v2.4.0.6

Variable Interest Entities | 3 Months Ended
--- | ---
Mar. 31, 2013
Variable Interest Entities [Abstract] |
Variable Interest Entities | 11. VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES A VIE is an entity that is evaluated for consolidation using more than a simple analysis of voting control. The analysis to determine whether an entity is a VIE considers contracts with an entity, credit support for an entity, the adequacy of the equity investment of an entity and the relationship of voting power to the amount of equity invested in an entity. This analysis is performed either upon the creation of a legal entity or upon the occurrence of an event requiring reevaluation, such as a significant change in an entity's assets or activities. If an entity is determined to be a VIE, a qualitative analysis of control determines the party that consolidates a VIE based on what party has the power to direct the most significant activities of the VIE that impact its economic performance as well as what party has rights to receive benefits or is obligated to absorb losses that are significant to the VIE. The analysis of the party that consolidates a VIE is a continual reassessment. CONSOLIDATED VIEs The table below shows the VIEs that Duke Energy and Duke Energy Carolinas consolidate and how these entities impact Duke Energy's and Duke Energy Carolinas' respective Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. None of these entities are consolidated by Progress Energy, Duke Energy Progress, Duke Energy Florida, Duke Energy Ohio or Duke Energy Indiana. Other than the discussion below related to CRC, no financial support was provided to any of the consolidated VIEs during the three months ended March 31, 2013 a nd the year ended December 31, 2012, or is expected to be provided in the future, that was not previously contractually required.
|  |  | March 31, 2013
(in millions) |  | DERF(a) |  | CRC |  | CinCapV |  | Renewables |  | Other |  | Total
Restricted Receivables of VIEs |  | $ | 680 |  | $ | 585 |  | $ | 16 |  | $ | 23 |  | $ | ― |  | $ | 1,304
Other Current Assets |  |  | ― |  |  | ― |  |  | 5 |  |  | 208 |  |  | 2 |  |  | 215
Intangibles, net |  |  | ― |  |  | ― |  |  | ― |  |  | 11 |  |  | ― |  |  | 11
Restricted Other Assets of VIEs |  |  | ― |  |  | ― |  |  | 48 |  |  | 6 |  |  | ― |  |  | 54
Other Assets |  |  | ― |  |  | ― |  |  | 12 |  |  | 1 |  |  | 2 |  |  | 15
Property, Plant and Equipment, Cost |  |  | ― |  |  | ― |  |  | ― |  |  | 1,564 |  |  | 15 |  |  | 1,579
Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization |  |  | ― |  |  | ― |  |  | ― |  |  | (114) |  |  | (5) |  |  | (119)
Other Deferred Debits |  |  | ― |  |  | ― |  |  | ― |  |  | 33 |  |  | ― |  |  | 33
| Total Assets |  |  | 680 |  |  | 585 |  |  | 81 |  |  | 1,732 |  |  | 14 |  |  | 3,092
Accounts Payable |  |  | ― |  |  | ― |  |  | ― |  |  | 2 |  |  | ― |  |  | 2
Non-Recourse Notes Payable of VIEs |  |  | ― |  |  | 325 |  |  | ― |  |  | ― |  |  | ― |  |  | 325
Taxes Accrued |  |  | ― |  |  | ― |  |  | ― |  |  | 3 |  |  | ― |  |  | 3
Current Maturities of Long-Term Debt |  |  | ― |  |  | ― |  |  | 13 |  |  | 52 |  |  | ― |  |  | 65
Other Current Liabilities |  |  | ― |  |  | ― |  |  | 6 |  |  | 29 |  |  | ― |  |  | 35
Non-Recourse Long-Term Debt |  |  | 300 |  |  | ― |  |  | 44 |  |  | 911 |  |  | ― |  |  | 1,255
Deferred Income Taxes |  |  | ― |  |  | ― |  |  | ― |  |  | 275 |  |  | ― |  |  | 275
Asset Retirement Obligations |  |  | ― |  |  | ― |  |  | ― |  |  | 23 |  |  | ― |  |  | 23
Other Liabilities |  |  | ― |  |  | ― |  |  | 11 |  |  | 33 |  |  | ― |  |  | 44
| Total Liabilities |  |  | 300 |  |  | 325 |  |  | 74 |  |  | 1,328 |  |  | ― |  |  | 2,027
Noncontrolling Interests |  |  | ― |  |  | ― |  |  | ― |  |  | ― |  |  | ― |  |  | ―
Net Assets of Consolidated VIEs |  | $ | 380 |  | $ | 260 |  | $ | 7 |  | $ | 404 |  | $ | 14 |  | $ | 1,065
(a) | Duke Energy Receivables Finance Company, LLC (DERF) is a wholly owned limited liability company of Duke Energy Carolinas.
|  |  | December 31, 2012
(in millions) |  | DERF(a) |  | CRC |  | CinCapV |  | Renewables |  | Other |  | Total
Restricted Receivables of VIEs |  | $ | 637 |  | $ | 534 |  | $ | 15 |  | $ | 16 |  | $ | (1) |  | $ | 1,201
Other Current Assets |  |  | ― |  |  | ― |  |  | 4 |  |  | 133 |  |  | 2 |  |  | 139
Intangibles, net |  |  | ― |  |  | ― |  |  | ― |  |  | 12 |  |  | ― |  |  | 12
Restricted Other Assets of VIEs |  |  | ― |  |  | ― |  |  | 52 |  |  | 2 |  |  | ― |  |  | 54
Other Assets |  |  | ― |  |  | ― |  |  | 10 |  |  | ― |  |  | 2 |  |  | 12
Property, Plant and Equipment, Cost |  |  | ― |  |  | ― |  |  | ― |  |  | 1,543 |  |  | 15 |  |  | 1,558
Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization |  |  | ― |  |  | ― |  |  | ― |  |  | (98) |  |  | (5) |  |  | (103)
Other Deferred Debits |  |  | ― |  |  | ― |  |  | ― |  |  | 40 |  |  | ― |  |  | 40
| Total Assets |  |  | 637 |  |  | 534 |  |  | 81 |  |  | 1,648 |  |  | 13 |  |  | 2,913
Accounts Payable |  |  | ― |  |  | ― |  |  | ― |  |  | 1 |  |  | ― |  |  | 1
Non-Recourse Notes Payable of VIEs |  |  | ― |  |  | 312 |  |  | ― |  |  | ― |  |  | ― |  |  | 312
Taxes Accrued |  |  | ― |  |  | ― |  |  | ― |  |  | 62 |  |  | ― |  |  | 62
Current Maturities of Long-Term Debt |  |  | ― |  |  | ― |  |  | 13 |  |  | 459 |  |  | ― |  |  | 472
Other Current Liabilities |  |  | ― |  |  | ― |  |  | 4 |  |  | 25 |  |  | ― |  |  | 29
Non-Recourse Long-Term Debt |  |  | 300 |  |  | ― |  |  | 48 |  |  | 504 |  |  | ― |  |  | 852
Deferred Income Taxes |  |  | ― |  |  | ― |  |  | ― |  |  | 154 |  |  | ― |  |  | 154
Asset Retirement Obligations |  |  | ― |  |  | ― |  |  | ― |  |  | 23 |  |  | ― |  |  | 23
Other Liabilities |  |  | ― |  |  | ― |  |  | 10 |  |  | 39 |  |  | ― |  |  | 49
| Total Liabilities |  |  | 300 |  |  | 312 |  |  | 75 |  |  | 1,267 |  |  | ― |  |  | 1,954
Noncontrolling Interests |  |  | ― |  |  | ― |  |  | ― |  |  | ― |  |  | ― |  |  | ―
Net Assets of Consolidated VIEs |  | $ | 337 |  | $ | 222 |  | $ | 6 |  | $ | 381 |  | $ | 13 |  | $ | 959
(a) | DERF is a wholly owned limited liability company of Duke Energy Carolinas.
DERF Duke Energy Carolinas securitizes certain accounts receivable through DERF, a bankruptcy remote, special purpose subsidiary. DERF is a wholly owned limited liability company of Duke Energy Carolinas with a separate legal existence from its parent, and its assets are not intended to be generally available to creditors of Duke Energy Carolinas. As a result of the securitization, on a daily basis Duke Energy Carolinas sells certain accounts receivable, arising from the sale of electricity and/or related services as part of Duke Energy Carolinas' franchised electric business, to DERF. In order to fund its purchases of accounts receivable, DERF has a $300 million secured credit facility with a commercial paper conduit, which expires in August 201 4. Duke Energy Carolinas provides the servicing for the receivables (collecting and applying the cash to the appropriate receivables). Duke Energy Carolinas' borrowing under the credit facility is limited to the amount of qualified receivables sold, which has been and is expected to be in excess of the amount borrowed, which is maintained at $300 million. The debt is classified as long-term since the facility has an expiration date of greater than one year from the balance sheet date. The obligations of DERF under the facility are non-recourse to Duke Energy Carolinas. Duke Energy and its subsidiaries have no requirement to provide liquidity, purchase assets of DERF or guarantee performance. DERF is considered a VIE because the equity capitalization is insufficient to support its operations. If deficiencies in the net worth of DERF were to occur, those deficiencies would be cured through funding from Duke Energy Carolinas. In addition, the most significant activity of DERF relates to the decisions made with respect to the management of delinquent receivables. Since those decisions are made by Duke Energy Carolinas and any net worth deficiencies of DERF would be cured through funding from Duke Energy Carolinas, Duke Energy Carolinas consolidates DERF. CRC CRC was formed in order to secure low cost financing for Duke Energy Ohio, including Duke Energy Kentucky, and Duke Energy Indiana. Duke Energy Ohio and Duke Energy Indiana sell on a revolving basis at a discount, nearly all of their customer accounts receivable and related collections to CRC. The receivables which are sold are selected in order to avoid any significant concentration of credit risk and exclude delinquent receivables. The receivables sold are securitized by CRC through a facility managed by two unrelated third parties and the receivables are used as collateral for commercial paper issued by the unrelated third parties. These loans provide the cash portion of the proceeds paid by CRC to Duke Energy Ohio and Duke Energy Indiana. The proceeds obtained by Duke Energy Ohio and Duke Energy Indiana from the sales of receivables are cash and a subordinated note from CRC (subordinated retained interest in the sold receivables) for a portion of the purchase p rice (typically approximates 25 percent of the total proceeds). The amount borrowed by CRC against these receivables is non-recourse to the general credit of Duke Energy, and the associated cash collections from the accounts receivable sold is the sole source of funds to satisfy the related debt obligation. Borrowing is limited to approximately 75 percent of the transferred receivables. Losses on collection in excess of the discount are first absorbed by the equity of CRC and next by the subordinated retained interests held by Duke Energy Ohio and Duke Energy Indiana. The discount on the receivables reflects interest expense plus an allowance for bad debts net of a servicing fee charged by Duke Energy Ohio and Duke Energy Indiana. Duke Energy Ohio and Duke Energy Indiana are responsible for the servicing of the receivables (collecting and applying the cash to the appropriate receivables). Depending on the experience with collections, additional equity infusions to CRC may be required to be made by Duke Energy in order to maintain a minimum equity balance of $3 million. There were no infusions to CRC during the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The amount borrowed fluctuates based on the amount of receivables sold. The debt is short term because the facility has an expiration date of less than one year from the balance sheet date. The current expiration date is November 2013. CRC is considered a VIE because the equity capitalization is insufficient to support its operations, the power to direct the most significant activities of the entity are not performed by the equity holder, Cinergy, and deficiencies in the net worth of CRC are not funded by Cinergy, but by Duke Energy. The most significant activity of CRC relates to the decisions made with respect to the management of delinquent receivables. These decisions, as well as the requirement to make up deficiencies in net worth, are made by Duke Energy and not by Duke Energy Ohio, Duke Energy Kentucky or Duke Energy Indiana. Thus, Duke Energy consolid ates CRC. Duke Energy Ohio and Duke Energy Indiana do not consolidate CRC. CinCap V CinCap V was created to finance and execute a power sale agreement with Central Maine Power Company for approximately 35 MW of capacity and energy. This agreement expires in 2016. CinCap V is considered a VIE because the equity capitalization is insufficient to support its operations. As Duke Energy has the power to direct the most significant activities of the entity, which are the decisions to hedge and finance the power sales agreement, CinCap V is consolidated by Duke Energy. Renewables Duke Energy's renewable energy facilities include Green Frontier Windpower, LLC, Top of The World Wind Energy LLC, Los Vientos W i ndpower I A LLC, Los Vientos Windpower I B, LLC and various solar projects, all subsidiaries of DEGS, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Duke Energy. Green Frontier Windpower, LLC, Top of the World Wind Energy, LLC and the various solar projects are VIEs due to power purchase agreements with terms that approximate the expected life of the projects. These fixed price agreements effectively transfer the commodity price risk to the buyer of the power. Los Vientos Windpower I A, LLC and Los Vientos Windpower I B, LLC are VIEs due to Duke Energy issuing debt service reserve guarantees and operations and mainte nance reserve guarantees in support of the debt financings in December 2012. Duke Energy has consolidated these entities since inception because the most significant activities that impact the economic performance of these renewable energy facilities were the decisions associated with the siting, negotiation of the purchase power agreement, engineering, procurement and construction, and decisions associated with ongoing operations and maintenance related activities, all of which were made solely by Duke Energy. The debt held by these renewable energy facilities is non-recourse to the general credit of Duke Energy. Duke Energy and its subsidiaries have no requirement to provide liquidity or purchase the assets of these renewable energy facilities. Duke Energy does not guarantee performance except for an immaterial multi-purpose letter of credit and various immaterial debt service reserve and operations and maintenance reserve guarantees. The assets are restricted and they cannot be pledged as collateral or sold to third parties without the prior approval of the debt holders. NON-CONSOLIDATED VIEs The tables below show the VIEs that the Duke Energy Registrants do not consolidate and how these entities impact the Duke Energy Registrants respective Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. As discussed above, while Duke Energy consolidated CRC, Duke Energy Ohio and Duke Energy Indiana do not consolidate CRC as they are not the primary beneficiary.
|  |  | March 31, 2013
|  |  |  | Duke Energy |  |  |  |  |  |
(in millions) |  | DukeNet |  | Renewables |  | Other |  | Total |  | Duke Energy Ohio |  | Duke Energy Indiana
Receivables |  | $ | ― |  | $ | ― |  | $ | ― |  | $ | ― |  | $ | 115 |  | $ | 135
Investments in equity method unconsolidated affiliates |  |  | 117 |  |  | 149 |  |  | 27 |  |  | 293 |  |  | ― |  |  | ―
Intangibles |  |  | ― |  |  | ― |  |  | 102 |  |  | 102 |  |  | 102 |  |  | ―
Investments and other assets |  |  | ― |  |  | ― |  |  | 2 |  |  | 2 |  |  | ― |  |  | ―
| Total assets |  |  | 117 |  |  | 149 |  |  | 131 |  |  | 397 |  |  | 217 |  |  | 135
Other current liabilities |  |  | ― |  |  | ― |  |  | 1 |  |  | 1 |  |  | ― |  |  | ―
Deferred credits and other liabilities |  |  | ― |  |  | ― |  |  | 16 |  |  | 16 |  |  | ― |  |  | ―
| Total liabilities |  |  | ― |  |  | ― |  |  | 17 |  |  | 17 |  |  | ― |  |  | ―
Net assets |  | $ | 117 |  | $ | 149 |  | $ | 114 |  | $ | 380 |  | $ | 217 |  | $ | 135
|  |  | December 31, 2012
|  |  | Duke Energy |  |  |  |  |
(in millions) |  | DukeNet |  | Renewables |  | FPC Capital I Trust(a) | Other |  | Total |  | Duke Energy Ohio |  | Duke Energy Indiana
Receivables |  | $ | ― |  | $ | ― |  | $ | ― | $ | ― |  | $ | ― |  | $ | 97 |  | $ | 116
Investments in equity method unconsolidated affiliates |  |  | 118 |  |  | 147 |  |  | ― |  | 27 |  |  | 292 |  |  | ― |  |  | ―
Intangibles |  |  | ― |  |  | ― |  |  | ― |  | 104 |  |  | 104 |  |  | 104 |  |  | ―
Investments and other assets |  |  | ― |  |  | ― |  |  | 9 |  | 2 |  |  | 11 |  |  | ― |  |  | ―
| Total assets |  |  | 118 |  |  | 147 |  |  | 9 |  | 133 |  |  | 407 |  |  | 201 |  |  | 116
Other current liabilities |  |  | ― |  |  | ― |  |  | ― |  | 3 |  |  | 3 |  |  | ― |  |  | ―
Deferred credits and other liabilities |  |  | ― |  |  | ― |  |  | 319 |  | 17 |  |  | 336 |  |  | ― |  |  | ―
| Total liabilities |  |  | ― |  |  | ― |  |  | 319 |  | 20 |  |  | 339 |  |  | ― |  |  | ―
Net assets (liabilities) |  | $ | 118 |  | $ | 147 |  | $ | (310) | $ | 113 |  | $ | 68 |  | $ | 201 |  | $ | 116
(a) | The entire balance of Investments and other assets and $274 million of the Deferred credits and other liabilities balance applies to Progress Energy.
No financial support that was not previously contractually required was provided to any of the unconsolidated VIEs during the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, or is expected to be provided in the future. With the exception of the power purchase agreement with the Ohio Valley Electric Corporation (OVEC), which is discussed below, and various guarantees, reflected i n the table above as “Deferred c r edits and other l iabilities”, the Duke Energy Registrants are not aware of any situations where the maximum exposure to loss significantly exceeds the carrying values shown above. DukeNet In 2010, Duke Energy sold a 50 percent ownership interest in DukeNet to Alinda. The sale resulted in DukeNet becoming a joint venture with Duke Energy and Alinda each owning a 50 percent interest. In connection with the for mation of the new DukeNet joint venture, a 5-year, $150 million senior secured credit facility was executed with a syndicate of 10 external financial institutions. This credit facility is non-recourse to Duke Energy. DukeNet is considered a VIE because it has entered into certain contractual arrangements that provide DukeNet with additional forms of subordinated financial support. The most significant activities that impact DukeNet's economic performance relate to its business development and fiber optic capacity marketing and management activities. The power to direct these activities is jointly and equally shared by Duke Energy and Alinda. As a result, Duke Energy does not consolidate DukeNet. Accordingly, DukeNet is a non-consolidated VIE that is reported as an equity method investment. Unless consent by Duke Energy is given otherwise, Duke Energy and its subsidiaries have no requirement to provide liquidity, purchase the assets of Duke Net, or guarantee performance. Renewables Duke Energy has investments in various entities that generate electricity through the use of renewable energy tech nology. Some of these entities are VIEs which are not consolidated due to the joint ownership of the entities when they were created and the power to direct and control key activities is shared jointly. Instead, Duke Energy's investment is recorded under the equity method of accounting. These entities are VIEs due to power purchase agreements with terms that approximate the expected life of the project. These fixed price agreements effectively transfer the commodity price risk to the buyer of the power. DS Cornerstone, LLC, a 50/50 joint venture entity with a third-party joint venture partner, owns two windpower projects and has executed a third party financing again st the two windpower projects. DS Cornerstone was a consolidated VIE of Duke Energy through August 31, 2012, as the members equity was not sufficient to support the operations of the joint venture as demonstrated by the third party financing. Duke Energy provided a Production Tax Credit (PTC) Remedy Agreement to the joint venture partner whereby Duke Energy guaranteed the two windpower projects would achieve commercial operation in 2012 and an agreed to number of wind turbines would qualify for production tax credits. In the event the agreed to number of wind turbines of the two wind generating facilities failed to qualify, the joint venture partner had the option to put its equity ownership interest back to Duke Energy. The PTC Remedy Agreement resulted in greater loss exposure to Duke Energy and, as a result, Duke Energy consolidated DS Cornerstone, LLC through August 31, 2012, until both projects reached commercial operation and the appropriate number of wind turbines qualified for PTC. As of March 31, 2013, DS Cornerstone is a non-consolidated VIE. The most significant activities that impact DS Cornerstone's economic performance are the decisions related to the ongoing operations and maintenance activities. The power to direct these activities is jointly and equally shared by Duke Energy and the third-party joint venture partner. As a result, Duke Energy does not consolidate the DS Cornerstone. Accordingly, DS Cornerstone is a non-consolidated VIE that is reported as an equity method investment. FPC Capital I Trust At December 31, 2012, Progress Energy had variable interests in the FPC Capital I Trust (the Trust) which was a VIE of which Duke Energy wa s not the primary beneficiary. The Trust, a finance subsidiary, was established in 1999 for the sole purpose of issuing $300 million of 7.10% Cumulative Quarterly Income Preferred Securities due 2039, and us ed the proceeds thereof to purchase from Florida Progress Funding Corporation (Funding Corp.), a wholly owned subsidiary of Progress Energy, $300 million of 7.10% Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Notes due 2039. The Trust ha d no other operations and its sole assets are the subordinated notes and related guarantees. Funding Corp. was formed for the sole purpose of providing financing to Duke Energy Florida. Funding Corp. did not engage in business activities other than such financing and ha d no independent operations. Progress Energy guaranteed the payments of all distributions required by the T rust. On February 1, 2013, Duke Energy redeemed the $300 million of 7.10% Cumulative Quarterly Income Preferred Securities and subsequently terminated the Trust. Other Duke Energy has investments in various other entities that are VIEs which are not consolidated. The most significant of these investments is Duke Energy Ohio's 9 percent ownership interest in OVEC. Through its ownership interest in OVEC, Duke Energy Ohio has a contractual arrangement through June 2040 to buy power from OVEC's power plants. The proceeds from the sale of power by OVEC to its power purchase agreement counterparties, including Duke Energy Ohio, are designed to be sufficient for OVEC to meet its operating expenses, fixed costs, debt amortization and interest expense, as well as earn a ROE. Accordingly, the value of this contract is subject to variability due to fluctuations in power prices and changes in OVEC's costs of business, including costs associated with its 2,256 MW of coal-fired generation capacity. As discussed in Note 5, the proposed rulemaking on cooling water intake structures, MATS, CSAPR and CCP's could increase the costs of OVEC which would be passed through to Duke Energy Ohio. The initial carrying value of this contract was recorded as an intangible asset when Duke Energy acquired Cinergy in April 2006. In addition, the company has guaranteed the performance of certain entities in which the company no longer has an equity interest. As a result, the company has a variable interest in certain other VIEs that are not consolidated. CRC As discussed above, CRC is consolidated only by Duke Energy. Accordingly, the retained interest in the sold receivables recorded on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets of Duke Energy Ohio and Duke Energy Indiana are eliminated in consolidation at Duke Energy. The proceeds obtained from the sales of receivables are largely cash but do include a subordinated note from CRC for a portion of the purchase price (typically approximates 25 percent of the total proceeds). The subordinated note is a retained interest (right to receive a specified portion of cash flows from the sold assets) and is classified within Receivables in Duke Energy Ohio's and Duke Energy Indiana's Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. The retained interests reflected on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets of Duke Energy Ohio and Duke Energy Indiana approximate fair value. The carrying values of the retained interests are determined by allocating the carrying value of the receivables between the assets sold and the interests retained based on relative fair value. Because the receivables generally turnover in less than two months, credit losses are reasonably predictable due to the broad customer base and lack of significant concentration, and the purchased beneficial interest (equity in CRC) is subordinate to all retained interests and thus would absorb losses first, the allocated basis of the subordinated notes are not materially different than their face value. The hypothetical effect on the fair value of the retained interests assuming both a 10 percent and a 20 percent unfavorable variation in credit losses or discount rates is not material due to the short turnover of receivables and historically low credit loss history. Interest accrues to Duke Energy Ohio and Duke Energy Indiana on the retained interests using the acceptable yield method, which generally approximates the stated rate on the notes since the allocated basis and the face value are nearly equivalent. An impairment charge is recorded against the carrying value of both the retained interests and purchased beneficial interest whenever it is determined that an other-than-temporary impairment has occurred. The key assumptions used in estimating the fair value in 2013 and 2012 is detailed in the following table:
|  | Duke Energy Ohio |  | Duke Energy Indiana
|  | 2013 |  | 2012 |  | 2013 |  | 2012
Anticipated credit loss ratio |  | 0.6 | % |  | 0.7 | % |  | 0.3 | % |  | 0.3 | %
Discount rate |  | 1.2 | % |  | 1.2 | % |  | 1.2 | % |  | 1.2 | %
Receivable turnover rate |  | 12.8 | % |  | 12.7 | % |  | 10.3 | % |  | 10.2 | %
The following table shows the gross and net receivables sold:
|  |  | Duke Energy Ohio |  | Duke Energy Indiana
(in millions) |  | March 31, 2013 |  | December 31, 2012 |  | March 31, 2013 |  | December 31, 2012
Receivables sold |  | $ | 304 |  | $ | 282 |  | $ | 317 |  | $ | 289
Less: Retained interests |  |  | 115 |  |  | 97 |  |  | 135 |  |  | 116
Net receivables sold |  | $ | 189 |  | $ | 185 |  | $ | 182 |  | $ | 173
The following tables show the retained interests, sales, and cash flows related to receivables sold:
|  |  | Duke Energy Ohio |  | Duke Energy Indiana
|  |  | Three Months Ended March 31, |  | Three Months Ended March 31,
(in millions) |  | 2013 |  | 2012 |  | 2013 |  | 2012
Sales |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Receivables sold |  | $ | 638 |  | $ | 610 |  | $ | 747 |  | $ | 706
Loss recognized on sale |  |  | 3 |  |  | 4 |  |  | 3 |  |  | 3
Cash flows |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Cash proceeds from receivables sold |  |  | 617 |  |  | 636 |  |  | 725 |  |  | 724
Collection fees received |  |  | ― |  |  | ― |  |  | ― |  |  | ―
Return received on retained interests |  |  | 1 |  |  | 2 |  |  | 2 |  |  | 2
Cash flows from the sale of receivables are reflected within Operating Activities on Duke Energy Ohio's and Duke Energy Indiana's Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. Collection fees received in connection with the servicing of transferred accounts receivable are included in Operation, Maintenance and Other on Duke Energy Ohio's and Duke Energy Indiana's Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income. The loss recognized on the sale of receivables is calculated monthly by multiplying the receivables sold during the month by the required discount which is derived monthly utilizing a three year weighted average formula that considers charge-off history, late charge history, and turnover history on the sold receivables, as well as a component for the time value of money. The discount rate, or component for the time value of money, is calculated monthly by summing the prior month-end LIBOR plus a fixed rate of 1.00 percent.

X
- Details
Name: | duk_VariableInterestEntitiesAbstract
Namespace Prefix: | duk_
Data Type: | xbrli:stringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition Disclosure of variable interests in consolidated and nonconsolidated variable interest entities. + References No definition available. + Details
Name: | duk_VariableInterestEntitiesDisclosureTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | duk_
Data Type: | nonnum:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration