |  |  | 6.6 |  |  | 13.5 |  |  | — |  |  | 31.9 |  |
Other |  |  | 5.2 |  |  | 6.0 |  |  | 10.6 |  |  | 0.2 |  |  | 22.0 |  |
|  |  | 39.4 |  |  | 19.1 |  |  | 47.7 |  |  | 0.2 |  |  | 106.4 |  |
Project expenses: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Fuel |  |  | 13.8 |  |  | 8.1 |  |  | 17.0 |  |  | — |  |  | 38.9 |  |
Operations and maintenance |  |  | 8.1 |  |  | 6.9 |  |  | 5.8 |  |  | 0.4 |  |  | 21.2 |  |
Depreciation and amortization |  |  | 8.5 |  |  | 7.3 |  |  | 8.9 |  |  | 0.1 |  |  | 24.8 |  |
|  |  | 30.4 |  |  | 22.3 |  |  | 31.7 |  |  | 0.5 |  |  | 84.9 |  |
Project other income (expense): |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Change in fair value of derivative instruments |  |  | (0.7) |  |  | — |  |  | 0.4 |  |  | (0.9) |  |  | (1.2) |  |
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates |  |  | 9.9 |  |  | 0.8 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 10.7 |  |
Interest expense, net |  |  | (2.1) |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (2.1) |  |
Other expense, net |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (0.2) |  |  | (0.2) |  |
|  |  | 7.1 |  |  | 0.8 |  |  | 0.4 |  |  | (1.1) |  |  | 7.2 |  |
Project income (loss) |  | $ | 16.1 |  | $ | (2.4) |  | $ | 16.4 |  | $ | (1.4) |  | $ | 28.7 |  |

|  | Three months ended March 31, 2015 |  |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Un-Allocated |  | Consolidated |  |
|  | East U.S. |  | West U.S. |  | Canada |  | Corporate |  | Total (1) |  |
Project revenue: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Energy sales |  | $ | 19.5 |  | $ | 10.4 |  | $ | 24.1 |  | $ | — |  | $ | 54.0 |  |
Energy capacity revenue |  |  | 12.0 |  |  | 6.7 |  |  | 14.8 |  |  | — |  |  | 33.5 |  |
Other |  |  | 6.1 |  |  | 5.9 |  |  | 11.5 |  |  | 0.3 |  |  | 23.8 |  |
|  |  | 37.6 |  |  | 23.0 |  |  | 50.4 |  |  | 0.3 |  |  | 111.3 |  |
Project expenses: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Fuel |  |  | 16.5 |  |  | 10.7 |  |  | 19.0 |  |  | — |  |  | 46.2 |  |
Operations and maintenance |  |  | 7.2 |  |  | 5.6 |  |  | 7.7 |  |  | 1.0 |  |  | 21.5 |  |
Development |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 1.1 |  |  | 1.1 |  |
Depreciation and amortization |  |  | 8.2 |  |  | 7.3 |  |  | 12.3 |  |  | 0.2 |  |  | 28 |  |
|  |  | 31.9 |  |  | 23.6 |  |  | 39.0 |  |  | 2.3 |  |  | 96.8 |  |
Project other income (expense): |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Change in fair value of derivative instruments |  |  | (2.6) |  |  | — |  |  | 1.6 |  |  | (0.7) |  |  | (1.7) |  |
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates |  |  | 9.9 |  |  | 0.9 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 10.8 |  |
Interest expense, net |  |  | (2.1) |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (2.1) |  |
|  |  | 5.2 |  |  | 0.9 |  |  | 1.6 |  |  | (0.7) |  |  | 7.0 |  |
Project income (loss) |  | $ | 10.9 |  | $ | 0.3 |  | $ | 13.0 |  | $ | (2.7) |  | $ | 21.5 |  |

| (1) |  | Excludes the Wind Projects, which were designated as assets held for sale and discontinued operations for the three months ended March 31, 2015. The Wind Projects were sold in June 2015.

East U.S.

Project income for the three months ended March 31, 2016 increased $5.2 million from the comparable 2015 period primarily due to:

| · |  | increased project income of $5.0 million at Curtis Palmer primarily due to higher water flow than the comparable period in 2015.

39

Table of Contents

West U.S.

Project income for the three months ended March 31, 2016 decreased $2.7 million from the comparable 2015 period primarily due to:

| · |  | decreased project income of $1.1 million at Naval Station primarily due to a $1.2 million decrease in energy sales related to lower gas prices;

| · |  | decreased project income of $0.4 million at North Island, which underwent a maintenance outage in February 2016; and

| · |  | decreased project income of $0.4 million at Manchief primarily due to a $0.3 million decrease in energy sales from lower dispatch than the comparable period in 2015.

