XML 40 R27.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT
v3.23.2

Environmental Matters | 6 Months Ended
--- | ---
Jun. 30, 2023
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract] |
Environmental Matters | Environmental Matters NRG is subject to a wide range of environmental laws in the development, construction, ownership and operation of power plants. These laws generally require that governmental permits and approvals be obtained before construction and maintained during operation of power plants. The electric generation industry has been facing increasingly stringent requirements regarding air quality, GHG emissions, combustion byproducts, water discharge and use, and threatened and endangered species. In general, future laws are expected to require the addition of emissions controls or other environmental controls or to impose additional restrictions on the operations of the Company's facilities, which could have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. The Company has elected to use a $1 million disclosure threshold, as permitted, for environmental proceedings to which the government is a party. Air CPP/ACE Rules — On July 8, 2019, the EPA promulgated the ACE rule, which rescinded the CPP, which had sought to broadly regulate CO 2 emissions from the power sector. The ACE rule required states that have coal-fired EGUs to develop plans to seek heat rate improvements from coal-fired EGUs. On January 19, 2021, the D.C. Circuit vacated the ACE rule (but on February 22, 2021, at the EPA's request, stayed the issuance of the portion of the mandate that would vacate the repeal of the CPP). On June 30, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the "generation shifting" approach in the CPP exceeded the powers granted to the EPA by Congress. The Court did not address the related issues of whether the EPA may adopt only measures applied at each source. On May 23, 2023, the EPA proposed significantly revising the manner in which new and existing EGU's GHG emissions should be regulated including using hydrogen as a fuel, capturing and storing/sequestering CO 2 and requiring new units to be more efficient. The EPA has stated that it intends to finalize these revisions in 2024. The Company expects that the final rule will be challenged in the courts and accordingly uncertain for several years. Cross-State Air Pollution Rule ("CSAPR") — On March 15, 2023, the EPA signed and released a prepublication of a final rule that sought to significantly revise the CSAPR to address the good-neighbor obligations of the 2015 ozone NAAQS for 23 states after earlier having disapproved numerous state plans to address the issue. Several states, including Texas, challenged the EPA's disapproval of their state plans. On May 1, 2023, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit stayed the EPA's disapproval of Texas' and Louisiana's state plans, which disapprovals are a condition precedent to the EPA imposing its plan on Texas and Louisiana. Several other states are also similarly situated because of similar stays. Nonetheless, on June 5, 2023, the EPA published this rule in the Federal Register. On July 31, 2023, the EPA promulgated an interim final rule that addresses the various judicial orders that have stayed several State-Implementation-Plan disapprovals by limiting the effectiveness of certain requirements of the final rule promulgated on June 5, 2023 in Texas and five other states. The final rule decreases, over time, the ozone-season NOx allowances allocated to generators in the states not affected by the judicial stays beginning this summer by assuming that participants in this cap-and-trade program had or would optimize existing NOx controls and later install additional NOx controls. The Company cannot predict the outcome of the legal challenges to the: (i) various state disapprovals; (ii) the final rule promulgated on June 5, 2023; and (iii) the interim final rule promulgated on July 31, 2023 that seeks to address the judicial orders. Regional Haze Proposal — On May 2023, the EPA proposed to withdraw the existing Texas Sulfur Dioxide Trading Program and replace it with unit-specific SO 2 limits for 12 units in Texas to address requirements to improve visibility at National Parks and Wilderness areas. If finalized as proposed, it would result in more stringent SO 2 limits for two of the Company's coal-fired units in Texas. The Company cannot predict the outcome of this proposal. Water Effluent Limitations Guidelines — In November 2015, the EPA revised the Effluent Limitations Guidelines ("ELG") for Steam Electric Generating Facilities, which imposed more stringent requirements (as individual permits were renewed) for wastewater streams from FGD, fly ash, bottom ash and flue gas mercury control. On September 18, 2017, the EPA promulgated a final rule that, among other things, postponed the compliance dates to preserve the status quo for FGD wastewater and bottom ash transport water by two years to November 2020 until the EPA amended the rule. On October 13, 2020, the EPA amended the 2015 ELG rule by: (i) altering the stringency of certain limits for FGD wastewater; (ii) relaxing the zero-discharge requirement for bottom ash transport water; and (iii) changing several deadlines. In 2021, the EPA announced that it was initiating a new rulemaking to evaluate revising the ELG rule but keeping the existing rule (as amended in 2020) in place. On March 29, 2023, the EPA proposed revisions to the ELG and sought comments on the proposal, which the EPA are currently analyzing. In October 2021, NRG informed its regulators that the Company intends to comply with the ELG by ceasing combustion of coal by the end of 2028 at its domestic coal units outside of Texas, and installing appropriate controls by the end of 2025 at its two plants that have coal-fired units in Texas. Byproducts, Wastes, Hazardous Materials and Contamination In April 2015, the EPA finalized the rule regulating byproducts of coal combustion (e.g., ash and gypsum) as solid wastes under the RCRA. On July 30, 2018, the EPA promulgated a rule that amended the ash rule by extending some of the deadlines and providing more flexibility for compliance. On August 21, 2018, the D.C. Circuit found, among other things, that the EPA had not adequately regulated unlined ponds and legacy surface impoundments. On August 28, 2020, the EPA finalized "A Holistic Approach to Close Part A: Deadline to Initiate Closure," which amended the April 2015 Rule to address the August 2018 D.C. Circuit decision and extend some of the deadlines. On November 12, 2020, the EPA finalized "A Holistic Approach to Closure Part B," which further amended the April 2015 Rule to, among other things, provide procedures for requesting approval to operate existing impoundments with an alternative liner. On May 23, 2023, the EPA proposed establishing requirements for: (i) inactive (or legacy) surface impoundments at inactive facilities and (ii) all coal combustion residual ("CCR") management units (regardless of how or when the CCR was placed) at regulated facilities. The EPA also solicited comments on this proposal. NRG anticipates further rulemaking related to the Federal Permit Program and legacy surface impoundments.

X
- References No definition available. + Details
Name: | us-gaap_CommitmentsAndContingenciesDisclosureAbstract
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | xbrli:stringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition The entire disclosure for environmental loss contingencies, such as presence of hazardous waste, relevant information from reports issued by regulators, and estimated costs to achieve compliance with regulatory requirements. This element may be used for all of an entity's disclosures about environmental loss contingencies. + References Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/recommendedDisclosureRef -Topic 410 -SubTopic 30 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Section 50 -Paragraph 10 -Subparagraph (d)(2) -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org//1943274/2147481931/410-30-50-10 Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/recommendedDisclosureRef -Topic 410 -SubTopic 30 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Section 50 -Paragraph 10 -Subparagraph (d)(3) -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org//1943274/2147481931/410-30-50-10 Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/exampleRef -Topic 410 -SubTopic 30 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Section 55 -Paragraph 11 -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org//1943274/2147481899/410-30-55-11 Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/exampleRef -Topic 410 -SubTopic 30 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Section 55 -Paragraph 16 -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org//1943274/2147481899/410-30-55-16 Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/disclosureRef -Topic 410 -SubTopic 30 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org//410-30/tableOfContent Reference 6: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/recommendedDisclosureRef -Topic 410 -SubTopic 30 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Section 50 -Paragraph 10 -Subparagraph (a) -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org//1943274/2147481931/410-30-50-10 Reference 7: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/recommendedDisclosureRef -Topic 410 -SubTopic 30 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Section 50 -Paragraph 10 -Subparagraph (b) -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org//1943274/2147481931/410-30-50-10 Reference 8: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/recommendedDisclosureRef -Topic 410 -SubTopic 30 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Section 50 -Paragraph 10 -Subparagraph (c) -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org//1943274/2147481931/410-30-50-10 Reference 9: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/recommendedDisclosureRef -Topic 410 -SubTopic 30 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Section 50 -Paragraph 10 -Subparagraph (d)(4) -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org//1943274/2147481931/410-30-50-10 Reference 10: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/recommendedDisclosureRef -Topic 410 -SubTopic 30 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Section 50 -Paragraph 10 -Subparagraph (d)(5) -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org//1943274/2147481931/410-30-50-10 Reference 11: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/recommendedDisclosureRef -Topic 410 -SubTopic 30 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Section 50 -Paragraph 11 -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org//1943274/2147481931/410-30-50-11 Reference 12: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/recommendedDisclosureRef -Topic 410 -SubTopic 30 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Section 50 -Paragraph 14 -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org//1943274/2147481931/410-30-50-14 Reference 13: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/recommendedDisclosureRef -Topic 410 -SubTopic 30 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Section 50 -Paragraph 17 -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org//1943274/2147481931/410-30-50-17 Reference 14: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/exampleRef -Topic 410 -SubTopic 30 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Section 55 -Paragraph 17 -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org//1943274/2147481899/410-30-55-17 + Details
Name: | us-gaap_EnvironmentalLossContingencyDisclosureTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | dtr-types:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration