XML 61 R14.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT
v3.20.2

LEASES | 12 Months Ended
--- | ---
Jun. 30, 2020
Leases [Abstract] |
Leases | LEASES During the first quarter of fiscal 2020, the Company adopted ASC 842 using the modified retrospective transition approach permitted under the new standard for leases that existed at July 1, 2019 and, accordingly, the prior comparative periods were not restated. Under this method, the Company was required to assess the remaining future payments of existing leases as of July 1, 2019. Additionally, as of the date of adoption, the Company elected the package of practical expedients that did not require the Company to assess whether expired or existing contracts contain leases as defined in ASC 842, did not require reassessment of the lease classification (i.e. operating lease vs. finance lease) for expired or existing leases, and did not require a change to the accounting for previously capitalized initial direct costs. The adoption of this standard impacted the Company’s consolidated balance sheet due to the recognition of right-of-use (“ROU”) assets and associated lease liabilities related to operating leases as compared to the previous accounting. The accounting for finance leases under ASC 842 is consistent with the prior accounting for capital leases. The impact of the adoption of this standard on the Company’s consolidated statements of earnings and consolidated statement of cash flows was not material. Per the guidance of ASC 842, a contract is, or contains, a lease if the contract conveys the right to control the use of an identified asset. The Company recognizes a lease liability and a related ROU asset at the commencement date for leases on its consolidated balance sheet, excluding short-term leases as noted below. The lease liability is equal to the present value of unpaid lease payments over the remaining lease term. The Company’s lease term at the commencement date may reflect options to extend or terminate the lease when it is reasonably certain that such options will be exercised. To determine the present value of the lease liability, the Company uses an incremental borrowing rate, which is defined as the rate of interest that the Company would have to pay to borrow (on a collateralized basis over a similar term) an amount equal to the lease payments in similar economic environments. The ROU asset is based on the corresponding lease liability adjusted for certain costs such as initial direct costs, prepaid lease payments and lease incentives received. Both operating and finance lease ROU assets are reviewed for impairment, consistent with other long-lived assets, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. After an ROU asset is impaired, any remaining balance of the ROU asset is amortized on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the remaining lease term or the estimated useful life. After the lease commencement date, the Company evaluates lease modifications, if any, that could result in a change in the accounting for leases. For a lease modification, an evaluation is performed to determine if it should be treated as either a separate lease or a change in the accounting of an existing lease. In addition, significant changes in events or circumstances within the Company’s control are assessed to determine whether a change in the accounting for leases is required. Certain of the Company’s leases provide for variable lease payments for the right to use an underlying asset that vary due to changes in facts and circumstances occurring after the commencement date, other than the passage of time. Variable lease payments that are dependent on an index or rate (e.g., Consumer Price Index) are included in the initial measurement of the lease liability, the initial measurement of the ROU asset, and the lease classification test based on the index or rate as of the commencement date. Any changes from the commencement date estimation of the index- and rate-based variable payments are expensed as incurred in the period of the change. Variable lease payments that are not known at the commencement date and are determinable based on the performance or use of the underlying asset, are not included in the initial measurement of the lease liability or the ROU asset, but instead are expensed as incurred. The Company’s variable lease payments primarily include rents based on a percentage of sales in excess of stipulated levels, common area maintenance based on the percentage of the total square footage leased by the Company, as well as costs relating to embedded leases, such as third-party manufacturing agreements. Upon the adoption of ASC 842, the Company made the following accounting policy elections: •Certain of the Company’s contracts contain lease components as well as non-lease components, such as an agreement to purchase services. Unless an accounting policy is elected to the contrary, the contract consideration must be allocated to the separate lease and non-lease components in accordance with ASC 842. For purposes of allocating contract consideration, the Company elected not to separate the lease components from non-lease components for all asset classes. This was applied to all existing leases as of July 1, 2019 and will be applied to new leases on an ongoing basis. •The Company elected not to apply the measurement and recognition requirements of ASC 842 to short-term leases (i.e. leases with a term of 12 months or less). Accordingly, short-term leases will not be recorded as ROU assets or lease liabilities on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets, and the related lease payments will be recognized in net earnings on a straight-line basis over the lease term. •For certain leases relating to automobiles, information technology equipment and office equipment, the Company elected to apply the guidance of ASC 842 utilizing a portfolio approach. Under this approach, the Company combined and accounted for leases (as a portfolio) with similar characteristics (e.g., lease term, discount rates, etc.) as a single lease, provided its application is not materially different when compared to the application at the individual lease level. As a result of the adoption of ASC 842, the Company recorded a cumulative adjustment of $29 million, net of tax, as a reduction to its fiscal 2020 opening balance of retained earnings, primarily to reflect the fair value of operating lease ROU assets that were impaired at, or prior to, the adoption date. In addition, the Company recognized operating lease ROU assets and liabilities of $2,598 million and $2,764 million, respectively, as of July 1, 2019. Finance lease ROU assets and liabilities are not material. The Company has operating and finance leases primarily for real estate properties, including corporate offices, facilities to support the Company’s manufacturing, assembly, research and development and distribution operations and retail stores, as well as information technology equipment, automobiles and office equipment, with remaining terms of approximately 1 year to 59 years. Some of the Company’s lease contracts include options to extend the leases for up to 30 years, while others include options to terminate the leases within 23 years. A summary of total lease costs and other information for the periods relating to the Company’s finance and operating leases is as follows:
(In millions) |  | June 30, 2020
Total lease cost |  |
Finance lease cost: |  |
Amortization of right-of-use assets |  | $ | 11 |
Interest on lease liabilities |  | 1 |
Operating lease cost |  | 625 |
Short-term lease cost |  | 24 |
Variable lease cost |  | 158 |
Total |  | $ | 819 |
Other information |  |
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities |  |
Operating cash flows from operating leases |  | $ | 426 |
Financing cash flows from finance leases |  | $ | 12 |
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for new operating lease liabilities |  | $ | 266 |
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for new finance lease liabilities |  | $ | 1 |
Weighted-average remaining lease term – finance leases |  | 2 years
Weighted-average remaining lease term – operating leases |  | 11 years
Weighted-average discount rate – finance leases |  | 2.7 | %
Weighted-average discount rate – operating leases |  | 2.5 | %
The total future minimum lease payments, over the remaining lease term, relating to the Company’s operating and finance leases for each of the next five fiscal years and thereafter is as follows:
(In millions) |  | Operating Leases |  | Finance Leases
Fiscal 2021 |  | $ | 436 |  |  | $ | 8 |
Fiscal 2022 |  | 377 |  |  | 4 |
Fiscal 2023 |  | 335 |  |  | 1 |
Fiscal 2024 |  | 301 |  |  | — |
Fiscal 2025 |  | 259 |  |  | — |
Thereafter |  | 1,349 |  |  | — |
Total future minimum lease payments |  | 3,057 |  |  | 13 |
Less imputed interest |  | (404) |  |  | — |
Total |  | $ | 2,653 |  |  | $ | 13 |
Operating lease and finance lease liabilities included in the consolidated balance sheet are as follows:
|  | June 30, 2020 |  |
(In millions) |  | Operating Leases |  | Finance Leases
Total current liabilities |  | $ | 375 |  |  | $ | 8 |
Total noncurrent liabilities |  | 2,278 |  |  | 5 |
Total |  | $ | 2,653 |  |  | $ | 13 |
The ROU assets and lease liabilities related to finance leases are included in Other assets and in Current debt and Long-term debt, respectively, in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2020. As a result of the challenging retail environment due to the COVID-19 pandemic, certain of the Company’s freestanding stores experienced lower net sales and lower expectations of future cash flows. These changes were an indicator that the carrying amounts may not be recoverable. Accordingly, the Company performed a recoverability test by comparing projected undiscounted cash flows from the use and eventual disposition of an asset or asset group to its carrying value. For those freestanding stores that failed step one of this test, the Company then compared the assets carrying values to their estimated fair values. Specifically, for the related ROU assets, the fair value was based on discounting market rent using a real estate discount rate. As a result, the Company recognized $215 million of long-lived asset impairments, included in Impairments of other intangible and long-lived assets, in the accompanying consolidated statements of earnings for the year ended June 30, 2020, related to operating lease ROU assets of $131 million, as well as the related property, plant and equipment and other long-lived assets in certain freestanding stores of $84 million, combined. A summary of the impairment charge for the year ended June 30, 2020 is as follows:
(In millions) |  |
Product Category |  | Impairment Charge
Skin care |  | $ | 22 |
Makeup |  | 160 |
Fragrance |  | 18 |
Hair care |  | 14 |
Other |  | 1 |
Total |  | $ | 215 |
Region |  | Impairment Charge
The Americas |  | $ | 103 |
Europe, the Middle East & Africa |  | 104 |
Asia/Pacific |  | 8 |
Total |  | $ | 215 |
As of June 30, 2020, the Company has additional operating lease obligations, relating primarily to facilities to support the Company’s manufacturing operations, retail stores, and corporate offices, that have not yet commenced of $103 million. In addition, the Company has additional finance lease obligations, relating to facilities to support the Company’s manufacturing operations, that have not yet commenced of $1 million. These leases will commence between fiscal 2021 and fiscal 2025 with lease terms of 1 year to 20 years.
Leases | LEASES During the first quarter of fiscal 2020, the Company adopted ASC 842 using the modified retrospective transition approach permitted under the new standard for leases that existed at July 1, 2019 and, accordingly, the prior comparative periods were not restated. Under this method, the Company was required to assess the remaining future payments of existing leases as of July 1, 2019. Additionally, as of the date of adoption, the Company elected the package of practical expedients that did not require the Company to assess whether expired or existing contracts contain leases as defined in ASC 842, did not require reassessment of the lease classification (i.e. operating lease vs. finance lease) for expired or existing leases, and did not require a change to the accounting for previously capitalized initial direct costs. The adoption of this standard impacted the Company’s consolidated balance sheet due to the recognition of right-of-use (“ROU”) assets and associated lease liabilities related to operating leases as compared to the previous accounting. The accounting for finance leases under ASC 842 is consistent with the prior accounting for capital leases. The impact of the adoption of this standard on the Company’s consolidated statements of earnings and consolidated statement of cash flows was not material. Per the guidance of ASC 842, a contract is, or contains, a lease if the contract conveys the right to control the use of an identified asset. The Company recognizes a lease liability and a related ROU asset at the commencement date for leases on its consolidated balance sheet, excluding short-term leases as noted below. The lease liability is equal to the present value of unpaid lease payments over the remaining lease term. The Company’s lease term at the commencement date may reflect options to extend or terminate the lease when it is reasonably certain that such options will be exercised. To determine the present value of the lease liability, the Company uses an incremental borrowing rate, which is defined as the rate of interest that the Company would have to pay to borrow (on a collateralized basis over a similar term) an amount equal to the lease payments in similar economic environments. The ROU asset is based on the corresponding lease liability adjusted for certain costs such as initial direct costs, prepaid lease payments and lease incentives received. Both operating and finance lease ROU assets are reviewed for impairment, consistent with other long-lived assets, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. After an ROU asset is impaired, any remaining balance of the ROU asset is amortized on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the remaining lease term or the estimated useful life. After the lease commencement date, the Company evaluates lease modifications, if any, that could result in a change in the accounting for leases. For a lease modification, an evaluation is performed to determine if it should be treated as either a separate lease or a change in the accounting of an existing lease. In addition, significant changes in events or circumstances within the Company’s control are assessed to determine whether a change in the accounting for leases is required. Certain of the Company’s leases provide for variable lease payments for the right to use an underlying asset that vary due to changes in facts and circumstances occurring after the commencement date, other than the passage of time. Variable lease payments that are dependent on an index or rate (e.g., Consumer Price Index) are included in the initial measurement of the lease liability, the initial measurement of the ROU asset, and the lease classification test based on the index or rate as of the commencement date. Any changes from the commencement date estimation of the index- and rate-based variable payments are expensed as incurred in the period of the change. Variable lease payments that are not known at the commencement date and are determinable based on the performance or use of the underlying asset, are not included in the initial measurement of the lease liability or the ROU asset, but instead are expensed as incurred. The Company’s variable lease payments primarily include rents based on a percentage of sales in excess of stipulated levels, common area maintenance based on the percentage of the total square footage leased by the Company, as well as costs relating to embedded leases, such as third-party manufacturing agreements. Upon the adoption of ASC 842, the Company made the following accounting policy elections: •Certain of the Company’s contracts contain lease components as well as non-lease components, such as an agreement to purchase services. Unless an accounting policy is elected to the contrary, the contract consideration must be allocated to the separate lease and non-lease components in accordance with ASC 842. For purposes of allocating contract consideration, the Company elected not to separate the lease components from non-lease components for all asset classes. This was applied to all existing leases as of July 1, 2019 and will be applied to new leases on an ongoing basis. •The Company elected not to apply the measurement and recognition requirements of ASC 842 to short-term leases (i.e. leases with a term of 12 months or less). Accordingly, short-term leases will not be recorded as ROU assets or lease liabilities on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets, and the related lease payments will be recognized in net earnings on a straight-line basis over the lease term. •For certain leases relating to automobiles, information technology equipment and office equipment, the Company elected to apply the guidance of ASC 842 utilizing a portfolio approach. Under this approach, the Company combined and accounted for leases (as a portfolio) with similar characteristics (e.g., lease term, discount rates, etc.) as a single lease, provided its application is not materially different when compared to the application at the individual lease level. As a result of the adoption of ASC 842, the Company recorded a cumulative adjustment of $29 million, net of tax, as a reduction to its fiscal 2020 opening balance of retained earnings, primarily to reflect the fair value of operating lease ROU assets that were impaired at, or prior to, the adoption date. In addition, the Company recognized operating lease ROU assets and liabilities of $2,598 million and $2,764 million, respectively, as of July 1, 2019. Finance lease ROU assets and liabilities are not material. The Company has operating and finance leases primarily for real estate properties, including corporate offices, facilities to support the Company’s manufacturing, assembly, research and development and distribution operations and retail stores, as well as information technology equipment, automobiles and office equipment, with remaining terms of approximately 1 year to 59 years. Some of the Company’s lease contracts include options to extend the leases for up to 30 years, while others include options to terminate the leases within 23 years. A summary of total lease costs and other information for the periods relating to the Company’s finance and operating leases is as follows:
(In millions) |  | June 30, 2020
Total lease cost |  |
Finance lease cost: |  |
Amortization of right-of-use assets |  | $ | 11 |
Interest on lease liabilities |  | 1 |
Operating lease cost |  | 625 |
Short-term lease cost |  | 24 |
Variable lease cost |  | 158 |
Total |  | $ | 819 |
Other information |  |
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities |  |
Operating cash flows from operating leases |  | $ | 426 |
Financing cash flows from finance leases |  | $ | 12 |
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for new operating lease liabilities |  | $ | 266 |
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for new finance lease liabilities |  | $ | 1 |
Weighted-average remaining lease term – finance leases |  | 2 years
Weighted-average remaining lease term – operating leases |  | 11 years
Weighted-average discount rate – finance leases |  | 2.7 | %
Weighted-average discount rate – operating leases |  | 2.5 | %
The total future minimum lease payments, over the remaining lease term, relating to the Company’s operating and finance leases for each of the next five fiscal years and thereafter is as follows:
(In millions) |  | Operating Leases |  | Finance Leases
Fiscal 2021 |  | $ | 436 |  |  | $ | 8 |
Fiscal 2022 |  | 377 |  |  | 4 |
Fiscal 2023 |  | 335 |  |  | 1 |
Fiscal 2024 |  | 301 |  |  | — |
Fiscal 2025 |  | 259 |  |  | — |
Thereafter |  | 1,349 |  |  | — |
Total future minimum lease payments |  | 3,057 |  |  | 13 |
Less imputed interest |  | (404) |  |  | — |
Total |  | $ | 2,653 |  |  | $ | 13 |
Operating lease and finance lease liabilities included in the consolidated balance sheet are as follows:
|  | June 30, 2020 |  |
(In millions) |  | Operating Leases |  | Finance Leases
Total current liabilities |  | $ | 375 |  |  | $ | 8 |
Total noncurrent liabilities |  | 2,278 |  |  | 5 |
Total |  | $ | 2,653 |  |  | $ | 13 |
The ROU assets and lease liabilities related to finance leases are included in Other assets and in Current debt and Long-term debt, respectively, in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2020. As a result of the challenging retail environment due to the COVID-19 pandemic, certain of the Company’s freestanding stores experienced lower net sales and lower expectations of future cash flows. These changes were an indicator that the carrying amounts may not be recoverable. Accordingly, the Company performed a recoverability test by comparing projected undiscounted cash flows from the use and eventual disposition of an asset or asset group to its carrying value. For those freestanding stores that failed step one of this test, the Company then compared the assets carrying values to their estimated fair values. Specifically, for the related ROU assets, the fair value was based on discounting market rent using a real estate discount rate. As a result, the Company recognized $215 million of long-lived asset impairments, included in Impairments of other intangible and long-lived assets, in the accompanying consolidated statements of earnings for the year ended June 30, 2020, related to operating lease ROU assets of $131 million, as well as the related property, plant and equipment and other long-lived assets in certain freestanding stores of $84 million, combined. A summary of the impairment charge for the year ended June 30, 2020 is as follows:
(In millions) |  |
Product Category |  | Impairment Charge
Skin care |  | $ | 22 |
Makeup |  | 160 |
Fragrance |  | 18 |
Hair care |  | 14 |
Other |  | 1 |
Total |  | $ | 215 |
Region |  | Impairment Charge
The Americas |  | $ | 103 |
Europe, the Middle East & Africa |  | 104 |
Asia/Pacific |  | 8 |
Total |  | $ | 215 |
As of June 30, 2020, the Company has additional operating lease obligations, relating primarily to facilities to support the Company’s manufacturing operations, retail stores, and corporate offices, that have not yet commenced of $103 million. In addition, the Company has additional finance lease obligations, relating to facilities to support the Company’s manufacturing operations, that have not yet commenced of $1 million. These leases will commence between fiscal 2021 and fiscal 2025 with lease terms of 1 year to 20 years.

X
- References No definition available. + Details
Name: | us-gaap_LeasesAbstract
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | xbrli:stringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition The entire disclosure for finance leases of lessee. Includes, but is not limited to, description of lessee's finance lease and maturity analysis of finance lease liability. + References Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/disclosureRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 842 -SubTopic 20 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/subtopic&trid=77888251 + Details
Name: | us-gaap_LesseeFinanceLeasesTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | nonnum:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition The entire disclosure for operating leases of lessee. Includes, but is not limited to, description of operating lease and maturity analysis of operating lease liability. + References Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/disclosureRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 842 -SubTopic 20 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/subtopic&trid=77888251 + Details
Name: | us-gaap_LesseeOperatingLeasesTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | nonnum:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration