6-K 1 d87550d6k.htm FORM 6-K

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 6-K

REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16

UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

September 14, 2021

BHP GROUP LIMITED (ABN 49 004 028 077) (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter) VICTORIA, AUSTRALIA (Jurisdiction of incorporation or organisation) 171 COLLINS STREET, MELBOURNE, VICTORIA 3000 AUSTRALIA (Address of principal executive offices) |  | BHP GROUP PLC (REG. NO. 3196209) (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter) ENGLAND AND WALES (Jurisdiction of incorporation or organisation) NOVA SOUTH, 160 VICTORIA STREET LONDON, SW1E 5LB UNITED KINGDOM (Address of principal executive offices)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F: ☒ Form 20-F ☐ Form 40-F

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): ☐

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: ☐ Yes ☒ No

If “Yes” is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): n/a

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

|  |  |  |  |  | BHP Group Limited and BHP Group Plc
Date: September 14, 2021 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Stefanie Wilkinson
|  |  |  | Name: |  | Stefanie Wilkinson
|  |  |  | Title: |  | Group Company Secretary

BHP Climate Transition Action Plan 2021

Contents Executive summary 4 1. Pursuing net zero 7 Our role and the opportunity to act 7 A suite of actions to drive results 10 2. Our Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions position and performance 10 Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions profile 10 FY2021 progress 11 Carbon offset strategy 12 3. Scope 3 emissions position and performance 12 Scope 3 emissions profile 13 Energy products 13 Maritime 15 Steelmaking 15 Future facing commodities 18 4. Assessing capital alignment with a 1.5°C world 19 Green revenue 19 5. Just transition 20 6. Climate policy engagement 21 7. Climate governance 22 Board skills and experience 22 Executive remuneration 22 Stakeholder engagement 22 Management authority 22 8. TCFD disclosure 22 Glossary 23 Reporting terms 24 Abbreviations key 25 BHP Climate Transition Action Plan 2

The Climate Transition Action Plan 2021 is available at bhp.com BHP Group Limited. ABN 49 004 028 077. Registered in Australia. Registered office: 171 Collins Street, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia. BHP Group Plc. Registration number 3196209. Registered in England and Wales. Registered office: Nova South, 160 Victoria Street London SW1E 5LB United Kingdom. Each of BHP Group Limited and BHP Group Plc is a member of the Group. BHP is a Dual Listed Company structure comprising BHP Group Limited and BHP Group Plc. The two entities continue to exist as separate companies but operate as a combined group known as BHP. The headquarters of BHP Group Limited and the global headquarters of the combined Group are located in Melbourne, Australia. The headquarters of BHP Group Plc are located in London, United Kingdom. Both companies have identical Boards of Directors and are run by a unified management team. Throughout this publication, the Boards are referred to collectively as the Board. Shareholders in each company have equivalent economic and voting rights in the Group as a whole. In this BHP Climate Transition Action Plan (Plan), the terms ‘BHP’, the ‘Company’, the ‘Group’, ‘our business’, ‘organisation’, ‘we’, ‘us’, ‘our’ and ‘ourselves’ refer to BHP Group Limited, BHP Group Plc and, except where the context otherwise requires, their respective subsidiaries as defined in note 13 ‘Related undertakings of the Group’ in section 3.2 of the BHP Annual Report 2021 available at bhp.com/annualreport. Those terms do not include non-operated assets. This Plan covers BHP’s assets (including those under exploration, projects in development or execution phases, sites and closed operations) that have been wholly owned and/or operated by BHP and that have been owned as a joint venture1 operated by BHP (referred to in this Plan as ‘operated assets’ or ‘operations’) during the period from 1 July 2020 to 30 June 2021. Our functions are also included. BHP also holds interests in assets that are owned as a joint venture but not operated by BHP (referred to in this Plan as ‘non-operated joint ventures’ or ‘non-operated assets’). Notwithstanding that this Plan may include production, financial, greenhouse gas emissions and other information from non-operated assets, non-operated assets are not included in the BHP Group and, as a result, statements regarding our operations, assets and values apply only to our operated assets unless stated otherwise. Forward looking statements This Plan has been prepared for submission to a shareholder advisory vote at the 2021 Annual General Meetings of BHP. It has not been prepared as financial or investment advice or to provide any guidance in relation to the future performance of BHP. This Plan contains forward looking statements, including, but not limited to: statements regarding trends in commodity prices and supply and demand for commodities; plans, strategies and objectives of management; assumed long-term scenarios; potential global responses to climate change; regulatory and policy developments; the development of certain technologies; the potential effect of possible future events on the value of the BHP portfolio and the plans, strategies and objectives of management. Forward looking statements may be identified by the use of terminology, including, but not limited to, ‘intend’, ‘aim’, ‘project’, ‘see’, ‘anticipate’, ‘expect’, ‘estimate’, ‘plan’, ‘objective’, ‘believe’, ‘expect’, ‘commit’, ‘may’, ‘should’, ‘need’, ‘must’, ‘will’, ‘would’, ‘continue’ , ‘forecast’, ‘guidance’, ‘trend’ or similar words. These statements discuss future expectations concerning the results of assets or financial conditions, or provide other forward looking information. In particular, such statements may include, but are not limited to, statements that relate to the purpose, goals, targets, plans and objectives of BHP, assumptions made in energy, and other forms of environmental transition scenarios, as well as statements about how we run our business, including our work with contractors and partners, and our work with suppliers and customers. The forward looking statements in this Plan are based on management’s current expectations and reflect judgements, assumptions, estimates and other the information available as at the date of this Plan and/or the date of the Group’s planning processes or scenario analysis processes. There are inherent limitations with scenario analysis and it is difficult to predict which, if any, of the scenarios might eventuate. Scenarios do not constitute definitive outcomes for us. Scenario analysis relies on assumptions that may or may not be, or prove to be, correct and may or may not eventuate, and scenarios may be impacted by additional factors to the assumptions disclosed. Additionally, forward looking statements do not represent guarantees or predictions of future performance, and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are beyond our control, and which may cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in the statements contained in this Plan. BHP cautions against reliance on any forward looking statements or guidance. For example, future revenues from our operations, projects or mines described in this Plan will be based, in part, upon the market price of the minerals, metals or petroleum produced, which may vary significantly from current levels. These variations, if materially adverse, may affect the timing or the feasibility of the development of a particular project, the expansion of certain facilities or mines, or the continuation of existing operations. There are a number of other factors that may have an adverse effect on our results or operations, including those identified in the risk factors discussed in BHP’s filings with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (the ‘SEC’) (including in Annual Reports on Form 20-F) which are available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Except as required by applicable regulations or by law, BHP does not undertake any obligation to publicly update or review any forward looking statements, whether as a result of new information or future events. Forward looking statements speak only as of the date of this Plan or the date planning process assumptions or scenario analysis assumptions were adopted, as relevant. Past performance cannot be relied on as a guide to future performance. Emissions data Due to the inherent uncertainty and limitations in measuring greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions under the calculation methodologies used in the preparation of such data, all GHG emissions data or references to GHG emissions volumes (including ratios or percentages) in this Plan are estimates. There may also be differences in the manner that third parties calculate or report GHG emissions data compared to BHP, which means that third party data may not be comparable to our data. For information on how we calculate our GHG emissions, see the BHP Scope 1, 2 and 3 GHG Emissions Calculation Methodology, available at bhp.com/climate. No offer of securities Nothing in this Plan should be construed as either an offer or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell BHP securities in any jurisdiction, or be treated or relied upon as a recommendation or advice by BHP. Reliance on third party information The views expressed in this Plan contain information that has been derived from publicly available sources that have not been independently verified. No representation or warranty is made as to the accuracy, completeness or reliability of the information. This Plan should not be relied upon as a recommendation or forecast by BHP. 1 References in this Plan to a ‘joint venture’ are used for convenience to collectively describe assets that are not wholly owned by BHP. Such references are not intended to characterise the legal relationship between the owners of the asset. BHP Climate Transition Action Plan 3

Executive summary The world faces a critical challenge to respond effectively to the risks of climate change. These risks are clear and pressing. Every segment of society – including business, government, investors, scientists and consumers – has a role to play. The world must prioritise action by focusing on sustained emissions reductions to enable global net zero2 emissions. BHP recognises the role we must play in helping the world achieve its decarbonisation ambitions. This Climate Transition Action Plan (Plan) provides an overview of our role and actions. It sets out our strategic approach to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions3 to net zero4 within our operations by 2050 and to work with customers and suppliers to support their own emissions reductions, consistent with the ambition of pursuing net zero in our value chain. Commitment and action BHP has been taking action to address climate risks for decades. We first set emissions targets in 1996, have disclosed our emissions performance since 1998 and for more than 10 years have incorporated carbon price assessments in our operational and project planning. We were involved in one of the earliest trades under the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme in January 2005. In 2015, we were one of the first companies to disclose the potential impacts of a low carbon transition on demand for our products and our profitability5. All of these steps were tied to our business strategy and understanding of long-term risks. This commercially-driven approach remains the defining feature of our climate planning. We continue to make significant progress in our climate actions to date, including tackling reductions in our operational emissions6 (where, for example, our iron ore production has the lowest emissions intensity in the sector7), supporting research into breakthrough low carbon solutions, investing in nature-based solutions including REDD and REDD+ projects8, and contributing to public policy debates on options to support economy-wide decarbonisation. We have also extended our own emissions reduction commitments.9 In 2020, we set a medium-term target to reduce our operational emissions by at least 30 per cent from FY2020 levels10 by FY2030. Our long-term goal is to achieve net zero operational emissions by 2050. In 2020, we also set goals for 2030 of supporting the development of technologies and pathways capable of 30 per cent emissions intensity reduction in integrated steelmaking with widespread adoption expected post 2030, and supporting 40 per cent emissions intensity reduction of BHP-chartered shipping of our products. The challenge moving forward For more than 130 years, BHP has been producing resources that have supported economic growth and made countless lives better, around the world. But the production of resources is not an end in itself; it is what these resources enable that makes the real difference: driving growth and development; underpinning materials for sanitation and healthcare; sustainable food production; developing industry; building vital infrastructure and allowing broad based wealth creation. We recognise there is more to do. BHP’s long-term success is dependent on a continued ability to attract people and capital and secure access to the resources the world needs, as well as providing continued value to those who rely on us. Our commodities are necessary for economic growth and for decarbonisation. Both outcomes are necessary if we are to achieve our purpose, ‘To bring people and resources together to build a better world’. Our portfolio is already well positioned to support the transition to a lower carbon world aligned with the Paris Agreement goals, while creating value for our shareholders and our broader stakeholders. We have an important role to play in supporting a transition to a high-growth, net zero emissions future: providing the essential building blocks for renewable energy and other decarbonisation infrastructure from our steelmaking materials (iron ore and metallurgical coal) and future facing commodities (including copper, nickel, and potash). To help enable a net zero emissions future, our commodities can play a vital part in accelerating the displacement of emissions intensive activities by lower emissions alternatives. The scenario analysis in the BHP Climate Change Report 202011 indicates that our portfolio is resilient and, in fact, many of our commodities would further benefit from an accelerated decarbonisation pathway. In our 1.5°C scenario12, the world is expected to need almost twice as much steel in the next 30 years as it did in the last 30. To keep pace with the development of renewable technologies such as electric vehicles and solar energy, copper production will have to double over the next 30 years. Under our 1.5°C scenario, nickel production will have to increase nearly four-fold to power the next generation of battery technology. Finally, potash will be vital for more efficient agricultural practices, and to ease pressure on scarce arable 2 Net zero refers to a state in which the greenhouse gases (as defined in the Glossary) going into the atmosphere are balanced by removal out of the atmosphere. All further references to ‘net zero’ in this Plan for industry sectors, the global economy, transition or future, or similar, have this meaning. Refer to the Glossary at the end of this Plan for our definition of key terms. 3 All further references to ‘emissions’ in this Plan are to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. 4 Net zero includes the use of carbon offsets as required. 5 The BHP Climate Change: Portfolio Analysis 2015 report is available at bhp.com 6 ‘Operational emissions’ in this Plan refers to the Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions from our operated assets. 7 ‘Building a better world’: BHP Climate change briefing presentation, 10 September 2020. 8 REDD and REDD+ are the United Nations programs for reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation. 9 These positions are expressed using terms that are defined in the Glossary, including the terms ‘net zero’, ‘target’ and ‘goal’. 10 FY2020 baseline will be adjusted for any material acquisitions and divestments based on emissions at the time of the transaction. Carbon offsets will be used as required. 11 The BHP Climate Change Report 2020 is available at bhp.com/climate. There are inherent limitations with scenario analysis and it is difficult to predict which, if any, of the scenarios might eventuate. Scenarios do not constitute definitive outcomes for us. Scenario analysis relies on assumptions that may or may not be, or prove to be, correct and may or may not eventuate, and scenarios may be impacted by additional factors to the assumptions disclosed. 12 This scenario aligns with the Paris Agreement goals and requires steep global annual emissions reductions, sustained for decades, to stay within a 1.5°C carbon budget. Refer to the BHP Climate Change Report 2020 available at bhp.com/climate for information about the assumptions, outputs and limitations of our 1.5°C Paris-aligned scenario. BHP Climate Transition Action Plan 4

