v2.4.1.9
Fair Value Measurements
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2015
Fair Value Measurements

Note 8: Fair Value Measurements

The accounting guidance related to financial assets and financial liabilities (“financial instruments”) establishes a hierarchy that prioritizes fair value measurements based on the types of inputs used for the various valuation techniques (market approach, income approach and cost approach). Level 1 consists of financial instruments whose values are based on quoted market prices for identical financial instruments in an active market. Level 2 consists of financial instruments that are valued using models or other valuation methodologies. These models use inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly. Level 3 consists of financial instruments whose values are determined using pricing models that use significant inputs that are primarily unobservable, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques, as well as instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation. Our financial instruments that are accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis are presented in the table below.

Recurring Fair Value Measures
Fair Value as of
March 31,December 31,
20152014
(in millions) Level 1Level 2Level 3TotalTotal
Assets
Trading securities$42$-$-$42$523
Available-for-sale securities112110132132
Interest rate swap agreements-91-9184
Other-4885671
Total$43$260$18$321$810
Liabilities
Derivative component of prepaid forward sale agreements
and indexed debt instruments$-$3$-$3$361
Contractual obligations--904904883
Contingent consideration--632632644
Other-50-508
Total$-$53$1,536$1,589$1,896

Contractual Obligations and Contingent Consideration

The estimated fair values of the contractual obligations and contingent consideration in the table above are primarily based on certain expected future discounted cash flows, the determination of which involves the use of significant unobservable inputs. The most significant unobservable inputs we use include our estimates of the future revenue we expect to generate from certain NBCUniversal businesses, which are related to our contractual obligations, and future net tax benefits that will affect payments to General Electric Company (“GE”), which are related to our contingent consideration. The discount rates used in the measurements of fair value were between 5% and 13% and are based on the underlying risk associated with our estimate of future revenue, the terms of the respective contracts and the uncertainty in the timing of our payments to GE. The fair value adjustments to contractual obligations and contingent consideration are sensitive to the assumptions related to future revenue and tax benefits, respectively, as well as to current interest rates, and therefore the adjustments are recorded to other income (expense), net in our condensed consolidated statement of income.

Changes in Contractual Obligations and Contingent Consideration
(in millions)Contractual ObligationsContingent Consideration
Balance, December 31, 2014$883$644
Fair value adjustments407
Payments(19)(19)
Balance, March 31, 2015$904$632

Fair Value of Redeemable Subsidiary Preferred Stock

As of March 31, 2015, the fair value of the NBCUniversal Enterprise redeemable subsidiary preferred stock was $764 million. The estimated fair value is based on Level 2 inputs that use pricing models whose inputs are derived primarily from or corroborated by observable market data through correlation or other means for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.

NBCUniversal Media, LLC [Member]  
Fair Value Measurements

Note 7: Fair Value Measurements

The accounting guidance related to financial assets and financial liabilities (“financial instruments”) establishes a hierarchy that prioritizes fair value measurements based on the types of inputs used for the various valuation techniques (market approach, income approach and cost approach). Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment and may affect the valuation of financial instruments and their classification within the fair value hierarchy.

Our financial instruments that are accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis were not material for all periods presented, except for the liabilities associated with our contractual obligations. The fair values of the contractual obligations in the table below are primarily based on certain expected future discounted cash flows, the determination of which involves the use of significant unobservable inputs. As the inputs used are not quoted market prices or observable inputs, we classify these contractual obligations as Level 3 financial instruments.

The most significant unobservable inputs we use are our estimates of the future revenue we expect to generate from certain of our businesses. The discount rates used in the measurements of fair value as of March 31, 2015 were between 12% and 13% and are based on the underlying risk associated with our estimate of future revenue and the terms of the respective contracts. The fair value adjustments to the contractual obligations are sensitive to the assumptions related to future revenue, as well as to current interest rates, and therefore the adjustments are recorded to other income (expense), net in our condensed consolidated statement of income.

Changes in Contractual Obligations
(in millions)Contractual Obligations
Balance, December 31, 2014$883
Fair value adjustments40
Payments(19)
Balance, March 31, 2015$904