XML 26 R15.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT
v3.22.2

Contracts Accounted for as Credit Derivatives | 6 Months Ended
--- | ---
Jun. 30, 2022
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities Disclosure [Abstract] |
Contracts Accounted for as Credit Derivatives | Contracts Accounted for as Credit Derivatives The portfolio of outstanding exposures discussed in Note 3, Outstanding Exposure, and Note 4, Expected Loss to be Paid (Recovered), includes contracts that are accounted for as insurance contracts, derivatives, and FG VIEs. Amounts presented in this note relate only to contracts accounted for as derivatives. See Note 5, Contracts Accounted for as Insurance for amounts that relate to contracts accounted for as insurance and Note 8, Financial Guaranty Variable Interest Entities and Consolidated Investment Vehicles, for amounts that relate to contracts that are accounted for as FG VIEs. The Company’s credit derivatives (financial guaranty contracts that meet the definition of a derivative in accordance with GAAP) are primarily CDS and also include interest rate swaps. Credit derivative transactions are governed by International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. documentation and have certain characteristics that differ from financial guaranty insurance contracts. For example, the Company’s control rights with respect to a reference obligation under a credit derivative may be more limited than when the Company issues a financial guaranty insurance contract. In addition, there are more circumstances under which the Company may be obligated to make payments. Similar to a financial guaranty insurance contract, the Company would be obligated to pay if the obligor failed to make a scheduled payment of principal or interest in full. In certain transactions the Company also specifically agreed to pay if the obligor were to become bankrupt or if the reference obligation were restructured. Furthermore, the Company may be required to make a payment due to an event that is unrelated to the performance of the obligation referenced in the credit derivative. If events of default or termination events specified in the credit derivative documentation were to occur, the non-defaulting or the non-affected party, which may be either the Company or the counterparty, depending upon the circumstances, may decide to terminate a credit derivative prior to maturity. In that case, the Company may be required to make a termination payment to its swap counterparty upon such termination. Absent such an event of default or termination event, the Company may not unilaterally terminate a CDS contract; however, the Company on occasion has mutually agreed with various counterparties to terminate certain CDS transactions. The components of the Company’s credit derivative net par outstanding by sector are presented in the table below. The estimated remaining weighted average life of credit derivatives was 13.3 years and 13.2 years as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively. Credit Derivatives (1)
|  | As of June 30, 2022 |  | As of December 31, 2021
Sector |  | Net Par Outstanding |  | Net Fair Value Asset (Liability) |  | Net Par Outstanding |  | Net Fair Value Asset (Liability)
|  | (in millions)
U.S. public finance |  | $ | 1,348 |  |  | $ | (80) |  |  | $ | 1,705 |  |  | $ | (72) |
Non-U.S. public finance |  | 1,476 |  |  | (42) |  |  | 1,800 |  |  | (48) |
U.S. structured finance |  | 355 |  |  | (22) |  |  | 400 |  |  | (32) |
Non-U.S. structured finance |  | 122 |  |  | (3) |  |  | 135 |  |  | (2) |
Total |  | $ | 3,301 |  |  | $ | (147) |  |  | $ | 4,040 |  |  | $ | (154) |
____________________ (1) Expected loss to be paid was $5 million as of both June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021. Distribution of Credit Derivative Net Par Outstanding by Internal Rating
|  | As of June 30, 2022 |  | As of December 31, 2021
Rating Category |  | Net Par Outstanding |  | % of Total |  | Net Par Outstanding |  | % of Total
|  | (dollars in millions)
AAA |  | $ | 1,317 |  |  | 39.9 | % |  | $ | 1,503 |  |  | 37.2 | %
AA |  | 1,116 |  |  | 33.8 |  |  | 1,283 |  |  | 31.8 |
A |  | 329 |  |  | 10.0 |  |  | 514 |  |  | 12.7 |
BBB |  | 480 |  |  | 14.5 |  |  | 677 |  |  | 16.7 |
BIG |  | 59 |  |  | 1.8 |  |  | 63 |  |  | 1.6 |
Credit derivative net par outstanding |  | $ | 3,301 |  |  | 100.0 | % |  | $ | 4,040 |  |  | 100.0 | %
Fair Value Gains (Losses) on Credit Derivatives
| Second Quarter |  | Six Months
| 2022 |  | 2021 |  | 2022 |  | 2021
| (in millions)
Realized gains (losses) and other settlements | $ | — |  |  | $ | 2 |  |  | $ | (1) |  |  | $ | 3 |
Net unrealized gains (losses) | 9 |  |  | (35) |  |  | 7 |  |  | (55) |
Fair value gains (losses) on credit derivatives | $ | 9 |  |  | $ | (33) |  |  | $ | 6 |  |  | $ | (52) |
During second quarter 2022, unrealized gains were generated primarily as a result of the increased cost to buy protection on AGC, as the market cost of AGC’s credit protection increased during the period, and changes in discount rates. These gains were partially offset by an increase in the credit spread of certain underlying reference obligations. For those CDS transactions that were pricing at or above their floor levels, when the cost of purchasing CDS protection on AGC, which management refers to as the CDS spread on AGC, increased, the implied spreads that the Company (or another comparable entity) would expect to receive on these transactions decreased. During second quarter 2021, unrealized losses were generated primarily as a result of the decreased cost to buy protection on AGC, as the market cost of AGC’s credit protection decreased during the period. These losses were partially offset by general price improvements of the underlying collateral. During six months 2022, unreali zed gains were generated primarily as a result of the increased cost to buy protection on AGC and changes in discount rates. These gains were partially offset by an increase in the credit spread of certain underlying reference obligations. During six months 2021, unrealized losses were generated primarily as a result of wider implied net spreads driven by the decreased market cost to buy protection in AGC’s name during the period. These losses were partially offset by general asset price improvement of the underlying collateral. The impact of changes in credit spreads will vary based upon the volume, tenor, interest rates, and other market conditions at the time these fair values are determined. In addition, since each transaction has unique collateral and structural terms, the change in fair value of each transaction may vary considerably. The fair value of credit derivative contracts also reflects the Company’s own credit cost based on the price to purchase credit protection on AGC. The Company determines its own credit risk primarily based on quoted CDS prices traded on AGC at each balance sheet date. CDS Spread on AGC (in basis points)
| As of June 30, 2022 |  | As of December 31, 2021 |  | As of June 30, 2021 |  | As of December 31, 2020
Five-year CDS spread | 103 |  | 49 |  | 62 |  | 132
One-year CDS spread | 41 |  | 16 |  | 16 |  | 36
Fair Value of Credit Derivative Assets (Liabilities) and Effect of AGC Credit Spread
| As of
| June 30, 2022 |  | December 31, 2021
| (in millions)
Fair value of credit derivatives before effect of AGC credit spread | $ | (223) |  |  | $ | (225) |
Plus: Effect of AGC credit spread | 76 |  |  | 71 |
Net fair value of credit derivatives | $ | (147) |  |  | $ | (154) |
The fair value of CDS contracts as of June 30, 2022, before considering the benefit applicable to AGC’s credit spread, is a direct result of the relatively wider credit spreads under current market conditions compared to those at the time of underwriting for certain underlying credits with longer tenor.

X
- References No definition available. + Details
Name: | us-gaap_DerivativeInstrumentsAndHedgingActivitiesDisclosureAbstract
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | xbrli:stringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition The entire disclosure for derivative instruments and hedging activities including, but not limited to, risk management strategies, non-hedging derivative instruments, assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and methodologies and assumptions used in determining the amounts. + References Reference 1: http://fasb.org/us-gaap/role/ref/legacyRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 815 -URI https://asc.fasb.org/topic&trid=2229140 Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/disclosureRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 815 -SubTopic 40 -Section 50 -Paragraph 5 -Subparagraph (f) -URI https://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=126731327&loc=d3e90205-114008 + Details
Name: | us-gaap_DerivativeInstrumentsAndHedgingActivitiesDisclosureTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | dtr-types:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration