XML 41 R25.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT
v3.25.2

Environmental Matters | 6 Months Ended
--- | ---
Jun. 30, 2025
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract] |
Environmental Matters | Environmental Matters NRG is subject to a wide range of environmental laws in the development, construction, ownership and operation of power plants. These laws generally require that governmental permits and approvals be obtained before construction and maintained during operation of power plants. In general, the electric generation industry has faced increasingly stringent requirements regarding air quality, GHG emissions, combustion byproducts, water use and discharge, and threatened and endangered species including several rules promulgated in 2024. In general, future laws are expected to require the addition of emissions controls or other environmental controls or to impose additional restrictions on the operations of the Company's facilities, which could have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. At the federal level, the President has issued several Executive Orders that indicate that the current administration intends to ease the regulatory burden on the electric generation industry, which may affect the outcome of the rulemakings and related legal challenges described below. The Company has elected to use a $1 million disclosure threshold, as permitted, for environmental proceedings to which the government is a party. Air CPP/ACE Rules — The attention in recent years on GHG emissions has resulted in federal and state regulations. In 2019, the EPA promulgated the ACE rule, which rescinded the CPP, which had sought to broadly regulate CO 2 emissions from the power sector. On January 19, 2021, the D.C. Circuit vacated the ACE rule (but on February 22, 2021, at the EPA's request, stayed the issuance of the portion of the mandate that would vacate the repeal of the CPP). On June 30, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the "generation shifting" approach in the CPP exceeded the powers granted to the EPA by Congress. On May 9, 2024, the EPA promulgated a rule that repealed the ACE rule and significantly revised the manner in which new combustion-turbine and existing steam EGU's GHG emissions will be regulated including capturing and storing/sequestering CO 2 in some instances. This rule has been challenged by numerous parties in the D.C. Circuit including 27 states with 22 states intervening in support of the rule. The D.C. Circuit held oral arguments related to this rule in December 2024. On February 5, 2025, the DOJ filed a motion asking the court to hold proceedings in abeyance while the EPA evaluates the rule. The court granted the motion on February 19, 2025. On June 17, 2025, the EPA proposed to repeal all GHG emission standards for fossil fuel-fired power plants under Section 111 of the CAA. The EPA is proposing to conclude that GHG emissions from domestic fossil fuel-fired EGUs do not contribute to dangerous air pollution at a level sufficient to invoke the EPA’s authority under CAA Section 111. In addition to its primary proposal to repeal all GHG emission standards for the power sector promulgated in both 2015 and 2024, the EPA has included an alternative proposal to repeal only specific portions. Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (“CSAPR”) — On March 15, 2023, the EPA signed and released a prepublication version of a final rule that sought to significantly revise the CSAPR to address the good-neighbor obligations of the 2015 ozone NAAQS for 23 states (a Federal Implementation Plan or “FIP”) after earlier having disapproved numerous state plans to address the issue. Several states, including Texas, challenged the EPA's disapproval of their state plans. On May 1, 2023, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit stayed the EPA's disapproval of Texas' and Louisiana's state plans, which disapprovals are a condition precedent to the EPA imposing its plan on Texas and Louisiana. On March 25, 2025, the Fifth Circuit upheld the EPA’s disapproval of Texas’ and Louisiana’s state plans but did not address the FIP. On May 9, 2025, Texas and other parties petitioned the Fifth Circuit for a rehearing with the whole court. On June 5, 2023, the EPA promulgated the FIP. On June 27, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court stayed the FIP in the 11 states where the rule had not already been stayed. On April 14, 2025, the D.C. Circuit granted the EPA’s request to hold the legal challenges in abeyance while the EPA revisits the rule. The Company cannot predict the outcome of the legal challenges to the various state disapprovals and the final rule promulgated on June 5, 2023. Regional Haze Proposal — In May 2023, the EPA proposed to withdraw the existing Texas Sulfur Dioxide Trading Program and replace it with unit-specific SO 2 limits for 12 units in Texas to address requirements to improve visibility at National Parks and Wilderness areas. If finalized as proposed, it would result in more stringent SO 2 limits for two of the Company's coal-fired units in Texas. The Company cannot predict the outcome of this proposal. Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (“MATS”) — On May 7, 2024, the EPA promulgated a final rule that amends the MATS rule by, among other things, increasing the stringency of the filterable particulate matter standard at coal-burning units. The deadline for complying with this more stringent standard had been 2027. On April 8, 2025, the President signed a Proclamation that creates a 2-year exemption for compliance beginning on July 8, 2027 and ending on July 8, 2029 for certain coal units including those owned by the Company. Twenty-three states have challenged this rule in the D.C. Circuit. On June 17, 2025, the EPA proposed to repeal the majority of the 2024 final rule amending the MATS rule. Accordingly, the outcome of this rulemaking is uncertain. Water ELG — In 2015, the EPA revised the ELG for Steam Electric Generating Facilities, which imposed more stringent requirements (as individual permits were renewed) for wastewater streams from FGD, fly ash, bottom ash and flue gas mercury control. In 2017, the EPA promulgated a final rule that, among other things, postponed the compliance dates to preserve the status quo for FGD wastewater and bottom ash transport water by two years to November 2020 until the EPA amended the rule. On October 13, 2020, the EPA amended the 2015 ELG rule by: (i) altering the stringency of certain limits for FGD wastewater; (ii) relaxing the zero-discharge requirement for bottom ash transport water; and (iii) changing several deadlines. In 2021, NRG informed its regulators that the Company intends to comply with the ELG by ceasing combustion of coal by the end of 2028 at its domestic coal units outside of Texas, and installing appropriate controls by the end of 2025 at its two plants that have coal-fired units in Texas. On May 9, 2024, the EPA promulgated a rule that revises the ELG by, among other things, further restricting the discharge of (i) FGD wastewater, (ii) bottom ash transport water, and (iii) combustion residual leachate. The rule was challenged in numerous courts, but the cases have been consolidated in the Eighth Circuit of the U.S. Court of Appeals. The outcome of the legal challenges is uncertain. On February 19, 2025, the DOJ filed a motion asking the court to hold proceedings in abeyance while the U.S. presidential administration evaluates the rule, which the court granted. During the second quarter of 2025, the EPA announced its intent to update the 2024 rule to advance the goals of the President Trump’s Unleashing American Energy Executive Order to support electric grid reliability and affordability while maintaining compliance with the Clean Water Act. Byproducts In 2015, the EPA finalized the rule regulating byproducts of coal combustion (e.g., ash and gypsum) as solid wastes under the RCRA. On August 21, 2018, the D.C. Circuit found, among other things, that the EPA had not adequately regulated unlined ponds and legacy surface impoundments. On August 28, 2020, the EPA finalized "A Holistic Approach to Close Part A: Deadline to Initiate Closure," which amended the April 2015 Rule to address the August 2018 D.C. Circuit decision and extend some of the deadlines. On November 12, 2020, the EPA finalized "A Holistic Approach to Closure Part B: Alternative Demonstration for Unlined Surface Impoundments," which further amended the April 2015 Rule to, among other things, provide procedures for requesting approval to operate existing ash impoundments with an alternate liner. On May 8, 2024, the EPA promulgated a rule that establishes requirements for: (i) inactive (or legacy) surface impoundments at inactive facilities and (ii) coal combustion residual ("CCR") management units (regardless of how or when the CCR was placed) at regulated facilities. The rule also creates an obligation to conduct site assessments (at all active and certain inactive facilities) to determine whether CCR management units are present. The rule has been challenged in the D.C. Circuit and the outcome of the legal challenges is uncertain.

X
- References No definition available. + Details
Name: | us-gaap_CommitmentsAndContingenciesDisclosureAbstract
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | xbrli:stringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition The entire disclosure for environmental loss contingencies, such as presence of hazardous waste, relevant information from reports issued by regulators, and estimated costs to achieve compliance with regulatory requirements. This element may be used for all of an entity's disclosures about environmental loss contingencies. + References Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/recommendedDisclosureRef -Topic 410 -SubTopic 30 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Section 50 -Paragraph 10 -Subparagraph (d)(2) -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org/1943274/2147481931/410-30-50-10 Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/recommendedDisclosureRef -Topic 410 -SubTopic 30 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Section 50 -Paragraph 10 -Subparagraph (d)(3) -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org/1943274/2147481931/410-30-50-10 Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/exampleRef -Topic 410 -SubTopic 30 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Section 55 -Paragraph 11 -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org/1943274/2147481899/410-30-55-11 Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/exampleRef -Topic 410 -SubTopic 30 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Section 55 -Paragraph 16 -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org/1943274/2147481899/410-30-55-16 Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/disclosureRef -Topic 410 -SubTopic 30 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org/410-30/tableOfContent Reference 6: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/recommendedDisclosureRef -Topic 410 -SubTopic 30 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Section 50 -Paragraph 10 -Subparagraph (a) -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org/1943274/2147481931/410-30-50-10 Reference 7: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/recommendedDisclosureRef -Topic 410 -SubTopic 30 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Section 50 -Paragraph 10 -Subparagraph (b) -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org/1943274/2147481931/410-30-50-10 Reference 8: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/recommendedDisclosureRef -Topic 410 -SubTopic 30 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Section 50 -Paragraph 10 -Subparagraph (c) -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org/1943274/2147481931/410-30-50-10 Reference 9: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/recommendedDisclosureRef -Topic 410 -SubTopic 30 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Section 50 -Paragraph 10 -Subparagraph (d)(4) -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org/1943274/2147481931/410-30-50-10 Reference 10: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/recommendedDisclosureRef -Topic 410 -SubTopic 30 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Section 50 -Paragraph 10 -Subparagraph (d)(5) -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org/1943274/2147481931/410-30-50-10 Reference 11: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/recommendedDisclosureRef -Topic 410 -SubTopic 30 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Section 50 -Paragraph 11 -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org/1943274/2147481931/410-30-50-11 Reference 12: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/recommendedDisclosureRef -Topic 410 -SubTopic 30 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Section 50 -Paragraph 14 -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org/1943274/2147481931/410-30-50-14 Reference 13: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/recommendedDisclosureRef -Topic 410 -SubTopic 30 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Section 50 -Paragraph 17 -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org/1943274/2147481931/410-30-50-17 Reference 14: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/exampleRef -Topic 410 -SubTopic 30 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Section 55 -Paragraph 17 -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org/1943274/2147481899/410-30-55-17 + Details
Name: | us-gaap_EnvironmentalLossContingencyDisclosureTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | dtr-types:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration