XML 37 R18.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.3.1.900
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2015
Goodwill and Intangible Assets

I.    GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Goodwill

Teradyne performs its annual goodwill impairment test as required under the provisions of ASC 350-10, “Intangibles—Goodwill and Other” on December 31 of each fiscal year unless interim indicators of impairment exist. Goodwill is considered to be impaired when the net book value of a reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value.

Teradyne has the option to perform a qualitative assessment (“Step zero”) to determine whether it is more-likely-than-not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If Teradyne determines this is the case, Teradyne is required to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test to identify potential goodwill impairment and measure the amount of goodwill impairment loss to be recognized. If Teradyne determines that it is more-likely-than-not that the fair value of the reporting unit is greater than its carrying amounts, the two-step goodwill impairment test is not required. When performing the two-step process, the first step involves a comparison of the estimated fair value of a reporting unit to its carrying amount, including goodwill. In performing the first step, Teradyne determines the fair value of a reporting unit using the results derived from an income approach and a market approach. The income approach is estimated through the discounted cash flow (“DCF”) analysis. Determining fair value requires the exercise of significant judgment, including judgments about appropriate discount rates, perpetual growth rates, and the amount and timing of expected future cash flows. Discount rates are based on a weighted average cost of capital (“WACC”), which represents the average rate a business must pay its providers of debt and equity, plus a risk premium. The WACC used to test goodwill is derived from a group of comparable companies. The cash flows employed in the DCF analysis are derived from internal forecasts and external market forecasts. The market approach estimates the fair value of the reporting unit by utilizing the market comparable method which is based on revenue and earnings multiples from comparable companies. If the estimated fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is not impaired and the second step of the impairment test is not necessary. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value, then the second step of the goodwill impairment test must be performed. The second step of the goodwill impairment test compares the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill with its carrying amount of goodwill to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill recognized in a business combination, whereby the estimated fair value of the reporting unit is allocated to all of the assets and liabilities of that unit (including any unrecognized intangible assets) as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination and the fair value of the reporting unit was the purchase price paid. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit’s goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess.

 

In 2015, Teradyne performed step one of the two step impairment test for the Wireless Test and Defense/Aerospace reporting units and the Step zero assessment for the Industrial Automation reporting unit. In 2015, there was no impairment.

In 2014, as a result of decreased projected demand attributable to an estimated smaller future wireless test market due to reuse of wireless test equipment, price competition and different testing techniques, Teradyne determined that for its Wireless Test reporting unit, the carrying amount of its net assets exceeded its respective fair value, indicating that a potential impairment existed. After completing the second step of the goodwill impairment test, Teradyne recorded a $98.9 million goodwill impairment charge in the fourth quarter of 2014.

The fourth quarter 2014 goodwill impairment test of Teradyne’s Defense/Aerospace reporting unit, which is included in Teradyne’s System Test reportable segment, did not identify any goodwill impairment.

The fourth quarter 2013 goodwill impairment test of Teradyne’s Wireless Test reporting unit did not identify any goodwill impairment.

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill by reportable segments for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 are as follows:

 

     Wireless
Test
    Industrial
Automation
    System
Test
    Semiconductor
Test
    Total  
     (in thousands)  

Balance at December 31, 2013:

          

Goodwill

   $ 361,792      $ —        $ 148,183      $ 260,540      $ 770,515   

Accumulated impairment losses

     —          —          (148,183     (260,540     (408,723
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

ZTEC adjustment

     27       —          —          —          27   

AIT acquisition

     —          —          10,516        —          10,516   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2014:

          

Goodwill

     361,819        —          158,699        260,540        781,058   

Accumulated impairment losses

     (98,897     —          (148,183     (260,540     (507,620
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Universal Robots acquisition

     —          221,128       —          —          221,128   

Foreign currency translation adjustment

     —          (6,153 )     —          —          (6,153
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2015:

          

Goodwill

     361,819        214,975        158,699        260,540        996,033   

Accumulated impairment losses

     (98,897     —          (148,183     (260,540     (507,620
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   $ 262,922      $ 214,975     $ 10,516      $ —        $ 488,413   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Intangible Assets

Amortizable intangible assets consist of the following and are included in intangible assets, net on the balance sheets:

 

     December 31, 2015  
     Gross
Carrying
Amount
     Accumulated
Amortization
     Net
Carrying
Amount
     Weighted
Average
Useful Life
 
     (in thousands)  

Developed technology

   $ 379,778       $ 220,306       $ 159,472         6.0 years   

Customer relationships

     110,340         63,718         46,622         7.9 years   

Tradenames and trademarks

     52,396         18,879         33,517         9.5 years   

Non-compete agreement

     320         100         220         4.0 years   

Customer backlog

     170         170         —           0.3 years   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

Total intangible assets

   $ 543,004       $ 303,173       $ 239,831         6.7 years   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

     December 31, 2014  
     Gross
Carrying
Amount
     Accumulated
Amortization
     Net
Carrying
Amount
     Weighted
Average
Useful Life
 
     (in thousands)  

Developed technology

   $ 345,513       $ 224,059       $ 121,454         6.2 years   

Customer relationships

     146,635         93,998         52,637         7.7 years   

Tradenames and trademarks

     30,414         14,205         16,209         9.0 years   

Non-compete agreement

     320         20         300         4.0 years   

Customer backlog

     170         170         —           0.3 years   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

Total intangible assets

   $ 523,052       $ 332,452       $ 190,600         6.8 years   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

During the year ended December 31, 2015, Teradyne recorded intangible assets in the amount of $121.6 million related to its Universal Robots acquisition and Teradyne wrote off $98.2 million of fully amortized intangible assets.

During the year ended December 31, 2014, Teradyne recorded intangible assets in the amount of $9.1 million related to its AIT acquisition.

Aggregate intangible assets amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 was $69.0 million, $70.8 million, and $72.4 million, respectively. Estimated intangible assets amortization expense for each of the five succeeding fiscal years is as follows:

 

Year

   Amortization Expense  
     (in thousands)  

2016

   $ 79,874   

2017

     71,133   

2018

     44,464   

2019

     23,611   

2020

     9,990   

Thereafter

     10,759