XML 33 R22.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.10.0.1
ASSET IMPAIRMENTS
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2018
Asset Impairment Charges [Abstract]  
ASSET IMPAIRMENTS

(14)

ASSET IMPAIRMENTS

 

Management estimates the fair value of each vessel not expected to return to active service (considered Level 3, as defined by ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures) by considering items such as the vessel’s age, length of time stacked, likelihood of a return to active service and actual recent sales of similar vessels, among others. For vessels with more significant carrying values, we obtain an estimate of the fair value of the stacked vessel from third-party appraisers or brokers for use in our determination of fair value estimates.

 

Stacked vessels expected to return to active service are generally newer vessels, have similar capabilities and likelihood of future active service as other currently operating vessels, are generally current with classification societies in regards to their regulatory certification status, and are being actively marketed. Stacked vessels expected to return to service are evaluated for impairment as part of their assigned active asset group and not individually.

 

The company reviews the vessels in its active fleet for impairment whenever events occur or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset group may not be recoverable. In such evaluation, the estimated future undiscounted cash flows generated by an asset group are compared with the carrying amount of the asset group to determine if a write-down may be required. If an asset group fails the undiscounted cash flow test, the company estimates the fair value of each asset group and compares such estimated fair value, considered Level 3, as defined by ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, to the carrying value of each asset group in order to determine if impairment exists. Similar to stacked vessels, management obtains estimates of the fair values of the active vessels from third party appraisers or brokers for use in determining fair value estimates.

The below tables summarize the number of vessels impaired and the amount of the impairment incurred.

 

 

 

Successor

 

 

 

Predecessor

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Period from

 

 

 

Period from

 

 

 

Three Months

 

 

August 1, 2017

 

 

 

July 1, 2017

 

 

 

Ended

 

 

through

 

 

 

through

 

(In thousands, except number of vessels impaired)

 

September 30, 2018

 

 

September 30, 2017

 

 

 

July 31, 2017

 

Number of vessels impaired in the period (A)

 

 

15

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8

 

Amount of impairment incurred

 

$

16,853

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

21,325

 

 

 

(A)

For the three month period ended September 30, 2018, (Successor) there were 15 stacked vessels impaired. For the period July 1 through July 31, 2017 there were seven stacked vessels and one active vessel impaired.  

 

 

 

Successor

 

 

 

Predecessor

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Period from

 

 

 

Period from

 

 

 

Nine Months

 

 

August 1, 2017

 

 

 

January 1, 2017

 

 

 

Ended

 

 

through

 

 

 

through

 

(In thousands, except number of vessels impaired)

 

September 30, 2018

 

 

September 30, 2017

 

 

 

July 31, 2017

 

Number of vessels impaired in the period (A)

 

 

30

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

97

 

Amount of impairment incurred

 

$

24,254

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

249,606

 

 

 

(A)

For the nine month period ended September 30, 2018, (Successor) there were 30 stacked vessels impaired. For the period January 1 through July 31, 2017 there were 90 stacked vessels and seven active vessels impaired.