XML 36 R17.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT
v3.4.0.3

Benefit Plans | 3 Months Ended
--- | ---
Mar. 31, 2016
Benefit Plans |
|  | For the Three Months Ended March 31, |  |  | Location of Gain / (Loss) Recognized in AOCI |  |  |  |
|  | 2016 |  |  | 2015 |  |  |
|  | (in millions) |  |  |  |  |
Euro notes |  | $ | 154 |  |  | $ | 314 |  |  |  | Currency |  |
Pound sterling notes |  |  | (23 | ) |  |  | 32 |  |  |  | Translation |  |
Swiss franc notes |  |  | 43 |  |  |  | (13 | ) |  |  | Adjustment |  |
Note 9. Benefit Plans Pension Plans Components of Net Periodic Pension Cost: Net periodic pension cost consisted of the following: |
|  | U.S. Plans |  |  | Non-U.S. Plans |
|  | For the Three Months Ended March 31, |  |  | For the Three Months Ended March 31, |
|  | 2016 |  |  | 2015 |  |  | 2016 |  |  | 2015 |
|  | (in millions) |  |  | (in millions) |
Service cost |  | $ | 13 |  |  | $ | 17 |  |  | $ | 38 |  |  | $ | 50 |
Interest cost |  |  | 16 |  |  |  | 17 |  |  |  | 60 |  |  |  | 77 |
Expected return on plan assets |  |  | (24 | ) |  |  | (23 | ) |  |  | (110 | ) |  |  | (119 | )
Amortization: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Net loss from experience differences |  |  | 9 |  |  |  | 12 |  |  |  | 31 |  |  |  | 39 |
Prior service cost |  |  | – |  |  |  | – |  |  |  | (1 | ) |  |  | – |
Settlement losses and other expenses |  |  | 4 |  |  |  | 3 |  |  |  | – |  |  |  | – |
Net periodic pension cost |  | $ | 18 |  |  | $ | 26 |  |  | $ | 18 |  |  | $ | 47 |
Net periodic pension cost decreased in the first quarter of 2016 due to a combination of factors, including a decreased number of plan participants, changes in discount rates, company contributions to the plans and a change in our approach to measuring service and interest costs. For 2015, we measured service and interest costs utilizing a single weighted-average discount rate derived from the yield curve used to measure the plan obligations. For 2016, we have elected to measure service and interest costs by applying the specific spot rates along that yield curve to the plans’ liability cash flows. We believe the new approach provides a more precise measurement of service and interest costs by aligning the timing of the plans’ liability cash flows to the corresponding spot rates on the yield curve. The impact of this change was approximately a $16 million decrease in net periodic pension cost for the three months ended March 31, 2016. This change does not affect the measurement of our plan obligations. We have accounted for this change as a change in accounting estimate and, accordingly, have accounted for it on a prospective basis. Net pension costs of our Non-U.S. plans in the first quarter of 2016 were also favorably impacted by the reduction in our pension plan obligations due to the JDE coffee business transactions. Prior to the July 2, 2015 closing of the JDE coffee business transactions, certain active employees who transitioned to JDE participated in our Non-U.S. pension plans. Following the transactions, benefits began to be provided directly by JDE to participants continuing with JDE. JDE assumed certain pension plan obligations and received the related plan assets. In 2015, we reduced our net benefit plan liabilities by $131 million and the related deferred tax assets by $24 million. Refer to Note 2, Divestitures and Acquisitions – JDE Coffee Business Transactions, for more information. For participants that elected not to transfer into the JDE plans, we retained the plan obligations and related plan assets. Employer Contributions: During the three months ended March 31, 2016, we contributed $154 million to our U.S. plans and $116 million to our non-U.S. plans. As of March 31, 2016, we plan to make further contributions of approximately $16 million to our U.S. plans and approximately $263 million to our non-U.S. plans during the remainder of 2016. However, our actual contributions may differ due to many factors, including changes in tax and other benefit laws or significant differences between expected and actual pension asset performance or interest rates. Postretirement Benefit Plans Net periodic postretirement health care costs consisted of the following:
|  | For the Three Months Ended |
|  | March 31, |
|  | 2016 |  |  | 2015 |
|  | (in millions) |
Service cost |  | $ | 3 |  |  | $ | 4 |
Interest cost |  |  | 5 |  |  |  | 6 |
Amortization: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Net loss from experience differences |  |  | 2 |  |  |  | 3 |
Prior service credit |  |  | (2 | ) |  |  | (2 | )
Net periodic postretirement health care costs |  | $ | 8 |  |  | $ | 11 |
Net periodic postretirement health care costs decreased in the first quarter of 2016 due to a combination of factors, including a decreased number of plan participants, changes in discount rates, company contributions to the plans and a change in our approach to measuring service and interest costs. For 2015, we measured service and interest costs utilizing a single weighted-average discount rate derived from the yield curve used to measure the plan obligations. For 2016, we elected to measure service and interest costs by applying the specific spot rates along that yield curve to the plans’ liability cash flows. We believe the new approach provides a more precise measurement of service and interest costs by aligning the timing of the plans’ liability cash flows to the corresponding spot rates on the yield curve. The impact of this change was approximately a $1 million decrease in net periodic postretirement health care costs for the three months ended March 31, 2016. This change does not affect the measurement of our plan obligations. We have accounted for this change as a change in accounting estimate and, accordingly, have accounted for it on a prospective basis. Postemployment Benefit Plans Net periodic postemployment costs consisted of the following:
|  | For the Three Months Ended |
|  | March 31, |
|  | 2016 |  |  | 2015 |
|  | (in millions) |
Service cost |  | $ | 2 |  |  | $ | 2 |
Interest cost |  |  | 1 |  |  |  | 1 |
Net periodic postemployment costs |  | $ | 3 |  |  | $ | 3 |

X
- Definition The entire disclosure for pension and other postretirement benefits. + References Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 715 -SubTopic 80 -Section 50 -Paragraph 11 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=49170332&loc=SL14450702-114947 Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 715 -SubTopic 20 -Section 50 -Paragraph 2 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=58740216&loc=d3e2410-114920 Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 715 -SubTopic 60 -Section 50 -Paragraph 2 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6414203&loc=d3e39675-114964 Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 715 -SubTopic 70 -Section 50 -Paragraph 1 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=49170846&loc=d3e28014-114942 Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 715 -SubTopic 60 -Section 50 -Paragraph 1 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6414199&loc=d3e39622-114963 + Details
Name: | us-gaap_PensionAndOtherPostretirementBenefitsDisclosureTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | nonnum:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration