FINTECH ASIA LIMITED
AUDITORS REPORT
Page 15
unless the directors either intend to liquidate the company or to cease opera�ons, or have no realis�c alterna�ve but to
do so.
Auditor’s responsibili�es for the audit of the financial statements
Our objec�ves are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from
material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinion.
Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs
(UK) will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are
considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic
decisions of users taken on the basis of these financial statements.
Irregulari�es, including fraud, are instances of non-compliance with laws and regula�ons. We design procedures in line
with our responsibili�es, outlined above, to detect material misstatements in respect of irregulari�es, including fraud.
The extent to which our procedures are capable of detec�ng irregulari�es, including fraud is detailed below:
• We obtained an understanding of the company and the sector in which it operates to iden�fy laws and
regula�ons that could reasonably be expected to have a direct effect on the financial statements. We obtained
our understanding in this regard through discussions with management, review of board minutes and
applica�on of cumula�ve audit knowledge and experience of the sector.
• We determined the principal laws and regula�ons relevant to the company in this regard to be those arising
from the Companies (Guernsey) Law 2008 and the FCA lis�ng rules.
• We designed our audit procedures to ensure the audit team considered whether there were any indica�ons of
non-compliance by the company with those laws and regula�ons. These procedures included, but were not
limited to:
o Review of board minutes;
o Review of legal expenses during the year; and
o Enquiries of management and the directors.
• We also iden�fied the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements due to fraud. We considered,
in addi�on to the non-rebutable presump�on of a risk of fraud arising from management override of controls,
the poten�al for management bias in rela�on to the recogni�on, classifica�on and measurement of the CLNs.
We refer you to the key audit mater for further details on how we addressed this.
• As in all of our audits, we addressed the risk of fraud arising from management override of controls by
performing audit procedures which included, but were not limited to: the tes�ng of journals; reviewing
accoun�ng es�mates for evidence of bias; and evalua�ng the business ra�onale of any significant transac�ons
that are unusual or outside the normal course of business.
Because of the inherent limita�ons of an audit, there is a risk that we will not detect all irregulari�es, including those
leading to a material misstatement in the financial statements or non-compliance with regula�on. This risk increases
the more that compliance with a law or regula�on is removed from the events and transac�ons reflected in the financial
statements, as we will be less likely to become aware of instances of non-compliance. The risk is also greater regarding
irregulari�es occurring due to fraud rather than error, as fraud involves inten�onal concealment, forgery, collusion,
omission or misrepresenta�on.
A further descrip�on of our responsibili�es for the audit of the financial statements is located on the Financial
Repor�ng Council’s website at: www.frc.org.uk/auditorsresponsibili�es.
This descrip�on forms part of our auditor’s
report.