land. Under any scenario, our industry will be critical to ensuring per cent14 of BHP’s total reported emissions inventory (Scopes 1, the rise of global living standards. 2 and 3). The most significant contributions to our reported We also noted in our Climate Change Report 2020 the Scope 3 inventory come from the emissions generated by importance of producing these resources in a manner that steelmaking through the processing of iron ore and metallurgical delivers strong social value outcomes in our communities and coal. through respectful relationships with local, regional and global In any net zero future, steel will play an essential role. It will be stakeholders. Our view is driven by the belief that investors, required for the infrastructure to support urban growth, industrial communities and governments will rightly preference those transformation, and the deployment of electric transport at global companies that demonstrate economic efficiency, a long-term scale. The challenge for steelmaking is to produce this vital perspective and a willingness to act collectively to deliver value, commodity to enable sustainable growth, while reducing the including the achievement of the United Nations Sustainable emissions footprint of the production process itself. Development Goals. The magnitude of the challenge to decarbonise and grow should demand nothing less. While Scope 3 emissions occur outside of our direct control, we seek opportunities to partner with others in the value chain to However, despite a general alignment among stakeholders as to enable the reduction of these emissions consistent with the urgency of, and the key changes required for, the transition, aspirations for global net zero. In this Plan, we build on our 2020 we remain concerned that collective action is not yet at a level commitments with an enhanced Scope 3 position that reflects required to achieve it. Current barriers to society achieving a net the challenges and opportunities for our contribution (refer to the zero emissions future include the pace of technology BHP’s climate change goals and targets box15 in section 1 development, new infrastructure, consumer behaviour change, ‘Pursuing net zero’). policy settings and the investment required to fund the transition. Overall, our aim is to position BHP to thrive in a low carbon world Action across the value chain by minimising emissions from existing products while providing All sectors of society and the economy will be impacted by, and the commodities that the world needs to achieve a net zero must contribute to, the system-wide response to achieve net future. To support this, we are working to align our portfolio and zero across the global value chain for the goods and services capital allocations and advocating for policy outcomes that that support global living standards. BHP is no exception. Rapid enhance the global response to climate change. decarbonisation is more feasible in some sectors versus others, Transparency and accountability and offsets will play an important role in balancing the system response to deliver net zero across the global economy. We The challenge the world faces is clear, but the solutions are recognise we have an important role to play in supporting complex - and urgent. For the world to meet its goals there must emissions reductions in our own value chain as part of this be transparency, clarity and a collective willingness to adjust and system response. improve responses to achieve the most effective pathway to net zero. Governments must set clear commitments aligned with the Scope 1 emissions result from sources that are owned or Paris Agreement goals, underpinned by the long-term and controlled by BHP, for example, emissions from materials equitable policy settings necessary to drive investment. Investors haulage, heat generation from combustion, etc. While exercising must allocate capital to activities that support decarbonisation control over the source of these emissions, we are in some and resilience building. cases reliant on the development and availability of low emissions equipment in the marketplace. Scope 2 emissions are This Plan aims to show how we have evolved and adapted our predominantly related to the generation of purchased electricity13 approach, and our determination to contribute our part to global consumed by our operations, and hence we are in some cases decarbonisation in line with our purpose. reliant on the development of options external to us, including We appreciate the engagement and insights of our investors and renewable energy at scale. Scope 3 includes all other emissions other stakeholders in the course of developing this Plan, which outside of BHP’s operated assets, resulting from the activities of has been prepared with reference to the Climate Action 100+ our suppliers, logistics, customers and investments (such as Net-Zero Corporate Benchmark criteria, and builds upon and non-operated joint ventures). Scope 3 emissions represent 96 should be read with the BHP Climate Change Report 2020. 13 Purchased electricity is defined as electricity that is purchased or otherwise brought into the organisational boundary of the reporting company. Scope 2 emissions physically occur at the facility where electricity is generated. 14 Based on FY2021 data. 15 These positions are expressed using terms that are defined in the Glossary, including the terms ‘net zero’, ‘target’ and ‘goal’. BHP Climate Transition Action Plan 5

Our actions in FY2021 Reducing operational emissions Agreement for Agreement for Established a pipeline of decarbonisation projects at 50% Up to 50% all operated assets renewable electricity renewable electricity at with an estimated US$0.5-1 bi Ilion across our Queensland Nickel West Kwinana spend over the next five years Coal mines refinery Agreement to build Jointly launched the ‘Charge on Two solar farms Innovation Challenge’ to develop charging infrastructure for and a @ battery-electric battery storage trucks system at Nickel West’s Mt Keith and Leinster Value chain emissions Transparency and accountability Committed to invest up to US$65 million Published the in partnerships focused on BHPCiimate steel decarbonisation Change Report with three major steel makers 2020 Founding member of the Global Centre for Maritime Issued and awarded Linked Decarbonisation world’s first LNG-fuelled Newcastlemax bulk 10% carrier tender, with the of executive remuneration aim of reducing emissions under the Cash and Deferred per voyage by Took part in the Plan to performance on over30% climate measures first marine biofuel trial s involving an ocean-going vessel BHP Climate Transition Action Plan 6

1. Pursuing net zero In this Plan, we describe our approach to operational and value chain emissions across the material segments in our emissions inventory. In FY2021, our total reported GHG emissions inventory was 418.7 million tonnes carbon dioxide equivalent (Mt CO2-e). This includes 16 Mt CO2-e of reported emissions from our operated assets (Scope 1 and Scope 2), and 402.5 Mt CO2-e of reported emissions from our value chain (Scope 3). Our role and the opportunity to act Our ability to achieve emissions reductions across our operated assets and value chain varies depending on our capacity to affect outcomes. Our actions may be categorised according to the following framework: ï,· Leveraging our control in areas where the decisions we take can have direct impact on emissions ï,· Seeking opportunities to partner with suppliers, customers, and others to drive outcomes ï,· Using our influence to provide thought leadership to support decarbonisation Figure 1 shows examples of actions and how they fall into this framework. In section 2 ‘Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions position and performance’, we describe our FY2021 progress towards our operational emissions targets and long-term goal and ongoing actions. Section 3 ‘Scope 3 emissions position and performance’ sets out our existing Scope 3 goals for 2030, and outlines our enhanced Scope 3 position. For a summary of potential strategies to advance a pathway to net zero, and the role we can play, see Figure 2. We have also summarised our existing goals and targets and our enhanced Scope 3 position in BHP’s climate change goals and targets box, on the next page. Figure 1: Control, Partner and Influence BHP Climate Transition Action Plan 7

BHP’s climate change goals and targets16 Operational greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (Scope 1 and Scope 2 from our operated assets) Our commitments are: ï,· A short-term target to maintain operational GHG emissions at or below FY2017 levels17 by FY2022, while we continue to grow our business ï,· A medium-term target to reduce operational GHG emissions by at least 30 per cent from FY2020 levels18 by FY2030 ï,· A long-term goal to achieve net zero19 operational GHG emissions by 2050 Value chain GHG emissions (Scope 3) For value chain (Scope 3) emissions, we have previously announced our goals for 2030 are to: ï,· Support industry to develop technologies and pathways capable of 30 per cent emissions intensity reduction in integrated steelmaking, with widespread adoption expected post 2030 ï,· Support 40 per cent emissions intensity reduction of BHP-chartered shipping of our products In this Plan, we are building on these medium-term goals. Our position reflects the challenges and opportunities in line with our strategy for increasing long-term portfolio exposure towards future facing commodities. Our recent proposed portfolio changes20 are aligned with our strategic approach to manage risk and maximise value. While these decisions were not made for the purpose of setting a future Scope 3 position, upon completion, the changes would lower our total Scope 3 emissions inventory (refer to ‘Energy products’ below in section 3). As we shape our portfolio for the future, we are announcing our enhanced Scope 3 position.21 While we cannot ensure the outcome alone, for our reshaped portfolio,22 we are pursuing the long-term goal of net zero23 Scope 3 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 2050 to support the transition that the world must make. To progress towards this goal: ï,· we are targeting net zero for the operational GHG emissions of our direct suppliers24 and the emissions from maritime transport of our products; and ï,· recognising the particular challenge of a net zero pathway for customers’ processing of our products,25 which is dependent on the development and downstream deployment of solutions and supportive policy, we cannot set a target, but will continue to partner with customers and others to accelerate the transition to carbon neutral26 steelmaking and other downstream processes. We will also support the value chain by pursuing carbon neutral production of our future facing commodities, such as copper, nickel and potash to provide the essential building blocks of a net zero transition. We have therefore set these Scope 3 targets:27 ï,· We will target net zero28 by 2050 for the operational GHG emissions of our direct suppliers,29 subject to the widespread availability of carbon neutral30 goods and services to meet our requirements. ï,· We will target net zero31 by 2050 for GHG emissions from all shipping32 of our products,33 subject to the widespread availability of carbon neutral34 solutions including low/zero-emission technology on board suitable ships and low/zero-emission marine fuels. 16 These positions are expressed using terms that are defined in the Glossary, including the terms ‘net zero’, ‘target’ and ‘goal’. 17 FY2017 baseline will be adjusted for any material acquisitions and divestments based on emissions at the time of the transaction. Carbon offsets will be used as required. 18 FY2020 baseline will be adjusted for any material acquisitions and divestments based on emissions at the time of the transaction. Carbon offsets will be used as required. 19 Net zero includes the use of carbon offsets as required. 20 On 17 August 2021, BHP announced it had entered into a merger commitment deed with Woodside to combine their respective oil and gas portfolios by an all-stock merger. Completion of the merger is subject to confirmatory due diligence, negotiation and execution of full form transaction documents, and satisfaction of conditions precedent including shareholder, regulatory and other approvals, and expected to occur in the second quarter of the 2022 calendar year, with an effective date of 1 July 2021. For more information, refer to the Joint Announcement ‘Woodside and BHP to create a global energy company’ by Woodside and BHP dated 17 August 2021, available at bhp.com/investor-centre. On 28 June 2021, BHP announced its agreement with Glencore to divest its 33.3 per cent interest in Cerrejón, a non-operated energy coal joint venture in Colombia, with an effective economic date of 31 December 2020. Completion is subject to the satisfaction of customary competition and regulatory requirements and expected to occur in the first half of the 2022 calendar year. 21 This position is expressed using terms that are defined in the Glossary, including the terms ‘net zero’, ‘target’ and ‘goal’. 22 Subject to completion of both of the divestment of our oil and gas business and the sale of our interest in Cerrejón. 23 Net zero includes the use of carbon offsets as required. 24 ‘Operational GHG emissions of our direct suppliers’ means the Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions of our direct suppliers included in BHP’s Scope 3 reporting categories of purchased goods and services (including capital goods), fuel and energy related activities, business travel, and employee commuting. 25 In line with our reporting methodology for Scope 3 emissions, we define ‘processing of our products’ as emissions resulting from our customers’ processing of our products comprising iron ore and metallurgical coal (steelmaking materials) and copper (assumed to be processed into copper wire for end use). 26 Carbon neutral includes all those greenhouse gas emissions as defined for BHP reporting purposes. 27 These targets are referable to a FY2020 baseline year, which will be adjusted for any material acquisitions and divestments based on emissions at the time of the transaction, and to reflect progressive refinement of the Scope 3 emissions reporting methodology. The targets’ boundaries may in some cases differ from required reporting boundaries. Carbon offsets will be used as required. 28 Net zero includes the use of carbon offsets as required. 29 ‘Operational GHG emissions of our direct suppliers’ means the Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions of our direct suppliers included in BHP’s Scope 3 reporting categories of purchased goods and services (including capital goods), fuel and energy related activities, business travel, and employee commuting. 30 Carbon neutral includes all those greenhouse gas emissions as defined for BHP reporting purposes. 31 Net zero includes the use of carbon offsets as required. 32 BHP-chartered and third party-chartered shipping. 33 Target excludes maritime transportation of products purchased by BHP. 34 Carbon neutral includes all those greenhouse gas emissions as defined for BHP reporting purposes. BHP Climate Transition Action Plan 8

Figure 2: Overview of actions towards net zero and the role we play in each Broader contribution Mtco,-e (FY2021) 16 10 7 76 301 5 N/A Scope 51+2 S3 53 53 S3 53 NIA Our Ci) Purchasing G updatinR G world-first 0 Invest in CCUS, $ Studying WAIO G Pilotinq Advocating fot actions renewable PAs, emissions tereder for lowet rncludinq USS20rn p rocessinQ traceability effective policy so far carbon offsets reportir emissions investment in options solutions settinqs methodoiO!l)’ LNG-fuelled CCUS Knowledge e Study on Zero e Ongoing technica Dave op market Working with Emission Material 1n line with vessels Centre and marketing support placement for low industry procurement un1versity &0 Movement 0 Exploring fuels to ClJStomert emissions metals associ.at1ons taxonomy and (rofuel, to build sector 0 Research on (JConducting stee Validating spend ammonia, H,), capability on biofilters to decarbonisation responsible tach (wind cliMate change reduce investor production assistance) credentials Joined emissions Q S$10 0 Approximately USS65m in steal decarbonisation partnerships supporting stee decarbonisation research at the University of Newcastle Joined Responsible Steel Current 8 Further e Understand Tier Investing in 8 continuing 0 Strengthening pipeline investment supplier carbon emissions emerging investment in 93Se!lsment approach to of actions renewable, PPAs risks, road mops data analytics technology emerging studies to provide advocacy on $ s on and targets through BHP technology customers more climate policy e Ventures through BHP transparency fleet G Add our shipping awareness Ventures e .g. and traceability renewable profile to vendor selection criteria 0 our closed carbon side selection 0 On board energy consortium with operating for steel, efficiency, FMG, energy usage G Hatch green steel of our optimisation abatement technologies technologies in production 0 Green H 0 Gett1ng. consort1um categories to of offsets Anglo, MG. coalition off to. with. Hatch Advocating for for from G appropriate the transition collaboration increases to ambit1ons and 0 Advocecy regulatiors end policy engagement Further 0 Partner with e Develop internal Ci) Increase opex on 0 Understand JV 8 Accelerate G Support customer Play larger role actions industry to systems to track: low/zero-emission partner climate processing access to in knowledge for review access green procurement fuels and ambitions, studies and renewable energy Paring for key energy, altE!r11ative emissions technologies collaborate investments and carbon low zero when available on emissions abatement and zero- 0 Work with others e optimise emissions fleet mine plans solutions emissions to standardise 0 Work with vesse considering deep technologies Q collaborate emission tracking owners and Q investin R&D with government system, data customers on decarbonisation for new tech in public-private collection energy-efficiency scenarios additional partnersn ps Engage with O Q Expand st3ndards suppliers to investment partnerships accreditafor Influence their in Singapore w th customers and traceability emission Global Centre to operationalise programs ambitions for Maritime low carbon stee Decarbonisation technology More active role in advocacy, forums Note Taal Scope1. 2 and 3 reported emissions inventory in FY20:l1 is estim3ted a1 419 less than Legend 1% of total) that a1e included in our GHG Protocol accounting but are not cutlinad 1n this diagram include non-maritime logistics cope 3 em:ss1ons categories ptnchased gocds and services tmcludmg capital goods). fuel and activities, business employee we energy prod Jets as as and energy coal. We account metallurgical coal w thi1 steelmaking emisgions Futura faeing commodities only includes cur processing of copper Other products 8 Control 0 Partner Influence and potash are currently not because of the their end use. productton volumes sull be1ng relatively tow, and/or dcwn5trecm being estimated to. Details on our $ ions reportirg methodology are at bhp.com/annua report BHP Climate Transition Action Plan 9

A suite of actions to drive results Recognising the complexity and multi-dimensional nature of the challenge to address emissions, we utilise a range of tools and levers as part of our approach. Investments and capital alignment We are supporting our climate plan with targeted investment in areas such as operational emissions reduction, product optimisation, customer, supplier and technology partnerships and future low-carbon growth technology options. ï,· We have established a pipeline of operational decarbonisation projects across all our operated assets, for which potential capital spend is expected to be in the range of US$100 million to US$200 million per annum over the next five years. This estimate for operational decarbonisation expenditure has been included in existing capital guidance. Potential capital spend on operational decarbonisation to FY2030 may be in the range of US$2 billion to US$4 billion35. ï,· In FY2020, we announced a commitment of at least US$400 million in emissions reduction initiatives across our operated assets (as described above) and value chain over the five-year life of the Climate Investment Program. We remain on track to exceed this commitment. In FY2021, we spent US$29 million under this program, and committed to spend significantly more, including up to US$65 million over coming years towards partnerships with our customers in the steel sector. ï,· Through BHP Ventures36, we target emerging companies with potentially game-changing offerings. We are seeking to drive innovation in solutions that support BHP, and our suppliers and customers as we all seek to decarbonise, while creating value for BHP and our shareholders. Going forward, as our climate response is further integrated into business-as-usual planning, our spending on climate initiatives will be increasingly indistinguishable from normal business spending as we integrate climate metrics into our operating, capital and portfolio decision making. We are making capital decisions that recognise BHP’s prioritisation of commodities that are positively leveraged to the emerging global decarbonisation mega-trend. We intend to systematically integrate one or more Paris-aligned scenarios (including 1.5°C scenarios) into our strategy and capital prioritisation processes beginning in FY2022. This will enhance our current approach, in which our 1.5°C scenario is used to inform and test strategic portfolio decisions. For more information, see our discussion in section 4 ‘Assessing capital alignment with a 1.5°C world’. Offsets We are furthering our approach to use of carbon offsets and supporting the market functionality required to enable their use. We believe carbon offsets are a necessary contributor to meeting the Paris Agreement goals, with offsets included in most credible pathways to a global net zero emissions position. BHP is a member of the Taskforce on Scaling Voluntary Carbon Markets (TSVCM), a private sector-led initiative sponsored by the International Institute of Finance. In January 2021, the TSVCM released a report37 which states that a large-scale voluntary carbon market is critical to reaching the Paris Agreement goals and estimates that voluntary carbon markets need to grow by more than 15-fold by 2030 in order to support the investment required to deliver a 1.5°C pathway. We expect voluntary and/or regulatory carbon offsets will play a role for some of our customers as they seek to reduce their Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions, contributing to decarbonisation in our value chain. We will continue to seek opportunities to invest in high-quality offset-generating projects that also deliver sustainability co-benefits. We are also considering supplying offsets to complement our customers’ decarbonisation strategies, which may include structured ‘low carbon’ product offerings or a standalone supply of offsets. Refer to ‘BHP’s Carbon Offset strategy’ below in section 2 for more information. Advocacy and transparency Management is held to account through both our rigorous process of Board oversight and a direct linkage of climate-related targets and goals to executive remuneration. We have also affirmed our commitment to advocate for efficient public policy settings in pursuit of global decarbonisation. We aim to continue to demonstrate leadership in responding to evolving approaches to climate change and climate-related disclosures. 2. Our Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions position and performance We remain committed to continuing reductions in GHG emissions in our operations. For our operational GHG emissions (Scope 1 and Scope 2 from our operated assets), we have set: 38 ï,· A short-term target to maintain operational GHG emissions at or below FY2017 levels39 by FY2022, while we continue to grow our business ï,· A medium-term target to reduce operational GHG emissions by at least 30 per cent from FY2020 levels40 by FY2030 ï,· A long-term goal to achieve net zero41 operational GHG emissions by 2050 This reflects our commitment to decarbonising BHP‘s operations and a recognition that we must play our part to accelerate the global pathway to decarbonisation. Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions profile The reported Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions inventory of our operated assets totalled 16.2 Mt CO2-e in FY2021, about 2 per cent higher than our operational emissions in FY2020. The majority of these emissions resulted from the combined impact of electricity use (6.2 Mt, 38 per cent) and diesel use for material movement (6.4 Mt, 40 per cent); the remainder was associated with fugitive emissions from coal mining and petroleum (2.2 Mt, 13.5 per cent), emissions from the use of natural gas for power and heat generation (1.2 Mt, 7 per cent), and other less material sources (0.2 Mt, 1 per cent).42 As a result of actions taken in FY2020 and FY2021, particularly securing the supply of renewable energy for some of our operated assets, our forecasted operational GHG emissions are currently tracking in line with our FY2022 and FY2030 targets. 35 Spend estimates remain uncertain and may change as studies continue to progress, technologies mature and new alternatives emerge. 36 Our internal venture capital unit. 37 Taskforce on Scaling Voluntary Carbon Markets https://www.iif.com/Portals/1/Files/TSVCM_Report.pdf. 38 These positions are expressed using terms that are defined in the Glossary, including the terms ‘net zero’, ‘target’ and ‘goal’. 39 FY2017 baseline will be adjusted for any material acquisitions and divestments based on GHG emissions at the time of the transaction. Carbon offsets will be used as required. 40 FY2020 baseline will be adjusted for any material acquisitions and divestments based on GHG emissions at the time of the transaction. Carbon offsets will be used as required. 41 Net zero includes the use of carbon offsets as required. 42 For detailed reporting of emissions, refer to the BHP Annual Report 2021 available at bhp.com/annualreport. BHP Climate Transition Action Plan 10

FY2021 progress In FY2021, each of our operated assets developed decarbonisation plans out to FY2030, containing a pipeline of emissions reduction projects and initiatives that collectively support our medium-term target and long-term goal for operational emissions. We have progressed early-stage projects designed to reduce operational emissions at a number of our operated assets, entered several renewable power purchase agreements (PPAs) and started to tackle the technical challenge of reducing emissions from the use of diesel for trucks. Operational capital planning We assess and rank each decarbonisation project across our operated assets through our Capital Allocation Framework, where our decarbonisation commitments rank alongside maintenance capital in the hierarchy of our capital allocation. Through our studies and investment governance process, we seek to optimise the risk and reward proposition for these projects to allocate capital and optimise decarbonisation at a portfolio level. We have developed an internal marginal abatement cost curve (Figure 3) designed to support the allocation of capital towards the most economically efficient and effective decarbonisation projects. We include regional carbon price forecasts in our assessment of all projects in the Capital Allocation Framework. In recognition that explicit carbon pricing regimes in many instances do not fully reflect the implicit regulatory risk and value of carbon across our value chain, we are developing additional qualitative and quantitative metrics to better capture the future cost and value of emissions abatement to inform corporate strategy and core business decisions. Power initiatives We have achieved significant milestones in progressing our plan to reduce future emissions associated with the use of electricity. We expect to increasingly see the impact from FY2022 onwards. Examples of actions taken in FY2021 include: ï,· Signing a renewable PPA, which is expected to supply up to 50 per cent of our electricity needs at the Nickel West Kwinana Refinery ï,· Working with TransAlta on plans to build two solar farms and a battery storage system to help power the Mt Keith and Leinster operations at Nickel West (announced July 2021) ï,· Securing renewable electricity via a PPA to supply approximately half of the electricity needs across Queensland Coal mines from low-emissions sources This builds on our FY2020 progress at our Chilean copper operated assets, Escondida and Spence, which put in place renewable PPAs commencing from FY2022. We are on track to use 100 per cent renewable power supply at these assets by the mid-2020s. Technology partnerships We continue to collaborate with industry peers and original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) to assess zero emissions material movement options and determine how they can be deployed at our operations in the future. In FY2021, we partnered with Rio Tinto and Vale to launch the ‘Charge on Innovation Challenge’, a mining truck electrification initiative, facilitated by Austmine. The initiative aims to develop innovative charging infrastructure in parallel with the development of battery-electric trucks. We recognise the essential role of OEMs in the development of new products, bringing their expertise and know-how to help solve for the emissions challenge. Acting alone, we are not in a position to achieve the necessary emissions reductions. In August 2021, BHP became a founding member of Komatsu’s GHG Alliance, which aims to develop commercially viable zero-GHG emissions haul trucks. We will provide engineering and technical resources to Komatsu, enabling our real-time access to technology in development and giving Komatsu the opportunity to draw on our mining expertise to accelerate its path to market. In FY2022, we intend to look for further opportunities to collaborate with OEMs, source renewable electricity for our Australian operated assets and progress studies for diesel displacement at our operated assets. For more information on our pathway to net zero operational emissions by 2050, see the BHP Climate Change Report 2020 available at bhp.com/climate. Figure 3: BHP operational emissions marginal abatement cost curve BHP Climate Transition Action Plan 11

Carbon offset strategy While we plan to prioritise emissions reductions within our operated assets to meet our medium-term target, we expect to have a requirement for offsets in order to deliver our net zero goal, particularly to address ‘hard to abate’ emissions such as fugitive methane from coal production. By including offsets as an element of our climate change strategy, we can also continue to support a range of projects that offer sustainability co-benefits, including support for local communities and biodiversity conservation. Our offset strategy focuses on: ï,· Directly investing in offset-generating projects that deliver sustainability co-benefits and that can provide a long-term supply of offsets ï,· Working with others to support the move toward mature international and sub-national carbon market mechanisms ï,· Developing a clear approach to both the voluntary and regulatory use of offsets to meet emission reduction commitments, as well as for structured product offerings to our customer base In FY2021, we retired 300,000 carbon offsets in the form of verified carbon units equivalent to the net increase in our FY2021 operational emissions from FY2020 of 0.3Mt CO2-e. The offsets were sourced from high quality projects such as the Cordillera Azul National Park REDD+ Project and the Kasigau Corridor REDD Project,43 representing additional, permanent and otherwise unclaimed emission reductions from activities designed to avoid contributing to social or environmental harms. For more information on our approach to progressive offsetting, see the BHP Climate Change Report 2020 available at bhp.com/climate. 3. Scope 3 emissions position and performance We recognise the importance of supporting efforts to reduce emissions in our value chain as a critical element in the pursuit of global net zero across the economy. In 2020, we set Scope 3 emissions goals for 2030 for processing of our steelmaking products and maritime transportation of our products, supported by an action plan and aligned to a long-term vision to support the economy-wide transition necessary to meet the Paris Agreement goals by working with customers and suppliers to achieve sectoral decarbonisation. Those goals are to: ï,· Support industry to develop technologies and pathways capable of 30 per cent emissions intensity reduction in integrated steelmaking, with widespread adoption expected post 2030 ï,· Support 40 per cent emissions intensity reduction of BHP-chartered shipping of our products In this Plan, we are building on these medium-term goals. Our position reflects the challenges and opportunities in line with our strategy for increasing long-term portfolio exposure towards future facing commodities. Our recent proposed portfolio changes44 are aligned with our strategic approach to manage risk and maximise value. While these decisions were not made for the purpose of setting a future Scope 3 position, upon completion, the changes would lower our total Scope 3 emissions inventory (refer to ‘Energy products’ below). As we shape our portfolio for the future, we are announcing our enhanced Scope 3 position.45 While we cannot ensure the outcome alone, for our reshaped portfolio46, we are pursuing the long-term goal of net zero47 Scope 3 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 2050 to support the transition that the world must make. To progress towards this goal: ï,· we are targeting net zero for the operational GHG emissions of our direct suppliers48 and the emissions from maritime transport of our products; and ï,· recognising the particular challenge of a net zero pathway for customers’ processing of our products,49 which is dependent on the development and downstream deployment of solutions and supportive policy, we cannot set a target, but will continue to partner with customers and others to accelerate the transition to carbon neutral50 steelmaking and other downstream processes. We will also support the value chain by pursuing carbon neutral production of our future facing commodities, such as copper, nickel, and potash, to provide the essential building blocks of a net zero transition. Each target is described with its assumptions and drivers in the relevant sub-section of this section 3 below. 43 REDD and REDD+ are United Nations programs for reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation. 44 On 17 August 2021, BHP announced it had entered into a merger commitment deed with Woodside to combine their respective oil and gas portfolios by an all-stock merger. Completion of the merger is subject to confirmatory due diligence, negotiation and execution of full form transaction documents, and satisfaction of conditions precedent including shareholder, regulatory and other approvals, and expected to occur in the second quarter of the 2022 calendar year, with an effective date of 1 July 2021. For more information, refer to the Joint Announcement ‘Woodside and BHP to create a global energy company’ by Woodside and BHP dated 17 August 2021, available at bhp.com/investor-centre. On 28 June 2021, BHP announced its agreement with Glencore to divest its 33.3 per cent interest in Cerrejón, a non-operated energy coal joint venture in Colombia, with an effective economic date of 31 December 2020. Completion is subject to the satisfaction of customary competition and regulatory requirements and expected to occur in the first half of the 2022 calendar year. 45 This position is expressed using terms that are defined in the Glossary, including the terms ‘net zero’, ‘target’ and ‘goal’. 46 Subject to completion of both of the divestment of our oil and gas business and the sale of our interest in Cerrejón. 47 Net zero includes the use of carbon offsets as required. 48 ‘Operational GHG emissions of our direct suppliers’ means the Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions of our direct suppliers included in BHP’s Scope 3 reporting categories of purchased goods and services (including capital goods), fuel and energy related activities, business travel, and employee commuting. 49 In line with our reporting methodology for Scope 3 emissions, we define ‘processing of our products’ as emissions resulting from our customers’ processing of our products comprising iron ore and metallurgical coal (steelmaking materials) and copper (assumed to be processed into copper wire for end use). 50 Carbon neutral includes all those greenhouse gas emissions as defined for BHP reporting purposes. BHP Climate Transition Action Plan 12