Canada

Project income for the three months ended March 31, 2016 increased $3.4 million from the comparable 2015 period primarily due to:

| · |  | increased project income of $2.8 million at Williams Lake due to a $2.8 million decrease in depreciation expenses resulting from a long-lived asset impairment recorded in the fourth quarter of December 31, 2015; and

| · |  | increased project income of $1.1 million at Mamquam primarily due to a $0.5 million increase in energy sales from higher water flow than the comparable period in 2015.

This increase was partially offset by:

| · |  | decreased project income of $0.7 million at Nipigon primarily due to a negative $0.8 million change in the fair value of gas purchase agreements that are accounted for as derivatives.

Un‑allocated Corporate

Total project loss for the three months ended March 31, 2016 decreased by $1.3 million from the comparable 2015 period primarily due to a $1.1 million decrease in development and administration costs from the comparable 2015 period.

Administrative and other expenses (income)

Administrative and other expenses (income) include the income and expenses not attributable to any specific project and is allocated to the Un‑allocated Corporate segment. These costs include the activities that support the executive and administrative offices, treasury function, costs of being a public registrant, costs to develop or acquire future projects, interest costs on our corporate obligations, the impact of foreign exchange fluctuations and corporate taxes. Significant non‑cash items that impact Administrative and other expenses (income), and that are subject to potentially significant fluctuations include the non‑cash impact of foreign exchange fluctuations from period to period on the U.S. dollar equivalent of our Canadian dollar‑denominated obligations and the related deferred income tax expense (benefit) associated with these non‑cash items.

Administration

Administration expense decreased $3.3 million or 35.1% from the comparable 2015 period primarily due to $3.9 million of severance costs incurred in the comparable 2015 period.

Interest, net

Interest expense decreased $9.1 million or 35.4% from the comparable 2015 period primarily due to lower interest expense related to the 9.0% Notes that were redeemed in June 2015.

40

Table of Contents

Foreign exchange loss (gain)

Foreign exchange loss increased $52.0 million representing a decrease from the comparable 2015 period primarily due to a $52.5 million decrease in unrealized loss in the revaluation of instruments denominated in Canadian dollars. The closing U.S. dollar to Canadian dollar exchange rates were 1.30 and 1.26 at March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, a decrease of 6.2% as compared to an increase of 9.2% in 2015. The average U.S. dollar to Canadian dollar exchange rates were 1.35 and 1.26 for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015.

Income tax expense

Income tax expense for the three months ended March 31, 2016 was $1.6 million. Expected income tax benefit for the same period, based on the Canadian enacted statutory rate of 26%, was $3.0 million. The primary items impacting the tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2016 were $2.8 million relating to a change in the valuation allowance, $2.5 million related to foreign exchange, $0.6 million relating to dividend withholding and other taxes and $0.2 million of other permanent differences. These items were partially offset by $1.1 million relating to operating in higher tax rate jurisdictions and $0.4 million related to capital loss on intercompany notes.

Income tax benefit for the three months ended March 31, 2015 was $4.6 million. Expected income tax expense for the same period, based on the Canadian enacted statutory rate of 26%, was $5.2 million. The primary items impacting the tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2015 were $2.9 million relating to a change in the valuation allowance, $2.4 million relating to operating in higher tax rate jurisdictions, $1.8 million relating to foreign exchange and $2.7 million of other permanent differences.

Project Operating Performance

Two of the primary metrics we utilize to measure the operating performance of our projects are generation and availability. Generation measures the net output of our proportionate project ownership percentage in megawatt hours. Availability is calculated by dividing the total scheduled hours of a project less forced outage hours by the total hours in the period measured. The terms of our PPAs require our projects to maintain certain levels of availability. The majority of our projects were able to achieve their respective capacity payments. For projects where reduced availability adversely impacted capacity payments, the impact was not material for the three months ended March 31, 2016. The terms of our PPAs provide for certain levels of planned and unplanned outages. All references below are denominated in thousands of Net MWh.

|  | Generation(1) |  |
|  | Three months ended March 31, |  |
|  |  |  |  |  | % change |  |
(in thousands of Net MWh) |  | 2016 |  | 2015 |  | 2016 vs. 2015 |  |
Segment |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
East U.S. |  | 700.2 |  | 653.2 |  | 7.2 | % |
West U.S. |  | 342.6 |  | 349.7 |  | (2.0) | % |
Canada |  | 544.2 |  | 517.1 |  | 5.2 | % |
Total |  | 1,587.0 |  | 1,520.0 |  | 4.4 | % |

| (1) |  | Excludes the Wind Projects, which were designated as assets held for sale and discontinued operations for the three months ended March 31, 2015. The Wind Projects were sold in June 2015.

Three months ended March 31, 2016 compared with three months ended March 31, 2015

Aggregate power generation for the three months ended March 31, 2016 increased 4.4% from the comparable 2015 period primarily due to:

| · |  | increased generation in the East U.S. segment primarily due to a 44.1 net MWh increase in generation at Curtis Palmer due to higher water flow; and

| · |  | increased generation in the Canada segment primarily due to a 21.3 net MWh increase in generation at Mamquam due to higher water flow.

41

Table of Contents

These increases were partially offset by:

| · |  | decreased generation in the West U.S. segment primarily due to a 66.9 net MWh decrease in generation at Manchief due to lower dispatch, and decreases of 12.5 MWh, 11.5 MWh and 10.5 MWh at North Island, Naval Station and Naval Training Center, respectively, due to outages. These decreases were offset by an increase of 94.8 MWh at Frederickson, which had lower demand in the comparable 2015 period resulting from milder weather.

|  | Availability(1) |  |
|  | Three months ended |  |
|  | March 31, |  |
|  |  |  |  |  | % change |  |
|  | 2016 |  | 2015 |  | 2016 vs. 2015 |  |
Segment |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
East U.S. |  | 99.0 | % | 97.9 | % | 1.1 | % |
West U.S. |  | 89.6 | % | 97.2 | % | (7.8) | % |
Canada |  | 99.5 | % | 96.8 | % | 2.8 | % |
Weighted average(2) |  | 96.6 | % | 97.5 | % | (0.9) | % |

| (1) |  | Excludes the Wind Projects, which were designated as assets held for sale and discontinued operations for the three months ended March 31, 2015. The Wind Projects were sold in June 2015.

Three months ended March 31, 2016 compared with three months ended March 31, 2015

Weighted average availability for the three months ended March 31, 2016 decreased 0.9% from the comparable 2015 period primarily due to:

| · |  | decreased availability in the West U.S. segment primarily due to North Island, Naval Station and Naval Training Center, which underwent maintenance outages.

These decreases were partially offset by:

| · |  | increased availability in the Canada segment primarily due to Mamquam, which underwent an outage during the comparable period in 2015; and

| · |  | increased availability in the East U.S. segment primarily due to Piedmont, which underwent an outage during the comparable period in 2015.

Supplementary Non‑GAAP Financial Information

The key measurement we use to evaluate the results of our business and relevant supplemental measures of our ability to generate cash is Project Adjusted EBITDA. Project Adjusted EBITDA is defined as project income (loss) plus interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (including non‑cash impairment charges) and changes in fair value of derivative instruments. Project Adjusted EBITDA is not a measure recognized under GAAP and does not have a standardized meaning prescribed by GAAP and is therefore unlikely to be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies. We use Project Adjusted EBITDA to provide comparative information about project performance without considering how projects are capitalized or whether they contain derivative contracts that are required to be recorded at fair value. A reconciliation of Project Adjusted EBITDA to project income (loss) is provided under “Project Adjusted EBITDA” below and a reconciliation of Project Adjusted EBITDA by segment to project income (loss) by segment is provided in Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements of this Quarterly Report on Form 10‑Q. Project Adjusted EBITDA for our equity investments in unconsolidated affiliates is presented on a proportionately consolidated basis in the table below. Investors are cautioned that we may calculate this measure in a manner that is different from other companies.

In addition to Project Adjusted EBITDA, we have previously provided Free Cash Flow as measure not recognized under GAAP. Free Cash Flow provided a measure of our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders. Because, as of the first quarter of 2016, we no longer pay a common dividend, we believe Free Cash Flow is no longer a relevant measure and have removed it from MD&A.

42

Table of Contents

Project Adjusted EBITDA

|  | Three months |  |  |
|  | ended |  |  |
|  | March 31, |  | $ change
|  | 2016 |  | 2015 |  | 2016 vs 2015
Project Adjusted EBITDA by segment(1) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
East U.S. |  | $ | 30.3 |  | $ | 26.7 |  | $ | 3.6
West U.S. |  |  | 7.5 |  |  | 10.0 |  |  | (2.5)
Canada |  |  | 24.8 |  |  | 23.7 |  |  | 1.1
Un-Allocated Corporate |  |  | (0.1) |  |  | (1.8) |  |  | 1.7
Total |  |  | 62.5 |  |  | 58.6 |  |  | 3.9
Reconciliation to project income |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Depreciation and amortization |  |  | 29.9 |  |  | 32.9 |  |  | (3.0)
Interest expense, net |  |  | 2.5 |  |  | 2.5 |  |  | —
Change in the fair value of derivative instruments |  |  | 1.2 |  |  | 1.7 |  |  | (0.5)
Impairment and other expense |  |  | 0.2 |  |  | — |  |  | 0.2
Project income |  | $ | 28.7 |  | $ | 21.5 |  | $ | 7.2

| (1) |  | Excludes the Wind Projects, which were designated as assets held for sale and a component of discontinued operations for the three months ended March 31, 2015. The Wind Projects were sold in June 2015.

East U.S.

