XML 105 R2.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT

Pay vs Performance Disclosure - USD ($)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2023

Dec. 31, 2022

Dec. 31, 2021

Dec. 31, 2020

Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]

Pay vs Performance [Table Text Block]

Pay-Versus-Performance Table

																	Value of initial Fixed $100 Investment												Company Selected Financial Performance Measure
Year	SCT Total Compensation for PEO (1)				Compensation Actually Paid to PEO				Average SCT Total Compensation For Non-PEO NEOs (2)				Average Compensation Actually Paid to Non‑PEO NEOs				Total Shareholder Return				Peer Group Total Shareholder Return (3)				Net Income (4) (in 000s)				Pre-Tax Income (5) (in 000s)
(a)	(b)				(c)				(d)				(e)				(f)				(g)				(h)				(i)
2023		$	2,887,694			$	3,479,323			$	1,134,652			$	1,292,075				246				142			$	56,319			$	72,711
2022			2,679,191				2,646,013				1,170,014				959,065				193				122				89,358				119,501
2021			3,161,832				3,814,594				1,215,126				1,490,490				184				184				90,803				118,535
2020			2,437,008				3,382,845				1,013,649				1,268,297				153				136				59,148				76,731

1.	Clarence Smith served as our CEO for the entirety of 2023, 2022, 2021, and 2020.

2.	The NEOs included in this calculation for each year are:

2023 – Steve Burdette, Richard Hare, Ed Clary, and John Gill

2022 – Steve Burdette, Richard Hare, Ed Clary, John Gill and Rawson Haverty

2021 – Steve Burdette, Richard Hare, Ed Clary, and John Gill

2020 – Steve Burdette, Richard Hare, Ed Clary, and John Gill

3.	The peer group TSR is based on the cumulative return of the NYSE/AMEX/Nasdaq Home Furnishings & Equipment Store Index (SIC Codes 5700-5799).

4.	Net income as included in our 2023 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

5.	Pre-tax income, or income before income taxes, as included in our 2023 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

6.

The additional table below sets forth each of the amounts required by SEC rule to be deducted from and added to the amount of total compensation as reflected in the Summary Compensation Table, to calculate CAP. There were no assumptions made in the valuation of equity awards that differ materially from those disclosed as of the grant date of such equity awards.

PEO		2023				2022				2021				2020
Total Compensation From SCT		$	2,887,694			$	2,679,191			$	3,161,832			$	2,437,008
DEDUCT: grant date fair value (GDFV) of equity awards granted during FY		$	1,330,012			$	1,150,562			$	1,092,213			$	816,800
ADD: FV as of FY-end of equity awards granted during the year that are outstanding and unvested as of FY-end		$	1,139,337			$	1,219,920			$	1,549,655			$	1,673,482
ADD: change as of end of FY in FV of awards granted in any prior year that are outstanding and unvested as of FY-end		$	466,558			$	(69,860	)		$	198,163			$	197,468
ADD: change as of the vesting date (from end of prior FY) in FV for any equity awards granted in any prior year that vested at the end of or during FY		$	375,969			$	(32,676	)		$	199,538			$	(57,482	)
DEDUCT: FV at the end of the prior FY for awards granted in any prior year that failed to meet applicable vesting conditions or were cancelled during FY		$	—			$	—			$	—			$	33,264
DEDUCT: change in actuarial present value of the accumulated benefit under all defined benefit and actuarial pension plans reported in SCT⁽¹⁾		$	60,223			$	—			$	202,381			$	17,567
Compensation Actually Paid (CAP) as defined by SEC Rule		$	3,479,323			$	2,646,013			$	3,814,594			$	3,382,845

Other NEOs		2023				2022				2021				2020
Total Compensation from SCT		$	1,134,652			$	1,170,014			$	1,215,126			$	1,013,649
DEDUCT: grant date fair value (GDFV) of equity awards granted during FY		$	368,122			$	281,772			$	350,958			$	254,229
ADD: FV as of FY-end of equity awards granted during the year that are outstanding and unvested as of FY-end		$	328,056			$	260,274			$	453,223			$	498,822
ADD: change as of end of FY in FV of awards granted in any prior year that are outstanding and unvested as of FY-end		$	122,711			$	(16,027	)		$	63,599			$	89,305
ADD: change as of the vesting date (from end of prior FY) in FV for any equity awards granted in any prior year that vested at the end of or during FY		$	92,237			$	(19,253	)		$	109,500			$	(37,018	)
DEDUCT: FV at the end of the prior FY for awards granted in any prior year that failed to meet applicable vesting conditions or were cancelled during FY		$	—			$	154,171			$	—			$	—
DEDUCT: change in actuarial present value of the accumulated benefit under all defined benefit and actuarial pension plans reported in SCT⁽¹⁾		$	17,459			$	—			$	—			$	42,232
Compensation Actually Paid (CAP) as defined by SEC Rule		$	1,292,075			$	959,065			$	1,490,490			$	1,268,297

(1)	As discussed on page 23, the SERP Plan was frozen in 2006 and accordingly there are no changes related to service costs and prior service costs.

Company Selected Measure Name

Pre-tax income

Named Executive Officers, Footnote [Text Block]

2.	The NEOs included in this calculation for each year are:

2023 – Steve Burdette, Richard Hare, Ed Clary, and John Gill

2022 – Steve Burdette, Richard Hare, Ed Clary, John Gill and Rawson Haverty

2021 – Steve Burdette, Richard Hare, Ed Clary, and John Gill

2020 – Steve Burdette, Richard Hare, Ed Clary, and John Gill

Peer Group Issuers, Footnote [Text Block]

3.	The peer group TSR is based on the cumulative return of the NYSE/AMEX/Nasdaq Home Furnishings & Equipment Store Index (SIC Codes 5700-5799).

PEO Total Compensation Amount

$ 2,887,694

$ 2,679,191

$ 3,161,832

$ 2,437,008

PEO Actually Paid Compensation Amount

$ 3,479,323

2,646,013

3,814,594

3,382,845

Adjustment To PEO Compensation, Footnote [Text Block]

6.

The additional table below sets forth each of the amounts required by SEC rule to be deducted from and added to the amount of total compensation as reflected in the Summary Compensation Table, to calculate CAP. There were no assumptions made in the valuation of equity awards that differ materially from those disclosed as of the grant date of such equity awards.

PEO		2023				2022				2021				2020
Total Compensation From SCT		$	2,887,694			$	2,679,191			$	3,161,832			$	2,437,008
DEDUCT: grant date fair value (GDFV) of equity awards granted during FY		$	1,330,012			$	1,150,562			$	1,092,213			$	816,800
ADD: FV as of FY-end of equity awards granted during the year that are outstanding and unvested as of FY-end		$	1,139,337			$	1,219,920			$	1,549,655			$	1,673,482
ADD: change as of end of FY in FV of awards granted in any prior year that are outstanding and unvested as of FY-end		$	466,558			$	(69,860	)		$	198,163			$	197,468
ADD: change as of the vesting date (from end of prior FY) in FV for any equity awards granted in any prior year that vested at the end of or during FY		$	375,969			$	(32,676	)		$	199,538			$	(57,482	)
DEDUCT: FV at the end of the prior FY for awards granted in any prior year that failed to meet applicable vesting conditions or were cancelled during FY		$	—			$	—			$	—			$	33,264
DEDUCT: change in actuarial present value of the accumulated benefit under all defined benefit and actuarial pension plans reported in SCT⁽¹⁾		$	60,223			$	—			$	202,381			$	17,567
Compensation Actually Paid (CAP) as defined by SEC Rule		$	3,479,323			$	2,646,013			$	3,814,594			$	3,382,845

(1)	As discussed on page 23, the SERP Plan was frozen in 2006 and accordingly there are no changes related to service costs and prior service costs.

Non-PEO NEO Average Total Compensation Amount

$ 1,134,652

1,170,014

1,215,126

1,013,649

Non-PEO NEO Average Compensation Actually Paid Amount

$ 1,292,075

959,065

1,490,490

1,268,297

Adjustment to Non-PEO NEO Compensation Footnote [Text Block]

6.

The additional table below sets forth each of the amounts required by SEC rule to be deducted from and added to the amount of total compensation as reflected in the Summary Compensation Table, to calculate CAP. There were no assumptions made in the valuation of equity awards that differ materially from those disclosed as of the grant date of such equity awards.

Other NEOs		2023				2022				2021				2020
Total Compensation from SCT		$	1,134,652			$	1,170,014			$	1,215,126			$	1,013,649
DEDUCT: grant date fair value (GDFV) of equity awards granted during FY		$	368,122			$	281,772			$	350,958			$	254,229
ADD: FV as of FY-end of equity awards granted during the year that are outstanding and unvested as of FY-end		$	328,056			$	260,274			$	453,223			$	498,822
ADD: change as of end of FY in FV of awards granted in any prior year that are outstanding and unvested as of FY-end		$	122,711			$	(16,027	)		$	63,599			$	89,305
ADD: change as of the vesting date (from end of prior FY) in FV for any equity awards granted in any prior year that vested at the end of or during FY		$	92,237			$	(19,253	)		$	109,500			$	(37,018	)
DEDUCT: FV at the end of the prior FY for awards granted in any prior year that failed to meet applicable vesting conditions or were cancelled during FY		$	—			$	154,171			$	—			$	—
DEDUCT: change in actuarial present value of the accumulated benefit under all defined benefit and actuarial pension plans reported in SCT⁽¹⁾		$	17,459			$	—			$	—			$	42,232
Compensation Actually Paid (CAP) as defined by SEC Rule		$	1,292,075			$	959,065			$	1,490,490			$	1,268,297

(1)	As discussed on page 23, the SERP Plan was frozen in 2006 and accordingly there are no changes related to service costs and prior service costs.

Compensation Actually Paid vs. Total Shareholder Return [Text Block]

Analysis of the Information Presented in the Pay-versus-Performance Table

While the company utilizes several performance measures to align executive compensation with company performance, not all of those company measures are presented in the Pay-versus-Performance Table set forth above. Moreover, the company generally seeks to incentivize positive long-term performance and, therefore, does not specifically align the company’s performance measures with compensation that is actually paid (as computed in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K) for a particular year. In accordance with Item 402(v), the company is providing the following descriptions of the relationships between information presented in the Pay‑versus-Performance table.

TSR: TSR has the most direct and significant impact on CEO and NEO compensation actually paid. This is primarily driven by our compensation program design, which is structured with a significant portion of compensation delivered in equity awards (RSUs and PRSUs). The graphs below show the relationship between (1) compensation actually paid to our CEO and the average of the compensation actually paid to our other NEOs and our cumulative TSR and (2) our cumulative TSR and peer group TSR, over the four fiscal years ending December 31, 2023.

CAP versus TSR

Compensation Actually Paid vs. Net Income [Text Block]

Analysis of the Information Presented in the Pay-versus-Performance Table

While the company utilizes several performance measures to align executive compensation with company performance, not all of those company measures are presented in the Pay-versus-Performance Table set forth above. Moreover, the company generally seeks to incentivize positive long-term performance and, therefore, does not specifically align the company’s performance measures with compensation that is actually paid (as computed in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K) for a particular year. In accordance with Item 402(v), the company is providing the following descriptions of the relationships between information presented in the Pay‑versus-Performance table.

Net Income: SEC rules require that net income be presented as a performance measure in the Pay-versus-Performance Table above. The graph below shows the relationship between compensation actually paid to our CEO and the average of the compensation actually paid to our other NEOs and net income attributable to Havertys over the four fiscal years ending December 31, 2023 as reported in the company’s consolidated financial statements.

CAP versus Net Income

Compensation Actually Paid vs. Company Selected Measure [Text Block]

Analysis of the Information Presented in the Pay-versus-Performance Table

While the company utilizes several performance measures to align executive compensation with company performance, not all of those company measures are presented in the Pay-versus-Performance Table set forth above. Moreover, the company generally seeks to incentivize positive long-term performance and, therefore, does not specifically align the company’s performance measures with compensation that is actually paid (as computed in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K) for a particular year. In accordance with Item 402(v), the company is providing the following descriptions of the relationships between information presented in the Pay‑versus-Performance table.

Pre-Tax Income: Pre-Tax Income impacts CEO and NEO compensation actually paid because it is the primary metric in our MIP-I Plan. The graphs below show the relationship between compensation actually paid to our CEO and the average of the compensation actually paid to our other NEOs and our pre-tax income over the four fiscal years ending December 31, 2023.

CAP versus Pre-Tax Income

Total Shareholder Return Vs Peer Group [Text Block]

Analysis of the Information Presented in the Pay-versus-Performance Table

While the company utilizes several performance measures to align executive compensation with company performance, not all of those company measures are presented in the Pay-versus-Performance Table set forth above. Moreover, the company generally seeks to incentivize positive long-term performance and, therefore, does not specifically align the company’s performance measures with compensation that is actually paid (as computed in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K) for a particular year. In accordance with Item 402(v), the company is providing the following descriptions of the relationships between information presented in the Pay‑versus-Performance table.

TSR: TSR has the most direct and significant impact on CEO and NEO compensation actually paid. This is primarily driven by our compensation program design, which is structured with a significant portion of compensation delivered in equity awards (RSUs and PRSUs). The graphs below show the relationship between (1) compensation actually paid to our CEO and the average of the compensation actually paid to our other NEOs and our cumulative TSR and (2) our cumulative TSR and peer group TSR, over the four fiscal years ending December 31, 2023.

TSR: Company versus Peer Group

Tabular List [Table Text Block]

Financial Performance Measures

Our executive compensation program and compensation decisions reflect the guiding principles of aligning long-term performance and shareholder interests. The metrics used within our incentive plans are selected to support these objectives. The most important financial performance measures used by the company to link executive compensation actually paid to the company’s NEOs for the most recently completed fiscal year to the company’s performance are as follows:

•	Pre-Tax Income

•	Adjusted EBITDA

•

Net Sales

•	Total Shareholder Return

Total Shareholder Return Amount

$ 246

193

184

153

Peer Group Total Shareholder Return Amount

142

122

184

136

Net Income (Loss)

$ 56,319,000

$ 89,358,000

$ 90,803,000

$ 59,148,000

Company Selected Measure Amount

72,711,000

119,501,000

118,535,000

76,731,000

Clarence Smith

Clarence Smith

Clarence Smith

Clarence Smith

Measure [Axis]: 1

Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]

Pre-Tax Income

Measure [Axis]: 2

Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]

Adjusted EBITDA

Measure [Axis]: 3

Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]

Net Sales

Measure [Axis]: 4

Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]

Total Shareholder Return

PEO [Member] | Adjustment for Grant Date Fair Value (GDFV) of Equity Awards Granted During FY [Member]

Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]

Adjustment to Compensation Amount

$ (1,330,012)

$ (1,150,562)

$ (1,092,213)

$ (816,800)

PEO [Member] | Adjustment for FV as of FY-End of Equity Awards Granted During the Year that are Outstanding and Unvested as of FY-End [Member]

Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]

Adjustment to Compensation Amount

1,139,337

1,219,920

1,549,655

1,673,482

PEO [Member] | Adjustment for Change as of End of FY in FV of Awards Granted in any Prior Year that are Outstanding and Unvested as of FY-End [Member]

Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]

Adjustment to Compensation Amount

466,558

(69,860)

198,163

197,468

PEO [Member] | Adjustment for Change as of the Vesting Date (from End of Prior FY) in FV for any Equity Awards Granted in any Prior Year that Vested at the End of or During FY [Member]

Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]

Adjustment to Compensation Amount

375,969

(32,676)

199,538

(57,482)

PEO [Member] | Adjustment for FV at the End of the Prior FY for Awards Granted in any Prior Year that Failed to Meet Applicable Vesting Conditions or were Cancelled During FY [Member]

Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]

Adjustment to Compensation Amount

0

0

0

(33,264)

PEO [Member] | Adjustment for Change in Actuarial Present Value of the Accumulated Benefit Under All Defined Benefit and Actuarial Pension Plans Reported in SCT [Member]

Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]

Adjustment to Compensation Amount

(60,223)

0

(202,381)

(17,567)

Non-PEO NEO [Member] | Adjustment for Grant Date Fair Value (GDFV) of Equity Awards Granted During FY [Member]

Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]

Adjustment to Compensation Amount

(368,122)

(281,772)

(350,958)

(254,229)

Non-PEO NEO [Member] | Adjustment for FV as of FY-End of Equity Awards Granted During the Year that are Outstanding and Unvested as of FY-End [Member]

Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]

Adjustment to Compensation Amount

328,056

260,274

453,223

498,822

Non-PEO NEO [Member] | Adjustment for Change as of End of FY in FV of Awards Granted in any Prior Year that are Outstanding and Unvested as of FY-End [Member]

Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]

Adjustment to Compensation Amount

122,711

(16,027)

63,599

89,305

Non-PEO NEO [Member] | Adjustment for Change as of the Vesting Date (from End of Prior FY) in FV for any Equity Awards Granted in any Prior Year that Vested at the End of or During FY [Member]

Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]

Adjustment to Compensation Amount

92,237

(19,253)

109,500

(37,018)

Non-PEO NEO [Member] | Adjustment for FV at the End of the Prior FY for Awards Granted in any Prior Year that Failed to Meet Applicable Vesting Conditions or were Cancelled During FY [Member]

Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]

Adjustment to Compensation Amount

0

(154,171)

0

0

Non-PEO NEO [Member] | Adjustment for Change in Actuarial Present Value of the Accumulated Benefit Under All Defined Benefit and Actuarial Pension Plans Reported in SCT [Member]

Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]

Adjustment to Compensation Amount

$ (17,459)

$ 0

$ 0

$ (42,232)