XML 30 R13.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.20.4
Short Duration Contracts
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2020
Short Duration Contracts Disclosure [Abstract]  
Short duration contracts The Company’s reserves for losses and loss adjustment expenses primarily relate to short-duration contracts with various characteristics (e.g., type of coverage, geography, claims duration). The Company considered such information in determining the level of disaggregation for disclosures related to its short-duration contracts, as detailed in the table below:
Reportable segmentLevel of disaggregationIncluded lines of business
InsuranceProperty energy, marine and aviationProperty energy, marine and aviation
Third party occurrence business
Excess and surplus casualty (excluding contract binding); construction and national accounts; and other (including alternative market risks, excess workers’ compensation and employer’s liability insurance coverages)
Third party claims-made businessProfessional lines
Multi-line and other specialty
Programs; contract binding (part of excess and surplus casualty); travel, accident and health; lenders products; and other (contract and commercial surety coverages)
ReinsuranceCasualtyCasualty
Property catastropheProperty catastrophe
Property excluding property catastropheProperty excluding property catastrophe
Marine and aviationMarine and aviation
Other specialtyOther specialty
MortgageDirect mortgage insurance in the U.S.Mortgage insurance on U.S. primary exposures
The Company determined the following to be insignificant for disclosure purposes: (i) amounts included in the ‘other’ segment (i.e., Watford) as described in note 12, “Variable Interest Entity and Noncontrolling Interests”; (ii) certain mortgage business, including non-U.S. primary business, second lien and student loan exposures, global mortgage reinsurance and participation in various GSE credit risk-sharing products, (iii) certain reinsurance business, including casualty clash and non-traditional lines and (iv) amounts associated with Barbican’s reserves for underwriting years 2018 and prior. Such amounts are included as reconciling items.
The Company is required to establish reserves for losses and loss adjustment expenses (“Loss Reserves”) that arise from the business the Company underwrites. Loss Reserves for the insurance, reinsurance and mortgage segments represent estimates of future amounts required to pay losses and loss adjustment expenses for insured or reinsured events which have occurred at or before the balance sheet date. Loss Reserves do not reflect contingency reserve allowances to account for future loss occurrences. Losses arising from future events will be estimated and recognized at the time the losses are incurred and could be substantial.
Insurance Segment
Loss Reserves for the insurance segment are comprised of estimated amounts for (1) reported losses (“case reserves”) and (2) incurred but not reported losses (“IBNR reserves”). Generally, claims personnel determine whether to establish a
case reserve for the estimated amount of the ultimate settlement of individual claims. The estimate reflects the judgment of claims personnel based on general corporate reserving practices, the experience and knowledge of such personnel regarding the nature and value of the specific type of claim and, where appropriate, advice of counsel. The Company also contracts with a number of outside third party administrators in the claims process who, in certain cases, have limited authority to establish case reserves. The work of such administrators is reviewed and monitored by our claims personnel. Loss Reserves are also established to provide for loss adjustment expenses and represent the estimated expense of settling claims, including legal and other fees and the general expenses of administering the claims adjustment process. Periodically, adjustments to the case reserves may be made as additional information is reported or payments are made. IBNR reserves are established to provide for incurred claims which have not yet been reported at the balance sheet date as well as to adjust for any projected variance in case reserving. Actuaries estimate ultimate losses and loss adjustment expenses using various generally accepted actuarial methods applied to known losses and other relevant information. Like case reserves, IBNR reserves are adjusted as additional information becomes known or payments are made. The process of estimating reserves involves a considerable degree of judgment by management and, as of any given date, is inherently uncertain.
Ultimate losses and loss adjustment expenses are generally determined by extrapolation of claim emergence and settlement patterns observed in the past that can reasonably be expected to persist into the future. In forecasting ultimate losses and loss adjustment expenses with respect to any line of business, past experience with respect to that line of business is the primary resource, developed through both industry and company experience, but cannot be relied upon in isolation. Uncertainties in estimating ultimate losses and loss adjustment expenses are magnified by the length of the time lag between when a claim actually occurs and when it is reported and settled. This time lag is sometimes referred to as the “claim-tail.” During this period additional facts regarding coverages written in prior accident years, as well as about actual claims and trends, may become known and, as a result, may lead to adjustments of the related Loss Reserves. If the Company determines that an adjustment is appropriate, the adjustment is recorded in the accounting period in which such determination is made. Accordingly, should Loss Reserves need to be increased or decreased in the future from amounts currently established, future results of operations would be negatively or positively impacted respectively. The Company authorizes managing general agents, general agents and other producers to write program business on the Company’s behalf within prescribed underwriting authorities. This delegated authority process introduces additional complexity to the actuarial determination of unpaid future
losses and loss adjustment expenses. In order to monitor adherence to the underwriting guidelines given to such parties, the Company periodically performs underwriting and claims due diligence reviews.
In determining ultimate losses and loss adjustment expenses, the cost to indemnify claimants, provide needed legal defense and other services for insureds and administer the investigation and adjustment of claims are considered. These claim costs are influenced by many factors that change over time, such as expanded coverage definitions as a result of new court decisions, inflation in costs to repair or replace damaged property, inflation in the cost of medical services and legislated changes in statutory benefits, as well as by the particular, unique facts that pertain to each claim. As a result, the rate at which claims arose in the past and the costs to settle them may not always be representative of what will occur in the future. The factors influencing changes in claim costs are often difficult to isolate or quantify and developments in paid and incurred losses from historical trends are frequently subject to multiple and conflicting interpretations. Changes in coverage terms or claims handling practices may also cause future experience and/or development patterns to vary from the past. A key objective of actuaries in developing estimates of ultimate losses and loss adjustment expenses, and resulting IBNR reserves, is to identify aberrations and systemic changes occurring within historical experience and adjust for them so that the future can be projected more reliably. Because of the factors previously discussed, this process requires the substantial use of informed judgment and is inherently uncertain.
Although Loss Reserves are initially determined based on underwriting and pricing analyses, the Company’s insurance segment applies several generally accepted actuarial methods, as discussed below, on a quarterly basis to evaluate the Loss Reserves, in addition to the expected loss method, in particular for Loss Reserves from more mature accident years (the year in which a loss occurred). Each quarter, as part of the reserving process, the segments’ actuaries reaffirm that the assumptions used in the reserving process continue to form a sound basis for the projection of liabilities. If actual loss activity differs substantially from expectations based on historical information, an adjustment to Loss Reserves may be supported. The Company places more or less reliance on a particular actuarial method based on the facts and circumstances at the time the estimates of Loss Reserves are made.
These methods generally fall into one of the following categories or are hybrids of one or more of the following categories:
Expected loss methods - these methods are based on the assumption that ultimate losses vary proportionately with premiums. Expected loss and loss adjustment expense
ratios are typically developed based upon the information derived by underwriters and actuaries during the initial pricing of the business, supplemented by industry data available from organizations, such as statistical bureaus and consulting firms, where appropriate. These ratios consider, among other things, rate increases and changes in terms and conditions that have been observed in the market. Expected loss methods are useful for estimating ultimate losses and loss adjustment expenses in the early years of long-tailed lines of business, when little or no paid or incurred loss information is available, and is commonly applied when limited loss experience exists for a company.
Historical incurred loss development methods - these methods assume that the ratio of losses in one period to losses in an earlier period will remain constant in the future. These methods use incurred losses (i.e., the sum of cumulative historical loss payments plus outstanding case reserves) over discrete periods of time to estimate future losses. Historical incurred loss development methods may be preferable to historical paid loss development methods because they explicitly take into account open cases and the claims adjusters’ evaluations of the cost to settle all known claims. However, historical incurred loss development methods necessarily assume that case reserving practices are consistently applied over time. Therefore, when there have been significant changes in how case reserves are established, using incurred loss data to project ultimate losses may be less reliable than other methods.
Historical paid loss development methods - these methods, like historical incurred loss development methods, assume that the ratio of losses in one period to losses in an earlier period will remain constant. These methods use historical loss payments over discrete periods of time to estimate future losses and necessarily assume that factors that have affected paid losses in the past, such as inflation or the effects of litigation, will remain constant in the future. Because historical paid loss development methods do not use incurred losses to estimate ultimate losses, they may be more reliable than the other methods that use incurred losses in situations where there are significant changes in how incurred losses are established by a company’s claims adjusters. However, historical paid loss development methods are more leveraged (meaning that small changes in payments have a larger impact on estimates of ultimate losses) than actuarial methods that use incurred losses because cumulative loss payments take much longer to equal the expected ultimate losses than cumulative incurred amounts. In addition, and for similar reasons, historical paid loss development methods are often slow to react to situations when new or different factors arise than those that have affected paid losses in the past.
Adjusted historical paid and incurred loss development methods - these methods take traditional historical paid and incurred loss development methods and adjust them for the estimated impact of changes from the past in factors such as inflation, the speed of claim payments or the adequacy of case reserves. Adjusted historical paid and incurred loss development methods are often more reliable methods of predicting ultimate losses in periods of significant change, provided the actuaries can develop methods to reasonably quantify the impact of changes. As such, these methods utilize more judgment than historical paid and incurred loss development methods.
Bornhuetter-Ferguson (“B-F”) paid and incurred loss methods - these methods utilize actual paid and incurred losses and expected patterns of paid and incurred losses, taking the initial expected ultimate losses into account to determine an estimate of expected ultimate losses. The B-F paid and incurred loss methods are useful when there are few reported claims and a relatively less stable pattern of reported losses.
Frequency-Severity methods - These methods utilize actual paid and incurred claim experience, but break the data down into its component pieces: claim counts, often expressed as a ratio to exposure or premium (frequency), and average claim size (severity). The component pieces are projected to an ultimate level and multiplied together to result in an estimate of ultimate loss. These methods are especially useful when the severity of claims can be confined to a relatively stable range of estimated ultimate average claim value.
Additional analyses - other methodologies are often used in the reserving process for specific types of claims or events, such as catastrophic or other specific major events. These include vendor catastrophe models, which are typically used in the estimation of Loss Reserves at the early stage of known catastrophic events before information has been reported to an insurer or reinsurer.
In the initial reserving process for short-tail insurance lines (consisting of property, energy, marine and aviation and other exposures including travel, accident and health and lenders products), the Company relies on a combination of the reserving methods discussed above. For catastrophe-exposed business, the reserving process also includes the usage of catastrophe models for known events and a heavy reliance on analysis of individual catastrophic events and management judgment. The development of losses on short-tail business can be unstable, especially for policies characterized by high severity, low frequency losses. As time passes, for a given accident year, additional weight is given to the paid and incurred B-F loss development methods and eventually to the historical paid and incurred loss development methods in the reserving process. The Company
makes a number of key assumptions in their reserving process, including that historical paid and reported development patterns are stable, catastrophe models provide useful information about our exposure to catastrophic events that have occurred and underwriters’ judgment as to potential loss exposures can be relied on. The expected loss ratios used in the initial reserving process for short-tail business have varied over time due to changes in pricing, reinsurance structure, estimates of catastrophe losses, policy changes (such as attachment points, class and limits) and geographical distribution. As losses in short-tail lines are reported relatively quickly, expected loss ratios are selected for the current accident year based upon actual attritional loss ratios for earlier accident years, adjusted for rate changes, inflation, changes in reinsurance programs and expected attritional losses based on modeling. Furthermore, ultimate losses for short-tail business are known in a reasonably short period of time.
In the initial reserving process for medium-tail and long-tail insurance lines (consisting of third party occurrence business, third party claims made business, and other exposures including surety, programs and contract binding exposures), the Company primarily relies on the expected loss method. The development of the Company’s medium-tail and long-tail business may be unstable, especially if there are high severity major events, as a portion of the Company’s casualty business is in high excess layers. As time passes, for a given accident year, additional weight is given to the paid and incurred B-F loss development methods and historical paid and incurred loss development methods in the reserving process. The Company makes a number of key assumptions in reserving for medium-tail and long-tail lines, including that the pricing loss ratio is the best estimate of the ultimate loss ratio at the time the policy is entered into, that the loss
development patterns, which are based on a combination of company and industry loss development patterns and adjusted to reflect differences in the insurance segment’s mix of business, are reasonable and that claims personnel and underwriters analyses of our exposure to major events are assumed to be the best estimate of exposure to the known claims on those events. The expected loss ratios used in the initial reserving process for medium-tail and long-tail business for recent accident years have varied over time, in some cases significantly, from earlier accident years. As the credibility of historical experience for earlier accident years increases, the experience from these accident years will be given a greater weighting in the actuarial analysis to determine future accident year expected loss ratios, adjusted for changes in pricing, loss trends, terms and conditions and reinsurance structure.
In 2018, the Company entered into a loss portfolio transfer and adverse development cover reinsurance agreement accounted for as retroactive reinsurance. The agreement transfers Loss Reserves and future favorable or adverse development on certain runoff programs, within multi-line and other specialty business, and certain third party occurrence business (the “Covered Lines”). As incurred losses and allocated loss adjustment expenses for the Covered Lines are ceded to the reinsurer, the Company is not exposed to changes in the amount, timing and uncertainty of cash flows arising from the Covered Lines. To avoid distortion, the incurred losses and allocated loss adjustment expenses and cumulative paid losses and loss adjustment expenses for the Covered Lines are excluded entirely from the tables below. Reinsurance recoverables at December 31, 2020 included $153.1 million related to this reinsurance agreement.
The following tables present information on the insurance segment’s short-duration insurance contracts:
Property, energy, marine and aviation ($000’s except claim count)
Incurred losses and allocated loss adjustment expenses, net of reinsuranceDecember 31, 2020
Total of IBNR liabilities plus expected development on reported claimsCumulative
number of reported claims
Year ended December 31,
Accident year2011
unaudited
2012
unaudited
2013
unaudited
2014
unaudited
2015
unaudited
2016
unaudited
2017
unaudited
2018
unaudited
2019
unaudited
2020
2011$269,739 $272,897 $231,841 $220,231 $210,926 $207,814 $200,918 $201,198 $197,833 $196,436 $689 4,219 
2012232,500 231,742 205,098 198,837 196,405 192,406 190,192 178,039 177,673 931 4,269 
2013158,718 156,344 148,800 143,046 134,620 133,544 128,301 126,968 809 4,278 
2014148,185 145,765 147,315 136,096 132,209 134,234 134,937 4,206 3,930 
2015112,333 109,799 103,944 102,469 97,809 91,788 5,249 4,618 
2016104,139 100,986 105,330 100,147 96,127 882 6,389 
2017280,695 246,272 235,932 230,421 9,327 6,752 
2018180,981 186,030 173,693 14,784 5,347 
2019179,056 178,564 20,553 6,051 
2020359,394 168,463 16,980 
Total$1,766,001 
Cumulative paid losses and allocated loss adjustment expenses, net of reinsurance
2011$34,478 $99,724 $142,231 $167,867 $200,473 $202,347 $197,720 $198,626 $195,245 $195,347 
201220,522 92,855 138,431 161,255 166,965 179,371 180,734 172,611 173,460 
201332,239 84,759 110,548 119,791 121,922 125,156 123,036 124,369 
201425,859 53,669 77,804 84,103 87,721 98,463 115,293 
201523,567 64,916 76,299 86,214 87,887 86,207 
201624,728 83,321 98,420 97,218 94,703 
201730,219 139,854 195,518 211,694 
201830,026 102,285 134,858 
201926,130 105,380 
202055,619 
Total1,296,930 
All outstanding liabilities before 2011, net of reinsurance23,517 
Liabilities for losses and loss adjustment expenses, net of reinsurance$492,588 
Third party occurrence business ($000’s except claim count)
Incurred losses and allocated loss adjustment expenses, net of reinsuranceDecember 31, 2020
Total of IBNR liabilities plus expected development on reported claimsCumulative
number of reported claims
Year ended December 31,
Accident year2011
unaudited
2012
unaudited
2013
unaudited
2014
unaudited
2015
unaudited
2016
unaudited
2017
unaudited
2018
unaudited
2019
unaudited
2020
2011$234,068 $240,669 $254,181 $258,784 $252,615 $253,976 $247,052 $239,676 $234,782 $235,073 $35,138 70,924 
2012241,062 262,718 268,365 271,035 257,418 252,822 242,930 243,484 241,378 50,208 65,495 
2013282,968 296,839 306,751 301,789 281,786 274,391 272,528 269,437 60,720 66,685 
2014329,809 335,720 338,623 342,868 339,495 343,995 342,731 77,547 74,964 
2015358,858 391,666 398,670 391,904 391,231 382,518 107,083 77,257 
2016389,623 394,281 405,889 399,394 374,728 142,000 76,765 
2017417,183 417,748 422,441 412,318 195,684 82,267 
2018430,216 452,975 450,736 248,271 74,789 
2019456,059 487,224 318,622 80,934 
2020606,827 524,473 67,541 
Total$3,802,970 
Cumulative paid losses and allocated loss adjustment expenses, net of reinsurance
2011$7,020 $25,276 $43,479 $73,448 $113,502 $134,622 $152,756 $160,609 $172,940 $181,505 
20126,966 30,824 58,444 83,328 108,252 129,572 143,177 154,282 162,202 
20136,845 29,230 71,370 101,196 122,120 149,098 164,187 174,700 
20149,209 40,263 71,519 112,591 161,993 191,168 211,503 
201511,119 44,542 88,443 139,403 181,566 211,573 
201611,689 41,938 87,565 136,793 164,573 
201713,396 52,323 99,827 135,025 
201817,002 63,798 115,076 
201918,392 73,120 
202024,439 
Total1,453,716 
All outstanding liabilities before 2011, net of reinsurance209,031 
Liabilities for losses and loss adjustment expenses, net of reinsurance$2,558,285 
Third party claims-made business ($000’s except claim count)
Incurred losses and allocated loss adjustment expenses, net of reinsuranceDecember 31, 2020
Total of IBNR liabilities plus expected development on reported claimsCumulative
number of reported claims
Year ended December 31,
Accident year2011
unaudited
2012
unaudited
2013
unaudited
2014
unaudited
2015
unaudited
2016
unaudited
2017
unaudited
2018
unaudited
2019
unaudited
2020
2011$287,607 $330,898 $322,274 $317,074 $322,934 $301,240 $288,038 $289,974 $291,477 $290,124 $4,594 11,762 
2012317,360 319,961 318,161 313,622 291,010 275,388 277,388 284,875 285,236 13,772 14,760 
2013301,715 320,387 324,167 320,284 294,465 290,961 281,751 271,262 15,306 14,543 
2014264,354 279,544 298,715 278,706 281,513 297,485 291,729 29,279 13,935 
2015258,817 277,437 276,328 259,902 255,276 252,329 29,255 13,817 
2016275,119 291,377 308,195 314,515 321,850 61,156 15,734 
2017270,523 285,993 311,980 308,401 82,537 15,923 
2018272,844 314,412 319,956 123,386 14,988 
2019289,463 317,668 186,452 18,871 
2020383,914 327,587 21,538 
Total$3,042,469 
Cumulative paid losses and allocated loss adjustment expenses, net of reinsurance
2011$13,740 $72,365 $130,424 $175,139 $208,665 $228,450 $240,267 $254,300 $269,579 $276,887 
201217,709 69,020 121,112 164,605 190,200 209,097 227,179 251,078 255,098 
201319,015 87,408 137,890 179,302 197,907 217,030 238,798 245,504 
201413,815 63,296 129,502 172,835 207,640 229,512 243,338 
20159,061 52,019 100,048 126,452 174,108 193,130 
201610,547 68,178 127,229 158,159 205,514 
20179,289 67,572 113,047 143,149 
201812,255 68,300 118,184 
201912,387 65,345 
202017,098 
Total1,763,247 
All outstanding liabilities before 2011, net of reinsurance97,957 
Liabilities for losses and loss adjustment expenses, net of reinsurance$1,377,179 
Multi-line and other specialty ($000’s except claim count) (1)
Incurred losses and allocated loss adjustment expenses, net of reinsuranceDecember 31, 2020
Total of IBNR liabilities plus expected development on reported claimsCumulative
number of reported claims
Year ended December 31,
Accident year2011
unaudited
2012
unaudited
2013
unaudited
2014
unaudited
2015
unaudited
2016
unaudited
2017
unaudited
2018
unaudited
2019
unaudited
2020
2011$183,081 $188,766 $182,979 $176,545 $172,649 $172,403 $168,888 $170,350 $170,091 $166,577 $1,790 44,989 
2012253,525 264,217 258,467 256,106 255,277 247,050 247,279 244,191 244,246 2,551 55,512 
2013274,361 283,112 274,483 281,697 271,687 275,386 273,177 270,853 4,661 72,323 
2014349,754 373,978 370,442 387,082 398,240 410,366 418,512 12,232 111,727 
2015398,755 418,761 420,642 443,258 456,329 471,865 18,596 151,598 
2016482,653 504,586 514,650 516,239 537,591 28,282 177,931 
2017551,688 579,217 578,341 615,833 45,947 221,643 
2018570,069 621,534 629,299 74,894 247,622 
2019613,638 667,415 134,996 234,383 
2020654,302 403,044 117,814 
Total$4,676,493 
Cumulative paid losses and allocated loss adjustment expenses, net of reinsurance
2011$51,312 $103,372 $117,927 $136,686 $148,049 $151,710 $157,199 $159,526 $162,460 $162,995 
201278,337 165,836 190,064 209,124 222,929 231,776 232,987 236,282 239,244 
201386,791 152,773 185,611 222,086 237,898 251,698 257,744 260,374 
2014109,236 206,444 255,332 306,411 341,580 367,026 380,041 
2015142,009 250,360 304,197 350,781 380,818 409,455 
2016181,415 323,681 382,805 425,642 464,774 
2017187,606 363,275 419,454 480,336 
2018214,475 399,852 464,970 
2019213,950 397,104 
2020174,862 
Total3,434,155 
All outstanding liabilities before 2011, net of reinsurance31,453 
Liabilities for losses and loss adjustment expenses, net of reinsurance$1,273,791 
(1) In 2019, the Company entered into a loss portfolio transfer agreement, which transferred reserves associated with certain multi-line business for accident years 2017 and prior to a third party. This loss portfolio transfer agreement was commuted in 2020, therefore the complete history of the subject business is now included in the multi-line triangles above.
The following table presents the average annual percentage payout of incurred losses and allocated loss adjustment expenses by age, net of reinsurance, as of December 31, 2020:
Average annual percentage payout of incurred losses and allocated loss adjustment expenses by age, net of reinsurance
Year 1Year 2Year 3Year 4Year 5Year 6Year 7Year 8Year 9Year 10
Property, energy, marine and aviation
18.6 %41.7 %19.6 %7.8 %3.9 %3.3 %2.3 %(1.0)%(0.6)%0.1 %
Third party occurrence business3.2 %9.2 %11.3 %11.6 %11.3 %8.8 %6.2 %3.9 %4.3 %3.6 %
Third party claims-made business
4.5 %18.7 %18.4 %12.9 %12.2 %7.1 %5.8 %5.2 %3.3 %2.5 %
Multi-line and other specialty30.8 %27.7 %10.5 %10.4 %6.7 %4.6 %2.3 %1.2 %1.5 %0.3 %
Reinsurance Segment
Loss Reserves for the Company’s reinsurance segment are comprised of (1) case reserves, (2) additional case reserves (“ACRs”) and (3) IBNR reserves. The Company receives reports of claims notices from ceding companies and records case reserves based upon the amount of reserves recommended by the ceding company. Case reserves may be supplemented by ACRs, which may be estimated by the Company’s claims personnel ahead of official notification from the ceding company, or when judgment regarding the size or severity of the known event differs from the ceding company. In certain instances, the Company establishes ACRs even when the ceding company does not report any liability on a known event. In addition, specific claim information reported by ceding companies or obtained through claim audits can alert the Company to emerging trends such as changing legal interpretations of coverage and liability, claims from unexpected sources or classes of business, and significant changes in the frequency or severity of individual claims. Such information is often used in the process of estimating IBNR reserves. IBNR reserves are established to provide for incurred claims which have not yet been reported at the balance sheet date as well as to adjust for any projected variance in case reserving. Actuaries estimate ultimate losses and loss adjustment expenses using various generally accepted actuarial methods applied to known losses and other relevant information. Like case reserves, IBNR reserves are adjusted as additional information becomes known or payments are made. The process of estimating Loss Reserves involves a considerable degree of judgment by management and, as of any given date, is inherently uncertain.
The estimation of Loss Reserves for the reinsurance segment is subject to the same risk factors as the estimation of Loss Reserves for the insurance segment. In addition, the inherent uncertainties of estimating such reserves are even greater for reinsurers, due primarily to the following factors: (1) the claim-tail for reinsurers is generally longer because claims are first reported to the ceding company and then to the reinsurer through one or more intermediaries, (2) the reliance on premium estimates, where reports have not been received from the ceding company, in the reserving process, (3) the potential for writing a number of reinsurance contracts with different ceding companies with the same exposure to a single loss event, (4) the diversity of loss development
patterns among different types of reinsurance contracts, (5) the necessary reliance on the ceding companies for information regarding reported claims and (6) the differing reserving practices among ceding companies.
Ultimate losses and loss adjustment expenses are generally determined by extrapolation of claim emergence and settlement patterns observed in the past that can reasonably be expected to persist into the future.As with the insurance segment, the process of estimating Loss Reserves for the reinsurance segment involves a considerable degree of judgment by management and, as of any given date, is inherently uncertain. As discussed above, such uncertainty is greater for reinsurers compared to insurers. As a result, our reinsurance operations obtain information from numerous sources to assist in the process. Pricing actuaries from the reinsurance segment devote considerable effort to understanding and analyzing a ceding company’s operations and loss history during the underwriting of the business, using a combination of ceding company and industry statistics. Such statistics normally include historical premium and loss data by class of business, individual claim information for larger claims, distributions of insurance limits provided, loss reporting and payment patterns, and rate change history. This analysis is used to project expected loss ratios for each treaty during the upcoming contract period.
As mentioned above, there can be a considerable time lag from the time a claim is reported to a ceding company to the time it is reported to the reinsurer. The lag can be several years in some cases and may be attributed to a number of reasons, including the time it takes to investigate a claim, delays associated with the litigation process, the deterioration in a claimant’s physical condition many years after an accident occurs, the case reserving approach of the ceding company, etc. In the reserving process, the Company assumes that such lags are predictable, on average, over time and therefore the lags are contemplated in the loss reporting patterns used in their actuarial methods. This means that the reinsurance segment must rely on estimates for a longer period of time than does an insurance company. Backlogs in the recording of assumed reinsurance can also complicate the accuracy of loss reserve estimation. As of December 31, 2020 there were no significant backlogs related to the processing of assumed reinsurance information at our reinsurance operations.
The reinsurance segment relies heavily on information reported by ceding companies, as discussed above. In order to determine the accuracy and completeness of such information, underwriters, actuaries, and claims personnel often perform audits of ceding companies and regularly review information received from ceding companies for unusual or unexpected results. Material findings are usually discussed with the ceding companies. The Company sometimes encounters situations where they determine that a claim presentation from a ceding company is not in accordance with contract terms. In these situations, the Company attempts to resolve the dispute with the ceding company. Most situations are resolved amicably and without the need for litigation or arbitration. However, in the infrequent situations where a resolution is not possible, the Company will vigorously defend its position in such disputes.
Although Loss Reserves are initially determined based on underwriting and pricing analysis, the Company applies several generally accepted actuarial methods, as discussed above, on a quarterly basis to evaluate its Loss Reserves in addition to the expected loss method, in particular for reserves from more mature underwriting years (the year in which business is underwritten). Each quarter, as part of the reserving process, the Company’s actuaries reaffirm that the assumptions used in the reserving process continue to form a sound basis for projection of liabilities. If actual loss activity differs substantially from expectations based on historical information, an adjustment to Loss Reserves may be supported. Estimated Loss Reserves for more mature underwriting years are now based more on actual loss activity and historical patterns than on the initial assumptions based on pricing indications. More recent underwriting years rely more heavily on internal pricing assumptions. The Company places more or less reliance on a particular actuarial method based on the facts and circumstances at the time the estimates of Loss Reserves are made.
In the initial reserving process for short-tail reinsurance lines (consisting of property excluding property catastrophe and property catastrophe exposures), the Company relies on a combination of the reserving methods discussed above. For known catastrophic events, the reserving process also includes the usage of catastrophe models and a heavy reliance on analysis which includes ceding company inquiries and management judgment. The development of property losses may be unstable, especially where there is high catastrophic exposure, may be characterized by high severity, low frequency losses for excess and catastrophe-exposed business and may be highly correlated across contracts. As time passes, for a given underwriting year, additional weight is given to the paid and incurred B-F loss development methods and historical paid and incurred loss development
methods in the reserving process. The Company makes a number of key assumptions in reserving for short-tail lines, including that historical paid and reported development patterns are stable, catastrophe models provide useful information about our exposure to catastrophic events that have occurred and our underwriters’ judgment and guidance received from ceding companies as to potential loss exposures may be relied on. The expected loss ratios used in the initial reserving process for property exposures have varied over time due to changes in pricing, reinsurance structure, estimates of catastrophe losses, terms and conditions and geographical distribution. As losses in property lines are reported relatively quickly, expected loss ratios are selected for the current underwriting year incorporating the experience for earlier underwriting years, adjusted for rate changes, inflation, changes in reinsurance programs, expectations about present and future market conditions and expected attritional losses based on modeling. Due to the short-tail nature of property business, reported loss experience emerges quickly and ultimate losses are known in a reasonably short period of time.
In the initial reserving process for medium-tail and long-tail reinsurance lines (consisting of casualty, other specialty, marine and aviation and other exposures), the Company primarily relies on the expected loss method. The development of medium-tail and long-tail business may be unstable, especially if there are high severity major events, with business written on an excess of loss basis typically having a longer tail than business written on a pro rata basis. As time passes, for a given underwriting year, additional weight is given to the paid and incurred B-F loss development methods and eventually to the historical paid and incurred loss development methods in the reserving process. Our reinsurance operations make a number of key assumptions in reserving for medium-tail and long-tail lines, including that the pricing loss ratio is the best estimate of the ultimate loss ratio at the time the contract is entered into, historical paid and reported development patterns are stable and claims personnel and underwriters’ analyses of our exposure to major events are our best estimate of our exposure to the known claims on those events. The expected loss ratios used in our reinsurance operations’ initial reserving process for medium-tail and long-tail contracts have varied over time due to changes in pricing, terms and conditions and reinsurance structure. As the credibility of historical experience for earlier underwriting years increases, the experience from these underwriting years is used in the actuarial analysis to determine future underwriting year expected loss ratios, adjusted for changes in pricing, loss trends, terms and conditions and reinsurance structure.
The following tables present information on the reinsurance segment’s short-duration insurance contracts:
Casualty ($000’s)
Incurred losses and allocated loss adjustment expenses, net of reinsuranceDecember 31, 2020
Total of IBNR liabilities plus expected development on reported claimsCumulative
number of reported claims
Year ended December 31,
Accident year2011
unaudited
2012
unaudited
2013
unaudited
2014
unaudited
2015
unaudited
2016
unaudited
2017
unaudited
2018
unaudited
2019
unaudited
2020
2011$152,359 $155,796 $149,799 $145,259 $141,023 $138,257 $132,142 $129,307 $130,769 $126,543 $16,905 N/A
2012145,770 143,950 139,762 127,563 117,551 111,938 120,655 123,884 122,312 28,208 N/A
2013168,738 161,993 157,804 151,340 139,221 137,591 133,857 137,978 37,566 N/A
2014219,506 224,801 222,220 236,505 233,033 242,792 243,067 48,039 N/A
2015225,908 224,525 233,644 240,886 244,861 251,747 63,133 N/A
2016217,499 229,862 254,032 268,880 275,966 65,394 N/A
2017268,353 253,959 269,434 297,998 79,858 N/A
2018282,010 296,507 286,944 81,666 N/A
2019338,581 347,126 178,981 N/A
2020393,328 333,679 N/A
Total$2,483,009 
Cumulative paid losses and allocated loss adjustment expenses, net of reinsurance
2011$2,353 $11,509 $21,684 $38,998 $55,027 $64,486 $71,457 $76,722 $82,728 $87,463 
20121,371 8,637 14,875 25,738 36,809 48,109 59,877 70,308 76,287 
20132,549 10,050 23,209 43,263 54,797 63,415 71,150 77,089 
20143,962 16,160 40,949 63,636 91,366 114,798 135,101 
20154,490 20,340 47,381 71,231 97,007 120,889 
20165,763 25,720 51,822 86,989 114,096 
20176,441 29,414 59,377 108,591 
20187,588 31,118 106,454 
201915,824 57,682 
202017,822 
Total901,474 
All outstanding liabilities before 2011, net of reinsurance303,572 
Liabilities for losses and loss adjustment expenses, net of reinsurance$1,885,107 

Property catastrophe ($000’s)
Incurred losses and allocated loss adjustment expenses, net of reinsuranceDecember 31, 2020
Total of IBNR liabilities plus expected development on reported claimsCumulative
number of reported claims
Year ended December 31,
Accident year2011
unaudited
2012
unaudited
2013
unaudited
2014
unaudited
2015
unaudited
2016
unaudited
2017
unaudited
2018
unaudited
2019
unaudited
2020
2011$215,493 $195,232 $176,170 $162,993 $159,174 $158,465 $156,150 $152,082 $150,971 $150,459 $— N/A
2012150,570 123,288 108,787 102,254 99,998 99,178 97,143 97,252 96,637 132 N/A
201369,044 49,507 37,714 33,143 30,567 29,848 28,910 29,060 (132)N/A
201446,774 32,188 26,438 23,491 21,671 20,957 20,845 (10)N/A
201534,895 19,282 12,724 6,643 4,746 4,102 67 N/A
201626,671 19,556 15,313 11,487 9,027 1,302 N/A
201782,521 49,340 46,354 32,747 87 N/A
201875,309 63,106 44,448 5,855 N/A
201951,202 35,789 9,545 N/A
2020273,069 50,368 N/A
Total$696,183 
Cumulative paid losses and allocated loss adjustment expenses, net of reinsurance
2011$63,175 $89,042 $122,060 $137,400 $143,141 $145,774 $147,929 $148,338 $148,929 $148,403 
201225,850 70,843 83,929 90,834 92,993 94,122 94,732 95,419 95,521 
201312,283 19,701 24,911 26,953 28,859 29,117 29,119 29,846 
201413,702 20,635 19,293 20,170 19,786 19,993 20,146 
2015(3,161)(1,825)2,660 2,959 2,537 2,630 
2016(6,752)2,646 3,057 4,515 3,803 
201730,173 30,224 34,534 24,209 
201825,505 14,232 26,189 
20193,878 17,393 
202053,495 
Total421,635 
All outstanding liabilities before 2011, net of reinsurance1,624 
Liabilities for losses and loss adjustment expenses, net of reinsurance$276,172 
Property excluding property catastrophe ($000’s)
Incurred losses and allocated loss adjustment expenses, net of reinsuranceDecember 31, 2020
Total of IBNR liabilities plus expected development on reported claimsCumulative
number of reported claims
Year ended December 31,
Accident year2011
unaudited
2012
unaudited
2013
unaudited
2014
unaudited
2015
unaudited
2016
unaudited
2017
unaudited
2018
unaudited
2019
unaudited
2020
2011$208,318 $180,624 $168,122 $164,414 $160,264 $158,952 $156,647 $155,606 $154,261 $152,753 $801 N/A
2012156,980 122,552 124,408 119,838 115,425 113,201 111,722 109,122 103,596 251 N/A
2013116,130 77,474 71,100 66,669 64,950 64,162 62,949 63,769 770 N/A
2014144,299 118,056 99,891 91,272 88,994 84,679 82,899 2,063 N/A
2015215,856 189,735 185,288 189,702 188,992 177,928 12,275 N/A
2016178,103 147,154 139,032 138,008 141,789 15,986 N/A
2017262,387 245,333 231,062 223,442 17,528 N/A
2018223,917 241,754 238,162 18,520 N/A
2019219,130 209,696 32,266 N/A
2020387,907 167,596 N/A
Total$1,781,941 
Cumulative paid losses and allocated loss adjustment expenses, net of reinsurance
2011$47,949 $122,137 $142,081 $146,626 $148,684 $149,788 $150,028 $150,302 $151,322 $150,417 
201226,158 78,416 93,752 102,445 103,452 104,091 103,274 103,216 103,076 
201326,068 43,068 50,208 53,389 54,202 56,090 61,601 62,591 
201423,641 63,144 72,133 77,098 78,753 79,146 79,009 
201575,725 119,578 150,207 161,447 166,632 160,271 
201633,418 96,174 99,954 105,486 113,336 
201725,807 118,658 148,638 156,523 
201829,724 108,263 153,599 
201943,809 125,698 
2020102,474 
Total1,206,994 
All outstanding liabilities before 2011, net of reinsurance6,125 
Liabilities for losses and loss adjustment expenses, net of reinsurance$581,072 

Marine and aviation ($000’s)
Incurred losses and allocated loss adjustment expenses, net of reinsuranceDecember 31, 2020
Total of IBNR liabilities plus expected development on reported claimsCumulative
number of reported claims
Year ended December 31,
Accident year2011
unaudited
2012
unaudited
2013
unaudited
2014
unaudited
2015
unaudited
2016
unaudited
2017
unaudited
2018
unaudited
2019
unaudited
2020
2011$39,359 $32,956 $35,889 $32,436 $28,811 $27,213 $27,264 $24,871 $23,792 $23,517 $1,317 N/A
201259,117 58,956 55,172 52,428 51,223 49,865 46,183 43,165 41,316 2,228 N/A
201339,538 38,509 37,545 36,101 35,993 35,248 34,806 31,087 5,039 N/A
201431,333 29,576 27,763 26,059 24,050 23,695 22,347 5,044 N/A
201534,066 37,875 31,953 31,910 30,964 28,618 4,738 N/A
201627,409 22,804 23,622 19,344 17,029 8,230 N/A
201728,868 26,407 23,878 20,853 6,783 N/A
201828,355 26,395 24,957 7,490 N/A
201949,466 55,921 17,208 N/A
202084,238 58,896 N/A
Total$349,883 
Cumulative paid losses and allocated loss adjustment expenses, net of reinsurance
2011$4,421 $12,122 $16,530 $19,235 $15,959 $16,634 $21,988 $21,911 $21,973 $21,979 
20122,664 11,480 27,623 33,428 35,174 36,379 37,871 38,164 38,257 
20135,109 14,330 19,075 22,111 23,135 24,427 24,804 24,520 
20144,373 8,221 11,872 12,748 14,939 15,376 16,253 
201511 13,476 19,120 20,971 22,773 22,456 
2016(7,300)(1,655)552 3,292 5,900 
20171,659 6,546 9,372 11,037 
20182,006 7,087 11,384 
201911,015 21,930 
20209,339 
Total183,055 
All outstanding liabilities before 2011, net of reinsurance16,534 
Liabilities for losses and loss adjustment expenses, net of reinsurance$183,362 
Other specialty ($000’s)
Incurred losses and allocated loss adjustment expenses, net of reinsuranceDecember 31, 2020
Total of IBNR liabilities plus expected development on reported claimsCumulative
number of reported claims
Year ended December 31,
Accident year2011
unaudited
2012
unaudited
2013
unaudited
2014
unaudited
2015
unaudited
2016
unaudited
2017
unaudited
2018
unaudited
2019
unaudited
2020
2011$115,554 $100,395 $96,117 $94,512 $92,703 $91,334 $90,727 $88,820 $89,163 $87,648 $1,058 N/A
2012231,531 219,627 209,355 203,114 200,945 203,898 202,085 196,309 187,908 4,635 N/A
2013259,594 232,427 222,046 218,354 219,314 216,861 216,579 210,455 10,351 N/A
2014283,138 263,653 265,417 258,595 253,373 255,341 250,825 15,127 N/A
2015217,666 208,927 207,220 204,179 204,458 201,046 19,996 N/A
2016231,160 228,501 222,788 217,054 223,777 18,179 N/A
2017282,024 271,084 260,051 259,041 40,904 N/A
2018338,298 334,567 326,027 53,316 N/A
2019378,545 358,997 80,438 N/A
2020551,374 259,496 N/A
Total$2,657,098 
Cumulative paid losses and allocated loss adjustment expenses, net of reinsurance
2011$29,717 $59,715 $72,298 $77,018 $80,642 $82,468 $84,815 $85,960 $85,643 $85,854 
201247,484 126,138 149,753 161,073 169,096 173,202 177,742 179,614 179,943 
201358,962 122,813 149,617 166,100 175,892 181,279 188,746 189,147 
201471,006 151,115 187,560 201,189 207,965 219,234 221,978 
201556,438 118,770 143,690 150,969 160,243 168,314 
201667,730 143,624 168,425 180,542 192,947 
201776,847 171,632 201,378 209,005 
201875,395 211,954 243,257 
201984,416 167,055 
2020101,559 
Total1,759,059 
All outstanding liabilities before 2011, net of reinsurance8,956 
Liabilities for losses and loss adjustment expenses, net of reinsurance$906,995 
The following table presents the average annual percentage payout of incurred losses and allocated loss adjustment expenses by age, net of reinsurance, as of December 31, 2020:
Average annual percentage payout of incurred losses and allocated loss adjustment expenses by age, net of reinsurance
Year 1Year 2Year 3Year 4Year 5Year 6Year 7Year 8Year 9Year 10
Casualty
2.4 %7.2 %11.2 %12.2 %10.3 %8.4 %7.3 %5.7 %4.8 %3.7 %
Property catastrophe20.5 %30.2 %25.1 %2.9 %(1.2)%1.4 %0.7 %1.2 %0.2 %(0.3)%
Property excluding property catastrophe
26.4 %39.5 %12.8 %5.2 %2.3 %0.2 %2.0 %0.6 %0.3 %(0.6)%
Marine and aviation
6.5 %27.2 %19.1 %10.0 %4.2 %2.2 %7.9 %(0.2)%0.2 %— %
Other specialty26.9 %33.9 %12.3 %5.2 %4.3 %3.1 %2.4 %0.8 %(0.1)%0.2 %
Mortgage Segment
The Company’s mortgage segment includes (1) direct mortgage insurance in the U.S., (2) direct mortgage insurance in Europe, (3) global mortgage reinsurance and (4) participation in various GSE credit risk-sharing products. The latter three categories along with second lien and student loan exposures are excluded on the basis of insignificance for the purposes of presenting disclosures related to short duration contracts.
For direct mortgage insurance business, the Company establishes case reserves for loans that have been reported as delinquent by loan servicers as well as those that are delinquent but not reported (IBNR reserves). The Company’s U.S. mortgage insurance operations also reserve for the expenses of adjusting claims related to these delinquencies. The trigger that creates a case reserve estimate is that an insured loan is reported to us as being two payments in arrears. The actuarial reviews and documentation created in the reserving process are completed in accordance with
generally accepted actuarial standards. The selected assumptions reflect actuarial judgment based on the analysis of historical data and experience combined with information concerning current underwriting, economic, judicial, regulatory and other influences on ultimate claim settlements.
Because the reserving process requires the Company to forecast future conditions, it is inherently uncertain and requires significant judgment and estimation. The use of different estimates would result in the establishment of different reserve levels. Additionally, changes in estimates are likely to occur from period to period as economic conditions change, and the ultimate liability may vary significantly from the estimates used. Major risk factors include (but are not limited to) changes in home prices and borrower equity, which can limit the borrower’s ability to sell the property and satisfy the outstanding loan balance, and changes in unemployment, which can affect the borrower’s income and ability to make mortgage payments. The unique nature of the COVID-19 pandemic, with no historical
precedent, adds further uncertainty to current reserve estimates.
The lead actuarial methodology used by the Company is a frequency-severity method based on the inventory of pending delinquencies. Each month the loan servicers report the delinquency status of each insured loan. Using the frequency-severity method allows the Company to take advantage of its knowledge of the number of delinquent loans and the coverage provided (“risk size”) on those loans by directly relating the reserves to these amounts. The delinquencies are grouped into homogeneous cohorts for analysis, reflecting product type and age of delinquency. A claim rate is then developed for each cohort which represents the frequency with which the delinquencies become claims. The claim frequency rates are based on an analysis of the patterns of emerging cure counts and claim counts, the foreclosure status of the pending delinquencies, the product and geographical mix of the delinquencies and our view of future economic and claim conditions, which include trends in home prices and unemployment. Claim rates can vary materially by age of delinquency, depending on the mix of delinquencies and economic conditions.
Claim size severity estimates are determined by examining the risk sizes on the delinquent loans and estimating the portion of risk that will be paid, as well as any expenses. This is done based on a review of historical development patterns, an assessment of economic conditions and the level of equity the borrowers may have in their homes, as well as considering economic conditions and loss mitigation opportunities. Mortgage insurance is generally not subject to large claim sizes, as with some other lines of insurance. A claim size over $250,000 is rare, and this helps reduce the volatility of claim size estimates.
The claim rate and claim size assumptions generate case reserves for the population of reported delinquencies. The reserve for unreported delinquencies (included in IBNR reserves) is estimated by looking at historical patterns of reporting. Claim rates and claim sizes can then be assigned to estimated unreported delinquencies using assumptions made in the establishment of case reserves.
Mortgage insurance Loss Reserves are short-tail, in the sense that the vast majority of delinquencies are resolved within two years of being reported. Due to the forbearances and foreclosure moratoriums associated with COVID-19, settlement timelines may be extended. While reserves are initially analyzed by reserve cohort, as described above, they are also rolled up by underwriting year to ensure that reserve assumptions are consistent with the performance of the underwriting year. The accuracy of prior reserve assumptions is also checked in hindsight to determine if adjustments to the assumptions are needed.
Loss Reserves for the Company’s mortgage reinsurance business and GSE credit-risk sharing transactions are comprised of case reserves and IBNR reserves. The Company’s mortgage reinsurance operations receive reports of delinquent loans and claims notices from ceding companies and record case reserves based upon the amount of reserves recommended by the ceding company. In addition, specific claim and delinquency information reported by ceding companies is used in the process of estimating IBNR reserves.
The tables below include the acquired business of United Guaranty Corporation (“UGC”) (including UGRIC), across all periods presented. Consistent with prior practice, the Company provides accident years 2012 and forward in the disclosures below. The following table presents information on the mortgage segment’s short-duration insurance contracts:
Direct mortgage insurance business in the U.S. ($000’s except claim count)
Incurred losses and allocated loss adjustment expenses, net of reinsuranceDecember 31, 2020
Total of IBNR liabilities plus expected development on reported claimsCumulative
number of paid claims
Year ended December 31,
Accident year2012
unaudited
2013
unaudited
2014
unaudited
2015
unaudited
2016
unaudited
2017
unaudited
2018
unaudited
2019
unaudited
2020
2012$520,835 $480,592 $475,317 $469,238 $467,296 $459,467 $458,065 $456,286 $456,331 15,083 
2013469,311 419,668 411,793 405,809 395,693 393,149 390,987 391,062 9,471 
2014316,095 297,151 279,434 266,027 265,992 261,091 262,682 6,290 
2015222,790 197,238 198,001 194,677 189,235 190,913 4,543 
2016183,556 170,532 148,715 140,608 142,392 3,411 
2017179,376 132,220 107,255 108,181 630 2,429 
2018132,318 96,357 89,120 1,281 1,512 
2019108,424 119,253 2,921 566 
2020420,003 15,879 32 
Total$2,179,937 
Cumulative paid losses and allocated loss adjustment expenses, net of reinsurance
2012(106,065)186,605 327,605 395,695 426,024 441,577 448,151 452,348 453,587 
201341,447 203,957 308,956 353,189 373,909 382,200 386,853 387,894 
201420,099 129,159 201,925 233,879 247,038 254,175 256,285 
201516,159 92,431 151,222 171,337 180,321 183,472 
201611,462 72,201 113,357 127,286 131,161 
20178,622 48,112 78,650 87,317 
20183,966 31,478 50,135 
20192,899 20,105 
20201,040 
1,570,996 
All outstanding liabilities before 2012, net of reinsurance14,504 
Liabilities for losses and loss adjustment expenses, net of reinsurance$623,445 
The following table presents the average annual percentage payout of incurred losses and allocated loss adjustment expenses by age, net of reinsurance, as of December 31, 2020:
Average annual percentage payout of incurred losses and allocated loss adjustment expenses by age, net of reinsurance
Year 1Year 2Year 3Year 4Year 5Year 6Year 7Year 8Year 9
U.S. Primary3.0 %39.0 %27.8 %11.1 %4.9 %2.5 %1.1 %0.6 %0.3 %
Other Segment
Loss Reserves for the ‘other’ segment (i.e., Watford) are comprised of case reserves, ACRs and IBNR reserves. For all business assumed by Watford, the Company acts as reinsurance underwriting manager, provides actuarial and risk management services and recommends a level of Loss Reserves to Watford. The Company does not guarantee or provide credit support for Watford, and the Company’s financial exposure to Watford is limited to its investment in Watford’s common and preferred shares and counterparty credit risk (mitigated by collateral) arising from the reinsurance transactions. The estimation of Loss Reserves for Watford is subject to the same risk factors as the estimation of Loss Reserves for the Company’s insurance, reinsurance
and mortgage segments as described earlier. Watford performs its own reserve reviews and sets its reserves independently. As noted previously, the Company determined that amounts in the ‘other’ segment are insignificant for the purposes of these footnote disclosures.
For the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company did not make any significant changes in its methodologies or assumptions as described above (a) to determine the presented amounts of IBNR reserves, (b) for expected development on case reserves.
The Company measures claim frequency information on an individual claim count basis. Claim counts are provided for the insurance and mortgage segments, where reliable
information is available. For insurance business, any claim which is reported to the Company is included in the count, even if it is subsequently settled without liability to the Company. The Company does not include claim count information for losses from U.S. insurance pool business where individual loss information is unavailable and impracticable to obtain. For mortgage business, only delinquencies which subsequently become claims are included in the claim count. For reinsurance business, claim counts are not provided. A significant amount of the Company’s reinsurance business is written on a proportional basis, for which individual loss information is typically unavailable and impracticable to obtain.
For the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company did not make any significant changes in its methodologies or assumptions as described above to calculate the cumulative claim frequency.
The following table represents a reconciliation of the disclosures of net incurred and paid loss development tables to the reserve for losses and loss adjustment expenses at December 31, 2020:
December 31, 2020
Net outstanding liabilities
Insurance
Property, energy, marine and aviation
$492,588 
Third party occurrence business
2,558,285 
Third party claims-made business
1,377,179 
Multi-line and other specialty
1,273,791 
Reinsurance
Casualty
1,885,107 
Property catastrophe
276,172 
Property excluding property catastrophe
581,072 
Marine and aviation
183,362 
Other specialty
906,995 
Mortgage
U.S. primary623,445 
Other short duration lines not included in disclosures (1)1,765,397 
Total for short duration lines11,923,393 
Unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses recoverable
Insurance
Property, energy, marine and aviation
331,817 
Third party occurrence business
1,272,034 
Third party claims-made business
808,238 
Multi-line and other specialty
246,915 
Reinsurance
Casualty
536,809 
Property catastrophe
266,946 
Property excluding property catastrophe
70,108 
Marine and aviation
63,781 
Other specialty
317,011 
Mortgage
U.S. primary52,016 
Other short duration lines not included in disclosures (2)1,090,486 
Intercompany eliminations(718,507)
Total for short duration lines4,337,654 
Lines other than short duration75,369 
Discounting(23,326)
Unallocated claims adjustment expenses200,839 
252,882 
Total gross reserves for losses and loss adjustment expenses$16,513,929 
(1)    Includes net outstanding liabilities of $1.2 billion for the ‘other’ segment.
(2)    Includes unpaid loss and loss adjustment expenses recoverable of $153.1 million related to the loss portfolio transfer reinsurance agreement.