v2.4.0.8
Financial Instruments and Fair Value
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2013
Financial Instruments and Fair Value [Abstract]  
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND FAIR VALUE
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND FAIR VALUE

The following table summarizes our investments ($ amounts in 000’s):
 
 
December 31, 2013
 
Amortized
Cost
 
Unrealized
Gains
 
Unrealized
Losses
 
Fair
Value
Corporate debt securities
603,185

 
1,506

 
(374
)
 
604,317

Commercial paper
69,356

 
7

 

 
69,363

Municipal bonds
38,815

 
48

 
(20
)
 
38,843

Certificates of deposit and term deposits
12,645

 
3

 

 
12,648

U.S. government and agency securities
2,000

 
1

 

 
2,001

Total available-for-sale securities
726,001

 
1,565

 
(394
)
 
727,172

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
December 31, 2012
 
Amortized
Cost
 
Unrealized
Gains
 
Unrealized
Losses
 
Fair
Value
Corporate debt securities
529,738

 
1,814

 
(161
)
 
531,391

Commercial paper
39,229

 
22

 
(6
)
 
39,245

Municipal bonds
36,787

 
83

 

 
36,870

Certificates of deposit and term deposits
9,099

 
6

 

 
9,105

Total available-for-sale securities
614,853

 
1,925

 
(167
)
 
616,611



The following table shows the gross unrealized losses and the related fair values of our investments that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position ($ amounts in 000’s):

 
December 31, 2013
 
Less Than 12 Months
 
12 Months or Greater
 
Total
 
Fair
Value
 
Unrealized
Losses
 
Fair
Value
 
Unrealized
Losses
 
Fair
Value
 
Unrealized
Losses
Corporate debt securities
182,795

 
(374
)
 
500

 

 
183,295

 
(374
)
Commercial paper
7,897

 

 

 

 
7,897

 

Municipal bonds
14,736

 
(20
)
 

 

 
14,736

 
(20
)
Total available-for-sale securities
205,428

 
(394
)
 
500

 

 
205,928

 
(394
)





The following table shows the gross unrealized losses and the related fair values of our investments that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position ($ amounts in 000’s):

 
December 31, 2012
 
Less Than 12 Months
 
12 Months or Greater
 
Total
 
Fair
Value
 
Unrealized
Losses
 
Fair
Value
 
Unrealized
Losses
 
Fair
Value
 
Unrealized
Losses
Corporate debt securities
133,006

 
(156
)
 
5,010

 
(5
)
 
138,016

 
(161
)
Commercial paper
8,464

 
(6
)
 

 

 
8,464

 
(6
)
Total available-for-sale securities
141,470

 
(162
)
 
5,010

 
(5
)
 
146,480

 
(167
)


The contractual maturities of our investments are as follows ($ amounts in 000’s)
 
 
December 31,
2013
 
December 31,
2012
Due within one year
375,497

 
290,719

Due within one to three years
351,675

 
325,892

Total
727,172

 
616,611



Available-for-sale securities are reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, included as a separate component of stockholders’ equity and in total comprehensive income. Realized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities are included in other expense, net in our consolidated statements of operations.

The unrealized losses on our available-for-sale securities were caused by fluctuations in market value and interest rates as a result of the economic environment. As the decline in market value are attributable to changes in market conditions and not credit quality, and because we have concluded currently that we neither intend to sell nor is it more likely than not that we will be required to sell these investments prior to a recovery of par value, we do not consider these investments to be other-than temporarily impaired as of December 31, 2013.

Realized gains and losses from the sale of available-for-sale securities were not significant in any period presented.
 
Fair Value Accounting—We apply the following fair value hierarchy for disclosure of the inputs used to measure fair value. This hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into three broad levels as follows:

Level 1—Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2—Inputs are quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or inputs that are observable for the assets or liabilities, either directly or indirectly through market corroboration, for substantially the full term of the financial instruments.

Level 3—Unobservable inputs based on our own assumptions used to measure assets and liabilities at fair value. The inputs require significant management judgment or estimation.

We measure the fair value of money market funds using quoted prices in active markets for identical assets. The fair value of all other financial instruments was based on quoted prices for similar asserts in active markets, or model driven valuations using significant inputs derived from or corroborated by observable market data.
 
We classify investments within Level 1 if quoted prices are available in active markets for identical securities.
 
We classify items within Level 2 if the investments are valued using model driven valuations using observable inputs such as quoted market prices, benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes or alternative pricing sources with reasonable levels of price transparency. Investments are held by custodians who obtain investment prices from a third-party pricing provider that incorporates standard inputs in various asset price models.

The following table presents the fair value of our financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 ($ amounts in 000’s):
 
 
December 31, 2013
 
 
 
December 31, 2012
 
 
 
Aggregate
Fair
Value
 
Quoted
Prices in
Active
Markets For
Identical
Assets
 
Significant
Other
Observable
Remaining
Inputs
 
Significant
Other
Unobservable
Remaining
Inputs
 
Aggregate
Fair
Value
 
Quoted
Prices in
Active
Markets For
Identical
Assets
 
Significant
Other
Observable
Remaining
Inputs
 
Significant
Other
Unobservable
Remaining
Inputs
 
 
 
(Level 1)
 
(Level 2)
 
(Level 3)
 
 
 
(Level 1)
 
(Level 2)
 
(Level 3)
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Corporate debt securities
604,317

 

 
604,317

 

 
531,391

 

 
531,391

 

Commercial paper
71,363

 

 
71,363

 

 
41,994

 

 
41,994

 

Municipal bonds
38,843

 

 
38,843

 

 
36,870

 

 
36,870

 

Certificates of deposit and term deposits
12,648

 

 
12,648

 

 
9,105

 

 
9,105

 

Money market funds
5,724

 
5,724

 

 

 
39,871

 
39,871

 

 

U.S. government and agency securities
2,001

 

 
2,001

 

 

 

 

 

Total
734,896

 
5,724

 
729,172

 

 
659,231

 
39,871

 
619,360

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Contingent consideration
1,850

 

 

 
1,850

 

 

 

 

Total
1,850

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Reported as:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash equivalents
7,724

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
42,620

 
 
 
 
 
 
Short-term investments
375,497

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
290,719

 
 
 
 
 
 
Long-term investments
351,675

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
325,892

 
 
 
 
 
 
Total
734,896

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
659,231

 
 
 
 
 
 


The fair value of contingent consideration arising from the acquisition of Coyote Point Systems (see Note 6), is classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy since it is based on a probability-based approach that includes significant unobservable inputs. The significant unobservable inputs include projected revenues and the percentage probability of occurrence to value the payment. A significant increase (decrease) in the projected revenue in isolation could result in a significantly higher (lower) fair value measurement and significant increase (decrease) in the probability of occurrence between the outcomes in isolation could result in a significantly higher (lower) fair value measurement. The fair value of the contingent consideration is calculated on a quarterly basis by management based on a collaborative effort of our operations and finance and accounting groups. Potential valuation adjustments are made as additional information becomes available, including the progress toward achieving revenue targets as compared to initial projections, the impact of market competition, and changes in actual and projected product mix and average selling price, with the impact of such adjustments being recorded in the earnings of that period.

There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy during the year ended December 31, 2013 or December 31, 2012.



The following table presents quantitative information about the inputs and valuation methodologies used for our fair value measurements classified in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy as of December 31, 2013 ($ amounts in 000’s):

 
December 31, 2013
 
Fair
Value
 
Valuation Technique
 
Significant Unobservable Input
 
 Range
Contingent consideration
$1,850
 
Probability Weighted Income Approach
 
Revenue (in 000's)
 
$7,000 - $12,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Probability of occurrence (%)
 
40%-80%