v2.4.0.6

Significant Accounting Policies | 9 Months Ended
--- | ---
Dec. 31, 2011
Notes to Financial Statements |
Significant Accounting Policies | Note 4. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Accounting Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. Estimates also affect the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reported periods. Our management believes the estimates utilized in preparing our condensed consolidated financial statements are reasonable. Actual results could differ from these estimates. Cash and Cash Equivalents Cash and cash equivalents are recorded in the balance sheets at cost, which approximates fair value. All highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less are considered to be cash equivalents. Revenue Recognition We recognize revenue from product sales in accordance with FASB ASC 605 — Revenue Recognition. Following agreements or orders from customers, we ship product to our customers often through a third party facilitator. Revenue from product sales is only recognized when substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership have transferred to our customers, the selling price is fixed and collection is reasonably assured. Typically, these criteria are met when our customer’s order is received and we receive acknowledgment of receipt by a third party shipper or cash is received by our third party facilitator. We also have offered our customers on a limited basis, services consisting of planning, shooting and editing infomercials to aid in the Direct Response marketing of their product or service. In these instances, revenue is recognized when the contracted services have been provided and accepted by the customer. Deposits, if any, on these services are recorded as deferred revenue until earned. Production costs associated with a given project are deferred until the related revenues are earned and recognized. As of December 31, 2011 and March 31, 2011 we had recognized deferred revenue of $68,250 and $88,652, respectively. The Company has a return policy whereby the customer can return any product within 60 days of receipt for a full refund excluding shipping and handling. However, historically the Company has accepted returns past 60 days of receipt. The Company provides an allowance for returns based upon past experience and industry knowledge. All significant returns for the periods presented have been offset against gross sales. The Company also provides a reserve for warranty which is not deemed to be significant as of December 31, 2011. Investments We carry our investments at December 31, 2011 and March 31, 2011, at our direct cash cost. The amounts paid were determined by contract provision on the contract commitment date. Due to our percentage ownership of 10% and lack of significant influence, the investments made by the Company are not accounted for under the consolidation or equity methods of accounting. These investments are accounted for under the cost method as provided under ASC 325-Investments-Other. Under this method, the Company’s share of the earnings or losses of each investee company are not included in our Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations. However, impairment charges, if any, are recognized in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations. If circumstances suggest that the value of the investee company has subsequently recovered, such recovery is not recorded. Receivables Accounts receivable consists of amounts due from the sale of our direct response and home shopping related products. Accounts receivables totaled $1,146,572 and $82,238 at December 31, 2011, and March 31, 2011, respectively. Our allowance for doubtful accounts at December 31, 2011, and March 31, 2011, totaled $113,381 and $25,000, respectively. The allowances are estimated based on historical customer experience and industry knowledge. Inventories and Advances on Inventory Purchases Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using a first-in, first-out, or FIFO, method. We review our inventory for excess or obsolete inventory and write-down obsolete or otherwise unmarketable inventory to its estimated net realizable value. Inventories totaled $1,485,639 and $1,107 at December 31, 2011 and March 31, 2011, respectively. As we do not internally manufacture any of our products, we do not maintain raw materials or work-in-process inventories. In addition, the Company had made advanced deposits against inventory orders placed totaling $2,134,298 and $0 at December 31, 2011 and March 31, 2011, respectively. At December 31, 2011, the Company had a balance of $2,134,298 in deposits on inventory purchases. This balance represents payments made to our product suppliers in advance of delivery to the Company. Upon delivery and receipt by the Company of the items ordered, and the Company taking title to the goods, the balances are transferred to inventory. Property, Plant and Equipment, net We record property, plant and equipment and leasehold improvements at historical cost. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are recorded to expense; additions and improvements are capitalized. We provide for depreciation using the straight-line method at rates that approximate the estimated useful lives of the assets. Leasehold improvements are amortized on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the useful life of the improvement or the remaining term of the lease. Depreciation expense totaled $14,779 and $36,101 for the three month and nine month periods ending December 31, 2011, respectively and $7,472 and $13,817 for the three month and nine month periods ending December 31, 2010, respectively. Earnings (Loss) Per Share The Company adopted FASB ASC 260-Earnings Per Share. Basic earnings per share is based on the weighted effect of all common shares issued and outstanding and is calculated by dividing net income (loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted average shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares used in the basic earnings per share calculation plus the number of common shares, if any, that would be issued assuming conversion of all potentially dilutive securities outstanding. The following is a reconciliation of the number of shares used in the calculation of basic earnings per share and diluted earnings per share for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. All potentially dilutive common shares were anti-dilutive for the nine months ended December 31, 2011, and for the three and nine month periods ending December 31, 2010.
|  | Three Months Ended December 31, |  | Nine Months Ended December 31, |
|  | 2011 |  | 2010 |  | 2011 |  | 2010 |
Net Income (loss) |  | $ | 2,245,024 |  | $ | (979,472 | ) | $ | (10,201,446 | ) | $ | (1,219,293 | )
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding |  |  | 26,179,515 |  |  | 10,187,700 |  |  | 16,358,756 |  |  | 9,679,038 |
Incremented shares from the assumed exercise of dilutive securities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Stock options |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |
Convertible Note |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |
Dilutive warrants |  |  | 2,528,450 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |
|  |  | 28,707,965 |  |  | 10,187,700 |  |  | 16,358,756 |  |  | 9,679,038 |
Net earnings (loss) per share: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Basic |  | $ | 0.09 |  | $ | (0.10 | ) | $ | (0.62 | ) | $ | (0.13 | )
Diluted |  | $ | 0.08 |  | $ | (0.10 | ) | $ | (0.62 | ) | $ | (0.13 | )
The following securities were not included in the computation of diluted net earnings per share as their effect would be anti-dilutive:
|  | Three Months Ended December 31, |  | Nine Months Ended December 31,
|  |  | 2011 |  | 2010 |  |  | 2011 |  | 2010
Stock options |  |  | 1,300,000 |  | 800,000 |  |  | 1,300,000 |  | 800,000
Warrants |  |  | 29,341,814 |  | 5,737,500 |  |  | 40,859,253 |  | 5,737,500
Convertible Notes |  |  |  |  | — |  |  | — |  | —
Related Party Convertible Note |  |  |  |  | 71,333 |  |  | — |  | 71,333
|  |  | 30,641,814 |  | 6,608,833 |  |  | 42,159,253 |  | 6,608,833
Share-Based Payments In May 2010, the Company adopted its 2010 Executive Equity Incentive Plan and 2010 Non Executive Equity Incentive Plan. In May 2010, the Board of Directors granted 600,000 options under the Executive Equity Incentive Plan and in May 2010 and July 2010, 500,000 options under the Non Executive Equity Incentive Plan. These options were exchanged for Company options with identical terms under the Merger Agreement. The weighted-average grant-date fair value of these awards was $880,000. On February 18, 2011, the Board of Directors increased the number of options available under both the 2010 Executive Equity Incentive Plan and the 2010 Non Executive Incentive Plan by 300,000 options and 300,000 options, respectively. We recognize share-based compensation expense on stock option awards. Compensation expense is recognized on that portion of option awards that are expected to ultimately vest over the vesting period from the date of grant. All options granted vest over their requisite service periods as follows: 6 months (50% vesting); 12 months (25% vesting) and 18 months (25% vesting). We granted no stock options or other equity awards which vest based on performance or market criteria. We had applied an estimated forfeiture rate of 10% to all share-based awards as of our second fiscal quarter, 2011, which represents that portion we expected would be forfeited over the vesting period. We reevaluate this analysis periodically and adjust our estimated forfeiture rate as necessary. During the third fiscal quarter of 2011, we adjusted our forfeiture rate to reflect the forfeiture of 400,000 Non Executive Equity Plan options granted resulting from employee terminations. In September 2011, October 2011 and December 2011, the Board of Directors granted an additional 200,000 options to an officer and two directors under the Executive Equity Incentive Plan and 300,000 options under the Non Executive Plan to nine employees and one consultant. The weighted-average grant date fair value of these awards was $458,000 We utilized the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the fair value of our stock options. Calculating share-based compensation expense requires the input of highly subjective judgment and assumptions, including estimates of expected life of the award, stock price volatility, forfeiture rates and risk-free interest rates. The assumptions used in calculating the fair value of share-based awards represent our best estimates, but these estimates involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management judgment. As a result, if factors change and we use different assumptions, our share-based compensation expense could be materially different in the future. Impairment of Long-Lived Assets We review our long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable from future undiscounted cash flows. Impairment losses are recorded for the excess, if any, of the carrying value over the fair value of the long-lived assets. No indicators of impairment existed at December 31, 2011. Income Taxes We account for income taxes in accordance with FASB ASC 740 — Income Taxes. Under this method, deferred income taxes are determined based on the estimated future tax effects of differences between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities given the provisions of enacted tax laws. Deferred income tax provisions and benefits are based on changes to the assets or liabilities from year to year. In providing for deferred taxes, we consider tax regulations of the jurisdictions in which we operate, estimates of future taxable income, and available tax planning strategies. If tax regulations, operating results or the ability to implement tax-planning strategies vary, adjustments to the carrying value of deferred tax assets and liabilities may be required. Valuation allowances are recorded related to deferred tax assets based on the “more likely than not” criteria of FASB ASC 740 — Income Taxes. FASB ASC 740 also requires that we recognize the financial statement benefit of a tax position only after determining that the relevant tax authority would more likely than not sustain the position following an audit. For tax positions meeting the “more-likely-than-not” threshold, the amount recognized in the financial statements is the largest benefit that has a greater than 50 percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the relevant tax authority. The fiscal years March 31, 2011 and 2010 are considered open tax years in U.S. Federal and State jurisdictions. We currently do not have any audit investigations in any jurisdictions. Concentration of Credit Risk Financial instruments that potentially expose us to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash, cash equivalents and trade accounts receivable. Cash and cash equivalents are held with financial institutions in the United States and from time to time we may have balances that exceed the amount of insurance provided by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation on such deposits. Concentration of credit risk with respect to our trade accounts receivable to our customers is limited to $1,146,572 at December 31, 2011. Credit is extended to our customers, based on an evaluation of a customer’s financial condition and collateral is not required. To date, we have not experienced any material credit losses. Fair Value Measurements FASB ASC 820 — Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. FASB ASC 820 requires disclosures about the fair value of all financial instruments, whether or not recognized, for financial statement purposes. Disclosures about the fair value of financial instruments are based on pertinent information available to us on December 31, 2011, and March 31, 2011, respectively. Accordingly, the estimates presented in these financial statements are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that could be realized on disposition of the financial instruments. FASB ASC 820 specifies a hierarchy of valuation techniques based on whether the inputs to those valuation techniques are observable or unobservable. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect market assumptions. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurement) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurement). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows: Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date. Level 1 primarily consists of financial instruments whose value is based on quoted market prices such as exchange-traded instruments and listed equities. Level 2 — Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 includes financial instruments that are valued using models or other valuation methodologies. These models consider various assumptions, including volatility factors, current market prices and contractual prices for the underlying financial instruments. Substantially all of these assumptions are observable in the marketplace, can be derived from observable data or are supported by observable levels at which transactions are executed in the marketplace. Level 3 — Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability. Financial instruments are considered Level 3 when their fair values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flows or similar techniques and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable. The carrying amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheet for cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, notes payable and accrued expenses approximate their fair value based on the short-term maturity of these instruments. Determination of fair value of related party payables is not practicable due to their related party nature. The Company recognizes all derivative financial instruments as assets or liabilities in the financial statements and measures them at fair value with changes in fair value reflected as current period income or loss unless the derivatives qualify as hedges. As a result, certain warrants issued in connection with various offerings were accounted for as derivatives. Additionally, the Company determined that the conversion feature on the convertible debentures issued in August 2011 and May 2011 qualifies for derivative accounting. See Note 8, Warrant Liabilities and Note 10, Notes Payable, for additional discussion. Debt Issuance Costs The Company capitalizes debt issuance costs and amortizes these costs to interest expense over the term of the related debt. New Accounting Standards In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS. ASU No. 2011-04 clarifies some existing concepts, eliminates wording differences between U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”), and in some limited cases, changes some principles to achieve convergence between U.S. GAAP and IFRS. ASU No. 2011-04 results in a consistent definition of fair value and common requirements for measurement of and disclosure about fair value between U.S. GAAP and IFRS. ASU No. 2011-04 also expands the disclosures for fair value measurements that are estimated using significant unobservable (Level 3) inputs. The provisions of ASU No. 2011-04 will become effective for us on April 1, 2012 and are to be applied prospectively. We do not expect the adoption of the provisions of ASU No. 2011-04 to have a material effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows and we do not expect to materially modify or expand our financial statement footnote disclosures. In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income. ASU No. 2011-05 requires an entity to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income, or in two separate but consecutive statements. ASU No. 2011-05 eliminates the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of stockholders’ equity. The presentation requirements will become effective for us on April 1, 2012. As ASU No. 2011-05 applies to financial statement presentation matters, the adoption of ASU No. 2011-05 will not affect our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows and we believe our current presentation of comprehensive income complies with the new presentation requirements.

X
- Details
Name: | ASTV_NotesToFinancialStatementsAbstract
Namespace Prefix: | ASTV_
Data Type: | xbrli:stringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition The entire disclosure for all significant accounting policies of the reporting entity. + References Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 235 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 2 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6367646&loc=d3e18743-107790 Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 235 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 5 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6367646&loc=d3e18854-107790 Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher AICPA -Name Accounting Principles Board Opinion (APB) -Number 22 -Paragraph 8 -LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy. Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 235 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 6 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6367646&loc=d3e18861-107790 Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 235 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 3 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6367646&loc=d3e18780-107790 Reference 6: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 235 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 1 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6367646&loc=d3e18726-107790 + Details
Name: | us-gaap_SignificantAccountingPoliciesTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | nonnum:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration