
Risks Applicable to Investments in the Company
Each series of ordinary shares is not a separate
legal entity
The Company may raise additional finance to invest in the
Master Fund by selling further series of ordinary shares
to investors. The net proceeds of issue of each series
of ordinary shares will be invested by the Company in a
corresponding class of interests in the Master Fund. In
certain circumstances, if the Company incurs a liability
in respect of assets attributable to another series of
ordinary shares, the ability of the Company to distribute
profits or repurchase ordinary shares, not only in relation
to that series, but also in relation to any other series
may be affected because under the Companies Law, the
ability to distribute profits or repurchase ordinary shares
has to be determined by reference to the solvency of the
Company as a whole, rather than on a series by series
basis. Liabilities relating to one ordinary share series
cannot be ring-fenced.
Additionally, the investment assets of the Company
(i.e. namely, its interests in the ordinary interests and
realisation share interests of the Master Fund), are not
legally segregated and so assets held by the Company and
attributed to any class of realisation shareholders may be
required to be liquidated to meet liabilities attributable to
ordinary shareholders (or vice versa).
Risk of not obtaining distributing or reporting status
There is no guarantee that the Company will continue to
obtain distributing or reporting status for UK taxation
purposes in relation to the ordinary shares. There is
therefore a risk that any gain realised on any disposal of
ordinary shares will be taxed as income in the UK, rather
than capital gain.
Sole purpose
The Company has been established with the sole
purpose of investing in the Master Fund. The success of
the Company therefore depends on the success of the
Master Fund and its ability to successfully implement its
investment strategy. Identification and exploitation of the
investment strategies to be pursued by the Master Fund
involve a high degree of uncertainty.
Limited redemption rights
The Company has no right of redemption in relation to
the Class F interests, Class R(F)1 interests, Class R(G)1
interests or Class R(F)2 interests in the Master Fund. The
right of shareholders to elect to move into realisation
shares does not result in the resulting realisation share
interests in the Master Fund (which will be held on behalf
of realisation shareholders) being redeemable. They will
only be redeemed when the underlying investments
are sold.
Cayman Islands registration
The Company is registered in the Cayman Islands. As a
result, the rights of the shareholders are governed by the
laws of the Cayman Islands and the Articles. The rights of
shareholders under Cayman Islands law may differ from
the rights of shareholders of companies incorporated in
other jurisdictions and the enforcement of such rights
may involve different considerations and may be more
difficult than would be the case if the Company had been
incorporated in England and Wales or the jurisdiction of
a shareholder’s residence. The following are examples: (i)
subject only to the Company’s articles of association, the
allotment and issue of securities is under the exclusive
control of the Directors and there are no pre-emption
rights under the Companies Law; (ii) there is no express
restriction on the Company making loans to Directors
nor the equivalent of substantial property rules for
transactions involving directors under the Companies
Law; and (iii) assets of the Company are under the exclusive
control of the Directors and the Companies Law does not
expressly restrict the powers of the directors to dispose
of assets. Examples (i) to (iii) above are intended for the
purposes of illustration only and are not an exhaustive
list. Investors should take appropriate independent legal
advice to determine if they are afforded protections they
consider are necessary for their specific circumstances.
The Cayman Islands courts ordinarily would be expected
to follow English case law precedents which permit a
minority shareholder to commence a representative
action against or derivative actions in the name of the
company to challenge (i) an act which is ultra vires the
company or illegal, (ii) an act which constitutes a fraud
against the minority and the wrongdoers are themselves
in control of the company, and (iii) an irregularity in the
passing of a resolution which requires a qualified (or
special) majority. In the case of a company (not being a
bank) having a share capital divided into shares, the courts
may, on the application of members holding not less than
one fifth of the shares of the company in issue, appoint
an inspector to examine the affairs of the company and
to report thereon in such manner as the courts will direct.
Any shareholder of a company may petition the courts
which may make a winding-up order if the courts are of
the opinion that it is just and equitable that the company
should be wound up. Generally, claims against a company
by its shareholders must be based on the general laws of
contract or tort applicable in the Cayman Islands or their
individual rights as shareholders as established by the
company’s memorandum and articles of association.
WWW.MARWYNVALUE.COM
|
75