DEF 14A 1 net-def14aproxy2021.htm DEF 14A
Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
_____________________________________________________________________
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
_____________________________________________________________________

Filed by the Registrant x | Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ¨

Check the appropriate box:
¨ | Preliminary Proxy Statement
¨ | Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
x | Definitive Proxy Statement
¨ | Definitive Additional Materials
¨ | Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12

CLOUDFLARE, INC.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
x | No fee required.
¨ | Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
| (1) | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
| (2) | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
| (3) | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
| (4) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
| (5) | Total fee paid:

¨ | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
¨ | Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
| (1) | Amount Previously Paid:
| (2) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
| (3) | Filing Party:
| (4) | Date Filed:

Table of Contents
Cloudflare, Inc.
101 Townsend Street
San Francisco, California 94107
April 21, 2021
NOTICE OF 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD VIRTUALLY ON JUNE 3, 2021
Dear Stockholder:
We are pleased to invite you to virtually attend the 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, including any adjournments, continuations, or postponements thereof (the Annual Meeting), of Cloudflare, Inc. (Cloudflare) to be held virtually on Thursday, June 3, 2021 at 9:00 a.m. Pacific Time. The Annual Meeting will be held virtually via a live interactive audio webcast on the Internet. If you held shares of our Class A common stock or Class B common stock at the close of business on April 14, 2021, you will be able to vote and submit your questions during the meeting at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NET2021. We are holding the Annual Meeting for the following purposes, which are more fully described in the accompanying proxy statement:
•to elect as Class II directors the three nominees named in the proxy statement, to serve until the 2024 annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors are duly elected and qualified, subject to their earlier death, resignation, or removal;
•to ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2021;
•to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers;
•to approve, on an advisory basis, the frequency of future stockholder advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive officers; and
•to transact any other business that properly comes before the Annual Meeting.
We have elected to provide Internet access to our Annual Meeting materials, which include the proxy statement for our Annual Meeting (the Proxy Statement) accompanying this notice, in lieu of mailing printed copies. On or about April 21, 2021, we expect to mail to our stockholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the Notice) containing instructions on how to access the Proxy Statement and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020 (2020 Annual Report). The Notice provides instructions on how to vote online or by telephone and includes instructions on how to receive a paper copy of proxy materials by mail. The Proxy Statement and our 2020 Annual Report can be accessed directly at the Internet address www.proxyvote.com using the control number located on the Notice, on your proxy card, or in the instructions that accompanied your proxy materials.
Our Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on April 14, 2021 as the record date for the Annual Meeting. Only stockholders of record at the close of business on April 14, 2021 are entitled to notice of, and to vote, during the Annual Meeting as set forth in the Proxy Statement. A list of stockholders eligible to vote at the Annual Meeting will be available for review during our regular business hours at our principal executive offices for the ten days prior to the meeting for any purpose related to the meeting, and will be available online during the entirety of the Annual Meeting.
Your vote is important. Whether or not you plan to virtually attend the meeting, please ensure that your shares are represented and voted during the Annual Meeting by signing and returning a proxy card or by using our Internet or telephonic voting system.
Thank you for your ongoing support of, and continued interest in, Cloudflare.
By order of the Board of Directors,

Matthew Prince |  | Michelle Zatlyn
Co-founder & CEO |  | Co-founder, President & COO

Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS

GENERAL INFORMATION | 1
BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE | 8
Nominees for Director | 9
Continuing Directors | 9
Director Independence | 11
Board Leadership Structure | 12
Board Meetings and Committees | 13
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation | 14
Considerations in Evaluating Director Nominees | 16
Stockholder Recommendations for Nominations to the Board of Directors | 16
Communications with the Board of Directors | 17
Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Business Conduct and Ethics | 17
Role of the Board in Risk Oversight | 17
Director Compensation | 18
PROPOSAL ONE: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS | 20
PROPOSAL TWO: RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM | 21
REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS | 23
PROPOSAL THREE: ADVISORY VOTE ON THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS | 24
PROPOSAL FOUR: ADVISORY VOTE ON THE FREQUENCY OF FUTURE STOCKHOLDER ADVISORY VOTES ON THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS | 25
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS | 26
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION | 27
Compensation Discussion and Analysis | 27
Report of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors | 38
Compensation Risk Assessment | 39
2020 Summary Compensation Table | 40
Outstanding Equity Awards at 2020 Year-End | 41
Option Exercises and Stock Vested in 2020 | 42
Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control | 43
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION | 45
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT | 46
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS | 49
OTHER MATTERS | 51

Table of Contents
Cloudflare, Inc.
101 Townsend Street
San Francisco, California 94107
PROXY STATEMENT
FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD AT 9:00 AM PACIFIC TIME ON THURSDAY, JUNE 3, 2021
GENERAL INFORMATION
Our Board of Directors solicits your proxy on our behalf for the 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, including any adjournments, continuations, or postponements thereof (the Annual Meeting), for the purposes set forth in this proxy statement for our Annual Meeting (this Proxy Statement) and the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting. The Annual Meeting will be held virtually via a live audio webcast on the Internet on Thursday, June 3, 2021 at 9:00 a.m. Pacific Time. The Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the Notice) containing instructions on how to access this Proxy Statement and the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020 (2020 Annual Report) is first being mailed on or about April 21, 2021 to all stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. If you held shares of our Class A common stock or Class B common stock at the close of business on April 14, 2021, you are invited to virtually attend the meeting at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NET2021 and vote on the proposals described in this Proxy Statement.
In this Proxy Statement, the terms "Cloudflare," "the company," "we," "us," and "our" refer to Cloudflare, Inc. and its subsidiaries. The mailing address of our principal executive offices is 101 Townsend Street, San Francisco, California 94107.
The information provided in the “question and answer” format below is for your convenience only and is merely a summary of the information contained in this Proxy Statement. You should read this entire Proxy Statement carefully. Information contained on, or that can be accessed through, our website is not intended to be incorporated by reference into this Proxy Statement and references to our website address in this Proxy Statement are inactive textual references only.
What matters are being voted on during the Annual Meeting?
You will be voting on the following proposals:
•the election of Maria Eitel, Matthew Prince, and Katrin Suder as Class II directors, to serve until the 2024 annual meeting of stockholders or until their successors are duly elected and qualified, subject to their earlier death, resignation, or removal;
•the ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for our fiscal year ending December 31, 2021;
•to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers;
•to approve, on an advisory basis, the frequency of future stockholder advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive officers; and
•any other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting.
As of the date of this Proxy Statement, our management and Board of Directors were not aware of any other matters to be presented at the Annual Meeting.
For a discussion of who our “named executive officers” are, see the section titled “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”
How does the Board of Directors recommend that I vote on these proposals?
Our Board of Directors recommends that you vote your shares:
•"FOR" the election of Maria Eitel, Matthew Prince, and Katrin Suder as Class II directors;
1

Table of Contents
•"FOR" the ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for our fiscal year ending December 31, 2021;
•"FOR" the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers; and
•to hold future stockholder advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive officers every "ONE YEAR."
How many votes are needed for approval of each proposal?
Proposal One: The election of directors requires a plurality of the voting power of the shares of our common stock present virtually or by proxy during the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote thereon to be approved. "Plurality" means that the nominees who receive the largest number of votes cast "FOR" such nominees are elected as directors. As a result, any shares not voted "FOR" a particular nominee, whether as a result of stockholder abstention or a broker non-vote (in other words, where a broker has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner and for which the broker does not have discretionary power to vote on a particular matter), will not be counted in such nominee's favor and will have no effect on the outcome of the election. You may vote “FOR” or “WITHHOLD” on each of the nominees for election as a director.
Proposal Two: The ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for our fiscal year ending December 31, 2021 requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the voting power of the shares of our common stock present virtually or by proxy during the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote thereon to be approved. You may vote “FOR,” “AGAINST,” or “ABSTAIN” with respect to this proposal. Abstentions are considered shares present and entitled to vote on this proposal, and thus, will have the same effect as a vote "AGAINST" this proposal. Broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of this proposal. Because this is a routine proposal, we do not expect any broker non-votes on this proposal.
Proposal Three: The approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the voting power of the shares of our common stock present virtually or by proxy during the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote thereon to be approved. You may vote “FOR,” “AGAINST,” or “ABSTAIN” with respect to this proposal. Abstentions are considered shares present and entitled to vote on this proposal, and thus, will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” this proposal. Broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of this proposal. Because this proposal is an advisory vote, the result will not be binding on our Board of Directors or our company. Our Board of Directors and our compensation committee, however, will consider the outcome of the vote when determining named executive officer compensation.
Proposal Four: For the approval, on an advisory basis, of the frequency of future stockholder advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive officers, the frequency (1-year, 2-years, or 3-years) receiving the highest number of votes cast at the Annual Meeting by stockholders entitled to vote thereon will be considered the frequency preferred by the stockholders. You may vote “ONE YEAR,” “TWO YEARS,” “THREE YEARS,” or “ABSTAIN” with respect to this proposal. If you “ABSTAIN” from voting on this proposal, it will have no effect on the outcome of this proposal. Broker non-votes also will have no effect on the outcome of this proposal. Because this proposal is an advisory vote, the result will not be binding on our Board of Directors or our company. Our Board of Directors and our compensation committee, however, will consider the outcome of the vote when determining how often we should submit to our stockholders an advisory vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers.
Who is entitled to vote?
Holders of either our Class A common stock or Class B common stock as of the close of business on April 14, 2021, which is the record date for the Annual Meeting (the Record Date), may vote during the Annual Meeting. As of the Record Date, there were 256,213,833 shares of our Class A common stock and 54,367,286 shares of our Class B common stock outstanding. Our Class A common stock and Class B common stock will vote as a single class on all matters described in this Proxy Statement for which your vote is being solicited. Stockholders are not permitted to cumulate votes with respect to the election of directors. Each share of Class A common stock is entitled to one vote on each proposal and each share of Class B common stock is entitled to 10 votes on each proposal. Our Class A common stock and Class B common stock are collectively referred to in this Proxy Statement as our "common stock."
A list of stockholders eligible to vote at the Annual Meeting will be available for review during our regular business hours at our principal executive offices for the ten days prior to the Annual Meeting for any purpose related to the Annual Meeting. If you would like to view the list, please contact our corporate secretary to schedule an appointment by writing to him at Cloudflare, Inc., 101 Townsend Street, San Francisco, California 94107, Attention: Secretary. The list of stockholders eligible
2

Table of Contents
to vote at the Annual Meeting will be available online at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NET2021 during the entirety of the Annual Meeting.
Registered Stockholders. If your shares of our common stock are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, Computershare Trust Company, N.A. (Computershare), then you are considered the stockholder of record with respect to those shares, and the Notice was provided to you directly by us. As the stockholder of record, you have the right to grant your voting proxy directly to the individuals listed on the proxy card or to vote live during the Annual Meeting. Throughout this Proxy Statement, we refer to these registered stockholders as "stockholders of record."
Street Name Stockholders. If your shares of our common stock are held on your behalf in a brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee, then you are considered to be the beneficial owner of shares that are held in "street name," and the Notice was forwarded to you by your broker, bank, or other nominee, who is considered the stockholder of record with respect to those shares. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker, bank, or other nominee as to how to vote your shares. Beneficial owners are also invited to attend the Annual Meeting. However, since a beneficial owner is not the stockholder of record, you may not vote your shares of our common stock live during the Annual Meeting unless you follow your broker's procedures for obtaining a legal proxy. If you request a printed copy of our proxy materials by mail, your broker, bank, or other nominee will provide a voting instruction form for you to use. Throughout this Proxy Statement, we refer to stockholders who hold their shares through a broker, bank, or other nominee as "street name stockholders."
What is the quorum requirement?
A quorum is the minimum number of shares required to be present or represented by proxy during the Annual Meeting to properly hold an annual meeting of stockholders and conduct business under our amended and restated bylaws and Delaware law. The presence, whether virtually or by proxy, of a majority of the voting power of all issued and outstanding shares of our common stock entitled to vote on the Record Date will constitute a quorum for the Annual Meeting. The shares subject to a proxy that are not being voted on a particular matter because of either stockholder withholding or broker non-vote will count for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum. Abstentions are also counted in the determination of a quorum. If there is no quorum, the chairperson of the meeting may adjourn the meeting to another time or place.
How do I vote and what are the voting deadlines?
If you are a stockholder of record, there are four ways to vote:
(1) by Internet at www.proxyvote.com, 24 hours a day, seven days a week, until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on June 2, 2021 (have your Notice or proxy card in hand when you visit the website);
(2) by toll-free telephone at 1-800-690-6903, 24 hours a day, seven days a week, until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on June 2, 2021 (have your Notice or proxy card in hand when you call);
(3) by completing, signing, and mailing your proxy card (if you received printed proxy materials) to be received prior to the scheduled start of the Annual Meeting; or
(4) by Internet during the Annual Meeting. Instructions on how to virtually attend and vote during the Annual Meeting are described at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NET2021 (have your Notice or proxy card in hand when you visit the website).
If you are a street name stockholder, you will receive voting instructions from your broker, bank, or other nominee. You must follow the voting instructions provided by your broker, bank, or other nominee in order to direct your broker, bank, or other nominee on how to vote your shares. Street name stockholders should generally be able to vote by returning a voting instruction form and may be able to vote by telephone or on the Internet, depending on the voting process of your broker, bank, or other nominee. As discussed above, if you are a street name stockholder, you may not vote your shares live at the virtual Annual Meeting unless you obtain a legal proxy from your broker, bank, or other nominee.
Can I change my vote or revoke my proxy?
Yes. If you are a stockholder of record, you can change your vote or revoke your proxy any time before the Annual Meeting by:
•notifying our Secretary, in writing, at Cloudflare, Inc., 101 Townsend Street, San Francisco, California 94107 before the vote is counted;
•voting again using the telephone or Internet before 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on June 2, 2021 (your latest telephone or Internet proxy is the one that will be counted);
3

Table of Contents
•by completing and mailing a later-dated proxy card (which must be received prior to the Annual Meeting); or
•attending and voting during the Annual Meeting. Simply logging into the Annual Meeting will not, by itself, revoke your proxy.
If you are a street name stockholder, you may revoke any prior voting instructions by contacting your broker, bank, or nominee.
What is the effect of giving a proxy?
Proxies are solicited by and on behalf of our Board of Directors. Matthew Prince, Michelle Zatlyn, and Thomas Seifert have been designated as proxy holders by our Board of Directors. When proxies are properly dated, executed, and returned, the shares represented by such proxies will be voted during the Annual Meeting in accordance with the instructions of the stockholder. If no specific instructions are given, however, the shares will be voted in accordance with the recommendations of our Board of Directors as described above. If any matters not described in this Proxy Statement are properly presented during the Annual Meeting, the proxy holders will use their own judgment to determine how to vote the shares. If the Annual Meeting is adjourned or postponed, the proxy holders can vote the shares on the new Annual Meeting date as well, unless you have properly revoked your proxy instructions, as described above.
What is the effect of abstentions and broker non-votes?
Votes withheld from any nominee, abstentions, and broker non-votes are counted as present for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum. Shares voting “WITHHOLD” on Proposal One will have no impact on the outcome of Proposal One. Abstentions will have no impact on the outcome of Proposal Four, while abstentions will have the same effect as a vote "AGAINST" Proposals Two and Three.
Brokerage firms and other intermediaries holding shares of our common stock in street name for their customers are generally required to vote such shares in the manner directed by their customers. In the absence of timely directions, your broker, bank, or other nominee will have discretion to vote your shares on our sole "routine" matter, which is the proposal to ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for our fiscal year ending December 31, 2021. Absent direction from you, your broker, bank, or other nominee will not have discretion to vote on Proposals One, Three, or Four, which are "non-routine" matters. In the event that your broker, bank, or other nominee votes your shares on our sole routine matter, but is not able to vote your shares on the non-routine matters, then those shares will be treated as broker non-votes with respect to the non-routine proposals. Accordingly, if you own shares through a nominee, such as a broker or bank, please be sure to instruct your nominee how to vote to ensure that your shares are counted on each of the proposals.
Why did I receive a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials instead of a full set of proxy materials?
In accordance with the rules of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), we have elected to furnish our proxy materials, including this Proxy Statement and our 2020 Annual Report, primarily via the Internet. As a result, we are mailing our stockholders the Notice instead of a paper copy of the proxy materials. The Notice containing instructions on how to access our proxy materials is first being mailed on or about April 21, 2021 to all stockholders entitled to vote during the Annual Meeting. Stockholders may request to receive all future proxy materials in printed form by mail or electronically by e-mail by following the instructions contained in the Notice. We encourage stockholders to take advantage of the availability of our proxy materials on the Internet to help reduce the environmental impact and cost of our annual meetings of stockholders.
How are proxies solicited for the Annual Meeting and who is paying for such solicitation?
Our Board of Directors is soliciting proxies for use in the Annual Meeting by means of the proxy materials. All expenses associated with this solicitation will be borne by us, including the preparation, assembly, printing, mailing, and distribution of these proxy materials. In addition, we will reimburse brokers, banks, and other nominees for reasonable expenses that they incur in sending our proxy materials to you if a broker, bank, or other nominee holds shares of our common stock on your behalf. In addition, our directors, officers, and other employees may also solicit proxies in person, by mail, telephone, email, or by other means of communication. Our directors and employees will not be paid any additional compensation for soliciting proxies.
Where can I find the voting results of the Annual Meeting?
We will announce preliminary voting results during the Annual Meeting. We will also disclose voting results on a Current Report on Form 8-K that we will file with the SEC within four business days after the Annual Meeting. If final voting results
4

Table of Contents
are not available to us in time to file a Current Report on Form 8-K within four business days after the Annual Meeting, we will provide preliminary voting results in the Current Report on Form 8-K and will provide the final results in an amendment to the Current Report on Form 8-K as soon as they become available.
What does it mean if I receive more than one Notice or more than one set of printed proxy materials?
If you receive more than one Notice or more than one set of printed proxy materials, then your shares may be registered in more than one name and/or are registered in different accounts. Please follow the voting instructions on each Notice or each set of printed proxy materials, as applicable, to ensure that all of your shares are voted.
I share an address with another stockholder, and we received only one paper copy of the Notice or proxy materials. How may I obtain an additional copy of the Notice or proxy materials?
We have adopted a procedure called "householding," which is permitted by SEC rules. Under this procedure, we deliver a single copy of the Notice and, if applicable, our proxy materials, to multiple stockholders who share the same address, unless we have received contrary instructions from one or more of such stockholders. This procedure reduces our printing costs, mailing costs, and fees. Stockholders who participate in householding will continue to be able to access and receive separate proxy cards. Upon written or oral request, we will deliver promptly a separate copy of the Notice and, if applicable, our proxy materials to any stockholder at a shared address to which we delivered a single copy of any of these materials. To receive a separate copy, or, if a stockholder is receiving multiple copies, to request that we only send a single copy of next year's Notice and, if applicable, our proxy materials, such stockholder may contact us at:
Cloudflare, Inc.
Attention: Investor Relations
101 Townsend Street
San Francisco, California 94107
Street name stockholders may contact their broker, bank, or other nominee to request information about householding.
What is the deadline to propose actions for consideration at next year's annual meeting of stockholders or to nominate individuals to serve as directors?
Stockholder Proposals
As provided in Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), stockholders may present proper proposals for inclusion in our proxy statement and for consideration at next year's annual meeting of stockholders by submitting their proposals in writing to our Secretary in a timely manner. For a stockholder proposal to be considered for inclusion in our proxy statement for the 2022 annual meeting of stockholders, our Secretary must receive the written proposal at our principal executive offices not later than December 22, 2021. In addition, stockholder proposals must comply with the other requirements of Rule 14a-8 regarding the inclusion of stockholder proposals in company-sponsored proxy materials. Stockholder proposals should be addressed to:
Cloudflare, Inc.
Attention: Secretary
101 Townsend Street
San Francisco, California 94107
Our amended and restated bylaws also establish an advance notice procedure for stockholders who wish to present a proposal before an annual meeting of stockholders but do not intend for the proposal to be included in our proxy statement. Our amended and restated bylaws provide that the only business that may be conducted at an annual meeting of stockholders is business that is (i) specified in our proxy materials with respect to such annual meeting, (ii) otherwise properly brought before such annual meeting by or at the direction of our Board of Directors, or (iii) properly brought before such meeting by a stockholder of record entitled to vote at such annual meeting who has delivered timely written notice to our Secretary, which notice must contain the information specified in our amended and restated bylaws. To be timely for the 2022 annual meeting of stockholders, our Secretary must receive the written notice at the address set forth above:
•not earlier than the close of business on February 5, 2022; and
•not later than the close of business on March 7, 2022.
5

Table of Contents
In the event that we hold the 2022 annual meeting of stockholders more than 30 days before, or more than 60 days after, the one-year anniversary of the Annual Meeting, then, for notice by the stockholder to be timely, it must be received by our Secretary not earlier than the close of business on the 120th day prior to such annual meeting and not later than the close of business on the later of (i) the 90th day prior to such annual meeting or (ii) the tenth day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such annual meeting is first made.
Pursuant to Rule 14a-8, if a stockholder has notified us of his, her, or its intention to electronically present a proposal at an annual meeting of stockholders but does not appear to electronically present his, her, or its proposal at such annual meeting, then we are not required to present the proposal for a vote at such annual meeting.
Nomination of Director Candidates
Holders of our common stock may propose director candidates for consideration by our nominating and corporate governance committee. Any such recommendations should include the nominee's name and qualifications for membership on our Board of Directors and should be directed to our Secretary at the address set forth above. For additional information regarding stockholder recommendations for director candidates, see the section titled "Board of Directors and Corporate Governance—Stockholder Recommendations and Nominations to the Board of Directors."
In addition, our amended and restated bylaws permit stockholders to nominate directors for election at an annual meeting of stockholders. To nominate a director, the stockholder must provide the information required by our amended and restated bylaws. In addition, the stockholder must give timely notice to our Secretary in accordance with our amended and restated bylaws, which, in general, require that the notice be received by our Secretary within the time periods described above under "Stockholder Proposals" for stockholder proposals that are not intended to be included in our proxy statement.
Availability of Bylaws
A copy of our amended and restated bylaws is available via the SEC's website at http://www.sec.gov. You may also contact our Secretary at the address set forth above for a copy of the relevant bylaw provisions regarding the requirements for making stockholder proposals and nominating director candidates.
What do I need to be able to attend the Annual Meeting online?
We will be hosting our Annual Meeting via live webcast only. You are entitled to participate in the Annual Meeting only if you were a stockholder as of the close of business on April 14, 2021, or if you hold a valid proxy for the Annual Meeting. Any such stockholder can attend the Annual Meeting live online at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NET2021. In order to be able to attend the Annual Meeting, you will need the 16-digit control number, which is located on your Notice, on your proxy card, or in the instructions accompanying your proxy materials. Instructions on how to participate in the Annual Meeting are also posted online at www.proxyvote.com. If you do not have a control number, you will be able to listen to the meeting only and you will not be able to vote or submit your questions during the meeting.
The Annual Meeting webcast will begin promptly at 9:00 a.m. Pacific Time on Thursday, June 3, 2021. We encourage you to access the meeting prior to the start time. Online check-in will begin at 8:45 a.m. Pacific Time, and you should allow ample time for the check-in procedures.
Why is this Annual Meeting being held virtually?
We are continuously exploring technologies and services that will best permit our stockholders to engage with us from any location around the world and exercise their vote. As was the case for last year's annual meeting of stockholders, we have decided to conduct the Annual Meeting on a virtual basis because we believe it will be more beneficial than holding a live meeting. The virtual meeting technology that we use provides ease of access and real-time communication, while reducing the environmental impact and costs associated with an in-person meeting. We believe that by hosting our Annual Meeting virtually, our stockholders will be provided comparable rights and opportunities to participate as they would at an in-person meeting, while offering a greater level of flexibility for many of our stockholders who may not be able to attend an annual meeting of stockholders in person, particularly in light of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and related restrictions and guidance on public gatherings.
Stockholders of record and street name stockholders with a legal proxy from their broker, bank, or other nominee will be able to attend the Annual Meeting by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NET2021, which will allow such stockholders to submit questions and vote shares electronically during the Annual Meeting. We believe our stockholders’ increased opportunity
6

Table of Contents
to participate in the Annual Meeting virtually should alleviate any concerns about disenfranchisement of our stockholder base as a result of our decision not to hold the Annual Meeting in person.
How can I submit a question before or during the Annual Meeting?
If you want to submit a question during the Annual Meeting, log into www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NET2021, type your question into the “Ask a Question” field, and click “Submit.” Stockholders are permitted to submit questions before and during the Annual Meeting via www.proxyvote.com and the virtual meeting website, respectively, that are in compliance with the meeting rules of conduct that will be available on the virtual meeting website and with a limit of one question per stockholder. We will answer as many questions submitted in accordance with the meeting rules of conduct as possible in the time allotted for the meeting. Only questions that are relevant to an agenda item to be voted on by stockholders will be answered. Our virtual meeting website will also contain instructions for accessing technical support to assist in the event a stockholder encounters any difficulties accessing the virtual meeting. The questions received during the meeting that are in compliance with the meeting rules of conduct and our answers to such questions will be available as soon as practicable after the Annual Meeting on https://cloudflare.NET. The questions and answers will remain available on https://cloudflare.NET for one week after posting.
What if I have technical difficulties or trouble accessing the Annual Meeting?
If you encounter any difficulties accessing the Annual Meeting during the check-in or meeting time, please call the technical support number that will be posted on the login page at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NET2021. Technical support will be available starting at 8:45 a.m. Pacific Time on Thursday, June 3, 2021 and will remain available until the Annual Meeting has ended.
Who will count the votes?
Votes will be counted by the inspector of election appointed for the Annual Meeting by our Board of Directors.
How can I contact the company’s transfer agent?
You may contact our transfer agent, Computershare, by telephone at 1-800-736-3001 or by regular mail to Computershare PO BOX 505000, Louisville, Kentucky 40233-5000 or by overnight delivery to 462 South 4th Street, Suite 1600, Louisville, Kentucky 40202. You may also access instructions with respect to certain stockholder matters (e.g., change of address) via the Internet at www.computershare.com/investor.
7

Table of Contents
BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Our business and affairs are managed under the direction of our Board of Directors, which is elected by our stockholders. Our Board of Directors consists of eight directors, all of whom, other than Mr. Prince and Ms. Zatlyn, qualify as "independent" under the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange (the NYSE). Our Board of Directors is divided into three classes with staggered three-year terms. At each annual meeting of stockholders, one class of directors will be elected for a three-year term to succeed the class whose term is then expiring.
The following table sets forth information regarding our directors, including their ages, as of March 31, 2021:

| Class |  | Age |  | Position |  | Director Since |  | Current Term Expires |  | Expiration of Term For Which Nominated
Employee Directors: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Matthew Prince | II |  | 46 |  | Chief Executive Officer and Chair of the Board of Directors |  | 2009 |  | 2021 |  | 2024
Michelle Zatlyn | I |  | 41 |  | President, Chief Operating Officer, and Director |  | 2009 |  | 2023 |  | —
Non-Employee Directors: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | —
Mark Anderson(2)(3) | III |  | 58 |  | Director |  | 2019 |  | 2022 |  | —
Maria Eitel(2) | II |  | 58 |  | Director |  | 2018 |  | 2021 |  | 2024
Carl Ledbetter(1)(2)(3) | III |  | 71 |  | Director |  | 2009 |  | 2022 |  | —
Stanley Meresman(1) | III |  | 74 |  | Director |  | 2018 |  | 2022 |  | —
Scott Sandell(2) | I |  | 56 |  | Lead Independent Director |  | 2010 |  | 2023 |  | —
Katrin Suder(1) | II |  | 49 |  | Director |  | 2019 |  | 2021 |  | 2024

_______________________
(1)Member of the audit committee.
(2)Member of the compensation committee.
(3)Member of the nominating and corporate governance committee.
8

Table of Contents
Information Concerning Director Nominees
Maria Eitel. Ms. Eitel has served on our Board of Directors since December 2018 and as Chair of our compensation committee since February 2019. Since September 2015, Ms. Eitel has served as the Co-Chair of the Nike Foundation, a non-profit organization funded by NIKE, Inc., and Chair of Girl Effect, an independent non-profit organization she founded with the goal of transforming the lives of adolescent girls. She served as the Founder, CEO, and President of the Nike Foundation from March 2005 to September 2015. From January 1998 to March 2005, Ms. Eitel was the first Vice President, Corporate Responsibility of NIKE, a designer, developer, and seller of athletic footwear, apparel, equipment, accessories, and services. Ms. Eitel holds a B.A. in Humanistic Studies from McGill University, an M.S. in Foreign Service from Georgetown University, and an Honorary Doctorate of Humane Letters from Babson College.
Ms. Eitel was selected to serve on our Board of Directors because of the perspective and experience she brings from her role as an executive of a publicly traded company and from her background in corporate social responsibility.
Matthew Prince. Mr. Prince is one of our co-founders and has served as our Chief Executive Officer and Chair of our Board of Directors since July 2009. He also co-founded Unspam Technologies, Inc., a software and services company, and has served as its chair since December 2001. Mr. Prince holds a B.A. in English and a minor in Computer Science from Trinity College-Hartford, a J.D. from the University of Chicago Law School, and an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School.
Mr. Prince was selected to serve on our Board of Directors because of the perspective and experience he brings as our Chief Executive Officer and as one of our co-founders.
Katrin Suder. Dr. Suder has served as a member of our Board of Directors and as a member of our audit committee since August 2019. Dr. Suder has served as Chairperson of the Advisory Council on Digitalization to the German Federal Government since August 2018. She has also been an industrial advisor to EQT, a private equity firm, since October 2018, and a partner at Macro Advisory Partners, a strategic advisory firm, since January 2019. From August 2014 until April 2018, Dr. Suder served as State Secretary for the German Federal Ministry of Defense. From October 2000 to July 2014, she was with McKinsey & Company, a management consulting company, where she managed the German Public Sector Practice from 2010 to 2014. Dr. Suder has served on the supervisory boards of Apleona GmbH, a European facility management provider, since January 2019, BBS Automation GmbH, a automation machine provider, since June 2020, and Schülke & Mayr GmbH, a European hygiene product and solution provider, since August 2020. Dr. Suder holds a B.A. in German Literature and Theater and a Ph.D. in Computational Neuroscience from Ruhr University Bochum.
Dr. Suder was selected to serve on our Board of Directors because of her experience at the intersection of technology, business, and policy.
Information Concerning Continuing Directors
Mark Anderson. Mr. Anderson has served as a member of our Board of Directors and our nominating and corporate governance committee since August 2019 and as a member of our compensation committee since January 2021. Mr. Anderson has served as the CEO of Alteryx, Inc., a software company, since October 2020. He served as a consultant for Anaplan, Inc., a software company, from February 2020 until October 2020 and as Chief Growth Officer at Anaplan, Inc. from August 2019 until February 2020. Mr. Anderson was previously with Palo Alto Networks, Inc., a cybersecurity company, where he served as President from August 2016 to October 2018, Executive Vice President, Worldwide Field Operations from May 2016 to August 2016, and Senior Vice President, Worldwide Field Operations from June 2012 to May 2016. From October 2004 to May 2012, Mr. Anderson was with F5 Networks, Inc., an IT infrastructure company, where he served in several management roles, including as Executive Vice President of Worldwide Sales. Mr. Anderson currently serves on the board of directors of Alteryx, Inc. He holds a B.A. in Business and Economics from York University.
Mr. Anderson was selected to serve on our Board of Directors due to his experience as an officer and director of publicly traded companies, his background in networking and cybersecurity, and his extensive experience as a sales executive in the technology industry.
Carl Ledbetter. Dr. Ledbetter has served as a member of our Board of Directors since November 2009, as a member of our audit committee since December 2018, as Chair of our nominating and corporate governance committee since August 2019, and as a member of our compensation committee since March 2021. Dr. Ledbetter has served as the Chairman and CTO of SimpleRose, Inc., a software company, since July 2018 and as CEO since August 2019. He served as a Managing Director of Pelion Venture Partners, a venture capital firm, from June 2003 through June 2018 and as a Special Advisor from June 2018 until December 2019. Dr. Ledbetter has served on the boards of directors of four other public companies and more than thirty
9

Table of Contents
privately-held companies during his career. Dr. Ledbetter holds a B.S. in Mathematics from the University of Redlands, an M.S. in Mathematics from Brandeis University, and a Ph.D. in Mathematics from Clark University.
Dr. Ledbetter was selected to serve on our Board of Directors because of his understanding of networking technology and his experience as a director of several technology companies.
Stanley Meresman. Mr. Meresman has served on our Board of Directors since December 2018 and as Chair of our audit committee since December 2018. During the last 10 years, he has served on the boards of directors of various public and private companies, including service as chair of the audit committee for certain of these companies. Mr. Meresman previously served as a Venture Partner with Technology Crossover Ventures, a private equity firm, from January 2004 through December 2004, and as its General Partner and Chief Operating Officer from November 2001 to December 2003. He currently serves on the boards of directors, and as chair of the audit committees, of DoorDash, Inc., a technology-enabled logistics company, Guardant Health, Inc., a precision oncology company, Medallia, Inc., a customer experience management company, and Snap Inc., a technology and camera company, and previously served as a member of the boards of directors, and chair of the audit committees, of LinkedIn Corporation, a career-focused social networking site acquired by Microsoft Corporation, Palo Alto Networks, Inc., a cybersecurity company, and Zynga Inc., a social gaming company. Mr. Meresman holds a B.S. in Industrial Engineering and Operations Research from the University of California, Berkeley and an M.B.A. from the Stanford Graduate School of Business.
Mr. Meresman was selected to serve as a member of our Board of Directors because of his experience with networking technologies, financial expertise, and years of strategic and management experience in the technology industry.
Scott Sandell. Mr. Sandell has served as a member of our Board of Directors since November 2010, as a member of our compensation committee since February 2019, and as our Lead Independent Director since September 2019. He has served as Managing General Partner of New Enterprise Associates, Inc. (NEA), a venture capital firm, since April 2017, Co-Managing General Partner from March 2015 to April 2017, and as a General Partner since September 2000. Mr. Sandell joined NEA in January 1996 and served as head of the firm’s technology investing practice for 10 years. He currently serves on the boards of directors of Bloom Energy Corporation, a provider of solid-oxide fuel cell systems, and several privately-held companies. Mr. Sandell previously served on the board of directors of Fusion-io, Inc., a computer hardware and software systems company acquired by SanDisk Corporation, Tableau Software, Inc., a software company, Workday, Inc., a provider of on-demand financial management and human capital management software, and Spreadtrum Communications, Inc., a semiconductor company acquired by Tsinghua Unigroup. Mr. Sandell holds an A.B. in Engineering from Dartmouth College and an M.B.A. from Stanford University.
Mr. Sandell was selected to serve on our Board of Directors because of his leadership experience and experience as a director of both publicly and privately held technology companies.
Michelle Zatlyn. Ms. Zatlyn is one of our co-founders and serves as our President and Chief Operating Officer. She served as our Head of User Experience from 2009 until she was appointed as our Chief Operating Officer in 2016 and President in 2020. Ms. Zatlyn has served as a member of our Board of Directors since November 2009. She holds a B.Sc. in Chemistry and Business from McGill University and an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School.
Ms. Zatlyn was selected to serve on our Board of Directors because of the perspective and experience she brings as our President and Chief Operating Officer and as one of our co-founders.
10

