XML 19 R8.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.5.0.2
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
9 Months Ended
Sep. 24, 2016
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Fair Value of Financial Instruments:

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. The Company uses a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value.  These tiers include: Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; Level 2, defined as inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable; and Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions.

The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, short-term receivables, trade payables, debt instruments and an interest rate swap.  Due to their short-term nature, the carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, short-term receivables and trade payables approximate current fair value at each balance sheet date. The Company had $295.0 million in borrowings under the Senior Credit Facility (as defined in Note 5) at September 24, 2016, $150.0 million in borrowings at December 26, 2015, and $190.0 million in borrowings at September 26, 2015. Based on market interest rates (Level 2 inputs), the carrying value of our borrowings under the Senior Credit Facility approximates fair value for each period reported. The fair value of the Company’s interest rate swap liability is determined based on the present value of expected future cash flows using forward rate curves (a Level 2 input). As described in further detail in Note 6, the fair value of the interest rate swap liability, excluding accrued interest, is $1.8 million at September 24, 2016. The interest rate swap did not have a fair value at either December 26, 2015 or September 26, 2015, as it was not in place at either date as described in Note 6.