XML 20 R9.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.21.2
Income Taxes
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2021
Income Taxes  
Income Taxes

3.            Income Taxes

Taxes primarily consist of a provision for foreign taxes recorded by the Company’s foreign subsidiaries in accordance with local tax regulations. Effective income tax rates are disproportionate due to the losses incurred by the Company’s U.S. and Canadian subsidiaries and a valuation allowance recorded on deferred taxes of these entities and tax effects of foreign operations, including foreign exchange gains and losses.

The reconciliations of the U.S. statutory rate with the Company’s effective tax rate for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2021 and 2020 are summarized in the table below:

For the Three Months Ended June 30,

    

2021

    

2020

Federal income tax expense at statutory rate

 

21.0

%

21.0

%

Effect of:

 

Change in valuation allowance

101.1

(78.5)

Tax effects of foreign operations

 

35.4

242.7

Change in tax rates

20.6

-

Foreign operations permanent difference - foreign exchange gains and losses

9.1

144.3

Return to provision true up

3.2

(50.6)

State income tax net of federal benefit

1.5

16.2

Withholding tax

-

9.3

Foreign rate differential

 

(19.6)

(34.7)

Effect of stock-based compensation

(62.1)

-

Increase (decrease) in unrecognized tax benefits (ASC 740)

(64.4)

67.1

Other

 

5.4

(23.1)

Effective tax rate

 

51.2

%

313.7

%

The following table presents a roll-forward of the Company’s unrecognized tax benefits and associated interest for the six months ended June 30, 2021 (in thousands):

    

Unrecognized

 

tax benefits

Balance - January 1, 2021

$

3,231

Tax settlement matters – prior periods

 

(1,476)

Change in tax position

(174)

Interest accrual

 

57

Foreign currency remeasurement

 

(27)

Balance - June 30, 2021

$

1,611

The Company expects that unrecognized tax benefits as of June 30, 2021 if recognized, would have a material impact on the Company’s effective tax rate.

Tax Assessments

In September 2015, the Company’s Indian subsidiary was subject to an inquiry by the Service Tax Department in India regarding the classification of services provided by this subsidiary, asserting that the services provided by this subsidiary fall under the category of online information and database access or retrieval services (OID Services), and not under the category of business support services (BS Services) that are exempt from service tax as historically indicated in the subsidiary’s service tax filings. The Company disagrees with the Service Tax Department’s position. In November 2019, the Commissioner of Central Tax, GST & Central Excise issued an order confirming the Service Tax Department's position. The Company is contesting this order in an appeal to the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal. In the event the Service Tax Department is ultimately successful in proving that the services fall under the category of OID Services, the revenues earned by the Company’s Indian subsidiary for the period July 2012 through November 2016 would be subject to a service tax of between 12.36% and 15%, and this subsidiary may also be liable for interest and penalties. The revenue of the Company’s Indian subsidiary during this period was approximately $64.0 million. In accordance with new rules promulgated by the Service Tax Department, as of December 1, 2016 service tax is no longer applicable to OID or BS Services. Based on the assessment of the Company’s counsel, the Company has not recorded any tax liability for this case.

In a separate action relating to service tax refunds, in October 2016, the Company’s Indian subsidiary received notices from the Indian Service Tax Department in India seeking to reverse service tax refunds of approximately $160,000 previously granted to the Company’s Indian subsidiary for three quarters in 2014, asserting that the services provided by this subsidiary fall under the category of OID Services and not BS Services. The appeal was determined in favor of the Service Tax Department. The Company disagrees with the basis of this decision and is contesting it. The Company expects delays in its Indian subsidiary receiving further service tax refunds until this matter is adjudicated with finality, and currently has service tax credits of approximately $1.0 million recorded as a receivable. Based on the assessment of the Company’s counsel, the Company has not recorded any tax liability or allowance for this case.

Substantial recovery against the Company in the above referenced 2015 Service Tax Department case could have a material adverse impact on the Company, and unfavorable rulings or recoveries in other tax proceedings could have a material adverse impact on the consolidated operating results of the period (and subsequent periods) in which the rulings or recovery occurs.