XML 50 R35.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT
v3.24.0.1

Commitments and Contingencies | 12 Months Ended
--- | ---
Dec. 31, 2023
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract] |
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES | COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES We and our subsidiaries have significant commitments and contingencies arising from our operations, including those related to unconditional purchase obligations, environmental matters, and enforcement and litigation matters. Unconditional Purchase Obligations Our electric utilities have obligations to distribute and sell electricity to their customers, and our natural gas utilities have obligations to distribute and sell natural gas to their customers. The utilities expect to recover costs related to these obligations in future customer rates. In order to meet these obligations, we routinely enter into long-term purchase and sale commitments for various quantities and lengths of time. The generation facilities that are part of our non-utility energy infrastructure segment have obligations to distribute and sell electricity through long-term offtake agreements with their customers for all of the energy produced. In order to support these sales obligations, these companies enter into easements and other service agreements associated with the generating facilities. The following table shows our minimum future commitments related to these purchase obligations as of December 31, 2023, including those of our subsidiaries:
|  |  |  |  |  | Payments Due By Period
(in millions) |  | Date Contracts Extend Through |  | Total Amounts Committed |  | 2024 |  | 2025 |  | 2026 |  | 2027 |  | 2028 |  | Later Years
Electric utility: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Nuclear |  | 2033 |  | $ | 6,280.6 |  |  | $ | 600.3 |  |  | $ | 634.5 |  |  | $ | 681.6 |  |  | $ | 730.4 |  |  | $ | 782.6 |  |  | $ | 2,851.2 |
Coal supply and transportation |  | 2026 |  | 549.0 |  |  | 358.3 |  |  | 164.6 |  |  | 26.1 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |
Purchased power |  | 2063 |  | 333.5 |  |  | 56.7 |  |  | 56.4 |  |  | 57.5 |  |  | 52.1 |  |  | 48.4 |  |  | 62.4 |
Other |  | 2043 |  | 100.6 |  |  | 13.9 |  |  | 13.3 |  |  | 12.9 |  |  | 11.6 |  |  | 10.2 |  |  | 38.7 |
Natural gas utility: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Supply and transportation |  | 2048 |  | 1,777.2 |  |  | 381.2 |  |  | 274.9 |  |  | 214.8 |  |  | 197.4 |  |  | 155.7 |  |  | 553.2 |
Non-utility energy infrastructure: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Purchased power |  | 2050 |  | 611.8 |  |  | 34.4 |  |  | 34.8 |  |  | 35.9 |  |  | 36.7 |  |  | 34.8 |  |  | 435.2 |
Natural gas storage and transportation |  | 2048 |  | 4.8 |  |  | 4.0 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 0.1 |  |  | 0.7 |
Total |  |  |  | $ | 9,657.5 |  |  | $ | 1,448.8 |  |  | $ | 1,178.5 |  |  | $ | 1,028.8 |  |  | $ | 1,028.2 |  |  | $ | 1,031.8 |  |  | $ | 3,941.4 |
Environmental Matters Consistent with other companies in the energy industry, we face significant ongoing environmental compliance and remediation obligations related to current and past operations. Specific environmental issues affecting us include, but are not limited to, current and future regulation of air emissions such as SO 2, NOx, fine particulates, mercury, and GHGs; water intake and discharges; management of coal combustion products such as fly ash; and remediation of impacted properties, including former manufactured gas plant sites. We have continued to pursue a proactive strategy to manage our environmental compliance obligations, including: •the development of additional sources of renewable electric energy supply, battery storage, and natural gas and LNG storage facilities; •the addition of improvements for water quality matters such as treatment technologies to meet regulatory discharge limits and improvements to our cooling water intake systems; •the addition of emission control equipment to existing facilities to comply with ambient air quality standards and federal clean air rules; •the protection of wetlands and waterways, biodiversity including threatened and endangered species, and cultural resources associated with construction projects; •the retirement of older coal-fired power plants and conversion to modern, efficient, natural gas generation, super-critical pulverized coal generation, and/or replacement with renewable generation; •the beneficial use of ash and other products from coal-fired and biomass generating units; •the remediation of former manufactured gas plant sites; •the reduction of methane emissions across our natural gas distribution system by upgrading infrastructure; and •the reporting of GHG emissions to comply with federal clean air rules. Air Quality Cross State Air Pollution Rule – Good Neighbor Plan In March 2023, the EPA issued its final Good Neighbor Plan, which became effective in August 2023 and requires significant reductions in ozone-forming emissions of NOx from power plants and industrial facilities. After review of the final rule, we believe that we are well positioned to meet the requirements. Our RICE units in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan and Wisconsin are not currently subject to the final rule as each unit is less than 25 MWs. To the extent we use RICE engines for natural gas distribution operations, those engines not part of an LDC are subject to the emission limits and operational requirements of the rule beginning in 2026. The EPA has exempted LDCs from the final rule. Mercury and Air Toxics Standards In 2012, the EPA issued the MATS to limit emissions of mercury, acid gases, and other hazardous air pollutants. In April 2023, the EPA issued the pre-publication version of a proposed rule to strengthen and update MATS to reflect recent developments in control technologies and performance of coal and oil-fired units. The EPA proposed three revisions including a proposal to lower the PM limit from 0.03 lb/MMBtu to 0.01 lb/MMBtu. The EPA also sought comments on an even lower limit of 0.006 lb/MMBtu. Adoption of either of these lower limits could have an adverse effect on our operations. National Ambient Air Quality Standards Ozone After completing its review of the 2008 ozone standard, the EPA released a final rule in October 2015, creating a more stringent standard than the 2008 NAAQS. The 2015 ozone standard lowered the 8-hour limit for ground-level ozone. In November 2022, the EPA's 2022 CASAC Ozone Review Panel issued a draft report supporting the reconsideration of the 2015 standard. The EPA staff initially issued a draft Policy Assessment in March 2023 that supported the reconsideration, however, in August 2023 it announced that it is instead restarting its ozone standard evaluation. The EPA has indicated it plans to release its Integrated Review Plan in fall 2024. This new review is anticipated to take 3 to 5 years to complete. In February 2022, revisions to the Wisconsin Administrative Code to adopt the 2015 standard were finalized. The amended regulations incorporated by reference the federal air pollution monitoring requirements related to the standard. The WDNR submitted the rule updates as a SIP revision to the EPA, which the EPA approved in February 2023. In April 2022, the EPA proposed to find that the Milwaukee, Sheboygan, and Chicago, IL-IN-WI nonattainment areas did not meet the marginal attainment deadline of August 2021 and should be adjusted to "moderate" nonattainment status for the 2015 standard. In October 2022, the EPA published its final reclassifications from "marginal" to "moderate" for these areas, effective November 7, 2022. Accordingly, the WDNR submitted a SIP revision to the EPA in December 2022 to address the moderate nonattainment status. In October 2023, the EPA found that 11 states, including Wisconsin, failed to submit timely SIP revisions to address nonattainment areas classified as "moderate" for the 2015 standard. This action triggered a 24-month deadline for states to get their SIP approved or the EPA will issue a federal implementation plan. Additionally, offset sanctions will take effect in 18 months if the SIP is not approved. The offset sanctions impact volatile organic compound and NOx emissions from new or modified sources in the nonattainment areas. We believe that we are well positioned to meet the requirements associated with the 2015 ozone standard and do not expect to incur significant costs to comply with the associated state and federal rules. Particulate Matter In December 2020, the EPA completed its 5-year review of the 2012 annual and 24-hour standards for fine PM and determined that no revisions were necessary to the current annual standard of 12 µg/m 3 or the 24-hour standard of 35 µg/m 3. All counties within our service territories are in attainment with the current 2012 standards. Under the Biden Administration's policy review, the EPA concluded that the scientific evidence and information from the December 2020 determination supports revising the level of the annual standard for the PM NAAQS to below the current level of 12 µg/m 3, while retaining the 24-hour standard. In January 2023, the EPA announced its proposed decision to revise the primary (health-based) annual PM2.5 standard from its current level of 12 µg/m 3 to within the range of 9 to 10 µg/m 3. The EPA also proposed not to change the current secondary (welfare-based) annual PM2.5 standard, primary and secondary 24-hour PM2.5 standards, and primary and secondary PM10 standards. The EPA did, however, take comments on the full range (between 8 and 11 µg/m 3) included in the CASAC's latest report. The EPA finalized the rule on February 7, 2024 and lowered the primary annual PM2.5 level to 9 µg/m 3, which could cause some nonattainment areas that may affect permitting at our facilities. The secondary and 24-hour standards remain unchanged. The EPA will designate areas as attainment and nonattainment with the new standard by early 2026. The WDNR will need to draft and submit a SIP for the EPA's approval. Climate Change In May 2023, the EPA proposed GHG performance standards for existing fossil-fired steam generating and gas combustion units and also proposed to repeal the Affordable Clean Energy rule, which had replaced the Clean Power Plan. For coal plants, no standards would apply under the proposed version of the rule until 2032, and after 2032 the applicable standard would depend on the unit's retirement date. For combined cycle natural gas plants above a 50% capacity factor, the proposed rule is highly dependent on the use of hydrogen as an alternative fuel, and on carbon capture technology. For simple cycle natural gas-fired combustion turbines, the proposed version of the rule does not include applicable limits as long as the capacity factor is less than 20%. Our RICE units in Michigan and the new Weston RICE project are not affected under the rule because each RICE unit is less than 25 MWs. We continue to evaluate the proposed rule to understand the impacts to our operations. A final rule is expected in the second quarter of 2024. In May 2023, the EPA proposed to revise the NSPS for GHG emissions from new, modified, and reconstructed fossil-fueled power plants. The EPA is proposing two distinct 111(b) rules – one for natural gas-fired stationary combustion turbines and the other for coal-fired units. New stationary combustion turbine units would be divided into three subcategories based on their annual capacity factor – low load, intermediate load, and base load. Our RICE units are not affected by this rule since each unit is below 25 MWs. Our ESG Progress Plan is heavily focused on reducing GHG emissions. The EPA has indicated that it anticipates a final rule in the second quarter of 2024. The EPA released proposed regulations for the Mandatory Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule, 40 CFR Part 98, in June 2022. In May 2023, the EPA released a supplementary proposal, which includes updates of the global warming potentials to determine CO 2 equivalency for threshold reporting and the addition of a new section regarding energy consumption. The proposed revisions could impact the reporting required for our electric generation facilities, local natural gas distribution companies, and underground natural gas storage facilities. In August 2023, the EPA also issued its proposed updates to amend reporting requirements for petroleum and natural gas systems, with an anticipated final rule to be issued in early 2024. We are currently evaluating the potential impact of the proposed rule, if any, on our operations. Our ESG Progress Plan includes the retirement of older, fossil-fueled generation, to be replaced with zero-carbon-emitting renewables and clean natural gas-fueled generation. We have already retired more than 1,900 MWs of fossil-fueled generation since the beginning of 2018. We expect to retire approximately 1,800 MWs of additional fossil-fueled generation by the end of 2031, which includes the planned retirements in 2024-2025 of OCPP Units 5-8, the planned retirement by June 2026 of jointly-owned Columbia Units 1 and 2, and the planned retirement in 2031 of Weston Unit 3. See Note 7, Property, Plant, and Equipment, for more information related to these planned power plant retirements. In May 2021, we announced goals to achieve reductions in carbon emissions from our electric generation fleet by 60% by the end of 2025 and by 80% by the end of 2030, both from a 2005 baseline. We expect to achieve these goals by continuing to make operating refinements, retiring less efficient generating units, and executing our capital plan. Over the longer term, the target for our generation fleet is to be net carbon neutral by 2050. We also continue to reduce methane emissions by improving our natural gas distribution systems, and have set a target across our natural gas distribution operations to achieve net-zero methane emissions by the end of 2030. We plan to achieve our net-zero goal through an effort that includes both continuous operational improvements and equipment upgrades, as well as the use of RNG throughout our utility systems. Water Quality Clean Water Act Cooling Water Intake Structure Rule The EPA issued a final regulation under Section 316(b) of the CWA that became effective in October 2014 and requires the location, design, construction, and capacity of cooling water intake structures at existing power plants reflect the BTA for minimizing adverse environmental impacts. The rule applies to all of our existing generating facilities with cooling water intake structures, except for the ERGS units, which were permitted and received a final BTA determination under the rules governing new facilities. Pursuant to a WDNR rule, which became effective in June 2020, the requirements of federal Section 316(b) of the CWA were incorporated into the Wisconsin Administrative Code. The WDNR applies this rule when establishing BTA requirements for cooling water intake structures at existing facilities. These BTA requirements are incorporated into WPDES permits for WE and WPS facilities. We have received a final BTA determination for VAPP. We have received interim BTA determinations for OCPP Units 5-8 and Weston Units 3 and 4. We believe that existing technology installed at the OCPP facility meets the BTA requirements; however, depending on the timing of the permit reissuance, all four generating units at the OCPP may be retired prior to the WDNR making a final BTA decision, anticipated in 2025. In addition, we believe that existing technology installed at the Weston facility will result in a final BTA determination during the WPDES permit reissuance expected in the first quarter of 2024. The WDNR reissued the WPDES permit for PWGS effective October 2023. This reissued permit includes a conditional BTA determination with conditions for the existing PWGS porous dike (rock breakwater) cooling water intake structure. We do not anticipate compliance with these conditions will result in a material impact on our financial condition or the efficiency of power plant operations. Steam Electric Effluent Limitation Guidelines The EPA's ELG rule, effective January 2016 and modified in 2020, revised the treatment technology requirements related to BATW and wet FGD wastewaters at existing coal-fueled facilities and created new requirements for several types of power plant wastewaters. The two new requirements that affect WE and WPS facilities relate to discharge limits for BATW and wet FGD wastewater. Although our power plant facilities already have advanced wastewater treatment technologies installed that meet many of the discharge limits established by this rule, certain facility modifications are necessary to meet the ELG rule requirements. Through 2023, compliance costs associated with the ELG rule required $105 million in capital investment. An $8 million BATW modification to OCPP Units 7 and 8 was completed and placed in-service in mid-2021, and in December 2021, the PSCW issued a Certificate of Authority approving the $89 million ERGS FGD wastewater treatment system modification. The BATW modifications, including $8 million of modifications at Weston Unit 3 completed in June 2023, did not require PSCW approval prior to construction. All of these ELG required projects were placed in-service ahead of WPDES permit deadlines. In March 2023, the EPA issued the proposed "supplemental ELG rule." The rule would replace the existing 2020 ELG rule and, as proposed, would establish stricter limitations on: 1) BATW; 2) FGD wastewater; 3) CCR leachate; and 4) legacy wastewaters. The most significant proposed ELG rule change is a ZLD requirement for FGD wastewater. Under the proposed rule, this new ZLD requirement must be met by a date determined by the permitting authority (the WDNR for WE) that is as soon as possible beginning 60 days following publication of the final rule, but no later than December 31, 2029. The proposed rule would also create a subcategory for "early adopters" that have already installed a compliant biological treatment system by the date of the proposed rule. Early adopters would not be required to install further FGD wastewater treatment, provided the facility owner also agrees to permanently cease combustion of coal by December 31, 2032. Although the $89 million biological treatment system at ERGS is complete and was placed in service in December 2023 to meet the WPDES permit deadline, the timing of the project's completion did not comply with the deadline proposed by the EPA to qualify for the early adopter status. In addition, we do not believe that the biological treatment system would be compliant with the additional ZLD FGD wastewater treatment requirements as proposed. In May 2023, we submitted written comments to the EPA articulating these concerns, including the cost impact to our customers. The EPA has indicated that it anticipates issuing the final rule in the second quarter of 2024. If the supplemental ELG rule is finalized as proposed, we anticipate that our coal-fueled facilities, including ER 1 and ER 2 that were built with ELG-compliant dry BA transport systems, will meet the BATW rule provisions. The EPA also proposed requirements for legacy wastewaters and landfill leachate. We have reviewed the proposed requirements to determine potential costs and actions required for our facilities. We submitted comments to the EPA regarding these proposed requirements. Waters of the United States In January 2023, the EPA and the Army Corps (the agencies) together released a final rule effective in March 2023 that established standards for identifying which wetland or surface drainage features qualify as WOTUS based on its pre-2015 definition. The pre-2015 approach involved applying factors established through case law and agency precedents to determine whether a wetland or surface drainage feature is subject to federal jurisdiction. In May 2023, in Sackett v. EPA, the Supreme Court issued a decision significantly narrowing federal jurisdiction over wetlands to "traditional navigable waters" and wetlands or other waters that have a "continuous surface connection" with a traditional navigable water. In August 2023, the agencies revised the final rule to conform the definition of WOTUS to the Supreme Court's May 2023 Sackett decision. The conforming rule became effective upon publication in the Federal Register on September 8, 2023. We anticipate this final rule revision based on the Sackett decision may lead to a decreased number of projects that require Army Corps federal wetland permits. This decision also may affect the administration of some state programs. At this point, our projects requiring federal permits are moving ahead, but we are monitoring these recent developments to better understand potential future impacts. Land Quality Manufactured Gas Plant Remediation We have identified sites at which our utilities or a predecessor company owned or operated a manufactured gas plant or stored manufactured gas. We have also identified other sites that may have been impacted by historical manufactured gas plant activities. Our natural gas utilities are responsible for the environmental remediation of these sites, some of which are in the EPA Superfund Alternative Approach Program. We are also working with various state jurisdictions in our investigation and remediation planning. These sites are at various stages of investigation, monitoring, remediation, and closure. In addition, we are coordinating the investigation and cleanup of some of these sites subject to the jurisdiction of the EPA under what is called a "multisite" program. This program involves prioritizing the work to be done at the sites, preparation and approval of documents common to all of the sites, and use of a consistent approach in selecting remedies. At this time, we cannot estimate future remediation costs associated with these sites beyond those described below. The future costs for detailed site investigation, future remediation, and monitoring are dependent upon several variables including, among other things, the extent of remediation, changes in technology, and changes in regulation. Historically, our regulators have allowed us to recover incurred costs, net of insurance recoveries and recoveries from potentially responsible parties, associated with the remediation of manufactured gas plant sites. Accordingly, we have established regulatory assets for costs associated with these sites. We have established the following regulatory assets and reserves for manufactured gas plant sites as of December 31:
(in millions) |  | 2023 |  | 2022
Regulatory assets |  | $ | 596.8 |  |  | $ | 610.7 |
Reserves for future environmental remediation |  | 463.7 |  |  | 499.6 |
Coal Combustion Residuals Rule The EPA issued a pre-publication proposed rule for CCR in May 2023 that would apply to landfills, historic fill sites, and projects where CCR was placed at a power plant site. As proposed, the rule would regulate previously exempt closed landfills. We are actively engaged with our trade organizations and provided them information to include in their comments to the EPA. The EPA has indicated that it anticipates issuing a final rule in the second quarter of 2024. As proposed, the rule could have a material adverse impact on our coal ash landfills and require additional remediation that has not been required under the current state programs. Renewables, Efficiency, and Conservation Wisconsin Legislation In 2005, Wisconsin enacted Act 141, which established a goal that 10% of all electricity consumed in Wisconsin be generated by renewable resources annually. WE and WPS have achieved their required renewable energy percentages of 8.27% and 9.74%, respectively, by constructing various wind parks, solar parks, a biomass facility, and by also relying on renewable energy purchases. WE and WPS continue to review their renewable energy portfolios and acquire cost-effective renewables as needed to meet their requirements on an ongoing basis. The PSCW administers the renewable program related to Act 141, and each utility funds the program based on 1.2% of its annual retail operating revenues. Michigan Legislation In December 2016, Michigan enacted Act 342, which required 12.5% of the state's electric energy to come from renewables for 2019 and 2020, and energy optimization (efficiency) targets up to 1% annually. The renewable requirement increased to 15.0% for 2021 and beyond. UMERC was in compliance with its requirements under this statute as of December 31, 2023. The legislation continues to allow recovery of costs incurred to meet the standards and provides for ongoing review and revision to assure the measures taken are cost-effective. In November 2023, Michigan enacted Acts 229, 231 and 235. The acts require electric providers to file a renewable energy plan every two years and to set renewable energy portfolio targets from now until 2040. The proposed renewable energy targets include 15% through 2029, 50% from 2030 through 2034, and 60% renewable energy by 2035 and thereafter. The bill also sets clean energy standards of 80% for 2035-2039 and 100% after 2040. The bill only allows natural gas to count as clean energy if it is accompanied with carbon capture and storage. The MPSC has indicated that it will complete a study by December 2024 on the unique conditions influencing electric generation, transmission, and demand in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan, which includes the unique role of RICE units placed in service to facilitate the retirement of coal-fired generation in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan. The new acts also revise the requirement a utility must meet in filing its energy waste reduction plans. They require a utility to file a plan every two years until 2025, then every three years thereafter. Enforcement and Litigation Matters We and our subsidiaries are involved in legal and administrative proceedings before various courts and agencies with respect to matters arising in the ordinary course of business. Although we are unable to predict the outcome of these matters, management believes that appropriate reserves have been established and that final settlement of these actions will not have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations. Consent Decrees Wisconsin Public Service Corporation – Weston and Pulliam Power Plants In November 2009, the EPA issued an NOV to WPS, which alleged violations of the CAA's New Source Review requirements relating to certain projects completed at the Weston and Pulliam power plants from 1994 to 2009. WPS entered into a Consent Decree with the EPA resolving this NOV. This Consent Decree was entered by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin in March 2013. With the retirement of Pulliam Units 7 and 8 in October 2018, WPS completed the mitigation projects required by the Consent Decree and received a completeness letter from the EPA in October 2018. See Note 6, Regulatory Assets and Liabilities, for more information about the retirement. We are working with the EPA on a closeout process for the Consent Decree and expect that process to begin in 2024. Joint Ownership Power Plants – Columbia and Edgewater In December 2009, the EPA issued an NOV to WPL, the operator of the Columbia and Edgewater plants, and the other joint owners of these plants, including MG&E, WE (former co-owner of an Edgewater unit), and WPS. The NOV alleged violations of the CAA's New Source Review requirements related to certain projects completed at those plants. WPS, along with WPL, MG&E, and WE, entered into a Consent Decree with the EPA resolving this NOV. This Consent Decree was entered by the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin in June 2013. As a result of the continued implementation of the Consent Decree related to the jointly owned Columbia and Edgewater plants, the Edgewater 4 generating unit was retired in September 2018. See Note 6, Regulatory Assets and Liabilities, for more information about the retirement. WPL started the process to close out this Consent Decree.

X
- References No definition available. + Details
Name: | us-gaap_CommitmentsAndContingenciesDisclosureAbstract
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | xbrli:stringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition The entire disclosure for commitments and contingencies. + References Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/disclosureRef -Topic 440 -SubTopic 10 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Section 50 -Paragraph 4 -Subparagraph (a) -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org//1943274/2147482648/440-10-50-4 Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2009/role/commonPracticeRef -Topic 450 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org//450/tableOfContent Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/disclosureRef -Topic 954 -SubTopic 440 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Section 50 -Paragraph 1 -Subparagraph (a) -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org//1943274/2147480327/954-440-50-1 Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/disclosureRef -Topic 440 -SubTopic 10 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Section 50 -Paragraph 4 -Subparagraph (c) -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org//1943274/2147482648/440-10-50-4 Reference 5: http://fasb.org/us-gaap/role/ref/legacyRef -Topic 440 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org//440/tableOfContent + Details
Name: | us-gaap_CommitmentsAndContingenciesDisclosureTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | dtr-types:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration