XML 83 R2.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.25.3
Pay vs Performance Disclosure - USD ($)
 12 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2025
Jun. 30, 2024
Jun. 30, 2023
Jun. 30, 2022
Jun. 30, 2021
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure, Table
Pay Versus Performance
This section provides disclosure
about
the relationship between executive compensation actually paid to our principal executive officer (“PEO”) and
Non-PEO
Named Executives and certain financial performance measures of the Company for the fiscal years listed below. This disclosure has been prepared in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation
S-K
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Pay Versus Performance Rules”) and does not necessarily reflect how the Compensation
Committee
evaluates compensation decisions.
Pay for Performance Table
 
Year
1
(a)
  
Summary
Compensation
Table Total
for PEO
($) (b)
    
Compensation
Actually Paid
to PEO
2
($) (c)
    
Average
Summary
Compensation
Table Total
for
Non-PEO
Named
Executive
Officers
($) (d)
    
Average
Compensation
Actually
Paid to
Non-PEO
Named
Executive
Officers
2
($) (e)
    
 

Value of Initial Fixed $100
Investment Based On:
3
    
Net Income
($)
(in millions)
(h)
    
Microsoft
Incentive
Plan
Revenue
4
($)
(in billions)
(i)
  
 
Microsoft
Total
Shareholder
Return
($) (f)
    
Peer Group
Total
Shareholder
Return
($) (g)
  
2025
     96,496,790       131,138,799       24,456,053       31,268,315       255       276       101,832       289.18  
2024
     79,106,183       171,304,590       21,081,007       40,171,628       227       243       88,136       246.12  
2023
     48,512,537       93,155,708       16,009,805       29,971,655       172       168       72,361       220.08  
2022
     54,946,310       56,936,384       20,074,444       20,494,054       128       123       72,738       206.67  
2021
     49,858,280       139,060,569       22,306,746       40,461,050       134       150       61,271       170.54  
 
(1)
The
Non-PEO
Named Executives for fiscal year 2025 were: Amy E. Hood, Judson B. Althoff, Takeshi Numoto, and Bradford L. Smith. The
Non-PEO
Named Executives for each of fiscal years 2024, 2023, and 2022 were: Amy E. Hood, Judson B. Althoff, Bradford L. Smith, and Christopher D. Young. The
Non-PEO
Named Executives for fiscal year 2021 were: Amy E. Hood, Jean-Philippe Courtois, Bradford L. Smith, and Christopher D. Young.
 
(2)
The dollar amounts reported represent the amount of “compensation actually paid,” as calculated in accordance with the Pay Versus Performance Rules. These dollar amounts do not reflect the actual amounts of compensation earned by or paid to our Named Executives during the applicable year. For purposes of calculating “compensation actually paid,” the fair value of equity awards is calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 using the same assumption methodologies used to calculate the grant date fair value of awards for purposes of the Summary Compensation Table (refer to “Named Executive Officer Compensation – Fiscal Year 2025 Compensation Tables – Summary Compensation Table” for additional information).
The “compensation actually paid” for fiscal years 2023, 2022, and 2021 has been updated from the amounts in Microsoft’s 2023 Proxy Statement to reflect the application of recent SEC guidance relating to retirement vesting treatment, which was issued following the filing of the 2023 Proxy Statement.
 
(3)
In accordance with the Pay Versus Performance Rules, Microsoft and Peer Group total shareholder return (“TSR”) is determined based on the value of an initial fixed investment through the end of the listed fiscal year. The Peer Group TSR set forth in this table was determined using the Nasdaq Computer Index, which we also use in preparing the stock performance graph required by Item 201(e) of Regulation
S-K
for our Annual Report for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025.
 
(4)
We have determined that Microsoft Incentive Plan Revenue (as defined on page
41
) is the financial performance measure that, in the Company’s assessment, represents the most important financial performance measure used to link “compensation actually paid” to our Named Executives, for fiscal year 2025, to company performance (the “Company Selected Measure” as defined in the Pay Versus Performance Rules).
       
Company Selected Measure Name Microsoft Incentive Plan Revenue        
Named Executive Officers, Footnote The
Non-PEO
Named Executives for fiscal year 2025 were: Amy E. Hood, Judson B. Althoff, Takeshi Numoto, and Bradford L. Smith. The
Non-PEO
Named Executives for each of fiscal years 2024, 2023, and 2022 were: Amy E. Hood, Judson B. Althoff, Bradford L. Smith, and Christopher D. Young. The
Non-PEO
Named Executives for fiscal year 2021 were: Amy E. Hood, Jean-Philippe Courtois, Bradford L. Smith, and Christopher D. Young. 		       
Peer Group Issuers, Footnote In accordance with the Pay Versus Performance Rules, Microsoft and Peer Group total shareholder return (“TSR”) is determined based on the value of an initial fixed investment through the end of the listed fiscal year. The Peer Group TSR set forth in this table was determined using the Nasdaq Computer Index, which we also use in preparing the stock performance graph required by Item 201(e) of Regulation
S-K
for our Annual Report for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025. 		       
PEO Total Compensation Amount $ 96,496,790 $ 79,106,183 $ 48,512,537 $ 54,946,310 $ 49,858,280
PEO Actually Paid Compensation Amount $ 131,138,799 171,304,590 93,155,708 56,936,384 139,060,569
Adjustment To PEO Compensation, Footnote
The following table shows the fiscal 2025 amounts deducted from and added to the Summary Compensation Table
total
compensation to calculate the “compensation actually paid” to our PEO and
Non-PEO
Named Executives in accordance with the Pay Versus Performance Rules.
 
  
 
   
PEO
($)
     
Average for
Non-PEO
NEO
($)
  
Summary Compensation Table (“SCT”) Total
    96,496,790      24,456,053  
     
Amounts Reported as ‘Stock Awards’ in SCT
      (84,245,496)        (20,371,476)  
Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in the Year and Unvested as of Year End
      107,802,587        25,076,581  
Change in Fair Value of Outstanding and Unvested Equity Awards, Granted in Prior Fiscal Years
      18,791,533        3,904,049  
Change in Fair Value of Equity Awards Vested, Granted in a Previous Year
      (7,706,615)        (1,796,892)  
Compensation Actually Paid
      131,138,799        31,268,315  
       
Non-PEO NEO Average Total Compensation Amount $ 24,456,053 21,081,007 16,009,805 20,074,444 22,306,746
Non-PEO NEO Average Compensation Actually Paid Amount $ 31,268,315 40,171,628 29,971,655 20,494,054 40,461,050
Adjustment to Non-PEO NEO Compensation Footnote
The following table shows the fiscal 2025 amounts deducted from and added to the Summary Compensation Table
total
compensation to calculate the “compensation actually paid” to our PEO and
Non-PEO
Named Executives in accordance with the Pay Versus Performance Rules.
 
  
 
   
PEO
($)
     
Average for
Non-PEO
NEO
($)
  
Summary Compensation Table (“SCT”) Total
    96,496,790      24,456,053  
     
Amounts Reported as ‘Stock Awards’ in SCT
      (84,245,496)        (20,371,476)  
Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in the Year and Unvested as of Year End
      107,802,587        25,076,581  
Change in Fair Value of Outstanding and Unvested Equity Awards, Granted in Prior Fiscal Years
      18,791,533        3,904,049  
Change in Fair Value of Equity Awards Vested, Granted in a Previous Year
      (7,706,615)        (1,796,892)  
Compensation Actually Paid
      131,138,799        31,268,315  
       
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Total Shareholder Return
 
 Compensation Actually Paid vs. Microsoft TSR vs. Peer Group TSR 
 
  
 
 
 
LOGO
       
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Net Income
 
 Compensation Actually Paid vs. Net Income vs. Incentive Plan Revenue 
 
  
 
 
 
LOGO
       
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Company Selected Measure
 
 Compensation Actually Paid vs. Net Income vs. Incentive Plan Revenue 
 
  
 
 
 
LOGO
       
Total Shareholder Return Vs Peer Group
 
 Compensation Actually Paid vs. Microsoft TSR vs. Peer Group TSR 
 
  
 
 
 
LOGO
       
Tabular List, Table
Financial Performance Measures
In accordance with the Pay Versus Performance Rules, the following table lists the financial performance measures that, in the Company’s assessment, represent the most important financial performance measures used to link “compensation actually paid” to our Named Executives, for fiscal year 2025, to Company performance, as further described in our Compensation Discussion and Analysis within the sections titled “Annual Cash Incentives” (see page 37) and “Equity Compensation” (see pages 38-39).
 
Most Important Performance Measures
Microsoft Incentive Plan Revenue (Company Selected Measure)
Relative TSR as compared to the S&P 500
Azure and Other Cloud Services Revenue
Microsoft Cloud Revenue, excluding Azure and Other Cloud Services
Microsoft Incentive Plan Operating Income
       
Total Shareholder Return Amount $ 255 227 172 128 134
Peer Group Total Shareholder Return Amount 276 243 168 123 150
Net Income (Loss) $ 101,832,000,000 $ 88,136,000,000 $ 72,361,000,000 $ 72,738,000,000 $ 61,271,000,000
Company Selected Measure Amount 289,180,000,000 246,120,000,000 220,080,000,000.00 206,670,000,000 170,540,000,000
Measure:: 1          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Name Microsoft Incentive Plan Revenue        
Measure:: 2          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Name Relative TSR as compared to the S&P 500        
Measure:: 3          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Name Azure and Other Cloud Services Revenue        
Measure:: 4          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Name Microsoft Cloud Revenue, excluding Azure and Other Cloud Services        
Measure:: 5          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Name Microsoft Incentive Plan Operating Income        
PEO | Aggregate Grant Date Fair Value of Equity Award Amounts Reported in Summary Compensation Table          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount $ (84,245,496)        
PEO | Year-end Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Covered Year that are Outstanding and Unvested          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount 107,802,587        
PEO | Year-over-Year Change in Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years That are Outstanding and Unvested          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount 18,791,533        
PEO | Change in Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Prior Year Equity Awards Vested in Covered Year          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount (7,706,615)        
Non-PEO NEO | Aggregate Grant Date Fair Value of Equity Award Amounts Reported in Summary Compensation Table          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount (20,371,476)        
Non-PEO NEO | Year-end Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Covered Year that are Outstanding and Unvested          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount 25,076,581        
Non-PEO NEO | Year-over-Year Change in Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years That are Outstanding and Unvested          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount 3,904,049        
Non-PEO NEO | Change in Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Prior Year Equity Awards Vested in Covered Year          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount $ (1,796,892)