COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES	3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2023
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES	COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIESFrom time to time, the Company is involved in routine litigation that arises in the ordinary course of business. In March 2022, the Company was served with a qui tam complaint (United States, ex. rel. Kruse v. Computer Programs and Systems, Inc., et. al., Case No. 3cv18-938 (N.D. Tex.)). The complaint alleges that at various times since 2012, CPSI, TruBridge and three hospital customers violated and conspired to violate the federal False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. 3729(a)(1)(A), (B), (C) and (G), and (a)(3), the Oklahoma Medicaid False Claims Act, the Texas False Claims Act, and the New Mexico False Claims Act, and demands unspecified damages. The complaint further alleges that TruBridge retaliated against the relator in violation of 31 U.S.C. 3730(h), when it terminated the relator's employment in May 2017. Although the U.S. Department of Justice and all of the state and local governments have declined to intervene, the relator continues to pursue the case. The court has set a trial date for February 2025. The Company believes that the claims in this matter are without merit and intends to vigorously defend against all allegations. Given the current status of these matters, the Company is unable to express a view regarding the ultimate outcome or, if the outcome is adverse, to estimate an amount or range of reasonably possible loss. Depending on the outcome of these matters, there could be a material impact on the Company's financial statements.

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2023

Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIESFrom time to time, the Company is involved in routine litigation that arises in the ordinary course of business. In March 2022, the Company was served with a qui tam complaint (United States, ex. rel. Kruse v. Computer Programs and Systems, Inc., et. al., Case No. 3cv18-938 (N.D. Tex.)). The complaint alleges that at various times since 2012, CPSI, TruBridge and three hospital customers violated and conspired to violate the federal False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. 3729(a)(1)(A), (B), (C) and (G), and (a)(3), the Oklahoma Medicaid False Claims Act, the Texas False Claims Act, and the New Mexico False Claims Act, and demands unspecified damages. The complaint further alleges that TruBridge retaliated against the relator in violation of 31 U.S.C. 3730(h), when it terminated the relator's employment in May 2017. Although the U.S. Department of Justice and all of the state and local governments have declined to intervene, the relator continues to pursue the case. The court has set a trial date for February 2025. The Company believes that the claims in this matter are without merit and intends to vigorously defend against all allegations. Given the current status of these matters, the Company is unable to express a view regarding the ultimate outcome or, if the outcome is adverse, to estimate an amount or range of reasonably possible loss. Depending on the outcome of these matters, there could be a material impact on the Company's financial statements.