Highlights and Company overview | 2 |
Strategic report | |
Chairman’s statement | |
Chief Executive’s review | |
Financial review | |
Key statistics | |
Emerging and principal risks and uncertainties | |
Non-Financial and Sustainability Information Statement | |
Modern Slavery Act disclosure statement 2025 | |
Governance | |
Chairman’s statement on corporate governance report | |
Management of the Company | |
Report of the Chairman of the Audit and Risk Committee | |
Report of the Chair of the Safety, Security and Operational Compliance Committee | |
Report of the Chairman of the Nomination and Governance Committee | |
Directors’ Remuneration Report | |
Directors’ Report | |
Company Information | |
Statement of Directors’ responsibilities in respect of the financial statements | |
Accounts and other information | |
Consolidated statement of comprehensive income | |
Consolidated statement of financial position | |
Consolidated statement of changes in equity | |
Consolidated statement of cash flows | |
Notes forming part of the financial statements | |
Independent auditors’ report to the members of Wizz Air Holdings Plc | |
Additional information | |
Alternative performance measures (APMs) | |
Glossary of terms | |
Sustainability report |
From Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) countries | |
Romania | 167 |
Poland | 150 |
Hungary | 79 |
Albania | 49 |
Bulgaria | 43 |
North Macedonia | 30 |
Serbia | 24 |
Georgia | 17 |
Lithuania | 14 |
Moldova | 9 |
Bosnia and Herzegovina | 6 |
Kosovo | 3 |
Montenegro | 3 |
Armenia | 1 |
From other European countries | |
Italy | 117 |
United Kingdom | 46 |
Austria | 29 |
Cyprus | 9 |
From Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) and Middle East countries | |
United Arab Emirates | 36 |
Israel | 1 |
Market | Market share | Low-cost segment share | Low-cost market position |
Albania | 55% | 63% | 1 |
Austria | 6% | 18% | 2 |
Bosnia and Herzegovina | 12% | 22% | 2 |
Bulgaria | 24% | 40% | 2 |
Cyprus | 12% | 22% | 2 |
Georgia | 20% | 46% | 1 |
Hungary | 36% | 50% | 1 |
Italy | 9% | 15% | 3 |
Lithuania | 11% | 20% | 2 |
Moldova | 20% | 29% | 2 |
Poland | 23% | 38% | 2 |
Romania | 50% | 75% | 1 |
Serbia | 16% | 68% | 1 |
United Arab Emirates | 3% | 10% | 3 |
United Kingdom | 4% | 7% | 4 |
CEE | 6% | 18% | 1 |
March 2025 | March 2026 | March 2027 | |
Actual | Planned | Planned | |
A320ceo (180/186 seats) | 37 | 20 | 12 |
A320neo (186 seats) | 6 | 6 | 6 |
A321ceo (230 seats) | 41 | 40 | 29 |
A321neo (239 seats) | 147 | 189 | 222 |
A321neo XLR (239 seats) | — | 8 | 12 |
Fleet size | 231 | 263 | 281 |
F25 | F24 | Change | |
Average jet fuel price ($/metric tonne, including SAF, into-plane premium and impact of effective hedges) | 919 | 1,000 | (8.2)% |
Average EUR/USD rate (including impact of effective hedges) | 1.08 | 1.08 | — |
Year-end EUR/USD rate | 1.08 | 1.08 | — |
€ million | F25 | F24 | Change |
Total revenue | 5,267.6 | 5,073.1 | 3.8% |
Fuel costs | (1,797.6) | (1,855.7) | (3.1)% |
Operating expenses less other income and excluding fuel costs | (3,302.5) | (2,779.5) | 18.8% |
Total operating expenses | (5,100.1) | (4,635.2) | 10.0% |
Operating profit | 167.5 | 437.9 | (61.7)% |
Operating margin | 3.2% | 8.6% | (5.5)ppt |
Net financing expense | (147.8) | (96.8) | 52.7% |
Profit before income tax | 19.7 | 341.1 | (94.2)% |
Income tax credit | 194.2 | 24.8 | 683.1% |
Profit for the year | 213.9 | 365.9 | (41.5)% |
Earnings per share, € (Note 12 ) | F25 | F24 | Change |
Basic earnings per share, € | 2.18 | 3.64 | (1.46) |
Diluted earnings per share, € | 1.78 | 2.96 | (1.18) |
F25 | F24 | ||||
Total (€ million) | Percentage of total revenue | Total (€ million) | Percentage of total revenue | Percentage change | |
Passenger ticket revenue1 | 2,917.0 | 55.4% | 2,804.2 | 55.3% | 4.0% |
Ancillary revenue1 | 2,350.6 | 44.6% | 2,268.9 | 44.7% | 3.6% |
Total revenue | 5,267.6 | 100.0% | 5,073.1 | 100.0% | 3.8% |
F25 | F24 | ||||||
Total (€ million) | Percentage of total operating expenses | Unit cost (€cts/ASK) | Total (€ million) (restated)* | Percentage of total operating expenses (restated)* | Unit cost (€cts/ ASK) (restated) * | Percentage change of total cost | |
Staff costs | 564.9 | 11.1% | 0.46 | 507.8 | 11.0% | 0.42 | 11.2% |
Fuel costs | 1,797.6 | 35.2% | 1.48 | 1,855.7 | 40.0% | 1.52 | (3.1)% |
Distribution and marketing | 117.8 | 2.3% | 0.10 | 117.1 | 2.5% | 0.10 | 0.6% |
Maintenance, materials and repairs | 330.4 | 6.5% | 0.27 | 285.0 | 6.1% | 0.23 | 15.9% |
Airport, handling and en- route charges | 1,351.8 | 26.5% | 1.11 | 1,210.1 | 26.1% | 0.99 | 11.7% |
Depreciation and amortisation | 966.8 | 19.0% | 0.79 | 755.3 | 16.3% | 0.62 | 28.0% |
Other expenses* | 466.6 | 9.1% | 0.38 | 370.0 | 8.0% | 0.30 | 26.1% |
Other income* | (495.8) | (9.7%) | (0.41) | (465.8) | (10.0%) | (0.38) | 6.4% |
Total operating expenses | 5,100.1 | 100.0% | 4.19 | 4,635.2 | 100.0% | 3.81 | 10.0% |
Net cost from financial income and expense** | 167.4 | 0.14 | 116.2 | 0.10 | 44.1% | ||
Total | 5,267.5 | 4.33 | 4,751.4 | 3.90 | 10.9% | ||
Total ex-fuel cost | 3,469.9 | 68.0% | 2.85 | 2,895.7 | 62.5% | 2.38 | 19.8% |
€ million | F25 | F24 | Change |
Net financial expense | (167.4) | (116.2) | 44.1% |
Net loss on derivative financial instruments | (6.4) | — | n.m.* |
Net foreign exchange gains | 26.0 | 19.4 | 34.0% |
Net financing expense | (147.8) | (96.8) | 52.7% |
F25 | F24 | Change | |
ROCE | 3.3% | 10.3% | (7.1) ppt |
Leverage ratio | 4.4 | 4.0 | 0.4 |
Liquidity | 31.5% | 29.2% | 2.3 ppt |
€ million | F25 | F24 (restated) | Change |
Net cash generated by operating activities* | 1,065.6 | 664.5 | 60% |
Net cash used in investing activities* | (263.4) | (347.7) | (24)% |
Net cash used in financing activities | (938.7) | (1,016.1) | (8)% |
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents | (136.5) | (699.3) | (80)% |
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year | 716.4 | 1,402.6 | (49)% |
Effect of exchange rate fluctuations on cash and cash equivalents | 17.0 | 13.1 | 30% |
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year | 596.9 | 716.4 | (17%) |
€ million | F25 | F24 | Change |
ASSETS | |||
Property, plant and equipment | 6,493.0 | 5,815.0 | 678.0 |
Restricted cash* | 78.3 | 109.4 | (31.1) |
Derivative financial instruments* | 12.1 | 36.9 | (24.8) |
Trade and other receivables* | 676.2 | 706.7 | (30.5) |
Short-term cash deposits | 1,060.2 | 751.1 | 309.1 |
Cash and cash equivalents | 597.5 | 728.4 | (130.9) |
Other assets* | 718.1 | 547.4 | 170.7 |
Total assets | 9,635.4 | 8,694.9 | 940.5 |
EQUITY AND LIABILITIES | |||
EQUITY | |||
Equity | 317.1 | 145.7 | 171.4 |
LIABILITIES | |||
Trade and other payables* | 1,108.3 | 1,022.4 | 85.9 |
Borrowings (incl. convertible debt)* | 6,614.0 | 6,269.7 | 344.3 |
Deferred income* | 1,179.8 | 944.6 | 235.2 |
Derivative financial instruments* | 42.6 | 0.7 | 41.9 |
Provisions* | 355.1 | 274.3 | 80.8 |
Other liabilities* | 18.6 | 37.5 | (18.9) |
Total liabilities | 9,318.3 | 8,549.2 | 769.1 |
Total equity and liabilities | 9,635.4 | 8,694.9 | 940.5 |
Period covered | F26 | F27 |
10 months | 8 months | |
Exposure in metric tonnes (‘000) | 1,977.7 | 2,158.2 |
Coverage in metric tonnes (‘000) | 1,407.5 | 413.5 |
Hedge coverage for the period | 71% | 19% |
Blended capped rate | $776.0 | $733.0 |
Blended floor rate | $701.0 | $666.0 |
Period covered | F26 | F27 |
10 months | 8 months | |
Exposure (million) | $1,264.1 | $1,309.5 |
Coverage (million) | $891.0 | $260.0 |
Hedge coverage for the period | 70% | 20% |
Weighted average ceiling | $1.1259 | $1.1166 |
Weighted average floor | $1.0827 | $1.0747 |
F25 | F24 | Change | |
Capacity | |||
Number of aircraft at end of period* | 231 | 208 | 11.1% |
Number of operating aircraft at end of period** | 186 | 160 | 16.3% |
Equivalent aircraft | 225.7 | 190.8 | 18.3% |
Equivalent operating aircraft** | 178.5 | 176.4 | 1.2% |
Utilisation (block hours per aircraft per day) | 9:51 | 11:29 | (14.3)% |
Utilisation (block hours per operating aircraft per day)** | 12:28 | 12:25 | 0.4% |
Total block hours | 812,673 | 802,346 | 1.3% |
Total flight hours | 705,720 | 699,837 | 0.8% |
Revenue departures | 314,448 | 309,594 | 1.6% |
Average departures per day per aircraft | 3.82 | 4.43 | (13.8)% |
Average departures per day per operating aircraft** | 4.83 | 4.79 | 0.8% |
Seat capacity | 69,546,340 | 68,813,271 | 1.1% |
Average aircraft stage length (km) | 1,749 | 1,769 | (1.1)% |
Total ASKs (’000 km) | 121,670,679 | 121,749,697 | (0.1)% |
Operating data | |||
RPKs (revenue passenger kilometres) (’000 km) | 111,143,998 | 109,962,210 | 1.1% |
Load factor (%) | 91.2% | 90.1% | 1.2% |
Number of passenger segments | 63,403,320 | 62,015,792 | 2.2% |
Fuel price (average $ per tonne, including SAF, hedging impact and into-plane premium) | 919 | 1,000 | (8.2)% |
Foreign exchange rate (USD/EUR including hedging impact) | 1.08 | 1.09 | (0.9)% |
Our Approach | Policy area | Due diligence | |
Environmental | Sustainability is embedded in our operations and strategic decision- making. We continuously strive to improve environmental performance through innovation, efficiency, and responsible growth. From investing in the newest, most fuel-efficient aircraft to optimizing flight operations and exploring alternative fuels, we are taking bold steps to minimize emissions and resource consumption. | ESG Policy - Wizz Air integrates ESG principles across all operations and governance structures—guided by CSRD, GRI, and TCFD standards— through a company-wide policy overseen by the Sustainability and Culture Committee, resulting in improved stakeholder alignment and sustainability performance. Environmental Policy - Wizz Air’s Environmental Policy reflects its commitment to reducing carbon emissions and minimising environmental impact through fleet modernisation, operational reviews, employee training, and stakeholder engagement, supporting innovation and compliance with high environmental standards and the transition to a net-zero emissions economy. Sustainable Procurement Policy - The Sustainable Procurement Policy embeds environmental and social considerations into all procurement activities and supplier evaluations across the Wizz Air group, fostering sustainable sourcing practices and continuous improvement in supply chain performance. Aspirational net zero roadmap - This strategy outlines our ambition for decarbonisation and calls on stakeholders and regulators to join us in ensuring the aviation industry achieves net zero. | The ESG Strategy responsibilities are embedded across all levels of the organisation, with oversight by the Sustainability and Culture Committee, operational implementation by cross- functional teams, annual policy reviews, and stakeholder engagement guided by frameworks such as CSRD, GRI, and TCFD. For further details on the policies and Wizz Air Priority Programmes within Wizz Air’s Environmental Strategy, please refer to Wizz Air’s Sustainability The Aspirational Net Zero Roadmap can be found on |
Social & Employee Matters | At Wizz Air, we believe that the strength of our organisation lies in the exceptional qualities of our people, and we are committed to attracting, developing, and retaining top talent by fostering an inclusive, engaging, and diverse workplace. We are committed to acting with integrity and responsibility— prioritizing the well- being of our customers, employees, partners, communities, and the environment. | Whistleblowing Policy - Wizz Air’s Whistleblowing Policy ensures employees and stakeholders can confidentially report concerns about misconduct or unethical behaviour without fear of retaliation, in line with applicable legal protections. Anti-Fraud Policy - Wizz Air’s Anti-Fraud Policy outlines preventive and corrective measures to detect, investigate, and address fraudulent activities, supporting financial integrity and regulatory compliance. Health and Safety Policy and Initiatives - Wizz Air’s Health and Safety Policy ensures a safe working environment through rigorous operational standards, employee training, and continuous monitoring aligned with aviation and workplace safety regulations. Equal Opportunities and Fair Treatment Policy - Wizz Air promotes diversity and inclusion through its Equal Opportunities and Fair Treatment Policy, ensuring that all employees are treated fairly regardless of gender, age, background, or beliefs. Training and Development Policy - Wizz Air’s Training and Development Policy fosters continuous learning and upskilling, supporting employee growth through structured training programmes and career development opportunities. | Wizz Air values its workforce as key stakeholders and actively engages with them through regular feedback surveys and comprehensive training programmes that support skill development and career growth. The company prioritises safety and responsibility, ensuring the well-being of both employees and passengers by maintaining high safety standards and continuously improving performance based on defined indicators. As a responsible corporate citizen, Wizz Air has consistently stepped up during challenging times— supporting local rescue efforts, swiftly organising emergency flights during natural disasters and political crises, and contributing to local communities and foundations—creating a positive impact that goes beyond providing air travel services. For more information on Wizz Air’s social policies and strategy, please see Wizz Air’s Sustainability Report |
Human Rights | Wizz Air is committed to conducting its business with the highest standards of ethics and integrity, and we expect the same from our suppliers. We require our suppliers to uphold strong ethical practices within their own operations and supply chains, including compliance with applicable human rights regulations and obligations under the Modern Slavery Act. | Wizz Air has policies in place related to human rights principles, including our Anti- Slavery and Human Trafficking Policy. As well as this, our Code of Ethics, “The Wizz Way”, applies to every Company employee regardless of seniority. These, along with our Supplier Code of Conduct, Whistleblowing Policy, Sustainable Procurement Policy, Anti-Fraud Policy and Anti-Corruption Policy, help us maintain an effective compliance environment across our supply chain. Actions in relation to these policies are reviewed by the Audit and Risk Committee of the Board. | We are committed to assessing any instance of non-compliance regarding modern slavery or human trafficking on a case-by- case basis. As part of our robust onboarding process, Wizz Air equips new employees with mandatory e-learning on business ethics and key policies. The company enforces compliance with its Supplier Code of Conduct by integrating specific contractual clauses to prevent modern slavery. Additionally, Wizz Air partners with a third-party risk management firm to assess suppliers across environmental, social, and governance (ESG) criteria— ensuring effective risk identification and management throughout the procurement lifecycle. For more information, please see the Modern Slavery Act Disclosure Statement 2025 and Wizz Air’s Sustainability Report |
Anti-corruption and bribery | Wizz Air is committed to conducting business with honesty, integrity, and full compliance with applicable laws and regulations, as outlined in our Policy of Good Conduct. We prioritise ethical behaviour, transparency, and accountability across all operations, with governance structures in place to uphold the highest standards for our Board of Directors and entire workforce. Our whistleblower protection programme encourages employees to report unethical behaviour without fear of retaliation. | Anti-Corruption Policy - It prohibits corrupt, improper practices and bribery. It applies to interactions between Wizz Air personnel and third parties. Policy of Good Conduct - This document outlines the expectations regarding Wizz Air employees’ behaviour at work, including their conduct towards colleagues, business partners, and the organisation as a whole, with attention to issues such as corruption and bribery. Corporate Political Engagement Policy and Statement - outlines the principles and guidelines for engaging with political stakeholders. This policy ensures that all interactions are conducted transparently, ethically and in alignment with the Company's values and regulatory requirements. | Wizz Air requires all employees and relevant third parties to complete mandatory e-learning on business ethics and key policies, including anti- corruption. High-risk roles receive additional targeted training. Suppliers must agree to the policy before contracting. Wizz Air conducts due diligence, monitors third-party activities, and allows concerns to be reported anonymously. Independent investigators handle all cases. For more information, please see Wizz Air’s Sustainability Report |
“Wizz Air’s strategic direction is grounded in strong corporate governance principles, with the Board and its Committees playing a crucial role in maintaining and reinforcing this governance framework through their dedicated oversight and guidance.” William Franke Chairman of the Board of Directors |
THE BOARD | |
CHAIRMAN – WILLIAM A. FRANKE | • Chairs the Board and sets direction. • Ensures highest standard of corporate governance. • Responsibility for setting the agenda and strategic discussion. • Responsible for ensuring engagement with investors and stakeholders. |
GROUP CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER – JÓZSEF VÁRADI | • Accountable to the Board and the Chairman. • Responsible for the Group’s senior leadership team. • Responsible for the strategic, financial and operational performance of the Group. |
SENIOR INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR – CHARLOTTE PEDERSEN | • Acts as a sounding board for the Chairman. • Acts as an intermediary for the other Directors. • Available to Shareholders to address concerns. |
NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS – ANNA GATTI ANDREW S. BRODERICK ANTHONY RADEV BARRY ECCLESTON CHARLOTTE ANDSAGER CHARLOTTE PEDERSEN ENRIQUE DUPUY DE LOME CHAVARRI STEPHEN L. JOHNSON WILLIAM A. FRANKE PHIT LIAN CHONG | Responsible for key reserved matters: • overall strategy and management; • structure and capital; • financial reporting and controls; • internal control and risk management; • approval of significant or material contracts; • approval of Shareholder communication and communication relating to Board decisions; • Board membership and appointments; • determining the executive remuneration plan and incentive plans; • reviewing corporate governance matters; and • reviewing Group safety, security and operational compliance. |
EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT DIRECTOR – ANTHONY RADEV | • Acts as link between the workforce, the People Council and the Board. • Provides regular updates to the Board on employee engagement, incorporated into decisions. |
COMPANY SECRETARY – YVONNE MOYNIHAN | • Supports the Chairman, the Group Chief Executive Officer and Chairs of Committees in agenda-setting and minute-taking. • Liaison between senior management and the Directors and responsible for timely delivery of materials. • Advises the Board on corporate governance and is responsible for compliance with the Share Dealing Code. • Works with the Chairman on the Board training plan, Board reviews and corporate governance improvements. |
Board leadership and company purpose |
Chairman’s Statement, p.4 |
Corporate culture, p.40 |
Investment in workforce, p.40 |
Board activities, p.40 |
Stakeholder interests, p.40 |
Board decisions, p.40 |
Section 172 Statement, p.40 |
Whistleblowing, p.33 |
Conflicts of interest, p.43 |
Division of responsibilities |
Board of Directors’ division of responsibilities, p.43 |
Directors’ independence, p.52 |
Governance framework, p.38 |
Board and Committee attendance, p.57 |
Board and Committee meetings, p.57 |
Composition, succession and evaluation |
Board composition, p.46 |
Appointment, re-election, resignation and removal of Directors, p.44 |
Nomination and Governance Committee Chairman’s Statement, p. 66 |
Board evaluation, p.44 |
Board biographies, p.46 |
Audit, risk and internal controls |
Audit and Risk Committee Report, p.58 |
Risk management and internal control, p.59 |
Confirmation and reassessment of emerging principal risks and uncertainties, p.59 |
Fair, balanced and understandable confirmation, p.59 |
Remuneration |
Directors’ Remuneration Report, p.69 |
Remuneration Committee Chairman’s Statement, p.69 |
Alignment with provisions of UK Corporate Governance Code, p.75 |
Shareholder | Reported shareholding | Reported number of shares |
Indigo Hungary LP | 18.3% | 18,950,611 |
Capital International Investors | 8.7% | 8,976,791 |
Coronation Fund Managers Limited | 7.4% | 7,638,804 |
Artisan Partners Limited Partnership | 7.1% | 7,308,292 |
Indigo Maple Hill LP | 5.5% | 5,734,284 |
Capital Research Global Investors | 5.0% | 5,202,587 |
Platinum Asset Management | 3.4% | 3,520,571 |
BlackRock Investment Management (UK) Ltd. | 3.1% | 3,246,364 |
Name | Position | Committee membership (as at 31 March 2025) |
Executive Director | ||
József Váradi | Chief Executive Officer | |
Non-Executive Directors | ||
William A. Franke | Chairman | Nomination and Governance Committee |
Stephen L. Johnson | Non-Executive Director and Deputy Chair | |
Barry Eccleston | Non-Executive Director | Nomination and Governance Committee, Remuneration Committee, Safety, Security and Operational Compliance Committee |
Charlotte Pedersen | Senior Independent Non- Executive Director | Safety, Security and Operational Compliance Committee |
Andrew S. Broderick | Non-Executive Director | Sustainability and Culture Committee, Safety, Security and Operational Compliance Committee |
Dr Anthony Radev | Non-Executive Director | Sustainability and Culture Committee, Remuneration Committee, INED overseeing employee engagement |
Charlotte Andsager | Non-Executive Director | Nomination and Governance Committee, Sustainability and Culture Committee |
Enrique Dupuy de Lome Chavarri | Non-Executive Director | Audit and Risk Committee, and Nomination & Governance Committee |
Anna Gatti | Non-Executive Director | Remuneration Committee, Audit and Risk Committee |
Phit Lian Chong | Non-Executive Director | Audit and Risk Committee |
Number of Board members | Percentage of the Board | Number of senior positions on the Board (CEO, SID and Chairman) | Number in executive management | Percentage of executive management | The data on gender and ethnic diversity of the Board and executive management was collected on a confidential and voluntary self-reporting basis. | ||
Men | 7 | 64% | 3 | 12 | 67% | ||
Women | 4 | 36% | 1 | 3 | 20% | ||
Other categories | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | ||
Not specified/prefer not to say | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ |
Number of Board members | Percentage of the Board | Number of senior positions on the Board (CEO, SID and Chairman) | Number in executive management | Percentage of executive management | Wizz Air is fully committed to promoting equality and diversity to enhance decision making, which is crucial for the long-term success of Wizz Air and its stakeholders. The Company’s commitment to diversity is set out in the Sustainability and TCFD Reports. The Board is mindful of the Listing Rule requirements in relation to gender and ethnic diversity of the Board and executive management. The targets set out in LRs 9.8.6R (9)(a)(i), (ii) and (iii) have not been met in respect of gender diversity. Ethnic diversity has been met. While diversity criteria are taken into consideration during recruitment processes, decisions are subject to the principle of merit. Addressing diversity remains a priority for the Nomination and Governance Committee in F25. | ||
White British or other White (including minority White groups) | 10 | 91% | 3 | 14 | 93.33% | ||
Mixed/multiple ethnic groups | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | ||
Asian/Asian British | 1 | 9% | _ | 1 | _ | ||
Black/African/Caribbean/Black British | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | ||
Other ethnic group, including Arab | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | ||
Not specified/prefer not to say | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ |
Name | Position |
Michael Delehant | Senior Chief Operations and Commercial Officer |
Ian Malin | Chief Financial Officer |
Michael Berlouis | Financial Operations Officer |
Owain Jones | Chief Corporate Affairs Officer |
Diarmuid O'Conghaile | Chief Operations Officer |
Silvia Mosquera | Commercial Officer |
Krzysztof Krolak | Central Operations Officer |
Ervin Banyai | Digital Officer |
Yvonne Moynihan | Corporate and ESG Officer |
Piotr Trawka | Network Officer |
Roland Tischner | Managing Director |
Name | Position |
Marion Geoffroy | Managing Director |
Name | Position |
Johan Eidhagen | Managing Director |
Name | Position |
Mauro Peneda | Managing Director |
Board attended/total | Audit and Risk attended/total | Remuneration attended/total | Nomination and Governance attended/total | Sustainability and Culture attended/total | Safety, Security and Operational Compliance attended/total | |
Executive Director | ||||||
József Váradi | 7/7 | 7/7* | 9/9* | 6/6* | 6/6* | 6/6* |
Non-Executive Directors | ||||||
William A. Franke | 7/7 | 6/6 | ||||
Stephen L. Johnson | 7/7 | 9/9 | 6/6 | |||
Barry Eccleston | 5/7** | 6/9** | 4/6** | 4/6 | ||
Andrew S. Broderick | 7/7 | 6/6 | 6/6 | |||
Charlotte Pedersen | 7/7 | 6/6 | ||||
Charlotte Andsager | 7/7 | 6/6 | 6/6 | |||
Enrique Dupuy de Lome Chavarri | 7/7 | 7/7 | 2/6*** | |||
Dr Anthony Radev | 7/7 | 9/9 | 6/6 | |||
Anna Gatti | 6/7 | 7/7 | 7/9 | |||
Phit Lian Chong | 7/7 | 7/7 |
“The Audit and Risk Committee evaluates and manages financial risks, ensures accurate reporting and maintains the integrity of the internal control environment.” Enrique Dupuy de Lome Chavarri Chairman of the Audit and Risk Committee |
“Aviation safety is of utmost importance, particularly during periods when the industry is under heightened scrutiny. The Committee has actively promoted the sharing of knowledge and best practices.” Charlotte Pedersen Chair of the Safety, Security and Operational Compliance Committee |
“Over the past year, the Committee continued to play a key role in strengthening governance practices and supporting leadership development across the Group.” William A. Franke Chairman of the Nomination and Governance Committee |
“The Company’s operational success and return to solid profitability is founded on the commitment, resilience, experience and hard work of the Company’s workforce ... this is reflected in the Committee’s approach to remuneration matters.” Barry Eccleston Chair of the Remuneration Committee |
“Remuneration outcomes remain below airline peer group due to the various headwinds that adversely affected the Company’s financial performance. To address this, the Committee is introducing a balanced LTIP approach, aligning with changes for all employees and ensuring competitive remuneration.” |
CEO remuneration | F25 earnings | F26 looking ahead | |
Base salary | €775,000 | €775,000 | |
Short-term Incentive Plan (STIP) | Maximum opportunity | 200% of base salary | |
Performance metrics (weightings) | Financial: Adjusted EBIT margin – 12.5% CASK ex-fuel (normalised for wet leases) – 12.5% Non-financial: Utilisation – 12.5% Completion (without extraordinary events) – 12.5% Customer satisfaction – 12.5% ESG (diversity) – 12.5% Individual rating – 25% | Financial: Adjusted EBIT margin – 12.5% CASK ex-fuel (normalised for wet leases) – 12.5% Non-financial: Utilisation – 12.5% Completion (without extraordinary events) – 12.5% Customer satisfaction – 12.5% ESG (diversity) – 12.5% Individual rating – 25% | |
Long-term Incentive Plan (LTIP) | Maximum opportunity | 300% of base salary (100% restricted shares) | 500% of base salary (60% restricted shares and 40% performance shares) |
Performance metrics (weightings) | Not applicable as award was granted as 100% restricted shares | 100% of performance shares portion of the award will be subject to Relative Total Shareholder Return (TSR) | |
Value Creation Plan (VCP) | Opportunity | One-off award granted in F22 – seven-year performance period with 40% vesting in year seven, and 20% vesting per year in years eight, nine and ten Maximum payment of £100 million for delivery of end share price of £119.34 Any value delivered under the VCP will be offset by the value of vested LTIP awards | |
Performance metrics (weightings) | Increase in share price (90%) ESG (10%) | ||
Share ownership guidelines | Holding requirement: 400% of base salary | ||
Post-cessation share ownership guidelines | Holding requirement: 100% of share ownership guideline for one year after leaving and 50% of share ownership guideline for the second year | ||
Clarity | Remuneration arrangements should be transparent and promote effective engagement with Shareholders and the workforce. | The Remuneration Committee has incorporated transparency into the design and delivery of our Remuneration Policy. We believe our remuneration structure is simple to understand, both for participants and Shareholders. We aim for disclosure of the policy and how it is implemented to be in a clear and succinct format. |
Simplicity | Remuneration structures should avoid complexity and their rationale and operation should be easy to understand. | Our remuneration arrangements for our Executive Director are simple and easy to understand, comprising fixed pay (base salary and benefits), a Short-term Incentive Plan (STIP), Long-term Incentive Plan (LTIP) and a one-off long- term arrangement in the form of a Value Creation Plan (VCP). |
Risk | Remuneration arrangements should ensure reputational and other risks from excessive rewards, and behavioural risks that can arise from target-based incentive plans, are identified and mitigated. | The DRP includes a number of points to mitigate. Potential risks: • There are defined limits on the maximum opportunity levels under incentive plans. • Performance targets are calibrated at appropriately stretching but sustainable levels. • The Remuneration Committee has the ability to use discretion to ensure that a fair and balanced outcome is achieved, taking into account the overall performance of the Company and the experience of Shareholders. • Incentive plans, including the LTIP and VCP, include provisions to allow malus and clawback to be applied, where appropriate. • Recent introduction of in-employment and post- employment shareholding requirements ensures that there is an alignment of interests between our Executive Director and Shareholders that encourages sustainable performance. |
Predictability | The range of possible values of rewards to individual Directors and any other limits or discretion should be identified and explained at the time of approving the policy. | We believe our disclosure is clear to allow Shareholders to understand the range of potential values which may be earned under the remuneration arrangements. Our DRP clearly sets out relevant limits and potential for discretion. |
Proportionality | The link between individual awards, the delivery of strategy and the long-term performance of the Company should be clear. Outcomes should not reward poor performance. | A significant proportion of our Executive Director’s potential reward is linked to performance through the VCP and LTIP with a clear line of sight between business performance and the delivery of Shareholder value. The Remuneration Committee may adjust formulaic outcomes of incentive arrangements to ensure that a fair and balanced outcome is achieved, taking into account the overall performance of the Company and the experience of Shareholders. |
Alignment to culture | Incentive schemes should drive behaviours consistent with Company purpose, values and strategy. | The incentive arrangements and the performance measures used are strongly aligned to those that the Board considers when determining the implementation success of the Company’s purpose, values and strategy. |
Element | Proposed change to Policy (Policy approved at 2023 AGM vs Policy approved at 2024 AGM) | Implementation from October 2024 | Implementation from F26 (April 2025) | Rationale for change |
Base salary | No change. | €775,000 | €775,000 | |
Short-term Incentive Plan (STIP) | No change. | 200% of base salary | 200% of base salary. | |
Long-term Incentive Plan (LTIP) | CEO will be eligible for awards of up to 500% of base salary in the form of performance or restricted shares, or a combination of the two. | One-off award of 300% of base salary in restricted shares. | 500% of base salary (60% of the award will be restricted shares and 40% of the award will be performance shares). | Ensure we maintain our focus on performance and the high profitable- growth potential we still see in the future. Align CEO pay with amendments proposed for the executive team – aligned with our “one for all” philosophy. |
Value-Creation Plan (VCP) | Any future value delivered under the VCP will be offset by the value of vested LTIP awards. | To maintain our focus on entrepreneurial growth but also ensure our current caps on CEO reward continue to operate and new schemes are not additive to existing VCP maximum caps agreed with shareholders. |
Element | Purpose and link to strategy | Operation and opportunity | Framework used to assess performance and provisions for the recovery of sums paid |
Base salary | To provide the core reward for the role. To attract, retain and motivate high-calibre executive management. | Salaries are reviewed annually, with any increase being awarded at the discretion of the Remuneration Committee. The Remuneration Committee may take into account a number of factors in deciding whether an increase should be made, including benchmarking against selected comparator companies, the individual’s skills and experience, internal relativities, and the Executive’s personal performance contribution. | The Remuneration Committee will consider the individual salary of the Executive Director at a meeting each year. |
Benefits | To attract, retain and motivate executive management without paying more than necessary. | The benefits to the Executive Director are in line with those provided to employees and those deemed necessary for the role or job taken. They include the following: The Executive Director is covered by the Company’s group personal accident and life assurance cover, which is in place for all employees (2x salary). Free return tickets usable on the route network of the Group, consistent with the number of free tickets made available for all employees. At its discretion, the Committee may provide reasonable support for costs associated with relocation where required at Company request, and other benefits as deemed necessary by the Remuneration Committee. | |
Pension | Not applicable | Not applicable. The Company does not provide a pension scheme for the Executive Director (unless contributions are required by law). | Not applicable |
Element | Purpose and link to strategy | Operation and opportunity | Framework used to assess performance and provisions for the recovery of sums paid |
Short-term Incentive Plan (STIP) | To incentivise the successful execution of the Company’s business strategy. To reward the achievement of annual financial and operational goals. | Payments under the STIP are made in cash and/or shares, subject to certain specified performance requirements as determined by the Remuneration Committee and up to a maximum STIP set as a percentage of base salary by the Remuneration Committee. The maximum payout is 200 per cent of base salary. A threshold level of performance is specified as 50 per cent of the at target bonus; if performance falls below this level, there will be no payout for that proportion of the award. | Performance requirements are determined by the Remuneration Committee. They are intended to align the performance of the Executive Director with the Group’s near-term objectives of delivering against its strategy. The Remuneration Committee may exercise its discretion to ensure that a fair and balanced outcome is achieved, taking into account the overall performance of the Company and the experience of Shareholders. The STIP is based on a combination of financial and non-financial measures as selected by the Remuneration Committee in any given year. Financial measures would typically represent no less than 50 per cent of the weighting. The annual STIP is subject to malus and/or clawback in the event of serious misconduct that could serve as a reason for terminating the employment for cause, or if the employee was involved in fraud, dishonesty or other types of illegal activity. The policy does not determine the time frame of the malus and/or clawback. |
Long-term Incentive Plan (LTIP) | To align the Executive Director’s long-term interests with those of Shareholders. To reward strong financial performance. | Each year, performance shares and restricted shares may be granted. Awards vest over a three- year period. Performance shares are subject to the achievement of performance targets over those three years. The maximum face value of annual awards will be 500 per cent of base salary. For performance shares, typically 25 per cent of award value will vest for threshold performance with straight-line vesting to maximum performance. | Performance targets are determined by the Remuneration Committee and vesting of the performance shares is subject to performance targets being met over the performance period. The performance targets for the LTIP are based on a combination of financial and non-financial measures and may include ESG measures as selected by the Remuneration Committee in any given year. Financial measures would typically represent no less than 50 per cent of the weighting. The Remuneration Committee may use its discretion to ensure that a fair and balanced outcome is achieved, taking into account the overall performance of the Company and the experience of Shareholders. If a participant’s employment ends before the end of the performance period or, in the case of restricted shares, the vesting period, any vested and unvested options will normally lapse, save in certain “good leaver” scenarios, although the Remuneration Committee retains discretion to allow all shares to vest subject to performance conditions (as applicable). LTIP awards are subject to malus and/or clawback in the event of serious misconduct which could serve as a reason for terminating the employment for cause, or if the employee was involved in fraud, dishonesty or other types of illegal activity. |
Value Creation Plan (VCP) | To retain the Chief Executive Officer and deliver Shareholder value. | One-off award of shares granted in 2021. Award vests after a seven-year period (40 per cent of the overall award at the end of year seven and 20 per cent per year after years eight, nine and ten). The award is based on the following performance conditions: • 90 per cent share price; and • 10 per cent ESG (5 per cent based on CO2 emissions reduction goals; and 5 per cent based on gender diversity target). Maximum payout is capped at £100 mn. Threshold payment is £20 mn for delivery of share price £77.24. Award payout to be offset against LTIP award. ESG criteria are independent of share price growth criteria. Straight line vesting in between. The share price related portion of the VCP award will pay out at 100 per cent if the maximum share price is achieved during two consecutive quarters before end-date. | To ensure that vesting outcomes are consistent with superior Shareholder experience, the Remuneration Committee has discretion to adjust the level of vesting downwards (including, for the avoidance of doubt, to nil) where it considers that the level of vesting resulting from applying a performance condition would not be a fair and accurate reflection of the performance of the Company, the Group, any Group member or the participant and/or such other factors as the Remuneration Committee may consider appropriate. If the participant ceases to be employed by reason of ill health, injury, disability, death, retirement with the agreement of the Remuneration Committee, or for any other reason at the discretion of the Remuneration Committee, 40 per cent of the award will vest as soon as practicable after the cessation date and 20 per cent in each of the next three years, to the extent that the performance conditions have been met. The award will lapse in all other circumstances. Malus and clawback may be applied at any time before an award vests, or for three years after the seventh anniversary of the grant date in the following circumstances: material misstatement of the results of the Company, errors or inaccuracies or misleading information leading to an incorrect grant or vesting of the award, gross misconduct, material failure of risk management by the Company, corporate failure (e.g. administration or liquidation) or any other circumstance which, in the opinion of the Remuneration Committee, could have a significantly adverse impact on the Company's reputation. |
Element | Purpose and link to strategy | Operation and opportunity | Framework used to assess performance and provisions for the recovery of sums paid |
Fees | To remunerate Non-Executive Directors to reflect their level of responsibility. | Each Non-Executive Director receives an annual fee which is inclusive of one Committee fee. Additional fees are paid: for chairing Committees; to the Senior Independent Director; to the Vice Chair; and to the Director responsible for employee engagement. Fees for Non-Executive Directors, other than the Chairman, are determined by the Chairman and the Executive members of the Board. Fees for the Chairman are determined by the Remuneration Committee without the Chairman being present. In both cases, there is flexibility to increase fee levels to ensure that they appropriately reflect the experience of the individual, time commitment of the role and fee levels in comparable companies. Non-Executive Directors receive an additional fee for sitting on more than one Committee. The Non-Executive Directors will also be reimbursed for all proper and reasonable expenses incurred in performing their duties. Fees are paid in cash and/or shares which are not subject to performance. | Not applicable; there are no provisions for the recovery of sums paid or the withholding of any payment relating to fees. |
Details of provision | Executive Director | Non-Executive Directors |
Notice period | Six months’ notice by either party. | One month’s notice by either party. |
Termination payment | The employing company may terminate the Executive Director’s employment with immediate effect by payment in lieu of notice. The Executive Director will be paid a sum equal to six months’ base salary if the employing company chooses to enforce the restrictive covenants referenced below. Upon termination of employment other than for cause, the Executive Director is entitled to a severance payment equal to six months’ base salary in addition to any notice pay or payment in lieu of notice. | Fees and expenses accrued up to termination only. |
Post-Termination covenants | Post-termination restrictive covenants apply for a period of one year following termination of employment. | Not applicable. |
Directors’ Remuneration Policy | Directors’ Remuneration Report | |||
Votes for | 11,281,085 | 63.32% | 17,178,448 | 96.03% |
Votes against | 6,533,913 | 36.68% | 710,722 | 3.97% |
Total votes | 17,814,998 | 17,889,170 | ||
Votes withheld | 79,504 | 374 | ||
József Váradi | |||||||||
Fees and salary € | Benefits € | STIP € | LTIP € | Other € | Pension € | Total € | Total fixed remuneration € | Total variable remuneration € | |
F25 | 775,000 | 22,291 | 770,727 | — | 2,325,000 | 1,570 | 3,894,588 | 798,861 | 3,095,727 |
F24 | 710,534 | 23,000 | 660,868 | — | — | 1,530 | 1,395,932 | 735,064 | 660,868 |
Weighting | Performance indicators | Threshold (50% payout) | Target (100% payout) | Stretched (150% payout) | Maximum (200% payout) | Outcome | Formulaic outcome |
25% | Financial performance | ||||||
12.5% | Adjusted EBIT margin (%) | 12.00% | Straight line between min and max | 15.00% | 3.00% | —% | |
12.5% | CASK ex-fuel (normalised for wet leases) | 2.61 | Straight line between min and max | 2.56 | 2.87 | —% | |
75% | Non-financial performance | ||||||
12.5% | Utilisation | 12:17 | Straight line between min and max | 12:43 | 12:28 | 14.18% | |
12.5% | Completion (without extraordinary events) | 99.39% | Straight line between min and max | 99.50% | 99.70% | 25.0% | |
12.5% | Customer Satisfaction | 72% | Straight line between min and max | 75% | 72.64% | 10.27% | |
12.5% | ESG (diversity) | 36.00% | Straight line between min and max | 37.00% | 37.90% | 25.0% | |
25% | Individual performance1,2 | ||||||
Individual performance rating | Rated A | Rated AA | Rated AAA | Rated 1 | Rated AA | 25.0% | |
Financial year | Executive Director | Single figure of total remuneration (€) | Performance STIP achieved against maximum possible | LTIP shares vesting against maximum possible |
F16 | József Váradi | 1,812,883 | 95% | n/a |
F17 | József Váradi | 1,240,812 | 48% | n/a |
F18 | József Váradi | 1,281,304 | 58% | n/a |
F19 | József Váradi | 4,056,438 | 26% | 100% |
F20 | József Váradi | 2,640,666 | 26% | 50% |
F21 | József Váradi | 1,620,409 | 0%1 | 50% |
F22 | József Váradi | 1,771,652 | 50% | 50% |
F23 | József Váradi | 1,266,511 | 41% | 0% |
F24 | József Váradi | 1,395,932 | 47% | 0% |
F25 | József Váradi | 3,095,727 2 | 50% | 0% |
F25 | F24 | F23 | F22 | F21 | |||||||||||
Salary and fees | Benefits1 | Annual STIP | Salary and fees | Benefits1 | Annual STIP | Salary and fees | Benefits1 | Annual STIP | Salary and fees | Benefits 1 | Annual STIP | Salary and fees | Benefits 1 | Annual STIP | |
József Váradi | 9% | (3%) | 17% | 3% | 156% | 16% | 16% | 100% | 85% | 19% | 0% | (22)% | 0% | (100)% | |
William A. Franke | 0% | 0% | 0% | 12% | 0% | 0% | 38% | 0% | 0% | 19% | 0% | 0% | (20)% | 0% | 0% |
Stephen L. Johnson | 6% | 0% | 0% | 30% | 0% | 0% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 20% | 0% | 0% | (21)% | 0% | 0% |
Simon Duffy5 | — | — | — | 0% | 0% | 0% | (100%) | 0% | 0% | 9% | 0% | 0% | (21)% | 0% | 0% |
Andrew S. Broderick | 0% | 0% | 0% | 28% | 0% | 0% | 12% | 0% | 0% | 28% | 0% | 0% | (14)% | 0% | 0% |
Barry Eccleston | 0% | 0% | 27% | 0% | 0% | 35% | 0% | 0% | 32% | 0% | 0% | (27)% | 0% | 0% | |
Peter Agnefjäll6 | — | — | — | 0% | 0% | 0% | (100)% | 0% | 0% | (98)% | 0% | 0% | (26)% | 0% | 0% |
Maria Kyriacou6 | — | — | — | 0% | 0% | 0% | (100)% | 0% | 0% | (78)% | 0% | 0% | (26)% | 0% | 0% |
Guido Demuynck7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | —% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | (83)% | 0% | 0% | |
Susan Hooper8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | —% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | (87)% | 0% | 0% | |
Charlotte Pedersen | 6% | 0% | 0% | 24% | 0% | 0% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 60% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Enrique Dupuy de Lome Chavarri | 0% | 0% | 0% | 21% | 0% | 0% | 26% | 0% | 0% | 158% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Charlotte Andsager | 0% | 0% | 0% | 31% | 0% | 0% | 21% | 0% | 0% | 148% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Dr Anthony Radev3 | (4%) | 0% | 0% | 30% | 0% | 0% | 16% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Anna Gatti4 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 28% | 0% | 0% | 155% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Phit Lian Chong9 | 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Average pay based on all employees 2 | 11% | 0% | 6% | 20% | 0% | 22% | 22% | 0% | 84% | 30% | 0% | (42)% | 0% | (100)% | |
Date of award | Ordinary shares | Face Value (€) | Share price at 30 September 2024 (£) | Vesting date | |
Restricted share options | 01-Oct-24 | 133,957 | 2,325,000 | 14.50 | 01-Oct-27 |
Salary and fees € | ||
F25 | F24 | |
William A. Franke | 336,000 | 336,000 |
Stephen L. Johnson | 127,238 | 120,000 |
Andrew S. Broderick | 112,500 | 112,500 |
Barry Eccleston | 107,094 | 157,500 |
Charlotte Pedersen | 132,323 | 125,000 |
Enrique Dupuy de Lome Chavarri | 125,000 | 125,000 |
Charlotte Andsager | 125,000 | 125,000 |
Dr Anthony Radev1 | 112,500 | 117,500 |
Phit Lian Chong3 | 100,000 | 75,000 |
Anna Gatti2 | 112,500 | 112,500 |
Total | 1,390,155 | 1,406,000 |
Direct ownership | Options (performance measures based) | Options (time restricted) | Interests1 | |||
Director | Number of Ordinary Shares | Vested, not exercised yet | Unvested2 | Unvested2 | Number of Ordinary Shares | Additional number of Ordinary Shares (if full principal of outstanding Convertible Notes is fully converted) |
William A. Franke | 212,917 | — | — | — | 24,759,645 | 24,246,715 |
József Váradi2 | 1,504,472 | — | 837,943 | 133,957 | 1,504,472 | — |
Stephen L. Johnson | 52,750 | — | — | — | — | — |
Anthony Radev | 17,300 | — | — | — | — | — |
Andrew S. Broderick | 5,090 | — | — | — | — | — |
Barry Eccleston | 5,000 | — | — | — | — | — |
Charlotte Andsager | 4,000 | — | — | — | — | — |
Charlotte Pedersen | 1,435 | — | — | — | — | — |
Enrique Dupuy de Lome Chavarri | 1,421 | — | — | — | — | — |
Phit Lian Chong | 395 | — | — | — | — | — |
Anna Gatti | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Method used | ||||
F25 | Option A | 126:1 | 97:1 | 55:1 |
F24 | Option A | 49:1 | 40:1 | 23:1 |
F23 | Option A | 44:1 | 36:1 | 22:1 |
F22 | Option A | 80:1 | 59:1 | 29:1 |
F21 | Option A | 80:1 | 62:1 | 37:1 |
P25 (lower quartile) | P50 (median) | P75 (upper quartile) | ||||
Financial year | Base pay | Total pay | Base pay | Total pay | Base pay | Total pay |
F25 | €23,245 | €30,811 | €26,615 | €40,178 | €40,358 | €71,105 |
F24 | €21,711 | €28,526 | €24,881 | €34,544 | €34,963 | €60,857 |
F23 | €21,121 | €28,878 | €23,987 | €35,231 | €31,705 | €56,272 |
F22 | €13,479 | €24,981 | €15,670 | €34,022 | €43,101 | €70,413 |
F21 | €16,269 | €24,569 | €24,044 | €31,587 | €36,235 | €53,903 |
Listing Rule | Information required | Relevant disclosure |
9.8.4(1) | Interest capitalised by the Group | N/A |
9.8.4(2) | Unaudited financial information as required (LR 9.2.18) | Unaudited financial information was published by the Group in its interim management statements (for Q1 and Q3), half-yearly results and preliminary announcement of results for the year. There have been no changes to the unaudited information previously published. |
9.8.4(4) | Long-term Incentive Plans (LR 9.4.3) | See Directors’ Remuneration Report. |
9.8.4(5) | Directors’ waivers of emoluments | See Directors’ Remuneration Report. |
9.8.4(6) | Directors’ waivers of future emoluments | See Directors’ Remuneration Report. |
9.8.4(7) | Non-pro-rata allotments of equity for cash (the Company) | See paragraph headed “Capital structure” in this report. |
9.8.4(8) | Non-pro-rata allotments of equity for cash (major subsidiaries) | N/A |
9.8.4(10) | Contracts of significance involving a Director | N/A |
9.8.4(11) | Contracts of significance involving a controlling Shareholder | N/A |
9.8.4(12) | Waivers of dividends | N/A |
9.8.4(13) | Waivers of future dividends | N/A |
9.8.4(14) | Agreement with a controlling Shareholder (LR 9.2.2.AR(2)(a)) | See Corporate Governance Report. |
Note | 2025 | 2024 (restated)* | |
€ million | € million | ||
Passenger ticket revenue | 5,6 | ||
Ancillary revenue | 5,6 | ||
Total revenue | 5,6 | ||
Staff costs | 8 | ( | ( |
Fuel costs | ( | ( | |
Distribution and marketing | ( | ( | |
Maintenance, materials and repairs | ( | ( | |
Airport, handling and en-route charges | ( | ( | |
Depreciation and amortisation | ( | ( | |
Other expenses* | ( | ( | |
Other income* | |||
Total operating expenses | ( | ( | |
Operating profit | |||
Financial income | 10 | ||
Financial expenses | 10 | ( | ( |
Net loss on derivative financial instruments | 10 | ( | |
Net foreign exchange gains | 10 | ||
Net financing expense | 10 | ( | ( |
Share of net profit of associates | 18 | ||
Profit before income tax | |||
Income tax credit | 11 | ||
Profit for the year | |||
Profit for the year attributable to: | |||
Non-controlling interests | 17 | ( | ( |
Owners of Wizz Air Holdings Plc | |||
Other comprehensive (expense)/income – items that may be subsequently reclassified to profit or loss: | |||
Change in fair value of cash flow hedging reserve, net of tax | 28 | ( | |
Cash flow hedging reserve recycled to profit or loss | 28 | ||
Cost of hedging | 28 | ( | |
Currency translation differences | 28 | ( | |
Share in other comprehensive income from investments | 18 | ||
Other comprehensive (expense)/income for the year, net of tax | ( | ||
Total comprehensive income for the year | |||
Total comprehensive income for the year attributable to: | |||
Non-controlling interests | 17 | ( | ( |
Owners of Wizz Air Holdings Plc | |||
Basic earnings per share (€/share) | 12 | ||
Diluted earnings per share (€/share) | 12 |
Note | 31 March 2025 | 31 March 2024 | |
€ million | € million | ||
ASSETS | |||
Non-current assets | |||
Property, plant and equipment | 13 | ||
Intangible assets | 14 | ||
Restricted cash | 22 | ||
Deferred tax assets | 15 | ||
Derivative financial instruments | 21 | ||
Trade and other receivables | 20 | ||
Investments in associates | 18 | ||
Investments in other entities | |||
Total non-current assets | |||
Current assets | |||
Inventories | 19 | ||
Trade and other receivables | 20 | ||
Current tax assets | |||
Derivative financial instruments | 21 | ||
Restricted cash | 22 | ||
Short-term cash deposits | |||
Cash and cash equivalents | |||
Total current assets | |||
Total assets | |||
Equity attributable to owners of the parent | |||
Share capital | 28 | ||
Share premium | 28 | ||
Reorganisation reserve | 28 | ( | ( |
Equity part of convertible debt | 28 | ||
Cash flow hedging reserve | 28 | ( | |
Cost of hedging reserve | 28 | ( | |
Cumulative translation adjustments | 28 | ||
Retained earnings/(Accumulated losses) | ( | ||
Capital and reserves attributable to the owners of Wizz Air Holdings Plc | |||
Non-controlling interests | 17 | ( | ( |
Total equity | |||
Non-current liabilities | |||
Borrowings | 23 | ||
Convertible debt | 24 | ||
Deferred income | 26 | ||
Derivative financial instruments | 21 | ||
Trade and other payables | 25 | ||
Provisions for other liabilities and charges | 29 | ||
Total non-current liabilities | |||
Current liabilities | |||
Trade and other payables | 25 | ||
Current tax liabilities | |||
Borrowings | 23 | ||
Convertible debt | 24 | ||
Derivative financial instruments | 21 | ||
Deferred income | 26 | ||
Provisions for other liabilities and charges | 29 | ||
Total current liabilities | |||
Total liabilities | |||
Total equity and liabilities |
Share capital | Share premium | Reorganisation reserve | Equity part of convertible debt | Cash flow hedging reserve | Cost of hedging reserve | Cumulative translation adjustments | (Accumulated losses)/ Retained earnings | Total | Non- controlling interest | Total equity | |
€ million | € million | € million | € million | € million | € million | € million | € million | € million | € million | € million | |
Note | 28 | 28 | 28 | 28 | 28 | 28 | 28 | 28 | 17 | ||
Balance at 1 April 2024 | ( | ( | ( | ||||||||
Comprehensive income/ (expense): | |||||||||||
Profit/(loss) for the year | ( | ||||||||||
Other comprehensive income/ (expense) | ( | ( | ( | ( | |||||||
Total comprehensive income/ (expense) for the year | ( | ( | ( | ||||||||
Transactions with owners in their capacity as owners: | |||||||||||
Share-based payment charge (Note 27) | |||||||||||
Total transactions with owners in their capacity as owners: | |||||||||||
Balance at 31 March 2025 | ( | ( | ( | ( |
Share capital | Share premium | Reorganisation reserve | Equity part of convertible debt | Cash flow hedging reserve | Cost of hedging reserve | Cumulative translation adjustment | Retained earnings/ (Accumulated losses) | Total | Non- controlling interest | Total equity | |
€ million | € million | € million | € million | € million | € million | € million | € million | € million | € million | € million | |
Note | 28 | 28 | 28 | 28 | 28 | 28 | 28 | 28 | 17 | ||
Balance at 1 April 2023 | ( | ( | ( | ( | ( | ( | ( | ||||
Comprehensive income/(expense): | |||||||||||
Profit for the year | ( | ||||||||||
Other comprehensive income/(expense) | ( | ( | |||||||||
Total comprehensive income/(expense) for the year | ( | ( | |||||||||
Transactions with owners in their capacity as owners: | |||||||||||
Share-based payment charge (Note 27) | |||||||||||
Total transactions with owners in their capacity as owners: | |||||||||||
Balance at 31 March 2024 | ( | ( | ( |
2025 | 2024 (restated) | ||
Note | € million | € million | |
Cash flows from operating activities | |||
Profit before income tax | |||
Adjustments for: | |||
Depreciation | 13 | ||
Amortisation | 14 | ||
Financial income | 10 | ( | ( |
Financial expenses | 10 | ||
Unrealised fair value losses/(gains) on derivative financial instruments | ( | ||
Unrealised foreign currency gains | ( | ( | |
Realised non-operating foreign currency (gains)/losses | ( | ||
Gain on sale of property, plant and equipment | ( | ( | |
Share-based payment charges | 27 | ||
Other non-cash operating income | ( | ( | |
Changes in working capital | |||
Decrease/(increase) in trade and other receivables | 20 | ( | |
Decrease/(increase) in inventory | 19 | ( | |
Increase/(decrease) in provisions | 29 | ( | |
(Decrease)/increase in trade and other payables | 25 | ( | |
Increase in deferred income | 26 | ||
( | |||
Cash generated by operating activities before tax | |||
Income taxes paid | ( | ( | |
Net cash generated by operating activities | |||
Cash flows from investing activities | |||
Purchase of aircraft maintenance assets | ( | ( | |
Purchase of tangible and intangible assets | ( | ( | |
Proceeds from the sale of tangible assets | |||
Advances paid for aircraft | 13 | ( | ( |
Refund of advances paid for aircraft | 13 | ||
Interest received | |||
Release of restricted cash*** | 22 | ||
Increase in restricted cash*** | 24 | ( | ( |
Release of short-term cash deposits*** | |||
Increase in short-term cash deposits*** | ( | ( | |
Payment for acquisition of investments | ( | ( | |
Net cash used in investing activities | ( | ( | |
Cash flows from financing activities | |||
Proceeds from new loans* | |||
Repayment of loans* | ( | ( | |
Interest paid – loans – IFRS 16 lease liability | ( | ( | |
Interest paid – loans – JOLCO, FTL and FL | ( | ( | |
Repayment of unsecured debt | ( | ||
Proceeds from secured debt | |||
Repayment of secured debt | ( | ( | |
Interest paid – unsecured debt | ( | ( | |
Interest paid – secured debt | ( | ( | |
Interest paid – other | ( | ( | |
Net cash used in financing activities | 30 | ( | ( |
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents | ( | ( | |
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the financial year** | |||
Effect of exchange rate fluctuations on cash and cash equivalents | |||
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year** |
Description in the statement of financial position | IFRS 9 category |
Non-current assets Restricted cash Derivative financial instruments Trade and other receivables Investments in other entities | Financial assets measured at amortised cost Fair value through profit or loss Financial assets measured at amortised cost Fair value through other comprehensive income |
Current assets Trade and other receivables Derivative financial instruments Restricted cash Short-term cash deposits Cash and cash equivalents Money market funds | Financial assets measured at amortised cost Fair value through profit or loss Financial assets measured at amortised cost Financial assets measured at amortised cost Financial assets measured at amortised cost Fair value through profit or loss |
Non-current liabilities Borrowings Convertible debt Derivative financial instruments | Financial liabilities measured at amortised cost Financial liabilities measured at amortised cost Fair value through profit or loss |
Current liabilities Trade and other payables Borrowings Convertible debt Derivative financial instruments | Financial liabilities measured at amortised cost Financial liabilities measured at amortised cost Financial liabilities measured at amortised cost Fair value through profit or loss |
Land and buildings – investments made on leased buildings | 3–5 years, being the shorter of the investment’s useful economic life and the lease term of the building |
Aircraft (A320neo and A321neo family)1 | 12-14 years |
Aircraft (A320ceo)2 | 20 years |
Aircraft spare engines (V2500 and GTF) | 16-20 years (part of aircraft parts in Note 13) |
Aircraft and spare engines – prepaid maintenance | 4–10 years (part of aircraft assets in Note 13) |
Aircraft maintenance assets (for leased aircraft or spare engines) | 1–10 years, or 2,000–10,000 flight cycles in the case of aircraft engines, being the shorter of the useful economic life and the lease term |
Aircraft parts (other than engines) | 7 years |
Fixtures and fittings (incl. computer hardware) | 3–5 years |
Right-of-use assets (from leases) | The lease term over one year (typically 8–12 years for leased aircraft, which is significantly less than its estimated useful economic life) |
Software licences | 3–8 years |
Web and other software development costs | 3–5 years |
Airport landing rights | Indefinite |
EUR | USD | Other | Total | |
At 31 March 2025 | € million | € million | € million | € million |
Financial assets | ||||
Trade and other receivables | 323.2 | 134.4 | 110.3 | 567.9 |
Investments in other entities | — | 3.7 | — | 3.7 |
Derivative financial assets | 0.5 | 11.6 | — | 12.1 |
Cash and cash equivalents | 254.4 | 236.8 | 106.3 | 597.5 |
Short-term cash deposits | 215.0 | 845.2 | — | 1,060.2 |
Restricted cash | 1.3 | 73.8 | 3.2 | 78.3 |
Total financial assets | 794.4 | 1,305.5 | 219.8 | 2,319.7 |
Financial liabilities | ||||
Unsecured debt* | 500.9 | — | — | 500.9 |
Secured debt | 271.9 | — | — | 271.9 |
IFRS 16 aircraft and engine lease liability | 775.0 | 2,866.6 | — | 3,641.6 |
IFRS 16 other lease liability | 19.6 | — | 9.9 | 29.5 |
JOLCO, FTL and FL liability | 1,520.1 | 488.6 | 122.0 | 2,130.7 |
Loans from non-controlling interests | — | 13.9 | — | 13.9 |
Convertible debt | 25.5 | — | — | 25.5 |
Trade and other payables | 463.4 | 114.6 | 236.5 | 814.5 |
Derivative financial liabilities | 7.1 | 35.5 | — | 42.6 |
Deferred income | 2.8 | — | 2.7 | 5.5 |
Total financial liabilities | 3,586.3 | 3,519.2 | 371.1 | 7,476.6 |
Net financial liabilities | (2,791.9) | (2,213.7) | (151.3) | (5,156.9) |
EUR | USD | Other | Total | |
At 31 March 2024 | € million | € million | € million | € million |
Financial assets | ||||
Trade and other receivables | 315.3 | 156.7 | 99.2 | 571.2 |
Investments in other entities | — | 1.6 | — | 1.6 |
Derivative financial assets | — | 36.8 | — | 36.8 |
Cash and cash equivalents | 138.4 | 523.8 | 66.2 | 728.4 |
Short-term cash deposits | 154.0 | 597.1 | — | 751.1 |
Restricted cash | 3.1 | 103.4 | 2.9 | 109.4 |
Total financial assets | 610.8 | 1,419.4 | 168.3 | 2,198.5 |
Financial liabilities | ||||
Unsecured debt* | 511.6 | — | — | 511.6 |
Secured debt | 257.5 | 205.7 | — | 463.2 |
IFRS 16 aircraft and engine lease liability | 637.4 | 2,947.4 | — | 3,584.8 |
IFRS 16 other lease liability | 16.8 | — | 10.3 | 27.1 |
JOLCO and FTL lease liability | 1,122.4 | 401.9 | 119.1 | 1,643.4 |
Loans from non-controlling interests | — | 13.9 | — | 13.9 |
Convertible debt | 25.7 | — | — | 25.7 |
Trade and other payables | 461.4 | 93.7 | 197.2 | 752.3 |
Derivative financial liabilities | — | 0.7 | — | 0.7 |
Deferred income | 4.8 | — | — | 4.8 |
Total financial liabilities | 3,037.6 | 3,663.3 | 326.6 | 7,027.5 |
Net financial liabilities | (2,426.8) | (2,243.9) | (158.3) | (4,828.9) |
2025 | 2024 | |
€ million | € million | |
Gain recognised within fuel costs | ||
Effective cash flow hedge | 12.7 | 1.9 |
Total gain recognised within fuel costs | 12.7 | 1.9 |
2025 | 2024 | |
€ million | € million | |
(Loss)/gain recognised within fuel costs | ||
Effective hedge | (26.2) | (24.3) |
Cost of hedging recycled to profit or loss | — | — |
Total loss recognised within fuel costs | (26.2) | (24.3) |
Derivative financial instruments | ||||||
At 31 March 2025 | Notional amount US$ million | Non-current assets € million | Current assets € million | Non-current liabilities € million | Current liabilities € million | Net asset € million |
Effective cash flow hedge positions | 1,147.0 | 0.1 | 8.1 | (3.6) | (4.2) | 0.4 |
Total foreign exchange hedges | 1,147.0 | 0.1 | 8.1 | (3.6) | (4.2) | 0.4 |
Derivative financial instruments | ||||||
At 31 March 2024 | Notional amount US$ million | Non-current assets € million | Current assets € million | Non-current liabilities € million | Current liabilities € million | Net asset € million |
Effective cash flow hedge positions | 801.0 | 0.7 | 7.9 | — | (0.5) | 8.1 |
Total foreign exchange hedges | 801.0 | 0.7 | 7.9 | — | (0.5) | 8.1 |
F26 | F27 | |
At 31 March 2025 | 12 months | 6 months |
Maturity profile of notional amount (million) | $931.0 | $216.0 |
Weighted average ceiling | $1.1224 | $1.1016 |
Weighted average floor | $1.0792 | $1.0591 |
F25 | F26 | |
At 31 March 2024 | 12 months | 6 months |
Maturity profile of notional amount (million) | $686.0 | $115.0 |
Weighted average ceiling | $1.1303 | $1.1304 |
Weighted average floor | $1.0867 | $1.0873 |
Derivative financial instruments | ||||||
At 31 March 2025 | ‘000 metric tonnes | Non-current assets € million | Current assets € million | Non-current liabilities € million | Current liabilities € million | Net liability € million |
Effective cash flow hedge positions | 1,753.0 | 1.1 | 2.3 | (2.7) | (25.1) | (24.3) |
Total fuel hedge | 1,753.0 | 1.1 | 2.3 | (2.7) | (25.1) | (24.3) |
Derivative financial instruments | ||||||
At 31 March 2024 | ‘000 metric tonnes | Non-current assets € million | Current assets € million | Non-current liabilities € million | Current liabilities € million | Net asset € million |
Effective cash flow hedge positions | 987.0 | 3.1 | 25.1 | — | (0.3) | 28.0 |
Total fuel hedge | 987.0 | 3.1 | 25.1 | — | (0.3) | 28.0 |
F26 | F27 | |
At 31 March 2025 | 12 months | 6 months |
Maturity profile (‘000 metric tonnes) | 1,420.0 | 333.0 |
Blended capped rate | $786.0 | 745 |
Blended floor rate | $709.0 | 677 |
F25 | F26 | |
At 31 March 2024 | 12 months | 6 months |
Maturity profile (‘000 metric tonnes) | 841.0 | 146.0 |
Blended capped rate | $860.0 | $844.0 |
Blended floor rate | $751.0 | $732.0 |
2025 | 2024 | |
Zero-cost collars | ||
Carrying amount net asset (€ million) | 0.4 | 8.1 |
Notional amount (US$ million) | 1,147.0 | 801.0 |
Maturity date | April 2025– August 2026 | April 2024– August 2025 |
Hedge ratio | 1:1 | 1:1 |
Change in fair value of outstanding hedging instruments (€ million) | (1.6) | 4.6 |
Change in value of hedged item used to determine hedge effectiveness (€ million) | 1.6 | (4.6) |
2025 | 2024 | |
Zero-cost collars | ||
Carrying amount net (liability)/asset (€ million) | (24.5) | 28.0 |
Notional amount (‘000 metric tonnes) | 1,726.5 | 987.0 |
Maturity date | April 2025– August 2026 | April 2024– August 2025 |
Hedge ratio | 1:1 | 1:1 |
Change in fair value of outstanding hedging instruments (€ million) | (8.7) | 12.4 |
Change in value of hedged item used to determine hedge effectiveness (€ million) | 8.7 | (12.4) |
Swaps | ||
Carrying amount net asset (€ million) | 0.2 | — |
Notional amount (‘000 metric tonnes) | 26.5 | — |
Maturity date | April 2025– May 2025 | — |
Hedge ratio | 1:1 | — |
Change in fair value of outstanding hedging instruments (€ million) | 0.2 | — |
Change in value of hedged item used to determine hedge effectiveness (€ million) | (0.2) | — |
2025 | 2024 | |
Difference in profit after tax € million | Difference in profit after tax € million | |
Fuel price sensitivity | ||
Fuel price $100 higher per metric tonne Fuel price $100 lower per metric tonne | -171.1 +171.1 | -167.1 +167.1 |
FX rate sensitivity (USD/EUR) | ||
FX rate 0.05 higher (meaning EUR stronger) FX rate 0.05 lower | 214.3 -235.3 | +204.0 -221.3 |
FX rate sensitivity (GBP/EUR) | ||
FX rate 0.03 higher (meaning EUR stronger) FX rate 0.03 lower | -17.0 18.3 | -16.8 +18.0 |
Interest rate sensitivity (EUR) | ||
Interest rate is higher by 100 bps Interest rate is lower by 100 bps | 17.6 -17.7 | +16.4 -16.7 |
2025 | 2024 | |
Difference € million | Difference € million | |
Fuel price sensitivity | ||
Fuel price $100 higher per metric tonne Fuel price $100 lower per metric tonne | 163.3 -163.3 | -91.0 +91.0 |
FX rate sensitivity (USD/EUR) | ||
FX rate 0.05 higher (meaning EUR stronger) FX rate 0.05 lower | -1.1 1.1 | +1.6 -1.6 |
Fuel volume sensitivity (metric tonnes) | ||
100,000 metric tonnes reduction in forecast fuel purchases 100,000 metric tonnes increase in forecast fuel purchases | -0.8 0.8 | +3.7 -3.7 |
At 31 March 2025 | Within three months € million | Between three months and one year € million | Between one and five years € million | More than five years € million | Total € million |
Financial assets | |||||
Trade and other receivables | 519.7 | 2.5 | 45.7 | — | 567.9 |
Derivative financial assets | 3.2 | 7.1 | 1.8 | — | 12.1 |
Short-term cash deposits | 361.1 | 699.1 | — | — | 1,060.2 |
Cash and cash equivalents | 597.5 | — | — | — | 597.5 |
Restricted cash | 21.0 | 20.7 | 31.5 | 5.1 | 78.3 |
Total financial assets | 1,502.5 | 729.4 | 79.0 | 5.1 | 2,316.0 |
Financial liabilities | |||||
Unsecured debt | 0.6 | 505.0 | — | — | 505.6 |
Secured debt | — | 284.7 | — | — | 284.7 |
IFRS 16 aircraft and engine lease liability | 184.2 | 560.1 | 2,242.1 | 1,211.7 | 4,198.1 |
IFRS 16 other lease liability | 1.3 | 3.4 | 16.4 | 13.8 | 34.9 |
JOLCO, FTL and FL liability | 45.4 | 151.7 | 915.7 | 1,443.0 | 2,555.8 |
Loans from non-controlling interests | — | — | — | 13.9 | 13.9 |
Convertible debt | 0.3 | — | 25.2 | — | 25.5 |
Trade and other payables | 796.9 | 1.6 | 9.9 | 6.1 | 814.5 |
Derivative financial liabilities | 6.5 | 22.7 | 13.4 | — | 42.6 |
Deferred income | 5.5 | — | — | — | 5.5 |
Total financial liabilities | 1,040.7 | 1,529.2 | 3,222.7 | 2,688.5 | 8,481.1 |
Within three months € million | Between three months and one year € million | Between one and five years € million | More than five years € million | Total € million | |
At 31 March 2024 | |||||
Financial assets | |||||
Trade and other receivables | 529.8 | 4.3 | 37.1 | — | 571.2 |
Derivative financial assets | 8.8 | 24.2 | 3.8 | — | 36.8 |
Short-term cash deposits | — | 751.1 | — | — | 751.1 |
Cash and cash equivalents | 728.4 | — | — | — | 728.4 |
Restricted cash | 9.1 | 46.3 | 50.9 | 3.1 | 109.4 |
Total financial assets | 1,276.1 | 825.9 | 91.8 | 3.1 | 2,196.9 |
Financial liabilities | |||||
Unsecured debt | 12.0 | 5.0 | 505.0 | — | 522.0 |
Secured debt | 39.5 | 388.3 | 54.8 | — | 482.6 |
IFRS 16 aircraft and engine lease liability | 167.2 | 517.0 | 2,149.5 | 1,318.9 | 4,152.6 |
IFRS 16 other lease liability | 0.9 | 2.8 | 16.8 | 13.5 | 34.0 |
JOLCO and FTL lease liability | 31.4 | 104.5 | 553.7 | 1,227.8 | 1,917.4 |
Loans from non-controlling interests | — | — | — | 13.9 | 13.9 |
Convertible debt | 0.3 | — | 25.4 | — | 25.7 |
Trade and other payables | 687.0 | 10.4 | 26.1 | 28.8 | 752.3 |
Derivative financial liabilities | 0.3 | 0.4 | — | — | 0.7 |
Deferred income | 4.8 | — | — | — | 4.8 |
Total financial liabilities | 943.4 | 1,028.4 | 3,331.3 | 2,602.9 | 7,906.0 |
A | A- | Other | Unrated | Total | |
At 31 March 2025 | € million | € million | € million | € million | € million |
Financial assets | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 516.0 | 47.5 | 30.9 | 3.0 | 597.5 |
Short-term cash deposits | 954.1 | 106.2 | — | — | 1,060.3 |
Restricted cash | 78.3 | — | — | — | 78.3 |
Trade and other receivables | 4.1 | 3.3 | 5.8 | 554.7 | 567.9 |
Derivative financial assets | 8.3 | 3.8 | — | — | 12.1 |
Investments in other entities | — | — | — | 3.7 | 3.7 |
Total financial assets | 1,560.8 | 160.8 | 36.7 | 561.4 | 2,319.8 |
A | A- | Other | Unrated | Total | |
At 31 March 2024 | € million | € million | € million | € million | € million |
Financial assets | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 449.0 | 1.2 | 265.5 | 12.8 | 728.4 |
Short-term cash deposits | 751.1 | — | — | — | 751.1 |
Restricted cash | 109.4 | — | — | — | 109.4 |
Trade and other receivables | 5.1 | 5.8 | 3.8 | 556.4 | 571.1 |
Derivative financial assets | 21.0 | 12.1 | 3.8 | — | 36.9 |
Investments in other entities | — | — | — | 1.6 | 1.6 |
Total financial assets | 1,335.5 | 19.0 | 273.1 | 570.9 | 2,198.5 |
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |
€ million | € million | € million | € million | |
Assets | ||||
Investments in other entities | — | — | 3.7 | 3.7 |
Derivative financial instruments | — | 12.1 | — | 12.1 |
Cash and cash equivalents | — | — | — | — |
Liabilities | ||||
Derivative financial instruments | — | 42.6 | — | 42.6 |
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |
€ million | € million | € million | € million | |
Assets | ||||
Investments in other entities | — | — | 1.6 | 1.6 |
Derivative financial instruments | — | 36.9 | — | 36.9 |
Cash and cash equivalents | 223.4 | — | — | 223.4 |
Liabilities | ||||
Derivative financial instruments | — | 0.7 | — | 0.7 |
2025 | 2024 | |
€ million | € million | |
Segment revenue | 5,267.6 | 5,073.1 |
Segment operating expenses | (5,100.1) | (4,635.3) |
Segment operating profit | 167.5 | 437.8 |
Net financing expense | (147.8) | (96.8) |
Income tax credit | 194.2 | 24.8 |
Profit for the year | 213.9 | 365.9 |
2025 | 2024 | |
€ million | € million | |
Passenger ticket revenue | 2,917.0 | 2,804.2 |
Ancillary revenue | 2,350.6 | 2,268.9 |
Total segment revenue | 5,267.6 | 5,073.1 |
2025 | 2024 | |
EU and EFTA countries | 3,638.3 | 3,576.2 |
UK | 547.6 | 533.4 |
Other (non-EU) | 1,081.7 | 963.5 |
Total revenue from external customers | 5,267.6 | 5,073.1 |
31 March 2025 | 31 March 2024 | |
€ million | € million | |
Wizz Air Hungary Ltd. | 2,226.3 | 2,448.9 |
Wizz Air Malta Ltd. | 1,913.7 | 1,754.0 |
Wizz Air Fleet Management Ltd. | 1,709.8 | 1,333.8 |
Wizz Air UK Limited | 407.7 | 481.5 |
Wizz Air Abu Dhabi Ltd. | 44.1 | 56.5 |
Wizz Air Asset Solutions Ltd. | 696.5 | — |
Other | 21.8 | 44.4 |
Total non-current assets | 7,019.9 | 6,119.1 |
2025 | 2024 | |
€ million | € million | |
Revenue from contracts with passengers | 5,197.6 | 4,994.6 |
Revenue from contracts with other partners | 70.0 | 78.5 |
Total revenue from contracts with customers | 5,267.6 | 5,073.1 |
2025 | 2024 | |
€ million | € million | |
Fees payable to the Company’s auditors for the audit of the consolidated financial statements | 1.0 | 1.3 |
Fees payable to the auditor and their associates for the audit of financial statements of subsidiaries pursuant to legislation | 1.3 | 1.0 |
Total fee for audit services | 2.3 | 2.3 |
Other audit-related services fees* | 0.2 | 0.2 |
Other non-audit services fees | 0.1 | 0.1 |
Total fee for non-audit services | 0.3 | 0.3 |
Total remuneration of auditors | 2.6 | 2.6 |
Number of persons | ||
2025 | 2024 | |
Non-Executive Directors | 10 | 10 |
Crew and pilots | 7,481 | 7,416 |
Administration and other staff | 655 | 502 |
Total staff number | 8,146 | 7,928 |
2025 | 2024 | |
€ million | € million | |
Wages and salaries | 473.3 | 423.4 |
Pension costs | 21.1 | 16.1 |
Social security costs other than pension | 46.4 | 42.0 |
Share-based payments | 11.5 | 8.3 |
Subtotal | 552.3 | 489.8 |
Subcontracted staff costs (rented pilots) | 12.6 | 18.0 |
Total staff costs | 564.9 | 507.8 |
2025 | 2024 | |
€ million | € million | |
Salaries and other short-term benefits | 2.9 | 2.8 |
Social security costs | 0.3 | 0.2 |
Share-based payments | 4.4 | 3.5 |
Total Directors’ emoluments | 7.6 | 6.5 |
2025 | 2024 | |
Directors receiving emoluments | 11 | 11 |
Number of Directors who in respect of their services received LTIP share options under long-term incentive schemes during the year | 1 | — |
2025 | 2024 | |
€ million | € million | |
Interest income | 82.1 | 80.5 |
Financial income | 82.1 | 80.5 |
Interest expenses on: | ||
Convertible debt | (1.9) | (1.8) |
IFRS 16 lease liability | (156.7) | (123.8) |
JOLCO, FTL and FL liability | (59.6) | (34.3) |
Unsecured debt | (5.8) | (11.8) |
Secured debt | (25.0) | (22.3) |
Other | (0.5) | (2.7) |
Financial expenses | (249.5) | (196.7) |
Net loss on derivative financial instruments | (6.4) | — |
Net foreign exchange gains | 26.0 | 19.4 |
Net financing expense | (147.8) | (96.8) |
2025 | 2024 | |
€ million | € million | |
Current tax on profit for the year | 30.8 | 39.8 |
Adjustment for current tax of prior years | (13.8) | 0.7 |
Other income-based taxes for the year | 9.1 | 7.9 |
Adjustment for income-based taxes of prior years | (0.4) | 1.5 |
Total current tax expense | 25.7 | 49.9 |
Decrease in deferred tax liabilities | — | (3.2) |
Increase in deferred tax assets | (219.9) | (71.5) |
Total deferred tax credit | (219.9) | (74.7) |
Total tax credit | (194.2) | (24.8) |
2025 | 2024 | |
€ million | € million | |
Profit before income tax | 19.7 | 341.0 |
Tax at the corporation tax rate of 14.7 per cent (2024: 13.97 per cent) | 2.9 | 47.6 |
Adjustment for current tax of prior years | (13.8) | 0.7 |
Adjustment for income-based taxes of prior years | (0.4) | 1.5 |
Adjustment for deferred tax of prior years | 22.5 | — |
Effect of different tax rates of subsidiaries versus the parent company | (207.7) | (25.4) |
Non-deductible expense | (0.7) | — |
Effect of newly recognised deferred tax assets | (6.1) | (44.0) |
Tax losses utilised for which no previous deferred tax was recognised | — | (13.1) |
Other income-based foreign tax | 9.1 | 7.9 |
Total tax credit | (194.2) | (24.8) |
Effective tax rate | n/a* | (7.3%) |
2025 | 2024 | |
€ million | € million | |
Deferred tax related to movements in cash flow hedging reserve | 5.4 | (13.2) |
Total tax credit/(charge) | 5.4 | (13.2) |
2025 | 2024 | |
Profit for the year attributable to equity holders of the Company, € million | 225.8 | 376.6 |
Weighted average number of Ordinary Shares in issue | 103,379,218 | 103,329,836 |
Basic earnings per share, € | 2.18 | 3.64 |
Diluted earnings per share, € | 2025 | 2024 |
Profit for the year attributable to equity holders of the Company, € million | 225.8 | 376.6 |
Interest expense on convertible debt (net of tax), € million | 1.9 | 1.8 |
Profit used to determine diluted earnings per share, € million | 227.7 | 378.4 |
Weighted average number of Ordinary Shares in issue | 103,379,218 | 103,329,836 |
Adjustment for assumed conversion on convertible instruments | 24,345,392 | 24,379,850 |
Weighted average number of Ordinary Shares for diluted earnings per share | 127,724,610 | 127,709,686 |
Diluted earnings per share, € | 1.78 | 2.96 |
Land and buildings € million | Aircraft maintenance assets € million | Aircraft assets and parts € million | Fixtures and fittings € million | Advances paid for aircraft* € million | Advances paid for aircraft maintenance assets € million | RoU assets – aircraft and spares € million | RoU assets – other € million | Total € million | |
Cost | |||||||||
At 1 April 2023 | 25.9 | 428.6 | 1,298.3 | 12.2 | 810.0 | 208.2 | 3,920.6 | 27.3 | 6,731.1 |
Additions | 12.3 | 202.0 | 576.9 | 1.1 | 512.7 | 68.7 | 1,048.1 | 11.9 | 2,433.7 |
Disposals | (0.7) | (172.1) | (72.7) | (0.1) | (480.4) | — | (315.8) | (5.4) | |
Transfers | — | 127.0 | — | — | — | (127.0) | — | — | — |
FX translation effect | — | (3.9) | 3.6 | — | — | — | 8.8 | — | 8.5 |
At 31 March 2024 | 37.5 | 581.6 | 1,806.1 | 13.2 | 842.3 | 149.9 | 4,661.7 | 33.8 | 8,126.1 |
Additions | 10.0 | 249.1 | 806.1 | 2.4 | 426.8 | 71.4 | 536.2 | 9.6 | 2,111.6 |
Disposals | — | (102.8) | (213.3) | (0.2) | (303.9) | — | (277.7) | (3.0) | (900.9) |
Transfers | — | 110.1 | 39.0 | — | (39.0) | (110.1) | — | — | — |
FX translation effect | — | (2.9) | 3.9 | — | — | 1.2 | 6.0 | 0.8 | 9.0 |
At 31 March 2025 | 47.5 | 835.1 | 2,441.8 | 15.4 | 926.2 | 112.4 | 4,926.2 | 41.2 | 9,345.8 |
Accumulated depreciation | |||||||||
At 1 April 2023 | 6.0 | 242.4 | 128.6 | 8.4 | — | — | 1,669.8 | 9.9 | 2,065.1 |
Depreciation charge | 1.7 | 156.7 | 92.9 | 1.9 | — | — | 479.8 | 2.9 | 735.9 |
Disposals | (0.3) | (166.1) | (4.3) | (0.1) | — | — | (311.0) | (4.0) | (485.8) |
FX translation effect | — | (6.1) | (0.5) | — | — | — | 2.5 | — | (4.1) |
At 31 March 2024 | 7.4 | 226.9 | 216.7 | 10.2 | — | — | 1,841.1 | 8.8 | 2,311.1 |
Depreciation charge | 2.2 | 238.7 | 109.9 | 1.8 | — | — | 583.0 | 4.3 | 939.9 |
Disposals | — | (101.9) | (17.1) | (0.3) | — | — | (276.3) | (1.5) | (397.1) |
FX translation effect | — | (3.1) | 0.4 | — | — | — | 1.4 | 0.2 | (1.1) |
At 31 March 2025 | 9.6 | 360.6 | 309.9 | 11.7 | — | — | 2,149.2 | 11.8 | 2,852.8 |
Net carrying amount | |||||||||
At 31 March 2025 | 37.9 | 474.5 | 2,131.9 | 3.7 | 926.2 | 112.4 | 2,777.0 | 29.4 | 6,493.0 |
At 31 March 2024 | 30.1 | 354.7 | 1,589.4 | 3.0 | 842.3 | 149.9 | 2,820.6 | 25.0 | 5,815.0 |
2026 | 2027 | 2028 | |
Jet fuel price (USD per metric tonne) | 863.1 | 876.4 | 880.3 |
EUR/USD exchange rate | 1.089 | 1.083 | 1.082 |
Software € million | Licences € million | CIP intangible assets € million | Total € million | |
Cost | ||||
At 1 April 2023 | 78.1 | 36.0 | 3.2 | 117.2 |
Additions | — | — | 34.5 | 34.5 |
Transfers | 27.5 | — | (27.5) | — |
Disposals | (4.7) | — | — | (4.7) |
FX translation effect | — | 0.8 | — | 0.8 |
At 31 March 2024 | 100.9 | 36.8 | 10.2 | 147.8 |
Additions | — | — | 32.6 | 32.6 |
Transfers | 27.9 | — | (27.9) | — |
Disposals | (13.0) | (0.1) | — | (13.1) |
FX translation effect | — | 0.6 | — | 0.6 |
At 31 March 2025 | 115.8 | 37.3 | 14.9 | 167.9 |
Accumulated amortisation and impairment | ||||
At 1 April 2023 | 40.4 | 0.1 | — | 40.5 |
Amortisation charge for the year | 19.2 | — | — | 19.2 |
Disposals | (4.6) | — | — | (4.6) |
At 31 March 2024 | 55.0 | 0.1 | — | 55.1 |
Amortisation charge for the year | 26.9 | — | — | 26.9 |
Disposals | (12.9) | (0.1) | — | (13.0) |
At 31 March 2025 | 69.0 | — | — | 69.0 |
Net carrying amount | ||||
At 31 March 2025 | 46.8 | 37.3 | 14.9 | 98.9 |
At 31 March 2024 | 45.9 | 36.7 | 10.2 | 92.7 |
RoU assets* | Lease liabilities* | Provisions for other liabilities and charges | Property, plant and equipment | Tax loss carry- forwards | Hedge | Other | Total | |
€ million | € million | € million | € million | € million | € million | € million | € million | |
At 1 April 2023 | (151.7) | 171.7 | 18.4 | (9.8) | 12.0 | 9.9 | (3.1) | 47.4 |
Credited/(charged) to: | ||||||||
Profit or loss | 24.5 | 1.2 | (3.8) | (9.1) | 15.4 | — | 46.8 | 75.0 |
Other comprehensive expense | — | — | — | — | — | (13.2) | — | (13.2) |
At 31 March 2024 | (127.2) | 172.9 | 14.6 | (18.9) | 27.4 | (3.3) | 43.7 | 109.2 |
Deferred tax assets | (127.2) | 172.9 | 14.6 | (18.9) | 27.4 | (3.3) | 43.7 | 109.2 |
Deferred tax liabilities | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Credited/(charged) to: | ||||||||
Profit or loss ** | (686.8) | 792.8 | 0.7 | 10.1 | (1.6) | — | 104.9 | 220.1 |
Other comprehensive income | — | — | — | — | — | 5.4 | — | 5.4 |
At 31 March 2025 | (814.0) | 965.7 | 15.3 | (8.8) | 25.8 | 2.1 | 148.6 | 334.7 |
Deferred tax assets | (814.0) | 965.7 | 15.3 | (8.8) | 25.8 | 2.1 | 148.6 | 334.7 |
Deferred tax liabilities | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Country of incorporation | Registered address | Principal activity | Class of shares held | Percentage held | Financial year end | |
Subsidiary undertakings | ||||||
Wizz Air Hungary Ltd. | Hungary | 1 | Airline operator | Ordinary | 100 | 31 March |
Cabin Crew Professionals Sp. Z.o.o. | Poland | 2 | Dormant | Ordinary | 100 | 31 March |
Wizz Air Bosnia LLC | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 3 | Dormant | Ordinary | 100 | 31 December |
Wizz Air Nederland Holding B.V. | The Netherlands | 4 | Dormant | Ordinary | 100 | 31 March |
Dnieper Aviation LLC | Ukraine | 5 | Dormant | Ordinary | 100 | 31 December |
Wizz Air Ukraine LLC | Ukraine | 5 | Dormant | Ordinary | 100 | 31 December |
Wizz Aviation Professionals S.R.L | Moldova | 6 | Crew company | Ordinary | 100 | 31 December |
WA Pilot Academy Sp. Z.o.o. | Poland | 7 | Special purpose company | Ordinary | 100 | 31 December |
Wizz Air UK Limited | UK | 8 | Airline operator | Ordinary | 100 | 31 March |
Wizz Air Finance Company B.V. | The Netherlands | 12 | Financing company | Ordinary | 100 | 31 March |
Wizz Air Fleet Management Ltd. | Hungary | 1 | Aircraft leasing | Ordinary | 100 | 31 March |
Wizz Air Abu Dhabi Limited | United Arab Emirates | 9 | Holding entity | Ordinary | 49 | 31 March |
Wizz Air Abu Dhabi LLC | United Arab Emirates | 10 | Airline operator | Ordinary | 49 | 31 March |
Wizz Air Innovation Ltd. | Hungary | 1 | Service provider | Ordinary | 100 | 31 December |
Wizz Air Malta Limited | Malta | 11 | Airline operator | Ordinary | 100 | 31 March |
WAM Ventures Holding Limited | Malta | 11 | Holding entity | Ordinary | 100 | 31 March |
Wizz Air Asset Solutions Ltd. (former name: AOG Jet Limited) | Malta | 11 | Aircraft leasing | Ordinary | 100 | 31 March |
Wizz Air Aviation Services LLC | Hungary | 1 | Dormant | Ordinary | 100 | 31 March |
Country of incorporation | Registered address | Principal activity | Class of shares held | Percentage held | Financial year end | |
Firefly Green Fuels Limited | UK | 13 | SAF R&D | Ordinary | 25 | 31 December |
2025 | 2024 | 2025 | 2024 | |
€ million Abu Dhabi LLC | € million Abu Dhabi LLC | € million Abu Dhabi Limited | € million Abu Dhabi Limited | |
Summarised balance sheet | ||||
Non-current assets | 247.4 | 309.8 | 46.3 | 46.3 |
Current assets | 106.3 | 89.3 | — | — |
Non-current liabilities | 232.4 | 311.9 | 46.3 | 46.3 |
Current liabilities | 283.8 | 210.6 | — | — |
Net liabilities | (162.5) | (123.4) | — | — |
Net liabilities attributable to NCI | (49.5) | (37.7) | — | — |
Revenue | 283.1 | 225.0 | — | — |
Net loss for the year | (39.3) | (35.6) | — | — |
Other comprehensive income/(expense) for the year, net of tax | 0.2 | (0.4) | — | — |
Total comprehensive expense | (39.1) | (36.0) | — | — |
Net loss for the year allocated to NCI | (11.9) | (10.7) | — | — |
Other comprehensive income/(expense) for the year, net of tax allocated to NCI | 0.1 | (0.1) | — | — |
Cash flows from operating activities | 23.1 | (4.0) | — | — |
Cash flows from investment activities | — | — | — | — |
Cash flows from financing activities (dividends to NCI: €nil) | (4.0) | (6.3) | — | — |
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 19.1 | (10.3) | — | — |
Firefly Green Fuels Limited € million | Firefly Green Fuels Limited € million | |
31 March 2025 | 31 March 2024 | |
Carrying amount of Firefly Green Fuels Limited | 5.7 | 5.7 |
Percentage ownership interest | 25.0% | 25.0% |
Share of net profit of associates | — | — |
Share in other comprehensive income from investments | — | — |
31 March 2025 | 31 March 2024 | |
€ million | € million | |
Aircraft consumables | 47.3 | 37.2 |
UK Emissions Trading Scheme (UK ETS) allowances* | 23.8 | 44.6 |
EU Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS) allowances (refer to Note 23)* | 200.8 | 251.8 |
Total inventories | 271.9 | 333.6 |
31 March 2025 | 31 March 2024 | |
€ million | € million | |
Non-current | ||
Receivables from lessors | 31.0 | 25.4 |
Other receivables | 14.7 | 11.8 |
Non-current trade and other receivables | 45.7 | 37.2 |
Current | ||
Trade receivables | 275.1 | 320.5 |
Receivables from lessors | 0.5 | 3.1 |
Other receivables | 38.1 | 31.9 |
Total current other receivables | 38.6 | 35.0 |
Prepayments and deferred expenses* | 71.4 | 104.4 |
Accrued income* | 245.3 | 209.9 |
Current trade and other receivables | 630.4 | 669.8 |
Total trade and other receivables | 676.1 | 706.9 |
31 March 2025 | 31 March 2024 | |
€ million | € million | |
Impaired receivables | ||
– trade receivables | (2.8) | (2.8) |
Allowances on impaired receivables | ||
– other receivables | (0.5) | (0.5) |
31 March 2025 | 31 March 2024 | |
€ million | € million | |
Assets | ||
Non-current derivatives | ||
Cash flow hedges | 1.3 | 3.9 |
Cross-currency interest rate swaps | 0.5 | — |
Current derivatives | ||
Cash flow hedges | 10.3 | 33.0 |
Total derivative financial assets | 12.1 | 36.9 |
Liabilities | ||
Non-current derivatives | ||
Cash flow hedges | (6.3) | — |
Cross-currency interest rate swaps | (7.1) | — |
Current derivatives | ||
Cash flow hedges | (29.2) | (0.7) |
Total derivative financial liabilities | (42.6) | (0.7) |
31 March 2025 | 31 March 2024 | |
€ million | € million | |
Non-current financial assets | 36.3 | 54.0 |
Current financial assets | 42.0 | 55.4 |
Total restricted cash | 78.3 | 109.4 |
31 March 2025 | 31 March 2024 | |
€ million | € million | |
Lease liability under IFRS 16 | 605.7 | 563.2 |
Unsecured debt | 500.9 | 12.0 |
Secured debt | 271.9 | 409.4 |
Liability related to JOLCO, FTL and FL contracts | 139.4 | 99.7 |
Total current borrowings | 1,517.9 | 1,084.3 |
Lease liability under IFRS 16 | 3,065.4 | 3,048.8 |
Unsecured debt | — | 499.6 |
Secured debt | — | 53.8 |
Loans from non-controlling interests | 13.9 | 13.9 |
Liability related to JOLCO, FTL and FL contracts | 1,991.3 | 1,543.6 |
Total non-current borrowings | 5,070.6 | 5,159.7 |
Total borrowings | 6,588.5 | 6,244.0 |
IFRS 16 aircraft and engine lease liability | IFRS 16 other lease liability | JOLCO, FTL and FL liability | Unsecured debt | Secured debt | Loans from non- controlling interests | Total | |
€ million | € million | € million | € million | € million | € million | € million | |
Payments due: | |||||||
Within one month | 42.8 | 0.3 | 11.4 | 0.6 | — | — | 55.1 |
Between one and three months | 95.7 | 0.6 | 26.3 | — | — | — | 122.6 |
Between three months and one year | 463.7 | 2.6 | 101.7 | 500.3 | 271.9 | — | 1,340.2 |
Between one and two years | 558.5 | 3.1 | 143.9 | — | — | — | 705.5 |
Between two and three years | 480.0 | 3.3 | 148.1 | — | — | — | 631.4 |
Between three and four years | 433.8 | 3.3 | 152.6 | — | — | — | 589.7 |
Between four and five years | 426.5 | 3.3 | 281.9 | — | — | — | 711.7 |
More than five years | 1,140.6 | 13.0 | 1,264.8 | — | — | 13.9 | 2,432.3 |
Total borrowings | 3,641.6 | 29.5 | 2,130.7 | 500.9 | 271.9 | 13.9 | 6,588.5 |
IFRS 16 aircraft and engine lease liability | IFRS 16 other lease liability | JOLCO and FTL lease liability | Unsecured debt | Secured debt | Loans from non- controlling interests | Total | |
€ million | € million | € million | € million | € million | € million | € million | |
Payments due: | |||||||
Within one month | 35.8 | 0.2 | 9.6 | 12.0 | — | — | 57.6 |
Between one and three months | 70.2 | 0.4 | 18.5 | — | 35.3 | — | 124.4 |
Between three months and one year | 454.7 | 1.9 | 71.5 | — | 374.1 | — | 902.2 |
Between one and two years | 535.3 | 2.8 | 107.0 | 499.6 | 53.8 | — | 1,198.5 |
Between two and three years | 488.0 | 2.9 | 110.0 | — | — | — | 600.9 |
Between three and four years | 409.0 | 3.1 | 113.0 | — | — | — | 525.1 |
Between four and five years | 365.0 | 3.1 | 116.4 | — | — | — | 484.5 |
More than five years | 1,226.8 | 12.7 | 1,097.4 | — | — | 13.9 | 2,350.8 |
Total borrowings | 3,584.8 | 27.1 | 1,643.4 | 511.6 | 463.2 | 13.9 | 6,244.0 |
31 March 2025 | 31 March 2024 | |
€ million | € million | |
Non-current convertible debt | 25.2 | 25.4 |
Current convertible debt | 0.3 | 0.3 |
Total convertible debt | 25.5 | 25.7 |
31 March 2025 | 31 March 2024 | |
€ million | € million | |
Non-current liabilities | ||
Accrued expenses | 69.5 | 97.2 |
Non-current trade and other payables | 69.5 | 97.2 |
Current liabilities | ||
Trade payables | 230.7 | 215.9 |
Payables to passengers | 57.9 | 68.4 |
Other payables | 37.7 | 28.2 |
Accrued expenses | 712.5 | 612.8 |
Current trade and other payables | 1,038.8 | 925.3 |
Total trade and other payables | 1,108.3 | 1,022.5 |
31 March 2025 | 31 March 2024 | |
€ million | € million | |
Non-current liabilities | ||
Deferred income | 166.5 | 147.2 |
Current liabilities | ||
Unearned revenue | 1,003.5 | 790.3 |
Other | 9.8 | 7.1 |
1,013.3 | 797.4 | |
Total deferred income | 1,179.8 | 944.6 |
All options | Performance options | |
Number of options | 0 | 0 |
Exercise price | nil | nil |
Vesting period | 7 years | |
Termination | 10 years |
All options | Performance options | |
Number of options | 19,008 | 19,008 |
Exercise price | nil | nil |
Vesting period | 5 years | |
Termination | 8 years |
All options | Restricted options | Performance options | |
Number of options | 852,795 | 852,795 | 0 |
Exercise price | nil | nil | nil |
Vesting period | 3 years | 3 years | |
Termination | 10 years | 10 years |
All options | Restricted options | Performance options | |
Outstanding at the beginning of the year | 2,355,177.0 | 366,011.0 | 1,989,166.0 |
Granted during the year | 871,803.0 | 852,795.0 | 19,008.0 |
Exercised during the year | (35,373.0) | (12,850.0) | (22,523.0) |
Forfeited during the year | (655,509.0) | (212,574.0) | (442,935.0) |
Outstanding at the end of the year | 2,536,098.0 | 993,382.0 | 1,542,716.0 |
Exercisable at the end of the year | 91,114.0 | 29,680.0 | 61,434.0 |
Number of shares | 31 March 2025 | 31 March 2024 |
In issue at the beginning of the year | 103,360,705 | 103,282,854 |
Issued during the year | 35,373 | 77,851 |
In issue at the end of the year – fully paid | 103,396,078 | 103,360,705 |
Ordinary Shares | 103,396,078 | 103,360,705 |
2025 | 2025 | 2024 | 2024 | |
Value of shares | £‘000 | €‘000 | £‘000 | €‘000 |
Authorised | ||||
Equity: 170,000,000 (2024: 170,000,000) Ordinary Shares of £0.0001 each and 80,000,000 (2024: 80,000,000) non- voting, non-participating Convertible Shares of £0.0001 each | 25 | 34 | 25 | 34 |
Allotted, called up and fully paid | ||||
Equity: 103,396,078 (2024: 103,360,705) shares of £0.0001 each | 10 | 13 | 10 | 13 |
Ordinary Shares | 10 | 13 | 10 | 13 |
Aircraft maintenance | Other | Total | |
€ million | € million | € million | |
At 1 April 2023 | 148.7 | 7.4 | 156.1 |
Non-current provisions | 76.2 | 0.1 | 76.3 |
Current provisions | 72.5 | 7.2 | 79.8 |
Capitalised within property, plant and equipment | 195.8 | — | 195.8 |
Charged to profit or loss | — | 5.3 | 5.3 |
Used during the year | (81.8) | (2.0) | (83.8) |
FX translation effect | 0.9 | — | 0.9 |
At 31 March 2024 | 263.6 | 10.7 | 274.3 |
Non-current provisions | 144.2 | 0.1 | 144.3 |
Current provisions | 119.4 | 10.6 | 130.0 |
Capitalised within property, plant and equipment | 231.2 | — | 231.2 |
Charged to profit or loss | — | 19.7 | 19.7 |
Used during the year | (153.5) | (14.5) | (168.0) |
FX translation effect | (2.1) | — | (2.1) |
At 31 March 2025 | 339.2 | 15.9 | 355.1 |
Non-current provisions | 186.1 | 15.1 | 201.2 |
Current provisions | 153.1 | 0.8 | 153.9 |
Carrying amount | Fair value | Carrying amount | Fair value | |
31 March 2025 | 31 March 2025 | 31 March 2024 | 31 March 2024 | |
€ million | € million | € million | € million | |
Financial asset at fair value through other comprehensive income | 3.7 | 3.7 | 1.6 | 1.6 |
Trade and other receivables due after more than one year | 45.7 | 45.7 | 37.1 | 37.1 |
Restricted cash | 78.3 | 78.3 | 109.4 | 109.4 |
Derivative financial assets | 12.1 | 12.1 | 36.9 | 36.9 |
Trade and other receivables due within one year | 522.2 | 522.2 | 534.0 | 534.0 |
Cash and cash equivalents | 597.5 | 597.5 | 728.4 | 728.4 |
Short-term cash deposits | 1,060.2 | 1,060.2 | 751.1 | 751.1 |
Trade and other payables due after more than one year | (16.0) | (16.0) | (55.0) | (55.0) |
Trade and other payables due within one year | (798.5) | (798.5) | (697.4) | (697.4) |
Derivative financial liabilities | (42.6) | (42.6) | (0.7) | (0.7) |
Convertible debt | (25.5) | (25.5) | (25.7) | (25.7) |
Borrowings | (5,815.7) | (5,674.4) | (5,269.2) | (5,071.0) |
Secured debt | (271.9) | (261.8) | (463.2) | (458.4) |
Unsecured debt | (500.9) | (489.7) | (511.6) | (482.3) |
Deferred income | (5.5) | (5.5) | (4.8) | (4.8) |
Net balance of financial instruments (liability) | (5,156.9) | (4,994.3) | (4,829.1) | (4,596.7) |
Carrying amount | Carrying amount | |
31 March 2025 | 31 March 2024 | |
€ million | € million | |
Derivative financial assets | 12.1 | 36.9 |
Total | 12.1 | 36.9 |
Carrying amount | Carrying amount | |
31 March 2025 | 31 March 2024 | |
€ million | € million | |
Derivative financial liabilities | 42.6 | 0.7 |
Total | 42.6 | 0.7 |
31 March 2025 | 31 March 2024 | |||||||||||
Effective interest | Total | Within one year | Two to five years | Above five years | Effective interest | Total | Within one year | Two to five years | Above five years | |||
rate | € million | € million | € million | € million | € million | rate | € million | € million | € million | € million | € million | |
Convertible Notes | 7.42% | 25.5 | 0.3 | 25.2 | 7.42% | 25.7 | 0.3 | 25.4 | — | — | ||
Unsecured debt | 1.16% | 500.9 | 500.9 | — | — | — | 1.16% | 511.6 | 12.0 | 499.6 | — | — |
Secured debt | 5.12% | 271.9 | 271.9 | — | — | — | 8.45% | 463.2 | 409.4 | 53.8 | — | — |
IFRS 16 aircraft engine lease liability | 4.22% | 3,641.6 | 602.2 | 558.5 | 1,340.3 | 1,140.6 | 4.19% | 3,584.8 | 560.7 | 535.3 | 1,262.0 | 1,226.8 |
IFRS 16 other lease liability | 3.39% | 29.5 | 3.5 | 3.1 | 9.9 | 13.0 | 3.25% | 27.1 | 2.5 | 2.8 | 9.1 | 12.7 |
JOLCO, FTL and FL liability | 3.18% | 2,130.7 | 139.4 | 143.9 | 582.6 | 1,264.8 | 2.71% | 1,643.4 | 99.6 | 107.0 | 339.4 | 1,097.4 |
Total | 6,600.1 | 1,518.2 | 730.7 | 1,932.8 | 2,418.4 | 6,255.8 | 1,084.5 | 1,223.9 | 1,610.5 | 2,336.9 | ||
31 March 2025 | 31 March 2024 | |
€ million | € million | |
Net borrowings at the beginning of the year | 6,269.7 | 5,301.4 |
Proceeds from new loans | 245.6 | 67.9 |
Repayment of loans | (720.0) | (580.4) |
Proceeds from unsecured debt* | — | 6.0 |
Repayment of unsecured debt | — | (500.0) |
Proceeds from secured debt | — | 415.0 |
Repayment of secured debt | (240.8) | (248.4) |
Paid interest | (223.5) | (170.2) |
Change in net borrowings from cash flows | (938.7) | (1,010.1) |
New non-cash borrowings | 1,059.7 | 1,767.7 |
Interest expense | 249.2 | 196.4 |
Exchange differences | (11.6) | 17.1 |
Other non-cash items | (14.3) | (2.8) |
Net borrowings at the end of the year | 6,614.0 | 6,269.7 |
2025 | 2024 | |
€ million | € million | |
Salaries and other short-term employee benefits | 9.9 | 10.1 |
Social security costs | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Share-based payments | 9.6 | 7.1 |
Total key management compensation expense | 20.7 | 18.3 |
Key audit matter | How our audit addressed the key audit matter |
Accuracy of IFRS 16 “Leases” input data | |
The group recognised right-of-use (“RoU”) assets of €2,806.4 million and associated lease liabilities of €3,671.1 million at 31 March 2025. The RoU assets and lease liabilities largely relate to aircraft leases and are calculated based on discounted future lease payments. These calculations involve assumptions including, but not limited to, the determination of the lease payments, the expected lease term, consideration of extension options and the discount rate used to determine the liabilities. We focused on this area because input data errors for new leases or a failure to accurately capture changes in lease contracts in the year could materially impact the lease accounting given the value of an individual aircraft lease. Refer to the Material accounting policies note 2, note 4 for management’s disclosures of the relevant judgments and estimates involved in determining the IFRS 16 balances at 31 March 2025 and notes 13 and 23 which disclose the RoU assets and lease liability balances and movements, respectively. | We understood and evaluated the process followed by management to account for its leases under IFRS 16. We tested the integrity of management’s system used to perform the lease liability and RoU asset calculations by testing that its IT general controls are operating effectively. We tested the accuracy of the underlying data used in management’s system calculation for new leases in the year to supporting lease documentation. We also tested the appropriateness of the other significant assumptions used for lease additions in the year. This included the discount rates used where we tested the rate used to discount future lease payments, and the appropriateness of the external sources of information used for risk-free rates and credit spread and found that the rates used for new leases were a reasonable approximation of the incremental borrowing rate of the group. Where leases contained an option for early termination or extension, we considered management’s assessment of the likelihood of the option being exercised, based on the nature of the assets and the terms including changes in the period under option. Using a digital audit solution we reperformed the calculation of the asset, liability, depreciation and interest entries relating to the accounting for leases under IFRS 16 and compared the results to the values generated by management’s system and found the difference to be within acceptable thresholds. We assessed the adequacy of disclosures in notes 2 and 4 in respect of the accounting policies and significant judgements and estimates involved in determining the IFRS 16 balances and the disclosures in notes 13 and 23 for leases. We did not identify any material uncorrected misstatements from our work on IFRS 16. |
Aircraft maintenance provisioning | |
The group operates aircraft which are held under lease arrangements and incurs liabilities for maintenance costs in respect of leased aircraft in line with the terms of its aircraft leases. Under these lease agreements, the group is contractually committed to either return the aircraft in a certain condition or to compensate the lessor based on the actual condition of the aircraft and its major components upon return. The group uses the "strict obligation” method of accounting for such costs under which provision is made for the minimum unavoidable costs of specific future maintenance obligations created by the lease at the time when such obligations become certain. Maintenance provisions of €339.2 million for aircraft maintenance costs in respect of leased aircraft are recorded in the financial statements at 31 March 2025 (refer to note 29 to the financial statements). At each balance sheet date, the calculation of the maintenance provision includes a number of variable factors and assumptions including the likely utilisation of the aircraft; the expected cost of the heavy maintenance check at the time it is expected to occur; the condition of the aircraft; and the lifespan of life-limited parts. We focused on this area because an inherent level of management judgement and estimation is required in determining the above variable factors and assumptions on an aircraft-by-aircraft basis. This includes a commercial decision on whether to perform future maintenance based on expected flying hours or to avoid this and pay compensation to the lessor at the end of the lease. Refer to the Material accounting policies note 2 and note 4 for management’s disclosures of the relevant judgments and estimates involved in calculating the maintenance provisions required, as well as note 29 for specific disclosures relating to the maintenance provisions. | We understood and evaluated the process followed by management to determine its maintenance provision, including the input data, assumptions and significant judgements and estimates used. We tested the integrity of the maintenance provision system used by management by testing the effectiveness of IT general controls and specific automated calculations therein. We also assessed the process by which the variable factors used within the provision calculation were appropriately estimated by performing the following procedures: •Comparing the cost assumptions in the maintenance provision system with recent invoices, inspected approved maintenance plans as well as validating current flight hours and flight cycles to non-financial data sources. •Testing the input data through agreement to underlying lease contracts, focusing specifically on new and amended contracts in F25 and considering whether the planned maintenance could be materially impacted by risks associated with climate change. •Understood the planned maintenance schedule and discussed it with management’s expert who advises on maintenance requirements. •Testing material manual adjustments to the provision amount calculated by the maintenance provision system. •Re-performing calculations. •Performing a look back test to assess the accuracy of past estimates. We tested the short and long-term classification of the provision. We assessed the adequacy of disclosures in note 4 in respect of the significant judgements and estimates involved in maintenance provisioning. We did not identify any material uncorrected misstatements from our work on maintenance provisions. |
Recognition and recoverability of deferred tax assets | |
The group recognised deferred tax assets of €334.7 million at 31 March 2025 (31 March 2024: €109.1 million) This balance increased significantly due to restructuring involving the group’s Maltese subsidiaries during the year. The recognition and recoverability of deferred tax assets is based on a number of significant assumptions. Deferred tax assets can be recognised to the extent it is probable that there will be sufficient future taxable profits to utilise them. The forecasts of future taxable profits include a number of assumptions regarding the future and thus estimation uncertainty. They cover an extended period to demonstrate the reversal of timing differences giving rise to the deferred tax assets recognised. This period goes beyond the group’s normal three-year planning horizon and involves assumptions regarding revenue and operating cost levels and fleet utilisation. Refer to the Material accounting policies note 2 and note 4 for management’s disclosures of the relevant judgments and estimates involved in assessing the recoverability of deferred tax assets, as well as note 11 for details of the income tax credit recognised in the year and note 15 for specific disclosures relating to the deferred tax asset balances. | We understood and evaluated management’s process of preparing deferred tax calculations and analysis of the deferred tax impact of transactions involving the group’s Maltese subsidiaries during the year. We tested the deferred tax calculations for arithmetic accuracy and validated input data. We also utilised local Malta tax experts to confirm specific local tax treatments that impact the calculation of the deferred tax assets. We evaluated management’s methodology for assessing the recognition and recoverability of deferred tax assets. The recognition of a deferred tax asset is supported by the availability of sufficient probable taxable profits in future periods against which temporary tax-deductible differences can be utilised. We assessed the reasonableness of assumptions underpinning the future forecasts. In doing this, we considered whether the taxable profit growth assumed was supportable. Where applicable we assessed the consistency of the forecasts used to justify the recognition of deferred tax assets to those used elsewhere in the business, including for the going concern assessment and impairment assessment of the fleet cash-generating unit. We also assessed the adequacy of disclosures over this area, particularly the disclosures on the deferred tax impact of recent transactions. We did not identify any material uncorrected exceptions from our audit work. |
Overall group materiality | €46,000,000 (2024: €45,000,000) |
How we determined it | 0.9% of total revenue |
Rationale for benchmark applied | We considered various potential benchmarks including profit before tax and concluded, using professional judgement, that total revenue (2024: total revenue) continues to be an appropriate benchmark for the current year audit. |
2025 | 2024 | |
€ million | € million | |
Operating profit | 167.5 | 437.9 |
Depreciation and amortisation | 966.8 | 755.3 |
EBITDA | 1,134.3 | 1,193.2 |
Total revenue | 5,267.6 | 5,073.1 |
EBITDA margin (%) | 21.5% | 23.5% |
31 March 2025 | 31 March 2024 | |
€ million | € million | |
Cash and cash equivalents | 597.5 | 728.4 |
Short-term cash deposits | 1,060.2 | 751.1 |
Total revenue | 5,267.6 | 5,073.1 |
Liquidity | 31.5% | 29.2% |
31 March 2025 | 31 March 2024 | |
€ million | € million | |
Non-current liabilities | ||
Borrowings | 5,070.6 | 5,159.7 |
Convertible debt | 25.2 | 25.4 |
Current liabilities | ||
Borrowings | 1,517.9 | 1,084.3 |
Convertible debt | 0.3 | 0.3 |
Current assets | ||
Short-term cash deposits | 1,060.2 | 751.1 |
Cash and cash equivalents | 597.5 | 728.4 |
Net debt | 4,956.3 | 4,790.2 |
EBITDA | 1,134.3 | 1,193.2 |
Leverage ratio | 4.4 | 4.0 |
2025 | 2024 | |
€ million | € million | |
Operating profit | 167.5 | 437.9 |
Average Shareholders’ equity | 231.4 | (106.1) |
Average borrowings and convertible debt | 6,441.8 | 5,785.6 |
Average cash and cash equivalents | (663.0) | (1,068.5) |
Average short-term cash deposits | (905.7) | (375.6) |
Average capital employed | 5,104.6 | 4,235.4 |
ROCE (%) | 3.3% | 10.3% |
31 March 2025 | 31 March 2024 | |
€ million | € million | |
Non-current assets | ||
Restricted cash | 36.3 | 54.0 |
Current assets | ||
Restricted cash | 42.0 | 55.4 |
Short-term cash deposits | 1,060.2 | 751.1 |
Cash and cash equivalents | 597.5 | 728.4 |
Total cash | 1,736.0 | 1,588.9 |
Report of the Chair of the Sustainability and Culture Committee | |
Our Proudest Moments in F25 | |
General information | |
Basis for preparation | |
Governance | |
Strategy | |
Impact, risk and opportunity management: disclosures on the double materiality assessment | |
Environmental information | |
Disclosures pursuant to Article 8 of Regulation 2020/852 (Taxonomy Regulation) | |
[E1] Climate change | |
[E] Other environmental information | |
Social information | |
[S1] Own workforce | |
[S2] Workers in the value chain | |
[S4] Consumers and end-users | |
[S] Other social information | |
Governance information | |
[G1] Business conduct | |
[G] Other governance information | |
Economy-related information | |
ESRS Content index | |
TCFD index |
“The Committee has contributed significantly to the Company’s success by providing oversight and guidance, ensuring that our sustainability efforts are aligned with our strategic goals and organisational culture.” Charlotte Andsager Chair of the Sustainability and Culture Committee |
Number of Executive Members | |
Male: 1 | Female: 0 |
Number of Non-executive Members | |
Male: 6 | Female: 4 |
Ratio of Non-executive and executive Board Members | |
Male: 64% | Female: 36% |
Number of Independent Board Members: 7 | |
Percentage of Independent Board Members: 64% | |
Responsibilities | Implementation |
Strategy | Reviewing and overseeing the implementation of Wizz Air’s sustainability strategy. |
Risk assessment | Examining extra-financial risks, particularly those related to environmental, social and societal issues. |
Reporting and benchmarks | Overseeing non-financial reporting processes, adhering to applicable legislation and international benchmarks. |
Culture and diversity | Beyond sustainability, evaluating the Company’s culture, ensuring that it promotes diversity across the workforce, and facilitating effective communication between management and employees. |
Employee engagement | Overseeing employee relations, ensuring that Wizz Air fosters a diverse and engaged workforce. |
SUSTAINABILITY GOVERNANCE SUMMARY | |
Board of Directors Approval and supervision of strategic objectives | Sustainability and Culture Committee ▶ Objective: Aligns the Company’s sustainability strategic objectives with industry best-in- class standards. ▶ Frequency: Meets at least six times per year, with an additional session dedicated to in- depth training on sustainability and climate-related matters each year. Audit and Risk Committee ▶ Objective: Approval of the climate-risk universe (including the physical and transition risk analysis), risk appetite and action plan to address these risks. ▶ Frequency: Meets at least six times per year. |
Leadership Team Development and execution of strategies | Sustainability Council The driving force behind sustainable practices, ensuring they are embedded throughout the organisation’s operations and culture. ▶ Strategic alignment: Supports the Leadership Team in defining sustainability objectives and corresponding strategies. Ensures alignment with industry best practices. ▶ Execution and prioritisation: Drives execution across the organisation by prioritising and allocating resources. Focuses on key priorities, including fleet renewal, fuel efficiency, climate regulation advocacy and sustainable aviation fuels. ▶ Expertise hub: Serves as a centre of expertise on ESG, sustainability and climate matters. ▶ Integration and action: Integrates functional leaders to swiftly deploy guidance into operations. |
Core elements of due diligence | Paragraphs in the sustainability statement |
Embedding due diligence in governance, strategy and business model | ESRS 2: GOV-1, GOV-2, GOV-3, SMB-3 Topical standards: S1-1, S2-1, S4-1, G1-1 |
Engaging with affected stakeholders in all key steps of the due diligence | ESRS 2: SBM-2, IRO-1, GOV-2 Topical standards: E1-2, S1-2, S2-2, S4-2, G1-2 |
Identifying and assessing adverse impacts | ESRS 2: IRO-1, SBM-3, |
Taking actions to address those adverse impacts | ESRS 2: GOV-2, GOV-5 Topical standards: E1-3, S1-4, S2-4, S4-4, G1-2, G1-3 |
Tracking the effectiveness of these efforts and communicating | ESRS 2: GOV-2, GOV-5 Topical standards: E1-4, E1-5, E1-6, E1-7, E1-8, S1-5, S1-6, S1-7, S1-9, S1-11, S1-13, S1-14, S1-17, S2-4, S2-5,G1-3, G1-4, G1-5, G1-6 |
Region | Headcount |
Europe, other | 8,217 |
Middle East | 599 |
Leading in fleet renewal | Fuel-efficient aircraft and engines | High seat capacity – low emissions per passenger | ||
We are committed to technology and innovation, and we believe that fleet renewal is a crucial solution available now to reduce our emissions per flight. The Airbus A321neo contributes significantly to this goal, offering a nearly 50 per cent reduction in noise footprint, a 20 per cent reduction in fuel consumption, and a 50 per cent reduction in nitrogen oxide emissions compared to previous-generation aircraft. Replacing older aircraft with the latest Airbus A321neo models is a key part of our long-term strategy to reduce Wizz Air’s carbon intensity by 25 per cent by 2030. | At Wizz Air, offering low costs and fares does not equate to compromising on service quality. In fact, we pride ourselves on operating one of the youngest and most carbon-efficient fleet (as per CAPA award) in Europe, and the third youngest fleet globally among airlines with over 100 aircraft (as per ch- aviation awards 2024). Our fleet has one of the lowest environmental footprints per passenger kilometre (as per CAPA award). By prioritising fuel efficiency, we continuously reduce our CO 2 emissions per passenger kilometre, outperforming the industry average. | With the Airbus A321neo aircraft’s 239-seat single-class configuration, Wizz Air is advancing its carbon efficiency efforts. By maximising the number of passengers per flight, we effectively lower carbon emissions per passenger kilometre. This strategy aligns seamlessly with our commitment to sustainability and responsible air travel. |
ENVIRONMENT | PEOPLE | ECONOMY | GOVERNANCE |
Key objective Continue to decrease our environmental footprint and maintain the lowest CO2 (grams) emitted per revenue passenger km in the industry. | Key objective Become an employer of choice, set an example for corporate citizenship. Retain and develop talent and provide a great customer experience. | Key objective Contribute to the GDP growth of our destinations by enabling affordable connectivity. Create new jobs, drive tourism and business opportunities. | Key objective Put the proper organisational structure of sustainability management, systems and people in place to support our strategy and vision. |
Wizz Air ESG pillars and contribution to UN SDGs via our relevant programmes | |||
Company goals ▶ Deliver an average of 15-20 per cent annual growth in capacity in the long term ▶ Deliver double-digit net income margin ▶ Reduce our CO2 emissions intensity by 25 per cent by F30 (versus base year F20) The main ESG-related metrics are integrated into our key performance measures year on year. | Strategic priorities ▶ A focused, ultra-low-cost, low-fare business model ▶ Increasing and diversifying our geographical footprint ▶ Delivering industry leading sustainability in accordance with the Company’s ESG strategy ▶ Enabling our business by creating the leading digital platform ▶ Continuing to run a highly engaged, agile and entrepreneurial organisation |
1. Leading on cost | 2. Increasing our geographical footprint | 3. Leading sustainability | 4. Leading digital platform | 5. Highly engaged organisation |
1.1. CASK performance | 2.1. Market penetration | 3.1. CO2 emissions intensity | 4.1. Brand awareness | 5.1. Employee engagement |
1.2. Ancillary PAX revenue | 2.2. Market share | 3.2. Gender diversity | 4.2. Web/app visitors | 5.2. Staff attrition |
1.3. Cash | 4.3. Conversion | 5.3. Promotion from within |
Activities | Value chain | Estimated location | Key stakeholders |
Inbound logistics | |||
Leasing/purchase of aircraft | Upstream and downstream value chain activities | AOC locations | Aircraft manufacturers, airplane leasing companies |
Ensuring sufficient fuel supply at each destination to ensure smooth operations | Upstream and downstream value chain activities | Network wide | Fuel suppliers, including SAF, airports, fuel hedging firms |
Procurement of parts and maintenance of aircraft fleet | Joint activity | Network wide | Parts suppliers, maintenance service providers, airports |
Outbound logistics | |||
Efficient utilisation of the fleet while scheduling flights | Joint activity | AOC locations | Own employees, air traffic control, airport authorities, ground service providers, IT service providers |
Crew scheduling, including standby crew arrangements, to ensure smooth operations | Joint activity | AOC locations | Own employees, IT service providers |
Offering tickets and ancillary services (e.g. extra legroom, priority boarding, baggage) to customers | Own activity | Network wide | Partners, customers |
Operations | |||
Overseeing aircraft servicing activities, including check-in, boarding and baggage handling | Joint activity | Network wide | Airports, events, marketing agencies, partners |
Operating flights or leasing out flight | Joint activity | AOC locations | Customers, employees, partners, employees in the value chain, flight operators |
Supporting activities | |||
Promoting Wizz Air's services through a variety of channels, including advertising campaigns and sponsorships | Joint activity | Destination wide | Airports, marketing agencies, partners, event organisers |
Addressing customer feedback and concerns, including rebooking flights and issuing refunds | Joint activity | Centralised | Customers, own employees, partners, employees in the value chain |
Activities | Value chain | Estimated location | Key stakeholders |
Inbound logistics | |||
Strategising the sales of food and beverages, services and other merchandise for flights | Joint activity | Destination wide | Customers, employees, partners/suppliers |
Coordinating the procurement of food, beverages and merchandise for onboard sales | Upstream and downstream value chain activities | Destination wide | Airports, ground service providers, workers in the value chain, suppliers |
Managing ground logistics for food, beverages and merchandise | Upstream and downstream value chain activities | Destination wide | Airports, ground service providers, suppliers, workers in the value chain |
Operations | |||
Facilitating onboard sales of merchandise and services | Joint activity | Destination wide | Customers, own employees |
Supporting activities | |||
Overseeing waste management from onboard sales and services | Upstream and downstream value chain activities | Destination wide | Airports, ground service providers, workers in the value chain |
Addressing and resolving customer complaints (e.g. rebooking flights, issuing refunds, etc.) | Joint activity | Centralised | Customers, own employees, partners, workers in the value chain |
Activities | Value chain | Estimated location | Key stakeholders |
Inbound logistics | |||
Establishment of partnership and procurement of services | Joint activity | AOC locations | Partners, customers |
Operations | |||
Sales of partner services | Own activity | Destination wide | Customers, partners |
Supporting activities | |||
Collecting and handling customer complaints (e.g. issuing refunds, etc.) | Joint activity | Centralised | Customers, own employees, partners, workers in the value chain |
Stakeholder | Why they matter to us |
Our customers | Our customers are the foundation of our success. We strive to meet their needs whilst keeping our cost structure competitive. |
Our investors | Our investors’ support is key to sustaining our business model and our strategy. Their backing allows us to support our customers through investing in the growth of our business whilst delivering leading shareholder returns. |
Sustainability and Culture Committee of the Board of Directors | The Sustainability and Culture Committee of the Board of Directors at Wizz Air is crucial to overseeing the strategic direction and governance of sustainability. Their priorities include integrating environmental considerations into the Company’s strategy to drive long-term sustainability and ensuring regulatory compliance. By providing strategic guidance, the Committee ensures our operations align with stakeholder expectations and industry standards, contributing to the airline's success and resilience. |
Our people | Above all, Wizz Air is made up of the many loyal employees we have. They are the face of the Company towards our customers. We strive to have highly engaged people as this leads to a more efficient and customer-centric service offered. |
Our partners | Wizz Air is a focused operation, and we partner with many companies to deliver a “lowest-cost-done-right” service. Wizz Air values the agility of partners even in the most difficult times, and rewards them with security and growth prospects. |
Our communities | Wizz Air brings prosperity and happiness to the communities we serve. We integrate communities into economies and connects people with opportunities. |
Regulators and policymakers | Wizz Air supports commitments for more sustainable aviation, advocating for a fair and equitable approach across all geographies, while developing the necessary ecosystems and incentivising a green transition that serves the best interests of our communities. |
Wizz Air’s Sustainability Team | The Sustainability Team at Wizz Air is the driving force behind embedding sustainable practices across the organisation’s operations and culture. |
Operative Management / ESG representatives of operational areas / departments | Our teams integrate sustainable practices into daily operations to ensure long-term viability. By engaging with stakeholders, including employees, customers and communities, we build trust and support for our sustainability goals. |
ESRS standard and topic | Materiality assessment | Impact on people or environment | Current and anticipated effects | Response and evaluation time perspective | Current and anticipated financial effects |
E1 - Climate change | |||||
ESRS E1 – CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION The material impact is concentrated in our own operations and our upstream value chain | Impact materiality high Time horizon: Short | The impact is negative, actual. Greenhouse gas emissions generated by air transport activities are contributors to climate change, which is associated with rising global temperatures, shifts in weather patterns, and sea level increases Our climate strategy includes challenging objectives and ambitious targets to address climate risks across our operations. | Wizz Air are dedicated to mitigating climate change impacts through a comprehensive strategy that includes renewing our aircraft fleet, continuously improving operational efficiency, and investing in sustainable aviation fuels. Furthermore, we actively collaborate with industry partners to ensure emissions reductions across our supply chain and broader operations.. The strategy is described in more detail in the ESRS E1 – Climate Change chapter. | Sustainability is integrated into Wizz Air’s core strategy. Wizz Air has implemented measures and set targets to reduce GHG emissions by investing in sustainable and alternative fuels, renewing its fleet, and enhancing fuel efficiency initiatives. | Currently, there are limited significant financial costs related to climate change mitigation. However, in the near future, we anticipate increased operational costs due to emission reduction regulations. Operating in the EU, UK and UAE adds compliance complexity. Additional costs will come from the UK and EU ETS, higher carbon prices, and new fossil fuel taxes. The financial impact could be higher with parallel carbon taxes, leading to double taxation. Increased SAF blending volumes will also raise operational costs. |
ESRS E1 – CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION The material impact is concentrated in our upstream value chain | Impact materiality high Time horizon: Short | The impact is negative, actual. Emissions generated in the upstream such as those caused by the manufacture of kerosene also contribute to climate change. | Wizz Air is investing in sustainable aviation fuel research and development companies, holding MOUs with several providers while fully complying with current regulations and mandates, such as ReFuelEU Aviation. | Sustainability is integrated into Wizz Air’s core strategy. Wizz Air has implemented measures and set targets to reduce GHG emissions by investing in sustainable and alternative fuels, renewing its fleet, and enhancing fuel efficiency initiatives. | Currently, there are limited significant financial costs related to climate change mitigation. However, in the near future, we anticipate increased operational costs due to emission reduction regulations, higher carbon prices, new fossil fuel taxes, and the rising volumes of SAF blending. |
ESRS standard and topic | Materiality assessment | Impact on people or environment | Current and anticipated effects | Response and evaluation time perspective | Current and anticipated financial effects |
S1 - Own workforce | |||||
ESRS S1 - SECURE EMPLOYMENT The material impact is concentrated in our own operations and our downstream value chain. | Impact materiality high Time horizon: Short | The impact is positive, actual. Wizz Air is committed to providing secure employment through comprehensive, indefinite-term contracts and enhanced employee support programmes. Our operations create direct and indirect job opportunities, from pilots and cabin crew to ground staff and maintenance personnel, contributing to job growth in the countries where we operate. | At Wizz Air, we are committed to retaining competencies to conduct business in the most effective and efficient way. There is no anticipated effect on our strategy, business model, value chain, or decision-making process. | No change planned. | No significant financial impact. |
ESRS S1 - WORKING TIME The material impact is concentrated in our own operations | Impact materiality high Time horizon:Short | The impact is positive, actual. The aviation industry is one of the most regulated sectors. Working- time regulations in the aviation industry, especially at Wizz Air, contribute positively to society by ensuring safer and healthier working conditions for employees. These regulations help maintain well-rested and alert staff, which enhances overall flight safety and service quality for passengers, promoting public confidence in air travel. | Due to the highest compliance of working-time regulations, it does not affect the strategy, business model, value chain and decision-making process. | No change planned. | No significant financial impact. |
ESRS S1 - HEALTH AND SAFETY (OWN WORKFORCE) The material impact is concentrated in our own operations | Impact materiality high Time horizon: Short | The impact is positive, and actual. Safety is the first priority in our work and the key to a successful business. Protecting employees from safety hazards and unhealthy and unsafe working conditions is our overarching goal. The Company operates a Safety Management System, where employees can report safety issues and concerns to maintain safe operations. | Compliance with H&S regulations and the Company's commitment do not affect the strategy, business model, value chain and decision-making process. | No change planned. | No significant financial impact. |
ESRS S1 TRAINING AND SKILLS DEVELOPMENT (OWN WORKFORCE) The material impact is concentrated in our own operations | Impact materiality high Financially material Time horizon: Medium | The impact is positive, and actual. At Wizz Air we are dedicated to recruiting top talent and providing them with essential tools, offering dynamic development opportunities through a specially tailored programme for all levels within the organisation. | It does not affect the strategy, business model, value chain and decision-making process. | No change planned. | The risk and anticipated financial impact may arise from a lack of skilled workforce for hire, affecting service quality. Additionally, losing talented and well- qualified employees poses a risk and has cost implications. Wizz Air maintains a high standard of quality and expertise for its employees, but a high turnover rate leads to increased costs. |
ESRS S1 – DIVERSITY The material impact is concentrated in our own operations | Impact materiality high Time horizon: Short | The impact is positive, and actual. Wizz Air's approach to diversity and inclusion aligns with its mission to democratise air travel. The airline expects its workforce to follow its diversity and inclusion principles and actively supports underrepresented groups, striving to increase their access to opportunities. | It does not affect the strategy, business model, value chain and decision-making process. | No change planned. | No significant financial impact. |
S2 - Workers in the value chain | |||||
ESRS S2 - SECURE EMPLOYMENT | Financially material Time horizon: Medium | Wizz Air only partners with suppliers who share our values and are expected to comply with our Supplier Code of Conduct. Wizz Air requires its partners to comply with ethical business practices, social and labour standards, and legal compliance. | It does not affect the strategy, business model, value chain and decision-making process. Wizz Air ensures that suppliers have accepted the Code of Conduct and conducts detailed reviews of suppliers categorised as priority (critical) or those with high-value contracts. | No change planned. | Although Wizz Air only partners with suppliers who share our values and are expected to comply with our Supplier Code of Conduct, risks can still arise on the supplier side, such as improper treatment of workers or non-compliance with laws. Even with an immediate contract termination, these issues may slightly affect Wizz Air's market activity, potentially leading to a bad reputation, reduced market demand, and financial consequences. |
ESRS S2 - SOCIAL DIALOGUE WITH PARTNERS IN THE VALUE CHAIN The material impact is concentrated in our downstream value chain | Impact materiality high Time horizon: Medium | The impact is positive, and actual. Wizz Air's commitment to strict ethical conduct and labour standards for its suppliers has a tangible and positive impact. By holding all providers to these high expectations, the Company fosters adherence to ethical practices, thereby contributing positively to society. | It does not affect the strategy, business model, value chain and decision-making process. | No change planned. | No significant financial impact. |
ESRS S2 - ADEQUATE WAGES | Financially material Time horizon: Medium | Wizz Air only partners with suppliers who share our values and are expected to comply with our Supplier Code of Conduct. Wizz Air requires its partners to comply with ethical business practices, social and labour standards, and legal compliance, including those related to working hours and working conditions. | It does not affect the strategy, business model, value chain and decision-making process. | No change planned. | Although Wizz Air only partners with suppliers who share our values and are expected to comply with our Supplier Code of Conduct, risks can still arise on the supplier side, such as improper treatment of workers or non-compliance with laws. Even with an immediate contract termination, these issues may slightly affect Wizz Air's market activity, potentially leading to a bad reputation, reduced market demand, and financial consequences. |
ESRS S2 - HEALTH AND SAFETY (VALUE CHAIN WORKERS) The material impact is concentrated in our upstream and downstream value chain | Impact materiality high Time horizon: Short | The impact is positive, and actual. Wizz Air's commitment to strict ethical conduct and labour standards for its suppliers has a tangible and positive impact. By holding all providers to these high expectations, the Company fosters adherence to ethical practices, thereby contributing positively to society. | It does not affect the strategy, business model, value chain and decision-making process. | No change planned. | No significant financial impact. |
S4 - Consumers and end-users | |||||
ESRS S4 - FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION (COMPLAINTS MANAGEMENT) The material impact is concentrated in our own operations | Impact materiality high Time horizon: Short | The impact is positive, and actual. Wizz Air implements consumer-focused complaints management, providing a platform for consumers to raise issues and work on solutions. | It does not affect the strategy, business model, value chain and decision-making process. | No change planned. | No significant financial impact. |
ESRS S4 - HEALTH AND SAFETY OF PASSENGERS The material impact is concentrated in our own operations | Impact materiality high Financially material Time horizon: Short | The impact is positive, and actual. Our employees' personal commitment ensures the highest level of safety for our customers. We comply with all laws, regulations and industry best practices, including IATA Standards and Recommended Practices (ISARPs), and continuously evaluate our systems and processes. | Wizz Air has put in place a comprehensive Safety Management System to manage the risks associated with its operations and activities. It does not affect the strategy, business model, value chain and decision-making process. | No change planned. | A financial risk may arise from failing to comply with applicable laws, regulations or standards, potentially resulting in harm to consumers, material loss, penalties and reputational damage. |
ESRS S4 - SECURITY OF PASSENGERS The material impact is concentrated in our own operations | Impact materiality high Financially material Time horizon: Short | The impact is positive, and actual. Adhering to strict policies and making safety a priority organisation-wide, Wizz Air is committed to safe travel and the protection of passengers. | Wizz Air has put in place a comprehensive Safety Management System to manage the risks associated with its operations and activities. It does not affect the strategy, business model, value chain and decision-making process. | No change planned. | Non-compliance with applicable laws, regulations, or standards may lead to consumer harm, significant financial loss, penalties, and damage to reputation. |
ESRS S4 - ACCESS TO PRODUCTS AND SERVICES, AND INFORMATION The material impact is concentrated in our own operations | Impact materiality high Financially material Time horizon: Short | The impact is positive, and actual. Wizz Air is committed to making travel more affordable for everyone. The highly efficient operational framework allows us to provide affordable, safe and reliable air travel to more and more people every day. | By providing air travel at an affordable price, Wizz Air connects people from diverse backgrounds. It does not affect the strategy, business model, value chain and decision-making process. | No change planned. | A financial risk associated with providing clear and reliable information is the potential cost of compliance and maintaining up-to-date, accurate data. |
ESRS S4 – RESPONSIBLE MARKETING | Financially material Time horizon: Medium | Wizz Air prioritises ethical marketing by providing accurate and timely information on its website. This commitment helps avoid legal issues, compensation claims, and reputational damage, which could lead to lost revenue and higher customer acquisition costs. The Company ensures all claims and product information are truthful and not misleading. | Not applicable. | No change planned. | Miscommunication and greenwashing can lead to reputational and financial losses. Wizz Air has already introduced sustainability practices, while guidelines and policies related to marketing and communications have been established. |
ESRS S4 – DATA PRIVACY | Financially material Time horizon:Short | Wizz Air prioritises cybersecurity and data privacy, ensuring strict regulatory compliance and adherence to internal policies. To maintain the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of sensitive information, and to mitigate risks, the airline has implemented a comprehensive cybersecurity and data protection framework. For more detailed information please | Not applicable. | No change planned. | An accidental data breach or leak can lead to reputational and legal repercussions, potentially resulting in revenue loss and penalties. Therefore, it is considered a financial risk and is assessed not only from a risk management perspective but also within the framework of Wizz Air's specific governance, cybersecurity, and data protection policies. |
ESRS standard and topic | Materiality assessment | Impact on people or environment | Current and anticipated effects | Response and evaluation time perspective | Current and anticipated financial effects |
G1 - Business conduct | |||||
ESRS G1 - BUSINESS ETHICS AND COMPLIANCE The material impact is concentrated in our own operations | Impact materiality high Financially material Time horizon: Short | The impact is positive, and actual. Wizz Air’s Board of Directors and the entire workforce are expected to act with integrity and in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations at all times. The ethics and integrity of Wizz Air have a far-reaching and positive impact on society by fostering trust, promoting responsible practices, addressing social and environmental challenges, and contributing to economic growth and development. | As the Company prioritises ethics and integrity, there is no effect on the strategy, business model, value chain and decision- making process. | No change planned. | A lack of ethics, integrity, and independence can increase the likelihood of financial risks arising from misconduct, legal issues, and damaged relationships with stakeholders. However, due to Wizz Air’s robust internal risk management, compliance processes, and quality assurance measures, the likelihood of such financial costs occurring is very low. |
ESRS G1 - BUSINESS ETHICS AND COMPLIANCE The material impact is concentrated in our downstream value chain | Impact materiality high Time horizon: Medium | The impact is positive, and potential. Wizz Air is committed to doing business with suppliers and partners who supply products and/or services to Wizz Air and who share Wizz Air’s values and commitments. | By partnering with suppliers who align with the Company's ethics and values, we ensure that the suppliers downstream act ethically and make a positive impact on our customers, and on their own workforce and partners. Therefore, there is no effect on the strategy, business model, value chain and decision- making process. | No change planned. | No significant financial impact. |
ESRS G1 - CORPORATE CULTURE The material impact is concentrated in our own operations | Impact materiality high Financially material Time horizon: Short | The impact is positive, and actual. By maintaining a respectful, inclusive, equitable and unbiased corporate culture, Wizz Air positively impacts its stakeholders by fostering a supportive and ethical environment for all. | It does not affect the strategy, business model, value chain and decision- making process. | No change planned. | No significant financial impact. |
ESRS G1 - PROTECTION OF WHISTLEBLOWERS The material impact is concentrated in our own operations | Impact materiality high Time horizon: Short | The impact is positive, and actual. Wizz Air ensures that an effective reporting line is in place to uphold the integrity of our business. This encourages ethical behaviour and accountability, ensuring that any misconduct is reported and addressed promptly. | It does not affect the strategy, business model, value chain and decision-making process. | No change planned. | No significant financial impact. |
ESRS G1 - POLITICAL ENGAGEMENT The material impact is concentrated in our own operations | Impact materiality high Time horizon: Medium | The impact is positive, and actual. Wizz Air is politically neutral and regularly engages in the public policymaking process and expresses its views on policies, laws and regulations that govern various aspects of its business in the EU and internationally. | By ensuring that our political engagement is transparent and ethical there is no effect on the strategy, business model, value chain and decision- making process. | No change planned. | No significant financial impact. |
ESRS G1 - MANAGEMENT OF RELATIONSHIPS WITH SUPPLIERS The material impact is concentrated in our own operations | Impact materiality high Financially material Time horizon: Medium | The impact is positive, and actual. Wizz Air is committed to doing business with suppliers and partners who supply products and/or services to Wizz Air and who share Wizz Air’s values and commitments. | By partnering with suppliers who align with the Company's ethics and values, we ensure that the suppliers downstream act ethically and make a positive impact on our customers, their own workforce, and partners. Therefore, there is no effect on the strategy, business model, value chain and decision-making process. | No change planned. | Although Wizz Air is committed to partnering only with suppliers who share our commitments to environmental sustainability, commercial sustainability, ethical business practices and data protection, and are expected to comply with our Supplier Code of Conduct, risks can still arise. If a supplier inadvertently or misleadingly fails to comply with our regulations, it can pose financial risks. |
ESRS G1 - PREVENTION AND DETECTION OF CORRUPTION AND BRIBERY The material impact is concentrated in our own operations | Impact materiality high Time horizon: Short | The impact is positive, and actual. The Anti-Corruption Policy sets out the principles, prohibitions and practical guidelines relating to bribery and corrupt practices. This ensures that Wizz Air preserves the integrity of its business, and complies with relevant anti-bribery and corruption regulations in all the countries where it operates. | It does not affect the strategy, business model, value chain and decision-making process. | No change planned. | No significant financial impact. |
ESRS G1 - PREVENTION AND DETECTION OF CORRUPTION AND BRIBERY The material impact is concentrated in our upstream value chain | Impact materiality high Time horizon: short | The impact is positive, and actual. Wizz Air’s suppliers are required to conduct their business activities in full compliance with all competition and fair-trading laws, including Wizz Air’s Anti-Corruption Policy. | It does not affect the strategy, business model, value chain and decision-making. | No change planned. | No significant financial impact. |
ESRS G1 - INCIDENTS OF CORRUPTION AND BRIBERY The material impact is concentrated in our own operations | Impact materiality high Time horizon: Short | The impact is negative, and potential. Wizz Air’s Anti-Corruption Policy prohibits corrupt or improper practices or bribery. It applies to interactions between Wizz Air personnel and third parties. The policy aims to prevent improper inducements or rewards related to relevant functions. Anti-corruption education and training are provided to Wizz Air personnel and third parties involved in business operations. | It does not affect the strategy, business model, value chain and decision-making. | No change planned. | No significant financial impact. |
ESRS G1 - MANAGEMENT OF THE GOVERNING BODY | Financially material Time horizon: Medium | Wizz Air’s Board of Directors and workforce are expected to act with integrity and comply with all laws and regulations. While a lack of ethics and integrity can lead to financial risks from misconduct and legal issues, our internal risk and compliance processes minimise this likelihood. Effective management of the governing bodies impacts corporate culture and investor confidence. Investors consider executive remuneration, board diversity and state involvement in decision-making as key factors in assessing financial risks. | It does not affect the strategy, business model, value chain and decision-making. | No change planned. | Wizz Air is not party to any third-party collective bargaining agreements which some investors may perceive as a potential risk. Wizz Air’s approach to employee engagement is one of innovative direct dialogue, which is the most effective way to safeguard and promote: (i) the right to freedom of expression; (ii) the right to obtain or impart information necessary to make an informed choice on matters relevant to the workplace; and (iii) the right to protection against interference with privacy, family, home, correspondence or reputation. Our approach is based on cooperation by relying on face-to-face interaction and communication through innovative technologies. Our approach offers a modern alternative to outdated third-party practices. We rely on our People Council for management-employee discussions and have an independent Board member overseeing employee engagement. Feedback is regularly shared with the Board and translated into actions on remuneration and work-life balance. Additionally, our executive management, including the CEO, conducts regular floor talks and base visits for open and transparent discussions with all employees. |
ESRS G ENTITY- SPECIFIC - CYBERSECURITY AND DATA PROTECTION (OPERATIONAL RESILIENCE) The material impact is concentrated in our own operations | Impact materiality high Financially material Time horizon: Short | The impact is positive, and actual. Cybersecurity, data protection and overall security are crucial aspects of Wizz Air's operations and are areas that the Board of Directors monitors closely and regularly. | Wizz Air complies with EU standards such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) as well as with relevant international and national regulations and guidelines. Responsible and ethical conduct, along with advancements in data protection, ensures that the personal data of Wizz Air employees and customers is managed securely. | No change planned. | Risks and financial implications may arise from accidental data breaches or leaks, which can have reputational and legal consequences, potentially leading to revenue loss and penalties. These financial risks are assessed not only from a risk perspective but also in Wizz Air's ESRS S4 framework concerning consumers, end-users and privacy data. |
ESRS G ENTITY- SPECIFIC - COMMUNITY PROGRAMMES AND CHARITABLE SUPPORT The material impact is concentrated in our own operations | Impact materiality high Time horizon: Short | The impact is positive and actual. Through the WIZZ Foundation, Wizz Air supports many community programmes. | The Company provides support during crises. | No change planned. | No significant financial impact. |
Horizon | Definition |
Short | 0–1 years |
Medium | 1–5 years |
Long | 5–10 years |
Scenario | Physical risks | Transition risks |
Low-emissions scenario | SSP1-1.9-SSP1-2.6 (~1.5–2°C) | IEA Net Zero Emissions by 2050 (NZE) |
High-emissions scenario | SSP3-7-SSP5.85 (~3–4°C) | IEA Stated Policies Scenario (STEPS) |
Risk type and estimated significance | Risk description | Financial impacts | Mitigation measures | |
More extreme heatwaves (acute) | Extreme heat can impact aircraft performance and flight operations because it can reduce efficiency and limit engine lifecycle, and may result in rescheduling departures for heavier aircraft or reduce the weight of the aircraft. As a result of heatwaves, airports can also decrease runway capacity due to the less dense warm air that is able to damage runway surfaces or taxiways. | Disruption of regular revenue streams and increased operating costs. | Ongoing climate-scenario analysis, aligned with the TCFD framework, allows the Company to evaluate risks and implement mitigation strategies in collaboration with the Operational and Commercial teams. Advancements in forecasting technologies, which track historical disruption causes and locations better, will enhance our operational planning in response to evolving weather patterns. Key mitigation measures are also implemented by Wizz Air’s airport operator partners, supported in Europe by the guidance of the European Plan for Aviation Safety. | |
Increase in the frequency and magnitude of wildfires | In the future, wildfires may increasingly impact travel decisions, leading to more frequent cancellations and revenue losses. Attractive summer holiday destinations could be affected by these fires, particularly in Southern Europe. Additionally, wildfire smoke can disrupt operations due to reduced visibility caused by particulate matter, potentially resulting in flight delays or cancellations. | Potential revenue loss and higher operating costs due to disruptions that cannot be prevented, avoided or planned for. | Ensuring operational readiness by following established procedures and policies for managing disruptions, including wildfires. Additionally, advancements in forecasting technologies, which track historical disruption causes and locations better, will enhance our operational planning in response to wildfire events. For wildfire risk, mitigation measures of airport operators are essential; in Europe this is supported by the guidance of the European Plan for Aviation Safety. |
Increase in frequency of more intensive storms | Severe storms have the potential to disrupt airspace and airport operations, as well as cause damage to infrastructure. Additionally, they may lead to increased fuel consumption. Northern, North Western and Central Europe are likely to see a rise in severe storms. Meanwhile, in the Mediterranean, cyclone frequency may decrease, but their intensity could increase. | Lost revenue and increased operating and fuel costs. | Continuous forecasting and risk assessment by Operational and Commercial teams to ensure operational preparedness for intense storms and related asset and infrastructure damage. Key mitigation measures are also implemented by Wizz Air’s airport operator partners, and in Europe this is supported by the guidance of the European Plan for Aviation. | |
Acute flooding | Heavy rainfall and pluvial flooding could occur across all regions. Flooding has the potential to harm airport infrastructure and runways, leading to reduced capacity, flight delays, cancellations and financial losses. Additionally, intense precipitation and flash floods may become more frequent at global warming levels exceeding 1.5°C, except in the Mediterranean. These weather events could disrupt ground operations and cause damage to airport facilities, resulting in flight disruptions. | Lost revenue and increased operating costs. | Ensuring operational readiness by following established procedures and policies for managing disruptions, including flooding. Continuous forecasting and risk assessment by Operational and Commercial teams for flooding and related disruptions. Airports’ adaptation plans are key for flood-risk mitigation, this is supported in Europe by the guidance of the European Plan for Aviation. | |
Change in weather patterns (general) | Significant changes in weather phenomena (frequency and intensity) are likely in the long term (e.g. by 2050 and beyond); however, we expect no critical change within the next ten years. | Potential revenue loss and higher operating costs due to disruptions that cannot be prevented, avoided or planned for. | Ongoing climate-scenario analysis aligned with the TCFD framework allows the Company to evaluate risks and implement mitigation strategies in collaboration with the Operational and Commercial teams. Additionally, advancements in forecasting technologies, which track historical disruption causes and locations better, will enhance our operational planning in response to evolving weather patterns. | |
Chronic change in temperature and sea levels | Rising sea levels pose a threat to low-lying and coastal regions in the long term (e.g. by 2050 and beyond), as well as islands, especially at a higher global warming level. Airports in such areas could be affected by flooding, potentially harming airport infrastructure and runways, leading to reduced capacity, flight delays and network disruptions. The temperature rise could also lead to a shift in destination preferences, besides the operational risks of acute heatwaves. We do not expect these changes to be critical within the next ten years. | Lost revenue and increased operating costs. | Continuous forecasting and risk assessment by Operational and Commercial teams – incorporating airport resilience assessment – to ensure operational preparedness for flooding and related disruptions. Integration of climate-scenario analysis into business planning to consider changing customer demand for routes impacted by the chronic changes in temperature in Wizz Air’s relevant markets. |
Risk type and estimated significance | Risk description | Financial impacts | Mitigation measures |
Emissions reduction regulations | In a 1.5–2°C scenario, Wizz Air may face strict policies across the network to reduce emissions. However, varying national policies without a standardised approach bears the risk of non-compliance due to regulatory complexities. Decarbonisation efforts, including fossil fuel taxation, aim to reduce carbon emissions, but they may increase operational costs. Additionally, differing timelines and reporting requirements as well as the changing regulatory environment pose risks to achieving adequate reductions. | Increased operational costs and possible penalties in the medium and long term, in the event of failure to comply with the complex set of requirements in our operating environment (Wizz Air currently has four airlines: two within the EU, one in the UK and one in a UAE jurisdiction, which results in added complexities in overall compliance). | Maintain strong emphasis on evaluating and ensuring compliance with tax and regulatory requirements related to emissions regulations (this involves cross-functional coordination to guarantee a full review across the organisation). Additionally, we actively engage with government bodies, the European Union, and other essential stakeholders to establish a cohesive approach across different regions. Continuously monitoring the changing regulatory environment is also essential. |
EU ETS – carbon price increase and decrease of free allowances | In a 1.5–2°C scenario, carbon price hikes are likely to occur in the medium and long term. The EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) is projected to surpass existing policy mandates significantly in the long term, after phase IV (ending by 2030). Consequently, operational and upstream expenses will rise sharply due to the elevated carbon prices, resulting in more substantial costs. These price increases are expected due to the gradual elimination of free carbon allowances by the EU, with forecasts indicating that the EU ETS will exceed current policy requirements over the long term. | Additional compliance costs under UK and EU ETS. Operational costs will increase due to higher carbon prices per unit, and the elimination of free allowances. | Maintaining an effective carbon allowance/offset purchasing strategy to mitigate price volatility. Continuously forecasting carbon prices and cost increases to boost resilience, Wizz Air uses internal carbon prices to forecast ETS unit cost, to facilitate better budgetary and risk management decisions. Wizz Air would also rely on the EU’s SAF-related support mechanisms, including free ETS allowances and/or lower annual carbon cost due to the use of SAF. |
Energy taxation – introduction of kerosene tax in the EU | The EU intends to impose a mandatory tax on kerosene of roughly €0.4 per litre, as part of the ongoing revision of the Energy Taxation Directive. The proposal allows Member States to introduce even higher tax rates under specific conditions. Originally planned for 2024, the approval and implementation have faced negotiation deadlock in the EU as of March 2025; however, the approval is expected later on to ensure compliance with the EU’s ambitious climate package, if it wants to maintain alignment with 1.5–2°C climate pathways. | New fossil fuel and related taxes may impact overall taxation costs in the medium and long term. The financial impact would be even higher if the EU and its Member States introduce carbon taxes in parallel, leading to double taxation. | Continuously and accurately assessing changes in tax legislation in Wizz Air’s network is crucial. Advocacy measures to ensure a standardised approach globally, avoiding double taxation of emissions, via carbon pricing and kerosene and carbon taxes, putting additional burden on operators. |
SAF mandates (ReFuelEU regulation) | Regulations requiring the use of SAFs in aviation fuel are already operational in some countries. A new mandate has also been implemented in the EU in 2025 (mandatory SAF blend in departing flights: 2 per cent in 2025, 6 per cent in 2030, and 70 per cent in 2050 as per the ReFuelEU aviation regulation), while similar trends are anticipated in other regions. | Higher operational and upstream costs in the medium term due to the increase in minimum SAF blending volumes in aviation fuel. Non-compliance and continued dependence on fossil fuels could lead to penalties. | Wizz Air took a significant step by investing in SAF companies, firstly Firefly then CleanJoule, and partnering with various SAF suppliers, ensuring a reliable long-term supply chain. Procurement efforts will keep focusing on ensuring compliance with current and future SAF mandates. Resources have also been allocated to advocacy regarding the book and claim mechanism. Although 2024 was mainly a preparatory year for ReFuelEU reporting, Wizz Air remained compliant and submitted the required data as mandated. |
Uncertainties regarding the changing landscape of ESG reporting obligations | Compliance with new ESG-related reporting standards (for example the EU's Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive - CSRD) will require additional administrative capacities at various functions of Wizz Air, and investments in new processes and systems may be needed to satisfy all emerging transparency requirements. As Wizz Air operates in different geographies, the new and changing reporting expectations create parallel reporting obligations. | Ensuring compliance with emerging reporting requirements can increase administrative costs and tie up capacity to otherwise implement strategic and value-adding transitional actions for the climate. Non-compliance with mandatory reporting requirements can result in penalties and reputational damage. | Competent teams at Wizz Air are working with various sustainability and ESG professionals to ensure continued compliance with all relevant transparency requirements. The relevant working group has been established to prepare for upcoming reporting needs. A new software solution has been implemented for an improved ESG supplier risk assessment and management process, while further initiatives are in progress. |
Disruptive aviation innovation | The rate at which low-carbon technologies are embraced influences the competitiveness of airlines, the cost of operations and the value of assets. Investments in capital expenditures (CapEx), research and development (R&D) and innovation need to strike a balance between risk and reward, fostering innovations that are both sustainable and profitable. Talent attraction for the success of innovation is also essential. | Failure to invest in the appropriate technology, or investing in unsuitable technology, can introduce significant risks, potentially leading to increased costs and reduced competitiveness. Additionally, the inability to retain and attract talent may hinder the successful implementation of new technologies. | Wizz Air signed a Memorandum of Understanding with Airbus in 2022 to explore the potential for hydrogen-powered aircraft operations. We have also joined the EU's Alliance for Zero Emission Aviation (AZEA) to pave the way for next-generation sustainable aircraft. Based on the current understanding, zero-emission aircraft large enough to fit our business model (above 200 seats) are not feasible in the near future. While we are waiting for technical improvements, we continue to look into opportunities to accelerate the ramp-up of the European SAF market – as the most efficient short-term tool for the decarbonisation of the aviation sector. |
Growing green investor sentiment | In the long term, investors may begin to withdraw from carbon- intensive sectors. | Such disinvestment is likely to result in higher capital costs for Wizz Air. | A robust environmental strategy including fleet renewal with the best available technology, and fuel efficiency initiatives. SAF strategy execution (including investments in R&D) to ensure a steady supply of alternative fuels, helping to achieve our targets. Wizz Air is committed to continued transparency regarding the transition planning. |
Opportunity | Analysis |
EU ETS – phasing out free allowances – competitive advantage: | Although the phasing out of free carbon allowances poses a risk, it also offers a competitive advantage in the short and medium term. Wizz Air’s total free allowances, relative to its emissions, have been significantly lower than most of its peers in the sector. This grants Wizz Air additional resilience, as the resulting cost increase will be much smaller compared to many airline competitors that currently benefit from higher volumes of free allowances. |
Sustainable Aviation Fuel investments: | Wizz Air invests strategically in research and development (R&D) projects to secure its own sources of SAF. These investments ensure a reliable supply chain in the longer term, allowing us to meet future blending mandates effectively. As an example, Firefly (the Company’s first equity investment) has pioneered an integrated technology pathway for SAF production using sewage sludge as a feedstock – which is a sustainable and highly abundant source. This proactive approach to SAF investments ensures a sustainable and resilient fuel supply due to the higher SAF volumes provided by one producer, at a preferential price. This would ensure cost-efficient SAF access, lower than market price, mitigating the cost increase resulting from the SAF mandates and opening up opportunities for additional SAF purchases and uplift if higher volumes are available after the production ramp-up. |
Sustainability- conscious customers: | Wizz Air currently strives (and will continue in the future) towards maintaining the lowest reported emissions intensity per passenger kilometre, compared to other major airlines in its network. Additionally, while there are still misconceptions about the ultra-low-cost, low-fare business model, with the growing transparency on emissions per passenger and per flight, climate change awareness is projected to shift consumer sentiment to favour ULCC more than traditional airlines. In terms of a low-carbon strategy, flying more efficient aircraft and maximising the passenger numbers in the cabin are crucial, and the preferences of climate-focused consumers (who cannot avoid flying) will shift towards more fuel-efficient flights and airlines. Consequently, this change could impact traditional airlines negatively, while carriers already efficient would benefit from it. |
Industry collaboration opportunities in various geographies: | Wizz Air, operating across diverse geographies, faces varying legal jurisdictions and climate-related demands. Within the EU, UK, UAE (where the four Wizz Air airlines are headquartered) and other third countries, the airline encounters a range of approaches towards achieving net zero emissions and the related decarbonisation strategies. This exposure allows Wizz Air to learn from diverse technological innovations and national strategies, leveraging them to its advantage. |
Enhanced ESG supplier risk assessment and management processes: | As a result of new climate-related transparency requirements, Wizz Air is already working on improving its third-party risk assessment and management approach, with a special focus on ESG topics, including environmental and climate-related programmes of its business partners and vendors. Through the enhanced process, the Company will be able to receive more detailed information on its main suppliers’ environment and climate- related initiatives, which will provide opportunities for better cooperation in the future. The focused risk assessment will also help the Company identify potential climate and environmental risks during the tender phase with prospective service providers. |
Regulatory and capital market incentives – competitive advantage: | Wizz Air’s leading role in the decarbonisation of the aviation industry makes it more resilient to climate regulation risks than its competitors, and strengthens its capital market position among green/transition investors. Wizz Air’s favourable risk profile among airlines as regards climate risks and associated financial risks enhances its standing among traditional investors as well. |
ESRS disclosure requirement | Material topic | Related policies |
E1 - Climate Change | Climate change mitigation | ESG Policy |
Environmental Policy | ||
Sustainable Procurement Policy |
PRIORITY PROGRAMME | GOALS AND KEY LEVERS | |
1. 1. FOCUS ON CARBON INTENSITY (CO2/RPK) REDUCTION RESOURCE EFFICIENCY | Our most important environmental commitment is to reduce the emissions intensity generated by flight operations gradually and radically through: ▶ 1.a fleet renewal; and ▶ 1.b fuel efficiency. | |
2. SUSTAINABLE AVIATION FUELS | ▶ Qualify a SAF supply chain. ▶ Invest strategically in SAF R&D. ▶ Partnerships and calls to action. | |
3. INDUSTRY COLLABORATION | ▶ Qualify future technology building blocks and industry partnerships for innovation and cooperation, to enable decarbonisation. |
Airline | Wizz Air | Ryanair | EasyJet | AF-KLM | IAG | LH | SAS |
Average fleet age | 4.7 | 10.0 | 10.2 | 12.1 | 12.4 | 14 | 7.9 |
Initiative | Efficiency gain | Total fuel saving | Total carbon saving |
Sharklets | 0.80% | 14,540 tonnes | 46,258 tonnes |
Lighter Seats | 0.50% | 8,650 tonnes | 27,519 tonnes |
Reduced take-off flap configuration | 0.20% | 3,630 tonnes | 11,549 tonnes |
Fuel Efficiency Pilot App | 0.20% | 3,480 tonnes | 11,071 tonnes |
Calculated Reserve Fuel | 0.20% | 3,140 tonnes | 9,990 tonnes |
Fuel Efficiency Platform | 0.20% | 3,090 tonnes | 9,831 tonnes |
Idle reverse thrust | 0.10% | 1,700 tonnes | 5,408 tonnes |
Electronic Flight Bag (EFB) | 0.10% | 1,240 tonnes | 3,945 tonnes |
Contingency Fuel | 0.10% | 1,110 tonnes | 3,531 tonnes |
Performance/idle factors | 0.10% | 1,080 tonnes | 3,436 tonnes |
Zero Fuel Weight Optimisation | 0.10% | 1,080 tonnes | 3,436 tonnes |
Statistical Taxi Fuel | 0.10% | 1,070 tonnes | 3,404 tonnes |
Single engine taxi-in | 0.00% | 770 tonnes | 2,450 tonnes |
CONF 3 landing | 0.00% | 700 tonnes | 2,227 tonnes |
Lighter Aircraft Brakes | 0.00% | 260 tonnes | 827 tonnes |
Environment | Commitments | On target | Current status |
Reduce CO2/RPK (carbon emitted per passenger kilometre) from flight operations by 25 per cent until 2030 (F20 base year). | Industry-leading results (as per CAPA award), though the F25 annual sub-target has not been achieved due to external factors. More | ||
Qualify a sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) supply chain from 2025. | On target. Two equity investments in sustainable aviation fuel research, partnerships with SAF suppliers and aspiration to fuel flights with 10 per cent SAF blend by 2030. Details on | ||
Drive noise reduction by ensuring all our fleet is compliant with the applicable Chapter 14 noise-emission standards by 2028. | |||
Qualify future technology building blocks and industry partnerships to enable decarbonisation by 2050. | Ongoing, with the Board of Directors leading and the Sustainability Council stakeholders projects. |
F20 | F21 | F22 | F23 | F24 | F25 | |
CO2 per RPK (in grams) | 57.2 | 77.3 | 60.7 | 53.8 | 52 | 52.2 |
Energy consumption and mix | Unit | F25 |
(1) Fuel consumption from coal and coal products | MWh | 0 |
(2) Fuel consumption from crude oil and petroleum products | MWh | 22,359,983 |
(3) Fuel consumption from natural gas | MWh | 0 |
(4) Fuel consumption from other fossil sources | MWh | 0 |
(5) Consumption of purchased or acquired electricity, heat, steam, and cooling from fossil sources | MWh | 1,001 |
(6) Total fossil energy consumption (calculated as the sum of lines 1 to 5) | MWh | 22,360,984 |
Share of fossil sources in total energy consumption | % | 100 |
(7) Consumption from nuclear sources | MWh | 657 |
Share of consumption from nuclear sources in total energy consumption | % | 0 |
(8) Fuel consumption for renewable sources, including biomass (also comprising industrial and municipal waste of biologic origin, biogas, renewable hydrogen, etc.) | MWh | 0 |
(9) Consumption of purchased or acquired electricity, heat, steam, and cooling from renewable sources | MWh | 164 |
(10) The consumption of self-generated non-fuel renewable energy | MWh | 0 |
(11) Total renewable energy consumption (calculated as the sum of lines 8 to 10) | MWh | 164 |
Share of renewable sources in total energy consumption | % | 0 |
Total energy consumption (calculated as the sum of points 6,7 and 11) | MWh | 22,361,805 |
Energy production | ||
Non-renewable energy production | (MWh) | 22,359,983 |
Renewable energy production | (MWh) | 0 |
High climate impact sector disclosures | ||
Energy intensity from activities in high climate impact sectors | MWh/€ | 0 |
Total energy consumption from activities in high climate impact sectors | MWh | 22,361,805 |
High climate impact sectors used to determine energy intensity | - | Transportation and Storage |
Energy intensity per net revenue | Unit | F25 |
Disclosure of reconciliation to relevant line item or notes in financial statements of net revenue from activities in high climate impact sectors | - | Annual report / main chapter Financial Review / sub-chapter Financial performance |
Net revenue from activities in high climate impact sectors | €M | 5,267.6 |
Net revenue from activities other than in high climate impact sectors | €M | 0 |
Total net revenue (Financial statements) | €M | 5,267.6 |
Area | Unit | F25 | F24 |
CO2/RPK | g/RPK | 52.2 | 52.0 |
Scope 1 GHG emissions | |||
CO2e gross Scope 1 | tCO₂eq | 5,834,826 | 5,771,643 |
CO2 Scope 1 | tCO₂eq | 5,782,148 | 5,719,535 |
CH4 Scope 1 | tCO₂eq | 4,030 | 3,986 |
N2O Scope 1 | tCO₂eq | 48,649 | 48,122 |
Scope 2 GHG emissions | |||
Gross location-based Scope 2 greenhouse gas emissions | tCO₂eq | 376 | 1,093 |
Gross market-based Scope 2 greenhouse gas emissions | tCO₂eq | 490 | 1,680 |
Scope 3 GHG emissions | |||
Total Gross indirect (Scope 3) GHG emissions | tCO₂eq | 2,126,990 | 1,773,193 |
Percentage of Gross Scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions | % | 17.71 | 15 |
3.1 Purchased goods and services | tCO₂eq | 549,108 | 121,085 |
3.2 Capital goods | tCO₂eq | 313,378 | 372,984 |
3.3 Fuel and energy-related activities (not included in Scope 1 or Scope 2) | tCO₂eq | 1,215,126 | 1,202,267 |
3.4 Upstream transportation and distribution | tCO₂eq | 18,991 | 38,800 |
3.5 Waste generated in operations | tCO₂eq | 7,793 | 7,772 |
3.6 Business travel | tCO₂eq | 6,741 | 3,585 |
3.7 Employee commuting | tCO₂eq | 9,263 | 17,805 |
3.8 Upstream leased assets | tCO₂eq | 1,506 | n/a |
3.9 Downstream transportation | tCO₂eq | n/a | n/a |
3.10 Processing of sold products | tCO₂eq | n/a | n/a |
3.11 Use of sold products | tCO₂eq | 26 | 19 |
3.12 End-of-life treatment of sold products | tCO₂eq | 252 | 258 |
3.13 Downstream leased assets | tCO₂eq | n/a | n/a |
3.14 Franchises | tCO₂eq | n/a | n/a |
3.15 Investments | tCO₂eq | 4,807 | 8,618 |
Total GHG emissions | |||
Total GHG emissions (location-based) | tCO₂eq | 7,962,194 | n/a |
Total GHG emissions (market-based) | tCO₂eq | 7,962,308 | 7,546,516 |
Area | Unit | F25 |
Percentage of Scope 1 GHG emissions from regulated emission trading schemes (EU/UK ETS) | % | 41 |
Percentage of Scope 1 GHG emissions from regulated emission trading schemes (CORSIA) | % | 37 |
Area | Unit | F25 |
Biogenic emissions of CO2 from the combustion or bio-degradation of biomass not included in Scope 1 GHG emissions | tCO₂eq | 0 |
Biogenic emissions of CO2 from combustion or bio-degradation of biomass not included in Scope 2 GHG emissions | tCO₂eq | 49 |
Biogenic emissions of CO2 from combustion or bio-degradation of biomass that occur in value chain not included in Scope 3 GHG emissions | tCO₂eq | 62 |
Total Biogenic Emissions | tCO₂eq | 111 |
GHG intensity by net revenue | Unit | F25 |
Net revenue | €M | 5,267.6 |
Total GHG emissions (location-based) per net revenue | tCO2eq/mEUR | 0.0023 |
Total GHG emissions (market-based) per net revenue | tCO2eq/mEUR | 0.0023 |
CO2 [t CO2e] | Total [t CO2e] |
With RFI-Factor 1.7 | 9,882,331 |
No RFI-Factor | 5,834,827 |
Primary Data share for Scope 3 | Unit | F25 |
Percentage of GHG Scope 3 calculated using primary [activity] data | % | 57 |
Percentage of GHG Scope 3 calculated using primary [intensity] data | % | 0 |
Tonnes of CO2 offset: | F25 | F24 |
Scope 1 CO2 emissions with EU/UK ETS offsets | 2,385,443 | 2,421,482 |
Scope 1 CO2 emissions with CORSIA offsets | 2,162,878 | 577,985 |
Scope 1 CO2 emissions without offset | 1,238,761 | 920,953 |
EPNdB | Lateral | Flyover | Approach | vs Chapter 4 | vs Chapter 14 |
A320neo | 86.6 | 79.7 | 92.3 | -20 | -13 |
A321neo | 87.8 | 83.1 | 94.5 | -15.6 | -8.6 |
Boeing 737-8 | 88.5 | 82.6 | 94.2 | -14.9 | -7.9 |
Emissions sources | Unit | F25 |
Carbon Monoxide (CO) | tCO₂eq | 13,785 |
Non-Methane Volatile Organic Compounds (NMVOC) | tCO₂eq | 1,947 |
Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) | tCO₂eq | 20,828 |
Sulphur Dioxide (SO2) | tCO₂eq | 1,861 |
Particulate Matter (PM) | tCO₂eq | 30 |
Area | Unit | Note | F25 |
Noise regulation compliance | Chapt.14 | 1 | 82% |
Waste-to-landfill | % | 2 | 27% |
Freshwater use per sales | l/EUR | 3 | 0.36 |
ESRS | Material topic | Related policies |
S1 - Own workforce | Secure employment | |
conduct policies and corporate culture) | ||
Anti-Slavery and Human Trafficking Policy and Modern Slavery Act Disclosure Statement | ||
Conflict of interests Policy | ||
Health and Safety | Health and Safety Policy and initiatives | |
Diversity | Equal Opportunities and Fair Treatment Policy | |
Working hours | Working Hours Policies and Compliance | |
Remote Working Location Policy | ||
Training and development skills | Training and Development Policy |
Council Pillars | Strategy |
Term and continuity | The Representatives serve for two years. After their mandate expires they can continue their term for another two-year period if re-elected by the local community. |
Committees and focus areas | The Council’s work revolves around two major areas: reward/recognition, and work patterns/rosters. Two dedicated committees – each led by two chairs appointed by the President – delve into a spectrum of topics, challenges and strategic initiatives. These committees convene twice a month to deliberate and shape policies. |
Facilitating effective communication | The entire Council engages monthly with the airline (AOC) Managing Directors, monthly with the senior Leadership Team, and separately with the Chief Executive Officer. Furthermore, Wizz Air has a dedicated Board member, Dr Anthony Radev, responsible for overseeing engagement with employees. These interactions foster open dialogue, enabling the Council to fulfil its core objective, |
Informed decision making and transparency | The Council provides critical insights on matters impacting the entire Wizz Air community. Every action and decision arising from monthly meetings is shared with employees by their appointed representatives. |
Topic/subtopic | Key programmes and connected actions |
Working conditions: | • Put Safety First: Prioritising the safety and well-being of all employees. • Engage Our Employees: Ensuring effective communication through the People Council. • Compensation and Salary: Conducting yearly reviews of the remuneration policy based on market benchmarks to provide competitive base salaries and non-financial benefits. |
Secure employment | • Crew to Office Programme: Wizz Air transferred 11 employees from crew to office positions during F25. This initiative aims to provide active flight and cabin crew employees with opportunities to transition their careers and gain experience in the office environment. • Reducing Attrition Rates: Focusing on enhancing employee satisfaction and retention by creating a supportive and engaging work culture. • Improving Engagement Survey Results: Actively listening to feedback and implementing initiatives that enhance the overall employee experience. |
Working time | • The working-time policies and conditions within Wizz Air fully comply with all applicable local and international regulations. These are specified in individual employment contracts and company policies, requiring no special actions workforce for details. |
Health and safety | • The Employee Assistance Programme (EAP): Implemented to support employees with stress, mental health problems or difficult life circumstances. • The Employee Emergency Funding initiative: Aims to provide assistance to employees who need financial support in medical emergency situations. |
Equal treatment and opportunities for all: | • Recruit and Develop Our Employees: Focusing on attracting and nurturing talent. • Improve and Leverage Diversity: Promoting a diverse and inclusive workplace. |
Training and skills development | • Providing various development opportunities and comprehensive training programmes to employees to enhance their professional skills and career growth according to their level and needs: - Training for flight and cabin crew - Wizz Air Pilot Academy (WAPA) Programme - Developing our office workforce - Leadership education - Digital learning solutions • Organising regular performance and talent reviews to set professional goals for the next business year and provide feedback to employees on their work and development. • Supporting career paths and transparent career development to ensure that employees can advance and achieve their professional goals. |
Diversity | • The Company expects its workforce to adhere to its diversity and inclusion principles, which are set out in ‘The Wizz Way’, its Policy for Good Conduct, and its Equal Opportunities and Fair Treatment Policy along with the expected standards of behaviour for every member of the Wizz Air team. Launching several unique programmes to nurture talent and diversity in our flight deck: - She Can Fly Programme - Internal Cadet Programme - Cabin Crew to Captain Programme - Self-Sponsored Cadet Programme • Hosting inspiring events and discussion panels to promote gender diversity and create a balanced and inclusive environment where all genders are equally represented and can thrive. • Achieving 40 per cent gender diversity in management, reflecting our commitment to gender equality at all levels of leadership. • Fostering generational diversity by creating an inclusive environment that values and leverages the strengths of employees from all generations, ensuring a dynamic and innovative workplace. |
People | Commitments | On target | Current status |
Continue to put safety first, in everything we do. | On target. Our Safety Review Board meets four times a year. Dedicated Safety, Security and Operational Compliance | ||
Further improve gender diversity in the Board, management and flight deck to achieve: 1. 33 per cent female gender diversity in the Board of Directors; 2. 40 per cent female gender diversity in the management team by F26; and 3. 7 per cent female gender diversity in the flight deck by F30. | 1. Board of Directors: 36 per cent – target reached. 2. Management team: 38 per cent. 3. Flight deck: 6 per cent. more details. | ||
Develop and maintain employee engagement at a medium level of 7.7, aligned with the industry benchmark. |
Gender | Number of employees (headcount) |
Female | 4,174 |
Male | 4,642 |
Non-binary | 0 |
Not reported | 0 |
Total | 8,816 |
Country | Number of employees (headcount) |
Romania | 1,403 |
Poland | 1,362 |
Hungary | 1,350 |
Italy | 1,187 |
United Kingdom | 915 |
Other (less then 10% of total headcount) | 2,599 |
Total | 8,816 |
Age group | Headcount | Percentage |
Distribution of employees under 30 years old | 4,296 | 49% |
Distribution of employees between 30 and 50 years old | 4,147 | 47% |
Distribution of employees over 50 years old | 373 | 4% |
Gender distribution at top management level | Headcount | Percentage |
Female | 3 | 20% |
Male | 12 | 80% |
Non-binary | 0 | 0 |
Not reported | 0 | 0 |
Total | 15 | 100% |
National diversity ratio: | |
Romanian | 23% |
Polish | 18% |
Italian | 10% |
Hungarian | 8% |
Albanian | 5% |
Bulgarian | 5% |
Ukranian | 4% |
British | 4% |
Others (with 2% share or less) | 23% |
National diversity ratio: | |
Polish | 17% |
Hungarian | 13% |
Italian | 12% |
Romanian | 12% |
British | 9% |
Bulgarian | 4% |
Others (with 2% share or less) | 33% |
National diversity ratio: | |
Hungarian | 54% |
Romanian | 4% |
Indian | 3% |
Emirati | 3% |
Others (with 2% share or less) | 36% |
National diversity ratio: | |
Hungarian | 45% |
British | 9% |
Romanian | 7% |
Bulgarian | 3% |
Irish | 3% |
Polish | 3% |
Portuguese | 3% |
Spanish | 3% |
Swedish | 3% |
Others (with 3% share or less) | 19% |
Female | Male | Other | Total | |
Percentage of employees and (or) non-employees that participated in regular performance and career development reviews | 46% | 77% | —% | 62% |
Average number of training hours per employee and (or) non-employee | 32 | 28 | N/A | 30 |
Health and Safety metrics | F25 |
The number of employees who are covered by health and safety management system in head count based on legal requirements and (or) recognised standards or guidelines | 8,816 |
Percentage of own workers who are covered by health and safety management system based on legal requirements and (or) recognised standards or guidelines | 100% |
Number of fatalities in own workforce as result of work-related injuries and work- related ill health | 0 |
Number of fatalities as result of work-related injuries and work-related ill health of other workers working on undertaking's sites | 0 |
Number of recordable work-related accidents for own workforce | 51 |
Rate of recordable work-related accidents for own workforce | 3.83 |
Number of cases of recordable work-related ill health of own workforce | 0 |
Number of days lost to work-related injuries and fatalities from work-related accidents, work-related ill health, and fatalities from ill health | 493 |
Total hours worked by people in own workforce | 13,304,943 |
Metrics related to working rights and human rights impacts | F25 |
Number of incidents of discrimination | 3 |
Number of complaints filed through channels for own workers to raise concerns | 10 |
Number of complaints filed to National Contact Points for OECD Multinational Enterprises | 0 |
Amount of material fines, penalties, and compensation for damages as result of violations regarding social and human rights factors | 0 |
Number of severe human rights issues and incidents connected to own workforce | 0 |
Number of severe human rights issues and incidents connected to own workforce that are violations of UN Global Compact Principles and OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises | 0 |
Amount of material fines, penalties, and compensation for severe human rights issues and incidents connected to own workforce | 0 |
Number of severe human rights cases where undertaking played role securing remedy for those affected | 0 |
ESRS | Material topic | Related policies |
S2 - Workers in the value chain | Secure Employment | Supplier Code of Conduct |
Adequate wages | Modern Slavery Act Disclosure Statement | |
Sustainable Procurement Policy | ||
Social dialogue | Purchasing Policy | |
Health and Safety |
ESRS | Material topic | Related policies |
S4: Customers and end-users | Freedom of expression | Internal Data Protection Regulation and Customer Privacy Notice |
Health and safety | General Conditions of Carriage of Passengers and Baggage | |
Security of a person | Terms and conditions of services offered | |
Access to products and services | Rules on delays, cancellations and refunds | |
Privacy | ||
Access to quality information | Safety compliance | |
Responsible marketing practices |
Percentage of entitled employees that took family-related leave | F25 |
Female | 16.1% |
Male | 4.6% |
Other gender | —% |
No data | —% |
Total | 10% |
High-risk functions / business activities | Mitigating measures |
Functions that select and do business with third-party suppliers can be at a higher risk of corruption and bribery. | Supplier due diligence, contractual provisions on anti- corruption principles, monitoring of third-party activities. |
Functions with interactions with Government Officials and Other Covered Parties. Aviation is a highly regulated sector where interactions between Government Officials and Other Covered Parties and market participants are unavoidable. | To mitigate risks from interactions, two methods are recommended: ▶ Long-term Relationships: Report these to the anti- corruption compliance officer, who will document and include them in the risk assessment process. ▶ Ad Hoc Relationships: Document meetings to ensure transparency. |
Group level operation. Wizz Air established the compliance framework at group level; however, individual member companies operate in different market environments and face different corruption risks. | To ensure robust compliance at the Group level, we establish a unified and effective compliance framework, including anti- corruption measures based on consistent principles and methods. Additionally, we tailor this framework to address the specific corruption risks of each member company, ensuring proper management both at the Group level and within each individual company. |
COMMUNITIES | UNIT | NOTE | F25 | F24 | F23 |
Passenger numbers | m | 1 | 63 | 62 | 51 |
Paid taxes | m EUR | 2 | 906 | 809 | 632 |
ESRS | Disclosure requirement | Page | Comment |
ESRS 2 | General Information | ||
Basis for preparation | |||
BP-1 | General basis for preparation of the sustainability statement | ||
BP-2 | Disclosures in relation to specific circumstances | ||
Governance | |||
GOV-1 | The role of the administrative, management and supervisory bodies | ||
GOV-2 | Information provided to and sustainability matters addressed by the undertaking’s administrative, management and supervisory bodies | ||
GOV-3 | Integration of sustainability- related performance in incentive schemes | ||
GOV-4 | Statement on due diligence | ||
GOV-5 | Risk management and internal controls over sustainability reporting | ||
Strategy | |||
SBM-1 | Strategy, business model and value chain | The disclosure requirement has not been applied, as the relevant Commission Delegated Act — which would specify the application date for ESRS 2 SBM-1 paragraph 40(b) (breakdown of total revenue by significant ESRS sector) and 40(c) (list of additional significant ESRS sectors) — has not yet been adopted pursuant to Article 29b(1), third subparagraph, point (ii), of Directive 2013/34/EU. | |
SBM-2 | Interests and views of stakeholders | ||
SBM-3 | Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model | ||
Impact, risk, and opportunity management Disclosures on the double materiality assessment | |||
IRO-1 | Description of the processes to identify and assess material impacts, risks, and opportunities | ||
IRO-2 | Disclosure requirements in ESRS covered by the undertaking’s sustainability statement | ||
E | Environmental information | ||
E1 | Climate change | ||
GOV-3 | Integration of sustainability- related performance in incentive schemes |
SBM-3 | Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model | ||
IRO-1 | Description of the processes to identify and assess material climate-related impacts, risks and opportunities | ||
E1-1 | Transition plan for climate change mitigation | ||
E1-2 | Policies related to climate change mitigation and adaptation | ||
E1-3 | Actions and resources in relation to climate change policies | ||
E1-4 | Targets related to climate change mitigation | ||
E1-5 | Energy consumption & mix | ||
E1-6 | Gross Scopes 1, 2, 3 and Total GHG | ||
E1-7 | GHG removals and GHG mitigation projects financed through carbon credits | - | Determined not material |
E1-8 | Internal carbon pricing | ||
E1-9 | Anticipated financial effects from material physical and transition risks and potential climate-related opportunities | - | Determined not material |
E | Other environmental information | ||
E2 | Pollution | non- material | Non-CO2 emission related air pollution is currently a non-material topic for Wizz Air. There are still scientific uncertainties about the impact of non-CO2 emissions per flight. Since there is no single metric to measure the climate effects of non-CO2 emissions, using a simple multiplier might overestimate these emissions. It’s important to note that addressing non-CO2 emissions does not increase GHG emissions. Therefore, Wizz Air is currently investigating the non-CO2 effects of flights and their contribution to global warming. |
EU Taxonomy | |||
S | Social information | ||
S1 | Own workforce | ||
SBM-2 | Interests and views of stakeholders | ||
SBM-3 | Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model | ||
S1-1 | Policies related to own workforce | ||
S1-2 | Processes for engaging with own workers and workers’ representatives about impacts | ||
S1-3 | Processes to remediate negative impacts and channels for own workforce to raise concerns | ||
S1-4 | Taking action on material impacts on own workforce, and approaches to managing material risks and pursuing material opportunities related to own workforce, and effectiveness of those actions |
S1-5 | Targets related to managing material negative impacts, advancing positive impacts, and managing material risks and opportunities | ||
S1-6 | Characteristics of the Undertaking’s Employees | ||
S1-7 | Characteristics of non-employee workers in the undertaking’s own workforce | In line with ESRS 1 Appendix C, Wizz Air has chosen to omit reporting on all datapoints in this Disclosure Requirement for this reporting year. | |
S1-9 | Diversity metrics | ||
S1-11 | Social protection | In accordance with the phase-in provisions defined in ESRS 1 General Requirements, Appendix C, Wizz Air has partly omitted the following Disclosure Requirement in its first- year Sustainability Report: S1-11 Social protection. For this topic, instead of applying the full set of disclosure requirements as outlined in the relevant ESRS, Wizz Air provided a brief description. This included the identification of these as material matters, as well as a summary of how its business model and strategy consider the related impacts; any time-bound targets and progress made; relevant policies and actions taken; and, where available, applicable metrics. | |
S1-13 | Training and skills development metrics | In accordance with the phase-in provisions defined in ESRS 1 General Requirements, Appendix C, Wizz Air has partly omitted the following Disclosure Requirement in its first- year Sustainability Report: S1-13 Training and skills development metrics. For this topic, instead of applying the full set of disclosure requirements as outlined in the relevant ESRS, Wizz Air provided a brief description. This included the identification of these as material matters, as well as a summary of how its business model and strategy consider the related impacts; any time-bound targets and progress made; relevant policies and actions taken; and, where available, applicable metrics. | |
S1-14 | Health and safety metrics | ||
S1-17 | Incidents, complaints and severe human rights impacts | ||
S2 | Workers in the value chain | ||
SBM-3 | Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model | ||
S2-1 | Policies related to value chain workers | ||
S2-2 | Processes for engaging with value chain workers about impacts | ||
S2-3 | Processes to remediate negative impacts and channels for value chain workers to raise concerns | ||
S2-4 | Taking action on material impacts on value chain workers, and approaches to managing material risks and pursuing material opportunities related to value chain workers, and effectiveness of those actions | ||
S2-5 | Targets related to managing material negative impacts, advancing positive impacts, and managing material risks and opportunities |
S4 | Consumers and end-users | ||
SBM-3 | Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model | ||
S4-1 | Policies related to consumers and end-users | ||
S4-2 | Processes for engaging with consumers and end-users about impacts | ||
S4-3 | Processes to remediate negative impacts and channels for consumers and end-users to raise concerns | ||
S4-4 | Taking action on material impacts on consumers and end- users, and approaches to managing material risks and pursuing material opportunities related to consumers and end- users, and effectiveness of those actions | ||
S4-5 | Targets related to managing material negative impacts, advancing positive impacts, and managing material risks and opportunities | ||
G | Governance information | ||
G1 | Business conduct | ||
GOV-1 | The role of the administrative, supervisory and management bodies | ||
IRO-1 | Description of the processes to identify and assess material impacts, risks, and opportunities | ||
G1-1 | Business conduct policies and corporate culture | ||
G1-2 | Management of relationships with suppliers | ||
G1-3 | Prevention and detection of corruption and bribery | ||
G1-4 | Incidents of corruption or bribery | ||
G1-5 | Political influence and lobbying activities | ||
G1-6 | Payment practices | ||
G | Other governance information |
Disclosure Requirement and related datapoint | SFDR reference | Pillar 3 reference | Benchmark regulation reference | EU Climate Law Reference | Page Reference |
ESRS 2 GOV-1 Board's gender diversity paragraph 21 (d) | Indicator number 13 of Table #1 of Annex 1 | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II | Pg. 187 | ||
ESRS 2 GOV-1 Percentage of board members who are independent, paragraph 21 (e) | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II | Pg. 187 | |||
ESRS 2 GOV-4 Statement on due diligence, paragraph 30 | Indicator number 10, Table #3 of Annex 1 | Pg. 190 | |||
ESRS 2 SBM-1 Involvement in activities related to fossil fuel activities, paragraph 40 (d) i | Indicators number 4 Table #1 of Annex 1 | Article 449a of Directive (EU) No. 575/2013; Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2453 (6), Table 1: Qualitative information on environmental risk, and Table 2: Qualitative information on social risk | Pg. 192 | ||
ESRS 2 SBM-1 Involvement in activities related to chemical production, paragraph 40 (d) ii | Indicator number 9, Table #2 of Annex 1 | Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II | Not Material | ||
ESRS 2 SBM-1 Involvement in activities related to controversial weapons, paragraph 40 (d) iii | Indicator number 14, Table #1 of Annex 1 | Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818 (7), Article 12, Paragraph 1 Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II | Not Material | ||
ESRS 2 SBM-1 Involvement in activities related to cultivation and production of tobacco, paragraph 40 (d) (i) | Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818, Article 12, Paragraph 1 Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II | Not Material | |||
ESRS E1-1 Transition plan to reach climate neutrality by 2050, paragraph 14 | Regulation (EU) 2021/1119, Article 2(1) | Pg. 219 | |||
ESRS E1-1 Undertakings excluded from Paris- aligned benchmarks paragraph 16 (g) | Article 449a Regulation (EU) No 575/2013; Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2453 Template 1: Banking book Climate Change transition risk: Credit quality of exposures by sector, emissions and residual maturity | Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818, Article12.1 (d) to (g), and Article 12.2 | Pg. 219 |
ESRS E1-4 GHG emission reduction targets, paragraph 34 | Indicator number 4 Table #2 of Annex 1 | Article 449a Regulation (EU) No 575/2013; Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2453 Template 3: Banking book – Climate change transition risk: alignment metrics | Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818, Article 6 | Pg. 231 | |
ESRS E1-5 Energy consumption from fossil sources disaggregated by sources (only high climate impact sectors), paragraph 38 | Indicator number 5 Table #1 and Indicator n. 5 Table #2 of Annex 1 | Pg. 232 | |||
ESRS E1-5 Energy consumption and mix, paragraph 37 | Indicator number 5 Table #1 of Annex 1 | Pg. 232 | |||
ESRS E1-5 Energy intensity associated with activities in high climate impact sectors, paragraphs 40 to 43 | Indicator number 6 Table #1 of Annex 1 | Pg. 232 | |||
ESRS E1-6 Gross Scope 1, 2, 3 and Total GHG emissions, paragraph 44 | Indicators number 1 and 2 Table #1 of Annex 1 | Article 449a; Regulation (EU) No 575/2013; Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2453 Template 1: | Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818, Article 5(1), 6 and 8(1) | Pg. 234 | |
ESRS E1-6 Gross GHG emissions intensity, paragraphs 53 to 55 | Indicators number 3 Table #1 of Annex 1 | Article 449a Regulation (EU) No 575/2013; Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2453 Template 3: Banking book – Climate change transition risk: alignment metrics | Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818, Article 8(1) | Pg. 234 | |
ESRS E1-7 GHG removals and carbon credits, paragraph 56 | Regulation (EU) 2021/1119, Article 2(1) | Not material | |||
ESRS E1-9 Exposure of the benchmark portfolio to climate-related physical risks, paragraph 66 | Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818, Annex II Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II | Not Material |
ESRS E1-9 Disaggregation of monetary amounts by acute and chronic physical risk, paragraph 66 (a) ESRS E1-9 Location of significant assets at material physical risk, paragraph 66 (c). | Article 449a Regulation (EU) No 575/2013; Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2453 paragraphs 46 and 47; Template 5: Banking book - Climate change physical risk: Exposures subject to physical risk. | Not Material | |||
ESRS E1-9 Breakdown of the carrying value of its real estate assets by energy efficiency classes, paragraph 67 (c). | Article 449a Regulation (EU) No 575/2013; Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2453, Paragraph 34; Template 2: Banking book – Climate change transition risk: Loans collateralised by immovable property – Energy efficiency of the collateral | Not Material | |||
ESRS E1-9 Degree of exposure of the portfolio to climate-related opportunities, paragraph 69 | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818, Annex II | Not Material | |||
ESRS E2-4 Amount of each pollutant listed in Annex II of the EPRTR Regulation (European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register) emitted to air, water and soil, paragraph 28 | Indicator umber 8 Table #1 of Annex 1 Indicator number 2 Table #2 of Annex 1 Indicator number 1 Table #2 of Annex 1 Indicator number 3 Table #2 of Annex 1 | Not Material | |||
ESRS E3-1 Water and marine resources, paragraph 9 | Indicator number 7 Table #2 of Annex 1 | Not Material | |||
ESRS E3-1 Dedicated policy, paragraph 13 | Indicator number 8 Table 2 of Annex 1 | Not Material | |||
ESRS E3-1 Sustainable oceans and seas, paragraph 14 | Indicator number 12 Table #2 of Annex 1 | Not Material | |||
ESRS E3-4 Total water recycled and reused, paragraph 28 (c) | Indicator number 6.2 Table #2 of Annex 1 | Not Material | |||
ESRS E3-4 Total water consumption in m3 per net revenue on own operations, paragraph 29 | Indicator number 6.1 Table #2 of Annex 1 | Not Material | |||
ESRS 2- IRO 1 - E4, paragraph 16 (a) i | Indicator number 7 Table #1 of Annex 1 | Pg. 198 | |||
ESRS 2- IRO 1 - E4, paragraph 16 (b) | Indicator number 10 Table #2 of Annex 1 | Pg. 198 | |||
ESRS 2- IRO 1 - E4, paragraph 16 (c) | Indicator number 14 Table #2 of Annex 1 | Pg. 198 | |||
ESRS E4-2 Sustainable land / agriculture practices or policies, paragraph 24 (b) | Indicator number 11 Table #2 of Annex 1 | Not Material |
ESRS E4-2 Sustainable oceans / seas practices or policies, paragraph 24 (c) | Indicator number 12 Table #2 of Annex 1 | Not Material | |||
ESRS E4-2 Policies to address deforestation, paragraph 24 (d) | Indicator number 15 Table #2 of Annex 1 | Not Material | |||
ESRS E5-5 Non-recycled waste, paragraph 37 (d) | Indicator number 13 Table #2 of Annex 1 | Not Material | |||
ESRS E5-5 Hazardous waste and radioactive waste, paragraph 39 | Indicator number 9 Table #1 of Annex 1 | Not Material | |||
ESRS 2- SBM3 - S1 Risk of incidents of forced labour, paragraph 14 (f) | Indicator number 13 Table #3 of Annex I | Pg. 199 | |||
ESRS 2- SBM3 - S1 Risk of incidents of child labour, paragraph 14 (g) | Indicator number 12 Table #3 of Annex I | Pg. 199 | |||
ESRS S1-1 Human rights policy commitments, paragraph 20 | Indicator number 9 Table #3 and Indicator number 11 Table #1 of Annex I | Pg. 245 | |||
ESRS S1-1 Due diligence policies on issues addressed by the fundamental International Labor Organisation Conventions 1 to 8, paragraph 21 | Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II | Pg. 245 | |||
ESRS S1-1 processes and measures for preventing trafficking in human beings, paragraph 22 | Indicator number 11 Table #3 of Annex I | Pg. 245 | |||
ESRS S1-1 workplace accident prevention policy or management system, paragraph 23 | Indicator number 1 Table #3 of Annex I | Pg. 245 | |||
ESRS S1-3 grievance/ complaints handling mechanisms, paragraph 32 (c) | Indicator number 5 Table #3 of Annex I | Pg. 251 | |||
ESRS S1-14 Number of fatalities and number and rate of work-related accidents, paragraph 88 (b) and (c) | Indicator number 2 Table #3 of Annex I | Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II | Pg. 263 | ||
ESRS S1-14 Number of days lost to injuries, accidents, fatalities or illness, paragraph 88 (e) | Indicator number 3 Table #3 of Annex I | Pg. 263 | |||
ESRS S1-16 Unadjusted gender pay gap, paragraph 97 (a) | Indicator number 12 Table #1 of Annex I | Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II | Not Material | ||
ESRS S1-16 Excessive CEO pay ratio, paragraph 97 (b) | Indicator number 8 Table #3 of Annex I | Not Material | |||
ESRS S1-17 Incidents of discrimination, paragraph 103 (a) | Indicator number 7 Table #3 of Annex I | Pg. 265 | |||
ESRS S1-17 Non-respect of UNGPs on Business and Human Rights and OECD, paragraph 104 (a) | Indicator number 10 Table #1 and Indicator number 14 Table #3 of Annex I | Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818 Art 12 (1) | Pg. 265 | ||
ESRS 2- SBM3 – S2 Significant risk of child labour or forced labour in the value chain, paragraph 11 (b) | Indicators number 12 and n. 13 Table #3 of Annex I | Not Material |
ESRS S2-1 Human rights policy commitments, paragraph 17 | Indicator number 9 Table #3 and Indicator number 11 Table #1 of Annex 1 | Pg. 268 | |||
ESRS S2-1 Policies related to value chain workers, paragraph 18 | Indicator number 11 and n. 4 Table #3 of Annex 1 | Pg. 268 | |||
ESRS S2- 1 Non-respect of UNGPs on Business and Human Rights principles and OECD guidelines, paragraph 19 | Indicator number 10 Table #1 of Annex 1 | Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818, Art 12 (1) | Pg. 268 | ||
ESRS S2-1 Due diligence policies on issues addressed by the fundamental International Labor Organisation Conventions 1 to 8, paragraph 19 | Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II | Pg. 268 | |||
ESRS S2-4 Human rights issues and incidents connected to its upstream and downstream value chain, paragraph 36 | Indicator number 14 Table #3 of Annex 1 | Pg. 270 | |||
ESRS S3-1 Human rights policy commitments, paragraph 16 | Indicator number 9 Table #3 of Annex 1 and Indicator number 11 Table #1 of Annex 1 | Not Material | |||
ESRS S3-1 Non-respect of UNGPs on Business and Human Rights, ILO principles and/or OECD guidelines, paragraph 17 | Indicator number 10 Table #1 Annex 1 | Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818, Art 12 (1) | Not Material | ||
ESRS S3-4 Human rights issues and incidents paragraph 36 | Indicator number 14 Table #3 of Annex 1 | Not Material | |||
ESRS S4-1 Policies related to consumers and end-users, paragraph 16 | Indicator number 9 Table #3 and Indicator number 11 Table #1 of Annex 1 | Pg. 272 | |||
ESRS S4-1 Non-respect of UNGPs on Business and Human Rights and OECD guidelines, paragraph 17 | Indicator number 10 Table #1 of Annex 1 | Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818, Art 12 (1) | Pg. 272 | ||
ESRS S4-4 Human rights issues and incidents, paragraph 35 | Indicator number 14 Table #3 of Annex 1 | Pg. 275 | |||
ESRS G1-1 United Nations Convention against Corruption, paragraph 10 (b) | Indicator number 15 Table #3 of Annex 1 | Pg. 281 | |||
ESRS G1-1 Protection of whistleblowers, paragraph 10 (d) | Indicator number 6 Table #3 of Annex 1 | Pg. 281 | |||
ESRS G1-4 Fines for violation of anti- corruption and anti- bribery laws, paragraph 24 (a) | Indicator number 17 Table #3 of Annex 1 | Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II) | Pg. 286 | ||
ESRS G1-4 Standards of anti-corruption and anti- bribery, paragraph 24 (b) | Indicator number 16 Table #3 of Annex 1 | Pg. 286 |
Governance | Disclose the organisation’s governance around climate- related risks and opportunities. |
Recommended disclosure a) Describe the board’s oversight of climate-related risks and opportunities. | |
Recommended disclosure b) Describe management’s role in assessing and managing climate-related risks and opportunities. | |
Our disclosure is consistent with the TCFD framework. | |
Strategy | Disclose the actual and potential impacts of climate-related risks and opportunities on the organisation’s businesses, strategy and financial planning where such information is material. |
Recommended disclosure a) Describe the climate-related risks and opportunities the organisation has identified over the short, medium and long term. | |
Recommended disclosure b) Describe the impact of climate-related risks and opportunities on the organisation’s businesses, strategy and financial planning. | |
Recommended disclosure c) Describe the resilience of the organisation’s strategy, taking into consideration different climate-related scenarios, including a 2°C or lower scenario. | Our climate strategy integrates climate risk assessments and is embedded in our short, medium and long-term planning process. Our climate scenario modelling processes include a qualitative and quantitative analysis with applicable risks under four different |
Our disclosure is consistent with the TCFD framework. | |
Risk management | Disclose how the organisation identifies, assesses and manages climate-related risks. |
Recommended disclosure a) Describe the organisation’s processes for identifying and assessing climate-related risks. | |
Recommended disclosure b) Describe the organisation’s processes for managing climate- related risks. | |
Recommended disclosure c) Describe how processes for identifying, assessing and managing climate-related risks are integrated into the organisation’s overall risk management. | |
Our disclosure is consistent with the TCFD framework. We are constantly working on developing our ERM framework and the applicable internal risk management processes to ensure heightened resilience in the face of climate change. | |
Metrics and targets | Disclose the metrics and targets used to assess and manage relevant climate-related risks and opportunities where such information is material. |
Recommended disclosure a) Disclose the metrics used by the organisation to assess climate-related risks and opportunities in line with its strategy and risk management process. | |
Recommended disclosure b) Disclose Scope 1, Scope 2, and if appropriate, Scope 3 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and the related risks. | We report extensively on Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 emissions |
Recommended disclosure c) Describe the targets used by the organisation to manage climate-related risks and opportunities and performance against targets. | |
Our disclosure is consistent with the TCFD framework. We will continue to improve our greenhouse gas disclosure with increased data granularity regarding location-based emissions reporting in the short and medium term. | |