Table of Contents
Director Independence
Our Class A common stock is listed on the NYSE. Under the listing standards of the NYSE, independent directors must comprise a majority of a listed company's board of directors. In addition, the listing standards of the NYSE require that, subject to specified exceptions, each member of a listed company's audit, compensation, and nominating and corporate governance committees be independent. Under the listing standards of the NYSE, a director will only qualify as an "independent director" if the listed company’s board of directors affirmatively determines that the director does not have a material relationship with the company (either directly or as a partner, shareholder, or officer of an organization that has a relationship with the company). As noted in the commentary to the listing standards, the concern is independence from management.
Audit committee members must also satisfy the additional independence criteria set forth in Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act and the listing standards of the NYSE. Compensation committee members must also satisfy the additional independence criteria set forth in Rule 10C-1 under the Exchange Act and the listing standards of the NYSE.
Our Board of Directors has undertaken a review of the independence of each director. Based on information provided by each director concerning his or her background, employment, and affiliations, our Board of Directors has affirmatively determined that each of our directors, other than Mr. Prince and Ms. Zatlyn, does not have material relationships with our company and that each of these directors is "independent" as that term is defined under the listing standards of the NYSE and the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC. In making these affirmative determinations, our Board of Directors considered the current and prior relationships that each non-employee director has with our company and all other facts and circumstances our Board of Directors deemed relevant in determining their independence, including the beneficial ownership of our capital stock by each non-employee director, and the transactions involving them described in the section titled "Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions."
There are no family relationships among any of our directors, director nominees, or executive officers.
11

Table of Contents
Board Leadership Structure
Matthew Prince, our co-founder and Chief Executive Officer, serves as Chair of our Board of Directors, presides over meetings of our Board of Directors, and holds such other powers and carries out such other duties as are customarily carried out by the Chair of our Board of Directors. Our independent directors bring experience, oversight, and expertise from outside of our company, while Mr. Prince and Ms. Zatlyn each bring current company-specific experience, leadership, and insight as our co-founders and Chief Executive Officer and President and Chief Operating Officer, respectively.
Our Board of Directors has adopted corporate governance guidelines that provide that one of our independent directors should serve as our Lead Independent Director if the Chair is not independent. Our Board of Directors has appointed Scott Sandell to serve as our Lead Independent Director. As Lead Independent Director, Mr. Sandell presides over periodic meetings of our independent directors, serves as a liaison between our Chair and our independent directors, and performs such additional duties as our Board of Directors may otherwise determine and delegate. The Board of Directors believes that our structure is appropriate and provides independent leadership and engagement from the Lead Independent Director, while providing the benefit of having our Chief Executive Officer, the individual with primary responsibility for managing the company’s day-to-day operations, chair regular Board of Directors meetings as key business and strategic issues are discussed.
12

Table of Contents
Board Meetings and Committees
During our fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, our Board of Directors held six meetings (including regularly scheduled and special meetings), and each director attended at least 75% of the aggregate of (i) the total number of meetings of our Board of Directors held during the period for which he or she had been a director and (ii) the total number of meetings held by all committees of our Board of Directors on which he or she served during the periods that he or she served.
Although our corporate governance guidelines do not have a formal policy regarding attendance by members of our Board of Directors at annual meetings of stockholders, we encourage, but do not require, our directors to attend. All of our directors who then served on our Board of Directors virtually attended our 2020 annual meeting of our stockholders.
Our Board of Directors has established an audit committee, a compensation committee, and a nominating and corporate governance committee. The composition and responsibilities of each of the committees of our Board of Directors is described below. Members serve on these committees until their resignation or until otherwise determined by our Board of Directors.
Audit Committee
Our audit committee consists of Dr. Ledbetter, Mr. Meresman, and Dr. Suder, with Mr. Meresman serving as Chair. Each member of our audit committee meets the requirements for independence under the listing standards of the NYSE and SEC rules and regulations. Each member of our audit committee also meets the financial literacy and sophistication requirements of the listing standards of the NYSE. In addition, our Board of Directors has determined that each of Dr. Ledbetter and Mr. Meresman is an "audit committee financial expert" within the meaning of Item 407(d) of Regulation S-K under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act). Our audit committee is responsible for, among other things:
•selecting a qualified firm to serve as the independent registered public accounting firm to audit our financial statements;
•helping to ensure the independence and overseeing performance of the independent registered public accounting firm;
•reviewing and discussing the scope and results of the audit with the independent registered public accounting firm, and reviewing, with management and the independent registered public accounting firm, our interim and year-end operating results;
•reviewing our financial statements and our critical accounting policies and estimates;
•reviewing the adequacy and effectiveness of our internal controls;
•developing procedures for employees to submit concerns anonymously about questionable accounting, internal accounting controls, or audit matters;
•overseeing our policies on risk assessment and risk management;
•overseeing compliance with our code of business conduct and ethics;
•reviewing related party transactions;
•pre-approving all audit and all permissible non-audit services to be performed by the independent registered public accounting firm; and
•overseeing the adoption of new accounting standards.
No member of our audit committee may serve on the audit committee of more than three public companies, including Cloudflare, unless the Board of Directors determines that such simultaneous service would not impair the ability of such member to effectively serve on the audit committee and discloses such determination in accordance with the requirements of the NYSE. Our Board of Directors has considered Mr. Meresman’s simultaneous service on the audit committees of Cloudflare and four other public companies and has determined that such simultaneous service does not impair his ability to effectively serve as a member and Chair of our audit committee.
Our audit committee operates under a written charter that satisfies the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and the listing standards of the NYSE. A copy of the charter of our audit committee is available on our website at https://cloudflare.NET.
Our audit committee held eight meetings during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020.
13

Table of Contents
Compensation Committee
Our compensation committee consists of Mr. Anderson, Ms. Eitel, Dr. Ledbetter, and Mr. Sandell, with Ms. Eitel serving as Chair. Each member of our compensation committee meets the requirements for independence under the listing standards of the NYSE and SEC rules and regulations. Each member of our compensation committee is also a non-employee director, as defined pursuant to Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act. Our compensation committee is responsible for, among other things:
•making recommendations to our Board of Directors regarding the compensation of our executive officers, including our Chief Executive Officer;
•administering our equity compensation plans;
•reviewing, approving, and administering incentive compensation and equity compensation plans;
•reviewing and approving our overall compensation philosophy; and
•making recommendations regarding non-employee director compensation to our full Board of Directors.
Our compensation committee has engaged an independent consultant, Compensia, Inc. (Compensia), to advise the compensation committee on an as-needed basis with respect to executive and non-employee director compensation matters. Compensia reports directly to the compensation committee and does not provide services to company management. For more information on the processes and procedures followed by the compensation committee for the consideration and determination of executive compensation, see the section titled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”
Our compensation committee operates under a written charter that satisfies the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and the listing standards of the NYSE. A copy of the charter of our compensation committee is available on our website at https://cloudflare.NET.
Our compensation committee held five meetings during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020.
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
Our nominating and corporate governance committee consists of Mr. Anderson and Dr. Ledbetter, with Dr. Ledbetter serving as Chair. Each member of our nominating and corporate governance committee meets the requirements for independence under the listing standards of the NYSE and SEC rules and regulations. Our nominating and corporate governance committee is responsible for, among other things:
•identifying, evaluating, and selecting, or making recommendations to our Board of Directors regarding, nominees for election to our Board of Directors and its committees;
•overseeing the evaluation of the performance of our Board of Directors and of individual directors;
•considering and making recommendations to our Board of Directors regarding the composition of our Board of Directors and its committees;
•overseeing our corporate governance practices;
•contributing to succession planning; and
•developing and making recommendations to our Board of Directors regarding corporate governance guidelines and matters.
Our nominating and corporate governance committee operates under a written charter that satisfies the applicable listing standards of the NYSE. A copy of the charter of our nominating and corporate governance committee is available on our website at https://cloudflare.NET.
Our nominating and corporate governance committee held two meetings during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
During 2020, Ms. Eitel and Mr. Sandell served as members of our compensation committee. Each of Mr. Anderson and Dr. Ledbetter were appointed to the compensation committee in 2021. None of the members of our compensation committee is or has been an officer or employee of our company. None of our executive officers currently serves, or in the past fiscal year has
14

Table of Contents
served, as a member of the board or compensation committee (or other board committee performing equivalent functions) of any entity that has one or more of its executive officers serving on our Board of Directors or compensation committee. See the section titled "Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions" for information about related party transactions involving members of our compensation committee or their affiliates.
15

Table of Contents
Considerations in Evaluating Director Nominees
Identifying and Evaluating Director Nominees
Our Board of Directors has delegated to the nominating and corporate governance committee the responsibility of identifying suitable candidates for nomination to the Board of Directors (including candidates to fill any vacancies that may occur) and assessing their qualifications in light of the policies and principles in our corporate governance guidelines and the committee's charter. The nominating and corporate governance committee may gather information about the candidates through interviews, detailed questionnaires, comprehensive background checks, or any other means that the nominating and corporate governance committee deems to be appropriate in the evaluation process. The nominating and corporate governance committee then meets to discuss and evaluate the qualities and skills of each candidate, both on an individual basis and taking into account the overall composition and needs of the Board of Directors. Based on the results of the evaluation process, the nominating and corporate governance committee recommends candidates to the Board of Directors for its approval as director nominees for election to the Board of Directors.
Director Qualifications
Our nominating and corporate governance committee uses a variety of methods for identifying and evaluating potential director nominees and will consider all facts and circumstances that it deems appropriate or advisable. In its identification and evaluation of director candidates, including current directors eligible for reelection, our nominating and corporate governance committee will consider the current size and composition of our Board of Directors and the needs of our Board of Directors and the respective committees of our Board of Directors. Some of the qualifications that our nominating and corporate governance committee considers include, without limitation, issues of character, ethics, integrity, judgment, diversity of experience, independence, skills, education, expertise, business acumen, length of service, understanding of our business and industry, potential conflicts of interest, and other commitments, including service on other public company boards of directors and related committees. Nominees must also have proven achievement and competence in their field, the ability to offer advice and guidance to our management team, the ability to make significant contributions to our success, and an understanding of the fiduciary responsibilities that are required of a director. Director candidates must have sufficient time available in the judgment of our nominating and corporate governance committee to perform all board and committee responsibilities. Members of our Board of Directors are expected to prepare for, attend, and participate in all Board of Directors and applicable committee meetings. Other than the foregoing, there are no stated minimum criteria for director nominees, although our nominating and corporate governance committee may also consider such other factors as it may deem, from time to time, are in our and our stockholders' best interests.
Although our Board of Directors does not maintain a specific policy with respect to board diversity, our Board of Directors believes that our Board of Directors should be a diverse body, and our nominating and corporate governance committee considers a broad range of backgrounds and experiences. In making determinations regarding nominations of directors, our nominating and corporate governance committee may take into account the benefits of diverse viewpoints. Our nominating and corporate governance committee also considers these and other factors as it oversees the annual board and committee evaluations. After completing its review and evaluation of director candidates, our nominating and corporate governance committee recommends to our full Board of Directors the director nominees for selection.
Stockholder Recommendations and Nominations to the Board of Directors
Our nominating and corporate governance committee will consider director candidates recommended by stockholders holding at least one percent (1%) of our fully diluted capitalization continuously for at least 12 months prior to the date of the submission of the recommendation, so long as such recommendations comply with our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, amended and restated bylaws, and applicable laws, rules and regulations, including those promulgated by the SEC. Our nominating and corporate governance committee will evaluate such recommendations in accordance with its charter, our amended and restated bylaws, and our policies and procedures for director candidates, as well as the regular director nominee criteria described above. This process is designed to ensure that our Board of Directors includes members with diverse backgrounds, skills, and experience, including appropriate financial and other expertise relevant to our business. Eligible stockholders wishing to recommend a candidate for nomination should contact our Secretary in writing. Such recommendations must include information about the candidate, information regarding any relationships between the candidate and Cloudflare, a statement of support by the recommending stockholder, evidence of the recommending stockholder’s ownership of our capital stock, a signed letter from the candidate confirming willingness to serve on our Board of Directors, and any additional information required by our amended and restated bylaws. Our nominating and corporate governance committee has discretion to decide which individuals to recommend for nomination as directors.
16

Table of Contents
Under our amended and restated bylaws, stockholders may also directly nominate persons for our Board of Directors. Any nomination must comply with the requirements set forth in our amended and restated bylaws and should be sent in writing to our Secretary at Cloudflare, Inc., 101 Townsend Street, San Francisco, California 94107. To be timely for the 2022 annual meeting of stockholders, nominations must be received by our Secretary observing the same deadlines for stockholder proposals discussed above under “General Information—What is the deadline to propose actions for consideration at next year’s annual meeting of stockholders or to nominate individuals to serve as directors?”
Communications with Our Board of Directors
Interested parties wishing to communicate with non-management members of our Board of Directors may do so by writing and mailing the correspondence to our Secretary at Cloudflare, Inc., 101 Townsend Street, San Francisco, California 94107. Each communication should set forth (i) the name and address of the sender and (ii) the class and number of shares of our common stock, if any, that are owned of record or beneficially owned by the sender.
Our Secretary or legal department, in consultation with appropriate members of our Board of Directors as necessary, will review all incoming stockholder communications and, if appropriate, such communications will be forwarded to the appropriate member or members of our Board of Directors, or if none is specified, to the Lead Independent Director.
Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
Our Board of Directors has adopted corporate governance guidelines that address items such as the qualifications and responsibilities of our directors and director candidates and corporate governance policies and standards applicable to us in general. In addition, our Board of Directors has adopted a code of business conduct and ethics that applies to all of our employees, officers, and directors, including our Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and other executive and senior financial officers. The full text of our corporate governance guidelines and our code of business conduct and ethics is posted on our website at https://cloudflare.NET. We intend to disclose any amendments to our code of business conduct and ethics, or waivers of its requirements, on our website, or in filings under the Exchange Act.
Role of Board in Risk Oversight
Risk is inherent with every business, and we face a number of risks, including strategic, financial, business and operational, legal and compliance, and reputational. We have designed and implemented processes to manage risk in our operations. Management is responsible for the day-to-day oversight and management of risks our company faces, while our Board of Directors, as a whole and assisted by its committees, has responsibility for the oversight of risk management. In its risk oversight role, our Board of Directors has the responsibility to satisfy itself that the risk management processes designed and implemented by management are appropriate and functioning as designed.
Our Board of Directors believes that open communication between management and our Board of Directors is essential for effective risk management and oversight. Consistent with this approach, our Board of Directors regularly reviews our strategic and operational risks in the context of discussions with management, question and answer sessions, and reports from the management team at each of its regular meetings. Our Board of Directors also receives regular reports on all significant committee activities at each of its regular meetings, and evaluates the risks inherent in significant transactions.
While our Board of Directors ultimately is responsible for risk oversight, the committees of our Board of Directors assist it in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities in certain areas of risk. Our audit committee assists our Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to risk management in the areas of internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures, legal and regulatory compliance, and cybersecurity, and discusses with management and the independent auditor guidelines and policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management. Our audit committee also reviews our major financial risk exposures and the steps management has taken to monitor and control these exposures. Our nominating and corporate governance committee assists our Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to the management of risk associated with board and committee organization, director independence, conflicts of interest, and corporate governance. Our compensation committee assesses risks created by the incentives inherent in our compensation policies by reviewing, in consultation with management and Compensia, our compensation committee's independent compensation consultant, our compensation plans, policies, and practices for named executive officers and other employees. These committees provide regular reports on our risk management efforts to the full Board of Directors.
17

Table of Contents
Non-Employee Director Compensation
We have adopted a compensation policy for our non-employee directors. Under this director compensation policy, each non-employee director receives the cash and equity compensation for his or her board services described below. We also reimburse our non-employee directors for reasonable, customary, and documented travel expenses to board and committee meetings. This policy was developed with input from Compensia regarding practices and compensation levels at comparable companies. We considered and discussed these recommendations and data, and considered the specific duties and committee responsibilities of particular directors. After careful consideration of this information and the scope of the duties and responsibilities of our non-employee directors, our Board of Directors adopted and our stockholders approved the director compensation policy. We review the director compensation policy annually and we continue to believe this policy provides reasonable compensation to our non-employee directors that is commensurate with their contributions and appropriately aligned with our peers.
The policy includes a maximum annual limit of $750,000 of cash compensation and equity awards that may be paid, issued, or granted to a non-employee director in any fiscal year. For purposes of this limitation, the value of equity awards is based on the grant date fair value (determined in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)). Any cash compensation paid or equity awards granted to a person for his or her services as an employee, or for his or her services as a consultant (other than as a non-employee director), will not count for purposes of the limitation. The maximum limit does not reflect the intended size of any potential compensation or equity awards to our non-employee directors.
Cash Compensation
Under the director compensation policy, each non-employee director is paid an annual cash retainer of $30,000. In addition, non-employee directors are entitled to receive the following cash compensation for annual service in the following positions:

Chair of the audit committee | $ | 20,000 |
Member of the audit committee (other than Chair) | $ | 10,000 |
Chair of the compensation committee | $ | 12,000 |
Member of the compensation committee (other than Chair) | $ | 6,000 |
Chair of the nominating and corporate governance committee | $ | 7,500 |
Member of the nominating and corporate governance committee (other than Chair) | $ | 4,000 |

Each non-employee director who serves as a committee chair will receive only the additional annual cash fee as the chair of the committee, and not the additional annual fee as a member of the committee. All cash payments to non-employee directors are paid quarterly in arrears on a prorated basis.
Equity Compensation
Initial Award
Each person who first becomes a non-employee director will receive, on the first trading date on or after the date on which the person first becomes a non-employee director, an initial award of restricted stock units (RSUs) covering a number of shares of our Class A common stock having a grant date fair value (determined in accordance with GAAP) equal to $400,000, rounded down to the nearest whole share. This initial award will vest in three equal, annual installments on each anniversary of the date of becoming a non-employee director, subject to continuing to provide services to us through each applicable vesting date. If the person was a member of our Board of Directors and also an employee, becoming a non-employee director due to termination of employment will not entitle the person to an initial award.
Annual Award
Each non-employee director who has completed at least six months of continuous service as a non-employee director automatically will receive, on the date of each annual meeting of our stockholders, an annual award of RSUs covering a number of shares of our Class A common stock having a grant date fair value (determined in accordance with GAAP) equal to $200,000, rounded down to the nearest whole share. Each annual award will vest on the earlier of (i) the one-year anniversary of the date the annual award is granted or (ii) the day prior to the date of the annual meeting of our stockholders that next follows the grant date of the annual award, subject to continuing to provide service to us through the applicable vesting date.
18

Table of Contents
Change in Control
In the event of a “change in control” (as defined in our 2019 Equity Incentive Plan (2019 Plan)), each non-employee director will fully vest in his or her outstanding company equity awards, provided that the non-employee director continues to be a non-employee director through the date of the change in control.
Non-Employee Director Compensation Table
The following table provides information regarding the total compensation that was earned by or paid to each of our non-employee directors for the year ended December 31, 2020. Directors who also serve as employees receive no additional compensation for their service as directors. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, Mr. Prince, our Chief Executive Officer, and Ms. Zatlyn, our President and Chief Operating Officer, were each a member of our Board of Directors, as well as an employee, and thus received no additional compensation for his or her services as a director. See the section titled “Executive Compensation” for additional information regarding their compensation.

Name |  | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash($) |  | Stock Awards($)(1)(2) |  |  |  | Total($)
Mark Anderson(3) |  | 34,000 |  |  | 199,984 |  |  |  |  | 233,984
Maria Eitel(4) |  | 42,000 |  |  | 199,984 |  |  |  |  | 241,984
Carl Ledbetter |  | 47,500 |  |  | 199,984 |  |  |  |  | 247,484
Stanley Meresman(5) |  | 50,000 |  |  | 199,984 |  |  |  |  | 249,984
Scott Sandell |  | 36,000 |  |  | 199,984 |  |  |  |  | 235,984
Katrin Suder(6) |  | 40,000 |  |  | 199,984 |  |  |  |  | 239,984

_______________________
(1)The amounts reported represent the aggregate grant date fair value of the RSUs awarded under our 2019 Plan to our non-employee directors in accordance with the director compensation policy, calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Such grant date fair value does not take into account any estimated forfeitures related to service-vesting conditions. These amounts do not necessarily correspond to the actual value recognized or that may be recognized by the directors.
(2)As of December 31, 2020, each non-employee director held 6,622 RSUs in connection with the annual award of RSUs granted to them on the date of our 2020 annual meeting of stockholders in accordance with our director compensation policy (the 2020 annual award). 100% of the shares of Class A common stock underlying these RSUs vest on the earlier of (i) June 2, 2021 or (ii) the day prior to the date of the Annual Meeting, subject to the director's continued service to us through the applicable vesting date.
(3)As of December 31, 2020, in addition to the 2020 annual award Mr. Anderson received, Mr. Anderson held 78,375 RSUs for shares of our Class B common stock in connection with his appointment to our Board of Directors in August 2019. The shares of Class B common stock underlying these RSUs vest in 16 quarterly installments following August 15, 2019.
(4)As of December 31, 2020, in addition to the 2020 annual award Ms. Eitel received, Ms. Eitel held 11,250 RSUs for shares of our Class B common stock that were granted in connection with her agreement to chair our compensation committee in July 2019. The shares of Class B common stock underlying these RSUs vest in 16 quarterly installments following February 15, 2019. In addition, Ms. Eitel was granted an option to purchase 110,000 shares of our Class B common stock in connection with her appointment to our Board of Directors in December 2018. On March 18, 2019, Ms. Eitel early exercised the stock option in full. As of December 31, 2020, 55,000 of the shares received as a result of early exercising such option remained subject to our right of repurchase.
(5)As of December 31, 2020, in addition to the 2020 annual award Mr. Meresman received, Mr. Meresman held an outstanding option to purchase 152,000 shares of our Class B common stock, of which 64,000 shares underlying the option had vested, that was granted in connection with his appointment to our Board of Directors in December 2018. The shares subject to the option are immediately exercisable and vest in 16 equal quarterly installments beginning on December 12, 2018.
(6)As of December 31, 2020, in addition to the 2020 annual award Dr. Suder received, Dr. Suder held 82,500 RSUs for shares of our Class B common stock in connection with her appointment to our Board of Directors in August 2019. The shares of Class B common stock underlying these RSUs vest in 16 quarterly installments following August 15, 2019.
19

Table of Contents
PROPOSAL ONE:
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Number of Directors; Board Structure
Our Board of Directors is comprised of eight members. In accordance with our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, our Board of Directors is divided into three staggered classes of directors. One class is elected each year during the annual meeting of stockholders for a term of three years. The term of the Class II directors expires at the Annual Meeting, the term of the Class III directors expires at the 2022 annual meeting, and the term of the Class I directors expires at the 2023 annual meeting. After their initial terms expire, directors are expected to be elected to hold office for three-year terms and until their successors have been duly elected and qualified, subject to their earlier death, resignation, or removal.
Nominees
Our nominating and corporate governance committee has recommended, and our Board of Directors has approved, Ms. Eitel, Mr. Prince, and Dr. Suder as nominees for election as Class II directors in the Annual Meeting. If elected, each of Ms. Eitel, Mr. Prince, and Dr. Suder will serve as Class II directors until the 2024 annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors are duly elected and qualified, subject to their earlier death, resignation, or removal. Each of the nominees is a current Class II director and member of our Board of Directors. For information concerning the nominees, please see “Board of Directors and Corporate Governance.”
If you are a stockholder of record and you sign your proxy card or vote by telephone or over the Internet but do not give instructions with respect to the voting of directors, your shares will be voted “FOR” the election of Ms. Eitel, Mr. Prince, and Dr. Suder. We expect that each of Ms. Eitel, Mr. Prince, and Dr. Suder will accept such nomination; however, in the event that a director nominee is unable or declines to serve as a director at the time of the Annual Meeting, the proxies will be voted for any nominee designated by our Board of Directors to fill such vacancy. If you are a street name stockholder and you do not give voting instructions to your broker, bank, or other nominee, your broker, bank, or other nominee will leave your shares unvoted on this matter.
Vote Required
The election of directors requires a plurality of the voting power of the shares of our common stock present virtually or by proxy during the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote thereon to be approved. Any shares not voted “FOR” a particular nominee (whether as a result of stockholder abstention or a broker non-vote) will not be counted in such nominee’s favor and will have no effect on this proposal.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE "FOR" EACH OF THE NOMINEES NAMED ABOVE.
20

Table of Contents
PROPOSAL TWO:
RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Our audit committee has appointed KPMG LLP (KPMG) as our independent registered public accounting firm to perform the audit of our consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2021, and we are asking you and our other stockholders to ratify this appointment. KPMG has served as our independent registered public accounting firm since 2014.
Our Board of Directors is submitting the appointment of KPMG to our stockholders because we value our stockholders’ views on our independent registered public accounting firm and as a matter of good corporate governance. Notwithstanding the appointment of KPMG, and even if our stockholders ratify the appointment, our audit committee, in its discretion, may appoint another independent registered public accounting firm at any time during our fiscal year if our audit committee believes that such a change would be in the best interests of our company and our stockholders. If our stockholders do not ratify the appointment of KPMG, our audit committee may reconsider the appointment. Representatives of KPMG will be present during the Annual Meeting, and they will have an opportunity to make a statement and will be available to respond to appropriate questions from our stockholders.
Policy on Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
We have adopted a policy under which our audit committee must pre-approve all audit and permissible non-audit services to be provided by the independent registered public accounting firm. As part of its review, our audit committee also considers whether the categories of pre-approved services are consistent with the rules on accountant independence of the SEC and the PCAOB. Our audit committee has pre-approved all services performed by KPMG during fiscal year 2020 in accordance with the pre-approval policy.
Fees Paid to the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The following table presents fees for professional audit services and other services rendered to our company by KPMG for our fiscal years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019.

Fee Category |  | Fiscal 2020 |  | Fiscal 2019 |
Audit Fees(1) |  | $ | 2,968,782 |  |  | $ | 3,936,117 |  |
Audit-Related Fees(2) |  | $ | 80,000 |  |  | — |  |
Tax Fees(3) |  | $ | 307,163 |  |  | $ | 234,908 |  |
All Other Fees |  | — |  |  | — |  |
Total Fees |  | $ | 3,355,945 |  |  | $ | 4,171,025 |  |

_______________________
(1)Audit Fees consist of fees for professional services provided in connection with the audit of our consolidated financial statements, reviews of our quarterly condensed consolidated financial statements, related accounting consultations, and statutory audits of our international subsidiaries. This category also includes fees for services incurred in connection with our IPO.
(2)Audit-Related Fees consist primarily of fees for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our consolidated financial statements and not reported under “Audit Fees.”
(3)Tax Fees consist of fees for professional services for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning. These services include consultation on tax matters and assistance regarding federal, state, and international tax compliance.
Auditor Independence
In our fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, there were no other professional services provided by KPMG, other than those listed above, that would have required our audit committee to consider their compatibility with maintaining the independence of KPMG.
21

Table of Contents
Vote Required
The ratification of the appointment of KPMG as our independent registered public accounting firm for our fiscal year ending December 31, 2021 requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the voting power of the shares of our common stock present virtually or by proxy during the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote thereon. Abstentions will have the effect of a vote against this proposal, and broker non-votes will have no effect.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE "FOR" THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF KPMG LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2021.
22

Table of Contents
REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The audit committee is a committee of our Board of Directors comprised solely of independent directors as required by the listing standards of the NYSE and rules and regulations of the SEC. The audit committee operates under a written charter approved by our Board of Directors, which is available on our website at https://cloudflare.NET. The composition of the audit committee, the attributes of its members, and the responsibilities of the audit committee, as reflected in its charter, are intended to be in accordance with applicable requirements for corporate audit committees. The audit committee reviews and assesses the adequacy of its charter and the audit committee's performance on an annual basis.
With respect to our financial reporting process, our management is responsible for (1) establishing and maintaining internal controls and (2) preparing our consolidated financial statements. Our independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG, is responsible for performing an independent audit of our consolidated financial statements. It is the responsibility of the audit committee to oversee these activities. It is not the responsibility of the audit committee to prepare our financial statements. These are the fundamental responsibilities of management. In the performance of its oversight function, the audit committee has:
•reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements with management and KPMG;
•discussed with KPMG the matters required to be discussed by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB and the SEC; and
•received the written disclosures and the letter from KPMG required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent accountant's communications with the audit committee concerning independence, and has discussed with KPMG its independence.
Based on the audit committee's review and discussions with management and KPMG, the audit committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 for filing with the SEC.
Respectfully submitted by the members of the audit committee of our Board of Directors:
Stanley Meresman (Chair)
Carl Ledbetter
Katrin Suder
This report of the audit committee is required by the SEC and, in accordance with the SEC's rules, will not be deemed to be part of or incorporated by reference by any general statement incorporating by reference this Proxy Statement into any filing under the Securities Act or under the Exchange Act, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate this information by reference, and this report and the information contained therein will not otherwise be deemed "soliciting material" or "filed" under either the Securities Act or the Exchange Act or be subject to Regulation 14A or Regulation 14C (other than as provided in Item 407 of Regulation S-K) or to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act.
23

Table of Contents
PROPOSAL THREE:
ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE THE
COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
In accordance with the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the Dodd-Frank Act) and SEC rules, we are providing our stockholders with the opportunity to vote to approve, on an advisory and non-binding basis, the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement. This proposal, commonly known as a “Say-on-Pay” proposal, gives our stockholders the opportunity to express their views on our named executive officers’ compensation as a whole. This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation or any specific named executive officer, but rather the overall compensation of all of our named executive officers and the philosophy, policies, and practices described in this Proxy Statement. For a discussion of who our “named executive officers” are, see the section titled “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”
The Say-on-Pay vote is advisory, and therefore is not binding on us, our compensation committee, or our Board of Directors. The Say-on-Pay vote will, however, provide information to us regarding investor sentiment about our executive compensation philosophy, policies, and practices, which our compensation committee will be able to consider when determining executive compensation for the remainder of the current fiscal year and beyond. Our Board of Directors and our compensation committee value the opinions of our stockholders. To the extent there is any significant vote against the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement, we will endeavor to communicate with stockholders to better understand the concerns that influenced the vote and consider our stockholders’ concerns, and our compensation committee will evaluate whether any actions are necessary to address those concerns.
You are encouraged to review the section titled “Executive Compensation” and, in particular, the section titled “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis” in this Proxy Statement, which provide a comprehensive review of our executive compensation program and its elements, objectives, and rationale. We believe that the information provided in the section titled “Executive Compensation,” and in particular the information discussed in the section titled “Executive Compensation—Executive Compensation Philosophy and Objectives,” demonstrates that our executive compensation program was designed appropriately and is working to ensure management’s interests are aligned with our stockholders’ interests to support long-term value creation. Accordingly, we ask our stockholders to vote “FOR” the following non-binding resolution at the Annual Meeting:
“RESOLVED, that the stockholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation paid to our named executive officers, as disclosed in the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC, including the compensation discussion and analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion, and other related disclosure.”
Vote Required
The approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers, requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the voting power of the shares of our common stock present virtually or by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote thereon to be approved. Abstentions will have the effect of a vote against this proposal, and broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of this proposal.
As an advisory vote, the result of this proposal is non-binding. Although the vote is non-binding, our Board of Directors and our compensation committee value the opinions of our stockholders and will consider the outcome of the vote when making future compensation decisions for our named executive officers.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL, ON AN ADVISORY BASIS, OF THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS.
24

Table of Contents
PROPOSAL FOUR:
ADVISORY VOTE ON THE FREQUENCY OF
FUTURE STOCKHOLDER ADVISORY VOTES ON THE
COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
In accordance with the Dodd-Frank Act and SEC rules, at least once every six years, we must provide our stockholders with the opportunity to indicate their preference regarding how frequently we should hold the Say-on-Pay vote. Accordingly, we are asking our stockholders to indicate whether they would prefer an advisory vote every one year, two years, or three years. Alternatively, stockholders may abstain from casting a vote.
After considering the benefits and consequences of each alternative, our Board of Directors recommends that the Say-on-Pay vote be submitted to the stockholders every year. In formulating its recommendation, our Board of Directors considered that compensation decisions are made annually and that an annual advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers will allow stockholders to provide more frequent and direct input on our compensation philosophy, policies, and practices.
Vote Required
The option among one year, two years, or three years that receives the highest number of votes cast at the Annual Meeting by stockholders entitled to vote thereon will be deemed to be the frequency preferred by our stockholders. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on this proposal.
While our Board of Directors believes that its recommendation is appropriate at this time, the stockholders are not voting to approve or disapprove that recommendation, but are instead asked to indicate their preference, on an advisory basis, as to whether non-binding future stockholder advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive officers should be held every year, two years, or three years.
As an advisory vote, the result of this proposal is non-binding. Although the vote is non-binding, our Board of Directors and our compensation committee value the opinions of our stockholders in this matter and, to the extent there is any significant vote in favor of one time period over another, will consider the outcome of this vote when making future decisions regarding the frequency of holding future stockholder advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive officers.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE TO HOLD FUTURE STOCKHOLDER ADVISORY VOTES ON THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS EVERY “ONE YEAR.”
25

Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The following table identifies certain information about our executive officers as of March 31, 2021. Each of our executive officers is appointed by, and serves at the discretion of, our Board of Directors.

Name |  | Age |  | Position
Matthew Prince |  | 46 |  | Chief Executive Officer and Chair of the Board of Directors
Michelle Zatlyn |  | 41 |  | President, Chief Operating Officer, and Director
Thomas Seifert |  | 57 |  | Chief Financial Officer
Douglas Kramer |  | 50 |  | General Counsel and Secretary

For the biographies of Mr. Prince and Ms. Zatlyn, see the section titled "Board of Directors and Corporate Governance."
Thomas Seifert. Mr. Seifert has served as our Chief Financial Officer since June 2017. Prior to joining us, he served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Symantec Corporation, a provider of cybersecurity software and services, from March 2014 to November 2016 and served in an advisory capacity to Symantec from December 2016 to March 2017. From December 2012 to March 2014, Mr. Seifert served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Brightstar Corp., a wireless distribution and services company. From October 2009 to September 2012, he served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer at Advanced Micro Devices Inc., a semiconductor company, where he additionally served as Interim Chief Executive Officer from January 2011 to August 2011. Mr. Seifert currently serves as a member of the board of directors of IPG Photonics Corporation, a manufacturer of fiber lasers, and First Derivatives plc, an ultra-high-performance analytics software company. He previously served on the board of directors of CompuGroup Medical SE, an eHealth provider. Mr. Seifert holds a B.A. in Business Administration and an M.B.A. from Friedrich Alexander University, and an M.A. in Mathematics and Economics from Wayne State University.
Douglas Kramer. Mr. Kramer has served as our General Counsel since August 2016 and our Secretary since August 2019. Prior to joining us, he served as Deputy Administrator of the U.S. Small Business Administration from April 2015 to July 2016. From November 2013 to March 2015, Mr. Kramer served as General Counsel of the United States Agency for International Development. He served in the White House as Staff Secretary and Deputy Assistant to the President from March 2012 to November 2013, and Associate Counsel and Special Assistant to the President of the United States from September 2010 to March 2012. From July 2009 to September 2010, Mr. Kramer served as Counsel to the Assistant Attorney General for the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice. From July 2006 to June 2009, he served as a Partner with the law firm of Polsinelli PC. From 2001 to 2006, Mr. Kramer was an Associate at the law firm of Covington & Burling LLP. Mr. Kramer holds a B.A. in Philosophy and English from Georgetown University, and a J.D. from the University of Chicago Law School.
26

Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Introduction
The following discussion and analysis of compensation arrangements of our named executive officers should be read together with the compensation tables and related disclosures set forth below. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that are based on our current plans, considerations, expectations, and determinations regarding future compensation programs. The actual amount and form of compensation and the compensation programs that we adopt may differ materially from currently planned programs as summarized in this discussion.
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis provides information regarding the 2020 compensation program for our principal executive officer, our principal financial officer, and each of our two other executive officers at fiscal year-end (our named executive officers). Our named executive officers for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 were:

Named Executive Officer |  | Title
Matthew Prince |  | Chief Executive Officer and Chair of our Board of Directors (our CEO)
Michelle Zatlyn(1) |  | President, Chief Operating Officer, and Director (our President)
Thomas Seifert |  | Chief Financial Officer
Douglas Kramer |  | General Counsel and Secretary

_______________________
(1)Effective December 16, 2020, our Board of Directors appointed Ms. Zatlyn, our Chief Operating Officer, as our President. No changes were made to her compensation arrangements in connection with such appointment.
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis describes the material elements of our executive compensation program during 2020. It also provides an overview of our executive compensation philosophy, including our principal compensation policies and practices. Finally, it analyzes how and why the compensation committee arrived at the specific compensation decisions for our named executive officers in 2020 and discusses the key factors that the compensation committee considered in determining their compensation.
Executive Summary
Who We Are
We are a global cloud services provider that delivers a broad range of services to businesses of all sizes and in all geographies— making them more secure, enhancing the performance of their business-critical applications, and eliminating the cost and complexity of managing individual network hardware. Our network serves as a scalable, easy-to-use, unified control plane to deliver security, performance, and reliability across on-premise, hybrid, cloud, and software-as-a-service (SaaS) applications. We serve comprehensive customer needs across security, performance, and reliability. As of December 31, 2020, more than 17% of the Fortune 1,000 were paying Cloudflare customers.
2020 Business Highlights
Our 2020 financial highlights included the following:
•Revenue – Total revenue of $431.1 million, representing an increase of 50% from revenue year-over-year.
•Gross Profit – GAAP gross profit was $330.0 million, or 76.6% gross margin, compared to $223.6 million, or 77.9%, in 2019. Non-GAAP gross profit was $334.6 million, or 77.6% gross margin, compared to $224.4 million, or 78.2%, in fiscal 2019.
27

Table of Contents
•Operating Loss – GAAP loss from operations was $106.8 million, or 24.8% of total revenue, compared to $107.9 million, or 37.6% of total revenue, in fiscal 2019. Non-GAAP loss from operations was $33.9 million, or 7.9% of total revenue, compared to $71.2 million, or 24.8% of total revenue, in fiscal 2019.
•Net Loss – GAAP net loss was $119.4 million, compared to $105.8 million for fiscal 2019. Non-GAAP net loss was $35.1 million, compared to $69.5 million for fiscal 2019. GAAP net loss per share was $0.40, compared to $0.72 for fiscal 2019. Non-GAAP net loss per share was $0.12, compared to $0.48 for fiscal 2019.
•Cash Flow – Net cash flow from operations was negative $17.1 million, compared to negative $38.9 million for fiscal 2019. Free cash flow was negative $92.1 million, or 21% of total revenue, compared to negative $96.2 million, or 34% of total revenue, for fiscal 2019.
To supplement our consolidated financial statements, which are prepared and presented in accordance with GAAP, we provide investors with certain non-GAAP financial measures, including non-GAAP gross profit, Non-GAAP operating loss, non-GAAP net loss, non-GAAP net loss per share, and free cash flow. For a full reconciliation for each non-GAAP financial measure to the most directly comparable financial measure stated in accordance with GAAP, please see our 2020 Annual Report and Exhibit 99.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 11, 2021.
Executive Compensation Highlights
The compensation committee took no action with respect to the compensation of our named executive officers for 2020:
•No Base Salary Increases – The annual base salaries of our named executive officers were maintained at their 2019 levels.
•No Annual Cash Bonus Program – We did have not have a cash bonus program in 2020 for our named executive officers, and historically have not maintained a formal annual cash bonus program for our named executive officers.
•Long-Term Incentive Compensation – While we grant long-term incentive compensation opportunities in the form of equity awards to our named executive officers from time to time, we did not grant any equity awards to our named executive officers in 2020.
Pay-for-Performance
We believe our executive compensation program is reasonable and competitive, and appropriately balances the goals of attracting, motivating, rewarding, and retaining our named executive officers with the goal of aligning their interests with those of our stockholders. While our named executive officers received no increases to their base salaries and no new equity awards in 2020, their annual compensation typically varies from year to year in a manner that is consistent with our “pay-for-performance” philosophy. Specifically, our executive compensation program emphasizes “variable” pay in the form of equity awards over “fixed” pay in the form of base salary. As discussed below, for 2020, the compensation committee believed that the then-outstanding equity awards held by our named executive officers provided sufficient pay-for-performance and retention incentives, and therefore it was not necessary to grant additional equity awards in 2020.
Executive Compensation Policies and Practices
We endeavor to maintain sound governance standards consistent with our executive compensation policies and practices. The compensation committee evaluates our executive compensation program on a regular basis to ensure that it is consistent with our short-term and long-term goals given the dynamic nature of our business and the market in which we compete for executive talent. The following summarizes our executive compensation and related policies and practices that were in effect in 2020:
28

Table of Contents

| What We Do |  | What We Don't Do
☑ | Maintain an Independent Compensation Committee. The compensation committee consists solely of independent directors who establish our compensation policies and practices. | ☒ | Limited Perquisites. Perquisites or other personal benefits are not a material part of our compensation program for our named executive officers, and generally are only provided when they serve a legitimate business purpose.
☑ | Retain an Independent Compensation Advisor. The compensation committee has engaged its own compensation consultant to provide information, analysis, and other advice on executive compensation independent of management. This consultant performed no other consulting or other services for us in 2020. | ☒ | Limited Tax Reimbursements. We do not provide any tax reimbursement payments (including “gross-ups”) on any perquisites or other personal benefits, except in limited circumstances to achieve specific business objectives.
☑ | Annual Executive Compensation Review. The compensation committee conducts an annual review and approval of our compensation strategy, including a review and determination of our compensation peer group used for comparative purposes and a review of our compensation-related risk profile to ensure that our compensation programs do not encourage excessive or inappropriate risk-taking and that the level of risk that they do encourage is not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on us. | ☒ | No Excise Tax Payments on Future Post-Employment Compensation Arrangements. We do not provide any excise tax reimbursement payments (including “gross-ups”) on payments or benefits contingent upon a change in control of the Company.
☑ | Use a Pay-for-Performance Philosophy. The majority of our named executive officers’ compensation opportunities consists of a long-term incentive compensation in the form of equity awards. As a result of this emphasis on equity awards, a substantial portion of each named executive officer’s target total direct compensation is dependent upon our overall, long-term success (as measured through our stock price), thereby aligning the interests of our named executive officers and our stockholders. | ☒ | No Special Retirement, Health, or Welfare Benefits. We do not provide our named executive officers with any retirement, health, or welfare benefit programs, other than participation in our broad-based employee plans and programs on the same basis as our other full-time, salaried employees.
|  | ☒ | No Hedging or Pledging of our Securities. We prohibit, absent a waiver from our general counsel or chief financial officer, our named executive officers and the members of our Board of Directors from hedging or pledging our securities.
|  | ☒ | No “Single Trigger” Change in Control Severance Payments or Benefits. We do not provide “single trigger” change in control severance payments or benefits to our named executive officers.

29

Table of Contents
Stockholder Advisory Votes on Named Executive Officer Compensation
At the Annual Meeting, we will be conducting the following stockholder advisory votes:
•a non-binding vote on the compensation of our named executive officers (commonly known as a “Say-on-Pay” vote); and
•a non-binding vote on the frequency of future Say-on-Pay votes (commonly known as a “Say-When-on-Pay” vote).
For additional information on these advisory votes, see Proposals Three and Four, respectively, in this Proxy Statement. Our Board of Directors and our compensation committee will consider the outcome of the Say-on-Pay vote, as well as feedback received throughout the year, when making compensation decisions for our named executive officers.
Executive Compensation Philosophy and Objectives
Our executive compensation program is designed to:
•attract, motivate, incentivize, and retain employees at the executive level who contribute to our long-term success;
•provide compensation packages to our executives that are fair and competitive and reward high performance and the achievement of our business objectives, and effectively align their interests with those of our stockholders; and
•effectively align our executives’ interests with those of our stockholders by focusing on long-term equity incentives that correlate with the growth of sustainable long-term value for our stockholders.
Generally, we structure the annual compensation of our named executive officers using two principal elements: (1) base salary and (2) long-term equity incentive opportunities in the form of equity awards. The design of our executive compensation program is influenced by a variety of factors, with the primary goals being to align the interests of our named executive officers and stockholders and to link pay with performance.
We have not adopted policies or employed guidelines for allocating compensation between current and long-term compensation, between cash and non-cash compensation, or among different forms of non-cash compensation.
Compensation-Setting Process
Role of Compensation Committee and Board of Directors
The compensation committee discharges the responsibilities of our Board of Directors relating to the compensation of our named executive officers as set forth in its charter and reports to our Board of Directors on its discussions, decisions, recommendations, and other actions. The compensation committee makes recommendations to our Board of Directors regarding the compensation for each named executive officer, including our Chief Executive Officer and President. Our Board of Directors makes all final decisions regarding the compensation of our CEO, President, and other named executive officers.
The compensation committee has overall responsibility for overseeing our compensation and benefits policies generally, and overseeing and evaluating the compensation plans, policies, and practices applicable to our CEO and other named executive officers. In carrying out its responsibilities, the compensation committee evaluates our compensation policies and practices with a focus on the degree to which these policies and practices reflect our executive compensation philosophy, develops strategies and makes decisions that it believes further our philosophy or align with developments in best compensation practices, and reviews the performance of our named executive officers when formulating recommendations with respect to their compensation.
The compensation committee retains a compensation consultant (as described below) to provide support in its review and assessment of our executive compensation program.
Setting Target Total Direct Compensation
The compensation committee reviews the annual base salary levels and long-term incentive compensation opportunities of our named executive officers at the beginning of each year, or more frequently as warranted.
The compensation committee does not establish a specific target for formulating its recommendations about the target total direct compensation opportunities of our named executive officers. Instead, the members of the compensation committee rely
30

Table of Contents
primarily on their general experience, business judgment and subjective considerations of various factors, our executive compensation program objectives, past and expected future company and individual performance, the executive officer’s role and responsibilities within the organization and expected contributions to the Company, internal equity among the members of the executive team, compensation practices of our compensation peer group and/or selected broad-based compensation surveys, and the recommendations of our CEO and/or our President (other than with respect to their own compensation).
These factors provide the framework for compensation decision-making and final decisions regarding the compensation opportunity for each named executive officer. No single factor is determinative in setting compensation levels, nor is the impact of any individual factor on the determination of pay levels quantifiable.
The compensation committee does not weight these factors in any predetermined manner, nor does it apply any formulas in developing its compensation recommendations.
The compensation committee does not engage in formal benchmarking against other companies’ compensation programs or practices to establish our compensation levels or make specific compensation decisions with respect to our named executive officers. Instead, in making its determinations, the compensation committee reviews information summarizing the compensation paid at a representative group of peer companies and more broad-based compensation surveys to gain a general understanding of market compensation levels.
Role of Management
In discharging its responsibilities, the compensation committee works with members of our management, including our CEO and our President. Our management assists the compensation committee by providing information on corporate and individual performance, market compensation data, and management’s perspective on compensation matters. The compensation committee solicits and reviews our CEO’s and our President’s proposals with respect to program structures, as well as their recommendations for adjustments to annual base salaries, long-term incentive compensation opportunities, and other compensation-related matters for our named executive officers (except with respect to their own compensation) based on our CEO’s and President’s evaluation of our other named executive officers’ performance for the prior year.
Our CEO and our President make their recommendations regarding annual base salaries and long-term incentive compensation opportunities for our other named executive officers based on such factors as our CEO and our President deem relevant, such as the Company’s overall performance and expected trajectory, the contributions toward these results , and anticipated future contributions, the named executive officer's role and performance of his or her duties, and his or her achievement of individual goals, retention considerations, and internal equity considerations.
The compensation committee reviews and discusses our CEO’s and our President’s proposals and recommendations with them and considers their proposals and recommendations as one factor in formulating its recommendations for the compensation of our named executive officers, including our CEO and our President. Our CEO and President also attend meetings of our Board of Directors and the compensation committee at which executive compensation matters are addressed, except with respect to discussions involving their own compensation.
Role of Compensation Consultant
The compensation committee engages an external compensation consultant to assist it by providing information, analysis, and other advice relating to our executive compensation program on an ongoing basis. The compensation consultant reports directly to the compensation committee and its chair and serves at the discretion of the compensation committee, which reviews the engagement annually.
In 2020, the compensation committee engaged Compensia, a national compensation consulting firm, to serve as its compensation consultant to advise on executive compensation matters, including competitive market pay practices for our named executive officers and the data analysis and selection of our compensation peer group.
During 2020, Compensia attended the meetings of the compensation committee (both with and without management present) as requested and provided various services, including the following:
•reviewed, researched, and updated of our compensation peer group;
•analyzed competitive market data based on our compensation peer group and broad-based compensation survey data for our executive officer positions, including our named executive officers’ positions, and an evaluation of how the
31

Table of Contents
compensation we pay our executive officers compares both to our performance and to how the companies in our compensation peer group and the broad-based compensation survey data compensate their executives;
•reviewed and analyzed the base salary levels and long-term incentive compensation opportunities of our named executive officers, including as compared to our compensation peer group’s practices;
•reviewed and analyzed our compensation peer group’s bonus practices;
•reviewed and analyzed the use of performance-based equity awards in the competitive market;
•reviewed and analyzed the adequacy of outstanding equity awards and consideration of the need for and appropriateness of future senior executive equity awards, including consideration of our compensation peer group’s practices, retention and motivation considerations, and corporate governance considerations;
•provided an assessment of executive compensation and related trends resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic within our industry, and
•provided updates on corporate governance and regulatory issues and developments;
•consulted with the compensation committee chair and other committee members between compensation committee meetings; and
•provided support on other ad hoc matters throughout the year.
Compensia also coordinated with our management for data collection and job matching for our executive officers. In 2020, Compensia did not provide any other services to us.
The compensation committee has evaluated its relationship with Compensia to ensure that it believes that such firm is independent from management, including such factors as were deemed relevant under the circumstances and has determined that no conflict of interest was raised as a result of the work performed by Compensia and that Compensia is independent pursuant to SEC and NYSE rules.
Competitive Positioning
For purposes of assessing our executive compensation against the competitive market, the compensation committee reviews and considers the compensation levels and practices of a select group of peer companies. This compensation peer group consists of publicly-traded technology companies against which we compete for executive talent and that are similar to us in terms of revenue, market capitalization, and industry focus. The competitive data drawn from this compensation peer group is only one of several factors that the compensation committee considers, however, in formulating its recommendations for our Board of Directors with respect to the compensation of our named executive officers.
In evaluating the companies comprising the compensation peer group, Compensia considered the following criteria:
•publicly-traded companies headquartered in the United States and traded on a major United States stock exchange;
•companies in the application software, systems software, and Internet software and services industries;
•companies with similar revenues – within a range of approximately 0.5x to approximately 3.0x our then-estimated 2019 revenue of approximately $317 million (approximately $160 million to approximately $950 million);
•companies with similar market capitalization – within a range of approximately 0.25x to 4.0x our then-projected valuation at initial public offering of approximately $4.25 billion (approximately $1.0 billion to approximately $17.0 billion); and
•certain other factors, such as regional location, whether the company had a security-related focus, high revenue growth, and/or a high market capitalization to revenue multiple.
32

Table of Contents
This compensation peer group approved by our Board of Directors in April 2019 consisted of the following companies:

•Anaplan | •Paycom Software | •Tenable Holdings
•Box | •Paylocity Holding | •Twilio
•Cloudera | •Pivotal Software | •Varonis Systems
•DocuSign | •Proofpoint | •Zendesk
•Forescout Technologies | •Qualys | •Zscaler
•New Relic | •Rapid7 | •Zuora
•Okta |  |

This compensation peer group was used by the compensation committee through the first half of 2020 as a reference for understanding the competitive market for executive positions in our industry sector.
In July 2020, the compensation committee, with the assistance of Compensia, reviewed and updated our compensation peer group for use for decisions related to the 2021 compensation of our named executive officers. These updates reflect recent acquisitions, changes in our market capitalization, and recognize our evolving business focus. In evaluating the companies comprising the compensation peer group at that time, Compensia considered the following criteria:
•publicly-traded companies headquartered in the United States and traded on a major United States stock exchange;
•cloud software companies (primary focus) and other software companies (secondary focus);
•companies with similar revenues – within a range of approximately 0.5x to approximately 3.0x our then-current trailing four quarters revenue of approximately $317 million (approximately $158 million to approximately $950 million);
•companies with similar market capitalization – within a range of approximately 0.25x to approximately 4.0x our then market capitalization of approximately $8.5 billion (approximately $2.1 billion to approximately $34.0 billion); and
•certain other factors, such as whether the company had a security-related focus, high revenue growth, and/or a high market capitalization to revenue multiple.
Based on a review of the analysis prepared by Compensia, the compensation committee approved an updated compensation peer group consisting of the following companies:

•Anaplan | •Five9 | •Rapid7
•Box | •New Relic | •Smartsheet
•Cloudera | •Okta | •Tenable Holdings
•CrowdStrike Holdings | •Paycom Software | •Varonis Systems
•Datadog | •Paylocity Holdings | •Zendesk
•Dynatrace | •Proofpoint | •Zscaler
•Fastly | •Qualys |

The compensation committee used data drawn from the companies in our compensation peer group, as well as Radford survey data drawn from a custom cut of 17 of the Company’s 20 peer companies, to evaluate the competitive market when determining the total direct compensation packages for our named executive officers, including base salary and long-term incentive compensation opportunities.
The compensation committee reviews our compensation peer group at least annually and makes adjustments to its composition if warranted, taking into account changes in both our business and the businesses of the companies in the peer group.
Compensation Elements
In 2020, the principal elements of our executive compensation program were base salary and long-term incentive compensation in the form of equity awards.
33

Table of Contents
Base Salary
Base salary represents the fixed portion of the compensation of our named executive officers and is an important element of compensation intended to attract and retain highly talented individuals. Generally, we use base salary to provide each executive officer with a specified level of cash compensation during the year with the expectation that he or she will perform his or her responsibilities to the best of his or her ability and in our best interests.
Historically, we have established the initial base salaries of our named executive officers through arm’s-length negotiation at the time we hire the individual, taking into account his or her position, qualifications, experience, prior salary level, and the base salaries of our other executive officers. Thereafter, the compensation committee reviews the base salaries of our named executive officers as part of its annual compensation review, with input from our CEO and our President (except with respect to their own base salaries) and makes adjustments as it determines to be reasonable and necessary to reflect the scope of an executive officer’s performance, individual contributions and responsibilities, position in the case of a promotion, and market conditions.
In 2020, the compensation committee reviewed the base salaries of our named executive officers and recommended to our Board of Directors that their annual base salaries be maintained at their 2019 levels. Following deliberations, our Board of Directors determined to maintain the annual base salaries of our named executive officers at their 2019 levels as follows:

Named Executive Officer |  | 2019 Base Salary($) |  | 2020 Base Salary($) |  | Percentage Adjustment
Matthew Prince |  | 400,000 |  |  | 400,000 |  |  | —
Michelle Zatlyn |  | 400,000 |  |  | 400,000 |  |  | —
Thomas Seifert |  | 650,000 |  |  | 650,000 |  |  | —
Douglas Kramer |  | 550,000 |  |  | 550,000 |  |  | —

The base salaries paid to our named executive officers during 2020 are set forth in the “2020 Summary Compensation Table” below.
Cash Bonuses
During 2020, the compensation committee did not recommend, nor did our Board of Directors adopt, an annual cash bonus or other incentive plan for our executive officers, including our named executive officers. Instead, our Board of Directors relied primarily on the long-term incentive compensation opportunities granted to our executive officers in prior years in the form of options to purchase shares of our Class B common stock and restricted stock unit awards that may vest and be settled for shares of our Class B common stock to incentivize them to increase the value of our common stock and create sustainable long-term value for our stockholders.
Long-Term Incentive Compensation
We view long-term incentive compensation in the form of equity awards as a critical component of our executive compensation program. The realized value of these equity awards bears a direct relationship to our stock price, and, therefore, these awards are an incentive for our named executive officers to create value for our stockholders. Equity awards also help us retain qualified executive officers in a competitive market.
Long-term incentive compensation opportunities in the form of equity awards are granted to our named executive officers by our Board of Directors (with Mr. Prince and Ms. Zatlyn abstaining from voting on their own equity awards), based on the recommendations of the compensation committee. The amount and forms of such equity awards are determined by the compensation committee and recommended to our Board of Directors after considering the factors described in “Compensation-Setting Process – Setting Target Total Direct Compensation” above, as well as the outstanding equity holdings of each named executive officer, the projected impact of the proposed awards on our earnings, the proportion of our total shares outstanding used for annual employee long-term incentive compensation awards (our “burn rate”) in relation to the median proportions of the companies in our compensation peer group, and the potential voting power dilution to our stockholders in relation to the median practice of the companies in our compensation peer group.
Historically, we have used stock options and RSU awards to retain, motivate, and reward our named executive officers for long-term increases in the value of our common stock and, thereby, to align their interests with those of our stockholders. Because
34

Table of Contents
stock options provide for an economic benefit only in the event that our stock price increases over the exercise price of the option (which exercise price is equal to the fair market value of our common stock as of the date of grant), we believe stock options effectively align the interests of our executive officers with those of our stockholders and provide them with a significant incentive to manage our business from the perspective of an owner with an equity stake in the business. In addition, because they are subject to a multi-year vesting requirement, stock options serve our retention objectives since our named executive officers must remain continuously employed by us through the applicable vesting dates to have an opportunity to exercise their stock options.
With respect to RSU awards, because they have value even in the absence of stock price appreciation, we believe they serve to incent and retain our named executive officers using fewer shares of our common stock. Since their value increases with any increase in the value of the underlying shares, RSU awards serve as an incentive which aligns with the long-term interests of our named executive officers and stockholders. Unlike stock options, however, RSU awards have real economic value when they vest even if the market price of our Class A common stock declines or stays flat, thus delivering more predictable value to our named executive officers. In addition, because they are subject to a multi-year vesting requirement, RSU awards serve our retention objectives since our named executive officers must remain continuously employed by us through the applicable vesting dates to fully earn these awards.
During 2020, no equity awards were granted to our named executive officers. Instead, our Board of Directors, noting the size and timing of the long-term incentive compensation opportunities granted to our named executive officers in prior years, including the significant stock options granted in 2017 to our named executive officers, which only began their four-year vesting schedule upon our initial public offering in September 2019, determined that such awards were sufficient to incentivize our named executive officers to increase the value of our Class A common stock and create sustainable long-term value for our stockholders.
Retirement, Health, and Welfare Benefits
Our named executive officers are eligible to receive the same employee benefits that are generally available to all employees, subject to the satisfaction of certain eligibility requirements, including participation in retirement, health, and welfare plans. These benefits include medical, dental, and vision insurance, business travel insurance, an employee assistance program, health and dependent care flexible spending accounts, basic life insurance, accidental death and dismemberment insurance, and short-term and long-term disability insurance.
We maintain a tax-qualified Section 401(k) retirement plan for all U.S. employees who satisfy certain eligibility requirements, including requirements relating to age and length of service. Under our Section 401(k) plan, employees may elect to defer up to all eligible compensation, subject to applicable annual Internal Revenue Code (the Code) limits. We intend for our Section 401(k) plan to qualify under Sections 401(a) and 501(a) of the Code so that contributions by employees to our Section 401(k) plan, and income earned on those contributions, are not taxable to employees until withdrawn from our Section 401(k) plan. The Section 401(k) plan also permits contributions to be made on a post-tax basis for those employees participating in the Roth 401(k) plan component. We have not made any matching contributions to the Section 401(k) plan to date.
We design our employee benefits programs to be affordable and competitive in relation to the market as well as compliant with applicable laws and practices. We adjust our employee benefits programs as needed based upon regular monitoring of applicable laws and practices and the competitive market.
Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits
Personal benefits currently are not a significant component of our executive compensation program. Accordingly, we do not provide significant perquisites or other personal benefits to our named executive officers, except as generally made available to our employees or in situations where we believe it is appropriate to serve a legitimate business purpose, including to assist an individual in the performance of his or her duties or to make him or her more efficient and effective, or to recruit or retain him or her. During 2020, none of our named executive officers received perquisites or other personal benefits that were, in the aggregate, $10,000 or more for any individual, except our CEO and our President were provided with security services during part of the year. We provided these services to our CEO and our President because we believe that their personal safety and security are of utmost importance to us and our stockholders. We believe that amounts paid by us for these security services have been reasonable, necessary, appropriate, and for the benefit of us and our stockholders.
We have in the past and may in the future provide perquisites or other personal benefits in limited circumstances, such as those described in the preceding paragraph. All future practices with respect to perquisites or other personal benefits generally will be approved and subject to periodic review by the compensation committee and our Board of Directors.
35

Table of Contents
Employment Agreements and Post-Employment Compensation
In August 2019, we entered into written confirmatory employment agreements with our CEO, President, and other named executive officers.
Each of these agreements provides for “at-will” employment, and sets forth the title and position of the named executive officer, including base salary as then in effect, bonus opportunity, participation in our employee benefit programs, eligibility for future equity awards, and the opportunity to participate in our Change in Control and Severance Policy (the Severance Policy) or other severance benefit program.
All of our named executive officers participate in our Severance Policy, which provides them with certain protection in the event of their termination of employment other than for “cause,” death, or “disability” (as such terms are defined in the Severance Policy), including in the event of certain terminations of employment in connection with a change in control of the Company.
These arrangements provide reasonable compensation to a named executive officer if he or she leaves our employ under certain circumstances to facilitate his or her transition to new employment. Further, in some instances we seek to mitigate any potential employer liability and avoid future disputes or litigation by requiring a departing named executive officer to sign a separation agreement and release of claims acceptable to us as a condition to receiving post-employment compensation payments or benefits. We also believe that the Severance Policy helps maintain their continued focus and dedication to their assigned duties to maximize stockholder value if there is a potential transaction that could involve a change in control of the Company.
Under the Severance Policy, all payments and benefits in the event of a change in control of the Company are payable only if there is a subsequent loss of employment by a named executive officer (a so-called “double-trigger” arrangement). In the case of the acceleration of vesting of outstanding equity awards, we use this double-trigger arrangement to protect against the loss of retention value following a change in control of the Company and to avoid windfalls, both of which could occur if vesting of either equity or cash-based awards accelerated automatically as a result of the transaction.
Prior to the adoption of the Severance Policy in August 2019, we did not have a formal plan with respect to severance benefits payable to our named executive officers and other key employees. From time to time, we granted equity awards to certain key employees, including our named executive officers, that provided for accelerated vesting of equity awards under certain circumstances following a change in control of the Company, as described further under the section entitled “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control.” Similar to the Severance Policy provisions triggered upon certain terminations of employment following a change in control, these double trigger provisions help protect against the loss of retention value following a change in control of the Company. Any double trigger provisions applicable to equity awards granted before the adoption of the Severance Policy remain in place and were not impacted by the adoption of the Severance Policy.
We believe that having in place reasonable and competitive post-employment compensation arrangements, including in the event of a change in control of the Company, are essential to attracting and retaining highly-qualified executive officers.
For detailed descriptions of the post-employment compensation arrangements with our named executive officers, as well as an estimate of the potential payments and benefits payable under these arrangements, see “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control” below.
Other Compensation Policies
Hedging and Pledging Prohibitions
Under our insider trading policy, absent a waiver from our general counsel or our chief financial officer, our employees (including officers) and members of our Board of Directors are prohibited from engaging in short sales, trading in derivative securities (other than stock options, restricted stock units, and other compensatory awards issued to such individuals by us) or engaging in hedging transactions, pledging our securities as collateral for a loan, and holding our securities in a margin account.
36

Table of Contents
Tax and Accounting Considerations
The compensation committee takes the applicable tax and accounting requirements into consideration in designing and overseeing our executive compensation program.
Deductibility of Executive Compensation
Generally, Section 162(m) of the Code limits the amount we may deduct from our federal income taxes for compensation paid to our CEO and certain other current or former executive officers who are “covered employees” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code to $1 million per year, per individual, subject to certain exceptions. The regulations promulgated under Section 162(m) of the Code contain a transition rule that applies to companies, such as ours, that become subject to Section 162(m) of the Code by reason of becoming publicly held. Under this rule, certain compensation granted during a transition period currently is not counted toward the deduction limitation of Section 162(m) of the Code if the compensation is paid under a compensation arrangement that was in existence before the effective date of the initial public offering and certain other requirements are met. While certain of our equity awards may be eligible to be excluded from the deductibility limitation of Section 162(m) of the Code under this transition rule, the compensation committee has not adopted a policy that all equity or other compensation must be deductible.
We currently expect our transition period to expire at our annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2023, although it could expire earlier in certain circumstances. In approving the amount and form of compensation for our named executive officers in the future, the compensation committee generally considers all elements of the cost to us of providing such compensation, including the potential impact of Section 162(m) of the Code, as well as our need to maintain flexibility in compensating executive officers in a manner designed to promote our goals. The compensation committee may, in its judgment, authorize compensation payments that will or may not be deductible when it believes that such payments are appropriate to attract, retain, or motivate executive talent.
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation
The compensation committee takes accounting considerations into account in designing compensation plans and arrangements for our executive officers and other employees. Chief among these is Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 (ASC Topic 718), the standard which governs the accounting treatment of certain stock-based compensation. Among other things, ASC Topic 718 requires us to record a compensation expense in our income statement for all equity awards granted to our executive officers and other employees. This compensation expense is based on the grant date “fair value” of the equity award and, in most cases, will be recognized ratably over the award’s requisite service period (which, generally, will correspond to the award’s vesting schedule). This compensation expense is also reported in the compensation tables below, even though recipients may never realize any value from their equity awards.
37

Table of Contents
REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The compensation committee of our Board of Directors has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis provided above. Based on its review and discussions, the compensation committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement and the Annual Report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended December 31, 2020.
Respectfully submitted by the members of the compensation committee of the Board of Directors:
Maria Eitel (Chair)
Mark Anderson
Carl Ledbetter
Scott Sandell
This report of the compensation committee is required by the SEC and, in accordance with the SEC's rules, will not be deemed to be part of or incorporated by reference by any general statement incorporating by reference this Proxy Statement into any filing under the Securities Act or under the Exchange Act, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate this information by reference, and this report and the information contained therein will not otherwise be deemed "soliciting material" or "filed" under either the Securities Act or the Exchange Act or be subject to Regulation 14A or Regulation 14C (other than as provided in Item 407 of Regulation S-K) or to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act.
38

Table of Contents
Compensation Risk Assessment
The compensation committee of our Board of Directors believes that our employee compensation policies and programs do not encourage excessive and unnecessary risk-taking and are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our company. The compensation committee oversaw the performance of a risk assessment of our compensation policies and programs as generally applicable to our employees to ascertain any potential material risks that may be created by our compensation programs. The compensation committee considered the findings of the assessment conducted by management with the assistance of Compensia, the compensation committee’s compensation consultant, and concluded that our compensation programs are designed and administered with the appropriate balance of risk and reward in relation to our overall business strategy and do not encourage employees to take unnecessary or excessive risks, and that the level of risk that they might encourage is not reasonably likely to materially harm our business or financial condition, after considering mitigating controls.
39

Table of Contents
2020 Summary Compensation Table
The following table provides information regarding the compensation of our named executive officers during the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018.

Name and Principal Position |  | Year |  | Salary ($) |  | Stock Awards ($)(1) |  | All Other Compensation ($) |  | Total ($)
Matthew Prince |  | 2020 |  |  | 400,000 |  |  |  | — |  |  | 34,722 |  | (2) |  |  | 434,722 |
Chief Executive Officer |  | 2019 |  |  | 400,000 |  |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  |  | 400,000 |
|  | 2018 |  |  | 400,000 |  |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  |  | 400,000 |
Michelle Zatlyn |  | 2020 |  |  | 400,000 |  |  |  | — |  |  | 17,457 |  | (2) |  |  | 417,457 |
President and Chief Operating Officer |  | 2019 |  |  | 400,000 |  |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  |  | 400,000 |
|  | 2018 |  |  | 400,000 |  |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  |  | 400,000 |
Thomas Seifert |  | 2020 |  |  | 650,000 |  |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  |  | 650,000 |
Chief Financial Officer |  | 2019 |  |  | 650,000 |  |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  |  | 650,000 |
|  | 2018 |  |  | 650,000 |  |  |  | — |  |  | 40,000 |  | (3) |  |  | 690,000 |
Douglas Kramer |  | 2020 |  |  | 550,000 |  |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  |  | 550,000 |
General Counsel and Secretary |  | 2019 |  |  | 550,000 |  | (4) |  |  | 2,636,500 |  |  | — |  |  |  | 3,186,500 |
|  | 2018 |  |  | 537,708 |  |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  |  | 537,708 |

_______________________
(1)The amounts reported represent the aggregate grant date fair value of the RSUs awarded under our 2010 Equity Incentive Plan (2010 Plan) to our named executive officers in the year ended December 31, 2019, calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Such grant date fair value does not take into account any estimated forfeitures related to service-vesting conditions. The assumptions used in calculating the grant date fair value of the RSUs reported in this column are set forth in the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in our 2019 Annual Report. These amounts do not necessarily correspond to the actual value recognized or that may be recognized by the executive officers.
(2)The amounts disclosed consist of costs related to personal security for Mr. Prince and Ms. Zatlyn and their families.
(3)The amount disclosed consists of $40,000 related to relocation assistance costs paid in 2018 related to Mr. Seifert’s joining us and relocating to San Francisco, California.
(4)Mr. Kramer's base salary was increased to $550,000, retroactively effective as of January 1, 2019.
40

Table of Contents
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal 2020 Year-End
The following table sets forth information regarding outstanding equity awards held by our named executive officers as of December 31, 2020:

|  | Option Awards(1) |  | Stock Awards
Name |  | Grant Date |  | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options |  |  | Option Exercise Price ($) |  | Option Expiration Date |  | Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#) |  |  |  | Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested($)(2)
Exercisable (#) |  |  |  | Unexercisable (#) |  |
Matthew Prince |  | 8/8/2017 |  | — |  |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 2,750,000 |  |  | (3)(4) |  | 208,972,500 |
Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Michelle Zatlyn |  | 8/8/2017 |  | 4,000,000 |  |  | (4) |  |  | — |  |  |  | 2.04 |  |  | 8/7/2027 |  | — |  |  |  |  | — |
President and Chief Operating Officer |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Thomas Seifert |  | 6/30/2017 |  | 934,058 |  |  | (5) |  |  | — |  |  |  | 1.95 |  |  | 6/29/2027 |  | — |  |  |  |  | — |
Chief Financial Officer |  | 7/26/2017 |  | 1,146,283 |  |  | (4) |  |  |  |  |  | 2.04 |  |  | 7/25/2027 |  | — |  |  |  |  | — |
Douglas Kramer |  | 7/26/2017 |  | 175,000 |  |  | (4) |  |  | — |  |  |  | 2.04 |  |  | 7/25/2027 |  | 65,625 |  |  | (3)(4) |  | 4,986,844 |
General Counsel and Secretary |  | 2/25/2019 |  | — |  |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 56,250 |  |  | (6) |  |  | 4,274,438 |
|  | 8/30/2019 |  | — |  |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 103,125 |  |  | (7) |  |  | 7,836,469 |

_______________________
(1)Each stock option was granted pursuant to our 2010 Plan, and is immediately exercisable, except as otherwise noted below. To the extent a named executive officer exercises his or her option prior to vesting, the shares of our common stock that he or she will receive will remain subject to the same vesting schedule and subject to the company's right of repurchase.
(2)The market value was calculated using the closing market price of a share of our Class A common stock as of December 31, 2020, which was $75.99.
(3)The shares of Class B common stock were acquired pursuant to an early exercise provision and remain subject to our repurchase right in accordance with the vesting schedule of the stock option. This award is subject to vesting acceleration under certain circumstances pursuant to the terms of the stock option agreement, as described in the section titled "Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control" below.
(4)The shares of Class B common stock underlying this stock option vest in 48 equal monthly installments following September 13, 2019, subject to continued service to us through each such date.
(5)The shares of Class B common stock underlying this stock option vested as to 1/4th of the total shares on June 1, 2018 and the remaining shares vest in 36 equal monthly installments thereafter, subject to continued service to us through each such date. This award is subject to vesting acceleration under certain circumstances pursuant to the terms of the stock option agreement, as described in the section titled "Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control" below.
(6)The shares of Class B common stock underlying the RSUs vest in 16 quarterly installments following February 15, 2019, subject to continued service to us through each such date. This award is subject to vesting acceleration under certain circumstances pursuant to the terms of the RSU agreement, as described in the section titled "Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control" below.
(7)The shares of Class B common stock underlying the RSUs vest in 16 quarterly installments following August 15, 2019, subject to continued service to us through each such date. This award is subject to vesting acceleration under certain circumstances pursuant to the terms of the RSU agreement, as described in the section titled "Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control" below.
41

Table of Contents
Option Exercises and Stock Vested in 2020
The following table presents, for each of the named executive officers, the number of shares of our common stock acquired upon the exercise of stock options and the vesting and settlement of RSUs during 2020 and the aggregate value realized upon the exercise of stock options and the vesting and settlement of RSUs:

|  | Option Awards |  | Stock Awards |
Name |  | Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#) |  | Value Realized on Exercise ($)(1) |  | Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#) |  | Value Realized on Vesting ($)(2) |
Matthew Prince |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |
Michelle Zatlyn |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |
Thomas Seifert |  | 300,000 |  |  | 10,459,350 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |
Douglas Kramer |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 90,625 |  |  | 2,824,375 |  |

_______________________
(1)The aggregate value realized is calculated by multiplying (i) the number of shares of common stock acquired upon exercise by (ii) the difference between the closing price of our Class A common stock on the date of exercise, as reported by the NYSE, and the applicable exercise price of the option, and does not represent actual amounts received by our named executive officers as a result of the option exercises.
(2)The aggregate value realized is calculated by multiplying (i) the number of shares of common stock acquired upon vesting of RSUs by (ii) the closing price of our Class A common stock on the vest date (or, in the event the vest date occurs on a holiday or weekend, the closing price of our Class A common stock on the immediately preceding trading day), as reported by the NYSE.
42

Table of Contents
Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control
Prior to August 2019, we did not have a formal plan with respect to severance benefits payable to our named executive officers and other key employees. From time to time, we granted equity awards to certain key employees, including our named executive officers, that provided for accelerated vesting of equity awards under certain circumstances. Specifically, the vesting of each equity award granted to our named executive officers before the effectiveness of our Severance Policy (as defined and described below) (each, a Pre-Severance Policy Equity Agreement) will accelerate in full if, in connection with or following a “change in control” (as defined in the 2010 Plan), the named executive officer’s continuous service with us is terminated by us without “cause” (as defined in the 2010 Plan) or by the named executive officer due to “constructive termination” (as defined in the applicable equity award agreement).
In August 2019, our Board of Directors approved change in control and severance benefits for our current named executive officers and certain other key employees (collectively, participants) pursuant to a Change in Control and Severance Policy (the Severance Policy).
The Severance Policy provides that if we terminate a named executive officer’s employment outside of the period beginning three months prior to and ending 12 months after a “change in control” (as defined in the Severance Policy) (such period, the change in control period) other than for “cause” (as generally defined within the named executive officer’s participation agreement), and other than due to death or disability, the named executive officer will receive:
•a lump sum payment equal to six months of base salary; and
•a lump sum payment equal to 12 months of COBRA continuation coverage premiums.
The following table describes the potential payments that would have been provided to each of our named executive officers pursuant to the Severance Policy in the event that they were involuntarily terminated as described above outside of a change in control period, assuming such termination occurred on December 31, 2020:

Named Executive Officer |  | Cash Compensation($) |  | Health Benefits($) |  | Total($)
Matthew Prince |  | 200,000 |  |  | 18,826 |  |  | 218,826
Michelle Zatlyn |  | 200,000 |  |  | 29,157 |  |  | 229,157
Thomas Seifert |  | 325,000 |  |  | 29,847 |  |  | 354,847
Douglas Kramer |  | 275,000 |  |  | 29,847 |  |  | 304,847

The Severance Policy provides that if a named executive officer’s employment is terminated during the change in control period either by us other than for cause, and other than due to death or disability, or by the named executive officer due to a “constructive termination” (as generally defined within the executive officer’s participation agreement), the named executive officer will receive:
•a lump sum payment equal to 12 months of base salary;
•a lump sum equal to a prorated target annual bonus for the year of termination;
•100% acceleration of unvested time-based equity awards granted on or after the effective date of the Severance Policy; and
•a lump sum payment equal to 12 months of COBRA continuation coverage premiums.
In addition, our equity incentive plans contain certain provisions related to a change in control that could impact awards held by our named executive officers. Our 2019 Plan provides that in the event of a merger or “change in control,” as defined under the 2019 Plan, each outstanding award will be treated as the administrator determines, except that if a successor corporation does not continue an outstanding award (or some portion of such award), then such award will fully vest, all restrictions on such award will lapse, all performance goals or other vesting criteria applicable to such award will be deemed achieved at 100% of target levels, and such award will become fully exercisable, if applicable, for a specified period prior to the transaction. The award will then terminate upon the expiration of the specified period of time. No equity awards were granted to our named executive officers under the 2019 Plan as of December 31, 2020.
Our 2010 Plan provides that, in the event of certain specified significant corporate transactions, each outstanding award each outstanding award will be treated as the administrator determines, unless otherwise provided in an award agreement or other
43

Table of Contents
written agreement between us and the award holder. Unless otherwise provided in an award agreement, if a 2010 Plan award is not assumed, continued or substituted for, the award will not vest and will terminate prior to the effective time of the transaction, but for awards held by individuals who have not terminated service with us prior to the corporate transaction, any reacquisition or repurchase rights held by us will lapse, contingent on the effectiveness of such transaction.
The following table describes the potential payments that would have been provided to each of our named executive officers in the event that, during a change in control period or, with respect to the equity acceleration, in connection with or following a change in control, they were involuntarily terminated as described above, assuming such termination occurred on December 31, 2020:

Named Executive Officer |  | Cash Compensation($) |  | Health Benefits($) |  | Equity Acceleration($)(1) |  | Total($)
Matthew Prince |  | 400,000 |  |  | 18,826 |  |  | 208,972,500 |  |  | 209,391,326
Michelle Zatlyn |  | 400,000 |  |  | 29,157 |  |  | 203,362,500 |  |  | 203,791,657
Thomas Seifert |  | 650,000 |  |  | 29,847 |  |  | 86,915,359 |  |  | 87,595,206
Douglas Kramer |  | 550,000 |  |  | 29,847 |  |  | 30,138,999 |  |  | 30,718,846

______________________
(1)For each named executive officer, the estimated benefit amount of unvested RSUs and unvested shares issued pursuant to the early exercise of stock options was calculated by multiplying the number of unvested RSUs or shares by the closing price of our Class A common stock on December 31, 2020, which was $75.99. The estimated benefit amount of unvested stock options was calculated by multiplying the number of unvested stock options subject to acceleration held by the applicable named executive officer by the difference between the exercise price of the option and the closing price of our Class A common stock on December 31, 2020, which was $75.99. This vesting acceleration is calculated pursuant to the named executive officer’s Pre-Severance Policy Equity Agreement and not pursuant to the Severance Policy.
The Severance Policy provides that if we discover after a participant’s receipt of payments or benefits under the Severance Policy that grounds for the termination of the participant’s employment for cause existed, then the participant will not receive any further payments or benefits under the Severance Policy and, to the extent permitted under applicable laws, will be required to repay to us any payments or benefits he or she received under the Severance Policy (and any financial gain derived from such payments or benefits).
In addition, the Severance Policy provides that if any payments or benefits received by a participant under the Severance Policy or otherwise would constitute “parachute payments” within the meaning of Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code (the Code) and be subject to excise taxes imposed by Section 4999 of the Code, such amount will either be delivered in full or reduced so as not to be subject to excise taxation, whichever amount results in a greater amount received by the participant on an after-tax basis. The Severance Policy does not require us to provide any tax gross-ups.
To receive the severance described above under the Severance Policy, the participant must sign and not revoke our then-standard separation agreement and release of claims within the timeframe that is set forth in the Severance Policy.
44

Table of Contents
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
The following table summarizes our equity compensation plan information as of December 31, 2020. Information is included for equity compensation plans approved by our stockholders. All of our equity compensation plans have been approved by our stockholders.

Plan Category |  | Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights |  | Weighted Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights(1) |  | Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in the first Column) |
Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders |  |  |  |  |  |  |
2010 Equity Incentive Plan(2) |  | 19,678,808 |  |  | $2.45 |  |  | — |  |
2019 Equity Incentive Plan(3) |  | 6,314,912 |  |  | $18.05 |  |  | 24,538,422 |  |
2019 Employee Stock Purchase Plan(4) |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 5,230,059 |  |
Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |
Total |  | 25,993,720 |  |  | $3.92 |  |  | 29,768,481 |  |

_______________________
(1)RSUs, which do not have an exercise price, are excluded in the calculation of weighted-average exercise price.
(2)As a result of our IPO and the adoption of the 2019 Plan, we no longer grant awards under the 2010 Plan; however, all outstanding awards under the 2010 Plan remain subject to the terms of the 2010 Plan. The number of shares underlying stock options or RSUs granted under the 2010 Plan that expire or terminate or are forfeited or repurchased by the company under the 2010 Plan, tendered to or withheld by the company for payment of an exercise price or for tax withholding, or repurchased by the company due to failure to vest will be automatically added to the shares of Class A common stock available for issuance under the 2019 Plan.
(3)Our 2019 Plan provides that the number of shares of Class A common stock available for issuance under the 2019 Plan will automatically increase on the first day of each fiscal year beginning with the 2021 fiscal year, in an amount equal to the least of (i) 29,335,000 shares, (ii) five percent (5%) of the outstanding shares of all classes of common stock of the company on the last day of the immediately preceding fiscal year, or (iii) such other amount as the compensation committee of the Board of Directors may determine.
(4)Our 2019 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP) provides that the number of shares of Class A common stock available for issuance under the ESPP will automatically increase on the first day of each fiscal year beginning with the 2021 fiscal year, in an amount equal to the least of (i) 5,870,000 shares, (ii) one percent (1%) of the outstanding shares of all classes of common stock of the company on the last day of the immediately preceding fiscal year, or (iii) such other amount as the compensation committee of the Board of Directors may determine.
45

Table of Contents
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF
CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our capital stock as of March 31, 2021 for:
•each of our named executive officers;
•each of our directors;
•all of our executive officers and directors as a group; and
•each person known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the outstanding shares of our Class A common stock and Class B common stock.
We have determined beneficial ownership in accordance with the rules of the SEC, and thus it represents sole or shared voting or investment power with respect to our securities. Unless otherwise indicated below, to our knowledge, the persons and entities named in the table have sole voting and sole investment power with respect to all shares that they beneficially owned, subject to community property laws where applicable.
We have based our calculation of percentage of beneficial ownership on 255,957,376 shares of our Class A common stock and 54,566,838 shares of our Class B common stock outstanding on March 31, 2021. We have deemed shares of our capital stock subject to stock options that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2021 or issuable pursuant to RSUs which are subject to vesting and settlement conditions expected to occur within 60 days of March 31, 2021 to be outstanding and to be beneficially owned by the person holding the stock option or RSU for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of that person. We did not deem these shares outstanding, however, for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person.
Unless otherwise indicated, the address of each beneficial owner listed in the table below is c/o Cloudflare, Inc., 101 Townsend Street, San Francisco, California 94107. The information provided in the table is based on our records, information filed with the SEC and information provided to us, except where otherwise noted.

| Shares Beneficially Owned |  |
| Class A |  | Class B |  | Total Voting %†
| Shares |  | % |  | Shares |  | % |  |
Named Executive Officers and Directors: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Matthew Prince(1) | — |  | * |  | 35,666,438 |  | 65.4 | % |  | 44.5 | %
Michelle Zatlyn(2) | — |  | * |  | 12,718,044 |  | 21.7% |  | 10.9 | %
Thomas Seifert(3) | — |  | * |  | 2,412,566 |  | 4.3% |  | *
Douglas Kramer(4) | 1,305 |  | * |  | 527,669 |  | 1.0 | % |  | *
Mark Anderson(5) | — |  | * |  | 49,875 |  | * |  | *
Maria Eitel(6) | — |  | * |  | 121,250 |  | * |  | *
Carl Ledbetter(7) | 2,369,549 |  | * |  | — |  | * |  | *
Stanley Meresman(8) | — |  | * |  | 128,000 |  | * |  | *
Scott Sandell(9) | 3,115,678 |  | 1.2 | % |  | 7,107,888 |  | 13.0 | % |  | 9.3 | %
Katrin Suder(10) | — |  | * |  | 39,500 |  | * |  | *
All executive officers and directors as a group (10 persons)(11) | 5,486,532 |  | 2.1 | % |  | 58,771,230 |  | 96.7 | % |  | 66.2 | %
Greater than 5% Stockholders: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Entities affiliated with NEA(12) | 2,763,583 |  | 1.1 | % |  | 7,107,888 |  | 13.0 | % |  | 9.2 | %
FMR LLC(13) | 30,316,791 |  | 11.8 | % |  | — |  | * |  | 3.8 | %
Baillie Gifford & Co(14) | 29,862,238 |  | 11.7 | % |  | — |  | * |  | 3.7 | %
The Vanguard Group(15) | 17,217,175 |  | 6.7 | % |  | — |  | * |  | 2.1 | %
Entities affiliated with Venrock(16) | 14,797,936 |  | 5.8 | % |  | — |  | * |  | 1.8 | %

______________________
* Represents less than one percent (1%).
46

Table of Contents
† Percentage of total voting power represents voting power with respect to all shares of our Class A common stock and Class B common stock, as a single class. Each holder of our Class A common stock is entitled to one vote per share, and each holder of our Class B common stock is entitled to 10 votes per share on all matters submitted to our stockholders for a vote. The Class A common stock and Class B common stock vote together as a single class on all matters submitted to a vote of our stockholders, except as may otherwise be required by our amended and restated certificate of incorporation or by law.
(1)Includes (i) 27,323,606 shares of Class B common stock held of record by The Matthew Prince Revocable Trust dated October 29, 2015, for which Mr. Prince serves as a trustee, and of which 2,500,000 may be repurchased by us at the original exercise price; (ii) 2,787,450 shares of Class B common stock held of record by The Matthew Prince 2019 Annuity Trust dated May 22, 2019, for which Mr. Prince serves as co-trustee and investment advisor; (iii) 3,942,717 shares of Class B common stock held of record by The Prince Family Nonexempt Irrevocable Trust dated March 29, 2016, for which Mr. Prince serves as an investment advisor; (iv) 1,060,000 shares of Class B common stock held of record by The Prince Family Exempt Irrevocable Trust dated March 29, 2016, for which Mr. Prince serves as an investment advisor; and (v) 552,665 shares of Class B common stock held of record by The Matthew Prince 2020 Annuity Trust dated May 20, 2020, for which Mr. Prince serves as co-trustee and investment advisor.
(2)Includes (i) 6,592,817 shares of Class B common stock held of record by The Sutherland/Zatlyn Revocable Trust dated November 17, 2016, for which Ms. Zatlyn serves as co-trustee; (ii) 1,150,210 shares of Class B common stock held of record by The Sutherland/Zatlyn Irrevocable Remainder Trust dated December 15, 2017, for which Ms. Zatlyn serves as co-trustee; (iii) 680,742 shares of Class B common stock held of record by The Sutherland/Zatlyn 2019 Annuity Trust dated February 28, 2019, for which Ms. Zatlyn serves as co-trustee; (iv) 294,275 shares of Class B common stock held of record by SZ 2020 Irrevocable Trust dated November 25, 2020, for which Ms. Zatlyn serves as an investment advisor; and (v) 4,000,000 shares of Class B common stock subject to options exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2021, of which 1,666,666 shares are fully vested.
(3)Includes (i) 283,925 shares of Class B common stock held of record by Mr. Seifert; (ii) 76,100 shares of Class B common stock held of record by Center Court 2020 Trust 1 dated December 11, 2020, for which Mr. Seifert serves as trustee; (iii) 76,100 shares of Class B common stock held of record by Center Court 2020 Trust 2 dated December 11, 2020, for which Mr. Seifert serves as trustee; (iv) 76,100 shares of Class B common stock held of record by Center Court 2020 Trust 3 dated December 11, 2020, for which Mr. Seifert serves as trustee; and (v) 1,900,341 shares of Class B common stock subject to options exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2021, of which 1,026,544 shares are fully vested.
(4)Includes (i) 1,305 shares of Class A common stock and 337,044 shares of Class B common stock held of record by Mr. Kramer, of whic h 43,750 shares may be repurchased by us at the original exercise price; (ii) 175,000 shares of Class B common stock subject to options exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2021, none of which are fully vested; and (iii) 15,625 shares of Class B common stock issuable upon the vesting of RSUs within 60 days of March 31, 2021.
(5)Includes (i) 42,750 shares of Class B common stock held of record by Mr. Anderson and (ii) 7,125 shares of Class B common stock issuable upon the vesting of RSUs within 60 days of March 31, 2021.
(6)Includes (i) 120,000 shares of Class B common stock held of record by Ms. Eitel, of which 48,125 shares may be repurchased by us at the original exercise price, and (ii) 1,250 shares of Class B common stock issuable upon the vesting of RSUs within 60 days of March 31, 2021.
(7)Includes 2,369,549 shares of Class A common stock held of record by the Carl S. Ledbetter Trust dated February 14, 2020, for which Dr. Ledbetter serves as trustee.
(8)Includes 128,000 shares of Class B common stock subject to options exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2021, of whic h 51,000 are fully vested.
(9)Includes (i) 352,095 shares of Class A common stock held of record by the Blue Mountain Trust, dated April 29, 2019, for which Mr. Sandell serves as trustee, and (ii) 2,763,583 shares of Class A common stock and 7,107,888 shares of Class B common stock disclosed in footnote (12) below that are held of record by New Enterprise Associates 13, L.P. (NEA 13).
(10)Includes (i) 32,000 shares of Class B common stock held of record by Dr. Suder and (ii) 7,500 shares of Class B common stock issuable upon the vesting of RSUs within 60 days of March 31, 2021.
(11)Includes (i) 5,486,532 shares of Class A common stock and 52,536,389 shares of Class B common stock beneficially owned by our executive officers and directors; (ii) 6,203,341 shares of Class B common stock subject to options exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2021 and held by our executive officers and directors, of which 2,744,210
47

Table of Contents
shares are fully vested; and (iii) 31,500 shares of Class B common stock issuable upon the vesting of RSUs within 60 days of March 31, 2021.
(12)According to a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 12, 2021 reporting stock ownership as of December 31, 2020 and a Form 4 filed with the SEC on February 25, 2021, consists of 2,763,583 shares of Class A common stock and 7,107,888 shares of Class B common stock held of record by NEA 13. As the sole general partner of NEA 13, NEA Partners 13, L.P. (NEA Partners 13) may be deemed to beneficially own the shares. As the sole general partner of NEA Partners 13, NEA 13 GP, LTD (NEA 13 GP) likewise may be deemed to beneficially own the shares. As the individual directors of NEA 13 GP, each of Forest Baskett, Patrick J. Kerins, and Scott Sandell, one of our directors, may also be deemed to beneficially own the shares. The address for these entities is c/o New Enterprise Associates, 1954 Greenspring Drive, Suite 600, Timonium, Maryland 21093.
(13)According to a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 8, 2021 reporting stock ownership as of December 31, 2020, consists of 30,316,791 shares of Class A common stock held of record by FMR LLC, certain of its subsidiaries and affiliates, and other companies and over which shares FMR LLC has sole dispositive power. FMR LLC has so le voting power with respect to 8,290,061 of such shares. Abigail P. Johnson is a Director, the Chairman, and the Chief Executive Officer of FMR LLC. Members of the Johnson family, including Abigail P. Johnson, are the predominant owners, directly or through trusts, of Series B voting common shares of FMR LLC, representing 49% of the voting power of FMR LLC. The Johnson family group and all other Series B stockholders have entered into a stockholders’ voting agreement under which all Series B voting common shares will be voted in accordance with the majority vote of Series B voting common shares. Accordingly, through their ownership of voting common shares and the execution of the stockholders’ voting agreement, members of the Johnson family may be deemed, under the Investment Company Act of 1940, to form a controlling group with respect to FMR LLC. Neither FMR LLC nor Ms. Johnson has the sole power to vote or direct the voting of the shares owned directly by the various investment companies registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the Fidelity Funds), advised by Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC (FMR Co), a wholly owned subsidiary of FMR LLC, which power resides in the Fidelity Funds’ Boards of Trustees. FMR Co carries out the voting of the shares under written guidelines established by the Fidelity Funds’ Boards of Trustees. The address for FMR LLC is 245 Summer Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02210.
(14)According to a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on January 7, 2021 reporting stock ownership as of December 31, 2020, consists of 29,862,238 shares of Class A common stock held of record by Baillie Gifford & Co (Baillie Gifford) and/or one or more of its investment adviser subsidiaries, which may include Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited, on behalf of investment advisor clients, which may include investment companies registered under the Investment Company Act, employee benefit plans, pension funds, or other institutional clients. Of the shares of Class A common stock beneficially owned, Baillie Gifford reported that it had sole voting power with respect to 19,552,857 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 29,862,238 shares. The address for Baillie Gifford is Calton Square, 1 Greenside Row, Edinburgh EH1 3AN, Scotland, United Kingdom.
(15)According to a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 10, 2021 reporting stock ownership as of December 31, 2020, consists of 17,217,175 shares of Class A common stock held of record by The Vanguard Group - 23-1945930 (The Vanguard Group). Of the shares of Class A common stock beneficially owned, The Vanguard Group reported that it had shared voting power with respect to 143,139 shares, shared dispositive power with respect to 267,645 shares, and sole dispositive power with respect to 16,949,530 shares. The address for The Vanguard Group is 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355.
(16)According to a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 16, 2021 reporting stock ownership as of December 31, 2020, consists of (i) 13,352,187 shares of Class A common stock held of record by Venrock Associates V, L.P. (VA5) and for which Venrock Management V, LLC serves as the general partner (VM5); (ii) 1,132,045 shares of Class A common stock held of record by Venrock Partners V, L.P. (VP5) and for which Venrock Partners Management V, LLC (VPM5) serves as the general partner; and (iii) 313,704 shares of Class A common stock held of record by Venrock Entrepreneurs Fund V, L.P. (VEF5) and for which VEF Management V, LLC serves as the general partner (VEFM5 and together with VA5, VP5, VEF5, VM5 and VPM5, the Venrock 5 Entities). The Venrock 5 Entities share voting and dispositive power with respect to all of the reported shares. The address for these entities is 3340 Hillview Avenue, Palo Alto, California 94304.
48

Table of Contents
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
In addition to the compensation arrangements, including employment, termination of employment, and change in control arrangements, discussed in the section titled "Executive Compensation," the following is a description of each transaction since the beginning of our last fiscal year and each currently proposed transaction in which:
•we have been or are to be a participant;
•the amount involved exceeded or exceeds $120,000; and
•any of our directors (including director nominees), executive officers, or holders of more than 5% of our outstanding capital stock, or any immediate family member of, or person sharing the household with, any of these individuals, had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.
Amended and Restated Investors' Rights Agreement
We are party to an Amended and Restated Investors’ Rights Agreement, dated as of September 4, 2018, which provides, among other things, registration rights to certain holders of our capital stock, including entities affiliated with each of Fidelity, NEA, and Venrock, which each beneficially owned more than 5% of our outstanding capital stock as of December 31, 2020. Mr. Sandell, a member of our Board of Directors, is affiliated with NEA.
Commercial Arrangements with Anaplan
In February 2020, we entered into a multi-year subscription agreement (the Subscription Agreement) with Anaplan, Inc. (Anaplan), of which Mr. Anderson served as chief growth officer from August 2019 until February 2020 and served as a consultant from February 2020 until October 2020. As a result, Mr. Anderson may have been deemed to have an indirect material interest in the arrangement with Anaplan. Pursuant to the Subscription Agreement, we have access to Anaplan's hosted software application. Our audit committee reviewed and approved entering into the Anaplan arrangement pursuant to our related person transactions policy. Subsequently, in March 2020, we entered into an enterprise subscription agreement (the Enterprise Agreement) with Anaplan, pursuant to which we provide certain infrastructure products. The Subscription Agreement provides for aggregate payments of $1.2 million over the initial term, and the Enterprise Agreement provides for aggregate payments of approximately $600,000 over the initial term.
Limitation of Liability and Indemnification of Officers and Directors
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation contains provisions that limit the liability of our directors for monetary damages to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law. Consequently, our directors will not be personally liable to us or our stockholders for monetary damages for any breach of fiduciary duties as directors, except liability for the following:
•any breach of their duty of loyalty to our company or our stockholders;
•any act or omission not in good faith or that involves intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law;
•unlawful payments of dividends or unlawful stock repurchases or redemptions as provided in Section 174 of the Delaware General Corporation Law; or
•any transaction from which they derived an improper personal benefit.
Any amendment to, or repeal of, these provisions will not eliminate or reduce the effect of these provisions in respect of any act, omission, or claim that occurred or arose prior to that amendment or repeal. If the Delaware General Corporation Law is amended to provide for further limitations on the personal liability of directors of corporations, then the personal liability of our directors will be further limited to the greatest extent permitted by the Delaware General Corporation Law.
In addition, our amended and restated bylaws provide that we will indemnify, to the fullest extent permitted by law, any person who is or was a party or is threatened to be made a party to any action, suit, or proceeding by reason of the fact that he or she is or was one of our directors or officers or is or was serving at our request as a director or officer of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust, or other enterprise. Our amended and restated bylaws provide that we may indemnify to the fullest extent permitted by law any person who is or was a party or is threatened to be made a party to any action, suit, or proceeding by reason of the fact that he or she is or was one of our employees or agents or is or was serving at our request as an employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust, or other enterprise. Our amended and restated bylaws also provide that we must advance expenses incurred by or on behalf of a director or officer in advance of the final disposition of any action or proceeding, subject to limited exceptions.
49

Table of Contents
Further, we have entered into indemnification agreements with each of our directors and executive officers that may be broader than the specific indemnification provisions contained in the Delaware General Corporation Law. These indemnification agreements require us, among other things, to indemnify our directors and executive officers against liabilities that may arise by reason of their status or service. These indemnification agreements also require us to advance all expenses incurred by the directors and executive officers in investigating or defending any such action, suit, or proceeding. We believe that these agreements are necessary to attract and retain qualified individuals to serve as directors and executive officers.
The limitation of liability and indemnification provisions that are included in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, amended and restated bylaws, and in indemnification agreements that we have entered into with our directors and executive officers may discourage stockholders from bringing a lawsuit against our directors and executive officers for breach of their fiduciary duties. They may also reduce the likelihood of derivative litigation against our directors and executive officers, even though an action, if successful, might benefit us and other stockholders. Further, a stockholder's investment may be adversely affected to the extent that we pay the costs of settlement and damage awards against directors and executive officers as required by these indemnification provisions. At present, we are not aware of any pending litigation or proceeding involving any person who is or was one of our directors, officers, employees, or other agents or is or was serving at our request as a director, officer, employee, or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust, or other enterprise, for which indemnification is sought, and we are not aware of any threatened litigation that may result in claims for indemnification.
We have obtained insurance policies under which, subject to the limitations of the policies, coverage is provided to our directors and executive officers against loss arising from claims made by reason of breach of fiduciary duty or other wrongful acts as a director or executive officer, including claims relating to public securities matters, and to us with respect to payments that may be made by us to these directors and executive officers pursuant to our indemnification obligations or otherwise as a matter of law.
Certain of our non-employee directors may, through their relationships with their employers, be insured and/or indemnified against certain liabilities incurred in their capacity as members of our Board of Directors.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers, or persons controlling our company pursuant to the foregoing provisions, we have been informed that, in the opinion of the SEC, such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is therefore unenforceable.
Policies and Procedures for Related Party Transactions
Our audit committee has the primary responsibility for reviewing and approving or disapproving “related party transactions,” which are transactions between us and related persons in which the aggregate amount involved exceeds or may be expected to exceed $120,000 and in which a related person has or will have a direct or indirect material interest. Our audit committee charter provides that our audit committee shall review and approve or disapprove any related party transactions.
We have adopted a formal written policy providing that our audit committee must approve or ratify any related party transaction. Our policy regarding transactions between us and related persons provides that a related person is defined as a director, executive officer, nominee for director, or greater than 5% beneficial owner of our common stock, in each case since the beginning of the most recently completed year, and any of their immediate family members. In approving or rejecting any such transaction, our audit committee is to consider the relevant facts and circumstances available and deemed relevant to our audit committee, including, but not limited to, whether the transaction is on terms no less favorable than terms generally available to an unaffiliated third party under the same or similar circumstances, whether such transaction would impair the independence of an outside director, and the extent of the related person’s interest in the transaction. Any member of the audit committee who has an interest in a potential related party transaction under discussion will abstain from voting on the approval of such transaction. If a related party transaction will be ongoing, the audit committee may establish guidelines for us to follow in our ongoing dealings with the related party.
50

Table of Contents
OTHER MATTERS
Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires that our executive officers and directors, and persons who own more than 10% of our common stock, file reports of ownership and changes of ownership with the SEC. Such directors, executive officers, and 10% stockholders are required by SEC regulation to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.
SEC regulations require us to identify in this Proxy Statement anyone who filed a required report late during the most recent fiscal year. Based solely on our review of copies of such forms that we have received, or written representations from reporting persons, we believe that during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, all Section 16(a) filing requirements were satisfied on a timely basis, with the exception of Dr. Ledbetter, who failed to timely report a distribution from Pelion Ventures of shares of our Class A common stock on April 20, 2020.
2020 Annual Report and SEC Filings
Our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020 are included in our 2020 Annual Report, which we will make available to stockholders at the same time as this Proxy Statement. Our 2020 Annual Report and this Proxy Statement are posted on our website at https://cloudflare.NET and are available from the SEC at its website at www.sec.gov. You may also obtain a copy of our 2020 Annual Report without charge by sending a written request to Cloudflare, Inc., Attention: Investor Relations, 101 Townsend Street, San Francisco, California 94107.
* * *
Our Board of Directors knows of no other matters that will be presented for consideration during the Annual Meeting. If any other matters are properly brought before the Annual Meeting, the persons appointed in the accompanying proxy intend to vote the shares represented thereby in accordance with their best judgment on such matters, under applicable laws.
It is important that your shares of our common stock be represented during the Annual Meeting, regardless of the number of shares that you hold. You are, therefore, urged to vote by telephone or by using the Internet as instructed on the enclosed proxy card or execute and return, at your earliest convenience, the enclosed proxy card in the envelope that has also been provided.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
San Francisco, California
April 21, 2021
51

Table of Contents

Table of Contents