Riverstone Energy Limited
Annual Report and Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2022
energy
transition
Powering a shift toward
Annual Report and Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2022
2022
Riverstone
Energy
Limited
(LSE: RSE)
Contents
Who We Are… 01
Financial and Operational Highlights 02
Key Financials 03
Board Chair’s Statement
04
Environmental, Social and Governance Report 08
Investment Manager’s Report 18
Investment Strategy
32
Board of Directors 34
Report of the Directors
36
Directors’ Responsibilities Statement 44
Responsibility Statement of the Directors in
Respect of the Annual Report under the
Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules
45
Corporate Governance Report 46
Report of the Audit Committee 56
Independent Auditor’s Report to the Members
of Riverstone Energy Limited
60
Independent Auditor’s Report to the Directors
of Riverstone Energy Limited
66
Statement of Financial Position 67
Statement of Comprehensive Income 68
Statement of Changes in Equity 69
Statement of Cash Flows 70
Notes to the Financial Statements 71
Alternative Performance Measures (“APMs”) 93
Glossary of Capitalised Defined Terms 95
Directors and General Information 99
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
1
Who we are...
RIVERSTONE ENERGY LIMITED
THE COMPANY’S INVESTMENT MANAGER IS RIGL HOLDINGS, LP, WHICH IS
MAJORITY-OWNED AND CONTROLLED BY AFFILIATES OF RIVERSTONE.
Riverstone is an energy and power-focussed private investment firm founded in 2000
by David M. Leuschen and Pierre F. Lapeyre with approximately $43 billion of capital raised.
Riverstone conducts buyout and growth capital investments in the E&P, midstream, oilfield services,
power and renewable sectors of the energy industry. Since 2009, Riverstone has committed over
$8 billion in renewable energy and decarbonisation, across 45 investments in technologies ranging
from wind development to financial software facilitating renewable deployment. With offices in
New York, London, Houston, Mexico City, Amsterdam and Menlo Park, the firm has committed to over
200 investments in North America, Latin America, Europe, Africa, Asia and Australia.
THE COMPANY SEEKS TO ACHIEVE SUPERIOR RISK ADJUSTED RETURNS
THROUGH INVESTING IN THE ENERGY SECTOR WITH A SPECIFIC FOCUS ON
ENERGY TRANSITION AND DECARBONISATION OF THE GLOBAL ECONOMY.
The transition to a clean mix of energy sources will require unprecedented investment
in new technologies and infrastructure. REL is poised to power that momentum by
supporting its conventional positions and by executing on its modified investment
programme. In 2022, REL invested $95 million in six companies located at diverse
junctions of the energy transition value chain.
The registered office of the Company is PO Box 286, Floor 2, Trafalgar Court,
Les Banques, St Peter Port, Guernsey, GY1 4LY.
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
2
Financial and Operational Highlights
(1)(2)
>
Net commitments during the year
ended 31 December 2022
Commitments increased by a net total of $69 million ($93 million pursuant to
decarbonisation strategy and ($24 million) pursuant to legacy conventional
strategy):
(i) $25 million in Tritium DCFC Limited
(ii) $20 million in Anuvia Plant Nutrients, Inc.
(iii) $17.5 million in T-REX Group, Inc.
(iv) $17.5 million in Infinitum Electric Inc.
(v) $12.5 million in Our Next Energy, Inc.
(vi) $4 million in Group14 Technologies Inc.
(vii) ($24 million) in Carrier Energy Partners II LLC
(viii) ($3 million) in Enviva, Inc. (in connection with overall approved
commitment reduction)
>
Remaining potential
unfunded commitments at
31 December 2022
$11 million
(2)(3)
($5 million pursuant to decarbonisation strategy and $6 million
pursuant to legacy conventional strategy):
(i) $6 million in Onyx Power
(ii) $4 million in Enviva Inc.
(iii) $1 million in Our Next Energy, Inc.
>
Investments during the year ended
31 December 2022
Invested a total of $95 million
(2)
($95 million pursuant to decarbonisation strategy):
(i) $25 million in Tritium DCFC Limited
(ii) $20 million in Anuvia Plant Nutrients Inc.
(iii) $17.5 million in T-REX Group, Inc.
(iv) $17.5 million in Infinitum Electric Inc.
(v) $11.5 million in Our Next Energy, Inc.
(vi) $4 million in Group14 Technologies Inc.
>
Realisations during the year ended
31 December 2022
Realised a total of $164 million
(2)
($163 million pursuant to legacy conventional
strategy and $1 million pursuant to decarbonisation strategy):
(i) $61 million in Onyx Power
(ii) $42 million from Pipestone Energy Corp. (formerly Canadian Non-Operated
Resources LP)
(iii) $34 million in Carrier Energy Partners II LLC
(4)
(iv) $23 million from Permian Resources Corporation (formerly Centennial
Resource Development, Inc.)
(v) $2 million from Meritage Midstream Services III, L.P.
(vi) $2 million in aggregate from ILX Holdings III, LLC, GoodLeap, LLC, Rock Oil
Holdings, LLC and Tritium DCFC Limited
INCREASING VALUE THROUGH SHARE REPURCHASES AND A FORWARD-LOOKING,
BALANCED APPROACH TO PORTFOLIO CONSTRUCTION WITH RISK-ADJUSTED RETURNS.
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
3
Key Financials
2022 2021
NAV as at 31 December
(5)
$739 million / £610 million
(6)
$682 million / £506 million
(6)
NAV per Share as at 31 December
(5)
$ 14.52 / £11.99
(6)
$12.41 / £9.19
(6)
Per cent. change in NAV per Share (USD) for the year
ended 31 December
17.0 per cent. 100.2 per cent.
Market capitalisation at 31 December $418 million / £345 million
(6)
$345 million / £255 million
(6)
Share price at 31 December $8.21 / £6.78 $6.28 / £4.65
Per cent. change in Share price (Sterling) for the year
ended 31 December
45.8 per cent. 56.6 per cent.
Number of Shares outstanding at 31 December 50,891,658 54,937,599
Share price discount to NAV 43.5 per cent. 49.4 per cent.
Cash and cash equivalents at 31 December $120million
(7)
/ £99million
(6)
$106 million
(7)
/ £78 million
(6)
Marketable securities (unrestricted) at 31 December $177 million
(8)
/ £146 million
(6)
$195 million
(8)
/ £144 million
(6)
Marketable securities (restricted) at 31 December $4 million
(9)
/ £3 million
(6)
$47 million
(9)
/ £35 million
(6)
Total comprehensive income for the year ended
31 December
$88.9 million $341.9 million
Basic and Diluted Earnings per Share for the year ended
31 December
171.87 cents 561.73 cents
Number of Shares repurchased/average price per
Share for the year ended 31 December
(9)
4,045,941
$7.95/ £6.63
8,000,867
$6.28 / £4.60
(1)
Amounts shown reflect investment-related activity at the Partnership, not the Company.
(2)
Amounts may vary due to rounding.
(3)
Excludes the remaining unfunded commitment for Hammerhead of $12.2 million, which is not expected to be funded. The expected funding of the remaining
unfunded commitments at 31 December 2022 are $4.5 million in 2023 and $nil in 2024. The residual amounts are to be funded as needed in 2025 and later years.
(4)
Please see page 30 for further information regarding the details of the Carrier II realisation transaction in December 2022.
(5)
NAV and NAV per Share are reflective of the fair value movements in the underlying investments held by the Partnership, net of income and expenses of
the Partnership and its related Investment Undertakings, including any Performance Allocation and applicable taxes which were both $nil as of
31 December 2022 and 31 December 2021.
(6)
Based on exchange rate of 1.2103 $/£ at 31 December 2022 (1.3503 $/£ at 31 December 2021 and 1.606 $/£ at IPO).
(7)
At 31 December 2022 and 2021, respectively, amounts are comprised of $15.8 million and $7.3 million held at the Company, $68.4 million and $4.5 million
held at the Partnership and $35.3 million and $94.0 million held at REL US Corp.
(8)
Unrestricted marketable securities held by the Partnership consist of publicly-traded shares of Permian Resources (formerly Centennial), Enviva,
Solid Power, Tritium and Hyzon for which the aggregate fair value was $177 million at 31 December 2022, and $197.8 million as of 27 February 2023
(31 December 2021: $195 million).
(9)
Restricted marketable securities held by the Partnership consist of publicly-traded shares of Tritium and DCRD for which the aggregate fair value was
$4 million at 31 December 2022 and $234 million as of 27 February 2023, which also includes the shares of HHRS (see Post-Year End Update section on
page 31 for further information) (31 December 2021: $47 million).
(10)
Inception to date total number of shares repurchased were 29,005,073 at an average price per share of £3.89 ($5.00) for a total cost of approximately
£113 million ($145 million).
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
4
Board Chair’s Statement
Dear Shareholder,
Global market disruption
2022 was one of the most event and policy driven energy markets
I have ever seen. On the face of it, commodity prices ended the year
in a similar place to where they started. WTI opened 2022 at
US$75.99/bbl and closed it at US$80.16/bbl. In Europe, the
Title Transfer Facility (TTF) natural gas price started the year
at 80.43/MWh and ended it at 76.31/MWh.
But this apparent calm year-on-year masked extreme intra-year
price movements, driven in a large part by Russia’s invasion
of Ukraine and the ensuing European gas and power crisis.
The high/low price for WTI during the year was $123.64/$71.05
per barrel. A near decade of under-investment in conventional fossil
fuels, combined with continued post-COVID demand recovery,
further exacerbated the energy crisis.
Unpredictable commodity prices have been matched by uncertainty
in the global stock and bond markets. The highest inflation seen in
Europe and North America for forty years, and subsequent shift
towards higher interest rate policies by the World’s central banks
for the first time in over a decade, contributed to a significant sell
off in technology and other growth sectors. It has also been a
difficult year for the SPAC market, which has seen demand fall back
from the high levels of 2020 and 2021.
Despite this tough backdrop REL has performed well. Our listed
companies have remained focused on executing their achievable
near-term growth plans. Furthermore, higher commodity prices
have lifted the value of our conventional E&P investments,
generating additional cashflows that support our share buybacks
and the growth of our decarbonisation portfolio as we continue to
pivot into the energy transition.
Government policy supports decarbonisation investment
Elevated energy prices and wider inflationary pressures continue
to fuel a cost-of-living crisis, threatening major economies with
recession just as they recover from the pandemic. More welcome
is that after years of low cost and abundant energy being taken for
granted, we are now seeing greater attention being placed on
energy security on both sides of the Atlantic.
Many European governments have reacted to the crisis by
introducing some form of windfall tax on high energy profits and at
the EU level a gas and power price cap. While it is understandable
that governments act to protect their most vulnerable citizens at
this time, this needs to be balanced against compounding the crisis
by dis-incentivising badly needed new investment in energy.
Consequently, it is encouraging that in addition to imposing
additional taxes governments have also doubled down on
decarbonisation as a means both to bolster energy security
through diversification and accelerate efforts to keep global
warming to below 1.5 degrees.
The EU announced the REPowerEU plan in May with the intention
to make Europe independent of Russian fossil fuels before 2030.
Under the plan the Commission made hundreds of billions of
Euro’s in financing available to member states to support clean
energy and clean industry initiatives and encourage significant
energy saving initiatives across the bloc.
In August, the US Congress passed its largest ever climate-related
legislation, the Inflation Reduction Act (“IRA”). The legislation
makes $391 billion of climate related incentives and provisions
available, two thirds of which are uncapped and could see the
overall quantum rise further. Designed to spur growth of the US’s
domestic green energy industry and supply chain, the legislation
will accelerate the development of blue hydrogen and CCUS
amongst others.
REL is well placed to capitalise on these new initiatives. While there
is little in either REPowerEU or the IRA to address one of our key
strategic initiatives which is to invest in grid flexibility and resilience,
our other areas of focus should benefit. These are the electrification
of transport; agriculture; next generation liquid fuels; and next
horizon resource use plays – all areas we have identified as attractive
opportunities for making decarbonisation investments.
THOUGH THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC AND RESULTING ECONOMIC IMPACTS
SEEMS TO BE LARGELY IN THE PAST, 2022 PRESENTED A NEW SET OF
CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR INVESTORS GLOBALLY.
The conflict in eastern Europe has presented a distraction from the energy transition as officials turn to
reliable energy sources to ride out market volatility. This has helped expose weaknesses in the energy system
that regulatory initiatives like the Inflation Reduction Act in the United States will help to address
by incentivising capital allocation and green infrastructure development.
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
5
Board changes
As previously announced, after nearly ten years as a REL Non-
Executive Director and as Chair of the Board for almost seven years,
I am standing down as Chair of the Board in February 2023 and
retiring from the Board after the AGM in May 2023. I am proud that
over the course of my time as Chair of the Board, REL has
successfully reoriented its strategy towards investing in the energy
transition, while strengthening its balance sheet and improving the
liquidity of its assets, as well as implemented significant favourable
adjustments to the IMA. Further, as of 31 December 2022, REL has
returned £113 million ($145 million) to Shareholders by purchasing
29,005,073 shares through the buyback programme, representing
36.3 per cent. of the total outstanding shares at commencement in
May 2020, at a weighted average price of £3.89 ($5.00) per share.
As a result, I am leaving the Company well positioned to benefit from
and support decarbonisation, the greatest investment theme of the
coming decades.
In October 2022, we welcomed Richard Horlick to the Board as a
Non-Executive Director. Richard brings a huge amount of
experience from a long career in investment management, including
with Schroders and Fidelity International. As well as joining the
Audit Committee, Nomination Committee and Management
Engagement Committee, Richard will become Chair of the Board in
February 2023. I wish him every success in the role
During the year, two further Non-Executive Directors announced that
they would be standing down from the Board, having served for
nearly ten years. Peter Barker will retire from the REL Board at the
Company’s 2023 Annual General Meeting, while Patrick Firth will
remain on the Board until December 2023 to ensure the orderly
transition of his responsibilities as Chair of the Audit Committee.
Again, I would like to thank both Peter and Patrick for their service to
REL and our Shareholders over the years.
I would like to welcome John Roche to the Board. John joined as a
Non-Executive Director in December 2022 and will become Chair of
the Audit Committee, taking over from Patrick Firth. John is a former
partner of PwC. With these changes to the Board of Directors, I
believe REL is now well placed for the next phase of its growth as the
Company continues to maximise the value of its conventional energy
investments and build out its investment portfolio in the
decarbonisation space.
Investment portfolio summary
As of 31 December 2022, REL’s portfolio comprised thirteen active
investments in decarbonisation and three conventional energy
investments. Over the course of 2022, we continued to invest in the
decarbonisation pipeline, making six exciting new investments.
At the beginning of the year, we made a $17.5 million investment in
T-REX Group. T-REX brings together asset class expertise, critical
data management capabilities, and a platform for deal structuring,
cash flow modelling, scenario analysis, real-time performance
tracking, and reporting. By giving institutions the modernised tools
and validation they require to deploy capital, T-REX facilitates
increased investment allocations into sustainable,
decarbonisation-related assets.
Shortly afterwards in February, REL announced it was making a
lead investment of $17.5 million in Infinitum Electric’s $80 million
Series D round. Founded in 2018, Infinitum Electric created the
breakthrough air-core motor which offers superior performance
at half the weight and size of conventional motors – and at a
fraction of the carbon footprint.
In March, REL invested $20 million in Anuvia Plant Nutrients’
$65.5 million Series D fund raising round. The company has
developed and now uses a unique technology that optimises
nutrient availability and efficiency for plants, while also improving
soil health, preserving natural resources, and reducing
greenhouse gas emissions.
Group14 Technologies held a $400 million Series C round in
April, with REL investing $4 million. Group14 is a battery
materials technology company that has developed a proprietary
silicon-based anode battery material to replace graphite in
conventional lithium-ion batteries.
In September, REL, alongside other investors, increased Tritium
DCFC Limited’s existing debt facility by $60 million to a total of
$150 million. Tritium is a global developer and manufacturer of
direct current (DC) fast charging technology for electric vehicles.
The additional funding will be used to fund working capital,
product development and to help accelerate production to meet
high demand from across the globe.
Our final investment of the year came in December, when REL
funded $11.5 million of its $12.5 million commitment to Our Next
Energy’s $300 million Series B round, valuing the company at over
$1 billion. ONE is a Michigan-based energy storage technology
company working to develop batteries for mobility and large-scale
storage applications.
The year also saw two mergers in our portfolio companies.
Centennial and Colgate completed its merger in September to
create a $7 billion Permian basin pure-play. REL has invested
$268 million into Centennial since 2016 and has so far realised
$194 million, or ~73 per cent. of its cost basis through proceeds
from share sales.
In September, REL announced that Hammerhead Resources Inc.,
a Calgary based E&P company, was merging with Decarbonization
Plus Acquisition Corporation IV (DCRD), a special purpose
acquisition company. The combination values Hammerhead at an
EV of C$1.39 billion, approximately 2.2x DCRD’s projected 2024
EBITDA for Hammerhead. The transaction will create a publicly
traded upstream oil and gas company with an identified investment
programme to decarbonise its oil and gas operations through
carbon capture and sequestration. This is expected to lead to a
79 per cent. reduction in scope 1 and 2 emissions by 2029 versus
2021, even after a doubling in production. The transaction closed
on 23 February 2023 (see Post-Year End Update section in the
Investment Manager’s Report on page 31 for further details).
Finally, REL realised some value from its legacy energy assets
announcing in February that it was exiting Pipestone Energy Corp.
Pipestone, a Calgary-based E&P company listed on the Toronto
Stock Exchange, yielded net proceeds of C$53 million, representing
approximately a 0.64x Gross MOIC. The sale further shifted our
portfolio away from oil and gas and provided additional proceeds to
accelerate our growth in decarbonisation opportunities.
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
6
Board Chair’s Statement continued
Buyback programme
Since the Company’s announcement on 14 February 2022 of the
authorised increase of £46 million for the share buyback
programme, 4,045,941 ordinary shares have been bought back at
a total cost of approximately £26.8 million ($32.2 million) and at
an average share price of approximately £6.63 ($7.95). As of
31 December 2022, £23.2 million was available for repurchasing.
With the intention to narrow the Company’s trading discount, the
Board took the decision in Q4 2022 to steadily buyback shares up to
£15.5 million ($17.5 million) for the period to 31 December 2022. In
Q4, REL repurchased 1,190,588 shares, an increase from 632,041
shares purchased in Q3. The Board will continue evaluating
opportunities for additional share buybacks or tender offers based
upon projected cashflow from potential significant asset
investment and divestitures.
Portfolio valuation
REL ended the period to 31 December 2022 with a NAV of
$14.52 (£11.99) per share, a 17.0 per cent. and 30.5 per cent.
increase in USD and GBP, respectively, compared to the
31 December 2021 NAV of $12.41 (£9.19) per share. REL ended
the period with an aggregate gross cash balance of $120 million
(£99 million) across the Company, Partnership and REL US Corp.
Reflecting the improved commodity price environment and the
extension of the share buyback programme, shares traded up
45.8 per cent. during the full year 2022.
Owing to the volatile markets, REL’s largest investments by gross
unrealised value had a mixed performance year on year. Onyx was
marked up from 1.70x to 3.00x Gross MOIC during 2022, a
substantial improvement and benefiting from continued good
performance in European energy markets. However, GoodLeap,
one of REL’s decarbonisation investments, saw a decline in its
marks from 2.75x Gross MOIC at the start of the year to 2.20x in
December 2022.
The valuation of REL’s investments is conducted quarterly by the
Investment Manager and is subject to approval by the independent
Directors. In addition, the valuations of REL’s investments are
audited by Ernst & Young LLP in connection with the annual audit
of the Company’s Financial Statements. The Company’s valuation
policy is compliant with both IFRS and IPEV Valuation Guidelines
and has been applied consistently from period to period since
inception. Those of the Company’s investments which are not
publicly quoted require meaningful judgement to establish a range
of values, and the ultimate value at which an investment is realised
may differ from its most recent valuation and the difference may
be significant. Further information on the Company’s valuation
policy can be found in the Investment Manager’s Report.
Outlook for 2023 and beyond
As I wrote at the beginning, 2022 has seen unprecedented event
and policy driven shifts in global energy and public markets. While
that makes predictions about the future even harder to make than
usual, I believe we are likely to see geopolitics continue to
dominate, whether that is Ukraine, US-China relations, or rising
tensions in Asia Pacific, and Taiwan in particular. These are likely
to outweigh any recessionary impacts with commodity prices
remaining elevated as a consequence.
While Europe looks like it will weather the 2022/23 winter, the
following winter could well be tougher, especially if a lack of
alternatives to Russian gas makes it hard to fill European
storage during the summer months. There is also a risk that by
dis-incentivising further necessary investment in energy –
renewable and conventional – the EU’s gas and power cap and
other windfall taxes will further limit the supply of badly needed
energy into Europe. Obviously, a powerful settlement to the
Ukraine conflict and lifting of sanctions could be expected to
stabilise energy prices at lower levels.
What is required is a pragmatic approach and recognition that
cleaner fossil fuels have an important role to play as a bridge to
wider decarbonisation in the energy transition. We believe the need
to provide greater supplies of green fossil fuels will become more
widely accepted. The IRA will boost both blue hydrogen and Carbon
Capture, Utilisation and Storage (CCUS) in the US and, with
transactions like Hammerhead and DCRD. Pressure on agriculture
to deliver the crop and food yields necessary to supply the world, at
a time when weather and climate is making this ever harder,
continues the drive and opportunity for innovative solutions. REL is
well placed to continue to invest into these trends as part of
growing its wider decarbonisation portfolio.
The Board’s objective has always been to maximise shareholder
value and to maintain the highest standards of corporate
governance. Over the past several years, there have been several
significant changes to the IMA. These include the Investment
Manager’s representatives voluntarily leaving the Board, amending
the IMA to stop performance fees until there is 100 per cent. make
whole from prior realised and unrealised losses (aggregating circa
$660 million at the start and now $95 million), and instituting an
8 per cent. hurdle for each deal as well as the requirement of full
capital return on individual deals before a performance fee. It is
important to note that changes to the IMA cannot be unilaterally
made by the Board. The Investment Manager’s consent is required
for IMA amendments, and both the Investment Manager and the
Cornerstone Investors must agree to any changes in performance
fees. Such negotiations are always protracted and require
compromises by all parties.
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
7
To be very clear, the Board has always been focused on the Net
Asset Value (NAV) share discount in making asset allocations.
We evaluate the immediate NAV uplift of share buy back as well as
the long term value enhancement from new investments in high
return decarb opportunities. Since inception, the Board has
emphasised and the Investment Manager has sought to achieve
high risk adjusted long term returns as was the premise with
Riverstone Energy Funds V and VI, which was set forth in the IPO
prospectus. When the share NAV discount is large, the Board has
pursued aggressive open market and tender offer buy backs. In
aggregate, REL has purchased 29,005,073 shares, representing
36.3 per cent. of the total outstanding shares at a weighted average
price of £3.89 ($5.00) per share. This is one of the largest
buybacks for any closed end fund since May 2020 when the
Company commenced its buyback programme. However, we are
also cognisant of the after effects of such programmes: reduced
share liquidity, less capital available for future investments,
smaller pool of investment opportunities, smaller deal size with
higher likely volatility, and therefore fewer deals, more
concentration, and less diversification, all of which entails
additional risk.
The Board welcomes feedback from Shareholders, but will not
relinquish its responsibilities to meet short-term objectives.
Moreover, if the Board deems it appropriate, they will call an EGM
for a shareholder vote, as can any shareholder or shareholder
group which in aggregate totals 10 per cent or more of the
shares outstanding.
Our investment protocols have proven to be successful during
2022. According to a recent JPM Euro Equity research report,
with the exception of four aircraft leasing companies, REL had
the highest price total return for closed end investment
companies. During 2022 and 2021, respectively, the Company’s
share price traded up 45.8 per cent. from £4.65 to £6.78 per share
and 56.6 per cent. from £2.97 to £4.65 per share. The list included
many energy, renewable, infrastructure and commodity funds.
Still, more can and will be done. Energy markets, both fossil and
renewable, have been challengingly volatile and the Board must
adapt accordingly. They will continue to allocate capital where they
expect the highest risk adjusted long term returns from both
capital investments and share repurchases. The Board will also
maintain their regular discussions with the Investment Manager to
make further shareholder friendly changes to the IMA, which will
require the consent of the Investment Manager and possibly the
Cornerstone investors as well. This approach should give the
Directors and Shareholders confidence that REL will continue with
the success it has achieved to date.
Let me end by thanking you for your continued support. REL
has repositioned its investments and portfolio over recent
years to capitalise on the shift towards the energy transition.
The long-term trends and demand driving our decarbonisation
investments remain strong and we see the opportunity for continued
capital deployment. At the same time the Investment Management
team and the teams running our portfolio companies have taken the
necessary steps to reduce leverage, improve cash generation and
improve liquidity. As a result, both our conventional, legacy E&P
investments and our thirteen decarbonisation investments are well
placed to continue to perform through a period of considerable
disruption and uncertainty in global energy markets.
I look forward to watching REL continue to grow under a refreshed
Board and would like to thank you all for your support over the past
10 years.
Richard Hayden
Chair of the Board
28 February 2023
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
8
Environmental, Social and Governance Report
THE INVESTMENT STRATEGY OF THE COMPANY, WHICH WAS ORIGINALLY FOCUSSED
ON THE TRADITIONAL OIL AND GAS SECTOR, HAS BEEN TRANSITIONED
TOWARDS DECARBONISATION ASSETS SINCE 2020.
This shift is reflective of a larger awareness and implementation of Environmental, Social and Governance
(“ESG”) policies and is a clear statement of the Companys focus on this area. The Company’s focus on
ESG not only guides its new investments, but also extends to its legacy portfolio, which has made
demonstrable progress in the pursuit of improvement of ESG policies and performance.
The Company itself, led by its independent Board, views ESG as a
core element in the management of REL. In order to put ESG into
practice, the Board relies on its Investment Manager to design and
implement an ESG policy which applies to their operations and
those of the investee companies. This policy and examples of its
application are highlighted below.
The Company utilises the services of Riverstone as the Investment
Manager to take appropriate ESG principles into account in its
investment decisions and in the ongoing management of the
portfolio. In order to support the robustness of these principles,
the Board engages with the Investment Manager on ESG matters
and monitors compliance of REL’s portfolio companies with
Riverstone’s ESG policy. Patrick Firth, a member of the REL Board
and Audit Committee Chair, leads the ESG efforts for the Company.
The Board receives periodic updates from the Investment Manager
on the Investment Manager’s ESG programme and on ESG matters
related to the REL investment portfolio. The Board takes its
fiduciary responsibility to Shareholders seriously and engages with
Riverstone on corporate governance matters as evidenced by the
changes to the Investment Management Agreement agreed in
January 2020.
Riverstone published its annual ESG report for 2022 in
February 2023. The pages that follow summarise the key
elements for investors which impact REL’s current and future
investments. More detail is included in the full report, which is
available on Riverstones website: https://www.riverstonellc.com/
en/responsible-investing/esg-reports. The statement from the
Investment Manager below relates to the Investment Manager’s
portfolio which includes investments made by the Company.
While Riverstone seeks to integrate ESG matters into its overall
investment management processes, including the standards and
strategies described in this report, there can be no assurance that
Riverstone will be able to successfully apply such strategies or
implement its ESG policies to procure particular ESG results for
any particular portfolio company or other initiative. The ESG
results for any portfolio company or business are no guarantee as
to ESG outcomes for any other portfolio company. Applying ESG
factors to investment decisions involves a mix of factors, including
considerations that are qualitative and subjective by nature. There
can be no assurance that the ESG criteria utilised by Riverstone, or
any judgment exercised by Riverstone with respect to ESG matters,
will reflect the beliefs or values of any third party.
No representation, warranty, forecast or other projection is given
with respect to any investment results. This report contains
forward-looking statements and actual results and outcomes may
differ materially and adversely. Numbers and percentages in this
report include estimates, approximations and assumptions that, if
inaccurate, may make results differ from current disclosures and
expectations. We are also reliant in part on third party data that we
have not independently verified or audited.
Riverstone’s ESG Report
Our primary obligation is to be exceptional stewards of our
investors’ capital. In today’s world, this translates not only into
delivering strong risk-adjusted returns but also doing so in a
manner which formally adopts and integrates proportionate and
measured environmental, social and governance (ESG) practices
for the benefit of a diverse group of stakeholders.
This is all at a time of increasing economic uncertainty, emerging
regulatory complexity and political scrutiny that will undoubtedly
shape how ESG evolves over the coming years.
We continue to recognise the correlation between those
businesses that make ESG a core pillar of their strategies and
day-to-day operations and those that are successful in what they
do. At Riverstone, we remain committed to deploying your capital
in a manner that appropriately and thoughtfully integrates
sustainability, ethical and social considerations.
In our last ESG report, we outlined several ambitious objectives.
The advances we have made against each of these are set out in
more detail in the following pages.
The below report on ESG is for the period ending on 31 December
2022. This report does not constitute an offer to sell or a
solicitation of an offer to purchase any securities. Past or projected
performance is no guarantee of future results. Additionally,
Riverstone may provide information herein that is not necessarily
“material” under the federal securities laws for SEC reporting
purposes, but that is informed by various ESG standards and
frameworks (including standards for the measurement of
underlying data) and the interest of various stakeholders. Much of
this information is subject to assumptions, estimates or third-party
information that is still evolving and subject to change.
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
9
For example, Riverstones disclosures based on any standards
may change due to revisions in the framework requirements,
availability of information, changes in Riverstone’s business or
applicable government policies, or other factors, some of which
may be beyond Riverstone’s control.
Emissions Reporting
We are particularly proud of the work we have undertaken to
measure greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions across Riverstones
portfolio (which includes the companies in which the Company has
invested). We now know the magnitude of financed emissions from
our investments for the 2021 calendar year. Having completed our
baseline year, we have two primary goals on emissions:
>
Increasing GHG emissions data quality with more of our
portfolio companies reporting more granular, “bottom-up”
data; and
>
Working with our portfolio companies on GHG emissions
reduction initiatives and technologies
As a firm, we will continue to invest in climate solutions and data
analytics to decrease the emissions of our portfolio companies.
By reducing these emissions and being able to track such
reductions, we understand and effectively communicate our
contribution to climate change mitigation.
Climate Risk Assessments
The climate crisis poses a host of different risks to the financial
stability of all organisations that need to be anticipated and
incorporated into investment decisions. These risks fall under two
main categories: “physical risks” and “transition risks.”
During 2022, we undertook physical and transition climate risk
assessments for the majority of Riverstone’s portfolio, including
for a number of the companies in which the Company has invested.
We plan to use the results to support our portfolio companies as
they seek to improve their climate resilience and capture potential
opportunities presented by the energy transition.
While some of the identified risks may be unavoidable,
understanding and adapting to the distinct and systemic risks
posed by the effects of climate change are important first steps to
reducing climate risk.
In addition to our work around emissions and climate change,
there are a number of other noteworthy developments to our ESG
programme which are highlighted in the following pages.
Looking Forward
We are encouraged by the improvements we have made to our
ESG programme in 2022. However, against the backdrop of the
heightened focus on ESG and, in particular, on climate change
issues, we recognise there is much more work required, in
partnership with our investors, our management teams, our
regulators and other important stakeholders. We will continue to
prioritise our commitment to being responsible investors and look
forward to providing further updates on our ESG activities in the
year to come.
In support of the low carbon transition, we will continue to focus on
investments in decarbonisation and plan to further align with the
recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial
Disclosures (TCFD).
As the ESG landscape evolves, we are preparing to manage risks
by monitoring emerging industry trends and scanning the
regulatory horizon, including evolving requirements from the SEC.
We also plan to maintain awareness of changes in reporting
frameworks as the International Sustainability Standards Board
(ISSB) strives to develop global sustainability standards. We will
consider opportunities to integrate these standards once available
to provide additional critical ESG data in our reporting. In addition,
we will monitor the framework in development from the Taskforce
on Nature-related Financial Disclosures (TNFD).
We will also continue to mature our ESG programme by leveraging
the insights collected during the past year and strengthening our
management approach for climate change.
To accomplish this, we plan to build on the objectives outlined in
our 2021 ESG Report while looking to incorporate additional
priorities for 2023 and 2024 and:
>
Continue to further align our reporting with the TCFD
recommendations and evaluate opportunities to advance our risk
management and estimate the financial implications of risks
>
Refine our GHG accounting across our portfolio companies and
include any new investments in our GHG inventory
>
Consider development of potential targets for emission
reductions and support our portfolio companies in
understanding their emissions and pursuing their own
reduction goals
>
Using the findings from our climate risk assessment, enhance
our engagement with our portfolio companies to mitigate
climate-related risks, capitalise on opportunities to enhance
resilience and assess opportunities to build on our risk
assessment further by evaluating additional companies and
considering sensitivity analysis
>
Update our annual ESG questionnaire to further monitor ESG
practices and track performance with additional focus on
climate change
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
10
>
Continue to facilitate ESG training/capacity building at
Riverstone to promote greater ESG awareness and
capabilities, specifically to further incorporate climate-related
considerations into our ongoing risk management and due
diligence processes
>
Further evolve our ESG due diligence procedures and
resources to incorporate climate risk assessment for potential
investments and enhance rigor of assessment process
Riverstone’s Approach to ESG
As one of the most experienced private investment firms within
the energy, power, infrastructure and decarbonisation sectors,
Riverstone recognises the ever-increasing importance of ESG and
has made the proactive implementation of ESG initiatives one of
its highest priorities. Riverstone takes its fiduciary responsibility
to investors very seriously and believes that a strong commitment
to addressing ESG factors is critical to the success of its funds,
portfolio companies and firm. By devoting substantial internal
and external resources towards ESG matters, Riverstone has
developed clear processes that take account of leading industry
standards. Riverstone believes this effort helps it to make
sustainable, ethical and socially responsible decisions over
the long run.
ESG objectives
Riverstone has established institutional ESG processes that
support the high standards that it has set for itself. These
procedures were developed to achieve several key objectives
related to ESG, including:
>
Providing Riverstone personnel and its portfolio companies
with training and the resources to enable those portfolio
companies to provide the necessary ESG support appropriately
>
Identifying potential risks and mitigants before an investment
is made
>
Immediate assistance with the identification of any issues
that may arise and tracking ongoing performance through
portfolio monitoring
>
Evaluating and tracking portfolio companies’ execution of
opportunities to improve current practices at its portfolio
companies and firm
Riverstone’s ESG policy
Riverstone has an ESG policy that sets out its approach to
handling key ESG factors, including inter alia natural resource
management, health and safety, community and stakeholder
impact, climate change, GHG emissions and governance. This
policy helps inform the ESG considerations that are relevant to the
management of Riverstone’s portfolio companies from initial due
diligence all the way through to an exit, and the operation of
Riverstone’s own business. Riverstone has continuously evolved its
ESG policy in conjunction with third-party ESG experts to strive
towards best practices across the board. A copy of Riverstone’s
ESG policy is available online: https://www.riverstonellc.com/en/
responsible-investing/esg-policy.
ESG resources at Riverstone
Riverstone’s ESG Committee comprises a cross-functional set of
leaders and our external ESG advisor, Environmental Resources
Management (ERM). The ESG Committee meets on a quarterly
basis to continually develop our ESG strategy, support ESG
initiatives across the firm and its portfolio companies, grow the
capabilities of the investment teams on which REL relies, and
analyse and benchmark ESG performance and trends using data
from portfolio company operations.
Nominated investment team members serve as ESG deal leads
and engage their respective portfolio company on ESG
management and performance. In partnership with Riverstone’s
internal legal team, ESG deal leads maintain responsibility for
coordinating the completion of annual compliance reviews and
ESG questionnaires and providing feedback on the ESG
monitoring scorecards.
Riverstone’s annual performance reviews assess the quality of
ESG engagement driven by each ESG deal lead, and the results
inform decisions related to compensation and promotion for
ESG deal leads.
ESG in Practice
The careful evaluation of ESG issues is a mandatory component for
the underwriting of all REL investments, both by the Investment
Manager’s Investment Committee and the Company’s Board.
Furthermore, Riverstone investment professionals conduct a
comprehensive evaluation of ESG considerations throughout the
lifecycle of an investment. These steps are summarised below:
Risk identification
>
Use Riverstone’s deep industry expertise, its ESG Minimum
Expectations (or ’ESG-MEs’) and its proprietary ESG toolkit to
identify and manage material ESG risks and value creation
opportunities in a consistent manner for investments
throughout the deal lifecycle
Due diligence
>
Early engagement with the management team and advisors to
understand the “ESG landscape” for a potential investment
>
Engage third-party experts to evaluate specific risks and areas
of concern
>
Thorough evaluation of key ESG risks for each potential
investment and determination of whether appropriate
mitigants can be implemented
>
Completion of the climate change screening questionnaire to
analyse whether a company has considered impacts from
climate-related market shifts, regulatory and voluntary
frameworks and extreme weather events
Environmental, Social and Governance Report continued
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
11
Investment committee
>
Complete ESG risk assessment as part of the Investment
Committee memo for potential investments, within the context
of the investment’s broader risk analysis
>
Review third-party ESG assessments and reference checks
>
Determine whether a potential investment has any ESG risks
that are “deal-breakers”
>
Robust discussion at Investment Committee, and by the
Company Board, of the ESG risk evaluation scorecard
>
Go/no go investment decision
ONGOING MONITORING AND PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT
>
Health, safety, environmental (HSE) and other material ESG
issues as part of Riverstone’s participation on the board of
portfolio companies
>
Annual portfolio review through ESG questionnaires with
portfolio company follow-up based on responses received
>
All portfolio companies are subject to periodic assessment of
foreign bribery risks and regular reporting and training
required for those portfolio companies identified as facing
higher levels of risk
>
Portfolio companies implement regular training and
compliance reviews including, where necessary, by
third-party legal teams
>
A third party conducts regular cybersecurity assessments of
portfolio companies to evaluate financial, operational
technology and information technology controls
Exit
>
Where appropriate, make relevant ESG disclosures and
evaluate whether potential buyers’ ESG standards comply with
all applicable laws with regard to, for example, employees and
decommissioning of assets and infrastructure
ESG:2022 in Review
In our 2021 ESG report, we established a number of overarching
ESG objectives for 2022 and 2023. Our progress through 2022
against these objectives, and other ESG issues addressed during
the year, are summarised below and presented in more detail
throughout this report.
Climate change
>
Completed actions to further develop Riverstone’s ESG
reporting, resulting in further alignment with the
recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-Related
Financial Disclosures (TCFD)
>
Engaged a leading carbon accounting platform, Persefoni, to
collaborate with our portfolio companies to track their
emissions, yielding disclosure of our financed emissions for the
first time, including Scope 1 and 2 emissions and significant
sources of Scope 3 emissions for our portfolio companies
>
Performed climate risk assessments to identify physical and
transition risks for the majority of the portfolio
ESG integration
>
Maintained portfolio company performance against our
ESG Minimum Expectations (or ‘ESG-MEs’) and continued
to strengthen criteria to drive further improvements
in performance
>
Developed an ESG onboarding pack for new portfolio
companies to share information with them about our ESG
programme, portfolio engagement and best practices
>
Continued to expand our Green and Sustainability-Linked Loan
investments across our credit funds
ESG engagement
>
Strengthened our partnership with Howard University by
providing summer internships, participating in their career fair
and leading on-campus seminars
>
Built ESG capacity at all levels in Riverstone by facilitating
training on ESG topics, including unconscious bias and
anti-harassment, and providing guidance on effectively
utilising the ESG toolkit
>
Participated in the ESG Data Convergence Initiative (EDCI) to
contribute comparable data that will enable private equity
firms to better assess their ESG progress and practices
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
12
CLIMATE CHANGE AND DECARBONISATION
Alignment with the TCFD recommendations
Riverstone recognises climate change is a threat to our global
economy, society and ecosystems. As a firm, we support the Paris
Agreement and its goal to limit global warming “to no more than”
(which tracks our ESG policy) 2°C above pre-industrial levels. In
addition, climate change also impacts how we evaluate investment
risk and opportunity as part of the world’s transition to a low
carbon economy.
In its April 2022 report, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change (IPCC) identified the financial industry as a fundamental
enabler of the low carbon transition. As the effects of climate
change continue to become more apparent, capital allocators can
look to climate-related disclosures to make informed decisions.
To enable greater understanding of these impacts, the TCFD
recommendations promote consistency and transparency around
climate-related reporting. The climate disclosure proposal
presented by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
also aligns emerging regulations with the pillars and requirements
of the TCFD framework.
In 2022, Riverstone performed analyses and took steps to improve
our management practices and enhance our disclosures through
increased alignment with TCFD guidance. Riverstone’s disclosures
aligning with the TCFD recommendations and structure are
included in pages 12 to 17 of this report.
In addition to reporting on more elements of the TCFD
recommendations in 2022, we also consider the TCFD
Supplemental Guidance for the Financial Sector specific to
asset managers.
Riverstone’s GHG emissions disclosure efforts align with the
Partnership for Carbon Accounting Financials (PCAF) Global GHG
Accounting and Reporting Standard for the Financial Industry.
We also reference the supplemental guidance in the GHG
Accounting and Reporting for the Private Equity Sector report —
produced by Initiative Climat International (iCI) and ERM and
supported by the Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI).
The statement from the Investment Manager below around
governance, strategy, risk management and metrics and targets
relate to the Investment Manager’s portfolio which includes
investments made by the Company.
Governance
Responsibilities
Driving collaboration across the firm, our cross-functional ESG
Committee leads Riverstone’s ESG programme and our response to
climate change, which includes our climate strategy, climate risk
assessments, risk management efforts and GHG reporting for our
firm and portfolio.
The ESG Committee monitors consistent application of our ESG
Policy and associated ESG initiatives across our activities.
The ESG Committee also supports our ESG deal leads. Each of our
investment teams has a designated ESG deal lead who help to
screen, assess and manage climate-related risks and opportunities
for each portfolio company throughout the investment lifecycle.
Please refer to page 10 for more details about the responsibilities of
ESG deal leads.
We incorporate external support as needed to enhance our ESG
programme and disclosures. For example, ERM serves as an
external advisor to our ESG Committee and assists our ESG deal
leads with portfolio engagement.
As part of Riverstone’s commitment to decarbonisation, we have
also engaged a leading carbon accounting platform, Persefoni, to
measure, track and report GHG emissions across our portfolio.
Persefoni’s platform is fully compliant with the PCAF framework,
and all calculations adhere to the global gold standard of carbon
accounting—the GHG Protocol. To learn more about how we strive
to understand and monitor the GHG footprint of our investments,
please see this video for interviews with key leaders within the firm.
Awareness
We endeavour to enhance understanding of climate-related risks
and opportunities across our firm and increase awareness of key
actions by providing regular ESG training for our investment
professionals. Through our ESG training we review information
about Riverstone’s ESG programme and ESG deal lead
responsibilities. We also provide updates on available resources
such as the ESG toolkit and the ESG diligence scorecards, which
include our climate change screening questionnaire and inform
due diligence and portfolio engagement around ESG topics. In
addition, we held a firm-wide call in 2022 to share the findings of
our climate risk assessments and highlight the importance of
managing climate-related risks and opportunities.
Environmental, Social and Governance Report continued
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
13
Strategy
Climate-Related Risks and Opportunities
We continue to inform our climate strategy by monitoring physical
and transition risks and opportunities within our portfolio.
Riverstone leverages these insights to drive conversations with
portfolio company management teams and to inform our overall
decarbonisation investment approach as part of the low carbon
transition. We consider the following time horizons as we
evaluate risks:
>
Short term: Present-2030
>
Medium term: 2031-2040
>
Long term: 2041-2050
Climate risk assessments allow us to proactively identify key
hazards. Our investment time horizon focuses on the short-term
timeframe. By understanding present and future risks, we can
support portfolio company success throughout the lifetime of our
investment and integrate our findings into implementation plans
and investment strategies. To inform our efforts, our third-party
partner, ERM, leveraged a Screen—Assess—Adapt strategic
approach for reviewing portfolio company data and used innovative
tools that generated insights into key risks and opportunities.
Physical Risk
Based on the evaluation of the selected sites of the Investment
Manager’s portfolio companies, the climate risk assessment
showed that approximately 3 per cent. of assets have high risk and
35 per cent. have moderate risk. While the number of high-risk
assets remains the same by 2030, the proportion of moderate risk
assets increases to 45 per cent.
Climate risk assessment conducted on a subset of the Investment
Manager’s portfolio revealed that companies may be subject to a
variety of physical climate hazards. Please see page 14 for details
about the selection of portfolio companies included in the analysis.
In the short term, top climate hazards across select portfolio
companies of the Investment Manager include water stress
(including drought) and tropical cyclones. Key emerging risks,
which reflect the greatest increases over medium-and long-term
time horizons, are extreme heat, water stress and wildfires.
Company-specific risk profiles, which highlight key climate
hazards facing the portfolio company, were developed and shared
with each company that was included in the assessment.
Impacts of climate hazards vary by sector and asset type.
Examples of potential impacts to operations include the following:
>
Extreme weather events, such as cyclones, wildfires and
flooding, may damage critical infrastructure, buildings,
equipment and vehicles, as well as interrupt key transportation
routes and supply chain networks
>
Water stress and extreme heat may reduce productivity
levels and lead to higher costs for cooling systems and other
operational needs
>
Climate hazards may pose health and safety risks to
site personnel and may require delays in operations that
impact revenue
>
If risks are not managed properly, climate-related events
could lead to potential contaminations, waste releases and
water pollution in the local environment
Transition Risk
From a transition risk perspective, losses in market share and
revenue primarily drive growing risks for exploration and
production and midstream oil and coal-fired power generation
portfolio companies in the medium- and long-term timeframes in
a low carbon future. Some portfolio companies could benefit in
the future from falling fuel prices but may also realise reduced
operational expenditures by switching to lower carbon fuels.
However, potential decarbonisation policies may add carbon
pricing to fuel costs and require companies to invest in emissions
reduction measures throughout their operations.
In the near term, natural gas may serve as a lower-emitting
“bridge option” compared to coal and other high carbon fuels. If
demand increases, natural gas-fired power generation portfolio
companies may have potential expansion opportunities. Despite
potential short-term benefits, natural gas demand is ultimately
expected to decrease over medium- and long-term time horizons
in a low carbon future and impact the market share for portfolio
companies in related sectors.
Power and energy transition portfolio companies may have greater
growth opportunities in a low carbon future, which could be readily
available in the short-term time horizon. Emerging supportive
policies and incentives may further improve the conditions for
these portfolio companies, depending on geography. Portfolio
companies that focus on renewable energy and electric vehicle
charging infrastructure may have greater opportunity for market
expansion over time. However, portfolio companies may receive
pressure to decarbonise their supply chains and invest in new
technology to reduce their carbon footprint, which may increase
operational costs for emissions management.
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
14
Implementation Plan
At portfolio company level, we aim to enhance our resilience
against climate-related risks through strategic engagement and
mitigation of risks identified in our assessment. By leveraging
these findings to promote discussion with management teams, we
plan to outline actions for mitigating physical risks, encouraging
geographical diversity, preparing for market shifts and limiting
emissions in advance of impending regulations.
Our climate strategy focuses on investments that align with our
decarbonization platform. Our climate risk assessment highlighted
the intensifying risks usually associated with conventional
investments and outlined the types of companies that may access
greater market share in the future. The screening did not include
financial or impact assessments at this stage, but we plan to make
use of the initial insights from the risk analysis. Going forward, we
intend to primarily invest in businesses that support the low
carbon transition and represent key growth opportunities. We
concentrate on reducing the impact that our investments have on
the climate by investing in five core areas that offer scalable
climate solutions:
>
Grid flexibility and resiliency
>
Electrification of transportation
>
Next generation fuels
>
Efficient resource use
>
Agriculture and natural resource plays
As we evolve our investment strategy in alignment with the low
carbon transition, we will also consider opportunities to integrate
climate-related physical and transition risks into our investment
process. We will strive to draw on potential opportunities to increase
resilience and drive value creation across our portfolio, and we aim
to track our progress as we build further on our performance.
Risk management
We actively utilise our ESG toolkit, climate risk assessments and
portfolio engagement processes to support our portfolio companies
in managing climate-related risks and monitoring GHG emissions.
During pre-investment due diligence, our deal teams evaluate how
a potential investment assesses and manages climate-related
risks and opportunities. As part of scoring prospective investments
on the basis of ESG performance, the deal teams utilise our climate
change screening questionnaire to analyse whether a company has
considered impacts from climate-related market shifts, regulatory
and voluntary frameworks and extreme weather events.
Each Investment Committee memo includes the results of this
assessment, along with a summary of other key ESG practices,
to inform investment decisions.
In 2022, we collaborated with a third party, Persefoni, to engage a
subset of our portfolio companies in developing high-quality GHG
inventories to track their emissions. During ownership, we expect
portfolio companies to establish a GHG baseline inventory for Scope
1 and 2 emissions, monitor their emissions and annually report on
performance as part of our portfolio engagement process.
Deal teams, with third party support as required, develop actions
to help portfolio companies meet our expectations and improve
their overall ESG performance, including efforts related to
climate change.
Additionally, Riverstone actively communicates with portfolio
companies on climate-related topics throughout the year as part
of our wider portfolio engagement efforts.
Climate Risk Assessment
Riverstone utilises risk assessments throughout the investment
lifecycle to identify and assess the impacts from potential
climate-related risks and opportunities. The analysis allows us to
identify risks for and to better inform our engagement with specific
portfolio companies.
In 2022, we expanded upon our pilot climate assessment and
conducted an in-depth climate risk assessment for certain
portfolio companies to contribute to a greater understanding of
Riverstone’s exposure to acute and chronic climate hazards, as
well as the types of climate policy, technology, market,
reputational and legal risks. We selected portfolio companies
while considering the level of our equity ownership and the
materiality of each company to our business strategy. The subset
of companies reflects the wide range of sectors and geographies
represented in our portfolio.
The results of the recent analysis provided insights about the
relevant types of climate-related risks and opportunities, which are
described in this report starting on page 13. In addition to supporting
engagement with specific portfolio companies, we aim to apply the
results to inform our ongoing implementation plan to prepare for
climate change and advance our decarbonisation investments.
Physical Risk Analysis
To understand the acute and chronic physical risks associated with
climate change, our assessment included analysis of extreme
temperatures, river flooding, rainfall flooding, coastal flooding,
tropical cyclones, wildfires, rainfall-induced landslides, water
stress and drought. We evaluated current and emerging climate
hazards at operational sites for certain portfolio companies at
present, 2030 and 2050 timeframes.
Environmental, Social and Governance Report continued
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
15
The scenarios used for the climate analysis are based on the IPCC
Assessment Report 6, which incorporates around 100 leading
climate models into five Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs).
These SSPs present plausible scenarios for global trends in net
carbon dioxide emissions. Although uncertainties exist around the
different scenarios and climate impacts, evaluation across
multiple scenarios enables increased preparedness against
possible risks. Two climate scenarios were analysed in our
physical risk assessment:
>
SSP1-2.6 is a low GHG emissions scenario in which global
warming stays below 2°C by 2100, aligned to current
commitments under the Paris Agreement
>
SSP3-7.0 represents a high GHG emissions scenario in which an
average warming greater than 3°C is projected to occur by 2100
We utilised ERM’s proprietary Climate Risk Impacts and Solutions
Platform (CRISP) tool to conduct a TCFD-aligned assessment of
the Investment Managers portfolio’s physical assets. CRISP
integrates climate data and exposure ratings, which account for
the characteristics of the site type (e.g., an oil and gas, renewable
or manufacturing site), and normalises the risk levels of individual
climate hazards to produce overall risk scores. The analysis
considered acute risks, which reflect extreme weather events, and
chronic risks, which are longer-term shifts in climate patterns.
For the subset of portfolio companies reflected in the analysis, the
screening provided asset-specific climate risk scores and
highlighted the asset locations and climate hazards that pose the
greatest risk. Assessment results included climate risk scores at
the present, 2030 and 2050 timeframes under the two SSP
scenarios. This analysis generated asset-specific insights about
the top baseline climate hazards and emerging climate hazards at
a given location. We will leverage these findings throughout
portfolio engagement to build resilience across operational sites
within our portfolio.
Physical Risk Level in Current and Future Time Horizons*
* Based on the SSP3-7.0 climate scenario and the assets analysed in the 2022 climate risk assessment.
** Climate risk ratings at the asset level present a summary statistic across different climate hazards (flooding, extreme heat, tropical cyclones, etc.) While generalising an
asset’s overall climate risk from “Low” to “Very High” is essential for comparative analysis, especially when assessing risk across a portfolio of assets, an overall risk rating
should be distinguished from the underlying individual climate hazards. Certain individual hazards may be rated as “Very High Risk,” but with an asset’s overall resulting risk
rating being lower due to other individual hazards being rated as “Low Risk.” An asset must be threatened by several hazards that reflect “Very High Risk” for an asset to
achieve a “Very High Risk” rating overall. For “Very High Risk” and “High Risk” categories, each asset risk category may remain stable due to individual hazards remaining
relatively stable for all time horizons. Conversely, the individual hazards may increase or decrease but result in a stable rating (e.g., risk of flooding may be increasing while
risk of extreme cold may be decreasing).
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%
100%
2050
2030
Baseline
Minimal RiskLow RiskModerate RiskHigh Risk
Percent Totals **
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
16
Transition Risk Analysis
We also conducted a climate transition risk assessment to better
understand how climate-related risks and opportunities might
develop under different scenarios, including how impacts change if
policy efforts ramp up over time to meet climate targets. Similar to
the physical risk analysis, the transition risk analysis employed
two main scenarios to determine potential trends. For global
temperature alignments, the scenarios incorporated data
primarily from the International Energy Agency (IEA) World Energy
Outlook and IEA Energy Technology Perspectives models:
>
The 2°C scenario limits global temperature rises by 2°C by
2100, based on pathways for sustainable development
>
The business-as-usual (BAU) scenario applies current policies
and commitments outlined by countries to mitigate emissions
This assessment incorporated geographic- and sector-specific
energy and emission results from the climate scenario modelling
to assess risks and opportunities from 2030 to 2050. To estimate
the effects of a low carbon transition, the process involved
assignment of company relevance weightings to sector-specific
indicators, used as a proxy for understanding potential commercial
impacts on each of the individual portfolio companies analysed.
Geography also impacts trajectories for risk assessment and indicator
data, because forecasts may expect certain countries to decarbonise
more quickly compared to other less developed regions. This
assessment relied on geography-specific model data where available,
based on the main operating regions of the portfolio companies, and
considered relevant policies and regulations specific to that region.
Scenario indicators were selected to cover a broad range of transition
risks and opportunities across the economy and Riverstone’s
business. Indicators included sector-specific model results related to
emissions in various industries and across the value chain, fuel
demand in certain markets, fuel prices and different power generation
resource types. Transition scenario indicators collectively describe an
economy-wide shift from BAU to the low carbon 2°C scenario path and
individually they provide relevance to the target sector and portfolio
company. The assessment generated indicator scores for 2030 to 2050
based on assigned relevance weightings, which were informed by how
the indicator potentially characterised the financial risk or opportunity
of transition to a company. As described in pages 13 and 14, the results
generally align with our expectations for growth or decline in certain
sectors while generating additional insights about specific risks.
The risk assessment provides information for Riverstone to
consider while evaluating potential adjustments to risk appetite
and strategy. We can also use the findings to respond to emerging
changes in a low carbon future and to capitalise on potential
opportunities for growth. This evaluation of risks continues to
represent an ongoing process as we strive to determine the extent
of financial and risk management implications.
Company Climate-related Targets*
Enviva
>
2030 Net Zero Target
>
Plan to Neutralise Scope 2
Emissions by using 100%
renewable energy by 2030
Hammerhead Resources
>
2030 Net Zero on Scope 1 and
2 Emissions
Onyx Power
>
2035 carbon neutral target
* This table is based on third-party information as of 31 December 2022, and
has not been independently verified.
Environmental, Social and Governance Report continued
To measure our portfolio’s progress in this area, we also track
GHG reporting through our ESG-MEs, which include a
recommendation for companies to calculate their GHG baseline for
Scope 1 (direct emissions) and Scope 2 (purchased energy) and
annually monitor and report their GHG emissions. We continue to
track this metric to assess how companies can enhance their GHG
emissions management. We also collect and report climate data
along with other ESG-related data through the EDCI.
Metrics and targets
To establish a baseline for our portfolio, Riverstone engaged a
leading carbon accounting platform, Persefoni, to support our
portfolio companies in calculating their GHG emissions. We
performed our GHG accounting in alignment with the PCAF
standard to estimate our Scope 3 category 15 financed emissions
across our portfolio. The organisational reporting boundary was
used in accordance with the GHG Protocol, and the calculations
included the seven GHGs outlined in the IPCC Fourth Assessment
Report and converted to carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) using
relevant global warming potentials. For each portfolio company,
we evaluated Scope 1 and 2 emissions, and we included partial
Scope 3 emissions for portfolio companies based on Scope 3
materiality determinations
(1)
.
We plan to explore opportunities to help portfolio companies set
individual reduction targets. Some of our portfolio companies have
already set GHG reduction targets:
(1)
Materiality was determined by reviewing common sources of emissions for each industry and evaluating the most significant sources for each portfolio company included in
Scope 3 calculations. Companies were then engaged to confirm the materiality of emissions for relevant Scope 3 categories.
~41,000 metric tons of CO
2
e of financed
emissions (Scope 1 and 2)
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
17
Additionally, we continue to calculate Riverstone’s annual firm GHG footprint to assess the climate impact of our own activities and identify
ways to reduce or offset our carbon footprint. In 2022, we expanded and refined our analysis of Scope 1 emissions from stationary
combustion at our facilities, Scope 2 emissions from purchased electricity at our sites and Scope 3 emissions from private and commercial
air travel (category 6). We also re-evaluated our 2021 emissions baseline using our revised methodology, leading to an updated estimate of
326 metric tons CO
2
e for our operational emissions in 2021 (note: we updated our calculation methodology but did not incorporate new
sources of data). This adjustment was largely driven by adopting an updated methodology around private air travel.
In 2022, our total emissions across these categories amounted to approximately 413 metric tons of CO
2
e. Compared to 2021, Riverstone’s
emissions increased by approximately 27 per cent. year-over-year. This increase was largely due to greater amounts of business travel and
increased office energy use as our operations returned to more in-person work, post-pandemic.
ESG in Practice within RELs Portfolio*
(1)
2021 emissions have been amended from Hammerhead’s 2022 ESG Report to reflect a 733 metric ton increase due to previously unaccounted liquid fuel invoices. Regarding calculation
methodology, greenhouse gases included in Scope 1 and 2 calculations are carbon dioxide (CO
2
), methane (CH
4
), nitrous oxide (N
2
O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs),
sulfur hexafluoride (SF
6
) and nitrogen trifluoride (NF
3
). HFCs, PFCs, SF
6
and NF
3
volumes are zero. All emission factors used for Scope 1 and 2 emissions, nitrogen oxides, sulfur dioxides and
other significant air emissions are provided by the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (CAPP), Canada Energy Regulator (CER), Environment Climate Change Canada (ECCC) and
Alberta Environment and Parks (AEP). All standards, methodologies and assumptions used for air emission calculations are provided by the CAPP, ECCC and AEP.
Hammerhead
Hammerhead Resources (Hammerhead) is a growth-oriented, upstream Canadian oil and gas company headquartered in
Calgary, Alberta, with an asset portfolio in Northern Alberta.
In 2020, Hammerhead made the commitment to net zero by 2050. Since that time, Hammerhead has dedicated resources to
focus on understanding baseline air pollutants and emissions (Scopes 1, 2 and 3), challenging operations to improve efficiency
around emitting sources and evaluating solutions to achieve an accelerated net zero goal, on a Scope 1 and 2 basis, by 2030.
Hammerhead has mapped a path to net zero using carbon capture technology and will be progressing engineering design on
its current batteries in the coming years. Hammerhead’s goal is to not only be considered a top producer, but also to
accelerate its net zero target to 2030, while also becoming a leader in sustainability and ESG disclosure and performance.
Hammerhead 2021 Emissions (metric tons CO
2
e)
(1)
Combustion 73.6%
Flaring 10.5%
Venting 8.9%
Drilling & Completion
Combustion 6.5%
Fugitives 0.4%
Electricity (Scope 2) 0.1%
Scope 1 & 2 Total 235,041 metric tons CO
2
e
2022
Quantified baseline for Scope 3 emissions
Sold Creek and Karr Asset certification
under EO100TM Standard for Responsible
Energy Development
Invested $2.5 million to eliminate
65 per cent. of vented emissions
2030 (2022-2030)
Carbon capture and storage
progression with net zero
Scopes 1 and 2 by 2030
2028
(2023-2028)
10% annual
reduction in flaring
2023
Pilot continuous fugitive
emissions monitoring
Zero routine venting by
end of 2023
Monitor and evaluate
new technologies and
alternate energy sources
for additional emission
reduction opportunities
Building the Path to Net Zero 2030
* The case studies presented in this report are intended to highlight relevant portfolio company ESG characteristics or results and are set forth for illustrative purposes only.
There can be no assurance that other Riverstone portfolio companies will have similar ESG characteristics or results.
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
18
Concern’s about inflation and fears of a global recession ruled fourth
quarter headlines, however due to a warmer than expected winter
consumers found some respite from elevated energy prices. This
provided relief to European consumers and also undermined
Russia’s efforts to weaponise energy in its ongoing war with Ukraine.
As the conflict stretches into its second year, the EU has made
improvements in its energy supply, leaning heavily on conventional
power assets to compensate for conflict-era deficits. Unseasonably
warm weather in the fourth quarter and near capacity storage of
natural gas in Europe drove prices to a 12-month low at year end.
Lower energy prices have provided governments a much-needed
reprieve from natural gas supply concerns to address structural
weaknesses in legacy energy supply chains and the opportunity to
further integrate additional renewable generation. On 14 January,
Germany broke the wind generation record it had set just 10 days
prior, generating 50,802 MW. Investments in grid and intermittency
management systems, among other decarbonisation technologies,
will allow the continent to take full advantage of existing assets in
efforts to advance a just and equitable energy transition.
The Investment Manager continues to make good progress in
meeting its investment strategy of re-positioning the portfolio away
from oil and gas investments in the exploration and production
sector and towards renewable energy, decarbonisation and select
infrastructure investments. This evolution in the portfolio reflects
the broader changes occurring in the global economy at large. In
2022, REL made a further six investments in line with this strategy in
the year and has also taken further steps to generate value from its
existing portfolio investments in the oil and gas space.
These portfolio changes were made against a backdrop of highly
volatile energy and commodity price moves which saw oil and gas
prices broadly ending the year where they started. Within that,
though, oil prices rose over 50 per cent. from trough to peak in the
year and gas prices more than doubled on the same basis before
pulling back in the second half of 2022. Despite these moves in
energy prices, our conventional energy companies are well
positioned to continue delivering positive earnings and returning
cash to their shareholders.
Commodity assets performed best among all asset classes in 2022
returning 16 per cent., while small-cap and growth companies
performed near the bottom of all asset classes, – down 20 per cent.
in 2022. These two extremes in performance carried implication for
REL’s entire portfolio as the majority of investments are
characterised as either commodity-linked — nearly 64 per cent. of
the portfolio’s gross unrealised value — or small cap assets, which
characterise the majority of REL’s decarbonisation holdings. REL’s
conventional portfolio investments held or improved their valuations
in the fourth quarter of 2022. Despite a considerable reduction in
anticipated weather-related natural gas demand, Permian
Resources, RELs sole publicly traded conventional energy
investment, grew in value by 12.5 per cent. Onyx, the second-largest
investment in REL’s portfolio, made three distributions to REL
totalling $61 million. The company has returned its cost basis on
REL’s investment, maintained its value over the course of the quarter,
and continues to provide key energy resources to western Europe in
the midst of the now year-old conflict in Ukraine.
REL ended the period to 31 December 2022 with a NAV of
$14.52 (£11.99) per share, a 17.0 per cent. and 30.5 per cent. increase
in USD and GBP, respectively, compared to the 31 December 2021
NAV of $12.41 (£9.19) per share.
Consistent with its investment strategy, REL announced in February
it was exiting Pipestone Energy Corp for net proceeds of C$53
million, representing approximately a 0.64x Gross MOIC. The year
also saw two mergers in our traditional investment portfolio
companies. Centennial and Colgate were merged in July to create a
$7 billion Permian basin pure-play. REL has invested $268 million
into Centennial since 2016 and has so far realised $194 million, or
73 per cent. of its cost basis through proceeds from share sales.
In September, REL announced Hammerhead Resources Inc, a
Calgary based E&P company, was merging with Decarbonisation
Plus Acquisition Corporation IV (DCRD), a special purpose
acquisition company. The combination values Hammerhead at an
EV of C$1.39 billion and REL holds an approximate 17 per cent. stake
in Hammerhead at 0.60x Gross MOIC as of 31 December 2022, a
carrying value of $154 million. In addition, REL owns 396,456 founder
shares and 638,247 warrants in DCRD worth $3 million at
31 December 2022. The transaction will create a publicly traded
upstream oil and gas company with an identified investment
programme to decarbonise its oil and gas operations through carbon
capture and sequestration. Please see Post-Year End Update section
in the Investment Manager’s Report on page 31 for further details
regarding the closing of the transaction.
Investment Managers Report
POSITIONED FOR GROWTH.
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
19
REL also made six new investments into areas aligned with the
modified investment strategy and which shift the portfolio further
towards our chosen areas of focus in renewable energy, agriculture
and decarbonisation. These investments were:
>
$17.5 million investment in T-REX Group, a SaaS provider
supporting the asset-backed financing industry to deploy capital.
>
A lead investment of $17.5 million in Infinitum Electric’s
$80 million Series D round. Infinitum Electric created the
breakthrough air-core motor which offers superior
performance at half the weight and size of conventional motors
– and at a fraction of the carbon footprint.
>
$20 million invested in Anuvia Plant Nutrients’ $65.5 million
Series D fund raising round. The company has developed and
now uses a unique technology that optimises nutrient
availability and efficiency for plants, while also improving soil
health, preserving natural resources, and reducing
greenhouse gas emissions.
>
$4 million in Group14 Technologies’ $400 million Series C round.
Group14 is a battery materials technology company that has
developed a proprietary silicon-based anode battery material to
replace graphite in conventional lithium-ion batteries.
>
Along side other investors, REL increased Tritium DCFC
Limited’s existing debt facility by $60 million to a total of
$150 million. Tritium is a global developer and manufacturer of
direct current (DC) fast charging technology for electric
vehicles. The additional funding will be used to fund working
capital, product development and to help accelerate
production to meet high demand from across the globe.
>
Lastly, in December, REL funded $11.5 million of its $12.5 million
commitment to Our Next Energy’s $300 million Series B round,
valuing the company at over $1 billion. ONE is a Michigan-based
energy storage technology company working to develop batteries
for mobility and large-scale storage applications.
There remains a significant opportunity in clean energy, driven by
increasing concern over the need to take more urgent and significant
steps to reduce the impact of carbon emissions on climate change,
as 2022 looks like being one of the warmest years on record. Coupled
with the increase in energy prices and concerns over security of
energy supply, as well as decades of under-investment in energy
generation and infrastructure assets, the pressure to find
sustainable alternative sources of energy means that three quarters
of the growth in energy investment is coming from renewable energy
investment which is expected to top $1.4 trillion in 2023.
A further catalyst for clean energy is the Inflation Reduction Act, the
largest ever climate-related bill which passed into law in the US
Congress on 16 August 2022. It provides $391 billion in climate
related incentives and provisions, with two thirds of incentives
uncapped which could see these provisions materially increase.
REL’s decarbonisation investments will stand to benefit from this
stimulus as its five investment families stand firmly at the core of the
legislation’s intended impact: batteries, renewables infrastructure,
critical materials, EV batteries and storage, and sustainable fuels to
name a few. The portfolio has already benefitted from this
legislation, with Group14 receiving in October a $100 million
non-dilutive grant to accelerate the build-out of its manufacturing
facility in Washington state. We expect other existing and future
portfolio companies to benefit from this Federal largesse.
With the exception of four aircraft leasing companies,
REL had the highest price total return for closed end
investment companies.
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
20
(1)
Gross realised capital is total gross proceeds realised on invested capital. Of the $1,285 million of capital realised to date, $983 million is the return of the cost basis, and the remainder is profit.
(2)
Gross Unrealised Value and Gross MOIC (Gross Multiple of Invested Capital) are before transaction costs, taxes (approximately 21 to 27.5 per cent. of U.S. sourced taxable income) and
20 per cent. carried interest on applicable gross profits in accordance with the revised terms announced on 3 January 2020, but effective 30 June 2019. Since there was no netting of losses
against gains before the aforementioned revised terms, the effective carried interest rate on the portfolio as a whole will be greater than 20 per cent. No further carried interest will be payable
until the $95.2 million of realised and unrealised losses to date at 31 December 2022 (largest deficit of $605.5 million at 30 June 2020) are made whole with future gains, so the earned carried
interest of $0.8 million at 31 December 2022 has been deferred and will expire in October 2023 if the aforementioned losses are not made whole. Since REL has not yet met the appropriate Cost
Benchmark at 31 December 2022, $38.0 million in Performance Allocation was not accrued in accordance with the terms of the current agreement, which would have been accrued under the
prior agreement. Based on the aforementioned Performance Allocation, net of estimated applicable taxes, the potential increase arising from the Investment Manager’s share purchases would
be $19 million as of 31 December 2022. In addition, there is a management fee of 1.5 per cent. of net assets (including cash) per annum and other expenses. Given these costs, fees and expenses
are in aggregate expected to be considerable, Total Net Value and Net MOIC will be materially less than Gross Unrealised Value and Gross MOIC. Local taxes, primarily on U.S. assets, may apply
at the jurisdictional level on profits arising in operating entity investments. Further withholding taxes may apply on distributions from such operating entity investments. In the normal course of
business, REL may form wholly-owned subsidiaries, to be treated as C Corporations for US tax purposes. The C Corporations serve to protect REL’s public investors from incurring U.S.
effectively connected income. The C Corporations file U.S. corporate tax returns with the U.S. Internal Revenue Service and pay U.S. corporate taxes on its taxable income.
(3)
Amounts may vary due to rounding.
Current Portfolio – Conventional
Gross
Committed
Capital
($mm)
Invested
Capital
($mm)
Gross
Realised
Capital
($mm)
(1)
Gross
Unrealised
Value
($mm)
(2)
Gross
Realised
Capital &
Unrealised
Value
($mm)
31 Dec
2022
Gross
MOIC
(2)
31 Dec
2021
Gross
MOIC
(2)
Investment
(Public/Private)
Permian Resources
(4)
(Public) 268 268 194 118 312 1.17x 0.98x
Onyx (Private) 66 60 61 118 179 3.00x 1.70x
Hammerhead Resources (Private) 307 295 23 154 177 0.60x 0.39x
Total Current Portfolio – Conventional – Public
(3)
268 268 194 118 312 1.17x 0.98x
Total Current Portfolio – Conventional – Private
(3)
373 355 84 272 356 1.00x 0.61x
Total Current Portfolio - Conventional – Public & Private
(3)
641 623 278 390 668 1.07x 0.77x
Current Portfolio – Decarbonisation
Gross
Committed
Capital
($mm)
Invested
Capital
($mm)
Gross
Realised
Capital
($mm)
(1)
Gross
Unrealised
Value
($mm)
(2)
Gross
Realised
Capital &
Unrealised
Value
($mm)
31 Dec
2022
Gross
MOIC
(2)
31 Dec
2021
Gross
MOIC
(2)
Investment
(Public/Private)
GoodLeap (formerly Loanpal) (Private) 25 25 2 53 55 2.20x 2.75x
Enviva
(4)
(Public) 22 18 - 35 35 1.93x 2.45x
Infinitum (Private) 18 18 23 23 1.30x n/a
FreeWire (Private) 10 10 - 20 20 2.00x 2.00x
Anuvia Plant Nutrients Inc. (Private) 20 20 - 20 20 1.00x n/a
Solid Power
(4)
(Public) 48 48 - 19 19 0.39x 1.24x
T-REX Group, Inc (Private) 18 18 - 18 18 1.00x n/a
Tritium DCFC
(4)
(Public) 25 25 - 15 15 0.60x 6.46x
Our Next Energy (Private) 13 11 - 11 11 1.00x n/a
Group 14 (Private) 4 4 - 4 4 1.00x
n/a
DCRD
(4)(5)
(Public) 1 1 - 3 3 4.99x 1.00x
Ionic I & II (Samsung Ventures) (Private) 3 3 - 3 3 1.00x 1.00x
Hyzon Motors (Public) 10 10 - 2 2 0.16x 0.65x
Total Current Portfolio – Decarbonisation – Public
(3)
105 102 - 73 73 0.72x 1.49x
Total Current Portfolio – Decarbonisation – Private
(3)
109 108 2 152 154 1.42x 2.42x
Total Current Portfolio - Decarbonisation – Public & Private
(3)
214 210 2 225 227 1.08x 1.80x
Total Current Portfolio – Conventional & Decarbonisation
– Public & Private
(3)
855 833 280 615 895 1.07x 0.93x
Cash and Cash Equivalents
(11)
$120
Total Liquidity $311
Total Market Capitalisation $418
Investment Manager’s Report continued
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
21
Realisations
Gross
Committed
Capital
($mm)
Invested
Capital
($mm)
Gross
Realised
Capital
($mm)
(1)
Gross
Unrealised
Value
($mm)
(2)
Gross
Realised
Capital &
Unrealised
Value
($mm)
31 Dec
2022
Gross
MOIC
(2)
31 Dec
2021
Gross
MOIC
(2)
Investment
(Initial Investment Date)
Rock Oil
(6)
(12 Mar 2014) 114 114 233 4 237 2.07x 2.06x
Three Rivers III (7 Apr 2015) 94 94 204 - 204 2.17x 2.17x
ILX III
(7)
(8 Oct 2015) 179 179 172 - 172 0.96x 0.96x
Meritage III
(7)
(17 Apr 2015) 40 40 88 - 88 2.20x 2.16x
RCO
(8)
(2 Feb 2015) 80 80 80 - 80 0.99x 0.99x
Carrier II
(9)
(22 May 2015) 110 110 63 3 66 0.60x 0.70x
Pipestone Energy (formerly CNOR) 90 90 58 - 58 0.64x 0.58x
Sierra (24 Sept 2014) 18 18 38 - 38 2.06x 2.06x
Aleph Midstream (9 Jul 2019) 23 23 23 - 23 1.00x 1.00x
Ridgebury H3 (19 Feb 2019) 18 18 22 - 22 1.22x
1.22x
Castex 2014 (3 Sep 2014) 52 52 14 - 14 0.27x 0.27x
Total Realisations
(3)
819 819 995 7 1,002 1.22x 1.23x
Withdrawn Commitments and Impairments
(10)
350 350 9 - 9 0.02x 0.02x
Total Investments
(3)
2,024 2,001 1,285 622 1,906 0.95x 0.89x
Total Investments & Cash and Cash Equivalents
(3)(11)
741
(4)
Represents closing price per share in USD for publicly traded shares Permian Resources Corporation (formerly Centennial Resource Development, Inc.) (NASDAQ:PR – 31-12-2022:
$9.40 per share / 31-12-2021: $5.98 price per share); Enviva, Inc. (NYSE:EVA – 31-12-2022: $52.97 per share / 31-12-2021: $70.42 price per share); Solid Power, Inc. (NASDAQ:SLDP – 31-
12-2022: $2.54 per share / 31-12-2021: $8.74 price per share); Hyzon Motors, Inc. (NASDAQ:HYZN – 31-12-2022: $1.55 per share / 31-12-2021: $6.49 price per share); and Tritium DCFC
Limited (NASDAQ:DCFC – 31-12-2022: $1.68 price per share / 31-12-2021 $9.97 price per share), which consisted of only the Tritium/DCRN Sponsor investment at 31 December 2021.
(5)
SPAC Sponsor investment for Decarbonisation Plus Acquisition Corporation IV (NASDAQ:DCRD).
(6)
The unrealised value of the Rock Oil investment consists of rights to mineral acres.
(7)
Midstream investment.
(8)
Credit investment.
(9)
The unrealised value of the Carrier II investment consists of certain assets held back at the closing of the transaction in December 2022, which are scheduled to be released from escrow
in Q1 2023. Please refer to the Investment Portfolio Summary section in the Investment Manager’s report on page 30 for further information regarding the details of the Carrier II
realisation transaction in December 2022.
(10)
Withdrawn commitments consist of Origo ($9 million) and CanEra III ($1 million), and impairments consist of Liberty II ($142 million), Fieldwood ($80 million), Eagle II ($62 million) and
Castex 2005 ($48 million).
(11)
This figure is comprised of $15.8 million held at the Company, $68.4 million held at the Partnership and $35.3 million held at REL US Corp.
(1) Gross Unrealised Value and Gross MOIC (Gross Multiple of Invested Capital) are before transaction costs, taxes (approximately 21 to 27.5 per cent. of U.S. sourced taxable
income) and 20 per cent. carried interest on applicable gross profits in accordance with the revised terms announced on 3 January 2020, but effective 30 June 2019. Since there
was no netting of losses against gains before the aforementioned revised terms, the effective carried interest rate on the portfolio as a whole will be greater than 20 per cent. No
further carried interest will be payable until the $95.2 million of realised and unrealised losses to date at 31 December 2022 (largest deficit of $605.5 million at 30 June 2020) are
made whole with future gains, so the earned carried interest of $0.8 million at 31 December 2022 has been deferred and will expire in October 2023 if the aforementioned losses
are not made whole. Since REL has not yet met the appropriate Cost Benchmark at 31 December 2022, $38.0 million in Performance Allocation was not accrued in accordance
with the terms of the current agreement, which would have been accrued under the prior agreement.
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
22
Hammerhead
As of 31 December 2022, REL, through the Partnership, has invested
$295 million of its $307 million commitment to Hammerhead.
Hammerhead is a private E&P company focused on liquids-rich
unconventional resources in the Montney and Duvernay resource play in
Western Canada. Since its establishment in 2010, Hammerhead has
aggregated one of the largest and most advantaged land positions in the
emerging Montney and Duvernay formations of Western Canada’s Deep
Basin. The company controls and operates 100 per cent. of this asset base,
which comprises over 1,800 net drilling locations across approximately
~112,000 Montney net acres. Since Riverstone’s initial investment,
Hammerhead has increased production almost ten-fold and has
significantly grown reserves to 310 mmboe. As of 31 December 2022,
the company was producing approximately 30,200 boepd.
Hammerhead plans to have higher capital expenditures in 2023 than in
2022 in order to increase development activities. As of 31 December 2022,
Hammerhead had hedged approximately 47 per cent. of forecasted 2022 oil
production at a weighted average price of US$72.95/bbl.
As of 31 December 2022, REL’s interest in Hammerhead, through the
Partnership, was valued at 0.60x Gross MOIC
(1)
or $176 million
(Realised: $23 million, Unrealised: $153 million). The Gross MOIC
(1)
increased over the prior period.
In September, REL announced that Hammerhead was merging with DCRD,
a special purpose acquisition company (see further details in the DCRD
and Post-Year End Update sections on pages 29 and 31, respectively).
Onyx
As of 31 December 2022, REL, through the Partnership, has invested
$60 million of its $66 million commitment to Onyx. Onyx is a European-based
independent power producer that was created through the successful
acquisition of 2,350MW of gross installed capacity (1,941MW of net installed
capacity) of five coal- and biomass-fired power plants in Germany and the
Netherlands from Engie SA. Two of the facilities in the current portfolio are
among Europe’s most recently constructed thermal plants, which benefit
from high efficiencies, substantial environmental controls, low emissions
profiles and the potential use of sustainable biomass.
As of 31 December 2022, REL’s interest in Onyx, through the Partnership, was
valued at 3.00x Gross MOIC
(1)
or $179 million (Realised: $61 million,
Unrealised: $118 million). The Gross MOIC
(1)
increased over the prior period.
Investment Manager’s Report continued
$60 MILLION
INVESTED OF ITS $66 MILLION COMMITMENT
TO ONYX
$295 MILLION
INVESTED OF ITS $307 MILLION COMMITMENT
TO HAMMERHEAD
Investment Portfolio Summary
Based on the aforementioned Performance Allocation, net of estimated applicable taxes, the potential increase arising from the Investment Manager’s share purchases would be
$19 million as of 31 December 2022. In addition, there is a management fee of 1.5 per cent. of net assets (including cash) per annum and other expenses. Given these costs, fees and
expenses are in aggregate expected to be considerable, Total Net Value and Net MOIC will be materially less than Gross Unrealised Value and Gross MOIC. Local taxes, primarily on
U.S. assets, may apply at the jurisdictional level on profits arising in operating entity investments. Further withholding taxes may apply on distributions from such operating entity
investments. In the normal course of business, REL may form wholly-owned subsidiaries, to be treated as C Corporations for US tax purposes. The C Corporations serve to protect
REL’s public investors from incurring U.S. effectively connected income. The C Corporations file U.S. corporate tax returns with the U.S. Internal Revenue Service and pay U.S.
corporate taxes on its taxable income.
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
23
GoodLeap (formerly Loanpal)
As of 31 December 2022, REL, through the Partnership, has invested
in full its $25 million commitment to GoodLeap. The company is a
technology-enabled sustainable home improvement loan originator,
providing a point-of-sale lending platform used by key residential
contractors. GoodLeap does not take funding risk. The company presells
its originated loans via forward purchase agreements to large asset
managers. The company’s attractive unit economics and asset-light
business model allow for rapid growth and the ability to scale faster than
its competitors, while generating free cash flow by capitalising on
upfront net cash payments on the flow of loan originations and avoiding
costly SG&A and capital expenditures incurred by other portions of the
value chain.
During the second quarter of 2022, the company closed on its
13th securitisation which was oversubscribed despite volatile markets.
Management continues to execute on its growth plans. On 13 October 2021,
GoodLeap announced a new investment round of over $800 million, which
will support the company’s operational improvements, technology
innovation efforts, and expansion.
As of 31 December 2022, REL’s interest in GoodLeap, through the
Partnership, was valued at 2.20x Gross MOIC
(1)
or $55 million
(Realised: $2 million, Unrealised: $53 million). The Gross MOIC
(1)
decreased over the period.
Permian Resources (formerly Centennial)
As of 31 December 2022, REL, through the Partnership, has invested in full
its $268 million commitment to Permian Resources / Centennial.
Headquartered in Midland, Texas, Permian Resources is the largest
pure-play E&P company in the Delaware Basin.
In Q3 2022, Centennial closed its merger with Colgate and began its first
day of trading as Permian Resources (NYSE: PR) on 12 September 2022.
In Q4 2022, Permian Resources announced an inaugural quarterly base
dividend of $0.05 / share and a robust capital programme, aiming to return
at least 50% of free cash flow after dividends starting in 2023.
Permian Resources expects to generate ~$1.1 billion of free cash flow FY
2023 and closed on a new $2.5 billion borrowing base RCF with an elected
commitment amount of $1.5 billion.
REL, through the Partnership, owns approximately 12.5 million shares
which are publicly traded (NYSE: PR).
As of 31 December 2022, REL’s interest in Centennial, through the
Partnership, was valued at 1.17x Gross MOIC
(1)
or $312 million
(Realised: $194 million, Unrealised: $118 million). The Gross MOIC
(1)
,
which reflects the mark-to-market value of REL’s shareholding, increased
over the period.
$25 MILLION
INVESTED IN FULL ITS COMMITMENT
TO GOODLEAP
$268 MILLION
INVESTED IN FULL ITS COMMITMENT
TO PERMIAN RESOURCES
As of 31 December 2022, REL’s portfolio comprised twenty active investments including three E&P investments, sixteen decarbonisation
investments and one power investment.
(1) Gross Unrealised Value and Gross MOIC (Gross Multiple of Invested Capital) are before transaction costs, taxes (approximately 21 to 27.5 per cent. of U.S. sourced taxable
income) and 20 per cent. carried interest on applicable gross profits in accordance with the revised terms announced on 3 January 2020, but effective 30 June 2019. Since there
was no netting of losses against gains before the aforementioned revised terms, the effective carried interest rate on the portfolio as a whole will be greater than 20 per cent. No
further carried interest will be payable until the $95.2 million of realised and unrealised losses to date at 31 December 2022 (largest deficit of $605.5 million at 30 June 2020) are
made whole with future gains, so the earned carried interest of $0.8 million at 31 December 2022 has been deferred and will expire in October 2023 if the aforementioned losses
are not made whole. Since REL has not yet met the appropriate Cost Benchmark at 31 December 2022, $38.0 million in Performance Allocation was not accrued in accordance
with the terms of the current agreement, which would have been accrued under the prior agreement.
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
24
Enviva
As of 31 December 2022, REL, through the Partnership, has invested
$18 million of its $22 million commitment to Enviva, which was reduced by
$3.0 million this period in conjunction with an overall commitment reduction
to the company by the Investment Manager. Enviva, based in Bethesda,
Maryland, is the world’s largest supplier of wood pellets to major utilities
and heat and power generators, principally in Europe and Japan. Through its
subsidiaries, Enviva owns and operates ten plants with a combined wood
pellet production capacity of approximately 6.2 million MTPY.
On 31 December 2021, Enviva completed its conversion from a master
limited partnership to a corporation following approval by Enviva unitholders
on 17 December 2021. The company continues to capitalise on the industry’s
growth opportunities, announcing its inaugural agreements with German
customers in May and continuing to expand into heat and other industrial
applications. Enviva commissioned its newly constructed Lucedale plant in
March 2022 and commemorated its first shipment of pellets from the Port of
Pascagoula in June 2022. On 17 November 2022, Enviva priced $100 million
of bonds in the U.S. tax-exempt market through the Mississippi Business
Finance Corporation (the issuer). The Tax-Exempt Green Bonds will bear
interest at an annual rate of 7.75 per cent. and mature in 2047, with the
option for holders to redeem at par in 2032.
As of 31 December 2022, REL’s interest in Enviva, through the
Partnership, was valued at 1.93x Gross MOIC
(1)
or $35 million
(Realised: nil, Unrealised: $35 million). The Gross MOIC
(1)
decreased
over the period.
Samsung Ventures
On 17 August 2021, REL announced the purchase of an interest in one of
Samsung Ventures’ battery technology focused venture capital portfolios
(the “Samsung Portfolio”) for $30.0 million. The majority of the Samsung
Portfolio consists of 1.66 million shares of Solid Power, Inc., which
successfully completed its business combination with DCRC on
8 December 2021. Gross proceeds to Solid Power from the transaction
amounted to $542.9 million from a fully committed $195 million PIPE and
$347.9 million of cash held in trust net of redemptions; only 0.6 per cent. of
shares held by public stockholders of DCRC were redeemed. Of the shares
voted at the special meeting of DCRC’s stockholders, over 99.9 per cent.
voted to approve the business combination.
The remainder of the portfolio is held in shares of Ionic Materials
(Ionic I & II), a material science company that manufactures
transformative polymers for use in solid-state batteries, healthcare and
5G applications. Ionic Materials’ solid polymer is believed to be the first of
its kind to conduct ions at room temperature, a critical enabler of
solid-state batteries.
As of 31 December 2022, REL’s aggregate investment in the Samsung
Portfolio, through the Partnership, was marked at 0.50x Gross MOIC
(1)
or $15 million (Realised: nil, Unrealised: $15 million). The Gross MOIC
(1)
decreased over the period.
Investment Manager’s Report continued
$18 MILLION
INVESTED OF ITS $25 MILLION COMMITMENT
TO ENVIVA
$30 MILLION
INVESTED IN FULL ITS COMMITMENT
TO SAMSUNG VENTURES
Investment Portfolio Summary continued
Based on the aforementioned Performance Allocation, net of estimated applicable taxes, the potential increase arising from the Investment Manager’s share purchases would be
$19 million as of 31 December 2022. In addition, there is a management fee of 1.5 per cent. of net assets (including cash) per annum and other expenses. Given these costs, fees and
expenses are in aggregate expected to be considerable, Total Net Value and Net MOIC will be materially less than Gross Unrealised Value and Gross MOIC. Local taxes, primarily on
U.S. assets, may apply at the jurisdictional level on profits arising in operating entity investments. Further withholding taxes may apply on distributions from such operating entity
investments. In the normal course of business, REL may form wholly-owned subsidiaries, to be treated as C Corporations for US tax purposes. The C Corporations serve to protect
REL’s public investors from incurring U.S. effectively connected income. The C Corporations file U.S. corporate tax returns with the U.S. Internal Revenue Service and pay U.S.
corporate taxes on its taxable income.
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
25
DCRC/Solid Power
As of 31 December 2022, REL, through the Partnership, has fully invested its
$20.6 million commitment to DCRC/Solid Power. Riverstone sponsored
DCRC’s $350 million IPO on 23 March 2021. REL made a $0.6 million
investment in DCRC at the time of the IPO, as the blank check company
began to pursue merger candidates. On 15 June 2021, DCRC announced its
business combination agreement with Solid Power, a Louisville, Colorado
based producer of all solid-state batteries for electric vehicles, to which REL
committed an additional $20 million to the $165 million PIPE that was raised.
Between DCRC’s IPO and announcing the business combination with Solid
Power, Solid Power closed on a $130 million Series B investment raise led by
BMW Group, Ford Motor Company, and Volta Energy Technologies. In
conjunction with the Series B raise, BMW and Ford expanded their existing
joint development agreements with the company to secure all solid-state
batteries for future electric vehicles. Both Ford and BMW will receive
full-scale 100 Ah cells for automotive qualification testing and vehicle
integration beginning in 2022. Solid Power’s all solid-state platform
technology allows for the production of unique cell designs expected to meet
performance requirements for each automotive partner.
The business combination between DCRC and Solid Power closed on
8 December 2021, with Solid Power beginning to trade on NASDAQ under
the ticker “SLDP”. Gross proceeds to Solid Power from the transaction
amounted to $542.9 million from a fully committed $195 million PIPE and
$347.9 million of cash held in trust net of redemptions; only 0.6 per cent. of
shares held by public stockholders of DCRC were redeemed. Of the shares
voted at the special meeting of DCRC’s stockholders, over 99.9 per cent.
voted to approve the business combination
As of 31 December 2022, REL’s interest in Solid Power, through the
Partnership, consisted of the $0.6 million sponsor investment, which was
valued at 2.20x Gross MOIC
(1)
or $1 million (Realised: $- million,
Unrealised: $2 million), and the $20 million PIPE investment, which was valued
at 0.25x Gross MOIC
(1)
or $5 million (Realised: nil, Unrealised: $5 million).
Hyzon
In connection with the closing of the previously announced merger
between DCRB and Hyzon Motors Inc. (NASDAQ: HYZN), REL purchased
$10 million of DCRB common stock in a private placement transaction at
$10 per share in July 2021. Hyzon, headquartered in Rochester, New York,
is the industry-leading global supplier of zero-emissions hydrogen fuel
cell powered commercial vehicles.
As of 31 December 2022, REL’s interest in Hyzon, through the
Partnership, was valued at 0.16x Gross MOIC
(1)
or $2 million
(Realised: nil, Unrealised: $2 million). The Gross MOIC
(1)
decreased
over the period.
$20.6 MILLION
INVESTED IN FULL ITS COMMITMENT
TO DCRC/SOLID POWER
$10 MILLION
INVESTED IN FULL ITS COMMITMENT
TO HYZON
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
26
Anuvia Plant Nutrients
As of 31 December 2022, REL, through the Partnership, has fully invested
its $20 million commitment to Anuvia Plant Nutrients. Anuvia Plant
Nutrients manufactures high-efficiency, sustainable field-ready fertilisers
for the agriculture, turf, and lawncare industries.
Located in Winter Garden, Florida, the company developed and uses a
unique technology that not only optimises nutrient availability and
efficiency for plants, but also improves soil health, preserves natural
resources, and reduces greenhouse gas emissions.
As of 31 December 2022, REL’s interest in Anuvia Plant Nutrients, through
the Partnership, was valued at 1.00x Gross MOIC
(1)
or $20 million
(Realised: nil, Unrealised: $20 million).
T-REX Group
As of 31 December 2022, REL, through the Partnership, has fully invested its
$17.5 million commitment to T-REX Group. T-REX Group, a SaaS provider
supporting the asset-backed financing industry, brings together asset class
expertise, critical data management capabilities, and a platform for deal
structuring, cash flow modeling, scenario analysis, real-time performance
tracking, and reporting.
T-REX Group combines sophisticated cloud-based SaaS technology with big
data and asset class expertise to drive down operating and capital expense,
reduce risk exposure, and enhance performance for complex investments.
As of 31 December 2022, REL’s interest in T-REX Group, through
the Partnership, was valued at 1.00x Gross MOIC
(1)
or $17.5 million
(Realised: nil, Unrealised: $17.5 million).
Investment Manager’s Report continued
$20 MILLION
INVESTED IN FULL ITS COMMITMENT
TO ANUVIA PLANT NUTRIENTS
$17.5 MILLION
INVESTED IN FULL ITS COMMITMENT
TO T-REX GROUP
Investment Portfolio Summary continued
(1) Gross Unrealised Value and Gross MOIC (Gross Multiple of Invested Capital) are before transaction costs, taxes (approximately 21 to 27.5 per cent. of U.S. sourced taxable
income) and 20 per cent. carried interest on applicable gross profits in accordance with the revised terms announced on 3 January 2020, but effective 30 June 2019. Since there
was no netting of losses against gains before the aforementioned revised terms, the effective carried interest rate on the portfolio as a whole will be greater than 20 per cent. No
further carried interest will be payable until the $95.2 million of realised and unrealised losses to date at 31 December 2022 (largest deficit of $605.5 million at 30 June 2020) are
made whole with future gains, so the earned carried interest of $0.8 million at 31 December 2022 has been deferred and will expire in October 2023 if the aforementioned losses
are not made whole. Since REL has not yet met the appropriate Cost Benchmark at 31 December 2022, $38.0 million in Performance Allocation was not accrued in accordance
with the terms of the current agreement, which would have been accrued under the prior agreement.
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
27
Infinitum Electric
As of 31 December 2022, REL, through the Partnership, has fully invested its
$17.5 million commitment to Infinitum. Infinitum Electric’s patented air-core
motors offer superior performance in half the weight and size, at a fraction
of the carbon footprint of traditional motors, making them pound for pound
the most efficient in the world. Infinitum Electric motors open up sustainable
design possibilities for the machines we rely on to be smaller, lighter and
quieter, improving our quality of life while also saving energy.
As of 31 December 2022, REL’s interest in Infinitum Electric, through
the Partnership, was valued at 1.30x Gross MOIC
(1)
or $22.8 million
(Realised: nil, Unrealised: $22.8 million).
$25 MILLION
INVESTED IN FULL ITS COMMITMENT
TO DCRN/TRITIUM
$17.5 MILLION
INVESTED IN FULL ITS COMMITMENT
TO INFINITUM
Based on the aforementioned Performance Allocation, net of estimated applicable taxes, the potential increase arising from the Investment Manager’s share purchases would be
$19 million as of 31 December 2022. In addition, there is a management fee of 1.5 per cent. of net assets (including cash) per annum and other expenses. Given these costs, fees and
expenses are in aggregate expected to be considerable, Total Net Value and Net MOIC will be materially less than Gross Unrealised Value and Gross MOIC. Local taxes, primarily on
U.S. assets, may apply at the jurisdictional level on profits arising in operating entity investments. Further withholding taxes may apply on distributions from such operating entity
investments. In the normal course of business, REL may form wholly-owned subsidiaries, to be treated as C Corporations for US tax purposes. The C Corporations serve to protect
REL’s public investors from incurring U.S. effectively connected income. The C Corporations file U.S. corporate tax returns with the U.S. Internal Revenue Service and pay U.S.
corporate taxes on its taxable income.
DCRN/Tritium
In February 2021, REL invested $0.6 million in the Founder Shares and
Warrants of Decarbonisation Plus Acquisition Corp. II (NASDAQ: DCRN) at the
time of its IPO. In May 2021, DCRN announced it would combine with Tritium, a
Brisbane based pioneer in e-mobility and EV charging infrastructure. On 4
January 2022, Tritium announced record breaking Q4’21 and FY’21 financial
performance results. The merger vote to approve the combination of Tritium
and DCRN occurred and closed on 12 January 2022.
In February 2022, REL funded an additional $15 million commitment to Tritium.
The funding event occurred three days after the company met with President
Biden to announce the construction of the Company’s Lebanon, Tennessee
manufacturing plant. The plant will employ 500 over the next five years, produce
over 10,000 DC fast chargers units annually, and will ultimately reach peak
production capacity of 30,000 units annually.
On 17 January 2023, Tritium announced its largest single customer order from
BP plc (NYSE: BP) for deployment across the U.S., UK, Europe, and Australia.
bp will install the chargers for fleets and the general public across three
continents as part of a multi-year contract with Tritium to expand its EV
charging business, bp pulse. In December 2022, Tritium achieved the largest
monthly production output in company history, with 50 per cent. more output
than any previous month as its Tennessee factory continues to ramp up.
The company opened the 2023 calendar year with a record order backlog of
~$159 million as of 31 December 2022. The company is projecting 2023
revenue in excess of $200 million, corresponding to a 100+ per cent. YoY
increase with expected gross margins of 10 per cent. to 12 per cent. as the
company benefits from manufacturing scale up, improved product pricing,
and planned produce suite streamlining.
As of 31 December 2022, REL’s interest in Tritium, through the Partnership,
consisted of the $0.6 million sponsor investment, which was valued at
1.7x Gross MOIC
(1)
or $1 million (Realised: nil, Unrealised: $1 million), the
$15 million equity investment, which was valued at 0.28x Gross MOIC
(1)
or
$4 million (Realised: nil, Unrealised: $4 million), and the $9.7 million loan
investment, which was valued at 1.00x Gross MOIC
(1)
or $10 million
(Realised: $0.2 million, Unrealised: $9.8 million).
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
28
Investment Manager’s Report continued
Group14
In April 2022, REL, through the Partnership, invested $4 million into
Group14 Technologies, Inc.’s $400 million Series C funding round. The
Series C round was led by Porsche AG, with participation from OMERS
Capital Markets, Decarbonisation Partners, Vsquared Ventures, and
others. Group14 is a battery materials technology company founded in
2015. The company has developed a proprietary silicon-based anode
battery material to replace graphite in conventional lithium-ion batteries.
In Q4 2022, the company raised an additional $214mm as a second close to
its Series C transaction; bringing total Series C capital raised to $614mm,
fully funding the business plan through 2023.
As of 31 December 2022, REL’s interest in Group14, through the
Partnership, was valued at 1.00x Gross MOIC
(1)
or $4 million
(Realised: nil, Unrealised: $4 million).
FreeWire Technologies
As of 31 December 2022, REL, through the Partnership, has fully invested
its $10 million commitment to FreeWire. FreeWire is the leading provider
of battery-integrated DC fast chargers (DCFCs) and their associated
software. Riverstone led the company’s $50 million Series C round in
January 2021.
Their primary hardware product is the Boost Charger, a unitised, turnkey
DCFC that offers charging speeds of up to 200kW with only a 27kW grid
connection by using a 160kWh battery. These specifications support
15-24 fast charging sessions per day. The current software platform,
AMP Connect, allows for charger management and integration with
existing customer platforms with broader services in development.
As of 31 December 2022, REL’s interest in FreeWire, through
the Partnership, was valued at 2.00x Gross MOIC
(1)
or $20 million
(Realised: nil, Unrealised: $20 million).
Investment Portfolio Summary continued
$4 MILLION
INVESTED IN FULL ITS COMMITMENT
TO GROUP14
$10 MILLION
INVESTED IN FULL ITS COMMITMENT
TO FREEWIRE TECHNOLOGIES
(1) Gross Unrealised Value and Gross MOIC (Gross Multiple of Invested Capital) are before transaction costs, taxes (approximately 21 to 27.5 per cent. of U.S. sourced taxable
income) and 20 per cent. carried interest on applicable gross profits in accordance with the revised terms announced on 3 January 2020, but effective 30 June 2019. Since there
was no netting of losses against gains before the aforementioned revised terms, the effective carried interest rate on the portfolio as a whole will be greater than 20 per cent. No
further carried interest will be payable until the $95.2 million of realised and unrealised losses to date at 31 December 2022 (largest deficit of $605.5 million at 30 June 2020) are
made whole with future gains, so the earned carried interest of $0.8 million at 31 December 2022 has been deferred and will expire in October 2023 if the aforementioned losses
are not made whole. Since REL has not yet met the appropriate Cost Benchmark at 31 December 2022, $38.0 million in Performance Allocation was not accrued in accordance
with the terms of the current agreement, which would have been accrued under the prior agreement.
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
29
DCRD
In August 2021, REL announced an investment of $0.6 million in DCRD,
a special purpose acquisition vehicle sponsored by an affiliate of REL’s
Investment Manager which raised over $316 million in its IPO.
On 23 January 2023, the business combination agreement by and among
DCRD, Hammerhead, Hammerhead Energy Inc., an Alberta corporation
and wholly owned subsidiary of Hammerhead (“NewCo”) and 2453729
Alberta ULC (“AmalCo”) was approved with 27,623,812 votes for, 3,314,327
votes against, and 1 abstention. The transaction subsequently closed on
23 February 2023. Please see further details in the Post-Year End Update
section on page 31.
As of 31 December 2022, REL’s interest in DCRD, through the
Partnership, was valued at 4.99x Gross MOIC(1) or $3.0 million
(Realised: nil, Unrealised: $3.0 million).
Our Next Energy (ONE)
In December 2022, REL invested $11.5 million of its $12.5 million
commitment to Our Next Energy’s (ONE) $300 million Series B round,
valuing the company at over $1 billion. ONE is a Michigan-based energy
storage technology company working to develop batteries for mobility and
large-scale storage applications. ONE will use the proceeds of the round
to complete ONE Circle, its Van Buren Township, Michigan facility, which
will be its first Lithium Iron Phosphate (LFP) battery manufacturing plant.
As of 31 December 2022, REL’s interest in ONE, through the
Partnership, was valued at 1.00x Gross MOIC
(1)
or $11 million
(Realised: nil, Unrealised: $11 million).
$0.6 MILLION
INVESTED IN FULL ITS COMMITMENT
TO DCRD
$11.5 MILLION
INVESTED OF ITS $12.5 MILLION COMMITMENT
TO OUR NEXT ENERGY (ONE)
Based on the aforementioned Performance Allocation, net of estimated applicable taxes, the potential increase arising from the Investment Manager’s share purchases would be
$19 million as of 31 December 2022. In addition, there is a management fee of 1.5 per cent. of net assets (including cash) per annum and other expenses. Given these costs, fees and
expenses are in aggregate expected to be considerable, Total Net Value and Net MOIC will be materially less than Gross Unrealised Value and Gross MOIC. Local taxes, primarily on
U.S. assets, may apply at the jurisdictional level on profits arising in operating entity investments. Further withholding taxes may apply on distributions from such operating entity
investments. In the normal course of business, REL may form wholly-owned subsidiaries, to be treated as C Corporations for US tax purposes. The C Corporations serve to protect
REL’s public investors from incurring U.S. effectively connected income. The C Corporations file U.S. corporate tax returns with the U.S. Internal Revenue Service and pay U.S.
corporate taxes on its taxable income.
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
30
Pipestone
Pipestone is a Calgary-based oil and gas company focused on the Western
Canadian Sedimentary Basin. CNOR had invested in a joint venture with
Tourmaline Oil Corp. targeting the Peace River High area (126,000 net
acres), which it sold in 3Q19 for C$175 million. Earlier in 2019, CNOR closed
on a strategic combination with publicly-traded Blackbird Energy to
consolidate its ~25,000 net acre Pipestone Montney position with that of
Blackbird’s offsetting ~73,000 acres. The pro forma company is named
Pipestone Energy Corporation and trades under TSX: PIPE. During the third
quarter of 2019, Pipestone completed the build-out of required
infrastructure needed to expand its future operations and has since been
working towards bringing incremental production online.
In February 2022, REL sold its entire position in Pipestone for net proceeds
of 53 million CAD (USD 41.7 million). With this transaction, REL no longer
owns any interest in Pipestone.
As of 31 December 2022, REL’s realised position in Pipestone, through
the Partnership, was valued at 0.64x Gross MOIC or $58 million
(100 per cent. realised).
$90 MILLION
INVESTED IN FULL ITS COMMITMENT
TO PIPESTONE (FKA CNOR)
Investment Manager’s Report continued
Carrier II
Carrier II is focused on the acquisition and exploitation of upstream oil and
gas assets by partnering with select operators that are developing both
unconventional and conventional reservoirs in North America. Shortly after
its establishment in May 2015, Carrier II entered into a joint venture
agreement with a highly experienced operator group made up of Henry
Resources, LLC and PT Petroleum, LLC, targeting 19,131 net acres for
development in the southern Midland Basin (subsequently increased to
20,260 net acres). In addition, through three separate acquisitions, the
company has acquired 3,892 net acres in Karnes County in the Eagle Ford
basin, targeting the Sugarloaf Project and the Chisholm Project, both
operated by Marathon Oil Corp.
The company continues to operate prudently and remains focused on using
free cash flow from high commodity prices to fund development and reduce
outstanding indebtedness on the company’s term loan.
Since inception, Carrier II has distributed $63 million through dividends to
REL, through the Partnership, representing approximately 57 per cent. of
REL’s invested capital.
On 27 December 2022, the non-operated interests of Carrier II were sold to
the operator of its wells, Marathon Oil Corporation. At closing, REL
received proceeds of approximately $34 million from Carrier II, and as a
result has reflected this as a realisation even though the Company will be
retaining its interest in Carrier II until Q1 2023 when it expects to receive
approximately $3 million of residual proceeds to be released from escrow.
As of 31 December 2022, REL’s realised position in Carrier, through
the Partnership, was valued at 0.60x Gross MOIC or $66 million
(Realised: $63 million, Unrealised: $3 million).
$110 MILLION
INVESTED OF ITS $113 MILLION COMMITMENT
TO CARRIER II
Realised Investments
(1) Gross Unrealised Value and Gross MOIC (Gross Multiple of Invested Capital) are before transaction costs, taxes (approximately 21 to 27.5 per cent. of U.S. sourced taxable
income) and 20 per cent. carried interest on applicable gross profits in accordance with the revised terms announced on 3 January 2020, but effective 30 June 2019. Since there
was no netting of losses against gains before the aforementioned revised terms, the effective carried interest rate on the portfolio as a whole will be greater than 20 per cent. No
further carried interest will be payable until the $95.2 million of realised and unrealised losses to date at 31 December 2022 (largest deficit of $605.5 million at 30 June 2020) are
made whole with future gains, so the earned carried interest of $0.8 million at 31 December 2022 has been deferred and will expire in October 2023 if the aforementioned losses
are not made whole. Since REL has not yet met the appropriate Cost Benchmark at 31 December 2022, $38.0 million in Performance Allocation was not accrued in accordance
with the terms of the current agreement, which would have been accrued under the prior agreement. Based on the aforementioned Performance Allocation, net of estimated
applicable taxes, the potential increase arising from the Investment Manager’s share purchases would be $19 million as of 31 December 2022. In addition, there is a management
fee of 1.5 per cent. of net assets (including cash) per annum and other expenses. Given these costs, fees and expenses are in aggregate expected to be considerable, Total Net
Value and Net MOIC will be materially less than Gross Unrealised Value and Gross MOIC. Local taxes, primarily on U.S. assets, may apply at the jurisdictional level on profits
arising in operating entity investments. Further withholding taxes may apply on distributions from such operating entity investments. In the normal course of business, REL may
form wholly-owned subsidiaries, to be treated as C Corporations for US tax purposes. The C Corporations serve to protect REL’s public investors from incurring U.S. effectively
connected income. The C Corporations file U.S. corporate tax returns with the U.S. Internal Revenue Service and pay U.S. corporate taxes on its taxable income.
Investment Portfolio Summary continued
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
31
Valuation
The Investment Manager is charged with proposing the valuation of the
assets held by REL through the Partnership. The Partnership has directed
that securities and instruments be valued at their fair value. REL’s
valuation policy is compliant with IFRS and IPEV Valuation Guidelines and
has been applied consistently from period to period since inception. As the
Company’s investments are generally not publicly quoted, valuations
require meaningful judgement to establish a range of values, and the
ultimate value at which an investment is realised may differ from its most
recent valuation and the difference may be significant.
The Investment Manager values each underlying investment in
accordance with the Riverstone valuation policy, the IFRS accounting
standards and IPEV Valuation Guidelines. The value of REL’s portion of
that investment is derived by multiplying its ownership percentage by
the value of the underlying investment. If there is any divergence
between the Riverstone valuation policy and RELs valuation policy, the
Partnership’s proportion of the total holding will follow REL’s valuation
policy. Valuations of RELs investments through the Partnership are
determined by the Investment Manager and disclosed quarterly to
investors, subject to Board approval.
Riverstone values its investments using common industry valuation
techniques, including comparable public market valuation,
comparable merger and acquisition transaction valuation, and
discounted cash flow valuation.
For development-type investments, Riverstone also considers the
recognition of appreciation or depreciation of subsequent financing
rounds, if any. For those early stage privately held companies where
there are other indicators of a decline in the value of the investment,
Riverstone will value the investment accordingly even in the absence of
a subsequent financing round.
Riverstone reviews the valuations on a quarterly basis with the
assistance of the Riverstone Performance Review Team (“PRT) as part
of the valuation process. The PRT was formed to serve as a single
structure overseeing the existing Riverstone portfolio with the goal of
improving operational and financial performance.
The Audit Committee reviews the valuations of the Company’s
investments held through the Partnership and makes a
recommendation to the Board for formal consideration and acceptance.
Uninvested Cash
As of 31 December 2022, REL had a cash balance of $15.8 million and
the Partnership, including its wholly-owned subsidiaries, REL Cayman
Holdings, LP, REL US Corp and REL US Centennial Holdings, LLC, had
uninvested funds of over $103.8 million held as cash and money market
fixed deposits, gross of the accrued Management Fee of $2.7 million.
After the accrued Management Fee, REL’s aggregate cash balance is
$116.9 million. As in prior years, in accordance with the Partnership
Agreement, if the Company requires additional funds for working
capital, it is entitled to receive another distribution from the Partnership.
The Partnership maintains deposit accounts with several leading
international banks. In addition, the Partnership invests a portion of its
cash deposits in short-term money market fixed deposits. REL’s
treasury policy seeks to protect the principal value of cash deposits
utilising low risk investments with top-tier counterparts.
Uninvested cash earned approximately 49 basis points during the year ended
31 December 2022. All cash deposits referred to in this paragraph are
denominated in U.S. dollars.
On 4 March 2022, the Board was pleased to allocate an additional
£46.0 million to the Share Buyback Programme at which time the
Company had the authority to repurchase 8,062,463 shares pursuant to
the authority granted at its 2022 AGM. In 2022, the Company had
repurchased 4,045,941 shares, in aggregate, for £26.8 million ($32.2 million)
at an average share price of £6.63 ($7.95). Since REL started the buyback
programme in May 2020, the Company has purchased 29,005,073 shares,
in aggregate, for £113 million ($145 million) at an average share price of
£3.89 ($5.00). As of 31 December 2022, £23 million remains available
for repurchasing.
As of 31 December 2022, REL, through the Partnership, had potential
unfunded commitments of $23 million. In connection with the listing of REL
on the London Stock Exchange, all proceeds of the offering were converted to
U.S. dollars at an average rate of 1.606 at inception. All cash deposits referred
to above are denominated in U.S. dollars. Additionally, REL’s functional
currency and Financial Statements are all presented in U.S. dollars. The
Partnership’s commitments are denominated in U.S. dollars, except
Hammerhead which is denominated in Canadian dollars.
Post-Year End Update
As a result of the combination of Hammerhead and DCRD, which closed on
23 February 2023, REL’s existing Hammerhead ownership converted into
15.4 million common shares of Hammerhead Energy Inc. (NASDAQ / TSX:
HHRS). REL also owns a 5 per cent. stake in the DCRD Sponsor. The DCRD
Sponsor is entitled to up to 45 per cent. of the 7.9 million Sponsor Shares subject
to Riverstone Fund V achieving a 1.0x Gross MOIC, as detailed in the F-4 Side
Letter. Therefore, at or above a $10.53 share price, REL will own an additional
0.2 million HHRS shares. Based on the 15.4 million common shares of HHRS at
the HHRS closing share price of $14.97 as of 27 February 2023, the company’s
initial day of trading on NASDAQ and TSX, REL’s investments in Hammerhead
and the DCRD Sponsor are valued at $255.8 million, inclusive of previously
realised proceeds of $23.1 million, which is an increase from $179.9 million as
at 31 December 2022. There can be no assurance that the closing price as of
27 February 2023 is an indicator of future performance. As the shares of HHRS
are publicly traded, going forward the valuation will be determined based on the
market price, rather than the basis used previously for unquoted investments.
Outlook
The Investment Manager continues to work with its portfolio companies
and management teams to navigate dynamic market conditions driven by
geopolitical strife, the ongoing pandemic, volatility in commodity markets,
and the energy transition. We believe past work with the legacy commodity
linked portfolio and work to identify strong growth equity opportunities in
the ever-evolving decarbonisation space, has positioned the portfolio well
to capitalise on the upside of energy market volatility and the steady
march toward a decarbonised economy. We expect portfolio companies
to manage liquidity with discipline, and to increase strategic capital
expenditure where appropriate. The Investment Manager will continue
to execute on the modified investment programme, identifying new
decarbonisation investments that present attractive risk-reward profiles
supporting value creation for shareholders.
RIGL Holdings, LP
28 February 2023
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
32
In 2022, REL, through the Partnership, further invested
$95 million in six companies (T-REX, Infinitum, Tritium, Anuvia
Plant Nutrients, Group14 and ONE), which are located at diverse
junctions of the energy transition value chain. The Company
believes that each of these investments provides an opportunity to
create shareholder value while supporting REL’s long-term focus
on ESG and energy transition investments. Going forward, REL
expects to continue to increase its exposure in areas that support
decarbonisation across the entire investment spectrum, from
traditional power generation to technology-enabled solutions that
facilitate increased renewables adoption and helps the global
economy reach its climate change goals.
The Company’s independent directors are supportive of the
continuation of the Investment Manager’s modified investment
strategy for the immediate future. The independent directors will
continue to monitor the Investment Manager’s success in
repositioning the Company’s existing investment strategy through
the modified investment strategy. At the EGM in 2020, the Board
committed to review the Company’s performance and, before
31 December 2022, decide whether or not it would be in the best
interests of all Shareholders to request an EGM to vote on a run-off
of its portfolio. Based on the significant improvement in the
performance of REL, taking into account the trading price of the
Ordinary Shares and portfolio performance from 30 September 2020
to 30 September 2022, and the outlook for further energy transition
investment opportunities from the Investment Manager, the
Company’s independent Directors did not seek Shareholder approval
before 31 December 2022 to amend the Company’s investment policy
to provide for the managed wind-down of the Company.
Investment Policy
The Company’s investment objective is to generate long term
capital growth by making investments in the global energy sector.
For so long as the Investment Manager (or any of its affiliates)
remains the investment manager of the Company, the Company
shall have the option to participate in all Qualifying Investments in
which the Private Riverstone Funds invest.
Asset Allocation
The Company shall acquire its interests in each Qualifying
Investment at the same time (or as near as practicable thereto) as,
and on substantially the same economic and financial terms as,
the relevant Private Riverstone Fund which may involve the Private
Riverstone Fund acquiring all or some of such Qualifying
Investment and selling it on to the Company on the same terms on
which the Private Riverstone Fund acquired the transferred
interest in the Qualifying Investment.
The Company and either Fund V or Fund VI has participated in each
applicable Qualifying Investment in which Fund V or Fund VI,
respectively, invests in a ratio of one-third to two-thirds. This
investment ratio was subject to adjustment on a case-by-case basis
(a) to take account of the liquid assets available to each of the
Company and Fund V for investment at the relevant time and any
other investment limitations applicable to either of them or
otherwise if (b) both (i) a majority of the Company’s independent
directors and (ii) the Investment Manager agree that the investment
ratio should be adjusted for specific Qualifying Investments.
For each Private Riverstone Fund subsequent to Fund V which is of
a similar target equity size as Fund V (i.e. US$7.7 billion) and has a
similar investment policy to the Company Riverstone shall seek to
ensure that, subject to the investment capacity of the Company at
the time, the Company and the Private Riverstone Fund invest in
applicable Qualifying Investments in an investment ratio of
one-third to two-thirds or in such other ratio as the Company’s
independent directors and the Investment Manager agree at or
prior to the first closing of such Private Riverstone Fund.
Such investment ratio may be adjusted by agreement between the
Company’s independent directors and the Investment Manager on
subsequent closings of a Private Riverstone Fund having regard to
the total capital commitments raised by that Private Riverstone
Fund during its commitment period, the liquid assets available to
the Company at that time and any other investment limitations
applicable to either of them.
Investment Strategy
THE INVESTMENT MANAGER CONTINUES TO REPOSITION REL’S PORTFOLIO AWAY
FROM COMMODITY PRICE-SENSITIVE OIL AND GAS INVESTMENTS TOWARDS A FOCUS
ON RENEWABLE AND THE DECARBONISATION THEMATIC.
This shift in the portfolio began in the summer of 2020 with the Company,
through the Partnership investing in Enviva, and progressed in 2021 with the commitments
to GoodLeap, FreeWire Technologies, DCRB, DCRN and DCRC.
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
33
The Investment Manager will typically seek to ensure that the
Company and the Private Riverstone Funds dispose of their
interests in Qualifying Investments at the same time and on
substantially the same terms, and in the case of partial disposals,
in the same ratio as the relevant Qualifying Investment was
acquired, but this may not always be the case.
In addition, the Company may at any time make investments
consistent with its investment policy independent from Private
Riverstone Funds, which may include investments alongside
Riverstone employee co-investment vehicles or other
Riverstone-managed co-investment arrangements.
The Company may hold controlling or non-controlling positions in
its investments and may make investments in the form of equity,
equity-related instruments, derivatives or indebtedness (to the
extent that such indebtedness is a precursor to an ultimate
equity investment). The Company may invest in public or private
securities. The Company will not permit any investments to be the
subject of stock lending or sale and repurchase.
In selecting investments, the Investment Manager will target
investments that are expected to generate long term capital
growth and, in particular, investments that are expected to
generate a Gross IRR of between 20 and 30 per cent.
Diversification
Save for the Company’s investment in Hammerhead, which may
represent up to 35 per cent. of the Company’s gross assets, including
cash holdings, measured at the time the investment was made, no
one investment made by the Company may (at the time of the
relevant investment) represent more than 25 per cent. of the
Company’s gross assets, including cash holdings, measured at the
time the investment is made. As at 31 December 2022, the
Company’s investment in Hammerhead represented approximately
21 per cent. of the Company’s gross assets, including cash holdings.
The Company shall utilise the Partnership and its Investment
Undertakings or other similar investment holding structures to make
investments and this limitation shall not apply to its ownership
interest in the Partnership or any such Investment Undertaking.
Gearing
The Company may, but shall not be required to, incur indebtedness
for investment purposes, working capital requirements and to fund
own-share purchases or redemptions up to a maximum of 30 per
cent. of the last published NAV as at the time of the borrowing, or
such greater amount as may be approved by the Shareholders
passing an ordinary resolution. The consent of a majority of the
Company’s Directors shall be required for the Company or the
Partnership to enter into any credit or other borrowing facility.
This limitation will not apply to portfolio level entities in respect
of which the Company is invested or is proposing to invest.
Investment Restrictions
The Company is subject to the following investment restrictions:
>
for so long as required by the Listing Rules, it will at all times
seek to ensure that the Investment Manager invests and
manages the Company’s and the Partnership’s assets in a way
which is consistent with the Company’s objective of spreading
risk and in accordance with the Company’s investment policy;
>
for so long as required by the Listing Rules, it must not
conduct a trading activity which is significant in the context of
the Company and its Investment Undertakings;
>
for so long as required by the Listing Rules, not more than
10 per cent. of the value of its total assets will be invested in other
UK-listed closed-ended investment funds, except for those which
themselves have published investment policies to invest not
more than 15 per cent. of their total assets in other UK-listed
closed-ended investment funds; in addition, the Company will not
invest more than 15 per cent. of the value of its total assets in
other UK-listed closed-ended investment funds; and
>
any investment restrictions that may be imposed by Guernsey
law (although no such restrictions currently exist).
Currency and interest rate hedging transactions will only be
undertaken for the purpose of efficient portfolio management and
these transactions will not be undertaken for speculative purposes.
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
34
Richard Hayden (77)
Chair of the Board and
Non-executive Independent Director
Appointment Appointed to the Board
in May 2013 and appointed as Chair
of the Board in May 2016.
Experience Mr Hayden serves as
non-executive Chairman of
TowerBrook Capital Partners
Advisory Board and member of the
Investment Committee. Prior to
joining TowerBrook in 2009,
Mr Hayden was Vice Chairman of
GSC Group Inc and Global Head of
the CLO and Mezzanine Debt
business. Previously, Mr Hayden was
with Goldman Sachs from 1969 to
1999. Mr Hayden held a variety of
senior positions during his time at
Goldman Sachs, including Deputy
Chairman of Goldman Sachs
International Ltd and Chairman of the
Global Credit Committee. Mr Hayden
has served on a number of corporate
and advisory boards including CQS
Capital Management, Haymarket
Financial, Deutsche Borse and Abbey
National Bank. Mr Hayden is
currently on the Finance and
Investment Committee of the
Children’s Investment
Fund Foundation. Mr Hayden is
a UK resident.
Committee Membership
A
N
M
Richard Horlick (63)
Chair Elect and
Non-executive Independent Director
Appointment Appointed to the Board
in October 2022.
Experience : Mr Horlick serves as a
non-executive director and chair of
BH Macro Limited and a non-
executive director of VH Global
Sustainable Energy Opportunities
PLC, each of which is admitted to
trading on the Main Market of the
London Stock Exchange. In addition
to his listed positions, he is currently
the non-executive chairman of CCLA
Investment Management which
manages assets for over 38,000
charities and church and local
authority funds. Mr Horlick is a UK
resident and has served on a number
of closed end fund boards and was
previously head of investment and
main board director of Schroders Plc
and President, Institutional, of
Fidelity International and
subsequently chairman of the Trust
Bank for the Fidelity Mutual funds in
the US. He has had a long and
distinguished career in investment
management since graduating from
Cambridge University in 1980 with an
MA in Modern History.
Committee Membership
A
N
M
Peter Barker (74)
Non-executive
Independent Director
Appointment Appointed to the Board
in September 2013.
Experience: Mr Barker was
California Chairman of JPMorgan
Chase & Co., a global financial
services firm, from September 2009
until his retirement on 31 January
2013, and a member of its Executive
Committee in New York. Mr Barker
was also an Advisory Director of
Goldman, Sachs & Co. from
December 1998 until his retirement in
May 2002, and a Partner of Goldman,
Sachs & Co. from 1982 to 1998,
heading up Investment Banking on the
West Coast, having joined Goldman,
Sachs & Co. in 1971. Mr Barker is
President of the Fletcher Jones
Foundation and has held numerous
directorships. He is currently on the
board of Avery Dennison Corporation,
the W. M. Keck Foundation, the Irvine
Company, and the Automobile Club of
Southern California. Mr Barker is also
a Trustee of Claremont McKenna
College, having formerly been its
Chairman, and was previously Chair
of the Los Angeles Area Council of the
Boy Scouts of America. Mr Barker is a
U.S. resident.
Committee Membership
A
N
M
Patrick Firth (61)
Non-executive
Senior Independent Director
Appointment Appointed to the Board
in May 2013 and appointed as Senior
Independent Director in May 2016.
Experience: Mr Firth qualified as a
Chartered Accountant with KPMG
Guernsey in 1991 and is also a
member of the Chartered Institute for
Securities and Investment. He has
worked in the fund industry in
Guernsey since joining Rothschild
Asset Management (CI) Limited in
1992 before moving to become
Managing Director at Butterfield
Fund Services (Guernsey) Limited
(subsequently Butterfield Fulcrum
Group (Guernsey) Limited), a
company providing third party fund
administration services, where he
worked from April 2002 until June
2009. He is a non-executive Director
of a number of investment funds and
management companies, including
India Capital Growth Fund Limited,
CT UK Capital & Income Investment
Trust plc and NextEnergy Solar Fund
Limited. Mr Firth is a UK resident.
Committee Membership
A
N
M
Board of Directors
AN EXPERIENCED BOARD
Jeremy Thompson (67)
Non-executive
Independent Director
Appointment Appointed to the Board
in May 2016.
Experience: Mr Thompson has sector
experience in Finance, Telecoms,
Engineering and Oil & Gas. He acts as
an independent non-executive
director for both listed, including DP
Aircraft 1 Limited, and PE funds. Prior
to that, he has worked in private
equity and was CEO of four
autonomous global businesses within
Cable & Wireless Plc (operating in
both regulated and unregulated
markets), and earlier held CEO roles
within the Dowty Group. He currently
serves as chairman of the States of
Guernsey Renewable Energy Team
and is a commissioner of the Alderney
Gambling Control Commission. He is
also an independent member of the
Guernsey Tax Tribunal panel. He is a
graduate of Brunel (B.Sc), Cranfield
(MBA) and Bournemouth (M.Sc)
Universities and was an invited
member to the UK’s senior defence
course RCDS (Royal College of
Defence Studies). He is a member of
the IoD and holds the IoD’s Certificate
and Diploma in Company Direction, is
an associate of the Chartered Institute
of Arbitration and a chartered
Company Secretary. Mr Thompson is
a resident of Guernsey and has
previously lived and worked in the UK,
USA and Germany.
Committee Membership
A
N
M
Claire Whittet (67)
Non-executive
Independent Director
Appointment Appointed to the Board
in May 2015.
Experience Mrs Whittet has over 40
years of experience in the financial
services industry. After obtaining a
MA (Hons) in Geography from the
University of Edinburgh, she joined
the Bank of Scotland for 19 years and
undertook a wide variety of roles.
She moved to Guernsey in 1996 and
was Global Head of Private Client
Credit for Bank of Bermuda before
joining the Board of Rothschild & Co
Bank International Limited in 2003,
initially as Director of Lending and
latterly as Managing Director and
Co-Head until May 2016 when she
became a non-executive Director.
Mrs Whittet is an ACIB member of
the Chartered Institute of Bankers in
Scotland, a Chartered Banker, a
member of the Chartered Insurance
Institute and holds an IoD Diploma in
Company Direction. She is an
experienced non-executive Director
and currently sits on the board of
four other listed funds (BH Macro
Limited, Eurocastle Investment
Limited, Third Point Offshore
Investors Limited and TwentyFour
Select Monthly Income Fund Limited)
and various PE funds. Mrs Whittet is
a Guernsey resident.
Committee Membership
A
N
M
John Roche (57)
Non-executive
Independent Director
Appointment Appointed to the Board
in December 2022.
Experience Mr Roche qualified as an
Irish Chartered Accountant in 1988
and moved immediately to Guernsey
to join the PwC predecessor firm,
Coopers & Lybrand. He seconded to
the investment management
practices at PwC Ireland (1996-1998)
and PwC UK (2003-2008) returning
on a full time basis to Guernsey in
2009. Promoted to partner in 2006,
he is now recently retired with a
strong background in auditing as well
as IPO and capital markets
transactions for investment
companies on the various London
markets. He has focussed delivering
audit services to alternative
investment managers, specialising in
private equity, secondaries, private
debt, infrastructure and real estate
in the listed and private sectors.
Mr Roche has been the firm’s Risk
Management Partner (2008-2015),
Partner Responsible for
Independence/Ethics & Business
Conduct (2008-2015 & 2018-2022),
as well as the Guernsey Office
Managing Partner (2013-2020).
He was also President of the
Guernsey Society of Chartered and
Certified Accountants (2013-2015).
Mr Roche is a Guernsey resident.
Committee Membership
A
N
M
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
35
A
Audit Committee Member
N
Nomination Committee
Member
M
Management Engagement
Committee Member
Chairman
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
36
Report of the Directors
THE DIRECTORS HEREBY SUBMIT THE ANNUAL REPORT AND
AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE COMPANY FOR THE YEAR
ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2022. THIS REPORT OF THE DIRECTORS SHOULD BE READ
TOGETHER WITH THE CORPORATE GOVERNANCE REPORT ON PAGES 46 TO 55.
General Information
REL is a company limited by shares, which was incorporated on
23 May 2013 in Guernsey with an unlimited life and registered with
the Commission as a Registered Closed-ended Collective
Investment Scheme pursuant to the POI Law. It has been listed on
the London Stock Exchange since 29 October 2013. The registered
office of the Company is PO Box 286, Floor 2, Trafalgar Court,
Les Banques, St Peter Port, Guernsey, GY1 4LY.
Principal Activities
The principal activity of the Company is to act as an investment
entity through the Partnership and make investments in the
energy sector.
The Company’s investment objective is to generate long-term
capital growth by investing in the global energy sector.
Business Review
A review of the Company’s business and its likely future development
is provided in the Board Chair’s Statement on pages 4 to 7 and in the
Investment Manager’s Report on pages 18 to 31.
Listing Requirements
Since being admitted on 29 October 2013 to the Official List of the
UK Listing Authority, maintained by the FCA, the Company has
complied with the applicable Listing Rules.
Results and Dividend
The results of the Company for the year are shown in the audited
Statement of Comprehensive Income on page 68.
The Net Asset Value of the Company as at 31 December 2022 was
$739 million (31 December 2021: $682 million).
The Directors do not recommend the payment of a dividend
in respect of the year ended 31 December 2022
(31 December 2021: $nil).
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
37
Share Capital
At incorporation on 23 May 2013, the Company issued one founder
Ordinary Share of no par value. On 29 October 2013, the Company
issued 71,032,057 Ordinary Shares of no par value at £10 per Ordinary
Share in an initial public offering raising a total of $1,138 million.
KFI, one of the Cornerstone Investors in the Company, paid for
and acquired 10 million Ordinary Shares in two equal tranches of
£50 million. The first tranche was paid on Admission and the second
tranche of 5 million Ordinary Shares was paid on 26 September 2014.
On 11 December 2015, the Company raised £67.6 million
($102.3 million)
(1)
through the issuance of 8,448,006 new Ordinary
Shares at £8.00 per Ordinary Share.
On 15 October 2018, the Company announced a Tender Offer for
£55.0 million in value of the Company’s Ordinary Shares. The Company
acquired 4,583,333 Ordinary Shares at £12.00 per share, which were
cancelled on 23 November 2018.
On 1 May 2020, the Company announced a buyback programme with
the intention of returning £50 million to Shareholders via on market
buybacks; which was completed on 9 March 2021. Since the
announcement, the Company has purchased 17,214,197 shares, in
aggregate, for £50 million ($63 million) at an average share price of
£2.90 ($3.67).
On 11 May 2021, the Company announced a buyback programme with
the intention of returning £20 million to Shareholders via on market
buybacks, which subsequently, on 4 October 2021, was increased to
£40 million. Since the announcement, the Company has purchased
7,744,935 shares, in aggregate, for £36 million ($50 million) at an
average share price of £4.65 ($6.40).
On 14 February 2022, the Company announced that the Board and
Investment Manager agreed to allocate an additional £46.0 million
to the programme. Since the announcement, 4,045,941 ordinary
shares have been bought back at a total cost of approximately
£26.8 million ($32.2 million) at an average share price of approximately
£6.63 ($7.95). With the intention to narrow the Company’s trading
discount, the Board took the decision in Q4 2022 to steadily buyback
shares up to £15.5 million ($17.5 million) for the period to
31 December 2022.
As at 31 December 2022, the share capital of the Company is
50,891,658 Ordinary Shares in aggregate.
The Company has one class of Ordinary Shares. The issued value of
the Ordinary Shares represents 100 per cent. of the total issued value
of all share capital. Under the Company’s Articles of Incorporation, on
a show of hands, each Shareholder present in person or by proxy has
the right to one vote at general meetings. On a poll, each Shareholder
is entitled to one vote for every share held.
Shareholders are entitled to all dividends paid by the Company and,
on a winding up, provided the Company has satisfied all of its liabilities,
the Shareholders are entitled to all of the surplus assets of the
Company. The Company has not declared or paid dividends from
inception to 31 December 2022, and has no intention to do so.
The Ordinary Shares have no right to fixed income.
Shareholdings of the Directors
The Directors with beneficial interests in the shares of the
Company as at 31 December 2022 and 2021 are detailed below:
Director
Ordinary
Shares
held 31
December
2022
Per cent.
Holding
at 31
December
2022
Ordinary
Shares
held 31
December
2021
Per cent.
Holding
at 31
December
2021
Richard Hayden
(1)
10,000 0.020 10,000 0.018
Richard Horlick
(1)
10,000 0.020 - -
Peter Barker
(1)(2)
5,000 0.010 5,000 0.009
Patrick Firth
(3)
8,000 0.016 8,000 0.015
Jeremy Thompson
(1)
3,751 0.007 3,751 0.007
Claire Whittet
(1)(4)
2,250 0.004 2,250 0.004
John Roche
(1)
2,201 0.004 - -
(1)
Non-executive Independent Director.
(2)
Ordinary Shares held jointly with spouse.
(3)
Senior Independent Director.
(4)
Ordinary Shares held indirectly with spouse.
In addition, the Company also provides the same information as at
28 February 2023, being the most current information available.
Director
Ordinary
Shares held
28 February
2023
Per cent.
Holding at
28 February
2023
Richard Hayden
(1)
10,000 0.020
Richard Horlick
(1)
10,000 0.020
Peter Barker
(1)(2)
5,000 0.010
Patrick Firth
(3)
8,000 0.016
Jeremy Thompson
(1)
3,751 0.007
Claire Whittet
(1)(4)
2,250 0.004
John Roche
(1)
2,201 0.004
(1)
Non-executive Independent Director.
(2)
Ordinary Shares held jointly with spouse.
(3)
Senior Independent Director.
(4)
Ordinary Shares held indirectly with spouse.
(1)
Gross of share issuance costs of $3.6 million
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
38
Directors’ Authority to Buy Back Shares
At the AGM on 24 May 2022 in St Peter Port, Guernsey, the
Company renewed the authority to make market purchases of up
to a maximum of 14.99 per cent. of the issued share capital of the
Company. Any buy back of the Company’s Ordinary Shares will be
made subject to Companies Law and within any guidelines
established from time to time by the Board. The making and timing
of any buy backs will be at the absolute discretion of the Board,
with consent of the Investment Manager, and not at the option of
the Shareholders. Purchases of the Company’s Ordinary Shares
will only be made through the market for cash at prices below the
prevailing Net Asset Value of the Company’s Ordinary Shares
(as last calculated) where the Directors believe such purchases
will enhance Shareholder value. Such purchases will also only be
made in accordance with the Listing Rules.
In accordance with the Company’s Articles of Incorporation and
Companies Law, up to 10 per cent. of the Company’s Ordinary
Shares may be held as treasury shares.
Directors’ and Officers’ Liability Insurance
The Company maintains insurance in respect of directors’ and
officers’ liability in relation to their acts on behalf of the Company.
Substantial Shareholdings
As at 31 December 2022, the Company had been notified, in
accordance with Chapter 5 of the Disclosure Guidance and
Transparency Rules, of the following substantial voting rights
as Shareholders of the Company.
Report of the Directors continued
Shareholder Shareholding
Per cent.
Holding
Nature of
Holding
Quilter Investors 12,292,141 24.2% Indirect
Moore Capital Mgt 8,430,490 16.6% Indirect
AKRC Investments LLC 6,208,990 12.2% Direct
SIX Group Ltd. 4,440,565 8.7% Indirect
Riverstone Related
Holdings
3,358,828 6.6% Direct
In addition, the Company also provides the same information as at
24 February 2023, being the most current information available.
Shareholder Shareholding
Per cent.
Holding
Nature of
Holding
Quilter Investors 12,292,141 24.6% Indirect
Moore Capital Mgt 8,430,490 16.9% Indirect
AKRC Investments LLC 4,777,598 9.6% Direct
SIX Group Ltd. 4,521,538 9.0% Indirect
Riverstone Related
Holdings
3,358,828 6.7% Direct
The Directors confirm that there are no securities in issue that
carry special rights with regards to the control of the Company.
Independent External Auditor
Ernst & Young LLP has been the Company’s external auditor since
incorporation in 2013. The Audit Committee reviews the
appointment of the external auditor, its effectiveness and its
relationship with the Company, which includes monitoring the use
of the external auditor for non-audit services and the balance of
audit and non-audit fees paid. Following a review of the
independence and effectiveness of the external auditor, a
resolution will be proposed at the 2023 Annual General Meeting to
reappoint Ernst & Young LLP. Each Director believes that there is
no relevant information of which the external auditor is unaware.
Each has taken all steps necessary, as a Director, to be aware of
any relevant audit information and to establish that Ernst & Young
LLP is made aware of any pertinent information. This confirmation
is given and should be interpreted in accordance with the
provisions of Section 249 of the Companies Law. Further
information on the work of the external auditor is set out in the
Report of the Audit Committee on pages 56 to 59.
Articles of Incorporation
The Company’s Articles of Incorporation may only be amended by
special resolution of the Shareholders. At the AGM on 22 May 2018,
the Company adopted Amended and Restated Articles.
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
39
AIFMD
REL is regarded as an externally managed non-EEA AIF under the
AIFM Directive. RIGL is the Investment Manager of the Company as
its non-EEA AIFM. The AIFMD outlines the required information
which has to be made available to investors in an AIF and directs
that material changes to this information be disclosed in the
Annual Report of the AIF. All information required to be disclosed
under the AIFMD is either disclosed in this Annual Report or is
detailed in the Appendix entitled AIFMD Disclosures on page 178 in
REL’s latest Prospectus which can be obtained through the
Company’s website www.RiverstoneREL.com. The AIFM has no
remuneration within the current or prior year that falls within the
scope of Article 22 of the Directive.
RIGL provides AIFMD compliant management services to REL. The
AIFM acting on behalf of the AIF, has appointed Ocorian Depositary
Company (UK) Limited to provide depositary services to the AIF.
The appointment of the Depositary is intended to adhere to, and
meet the conditions placed on the Depositary and the AIFM under
Article 21 and other related articles of the AIFMD. The Depositary
shall only provide depositary services to the AIF should it admit
one or more German and/or Danish investors following marketing
activity towards them. At that time, the Depositary shall observe
and comply with the Danish and German regulations applying to
the provision of depositary services to a non-EEA AIF marketed in
Denmark or Germany, as the case may be, by a non-EEA AIFM.
UCITS Eligibility
The Investment Manager is a relying adviser of Riverstone
Investment Group LLC. Riverstone Investment Group LLC is
registered as an investment adviser with the SEC under the U.S.
Investment Advisers Act. As such, the Investment Manager is
subject to Riverstone Investment Group LLC’s supervision and
control, the advisory activities of the Investment Manager are
subject to the U.S. Investment Advisers Act and the rules
thereunder and the Investment Manager is subject to examination
by the SEC. Accordingly the Company has been advised that its
Ordinary Shares should be “transferable securities” and,
therefore, should be eligible for investment by authorised funds in
accordance with the UCITS Directive or NURS on the basis that:
>
the Company is a closed end investment company;
>
the Ordinary Shares are admitted to trading on the Main
Market of the London Stock Exchange; and
>
the Ordinary Shares have equal voting rights.
However, the manager of the relevant UCITS or NURS should
satisfy itself that the Ordinary Shares are eligible for investment
by the relevant UCITS or NURS.
AEOI Rules
Under AEOI Rules the Company continues to comply with both FATCA
and CRS requirements to the extent applicable to the Company.
General Partner’s Performance Allocation and
Management Fees
The General Partner’s Performance Allocation is equal to 20 per
cent. of all applicable realised pre-tax profits, in accordance with
the revised terms announced on 3 January 2020, but effective
30 June 2019 (see Note 9 for further detail). In particular, taxes on
realised gains from ECI investments, as shown in the Investment
Manager’s Report, in excess of existing net operating losses, can
be substantial at rates up to 27.5 per cent. The Company is not an
umbrella collective investment undertaking and therefore has no
gross liability. In the normal course of business, REL may form
wholly-owned subsidiaries, to be treated as C Corporations for
U.S. tax purposes. The C Corporations serve to protect REL’s
public investors from incurring U.S. ECI. The C Corporations file
U.S. corporate tax returns with the U.S. IRS and pay U.S. corporate
taxes on its taxable income.
The General Partner’s Performance Allocation is calculated under
the aforementioned revised terms of the Partnership Agreement
announced on 3 January 2020, but effective 30 June 2019, and as
described in the Prospectuses.
The accrued Performance Allocation is calculated on a quarterly
basis, which is taken into account when calculating the fair value of
the Company’s investment in the Partnership, as described in Note
10. The fair value of the Company’s investment in the Partnership is
after the calculation of Management Fees, as described in Note 9.
The financial effect of the General Partner’s Performance
Allocation, Management Fees and any taxes on ECI investments is
shown in Note 6. The Investment Management Agreement
continues into perpetuity post the seventh year anniversary as the
Discontinuation Resolution was not passed in 2020, subject to the
termination for cause provisions described in Note 9.
However, either the Board or a 10 per cent. Shareholder or group
can request an EGM to vote on a wind-up of the Company at any
time. If passed, such actions would trigger an exit fee equal to
20 times the most recent quarterly management fee.
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
40
Going Concern
The Audit Committee has reviewed the appropriateness of the
Company’s Financial Statements being prepared in accordance
with Guernsey law and IFRS and presented on a going concern
basis, which it has recommended to the Board. As further disclosed
in the Corporate Governance Report, the Company is a member of
the AIC and complies with the AIC Code. The Financial Statements
have been prepared on a going concern basis for the reasons set
out below and as the Directors, with the recommendation from the
Audit Committee, have a reasonable expectation that the Company
has adequate resources to continue in operational existence for the
foreseeable future, which is defined as the period from the date of
approval of Financial Statements up until 31 March 2024. In
reaching this conclusion, the Directors, with the recommendation
from the Audit Committee, have considered the risks that could
impact the Company’s liquidity over the period from the date of
approval of the Financial Statements up until 31 March 2024, and
have taken into account the following two key considerations, which
are discussed further below.
1. Available liquid resources and potential proceeds from
investment realisations versus current and expected liabilities
of the Company over the period from the date of approval of
the Financial Statements up until 31 March 2024; and
2. Available liquid resources and potential proceeds from
investment realisations versus total potential unfunded
commitments of the Partnership
1. Available liquid resources and potential proceeds
from investment realisations versus current and
expected liabilities of the Company over the period
from the date of approval of the Financial Statements
up until 31 March 2024
REL retained $11.5 million of cash in the Company’s IPO and
Placing and Open Offer for the initial three years post-listing
and has requested and received eight distributions for working
capital needs in aggregate of $29.4 million from the
Partnership cumulatively through 31 December 2022. During
2022, the Company requested and received distribution
requests in aggregate of £35.2 million ($42.3 million) for the
share buyback programme, of which $15.7 million remains at
31 December 2022 (31 December 2021: $7.3 million). This cash
and cash equivalents balance is sufficient to cover the
Company’s existing liabilities at 31 December 2022 of
$0.7 million and the forecasted company’s annual expenses of
approximately $4.3 million. Additionally, REL will need
additional distributions of approximately $28.0 million from the
Partnership to fulfill the remainder of the share buyback
programme amount of £23.2 million, which was announced by
the Company on 8 February 2022 and for which the buyback
authority was approved at the EGM on 4 March 2022. As in
prior years, in accordance with the Partnership Agreement, if
the Company requires additional funds for working capital or
the share buyback programme, it is entitled to receive another
distribution from the Partnership. In order to do so, the
Company would submit a distribution request approved by the
Board to the Partnership, which would then be required to
arrange for the payment of the requested amount. Since REL’s
inception, the Company has requested and received eight
distributions from the Partnership for working capital needs.
As detailed further in section 2 below, REL, through the
Partnership, had available liquid resources of $103.8 million in
excess of potential unfunded commitments of $22.9 million at
31 December 2022, but currently, as of the date of this report,
REL, through the Partnership, has total potential unfunded
investment commitments of up to $21.9 million, which does not
exceed its available liquid resources of $99.9 million. However,
based on the Investment Manager’s cash flow forecast for the
next three years to 31 December 2025, the expectation is that,
if needed, the Partnership will only fund the remaining
investment commitments to Enviva, and Onyx, which total
$9.7 million as of the date of this report.
Report of the Directors continued
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
41
2. Available liquid resources and potential proceeds
from investment realisations versus total potential
unfunded commitments of the Partnership up until
31 March 2024
As at 31 December 2022, REL and the Partnership, including
its wholly-owned subsidiaries, REL Cayman Holdings, LP,
REL US Corp and REL US Centennial Holdings, LLC, had
$119.5 million of uninvested funds held as cash and cash
equivalents (31 December 2021: $105.8 million). This amount
is comprised of $103.8 million held at the Partnership and
$15.7 million held at REL. Subsequent to 31 December 2022
and up to the date of this report, the Company, through the
Partnership, made payments of $2.7 million for the Q4 2022
Management Fee, $0.1 million for Partnership expenses and
funded the remaining commitment amount for ONE of
$1.0 million. In accordance with the revised terms for REL’s
GP Performance Allocation announced in January 2020,
REL did not meet the portfolio level Cost Benchmark at
31 December 2022; therefore, any unrealised Performance
Allocation has been deferred. If these changes had not been
accepted, then the accrued GP Performance Allocation would
have been $38.0 million as of 31 December 2022. No
performance fees will be payable until the $95.2 million
realised and unrealised losses to date at 31 December 2022
are offset with future gains. If these realised and unrealised
losses have not been offset, any such accrued fees will no
longer be payable after three years from each respective
accrual date.
The Company’s total potential unfunded investment
commitments of $22.9 million as at 31 December 2022
(31 December 2021: $49.1 million), through the Partnership,
did not exceed its available liquid resources as at
31 December 2022. This amount does not exceed the
Partnership’s available liquid resources of $99.9 million as of
the date of this report. It is not expected that all potential
unfunded investment commitments will be drawn due to a
variety of factors, such as the ability for the commitment to be
reduced and/or cancelled by the Investment Manager with
consideration from the Board, the present market conditions
do not warrant presently further capital expenditure as the
returns would not be incrementally positive, a portfolio
company being sold earlier than anticipated or a targeted
investment opportunity changing or disappearing. Based on
the Investment Manager’s cash flow forecast for the next
three years to 31 December 2025, the expectation is that, if
needed, the Partnership will only fund the remaining
commitments to Enviva and Onyx which aggregate up to
$9.7 million as of the date of this report. However, if the
Board decides to fund any of the Partnership’s unfunded
commitments to the other active investments, the Partnership
can execute a reactionary measure to provide liquidity as
discussed further below.
At 31 December 2022, ten of the Company’s realised
investments, held through the Partnership, resulted in
$937.9 million of gross proceeds on invested capital of
$729.3 million, respectively in aggregate, resulting in an
average Gross MOIC of approximately 1.3x. The initial
commitments to these ten investments were in excess of
$1,067.8 million, so approximately 68 per cent. had been
funded before realisation. In addition, the board of each
underlying portfolio company, more often than not are
controlled by Riverstone, which has discretion over whether
or not that capital is ultimately invested. Moreover, REL’s
arrangements with Riverstone allow the Companys potential
unfunded commitments to be reduced and/or cancelled by
the Investment Manager with consideration from the Board,
although this has yet to happen. Moreover, any proposed
investments outside of those made with Fund V and VI can
be unilaterally declined by the Board.
Finally, as a reactionary measure, the Partnership’s
investments in the publicly-traded shares of the portfolio
companies could always be sold, or used as collateral to
secure asset-backed financing, to fund the Partnership’s
shortfall of liquid resources and potential proceeds from
investment realisations versus potential unfunded
commitments. The Partnership holds unrestricted
marketable securities consisting of publicly-traded shares
of Enviva, Permian Resources, Solid Power, Tritium and
Hyzon, for which the aggregate fair value was $177.1 million at
31 December 2022 and $198.0 million as of 27 February 2023.
Additionally, the Partnership holds restricted marketable
securities consisting of publicly-traded shares of Tritium
(lock-up expiration in 1Q2023), and DCRD (lock-up expiration
is one year post future business combination), for which the
aggregate fair value was $4.0 million at 31 December 2022
and $234.2 million as of 27 February 2023, which also
includes the shares of HHRS (see Post-Year End Update
section on page 31 for further information).
Directors’ Assessment of Going Concern
Based on the reasons outlined above, on balance, the
Directors are satisfied, as of the date of this report, that it is
appropriate to adopt the going concern basis in preparing the
Financial Statements.
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
42
Viability Statement
The Directors, with recommendation from the Audit Committee, have
assessed the prospects of the Company over a longer period than
required by the going concern provision. With recommendation from
the Audit Committee, the Board chose to conduct a review for a period
of three years to 31 December 2025 as it was determined to be an
appropriate timeframe based on the historical investment cycle of the
Company’s investments, through the Partnership, and its financial
planning processes. On a rolling basis the Directors evaluate the
outcome of the investments and the Company’s financial position as a
whole. While an unprecedented and long term decline in global oil and
gas consumption could threaten the Company’s performance, it would
not necessarily threaten its viability, not least as a result of the
Company’s progressive shift to decarbonisation asset investments.
In support of this statement, the Audit Committee recommended
to the Directors to take into account all of the principal risks and
their mitigation as identified in the Principal Risk and
Uncertainties section of the Corporate Governance Report, the
nature of the Company’s business; including the cash reserves
and money market deposits at the Partnership, the potential of its
portfolio of investments to generate future income and capital
proceeds, and the ability of the Directors to minimise the level of
cash outflows, if necessary. The most relevant potential impacts
of the identified Principal Risks and Uncertainties on viability were
determined to be:
>
An investment’s capital requirements may exceed the
Company’s ability to provide capital; and
>
The Company may not have sufficient capital available to
participate in all investment opportunities presented.
Each quarter, the Directors, through the Audit Committee, review
threats to the Company’s viability utilising the risk matrix and
update as required due to recent developments and/or changes in
the global market. The Board relies on periodic reports provided
by the Investment Manager and Administrator regarding risks
faced by the Company. When required, experts are utilised to
gather relevant and necessary information, regarding tax, legal,
and other factors.
The Investment Manager considers the future cash requirements
of the Company before funding portfolio companies. Furthermore,
the Board receives regular updates from the Investment Manager
on the Company’s cash position, which allows the Board to
maintain their fiduciary responsibility to the Shareholders and, if
required, limit funding for existing commitments.
The Board, with recommendation from the Audit Committee,
considered the Company’s viability over the three year period,
based on a working capital model prepared by the Investment
Manager. Given the significant improvement in the
performance of the Company, taking into account the trading
price of the Ordinary Shares and portfolio performance from
30 September 2020 to 30 September 2022, the Company’s
independent directors did not seek Shareholder approval before
31 December 2022 to amend the Company’s investment policy to
provide for the managed wind-down of the Company.
The working capital model forecasts key cash flow drivers such as
capital deployment rate, investment returns, Management Fees
and operating expenses. In connection with the preparation of the
working capital model, capital raises, realisations, and, dividend
payments and/or share repurchases were assumed to not occur
during the three year period, unless already predetermined. In
addition, the Board reviews credit market availability, but no such
financing has been assumed.
If all factors apart from capital deployment rate remain constant,
accelerating the capital deployment rate (which is the most critical
aspect of the Company’s operations) by approximately 67 per cent.,
from 36 months to 12 months, in a worst case scenario, would
result in the Company being able to preserve its ability to maintain
sufficient working capital for the three year period.
The Investment Manager believes that the investment outlook for
the Company remains attractive, in particular in light of its modified
investment programme for the Company (adopted in 2019) which
seeks to give the Company greater autonomy from the private funds
managed by affiliates of the Investment Manager and to diversify
the Companys investments. The Investment Manager continues to
reposition the Company’s focus away from oil and gas investments
in the exploration and production sector and to increase its focus
on renewable, decarbonisation and selective infrastructure
investments, in each case with strong ESG processes in place.
This includes the Company’s $96.5 million in aggregate
commitments announced and funded during 2022 to Anuvia
($20.0 million), T-REX Group ($17.5 million), Infinitum
($17.5 million), Tritium ($15.0 million), Tritium Loan ($10.0 million)
Our Next Energy ($12.5 million) and Group14 ($4.0 million).
The Company’s fully independent Board is supportive of the
continuation of the Investment Manager’s modified investment
strategy for the immediate future and will continue to monitor the
Investment Manager’s success in repositioning the Companys
existing investment policy through the modified investment strategy.
At the EGM in 2020, the Board committed to review the Company’s
performance and, before 31 December 2022, decide whether or not it
would be in the best interests of all Shareholders to request an EGM
to vote on a run-off of its portfolio. As mentioned above, based on the
significant improvement in the performance of REL, taking into
account the trading price of the Ordinary Shares and portfolio
performance from 30 September 2020 to 30 September 2022, and
the outlook for further energy transition investment opportunities
from the Investment Manager, the Companys independent Directors
did not seek Shareholder approval before 31 December 2022 to
amend the Company’s investment policy to provide for the managed
wind-down of the Company.
Based on the aforementioned procedures and the existing internal
controls of the Company and Investment Manager, the Board, with
recommendation from the Audit Committee, has concluded there
is a reasonable expectation that the Company will be able to
continue in operation and meet its liabilities as they fall due over
the three-year period of the assessment.
Report of the Directors continued
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
43
Directors’ Responsibilities
Although the Company is domiciled in Guernsey, in accordance
with the guidance set out in the AIC Code, the Directors describe in
this Annual Report how the matters set out in Section 172 of the
UK Companies Act 2006 have been considered in their board
discussions and decision-making. Section 172 of the Companies
Act requires that the directors of a company act in the way that
they consider, in good faith, is most likely to promote the success
of the company for the benefit of its members as a whole, and in
doing so have regard (amongst other matters) to the likely
consequences of any decision in the long term and the interests of
all the Company’s stakeholders.
The Board seeks to encourage engagement between the
Company’s Shareholders and the Chair of the Board, the Chairs of
the Audit and Management Engagement Committees and the
Senior Independent Director, which has been facilitated throughout
the year. Up to date quarterly reporting also provides the Board
with accurate, timely information on shareholder sentiment and
direct feedback from service providers, impacted by the
Company’s operations, and is canvassed at least annually by the
Chair of the Management Engagement Committee. It is against this
backdrop that key decisions which are either material to the
Company or are significant to any of the Company’s key
stakeholders on pages 52 and 53 are taken. The below key
decisions were made or approved by the Directors during the year,
with the overall aim of promoting the success of the Company,
having regard to the long term, while considering the impact on its
members, stakeholders and the wider society as outlined in the
ESG section on pages 8 to 17.
Engagement with Shareholders
The Company reports to Shareholders in a number of formal
ways, including its Annual Report, Interim Report and regulatory
news releases, all of which are approved by the Board. In
addition, the Company’s website contains comprehensive
information for Shareholders.
On 11 May 2020, the Company announced a buyback programme
with the intention of returning £20 million to Shareholders via on
market buybacks, which subsequently, on 4 October 2021, was
increased to £40 million. The Board allocated a further
£46.0 million to the buyback programme in March 2022. With the
intention to narrow the Company’s trading discount, the Board took
the decision to steadily buyback shares up to £15.5 million
($17.5 million) of the available £31 million ($35 million) for the
period to 31 December 2022. Since the announcement, the
Company has purchased 4,045,941 shares, in aggregate, for
£27 million ($32 million) at an average share price of £6.63 ($7.95).
Financial Risk Management Objectives
Financial Risk Management Objectives are disclosed in Note 10 on
pages 86 to 90.
Principal Risk and Uncertainties
Principal Risk and Uncertainties are discussed in the Corporate
Governance Report on pages 53 to 55.
Annual General Meetings
The AGM of the Company will be held at 10:30 BST on 23 May 2023
at the offices of Ocorian Administration (Guernsey) Limited,
Trafalgar Court, Les Banques, St Peter Port, Guernsey, Channel
Islands. Details of the resolutions to be proposed at the AGM,
together with explanations, will appear in the notices of meetings
to be distributed to Shareholders listed on the register as at
31 December 2022 together with this Annual Report. As a matter
of good practice, all resolutions will be conducted on a poll and the
results will be announced to the market as soon as possible after
the meeting.
Members of the Board, including the Chair of the Board and the
Chair of each Committee, intend to be in attendance at the AGM,
and will be available to answer Shareholder questions.
Additionally, Shareholders can submit questions in advance to
IR@RiverstoneREL.com addressed for the attention of the Board.
By order of the Board
Richard Hayden
Chair of the Board
28 February 2023
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
44
The Directors are responsible for preparing the Annual Report
and Financial Statements in accordance with applicable law
and regulations.
The Companies Law requires the Directors to prepare Financial
Statements for each financial year. Under the Companies Law, the
Directors must not approve the Financial Statements unless they
are satisfied that they give a true and fair view of the state of affairs
of the Company and of the profit or loss of the Company for that
period. In preparing these Financial Statements, the Directors are
required to:
>
select suitable accounting policies and apply them consistently;
>
make judgements and estimates that are reasonable
and prudent;
>
present information, including accounting policies, in a
manner that provides relevant, reliable, comparable and
understandable information;
>
provide additional disclosures when compliance with the
specific requirements in IFRS are insufficient to enable users
to understand the impact of particular transactions, other
events and conditions on the Company’s financial position and
financial performance;
>
state that the Company has complied with IFRS, subject to any
material departures disclosed and explained in the Financial
Statements; and
>
prepare the Financial Statements on a going concern basis
unless it is inappropriate to presume that the Company will
continue in business.
Directors’ Responsibilities Statement
The Directors confirm that they have complied with the above
requirements in preparing the Financial Statements.
The Directors are responsible for keeping proper accounting
records, which disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time, the
financial position of the Company and to enable them to ensure that
the Financial Statements comply with Companies Law. They are
also responsible for safeguarding the assets of the Company and
hence for taking reasonable steps for the prevention and detection
of fraud, error and non-compliance with law and regulations.
The Directors are responsible for the maintenance and integrity of
the corporate and financial information included on the Company’s
website (www.RiverstoneREL.com). The work carried out by the
external auditor does not involve considerations of these matters
and, accordingly, the external auditor accepts no responsibility for
any changes that may have occurred to the Financial Statements
since they were initially presented on the website.
Legislation in Guernsey governing the preparation and
dissemination of the Financial Statements may differ from
legislation in other jurisdictions.
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
45
Responsibility Statement of the Directors in respect of the Annual
Report under the Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules
Each of the Directors whose names are on pages 34 and 35
confirms to the best of their knowledge and belief that:
>
the Financial Statements, prepared in accordance with IFRS,
give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial
position and profit or loss of the Company;
>
the Annual Report includes a fair review of the development
and performance of the business and the position of the
Company, together with a description of the principal risks and
uncertainties faced; and
>
the Annual Report and Financial Statements include
information required by the UK Financial Conduct Authority so
that the Company complies with the provisions of the Listing
Rules, Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules of the UK
Listing Authority. With regard to corporate governance, the
Company is required to disclose how it has applied the
principles, and complied with the provisions of the corporate
governance code applicable to the Company.
The Directors are responsible for preparing the Annual Report and
Financial Statements in accordance with applicable law and
regulations. As part of the preparation of the Annual Report and
Financial Statements, the Directors have received reports and
information from the Company’s Administrator and Investment
Manager. The Directors have considered, reviewed and
commented upon the Annual Report and Financial Statements
throughout the drafting process in order to satisfy itself in respect
of the content. In the opinion of the Directors, the Annual Report
and Financial Statements, taken as a whole, are fair, balanced and
understandable and provide the information necessary for
Shareholders to assess the Company’s performance, business
model and strategy.
By order of the Board
Richard Hayden Patrick Firth
Chair of the Board Director
28 February 2023 28 February 2023
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
46
Corporate Governance Report
AS A UK LISTED COMPANY, REL’S GOVERNANCE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE BASED ON
THE PRINCIPLES OF THE UK CODE AS REQUIRED UNDER THE LISTING RULES. THE UK CODE IS
AVAILABLE ON THE FINANCIAL REPORTING COUNCIL’S WEBSITE, WWW.FRC.ORG.UK.
The Company is subject to the GFSC Code, which applies to all companies registered as collective
investment schemes in Guernsey. The GFSC has also confirmed that companies that report against
the UK Code or AIC Code are deemed to meet the GFSC Code.
Although not required as the Company is no longer within the
FTSE 350, the Board monitors developments in corporate
governance to ensure the Board remains aligned with best
practice especially with respect to the increased desired focus on
greater gender and ethnic diversity on the boards of FTSE 350
companies. The Board recognises and supports the Hampton
Alexander Review and the Parker Review, and acknowledges the
importance of having a variety of backgrounds and experiences
represented in the boardroom for the effective functioning of
the Board. It is the ongoing aspiration of the Board to have a
well-diversified representation. The Board also values diversity
of business skills and experience because Directors with diverse
skills sets, capabilities and experience gained from different
geographical backgrounds enhance the Board by bringing a wide
range of perspectives to the Company. The Board’s view has been
and, continues to be, that all appointments to the Board should be
merit based, assessed against objective selection criteria. To
avoid precluding any deserving candidate from consideration,
executive search consultants will be asked to provide candidates
from a diverse range of backgrounds and that these lists are
gender neutral.
The AIC Code addresses all the principles set out in the UK Code,
as well as setting out additional principles and recommendations
on issues that are of specific relevance to investment companies
such as the Company. The Board considers that reporting against
the principles and recommendations of the AIC Code provides
better information to Shareholders.
The Company has complied with the recommendations of the AIC
Code and the relevant provisions of the UK Code, except as set
out below.
The UK Code includes provisions relating to:
>
the role of the chief executive;
>
executive directors’ remuneration; and
>
the need for an internal audit function.
As explained in the UK Code, the Board considers that the above
provisions are not currently relevant to the position of the
Company, being an externally managed investment company,
which delegates most day-to-day functions to third parties.
The Company does not have a chief executive or any executive
directors. The Company has not established a separate
remuneration committee as the Company has no executive officers
and the Board is satisfied that any relevant issues that arise can be
properly considered by the Board.
The Company has no employees or internal operations and has
therefore not reported further in respect of these provisions.
The need for an internal audit function is discussed in the Audit
Committee report.
The Board
The Company is led and controlled by a Board of Directors, which
is collectively responsible for the long-term sustainable success
of the Company. It does so by creating and preserving value, and
has as its foremost principle acting in the interests of
Shareholders as a whole and the Companys stakeholders.
The Company believes that the composition of the Board is a
fundamental driver of its success as the Board must provide
strong and effective leadership of the Company. The current
Board was selected, as their biographies illustrate, to bring a
breadth of knowledge, skills and business experience to the
Company. The non-executive Directors provide independent
challenge and review, bringing wide experience, specific
expertise and a fresh objective perspective.
The Board consists of seven Non-executive Directors
(31 December 2021: five), all of whom, including the Chair of the
Board, are independent of the Company’s Investment Manager;
Mr Hayden, Mr Firth, Mr Barker, Mrs Whittet, Mr Roche, Mr Horlick
and Mr Thompson. All Directors served during the year, with
Mr Horlick being appointed on 26 October 2022 and Mr Roche
being appointed on 14 December 2022. As flagged in the Board
Chair’s Statement, Mr Hayden and Mr Baker will not be standing
for re-election at the next AGM and the Board will revert to
five members.
The Chairman of the Board is independent and is appointed
in accordance with the Company’s Articles of Incorporation.
Mr Hayden is considered to be independent because he:
>
has no current or historical employment with the
Investment Manager;
>
has no current directorships or partnerships in any other
investment funds managed by the Investment Manager; and
>
is not an executive of a self-managed company or an
ex-employee who has left the executive team of a
self-managed company within the last five years.
The Board is fully satisfied that Mr Firth demonstrates complete
independence and robustness of character and judgement in
his capacity as Senior Independent Director. The Board is of
the view that no individual or group of individuals dominates
decision making.
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
47
New Directors receive an induction from the Investment Manager
and all Directors receive other relevant training as necessary.
At each subsequent Annual General Meeting of the Company, each
of the Directors at the date of the notice convening the Annual
General Meeting shall retire from office and may offer themselves
for election or re-election by the Shareholders.
The Board meets at least four times a year for regular, scheduled
meetings and should the nature of the activity of the Company
require it, additional meetings may be held, some at short notice.
At each meeting the Board follows a formal agenda that covers the
business to be discussed. The primary focus at Board meetings is
a review of investment performance and associated matters such
as asset allocation, share price discount/premium management,
investor relations, peer group information, gearing, industry
issues and principal risks and uncertainties in particular those
identified at the end of this report. Additionally, since the
Company’s modified investment strategy was implemented in
2020, the Board is required to regularly hold meetings to consent
to all new investments brought forward by the Investment
Manager. During the year, the total number of ad hoc and regular
meetings was 29.
Between meetings the Board visits the Investment Manager at least
annually, and there is regular contact with the Administrator. The
Board requires to be supplied in a timely manner with information by
the Investment Manager, the Company Secretary and other advisers
in a form and of a sufficient quality to enable it to discharge its duties.
The Company has adopted a share dealing code for the Board
and will seek to ensure compliance by the Board and relevant
personnel of the Investment Manager and other third party service
providers with the terms of the share dealing code.
Board Tenure and Re-election
In accordance with the AIC Code, when and if any director shall
have been in office (or on re-election would at the end of that term
of office) for more than nine years, the Company will consider
further whether there is a risk that such a director might
reasonably be deemed to have lost independence through such
long service. Mr Firth has served for more than nine years but the
Board considers him to be independent and he is to remain a
Director until the end of 2023 in order to facilitate a handover period
to Mr Roche who will become the new Audit Chair. The Board
considers its composition and succession planning on an ongoing
basis. All Directors stand for annual re-election at the AGM.
A Director who retires at an Annual General Meeting may, if willing
to continue to act, be elected or re-elected at that meeting. If, at a
general meeting at which a Director retires, the Company neither
re-elects that Director nor appoints another person to the Board in
the place of that Director, the retiring Director shall, if willing to act,
be deemed to have been re-elected unless at the general meeting it
is resolved not to fill the vacancy or unless a resolution for the
re-election of the Director is put to the meeting and not passed.
Directors are appointed under letters of appointment, copies of
which are available at the registered office of the Company. The
Board considers its composition and succession planning on an
ongoing basis.
Directors’ Remuneration
The level of remuneration of the Non-executive Directors reflects
the time commitment and responsibilities of their roles. The
remuneration of the Non-executive Directors does not include any
share options or other performance related elements and there
are no plans to seek any Shareholder waivers to deviate from this.
The Chair of the Board is entitled to annual remuneration
of £132,000 (31 December 2021: £132,000). The Chair of the
Audit Committee is entitled to annual remuneration of
£82,500 (31 December 2021: £82,500) and the Chair of the
Management Engagement Committee is entitled to annual
remuneration of £71,500 (31 December 2021: £71,500). The other
independent Directors are entitled to annual remuneration of
£66,000 (31 December 2021: £66,000). The Chair of the Nomination
Committee is entitled to remuneration of £71,500 with effect from
1 January 2022.
Director
2022
($’000)
2021
($’000)
Peter Barker
(1)
82 91
Patrick Firth
(1)(2)
102 114
Richard Hayden
(1)(3)
164 182
Jeremy Thompson
(1)
89 91
Claire Whittet
(1)(4)
89 98
Richard Horlick
(1)
15 -
John Roche
(1)
4 -
(1)
Non-executive Independent Director
(2)
Senior Independent Director and Chair of the Audit Committee
(3)
Chair of the Company
(4)
Chair of the Management Engagement Committee
The above fees due to the Directors are for the year ended
31 December 2022 and 31 December 2021, and none were
outstanding at 31 December 2022 (31 December 2021: $nil).
Duties and Responsibilities
The Board is responsible to Shareholders for the overall
management of the Company. The duties and powers reserved for
the Board include decisions relating to the determination of
investment policy and approval of investments in certain
instances, strategy, capital raising, statutory obligations and
public disclosure, financial reporting and entering into any
material contracts by the Company.
The Board retains direct responsibility for certain matters,
including (but not limited to):
>
approving the Company’s long term objective and any
decisions of a strategic nature including any change in
investment objective, policy and restrictions, including those
which may need to be submitted to Shareholders for approval;
>
reviewing the performance of the Company in light of the
Company’s strategy objectives and budgets ensuring that any
necessary corrective action is taken;
>
the appointment, overall supervision and removal of key
service providers and any material amendments to the
agreements or contractual arrangements with any key
delegates or service providers;
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
48
>
approving any transactions with ‘‘related parties’’ for the
purposes of the Company’s voluntary compliance with the
applicable sections of the UK Listing Rules;
>
the review of the Company’s valuation policy;
>
the review of the Company’s corporate governance
arrangements; and
>
approving any actual or potential conflicts of interest.
The Directors have access to the advice and services of the
Administrator, who is responsible to the Board for ensuring that
Board procedures are followed and that it complies with
Companies Law and applicable rules and regulations of the GFSC
and the LSE. Where necessary, in carrying out their duties, the
Directors may seek independent professional advice and services
at the expense of the Company. The Company maintains directors’
and officers’ liability insurance in respect of legal action against its
Directors on an ongoing basis.
The Board’s responsibilities for the Annual Report are set out in the
Directors’ Responsibility Statement. The Board is also responsible
for issuing appropriate half-yearly financial reports, quarterly
portfolio valuations and other price-sensitive public reports.
Directors’ attendance at Board and Committee Meetings:
One of the key criteria the Company uses when selecting
Non-executive Directors is their confirmation prior to their
appointment that they will be able to allocate sufficient time to the
Company to discharge their responsibilities in a timely and
effective manner.
The Board formally met four times during the year. The Board has
held a number of ad hoc meetings, and the sub committees of the
Board have met frequently, during the course of 2022. The Chair of
the Board meets privately with the Non-executive Directors before
each scheduled Board meeting. Directors are encouraged when
they are unable to attend a meeting to give the Chair of the Board
their views and comments on matters to be discussed, in advance.
In addition to their meeting commitments, the Non-executive
Directors also liaise with the Investment Manager whenever
required and there is regular contact outside the Board meeting
schedule. In addition to the Board members, members of the
Investment Manager attend relevant sections of the Board
meetings by invitation.
Attendance is further set out below:
Board
Meetings
Audit
Committee
Meetings
Nomination
Committee
Meetings
Management
Engagement
Committee
Meetings
Tenure as at
31 December 2022Director
Peter Barker
(1)
4 4 4 1 9 years, 4 months
Patrick Firth
(1)(2)
4 4 4 1 9 years, 8 months
Richard Hayden
(1)
4 4 4 1 9 years, 8 months
Claire Whittet
(1)
4 4 4 1 7 years, 8 months
Jeremy Thompson
(1)
4 4 4 1 6 years, 8 months
John Roche
(1)
- - - - 0.5 months
Richard Horlick
(1)
1 1 1 1 2 months
(1)
Non-executive Independent Director
(2)
Non-executive Senior Independent Director
A quorum is comprised of any two or more members of the Board
from time to time, to perform administrative and other routine
functions on behalf of the Board, subject to such limitations as the
Board may expressly impose on this committee from time to time.
Board members who are not ordinarily resident in Guernsey were
unable to travel and attend certain Board and committee meetings
in person during 2022. In those cases, the relevant Board
members attended those meetings by telephone or video link (and
are shown as being in attendance at the relevant meeting in the
table above), although only the Directors who were physically
present in Guernsey were treated as being present at the meeting
for the quorum and voting provisions applicable to Board and
committee meetings contained in the Company’s Articles.
Conflicts of interest
A Director has a duty to avoid a situation in which he or she has, or
can have, a direct or indirect interest that conflicts, or possibly
may conflict, with the interests of the Company. The Board
requires Directors to declare all appointments and other
situations that could result in a possible conflict of interest and
has adopted appropriate procedures to manage and, if
appropriate, approve any such conflicts. The Board is satisfied
that there is no compromise to the independence of those
Directors who have appointments on the boards of, or
relationships with, companies outside the Company.
Committees of the Board
The Board believes that it and its committees have an appropriate
composition and blend of skills, experience, independence and
diversity of backgrounds to discharge their duties and
responsibilities effectively. The Board keeps its membership, and
that of its committees, under review to ensure that an acceptable
balance is maintained, and that the collective skills and experience
of its members continue to be refreshed. It is satisfied that all
Directors have sufficient time to devote to their roles and that
undue reliance is not placed on any individual.
Corporate Governance Report continued
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
49
Each committee of the Board has written terms of reference,
approved by the Board, summarising its objectives, remit and
powers, which are available on the Company’s website
(www.RiverstoneREL.com) and reviewed on an annual basis.
All committee members are provided with appropriate induction
on joining their respective committees, as well as on-going access
to training. Minutes of all meetings of the committees (save for the
private sessions of committee members at the end of meetings)
are made available to all Directors and feedback from each of the
committees is provided to the Board by the respective committee
Chairmen at the next Board meeting. The Chair of the Board of
each committee attends the AGM to answer any questions on their
committee’s activities.
The Board and its committees are supplied with regular,
comprehensive and timely information in a form and of a quality
that enables them to discharge their duties effectively. All
Directors are able to make further enquiries of management
whenever necessary and have access to the services of the
Company Secretary.
Audit Committee
The Audit Committee is chaired by Mr Firth and comprises
Mr Barker, Mr Hayden, Mr Thompson, Mrs Whittet, Mr Roche and
Mr Horlick. The Chair of the Audit Committee, the Investment
Manager and the external auditor, Ernst & Young LLP, have held
discussions regarding the audit approach and identified risks.
The external auditors attend Audit Committee meetings and a
private meeting is routinely held with the external auditors to
afford them the opportunity of discussions without the presence of
management. The Audit Committee activities are contained in the
Report of the Audit Committee.
Nomination Committee
The Nomination Committee is chaired by Mr Thompson and
comprises Mr Barker, Mr Firth, Mr Hayden, Mrs Whittet, Mr Roche
and Mr Horlick.
The Nomination Committee is convened for the purpose of
considering the appointment of additional Directors as and when
considered appropriate. The Nomination Committee recognises
the continuing importance of planning for the future and ensuring
that succession plans are in place. In considering appointments to
the Board, the Nomination Committee takes into account the
ongoing requirements of the Company and evaluates the balance
of skills, experience, independence, and knowledge of each
candidate. Appointments are therefore made on personal merit
and against objective criteria with the aim of bringing new skills
and different perspectives to the Board whilst taking into account
the existing balance of knowledge, experience and diversity.
In the case of candidates for Non-executive Directorships, care
is taken to ascertain that they have sufficient time to fulfil their
Board and, where relevant, committee responsibilities. The Board
believes that the terms of reference of the Nomination Committee
ensure that it operates in a rigorous and transparent manner.
The Board believes that, as a whole, it comprises an appropriate
balance of skills, experience and knowledge. The Board also
believes that diversity of experience and approach, including
gender diversity, amongst Board members is of great importance
and it is the Company’s policy to give careful consideration to issues
of Board balance and diversity when making new appointments.
The Board remains focussed on the guidelines outlined by the
Hampton-Alexander Review and The Parker Review.
The Nomination Committee met frequently in the second half of
the year to establish a process to identify successors for the Chair
of the Board and Audit Chair. The Committee faced the situation of
three retiring directors during the course of 2023. Mr Hayden and
Mr Barker advised that they would not seek re-election at the May
2023 AGM and would stand down following that meeting. Mr Firth
rather than standing down at the AGM was requested to serve until
December 2023 to allow for a transition period with the incoming
Audit Chair elect. The Committee reviewed the size of the Board
and confirmed that notwithstanding the overlap of key Directors it
was the intention that the Board size would revert to five members.
A comprehensive and rigorous process was undertaken to identify
a chair successor. As a first step in starting the systematic global
search (led by Egon Zehnder) each Director was consulted
privately, to enable the design of a specification that reflected the
desired independence, appropriate sector knowledge and
compelling chair skills for a major public company with a diverse
investor base.
More than 30 candidates were researched in depth and considered
from both sides of the Atlantic, in two phases of the search.
Following this process over half were approached. The Committee
met with 8 potential candidates, some excelling in energy
transition knowledge; others brought specific strengths in
closed-end funds and PLC governance. The three short listed
candidates met with the Company’s principal advisors and
Investment Manager prior to the final interview with the
Committee. The recommendation by the Committee to the Board
was that the Company would be best served with the appointment
of Mr Horlick - who combined compelling, demonstrably
independent, fund board leadership skills with meaningful
knowledge of the energy transition space. This recommendation
was accepted and ratified by the Board.
The Nomination Committee, working with a leading search firm
(FletcherJones), also commenced a rigorous process to identify a
successor to Mr Firth as Audit Chair elect. Following a process
which included a long list and short list process the Committee
interviewed four candidates in person. From this position the
Committee recommended the appointment of Mr Roche, a
Guernsey based former partner of PwC as the preferred candidate.
This recommendation was accepted and adopted by the Board.
The Committee is working to find a successor to Mr Barker and the
Board expects to be in a position to announce his successor prior
to the AGM.
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
50
The Nomination Committee has reviewed the composition,
structure and diversity of the Board, succession planning, the
independence of the Directors and whether each of the Directors
has sufficient time available to discharge their duties effectively.
The Nomination Committee and the Board confirm that they
believe that the Board has an appropriate mix of skills and
backgrounds and was selected with that in mind, that all Directors
should be considered as Independent in accordance with the
provisions of the AIC Code and that all Directors have the time
available to discharge their duties effectively.
Notwithstanding that Mrs Whittet is on the Boards of five companies
listed on the London Stock Exchange or Euronext, the Committee
noted that she is a full-time non-executive director and that all of the
five companies are listed investment companies where the level of
complexity and time commitment required is lower than larger
trading companies. Further, they noted that Mrs Whittet has
attended all Board and main committee meetings during the year,
and that she has always shown the time commitment to discharge
fully and effectively her duties as a Director.
Mr Firth is a Director and Chair of the Audit Committee of four
companies listed on the London Stock Exchange. He is also a
full-time non-executive director and all of the four companies are
listed investment companies. Further, they noted that Mr Firth has
attended all Board and main committee meetings during the year
and that he has always demonstrated the time commitment to
discharge fully and effectively his duties as a Director.
Although not a requirement for REL, during 2022, the Board agreed
to defer the tri-annual requirement for an independent evaluation
until 2023 due to the changes in the Board’s composition.
Accordingly, the Board recommends that Shareholders vote in
favour of the re-election of all Directors at the forthcoming AGM,
as noted in the Board Tenure and Re-election section of the
Corporate Governance Report.
Management Engagement Committee
The Management Engagement Committee is chaired by
Mrs Whittet and comprises Mr Barker, Mr Hayden, Mr Firth,
Mr Thompson, Mr Roche and Mr Horlick. The Management
Engagement Committee meets at least once a year pursuant
to its terms of reference.
The Management Engagement Committee provides a formal
mechanism for the review of the performance of the Investment
Manager and the Company’s other advisors and service providers.
It carries out this review through consideration of a number of
objective and subjective criteria and through a review of the terms
and conditions of the advisors’ appointments with the aim of
evaluating performance, identifying any weaknesses and ensuring
value for money for the Shareholders.
Board Performance and Evaluation
In accordance with Provision 26 of the AIC Code which requires a
formal and rigorous annual evaluation of its performance, the
Board formally reviews its performance annually through an
internal process. Internal evaluation of the Board, the Audit
Committee, the Nomination Committee, the Management
Engagement Committee and individual Directors has taken the
form of self-appraisal questionnaires and discussions to
determine effectiveness and performance in various areas as well
as the Directors’ continued independence.
The Board believes that annual evaluations are helpful and provide
a valuable opportunity for continuous improvement. Whilst the
Board is not for a FTSE 350 company, it will be undertaking an
external board evaluation during 2023.
All Directors participated in the evaluation, and the findings were
collectively considered by the Board. No significant areas of
weaknesses were highlighted during the evaluation and the Board
concluded that it had operated effectively throughout 2022. The
Board is confident in its ability to continue effectively to lead the
Company and oversee its affairs. The Board believes that the
current mix of skills, experience, knowledge and age of the
Directors is appropriate to the requirements of the Company.
New Directors receive an induction on joining the Board and
regularly meet with the senior management employed by the
Investment Manager both formally and informally to ensure that
the Board remains regularly updated on all issues. All members of
the Board are members of professional bodies and serve on other
Boards, which ensures they are kept abreast of the latest technical
developments in their areas of expertise.
The Board arranges for presentations from the Investment
Manager, the Company’s brokers and other advisors on matters
relevant to the Company’s business. The Board assesses the
training needs of Directors on an annual basis.
Internal Control and Financial Reporting
The Directors acknowledge that they are responsible for
establishing and maintaining the Company’s system of internal
control and reviewing its effectiveness. Internal control systems
are designed to manage rather than eliminate the failure to
achieve business objectives and can only provide reasonable but
not absolute assurance against material misstatements or loss.
However, the Board’s objective is to ensure that REL has
appropriate systems in place for the identification and
management of risks. The Directors carry out a robust
assessment of the principal risks facing the Company, including
those that would threaten its business model, future performance,
solvency or liquidity. The key procedures which have been
established to provide internal control are that:
Corporate Governance Report continued
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
51
>
the Board has delegated the day-to-day operations of the
Company to the Administrator and Investment Manager;
however, it retains accountability for all functions it delegates;
>
the Board clearly defines the duties and responsibilities of the
Company’s agents and advisors and appointments are made by
the Board after due and careful consideration. The Board
monitors the ongoing performance of such agents and
advisors and will continue to do so through the Management
Engagement Committee;
>
the Board monitors the actions of the Investment Manager at
regular Board meetings and is given frequent updates on
developments arising from the operations and strategic
direction of the underlying investee companies;
>
the Administrator provides administration and company
secretarial services to the Company.
>
The Administrator maintains a system of internal control on
which they report to the Board; and
>
the Board has reviewed the need for an internal audit function
and has decided that the systems and procedures employed by
the Administrator and Investment Manager, including their own
internal controls and procedures, provide sufficient assurance
that an appropriate level of risk management and internal
control, which safeguards Shareholders’ investment and the
Company’s assets, is maintained. An internal audit function
specific to the Company is therefore considered unnecessary.
Internal controls over financial reporting are designed to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of Financial Statements for external
reporting purposes. The Administrator and Investment Manager
both operate risk controlled frameworks on a continual ongoing
basis within a regulated environment. The Administrator has
undertaken an ISAE 3402: Assurance Reports on Controls at a
Service Organisation audit and formally reports to the Board
quarterly through a compliance report. The Investment Manager
formally reports to the Board quarterly including updates within
Riverstone and also engages with the Board on an ad-hoc basis as
required. No weaknesses or failings within the Administrator or
Investment Manager have been identified.
The systems of control referred to above are designed to ensure
effectiveness and efficient operation, internal control and
compliance with laws and regulations. In establishing the systems
of internal control, regard is paid to the materiality of relevant
risks, the likelihood of costs being incurred and costs of control.
It follows therefore that the systems of internal control can only
provide reasonable but not absolute assurance against the risk of
material misstatement or loss. This process has been in place for
the year under review and up to the date of approval of this Annual
Report and Financial Statements. It is reviewed by the Board and is
in accordance with the FRC’s internal control publication:
Guidance on Risk Management, Internal Control and Related
Financial and Business Reporting.
Investment Management Agreement
The Investment Manager is the sole Investment Manager of the
Company and the Partnership. Pursuant to the Investment
Management Agreement, the Investment Manager has
responsibility for and discretion over investing and managing the
Company’s and the Partnership’s direct and indirect assets,
subject to and in accordance with the Company’s investment
policy. The Investment Manager is entitled to delegate all or part of
its functions under the Investment Management Agreement to one
or more of its affiliates.
The Company has delegated the provision of all services to
external service providers whose work is overseen by the
Management Engagement Committee at its regular scheduled
meetings. Each year, a detailed review of performance pursuant to
their terms of engagement is undertaken by the Management
Engagement Committee. In particular, during 2019, the
Management Engagement Committee and the Investment
Manager discussed fees, termination provisions, capital structure
management, the performance of the Company, and the basis of
the Companys and the Investment Manager’s relationship and
alignment of interests at length, including the benefits to the
Company of Riverstone’s extensive participation in the
management of all of the Company’s investments and the
significant equity commitment of Riverstone to the Company as
one of its major Shareholders.
In accordance with Listing Rule 15.6.2(2)R and having formally
appraised the performance and resources of the Investment
Manager, in the opinion of the Directors the continuing
appointment of the Investment Manager on the terms agreed is in
the interests of the Shareholders as a whole.
On 3 January 2020, the Company announced amendments to
Performance Allocation arrangements under the Investment
Management Agreement that are effective from 30 June 2019.
The amended terms on which the Company is required to pay a
Performance Allocation in respect of its investment are as follows:
>
Portfolio level cost benchmark: A Performance Allocation will
only be distributed in respect of a realised investment if, at the
time of the realisation of the relevant investment, the aggregate
of the fair market value of all of the Company’s then unrealised
investments and the proceeds of all of its realised investments
since inception exceeds the aggregate acquisition price of all of
the Companys unrealised and realised investments. If this
portfolio level cost benchmark is not met at the time of
realisation of the relevant investment, distribution of the
Performance Allocation is subject to deferment as described
further below. As of 31 December 2022, the portfolio level cost
benchmark was in deficit of $95.2 million.
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
52
>
8 per cent. Hurdle rate: A Performance Allocation will only be
accrued for payment upon the realisation of an investment if
the proceeds from that investment exceed an amount equal to
its acquisition cost plus an 8 per cent. annual cumulative hurdle
rate calculated from the date of investment to the date of
realisation. If the hurdle is met, the Performance Allocation will
be 20 per cent of all Net Profits in respect of each such
investment. As of 31 December 2022, ten investments exceeded
the hurdle rate and the total portfolio’s Gross IRR is
approximately (1) per cent.
>
Full realisation: A Performance Allocation will only be
calculated and accrued on the full realisation of the entire
interest in an investment, unless a partial realisation results in
the full return of all capital invested in such investment.
Otherwise, no Performance Allocation will be payable on
partial disposals and the ability for the Investment Manager to
elect to receive a Performance Allocation on an investment
that has been held by the Company for at least seven years
(but not sold) has been removed.
>
Deferral: If the portfolio level cost benchmark is not met at the
time of full realisation of the relevant investment, it will be
retested on a quarterly basis for the following three years. If, at
any time during those three years, the benchmark is satisfied
for four continuous quarters, the relevant Performance
Allocation will then become distributable without interest. Any
accrued but undistributed Performance Allocation that has
been deferred due to the portfolio level cost benchmark test
will expire after 36 months.
The Investment Manager will continue to be required to apply each
Performance Allocation (net of taxes) to acquire ordinary shares of
the Company.
During 2021, in compliance with the laws of the Cayman Islands,
the Company and its existing Investment Manager, Riverstone
International Limited, a Cayman Islands exempted company,
assigned its investment advisory rights and obligations under the
Company’s Investment Management Agreement to RIL’s immediate
parent entity, RIGL Holdings, LP, a Cayman Islands exempted
limited partnership.
Furthermore, on 9 December 2020, the Company’s Investment
Management Agreement has been amended to remove the
Investment Manager’s ability to nominate directors of the Company
and to replace it with the ability to request that its representatives
attend Board meetings as observers instead, except in
circumstances where matters specifically regarding the
Investment Manager and its affiliates are being considered.
Distribution of Investment Proceeds
In addition, the Company and the Investment Manager have agreed
that, going forward, 20 per cent. of the Net Profits attributable to
each fully realised investment, net of taxes, withholdings or
reserves for taxes will, at the discretion of the Company, be
available for distribution to the Company’s Shareholders, whether
by dividend or share repurchases.
Our Culture
The Board has determined that the Company’s culture is built
around that of the Investment Manager, with a focus on long
lasting relationships with a diverse investor base; sustainable
investment excellence; and a world class team demonstrating
extensive industry knowledge. The Board monitors the Company’s
culture on an annual basis through continued engagement with
Shareholders and management.
Relations with Shareholders
The Board welcomes Shareholders’ views and places great
importance on communication with its Shareholders. In addition,
Mr Firth, as the Senior Independent Director, is available to
Shareholders if they have concerns which contact through the
normal channels has failed to resolve or for which such contact
would be inappropriate. Mrs Whittet, Management Engagement
Committee Chair, is available to discuss matters regarding
service providers of REL. The Chair of the Board, Senior
Independent Director and other Directors are also available to
meet with Shareholders at other times, if required. At the request
of several Shareholders, the Chair of the Board, Senior
Independent Director and other Directors arranged meetings and
addressed direct correspondence raised at the quarterly Board
meetings during the year.
The Company reports formally to Shareholders in a number of ways;
regulatory news releases through the London Stock Exchange’s
Regulatory News Service, announcements are issued in response
to events or routine reporting obligations. Also, an Interim Report
will be published each year outlining performance to 30 June
and the Annual Report will be published each year for the year ended
31 December, both of which will be made available on the Company’s
website. In addition, the Company’s website contains comprehensive
information, including company notifications, share information,
financial reports, investment objectives and policy, investor contacts
and information on the Board and corporate governance.
Shareholders and other interested parties can subscribe to email
news updates by registering online on the website.
The Investment Manager has regular contact with Shareholders,
including the Cornerstone Investors, and any views that they may
have are communicated to the Board and vice versa. No sensitive
information is provided to the Cornerstone Investors that is not
provided to the Shareholders as a whole and at the same time.
The Board is also kept fully informed of all relevant market
commentary on the Company by the Investment Manager and the
Corporate Brokers. The Directors and Investment Manager receive
informal feedback from analysts and investors, which is presented
to the Board by the Company’s Broker. The Company Secretary also
receives informal feedback via queries submitted through the
Company’s website and these are addressed by the Board, the
Investment Manager or the Company Secretary, where applicable.
Over the year, the Investment Manager’s investor relations team and
senior management held several roadshows and meetings with
investors and equity research analysts.
Corporate Governance Report continued
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
53
Engagement with Stakeholders
The wider stakeholders of the Company comprise its service
providers, investee companies and suppliers and the Board
recognises and values these stakeholders.
The Company’s relationship with its service providers, including
the Investment Manager, is of particular importance. Service
providers have been selected and engaged based on due diligence
and references including consideration of their internal controls
and expertise. The Company has a Management Engagement
Committee, who will review the performance of each service
provider annually and provide feedback as appropriate, to maintain
good working relationships.
Responsible investing principles have been applied to each of the
investments made, which ensures that appropriate due diligence
has been conducted and that the terms of the investments are
clearly set out and agreed with investee companies in advance.
The Board recognises that relationships with suppliers are enhanced
by prompt payment and the Company’s Administrator, in conjunction
with the Investment Manager, ensures all payments are processed
within the contractual terms agreed with the individual suppliers.
Relations with Other Stakeholders
The Investment Manager conducts presentations with analysts and
investors to coincide with the announcement of the Company’s full
and half year results, providing an opportunity for discussions and
queries on the Company’s activities, performance and key metrics.
In addition to these semi-annual presentations, the Investment
Manager meets regularly with analysts and investors to provide
further updates with how the Company and the investment
portfolio are performing.
The Directors and Investment Manager receive informal feedback
from analysts and investors, which is presented to the Board by
the Companys Brokers. The Company Secretary also receives
informal feedback via queries submitted through the Company’s
website and these are addressed by the Board, the Investment
Manager or the Company Secretary, where applicable.
The Directors recognise that the long term success of the
Company is linked to the success of the communities in which the
Group, and its investee companies, operate.
Whistleblowing
The Board has considered arrangements by which staff of the
Investment Manager or Administrator may, in confidence, raise
concerns within their respective organisations about possible
improprieties in matters of financial reporting or other matters.
It has concluded that adequate arrangements are in place for the
proportionate and independent investigation of such matters and,
where necessary, for appropriate follow-up action to be taken
within their organisation.
Principal Risks and Uncertainties
The Company’s assets consist of listed and private equity
investments, held through the Partnership, in the conventional
and decarbonisation portfolios. Initially, there was a particular
focus on opportunities in the global E&P and midstream energy
sub-sectors, but since 2020 REL has been exclusively focussed on
pursuing a global strategy across decarbonisation sectors
presented by Riverstone’s investment platform. Its principal risks
are therefore related to market conditions in the energy and
energy transition sectors in general, but also to the particular
circumstances of the businesses in which it is invested through
the Partnership. The Investment Manager, through the
Partnership, seeks to mitigate these risks through active asset
management initiatives and carrying out due diligence work on
potential targets before entering into any investments.
Each Director is fully aware of the risks inherent in the Company’s
business and understands the importance of identifying,
evaluating and monitoring these risks. The Board has adopted
procedures and controls that enable it to carry out a robust
assessment of the risks facing the Company, manage these risks
within acceptable limits and meet all of its legal and regulatory
obligations. The Board is committed to upholding and maintaining
our zero tolerance towards the criminal facilitation of tax evasion.
The Board thoroughly considers the process for identifying,
evaluating and managing any significant risks faced by the
Company on an ongoing basis and these risks are reported and
discussed at Audit Committee and Board meetings. The Board
ensures that effective controls are in place to properly mitigate
these risks to the greatest extent possible and that a satisfactory
compliance regime exists to ensure all applicable local and
international laws and regulations are upheld.
For each material risk, the likelihood and consequences are identified,
management controls and frequency of monitoring are confirmed, and
results reported and discussed at the quarterly Board meetings.
The Company’s principal risk factors are fully discussed in
the Prospectuses, available on the Company’s website
(www.RiverstoneREL.com) and should be reviewed by Shareholders.
Please note that not all principal risks are disclosed on the Company’s
website, only those established at the time of the Prospectuses.
2023 Key Shareholder Engagements
January Quarterly Portfolio Valuations
February Full Year Results Approved
April Notice of Annual General Meeting
Quarterly Portfolio Valuations
May Annual General Meeting
July Quarterly Portfolio Valuations
August Half Year Results
October Quarterly Portfolio Valuation
Financial results, events, corporate reports, webcasts and fact
books are all stored in the Investor Relations section of our website:
www.riverstonerel.com/investors/
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
54
The Company’s current principal areas of risk and mitigating
actions being taken are summarised below:
1. The Company initially intended to only invest in the global
energy sector, with a particular focus on oil and gas
exploration and production, and midstream investments,
which exposed it to industry and sector concentration risk.
Under the modified investment strategy, since 2020, the
Company has pivoted to focus on energy transition and
decarbonisation and this provides an element of
diversification for the portfolio, albeit with the additional
investment risks noted below. Overall, the valuation risk of the
investment portfolio has also been reduced with an increased
portion now being held in listed investments.
2. The Company’s shares have, for a considerable period of time,
been trading at a discount to NAV per share for reasons,
including, but not limited to, general market conditions in the
energy sector, liquidity concerns, perceived issues with the
terms of the Investment Management Agreement and actual or
expected Company performance as the Company transitions
to maximise value from the conventional portfolio allowing
investment into its decarbonisation strategy. This persistent
discount to NAV has the potential to lead to material
shareholder dissatisfaction where any shareholder or
shareholder group which in aggregate totals 10 per cent or
more of the shares outstanding can call an EGM for a
shareholder vote.
The Company has seen a marked improvement in the
performance of its share price since 2020, and over this time
it has also been very active in attempting to narrow this
persistent discount with the introduction of a well-funded and
material series of successive buybacks as well as enhanced
shareholder engagement. There is no guarantee that the
continued attempts to mitigate this discount will be successful
or that the continued use of discount control mechanisms will
remain possible over time. There is a risk that through
successive buybacks to try and manage the share price
discount to NAV, that the Company may become too small to
be viable or to be able to make new or follow-on investments.
3. The investment portfolio held by the Company in both the
conventional and decarbonisation strategies exposes the
Company to a number of specific investment and valuation
risks, the most notable ones being:
>
The risks and judgements associated with the fair
valuation of the private equity investments could result in
the NAV of the Company being materially misstated. These
private equity investments expose the Company’s valuation
models to changes over time in a number of variables
including the price of oil, interest rates, certain public
market trading comparables, transaction comparables,
discounted cash flow rates, taxation etc. Ultimately the
success or otherwise of a private equity investment will
only be determined on eventual realisation.
The Investment Manager has an extensive and consistent
valuation policy which is applied each quarter and fair
values all private equity investments held. All quarterly
valuations firstly go through the valuation processes
adopted by the Investment Manager and when approved by
the Investment Manager are released to the Board for
review and challenge. Quarterly meetings are held by the
Board with the Investment Manager to review the draft
valuations ahead of confirmation and release to the market.
>
Potential changes to domestic policy, banking, regulatory
and/or the tax environment of target and existing
investments in the Company’s chosen geographies may
adversely affect the fair value/market value or liquidity of
those investments, their ability to borrow and transact
business plans or impact the Company’s ability to
properly realise those investments at previously intended
valuations or timescales.
The Investment Manager closely monitors the sectors
and industries in which the Company invests or intends to
target investment. All investment opportunities proposed
only proceed after thorough due diligence processes
prior to acquisition and ongoing monitoring processes
are employed while investments are held in the portfolio.
>
The specific investments in the decarbonisation portfolio
can expose the Company to additional investment and
operational risks arising from investment in the build-up
and early/development stages where a company may have
little or no operating history, be more vulnerable to
financial failure than more established companies, have
requirements to invest in further funding rounds or suffer
dilution/decrease in value, operating in emerging
industries with technologies that are as yet unproven and
investments where the Company is a minority investor
with limited access.
>
Significant global/regional conflict, such as that in
Ukraine, or the imposition of sanctions or adverse
publicity and/or poor ethical practices of the Company or,
more particularly, our portfolio companies, operating in
hazardous industries which are highly regulated by health
and safety laws and where their supply chains could lead
to a significant increase in the risk of disruption to the
supply chains that are key for the Company and our
portfolio companies and have an adverse impact on the
reputation of the Company and on the valuations/
realisation prospects of our portfolio companies.
Corporate Governance Report continued
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
55
The Investment Manager maintains dialogue with the portfolio
companies to make sure that they have appropriate plans and
resources in place to prioritise the health and safety of their
employees, as well as to assess their wider operational and
macro environments to include supply chain disruptions and
ensure the normal operations of their businesses and to protect
our valuations. All investments are initially screened and then
monitored against the Investment Manager’s ESG policy.
Although this risk is reducing over time, there may be differences
in the investment time horizons and fee provisions between the
Company and the private funds managed by Riverstone where the
Company has coinvested and these may create conflicts regarding
the allocation of investment opportunities and holding periods
between the Company and those funds, in particular as a result of
step-downs in fees payable by a private fund part way through its
duration. The investments made via Special Purpose Acquisition
Companies (“SPACs”) may attract a degree of liquidity risk of the
SPAC vehicle itself.
4. The Company is heavily reliant on the services provided by the
Investment Manager under the Investment Management
Agreement, including ongoing investment opportunities for REL.
The Investment Management Agreement requires the
Investment Manager to provide competent, attentive, and
efficient services and personnel to the Company. If the
Investment Manager was not able to do this or if there was an
unacceptable reduction in the service received or investment
competence levels of the personnel employed by the Investment
Manager, then the Company would not able to terminate The
Investment Management Agreement as it does not expressly
provide for termination on notice without specific cause, and
poor investment performance, the departure of key Riverstone
executives or a change of control of Riverstone do not constitute
cause for these purposes.
Furthermore, it will be costly for the Company to terminate the
Investment Management Agreement as the Company would be
required to make significant payments, including if a
Discontinuation Resolution were to be proposed and passed by
Shareholders or if the Company was otherwise wound up.
Please refer to page 39.
The Board has been engaged over time with the Investment
Manager to effect some changes to the Investment Management
Agreement most notably in the area of performance fees. The
Board continues to monitor the performance of the Investment
Manager and to discuss potential changes in light of the overall
financial performance of the Company.
5. Affiliates of the Investment Manager and the Company’s
Cornerstone Investors would be entitled to vote on any
Discontinuation Resolution that may be proposed. As the
Investment Manager and its affiliates (and, indirectly, the
Cornerstone Investors) receive fees from the Company, they
will most probably be incentivised to vote against such
resolution. As at 31 December 2022 and 24 February 2023,
respectively, Riverstone and the Company’s Cornerstone
Investors, in aggregate, own ~36 per cent. and ~33 per cent, of
outstanding Ordinary Shares, with the largest Cornerstone
Investor owning ~17 per cent. at both period-end’s.
6. The effects of climate change and the transition to a low carbon
economy could possibly reduce demand for some of the
Company’s existing investments, as well as impact their
valuations, and may limit future growth opportunities. General
sentiment may affect investor appetite and hence may lead to a
depression of the Company’s share price. There is a risk that the
change to ESG investment focus is wrongly perceived by the
market as being without genuine foundation (greenwashing).
Furthermore, there may be a perceived over reliance on the
Investment Manager’s ESG credentials. Riverstone has adopted
what it believes are currently best practices for ESG investing
having become a signatory to the UN-supported Principles for
Responsible Investment.
The Company (as with all companies) continues to be exposed to
external cyber-security threats. The Company recognises the
increased incidence of cyber-security threats and regularly reviews its
policies, procedures and defences to mitigate associated risks, as well
as receiving confirmation of the policies, procedures and defences of
the Investment Manager, Administrator and key service providers, and
engages market-leading specialists where appropriate. This is to
ensure that the Company is resilient to existing and emerging threats.
The above risks are mitigated and managed by the Board through
continual review, policy setting and updating of the Company’s Risk
Matrix at each Audit Committee Meeting to ensure that procedures
are in place with the intention of minimising the impact of the
above-mentioned risks. The Board relies on periodic reports provided
by the Investment Manager and Administrator regarding risks that
the Company faces. When required, experts will be employed to
gather information, including tax advisers, legal advisers, and
environmental advisers. As it is not possible to eliminate risks
completely, the purpose of the Company’s risk management policies
and procedures is not to eliminate risks, but to reduce them and to
ensure that the Company is adequately prepared to respond to such
risks and to minimise any impact if the risk develops.
By order of the Board
Richard Hayden
Chair of the Board
28 February 2023
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
56
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
56
Report of the Audit Committee
THE AUDIT COMMITTEE, CHAIRED BY MR FIRTH, OPERATES WITHIN CLEARLY DEFINED
TERMS OF REFERENCE, WHICH ARE AVAILABLE FROM THE COMPANY’S WEBSITE
WWW.RIVERSTONEREL.COM, AND INCLUDE ALL MATTERS INDICATED BY DISCLOSURE
GUIDANCE AND TRANSPARENCY RULE 7.1, THE AIC CODE AND THE UK CODE.
Its other members are Mr Barker, Mr Horlick, Mr Hayden,
Mr Thompson, Mrs Whittet and Mr Roche. Members of the Audit
Committee must be independent of the Company’s external auditor
and Investment Manager. The Audit Committee will meet no less
than three times in a year, and at such other times as the Audit
Committee Chair shall require, and will meet the external auditor
at least once a year.
The Committee members have considerable financial and
business experience and the Board has determined that the
membership, as a whole, has sufficient recent and relevant sector
and financial experience to discharge its responsibilities and that
at least one member has competence in accounting or auditing
having a background as a chartered accountant.
Responsibilities
The main duties of the Audit Committee are:
>
to monitor the integrity of the Company’s Financial
Statements and regulatory announcements relating to its
financial performance and review significant financial
reporting judgements;
>
to report to the Board on the appropriateness of the
Company’s accounting policies and practices;
>
to review the valuations of the Company’s investments
prepared by the Investment Manager, and provide a
recommendation to the Board on the valuation of the
Company’s investments;
>
to oversee the relationship with the external auditors,
including agreeing their remuneration and terms of
engagement, monitoring their independence, objectivity and
effectiveness, ensuring that policy surrounding their
engagement to provide non-audit services is appropriately
applied, and making recommendations to the Board on their
appointment, reappointment or removal, for it to put to the
Shareholders in general meeting;
>
to monitor and consider annually whether there is a need for
the Company to have its own internal audit function;
>
to keep under review the effectiveness of the Company’s
internal controls, including financial controls and risk
management systems;
>
to review and consider the UK Code, the AIC Code, the GFSC
Code, the AIC Guidance on Audit Committees and the
Stewardship Code; and
>
to report to the Board on how it has discharged
its responsibilities.
The Audit Committee is aware that the Annual Report is not
subject to formal statutory audit, including the Board Chair’s
Statement and the Investment Manager’s Report. Financial
information in these sections is reviewed by the Audit Committee.
The Audit Committee is required to report its findings to the
Board, identifying any matters on which it considers that action or
improvement is needed, and make recommendations on the steps
to be taken.
The external auditor is invited to attend the Audit Committee
meetings at which the Annual Report and Interim Financial Report
are considered and at which they have the opportunity to meet
with the Committee without representatives of the Investment
Manager or Administrator being present at least once per year.
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
57
Financial Reporting
The primary role of the Audit Committee in relation to financial
reporting is to review with the Administrator, Investment Manager
and the external auditor and report to the Board on the
appropriateness of the Annual Report and Financial Statements
and Interim Financial Report, concentrating on, amongst
other matters:
>
the quality and acceptability of accounting policies
and practices;
>
the clarity of the disclosures and compliance with financial
reporting standards and relevant financial and governance
reporting requirements;
>
material areas in which significant judgements have been
applied or there has been discussion with the external auditor
including going concern and viability statement;
>
whether the Annual Report and Financial Statements, taken as
a whole, is fair, balanced and understandable and provides the
information necessary for Shareholders to assess the
Company’s performance, business model and strategy; and
>
any correspondence from regulators in relation to our
financial reporting.
To aid its review, the Audit Committee considers reports from the
Administrator and Investment Manager and also reports from the
external auditor on the outcomes of their half-year review and annual
audit. The Audit Committee supports Ernst and Young LLP in
displaying the necessary professional scepticism their role requires.
Meetings
During the year ended 31 December 2022, the Audit Committee met
formally four times and maintained ongoing liaison and discussion
between the external auditor and the Chair of the Audit Committee
with regards to the audit approach and the identified risks.
Additional ad hoc meetings or informal discussions have been
convened at other times during the year as the Committee
determined appropriate. The Audit Committee has met on two
occasions since the year-end through to the date of this report on
23 February 2023 and 28 February 2023. The matters discussed at
those meetings include:
>
review of the terms of reference of the audit committee for
approval by the Board;
>
review of the accounting policies and format of the
Financial Statements;
>
review and approval of the audit plan of the external auditor;
>
discussion and approval of the fee for the external audit;
>
detailed review of the valuations of the Company’s investment
portfolio and recommendation for approval by the Board;
>
detailed review of the Annual Report and Financial Statements,
Interim Financial Report and quarterly portfolio valuations,
and recommendation for approval by the Board;
>
assessment of the independence of the external auditor;
>
assessment of the effectiveness of the external audit process
as described below;
>
review of the Company’s key risks and internal controls;
>
consideration of going concern applicability;
>
focus on ESG; and
>
application of any IFRS changes.
Significant Areas of Judgement Considered
by the Audit Committee
The Audit Committee has determined that a key risk of
misstatement of the Companys Financial Statements relates to
the valuation of the investment in the Partnership at fair value
through profit or loss, in the context of the judgements necessary
to evaluate market values of the underlying investments held
through the Partnership.
The Directors have considered whether any discount or premium
should be applied to the net asset value of the Partnership, which
is based on the fair value of its underlying investments. In view of
the Company’s investment in the Partnership and the nature of
the Partnership’s assets, no adjustment to the net asset value of
the Partnership has been made, as this is deemed equivalent to
fair value.
The Audit Committee reviews, considers and, if thought
appropriate, recommends for the purposes of the Company’s
Financial Statements, valuations prepared by the Investment
Manager in respect of the investments of the Partnership.
As outlined in Note 6 to the Financial Statements, the total
carrying value of the investment in the Partnership at fair value
through profit or loss at 31 December 2022 was $723 million
(31 December 2021: $674 million). Market quotations are not
available for this financial asset such that the value of the
Company’s investment is based on the value of the Company’s
limited partner capital account with the Partnership, which itself is
based on the value of the Partnership’s investments as determined
by the Investment Manager, along with the cash and fixed deposits
held. The valuation for each individual investment held by the
Partnership is determined by reference to common industry
valuation techniques, including comparable public market valuation,
comparable merger and acquisition transaction valuation, and
discounted cash flow valuation, as detailed in the Investment
Manager’s Report and Note 5 to the Financial Statements.
The valuation process and methodology was discussed with the
Investment Manager and with the external auditor at the Audit
Committee meetings held on 14 October 2022 and 23 February
2023. The Investment Manager has carried out a valuation
quarterly and provided a detailed valuation report to the Company
at each quarter.
The Audit Committee reviewed the Investment Manager’s Report.
The external auditor explained the results of their audit work on
valuations. There were no adjustments proposed that were
material in the context of the Annual Report and Financial
Statements as a whole.
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
58
The Audit Committee considers, and if thought appropriate,
recommends that the Board adopts the going concern basis for
preparing the Company’s Financial Statements. As outlined in
Report of the Directors on pages 36 to 43, the Audit Committee has
considered the risks that could impact the Company’s liquidity over
the next period from the date of approval of the Financial
Statements up until March 2024, as well as taken into account the
below two key considerations.
1. Available liquid resources and potential proceeds from
investment realisations versus current and expected liabilities
of the Company over the period from the date of approval of
the Financial Statements up until 31 March 2024; and
2. Available liquid resources and potential proceeds from
investment realisations versus total potential unfunded
commitments of the Partnership.
The Audit Committee, based on the reasons set out in the Report of
the Directors, are satisfied, as of today’s date, that it is appropriate
to adopt the going concern basis in preparing these Financial
Statements and has recommended this approach is adopted by
the Board.
The Audit Committee considers, and if thought appropriate,
recommends that the Board considers the Company’s viability over
a period of three years to 31 December 2025. The Audit Committee
has determined that the period of three years was deemed to be an
appropriate timeframe and that there is a reasonable expectation
that the Company will be able to continue in operation and meet its
liabilities as they fall due over this period of assessment, as
further outlined in the Report of the Directors on pages 36 to 43.
Accordingly, the Audit Committee has recommended the three
year period of assessment for the Company’s longer-term viability
is adopted by the Board.
Risk Management
The Board is accountable for carrying out a robust assessment of
the principal risks facing the Company, including those threatening
its business model, future performance, solvency and liquidity. On
behalf of the Board, the Audit Committee reviews the effectiveness
of the Company’s risk management processes. The Company’s
risk assessment process and the way in which significant business
risks are managed is a key area of focus for the Audit Committee.
The work of the Audit Committee was driven primarily by the
Company’s assessment of its principal risks and uncertainties as
set out in the Corporate Governance Report. The Audit Committee
receives reports from the Investment Manager and Administrator
on the Company’s risk evaluation process and reviews changes to
significant risks identified.
Internal Audit
The Audit Committee shall consider at least once a year whether
or not there is a need for an internal audit function. Currently, the
Audit Committee does not consider there to be a need for an
internal audit function, given that there are no employees in the
Company and all outsourced functions are with parties who have
their own internal controls and procedures.
External Audit
Ernst & Young LLP has been the Company’s external auditor since
the Company’s incorporation. This is the tenth year of audit.
The external auditor is required to rotate the audit partner every
five years. The current Ernst & Young LLP lead audit partner,
David Moore, started his tenure in 2018 and his current rotation
will end with the audit of the 2022 Annual Report and Financial
Statements. There are no contractual obligations restricting the
choice of external auditor and the Company will put the audit
services contract out to tender periodically. It was decided the
audit services contract will not be put out to tender for the next
reporting period due to mutual benefits of Ernst & Young’s external
audit contract with the other Riverstone private funds. Under
Companies Law, the reappointment of the external auditor is
subject to Shareholder approval at the Annual General Meeting.
The Audit Committee assessed the qualifications, expertise and
resources, and independence of the external auditor as well as the
effectiveness of the audit process. This review covered all aspects of
the audit service provided by Ernst & Young LLP, including obtaining
a report on the audit firm’s own internal quality control procedures
and consideration of the audit firm’s annual transparency reports in
line with the UK Code. The Audit Committee also approved the
external audit terms of engagement and remuneration. During 2022,
the Committee held private meetings with the external auditor. The
Audit Committee Chair also maintained regular contact with the
audit partner throughout the year. These meetings provide an
opportunity for open dialogue with the external auditor without
management being present. Matters discussed included the
auditor’s assessment of significant financial risks and the
performance of management in addressing these risks, the auditor’s
opinion of management’s role in fulfilling obligations for the
maintenance of internal controls, the transparency and
responsiveness of interactions with management, confirmation that
no restrictions have been placed on them by management,
maintaining the independence of the audit, and how they have
exercised professional challenge. The Audit Committee will continue
to monitor the performance of the external auditor on an annual
basis and will consider their independence and objectivity, taking
account of appropriate guidelines. In addition, the Audit Committee
Chair will continue to maintain regular contact with the lead audit
partner outside the formal Committee meeting schedule, not only to
discuss formal agenda items for upcoming meetings, but also to
review any other significant matters. Members of the Audit
Committee also sat in on the valuation meetings between the
Investment Manager and external auditor.
Report of the Audit Committee continued
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
59
The Audit Committee reviews the scope and results of the audit,
its cost effectiveness and the independence and objectivity of the
external auditor, with particular regard to the level of non-audit
fees. The Audit Committee is also monitoring developments, in this
regard, with respect to the Crown Dependencies’ Audit Rules and
Guidance. Notwithstanding such services the Audit Committee
considers Ernst & Young LLP to be independent of the Company
and that the provision of such non-audit services is not a threat to
the objectivity and independence of the conduct of the audit.
To further safeguard the objectivity and independence of the
external auditor from becoming compromised, the Audit
Committee has a formal policy governing the engagement of the
external auditor to provide non-audit services. This precludes
Ernst & Young LLP from providing certain services such as
valuation work or the provision of accounting services and also
sets a presumption that Ernst & Young LLP should only be
engaged for non-audit services where Ernst & Young LLP are best
placed to provide the non-audit service for example, the interim
review. Note 13 details services provided by Ernst & Young LLP.
In addition to processes put in place to ensure segregation of audit
and non-audit roles, Ernst & Young LLP is required, as part of the
assurance process in relation to the audit, to confirm to the
Committee that it has both the appropriate independence and the
objectivity to allow it to continue to serve the members of the
Company. This confirmation is received every six months and no
matters of concern were identified by the Committee.
To fulfil its responsibility regarding the independence of the
external auditor, the Audit Committee considers:
>
discussions with or reports from the external auditor
describing its arrangements to identify, report and manage
any conflicts of interest; and
>
the extent of non-audit services provided by the
external auditor.
To assess the effectiveness of the external auditor, the
committee reviews:
>
the external auditor’s fulfilment of the agreed audit plan and
variations from it;
>
discussions or reports highlighting the major issues that arose
during the course of the audit; and
>
feedback from other service providers evaluating the
performance of the audit team.
The Audit Committee is satisfied with Ernst & Young LLP’s
effectiveness and independence as external auditor having
considered the degree of diligence and professional scepticism
demonstrated by them. Having carried out the review described
above and having satisfied itself that the external auditor remains
independent and effective, the Audit Committee has recommended
to the Board that Ernst & Young LLP be reappointed as external
auditor for the year ending 31 December 2023.
The Audit Committee has provided the Board with its
recommendation to the Shareholders on the re-appointment
of Ernst & Young LLP as external auditor for the year ending
31 December 2023. Accordingly, a resolution proposing the
reappointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our external auditor will
be put to Shareholders at the Annual General Meeting.
On behalf of the Audit Committee
Patrick Firth
Chair of the Audit Committee
28 February 2023
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
60
Independent Auditor’s Report
To The Members Of Riverstone Energy Limited
Opinion
We have audited the Financial Statements of Riverstone Energy
Limited (the “Company) for the year ended 31 December 2022
which comprise the Statement of Financial Position, the Statement
of Comprehensive Income, the Statement of Changes in Equity, the
Statement of Cash Flows and the related notes 1 to 15, including a
summary of significant accounting policies. The financial reporting
framework that has been applied in their preparation is applicable
law and International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by
the European Union (‘IFRS’).
In our opinion, the Financial Statements:
>
give a true and fair view of the state of the Company’s affairs as
at 31 December 2022 and of its profit for the year then ended;
>
have been properly prepared in accordance with IFRS; and
>
have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of
The Companies (Guernsey) Law, 2008.
Basis for opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance with International
Standards on Auditing (UK) (‘ISAs (UK)’) and applicable law.
Our responsibilities under those standards are further described
in the “Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the Financial
Statements section” of our report. We believe that the audit
evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide
a basis for our opinion.
Independence
We are independent of the Company in accordance with the ethical
requirements that are relevant to our audit of the Financial
Statements, including the UK FRC’s Ethical Standard as applied to
listed public interest entities, and we have fulfilled our other
ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements.
The non-audit services prohibited by the FRC’s Ethical Standard
were not provided to the Company and we remain independent of
the Company in conducting the audit.
Conclusions relating to going concern
In auditing the Financial Statements, we have concluded that the
Directors’ use of the going concern basis of accounting in the
preparation of the financial statements is appropriate. Our
evaluation of the Directors’ assessment of the Company’s ability to
continue to adopt the going concern basis of accounting included:
>
The audit engagement partner directed and supervised the
audit procedures on going concern, including internal
consultations where deemed necessary;
>
We assessed the determination made by the Board of
Directors of the Company and the Investment Manager that the
Company is a going concern, including sensitivity disclosures
(as compared to prior year) where they are not now relevant up
until 31 March 2024, and hence the appropriateness of the
financial statements to be prepared on a going concern basis;
>
We obtained the cash flow forecasts and sensitivities prepared
by the Investment Manager and tested the arithmetical
accuracy of the models;
>
We challenged the appropriateness of the Investment
Manager’s forecasts by assessing historical forecasting
accuracy, challenging their consideration of downside
sensitivity analysis and applying further sensitivities to
understand the impact on liquidity of the Company;
>
We assessed whether available funds compared to
commitments made to underlying investments, taking account
of the existing arrangements with the Riverstone Energy
Investment Partnership, L.P. (“the underlying Partnership”)
and continued share buy-backs, cast significant doubt over the
going concern status of the Company; and
>
We assessed the disclosures in the Annual Report and
Financial Statements relating to going concern to ensure they
were fair, balanced and understandable and in compliance
with IAS1.
Based on the work we have performed, we have not identified any
material uncertainties relating to events or conditions that, individually
or collectively, may cast significant doubt on the Company’s ability to
continue as a going concern from the date the Financial Statements
are authorised for issue up until 31 March 2024.
In relation to the Company’s reporting on how they have applied
the UK Corporate Governance Code, we have nothing material to
add or draw attention to in relation to the Directors’ Statement in
the financial statements about whether the Directors considered it
appropriate to adopt the going concern basis of accounting.
Our responsibilities and the responsibilities of the Directors with
respect to going concern are described in the relevant sections of
this report. However, because not all future events or conditions
can be predicted, this statement is not a guarantee as to the
Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
Overview of our audit approach
Key audit
matters
>
Misstatement or manipulation of the
valuation of the Company’s investment
in Riverstone Energy Investment Partnership, L.P.
(“the Underlying Partnership”)
Materiality
>
Overall materiality of $14.4 million which
represents 2 per cent. of equity.
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
61
An overview of the scope of our audit
Tailoring the scope
Our assessment of audit risk, our evaluation of materiality and our
allocation of performance materiality determine our audit scope
for the Company. This enables us to form an opinion on the
Financial Statements. We take into account size, risk profile, the
organisation of the Company and effectiveness of controls,
including controls and changes in the business environment when
assessing the level of work to be performed. All audit work was
performed directly by the audit engagement team.
The audit was led from Guernsey, and the audit team included
individuals from the Guernsey and New York offices of Ernst &
Young and operated as an integrated audit team. In addition, we
engaged our Valuation, Modelling and Economics (“VME”) industry
valuation specialists from the Houston and London offices, who
assisted us in auditing the valuation of unquoted investments.
Changes from the prior year
Due to the additional investments in unquoted companies made by
the underlying Partnership in the current period we have
increased the sample size assigned to our valuation specialists
and have ensured that the new investments deemed to have a high
degree of estimation uncertainty were included in the sample.
We further note that the extent of our procedures performed in
relation to the Director’s going concern assessment reduced as,
given the deadline set by the Directors has passed, we no longer
needed to assess the probability that the Directors would seek
approval to amend the Company’s investment policy to provide for
the managed run-off of the Company’s portfolio.
Climate change
Stakeholders are increasingly interested in how climate change
will impact the Company. The Company has determined that the
most significant future impacts from climate change on its
operations will be from transition and physical risks. These are
explained on page 13 in the Task Force for Climate related
Financial Disclosures and on page 55 in the Principal Risks and
Uncertainties. They have also explained their climate
commitments on pages 9 and 10. All of these disclosures form
part of the “Other information,” rather than the audited financial
statements. Our procedures on these unaudited disclosures
therefore consisted solely of considering whether they are
materially inconsistent with the financial statements, or our
knowledge obtained in the course of the audit or otherwise appear
to be materially misstated, in line with our responsibilities on
“Other information”.
In planning and performing our audit we assessed the potential
impacts of climate change on the Company’s business and any
consequential material impact on its financial statements.
The Company has explained in Notes 2(a)(iii) its articulation of how
climate change has been reflected in the financial statements and
how they have reflected the impact of climate change in their
financial statements. Significant judgements and estimates
relating to climate change are included in note 3.
Our audit effort in considering the impact of climate change on the
financial statements was focused on evaluating management’s
assessment of the impact of climate risk, be it physical or
transitional, their climate commitments, and the significant
judgements and estimates disclosed in note 3 and whether these
have been appropriately reflected in asset values where these are
impacted by future cash flows following the requirements of IFRS.
As part of this evaluation, we performed our own risk assessment
to determine the risks of material misstatement in the financial
statements from climate change which needed to be considered in
our audit.
We also challenged the Directors’ considerations of climate
change risks in their assessment of going concern and viability and
associated disclosures. Where considerations of climate change
were relevant to our assessment of going concern, these are
described above.
Based on our work we have not identified the impact of climate
change on the Financial Statements to be a key audit matter. Our
audit effort was focused on the significant assumptions used in
estimating the valuation of the Companys investment in the
underlying Partnership. Details of our procedures and findings are
included in our key audit matters below.
Key audit matters
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional
judgement, were of most significance in our audit of the Financial
Statements of the current period and include the most significant
assessed risks of material misstatement (whether or not due to
fraud) that we identified. These matters included those which had
the greatest effect on: the overall audit strategy, the allocation of
resources in the audit; and directing the efforts of the engagement
team. These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of
the Financial Statements as a whole, and in our opinion thereon,
and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters.
Our application of materiality
We apply the concept of materiality in planning and performing the
audit, in evaluating the effect of identified misstatements on the
audit and in forming our audit opinion.
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
62
Independent Auditor’s Report
To The Members Of Riverstone Energy Limited continued
Risk Our response to the risk
Key observations
communicated to the
Audit Committee
Misstatement or manipulation of
the valuation of the Company’s
investment in the underlying
Partnership ($723 million;
2021 $674 million).
Refer to the Audit Committee Report
page 57; Accounting policies page 71;
and Note 5 of the Consolidated
Financial Statements page 76.
The fair value of the Company’s
investment in the underlying
Partnership is based on the Net Asset
Value of the underlying Partnership
which, in turn, is based on the fair
values of its net assets including the
underlying investments held by the
underlying Partnership through the
investment structures. A number of the
underlying investments are level three
investments as defined in the IFRS
hierarchy. Valuing such investments
requires significant judgement and
estimation as explained in Note 3 to
the Financial Statements and in
the Audit Committee Report on
pages 56 to 59. It also requires
significant industry expertise.
Our audit procedures consisted of:
>
Updating and confirming our understanding of the Company’s processes and
methodologies, including the use of industry specific measures, and policies for
valuing investments held by the underlying Partnership;
>
Obtaining and inspecting the valuation papers and supporting data to assess
whether the data used is appropriate and relevant, and discussing these with the
Investment Manager to evaluate whether the fair value of the Company’s
investment in the underlying Partnership approximates to the net asset value of
the underlying Partnership, challenging the assumptions made by the Investment
Manager and Board of Directors of the Company;
>
Attending fair value discussions in relation to 30 September and 31 December
2022 valuations. These included the Investment Manager, EY Guernsey and EY
New York audit teams, EY Houston VME and EY London VME teams;
>
Obtaining management’s calculations and supporting documents with regards
to the discounts applied to the SPAC sponsor investments and assessing the
reasonableness of the discounts applied. Our procedures included, on a sample
basis, independently sourcing the model and inputs to re-calculate the
discounts, and testing the arithmetical accuracy of the Company’s calculations;
>
Vouching valuation inputs that do not require specialist knowledge to
independent sources and testing the arithmetical accuracy of the
Company’s calculations;
>
For a sample of investments, engaging EY Houston and EY London VME teams
as valuation specialists to:
a) use their knowledge of the market to corroborate the Investment
Manager’s mark, and their related judgements and valuation inputs
including, amongst others, discount rates, forward oil price, production
values and recent relevant transaction data; and
b) assist us to determine whether the methodologies used to value
investments were in accordance with methods, particularly those
specific to the industry, usually used by market participants.
>
Updating our previous discussions with the Investment Manager with respect
to the qualitative factors and other information used to value investments;
>
Performing roll forward procedures to capture fair value changes between
30 September and 31 December 2022, with specific focus on changes in macro
factors such as oil prices, geopolitical events and Company specific events;
>
Assessing levels of taxation and performance fee/incentive accruals in
investment valuations;
>
Reporting to the Audit Committee on the calibration of investment valuations
against EY’s ranges and comment on those ranges against other market
participants. In addition, we commented on any specific movements of valuation
marks in those ranges’ vs prior periods; and
>
Identifying the key unobservable inputs to valuations and reviewing and assessing
the reasonableness of the sensitivity workings and disclosures, comparing the
Investment Adviser’s position with EY’s range of acceptable inputs.
We reported to the
Audit Committee that,
overall, the valuation of
the Company’s
investment in the
underlying Partnership
was materially
correct, in accordance
with IFRS and within
our estimated
valuation range.
The values of unquoted investments
may be misstated due to the
application of inappropriate
methodologies, inputs to the
valuation, discount/premiums
applied at the underlying Partnership
level and/or inappropriate
judgemental factors.
There is also a risk that proper
adjustments are not made in the
fair value calculations for the effects
that tax and General Partner
performance allocation will have on
realised and unrealised gains of
underlying investments.
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
63
Materiality
The magnitude of an omission or misstatement that, individually or in the
aggregate, could reasonably be expected to influence the economic
decisions of the users of the Financial Statements. Materiality provides a
basis for determining the nature and extent of our audit procedures.
We determined materiality for the Company to be $14.4 million
(2021: $13.2 million), which is approximately 2 per cent.
(2021: 2 per cent.) of the equity value at 30 June 2022. We believe that
equity provides us with Company’s primary performance measures
for internal and external reporting. During the course of our audit, we
reassessed initial materiality and elected to keep materiality at the
30 June 2022 materiality as it, in our professional judgment, remains
appropriate for the actual results for the financial year.
Performance materiality
The application of materiality at the individual account or balance
level. It is set at an amount to reduce to an appropriately low level the
probability that the aggregate of uncorrected and undetected
misstatements exceeds materiality.
On the basis of our risk assessments, together with our assessment
of the Company’s overall control environment, our judgement was
that performance materiality was 75 per cent. (2021: 75 per cent.)
of our materiality, namely $10.8 million (2021: $9.9 million). We have
set performance materiality at this percentage given that there is no
history of material misstatements, the likelihood of misstatement in
the future is deemed low, we have a strong understanding of the
control environment and there were no changes in circumstances
such as a change in accounting personnel or events out of the normal
course of business.
Reporting threshold
An amount below which identified misstatements are considered as
being clearly trivial.
We agreed with the Audit Committee that we would report to
them all uncorrected audit differences in excess of $0.8 million
(2021: $0.7 million), which is set at 5 per cent. of materiality, as
well as differences below that threshold that, in our view,
warranted reporting on qualitative grounds.
We evaluate any uncorrected misstatements against both the
quantitative measures of materiality discussed above and in light
of other relevant qualitative considerations in forming our opinion.
Other information
The other information comprises the information included in the
Annual Report set out on pages 1 to 59 and 67 to 101, other than
the Financial Statements and our auditor’s report thereon. The
Directors are responsible for the other information contained
within the Annual Report.
Our opinion on the Financial Statements does not cover the
other information and, except to the extent otherwise explicitly
stated in this report, we do not express any form of assurance
conclusion thereon.
Our responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing so,
consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent
with the Financial Statements or our knowledge obtained in the
course of the audit or otherwise appears to be materially misstated.
If we identify such material inconsistencies or apparent material
misstatements, we are required to determine whether this gives rise
to a material misstatement in the Financial Statements themselves.
If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a
material misstatement of the other information, we are required to
report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.
Matters on which we are required to report by exception
We have nothing to report in respect of the following matters in
relation to which The Companies (Guernsey) Law, 2008 requires us
to report to you if, in our opinion:
>
adequate accounting records have not been kept by the
Company; or
>
the Financial Statements are not in agreement with the
Company’s accounting records and returns; or
>
we have not received all the information and explanations we
require for our audit
Corporate Governance Statement
We have reviewed the Directors’ statement in relation to going
concern, longer-term viability and that part of the Corporate
Governance Statement relating to the Company’s compliance with
the provisions of the UK Corporate Governance Code specified for
our review by the Listing Rules.
Based on the work undertaken as part of our audit, we have
concluded that each of the following elements of the Corporate
Governance Statement is materially consistent with the Financial
Statements or our knowledge obtained during the audit:
>
Directors’ statement with regards to the appropriateness of
adopting the going concern basis of accounting and any
material uncertainties identified set out on pages 40 and 41;
>
Directors’ explanation as to its assessment of the Company’s
prospects, the period this assessment covers and why the
period is appropriate set out on pages 40 to 42;
>
Director’s statement on whether it has a reasonable
expectation that the Company will be able to continue in
operation and meets its liabilities set out on pages 40 to 42;
>
Directors’ statement on fair, balanced and understandable set
out on page 45;
>
Board’s confirmation that it has carried out a robust
assessment of the emerging and principal risks set out on
pages 53 to 55;
>
The section of the annual report that describes the review of
effectiveness of risk management and internal control
systems set out on pages 50 and 51; and
>
The section describing the work of the audit committee set out
on pages 56 to 59.
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
64
Responsibilities of directors
As explained more fully in the Directors’ Responsibilities
Statement set out on page 44, the Directors are responsible for the
preparation of the Financial Statements and for being satisfied that
they give a true and fair view, and for such internal control as the
Directors determine is necessary to enable the preparation of
Financial Statements that are free from material misstatement,
whether due to fraud or error.
In preparing the Financial Statements, the Directors are
responsible for assessing the Company’s ability to continue as a
going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going
concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless
the Directors either intend to liquidate the Company or to cease
operations, or have no realistic alternative but to do so.
Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the
financial statements
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the Financial Statements as a whole are free from material
misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an
auditor’s report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance
is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit
conducted in accordance with ISAs (UK) will always detect a
material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise
from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or
in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence
the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these
Financial Statements.
Explanation as to what extent the audit was considered
capable of detecting irregularities, including fraud
Irregularities, including fraud, are instances of non-compliance
with laws and regulations. We design procedures in line with our
responsibilities, outlined above, to detect irregularities, including
fraud. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement due to
fraud is higher than the risk of not detecting one resulting from
error, as fraud may involve deliberate concealment by, for
example, forgery or intentional misrepresentations, or through
collusion. The extent to which our procedures are capable of
detecting irregularities, including fraud, is detailed below.
However, the primary responsibility for the prevention and
detection of fraud rests with both those charged with governance
of the Company and Management.
>
We obtained an understanding of the legal and regulatory
frameworks that are applicable to the Company and
determined that the most significant are:
Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”) Listing Rules
Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules (“DTR”)
The 2018 UK Corporate Governance Code
The 2019 AIC Code of Corporate Governance
The Companies (Guernsey) Law, 2008, as amended
The Protection of Investors (Bailiwick of Guernsey) Law,
2020 (including Registered Collective Investment
Schemes (RCIS) Rules 2021)
>
We understood how the Company is complying with those
frameworks by:
Discussing the processes and procedures used by the
Directors, the Investment Manager, the Company
Secretary and Administrator to ensure compliance with
the relevant frameworks;
Reviewing internal reports that evidenced quarterly
compliance testing; and
Inspecting any correspondence with regulators.
>
We assessed the susceptibility of the Company’s Financial
Statements to material misstatement, including how fraud
might occur by undertaking the audit procedures set out in Key
Audit Matter section above and reading the Financial
Statements to check that the disclosures are consistent with
the relevant regulatory requirement; and.
>
Based on this understanding we designed our audit
procedures to identify non-compliance with such laws and
regulations. Our procedures involved:
Through discussion, gaining an understanding of how
those charged with governance, the Investment Manager,
the Company Secretary and Administrator identify
instances of non-compliance by the Company with
relevant laws and regulations;
Inspecting the relevant policies, processes and
procedures to further our understanding;
Holding discussions with the Company’s nominated
Compliance Officer;
Reviewing internal compliance reporting, Board and Audit
Committee minutes;
Inspecting correspondence with regulators; and
Obtaining relevant written representations from the
Board of Directors.
Independent Auditor’s Report
To The Members Of Riverstone Energy Limited continued
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
65
Notes:
(1)
The maintenance and integrity of the Company’s website is the sole responsibility of the Directors; the work carried out by the auditors does not involve consideration of these
matters and, accordingly, the auditor accepts no responsibility for any changes that may have occurred to the Financial Statements since they were initially presented on the website.
(2)
Legislation in Guernsey governing the preparation and dissemination of Financial Statements may differ from legislation in other jurisdictions.
A further description of our responsibilities for the audit of
the financial statements is located on the Financial
Reporting Council’s website at https://www.frc.org.uk/
auditorsresponsibilities. This description forms part of our
auditor’s report.
Other matters we are required to address
>
Following the recommendation from the audit
committee, we were appointed by the Company to audit
the financial statements for the year ending
31 December 2013 and subsequent financial periods.
We signed an engagement letter on 28 January 2014.
The period of total uninterrupted engagement including
previous renewals and reappointments is ten years,
covering the years ending 31 December 2013 to
31 December 2022.
>
The audit opinion is consistent with the additional report
to the audit committee.
Use of our report
This report is made solely to the Company’s members, as a
body, in accordance with Section 262 of The Companies
(Guernsey) Law, 2008. Our audit work has been undertaken
so that we might state to the Company’s members those
matters we are required to state to them in an auditor’s
report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent
permitted by law, we do not accept or assume responsibility
to anyone other than the Company and the Company’s
members as a body, for our audit work, for this report, or for
the opinions we have formed.
David Robert John Moore, ACA
For and on behalf of Ernst & Young LLP
28 February 2023
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
66
Report Of Independent Auditors
To The Directors Of Riverstone Energy Limited
Opinion
We have audited the Financial Statements of Riverstone Energy
Limited (the “Company), which comprise the Statement of
Financial Position as of 31 December 2022 and 2021, and the
related Statements of Comprehensive Income, the Statements of
Changes in Equity, the Statements of Cash Flows for the years then
ended, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the
“Financial Statements”).
In our opinion, the accompanying Financial Statements present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the
Company at 31 December 2022 and 2021, and the results of its
operations, changes in equity, and its cash flows for the years then
ended, in conformity with International Financial Reporting
Standards as adopted by the European Union (“IFRS”).
Basis for Opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards
generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAS). Our
responsibilities under those standards are further described in the
Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements
section of our report. We are required to be independent of the
Company and to meet our other ethical responsibilities in
accordance with the relevant ethical requirements relating to our
audit. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is
sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.
Director’s Responsibility for the Financial Statements
The Directors are responsible for the preparation and fair
presentation of the Financial Statements in accordance with IFRS
and for the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal
control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of
Financial Statements that are free of material misstatement,
whether due to fraud or error.
In preparing the Financial Statements, the Directors are required
to evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in
the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the Company’s
ability to continue as a going concern for one year after the date
that the Financial Statements are available to be issued.
Auditor’s Responsibilities
for the Audit of the Financial Statements
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the Financial Statements as a whole are free of material
misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an
auditor’s report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance
is a high level of assurance but is not absolute assurance and
therefore is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance
with GAAS will always detect a material misstatement when it
exists. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting
from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud
may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions,
misrepresentations, or the override of internal control.
Misstatements are considered material if there is a substantial
likelihood that, individually or in the aggregate, they would
influence the judgment made by a reasonable user based on the
Financial Statements.
In performing an audit in accordance with GAAS, we:
>
Exercise professional judgment and maintain professional
scepticism throughout the audit.
>
Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the
Financial Statements, whether due to fraud or error, and
design and perform audit procedures responsive to those
risks. Such procedures include examining, on a test basis,
evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the
Financial Statements.
>
Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the
audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate
in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an
opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control.
Accordingly, no such opinion is expressed.
>
Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and
the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made
by management, as well as evaluate the overall presentation of
the Financial Statements.
>
Conclude whether, in our judgment, there are conditions or
events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial
doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going
concern for a reasonable period of time.
We are required to communicate with those charged with
governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope
and timing of the audit, significant audit findings, and certain
internal control-related matters that we identified during the audit.
Other Information
The Directors are responsible for the other information. The other
information comprises the information included in the Annual Report
set out on pages 1 to 59 and pages 67 to 101, but does not include the
Financial Statements and our auditor’s report thereon. Our opinion
on the Financial Statements does not cover the other information,
and we do not express an opinion or any form of assurance thereon.
In connection with our audit of the Financial Statements, our
responsibility is to read the other information and consider whether a
material inconsistency exists between the other information and the
Financial Statements, or the other information otherwise appears to
be materially misstated. If, based on the work performed, we
conclude that an uncorrected material misstatement of the other
information exists, we are required to describe it in our report.
Ernst & Young LLP
Guernsey, Channel Islands
28 February 2023
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
67
Statement Of Financial Position
As at 31 December 2022
Notes
31
December
2022
$’000
31
December
2021
$’000
Assets
Non-current assets
Investment at fair value through profit or loss 6 723,102 674,439
Total non-current assets 723,102 674,439
Current assets
Trade and other receivables 598 970
Cash and cash equivalents 7 15,755 7,296
Total current assets 16,353 8,266
Total assets 739,455 682,705
Current liabilities
Trade and other payables 665 664
Total current liabilities 665 664
Total liabilities 665 664
Net assets 738,790 682,041
Equity
Share capital 8 1,101,674 1,133,854
Retained deficit (362,884) (451,813)
Total equity 738,790 682,041
Number of Shares in issue at year end 8 50,891,658 54,937,599
Net Asset Value per Share ($) 12 14.52 12.41
The Financial Statements of the Company on pages 67 to 92 were approved and authorised for issue by the Board of Directors on
28 February 2023 and signed on its behalf by:
By order of the Board
Richard Hayden Patrick Firth
Chair of the Board Director
The accompanying notes on pages 71 to 92 form an integral part of the Company’s Financial Statements.
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
68
Statement Of Comprehensive Income
For the year ended 31 December 2022
Notes
1 January
2022 to
31 December
2022
$’000
1 January
2021 to
31 December
2021
$’000
Investment profit
Change in fair value of investment at fair value through profit or loss 6 95,939 346,677
Expenses
Directors’ fees and expenses 9 (854) (648)
Legal and professional fees (1,036) (426)
Other operating expenses 13
(3,732) (3,270)
Total expenses (5,622) (4,344)
Operating profit for the financial year 90,317 342,333
Finance expense
Foreign exchange loss (1,388) (389)
Total finance expense (1,388) (389)
Profit for the year 88,929 341,944
Total comprehensive income for the year 88,929 341,944
Basic and Diluted Earnings per Share (cents) 12 171.87 561.73
All activities derive from continuing operations.
The accompanying notes on pages 71 to 92 form an integral part of the Company’s Financial Statements.
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
69
Statement Of Changes In Equity
For the year ended 31 December 2022
Share
capital
$’000
Retained
deficit
$’000
Total
Equity
$’000
As at 1 January 2022 1,133,854 (451,813) 682,041
Profit for the financial year - 88,929 88,929
Total comprehensive income for the year - 88,929 88,929
Buyback and cancellation of shares (32,180) - (32,180)
As at 31 December 2022 1,101,674 (362,884) 738,790
Share
capital
$’000
Retained
deficit
$’000
Total
Equity
$’000
As at 1 January 2021 1,184,100 (793,757) 390,343
Profit for the financial year - 341,944 341,944
Total comprehensive income for the year - 341,944 341,944
Buyback and cancellation of shares (50,246) - (50,246)
As at 31 December 2021 1,133,854 (451,813) 682,041
The accompanying notes on pages 71 to 92 form an integral part of the Company’s Financial Statements.
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
70
Notes
1 January
2022 to
31 December
2022
$’000
1 January
2021 to
31 December
2021
$’000
Cash flow used in operating activities
Operating profit for the financial year 90,317 342,333
Adjustments for:
Increase in fair value of investment at fair value through profit or loss 6 (95,939) (346,677)
Decrease in trade and other receivables 372 167
Increase / (Decrease) in trade and other payables
1 (2,526)
Net cash used in operating activities (5,249) (6,703)
Cash flow generated from investing activities
Distribution from the Partnership 47,276 55,827
Net cash generated from investing activities 47,276 55,827
Cash flow used in financing activities
Buyback of shares 8 (32,180) (50,246)
Net cash used in financing activities (32,180) (50,246)
Net movement in cash and cash equivalents during the year 9,847 (1,122)
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year 7,296 8,807
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes (1,388) (389)
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year 15,755 7,296
Statement Of Cash Flows
For the year ended 31 December 2022
The accompanying notes on pages 71 to 92 form an integral part of the Company’s Financial Statements.
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
71
1. GENERAL INFORMATION
REL is a company limited by shares, which was incorporated on 23 May 2013 in Guernsey with an unlimited life and registered
with the GFSC as a Registered Closed-ended Collective Investment Scheme pursuant to the POI Law. The Company’s
Ordinary Shares were admitted to the UK Listing Authority’s Official List and to trading on the London Stock Exchange as part
of its IPO which completed on 29 October 2013. The registered office of the Company is PO Box 286, Floor 2, Trafalgar Court,
Les Banques, St Peter Port, Guernsey, GY1 4LY.
The Company makes its investments through the Partnership, a Cayman Islands registered exempted limited partnership, in
which the Company is the sole limited partner. The principal place of business of the Partnership is the Cayman Islands. Both
the Company and the Partnership are subject to the Investment Management Agreement with the Investment Manager, a
partnership registered in the Cayman Islands.
The Partnership has the right to invest alongside the Private Riverstone Funds in all Qualifying Investments in which the
Private Riverstone Funds participate. These funds are managed and advised by affiliates of the Investment Manager.
Further detail of these investments is provided in the Investment Manager’s Report.
2. ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of preparation
The Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2022 have been prepared in accordance with IFRS and with the
Companies (Guernsey) Law, 2008, (as amended) (the “Companies Law”).
In the preparation of these Financial Statements, the Company followed the same accounting policies and methods of
computation as compared with those applied in the previous year.
The Financial Statements have been prepared on a going concern basis. The Board has examined areas of possible financial
risk, in particular the projected cash requirements for the Company and the Partnership. After due consideration, the
Directors believe that the Company has adequate financial resources and suitable management arrangements in place to
continue in operational existence for a period of at least twelve months from the date of approval of these Financial
Statements. Accordingly, the Financial Statements have been prepared on a going concern basis.
Foreign currencies
The functional currency of the Company is U.S. Dollars reflecting the primary economic environment in which the
Company operates.
The Company has chosen U.S. Dollars as its presentation currency for financial reporting purposes.
Transactions during the year, including purchases and sales of investments, income and expenses are translated into U.S.
Dollars at the rate of exchange prevailing on the date of the transaction. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in
currencies other than U.S. Dollars are retranslated at the functional currency rate of exchange ruling at the reporting date.
Non-monetary items that are measured in terms of historical cost in a currency other than U.S. Dollars are translated using
the exchange rates as at the dates of the initial transactions. Non-monetary items measured at fair value in a currency other
than U.S. Dollars are translated using the exchange rates at the date when the fair value was determined. Foreign currency
transaction gains and losses on financial instruments classified as at fair value through profit or loss are included in profit or
loss in the Statement of Comprehensive Income as part of the “Change in fair value of investments at fair value through profit
or loss”. Exchange differences on cash and cash equivalents are included in profit or loss in the Statement of Comprehensive
Income as “Foreign exchange gain/(loss).
Notes To The Financial Statements
For the year ended 31 December 2022
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
72
Financial instruments
In accordance with IFRS 9, financial assets and financial liabilities are recognised in the Company’s Statement of Financial
Position when the Company becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the instrument.
Financial assets
At initial recognition, financial assets are classified based on the Company’s business model for managing the financial
assets and the contractual cash flow characteristics of the financial asset. The Company initially measures a financial asset
at its fair value.
a) Investment at fair value through profit or loss
i. Classification
Financial assets classified at FVTPL are those that do not meet the contractual cash flow test and are managed
with their performance evaluated on a fair value basis in accordance with the Companys investment strategy.
The Company includes in this category its only investment, being the Partnership.
ii. Measurement
Investments made by the Company in the Partnership are measured initially and subsequently at fair value, with
changes in fair value taken to the Statement of Comprehensive Income.
iii. Fair value estimation
A summary of the more relevant aspects of IPEV of the underlying Partnership’s valuations are set out below:
Marketable (Listed) Securities – where an active market exists for the security, the value is stated at the bid
price on the last trading day in the period. Marketability discounts are not generally applied unless there is some
contractual, governmental or other legally enforceable restriction preventing realisation at the reporting date,
such as the Founder shares acquired through the SPAC Sponsor investments (see further below in Unlisted
Investments section and Note 5).
Unlisted Investments – are carried at such fair value as the Investment Manager considers appropriate, and as
approved or adjusted by the Board, taking into account the performance of each investee company and the
exercise of ratchets, options or other incentive schemes. Methodologies used in arriving at the fair value include
prices of recent investment, earnings multiples, net assets, discounted cash flows analysis and industry
valuation benchmarks. Valuations may be derived by reference to observable valuation measures for
comparable companies or transactions (examples include discount rates, forward oil prices, production
multiples, volatility of comparable public traded prices, and multiplying a key performance metric of the investee
company such as estimated, unobservable EBITDA by a relevant valuation multiple observed in the range of
comparable companies or transactions), adjusted for differences between the investment and the referenced
comparable. For the SPAC Sponsor investments, the Investment Manager values the Founder Shares based on
the closing price of the publicly traded common shares, subject to applicable discounts for lack of identified
target, risk of unsuccessful closing of the business combination and applicable lock-up periods post-closing.
The Founder Warrants are valued based on a valuation from a third party, independent valuation specialist.
The Company has determined that the fair value of its investment in the Partnership is $723 million
(31 December 2021: $674 million) and is calculated in accordance with applicable IFRS accounting standards
and IPEV Valuation Guidelines. No adjustment to the net asset value of the Partnership has been made, as this is
deemed equivalent to fair value.
b) Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents comprises cash on hand and demand deposit. Cash equivalents are held to meet short
term cash commitments and comprise other short-term highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three
months or less that are readily convertible to a known amount of cash and are subject to an insignificant risk of
changes in value.
Notes To The Financial Statements continued
For the year ended 31 December 2022
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
73
c) Trade and other receivables
Trade receivables are classified as financial assets at amortised cost. They are measured at amortised cost less
impairment assessed using the simplified approach of the expected credit loss model based on experience of previous
losses and expectations of future losses.
A financial asset is derecognised (in whole or in part) either:
>
when the Company has transferred substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership; or
>
when it has neither transferred nor retained substantially all the risks and rewards and when it no longer has control
over the assets or a portion of the asset; or
>
when the contractual right to receive cash flow has expired.
Financial liabilities
Trade and other payables
Trade payables are classified as financial liabilities at amortised cost.
Equity
The Company’s Ordinary Shares are classified as equity and upon issuance, the fair value of the consideration received is
included in equity, net of share issue costs (excluding share issue costs of the IPO). All formation and initial expenses of the
Company, including the share issue costs of its IPO, have been borne by the Investment Manager.
Repurchase of Ordinary Shares for cancellation
The cost of repurchasing Ordinary Shares, including any related stamp duty and transaction costs, is charged to ‘Share Capital
and dealt with in the Statement of Changes in Equity. Share repurchase and cancellation transactions are accounted for on a
trade date basis.
Finance income
Interest income is recognised on a time apportioned basis.
Expenses
Expenses include legal, accounting, auditing and other operating expenses. They are recognised on an accruals basis in the
Statement of Comprehensive Income in the period in which they are incurred.
Provisions and Contingent Liabilities
In line with IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets, we recognise provisions when the Company has a
present legal or constructive obligation as a result of past events, it is probable that an outflow of resources will be required
to settle the obligation and the amount can be reliably estimated.
Where this criterion is not met we disclose a contingent liability if the Company has a possible obligation, or has a present
obligation with an outflow that is not probable or which cannot be reliably estimated. Provisions are determined by
discounting the expected future cash flows at a pre-tax rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of
money and the risks specific to the liability.
Amended standards and interpretations
New and amended standards and interpretations applied in these Financial Statements
There were no new standards or interpretations effective for the first time for periods beginning on or after 1 January 2022
that had a significant effect on the Company’s Financial Statements. Furthermore, none of the amendments to standards that
are effective from that date had a significant effect on these Financial Statements.
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
74
New and amended standards and interpretations not applied in these Financial Statements
(issued but not yet effective)
Other accounting standards and interpretations have been published and will be mandatory for the Company’s accounting
periods beginning on or after 1 January 2023 or later periods. The impact of these standards is not expected to be material to
the reported results and financial position of the Company.
3. CRITICAL ACCOUNTING JUDGEMENTS, ESTIMATES AND ASSUMPTIONS
The preparation of Financial Statements requires management to make judgements, estimates and assumptions that affect
the application of accounting policies and the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expenses.
Estimates and judgements are continually evaluated and are based on historical experience and other factors, including
expectations of future events that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances.
Judgements
In the process of applying the Company’s accounting policies, management has made the following critical judgements,
which have the most significant effect on the amounts recognised in the Financial Statements:
Assessment as an Investment Entity
The Company meets the definition of an investment entity on the basis of the following criteria:
1. the Company obtains funds from multiple investors for the purpose of providing those investors with investment
management services;
2. the Company commits to its investors that its business purpose is to invest funds solely for returns from capital
appreciation, investment income, or both; and
3. the Company measures and evaluates the performance of substantially all of its investments on a fair value basis.
To determine that the Company meets the definition of an investment entity, further consideration is given to the
characteristics of an investment entity, which are that:
>
it should have more than one investment, to diversify the risk portfolio and maximise returns
>
it should have multiple investors, who pool their funds to maximise investment opportunities
>
it should have investors that are not related parties of the entity; and
>
it should have ownership interests in the form of equity or similar interests
The Directors are of the opinion that the Company meets the essential criteria and typical characteristics of an
Investment Entity.
Assessment of control over the Partnership
The Company makes its investments through the Partnership in which it is the sole limited partner.
The Board has assessed whether the Company has all the elements of control as prescribed by IFRS 10 in relation to the
Company’s investment in the Partnership and has concluded that although the Company is the sole limited partner, it does
not control the Partnership but instead has significant influence and therefore accounts for the Partnership as an investment
in associate at fair value in accordance with IAS 28.
Notes To The Financial Statements continued
For the year ended 31 December 2022
2. ACCOUNTING POLICIES continued
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
75
Assessment of the Partnership as a structured entity
The Company considers the Partnership to be a structured entity under IFRS 12. Transfer of funds by the Partnership to the
Company is determined by the General Partner (see Note 9). The risks associated with the Company’s investment in the
Partnership are disclosed in Note 10. The summarised financial information for the Company’s investment in the Partnership
is disclosed in Note 6.
Contingent Liabilities - Performance Fee Allocation
In the ordinary course of business, we monitor the performance fee allocation and provide for anticipated costs where an outflow
of resources is considered probable and a reasonable estimate can be made of the likely outcome.
Where an outflow is not probable but is possible a contingent liability may still exist and its relevant details will be disclosed.
In January 2020, the management engagement committee of REL, consisting of REL’s independent directors, agreed with RIGL
Holdings, LP (formerly Riverstone International Limited), REL’s Investment Manager (the “Investment Manager”), to amend the
terms on which REL is required to pay a performance allocation (the “Performance Allocation”) in respect of REL’s investments.
These terms are disclosed in Note 9; Related Party Transactions.
At the reporting date we are not aware of any evidence to indicate that a present obligation exists, nor is it probable that an
outflow of resources will be required such that any amount should be provided for, even though there were realisations of certain
investments during the period. This is due to the Portfolio Level Cost Benchmark and 8 per cent. Hurdle Rate not being met.
Estimates and assumptions
Fair valuation of investment in the Partnership
The area involving a high degree of judgement or complexity and where assumptions and estimates are significant to the
Financial Statements has been identified as the risk of misstatement of the valuation of the investment in the Partnership
(see Note 5). Revisions to accounting estimates are recognised in the period in which the estimate is revised and in any future
periods affected. The Board’s determination that no discount or premium should be applied to the net asset value of the
Partnership involves a degree of judgement due to the nature of the Partnership’s investments and other assets and
liabilities (see Note 2: Financial assets a) iii.) and the valuation techniques and procedures adopted by the Partnership.
The resulting accounting estimates will, by definition, seldom equal the related actual results.
Climate change
In preparing the financial statements, the Directors have considered the impact of climate change, particularly in the context
of the climate change risks identified in the ESG Report.
In preparing the financial statements, the Directors have considered the medium and longer term cash flow impacts of
climate change on a number of key estimates within the financial statements, including the estimates of future cash flows
and future profitability used in the assessment of the fair value of the underlying investments held by the Partnership.
These considerations did not have a material impact on the financial reporting estimates and assumptions in the current
year. This reflects the conclusion that climate change is not expected to have a significant impact on the recognition and
separate measurement considerations of the assets or the Company’s short-term cash flows including those considered in
the going concern and viability assessments.
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
76
4. TAXATION
The Company has made an election to, and currently expects to conduct its activities so as to be treated as a partnership for U.S.
federal income tax purposes. Therefore, the Company expects that it generally will not be liable for U.S. federal income taxes. In the
normal course of business, REL may form wholly owned subsidiaries, to be treated as C Corporations for U.S. tax purposes. The C
Corporations serve to protect REL’s public investors from incurring U.S. ECI. The C Corporations file U.S. corporate tax returns with
the U.S. IRS and pay U.S. corporate taxes on its income. Each of the Company’s Shareholders who are liable for U.S. taxes will take
into account their respective share of the Company’s items of income, gain, loss and deduction in computing its U.S. federal income
tax liability as if such Shareholder had earned such income directly, even if no cash distributions are made to the Shareholder.
The Company is exempt from taxation in Guernsey under the provisions of the Income Tax (Exempt Bodies) (Guernsey)
Ordinance, 2008 and is charged an annual exemption fee of £1,200.
The Cayman Islands at present impose no taxes on profit, income, capital gains or appreciations in value of the Partnership.
There are also currently no taxes imposed in the Cayman Islands by withholding or otherwise on the Company as a limited
partner of the Partnership on profit, income, capital gains or appreciations in respect of its partnership interest nor any taxes
on the Company as a limited partner of the Partnership in the nature of estate duty, inheritance or capital transfer tax.
Local taxes may apply at the jurisdictional level on profits arising in operating entity investments. Further taxes may apply
on distributions from such operating entity investments. The company is structured, and has structured its investments, to
eliminate the incurrence of ECI by REL’s investors. Based upon the current commitments and investments held through REL
US Corp., the future U.S. tax liability on profits is expected to be in the range of 21 to 27.5 per cent. (31 December 2021: 21 to
27.5 per cent.). Additionally, depending on REL US Corp’s current and accumulated earnings and profit, the future U.S. tax
liability on distributions from REL US Corp is expected to be 0 per cent. and 30 per cent., respectively, for those distributions
determined to be return of capital and dividend income. Any applicable taxes are captured in the Company’s NAV through
the fair value movements in the underlying investments held by the Partnership and its related Investment Undertakings.
5. FAIR VALUE
IFRS 13 ‘Fair Value Measurement’ requires disclosure of fair value measurement by level. The level in the fair value hierarchy
within which the financial assets or financial liabilities are categorised is determined on the basis of the lowest level input
that is significant to the fair value measurement, adjusted if necessary.
Financial assets and financial liabilities are classified in their entirety into only one of the three levels:
>
Level 1 – quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;
>
Level 2 – inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the assets or liabilities, either
directly (i.e. as prices) or indirectly (i.e. derived from prices);
>
Level 3 – inputs for the assets or liabilities that are not based on observable market data (unobservable inputs).
The Company’s only financial instrument carried at fair value is its investment in the Partnership which has been classified
within Level 3 as it is derived using unobservable inputs. Amounts classified under Level 3 for the year ended 31 December
2022 were $723 million (31 December 2021: $674 million).
The fair value of all other financial instruments approximates to their carrying value.
Transfers during the period
There have been no transfers between levels during the year ended 31 December 2022 (31 December 2021: nil). Any transfers
between the levels will be accounted for on the last day of each financial period. Due to the nature of the investment in the
Partnership, it is always expected to be classified under Level 3.
Notes To The Financial Statements continued
For the year ended 31 December 2022
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
77
Valuation methodology and process
The Directors base the fair value of the investment in the Partnership on the value of its limited partnership capital account
received from the General Partner, which is determined on the basis of the fair value of its assets and liabilities, adjusted if
necessary, to reflect liquidity, future commitments, and other specific factors of the Partnership and Investment Manager.
This is based on the components within the Partnership, principally the value of the Partnership’s investments in addition to
cash, cash equivalents and short-term money market fixed deposits. Any fluctuation in the value of the Partnership’s
investments in addition to cash, cash equivalents and short-term money market fixed deposits held will directly impact on the
value of the Company’s investment in the Partnership.
The Partnership’s investments are valued using the techniques described in the Company’s valuation policy. The Investment
Manager’s assessment of fair value of investments held by the Partnership, through Investment Undertakings, is determined
in accordance with IPEV Valuation Guidelines. When valuing the Partnership’s investments, the Investment Manager reviews
information provided by the underlying investee companies and other business partners and applies IPEV methodologies, to
estimate a fair value as at the date of the Statement of Financial Position, subject to Board approval. It is the opinion of the
Directors, that the IPEV valuation methodology used in deriving a fair value is generally not different from the fair value
requirements of IFRS 13. In the event that there is a difference, the requirements of IFRS 13 override the IPEV requirements.
The Investment Manager values the investments on a quarterly basis using common industry valuation techniques, including
comparable public market valuation, comparable merger and acquisition transaction valuation and discounted cash flow
valuation. For early stage private investments, Riverstone’s investment due diligence process includes assumptions about
short-term financial results in determining the appropriate purchase price for the investment. For the SPAC Sponsor
investments, the Investment Manager applies discounts to the closing price of the publicly traded shares for lack of identified
target, risk of unsuccessful closing of the business combination and applicable lock-up periods post-closing. The techniques
used in determining the fair value of the Company’s investments through the Partnership are selected on an investment by
investment basis so as to maximise the use of market based observable inputs.
REL’s valuation policy is compliant with both IFRS and IPEV Valuation Guidelines and is applied consistently from period to
period. As the Company’s investments are generally not publicly quoted, valuations require meaningful judgement to establish
a range of values, and the ultimate value at which an investment is realised may differ from its most recent valuation and the
difference may be significant.
For the year ended 31 December 2022, the valuations of the Company’s investments, through the Partnership, are detailed in
the Investment Managers Report.
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
78
(1)
Calculated based on fair values of the Partnership’s Level 3 investments.
(2)
Based on its professional experience and recent market conditions, the Investment Manager has provided the Board with these weighted average change in the inputs with a forecasted
time period of 6 to 12 months.
(3)
The Partnership’s Level 3 investments are valued using one or more of the techniques which utilise one or more of the unobservable inputs, so the amounts in the “Fair value of Level 3
investments” column will not aggregate to the total fair value of the Partnership’s Level 3 investments.
(4)
Discounted cash flow technique involves the use of a discount factor of 10 per cent.
(5)
As at 31 December 2022, the sensitivity of this unobservable input to the total fair value of Level 3 investments was determined to be significant by applying the same methodology that
determined it not to be significant as at 31 December 2021.
(6)
‘Other’ include certain investments that are not subject to a sensitivity analysis because they are insensitive to the changes in inputs set out above as at 31 December 2022 and
31 December 2021, respectively.
(7)
As at 31 December 2021, the sensitivity of this unobservable input to the total fair value of Level 3 investments was determined to be significant by applying the same methodology that
determined it not to be significant as at 31 December 2020.
(8)
As at 31 December 2022, the sensitivity of this unobservable input to the total fair value of Level 3 investments was determined to be no longer significant by applying the same methodology
that determined it to be significant as at 31 December 2021.
Notes To The Financial Statements continued
For the year ended 31 December 2022
Qualitative Information for Level 3 Fair Value Measurements as at 31 December 2022
Industry: Energy
Unobservable
input(s)
Weighted
Average
(1)
Sensitivity of the input to fair value
of Level 3 investments
(2)
Fair value
of Level 3
Investments
affected by
unobservable
input
(3)
(in thousands)
Fair value of
Level 3
Investments
(in thousands)
Range
Valuation
technique(s) Low
(1)
High
(1)
$255,797 Public
comparables
2023E EV /
EBITDA
Multiple
16.0x 36.0x 34.1x
25 per cent. weighted average change in the
input would result in 1 per cent. change in the
total fair value of Level 3 investments
53,156
2024E EV /
EBITDA
Multiple
(5)
1.0x 3.0x 1.0x
25 per cent. weighted average change in the
input would result in 6 per cent. change in the
total fair value of Level 3 investments
118,348
2022E EV/
Revenue
Multiple
2.0x 12.4x 7.2x
20 per cent. weighted average change in the
input would result in 1 per cent. change in the
total fair value of Level 3 investments
40,043
2023E EV/
Revenue
Multiple
(5)
2.0x 19.1x 10.9x
20 per cent. weighted average change in the
input would result in 1 per cent. change in the
total fair value of Level 3 investments
113,406
Transaction
comparables
Asset Value
($m/kW)
$56 $182 $58
50 per cent. weighted average change in the
input would result in 1 per cent. change in the
total fair value of Level 3
118,348
Discounted
cash flow
Discount Rate
(4)
30% 10% 30%
50 per cent. weighted average change in the
input would result in 1 per cent. change in the
total fair value of Level 3 investments
138,348
$188,795 Other
(6)
$444,592 Total
5. FAIR VALUE continued
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
79
Qualitative Information for Level 3 Fair Value Measurements as at 31 December 2021
Industry: Energy
Unobservable
input(s)
Weighted
Average
(1)
Sensitivity of the input to fair value of Level
3 investments
(2)
Fair value
of Level 3
Investments
affected by
unobservable
input
(3)
(in thousands)
Fair value of
Level 3
Investments
(in thousands)
Range
Valuation
technique(s) Low
(1)
High
(1)
$330,548 Public
comparables
2022EV /
EBITDA Multiple
1.0x 24.5x 7.5x
25 per cent. weighted average change in the
input would result in 4 per cent. change in the
total fair value of Level 3 investments
310,548
2021 EV /
Revenue
Multiple
(7)
24.2x 27.9x 25.1x
10 per cent. weighted average change in the
input would result in 1 per cent. change in the
total fair value of Level 3 investments
87,402
EV / 2021E
Production
Multiple
($/Boepd)
(8)
$33,200 $41,100 $35,900
25 per cent. weighted average change in the
input would result in 1 per cent. change in the
total fair value of Level 3 investments
141,493
EV / 2022E
Production
Multiple
($/Boepd)
(8)
$28,200 $41,100 $32,600
10 per cent. weighted average change in the
input would result in 1 per cent. change in the
total fair value of Level 3 investments
141,493
1P Reserve
multiple
($/Boe)
(8)
$6 $10 $8
25 per cent. weighted average change in the
input would result in 1 per cent. change in the
total fair value of Level 3 investments
48,172
2P Reserve
multiple
(8)
($/Boe)
$4 $5 $4
25 per cent. weighted average change in the
input would result in 3 per cent. change in the
total fair value of Level 3 investments
93,321
Transaction
comparables
Asset Value
($m/kW)
$56 $182 $57
50 per cent. weighted average change in the
input would result in 2 per cent. change in the
total fair value of Level 3 investments
101,653
Discounted
cash flow
Oil Price Curve
($/bbl)
$61 $67 $63
35 per cent. weighted average change in the
input would result in 10 per cent. change in
the total fair value of Level 3 investments
141,493
Gas Price Curve
($/mcfe)
$3 $4 $3
35 per cent. weighted average change in the
input would result in 11 per cent. change in
the total fair value of Level 3 investments
141,493
Discount Rate 30% 10% 30%
+/-50 per cent. weighted average change in
the input would result in -/+1 per cent. change
in the total fair value of Level 3 investments
101,653
$52,478 Other
(6)
$383,026 Total
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
80
Notes To The Financial Statements continued
For the year ended 31 December 2022
The Board reviews and considers the fair value of each of the Partnership’s investments arrived at by the Investment
Manager before incorporating such values into the fair value of the Partnership. The variety of valuation bases adopted,
quality of management information provided by the underlying investee companies and the lack of liquid markets for the
investments mean that there are inherent difficulties in determining the fair value of these investments and such difficulties
cannot be eliminated. Therefore, the amounts realised on the sale of investments may differ from the fair values reflected in
these Financial Statements and the differences may be significant.
The Board approves the valuations performed by the Investment Manager and monitors the range of reasonably possible
changes in significant observable inputs on a regular basis with consultation from the Investment Manager. Using its
extensive industry experience, the Investment Manager provides the Board with its determination of the reasonably possible
changes in significant unobservable inputs in normal market conditions as of the year end. For the SPAC Sponsor
investments, a reasonable change in the discounts applied (as set out above) to the closing price of the publicly traded shares
have been deemed not to be material.
The Directors have considered whether a discount or premium should be applied to the net asset value of the Partnership
and have concluded that as the Partnership’s underlying assets are measured at fair value, no adjustment to the net asset
value of the Partnership has been deemed to be necessary (see Note 3).
6. INVESTMENT AT FAIR VALUE THROUGH PROFIT OR LOSS
The movement in fair value is derived from the fair value movements in the underlying investments held by the Partnership,
net of income and expenses of the Partnership and its related Investment Undertakings, including any Performance
Allocation and applicable taxes. The table below reconciles the Company’s Level 3 assets during the year.
31 December
2022
$’000
31 December
2021
$’000
Cost
Brought forward
1,094,090 1,149,917
Distribution from the Partnership (47,276) (55,827)
Carried forward 1,046,814 1,094,090
Fair value movement through profit or loss
Brought forward (419,651) (766,328)
Fair value movement during the year – see Summary Income Statement below 95,939 346,677
Carried forward (323,712) (419,651)
Fair value at year end 723,102 674,439
Summary financial information for the Partnership’s investments and its related Investment Undertakings
Summary Balance Sheet
31 December
2022
$’000
31 December
2021
$’000
Investments at fair value (net ) 657,040 672,314
Cash and cash equivalents
(1)
68,483 4,127
Money market fixed deposits - -
Management Fee payable – see Note 9 (2,682) (2,463)
Other net assets 261 461
Fair value of RELs investment in the Partnership 723,102 674,439
(1)
These figures, together with the $35.3 million held at REL US Corp (31 December 2021: $94.4 million), comprise the $103.8 million cash and cash equivalents
held in the Partnership (31 December 2021: $98.5 million).
5. FAIR VALUE continued
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
81
Reconciliation of Partnership’s investments at fair value
31 December
2022
$’000
31 December
2021
$’000
Investments at fair value – Level 1 (gross) 177,136 194,937
Investments at fair value – Level 3 (gross) - see Note 5 444,592 383,026
Investments at fair value (gross) 621,728 577,963
Cash and cash equivalents 35,312 94,351
Partnership’s investments at fair value (net) 657,040 672,314
Summary Income Statement
1 January
2022 to
31 December
2022
$’000
1 January
2021 to
31 December
2021
$’000
Unrealised and realised gain on Partnership’s investments (net) 108,696 356,805
Interest and other income 1,477 (76)
Management Fee expense – see Note 9 (11,302) (8,874)
Other operating expenses (2,932) (1,178)
Portion of the operating gain for the year attributable to REL’s investment in the Partnership 95,939 346,677
Reconciliation of unrealised and realised gain on Partnership’s investments
1 January
2022 to
31 December
2022
$’000
1 January
2021 to
31 December
2021
$’000
Unrealised profit on Partnership’s investments (gross) 148,511 619,723
Realised loss on Partnership’s investments (gross) (37,235) (260,371)
General Partner’s performance allocation – see Note 9 - -
Release of provision for taxation (2,580) (2,547)
Unrealised and realised gain on Partnership’s investments (net) 108,696 356,805
7. CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
These comprise cash and short-term bank deposits available on demand. The carrying amounts of these assets approximate
to their fair value.
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
82
8. SHARE CAPITAL
31 December
2022
$’000
31 December
2021
$’000
Authorised:
Ordinary Shares of no par value Unlimited Unlimited
Total No. Total No.
Issued and fully paid:
Unlimited Shares of no par value
Shares as at inception -
Issued on 23 May 2013 1 1
Issued on 29 October 2013 71,032,057 71,032,057
Issued on 10 October 2014 5,000,000 5,000,000
Issued on 11 December 2015 8,448,006 8,448,006
Cancelled on 23 November 2018 (4,583,333) (4,583,333)
Cancelled during year ended 31 December 2020 (16,958,265) (16,958,265)
Cancelled during year ended 31 December 2021 (8,000,867) (8,000,867)
Cancelled during year ended 31 December 2022 (4,045,941) -
Shares as at year end 50,891,658 54,937,599
Share capital $’000 $’000
Share capital brought forward 1,133,854 1,184,100
Movements for the year:
Cancellation of shares (32,180) (50,246)
Share capital as at year end 1,101,674 1,133,854
The Company has one class of Ordinary Shares. The issued value of the Ordinary Shares represents 100 per cent. of the total
issued value of all share capital. Under the Company’s Articles of Incorporation, on a show of hands, each Shareholder
present in person or by proxy has the right to one vote at general meetings. On a poll, each Shareholder is entitled to one vote
for every Share held.
Shareholders are entitled to all dividends paid by the Company and, on a winding up, providing the Company has satisfied all
of its liabilities, the Shareholders are entitled to all of the surplus assets of the Company. The Ordinary Shares have no right
to fixed income.
On 15 October 2018, the Company announced a Tender Offer for £55.0 million in the value of the Company’s Ordinary Shares.
The Company acquired 4,583,333 Ordinary Shares which were cancelled on 23 November 2018.
On 1 May 2020, the Company announced a share buyback programme for £50.0 million in the value of the Company’s Ordinary
Shares. During the year 2020, the Company acquired 16,958,265 Ordinary Shares which were subsequently cancelled.
On 11 May 2021, the Company announced a share buyback programme for £20.0 million in the value of the Company’s
Ordinary Shares, which subsequently, on 4 October 2021, was increased to £40 million. During 2021 the Company acquired
8,000,867 Ordinary Shares which were subsequently cancelled.
On 8 February 2022, the Company announced a share buyback programme for £46.0 million in the value of the Company’s
Ordinary Shares. During 2022 the Company acquired 4,045,941 Ordinary Shares which were subsequently cancelled.
Following the cancellation of Ordinary Shares from the Tender Offer and share buyback programme, the share capital of the
Company is 50,891,658 Ordinary Shares in aggregate.
Notes To The Financial Statements continued
For the year ended 31 December 2022
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
83
9. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Parties are considered to be related if one party has the ability to control the other party or exercise significant influence over
the party in making financial or operational decisions.
Directors
The Company has seven non-executive Directors (31 December 2021: five). The Chair of the Board is entitled to annual
remuneration of £132,000 (31 December 2021: £132,000). The Chair of the Audit Committee is entitled to annual remuneration
of £82,500 (31 December 2021: £82,500) and the Chair of the Management Engagement Committee is entitled to annual
remuneration of £71,500 (31 December 2021: £71,500). The other independent Directors are entitled to annual remuneration
of £66,000 (31 December 2021: £66,000). The Chair of the Nomination Committee is entitled to remuneration of £71,500 with
effect from 1 January 2022.
Directors’ fees and expenses for the year ended 31 December 2022 amounted to $854,413 (31 December 2021: $647,815),
which resulted in a reduction to the 31 December 2022 quarter-end Management Fee as further discussed below.
$nil of Directors’ expenses were outstanding at year-end (31 December 2021: $nil).
Messrs Barker and Hayden have direct or indirect economic interests in Other Riverstone Funds as investors.
Partnership
In accordance with section 4.1(a) of the Partnership Agreement, the Company received distributions in aggregate of
$47.2 million (31 December 2021: $55.8 million) from the Partnership through the year to 31 December 2022. In accordance
with section 4.1(a) of the Partnership Agreement, in the event of the Company requiring additional funds for working capital,
it is entitled to receive another distribution from the Partnership.
Investment Manager
The Investment Manager, an affiliate of Riverstone, provides advice to the Company and the Partnership on the origination
and completion of new investments, on the management of the portfolio and on realisations, as well as on funding
requirements, subject to Board approval. For the provision of services under the Investment Management Agreement, the
Investment Manager is paid in cash out of the assets of the Partnership an annual Management Fee equal to 1.5 per cent.
per annum of the Company’s Net Asset Value (including cash). The fee is payable quarterly in arrears and each payment is
calculated using the quarterly Net Asset Value as at the relevant quarter end.
The Investment Manager has agreed to deduct from its annual Management Fee all fees, travel costs and related expenses of
the Directors exceeding the following annual limits:
Portion of NAV Limit (as a percentage of the then last published NAV)
Up to and including £500 million 0.084 per cent.
From £500 million to and including £600 million 0.084 per cent. at £500 million and thereafter adjusted downwards
proportionately to NAV to 0.07 per cent. at £600 million
From £600 million to and including £700 million 0.07 per cent. at £600 million and thereafter adjusted downwards
proportionately to NAV to 0.06 per cent. at £700 million
Above £700 million 0.06 per cent.
The above limits are subject to adjustment by agreement between the Investment Manager and the Company acting by its
independent Directors. Based on the last published NAV as of 31 December 2022, the maximum amount of annual fees,
travel and related expenses of the Directors is $765,682 (31 December 2021: $553,425). During the year ended
31 December 2022, fees and expenses of the Directors amounted to $854,413 (31 December 2021: $647,815), resulting in an
reduction of $88,731 to the 31 December 2022 quarter-end Management Fee (31 December 2021: reduction of $94,390 of the
quarter-end Management Fee).
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
84
Notes To The Financial Statements continued
For the year ended 31 December 2022
During the year ended 31 December 2022, the Partnership incurred Management Fees of $11,302,322 (31 December 2021:
$8,874,492) of which $2,681,729 remained outstanding as at the year-end (31 December 2021: $2,463,262). In addition, the
Company and Partnership, in aggregate, reimbursed the Investment Manager $2,028,851 in respect of amounts paid on
their behalf for the year (31 December 2021: $1,555,093), of which $1,376,733 related to legal and professional fees of the
Company and Partnership (31 December 2021: $1,273,507), and $192,603 related to travel and other operating expenses of
the Investment Manager (31 December 2021: $27,834), and reimbursable amounts due to the Investment Manager of
$459,515 (31 December 2021: $253,752) related to expenses incurred by portfolio companies.
The circumstances in which the Company and the Investment Manager may terminate the Investment Management
Agreement are as follows:
Event Notice period Consequences of termination
By the Company if the Investment Manager is in
material breach which has not been rectified
12 months The General Partner is entitled to receive a payment equal to four
times the quarterly Management Fee payable to the Investment
Manager on the basis of the Company’s most recent Net Asset Value
and an amount equal to the Performance Allocation due on the
Company’s investments on the basis, at the Company’s option,
of the latest quarterly valuation or the actual realisation value for
each investment.
By the Investment Manager if the Company is in
material breach which has not been rectified
12 months The General Partner is entitled to receive a payment equal to
twenty times the quarterly Management Fee payable to the
Investment Manager on the basis of the Company’s most recent
Net Asset Value and an amount equal to the Performance
Allocation due on the Company’s investments on the basis, at the
General Partner’s option, of the latest quarterly valuation or the
actual realisation value for each investment.
By the Company if the Investment Manager
becomes insolvent or resolves to wind up or if the
Investment Manager commits an act of fraud or
wilful default in relation to the Company which
results in material harm to the Company
Immediate No payment to be made to the Investment Manager or the
General Partner.
The Investment Management Agreement cannot be terminated by either the Company or the Investment Manager
without cause.
Following the seventh anniversary of the Company’s London listing on 29 October 2020, a discontinuation resolution was
proposed and not passed, therefore the Investment Manager Agreement will continue in perpetuity subject to the termination
for cause provisions described above. However, either the Board or Shareholders holding in aggregate 10 per cent. of the
Company’s voting securities can call an EGM at any time to vote on the liquidation of the Company (75 per cent. of the votes
cast in favour required) or run-off of its portfolio (50 per cent. of the votes cast in favour required). As announced on
30 October 2020, the Company’s independent directors agreed to closely monitor the Investment Manager’s success in
repositioning the Company’s existing investment strategy through the modified investment strategy over the next twenty four
months following the previous quarter ended 30 September 2020. In the absence of a significant improvement in the
performance of the Company, taking into account the trading price of the Ordinary Shares and portfolio performance over
that period through 30 September 2022, the independent directors would release an announcement in November 2022
regarding an EGM to seek Shareholder approval before 31 December 2022 to amend the Company’s investment policy to
provide for the managed wind-down of the Company. Based on this significant improvement in the performance of REL and
the outlook for further energy transition investment opportunities from the Investment Manager, the Company’s independent
directors did not seek Shareholder approval before 31 December 2022 to amend the Company’s investment policy to provide
for the managed wind-down of the Company. Under both these scenarios, the General Partner would be entitled to twenty
times the most recent quarterly Management Fee payable to the Investment Manager.
9. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS continued
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
85
General Partner
The General Partner makes all management decisions, other than investment management decisions, in relation to the
Partnership and controls all other actions by the Partnership and is entitled to receive a Performance Allocation, calculated
and payable at the underlying investment holding subsidiary level, equal to 20 per cent. of the gross realised profits (if any) in
respect of a disposal, in whole or in part, of any underlying asset of the Company.
The General Partner is entitled to receive its Performance Allocation in cash, all of which, after tax, Riverstone, through
its affiliate RELCP, reinvests in Ordinary Shares of the Company on the terms summarised in Part I and Part VIII of the
IPO Prospectus.
During the year ended 31 December 2022, the Partnership paid Performance Allocation of $nil (31 December 2021: $nil) of
which $nil remained outstanding as at the year-end (31 December 2021: $nil).
On 3 January 2020, the Company announced amendments to Performance Allocation arrangements under the Investment
Management Agreement that were effective from 30 June 2019. The amended terms on which the Company is required to pay
a Performance Allocation in respect of its investment are as follows:
>
Portfolio level cost benchmark: A Performance Allocation will only be distributed in respect of a realised investment if, at
the time of the realisation of the relevant investment, the aggregate of the fair market value of all of the Company’s then
unrealised investments and the proceeds of all of its realised investments since inception exceeds the aggregate
acquisition price of all of the Company’s unrealised and realised investments. If this portfolio level cost benchmark is not
met at the time of realisation of the relevant investment, distribution of the Performance Allocation is subject to deferment
as described further below. As of 31 December 2022, the portfolio level cost benchmark was in deficit of $95.2 million.
>
8 per cent. hurdle rate: A Performance Allocation will only be accrued for payment upon the realisation of an investment if
the proceeds from that investment exceed an amount equal to its acquisition cost plus an 8 per cent. annual cumulative
hurdle rate calculated from the date of investment to the date of realisation. If the hurdle is met, the Performance
Allocation will be 20 per cent. of all Net Profits in respect of each such investment. As of 31 December 2022, ten
investments exceeded the hurdle rate and the total portfolio’s Gross IRR was approximately (1) percent.
>
Full realisation: A Performance Allocation will only be calculated and accrued on the full realisation of the entire interest
in an investment unless a partial realisation results in the full return of all capital invested in such investment. Otherwise,
no Performance Allocation will be payable on partial disposals and the ability for the Investment Manager to elect to
receive a Performance Allocation on an investment that has been held by the Company for at least seven years (but not
sold) has been removed.
>
Deferral: If the portfolio level cost benchmark is not met at the time of full realisation of the relevant investment, it will be
retested on a quarterly basis for the following three years. If, at any time during those three years, the benchmark is
satisfied for four continuous quarters, the relevant Performance Allocation will then become distributable without
interest. Any accrued but undistributed Performance Allocation that has been deferred due to the portfolio level cost
benchmark test will expire after 36 months.
In accordance with the revised terms above, no further Performance Allocation will be payable until the $95.2 million of
realised and unrealised losses to date at 31 December 2022 are made whole with future gains. The earned Performance
Allocation of $0.8 million at 31 December 2022 has been deferred and will expire in October 2023 if the aforementioned
losses are not made whole. Since REL has not yet met the appropriate Cost Benchmark at 31 December 2022, $38.0 million
in Performance Allocation was not accrued in accordance with the terms of the current agreement, which would have been
accrued under the prior agreement. The Investment Manager will continue to be required to apply each Performance
Allocation (net of taxes) to acquire ordinary shares of the Company.
Distribution of Investment Proceeds
In addition, the Company and the Investment Manager have agreed that, going forward, 20 per cent. of the Net Profits
attributable to each fully realised investment, net of taxes, withholdings or reserves for taxes will, at the discretion of the
Company, be available for distribution to the Company’s Shareholders, whether by dividend or share repurchases.
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
86
Notes To The Financial Statements continued
For the year ended 31 December 2022
Cornerstone Investors
Each of the Cornerstone Investors has acquired an indirect economic interest in each of the General Partner and the
Investment Manager depending on the size of their commitment and the total issue size, up to an aggregate maximum
indirect economic interest of 20 per cent. in each, for nominal consideration. These interests entitle the Cornerstone
Investors to participate in the economic returns generated by the General Partner, including from the Performance
Allocation, and the Investment Manager, which receives the Management Fee.
10. FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT
Financial risk management objectives
The Company’s investing activities, through its investment in the Partnership, intentionally expose it to various types of risks
that are associated with the underlying investee companies of the Partnership, including the ongoing volatility in the oil and
gas market. The Company makes the investment in order to generate returns in accordance with its investment policy
and objectives.
The most important types of financial risks to which the Company is exposed are market risk (including price, interest rate
and foreign currency risk), liquidity risk and credit risk. The Board of Directors has overall responsibility for the
determination of the Company’s risk management and sets policy to manage that risk at an acceptable level to achieve those
objectives. The policy and process for measuring and mitigating each of the main risks are described below.
The Investment Manager and the Administrator provide advice to the Company which allows it to monitor and manage
financial risks relating to its operations through internal risk reports which analyse exposures by degree and magnitude of
risks. The Investment Manager and the Administrator report to the Board on a quarterly basis.
Categories of financial instruments
31 December
2022
$’000
31 December
2021
$’000
Financial assets
Investment at fair value through profit or loss:
Investment in the Partnership 723,102 674,439
Other financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents 15,755 7,296
Trade and other receivables 598 970
Financial liabilities
Financial liabilities:
Trade and other payables
(665)
(664)
Capital risk management
The Company manages its capital to ensure that the Company will be able to continue as a going concern while maximising
the capital return to Shareholders. The capital structure of the Company consists of issued share capital and retained
earnings, as stated in the Statement of Financial Position.
In order to maintain or adjust the capital structure, the Company may buy back shares or issue new shares. During the
year, the Company bought and cancelled 4,045,941 Ordinary Shares. There are no external capital requirements imposed
on the Company.
The Company’s investment policy is set out in the Investment Policy section of the Annual Report.
9. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS continued
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
87
Market risk
Market risk includes price risk, foreign currency risk and interest rate risk.
(a) Price risk
The underlying investments held by the Partnership present a potential risk of loss of capital to the Partnership
and hence to the Company. The Company invests through the Partnership. Price risk arises from uncertainty about
future prices of underlying financial investments held by the Partnership, which at year-end was $621,728,409
(31 December 2021: $577,963,016). Please refer to Note 5 for quantitative information about the fair value
measurements of the Partnership’s Level 3 investments. In addition, there were $177 million (31 December 2021:
$195 million) Level 1 investments which are exposed to price risk as well. A change of +/- 10% in the Level 1
investments would result in a +/- $17.7 million change in their fair value (31 December 2021: a change of +/- 10% in
the Level 1 investments would result in a +/- $19.5 million change in their fair value).
The Partnership is exposed to a variety of risks which may have an impact on the carrying value of the Company’s
investment in the Partnership. The Partnership’s risk factors are set out in (a)(i) to (a)(iii) below.
(i) Not actively traded
The Partnership’s investments are not generally traded in an active market but are indirectly exposed to market
price risk arising from uncertainties about future values of the investments held. The underlying investments of
the Partnership vary as to industry sub-sector, geographic distribution of operations and size, all of which may
impact the susceptibility of their valuation to uncertainty.
Although the investments are in the same industry, this risk is managed through careful selection of investments
within the specified limits of the investment policy. The investments are monitored on a regular basis by the
Investment Manager.
(ii) Concentration
The Company, through the Partnership, invests in the global energy sector, with a particular focus on businesses
that engage in oil and gas exploration and production and midstream investments in that sector. This means that
the Company is exposed to the concentration risk of only making investments in the global energy sector, which
concentration risk may further relate to sub-sector, geography, and the relative size of an investment or other
factors. Whilst the Company is subject to the investment and diversification restrictions in its investment policy,
within those limits, material concentrations of investments have arisen.
The Board and the Investment Manager monitor the concentration of the investment in the Partnership on a
quarterly basis to ensure compliance with the investment policy.
(iii) Liquidity
The Company’s underlying investments through the Partnership are dynamic in nature. The Partnership will maintain
flexibility in funding by keeping sufficient liquidity in cash and cash equivalents which may be invested on a temporary
basis in line with the cash management policy as agreed by the Board from time to time.
As at 31 December 2022, $103.8
(1)
million or 14.3 per cent. (31 December 2021: $98.5
(1)
million or 14.6 per cent.) of
the Partnership’s financial assets, including those held by its wholly-owned subsidiaries, REL US Corp and REL US
Centennial Holdings, LLC, were cash balances held on deposit with several,
A or higher rated, banks.
(1)
These figures are comprised of $68.5 million (2021: $4.1 million) held at the Partnership and $35.3 million (2021: $94.4 million) held at
REL US Corp.
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
88
Notes To The Financial Statements continued
For the year ended 31 December 2022
(b) Foreign currency risk
The Company has exposure to foreign currency risk due to the payment of some expenses in Pounds Sterling.
Consequently, the Company is exposed to risks that the exchange rate of its currency relative to other foreign
currencies may change in a manner that has an adverse effect on the value of that portion of the Company’s assets or
liabilities denominated in currencies other than the U.S. Dollar.
The Directors do not consider that the foreign currency exchange risk at the balance sheet date is material and
therefore sensitivity analysis for the foreign currency risk has not been provided.
The following tables set out, in U.S. Dollars, the Company’s total exposure to foreign currency risk and the net
exposure to foreign currencies of the monetary assets and liabilities:
As at 31 December 2022
$
$’000
£
$’000
Total
$’000
Assets
Non-current assets
Investment in the Partnership
(1)
723,102 - 723,102
Total non-current assets 723,102 - 723,102
Current assets
Trade and other receivables
572 26 598
Cash and cash equivalents 2,037 13,718 15,755
Total current assets 2,609 13,744 16,353
Current liabilities
Trade and other payables 100 565 665
Total current liabilities 100 565 665
Total net assets 725,611 13,179 738,790
As at 31 December 2021
$
$’000
£
$’000
Total
$’000
Assets
Non-current assets
Investment in the Partnership
(1)
674,439 - 674,439
Total non-current assets 674,439 - 674,439
Current assets
Trade and other receivables
938 32 970
Cash and cash equivalents 1,524 5,772 7,296
Total current assets 2,462 5,804 8,266
Current liabilities
Trade and other payables 117 547 664
Total current liabilities 117 547 664
Total net assets 676,784 5,257 682,041
10. FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT continued
(1)
Includes the fair value of one investment held through the Partnership, Hammerhead, denominated in CAD and therefore subject to foreign currency risk.
This investment had an aggregate fair value of $153.7 million as at 31 December 2022 (31 December 2021: $128.9 million for Hammerhead and Pipestone
(formerly CNOR)). The impact of a +/- 4% change in CAD/USD exchange rate would have a +/- $6.6m impact on the profit/loss for this investment
(31 December 2021: the impact of a +/- 4% change in CAD/USD exchange rate would have a +/- $ 5.2m impact on the profit/loss for these investments).
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
89
(c) Interest Rate Risk
The Company’s exposure to interest rate risk relates to the Company’s cash and cash equivalents held through the
Partnership. The Company is subject to risk due to fluctuations in the prevailing levels of market interest rates. Any
excess cash and cash equivalents are invested at short-term market interest rates. As at the date of the Statement of
Financial Position, the majority of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents were held on interest bearing fixed
deposit accounts and Treasury Bills at the Partnership. Any exposure to interest rate risk at the underlying investment
level is captured within price risk.
The Company has no other interest-bearing assets or liabilities as at the reporting date. As a consequence, the
Company is only exposed to minimal variable market interest rate risk. Management does not expect any residual
interest rate risk to be material, and therefore sensitivity analysis has not been provided.
31 December
2022
$’000
31 December
2021
$’000
Non-interest bearing
Cash and cash equivalents
15,755 7,296
Liquidity risk
Ultimate responsibility for liquidity risk management rests with the Board of Directors.
Liquidity risk is defined as the risk that the Company may not be able to settle or meet its obligations on time or at a
reasonable price.
The Company adopts a prudent approach to liquidity management and through the preparation of budgets and cash flow
forecasts maintains sufficient cash reserves to meet its obligations. During the year, the Company received distributions in
aggregate of £39.1 million ($47.3 million) from the Partnership (2021: $55.8/£40 million) to fund the 2021 share buyback
programme announced on 11 May 2021. As in prior years, in accordance with the Partnership Agreement, if the Company
requires additional funds for working capital, it is entitled to receive further distributions from the Partnership. In order to do
so, the Company would submit a distribution request approved by the Board to the Partnership, which would then be required
to arrange for the payment of the requested amount. Since REL’s inception, the Company has requested and received eight
distributions from the Partnership for working capital needs. As at 31 December 2022, REL, through the Partnership, had
available liquid resources of $103.8 million in excess of potential unfunded commitments of $22.9 million, but currently, as of
the date of this report, REL, through the Partnership, has total potential unfunded commitments of up to $21.9 million. This
amount does not exceed its available liquid resources of $99.9 million as of the date of this report. However, based on the
Investment Manager’s cash flow forecast for the next three years, the expectation is that, if needed, the Partnership will only
fund the remaining commitments to Enviva and Onyx, which aggregate up to $9.7 million as of the date of this report. In order
to enable the Partnership to satisfy an additional distribution request from the Company, as a reactionary measure, the
Partnership’s investments in the publicly-traded shares of portfolio companies could always be sold, or used as collateral to
secure asset-backed financing, to fund the Partnership’s shortfall of liquid resources and potential proceeds from
investment realisations versus potential unfunded commitments. The Partnership holds marketable securities consisting of
publicly-traded shares of Enviva, Permian Resources, Solid Power, Tritium and Hyzon for which the aggregate fair value was
$177.1 million at 31 December 2022 and $198.0 million as of 27 February 2023.
The Company’s financial assets (excluding equity investments) and liabilities have an expected maturity of less than
12 months from 31 December 2022 (2021: less than 12 months from 31 December 2021). Based on the assessment
outlined above, the Board has concluded that, as of the date of this report, the Company and Partnership have sufficient
available liquid resources to meet current liabilities as they fall due over the next 13 months to 31 March 2024.
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
90
Notes To The Financial Statements continued
For the year ended 31 December 2022
Credit risk
Credit risk refers to the risk that a counterparty will default on its contractual obligations resulting in financial loss to the
Company. Any exposure to credit risk at the underlying investment level is captured within price risk.
Financial assets mainly consist of cash and cash equivalents, trade and other receivables, and investments at fair value
through profit or loss. The Company’s risk on liquid funds, including those held by the Partnership
(1)
, is reduced because it
can only deposit monies with institutions with a minimum credit rating of “single A. The Company mitigates its credit risk
exposure on its investment at fair value through profit or loss by the exercise of due diligence on the counterparties of the
Partnership, its General Partner and the Investment Manager.
The table below shows the material cash balances and the credit rating for the counterparties used at the year-end date:
Counterparty Location Rating
31 December
2022
$’000
31 December
2021
$’000
Barclays Bank Plc Guernsey A 15,755 7,296
(1) The Partnership hold its cash and cash equivalents at Barclays Bank Plc (Rating: A), Citibank (Rating: A+) and JPMorgan Bank Luxembourg S.A. (Rating: A+).
The Company’s maximum exposure to loss of capital from credit risk at the year-end is shown below:
31 December 2022
Carrying Value and
Maximum exposure
$’000
Other financial assets (including cash and cash equivalents but excluding prepayments) 15,755
31 December 2021
Carrying Value and
Maximum exposure
$’000
Other financial assets (including cash and cash equivalents but excluding prepayments) 7,296
Gearing
As at the date of these Financial Statements the Company itself has no gearing. The Company may have indirect gearing
through the operations of the underlying investee companies.
11. SEGMENTAL REPORTING
Operating segments are reported in a manner consistent with the internal reporting provided to the chief operating decision-
maker. The chief operating decision-maker, who is responsible for allocating resources and assessing performance of the
operating segments, has been identified as the Board of Directors, as a whole. The key measure of performance used by the
Board to assess the Company’s performance and to allocate resources is the Total Return of the Company’s Net Asset Value
and therefore no reconciliation is required between the measure of profit or loss used by the Board and that contained in the
Financial Statements.
For management purposes, the Company is organised into one main operating segment, which invests in one limited partnership.
All of the Company’s income is derived from within Guernsey and the Cayman Islands.
All of the Company’s non-current assets are located in the Cayman Islands.
Due to the Company’s nature, it has no customers.
10. FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT continued
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
91
12. EARNINGS PER SHARE AND NET ASSET VALUE PER SHARE
Earnings per Share
31 December
2022
Basic /
Diluted
31 December
2021
Basic /
Diluted
Profit for the year ($’000) 88,929 341,944
Weighted average numbers of Shares in issue 51,742,789 60,873,614
EPS (cents) 171.87 561.73
The Earnings per Share is based on the profit or loss of the Company for the year and on the weighted average number
of Shares the Company had in issue for the year ended 31 December 2022.
The weighted average number of Shares during the year is 51,742,789 (31 December 2021: 60,873,614).
There are no dilutive Shares in issue as at 31 December 2022 (31 December 2021: nil).
Net Asset Value per Share
31 December
2022
Basic /
Diluted
31 December
2021
Basic /
Diluted
NAV ($’000) 738,790 682,041
Number of Shares in issue 50,891,658 54,937,599
Net Asset Value per Share ($) 14.52 12.41
Net Asset Value per Share (£) 11.99 9.19
Share Price (£) 6.78 4.65
Discount to NAV (per cent.) 43.46 49.40
The Net Asset Value per Share is arrived at by dividing the net assets as at the date of the Statement of Financial Position by the
number of Ordinary Shares in issue at that date. The Discount to NAV is arrived at by calculating the percentage discount of the
Company’s Net Asset Value per Share to the Company’s closing Share price as at the date of the Statement of Financial Position.
13. AUDITOR’S REMUNERATION
Other operating expenses include all fees payable to the auditor, which can be analysed as follows:
2022
$’000
2021
$’000
Ernst & Young LLP (United Kingdom) Audit fees 626 603
2022
$’000
2021
$’000
Ernst & Young LLP (United Kingdom) Interim Review fees
211 190
Ernst & Young Non-Audit fees
211 190
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
92
14. IFRS TO US GAAP RECONCILIATION
The Company’s Financial Statements are prepared in accordance with IFRS, which in certain respects differ from US GAAP.
These differences are not material and therefore no reconciliation between IFRS and US GAAP has been presented. For
reference, please see below for a summary of the key judgments and estimates taken into account with regards to the
Company as of 31 December 2022, as well as the Shareholders’ financial highlights required under US GAAP.
Assessment as an Investment Entity
As stated in Note 3, REL meets the definition of an investment entity under IFRS 10. Per US GAAP (Financial Services –
Investment Companies (Topic 946): Amendments to the Scope, Measurement, and Disclosure Requirements or “ASC 946”),
REL meets the definition of an investment company, and as required by ASC 946, REL measures its investment in the
Partnership at FVTPL, which in turn measures its investment in the underlying investments at FVTPL.
RELs Investment in the Partnership
As stated in Note 3, although the Company is the sole limited partner, it does not control the Partnership (as that is attributable to
the General Partner), but instead has significant influence. Therefore, REL accounts for the Partnership as an investment in
associate in accordance with IAS 28 – Investment in Associates and Joint Ventures, and, since REL meets the definition of an
investment company in accordance with IFRS 10, it measures its investment in the Partnership at FVTPL. Taking into
consideration all applicable US GAAP requirements (ASC 946 and ASC 323), REL is permitted to not consolidate its investment in
the Partnership and account for it at FVTPL as required by ASC 946 and ASC 323, which is similar to the IFRS 10 requirements.
Fair Value Measurements
The fair value of the underlying investments held by the Partnership are determined based on valuation techniques and
inputs that are observable and unobservable in the market which market participants have access to and will use to
determine the exit price or selling price of the investments. The change in valuation of REL’s investments held by the
Partnership is then reflected in the fair value of REL’s investment in the Partnership.
Shareholders’ Financial Highlights
Year Ended
31 December
2022
Year Ended
31 December
2021
Expense ratio
(1)
2.7% 2.7%
Performance Allocation ratio
(1)
0.0% 0.0%
Total Expense and Performance Allocation ratio 2.7% 2.7%
Net investment loss ratio
(2)
(2.6) % (2.8) %
Internal rate of return
(3)
, beginning of year (5.4) % (13.0) %
Internal rate of return
(3)
, end of year (3.8) % (5.4) %
Net contributed capital to total capital commitments
(4)
100.0% 100.0%
15. POST-YEAR END UPDATE
As a result of the combination of Hammerhead and DCRD, which closed on 23 February 2023, REL’s existing Hammerhead
ownership converted into 15.4 million common shares of Hammerhead Energy Inc. (NASDAQ / TSX: HHRS). REL also owns a
5 per cent. stake in the DCRD Sponsor. The DCRD Sponsor is entitled to up to 45 per cent. of the 7.9 million Sponsor Shares
subject to Riverstone Fund V achieving a 1.0x Gross MOIC, as detailed in the F-4 Side Letter. Therefore, at or above a $10.53
share price, REL will own an additional 0.2 million HHRS shares. Based on the 15.4 million common shares of HHRS at the
HHRS closing share price of $14.97 as of 27 February 2023, the company’s initial day of trading on NASDAQ and TSX, REL’s
investments in Hammerhead and the DCRD Sponsor are valued at $255.8 million, inclusive of previously realised proceeds of
$23.1 million, which is an increase from $179.9 million as at 31 December 2022. There can be no assurance that the closing
price as of 27 February 2023 is an indicator of future performance. As the shares of HHRS are publicly traded, going forward
the valuation will be determined based on the market price, rather than the basis used previously for unquoted investments.
Notes To The Financial Statements continued
For the year ended 31 December 2022
(1)
The expense ratio is calculated using total expenses of the Company and the Partnership allocated to the Shareholders divided by the Shareholders’ average capital balance for the year
presented. For the years ended 31 December 2022 and 2021, the Performance Allocation realised by the General Partner of the Partnership was $nil and $nil, respectively, and the
Performance Allocation accrued by the General Partner of the Partnership was approximately $nil and $nil, respectively.
(2)
The net investment loss ratio is the Shareholders’ investment income of the Company and Partnership reduced by total expenses of the Company and the Partnership divided by the
Shareholders’ average capital balance for the year presented. However, net investment loss does not include any realised or unrealised gains/losses generated from the sale or
recapitalisation of an investment of the Partnership. Thus, net investment loss includes dividend and interest income of the Company and the Partnership less the total expenses of the
Company and the Partnership incurred during the year presented.
(3)
The internal rate of return since the commencement of operations (“IRR) is computed based on the dates of the Shareholders’ capital contributions to the Company, distributions from
the Company to the Shareholders, and the fair value of the Shareholders’ NAV as of 31 December 2022. The IRR of the Shareholders is net of all fees and Performance Allocation to the
General Partner of the Partnership. The computation of the IRR for an individual Shareholder may vary from the IRR presented above due to the timing of capital transactions.
(4)
Net contributed capital is based on the Shareholders’ gross capital contributions.
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
93
This Annual Report and Accounts contain APMs, which are financial measures not defined in IFRS. These include certain financial and
operational highlights and key financials on pages 2 and 3, as well as in the performance section of the Board Chair’s Statement 4 to 7.
The definition of each of these APMs is shown below.
The Company assesses its performance using a variety of measures that are not specifically defined under IFRS and are therefore termed
APMs. The APMs that the Company uses may not be directly comparable with those used by other companies. These APMs are used to
present a clearer picture of how the Company has performed over the year and are all financial measures of historical performance.
The table below defines our APMs.
APM Definition Purpose Calculation and (where relevant) reconciliation to IFRS
NAV per Ordinary Share The Company’s NAV
divided by the number of
Ordinary Shares.
A measure of the value of
one ordinary share.
The net assets as shown on the statement of financial
position ($739 million as at 31 December 2022 and
$682 million as at 31 December 2021) divided by the
number of Ordinary Shares in issue as at the calculation
date ( 50,891,658 as at 31 December 2022 and 54,937,599
as at 31 December 2021).
Ordinary NAV total return The increase/(decrease) in the
NAV per ordinary share.
A measure of the overall
financial performance of
the Company.
The difference in the NAV per Ordinary Share at the
beginning and end of the year from the statement of
financial position ($14.52 for the year ended 31 December
2022 & $12.41 for the year ended 31 December 2021)
as a percentage of the opening NAV per Ordinary Share
as shown in the Statement of Financial Position
(being $12.41 per ordinary share as at 31 December
2021 & $6.20 as at 31 December 2020).
Premium/(discount)
to NAV
The amount by which the
ordinary share price is higher/
lower than the NAV per
Ordinary Share, expressed as a
percentage of the NAV per
ordinary share.
A measure of the
performance of the
Company’s share price
relative to the NAV per
Ordinary Share.
The difference between the Company’s share price
and NAV per Ordinary Share as a relative percentage
of the NAV per Ordinary Share (43.5 per cent. as at
31 December 2022 and 49.4 per cent. as at
31 December 2021).
Annual total costs’
impact on return
per year
The impact on return each year
that total costs, including GP
Performance Allocation, have
on the investment return.
A measure to show how total
costs, including GP
Performance Allocation,
affect the return from
the Company.
Annual total costs of the Company and Partnership as a
per cent of average NAV of the Company:
Total annual costs for the year ended 31 December 2022:
$19,856,075 (31 December 2021: $14,367,376).
Average NAV of the Company for the year ended
31 December 2022: $742,637,411 (31 December 2021:
$603,786,244).
Annual total costs’ impact of return per year:
2.6 per cent. as of 31 December 2022 (2.4 per cent. as of
31 December 2021).
Reconciliation of
Partnership’s
investments
The annual investment value of
the Partnership, including
capital deployed into the
Companys assets, cash
received from the Company’s
investment portfolio and the
net unrealised change in value.
A reconciliation of the
Partnership’s investments
on an annual basis.
For the year ended 31 December 2022:
$578 million – Brought Forward
$95 million – Capital Invested
$(164) million – Cash Proceeds
$113 million – Change in Unrealised Gain/ (Loss)
$622 million – Carried Forward
For the year ended 31 December 2021:
$288 million – Brought Forward
$109 million – Capital Invested
$436 million – Cash Proceeds
$617 million – Change in Unrealised Gain/(Loss)
$578 million – Carried Forward
Alternative Performance Measures (“APMs”)
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
94
Alternative Performance Measures (“APMs”) continued
APM Definition Purpose Calculation and (where relevant) reconciliation to IFRS
Expense Ratio The impact on return each year
that total costs, excluding GP
Performance Allocation, have
on the investment return.
A measure to show how
costs, excluding GP
Performance Allocation,
affect the return from
the Company.
As shown in Note 14, the expense ratio is calculated using
total expenses of the Company and the Partnership
allocated to the Shareholders divided by the Shareholders’
average capital balance for the year presented 2.7 per cent.
for the year ended 31 December 2022 & 2.7 per cent. for
the year ended 31 December 2021).
Performance
Allocation Ratio
The impact on return each year
that GP Performance
Allocation has on the
investment return.
A measure to show how
GP Performance Allocation
affects the return from
the Company.
As shown in Note 14, for the years ended 31 December
2022 and 2021, the Performance Allocation realised by
the General Partner of the Partnership was $nil and
$nil million, respectively, and the Performance
Allocation accrued by the General Partner of the
Partnership was approximately $nil and
$nil, respectively.
Net Investment
Loss Ratio
The impact on return each
year that total costs, net of
interest income, have on the
investment return.
A measure to show how
total costs, net of interest
income, affect the return
from the Company.
As shown in Note 14, the net investment loss ratio is the
Shareholders’ investment income of the Company and
Partnership reduced by total expenses of the Company
and the Partnership divided by the Shareholders’
average capital balance for the year presented. However,
net investment loss does not include any realised or
unrealised gains/losses generated from the sale or
recapitalisation of an investment of the Partnership.
Thus, net investment loss includes dividend and interest
income of the Company and the Partnership less the
total expenses of the Company and the Partnership
incurred during the year presented. (2.6 per cent. for the
year ended 31 December 2022 & 2.8 per cent. for the year
ended 31 December 2021).
Internal Rate of Return The cumulative return on
Shareholders’ investment.
A measure to show the
return from the Company.
As shown in Note 14, the internal rate of return since the
commencement of operations (“IRR) is computed based
on the dates of the Shareholders’ capital contributions to
the Company, distributions from the Company to the
Shareholders, and the fair value of the Shareholders’
NAV as of 31 December 2022. The IRR of the
Shareholders is net of all fees and Performance
Allocation to the General Partner of the Partnership.
(3.8) per cent. as of 31 December 2022
(5.4) per cent. as of 31 December 2021
(13.0) per cent. as of 31 December 2020
Net Contributed Capital
to Total Capital
Commitments
The Shareholders’ gross
capital contributions in relation
to total capital commitments.
A measure to show the
remaining unfunded portion
of the Shareholders’ total
capital commitments.
As shown in Note 14, net contributed capital is based
on the Shareholders’ gross capital contributions.
(100 per cent. as of 31 December 2022 and 2021).
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
95
1P reserve” means proven reserves;
2P reserve” means proven and probable reserves;
Administrator” means Ocorian Administration (Guernsey) Limited (formerly Estera International Fund Managers (Guernsey) Limited);
Admission” means admission, on 29 October 2013, to the Official List and/or admission to trading on the London Stock Exchange, as the
context may require, of the Ordinary Shares becoming effective in accordance with the Listing Rules and/or the LSE Admission Standards
as the context may require;
AEOI Rules” means Automatic Exchange of Information;
AIC” means the Association of Investment Companies;
AIC Code” means the AIC Code of Corporate Governance;
AIF” means Alternative Investment Funds;
AIFM” means AIF Manager;
AIFMD” means EU Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (No. 2011/61EU);
Aleph Midstream means Aleph Midstream S.A;
Annual General Meeting” or “AGM” means the general meeting of the Company;
Annual Report and Financial Statements means the annual publication of the Company provided to the Shareholders to describe their
operations and financial conditions, together with their Financial Statements;
Anuvia” means Anuvia Plant Nutrients;
Articles of Incorporation” or “Articles” means the articles of incorporation of the Company, as amended from time to time;
Audit Committee” means a formal committee of the Board with defined terms of reference;
bbl” means barrel of crude oil;
Board” or “Directors” means the directors of the Company;
boepd” means barrels of equivalent oil per day;
CAD” or “C$” means Canadian dollar;
CanEra III” means CanEra Inc.;
Carrier II” means Carrier Energy Partners II LLC;
Castex 2005” means Castex Energy 2005 LLC;
Castex 2014” means Castex Energy 2014 LLC;
‘CCUS’ means Carbon Capture, Utilisation and Storage;
Centennial” means Centennial Resource Development, Inc.;
CNOR” means Canadian Non-Operated Resources LP;
Companies Law” means the Companies (Guernsey) Law, 2008, (as amended);
Company” or “REL” means Riverstone Energy Limited;
Company Secretary” means Ocorian Administration (Guernsey) Limited (formerly Estera International Fund Managers (Guernsey) Limited);
Cornerstone Investors” means those investors who have acquired Ordinary Shares and acquired a minority economic interest in the
General Partner and in the Investment Manager, being AKRC Investments LLC, Casita, L.P., KFI and McNair;
Corporate Brokers” means JP Morgan Cazenove and Numis Securities Limited;
C Corporation” means a C Corporation, under U.S. federal income tax law, being a corporation that is taxed separately from its owners;
CRS” means Common Reporting Standard;
DCRB” means Decarbonisation Plus Acquisition Corporation;
DCRC” means Decarbonisation Plus Acquisition Corporation III;
DCRD” means Decarbonisation Plus Acquisition Corporation IV;
DCRN” means Decarbonisation Plus Acquisition Corporation II;
Depositary” means Ocorian Depositary Company (UK) Limited (formerly Estera Depositary Company (UK) Limited);
Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules” or “DTRs” mean the disclosure guidance published by the FCA and the transparency rules
made by the FCA under section 73A of FSMA;
Discontinuation Resolution” means a special resolution that was proposed and not passed by the Company’s Shareholders to discontinue
the Company within six weeks of the seventh anniversary of the Company’s first Admission if the trading price has not met the Target Price,
and the Invested Capital Target Return has not been met;
Discount to NAV” means the situation where the Ordinary shares of the Company are trading at a price lower than the Company’s Net
Asset Value;
E&P” means exploration and production;
Eagle II” means Eagle Energy Exploration, LLC;
Glossary Of Capitalised Defined Terms
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
96
Earnings per Share” or “EPS” means the Earnings per Ordinary Share and is expressed in U.S. dollars;
EBITDA means earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortisation;
ECI” means effectively connected income, which refers to all income from sources within the United States connected with the conduct of
a trade or business;
EEA” means European Economic Area;
EGM” means an Extraordinary General Meeting of the Company;
Enviva” means Enviva Holdings, LP;
EU” means the European Union;
EV” means enterprise value;
FATCA” means Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act;
FCA” means the UK Financial Conduct Authority (or its successor bodies);
Fieldwood” means Fieldwood Energy LLC;
Financial Statements” means the audited financial statements of the Company, including the Statement of Financial Position, the
Statement of Comprehensive Income, the Statement of Cash Flows, the Statement of Changes in Equity and associated notes;
FRC” means Financial Reporting Council;
FreeWire” means FreeWire Technologies, Inc.;
Fund V” means Riverstone Global Energy & Power Fund V, L.P.;
Fund VI” means Riverstone Global Energy & Power Fund VI, L.P.;
FVTPL” means Fair Value through the profit or loss;
General Partner” means REL IP General Partner LP (acting through its general partner, REL IP General Partner Limited), the general
partner of the Partnership and a member of the Riverstone group;
GFSC” or “Commission” means the Guernsey Financial Services Commission;
GFSC Code” means the GFSC Finance Sector Code of Corporate Governance;
GHG” means greenhouse gases;
GoodLeap” means GoodLeap, LLC;
Gross IRR” means an aggregate, annual, compound, gross internal rate of return on investments. Gross IRR does not reflect expenses to
be borne by the relevant investment vehicle or its investors including, without limitation, Performance Allocation, management fees, taxes
and organisational, partnership or transaction expenses;
Gross MOIC” means gross multiple of invested capital;
Hammerhead” means Hammerhead Resources Inc.;
“HHRS” means Hammerhead Energy Inc.;
Hyzon” means Hyzon Motors, Inc.;
IAS” means international accounting standards as issued by the Board of the International Accounting Standards Committee;
IEA means International Energy Agency;
IFRS” means the International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the European Union, being the principles-based accounting
standards, interpretations and the framework by that name issued by the International Accounting Standards Board;
ILX III” means ILX Holdings III LLC;
IMO” means the International Maritime Organization (IMO), an agency of the United Nations which has been formed to promote maritime safety;
Interim Financial Report” means the Company’s half yearly report and unaudited interim condensed financial statements for the period
ended 30 June;
Investment Manager” or “IM” means RIL (effective through 17 August 2020) and RIGL (effective after 17 August 2020) which are both
majority-owned and controlled by Riverstone;
Investment Management Agreement” or “IMA” means the investment management agreement dated 24 September 2013 between RIL,
the Company and the Partnership (acting through its General Partner) under which RIL is appointed as the Investment Manager of both the
Company and the Partnership (effective 17 August 2020), the2nd Amended & Restated investment management agreement effective after
17 August 2020 between RIGL, the Company and the Partnership (acting through its General Partner) under which RIGL is appointed as the
Investment Manager of both the Company and the Partnership and the 3rd Amended & Restatement investment management agreement
effective 9 December 2020 between RIGL, the Company and the Partnership (acting through its General Partner);
Invested Capital Target Return” means, as defined in the Articles, the Gross IRR of 8 per cent. on the portion of the proceeds of the Issue
(as such term is defined in the Company’s Prospectus) that have been invested or committed to an investment (“Invested Capital) in
respect of the period from the dates of investment or commitment of that Invested Capital (being the dates from which a Management Fee
has been paid in respect of that Invested Capital) to the seventh anniversary of the first Admission, calculated by reference to the prevailing
U.S. dollar valuations (as of the seventh anniversary of the first Admission (or earlier disposal)) of the investment acquired with that
Invested Capital and sales proceeds of investments that have been disposed of prior to such seventh anniversary and taking account of any
distributions made on those investments prior to the seventh anniversary of the first Admission;
Glossary Of Capitalised Defined Terms continued
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
97
Investment Undertaking” means the Partnership, any intermediate holding or investing entities that the Company or the Partnership may
establish from time to time for the purposes of efficient portfolio management and to assist with tax planning generally and any subsidiary
undertaking of the Company or the Partnership from time to time;
IPEV Valuation Guidelines” means the International Private Equity and Venture Capital Valuation Guidelines;
IPO” means the initial public offering of shares by a private company to the public;
IRS” means the Internal Revenue Service, the revenue service of the U.S. federal government;
ISA” means International Standards on Auditing (UK);
ISAE 3402” means International Standard on Assurance Engagements 3402, “Assurance Reports on Controls at a Service Organisation”;
ISIN” means an International Securities Identification Number;
KFI” means Moore Capital Management, formerly known as Kendall Family Investments, LLC, a cornerstone investor in the Company;
Liberty II” means Liberty Resources II LLC;
Listing Rules” means the listing rules made by the UK Listing Authority under section 73A Financial Services and Markets Act 2000;
Loanpal” means Loanpal, LLC;
London Stock Exchange” or “LSE” means London Stock Exchange plc;
LSE Admission Standards” means the rules issued by the London Stock Exchange in relation to the admission to trading of, and
continuing requirements for, securities admitted to the Official List;
Management Engagement Committee” means a formal committee of the Board with defined terms of reference;
Management Fee means the management fee to which the Investment Manager is entitled;
mcfe” means thousand cubic feet equivalent (natural gas);
McNair” means RCM Financial Services, L.P. for the purposes of acquiring Ordinary Shares and Palmetto for the purposes of acquiring a
minority economic interest in the General Partner and the Investment Manager;
Meritage III” means Meritage Midstream Services III, L.P.;
mmboe means million barrels of oil equivalent;
NASDAQ” means National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotations Stock Market;
NAV per Share” means the Net Asset Value per Ordinary Share;
Net Asset Value” or “NAV” means the value of the assets of the Company less its liabilities as calculated in accordance with the
Company’s valuation policy and expressed in U.S. dollars;
Net MOIC” means gross multiple of invested capital net of taxes and Performance Allocation on gross profit;
Net Profits” means the proceeds received from each realised investment (after the expenses related to its disposal) minus the acquisition
price of that realised investment;
Nomination Committee” means a formal committee of the Board with defined terms of reference;
NURS” means non-UCITS retail schemes;
NYSE” means The New York Stock Exchange;
Official List” is the list maintained by the Financial Conduct Authority (acting in its capacity as the UK Listing Authority) in accordance
with Section 74(1) of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000;
Onyx Power” means Onyx Strategic Investment Management I BV;
Ordinary Shares” means redeemable ordinary shares of no par value in the capital of the Company issued and designated as “Ordinary
Shares” and having the rights, restrictions and entitlements set out in the Articles;
Origo” means Origo Exploration Holding AS;
Other Riverstone Funds” means other Riverstone-sponsored, controlled or managed entities, including Fund V/VI, which are or may in
the future be managed or advised by the Investment Manager or one or more of its affiliates, excluding the Partnership;
“ONE or “Our Next Energy means Our Next Energy, Inc.;
Partnership” or “RELIP” means Riverstone Energy Investment Partnership, L.P., the Investment Undertaking in which the Company is the
sole limited partner;
Partnership Agreement” means the partnership agreement in respect of the Partnership between inter alios the Company as the sole
limited partner and the General Partner as the sole general partner dated 23 September 2013;
Performance Allocation” means the Performance Allocation to which the General Partner is entitled;
“Permian Resources” means Permian Resources Corporation;
PIPE” means private investment in public entity;
Placing and Open Offer” means the issuance of 8,448,006 new Ordinary Shares at £8.00 per Ordinary Share on 11 December 2015;
POI Law” means the Protection of Investors (Bailiwick of Guernsey) Law, 2020;
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
98
Glossary Of Capitalised Defined Terms continued
Private Riverstone Funds” means Fund V and all other private multi-investor, multi-investment funds that are launched after Admission
and are managed or advised by the Investment Manager (or one or more of its affiliates) and excludes Riverstone employee co-investment
vehicles and any Riverstone managed or advised private co-investment vehicles that invest alongside either Fund V or any multi-investor
multi-investment funds that the Investment Manager (or one or more of its affiliates) launches after Admission;
Prospectuses” means the prospectus published on 24 September 2013 by the Company in connection with the IPO of Ordinary Shares and
further prospectus published on 23 November 2015;
PRT” means Riverstone Performance Review Team;
Qualifying Investments” means all investments in which Private Riverstone Funds participate which are consistent with the Company’s
investment objective where the aggregate equity investment in each such investment (including equity committed for future investment)
available to the relevant Private Riverstone Fund and the Company (and other co-investees, if any, procured by the Investment Manager or
its affiliates) is $100 million or greater, but excluding any investments made by Private Riverstone Funds where both (a) a majority of the
Company’s independent directors and (b) the Investment Manager have agreed that the Company should not participate;
RCO” means Riverstone Credit Opportunities, L.P.;
RELCP” means Riverstone Energy Limited Capital Partners, LP (acting by its general partner Riverstone Holdings II (Cayman) Ltd.) a
Cayman exempted limited partnership controlled by affiliates of Riverstone;
Ridgebury H3” means Ridgebury H3, LLC;
RIGL” means RIGL Holdings, LP;
RIL” means Riverstone International Limited;
Riverstone” means Riverstone Holdings LLC and its affiliated entities (other than the Investment Manager and the General Partner), as
the context may require;
Rock Oil” means Rock Oil Holdings, LLC;
SEC” means the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission;
Sierra” means Sierra Oil and Gas Holdings, L.P.;
Shareholder” means the holder of one or more Ordinary Shares;
Solid Power” means Solid Power, Inc.;
SPAC” means special purpose acquisition company;
Stewardship Code” means the UK Stewardship Code;
Target Price” means, as defined in the Articles, £15.00, subject to (a) downward adjustment in respect of the amount of all dividends and
other distributions, stock splits and equity issuances below the prevailing NAV per Ordinary Share made following the first Admission and
(b) upward adjustment to take account of any share consolidations made following the first Admission;
Tender Offer” means up to £55,000,000 in value of Ordinary Shares made by the Company in 2018;
Three Rivers III” means Three Rivers Natural Resources Holdings III LLC;
Total Return of the Company’s Net Asset Value” means the capital appreciation of the Company’s Net Asset Value plus the income
received from the Company in the form of dividends;
T-REX or T-REX Group” means T-REX Group, Inc.;
Tritium” means Tritium DCFC Limited;
TSX” means Toronto Stock Exchange;
UCITS” means undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities;
United States Bankruptcy Code” means the source of bankruptcy law in the United States Code;
United States Code” means the consolidation and codification by subject matter of the general and permanent laws of the United States;
UK” or “United Kingdom” means the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland;
UK Code” means The UK Corporate Governance Code 2018, issued by the FRC;
UK Listing Authority” or “UKLA” means the Financial Conduct Authority;
U.S.” or “United States” means the United States of America, its territories and possessions, any state of the United States and the
District of Columbia;
US GAAP” means the accounting principles generally accepted in the United States;
WTI” means West Texas Intermediate which is a grade of crude oil used as a benchmark in oil pricing;
£” or “Pounds Sterling” or “Sterling” means British pound sterling and “pence” means British pence; and
$” means United States dollars and “cents” means United States cents.
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
99
Directors
Richard Hayden (Chair of the Board)
Richard Horlick
Peter Barker
Patrick Firth
John Roche
Jeremy Thompson
Claire Whittet
Audit Committee
Patrick Firth (Chair)
Peter Barker
Richard Hayden
Richard Horlick
John Roche
Jeremy Thompson
Claire Whittet
Management Engagement Committee
Claire Whittet (Chair)
Peter Barker
Patrick Firth
Richard Hayden
Richard Horlick
John Roche
Jeremy Thompson
Nomination Committee
Jeremy Thompson (Chair)
Peter Barker
Patrick Firth
Richard Hayden
Richard Horlick
John Roche
Claire Whittet
Investment Manager
RIGL Holdings, LP
190 Elgin Avenue
George Town
Grand Cayman
KY1-9005
Cayman Islands
Investment Managers Performance
Review Team
Pierre Lapeyre
David Leuschen
Baran Tekkora
Robert Tichio
Website: www.RiverstoneREL.com
ISIN: GG00BBHXCL35
Ticker: RSE
Administrator and Company
Secretary
Ocorian Administration (Guernsey) Limited
PO Box 286
Floor 2
Trafalgar Court
Les Banques
St Peter Port
Guernsey
GY1 4LY
Channel Islands
Registered office
PO Box 286
Floor 2
Trafalgar Court
Les Banques
St Peter Port
Guernsey
GY1 4LY
Channel Islands
Registrar
Link Asset Services
65 Gresham Street
London
EC2V 7NQ
United Kingdom
Principal banker and custodian
Barclays Bank PLC
PO Box 41
Le Marchant House
Le Truchot
St Peter Port
Guernsey
GY1 3BE
Channel Islands
English solicitors to the Company
Hogan Lovells International LLP
Atlantic House
Holborn Viaduct
London
EC1A 2FG
United Kingdom
Guernsey advocates to the Company
Carey Olsen
Carey House
PO Box 98
Les Banques
St Peter Port
Guernsey
GY1 4BZ
Channel Islands
U.S. legal advisors to the Company
Vinson & Elkins LLP
1001 Fannin Street
Suite 2500
Houston, Texas
TX 77002
United States of America
Independent auditor
Ernst & Young LLP
PO Box 9, Royal Chambers
St Julian’s Avenue
St Peter Port
Guernsey
GY1 4AF
Channel Islands
Corporate Brokers
JP Morgan Cazenove
25 Bank Street
Canary Wharf
London
E15 5JP
United Kingdom
Numis Securities Limited
The London Stock Exchange Building
10 Paternoster Square
London
EC4M 7LT
United Kingdom
Directors And General Information
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
100
Additional Information For Investors In Switzerland
This Swiss Supplement is supplemental to, forms part of and should be read in conjunction with the Audited Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2022 for RIVERSTONE ENERGY LIMITED (the “Fund”).
Effective from 20 July 2015, the Fund had appointed Société Générale as Swiss Representative and Paying Agent. The current Prospectus,
the Memorandum and Articles of Association and the annual report of the Fund can be obtained free of charge from the representative in
Switzerland, Socté Gérale, Paris, Zurich Branch, Talacker 50, P.O. Box 5070, CH-8021 Zurich. The paying agent of the Fund in
Switzerland is Socté Gérale, Paris, Zurich Branch, Talacker 50, P.O. Box 5070, CH-8021 Zurich. The Company may offer Shares only to
qualified investors in Switzerland. In respect of the Shares distributed in and from Switzerland, the place of performance and jurisdiction
is the registered office of the Swiss Representative.
Swiss Supplement
The Board Chair’s Statement, the Investment Manager’s Report and the Report of the Directors have been prepared solely to provide
additional information for Shareholders to assess the Company’s strategies and the potential for those strategies to succeed. These
should not be relied on by any other party or for any other purpose.
The Board Chair’s Statement, the Investment Manager’s Report and the Report of the Directors may include statements that are, or
may be deemed to be, “forward-looking statements”. These forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking
terminology, including the terms “believes”, “estimates”, “anticipates”, “expects”, “intends”, “may”, “will” or “should” or, in each case,
their negative or other variations or comparable terminology.
These forward-looking statements include all matters that are not historical facts. They appear in a number of places throughout this
document and include statements regarding the intentions, beliefs or current expectations of the Directors and the Investment Adviser,
concerning, amongst other things, the investment objectives and investment policy, financing strategies, investment performance, results
of operations, financial condition, liquidity, prospects, and distribution policy of the Company and the markets in which it invests.
By their nature, forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties because they relate to events and depend on circumstances
that may or may not occur in the future. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance.
The Company’s actual investment performance, results of operations, financial condition, liquidity, distribution policy and the development
of its financing strategies may differ materially from the impression created by the forward-looking statements contained in this document.
Subject to their legal and regulatory obligations, the Directors and the Investment Manager expressly disclaim any obligations to update or
revise any forward-looking statement contained herein to reflect any change in expectations with regard thereto or any change in events,
conditions or circumstances on which any statement is based.
Designed and produced by MAGEE (www.magee.co.uk)
Printed by Pureprint Group Limited, a CarbonNeutral
®
Printing Company.
Pureprint Group Limited is FSC
®
certified and ISO 14001 certified.
Cautionary Statement
Riverstone Energy Limited – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
101
Riverstone Energy Limited
PO Box 286, Floor 2, Trafalgar Court, Les Banques,
St Peter Port, Guernsey, GY1 4LY, Channel Islands.
T: 44 (0) 1481 742742
F: 44 (0) 1481 742698
www.RiverstoneREL.com
Riverstone
Energy
Limited
(LSE: RSE)