Scope 3 emissions profile BHP’s total reported Scope 3 emissions inventory in FY2021 is estimated at 402.5 Mt CO2-e. The most significant contributions to Scope 3 emissions come from the downstream processing of our products, in particular from the processing of iron ore and metallurgical coal in steelmaking. Key Scope 3 emissions addressed in this transition plan#^ Million tonnes CO2--equivalent FY2021 FY2020 Procurement* 10.4 10.4 Maritime 7.4 7.5 Energy products** 76.4 96.8 Steelmaking, comprising: 300.5 292.9 Iron ore 260.7 252.8 Metallurgical coal 39.8 40.1 Future facing 5.0 5.2 commodities*** # Source: BHP Annual Report 2021, available at bhp.com/annualreport ^ Some non-material categories (representing less than 1 per cent of our total reported Scope 3 emissions inventory) that are not listed in the categories above include investments and non-maritime upstream and downstream logistics. Energy investments are discussed in the ‘Energy products’ sub-section below. * Procurement includes Scope 3 emissions reporting categories of purchased goods and services (including capital goods), fuel and energy related activities, business travel, and employee commuting. ** In line with our reporting methodology for Scope 3 emissions, we define our energy products as oil, gas and energy coal and we account for metallurgical coal within our customers’ processing of sold products (within steelmaking emissions). *** Future facing commodities currently only includes our customers’ processing of copper. Other products including nickel and potash are currently not included because of the difficulty in determining their exact end use, current production volumes still being relatively low or inconsequential, and/or downstream emissions being estimated to be immaterial. We calculate Scope 3 emissions using methodologies consistent with the GHG Protocol Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Accounting and Reporting Standard (Scope 3 Standard). This identifies five generally accepted principles: relevance, completeness, consistency, transparency, and accuracy. We have made key improvements to our reporting of steelmaking emissions this year, as described in the Improving the accuracy and transparency of steelmaking emissions box on this page. However, a degree of overlap in reporting boundaries still exists in other parts of Scope 3 emissions due to our involvement at multiple points in the life cycle of commodities we produce and consume. As result, some ‘double counting’ may be inherent due to our position in the value chain and may inflate the total Scope 3 figure reported. As reporting improves in other parts of our value chain, we will seek to improve our own reporting, continuing to focus on accuracy and relevance. For further detail on how we calculate our emissions inventory see the BHP Scope 1, 2 and 3 GHG Emissions Calculation Methodology, available at bhp.com/climate. As noted, our Scope 3 targets are referable to a FY2020 baseline year and, in some cases, their boundaries differ from the required reporting boundaries. We expect the significant degree of uncertainty that currently affects Scope 3 reporting, including ‘double counting’ and the inevitable inaccuracy of top-level estimates for emissions intensity for different categories, to improve over time as stakeholders work to refine Scope 3 emissions reporting. As the boundaries and methodology of accounting evolve, we will seek to recalculate the emissions baseline for our Scope 3 targets accordingly. Improving the accuracy and transparency of steelmaking emissions In FY2021, we have addressed some of the key limitations associated with estimating Scope 3 emissions in our reported inventory. We have worked to eliminate ‘double counting’ of emissions from our customers’ processing of iron ore and metallurgical coal in steelmaking, by allocating emissions between the two and reporting a single total Scope 3 estimation for emissions from steelmaking. We now include metallurgical coal together with iron ore under the ‘processing of sold products’ category to form a complete picture of steelmaking emissions. This approach to improving accuracy is consistent with the GHG Protocol’s Scope 3 Standard. We have also improved the accuracy of the emission factor used to estimate Scope 3 emissions by reflecting the blast furnace integrated steelmaking route into which the majority of our steelmaking raw materials portfolio is sold. The improved estimation also considers our iron ore product quality and its impact on the amount of ore required to produce steel. We will adjust the balance of intensity factors as transparency in the industry grows and our product quality and sales placement evolve. Energy products We are in the process of several portfolio changes that propose to shape our business reflecting a range of criteria consistent with our long-term strategy to maximise shareholder value. Each decision around portfolio must be made on its merits, and consider a range of impacts on economic, social and environmental outcomes. Divestments also allow for a reallocation of capital towards other parts of the portfolio. Our proposed portfolio changes will further enable us to focus our investment on production of the future facing commodities that are the essential building blocks of a net zero transition. Upon completion of these transactions, emissions associated with customers’ use of our energy products will no longer be a significant portion of the overall reported emissions inventory in our reshaped, future facing portfolio. In FY2021, customers’ use of our energy products contributed an estimated total of 76.4 Mt CO2-e to the ‘use of sold products’ category of our reported Scope 3 emissions inventory. This consisted of energy coal (38.3 Mt CO2-e), natural gas (19.5 Mt CO2-e), crude oil and condensates (16.8 Mt CO2-e) and natural gas liquids (1.8 Mt CO2-e). Metallurgical coal is excluded from this category and counted in steelmaking emissions under the customers’ processing of our products category. Oil and gas On 17 August 2021, we announced our intent to separate our oil and gas business, including all our Petroleum operated assets and equity investments in non-operating oil and gas joint ventures, and combine it with Woodside’s oil and gas portfolio by an all-stock merger. The merger is subject to confirmatory due diligence, negotiation and execution of full form transaction documents, and satisfaction of conditions precedent including shareholder, regulatory and other approvals, and expected to be completed in the second quarter of the 2022 calendar year with an effective date of 1 July 2021. For more information, refer to the Joint Announcement ‘Woodside and BHP to create a global energy company’ by Woodside and BHP dated 17 August 2021, available at bhp.com/investor-centre. The merged entity is expected to unlock synergies and increase choice for BHP’s shareholders in the energy transition, while building on Woodside’s and BHP’s shared values and focus on sustainable operations, carbon management and ESG leadership. We believe that the combined business will be more resilient, agile, and likely to have the necessary cash flow and BHP Climate Transition Action Plan 13

balance sheet to facilitate investment in emerging opportunities such as hydrogen, ammonia and carbon capture, utilisation and storage (CCUS). The combined business should be better placed to fund investments that support the energy transition than two smaller, separate sets of assets. In FY2021, the Petroleum business (our Petroleum operated assets and equity investments in non-operating oil and gas joint ventures) accounted for 38.1Mt CO2-e of our reported Scope 3 emissions inventory in the ‘use of sold products’ category, and 2.3Mt CO2-e in the downstream investments (i.e. our non-operated assets) category. Energy coal In August 2020, we announced plans to divest our interests in assets, including Cerrejón, a non-operated energy coal joint venture in Colombia, and New South Wales Energy Coal (NSWEC), to focus our coal portfolio on higher-quality metallurgical coals used in steelmaking. In June 2021, we announced the signing of an agreement to divest our 33.3 per cent interest in Cerrejón, with an effective economic date of 31 December 2020. Subject to the satisfaction of customary competition and regulatory requirements, this is expected to complete in the second half of FY2022. In FY2021, Cerrejón51 accounted for 3.4 Mt CO2-e of our reported Scope 3 emissions inventory in the ‘use of sold products’ category, and 0.05 Mt CO2-e in the downstream investments (i.e. our non-operated assets) category. The process for NSWEC is progressing, in line with the two-year timeframe we set last year. We remain open to all options and continue consultation with relevant stakeholders. In FY2021, NSWEC accounted for 34.9 Mt CO2-e of our reported Scope 3 emissions inventory in the ‘use of sold products’ category. Procurement BHP’s reported Scope 3 emissions inventory for procurement-related categories (purchased goods and services [including capital goods], fuel and energy related activities, business travel, and employee commuting) totalled 10.4 Mt CO2-e in FY2021. Reported emissions in these categories include emissions from production of equipment used in our operations; construction materials used in our capital projects; professional services; and the upstream emissions related to the production of fuels used in our operations. ï,· For purchased goods and services, our current calculation methodology is the ‘spend-based’ method, assigning industry average emission factors to the economic value of the goods and services. ï,· For fuel and energy related activities, industry-average Scope 3 emission factors for each fuel source and electricity are applied to the relevant consumption volumes from our operations to calculate an overall emissions estimate. ï,· Business travel is calculated based on distance, sourced from our corporate travel services providers and other internal spend data. Employee commuting is primarily related to business flights and Fly-in Fly-out (FIFO) charters and is also calculated based on spend. Aligned with the GHG Protocol reporting standards, the majority of our emissions estimations for procurement categories currently rely on the ‘spend-based’ method which covers ‘cradle-to-gate’52 emissions as the reporting boundary. However, the accounting of the above categories remains highly uncertain and category-level default factors based on spend do not accurately reflect the real intensity of goods and services procured. Our reported emissions inventory boundary based on this method will also differ from how we will track progress towards our Scope 3 target for procurement, which is focused on our ability to influence the Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions of our direct suppliers. We will target net zero53 by 2050 for the operational GHG emissions of our direct suppliers,54 subject to the widespread availability of carbon neutral55 goods and services to meet our requirements. In order to take targeted measures to support reduction and management of emissions from the highest emitting supplier categories, we will take further steps to improve the recording of the carbon footprint of our supplier value chain. In FY2022, we will review our procurement-related emissions methodology, seeking to incorporate accounting and intensity factors more tailored to a BHP-specific, rather than industry-wide, position. We have started to engage with our major strategic suppliers to understand their emissions, climate roadmap, targets and risks. In the short term, we plan to actively monitor and track our key suppliers’ public commitments to decarbonisation. In coming years, we will systemise the integration of our climate target into our supplier selection criteria, onboarding of new suppliers, existing contract management practices and contract renewals. Progressive improvement in the emissions intensity of inbound goods and services is expected, in line with country-level targets and corporate commitments. We will seek to partner in the development and commercialisation of carbon neutral goods and services targeting the needs of our business. We acknowledge the challenges that some of our suppliers may face in reducing hard-to-abate emissions, and we plan to work with them through knowledge sharing and research and development initiatives to support the pursuit of solutions. 51 Emissions for 2H2020 only; 1H2021 are not accounted or in FY2021 reporting as a result of the effective economic date for sale of BHP’s interest in Cerrejón. 52 Cradle-to-gate includes all emissions that occur in the lifecycle of purchased products, up to the point of receipt by the reporting company (excluding emissions from sources that are owned or controlled by the reporting company). 53 Net zero includes the use of carbon offsets as required. 54 ‘Operational GHG emissions of our direct suppliers’ means the Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions of our direct suppliers included in BHP’s Scope 3 reporting categories of purchased goods and services (including capital goods), fuel and energy related activities, business travel, and employee commuting. 55 Carbon neutral includes all those greenhouse gas emissions as defined for BHP reporting purposes. BHP Climate Transition Action Plan 14

Maritime Maritime transport of our products contributed 7.4 Mt CO2-e to our reported Scope 3 emissions inventory in FY2021. BHP is one of the largest dry bulk charterers in the world and maritime transport of our products makes up approximately 1 per cent of the international shipping emissions from the maritime industry. As a result, we recognise our role in supporting the maritime industry in meeting or exceeding the decarbonisation ambitions planned by the International Maritime Organisation (IMO), while plotting a trajectory towards net zero shipping of our products by 2050. We will target net zero56 by 2050 for GHG emissions from all shipping57 of our products,58 subject to the widespread availability of carbon neutral59 solutions including low/zero-emission technology on board suitable ships and low/zero-emission marine fuels. Actions we are planning include investing in the Global Centre for Maritime Decarbonisation, to be established in Singapore. We are seeking further opportunities to collaborate with ship owners and fuel suppliers on projects to test and adopt low/zero-emission fuels and energy-efficient technology on board ships. We commit to chartering and fuelling low/zero-emission vessels in line with the rate they become available on the market. In the medium term, we will continue supporting 40 per cent emissions intensity reduction of BHP-chartered shipping of our products (our goal for 2030). Our FY2021 progress in maritime BHP issued and awarded a world-first tender for lower-emissions LNG-fuelled bulk carrier vessels for iron ore transportation to Eastern Pacific Shipping and the LNG supply agreement to Shell. This will significantly reduce GHG emissions per voyage and virtually eliminate nitrogen oxides (NOx) and sulfur oxides (SOx)60 emissions. We signed a Memorandum of Cooperation to become one of the founding members of the Global Centre for Maritime Decarbonisation. The Centre will be set up in Singapore and act as a focal point for the global maritime industry’s efforts in decarbonisation and innovation. We have initially pledged S$10M to support the establishment of the Centre and fund research and development projects through the Centre. BHP participated in the first marine biofuel trial involving an ocean-going vessel bunkering in Singapore in collaboration with Oldendorff and GoodFuels, and supported by the Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore. This trial sought to reduce GHG emissions by 80-90 per cent ‘well-to-wake’ compared with Heavy Fuel Oil/Very Low Sulphur Fuel Oil, with fuel produced from sustainable waste and residue streams. We recommitted to GHG rating vetting criteria of RightShip61, choosing only to allow vessels into our supply chain that have a better relative design efficiency compared to peer vessels. While we continue to support our shipping partners in achieving the IMO’s GHG strategy ambitions, including their 2030 emissions intensity targets, we believe that the IMO must set more ambitious longer-term goals for international shipping and we will use our position to advocate for these. The use of offsets will be influenced by factors including remnant lifecycle emissions associated with the production, processing and transport of marine fuels, any remaining third party-chartered vessel emissions and the effectiveness of on board carbon capture and offshore storage. We will monitor the relative emissions intensity of future low-emission technology and fuel, and use our position and actions to influence our value chain towards lower emissions-intensity options to minimise our use of offsets in meeting the target. In FY2022, we intend to begin to integrate the use of LNG-fuelled bulk carriers into our maritime operations, while also assessing the suitability of other routes for LNG or bio-fuelled bulk carriers. We will also explore additional ecosystem partnerships focused on wind-assisted propulsion and renewably produced future fuels. We expect that, in the long term, new fuels such as renewably produced diesel or LNG, or green/blue ammonia or methanol-fuelled dry bulk vessels, will be required to fully decarbonise the industry. In addition to our existing use of RightShip’s GHG rating vetting criteria, we are working to develop a sustainability analytics platform to analyse the operational energy efficiency and emissions of BHP-chartered vessels. This will provide intelligence to enable more energy-efficient vessel selection, as well as more targeted emissions reduction insights and actions that can be pursued with our shipping partners. Steelmaking Steel is the backbone of the modern built environment and has an important role in decarbonisation. Our 1.5°C scenario62 modelling suggests the world is expected to need almost twice as much steel in the next 30 years as it did in the last 30. As climate action and the energy transition unfold, we expect steel to remain the key building block of global infrastructure, underpinning the energy and economic transition as well as broader development goals. Emissions from steelmaking represent around 7-10 per cent of global total estimated emissions,63 meaning tackling the challenge of decarbonising the sector is crucial to meeting global ambitions. The continued production of steel is necessary to support future economic growth and to enable system-wide decarbonisation, even while it remains one of the most difficult sectors to abate. The Institutional Investors Group on Climate Change (IIGCC), in partnership with Climate Action 100+ (CA100+), recently published a report64 highlighting how difficult it will be to transition the global steel value chain to net zero by 2050. In their modelling of even the most ambitious trajectory for innovation, investment and adoption of decarbonisation measures, the steel industry is considered unlikely to reach net zero. 56 Net zero includes the use of carbon offsets as required. 57 BHP-chartered and third party-chartered shipping. 58 Target excludes maritime transportation of products purchased by BHP. 59 Carbon neutral includes all those greenhouse gas emissions as defined for BHP reporting purposes. 60 SOx are not GHGs and not all NOx are GHGs. However, nitrous oxide is a GHG and is commonly included under the banner of NOx. 61 RightShip is a leading maritime risk management and environmental assessment organisation that aims to improve the safety and environmental sustainability of the maritime industry. The company is equally owned by BHP, Rio Tinto and Cargill. More information is available at rightship.com. 62 This scenario aligns with the Paris Agreement goals and requires steep global annual emissions reductions, sustained for decades, to stay within a 1.5°C carbon budget. Refer to the BHP Climate Change Report 2020 available at bhp.com/climate for information about the assumptions, outputs and limitations of our 1.5°C Paris-aligned scenario. 63 https://www.iea.org/reports/iron-and-steel-technology-roadmap 64 https://www.iigcc.org/resources BHP Climate Transition Action Plan 15

For BHP, emissions from the processing of iron ore and decarbonisation must be supported by regulators and investors metallurgical coal within customers’ steelmaking operations and shared appropriately across the value chain. These costs totalled 300.5 Mt CO2-e in FY2021, representing 75 per cent of will need to be captured in price signals further downstream to our total reported Scope 3 emissions inventory. the end consumer in order to incentivise the development of solutions. Through wide-scale deployment and adoption, these BHP’s iron ore and metallurgical coal is processed almost costs can be brought down over time through efficiencies of exclusively within the blast furnace-basic oxygen furnace (BF-scale and innovation. BOF) steelmaking process, which today represents 72 per cent of steel production.65 The BF-BOF is favoured because of its For more on BHP’s views on the key technologies needed to efficiency and operational flexibility, enabling the use of a decarbonise steel, refer to our “Pathways to decarbonisation” broad range of iron ore qualities. However, the BF-BOF series available at bhp.com/media-and-insights/prospects/ process is roughly five times more emissions intensive than scrap-based electric arc furnace (EAF) and two times more Pathways to decarbonisation episode one: power emissions intensive than natural gas-based direct reduced Pathways to decarbonisation episode two: steelmaking iron-EAF (DRI-EAF). technologies The blast furnace (BF) relies on coke (produced from Pathways to decarbonisation episode three: regional metallurgical coal) to remove oxygen and other impurities from approaches to steel iron ore to yield metallic iron. While low carbon fuels such as Pathways to decarbonisation episode four: hydrogen hydrogen can supplement energy requirements, only coke can provide the structural support required for efficient BF operation. Steelmaking: inherent uncertainties to net zero Utilising our deep understanding of the steelmaking process, we There are a number of global uncertainties that must be have developed a Steel Decarbonisation Framework to examine reckoned with in terms of achieving net zero in steel. These are the stages that the industry must pass through on its principally in the areas of technology development (including decarbonisation journey, and associated technologies (Figure 4). cost). Beyond this, there are a range of regional factors that are The framework envisions an ultimate, assumed ‘green’ end-state equally influential (and in some cases maybe more so) in in which carbon neutral steel can be produced due to the determining likely future pathways. Key factors include: adoption of incremental and transformative technologies such as hydrogen-based direct reduced iron (DRI) or electrolysis. This Availability of lower carbon raw material feedstock (including would require access to affordable renewable electricity, but not exclusively scrap) widespread commercial-scale low or zero carbon alternative Age of existing facilities fuels (like hydrogen and biofuels) and supporting infrastructure. In the transition to this ‘green’ end state, additional abatement Variable levels of policy support (either subsidies for measures such as BF optimisation technologies (including use of technology or carbon pricing to incentivise abatement) low carbon fuels and/or top gas recycling) and CCUS would also Exposure to international trade in steel and steel products be necessary. Capital cost estimates for decarbonisation of the global steel sector vary widely, dependent upon technology Future growth in demand for affordable steel pathways and assumptions regarding the inclusion of associated renewable energy infrastructure, but typically exist in the range of US$1 trillion and US$3 trillion (cumulative).66 As argued by the IIGCC and other industry stakeholders, the costs of development and deployment of technologies and energy sources for steel Figure 4: BHP’s steel decarbonisation framework 65 https://www.iea.org/reports/iron-and-steel-technology-roadmap 66 See, for example, the Global Financial Markets Association, Climate Finance Markets and the Real Economy BHP Climate Transition Action Plan 16

Different regions will progress decarbonisation at different paces because of the factors outlined above. Today’s policies and signposts indicate that most regions will only achieve a green end-state after 2050, as illustrated by the steel outcomes in our Central Energy and Lower Carbon scenarios (Figure 5)67. Even assuming a step-change and global convergence in regulatory and technological factors over the next decade, our modelling indicates that it is still difficult to achieve net zero sector emissions for key steel producing regions. To explore the bottom-up limits of steel decarbonisation on a regional basis, we have developed a “Deep Green” hypothetical for the steel sector. Deep Green seeks to simulate the specific impact on the steel sector of a much more rapid global convergence towards decarbonisation, universal access to zero emissions electricity and a US$200 per tonne global carbon price. It is not like the whole-system modelling with global temperature outcomes like our Central Energy or Lower Carbon scenarios. Deep Green is also entirely separate to BHP’s 1.5°C scenario (which is a global top-down technical model more similar in approach to the Central Energy and Lower Carbon scenarios) In this Deep Green hypothetical, global steel emissions fall by around two-thirds from current levels, bringing absolute volumes well below the 1990 base level. That is significant, but is not net zero. Even in Europe, which has positive exposure to the factors outlined above, net zero is not achieved. Under the Deep Green hypothetical, primary iron demand could be modestly affected due to higher scrap use. Metallurgical coal demand volumes may be lower than projected in our climate change scenarios due to higher penetration of alternative steelmaking processes. However, potential reduction in demand could be offset by expected increase in premiums for higher quality coal, which BHP would be well placed to capture. It is important to emphasise that we consider the likelihood of the Deep Green hypothetical to be much lower than our Central and Lower Carbon scenarios. We do note that the commitment to enable swifter decarbonisation pathways in the steel sector is gathering momentum. Today, 34 per cent of BHP’s current iron sales are to customers that have net zero targets in place. These commitments are underpinned by net zero commitments in the major Asian steelmaking nations of China (2060), Japan (2050) and South Korea (2050). However, although ambitions are growing, a pathway to net zero for steel is still highly uncertain. Despite the supportive regulatory landscape, emitters may still be constrained by bottlenecks in scrap availability and the ramp up of low emissions steelmaking capacity. Notably, some steelmakers expect to utilise offsets and carbon abatement solutions (including CCUS), in addition to new production technologies, to achieve their long-term goals. Finally, steel producers have available various decarbonisation levers (such as scrap usage), which do not always result in reduced emissions from customers’ processing of our products. Net zero for some of our steel producers may not result in equivalent reduction of BHP’s value chain emissions. Figure 5: Steel emissions for key regions under different assumptions 67 The Central Energy View and Lower Carbon View scenarios are described in the footnotes to section 4 below, and in more detail in the BHP Climate Change Report 2020 available at bhp.com/climate. There are inherent limitations with scenario analysis and it is difficult to predict which, if any, of the scenarios might eventuate. Scenarios do not constitute definitive outcomes for us. Scenario analysis relies on assumptions that may or may not be, or prove to be, correct and may or may not eventuate, and scenarios may be impacted by additional factors to the assumptions disclosed. BHP Climate Transition Action Plan 17

Steelmaking: BHP’s action plan Future facing commodities Recognising the particular challenge of a net zero Future facing commodities are those that BHP deem to be pathway for customers’ processing of our products68, positively leveraged to the mega-trends, including decarbonisation, that are playing out in the world around us, as which is dependent on the development and downstream indicated by our scenario analysis including our 1.5°C scenario. deployment of solutions and supportive policy, we will In general, the demand for future facing commodities increases continue to partner with customers and others to as the scale of decarbonisation encapsulated in each scenario accelerate the transition to carbon neutral69 steelmaking. increases. The modelled demand increases are of sufficient scale that they may be expected to have a material impact on In the medium term, we will continue supporting industry to long-term market balance. Currently, the major commodities in develop technologies and pathways capable of 30 per cent the BHP portfolio that fall within this criteria are copper, nickel, emissions intensity reduction in integrated steelmaking, with and potash. widespread adoption expected post 2030 (our goal for 2030). Buyers of future facing commodities are increasingly demanding As the IIGCC noted in their report, the decarbonisation of the improved supply chain sustainability and traceability. The legal steel industry is inherently a value chain effort that will require landscape, governmental policies and corporate goals continue contributions from policy makers, investors, steel producers, to push the industry towards more sustainable practices and set suppliers and customers. We have a number of partnerships and new performance criteria for decarbonisation. Key nickel and internal initiatives underway to test and implement low-carbon copper customers such as automakers and battery steelmaking technologies and raw materials. manufacturers have indicated they are firstly focusing on In FY2021, we announced memoranda of understanding for removing emissions from their own operations and then from the partnerships with China Baowu, JFE and HBIS to invest up to entire value chain. a total of US$65 million in research and development of steel We will support industry to develop technologies for decarbonisation pathways. We also established a research improved traceability and support the value chain by program with University of Newcastle in Australia to study raw material properties in low carbon iron and steel making. pursuing carbon neutral70 production of our future facing commodities, such as copper, nickel and potash, to Additionally, BHP Ventures is strategically investing in a provide the essential building blocks of a net zero range of emerging companies, including some focused on transition. low- or no-carbon steelmaking. Our portfolio includes various investments in electrochemical technologies that are In FY2021, emissions related to our customers’ processing of particularly amenable to processing our Pilbara iron ores, copper was 5 Mt CO -e, representing only one per cent of our potentially providing BHP and our customers with added 2 optionality to complement other more readily available total reported Scope 3 emissions inventory. Our customers’ technologies, such as hydrogen-based DRI. processing or application of other products and/or by-products, including nickel and potash, are currently not included because We are currently assessing the opportunity to implement of the difficulty in determining their exact end use, current beneficiation at our Jimblebar operation. By improving our production volumes still being relatively low or inconsequential, product quality, we can support emissions reduction in the and/or downstream emissions being estimated to be immaterial. short- to medium-term within the integrated BF-BOF For nickel, we have estimated the downstream emissions steelmaking process. Longer-term, advancements in associated with the use of our product. The majority of our nickel beneficiation and or EAF technology may see a greater is sold to the battery industry and we have consulted with that proportion of BHP’s ores used in DRI-EAF steelmaking. industry to assess value chain emissions. While the emissions We will continue to seek opportunities to form partnerships with associated with nickel production (accounted for in BHP’s Scope our customers and others in the industry to advance the 1 and Scope 2 emissions) are a material part of total emissions development of key technologies and products. In FY2022, we in the battery value chain, the emissions downstream from our intend to progress research and development and develop plans nickel production are not material to our total reported Scope 3 for operational testing and trials under the three steelmaking emissions inventory. As emissions reporting standards in the partnerships described above. In the long-term, we expect battery sector improve, we will aim to include nickel downstream significant advancements in CCUS for the blast furnace and Scope 3 emissions within our reporting. green hydrogen DRI-EAF will also be needed. For potash, we announced on 17 August 2021 the approval of US$5.7 billion (C$7.5 billion) in capital expenditure for the Jansen Stage 1 potash project in the province of Saskatchewan, Canada. Jansen is designed with a focus on sustainability, including embedding a low carbon footprint and low water intensity in the design.71 First ore is not targeted until the 2027 calendar year, so downstream emissions are currently immaterial, however we project that the potential emissions associated with our customers’ processing and application of potash may be lower relative to that of other fertilisers.72 68 In line with our reporting methodology for Scope 3 emissions, we define ‘processing of our products’ as emissions resulting from our customers’ processing of our products comprising iron ore and metallurgical coal (steelmaking materials) and copper (assumed to be processed into copper wire for end use). 69 Carbon neutral includes all those greenhouse gas emissions as defined for BHP reporting purposes. 70 Carbon neutral includes all those greenhouse gas emissions as defined for BHP reporting purposes. 71 Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions of ~60kg CO2-e/t. Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions for flotation-based MOP 50-80 kg CO2-e/t, other production routes are 100-500kg. High nutrient concentration (60 per cent K2O) maximises efficiency in transportation and spreading. 72 From BHP research conducted so far, nitrogen-based fertilisers appear to have a larger downstream emissions impact than potash-based fertilisers. However, trying to estimate the GHG contribution impact of fertiliser on soils and crops is very complicated. We continue to develop and improve our knowledge in this area. Scope 3 impact relates only to emissions associated with downstream processing and application, not other considerations such as transportation. BHP Climate Transition Action Plan 18

4. Assessing capital alignment with a 1.5°C world73 We recognise the importance of demonstrating how our capital allocation aligns with our strategy and action on climate change. Our stakeholders want to understand the potential impacts on our business if the world takes the actions necessary to limit global temperature increase to 1.5°C, and how we consider these potential impacts in our strategic decision making and allocation of growth capital. Stakeholders have also communicated that they want to be able to assess whether we are allocating sufficient capital to meet our targets to reduce operational emissions (Scope 1 and Scope 2). See Section 2 above for how we are investing in operational decarbonisation through asset-level planning and our Capital Allocation Framework. The Basis of Preparation (BoP) of BHP’s FY2021 financial statements describes how operational emissions reduction projects are considered in our key accounting judgements and estimates. The BoP also describes the two scenarios (Central Energy View74 and Lower Carbon View75) currently being used as inputs to our operational planning cases, based on our current estimates of the most likely range of futures for the global economy and associated subsystems. These operational planning ranges are periodically reviewed to reflect new information. They impact certain of the significant judgements and key estimates that Management is required to make in the preparation of BHP’s Financial Statements, including the determination of the valuation of assets and potential impairment charges, the estimation of the remaining useful economic life of assets for depreciation purposes, the timing of closure and rehabilitation activities and the recoverability of certain deferred tax assets. For more information, refer to the BHP Annual Report 2021 available at bhp.com/annualreport. Our capital alignment approach We consider a range of different global, sectoral and regional scenarios in forming our strategy and in operational and commercial decision making. Our decisions on portfolio composition and capital allocation are based on assessment of plausible future pathways and then tested against a range of scenarios. For example, in 2020 we updated our portfolio analysis to include our 1.5°C scenario to better identify signposts for climate-related risks and opportunities, and understand how our scenario’s trajectory towards a 1.5°C world might impact our strategy and portfolio resilience (refer to the BHP Climate Change Report 2020 available at bhp.com/climate for more information). Applying a wide range of scenarios is intended to enable us to examine divergent pathways to identify the biggest and most durable trends, determine the balance of risks that these external trends pose to the resilience of our portfolio and investment decisions, and identify how well placed we are to act on opportunities they may present. Evolving our approach in FY2022 Global action to decarbonise under a 1.5°C trajectory would represent a significant shift in the global economy. Such a transition would be complex, multi-faceted and could reasonably be expected to manifest in unique ways across different regions, reflecting heterogeneous local conditions. We intend to systematically integrate one or more Paris-aligned scenarios (including 1.5°C scenarios) into our strategy and capital prioritisation processes beginning in FY2022. This will enhance our current approach, in which our 1.5°C scenario is used to inform and test strategic portfolio decisions. Green revenue Green revenue is intended as a measure of the extent to which products and services contribute to the transition to a green economy76. While these contributions will be measured on a range of important indicators (including water conservation, biodiversity or reforestation), much of the discussion about green revenue is focused around the contribution to the transition to renewable energy that is vital for climate change mitigation. There is no settled methodology for classifying green revenue in the resources sector. In response to increased investor interest in the concept, in FY2021 we reviewed potential approaches to classification and measurement of green revenue, starting with consideration of how our products contribute to addressing the challenge of climate change. We expect many of our commodities to be important to the energy transition. For example, the International Energy Agency’s ‘The Role of Critical Minerals in Clean Energy Transitions’ report77 highlights the critical role of copper and nickel. Our 1.5°C scenario78 indicates demand growth for copper, nickel and potash could be even more compelling as the world takes action to decarbonise. Iron ore also fares slightly better under our 1.5°C scenario versus our other scenarios, as steel requirements of the energy transition are expected to be considerable. The most commonly used measure for green revenue is based on end use of products. However, this measure is not straightforward, for two reasons. ï,· Identifying the end use of some commodities is challenging. Copper and iron ore, in particular, undergo multiple stages of processing and have a diverse range of end uses. ï,· The way in which commodities are produced is not captured by end use measures. However, production methods for the resource sector can in themselves be an important contributor to achieving a green economy. For example, our Chilean copper operated asset at Escondida is on track to 73 The Paris Agreement’s central aim is to strengthen the global response to the threat of climate change by keeping a global temperature rise this century well below 2°C above pre-industrial levels and to pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase even further to 1.5°C. There are a range of GHG emissions trajectories to 2100 that could limit global warming to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels. We refer to a ‘1.5°C world’ as the 2050 point on these trajectories. 74 Central Energy View reflects, and is periodically updated to respond to, existing policy trends and commitments and currently tracks to approximately 3°C temperature increase above pre-industrial levels by 2100. Refer to the BHP Climate Change Report 2020 available at bhp.com/climate for more information. 75 Lower Carbon View currently tracks to approximately 2.5°C temperature increase above pre-industrial levels by 2100, and accelerates decarbonisation trends and policies, particularly in easier-to-abate sectors such as power generation and light duty vehicles. Refer to the BHP Climate Change Report 2020 available at bhp.com/climate for more information. 76 A green economy is defined by the UN Environment Programme as low carbon, resource efficient and socially inclusive. In a green economy, growth in employment and income are driven by public and private investment into such economic activities, infrastructure and assets that allow reduced carbon emissions and pollution, enhanced energy and resource efficiency, and prevention of the loss of biodiversity and ecosystem services. Refer to Green Economy at unep.org for more information. 77 The Role of Critical Minerals in Clean Energy Transitions, World Energy Outlook Special Report, May 2021. 78 This scenario aligns with the Paris Agreement goals and requires steep global annual emissions reductions, sustained for decades, to stay within a 1.5°C carbon budget. Refer to the BHP Climate Change Report 2020 available at bhp.com/climate for information about the assumptions, outputs and limitations of our 1.5°C Paris-aligned scenario. BHP Climate Transition Action Plan 19

have 100 per cent renewable electricity supply by the mid-2020s, and source desalinated water for operational purposes, minimising water extraction from sensitive Andean aquifers. End use may therefore not be the sole appropriate measure of products’ contribution to the energy transition, and other measures (such as how they are produced) may also be useful, and even be more appropriate in some circumstances. In FY2021, we have applied an approach to green revenue based on end use, using nickel and uranium by way of illustration. At this stage, these are the most straightforward of our commodities for which to determine contribution to the energy transition from their end use. In FY2022, we intend to continue to consult with investors, industry and standard setters to explore ways of establishing clear methodologies for classification and measurement of green revenue. We also plan to work with our customers, suppliers and others in our value chain to improve the traceability of our products and the emissions produced by their use. Battery manufacture contributes to climate change mitigation79. Therefore, for illustrative purposes,80 we have measured the revenue from our sales to battery materials suppliers as green revenue. Seventy two per cent of BHP’s battery-suitable nickel metal81 was sold to global battery material suppliers in FY202182. For FY2021, our green revenue from battery-suitable nickel metal amounted to US$760 million83. Australian uranium is sold for nuclear power generation only, a low emissions source of electricity, and therefore, also for illustrative purposes, we have measured all revenue from uranium as green revenue. For FY2021, our green revenue from uranium amounted to US$249 million. 5. Just transition The Paris Agreement recognises the need to reduce emissions but also to take “into account the imperatives of a just transition of the workforce and the creation of decent work and quality jobs in accordance with nationally defined development priorities”.84 The process of structural adjustment as economies and consumer priorities evolve is not new. However the energy transition implies an adjustment process on a global scale that will likely extend for decades as the world pursues decarbonisation of power generation and industrial processes. And the energy transition is only one aspect of the way in which economies are anticipated to evolve in the decades to come. Such transitions must balance the needs of communities, nations and investors and protect our environment for the long term. Both financial and social value considerations are relevant—and inherently linked. Social value is the positive contribution we make to the environment and society. It goes hand in hand with financial value in our decision-making, and we believe this approach is in the long-term best interests of shareholders. The longevity of our assets means that it is important for us to think and plan in decades. When we invest in a region, we become an intrinsic part of the local community for the long term, which is why social value is an important part of the way we do business. As a global leader in the development of natural resources, we have an opportunity to demonstrate a planned and purposeful approach to closure and rehabilitation through the life cycle of our operated assets. Our process considers risks and opportunities, for the communities and environment where we operate, as well as shareholder value. Where value cannot be generated from divestment, the best option to balance financial, workforce and community considerations may be to retain an asset and transition it towards closure, while setting a leading example for both rehabilitation and partnership with employees, local community and governments. It drives toward optimised closure outcomes for our sites by balancing our values, obligations, safety, costs and the expectations of external stakeholders to enable an outcome that involves one or a combination of an alternative land-use, ongoing management, relinquishment or divestment. We maintain a provision for closure and rehabilitation, which currently stands, as disclosed in the BHP Annual Report 2021, at US$11.9 billion. Each of our operations (whether they are projects, producing assets, in care and maintenance or a closed site) must have a Closure Management Plan, documenting the implementation of the closure management process. This process includes collating relevant knowledge and data, undertaking a risk and opportunity assessment, framing closure options, comparing alternative options, and selecting the optimised closure outcomes, underpinned by ongoing stakeholder engagement and communication. Closure Management Plans are required to be supported by stakeholder engagement plans for the lifecycle of the site, and should balance business and stakeholder needs while meeting the following objectives: · Meet all legal requirements and obligations, and recognised industry practice · Manage pre- and post-closure risks and opportunities · Manage and optimise costs · Achieve safe and stable outcomes and meet approved environment outcomes · Progressively reduce obligations At some of our operations, the transition to new skill sets is already underway through the changing use of technology. For example, the implementation of autonomous haulage at sites such as Western Australia Iron Ore’s Jimblebar mine has provided opportunities for our workforce to gain new skills. While the introduction of this technology removes the need for an operator in the haul truck, new roles are being created in the operations as a result. Roles such as field officers, service technicians and mine controllers are an essential part of an autonomous operation and we are working with our people to provide opportunities to transition into these new roles. Our people and the communities in which we operate are central to this change. We also recognise that reducing employee numbers at certain operations can impact the viability of local communities, so it is important to consider not just which roles transition, but where they are located. As an example of where we have considered 79 For example, the draft EU taxonomy recognises battery manufacture as a significant contributor to climate change mitigation. The EU Taxonomy is a classification system, establishing a list of environmentally sustainable economic activities. Note the EU taxonomy does not presently cover the mining sector. https://ec.europa.eu/finance/docs/level-2-measures/taxonomy-regulation-delegated-act-2021-2800-annex-1_en.pdf 80 Recognising that a settled methodology for classifying green revenue in the resources sector has yet to be determined. 81 Battery suitable nickel metal is defined as nickel briquettes and nickel powder. It does not include off-spec nickel metal. 82 Based on percentage battery-suitable nickel metal sales to battery material suppliers. Where customer’s planned end-use is not known with certainty to be for battery supply, assumptions of usage have been made using historical nickel metal usage for those customers. 83 Calculated based on gross revenue from battery-suitable nickel metal multiplied by percentage of BHP’s sales of nickel metal to battery material suppliers. 84 Paris Agreement preamble, https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/english_paris_agreement.pdf. BHP Climate Transition Action Plan 20

these issues, in 2020 we launched our FutureFit Academy as part of BHP Operations Services, a new team of permanent BHP employees that provides production and maintenance services. Among other things, the FutureFit Academy is intended to develop the future facing skills in our teams to operate and maintain the zero-emission trucks under development through our collaboration with Komatsu. Candidates from regional communities are specifically targeted, and are offered fit-for-purpose training programs in dedicated learning centres in Perth, Western Australia or Mackay, Queensland. Once trained and qualified, graduates are offered a permanent position with the Operations Services Maintenance team at one of our Australia-based operations in Western Australia’s Pilbara or Queensland’s Bowen Basin regions. Where demand for a commodity is expected to be particularly impacted by the transition, the opportunity for migration to alternate mining roles may not be possible and therefore alternative solutions will need to be identified in cooperation with government and the community themselves. Currently, there are several external frameworks related to ensuring a just transition. Developing a common understanding of just transition and tracking progress will be essential for success, allowing companies to make clear commitments and investors to identify benefits of effective implementation. The CA100+ Net Zero Company Benchmark, in its Disclosure Indicator 9, requests that a company considers the impacts from transitioning to a lower-carbon business model on its workers and communities. CA100+ has not yet fully developed this indicator. In FY2022, we intend to contribute to the CA100+ development work, providing insights from our sector. 6. Climate policy engagement Achieving the Paris Agreement goals will require supportive policy across jurisdictions globally. The following principles underpin our views on how governments should take action on climate change: ï,· Climate change is a global challenge, and international collaboration is required to maximise emissions reductions and minimise impacts to competitiveness. ï,· National governments should set long-term climate change targets consistent with the Paris Agreement and intermediate targets aligned with this goal. Such certainty is essential to support business decision making. ï,· Policymaking should accommodate changes in scientific understanding over time, take into account full life-cycle impacts and promote the most efficient system-wide decarbonisation outcomes. ï,· Least-cost abatement should be the primary focus of climate mitigation policies. This is most likely to be realised through market mechanisms (including carbon pricing) and outcomes-based regulatory approaches. ï,· Governments should play an active role in supporting the development and deployment of low emissions technologies. ï,· Governments should undertake regular adaptation planning and introduce policies to strengthen the adaptive capacity of businesses and communities. The policy-making process is complex and change is unlikely to be smooth or linear. We believe we can best support policy development by ensuring we meet our own climate commitments, continuing to make the case for the economic opportunities arising from the energy transition, and focusing on those policy areas where we are likely to have the greatest ability to influence change. We engage on policy matters directly with government and through our membership of industry associations and issue- specific coalitions and initiatives. Key examples of our recent public advocacy include: ï,· We are a signatory to the World Bank’s ‘Putting a Price on Carbon’ statement and a partner in the Carbon Pricing Leadership Coalition, a global initiative that brings together leaders from industry, government, academia and civil society with the goal of putting in place effective carbon pricing policies. As part of this, we participated in the development of the Report of the High Level Commission on Carbon Pricing and Competitiveness. ï,· We have supported efforts by the Centre for Climate and Energy Solutions (C2ES) to strengthen the policy response to climate change in the United States. This included signing on to public statements calling for the administration and Congress to ‘enact ambitious, durable, and bipartisan climate policies’, and to prioritise investment in low carbon infrastructure. We also opposed the previous administration’s change to methane emissions rules. ï,· We have provided feedback on key aspects of the Australian Government’s approach to climate change, including the proposed Corporate Emissions Reduction Transparency report and the Technology Investment Roadmap. We recognise there is considerable stakeholder interest in the role played by industry associations in public policy debates, particularly in the context of climate change policy. Over the past five years, we have introduced a range of measures to strengthen governance of our member associations and their climate change advocacy. These have included: ï,· Establishing a transparent process to review the alignment between BHP’s climate policy positions and those held by our member associations, and to act where ‘material differences’ have been identified ï,· Publishing our Global Climate Policy Standards, which set our expectations for how member associations should advocate on climate policy ï,· Committing to disclose in ‘real time’ if we determine that one of our member associations has substantially departed from our Global Climate Policy Standards ï,· Working with key member associations in Australia to clarify advocacy roles and responsibilities and improve the transparency of their advocacy activities ï,· Disclosing key information about BHP’s material member associations, including membership fees and our rationale for membership85 BHP has also been taking proactive steps to enhance the climate advocacy of our member associations. This has involved: ï,· Working with other members to progress the Mineral Council of Australia’s (MCA) Climate Action Plan. This plan is focused on developing technology pathways to drive emissions reduction, improving the sector’s understanding and management of climate change risks, and raising awareness of the sector’s response to climate change. ï,· Working with the Australian Petroleum Production and Exploration Association to update its climate change policy principles. These provide explicit support for achieving net zero emissions by 2050, and are aligned with BHP’s Global Climate Policy Standards. ï,· Supporting the efforts of the C2ES, the CEO Climate Dialogue and the Climate Leadership Council to provide public backing for the enactment of enact ambitious climate policy in the United States Congress. ï,· Contributing to the development of the Business Council of Australia’s new National Climate Strategy, which is expected 85 Refer to bhp.com/our-approach/operating-with-integrity/industry-associations-bhps-approach/. BHP Climate Transition Action Plan 21

to be released ahead of the 26th United Nations Climate Change Conference of the Parties (COP26) in late 2021. We are also strengthening our approach by subjecting our material member associations to a formal industry association review, as we announced in 2020. In accordance with BHP’s principles for participating in industry associations, if the review process identifies a material difference with a member association on climate policy, BHP will consider a range of remediation measures, including suspension or cessation of membership. BHP’s general view, however, is that there is greater scope to achieve positive climate outcomes if we use our influence within industry associations. As an example of this, BHP’s 2019 industry association review identified two material differences with the US Chamber of Commerce (US Chamber), relating to the association’s previous opposition to specific emissions reduction targets and carbon pricing. Through engagement from BHP and other member companies, the US Chamber recently updated its climate change position statement to provide support for market-based approaches to accelerate emissions reduction across the US economy. The US Chamber also recently welcomed the return of the United States ‘to international leadership on climate change’ following the announcement of President Biden’s new climate goal. BHP will continue to use its position on the US Chamber’s Task Force on Climate Action to further strengthen the association’s advocacy on climate policy, particularly in regard to providing clearer support for carbon pricing and emissions reduction targets aligned with the Paris Agreement goals. The next update to this review will be published in 2022. Further information on our approach to industry associations is available at bhp.com/our-approach/operating-with-integrity. 7. Climate governance Climate change is a material governance and strategic issue and is routinely on the BHP Board’s agenda, including as part of strategy discussions, portfolio reviews and investment decisions, risk management oversight and monitoring, and performance against our commitments. The Sustainability Committee assists the Board in overseeing the Group’s climate change performance and governance responsibilities, and the Risk and Audit Committee assists the Board with the oversight of climate-related risk management, although the Board retains overall accountability for BHP’s risk profile. Board skills and experience Board members bring experience from a range of sectors, including resources, energy, finance, technology and the public sector. The Board also seeks the input of suitably skilled members of management and independent advisers. This equips them to consider potential implications of climate change on BHP and our operational capacity, as well as to understand the nature of the debate and the international policy response as it develops. In addition, there is an ongoing focus on understanding systemic risk and the potential impacts on our portfolio. The Board has taken measures designed to ensure its decisions are informed by climate change science and expert advisers. The Board seeks the input from management (including Dr Fiona Wild, our Vice President Sustainability and Climate Change) and a range of independent advisers. In addition, our Forum on Corporate Responsibility (which includes Don Henry, former CEO of the Australian Conservation Foundation and Changhua Wu, former Greater China Director, the Climate Group) advises operational management teams and engages with the Sustainability Committee and the Board, as appropriate. Executive remuneration The Board strengthened the link between executive remuneration and delivery of our climate change strategy in 2020, with performance against operational emissions and value chain measures now representing 10 per cent of the Cash and Deferred Plan (CDP) scorecard. The 10 per cent climate change component applied to remuneration paid in respect of FY2021 and includes these key measures: ï,· Reductions in Scope 1 and Scope 2 operational GHG emissions ï,· Short and medium-term actions to reduce operational GHG emissions on the pathway to net zero emissions ï,· Short and medium-term actions to address value chain (Scope 3) GHG emissions Stakeholder engagement The Board uses a range of formal and informal communication channels to seek to understand and take into account the views of shareholders. Feedback and commentary related to climate change are increasingly a part of all of our routine investor engagements, including results roadshows with the CEO and CFO, and the Chair’s investor engagement meetings. A summary of this feedback is provided to the Board. In FY2021, the CEO, CFO, senior management and the Investor Relations team held virtual meetings and roundtables with investors worldwide. Topics covered included corporate governance and ESG matters, steel decarbonisation technologies, strategy, finance and operating performance. We also engaged regularly with the CA100+ on a range of decarbonisation and emissions related topics, and with the Transparency Pathway Initiative and FTSE Russell about their methodologies relating to the transition and approach to mined commodities. Management authority Below the level of the Board, key management decisions are made by the CEO and management, in accordance with their delegated authority. Our Executive Leadership Team (ELT) is held to account for a range of measures including climate-related performance, which are then cascaded through the organisation. BHP has a dedicated Climate Change Team that is responsible for advising the ELT. The team collaborates with BHP’s functions and asset teams, external partners and industry to develop practical climate change solutions, designed to preserve and unlock long-term value for the Group. It regularly prepares information and advice for the ELT, Sustainability Committee, Risk and Audit Committee and the Board on climate-related strategy, risks and opportunities, and performance against climate-related metrics. It also monitors key risk indicators and signposts against our appetite for climate change-related risks. Climate-related activity is also undertaken across the Group, including in our Portfolio Strategy and Development, Commercial, Planning and Technical and Environment teams. These activities are overseen by the Climate Change Steering Committee, which is made up of ELT representatives of our Operational and Commercial teams, plus Legal, Governance, Finance, Planning and Investor Relations functions. 8. TCFD disclosure We have been reporting in line with the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) recommendations since the recommendations were released in 2017. For example, the BHP Climate Change Report 2020 aligns with the TCFD’s themes of Governance, Strategy, Risk Management, and Metrics and Targets. Our Vice President of Sustainability and Climate Change, Dr Fiona Wild, has been a member of the Task Force since its inception in 2015. We believe the TCFD recommendations represent an important step towards establishing a widely accepted framework for climate-related financial risk disclosure. BHP Climate Transition Action Plan 22

Glossary Assets Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions Assets are a set of one or more geographically proximate For BHP reporting purposes, GHG emissions are the aggregate operations (including open-cut mines, underground mines, and anthropogenic carbon dioxide equivalent emissions of carbon onshore and offshore oil and gas production and processing dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), facilities). Assets include our operated and non-operated assets. hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs) and BHP (‘the Group’, ‘our business’, ‘organisation’, ‘we’, ‘us’, sulphur hexafluoride (SF6). All are expressed in carbon dioxide ‘our’ and ‘ourselves’) equivalent (CO2-e). Nitrogen trifluoride (NF3) GHG emissions are currently not relevant for BHP reporting purposes. Both companies in the dual listed company structure, being BHP Group Group Limited, BHP Group Plc, and their respective subsidiaries. BHP Group Limited, BHP Group Plc and their respective BHP Ventures subsidiaries. Our internal venture capital unit, which looks to invest in Net zero (for a BHP goal, target or pathway, or similar) emerging companies with game-changing technologies and management teams to help drive innovation and provide us with Net zero includes the use of carbon offsets as required. a valuable portfolio of growth options. Net zero (for industry sectors, the global economy, Board transition or future, or similar) The Board of Directors of BHP. Net zero refers to a state in which the greenhouse gases (as Carbon dioxide equivalent (CO -e) defined in this Glossary) going into the atmosphere are balanced 2 by removal out of the atmosphere. The universal unit of measurement to indicate the global Nickel West warming potential (GWP) of each greenhouse gas, expressed in terms of the GWP of one unit of carbon dioxide. It is used to Nickel West is our integrated sulphide mining, concentrating, evaluate releasing (or avoiding releasing) different greenhouse smelting and refining operation in Western Australia. gases against a common basis. Paris Agreement Carbon neutral The Paris Agreement is an agreement between countries party Carbon neutral includes all those greenhouse gas emissions as to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change defined for BHP reporting purposes. (UNFCC) to strengthen efforts to combat climate change and adapt to its effects, with enhanced support to assist developing Carbon offsets countries to do so. The central purpose of a carbon offset for an organisation is to Paris Agreement goals substitute for internal GHG emission reductions. Offsets may be generated through projects in which GHG emissions are The central objective of the Paris Agreement is its long-term avoided, reduced, removed from the atmosphere or permanently temperature goal to hold global average temperature increase to stored (sequestration). Carbon offsets are generally created and well below 2°C above preindustrial levels and pursue efforts to independently verified in accordance with either a voluntary limit the temperature increase to 1.5°C above pre-industrial program or under a regulatory program. The purchaser of a levels. carbon offset can ‘retire’ or ‘surrender’ it to claim the underlying Paris-aligned reduction towards their own GHG emissions reduction targets or goals or to meet legal obligations. Aligned to the Paris Agreement goals. Executive Leadership Team Plan The Executive Leadership Team directly reports to the Chief This Climate Transition Action Plan. Executive Officer and is responsible for the day-to-day management of BHP and leading the delivery of our strategic Queensland Coal objectives. Queensland Coal comprises the BHP Mitsubishi Alliance (BMA) Goal and BHP Mitsui Coal (BMC) assets in the Bowen Basin in Central Queensland, Australia. An ambition to seek an outcome for which there is no current pathway(s), but for which efforts will be pursued towards Target addressing that challenge, subject to certain assumptions or conditions. An intended outcome in relation to which we have identified one or more pathways for delivery of that outcome, subject to certain assumptions or conditions. 1.5°C Above pre-industrial levels. BHP Climate Transition Action Plan 23

Scenario analysis Direct emissions Emissions from sources that are owned or controlled by the Central Energy scenario reporting company. Central Energy View is one of our scenarios used as an input to our planning cases (our mid-planning case). It reflects, and Downstream emissions is periodically updated to respond to, existing policy trends Indirect GHG emissions from sold goods and services. and commitments and currently tracks to approximately 3°C Downstream emissions also include emissions from products temperature increase above pre-industrial levels by 2100. that are distributed but not sold (i.e. distributed without receiving Refer to the BHP Climate Change Report 2020 at bhp.com for payment). more information. Lower Carbon scenario Emission factor Lower Carbon View is one of our scenarios used as an input to our planning cases. It currently tracks to approximately A factor that converts activity data into GHG emissions data (e.g. 2.5°C temperature increase above pre-industrial levels by kg CO2-e emitted per gigajoule of fuel consumed, kg CO2-e 2100, and accelerates decarbonisation trends and policies, emitted per kilowatt-hour of electricity used). particularly in easier-to-abate sectors such as power Energy coal generation and light duty vehicles. Refer to the BHP Climate Change Report 2020 at bhp.com for more information. Used as a fuel source in electrical power generation, cement BHP’s 1.5°C scenario (‘our 1.5°C scenario’) manufacture and various industrial applications. Energy coal Our 1.5°C scenario models a GHG emissions trajectory to may also be referred to as steaming or thermal coal. 2100 that limits global warming to 1.5°C above pre-industrial Fugitive emissions levels. BHP’s 1.5°C scenario aligns with the Paris Agreement goals and requires steep global annual emissions reductions, Emissions that are not physically controlled but result from the sustained for decades, to stay within a 1.5°C carbon budget. intentional or unintentional releases of greenhouse gases. Deep Green hypothetical GHG Protocol Deep Green hypothetical is BHP’s regional and sector-specific, bottom-up modelling exercise that seeks to simulate The Greenhouse Gas Protocol: A Corporate Accounting and the specific impact on the steel sector of a much more rapid Reporting Standard, which provides requirements and guidance global convergence towards decarbonisation, universal for companies and other organisations preparing a corporate-access to zero emissions electricity and a US$200 per tonne level GHG emissions inventory. global carbon price. It is unlike and wholly separate from the whole-system modelling with global temperature outcomes Indirect emissions approach taken in our Central Energy, Lower Carbon, or Emissions that are a consequence of the activities of the 1.5°C scenarios. reporting company, but occur at sources owned or controlled by another party. Reporting terms LNG (liquefied natural gas) Capital goods Consists largely of methane that has been liquefied through chilling and pressurisation. One tonne of LNG is approximately Final goods that have an extended life and are used by the equivalent to 46,000 cubic feet of natural gas. reporting company to manufacture a product, provide a service, or sell, store, and deliver merchandise. In financial accounting, Metallurgical coal capital goods are treated as fixed assets or plant, property and A broader term than coking coal, which includes all coals used in equipment (PP&E). Examples of capital goods include steelmaking, such as coal used for the pulverised coal injection equipment, machinery, buildings, facilities, and vehicles. process Cradle-to-gate Natural gas liquids All GHG emissions that occur in the lifecycle of purchased products, up to the point of receipt by the reporting company Consists of propane, butane and ethane – individually or as a (excluding emissions from sources that are owned or controlled mixture. by the reporting company). Non-operated asset/non-operated joint venture (NOJV) Customers’ processing of our products Non-operated assets/non-operated joint ventures include In line with our reporting methodology for Scope 3 emissions, we interests in assets that are owned as a joint venture but not define ‘processing of our products’ as emissions resulting from operated by BHP. References in this Plan to a ‘joint venture’ are our customers’ processing of our products comprising iron ore used for convenience to collectively describe assets that are not and metallurgical coal (steelmaking materials) and copper wholly owned by BHP. Such references are not intended to (assumed to be processed into copper wire for end use). These characterise the legal relationship between the owners of the are reported under the Scope 3 Standard’s ‘Processing of sold asset. products’ category. Customers’ use of our energy products In line with our reporting methodology for Scope 3 emissions, we define our energy products as oil, gas and energy coal and we account for metallurgical coal within our customers’ processing of sold products (within steelmaking emissions). These are reported under the Scope 3 Standard’s ‘Use of sold products’ category. BHP Climate Transition Action Plan 24

Operated assets (‘our operations’) Operated assets include assets that are wholly owned and operated by BHP and assets that are owned as a joint venture and operated by BHP. References in this Plan to a ‘joint venture’ are used for convenience to collectively describe assets that are not wholly owned by BHP. Such references are not intended to characterise the legal relationship between the owners of the asset. Operational boundaries The boundaries that determine the direct and indirect GHG emissions associated with operations owned or controlled by the reporting company. Operational emissions (‘operational GHG emissions’) ‘Operational emissions’ or ‘operational GHG emissions’ in this Plan refers to the Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions from our operated assets. Operational GHG emissions of our direct suppliers ‘Operational GHG emissions of our direct suppliers’ means the Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions of our direct suppliers included in BHP’s Scope 3 reporting categories (under the Scope 3 Standard) of ‘Purchased goods and services (including capital goods)’, ‘Fuel and energy related activities’, ‘Business travel’, and ‘Employee commuting’. Scope 1 greenhouse gas emissions Scope 1 greenhouse gas emissions are direct emissions from operations that are owned or controlled by the reporting company. For BHP, these are primarily emissions from fuel consumed by haul trucks at our operated assets, as well as fugitive methane emissions from coal and petroleum production at our operated assets. Scope 2 greenhouse gas emissions Scope 2 greenhouse gas emissions are indirect emissions from the generation of purchased or acquired electricity, steam, heat or cooling that is consumed by operations that are owned or controlled by the reporting company. BHP’s Scope 2 emissions have been calculated using the market-based method using supplier specific emissions factors unless otherwise specified Scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions Scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions are all other indirect emissions (not included in Scope 2) that occur in the reporting company’s value chain. For BHP, these are primarily emissions resulting from our customers using and processing the commodities we sell, as well as upstream emissions associated with the extraction, production and transportation of the goods, services, fuels and energy we purchase for use at our operations; emissions resulting from the transportation and distribution of our products; and operational GHG emissions (on an equity basis) from our non-operated joint ventures. Scope 3 Standard The GHG Protocol Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Accounting and Reporting Standard, which allows companies to assess their entire value chain emissions impact and identify where to focus reduction activities. Scope 3 category One of the 15 types of Scope 3 emissions defined by the Scope 3 Standard. Upstream emissions Indirect GHG emissions from purchased or acquired goods and services. Value chain emissions ‘Value chain emissions’ in this Plan refers to BHP’s reported Scope 3 emissions inventory. Abbreviations key BF - blast furnace BF-BOF - blast furnace-basic oxygen furnace CA100+ - Climate Action 100+ CCUS - carbon capture, utilisation and stor age and/or carbon capture and storage. CO2-e - tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent DRI - direct reduced iron DRI-EAF - direct reduced iron electric arc furnace EAF - electric arc furnace ESG - Environment Social Governance GHG—greenhouse gas H2—hydrogen IEA - International Energy Agency IIGCC - Institutional Investors Group on Climate Change IMO—International Maritime Organisation IPCC - Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Kt CO2-e – kilotonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent LNG - liquefied natural gas Mt CO2-e - million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent NSWEC - New South Wales Energy Coal OEM – original equipment manufacturer PPA – power purchasing agreement TCFD - Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures UN – United Nations US$/t CO2-e – United States dollars per tonne of carbon dioxide equivalent BHP Climate Transition Action Plan 25

Ernst & Young Tel: +61 3 9288 8000 8 Exhibition Street Fax: +61 3 8650 7777 EY Melbourne VIC 3000 Australia ey.com/au GPO Box 67 Melbourne VIC 3001 Building a better working world Independent Limited Assurance Report to the Management and Directors of BHP Group Limited and BHP Group Pic (‘BHP’) Our Conclusion: Based on the procedures we have perfonmed and the evidenc e we have obtained, nothing has come to our attention that suggests that the disclosures w ithin BHP’s C limate Transition Action Plan 2021 (‘the Plan’), including the reasonableness of the approach supporting BHP’s planned actions and c limat e- related goals and targets. and ttne completeness of the disclosures. have not been prepared . in all m aterial respects: in alignment w ith the C limate Action 100+ Net Zero Company Benchmark Framework (‘CA 100+ NZCB’); and in accordance w ith the Criteria defined below. What our review covered Evaluating the suitability of the Criteria and that the Criteria have been applied appropriately to the S ubject Matter Ernst & Young (EY) was engaged by BHP to provide limited assurance over the following information (‘S ubject Matten in alignment with the noted Criteria: Checking if the approach supporting BHP’s planned actions and climate-related goals and targets was consistent wrth the principles specified in the BHP’s disclosures with reference to theCA100+ NZCB. as presented in Criteria BHP’s Climate Transition Action Plan 2021 Evaluating select disclosures against the CA100+ NZCB disclosure The approach supporting BHP’s planned actions and climate-relate-d goals indicators to consider whether BHP partially or fully meets the Criteria and targets as outlined in the Plan. requirements Criteria applied by BHP: Checking if the approach supporting BHP’s planned actions and climate-The Criteria for our assurance engagement (‘Criteria’) included the following: related goals and targets was consistent wrth the principles specified in the The Climate Action 100+ Net Zero Company Benchmark Framework Criteria Undertaking analytical procedures of the metrics disclosed in the Plan The Criteria also includes the below list of principles that have been used by BHP to inform the approach to reporting against the CA100+ NZCB, inoluding On a sample basis, based on our professional judgement, agreeing claims the assumptions and claims supporting BHP’s planned actions and climate- and metrics to source information to check the accuracy and completeness related goals and targets: of the daims Reasonableness, including Identifying and testing the reasonableness of assumptions and approach supporting BHP’s planned actions and climate related goals and targets. Transparency—that the Plan details BHP’s decarbonisatio n approach across its seH-identified material climate related We believe that the evidence obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a transition risks and opportunities, basis for our limited assurance conclusions. Neutrality—that the Plan neither overstates, nor understat es the Observations from our assurance approach impact, The Just Transition disclosure indicator 9 set by theCA100+ NZCB is currently Defensible—that BHP’s approach to decarbonisation set out in the under development by Climate Action 100+. In the absence of disclosure Plan is achievable and does not contradict credible external expectations in this area, BHP hav e disclosed the consideration of the impacts climate scenarios. from transitioning to a lower-carbon business model on its workers and communities with reference to the principles noted in our Criteria. Completeness—that the Plan incorporates BHP’s approach to decarbonisation across all seiHdentified material climate related tra nsition Our conclusion is not modified in respect of this matter. risks and opportunities, and with reference to all publicly stated climate change performance KPis. Other matters We have not performed assurance procedures in respect of any information Key responsibilities relating to prior reporting periods, including those presented in the Plan. Our EY’s responsibility and independence review does not include forwards looking statements or abatement projections disclosed in the Plan. Our responsibility was 1o express a limited assurance condusion on the noted While we considered the effective ness of management’s internal controls when Subject Matter detailed in the “What our review covered” section above. determining the nature and extent of our procedures, our assurance We were also responsible for maintaining our independence and confinn that engagement was not designed to provide assurance on internal controls. Our we have met the requirements of the APES 110 Code of Ethics for Professional procedures did not include testing controls or performing procedures relating to Accountants (including Independence Standards). and have the required checking aggregation or calculation of data within IT systems. competencies and experience to conduct this assurance engagement Limited Assurance BHP’s responsibility Procedures performed in a limited assurance engagement vary in nature and BHP’s management was responsible for selecting the Criteria and appropriately timing from, and are less in extent than for a reasonable assurance preparing, in all material respects, the Subject Matter in the Climate Transition engagement. Consequently, the level of assurance obtained in a limited Report in accordance with that Criteria. This responsibility includes establishing assurance engagement is substantially lower than the assurance that would and maintaining internal controls, adequate records and making estimates that have been obtained had a reasonable assurance engagement been performed. are reasonable in the circumstances. Our procedures were designed to obtain a limited level of assurance on which to base our conclusion and do not provide all the evidence that would be required Our approach to conducting the review to provide a reasonable level of assurance. We conducted this review in accordance with the International Federation of Accountants’ International Standard on Assurance Engagements Other Than Use of our Assurance State ment Audits or Reviews of Historical Financial Information (ISAE 3000) and the terms We disclaim any assumption of responsibility for any reliance on this assurance of reference for this engagement as agreed with BHP on 16 August 2021. report to any persons other than management and the directors of BHP. or for Summary of review pr ocedures performed any purpose other than that for which it was prepared. Our review included web-based information that was available via web links as A review consists of making enquiries, primarily of persons responsible for preparing the Plan and related information and applying analytical and other of the date of this statement. We provide no assurance over changes to the content of this web-based information after the date of this assurance review procedures_ statement. Our procedures included: Interviewing key personnel to understand the reporting process, inc luding management’s processes to identify BHP’s material climate-related :::: YoJ J transition risks and opportunities and decarbonisation ambitions Checking the Plan to understand how BHP’s identified material climate- Melbourne, Australia Partner related transition risks and opportunities and decarbonisation ambitions are 2 September 2021 reftected in the qualitative disclosures A member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation BHP Climate Transition Action Plan 26

BHP bhp.com