XML 36 R13.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT
v3.21.2

Early Plant Retirements/Asset Dispositions Early Plant Retirements/Asset Dispositions | 6 Months Ended
--- | ---
Jun. 30, 2021
Early Plant Retirements/Asset Dispositions [Line Items] |
Early Plant Retirements/Asset Dispositions | Early Plant Retirements/Asset Dispositions and Impairments Nuclear In April 2019, PSEG Power’s Salem 1, Salem 2 and Hope Creek nuclear plants were awarded ZECs by the BPU. Pursuant to a process established by the BPU, ZECs are purchased from selected nuclear plants and recovered through a non-bypassable distribution charge in the amount of $0.004 per kilowatt-hour (KWh) used (which is equivalent to approximately $10 per megawatt hour (MWh) generated in payments to selected nuclear plants (ZEC payment)). Each nuclear plant is expected to receive ZEC revenue for approximately three years, through May 2022. In April 2021, PSEG Power’s Salem 1, Salem 2 and Hope Creek nuclear plants were awarded ZECs for the three-year eligibility period starting June 2022 at the same approximate $10 per MWh received during the current ZEC period through May 2022 referenced above. As a result, each nuclear plant is expected to receive ZEC revenue for an additional three years starting June 2022. The terms and conditions of this April 2021 ZEC award are the same as the current ZEC period as discussed above. The award of ZECs attaches certain obligations, including an obligation to repay the ZECs in the event that a plant ceases operations during the period that it was awarded ZECs, subject to certain exceptions specified in the ZEC legislation. PSEG Power has and will continue to recognize revenue monthly as the nuclear plants generate electricity and satisfy their performance obligations. Further, the ZEC payment may be adjusted by the BPU at any time to offset environmental or fuel diversity payments that a selected nuclear plant may receive from another source. For instance, the New Jersey Division of Rate Counsel (New Jersey Rate Counsel), in written comments filed with the BPU, has advocated for the BPU to offset market benefits resulting from New Jersey’s rejoining the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative from the ZEC payment. PSEG intends to vigorously defend against these arguments. Due to its preliminary nature, PSEG cannot predict the outcome of this matter. The BPU’s April 2019 decision awarding ZECs through May 2022 and April 2021 decision awarding ZECs through May 2025 have been appealed by the New Jersey Rate Counsel (Rate Counsel). In May 2021, Rate Counsel filed an appeal with the New Jersey Appellate Division of the BPU’s April 2021 decision. In July 2021, the New Jersey Supreme Court denied the Rate Counsel’s petition for further appellate review of the BPU’s April 2019 decision. PSEG cannot predict the outcome of these matters. In the event that (i) the ZEC program is overturned or is otherwise materially adversely modified through legal process; or (ii) any of the Salem 1, Salem 2 and Hope Creek plants is not sufficiently valued for its environmental, fuel diversity or resilience attributes in future periods and does not otherwise experience a material financial change that would remove the need for such attributes to be sufficiently valued, PSEG Power will take all necessary steps to cease to operate all of these plants. Alternatively, even with sufficient valuation of these attributes, if the financial condition of the plants is materially adversely impacted by changes in commodity prices, FERC’s changes to the capacity market construct (absent sufficient capacity revenues provided under a program approved by the BPU in accordance with a FERC-authorized capacity mechanism), or, in the case of the Salem nuclear plants, decisions by the EPA and state environmental regulators regarding the implementation of Section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act (CWA) and related state regulations, or other factors, PSEG Power will take all necessary steps to cease to operate all of these plants. Ceasing operations of these plants would result in a material adverse impact on PSEG’s and PSEG Power’s results of operations. Non-Nuclear In July 2020, PSEG announced that it is exploring strategic alternatives for PSEG Power’s non-nuclear generating fleet, which includes more than 6,750 MW of fossil generation located in New Jersey, Connecticut, New York and Maryland and, prior to the sale of Solar Source, included 467 MW Solar Source portfolio located in various states. PSEG intends to retain ownership of PSEG Power’s existing nuclear fleet. In May 2021, PSEG Power Ventures LLC (Power Ventures), a direct wholly owned subsidiary of PSEG Power, entered into a purchase agreement with Quattro Solar, LLC, an affiliate of LS Power, relating to the sale by Power Ventures of 100% of its ownership interest in Solar Source including its related assets and liabilities. The transaction closed in June 2021. As a result of the sale, PSEG Power recorded a pre-tax gain on sale of approximately $62 million, which is inclusive of the recognition of previously deferred unamortized investment tax credits (ITC) of $185 million, and income tax expense of approximately $63 million primarily due to the recapture of ITC on units that operated for less than five years. Any potential transactions involving PSEG Power’s fossil generation are expected to be completed either in the fourth quarter of 2021 or the first quarter of 2022. As a result of the strategic review of PSEG Power’s non-nuclear generating assets, and the launch in the fourth quarter of 2020 of an associated marketing process for their potential disposition, PSEG Power has performed an impairment assessment of its PJM, NYISO and ISO-NE asset groupings, as of each quarter end. The assessments included probability weightings assigned to undiscounted cash flow scenarios of retaining the assets through the end of their estimated useful lives and a successful disposition of the non-nuclear assets. Estimates of cash flows associated with a sale scenario were based on management’s expectations of the fair value of such assets. The probability weighted aggregation of undiscounted cash flows for the PJM and NYISO asset groupings expected to result from the use and potential disposition of the asset groups exceeded their carrying value at the assessment dates. As such, it demonstrated that no impairment exists for these asset groupings and they continue to remain classified as held-for-use as of June 30, 2021. However, neither the ISO-NE asset grouping’s probability weighted aggregation of undiscounted cash flows nor its fair value exceeded its carrying value as of June 30, 2021. This demonstrated that an impairment existed and PSEG Power recorded a pre-tax charge in (Gains) Losses on Asset Dispositions and Impairments of approximately $519 million for the ISO-NE asset grouping which has remained classified as held-for-use as of June 30, 2021. There is no assurance that the strategic review will result in a sale or other disposition of all or any portion of the fossil generation assets. Any transaction would be subject to market conditions and customary closing conditions, including the receipt of all required regulatory approvals. Management expects that a change to a held-for-sale classification from a held-for-use classification would result in a pre-tax loss of approximately $2.5 billion related to additional impairments on the fossil assets being sold and other related fossil common fixed assets, employee severance and retention costs, environmental remediation costs, and debt redemption costs, including a make-whole premium among other things, and excluding any potential impacts on employee pension and other postretirement plans. This potential approximation of loss is a preliminary estimate and may change materially depending upon the ongoing marketing process and the terms of a final agreement, if any, to dispose of these assets.
PSEG Power [Member] |
Early Plant Retirements/Asset Dispositions [Line Items] |
Early Plant Retirements/Asset Dispositions | Early Plant Retirements/Asset Dispositions and Impairments Nuclear In April 2019, PSEG Power’s Salem 1, Salem 2 and Hope Creek nuclear plants were awarded ZECs by the BPU. Pursuant to a process established by the BPU, ZECs are purchased from selected nuclear plants and recovered through a non-bypassable distribution charge in the amount of $0.004 per kilowatt-hour (KWh) used (which is equivalent to approximately $10 per megawatt hour (MWh) generated in payments to selected nuclear plants (ZEC payment)). Each nuclear plant is expected to receive ZEC revenue for approximately three years, through May 2022. In April 2021, PSEG Power’s Salem 1, Salem 2 and Hope Creek nuclear plants were awarded ZECs for the three-year eligibility period starting June 2022 at the same approximate $10 per MWh received during the current ZEC period through May 2022 referenced above. As a result, each nuclear plant is expected to receive ZEC revenue for an additional three years starting June 2022. The terms and conditions of this April 2021 ZEC award are the same as the current ZEC period as discussed above. The award of ZECs attaches certain obligations, including an obligation to repay the ZECs in the event that a plant ceases operations during the period that it was awarded ZECs, subject to certain exceptions specified in the ZEC legislation. PSEG Power has and will continue to recognize revenue monthly as the nuclear plants generate electricity and satisfy their performance obligations. Further, the ZEC payment may be adjusted by the BPU at any time to offset environmental or fuel diversity payments that a selected nuclear plant may receive from another source. For instance, the New Jersey Division of Rate Counsel (New Jersey Rate Counsel), in written comments filed with the BPU, has advocated for the BPU to offset market benefits resulting from New Jersey’s rejoining the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative from the ZEC payment. PSEG intends to vigorously defend against these arguments. Due to its preliminary nature, PSEG cannot predict the outcome of this matter. The BPU’s April 2019 decision awarding ZECs through May 2022 and April 2021 decision awarding ZECs through May 2025 have been appealed by the New Jersey Rate Counsel (Rate Counsel). In May 2021, Rate Counsel filed an appeal with the New Jersey Appellate Division of the BPU’s April 2021 decision. In July 2021, the New Jersey Supreme Court denied the Rate Counsel’s petition for further appellate review of the BPU’s April 2019 decision. PSEG cannot predict the outcome of these matters. In the event that (i) the ZEC program is overturned or is otherwise materially adversely modified through legal process; or (ii) any of the Salem 1, Salem 2 and Hope Creek plants is not sufficiently valued for its environmental, fuel diversity or resilience attributes in future periods and does not otherwise experience a material financial change that would remove the need for such attributes to be sufficiently valued, PSEG Power will take all necessary steps to cease to operate all of these plants. Alternatively, even with sufficient valuation of these attributes, if the financial condition of the plants is materially adversely impacted by changes in commodity prices, FERC’s changes to the capacity market construct (absent sufficient capacity revenues provided under a program approved by the BPU in accordance with a FERC-authorized capacity mechanism), or, in the case of the Salem nuclear plants, decisions by the EPA and state environmental regulators regarding the implementation of Section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act (CWA) and related state regulations, or other factors, PSEG Power will take all necessary steps to cease to operate all of these plants. Ceasing operations of these plants would result in a material adverse impact on PSEG’s and PSEG Power’s results of operations. Non-Nuclear In July 2020, PSEG announced that it is exploring strategic alternatives for PSEG Power’s non-nuclear generating fleet, which includes more than 6,750 MW of fossil generation located in New Jersey, Connecticut, New York and Maryland and, prior to the sale of Solar Source, included 467 MW Solar Source portfolio located in various states. PSEG intends to retain ownership of PSEG Power’s existing nuclear fleet. In May 2021, PSEG Power Ventures LLC (Power Ventures), a direct wholly owned subsidiary of PSEG Power, entered into a purchase agreement with Quattro Solar, LLC, an affiliate of LS Power, relating to the sale by Power Ventures of 100% of its ownership interest in Solar Source including its related assets and liabilities. The transaction closed in June 2021. As a result of the sale, PSEG Power recorded a pre-tax gain on sale of approximately $62 million, which is inclusive of the recognition of previously deferred unamortized investment tax credits (ITC) of $185 million, and income tax expense of approximately $63 million primarily due to the recapture of ITC on units that operated for less than five years. Any potential transactions involving PSEG Power’s fossil generation are expected to be completed either in the fourth quarter of 2021 or the first quarter of 2022. As a result of the strategic review of PSEG Power’s non-nuclear generating assets, and the launch in the fourth quarter of 2020 of an associated marketing process for their potential disposition, PSEG Power has performed an impairment assessment of its PJM, NYISO and ISO-NE asset groupings, as of each quarter end. The assessments included probability weightings assigned to undiscounted cash flow scenarios of retaining the assets through the end of their estimated useful lives and a successful disposition of the non-nuclear assets. Estimates of cash flows associated with a sale scenario were based on management’s expectations of the fair value of such assets. The probability weighted aggregation of undiscounted cash flows for the PJM and NYISO asset groupings expected to result from the use and potential disposition of the asset groups exceeded their carrying value at the assessment dates. As such, it demonstrated that no impairment exists for these asset groupings and they continue to remain classified as held-for-use as of June 30, 2021. However, neither the ISO-NE asset grouping’s probability weighted aggregation of undiscounted cash flows nor its fair value exceeded its carrying value as of June 30, 2021. This demonstrated that an impairment existed and PSEG Power recorded a pre-tax charge in (Gains) Losses on Asset Dispositions and Impairments of approximately $519 million for the ISO-NE asset grouping which has remained classified as held-for-use as of June 30, 2021. There is no assurance that the strategic review will result in a sale or other disposition of all or any portion of the fossil generation assets. Any transaction would be subject to market conditions and customary closing conditions, including the receipt of all required regulatory approvals. Management expects that a change to a held-for-sale classification from a held-for-use classification would result in a pre-tax loss of approximately $2.5 billion related to additional impairments on the fossil assets being sold and other related fossil common fixed assets, employee severance and retention costs, environmental remediation costs, and debt redemption costs, including a make-whole premium among other things, and excluding any potential impacts on employee pension and other postretirement plans. This potential approximation of loss is a preliminary estimate and may change materially depending upon the ongoing marketing process and the terms of a final agreement, if any, to dispose of these assets.

X
- Definition Line items represent financial concepts included in a table. These concepts are used to disclose reportable information associated with domain members defined in one or many axes to the table. + References No definition available. + Details
Name: | us-gaap_RestructuringCostAndReserveLineItems
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | xbrli:stringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition The entire disclosure of costs incurred for restructuring including, but not limited to, exit and disposal activities, remediation, implementation, integration, asset impairment, and charges against earnings from the write-down of assets. + References No definition available. + Details
Name: | us-gaap_RestructuringImpairmentAndOtherActivitiesDisclosureTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | nonnum:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Details
Name: | dei_LegalEntityAxis=pseg_PSEGPowerLLCMember
Namespace Prefix: |
Data Type: | na
Balance Type: |
Period Type: |