Commitments and Contingencies	6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2015
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]
Commitments and Contingencies	Commitments and Contingencies Legal Matters The Company is regularly involved in litigation, both as a plaintiff and as a defendant, relating to its business and operations. The Company assesses the likelihood of any judgments or outcomes with respect to these matters and determines loss contingency assessments on a gross basis after assessing the probability of incurrence of a loss and whether a loss is reasonably estimable. In addition, the Company considers other relevant factors that could impact its ability to reasonably estimate a loss. A determination of the amount of reserves required, if any, for these contingencies is made after analyzing each matter. The Company’s reserves may change in the future due to new developments or changes in strategy in handling these matters. Although the results of litigation and claims cannot be predicted with certainty, the Company currently believes that the final outcome of the matters listed below will not have a material adverse effect on its business, consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Regardless of the outcome, litigation can adversely impact the Company as a result of defense and settlement costs, diversion of management resources and other factors. Putative Securities Class Action Litigation. Two putative securities class action complaints were filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, naming the Company and several of its current and former directors and officers as defendants. Baron v. Angie’s List, Inc. et al., 1:13-cv-2032, filed on December 23, 2013, and Bartolone v. Angie’s List, Inc., et al, 1:14-cv-0023, filed on January 9, 2014, allege that the defendants violated Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by making material misstatements in, and omitting material information from, the Company’s public disclosures concerning its paid membership model. The two cases were consolidated on June 16, 2014. The Court granted the defendants' motion to dismiss without prejudice on June 18, 2015. The plaintiff did not file an amended complaint within the time prescribed by the Court. Korda v. Oesterle, et al., 1:14-cv-00004. On January 3, 2014, a derivative complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, naming the Company’s Board of Directors and various current and former officers as individual defendants. The complaint asserts that the individual defendants breached their fiduciary duty based on their knowledge that the Company’s public statements during 2013 concerning the Company’s business prospects were allegedly misleading. The complaint also alleges that certain defendants breached their fiduciary duty by selling shares of Angie’s List common stock between December 2012 and December 2013. The Court issued an order staying the action pending a ruling on the motion to dismiss in the Putative Securities Class Action Litigation described above. Clark v. Oesterle, et al., C.A. No. 10255. On October 17, 2014, a derivative complaint was filed in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware, naming members of the Company’s Board of Directors and various current and former officers as individual defendants. The complaint alleges that the individual defendants breached their fiduciary duties by making misleading representations regarding, among other things, the Company’s business prospects. The complaint also alleges that certain individual defendants breached their fiduciary duties by selling shares of Angie’s List common stock between February 2013 and October 2013. The Court issued an order staying the action pending a ruling on the motion to dismiss in the Putative Securities Class Action Litigation described above. Moore v. Angie’s List, Inc., 2:15cv-01243-SD. On March 11, 2015, a lawsuit seeking class action status was filed against the Company in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The lawsuit alleges claims of breaches of contract and covenants of good faith and fair dealing, fraud and fraudulent inducement, unjust enrichment and violation of Pennsylvania’s Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law. On May 13, 2015, the Company filed a motion to dismiss, which has yet to be ruled upon by the Court.

Commitments and Contingencies

Legal Matters

The Company is regularly involved in litigation, both as a plaintiff and as a defendant, relating to its business and operations. The Company assesses the likelihood of any judgments or outcomes with respect to these matters and determines loss contingency assessments on a gross basis after assessing the probability of incurrence of a loss and whether a loss is reasonably estimable. In addition, the Company considers other relevant factors that could impact its ability to reasonably estimate a loss. A determination of the amount of reserves required, if any, for these contingencies is made after analyzing each matter. The Company’s reserves may change in the future due to new developments or changes in strategy in handling these matters. Although the results of litigation and claims cannot be predicted with certainty, the Company currently believes that the final outcome of the matters listed below will not have a material adverse effect on its business, consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Regardless of the outcome, litigation can adversely impact the Company as a result of defense and settlement costs, diversion of management resources and other factors.

Putative Securities Class Action Litigation. Two putative securities class action complaints were filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, naming the Company and several of its current and former directors and officers as defendants. Baron v. Angie’s List, Inc. et al., 1:13-cv-2032, filed on December 23, 2013, and Bartolone v. Angie’s List, Inc., et al, 1:14-cv-0023, filed on January 9, 2014, allege that the defendants violated Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by making material misstatements in, and omitting material information from, the Company’s public disclosures concerning its paid membership model. The two cases were consolidated on June 16, 2014. The Court granted the defendants' motion to dismiss without prejudice on June 18, 2015. The plaintiff did not file an amended complaint within the time prescribed by the Court.

Korda v. Oesterle, et al., 1:14-cv-00004. On January 3, 2014, a derivative complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, naming the Company’s Board of Directors and various current and former officers as individual defendants. The complaint asserts that the individual defendants breached their fiduciary duty based on their knowledge that the Company’s public statements during 2013 concerning the Company’s business prospects were allegedly misleading. The complaint also alleges that certain defendants breached their fiduciary duty by selling shares of Angie’s List common stock between December 2012 and December 2013. The Court issued an order staying the action pending a ruling on the motion to dismiss in the Putative Securities Class Action Litigation described above.

Clark v. Oesterle, et al., C.A. No. 10255. On October 17, 2014, a derivative complaint was filed in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware, naming members of the Company’s Board of Directors and various current and former officers as individual defendants. The complaint alleges that the individual defendants breached their fiduciary duties by making misleading representations regarding, among other things, the Company’s business prospects. The complaint also alleges that certain individual defendants breached their fiduciary duties by selling shares of Angie’s List common stock between February 2013 and October 2013. The Court issued an order staying the action pending a ruling on the motion to dismiss in the Putative Securities Class Action Litigation described above.

Moore v. Angie’s List, Inc., 2:15cv-01243-SD. On March 11, 2015, a lawsuit seeking class action status was filed against the Company in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The lawsuit alleges claims of breaches of contract and covenants of good faith and fair dealing, fraud and fraudulent inducement, unjust enrichment and violation of Pennsylvania’s Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law. On May 13, 2015, the Company filed a motion to dismiss, which has yet to be ruled upon by the Court.