Commitments and Contingencies	3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2015
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]
Commitments and Contingencies	Commitments and Contingencies Legal Matters From time to time, the Company has or may become party to litigation incident to the ordinary course of business. The Company assesses the likelihood of any adverse judgments or outcomes with respect to these matters and determines loss contingency assessments on a gross basis after assessing the probability of incurrence of a loss and whether a loss is reasonably estimable. In addition, the Company considers other relevant factors that could impact its ability to reasonably estimate a loss. A determination of the amount of reserves required, if any, for these contingencies is made after analyzing each matter. The Company’s reserves may change in the future due to new developments or changes in strategy in handling these matters. Although the results of litigation and claims cannot be predicted with certainty, the Company currently believes that the final outcome of the matters listed below will not have a material adverse effect on its business, consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Regardless of the outcome, litigation can adversely impact the Company as a result of defense and settlement costs, diversion of management resources and other factors. Putative Securities Class Action Litigation. On December 23, 2013, the first of two putative securities class action complaints was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, naming the Company and various of its current and former directors and officers as defendants. The first complaint is styled as Baron v. Angie’s List, Inc. et al., 1:13-cv-2032. On January 9, 2014, the second putative securities class action was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana. The second complaint is styled as Bartolone v. Angie’s List, Inc., et al, 1:14-cv-0023. Both complaints allege that the defendants violated Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) by making material misstatements in and omitting material information from the Company’s public disclosures concerning the Company’s business prospects. On June 16, 2014, the Court consolidated the two cases and appointed United Food & Commercial Workers Local 464A Pension Fund as lead plaintiff (“Local 464A”). On August 29, 2014, Local 464A filed its consolidated Amended Complaint (the "Amended Complaint"). The Amended Complaint alleges that Angie's List made material misrepresentations and omissions regarding its paid membership model ("PPM"). The defendants filed a motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint, which has yet to be ruled upon by the Court. Korda v. Oesterle, et al. On January 3, 2014, a derivative complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, naming the Company’s Board of Directors and various current and former officers as individual defendants. The Company is named as a nominal defendant. The complaint is styled as Korda v. Oesterle, et al., 1:14-cv-00004. The complaint asserts that the individual defendants breached their fiduciary duty based on their knowledge that the Company’s public statements during 2013 concerning the Company’s business prospects were allegedly misleading. The complaint also alleges that certain defendants breached their fiduciary duty by selling shares of Angie’s List common stock between December 2012 and December 2013. The plaintiff asks for unspecified amounts in damages, interest and costs as well as ancillary relief. The Court issued an order staying the action pending a ruling on the motion to dismiss Local 464A’s Amended Complaint in the Putative Securities Class Action Litigation described above. Clark v. Oesterle, et al. On October 17, 2014, a derivative complaint was filed in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware, naming members of the Company’s Board of Directors and various current and former officers as individual defendants. The Company is named as a nominal defendant. The complaint is styled as Clark v. Oesterle, et al., C.A. No. 10255. The complaint alleges that the individual defendants breached their fiduciary duties by making misleading representations regarding, among other things, the Company’s business prospects. The complaint also alleges that certain individual defendants breached their fiduciary duties by selling shares of Angie’s List common stock between February 2013 and October 2013. The plaintiff asks for unspecified amounts in damages, interest and costs as well as ancillary relief. The Court issued an order staying the action pending a ruling on the motion to dismiss Local 464A’s Amended Complaint in the Putative Securities Class Action Litigation described above. Moore v. Angie’s List, Inc. On March 11, 2015, a lawsuit seeking class action status was filed against the Company in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (the “Court”). The lawsuit alleges claims of breaches of contract and covenant of good faith and fair dealing, fraud and fraudulent inducement, unjust enrichment and violation of Pennsylvania’s Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law, alleging, in part, that the Company lures consumers to purchase membership fees for “access to purportedly unfiltered reviews, ratings and search result rankings.” On April 10, 2015, the Court issued an Order approving the parties' proposed responsive pleadings deadline.

Commitments and Contingencies

Legal Matters

From time to time, the Company has or may become party to litigation incident to the ordinary course of business. The Company assesses the likelihood of any adverse judgments or outcomes with respect to these matters and determines loss contingency assessments on a gross basis after assessing the probability of incurrence of a loss and whether a loss is reasonably estimable. In addition, the Company considers other relevant factors that could impact its ability to reasonably estimate a loss. A determination of the amount of reserves required, if any, for these contingencies is made after analyzing each matter. The Company’s reserves may change in the future due to new developments or changes in strategy in handling these matters. Although the results of litigation and claims cannot be predicted with certainty, the Company currently believes that the final outcome of the matters listed below will not have a material adverse effect on its business, consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Regardless of the outcome, litigation can adversely impact the Company as a result of defense and settlement costs, diversion of management resources and other factors.

Putative Securities Class Action Litigation. On December 23, 2013, the first of two putative securities class action complaints was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, naming the Company and various of its current and former directors and officers as defendants. The first complaint is styled as Baron v. Angie’s List, Inc. et al., 1:13-cv-2032. On January 9, 2014, the second putative securities class action was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana. The second complaint is styled as Bartolone v. Angie’s List, Inc., et al, 1:14-cv-0023. Both complaints allege that the defendants violated Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) by making material misstatements in and omitting material information from the Company’s public disclosures concerning the Company’s business prospects. On June 16, 2014, the Court consolidated the two cases and appointed United Food & Commercial Workers Local 464A Pension Fund as lead plaintiff (“Local 464A”). On August 29, 2014, Local 464A filed its consolidated Amended Complaint (the "Amended Complaint"). The Amended Complaint alleges that Angie's List made material misrepresentations and omissions regarding its paid membership model ("PPM"). The defendants filed a motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint, which has yet to be ruled upon by the Court.

Korda v. Oesterle, et al. On January 3, 2014, a derivative complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, naming the Company’s Board of Directors and various current and former officers as individual defendants. The Company is named as a nominal defendant. The complaint is styled as Korda v. Oesterle, et al., 1:14-cv-00004. The complaint asserts that the individual defendants breached their fiduciary duty based on their knowledge that the Company’s public statements during 2013 concerning the Company’s business prospects were allegedly misleading. The complaint also alleges that certain defendants breached their fiduciary duty by selling shares of Angie’s List common stock between December 2012 and December 2013. The plaintiff asks for unspecified amounts in damages, interest and costs as well as ancillary relief. The Court issued an order staying the action pending a ruling on the motion to dismiss Local 464A’s Amended Complaint in the Putative Securities Class Action Litigation described above.

Clark v. Oesterle, et al. On October 17, 2014, a derivative complaint was filed in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware, naming members of the Company’s Board of Directors and various current and former officers as individual defendants. The Company is named as a nominal defendant. The complaint is styled as Clark v. Oesterle, et al., C.A. No. 10255. The complaint alleges that the individual defendants breached their fiduciary duties by making misleading representations regarding, among other things, the Company’s business prospects. The complaint also alleges that certain individual defendants breached their fiduciary duties by selling shares of Angie’s List common stock between February 2013 and October 2013. The plaintiff asks for unspecified amounts in damages, interest and costs as well as ancillary relief. The Court issued an order staying the action pending a ruling on the motion to dismiss Local 464A’s Amended Complaint in the Putative Securities Class Action Litigation described above.

Moore v. Angie’s List, Inc. On March 11, 2015, a lawsuit seeking class action status was filed against the Company in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (the “Court”). The lawsuit alleges claims of breaches of contract and covenant of good faith and fair dealing, fraud and fraudulent inducement, unjust enrichment and violation of Pennsylvania’s Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law, alleging, in part, that the Company lures consumers to purchase membership fees for “access to purportedly unfiltered reviews, ratings and search result rankings.” On April 10, 2015, the Court issued an Order approving the parties' proposed responsive pleadings deadline.