The following table summarizes Project Adjusted EBITDA for our East U.S. segment for the periods indicated:

|  | March 31, |  |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  | % change |  |
|  | 2016 |  | 2015 |  | 2016 vs. 2015 |  |
East U.S. |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Project Adjusted EBITDA |  | $ | 30.3 |  | $ | 26.7 |  | 13 | % |

Three months ended March 31, 2016 compared with three months ended March 31, 2015

Project Adjusted EBITDA for the three months ended March 31, 2016 increased $3.6 million from the comparable 2015 period primarily due to increased Project Adjusted EBITDA of:

| · |  | $5.0 million at Curtis Palmer due to higher water flow than the comparable 2015 period.

This increase was partially offset by a decrease in Project Adjusted EBITDA of:

| · |  | $1.1 million at Kenilworth due to lower demand resulting from mild weather.

West U.S.

The following table summarizes Project Adjusted EBITDA for our West U.S. segment for the periods indicated:

|  | March 31, |  |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  | % change |  |
|  | 2016 |  | 2015 |  | 2016 vs 2015 |  |
West U.S. |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Project Adjusted EBITDA |  | $ | 7.5 |  | $ | 10.0 |  | (25) | % |

43

Table of Contents

Three months ended March 31, 2016 compared with three months ended March 31, 2015

Project Adjusted EBITDA for the three months ended March 31, 2016 decreased $2.5 million from the comparable 2015 period primarily due to decreased Project Adjusted EBITDA of:

| · |  | $1.1 million at Naval Station due to lower energy sales from lower gas prices;

| · |  | $0.4 million at North Island, which had a maintenance outage in February 2016; and

| · |  | $0.4 million at Manchief due to lower dispatch resulting from warmer weather.

Canada

The following table summarizes Project Adjusted EBITDA for our Canada segment for the periods indicated:

|  | March 31, |  |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  | % change |  |
|  | 2016 |  | 2015 |  | 2016 vs. 2015 |  |
Canada |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Project Adjusted EBITDA |  | $ | 24.8 |  | $ | 23.7 |  | 5 | % |

Three months ended March 31, 2016 compared with three months ended March 31, 2015

Project Adjusted EBITDA for the three months ended March 31, 2016 increased $1.1 million from the comparable 2015 period primarily due to an increase in Project Adjusted EBITDA of:

| · |  | $1.1 million at Mamquam due to higher water flow than the comparable 2015 period.

Un‑allocated Corporate

The following table summarizes Project Adjusted EBITDA for our Un‑allocated Corporate segment for the periods indicated:

|  | March 31, |  |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  | % change |  |
|  | 2016 |  | 2015 |  | 2016 vs. 2015 |  |
Un-allocated Corporate |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Project Adjusted EBITDA |  | $ | (0.1) |  | $ | (1.8) |  | (94) | % |

Three months ended March 31, 2016 compared with three months ended March 31, 2015

Project Adjusted EBITDA for the three months ended March 31, 2016 increased $1.7 million from the comparable 2015 period primarily due to increases in Project Adjusted EBITDA of:

| · |  | $1.1 million of lower compensation expense from headcount reductions and $1.0 million in decreased development and administrative costs.

Project Adjusted EBITDA excludes the Wind Projects, which are designated as discontinued operations for the three months ended March 31, 2015. Project Adjusted EBITDA for the Wind Projects was $13.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015.

44

Table of Contents

Liquidity and Capital Resources

|  | March 31, |  | December 31, |
|  | 2016 |  | 2015 |
Cash and cash equivalents |  | $ | 64.3 |  | $ | 72.4 |
Restricted cash |  |  | 10.0 |  |  | 15.2 |
Total |  |  | 74.3 |  |  | 87.6 |
Revolving credit facility availability |  |  | 113.7 |  |  | 106.0 |
Total liquidity |  | $ | 188.0 |  | $ | 193.6 |

Overview

Our primary source of liquidity is distributions from our projects and availability under our revolving credit facility. Our future liquidity depends in part on our ability to successfully enter into new PPAs at projects when PPAs expire or terminate. PPAs in our portfolio have expiration dates ranging from December 31, 2017 (at our North Bay and Kapuskasing projects) to December 2037. We are currently in negotiations with counterparties regarding the renewal or entry into new power purchase agreements or may elect to operate certain facilities in the merchant market upon expiration of their PPAs. When a PPA expires or is terminated, it may be difficult for us to secure a new PPA, if at all, or the price received by the project for power under subsequent arrangements may be reduced significantly. As a result, this may reduce the cash received from project distributions and the cash available for further debt reduction, identification of and investment in accretive growth opportunities (both internal and external), to the extent available, repurchase of common shares and other allocation of available cash. See “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Structure—We may not generate sufficient cash flow to pay dividends, if and when declared by our board of directors, service our debt obligations or finance internal or external growth opportunities or fund our operations” in our Annual Report on Form 10‑K for the year ended December 31, 2015.

We expect to reinvest approximately $60.0 million in our portfolio in the form of project capital expenditures and maintenance expenses in 2016. Such investments are generally paid at the project level. See “—Capital and Major Maintenance Expenditures” in our Annual Report on Form 10‑K for the year ended December 31, 2015. We do not expect any other material or unusual requirements for cash outflows for 2016 for capital expenditures or other required investments. We believe that we will be able to generate sufficient amounts of cash and cash equivalents to maintain our operations and meet obligations as they become due for at least the next 12 months.

Consolidated Cash Flow Discussion

The following table reflects the changes in cash flows for the periods indicated:

|  | Three months ended |  |  |  |
|  | March 31, |  |  |  |
|  | 2016 |  | 2015 |  | Change |
Net cash provided by operating activities |  | $ | 29.4 |  | $ | 35.1 |  | $ | (5.7) |
Net cash provided by investing activities |  |  | 9.2 |  |  | 7.6 |  |  | 1.6 |
Net cash used in financing activities |  |  | (46.7) |  |  | (46.4) |  |  | (0.3) |

Operating Activities

Cash flow from our projects may vary from period to period based on working capital requirements and the operating performance of the projects, as well as changes in prices under the PPAs, fuel supply and transportation agreements, steam sales agreements and other project contracts, and the transition to merchant or re‑contracted pricing following the expiration of PPAs. Project cash flows may have some seasonality and the pattern and frequency of distributions to us from the projects during the year can also vary, although such seasonal variances do not typically have a material impact on our business.

For the three months ended March 31, 2016, the net decrease in cash flows from operating activities of $5.7 million was primarily the result of the following:

| · |  | Sale of Wind Projects – in the first quarter of 2015, the Wind Projects, which were sold in June 2015, provided $10.8 million of operating cash flows.

45

Table of Contents

This decrease was partially offset by an increase in net cash provided by operating activities primarily the result of the following:

| · |  | Increase in Project Adjusted EBITDA – Project Adjusted EBITDA increased by $3.9 million primarily due to the strong performance of our hydro projects in the first quarter of 2016.

Investing Activities

Cash flow from investing activities includes changes in restricted cash. Restricted cash fluctuates from period to period in part because certain of our non‑recourse project‑level financing arrangements require all operating cash flow from the project to be deposited in restricted accounts and then released at the time that principal payments are made and project‑level debt service coverage ratios are met. As a result, the timing of principal payments on certain of our project‑level debt causes significant fluctuations in restricted cash balances, which typically benefits investing cash flow in the second and fourth quarters of the year and decreases investing cash flow in the first and third quarters of the year. For the three months ended March 31, 2016, the net increase in cash flows from investing activities of $1.6 million was primarily the result of the following:

| · |  | Reimbursement of construction cost – we received a reimbursement of $4.7 million for the construction project at Morris; and

| · |  | Capitalized development costs – we incurred $0.8 million of capitalized development costs in the comparable 2015 period.

These increases were partially offset by a decrease in net cash provided by investing activities primarily the result of the following:

| · |  | Restricted cash – restricted cash decreased due to the sale of the Wind Projects in June 2015.

Financing Activities

Financing Activities

For the three months ended March 31, 2016, the net increase in cash flows used in financing activities of $0.3 million was primarily the result of the following:

| · |  | Convertible debenture repayments – w e redeemed and cancelled $16.3 million and $5.7 million of our convertible debentures in the three month periods ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

This increase was partially offset by a decrease in net cash used by financing activities primarily as a result of the following:

| · |  | Corporate and project-level debt – our debt repayment decreased from $32.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015 to $27.5 million for the comparative period in 2016. In the first quarter of 2015, we repaid $9.0 million of our former 9.0% Senior Unsecured Notes.

46

Table of Contents

Corporate Debt

The following table summarizes the maturities of our corporate debt at March 31, 2016:

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Remaining |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  | Maturity |  | Interest |  | Principal |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  | Date |  | Rates |  | Repayments |  | 2016 |  | 2017 |  | 2018 |  | 2019 |  | 2020 |  | Thereafter |
Senior Secured Term Loan Facility(1)(2) |  | February 2021 |  | 4.75 | % | - | 5.90 | % | $ | 447.9 |  | $ | 4.5 |  | $ | 4.4 |  | $ | 4.4 |  | $ | 4.3 |  | $ | 4.3 |  | $ | 426.0 |
Atlantic Power Income LP Note(2) |  | June 2036 |  | 5.95 | % |  |  |  |  | 161.7 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 161.7 |
Convertible Debenture(2) |  | March 2017 |  | 6.25 | % |  |  |  |  | 51.7 |  |  | — |  |  | 51.7 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |
Convertible Debenture(2) |  | June 2017 |  | 5.60 | % |  |  |  |  | 58.3 |  |  | — |  |  | 58.3 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |
Convertible Debenture |  | June 2019 |  | 5.75 | % |  |  |  |  | 105.3 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 105.3 |  |  | — |  |  | — |
Convertible Debenture |  | December 2019 |  | 6.00 | % |  |  |  |  | 62.4 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 62.4 |  |  | — |  |  | — |
Total Corporate Debt |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | $ | 887.3 |  | $ | 4.5 |  | $ | 114.4 |  | $ | 4.4 |  | $ | 172.0 |  | $ | 4.3 |  | $ | 587.7 |

| (1) |  | In addition to the annual principal payments described herein, the Credit Agreement requires payment of 50% of the excess cash flow of the Partnership and its subsidiaries. On May 5, 2014, we entered into interest rate swap agreements to mitigate the exposure to changes in LIBOR for $199.0 million notional amount ($1 40.4 million at March 31, 2016) of the $600.0 million ($447.9 million at March 31, 2016) outstanding aggregate borrowings. See Note 8, Accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities for further details.

| (2) |  | The Senior Secured Term Loan Facility, Series A Debentures and Series B Debentures were redeemed in whole, at a price equal to par plus accrued interest on April 13, 2016 with a portion of the proceeds from the New Credit Facilities. The New Credit Facility includes a New Term Loan totaling $700.0 million that matures in April 2013 and contains a mandatory amortization feature determined by using the greater of (i) 50% of the cash flow of APLP Holdings and its subsidiaries that remains after the application of funds, in accordance with a customary priority, to operations and maintenance expenses of APLP Holdings and its subsidiaries, debt service on the New Credit Facilities and the MTNs, funding of the debt service reserve account, debt service on other permitted debt of APLP Holdings and its subsidiaries, capital expenditures permitted under the Credit Agreement, and payment on the preferred equity issued by Atlantic Power Preferred Equity Ltd., a subsidiary of APLP Holdings or (ii) such other amount up to 100% of the cash flow described in clause (i) above that is required to reduce the aggregate principal amount of New Term Loans outstanding to achieve a target principal amount that declines quarterly based on a pre-determined specified schedule.

Project‑Level Debt

Project‑level debt of our consolidated projects is secured by the respective project and its contracts with no other recourse to us. Project‑level debt generally amortizes during the term of the respective revenue‑generating contracts of the projects. All project‑level debt is non‑recourse to us and substantially the entire principal is amortized over the life of the projects’ PPAs. The following table summarizes the maturities of project‑level debt. The amounts represent our share of the non‑recourse project‑level debt balances at March 31, 2016. Certain of the projects have more than one tranche of debt outstanding with different maturities, different interest rates and/or debt containing variable interest rates. Project‑level debt agreements contain covenants that restrict the amount of cash distributed by the project if certain debt service coverage ratios are not attained. At May 2, 2016, all of our projects with the exception of Piedmont were in compliance with the covenants contained in project‑level debt. Projects that do not meet their debt service coverage ratios are limited from making distributions, but are not callable or subject to acceleration under the terms of their debt agreements. We do not expect our Piedmont project to meet its debt service coverage ratio covenants or to make distributions before the project’s debt maturity in 2018 at the earliest. See Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, Long‑term debt—Non‑Recourse Debt.

47

Table of Contents

The range of interest rates presented represents the rates in effect at March 31, 2016. The amounts listed below are in millions of U.S. dollars, except as otherwise stated.

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Remaining |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  | Maturity |  | Range of |  | Principal |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  | Date |  | Interest Rates |  | Repayments |  | 2016 |  | 2017 |  | 2018 |  | 2019 |  | 2020 |  | Thereafter |
Consolidated Projects: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Epsilon Power Partners |  | January 2019 |  | 3.40 | % |  |  |  | $ | 18.0 |  | $ | 4.5 |  | $ | 6.3 |  | $ | 6.5 |  | $ | 0.7 |  | $ | — |  | $ | — |
Piedmont |  | August 2018 |  | 5.16 | % |  |  |  |  | 59.0 |  |  | 2.4 |  |  | 2.5 |  |  | 54.1 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |
Cadillac |  | August 2025 |  | 6.17 | % |  |  |  |  | 28.9 |  |  | 1.9 |  |  | 3.0 |  |  | 3.0 |  |  | 3.0 |  |  | 3.0 |  |  | 15.0 |
Total Consolidated Projects |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 105.9 |  |  | 8.8 |  |  | 11.8 |  |  | 63.6 |  |  | 3.7 |  |  | 3.0 |  |  | 15.0 |
Equity Method Projects: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Chambers(1) |  | December 2019 and 2023 |  | 4.50 | % | - | 5.00 | % |  | 43.0 |  |  | 0.1 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 5.2 |  |  | 7.8 |  |  | 29.9 |
Total Equity Method Projects |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 43.0 |  |  | 0.1 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 5.2 |  |  | 7.8 |  |  | 29.9 |
Total Project-Level Debt |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | $ | 148.9 |  | $ | 8.9 |  | $ | 11.8 |  | $ | 63.6 |  | $ | 8.9 |  | $ | 10.8 |  | $ | 44.9 |

| (1) |  | In June 2014, Chambers refinanced its project debt and issued (i) Series A (tax exempt) Bonds due December 2023, of which our proportionate share is $41.3 million and (ii) Series B (taxable) Bonds due December 2019, of which our proportionate share is $1.6 million. The above table does not include our $4.2 million proportionate share of issuance premiums.

Uses of Liquidity

Our requirements for liquidity and capital resources, other than operating our projects, consist primarily of principal and interest on our outstanding convertible debentures, senior notes and other corporate and project level debt, funding the repurchase of shares of our common stock (to the extent we choose to pursue any such repurchase), collateral and capital expenditures, including major maintenance and business development costs and dividend payments, if and when declared by our board of directors, to our common shareholders and preferred shareholders of a subsidiary company. We may fund future acquisitions with a combination of cash on hand, the issuance of additional corporate debt or equity securities and the incurrence of privately placed bank or institutional non‑recourse operating level debt, although we can provide no assurances regarding the availability of public or private financing on acceptable terms or at all.

Capital and Maintenance Expenditures

Capital expenditures and maintenance expenses for the projects are generally paid at the project level using project cash flows and project reserves. Therefore, the distributions that we receive from the projects are made net of capital expenditures needed at the projects. The operating projects which we own consist of large capital assets that have established commercial operations. On‑going capital expenditures for assets of this nature are generally not significant because most expenditures relate to planned repairs and maintenance and are expensed when incurred.

We expect to reinvest approximately $60.0 million in our portfolio in the form of project capital expenditures and maintenance expenses in 2016. Such investments are generally paid at the project level. See “—Capital and Major Maintenance Expenditures” in our Annual Report on Form 10‑K for the year ended December 31, 2015. We do not expect any other material or unusual requirements for cash outflows for 2016 for capital expenditures or other required investments. We believe that we will be able to generate sufficient amounts of cash and cash equivalents to maintain our operations and meet obligations as they become due for at least the next 12 months.

We believe one of the benefits of our diverse fleet is that plant overhauls and other expenditures do not occur in the same year for each facility. Recognized industry guidelines and original equipment manufacturer recommendations provide a source of data to assess maintenance needs. In addition, we utilize predictive and risk‑based analysis to refine our expectations, prioritize our spending and balance the funding requirements necessary for these expenditures over time. Future capital expenditures and maintenance expenses may exceed the projected level in 2016 as a result of the timing of more infrequent events such as steam turbine overhauls and/or gas turbine and hydroelectric turbine upgrades.

Scheduled maintenance outages during the three months ended March 31, 2016 occurred at such times that did not materially impact the facilities’ availability requirements under their respective PPAs.

48

Table of Contents

Recently Adopted and Recently Issued Accounting Guidance

See Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10‑Q.

Off‑Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of March 31, 2016, we had no off‑balance sheet arrangements as defined in Item 303(a)(4) of Regulation S‑K.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Our exposure to financial market risk results primarily from fluctuations in interest and currency rates and fuel and electricity prices. There have been no material changes to our market risks as disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10‑K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have evaluated our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a‑15(e) and 15d‑15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of March 31, 2016 as a result of the material weakness that exists in our internal control over financial reporting as previously described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.

Previously Identified Material Weakness

As of December 31, 2015, Management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective due to the material weakness identified. Management concluded that the long-lived asset and goodwill impairment tests were not designed effectively to ensure the proper application of U.S. GAAP over (i) the determination of the carrying value of our asset groups and reporting units used in the accounting for long-lived asset recoverability and goodwill impairment test, and (ii) the determination of the long-lived asset and goodwill impairment charges. Specifically, with respect to (i) and (ii), we did not design and maintain effective controls related to determining the carrying value of the asset groups for the purpose of performing the long-lived asset impairment testing as we did not appropriately include the carrying value of goodwill in certain long-lived asset groups in which the asset group is at the same level as the reporting unit. This resulted in an initial conclusion that no long-lived asset impairment should be recorded and also impacted the carrying value of our reporting units for step 1 and step 2 of our goodwill impairment tests. These control deficiencies resulted in misstatements related to goodwill, property, plant and equipment, deferred income taxes and impairment, within the preliminary consolidated financial statements that were corrected prior to the issuance of the Company’s consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015.

A material weakness is defined as a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected in a timely manner.

Management’s Remediation Plan

Management is actively engaged in the planning for, and implementation of, remediation efforts to address the material weakness identified above. Management intends to take the following actions to address the material weakness:

Re-designing its controls, including the implementation of new controls, relating to the long-lived asset and goodwill impairment analysis, including: (i) enhancing the design and documentation of management review controls in order to enhance the precision at which management review controls operate, (ii) improving the documentation of

49

Table of Contents

internal control procedures, and (iii) enhancing the evaluation of the components of carrying value and comparison to the requirements of generally accepted accounting principles.

We are in the process of implementing our remediation plan and expect to have the material weakness remediated prior to December 31, 2016.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Other than the material weakness described above, there has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended March 31, 2016 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Inherent Limitations of Disclosure Controls and Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Because of their inherent limitations, our disclosure controls and procedures and our internal control over financial reporting may not prevent material errors or fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. The effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and our internal control over financial reporting is subject to risks, including that the control may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with our policies or procedures may deteriorate.

50

Table of Contents

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are party to legal proceedings, including securities class actions, from time to time. In particular, we and/or certain of our current and former officers have been named as defendants in various class action lawsuits. Due to the nature of these proceedings, the lack of precise damage claims and the type of claims we are subject to, we are unable to determine the ultimate or maximum amount of monetary liability or financial impact, if any, to us in these legal matters, which unless otherwise specified, seek damages from the defendants of material or indeterminate amounts.

Shareholder class action lawsuits

On March 19, 2013, April 2, 2013 and May 10, 2013, three notices of action relating to Canadian securities class action claims against the Proposed Defendants were also issued by alleged investors in Atlantic Power common shares, and in one of the actions, holders of Atlantic Power convertible debentures, with the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in the Province of Ontario. On April 8, 2013, a similar claim issued by alleged investors in Atlantic Power common shares seeking to initiate a class action against the Proposed Defendants was filed with the Superior Court of Quebec in the Province of Quebec (the “Canadian Actions”).

On August 30, 2013, the three Ontario actions were succeeded by one action with an amended claim being issued on behalf of Jacqeline Coffin and Sandra Lowry. This claim named the Company, Barry E. Welch and Terrence Ronan as Defendants. The Plaintiffs sought leave to commence an action for statutory misrepresentation under the Ontario Securities Act and asserted common law claims for misrepresentation.

The Plaintiffs’ motions for leave and certification were heard on May 20-21, 2015.

On July 24, 2015, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice issued a decision denying the Plaintiffs’ motion for leave and certification. The Superior Court granted leave to reconstitute a claim for debenture holders but required that there be a debenture holder as plaintiff, that the claim be amended and that the Plaintiffs pay the Defendants partial indemnity costs of responding to the Plaintiffs’ motion.

The Plaintiffs appealed the July 24 decision on leave and certification to the Ontario Court of Appeal.

The appeal was subsequently abandoned by the Plaintiffs, and the Ontario action was dismissed by Order dated December 2, 2015, the Defendants agreeing not to claim costs from the Plaintiffs.

The proposed Quebec class action was suspended by the Superior Court of Quebec pending the outcome of the motions for leave and certification of the Ontario action as a class proceeding. On April 19, 2016, the Superior Court of Quebec authorized the discontinuance of the action.

Other than as described above, there were no material changes to legal proceedings disclosed in “Item 3. Legal Proceedings” of our Annual Report on Form 10‑K for the year ended December 31, 2015.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

There were no material changes to the risk factors disclosed in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” of our Annual Report on Form 10‑K for the year ended December 31, 2015 (except to the extent additional factual information disclosed elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10‑Q relates to such risk factors (including, without limitation, the matters discussed in “Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”). To the extent any risk factors in our Annual Report on Form 10‑K for the year ended December 31, 2015 relate to the factual information disclosed elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10‑Q, including with respect to our business plan and any updated to our business strategy, such risk factors should be read in light of such information.

51

Table of Contents

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit No. |  | Description
10.1 |  | Credit and Guaranty Agreement, dated as of April 13, 2016, among APLP Holdings Limited Partnership, as Borrower, Atlantic Power Corporation, as guarantor, Certain Subsidiaries of APLP Holdings Limited Partnership, as Guarantors, Various Lenders, Goldman Sachs Bank USA and Bank of America, N.A., as L/C Issuers, Goldman Sachs Lending Partners LLC and Bank of America, N.A., as Joint Syndication Agents, Goldman Sachs Lending Partners LLC as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent, and Goldman Sachs Lending Partners LLC, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, RBC Capital Markets, The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, in their respective capacities as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Bookrunners (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8‑K filed on April 13, 2016).
10.2 |  | Securities Pledge Agreement, dated as of April 13, 2016, among Atlantic Power Corporation, Atlantic Power GP II, Inc. and Goldman Sachs Lending Partners LLC as Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Current Report on Form 8‑K filed on April 13, 2016).
31.1* |  | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a‑14(a) or Rule 15d‑14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
31.2* |  | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a‑14(a) or Rule 15d‑14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
32.1** |  | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes‑Oxley Act of 2002
32.2** |  | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes‑Oxley Act of 2002
101.INS* |  | XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH* |  | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
101.CAL* |  | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
101.DEF* |  | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase
101.LAB* |  | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
101.PRE* |  | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase

*Filed herewith.

**Furnished herewith.

52

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Date: May 5, 2016 | Atlantic Power Corporation
| By: | /s/ Terrence Ronan
|  | Name: | Terrence Ronan
|  | Title: | Chief Financial Officer (Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Financial Officer)

53