XML 42 R30.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.21.2
Litigations
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2021
Litigations  
Litigations

23.

Litigations

a) Provision for legal proceedings

The Company has considered all information available to assess the likelihood of an outflow of resources and in the preparation on the estimate of the costs that may be required to settle the obligations. The main litigations refer to:

Tax litigations - Mainly refers to the lawsuit filed in 2011 by Valepar (merged by Vale) seeking the right to exclude the amount of dividends received in the form of interest on stockholders’ equity (“JCP”) from the PIS and COFINS tax base. The amount reserved for this proceeding as at June 30, 2021 is US$442 (US$423 as at December 31,2020). This proceeding is guaranteed by a judicial deposit in the amount of US$509 recorded at June 30, 2021 (US$487 as at December 31,2020).

Civil litigations - Refers to lawsuits for: (i) indemnities for losses, payments and contractual fines due to contractual imbalance or non-compliance that are alleged by suppliers, and (ii) land claims referring to real estate Vale's operational activities.

Labor litigations - Refers to lawsuits for individual claims by in-house employees and service providers, primarily involving demands for additional compensation for overtime work, moral damages or health and safety conditions.

Environmental litigations - Refers mainly to proceedings for environmental damages and issues related to environmental licensing.

    

    

    

    

Environmental

    

Total of

    

Tax litigation

    

Civil litigation

    

Labor litigation

    

litigation

    

litigation provision

Balance at December 31, 2020

485

260

335

11

1,091

Additions and reversals, net

 

(2)

(1)

46

1

44

Payments

 

(15)

(29)

(4)

(48)

Indexation and interest

 

3

10

23

36

Translation adjustment

 

19

11

17

47

Acquisition of NLC (note 12)

1

5

6

Balance at June 30, 2021

505

266

397

8

1,176

Current liabilities

9

17

76

102

Non-current liabilities

496

249

321

8

1,074

505

266

397

8

1,176

    

    

    

    

Environmental

    

Total of

Tax litigation

    

Civil litigation

Labor litigation

litigation

litigation provision

Balance at December 31, 2019

 

696

 

300

 

455

 

11

 

1,462

Additions and reversals, net

 

19

 

28

 

14

 

2

 

63

Payments

 

(10)

 

(11)

 

(34)

 

 

(55)

Indexation and interest

 

13

 

16

 

13

 

 

42

Translation adjustment

 

(168)

 

(77)

 

(120)

 

(3)

 

(368)

Balance at June 30, 2020

 

550

 

256

 

328

 

10

 

1,144

Current liabilities

7

14

63

84

Non-current liabilities

543

242

265

10

1,060

550

256

328

10

1,144

b) Contingent liabilities

The main contingent liabilities, updated by applicable interest rates, for which the likelihood of loss is not considered remote are presented by nature as follows:

    

June 30, 2021

    

December 31, 2020

Tax litigations

8,166

6,911

Civil litigations

1,644

1,348

Labor litigations

572

563

Environmental litigations

1,006

907

Total

11,388

9,729

The contingent liabilities related to the Brumadinho event and Samarco are not presented above. Further information is presented in notes 20 and 21.

As reported in the annual financial statements for 2020, the Company is party in several actions and the main updates on contingent liabilities since then, are discussed as follows:

(b.i) Assessments regarding the disallowance of JCP:

In February 2021 Vale was assessed for collection of corporate income tax (IRPJ, CSLL) and penalties regarding the disallowance of the JCP expenses deducted from the 2017 taxable income, in the amount of US$685 (R$3,426 million). There was also a reduction in tax losses, with the corresponding tax impact of US$140 (R$698 million) in June 30,2021. The Company had filed an administrative appeal and a decision is pending. As at June 30,2021, the likelihood of loss is possible.

(b.ii) Proceeding related to income tax paid abroad:

In March 2021, Vale was assessed for the collection of US$434 (R$2,171 million) due to the disregard of taxes paid abroad that were offset by the IRPJ debt in 2016. Tax authorities allege the Company has failed to comply with the applicable rules relating to the offset, in Brazil, of income taxes paid abroad. The Company had filed an administrative appeal and a decision is pending. As at June 30, 2021, the likelihood of loss is possible.

c)

Judicial deposits

    

June 30, 2021

    

December 31, 2020

Tax litigations

1,052

988

Civil litigations

83

85

Labor litigations

168

177

Environmental litigations

23

18

Total

1,326

1,268

d) Guarantees contracted for legal proceedings

In addition to the above-mentioned tax, civil, labor and environmental judicial deposits, the Company contracted US$2.4 billion (R$11.8 billion) in guarantees for its lawsuits.

e) ICMS included in PIS and COFINS computation tax base

Vale has been discussing the issue regarding the exclusion of ICMS in PIS and COFINS tax basis in two judicial proceedings filed before March 2017. In one of the proceedings includes refers to the taxable events from March 2012 onwards and has a definitive favorable decision (res judicata). This proceeding gave rise to the recognition of a gain in the amount of US$63 (R$ 313 million) in the income statement for the year ended December 31, 2020. This amount was calculated based on the thesis that the collected ICMS was supposed to be excluded from the contribution basis. With the definition of the subject by Federal Supreme Court in the leading case (RE 574.706), which is binding to all taxpayers and has determined that the ICMS amount to be excluded shall be the amount stated in the invoices, the Company recognized an additional gain of US$29 (R$146 million) for the three-month period ended June 30, 2021.

The other proceeding, which covers the taxable events occurred between December 2001 and February 2012, resulted in a gain of US$162 (R$808 million) for the three-month period ended June 30, 2021, due to the favorable decision to the Company, which is consistent to the recent decision of the Federal Supreme Court on the leading case with wider repercussion to all taxpayers.