-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----
Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR
Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov
Originator-Key-Asymmetric:
 MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen
 TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB
MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA,
 IWOY+B8CSkQKMiRysw5+ZFakwB/QjmOmEW4/H5JV3oAmdTSZQwEVNzX8nTJb/Ln+
 RV2O7xbDefiInhDMwewZrg==

<SEC-DOCUMENT>0001188112-03-000329.txt : 20030520
<SEC-HEADER>0001188112-03-000329.hdr.sgml : 20030520
<ACCEPTANCE-DATETIME>20030520172343
ACCESSION NUMBER:		0001188112-03-000329
CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE:	40-F
PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT:		19
CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT:	20021231
FILED AS OF DATE:		20030520

FILER:

	COMPANY DATA:	
		COMPANY CONFORMED NAME:			KINROSS GOLD CORP
		CENTRAL INDEX KEY:			0000701818
		STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION:	GOLD & SILVER ORES [1040]
		IRS NUMBER:				650430083
		FISCAL YEAR END:			1231

	FILING VALUES:
		FORM TYPE:		40-F
		SEC ACT:		1934 Act
		SEC FILE NUMBER:	001-13382
		FILM NUMBER:		03713337

	BUSINESS ADDRESS:	
		STREET 1:		185 SOUTH STATE STREET
		STREET 2:		STE 400
		CITY:			SALT LAKE CITY
		STATE:			UT
		ZIP:			84111
		BUSINESS PHONE:		8013639152

	FORMER COMPANY:	
		FORMER CONFORMED NAME:	PLEXUS RESOURCES CORP
		DATE OF NAME CHANGE:	19920703
</SEC-HEADER>
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>40-F
<SEQUENCE>1
<FILENAME>t40f-29727.txt
<DESCRIPTION>40-F
<TEXT>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                                                             <C>
                                                            UNITED STATES
                                                 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                                                       WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                                                              FORM 40-F
                      [Check one]

                      [ ] REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                                                                 OR

                      [X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13(A) OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                          For the fiscal year ended DECEMBER 31, 2002              Commission File Number 0-10321
                                                    -----------------                                     -------

                                                      KINROSS GOLD CORPORATION
                                                      ------------------------
                                       (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

                                                                 N/A
                                                                 ---
                                   (Translation of Registrant's name into English (if applicable))

                                                     PROVINCE OF ONTARIO, CANADA
                                                     ---------------------------
                                  (Province or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

                                                                1041
                                                                ----
                              (Primary Standard Industrial Classification Code Number (if applicable))

                                                              650430083
                                                              ---------
                                       (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number (if applicable))

                   52ND FLOOR, SCOTIA PLAZA, 40 KING STREET WEST, TORONTO, ONTARIO, CANADA M5H 3Y2 (416) 365-5123
                   ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                             (Address and telephone number of Registrant's principal executive offices)

               PARR WADDOUPS BROWN GEE & LOVELESS, 185 SOUTH STATE STREET, SUITE 1300, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111-1537
               -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                           (801) 532-7840
                                                           --------------
                           (Name, address (including zip code) and telephone number (including area code)
                                             of agent for service in the United States)

               Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act.

                        Title of each class                                     Name of each exchange on which registered

                        COMMON SHARES, NO PAR VALUE                             NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE
                        ---------------------------                             -----------------------

               Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act.

                                                                NONE
                                                                ----
                                                          (Title of Class)

               Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act.

                                                     COMMON SHARES, NO PAR VALUE
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                          (Title of Class)

               For annual reports, indicate by check mark the information filed with this Form:
                        [x] Annual information form                             [x] Audited annual financial statements

                        Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer's classes of capital or common stock as of
               the close of the period covered by the annual report.

                           AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2002, THERE WERE 136,172,376 SHARES OF COMMON STOCK OUTSTANDING.
                           -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                        Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant by filing the information contained in this Form is also
               thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of
               1934 (the "Exchange Act"). If "Yes" is marked, indicate the filing number assigned to the Registrant in connection
               with such Rule.
                                                           Yes     No  X
                                                               ---    ---

                        Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13
               or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was
               required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

                                                           Yes  X  No
                                                               ---    ---
</TABLE>
<PAGE>

     This annual report on Form 40-F, including the exhibits hereto, is
specifically incorporated by reference into Kinross Gold Corporation's
registration statement on Form F-10, Registration No. 333-102660, filed January
22, 2003, as amended January 29, 2003.

           NOTE FOR U.S. READERS ON CANADA/U.S. REPORTING DIFFERENCES

     Pursuant to the requirements of Form 40-F, Kinross' Annual Information Form
dated May 20, 2003, is hereby filed under cover of this form. In addition, the
audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the three years
ended December 31, 2002, together with the accompanying Management's Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation, are filed
herewith. See Note 21 to the audited consolidated financial statements for a
reconciliation of the financial statements to U.S. GAAP as required by Item 17
of Form 20-F. The formation of Kinross on May 31, 1993, qualifies under
International Accounting Standard No. 22 (IAS 22), business combinations, as a
uniting of interests and thereby has been accounted for as a pooling of
interests. For purposes of reconciliation to U.S. GAAP, the accounting complies
with Item 17 of Form 20-F and is different than that required by U.S. GAAP.

     Readers should note that in the United States, reporting standards for
auditors require the addition of an explanatory paragraph (following the opinion
paragraph) when there are changes in accounting principles that have a material
effect on the comparability of the financial statements, such as the changes
described in Note 1 to Kinross' consolidated financial statements. Our report to
the shareholders dated March 3, 2003, except as to Note 23 (b), which is as of
March 26, 2003, is expressed in accordance with Canadian reporting standards,
which do not require a reference to such changes in accounting principles in the
auditors' report when the changes are properly accounted for and adequately
disclosed in the financial statements.

                                   UNDERTAKING

     Registrant undertakes to make available, in person or by telephone,
representatives to respond to inquiries made by the Commission staff, and to
furnish promptly, when requested to do so by the Commission staff, information
relating to: the securities registered pursuant to Form 40-F; the securities in
relation to which the obligation to file an annual report on Form 40-F arises;
or transactions in said securities.

                             CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

A.   EVALUATION

     Based on their evaluation as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of
this report, Kinross' Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have
concluded that Kinross' disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rule
13(a)-14(c) and 15(d)-14(c) under the Exchange Act are effective to ensure that
information required to be disclosed by Kinross in reports that it files or
submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported
within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules
and forms.

B.   CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROLS

     Since the date of the evaluation, there have not been any significant
changes in the internal controls or in other factors that could significantly
affect the internal controls, and there were not any significant deficiencies or
material weaknesses. As a result, no corrective actions were required or
undertaken.

<PAGE>

                                   SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Exchange Act, the Registrant certifies
that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 40-F and has duly
caused this annual report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereto
duly authorized.

                                            KINROSS GOLD CORPORATION



Dated:  May 20, 2003                        By /s/ Brian W. Penny
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Brian W. Penny
                                              Chief Financial Officer





<PAGE>

                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14
               OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES - OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     I, Robert M. Buchan certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of Kinross Gold
Corporation;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

     4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

     (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

     (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     (c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

     5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
or registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):

     (a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

     (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

     6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


May 20, 2003                     /s/ Robert M. Buchan
   (Date)                        ----------------------------------------------
                                 Robert M. Buchan (principal executive officer)

<PAGE>

                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14
               OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES - OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     I, Brian W. Penny, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of Kinross Gold
Corporation;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

     4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

     (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

     (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     (c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

     5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
or registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):

     (a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

     (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

     6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


May 20, 2003                                /s/ Brian W. Penny
   (Date)                                   ------------------------------------
                                            Brian W. Penny
                                            Chief Financial Officer (principal
                                            financial and accounting officer)
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT INDEX

   Exhibit                               Description
- --------------    --------------------------------------------------------------

    99.1          Annual Information Form for Kinross Gold Corporation dated
                  May 8, 2003

    99.2          Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Financial Statements for
                  Kinross Gold Corporation, Appendix A to the Annual Information
                  Form included in Exhibit 99.1

    99.3          Audited Consolidated Financial Statements of TVX Gold Inc.,
                  Appendix B to the Annual Information Form included in
                  Exhibit 99.1

    99.4          Audited Consolidated Financial Statements of Echo Bay Mines
                  Ltd., Appendix C to the Annual Information Form included in
                  Exhibit 99.1

    99.5          Annual Report of Kinross Gold Corporation for the year ended
                  December 31, 2002, including the Audited Consolidated
                  Financial Statements and Management's Discussion and Analysis
                  of Kinross Gold Corporation

    99.6          Management Information Circular and Shareholder Proxy
                  Materials dated May 8, 2003

    99.7          Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP, independent chartered
                  accountants for Kinross Gold Corporation

    99.8          Consent of PriceWaterhouseCoopers, LLP, independent chartered
                  accountants for TVX Gold Inc.

    99.9          Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, independent chartered
                  accountants for Echo Bay Mines Ltd.

    99.10         Consent of Steffen Robertson and Kirsten (Canada) Inc.
                  regarding Crixas Mine, Brazil

    99.11         Consent of Victor J. Miller, P.E. regarding Fort Knox Mine,
                  Alaska

    99.12         Consent of Dean T. Wilton P.G. regarding Fort Knox Mine,
                  Alaska

    99.13         Consent of Scott Anderson regarding the Kubaka Mine, Russia

    99.14         Consent of AMEC E&C Services Limited regarding La Coipa Mine,
                  Chile

    99.15         Consent of Steffen Robertson and Kirsten (Canada) Inc.
                  regarding Morro do Ouro, Brazil

    99.16         Consent of AMEC E&C Services Limited regarding Musselwhite
                  Mine Operations

    99.17         Consent of Steffen Robertson and Kirsten (Canada) Inc.
                  regarding Porcupine Joint Venture

    99.18         Consent of Frank K. Fenne, P.G. regarding Round Mountain Mine,
                  Nevada

    99.19         Consent of Daniel B. Moore regarding Round Mountain Mine,
                  Nevada

    99.20         Certification of the Principal Executive Officer pursuant to
                  18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
                  of 2002)

    99.21         Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18
                  U.S.C. Section 1350 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
                  2002)


</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>EX-99.1
<SEQUENCE>3
<FILENAME>tex99_1-29727.txt
<DESCRIPTION>EX-99.1
<TEXT>
<PAGE>





                            KINROSS GOLD CORPORATION







                         RENEWAL ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM


                      FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002






                                DATED MAY 8, 2003





<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

TABLE OF CONTENTS

                                                                                Page Number

<s>                                                                             <c>
ITEM: COVER PAGE............................................................................X

ITEM 2: CORPORATE STRUCTURE.................................................................2

ITEM 3: GENERAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE BUSINESS.................................................3

ITEM 4: NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF THE BUSINESS...............................................5

ITEM 5: SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION........................................95

ITEM 6: MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS AND CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.........95

ITEM 7: MARKET FOR SECURITIES..............................................................95

ITEM 8: DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS.............................................................96

ITEM 9: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.............................................................97

APPENDIX A - PRO FORMA FINANCIAL STATEMENTS...............................................A-1

APPENDIX B - TVX GOLD INC. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS...........................................B-1

APPENDIX C - ECHO BAY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS................................................C-1
</TABLE>

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT

This Annual Information Form and the documents incorporated by reference herein
contain "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the United States
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements
include, but are not limited to, statements with respect to the future price of
gold and silver, the estimation of mineral reserves and resources, the
realization of mineral reserve estimates, the timing and amount of estimated
future production, costs of production, capital expenditures, costs and timing
of the development of new deposits, success of exploration activities,
permitting time lines, currency fluctuations, requirements for additional
capital, government regulation of mining operations, environmental risks,
unanticipated reclamation expenses, title disputes or claims and limitations on
insurance coverage. In certain cases, forward-looking statements can be
identified by the use of words such as "plans", "expects" or "does not expect",
"is expected", "budget", "scheduled", "estimates", "forecasts", "intends",
"anticipates" or "does not anticipate", or "believes", or variations of such
words and phrases or state that certain actions, events or results "may",
"could", "would", "might" or "will be taken", "occur" or "be achieved".
Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and
other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of
the Company to be materially different from any future results, performance or
achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Such
factors include, among others, risks related to the integration of acquisitions;
risks related to international operations; risks related to joint venture
operations; actual results of current exploration activities; actual results of
current reclamation activities; conclusions of economic evaluations; changes in
project parameters as plans continue to be refined; future prices of gold and
silver; possible variations in mineral reserves and resources, grade or recovery
rates; failure of plant, equipment or processes to operate as anticipated;
accidents, labour disputes and other risks of the mining industry; delays in
obtaining governmental approvals or financing or in the completion of
development or construction activities, as well as those factors discussed in
the section entitled "General Development of the Business - Risk Factors" in
this Annual Information Form. Although the Company has attempted to identify
important factors that could cause actual actions, events or results to differ
materially from those described in forward-looking statements, there may be
other factors that cause actions, events or results not to be as anticipated,
estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that forward-looking statements
will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ
materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers
should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements.

                                                                               1
<PAGE>

CURRENCY AND SHARE INFORMATION PRESENTATION

All dollar amounts referenced, unless otherwise indicated, are expressed in
United States dollars. All share information has been retroactively adjusted to
give effect to the three for one consolidation which was completed January 31,
2003.

ITEM 2: CORPORATE STRUCTURE

INCORPORATION

Kinross Gold Corporation (the "Company" or "Kinross") is the continuing
corporation resulting from the May 1993 amalgamation under the Ontario Business
Corporations Act of CMP Resources Ltd., Plexus Resources Corporation and 1021105
Ontario Corp. The Company and Falconbridge Amalco Inc. ("Falconbridge Amalco"),
a corporation that was formed upon the amalgamation of Falconbridge Gold
Corporation and FGC Acquisition Inc., then amalgamated on December 31, 1993 by
way of arrangement. The Company filed articles of amalgamation on December 29,
2000 in connection with the amalgamation of the Company with La Teko Resources
Inc. ("La Teko").

The registered office and principal place of business of the Company is located
at Suite 5200, Scotia Plaza, 40 King Street West, Toronto, Ontario, M5H 3Y2.

SUBSIDIARIES AND MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE

Each of the Company's operations is a separate business unit managed by its
general manager, who in turn reports to the Chief Operating Officer. Exploration
activities outside the operating mine sites, corporate financing, tax planning,
additional technical support services, hedging and acquisition strategies are
managed centrally. The Company's risk management programs are subject to
overview by the Company's Audit Committee and the Board of Directors.

A significant portion of the Company's business is carried on through
subsidiaries. A chart showing the names of the significant subsidiaries of the
Company and their respective jurisdictions of incorporation is set out below.
All subsidiaries are 100% owned unless otherwise noted. Unless otherwise
indicated herein, the term "the Company" or "Kinross" includes, collectively,
all of the subsidiaries of the Company.


                                                                               2
<PAGE>
                                [CHART OMITTED]
ORGANIZATION CHART






           Kinross Gold Corporation Chart of Significant Subsidiaries.
                                [PICTURE OMITTED]







ITEM 3: GENERAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE BUSINESS

The Company is principally engaged in the exploration for and the acquisition,
development and operation of gold bearing properties in the Americas, Russia,
Greece, Australia and Africa. The Company's principal product and source of cash
flow is gold. The general development of the business since the formation of the
Company in 1993 and the material transactions over the past three years are
outlined below.

The Company's long-term financial objective is growth in cash flow and a return
to earnings per share through successful exploration, acquisitions and
development of existing and acquired properties. Mine operating plans focus on
maximizing the pre-tax cash flow return on investment over the life of the
business unit. The Company's key performance measure is cash cost per unit of
production.

The Company's operations and reserves are impacted by changes in metal prices.
Over the past three years, gold has averaged $287 per ounce and was $343 per
ounce on the last trading day of 2002. Subsequent to the end of 2002, gold has
traded above $350 per ounce. The Company used a forecast of $300 per ounce as a
long-term price at the end of 2002

                                                                               3
<PAGE>

to estimate reserves and a price of $325 to assess mining assets for impairment.
The Company used a forecast of $300 per ounce in 2001 and 2000 to estimate
reserves and test for impairment.

In each of the past three years write-downs of the carrying values of certain
mining assets were required. In 2002, the Company recorded write-downs and other
non-cash charges of $7.7 million, mainly relating to increased reclamation
provisions at the closure properties. In 2001, the Company recorded write-downs
of $16.1 million, including $11.8 million relating to the Blanket mine due to
the Company's inability to manage this operation because of political turmoil
creating extreme inflationary pressures within Zimbabwe, difficulty in accessing
foreign currency to pay for imported goods and services and civil unrest. The
balance of the write-down included additional reclamation accruals for the
DeLamar mine reclamation project of $4.3 million. In 2000, the Company recorded
write-downs of $72.1 million, including $36.1 million relating to the Refugio
mine as a result of the decision to suspend operations in mid-2001 and $36.0
million on various other non-core reclamation projects.

The Company's pro-forma share of proven and probable reserves as at December 31,
2002 was 13.2 million ounces (giving effect to the completion of the TVX and
Echo Bay transaction as at that date). These estimates have been calculated
using industry standard methodology and the appropriate cut-off grade assuming a
long-term gold price of $300 per ounce.

Over the past several years, in response to weak gold prices, the Company took
steps to preserve its cash balances and maintain its financial flexibility.
Exploration and business development expenditures were $11.6 million in 2002
compared to $7.9 million in 2001 and $11.4 million in 2000. Planned exploration
expenditures in 2003 are estimated at $20 million. In addition, capital
expenditures were $22.6 million in 2002 compared to $30.4 million in 2001 and
$41.6 million in 2000. The 2002 capital expenditures were primarily at the
Porcupine Joint Venture and at Fort Knox. Planned capital expenditures,
including the newly acquired mines held by TVX Gold Inc. ("TVX") and Echo Bay
Mines Ltd. ("Echo Bay"), are estimated at $74 million in 2003 and will be funded
from cash flow from operating activities and current cash reserves.

On June 1, 1998, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company merged (the "Kinam
Merger") with Kinam Gold Inc. ("Kinam"), formerly Amax Gold Inc. (unless
otherwise indicated herein, the term "Kinam" means Kinam and its subsidiaries).
Concurrent with the Kinam Merger, Cyprus Amax Minerals Company ("Cyprus Amax")
contributed $135.0 million to Kinross in exchange for 11.7 million common shares
of the Company and 2.9 million common share purchase warrants (the
"Recapitalization") and 12.7 million common shares of the Company were issued
pursuant to a public offering (the "Equity Financing"). As a result of the Kinam
Merger, the Recapitalization and the Equity Financing, the Company issued 55
million common shares, representing approximately 56.4% of the common shares
outstanding after the Kinam Merger, in addition to the common share purchase
warrants to acquire 2.9 million common shares of the Company issued to Cyprus
Amax, which subsequently expired unexercised. The purchase price of the Kinam
Merger was $337.9 million. Kinam owned various mining properties including the
Fort Knox mine near Fairbanks Alaska, a 50% interest in the Refugio mine in
Chile and a 50% interest in the Kubaka mine located in the Russian Far East.

In 2001, the Company embarked on a strategy to reduce long-term debt and the
costs associated with the outstanding convertible preferred shares of Kinam (the
"Kinam Preferred Shares"). The benefit to future consolidated results would be a
reduction of interest expense, a reduced accrual of the dividends on the Kinam
Preferred Shares and lower non-cash charges such as depreciation, depletion and
amortization due to a negative purchase price discrepancy resulting from the
transaction being applied to the carrying value of property, plant and equipment
since the Kinam Preferred Shares were trading at a discount to their carrying
value for financial reporting purposes. During 2001, the Company repaid $46.5
million of long-term debt and acquired 945,400 Kinam Preferred Shares with a
carrying value of $48.9 million in exchange for 8.1 million common shares of the
Company valued at $23.2 million. The $25.7 million difference in value
associated with this transaction was applied against the carrying value of
certain property, plant and equipment.

Kinross completed an equity offering in February 2002 pursuant to which 7.7
million common shares were issued for net proceeds of $18.5 million. The
majority of funds raised were used for a $16.00 per share cash tender offer for
the Kinam Preferred Shares. 670,722 Kinam Preferred Shares were tendered having
a book value of $36.6 million and were purchased by Kinross for $10.7 million
($11.4 million including costs of the tender offer). The $25.2 million
difference in value associated with this transaction was applied against the
carrying value of certain property, plant and equipment.

On July 1, 2002, Kinross entered into a agreement with a wholly owned subsidiary
of Placer Dome Inc., Placer Dome (CLA) Limited ("Placer"), to form a joint
venture that combined the two companies' respective gold mining operations in
the Porcupine district in Ontario, Canada (the "Porcupine Joint Venture").
Placer owns a 51% interest and Kinross owns a 49% interest in the Porcupine
Joint Venture, which is operated by a Placer affiliate. Placer contributed the
Dome mine and mill and Kinross contributed the Hoyle Pond, Pamour and Nighthawk
Lake mines as well as the Bell Creek mill. Capital and operating costs are
shared in proportion to each party's ownership interest.

                                                                               4
<PAGE>

On December 5, 2002, the Company completed a public offering and issued 16.7
million common shares and 25.0 million common share purchase warrants for net
proceeds of $83.7 million. Three common share purchase warrants can be exercised
on or before December 5, 2007, for one Kinross common share at an exercise price
of Cdn.$15.00.

On February 27, 2003, Kinross entered into a credit facility with a syndicate of
financial institutions for the provision of a $125 million revolving credit
facility maturing December 31, 2005 to be used for the purpose of replacing
existing letters of credit outstanding under an existing secured credit
agreement and for additional letters of credit required for the TVX and Echo Bay
financial assurance requirements for mine closure with various regulatory
bodies. The credit facility is secured by first ranking security interests in
substantially all of Kinross' (and its subsidiaries) assets and properties and
also contains a number of financial and operating covenants. The covenants
include (but are not limited to) a leverage ratio of net debt to operating cash
flow, an interest coverage ratio of operating cash flow to interest expense,
minimum unencumbered cash balances, and minimum proven and probable reserves.

On June 10, 2002, the Company, TVX and Echo Bay entered into a combination
agreement, for the purpose of combining the ownership of their respective
businesses. The combination was effected by way of a plan of arrangement under
the Canada Business Corporations Act on January 31, 2003.

Also on June 10, 2002, TVX and a subsidiary of TVX entered into agreements with
a subsidiary of Newmont Mining Corporation ("Newmont") pursuant to which TVX
acquired Newmont's 50% non-controlling interest in the TVX Newmont Americas
joint venture ("TVX Newmont J/V") for an aggregate purchase price of $180.0
million. The acquisition closed on January 31, 2003.

Pursuant to the combination, TVX amalgamated with a newly-formed, wholly-owned
subsidiary of the Company, and each holder of TVX common shares received 2.1667
common shares of the Company. Shareholders of Echo Bay (other than the Company)
received 0.1733 common shares of the Company for each Echo Bay common share. The
Company issued 177.8 million common shares with a fair value of $1,269.8 million
with respect to the combination with TVX and Echo Bay.

The TVX Newmont J/V held interests in various operating mines located in Canada,
Brazil and Chile. The production from the TVX Newmont J/V in 2002 was 473,603
ounces of gold equivalent. Echo Bay held interests in various operating mines in
Canada and the United States. Echo Bay's share of production from these mines in
2002 was 522,208 ounces of gold equivalent.


ITEM 4: NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF THE BUSINESS

The material properties of Kinross are the following:

                                                                  PROPERTY
PROPERTY                                                          OWNERSHIP
- --------                                                          ---------

Fort Knox Mine(1).............................................     100%(2)
Porcupine Joint Venture(3) ...................................      49%
Kubaka Mine(4) ...............................................      98.1%(5)
La Coipa(6)...................................................      50%
Crixas(7).....................................................      50%
Brasilia(8)...................................................      49%
Musselwhite(9)................................................      32%
Round Mountain(10)............................................      50%

- ----------
Notes:
(1)  The True North property is subject to various net smelter return royalties,
     ranging from 3.5% to 5%. The Ryan Lode project is subject to various net
     smelter return royalties ranging from 3% to 5% and annual rental payments
     of $150,000.
(2)  Kinross holds a 100% interest in the properties forming part of the Fort
     Knox mine except for the Gil property in which Kinross holds an 80%
     interest.
(3)  The Porcupine Joint Venture was formed pursuant to an agreement with Placer
     dated July 1, 2002. The Hoyle Pond mine is subject to two tonnage based
     royalties for which $0.1 million was expensed in 2002. A 2% net smelter
     royalty is payable on production from the Preston, Paymaster and Vedron
     properties.
(4)  The Kubaka mine is subject to royalty and production based taxes which
     amounted to 6.7% in 2002.
(5)  As of March 26, 2003, the Company's increased its interest in the Kubaka
     Mine to 98.1% from 54.7%. All historical productive and mineral reserve and
     resources information contained herein are based on the Company's 54.7%
     interest as of December 31, 2002.
(6)  No royalties are applicable on gold and silver produced but an annual
     preferred dividend of $1.8 million is payable.
(7)  The Crixas mine is subject to a mining tax of 1% or net sales and a profits
     tax of 3% of net sales.

                                                                               5
<PAGE>

(8)  The Brasilia mine is subject to a royalty 0.33% of net sales, a mining tax
     of 1% of net sales and a profits tax of 3% of net sales.
(9)  The Musselwhite mine is a 5% net profits royalty and a 3.75% net profits
     royalty. $0.2 million was paid as an advance on these royalties in 2002.
(10) The Round Mountain mine is subject to a net smelter returns royalty ranging
     from 3.53% to 6.35%. During 2002, this royalty averaged 3.5%. Production is
     also subject to a gross revenue royalty of 3.0%.

OPERATIONS

The Company's share of production in 2002 was derived from the mines in Canada
(21%), the United States (47%), Russia (25%), South America (1%) and Africa (5%)








                                [PICTURE OMITTED]
                    Map of World showing locations of Mines









The following table summarizes production by Kinross in the last three years:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,                                                             2002            2001            2000
                                                                                     ----            ----            ----
<S>                                                                                <C>              <C>            <C>
Attributable gold equivalent production - ounces...........................        888,643          944,803        943,798

Gold sales - ounces (excluding equity accounted ounces)....................        848,513          907,149        897,428
</TABLE>

Included in attributable gold equivalent production is silver production
converted into gold production using a ratio of the average spot market prices
of gold and silver for the three comparative years. The ratios were 67.24:1 in
2002, 62.00:1 in 2001 and 56.33:1 in 2000.

Gold Equivalent Production (Kinross) (ounces)

                                                                               6
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

The following table sets forth Kinross' gold equivalent production for each of its operating assets in the last three years:

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,                                                             2002            2001            2000
                                                                                     ----            ----            ----
<S>                                                                                 <C>            <C>             <C>
PRIMARY OPERATIONS:........................................................
Fort Knox..................................................................         410,519        411,221         362,959
Porcupine Joint Venture....................................................         189,464        156,581         140,441
Kubaka.....................................................................         220,972        237,162         244,641
                                                                                    -------        -------         -------
   Sub total...............................................................         820,955        804,964         748,041
                                                                                    -------        -------         -------

OTHER OPERATIONS:
Refugio....................................................................          13,047         67,211          85,184
Blanket....................................................................          41,612         39,592          34,571
Denton-Rawhide (1).........................................................          11,162         17,713          29,361
Andacollo (1)..............................................................           1,858         11,718          21,030
Hayden Hill ...............................................................               -          1,887           9,582
Guanaco....................................................................               -          1,718          16,029
                                                                                    -------        -------         -------
  Sub total................................................................          67,679        139,839         195,757
                                                                                    -------        -------         -------
  Total....................................................................         888,634        944,803         943,798
                                                                                    =======        =======         =======
- ------------
Note:
(1)  The 49% interest in the Denton-Rawhide mine was sold to Pacific Rim on March 31, 2000 for common shares of Pacific Rim. As a
     result of this transaction and the sale to Pacific Rim of certain other assets, Kinross' share of production represents its
     equity ownership percentage for the above periods.

GOLD EQUIVALENT PRODUCTION (TVX) (OUNCES)

The following table sets forth TVX's gold equivalent production for each of its
operating assets in the last three years:

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,                                                             2002            2001            2000
                                                                                     ----            ----            ----

La Coipa (1)...............................................................         149,284        155,915         174,706
Crixas (1).................................................................          93,660         96,157          96,400
Brasilia (1)...............................................................         110,035         91,588         112,104
New Britannia (1)..........................................................          53,745         57,264          52,756
Musselwhite (1)............................................................          66,879         74,577          78,284
                                                                                    -------        -------         -------
  Total....................................................................         473,603        475,501         514,250
                                                                                    =======        =======         =======
- ------------
Note:
(1)  Includes Newmont's 50% share of the TVX Newmont J/V.

GOLD EQUIVALENT PRODUCTION (ECHO BAY) (OUNCES)

The following table sets forth Echo Bay's gold equivalent production for each of its operating assets in the last three years:

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,                                                             2002            2001            2000
                                                                                     ----            ----            ----

GOLD PRODUCTION
Round Mountain.............................................................         377,747        373,475         320,064
Lupin......................................................................         113,835        139,327         117,729
Kettle River...............................................................          30,626         50,349          94,086
McCoy/Cove (1).............................................................          16,501         94,633         162,784
                                                                                    -------        -------         -------
  Total Gold Production....................................................         538,709        657,784         694,663
                                                                                    =======        =======         =======

SILVER PRODUCTION
McCoy/Cove                                                                        1,470,094      6,451,425      12,328,297
                                                                                  ---------      ---------      ----------
Gold Equivalent ounces (McCoy/Cove)(2)                                               22,617        104,561         221,334
                                                                                    -------        -------         -------
  Total Gold Equivalent Production                                                  561,326        762,345         915,997
                                                                                    =======        =======         =======

- ------------
Notes:
(1)  The McCoy/Cove complex was conveyed to a subsidiary of Newmont effective February 7, 2003 and was therefore not part of the
     assets acquired and liabilities assumed of Echo Bay pursuant to the combination.
(2)  McCoy/Cove completed running and processing activities on March 31, 2002. The average silver to gold ratio was 65.00:1 in 2002
     compared to 61.70:1 in 2001 and 55.70:1 in 2000. This ratio was used in computing equivalent ounces for the purposes of
     computing cash costs per ounce.

                                                                                                                                   7
</TABLE>
<PAGE>

CALCULATION OF CASH COSTS, PRODUCTION COSTS AND REALIZED REVENUE AND
RECONCILIATION TO THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

Total cash costs, production costs and realized revenue are furnished to provide
additional information and are non-GAAP measures. These measures should not be
considered in isolation as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and are not necessarily
indicative of operating profit or cost from operations as determined under
generally accepted accounting principles.

KINROSS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,                                                           2002            2001           2000
   (IN MILLIONS EXCEPT UNIT COSTS)                                                 ----            ----           ----
<S>                                                                            <C>              <C>            <C>
CASH COSTS
  Operating expense per financial statements...............................    $   174.8        $    180.7     $    189.6
  Operating costs for non-consolidated production..........................         13.4               7.4            9.4
  Operating costs for E - Crete............................................         (3.2)             (2.5)            --
  Site restoration cost accruals...........................................         (3.0)             (1.9)          (2.7)
  Care, maintenance, severance and other...................................         (1.2)             (2.7)          (5.4)
  Change in bullion inventory..............................................         (2.0)              1.5             --
                                                                               ---------        ----------     ----------
Total cash costs of production.............................................    $   178.8        $    182.5     $    190.9
                                                                               =========        ==========     ==========

  Gold ounces produced.....................................................      888,643           944,803        943,798
Total cash costs per equivalent ounce of gold..............................    $     201        $      193     $      202

REALIZED REVENUE
  Mining revenue per financial statement...................................        261.0             270.1          271.0
  Silver revenue...........................................................         (1.4)             (1.3)          (3.2)
                                                                               ---------        ----------     ----------
                                                                               $   259.6        $    268.8     $    267.8
                                                                               =========        ==========     ==========

  Gold ounces sold.........................................................      848,513           907,149        897,428

Total realized revenue per ounce...........................................    $     306        $      296     $      298

TVX

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,                                                           2002            2001           2000
   (IN MILLIONS EXCEPT UNIT COSTS)                                                 ----            ----           ----
CASH COSTS
  Cost of sales per financial statements...................................    $   121.3        $    108.1     $    106.8
  Stratoni cost of sales...................................................        (34.6)            (22.5)         (16.0)
                                                                               ---------        ----------     ----------
Total cash costs of production.............................................    $    86.7        $     85.6     $     90.8
                                                                               =========        ==========     ==========

Gold equivalent ounces sold (1)............................................      475,753           474,890        508,744
Total cash costs per equivalent ounce of gold..............................    $     182        $      180     $      178

REALIZED REVENUE
  Mining revenue per financial statement...................................        184.8             158.3          170.0
  Stratoni revenue.........................................................        (31.0)            (24.2)         (16.2)
                                                                               ---------        ----------     ----------
                                                                               $   153.8        $    134.1     $    153.8
                                                                               =========        ==========     ==========

Gold equivalent ounces sold................................................      475,753           474,890        508,744

Total realized revenue per ounce...........................................    $     323        $      282     $      302
</TABLE>
- ------------
Notes:
(1)  Includes Newmont's 50% share of the TVX Newmont J/V.

                                                                               8
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

ECHO BAY

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,                                                           2002            2001           2000
   (IN MILLIONS EXCEPT UNIT COSTS)                                                 ----            ----           ----
<S>                                                                            <C>              <C>            <C>
CASH COSTS
  Operating costs per financial statements.................................    $   128.1        $    175.3     $    173.4
  Royalties per financial statements.......................................          7.8               7.6            8.0
  Production taxes per financial statements................................          1.2               0.2            2.5
  Change in bullion inventory..............................................         (3.9)             (5.5)           3.5
                                                                               ---------        ----------     ----------
Total cash costs of production.............................................    $   133.2        $    177.6     $    187.4
                                                                               =========        ==========     ==========

Gold equivalent production - ounces .......................................      561,326           762,345        915,997
Total cash costs per equivalent ounce of gold..............................    $     237        $      233     $      204

REALIZED REVENUE
  Mining revenue per financial statement...................................        206.5             237.7          281.0
  Silver revenue...........................................................         (9.2)            (34.1)         (65.2)
                                                                               ---------        ----------     ----------
                                                                               $   197.3        $    203.6     $    215.8
                                                                               =========        ==========     ==========

Gold ounces sold...........................................................      547,024           667,015        676,439

Total realized revenue per ounce...........................................    $     361        $      305     $      319
</TABLE>

The above non-GAAP measures have been calculated on a consistent basis in each
period. For reasons of comparability, cash costs, production costs and realized
revenue do not include certain items such as property write-downs which do not
occur in all periods but are included under GAAP in the determination of net
earnings or loss.

Total cash costs and production costs are calculated in accordance with "The
Gold Industry Production Cost Standard". Cash costs, production costs and
realized revenue may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other
companies.

Total cash costs, production costs and realized revenue are used by management
to assess profitability and cash flow of individual operations as well as to
compare with other precious metal producers.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SEGMENTED INFORMATION (KINROSS)

                                                                REPORTABLE OPERATING SEGMENTS
                                              ------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                            CORPORATE
                                                HOYLE/                                                         AND
                                              PORCUPINE    KUBAKA   FORT KNOX  BLANKET   REFUGIO   E-CRETE    OTHER        TOTAL
                                              ---------   --------  ---------  -------   -------   -------   -------    -----------
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002:
<S>                                           <C>         <C>        <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>        <C>
Total cash costs (1):
  Operating expense per financial statements  $    38.6   $   28.6   $   99.2  $    --   $   3.9   $   3.2   $   1.3    $    174.8
  Operating costs for non-consolidated
    production..............................         --         --         --     10.1        --        --       3.3          13.4
  Site restoration costs....................       (1.5)      (0.8)      (1.0)      --        --        --        --          (3.3)
  Change in bullion inventory...............        1.5       (0.1)      (2.9)      --      (0.5)       --        --          (2.0)
  Management fees...........................         --        1.6         --       --       0.1        --        --           1.7
  Operating costs not related to gold
    production..............................       (0.6)        --         --       --      (1.1)     (3.2)     (0.9)         (5.8)
                                              ---------   --------   --------  -------   -------   -------   -------    ----------
Total cash costs of production..............  $    38.0   $  $29.3   $   95.3  $  10.1   $   2.4   $    --   $   3.7    $    178.8
                                              =========   ========   ========  =======   =======   =======   =======    ==========

Equivalent gold ounces produced.............    189,464    220,972    410,519   41,612    13,047        --    13,020       888,634
                                              =========   ========   ========  =======   =======   =======   =======    ==========

Total cash costs per ounce..................        201        133        232      243       186        --       284           201

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001

Total cash costs (1):
  Operating expense per financial statements  $    29.1  $    34.1   $   82.9  $  11.2   $  17.4   $   2.5   $   3.5    $    180.7
  Operating costs for non-consolidated
    production..............................         --         --         --       --        --        --       7.4           7.4
  Site restoration costs....................       (0.2)      (0.4)      (1.2)    (0.1)       --        --        --          (1.9)
  Change in bullion inventory...............        0.7       (1.6)       3.3       --      (0.9)       --        --           1.5
  Management fees...........................         --        2.5         --       --       0.2        --        --           2.7
  Operating costs not related to gold              (1.1)      (1.5)        --       --      (0.3)     (2.5)     (2.5)         (7.9)
    production..............................  ---------   --------   --------  -------   -------   -------   -------    ----------
Total cash costs of production..............  $    28.5   $   33.1   $   85.0  $  11.1   $  16.4   $    --   $   8.4    $    182.5
                                              =========   ========   ========  =======   =======   =======   =======    ==========

Equivalent gold ounces produced.............    156,581    237,162    411,221   39,592    67,211        --    33,036       944,803
                                              =========   ========   ========  =======   =======   =======   =======    ==========

Total cash costs per ounce..................  $     182   $    140   $    207  $   279   $   242   $    --   $   263    $      193
</TABLE>

                                                                               9
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                REPORTABLE OPERATING SEGMENTS
                                              ------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                            CORPORATE
                                                HOYLE/                                                         AND
                                              PORCUPINE    KUBAKA   FORT KNOX  BLANKET   REFUGIO   E-CRETE    OTHER        TOTAL
                                              ---------   --------  ---------  -------   -------   -------   -------    -----------
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000
<S>                                           <C>         <C>        <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>        <C>
Total cash costs (1):
  Operating expense per financial statements  $    33.7   $   33.7   $   74.8  $   8.4   $  26.4   $   1.3   $  11.3    $    189.6
  Operating costs for non-consolidated
    production..............................         --         --         --       --        --        --       9.4           9.4
  Site restoration costs....................       (0.1)      (0.8)      (1.3)    (0.1)     (0.4)       --        --          (2.7)
  Management fees...........................         --        1.1         --       --       0.4        --        --           1.5
  Operating costs not related to gold
    production..............................       (4.2)        --         --       --      (0.8)     (1.3)     (0.6)         (6.9)
    production..............................  ---------   --------   --------  -------   -------   -------   -------    ----------
Total cash costs of production..............  $    29.4   $   34.0   $   73.5  $   8.3   $  25.6   $    --   $  20.1    $    190.9
                                              =========   ========   ========  =======   =======   =======   =======    ==========

Equivalent gold ounces produced.............    140,441    244,641    362,959   34,571    85,184        --    76,002       943,798
                                              =========   ========   ========  =======   =======   =======   =======    ==========

Total cash costs per ounce..................  $     209   $    139   $    203  $   236   $   300   $    --   $   263    $      202

- --------------
Note:
(1)  The item total cash costs is furnished to provide additional information and is a non-GAAP measure. This measure should not be
     considered in isolation as a substitute for a measure of performance prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting
     principles and is not necessarily indicative of operating profit or cost from operations as determined under generally accepted
     accounting principles. There are no differences computing operating costs under U.S. GAAP. Therefore, total cash costs per
     ounce computed in accordance with U.S. GAAP are unchanged from the Canadian GAAP amounts.

SEGMENTED INFORMATION (TVX)

                                                                     REPORTABLE OPERATING SEGMENTS
                                                  ------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                     MUSSEL-      NEW
                                                  LA COIPA    BRASILIA    CRIXAS      WHITE    BRITANNIA    STRATONI      TOTAL
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002:             --------    --------   --------   --------   ---------    --------    ---------
Total cash costs (1):
  Cost of sales per financial statements....      $   33.7    $   18.1   $    8.4   $   15.5    $   11.1    $   34.6    $   121.3
  Cost of sales not related to gold production          --          --         --         --          --       (34.6)       (34.6)
                                                  --------    --------   --------   --------    --------    --------    ---------
Total cash costs of production..............      $   33.6    $   18.1   $    8.4   $   15.5    $   11.1    $     --    $    86.7
                                                  ========    ========   ========   ========    ========    ========    =========

Equivalent gold ounces sold.................       148,481     108,326     96,071     67,926      54,949          --      475,753
                                                  ========    ========   ========   ========    ========    ========    =========

Total cash costs per ounce..................      $    226    $    167   $     88   $    228    $    202    $     --    $     182

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001

Total cash costs (1):
  Cost of sales per financial statements....      $   32.1    $   18.0   $   10.8   $   14.3    $   10.5    $   22.5    $   108.2
  Cost of sales not related to gold production          --          --         --         --          --       (22.5)       (22.5)
                                                  --------    --------   --------   --------    --------    --------    ---------
Total cash costs of production..............      $   32.1    $   18.0   $   10.8   $   14.3    $   10.5    $     --    $    85.7
                                                  ========    ========   ========   ========    ========    ========    =========

Equivalent gold ounces sold.................       152,709      93,774     97,876     74,219      56,312          --      474,890
                                                  ========    ========   ========   ========    ========    ========    =========

Total cash costs per ounce..................      $    210    $    191   $    110   $    192    $    187    $     --    $     180

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000

Total cash costs (1):
  Cost of sales per financial statements....      $   37.3    $   19.4   $   10.6   $   12.5    $   11.0    $   16.0    $   106.8
  Cost of sales not related to gold production          --          --         --         --          --       (16.0)       (16.0)
                                                  --------    --------   --------   --------    --------    --------    ---------
Total cash costs of production..............      $   37.3    $   19.4   $   10.6   $   12.5    $   11.0    $     --    $    90.8
                                                  ========    ========   ========   ========    ========    ========    =========

Equivalent gold ounces sold.................       176,375     108,406     94,550     77,747      51,666          --      508,744
                                                  ========    ========   ========   ========    ========    ========    =========

Total cash costs per ounce..................      $    211    $    179   $    112   $    161    $    213    $     --    $     178

- ----------------
Note:
(1)  The item total cash costs is furnished to provide additional information and is a non-GAAP measure. This measure should not be
     considered in isolation as a substitute for a measure of performance prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting
     principles and is not necessarily indicative of operating profit or cost from operations as determined under generally accepted
     accounting principles. There are no differences computing operating costs under U.S. GAAP. Therefore, total cash costs per
     ounce computed in accordance with U.S. GAAP are unchanged from the Canadian GAAP amounts.

                                                                                                                                  10
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

SEGMENTED INFORMATION (ECHO BAY)

                                                                       REPORTABLE OPERATING SEGMENTS
                                                           ---------------------------------------------------

                                                              ROUND                     KETTLE        MCCOY/
                                                            MOUNTAIN       LUPIN        RIVER          COVE        TOTAL
                                                           ----------    ---------    ---------     ----------   ---------
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002:
<S>                                                        <C>           <C>          <C>           <C>          <C>
Total cash costs (1):
  Operating costs per financial statements..               $    68.3     $    37.2    $     9.2     $     13.5   $  128.2
  Royalties per financial statements........                     7.6            --          0.1             --        7.7
  Production taxes per financial statements.                     1.5            --          0.1           (0.4)       1.2
  Change in bullion inventory...............                     1.0           0.4         (0.7)          (4.6)      (3.9)
                                                           ---------     ---------    ---------     ----------   --------
Total cash costs of production..............               $    78.4     $    37.6    $     8.7     $      8.5   $  133.2
                                                           =========     =========    =========     ==========   ========

Equivalent gold ounces produced.............                 377,747       113,835       30,626         39,118    561,326
                                                           =========     =========    =========     ==========   ========

Total cash costs per ounce..................               $     207     $     330    $     283     $      214   $    237

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001

Total cash costs (1):
  Operating costs per financial statements..               $    72.0     $    34.7    $    15.6     $     53.0   $  175.3
  Royalties per financial statements........                     6.9            --          0.5            0.2        7.6
  Production taxes per financial statements.                     0.7            --          0.1           (0.6)       0.2
  Change in bullion inventory...............                    (1.2)         (0.5)        (1.0)          (2.8)      (5.5)
                                                           ---------     ---------    ---------     ----------   --------
Total cash costs of production..............               $    78.4     $    34.2    $    15.2     $     49.8   $  177.6
                                                           =========     =========    =========     ==========   ========

Equivalent gold ounces produced.............                 373,475       139,327       50,349        199,194    762,345
                                                           =========     =========    =========     ==========   ========

Total cash costs per ounce..................               $     210     $     246    $     299     $      250   $    233

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000

Total cash costs (1):
  Operating costs per financial statements..               $    60.5     $    22.9    $    20.1     $     69.9   $  173.4
  Royalties per financial statements........                     5.6            --          1.2            1.3        8.1
  Production taxes per financial statements.                     0.3            --          0.1            2.1        2.5
  Change in bullion inventory...............                     2.1           2.2          0.3           (1.2)       3.4
                                                           ---------     ---------    ---------     ----------   --------
Total cash costs of production..............               $    68.5     $    25.1    $    21.7     $     72.1   $  187.4
                                                           =========     =========    =========     ==========   ========

Equivalent gold ounces produced.............                 320,064       117,729       94,086        384,118    915,997
                                                           =========     =========    =========     ==========   ========

Total cash costs per ounce..................               $     213     $     213    $     232     $      187   $    204

- -------------
Note:
(1)  The item total cash costs is furnished to provide additional information and is a non-GAAP measure. This measure should not be
     considered in isolation as a substitute for a measure of performance prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting
     principles and is not necessarily indicative of operating profit or cost from operations as determined under generally accepted
     accounting principles. There are no differences computing operating costs under U.S. GAAP. Therefore, total cash costs per
     ounce computed in accordance with U.S. GAAP are unchanged from the Canadian GAAP amounts.

MARKETING

Gold is a metal that is traded on world markets, with benchmark prices generally based on the London market (London fix). Gold has
two principal uses: product fabrication and bullion investment. Fabricated gold has a wide variety of end uses, including jewelry
manufacture (the largest fabrication component), electronics, dentistry, industrial and decorative uses, medals, medallions and
official coins. Gold bullion is held primarily as a store of value and a safeguard against the collapse of paper assets denominated
in fiat currencies. The Company sells all of its refined gold to banks, bullion dealers, and refiners. The Company's sales to major
customers that exceeded 10% of total sales were $190.6 million to five customers during 2002 and $148.6 million to four customers in
2001. Due to the size of the bullion market and the above ground inventory of bullion, activities by the Company will generally not
influence gold prices. The Company believes that the loss of any of these customers would have no material adverse impact on the
Company because of the active worldwide market for gold.

                                                                                                                                  11
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

The following table sets forth for the years indicated the high and low London Bullion Market afternoon fixing prices for gold:

      YEAR                          HIGH                            LOW
      ----                          ----                            ---
      1998                        $313.15                         $273.40
      1999                        $325.50                         $252.80
      2000                        $312.70                         $263.80
      2001                        $293.25                         $255.95
      2002                        $349.30                         $277.75

MINERAL RESERVES AND MINERAL RESOURCES

The following tables sets forth the Company's estimated mineral reserves and mineral resources for each of its properties which
contain mineral reserves:

MINERAL RESERVE AND RESOURCE STATEMENT PROVEN AND PROBABLE MINERAL RESERVES (1,3,4,5,6)
KINROSS GOLD CORPORATION'S PRO-FORMA SHARE AT DECEMBER 31, 2002
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPERTY             LOCATION   OPERATOR    KINROSS           PROVEN                   PROBABLE             PROVEN AND PROBABLE
                                            INTEREST  TONNES  GRADE    OUNCES  TONNES   GRADE    OUNCES   TONNES   GRADE   OUNCES
                                              (%)     (,000)  (G/T)    (000S)  (,000)   (G/T)    (000S)   (,000)   (G/T)   (000S)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GOLD
<S>                   <C>       <C>           <C>     <C>      <C>     <C>     <C>       <C>        <C>   <C>       <C>     <C>
Fort Knox             USA       Kinross       100.0   56,938   0.84    1,531   33,758    0.77       841   90,696    0.81    2,372
True North                      Kinross       100.0    1,476   0.84       40    4,986    1.66       266    6,462    1.47      306
Ryan Lode                       Kinross       100.0        -      -        -        -       -         -        -       -        -
Gil                             Kinross        80.0        -      -        -        -       -         -        -       -        -

Fort Knox and area    USA       Kinross       100.0   58,414   0.84    1,571   38,744    0.89     1,107   97,158    0.86    2,678
Hoyle Pond            Canada    Placer Dome    49.0      161  12.94       67      274   12.49       110      435   12.66      177
Pamour (Pit)          Canada    Placer Dome    49.0    2,476   1.42      113   15,222    1.38       674   17,698    1.38      787
Dome                  Canada    Placer Dome    49.0    5,358   1.03      177    5,359    2.00       344   10,717    1.51      521
Owl Creek (Pit)       Canada    Placer Dome    49.0        -      -        -        -       -         -        -       -        -
Other PJV             Canada    Placer Dome    49.0        -      -        -        -       -         -        -       -        -

Porcupine JV (8,16)   Canada    Placer Dome    49.0    7,995   1.39      357   20,855    1.68     1,128   28,850    1.60    1,485
Kubaka Stockpile      Russia    Kinross        54.7      887   3.79      108        -       -         -      887    3.79      108
Kubaka UG             Russia    Kinross        54.7       33  22.62       24       33       -        24       66   22.62       48
Birkachan OP          Russia    Kinross        54.7        -      -        -        -       -         -        -       -        -

Kubaka                Russia    Kinross        54.7      920   4.46      132       33   22.62        24      953    5.09      156
Blanket               Zimbabwe  Kinross       100.0    1,054   3.25      110    1,083    4.31       150    2,137    3.78      260
Vubachikwe tailings   Zimbabwe  Kinross       100.0        -      -        -      545    1.14        20      545    1.14       20

Blanket               Zimbabwe  Kinross       100.0    1,054   3.25      110    1,628    3.25       170    2,682    3.25      280

Refugio               Chile     Kinross        50.0   11,275   0.96      347   12,280    0.91       359   23,555    0.93      706
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SUBTOTAL                                              79,658   0.98    2,517   73,540    1.18     2,788  153,198    1.08    5,305
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Brasilia (14)         Brazil    Rio Tinto Zinc 49.0  156,457   0.43    2,163   24,402    0.43       337  180,859    0.43    2,500
Round Mtn             USA       Kinross        50.0   42,893   0.59      815   44,247    0.75     1,060   87,140    0.67    1,875
Musselwhite (16)      Canada    Placer Dome    32.0    2,804   5.67      511    1,008    4.81       156    3,812    5.44      667
La Coipa (16)         Chile     Placer Dome    50.0   14,037   1.15      518    3,766    1.05       127   17,803    1.13      645
Crixas (15)           Brazil    Anglogold      50.0    1,392   7.64      342      526    8.04       136    1,918    7.75      478
Lupin Mine            Canada    Kinross       100.0      765   8.09      199      440    9.40       133    1,205    8.57      332
New Britannia         Canada    Kinross        50.0      131   4.75       20      953    4.50       138    1,084    4.53      158
Aquarius (12)         Canada    Kinross       100.0        -      -        -   15,900    2.33     1,189   15,900    2.33    1,189
Kettle River          USA       Kinross       100.0       17   7.32        4        -       -         -       17    7.32        4
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL                                             218,496   0.65    4,572   91,242    1.12     3,276  309,738    0.79    7,848
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

TOTAL GOLD                                           298,154   0.74    7,089  164,782    1.14     6,064  462,936    0.88   13,153
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                                                                                                  12
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPERTY             LOCATION   OPERATOR     KINROSS             PROVEN                   PROBABLE             PROVEN AND PROBABLE
                                             INTEREST   TONNES   GRADE   OUNCES   TONNES   GRADE   OUNCES    TONNES   GRADE   OUNCES
                                              (%)       (,000)   (G/T)   (000S)   (,000)   (G/T)   (000S)    (,000)   (G/T)   (000S)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SILVER
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                   <C>       <C>          <C>         <C>    <C>         <C>    <C>      <C>     <C>      <C>    <C>      <C>
Kubaka Stockpile      Russia    Kinross        54.7%       887    10.59       302       -       -       -       887    10.6     302
Kubaka UG             Russia    Kinross        54.7%        33    23.56        25      33   23.56      25        66    23.6      50
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kubaka                Russia    Kinross        54.7        920     11.1       327      33    23.6      25       953    11.5     352
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
La Coipa (16)         Chile     Placer Dome    50.0     14,037     58.3    26,295   3,766    47.4   5,743    17,803    56.0  32,038
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL SILVER                                            14,957     55.4    26,622   3,799    47.2   5,768    18,756    53.7  32,390
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cautionary Note to U.S. Investors Concerning Estimates of Measured and Indicated Resources

This section uses the terms "measured" and "indicated" resources. U.S. investors are advised that while those terms are recognized
and required by Canadian regulations, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission does not recognize them. U.S. INVESTORS ARE
CAUTIONED NOT TO ASSUME THAT ALL OR ANY PART OF MINERAL DEPOSITS IN THESE CATEGORIES WILL EVER BE CONVERTED INTO PROVEN AND PROBABLE
RESERVES.

MINERAL RESERVE AND RESOURCE STATEMENT
MEASURED AND INDICATED MINERAL RESOURCES (EXCLUDES PROVEN AND PROBABLE RESERVES) (2,3,5,6,7)
KINROSS GOLD CORPORATION'S PRO-FORMA SHARE AT DECEMBER 31, 2002

                                                                                                           MEASURED AND
    PROPERTY            LOCATION   OPERATOR      KINROSS       MEASURED               INDICATED              INDICATED
                                                INTEREST   TONNES      GRADE       TONNES     GRADE       TONNES    GRADE
                                                   (%)     (,000)      (G/T)       (,000)     (G/T)       (,000)    (G/T)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GOLD
Fort Knox                USA        Kinross       100.0     3,879       0.81       11,345     0.65         15,224   0.69
True North               USA        Kinross       100.0         -          -          823     1.38            823   1.38
Ryan Lode                USA        Kinross       100.0         -          -        3,027     2.37          3,027   2.37
Gil                      USA        Kinross        80.0         -          -        2,593     1.28          2,593   1.28

Fort Knox and area (10)  USA        Kinross       100.0     3,879       0.81       17,788     1.07         21,667   1.02
Hoyle Pond               Canada     Placer Dome    49.0        21       8.89           38     6.55             59   7.38
Pamour (Pit)             Canada     Placer Dome    49.0        87       0.72        1,136     1.07          1,223   1.04
Dome                     Canada     Placer Dome    49.0         -          -        4,525     1.72          4,525   1.72
Owl Creek (Pit)          Canada     Placer Dome    49.0       480       2.66          542     2.30          1,022   2.47
Other PJV                Canada     Placer Dome    49.0         -          -            -        -              -      -

Porcupine JV (8,9,16)    Canada     Placer Dome    49.0       588       2.59        6,241     1.68          6,829   1.76
Kubaka Stockpile         Russia     Kinross       54.7%         -          -            -        -              -      -
Kubaka UG                Russia     Kinross       54.7%         -          -            -        -              -      -
Birkachan OP             Russia     Kinross       54.7%       166      10.95            -        -            166  10.95
Kubaka (11)              Russia     Kinross        54.7       166      11.05            -        -            166  11.05
Blanket Mine             Zimbabwe   Kinross      100.0%         -          -          571     4.36            571   4.36
Vubachikwe tailings      Zimbabwe   Kinross      100.0%         -          -          121     1.29            121   1.29

Blanket                  Zimbabwe   Kinross       100.0         -          -          692     3.82            692   3.82

Refugio (13)             Chile      Kinross        50.0     4,575       0.75       21,810     0.75         26,385   0.75
George Lake              Canada     Kinross      100.0%         -          -        1,825    11.81          1,825  11.81
Goose Lake               Canada     Kinross      100.0%         -          -        1,185    11.31          1,185  11.31

George-Goose Lake (12)   Canada     Kinross       100.0         -          -        3,010    11.61          3,010  11.61
Selene                   Australia  Kinross      100.0%         -          -          802     2.17            802   2.17
Mt. Henry                Australia  Kinross      100.0%         -          -        1,141     2.34          1,141   2.34
North Scotia             Australia  Kinross      100.0%         -          -          207     6.46            207   6.46

Norseman (13)            Australia  Kinross       100.0         -          -        2,150     2.68          2,150   2.68

Delamar                  USA        Kinross       100.0       610       0.61        1,863     1.90          2,473   1.58
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL                                                    9,818       1.05       53,554     1.73         63,372   1.63
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brasilia (13,14)         Brazil     Rio Tinto      49.0    14,700       0.46       69,580     0.38         84,280   0.39
Round Mtn                USA        Kinross        50.0       795       0.63        5,506     0.68          6,301   0.68
Musselwhite (16)         Canada     Placer Dome    32.0     1,049       6.26          771     6.41          1,820   6.32
La Coipa (16)            Chile      Placer Dome    50.0       260       0.48          149     0.63            409   0.53
Crixas (15)              Brazil     Anglogold      50.0         -          -            -        -              -      -
Lupin Mine (13)          Canada     Kinross       100.0         -          -            -        -              -      -

                                                                                                                      13
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                           MEASURED AND
    PROPERTY            LOCATION   OPERATOR      KINROSS       MEASURED               INDICATED              INDICATED
                                                INTEREST   TONNES      GRADE       TONNES     GRADE       TONNES    GRADE
                                                   (%)     (,000)      (G/T)       (,000)     (G/T)       (,000)    (G/T)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                     <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>        <C>       <C>         <C>         <C>       <C>
New Britannia            Canada     Kinross        50.0        25       3.73          766     4.79            791   4.76
Aquarius (12,13)         Canada     Kinross       100.0         -          -            -        -              -      -
Kettle River (13)        USA        Kinross       100.0         -          -           22     5.66             22   5.66
Gurupi (12)              Brazil     Kinross       100.0         -          -       60,385     1.39         60,385   1.39
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL                                                   16,829       0.83      137,179     0.90        154,008   0.89
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL GOLD                                                 26,647       0.91      190,733     1.13        217,380   1.11
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kubaka Stockpile         Russia     Kinross        54.7%        -          -            -        -              -      -
Kubaka UG                Russia     Kinross        54.7%        -          -            -        -              -      -
Birkachan OP             Russia     Kinross        54.7%      166      25.30            -        -            166   25.5
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kubaka (11)              Russia     Kinross        54.7       166       25.5            -        -            166   25.5
Delamar                  USA        Kinross       100.0        610      64.8        1,863     39.2          2,473   45.5
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL                                                      776       56.4        1,863     39.2          2,639   44.2
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
La Coipa (16)            Chile     Placer Dome     50.0       260       35.1          149     29.9            409   33.2
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL                                                      260       35.1          149     29.9            409   33.2
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL SILVER                                                1,036       51.0        2,012     38.5          3,048   42.7
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

- ------------
Notes:
(1)  Unless otherwise noted, the Company's reserves are estimated using appropriate cut-off grades derived from an assumed gold
     price of $300 per ounce, and a silver price of $4.75 per ounce. Reserves are estimated using current and/or projected process
     recoveries, operating costs and mine plans that are unique to each property and include actual and/or assumed allowances for
     dilution and mining recovery.
(2)  Unless otherwise noted, the Company's resources are estimated using appropriate cut-off grades derived from an assumed gold
     price of $325 per ounce and a silver price of $4.75 per ounce.
(3)  The Company's reserves and resources as at December 31, 2002 are classified in accordance with the Canadian Institute of Mining
     Metallurgy and Petroleum's "CIM Standards on Mineral Resources and Reserves, Definition and Guidelines" as per Canadian
     Securities Administrator's National Instrument 43-101 ("NI 43-101") requirements.
(4)  The mineral reserves presented herein comply with the reserve categories of Industry Guide 7 promulgated by the United States
     Securities and Exchange Commission.
(5)  Individuals supervising, preparing and otherwise responsible for the Company's reserve and resource estimates presented in this
     disclosure are listed in a separate table and meet the definition of a "qualified person" as described by NI 43-101.
(6)  The Company's normal data verification procedures have been used in collecting, compiling, interpreting and processing the data
     used to estimate reserves and resources. Independent data verification has not been performed.
(7)  Resources, unlike reserves, do not have demonstrated economic viability.
(8)  Includes the undeveloped Pamour deposit which is subject to permitting from Canadian authorities. The permits necessary to
     commence mining of the mineral reserves contained in the existing Pamour pit, referred to as the phase one mine plan, have been
     maintained in good standing and require administrative reactivation. Additional permits are required to mine south of the
     existing Pamour pit, which is outside the phase one mine plan. There is a high level of assurance that the project will receive
     all required permits for development.
(9)  Includes mineral resources from the undeveloped Owl Creek deposit which is subject to permitting from Canadian authorities.
(10) Includes mineral resources from the undeveloped Gil and Ryan Lode deposits in the Fort Knox area. The Company holds a 100%
     interest in the properties forming the Fort Knox area except for the Gil property in which the Company holds an 80% interest.
(11) Includes mineral resources from the undeveloped Birkachan deposit which is subject to permitting from Russian authorities.
(12) Undeveloped property, development assumes successful permitting allowing mining operations to be conducted.
(13) Resources estimated using an assumed gold price of $300 per ounce.
(14) Operated by Rio Tinto plc.
(15) Operated by AngloGold Ltd.
(16) Operated by Placer Dome Inc.

                                                                                                                                  14
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                                                     <C>
             MINERAL RESERVES AND RESOURCES
         RECOVERY AND CUT-OFF GRADE ASSUMPTIONS
- ----------------------------------------------------------------
GOLD                                                                                     RESERVE DRILL SPACING
- ----------------------------------------------------------------
       Property            Average             Average                  ---------------------------------------------------------
                           Process           Gold Cut-off
                         Recovery (%)        Grade(s) (g/t)             ---------------------------------------------------------
- ----------------------------------------------------------------        Property                  Proven           Probable
Fort Knox                   85.6                 0.48                                              (m)               (m)
- ----------------------------------------------------------------
True North                  85.0                 0.68                   ---------------------------------------------------------
- ----------------------------------------------------------------        Fort Knox                     36.6              48.8
Ryan Lode                                        1.19                   ---------------------------------------------------------
- ----------------------------------------------------------------        True North                 N/A                  30.5
Gil                                              0.50                   ---------------------------------------------------------
- ----------------------------------------------------------------        Hoyle Pond                     7.6              15.2
Round Mtn                 16 to 85           0.21 to 0.34               ---------------------------------------------------------
- ----------------------------------------------------------------        Pamour                     N/A                   7.6
Hoyle Pond                  88.0                 7.52                   ---------------------------------------------------------
- ----------------------------------------------------------------        Dome                          24.4              48.8
Dome UG                   91.6-92.8           3.8 - 8.3                 ---------------------------------------------------------
- ----------------------------------------------------------------        Kubaka                         6.1               6.1
Dome pit                    88.0                 0.70                   ---------------------------------------------------------
- ----------------------------------------------------------------        Refugio                        7.6               7.6
Pamour (OP)                 84.0                 0.96                   ---------------------------------------------------------
- ----------------------------------------------------------------        Brasilia                     100.0             150.0
Owl Creek (OP)                                                          ---------------------------------------------------------
- ----------------------------------------------------------------        Round Mtn                     15.2              30.5
Aquarius                    95.0%                0.60                   ---------------------------------------------------------
- ----------------------------------------------------------------        Musselwhite                   50.0              50.0
Musselwhite                 95.0             3.25 - 4.00                ---------------------------------------------------------
- ----------------------------------------------------------------        La Coipa                      25.0              50.0
Lupin                       93.0            5.5 to 8.3 g/t              ---------------------------------------------------------
- ----------------------------------------------------------------        Crixas                        25.0              50.0
New Britannia               93.8                 3.26                   ---------------------------------------------------------
- ----------------------------------------------------------------        Lupin Mine                     4.5              22.9
Kettle River                83.5                 5.31                   ---------------------------------------------------------
- ----------------------------------------------------------------        New Britania                  15.2              61.0
Goldbanks                   79.8%                0.21                   ---------------------------------------------------------
- ----------------------------------------------------------------        Aquarius                      25.0              25.0
George Lake                 92.0%                7.00                   ---------------------------------------------------------
- ----------------------------------------------------------------        Kettle River                  22.9              22.9
Goose Lake                  92.0%                7.00                   ---------------------------------------------------------
- ----------------------------------------------------------------
Delamar                     91.0%           1.27 g/t Au EQ
- ----------------------------------------------------------------
Brasilia                    79.14                0.30
- ----------------------------------------------------------------
La Coipa                    80.4             0.45 - 0.92
- ----------------------------------------------------------------
Refugio                     67.2%                0.48
- ----------------------------------------------------------------
Crixas                      92-95            3.07 to 7.33
- ----------------------------------------------------------------
Gurupi                   86.5-93.5%          0.25 - 0.50
- ----------------------------------------------------------------
Kubaka stockpiles           97.5%                2.45
- ----------------------------------------------------------------
Birkachan OP                97.5%                2.97
- ----------------------------------------------------------------
Kubaka ug                   97.5%                8.13
- ----------------------------------------------------------------
Kubaka                      97.5             2.66 - 8.82
- ----------------------------------------------------------------
Blanket                     87.0                 3.30
- ----------------------------------------------------------------
Blanket tailings            57.0                 0.00
- ----------------------------------------------------------------
Norseman Mt Henry           85-90             1.25-1.32
- ----------------------------------------------------------------
Norseman Selene             85.0%                          1.16
- ----------------------------------------------------------------
Norseman N Scotia           95.0%                          0.92
- ----------------------------------------------------------------
SILVER
- ----------------------------------------------------------------
Delamar                     78.0%           1.27 g/t Au EQ
- ----------------------------------------------------------------
La Coipa                    59.2             28.0 - 58.4
- ----------------------------------------------------------------

                                                                                                                                  15
</TABLE>
<PAGE>

Reserve reconciliation is shown in the following table:

                                           Kinross Share
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
       Property      Reserve (oz)   Production    Other increase   Reserve (oz)
                     December 31   Depletion (oz) (decrease) in    December 31
                        2001           2002        reserves (oz)      2002

 GOLD (000'S OZS)
 Fort Knox             2,367           (276)           281           2,372
 True North              491           (140)           (45)            306
 Ryan Lode               225              -           (225)              -
 Gil                       -              -              -               -
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Fort Knox and area    3,083           (489)            84           2,678
 Hoyle Pond              407           (169)           (61)            177
 Pamour (Pit)            753              -             34             787
 Dome                      -           (75)            596             521
 Owl Creek (Pit)           -                                             -
 Other PJV                 -                                             -

 Porcupine JV          1,160           (207)           532           1,485
 Kubaka Stockpile         78            (18)            48             108
 Kubaka                  272           (229)           (43)              -
 Kubaka UG                 -              -             48              48
 Birkachan OP              -              -              -               -
 Kubaka                  350           (226)            32             156
 Blanket                 276            (27)            11             260
 Vubachikwe tailings      53            (15)           (18)             20

 Brasilia              2,491           (140)           149           2,500
 Round Mtn             2,244           (590)           220           1,874
 Musselwhite             733            (70)             4             667
 La Coipa                800           (119)           (36)            645
 Crixas                  499            (98)            77             478
 Lupin Mine              350           (123)           105             332
 New Britannia           180            (57)            35             158

 SILVER (000's ozs)
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Kubaka                  500           (375)           226             351
 La Coipa             38,190         (6,100)           (52)         32,038
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
MINERAL RESERVES AND RESOURCES
QUALIFIED PERSONS
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Property        Primary          Company          Qualification           Secondary          Company        Qualification
                     QP                                                     QP
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>             <C>               <C>               <C>                    <C>              <C>           <C>
Fort Knox        T. Wilton         Kinross          PGeo                    V. Miller       Kinross       PE
Round Mtn        F. Fenne          Echo Bay         PGeo                    R. Bullis       Echo Bay      P Geo
Porcupine JV     A. Still          Placer Dome      PGeo                    J. Monaghan     Placer Dome   Chief Engineer
Aquarius         R. Bullis         Echo Bay Mines   PGeo
Musselwhite      A. Cheatle        Placer Dome      Chief Geo               R. Usher        Placer Dome   Chief Engineer
Lupin            R.A. Hureau       Echo Bay         PGeo                    R. Bullis       Echo Bay      PGeo
New Britannia    B. Lewis          TVX              PGeo                    M Hodgson       TVX           Mgr. Tech Services

Kettle River     D. Hussey         Echo Bay         PGeo                    R. Bullis       Echo Bay      PGeo
Goldbanks        V. Miller         Kinross          PE
George Lake      D. Cater          Kinross          PGeo                    S. Juras        MRDI          P.Geo
Goose Lake       D. Cater          Kinross          PGeo                    R. Risto        WGM           P.Geo
Delamar          D. Cuvelier       Kinross          PE

Brasilia         M.A. Barelochi    Rio Tinto        Geologist CREA          F.B. Marques    Rio Tinto     Geologist CREA

La Coipa         J. Ochoa          Placer Dome      Chief Engineer AusIMM   M. Rubio        Placer Dome   Geologist AusIMM
Refugio          V. Miller         Kinross          PE

Crixas           W. Yamaoka        AngloGold        Geologist AusIMM        M G de Simoni   AngloGold     Engineer AusIMM
Gurupi           A. Schneider      TVX              Consultant
Skouries         M Hodgson         TVX              Mgr. Tech Services
Olympias         M Hodgson         TVX              Mgr. Tech Services
Kubaka           R. Falletta       Kinross          PE                      S. Anderson     Kinross       Mine Engineer
Blanket          M. Michaud        SRK              PGeo                    H. Waldeck      SRK           Principal Mining Engineer
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Norseman         B. Butler         Kinross          AusIMM
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stratoni         M Hodgson         TVX              Mgr. Tech Services
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                                                                                                  16
</TABLE>
<PAGE>

ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS

The Company's exploration activities and mining and processing operations are
subject to the federal, state, provincial, regional and local environmental laws
and regulations in the jurisdictions in which the Company's facilities are
located. In all jurisdictions in which the Company operates, environmental
licenses, permits and other regulatory approvals are required in order to engage
in exploration, mining and processing, and mine closure activities. Regulatory
approval of a detailed plan of operations and a comprehensive environmental
impact assessment is required prior to initiating mining or processing
activities or for any substantive change to previously approved plans. In all
jurisdictions in which the Company operates, specific statutory and regulatory
requirements and standards must be met throughout the life of the mining or
processing operations in regard to air quality, water quality, fisheries and
wildlife protection, archaeological and cultural resources, solid and hazardous
waste management and disposal, the management and transportation of hazardous
chemicals, toxic substances, noise, community right-to-know, land use, and
reclamation. The Company is currently in compliance in all material respects
with all applicable environmental laws and regulations.

In 1998, Lassen Gold Mining Inc. (a subsidiary of the Company ) was identified
as a Potentially Responsible Party ("PRP") under the U.S. Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act ("CERCLA"), 42 U.S.C.
ss.ss.9601, et seq.; the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, as amended 42
U.S.C. ss.ss.6901, et seq.; and the California Hazardous Substances Account Act,
as amended, the California Health and Safety Code ss.ss. 25300 et seq., in
connection with the PRC Patterson Superfund Site. The Company became a member of
the Patterson Environmental Trust that funded the site remediation. The total
paid to the Trust by the Company was $175,552. As more PRPs were identified and
became contributors to the Trust or participated in funding remediation
separately, the amount of funds held by the Trust exceeded the financial
obligation. In 2001, in accordance with a Cash-Out Settlement Agreement, the
Company was refunded $152,308. The Company may receive a supplemental
distribution when settlement is reached with the additional PRPs and from
accrued interest in the Trust escrow account. All remediation and restoration
activities have been completed at the PRC Patterson Superfund site. The Company
no longer has any liability associated with the site.

Other than as disclosed above, the Company is not a PRP in any other CERCLA
action.

RISK FACTORS

NATURE OF MINERAL EXPLORATION AND MINING

The exploration and development of mineral deposits involves significant
financial and other risks over an extended period of time, which even a
combination of careful evaluation, experience and knowledge may not eliminate.
While discovery of a gold-bearing structure may result in substantial rewards,
few properties that are explored are ultimately developed into producing mines.
Major expenses are required to establish reserves by drilling and to construct
mining and processing facilities at a site. It is impossible to ensure that the
current or proposed exploration programs on properties in which the Company has
an interest will result in profitable commercial mining operations.

The operations of the Company are subject to the hazards and risks normally
incident to exploration, development and production of gold, any of which could
result in damage to life or property, environmental damage and possible legal
liability for such damage. The activities of the Company may be subject to
prolonged disruptions due to weather conditions depending on the location of
operations in which the Company has interests. Hazards, such as unusual or
unexpected formations, rock bursts, pressures, cave-ins, flooding or other
conditions may be encountered in the drilling and removal of material.

Whether a gold deposit will be commercially viable depends on a number of
factors, some of which are the particular attributes of the deposit, such as its
size and grade, costs and efficiency of the recovery methods that can be
employed, proximity to infrastructure, financing costs and governmental
regulations, including regulations relating to prices, taxes, royalties,
infrastructure, land use, importing and exporting of gold and environmental
protection. The effect of these factors cannot be accurately predicted, but the
combination of these factors may result in the Company not receiving an adequate
return on its invested capital.

REGULATORY AND ENVIRONMENTAL RISKS

The Company's mining and processing operations and exploration activities in the
Americas, Russia, Greece, Australia, Africa and other countries and regions are
subject to various laws and regulations governing the protection of the
environment, exploration, development, production, exports, taxes, labour
standards, occupational health, waste disposal, toxic substances, mine safety
and other matters. New laws and regulations, amendments to existing laws and
regulations, or more stringent implementation of existing laws and regulations
could have a material adverse impact on the Company,

                                                                              17
<PAGE>

increase costs, cause a reduction in levels of production and/or delay or
prevent the development of new mining properties. Compliance with these laws and
regulations requires significant expenditures and increases the Company's mine
development and operating costs. Changes in regulations and laws could adversely
affect the Company's operations or substantially increase the costs associated
with those operators.

In all jurisdictions, permits from various governmental authorities are
necessary in order to engage in mining operations. Such permits relate to many
aspects of mining operations, including maintenance of air, water and soil
quality standards. In most jurisdictions, the requisite permits cannot be
obtained prior to completion of an environmental impact statement and, in some
cases, public consultation. Further, the Company may be required to submit for
government approval a reclamation plan and to pay for the reclamation of the
mine site upon the completion of mining activities. The Company estimates its
share of reclamation closure obligations as at December 31, 2002 at $70.4
million based on information currently available. As at December 31, 2002, the
Company has accrued $57.0 million of this liability. The Company will continue
to accrue this liability on a unit-of-production basis over the remaining
reserves. In addition, the Company plans reclamation spending of approximately
$18.2 million in 2003 as part of its plan to get as many closure projects as
possible to post closure monitoring by the end of 2005.

Mining, like many other extractive natural resource industries, is subject to
potential risks and liabilities associated with pollution of the environment and
the disposal of waste products occurring as a result of mineral exploration and
production. Environmental liability may result from mining activities conducted
by others prior to the Company's ownership of a property. To the extent the
Company is subject to uninsured environmental liabilities, the payment of such
liabilities would reduce funds otherwise available and could have a material
adverse effect on the Company. Should the Company be unable to fund fully the
cost of remedying an environmental problem, the Company might be required to
suspend operations or enter into interim compliance measures pending completion
of the required remedy, which could have a material adverse effect on the
Company.

INFRASTRUCTURE

Mining, processing, development and exploration activities depend, to one degree
or another, on adequate infrastructure. Reliable roads, bridges, power sources
and water supply are important determinants which affect capital and operating
costs. Unusual or infrequent weather phenomena, sabotage, government or other
interference in the maintenance or provision of such infrastructure could
adversely affect the Company's operations, financial condition and results of
operations.

RESERVE AND RESOURCE ESTIMATES

The figures for reserves and resources presented herein are estimates, and no
assurance can be given that the anticipated tonnages and grades will be achieved
or that the indicated level of recovery will be realized. Market fluctuations in
the price of gold or increases in the costs to recover gold at the Company's
mines may render the mining of ore reserves uneconomical and require the Company
to take a write-down of the asset or to discontinue development or production.
Moreover, short-term operating factors relating to the reserves, such as the
need for orderly development of the ore body or the processing of new or
different ore grades, may cause a mining operation to be unprofitable in any
particular accounting period.

Proven and probable reserves at the Company's mines and development projects
were calculated based upon a gold price of $300 per ounce and measures and
indicated resources were calculated based upon a gold price of $325 per ounce.
Prolonged declines in the market price of gold may render reserves containing
relatively lower grades of gold mineralization uneconomic to exploit and could
reduce materially the Company's reserves and resources. Should such reductions
occur, material write downs of the Company's investment in mining properties or
the discontinuation of development or production might be required, and there
could be material delays in the development of new projects, increased net
losses and reduced cash flow.

The estimates of mineral reserves and resources attributable to a specific
property of the Company are based on accepted engineering and evaluation
principles. The estimated amount of contained gold in proven and probable
reserves does not necessarily represent an estimate of a fair market value of
the evaluated properties.

There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities of mineral
reserves and resources. The estimates in this Annual Information Form are based
on various assumptions relating to gold prices and exchange rates during the
expected life of production, mineralization of the area to be mined, the
projected cost of mining, and the results of additional planned development
work. Actual future production rates and amounts, revenues, taxes, operating
expenses, environmental and regulatory compliance expenditures, development
expenditures and recovery rates may vary substantially from those

                                                                              18
<PAGE>

assumed in the estimates. Any significant change in these assumptions, including
changes that result from variances between projected and actual results, could
result in material downward or upward revision of current estimates.

UNCERTAINTY INVOLVING MINERAL RESOURCES

Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated
economic viability. Due to the uncertainty which may attach to inferred mineral
resources, there is no assurance that mineral resources will be upgraded to
proven and probable mineral reserves as a result of continued exploration.

NEED FOR ADDITIONAL MINERAL RESERVES

Because mines have limited lives based on proven and probable mineral reserves,
the Company must continually replace and expand its mineral reserves as its
mines produce gold and silver. The life-of-mine estimates included in this
Annual Information Form for each of the Company's material properties may not be
correct. The Company's ability to maintain or increase its annual production of
gold and silver will be dependent in significant part on its ability to bring
new mines into production and to expand mineral reserves at existing mines.

OPERATIONS OUTSIDE OF NORTH AMERICA

The Company has mining and exploration operations in South America, Russia,
Greece, Australia and Africa and such operations are exposed to various levels
of political, economic and other risks and uncertainties. These risks and
uncertainties vary from country to country and include, but are not limited to,
terrorism; hostage taking; military repression; expropriation; extreme
fluctuations in currency exchange rates; high rates of inflation; labour unrest;
the risks of war or civil unrest; expropriation and nationalization;
renegotiation or nullification of existing concessions, licenses, permits and
contracts; illegal mining; changes in taxation policies; restrictions on foreign
exchange and repatriation; and changing political conditions, currency controls
and governmental regulations that favour or require the awarding of contracts to
local contractors or require foreign contractors to employ citizens of, or
purchase supplies from, a particular jurisdiction.

There is no assurance that future political and economic conditions in these
countries will not result in these governments adopting different policies
respecting foreign development and ownership of mineral resources. Any such
changes in policy may result in changes in laws affecting ownership of assets,
foreign investment, taxation, rates of exchange, gold sales, environmental
protection, labour relations, price controls, repatriation of income, and return
of capital, which may affect both the ability of the Company to undertake
exploration and development activities in respect of future properties in the
manner currently contemplated, as well as its ability to continue to explore,
develop and operate those properties for which it has obtained exploration,
development and operating rights to date. The possibility that a future
government of these countries may adopt substantially different policies, which
might extend to expropriation of assets, cannot be ruled out.

The Company is subject to the considerations and risks of operating in Russia.
The economy of the Russian Federation continues to display characteristics of an
emerging market. These characteristics include, but are not limited to, the
existence of a currency that is not freely convertible outside of the country,
extensive currency controls and high inflation. The prospects for future
economic stability in the Russian Federation are largely dependent upon the
effectiveness of economic measures undertaken by the government, together with
legal, regulatory and political developments.

Russian laws, licenses and permits have been in a state of change and new laws
may be given a retroactive effect. It is also not unusual in the context of
dispute resolution in Russia for parties to use the uncertainty in the Russian
legal environment as leverage in business negotiations. In addition, Russian tax
legislation is subject to varying interpretations and constant change. Further,
the interpretation of tax legislation by tax authorities as applied to the
transactions and activities of the Company's Russian operations may not coincide
with that of management. As a result, transactions may be challenged by tax
authorities and the Company's Russian operations may be assessed additional
taxes, penalties and interest, which could be significant. The periods remain
open to review by the tax authorities for three years.

The Company is subject to risks relating to an uncertain or unpredictable
political and economic environment in Brazil and Chile. In the short term,
significant macroeconomic instability in the region is expected to negatively
impact the business environment and may lead to longer term negative changes in
the national approaches taken to ownership by foreign companies of natural
resources.

TVX Hellas, a subsidiary of the Company, owns the Hellenic Gold Properties which
are in located northeastern Greece and cover an area of 31,400 hectares. These
properties include the Olympias project, the Skouries gold-copper deposit and
the Stratoni lead-silver and zinc mine and mill. On January 9, 2003, the Greek
Ministry of Development ordered TVX Hellas to

                                                                              19
<PAGE>

suspend mining beneath the village of Stratoniki. The order was to be lifted
upon the receipt of new mining permits, which occurred on February 18, 2003.
Operations were suspended pursuant to the order, but they were not re-commenced
once the revised permits were issued, as the Company is attempting to negotiate
a settlement and possible exit strategy with the Greek Government. Pending the
outcome of these discussions, TVX Hellas filed a petition for bankruptcy,
although the court hearing confirming the bankruptcy has not yet been held.

The Greek Government has undertaken initiatives to create a viable long-term
ownership structure to facilitate the re-opening of the Stratoni mine. It is
expected that representatives of the new potential owners will meet to set in
motion the legal processes for the creation of the new ownership structure. The
proposed ownership structure includes the Company, a Greek mining enterprise, a
group of Greek construction companies, local Prefectural and Municipal
authorities and the Alpha Group, which comprises three individuals with whom TVX
has been involved in litigation since 1995. It is currently contemplated that
the Olympias project would be owned by the new ownership structure and that
Kinross would contribute $10 million to the venture. For the transitional
period, the Company has agreed with the Greek Government that it will maintain
the operation of the water treatment plant at the Stratoni mine for the
protection of the environment. It is currently contemplated that the Skouries
deposit would continue to be owned by TVX.

In the event that these negotiations breakdown, TVX Hellas may have significant
financial obligations, including severance, environmental and contractual
liabilities. In addition, TVX's interest in the Hellenic Gold Properties is
subject to the claims of the Alpha Group described under "Legal Proceedings".

LICENSES AND PERMITS

The operations of the Company require licenses and permits from various
governmental authorities. Such licenses and permits are subject to change in
various circumstances. There can be no guarantee that the Company will be able
to obtain or maintain all necessary licenses and permits that may be required to
explore and develop its properties, commence construction or operation of mining
facilities and properties under exploration or development or to maintain
continued operations that economically justify the cost.

GOLD PRICES

The profitability of any gold mining operations in which the Company has an
interest will be significantly affected by changes in the market price of gold.
Gold prices fluctuate on a daily basis and are affected by numerous factors
beyond the control of the Company. The supply and demand for gold, the level of
interest rates, the rate of inflation, investment decisions by large holders of
gold, including governmental reserves, and stability of exchange rates can all
cause significant fluctuations in gold prices. Such external economic factors
are in turn influenced by changes in international investment patterns and
monetary systems and political developments. The price of gold has fluctuated
widely and future serious price declines could cause continued commercial
production to be impractical. Depending on the price of gold, cash flow from
mining operations may not be sufficient to cover costs of production and capital
expenditures. If, as a result of a decline in gold prices, revenues from metal
sales were to fall below cash operating costs, production may be discontinued.

HISTORY OF LOSSES

The Company had net losses of $30.9 million, $36.3 million and $125.4 million
for 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. The Company's ability to operate
profitably in the future will depend on the success of its principal mines and
on the price of gold. There can be no assurance that the Company will be
profitable.

TITLE TO PROPERTIES

The validity of mining claims which constitute most of the Company's property
holdings in the Americas, Russia, Greece, Australia and Africa may, in certain
cases, be uncertain and is subject to being contested. The Company's titles,
particularly title to undeveloped properties, may be defective.

Certain of the Company's United States mineral rights consist of unpatented lode
mining claims. Unpatented mining claims may be located on U.S. federal public
lands open to appropriation, and may be either lode claims or placer claims
depending upon the nature of the deposit within the claim. In addition,
unpatented mill site claims, which may be used for processing operations or
other activities ancillary to mining operations, may be located on federal
public lands that are non-mineral in character. Unpatented mining claims and
mill sites are unique property interests, and are generally considered to be
subject to greater title risk than other real property interests because the
validity of unpatented mining claims is often uncertain and is always subject to
challenges of third parties or contests by the federal government of the United
States. The validity of an

                                                                              20
<PAGE>

unpatented mining claim, in terms of both its location and its maintenance, is
dependent on strict compliance with a complex body of U.S. federal and state
statutory and decisional law. In addition, there are few public records that
definitively control the issues of validity and ownership of unpatented mining
claims. The General Mining Law of the United States, which governs mining claims
and related activities on U.S. federal public lands, includes provisions for
obtaining a patent, which is essentially equivalent to fee title, for an
unpatented mining claim upon compliance with certain statutory requirements
(including the discovery of a valuable mineral deposit).

COMPETITION

The mineral exploration and mining business is competitive in all of its phases.
The Company competes with numerous other companies and individuals, including
competitors with greater financial, technical and other resources than the
Company, in the search for and the acquisition of attractive mineral properties.
The ability of the Company to acquire properties in the future will depend not
only on its ability to develop its present properties, but also on its ability
to select and acquire suitable producing properties or prospects for mineral
exploration. There is no assurance that the Company will continue to be able to
compete successfully with its competitors in acquiring such properties or
prospects on terms it considers acceptable, if at all.

ADDITIONAL CAPITAL

The mining, processing, development and exploration of the Company's properties,
may require substantial additional financing. Failure to obtain sufficient
financing may result in delaying or indefinite postponement of exploration,
development or production on any or all of the Company's properties or even a
loss of property interest. There can be no assurance that additional capital or
other types of financing will be available if needed or that, if available, the
terms of such financing will be favourable to the Company.

INSURANCE

The Company's business is subject to a number of risks and hazards generally,
including adverse environmental conditions, industrial accidents, labour
disputes, unusual or unexpected geological conditions, ground or slope failures,
cave-ins, changes in the regulatory environment and natural phenomena such as
inclement weather conditions, floods and earthquakes. Such occurrences could
result in damage to mineral properties or production facilities, personal injury
or death, environmental damage to the Company's properties or the properties of
others, delays in mining, monetary losses and possible legal liability.

Although the Company maintains insurance to protect against certain risks in
such amounts as it considers to be reasonable, its insurance will not cover all
the potential risks associated with a mining company's operations. The Company
may also be unable to maintain insurance to cover insurable risks at
economically feasible premiums. Insurance coverage may not continue to be
available or may not be adequate to cover any resulting liability. Moreover,
insurance against risks such as environmental pollution or other hazards as a
result of exploration and production is not generally available to the Company
or to other companies in the mining industry on acceptable terms. The Company
might also become subject to liability for pollution or other hazards which may
not be insured against or which the Company may elect not to insure against
because of premium costs or other reasons. Losses from these events may cause
the Company to incur significant costs that could have a material adverse effect
upon its financial condition and results of operations.

CURRENCY RISK

Currency fluctuations may affect the revenues which the Company will realize
from its operations as gold is sold in the world market in United States
dollars. The costs of the Company are incurred principally in Canadian dollars,
United States dollars, Russian rubles, Chilean pesos, Brazilian reals and also
in Zimbabwean dollars. The appreciation of non-US dollar currencies against the
US dollar can increase the cost of gold and silver production in US dollar
terms. From time to time, the Company transacts currency hedging to reduce the
risk associated with currency fluctuations. There is no assurance that its
hedging strategies will be successful. Currency hedging may require margin
activities. Sudden fluctuations in currencies could result in margin calls that
could have an adverse effect on the Company's financial position. While the
Russian ruble, Chilean peso, Brazilian real and the Zimbabwean dollar are
currently convertible into Canadian and United States dollars, there is no
guarantee that they will continue to be so convertible.

                                                                              21
<PAGE>

JOINT VENTURES

Some of the mines in which the Company owns interests are operated through joint
ventures with other mining companies and are subject to the risks normally
associated with the conduct of joint ventures. The existence or occurrence of
one or more of the following circumstances and events could have a material
adverse impact on the Company's profitability or the viability of its interests
held through joint ventures, which could have a material adverse impact on the
Company's future cash flows, earnings, results of operations and financial
condition. These risks include the following:

     -    inability to exert influence over strategic decisions made in respect
          of joint venture properties;
     -    disagreement with partners on how to develop and operate mines
          efficiently;
     -    inability of partners to meet their obligations to the joint venture
          or third parties; and
     -    litigation between partners regarding joint venture matters.

ROYALTIES

The Company's mining properties are subject to various royalty and land payment
agreements. Failure by the Company to meet its payment obligations under these
agreements could result in the loss of related property interests.

COMMODITY HEDGING

The Company has historically reduced its exposure to gold and silver price
fluctuations by engaging in hedging activities. There is no assurance that the
Company will continue to implement a hedging policy, or any other hedging
techniques, or that, if they are continued, the Company will be able to achieve
in the future realized prices for gold produced in excess of average London
market prices as a result of its hedging activities. Hedging may not protect
adequately against declines in the price of gold and silver. Although hedging
may protect the Company from a decline in the price of gold and silver, it may
also prevent the Company from benefiting fully from price increases. Hedging of
gold and silver may require margin activities. Sudden fluctuations in the price
of gold or silver could result in margin calls that could have an adverse effect
on the financial position of the Company.

LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT MATTERS

While the Company has good relations with both its unionized and non-unionized
employees, production at the Company's mines is dependent upon the efforts of
the Company's employees. In addition, relations between the Company and its
employees may be impacted by changes in the scheme of labour relations which may
be introduced by the relevant governmental authorities in whose jurisdictions
the Company carries on business. Adverse changes in such legislation or in the
relationship between the Company with its employees may have a material adverse
effect on the Company's business, results of operations and financial condition.

FOREIGN SUBSIDIARIES

The Company conducts operations through foreign subsidiaries and joint ventures,
and substantially all of its assets are held in such entities. Accordingly, any
limitation on the transfer of cash or other assets between the parent
corporation and such entities, or among such entities, could restrict the
Company's ability to fund its operations efficiently. Any such limitations, or
the perception that such limitations may exist now or in the future, could have
an adverse impact on the Company's valuation and stock price.

ACQUISITION STRATEGY

As part of the Company's business strategy, it has sought and will continue to
seek new mining and development opportunities in the mining industry. In pursuit
of such opportunities, the Company may fail to select appropriate acquisition
candidates or to negotiate acceptable arrangements, including arrangements to
finance acquisitions or integrate the acquired businesses and their personnel
into the Company. The Company cannot assure that it can complete any acquisition
or business arrangement that it pursues, or is pursuing, on favourable terms, or
that any acquisitions or business arrangements completed will ultimately benefit
the Company's business.

MARKET PRICE OF COMMON SHARES

The Common Shares are listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange (the "TSX") and the
New York Stock Exchange (the "NYSE"). The Company's share price is likely to be
significantly affected by short-term changes in gold or in its financial

                                                                              22
<PAGE>

condition or results of operations as reflected in its quarterly earnings
reports. Other factors unrelated to the Company's performance that may have an
effect on the price of the Common Shares include the following: the extent of
analytical coverage available to investors concerning the Company's business may
be limited if investment banks with research capabilities do not continue to
follow the Company's securities; the lessening in trading volume and general
market interest in the Company's securities may affect an investor's ability to
trade significant numbers of common shares and a substantial decline in the
price of the common shares that persists for a significant period of time could
cause the Company's shares to be delisted from the NYSE, further reducing market
liquidity.

As a result of any of these factors, the market price of the common shares at
any given point in time may not accurately reflect the Company's long-term
value. Securities class action litigation often has been brought against
companies following periods of volatility in the market price of their
securities. The Company may in the future be the target of similar litigation.
Securities litigation could result in substantial costs and damages and divert
management's attention and resources.

DIVIDEND POLICY

No dividends on the common shares have been paid by the Company to date. The
Company anticipates that it will retain all future earnings and other cash
resources for the future operation and development of its business. The Company
does not intend to declare or pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
Payment of any future dividends will be at the discretion of the Company's board
of directors after taking into account many factors, including the Company's
operating results, financial condition and current and anticipated cash needs.

FUTURE SALES OF COMMON SHARES BY EXISTING SHAREHOLDERS

Sales of a large number of common shares in the public markets, or the potential
for such sales, could decrease the trading price of the common shares and could
impair the Company's ability to raise capital through future sales of common
shares. Substantially all of the common shares of the Company can be resold
without material restriction either in the United States, in Canada or both.

KEY EXECUTIVES

The Company is dependent on the services of key executives, including its Chief
Executive Officer and a small number of highly skilled and experienced
executives and personnel. The loss of these persons or the Company's inability
to attract and retain additional highly skilled employees may adversely affect
its business and future operations.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

The Company is a party to legal proceedings. If decided adversely to the
Company, the legal proceedings may have an adverse effect on its financial
condition or prospects. See "Legal Proceedings".

EMPLOYEES

At December 31, 2002, the Company and its subsidiaries employed approximately
2,443 persons. The Company's employees in the United States and Canada, are
predominately non-unionized. At the Porcupine Joint Venture a three-year
Collective Bargaining Agreement was ratified on November 1, 2002. The Company
considers its employee relations to be good.

MATERIAL PROPERTIES

The Company is principally engaged in the exploration for, and acquisition,
development and operation of, gold-bearing properties. The material properties
of Kinross are as follows:

     o    100% interest in the Fort Knox mine near Fairbanks, Alaska, United
          States;

     o    49% interest in the Hoyle Pond mine and a 49% interest in the Dome
          mine, both near Timmins, Ontario, Canada, through its 49% interest in
          the Porcupine Joint Venture;

     o    98.1% interest in the Kubaka mine in the Magadan Oblast situated in
          far east Russia;

     o    50% interest in the La Coipa mine in Chile;

                                                                              23
<PAGE>

     o    50% interest in the Crixas mine in Brazil;

     o    49% interest in the Brasilia mine in Brazil;

     o    32% interest in the Musselwhite mine in Ontario, Canada; and

     o    50% interest in the Round Mountain mine in Nevada, United States;

In addition, the Company holds a 100% interest in the Blanket mine, situated in
Zimbabwe, Africa, a 100% interest in the Kettle River mine in Washington, United
States, a 100% interest in the Lupin mine in Nunavut Territory, Canada, a 50%
interest in the New Britannia mine in Manitoba, Canada, a 100% interest in
certain development and operating assets in Greece referred to as the Hellenic
Gold Complex (which includes the Stratoni base metals operations and the
Skouries development project), which interest is subject to a 12% carried
interest and a right to acquire a 12% participating interest in favour of
certain third parties, and other mining properties in various stages of
exploration, development, reclamation and closure.

All production data is presented on a 100% basis with the exception of gold
equivalent production, which represents the Company's proportionate share.

FORT KNOX MINE AND AREA, ALASKA

The Company is the owner of the Fort Knox mine located in Fairbanks North Star
Borough, Alaska. The Fort Knox mine includes the main Fort Knox open pit mine,
mill, and tailings storage facility, the True North open pit mine, which
commenced production in 2001, the Ryan Lode project and an 80% ownership
interest in the Gil property that is subject to a joint venture agreement with
Teryl Resources Corp ("Teryl"). The Company's ownership interest in the Fort
Knox mine was acquired as a result of the Kinam Merger on June 1, 1998. The Fort
Knox property has been pledged as security against the syndicated credit
facility which supports, inter-alia, $25.0 million of industrial revenue bonds
outstanding as at December 31, 2002.

A report entitled "Technical Report on the Fort Knox and True North Deposits,
Fairbanks North Star Borough, Alaska USA" dated April 4, 2003 (the "Fort Knox
Report") has been prepared for the Company by Victor J. Miller, P.E., senior
planning engineer, and Dean T. Wilton, P.G., technical services manager, both of
Fairbanks Gold Mining, Inc., a subsidiary of the Company. The following
summaries of the Fort Knox deposit and True North deposit have been prepared
from the Fort Knox Report and, in some cases, are extracts from the Fort Knox
Report.

PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION

FORT KNOX OPEN PIT

The Fort Knox open pit mine, mill and mineral claims cover approximately 20,463
hectares located 40 kilometers northeast of the City of Fairbanks, Alaska. The
Company owns 1,168 State of Alaska mining claims covering an area of
approximately 19,962 hectares, an additional 501 hectares of mineral rights
comprised of an Upland Mineral Lease issued by the State of Alaska, a Millsite
Lease, and one unpatented federal lode mining claim. Mineral reserves at the
Fort Knox mine are situated on 505 hectares of land that are covered by a State
of Alaska Millsite Lease that expires in 2014, and may be renewed for a period
not to exceed 55 years.

The State of Alaska Millsite Lease carries a 3% production royalty, based on net
income and recovery of the initial capital investment. Mineral production from
State mining claims is subject to a Mine License Tax, following a three-year
grace period after production commences. The license tax ranges from 3% to 7% of
taxable income. There has been no production from State claims situated outside
the boundaries of the Millsite Lease at the Fort Knox mine. The unpatented
federal lode claim is owned by the Company and is not currently subject to any
royalty provisions. There were no royalties paid in 2002 or 2001.

All requisite permits have been obtained for mining and continued development of
the Fort Knox open pit mine and are in good standing. The Company is in
compliance with the Fort Knox permits in all material respects.

                                                                              24
<PAGE>

TRUE NORTH OPEN PIT

The True North open pit mine mineral claims cover approximately 3,804 hectares,
located 43 kilometers northeast of the City of Fairbanks, Alaska. The Company
owns 104 State of Alaska mining claims, covering 1,619 hectares which are
subject to a State production royalty tax of 3%. Mineral reserves are situated
on two groups of State claims that the Company has leased from private
individuals. Mineral production to date has been from one of the leased claim
blocks. Mineral leases have been executed with third parties for an additional
138 State mining claims that cover approximately 2,185 hectares. Leased claims
are subject to net smelter return royalties ranging from 3.5% to 5%. The Company
paid royalties of $0.6 million in 2002 and $0.2 million in 2001.

All requisite permits have been obtained for mining of the True North open pit
mine which consists of the Hindenburg, Shepard, Zeppelin, Central and East Pit
zones. These permits are in good standing. The Company is currently in
compliance with the True North permits in all material respects.

RYAN LODE PROJECT

The Ryan Lode project mineral claims cover approximately 500 hectares located 10
kilometers west of the City of Fairbanks, Alaska. The claim block consists of 50
State of Alaska mining claims, ten patented federal mining claims and five
unpatented federal mining claims, which are either leased from third parties or
owned by the Company. All production from the State of Alaska mining claims is
subject to the State of Alaska Mine License Tax following a three-year tax grace
period after production commences. The State of Alaska Mine License tax is
graduated from 3% to 7% of taxable income. In addition to the State of Alaska
Mine License Tax, the leased claims are subject to net smelter royalties of 5%,
and annual rental payments of $150,000. The annual rental payments are not
deductible when computing the net smelter return royalties. The Company paid
$150,000 of annual rental payments in each of 2002 and 2001.

GIL PROPERTY

The Gil property mineral claims cover approximately 2,700 hectares located
contiguous to the Fort Knox claim block. The claim block consists of 167 State
of Alaska mining claims and is subject to a joint venture agreement between the
Company and Teryl. The Company's ownership interest in the Gil claim block is
80%. All production from the State of Alaska mining claims is subject to the
State of Alaska Mine License Tax following a three-year tax grace period after
production commences. The State of Alaska Mine License tax is graduated from 3%
to 7% of taxable income. The Company continues to actively explore the Gil
claims.

ACCESSIBILITY, CLIMATE, LOCAL RESOURCES, INFRASTRUCTURE, AND PHYSIOGRAPHY

The Fort Knox mine is situated in close proximity to the City of Fairbanks,
which is a major population, service and supply center for the interior region
of Alaska. Services, supplies, fuel and electricity are available in Fairbanks
in ample quantities to support the local and regional needs, along with the
mining and processing operations of the Company.

Access to the Fort Knox mine from Fairbanks, Alaska is by 34 kilometers of paved
highway and eight kilometers of unpaved road. The True North mine is located 18
kilometers west of the Fort Knox property and is accessible by an unpaved road.
The Ryan Lode project is located 65 kilometers from the Fort Knox property and
is accessible by 54 kilometers of paved road and 11 kilometers of unpaved roads.
The area has a sub-arctic climate, with long cold winters and short summers.
Winter low temperatures drop to the range of -40 to -55 degrees Fahrenheit,
while in the summer, highs may occasionally exceed 90 degrees Fahrenheit. The
annual rainfall in Fairbanks is approximately 30 centimeters.

The area topography consists of rounded ridges with gentle side slopes.
Vegetation includes spruce, birch and willow trees and various shrubs, grasses
and mosses. The elevation ranges from 1,000 to 1,600 meters.

The Fort Knox milling operation obtains its process water from a fresh water
reservoir located within the permitted property area. The tailings storage area
on site has adequate capacity for the remaining mine life of the Fort Knox and
the True North mines. Power is provided to the mine by Golden Valley Electric
Association's power grid serving the area over a distribution line paid for by
the Company.

HISTORY

An Italian prospector named Felix Pedro discovered gold in the Fairbanks mining
district in 1902. Between 1902 and 1993 more than 8.0 million ounces of
predominately placer gold were mined in the district. In 1984 a geologist
discovered visible

                                                                              25
<PAGE>

gold in granitic hosted quartz veins on the Fort Knox property. Between 1987 and
1991, a number of companies conducted extensive exploration work on the Fort
Knox, True North and Gil properties. In 1991, Kinam entered into a joint venture
agreement with Teryl to explore the Gil property. In 1992, Kinam acquired
ownership of the Fort Knox property. Construction of the Fort Knox mine and mill
operations began in 1995 and were completed in 1997. Commercial production at
Fort Knox was achieved on March 1, 1997. Construction of the mine was completed
at a capital cost of approximately $373 million, which included approximately
$28 million of capitalized interest. After acquiring ownership of the True North
property in 1999, the Company completed pre-production capital expenditures,
primarily permitting and the building of a haulage road to the Fort Knox mill.
Commercial production at True North was achieved on April 1, 2001.
Pre-production capital expenditures for True North were approximately $29.6
million.

GEOLOGY AND MINERALIZATION

The Company's mining and exploration properties are located within the Fairbanks
mining district, a southwest - northeast trending belt of lode and placer gold
deposits that comprise one of the largest gold producing areas in the state of
Alaska.

The Fairbanks district is situated in the northwestern part of the Yukon -
Tanana Uplands. The Yukon - Tanana terrane consists of a thick sequence of
polymetamorphic rocks that range from Precambrian to upper Paleozoic in age. The
dominant rock unit in the district is the Fairbanks Schist. It is comprised of
gray to brown fine-grained micaceous schist and micaceous quartzite.
Interlayered with the Fairbanks Schist is the Cleary Sequence, a varied
assemblage of metamorphic lithologies. In the northern part of the district high
grade metamorphic rocks of the Chatanika terrane have been identified. These
rocks, which are in fault contact with the Fairbanks Schist and Cleary Sequence,
are thought to be Devonian to Mississippian in age, and have been metamorphosed
to eclogite facies.

The dominant structural trend of the district is expressed by numerous northeast
trending faults and shear zones. These structures, which were important to the
localization of gold mineralization, show a dominant strike-slip movement.

Several intrusive bodies, ranging in age from late Cretaceous to early Tertiary,
penetrate the Yukon-Tanana terrane. They generally range from ultramafic to
felsic in composition, and can be distinguished from older intrusive rocks by
their lack of metamorphic textures.

The Fort Knox gold deposit is hosted by the Vogt stock - a late Cretaceous-aged
multi-Phase granitic body that intrudes Precambrian to mid-upper Paleozoic
schists of the Yukon-Tanana terrane. The surface exposure of the Vogt stock is
elongate, measuring approximately 1,067 meters east-west and 610 meters
north-south.

Gold occurs in and along the margins of pegmatites, quartz veins and veinlets,
quartz-filled shears, and fractures within the granite. Pre-mineralization
fractures, which resulted from magmatic doming, provided conduits for
mineralizing fluids within the stockwork and shear zones. The stockwork veins
strike predominantly east-west and dip randomly. Vein density decreases with
depth. Shear zones generally strike northwest to southeast and dip moderately to
the southwest.

There appear to be two distinct zones of gold distribution within the deposit:
the inner zone, which is characterized by mineralization that has good
continuity over considerable distances; and an outer zone, where the
mineralization has shown itself to be less predictable. It appears that the
differences in the continuity of the mineralization may be due to grain size
changes and different Phases within the stock.

Mineralization in the quartz-filled shears is distributed relatively evenly, and
individual gold grains are generally less than 100 microns in size, in contrast
to the stockwork veins, where gold particle size and distribution are more
erratic. The mineralized zone has a very low sulfide content.

The True North gold deposits lies within the poly-metamorphic Chatanika Terrane,
a klippe of eclogitic marbles, calc-magnesian schists, quartz-muscovite schists,
carbonaceous phyllites and quartzites.

The mineral deposits are partially situated in a structurally complex zone that
has a northeast elongated orientation that parallels the Eldorado fault. It is
characterized by a series of gentle to complex folds, especially between the
Eldorado fault and the sub-parallel "Neil's discontinuity", shear zones,
breccias, and occasional low angle faults. Northwest of Neil's discontinuity the
mineralized zones dip gently to the northwest, while south of the zone
mineralization dips to the southeast. The area between Neil's discontinuity and
the Eldorado fault is structurally complex, and the orientation of individual
mineralized zones in this area can be highly variable.

                                                                              26
<PAGE>

The gold mineralization in the True North deposits is hosted in felsic schists
and is frequently accompanied by carbon and carbonate alteration in sheared or
otherwise structurally prepared zones. The gold is very fine grained, and is
closely associated with pyrite, arsenopyrite, and stibnite in the unoxidized
zones. It occurs in drusy quartz veins, and in altered and brecciated rocks
adjacent to breccia bodies. There appears to be a direct relationship between
veining and gold content, as weakly veined rocks generally carry lower gold
values.

EXPLORATION

The gold exploration procedures that have been utilized at the Fort Knox and
True North projects include: reconnaissance and detailed geologic mapping; soil
and rock chip sampling to determine the presence of gold mineralization, or
associated (trace) elements; trenching of soil anomalies to create exposures of
bedrock; drilling, geochemical and assay determinations for gold and associated
elements.

Two types of drilling methods have been used namely, diamond core and reverse
circulation (RC). Drilling is always completed by independent drilling
contractors under the supervision of Company personnel. Sampling of the drill
holes is done by staff of the drill contractors, under close supervision of
Company or contract geologists. Geochemical and assay determinations for gold
and associated elements are undertaken by independent commercial laboratories.
The Company has utilized the services of two firms - ALS Chemex Laboratories and
Bondar-Clegg (now owned by the ALS Chemex group). Check assay work during 2002
was done by Acme Analytical of Vancouver, British Columbia.

The Company's regional exploration within the Fairbanks district totalled $1.6
million during 2002. The exploration budget for 2003 is $3.2 million.

DRILLING, SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS, AND SECURITY OF SAMPLES

Drilling is the principal tool utilized to explore for and define mineral
deposits in the Fairbanks mining district. Two types of drilling are utilized
during exploration and development programs at the various properties, diamond
core and reverse circulation drilling.

Core drilling is the process of obtaining continuous cylindrical samples of rock
from drill holes by means of annular shaped rock cutting bits rotated by a
bore-hole drilling machine. Core drilling, also referred to as diamond drilling,
is commonly used to collect undisturbed and continuous samples from either
complete drill holes or intervals of holes that are of particular interest for
the purposes of detailed and comprehensive sampling, for geotechnical and rock
strength tests, or because alternative drilling methods may be incapable of
providing appropriate geological or geotechnical data.

Reverse circulation is a method of rotary drilling whereby the drilling medium
is circulated to the drill bit face from the surface and the drill cuttings that
are ground up by the drill bit cutting face are removed from the drill hole by
the drilling medium (water, foam or other drilling muds and additives, or air)
inside the drill rods. Reverse circulation drilling is a generally accepted
method that is commonly used in mineral exploration and development drilling
programs throughout the world.

Comprehensive drilling programs have been carried out at both mines. The Fort
Knox deposit has been defined by 594 drill holes (201 core holes and 393 reverse
circulation holes totaling 375,230 feet), which have provided 75,046 nominal
1.52-meter long samples. The True North deposit has been defined by 1,353 drill
holes (totaling 352,660 feet), which provided 70,532 nominal 1.52-meter long
samples.

Core samples and reverse circulation drill cuttings are collected from each
drill hole and are geologically logged. RC drill cuttings are collected at one
and a half meter intervals by a geologist or helper at each drill site. Each
core interval and RC cutting sample is submitted to an independent assay
laboratory for geochemical analysis, and the subsequent geochemical data is
entered with the lithologic log data into the project database. In an effort to
collect the most representative sample possible, 83.1 millimeter (83 millimeter
prior to 1998) diameter core holes have been drilled at the Fort Knox and Ryan
Lode deposits, while 64 millimeter core holes are drilled at True North and Gil.
Core is regularly photographed and then logged and sampled in one and a half
meter intervals. Data is entered on the logs in a digital format. Special
emphasis is placed on shear and vein orientations, as well as mineralization and
oxidation. A representative sample is retained for later use and the remainder
of each interval is submitted for assay.

Drill samples are collected from the drill hole by personnel of the various
drilling contractors, under the direct supervision of Company staff. The samples
are labeled and placed in bags at the drill site and prepared for transport to
commercial

                                                                              27
<PAGE>

laboratories for preparation and assay. All samples are either delivered to the
preparation facility by Company personnel, or are picked up at a Company
facility by employees of the laboratory.

Duplicate samples are collected from every tenth sample and a check assay is
performed and compared to the original assay. As a form of quality control, the
inclusion of "blank" (unmineralized) samples within each sample shipment is part
of the standard procedure.

A pulp sample of known grade is also submitted to the laboratory. The sample
frequency is twice per core hole, and every 30 meters for reverse circulation
holes. These standards are prepared both in-house and by outside laboratories
over the different exploration seasons, and they represent different ranges of
gold grades. For samples with fire assays greater than 0.3 grams per tonne, the
samples are resubmitted to the laboratory for a cyanide soluble assay. The
purpose of this procedure is to determine mill recovery rates.

The Company employs, as a standard operating procedure, a very detailed analysis
program for determining if a particular reverse circulation drill sample is
representative of the rock within the drill hole. This program includes weighing
the samples to determine if the sample is under weight (indicating loss of
material in the sampled interval). The presence of unusually high sample weights
is often an important indicator of sample contamination in a drill hole. All
assay data from mineralized intervals are analyzed by two computer programs
(developed by MRDI, an independent mining consulting firm) to determine if there
is a predictable repetition (cyclicity) to high grade intervals, or (decay) of
assays immediately adjacent to and below high grade intervals, possibly
indicating contamination of certain assay values. Any holes suspected of down
hole contamination on the basis of these three criteria are examined in
cross-sections. Based on how the area compared to adjacent holes, a decision is
made as to whether or not the data is to be rejected. If any samples are
determined from these procedures to be suspicious, that data is rejected and is
excluded from the database used to estimate mineral resources.

Any mineralized drill hole interval that has a calculated recovery greater than
100% is closely scrutinized and may be rejected. This is the primary (but not
only) method for determining contamination at the Fort Knox deposit, but it is a
less effective method for the True North deposit, where cyclicity and decay are
more effective tools.

The nature of the mineralization and host rock at the Fort Knox deposit requires
that particular care be given to the collection of drill hole samples,
especially for reverse circulation holes, that penetrate the water table within
the deposit. The reasonableness of the Company's methods in drilling this part
of the deposit has been validated by the results of mining in several of these
areas of the deposit. These techniques are now also used as standard practice at
all of the Company's properties in the Fairbanks mining district, including the
True North mine.

MINERAL RESERVE AND RESOURCE ESTIMATES

The following table sets forth the estimated proven and probable reserves for
the Fort Knox mine and area as at December 31, 2002 and 2001:

                       2002                                2001
         -----------------------------------------------------------------------
                     AVERAGE      GOLD                    AVERAGE       GOLD
          TONNES      GRADE      CONTENT       TONNES      GRADE      CONTENT
          ------      -----      -------       ------      -----      -------
          (000'S)     (GPT)     (000'S OZ)     (000'S)     (GPT)     (000'S OZ)

Proven    58,414       0.84        1,571       59,212      0.83         1575
Probable  38,744       0.89        1,107       44,708      1.05        1,508
          ------       ----        -----       ------      ----        -----
Total     97,158       0.86        2,678      103,920      0.92        3,083
          ======       ====        =====      =======      ====        =====

In addition to estimated proven and probable reserves, as at December 31, 2002,
the Fort Knox mine and area has an estimated 21.7 million tonnes of measured and
indicated resources at an average grade of 1.02 grams of gold per tonne. For
more detail on reserves and resources see pages 12 to 16.

MINING AND MILLING OPERATIONS

The Fort Knox and True North deposits are mined by conventional open pit
methods. Ore from the Fort Knox and True North mines is processed at the
Company's CIP (carbon-in-pulp) mill located near the Fort Knox mine. The mill
processes ore on a 24 hours per day, 365 days per year schedule.

                                                                              28
<PAGE>

The Fort Knox mill has a daily capacity of between 32,658 to 45,359 tonnes per
day. An average of 37,650 tonnes per day is scheduled to be processed in 2003,
with True North providing 22% of the mill feed. Mill feed is first crushed to
minus 20 centimeters in the primary gyratory crusher located near the Fort Knox
pit and conveyed 800 meters to a coarse-ore stockpile located near the mill. The
crushed material is conveyed to a semi-autogenous (SAG) mill, which operates in
closed circuit with two ball mills and a bank of cyclones for sizing. A portion
of the cyclone underflow is screened and then directed to a gravity recovery
circuit. Because the True North mineralization has a much finer gold particle
size than the Fort Knox mineralization, the gravity circuit is not a significant
factor in recovering True North reserves.

Correctly sized material flows into a high rate thickener and then into leach
tanks where cyanide is used to dissolve the gold. Activated carbon is used in
the CIP (carbon-in-pulp) circuit to absorb the gold from the cyanide solution.
Carbon particles loaded with gold are removed from the slurry by screening and
are transferred to the gold recovery circuit where the gold is stripped from the
carbon by a solution, plated onto a cathode by electrowinning, and melted into
dore bars for shipment to a refiner. Mill tailings are detoxified and
transferred into the tailings impoundment below the mill.

Gold recoveries at the Fort Knox mill have historically ranged from 87% to more
than 90% since production began in 1996. With the commencement of feed from the
True North mine in 2001, it has been necessary to add lead nitrate to the
process, and make modest increases to the cyanide and lime concentrations to
maintain mill recovery rates.

FORT KNOX MINE

The mine production rate varies between 94,000 and 130,000 tonnes per day of
total material. Mining is carried out on a year round basis, seven days a week.
Standard drilling and blasting techniques are used, and the blast holes are
sampled and assayed for production grade control purposes. Broken rock is loaded
with a shovel or a wheel loader into haul trucks. Depending on the grade control
results, the mined material is delivered to either the primary crusher,
low-grade stockpiles, or to waste rock dumps.

In 1996 a 1.3 million short ton slope failure developed in the central south
wall above the granite-schist contact. The slide was stabilized with mining set
backs at the toe of the failure. Ground water was believed to be a contributing
factor to the failure, and a dewatering program is planned before mining this
zone.

The mine currently has 14 dewatering wells, which produce approximately 600
gallons per minute. In 2003, four additional wells will be drilled.

Stripping of Phase-6 is scheduled to begin in 2004 on the 2200 bench. Before
sustained mill feed rates can be reached in mid 2006 on the 1460 bench, 55
million tons of waste rock will be mined, at an average rate of 60,000 short
tons per day. Six additional haul trucks and a loader will be added to the
mining fleets in order to accomplish the stripping.

Typically, upper Phase-6 benches average 4,700 feet in length, with a mining
face width between 150 and 500 feet. Haul road access to the Phase will be from
the northeastern end. Subdividing the Phase would reduce the stripping load, but
due to the bench geometry and access limitations, this has not been considered.

TRUE NORTH MINE

Production rates for the True North open pit mine vary between 18,100 and 36,300
tonnes per day of material, seven days a week. Standard drilling and blasting
techniques are used and the blast holes are sampled and assayed for grade
control purposes. Broken rock is loaded with a shovel or a wheel loader into
77-tonne haul trucks. Depending on the ore-control plan the mine material is
delivered either to the stockpiles or to waste rock dumps.

From the stockpile, mill feed is reloaded into 77-tonne capacity trucks for the
20.9 kilometer long trip to the Fort Knox mill at 8,437 tonnes per day. The
material is directed dumped into a gyratory crusher.

The True North mine will operate at full production into the third quarter of
2004 with reserves at True North being depleted by the first quarter of 2005.

The current True North mining permit does not allow water discharge or mining
below the water table. All the pits were designed to meet these criteria based
on our current estimation of the groundwater surface. As mining progresses,
refinements in the water table location may allow changes in the pit designs.

As the mine is a side hill excavation, waste rock will be place either in access
roads or in dumps adjacent to the excavations.

                                                                              29
<PAGE>

During 2003, waste will also be backfilled into completed areas. Because much of
the deposit is located on north and northwest facing slopes, discontinuous
permafrost is present in the mining area. Clearing and grubbing in the
permafrost areas must be done during the winter months because bulldozing
becomes very difficult once the surface layers thaw. Access roads can be placed
across permafrost areas but waste dumps cannot.

SUMMARY OF PRODUCTION AND FINANCIAL DATA

The following table summarizes certain gold production, operating and financial
data relating to the Fort Knox mine for the three years ended December 31, 2002:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,                                                            2002            2001           2000
                                                                                    ----            ----           ----

SELECTED PRODUCTION AND OPERATING INFORMATION:
<S>                                                                                <C>             <C>             <C>
Tonnes mined (000's).......................................................        32,699.0        31,212.9        32,301.9
Ore processed (000's)......................................................        13,842.9        14,209.1        13,603.2
Gold grade (gpt)...........................................................            1.09            1.05            0.94
Average gold recovery (%)..................................................              84              86              89
Gold equivalent production.................................................         410,519         411,221         362,959
Number of employees........................................................             388             361             256

SELECTED FINANCIAL INFORMATION (IN MILLIONS EXCEPT UNIT COSTS):

Revenue....................................................................      $    131.6      $    109.0      $    102.8
                                                                                 ----------      ----------      ----------
Cost of production                                                                     95.3            85.0            73.5
Inventory change...........................................................             2.9            (3.3)            --
Site restoration cost accruals.............................................             1.0             1.2             1.3
Depreciation, depletion and amortization...................................            54.9            42.9            31.9
Mining property write-down.................................................              --              --              --
Interest expense...........................................................             1.5             3.6             5.7
Exploration................................................................             1.6             0.5             0.1
                                                                                 ----------      ----------      ----------
                                                                                      157.2           129.9           112.5
                                                                                 ----------      ----------      ----------
Net loss...................................................................      $    (25.6)     $    (20.9)     $     (9.7)
                                                                                 ==========      ==========      ==========

OTHER FINANCIAL INFORMATION:

Capital expenditures (millions) ...........................................      $     15.0       $    20.2      $     17.6
Unit costs:
  Total cash costs per gold equivalent ounce produced......................             232             207             203
  Total cash costs per tonne milled........................................               7               6               5
  Total production cost per gold equivalent ounce..........................             343             314             294
</TABLE>

Total cash costs and total production costs are non-GAAP measures. For further
information on these non-GAAP measures, please refer to the disclosure under the
heading "Calculation of Cash Costs, Production Costs and Realized Revenue and
Reconciliation to the Statements of Operations".

For further information on the 2002, 2001 and 2000 results, refer to the
disclosure included under "Financial Results, Operations, Fort Knox Mine" which
is incorporated by reference in the Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

PRODUCTION FORECAST, LIFE OF MINE AND CAPITAL EXPENDITURES

Estimated gold equivalent production for 2003 is 410,000 ounces at estimated
total cash costs of approximately $230 per ounce.

The life of mine plan prepared by the Company provides for completion of mining
at True North in 2005. From that point onwards, production is derived entirely
from the Fort Knox deposit until 2010 when the feed will originate predominantly
from the low grade stockpile material.

Capital expenditures at the Fort Knox operations in 2002 were $15.0 million
compared to $20.2 million during 2001. Planned capital expenditures for 2003 are
estimated to be $16.2 million, primarily in fleet additions and replacements.

                                                                              30
<PAGE>




                      Fort Knox Mine Property Location Map
                                [PICTURE OMITTED]






- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FAIRBANKS GOLD MINING, INC.     FORT KNOX MINE          FORT KNOX MINE

A SUBSIDIARY OF KINROSS GOLD CORPORATION                GENERAL ARRANGEMENT
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


                                                                              31
<PAGE>

                             TRUE NORTH PROPERTY MAP



                     TRUE NORTH MINE PROPERTY LOCATION MAP



                                [PICTURE OMITTED]






                                                                              32
<PAGE>

THE PORCUPINE JOINT VENTURE

GENERAL

Kinross and Placer entered into an asset exchange agreement (the "Asset Exchange
Agreement") and a joint venture agreement, both dated as of July 1, 2002, for
the purpose of forming a joint venture that combined the two companies'
respective gold mining operations in the Porcupine district in the Timmins area,
Ontario, Canada. Placer owns a 51% participating interest and Kinross owns a 49%
participating interest in the Porcupine Joint Venture, which joint venture is
managed by Placer. The Porcupine Joint Venture incorporates Placer's Dome mine
and mill, Kinross' Hoyle Pond, Pamour and Nighthawk Lake mines and the Bell
Creek mill.

THE ASSET EXCHANGE AGREEMENT

Pursuant to the Asset Exchange Agreement which was entered into as a step in
implementing the Porcupine Joint Venture, Placer transferred to Kinross an
undivided 49% interest in all of Placer's assets owned, used or thereafter
acquired by Placer or its affiliates and located within a 100 kilometer radius
of Placer's Dome Mill in or near Timmins, Ontario (the "Development Area") and
used in the gold mining, milling and exploration business and operations carried
on by Placer or its affiliates, including all real property, personal property,
inventory, certain accounts receivables, buildings, fixtures, facilities,
private roads and other assets located or acquired in the Development Area,
including all patented, leasehold, unpatented mining claims and licenses of
occupation recorded in the name of Placer or its affiliates, the benefit of any
royalty agreements in favour of Placer or its affiliates, the benefit of
Placer's leases and other contracts relating to Placer's real property and
mining claims in this area and the benefits which may be obtained under any
existing actions, claims or other proceedings relating to Placer's business in
this area and all goodwill attributable to such business.

Under the Asset Exchange Agreement, Kinross in turn transferred to Placer an
undivided 51% interest in all of Kinross' assets owned, used or thereafter
acquired by Kinross or its affiliates and located within the Development Area
and used in the gold mining, milling and exploration business and operations
carried on by Kinross or its affiliates, including all real property, personal
property, inventory, certain accounts receivable, buildings, fixtures,
facilities, private roads and other assets located or acquired in the
Development Area, including all patented, leasehold, unpatented claims and
licenses of occupation recorded in the name of Kinross, the benefit of any
royalty agreements in favour of Kinross or its affiliates, the benefit of
Kinross' leases and other contracts relating to Kinross' real property and
mining claims in this area and the benefits which may be obtained under any
existing action, claims or other proceedings relating to Kinross' business in
this area and all goodwill attributable to such business. Any interest that
Kinross may acquire in and to the project within the Development Area commonly
known as the Aquarius Project is excluded from the Porcupine Joint Venture
pending agreement between the parties to include it.

Under the Asset Exchange Agreement, Kinross has also transferred all of its
contracts relating to its Timmins operations to Placer, and Placer assumed such
contracts as manager of the Porcupine Joint Venture for the benefit of both
parties and the exclusive use of the Porcupine Joint Venture. Placer's contracts
relating to its Timmins operations remain in the name of Placer, which will hold
such contracts as manager of the Porcupine Joint Venture for the benefit of both
parties and the exclusive use of the Porcupine Joint Venture.

THE PORCUPINE JOINT VENTURE AGREEMENT

The purpose of the Porcupine Joint Venture is to engage in operations relating
to the mining, milling, exploration and development of the properties subject to
the Porcupine Joint Venture, and to perform any other activity necessary,
appropriate or incidental to the foregoing. The term of the Porcupine Joint
Venture is from July 1, 2002 and until so long thereafter as ores and mineral
resources are produced from the assets forming part of the Porcupine Joint
Venture and all reclamation obligations, liabilities or responsibilities under
applicable laws or instruments of title relating to operations under the
Porcupine Joint venture have ceased or been satisfied, to a maximum of 99 years,
unless the Porcupine Joint Venture is earlier terminated pursuant to the terms
of the Porcupine Joint Venture Agreement.

Each of Kinross and Placer is obligated to contribute funds from time to time to
the Porcupine Joint Venture in proportion to their respective participating
interests, pursuant to adopted programs and budgets.

Under the Porcupine Joint Venture a party's participating interest may be
reduced upon the election by such party not to contribute to an adopted program
and budget for the Porcupine Joint Venture, or in the event of a default by such
party in making its agreed upon contribution to an adopted program and budget.

                                                                              33
<PAGE>

In addition, if a party's participating interest is reduced to less than 10%,
the other party may elect that the first party be vested with a 2% net smelter
returns royalty on ores and minerals mined from the properties subject to the
Porcupine Joint Venture and the first party shall be deemed to have transferred
its remaining participating interest to the other party.

PORCUPINE JOINT VENTURE OPERATIONS

The Porcupine Joint Venture operations consist of the Dome underground and open
pit mine and mill, the Hoyle Pond underground mine and the Bell Creek mill and
tailings storage facility which is presently on care and maintenance with all
processing taking place at the Dome Mill. In addition, the Porcupine Joint
Venture operations consist of a number of former producing mines, most notably
the Pamour and Nighthawk Lake mines. The only producing mines forming part of
the Porcupine Joint Venture in Timmins at present are the Dome mine and the
Hoyle Pond mine.

A report entitled "Independent Technical Report on the Porcupine Joint Venture,
Ontario, Canada" dated March 2003 (the "PJV Report") has been prepared for the
Company by Steffen, Robertson and Kirsten Consulting (Canada) Inc. ("SRK
Consulting") and authored by Jean-Francois Couture, Ph.D., P.Geo, principal
geologist, William F. Tanaka, principal geologic engineer, Robert Crepeau,
P.Eng, Nicholas Michael, MBA, senior mining engineer, and Tim Mosey, senior
geological/mining engineer. The following summaries of the Porcupine Joint
Venture have been prepared from the PJV Report and, in some cases, are extracts
from the PJV Report.

PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION

HOYLE POND UNDERGROUND MINE AND BELL CREEK MILL

The Hoyle Pond underground mine, mineral claims and the Bell Creek mill are
located in Hoyle Township in Timmins, Ontario on 4,065 hectares of patented
land, land leased from the province and one private lease. The private lease is
for a term of 20 years and is in good standing until May 31, 2005. There are
also two contiguous staked mining claims covering 32 hectares located in Whitney
Township south of Hoyle Township.

There are various royalties on the Hoyle Pond underground mine land package. The
only royalties requiring payment at present are a tonnage-based royalty on the
private lease and a $0.10 per tonne royalty. Royalty payments were $0.1 million
in 2002 and $0.1 million in 2001.

All requisite permits have been obtained for the mining and continued
development of the Hoyle Pond underground mine and the Bell Creek mill and are
in good standing and the Porcupine Joint Venture is in compliance with Hoyle
Pond and Bell Creek permits in all material respects.

DOME MINE AND MILL

The Dome underground and open pit mine and mill are located within the city
limits of Timmins, Ontario, on an area that covers over 5,004 hectares of staked
and patented mining claims held or under option, including the Preston property
that lies to the south and east, immediately adjacent to the Dome property, the
Paymaster property that lies to the west of the Dome open pit and the Vedron
property that lies south of the Paymaster property.

The Dome open-pit and underground mines, claims, mining and surface rights are
registered in the name of Placer Dome Canada Limited (51%) and the Company
(49%). The Preston property includes 19 mining claims. The Paymaster property
includes 26 contiguous mining claims.

A 2% net smelter royalty is payable on production from the Preston, Paymaster
and Vedron properties. No other royalties are payable on the Dome property.

All requisite permits have been obtained for the mining and continued
development of the Dome underground and open pit mine and mill and are in good
standing; the Porcupine Joint Venture is in compliance with such permits in all
material respect.

                                                                              34
<PAGE>

PAMOUR AND NIGHTHAWK LAKE MINES

The Pamour open pit and Nighthawk Lake underground mines and mineral claims are
located in Timmins, Ontario on 7,783 hectares. The Pamour mine is located north
of Highway 101 and the Pamour mine site is approximately 19 kilometers east of
the downtown core of Timmins and 43 kilometers west of Highway 11. The Pamour
mine is also approximately two kilometers south of and contiguous with the Hoyle
Pond mine. The Nighthawk Lake mine is approximately 17 kilometers southeast of
Hoyle Pond. There has been no production at these mines since their acquisition
in 1999.

The necessary permits required to commence mining of the mineral reserves
contained in the existing Pamour pit, north of Highway 101, referred to as the
phase one mine plan, have been maintained in good standing and require only
administrative reactivation.

The Company will require additional permit approvals to mine south of Highway
101, which is outside of the phase one mine plan. The government agencies that
will be involved in the additional permitting process include the City of
Timmins, the Matagami River Conservation Authority, the Ontario Ministries of
Northern Development and Mines, Natural Resources, Environment and
Transportation, the Federal Department of Fisheries and Oceans and Environment
Canada.

The key element in the development of the expanded open pit outside of the phase
one mine plan will be the relocation of Highway 101. The proposed relocation
will involve constructing a causeway over a portion of a small lake, the Three
Nations Lake, and will therefore have a direct effect on a nearby fish habitat.
This highway has been relocated several times during the production history of
the mine. As a fishery resource will be involved in the project planning, the
Canadian Environmental Assessment Act process will be the guiding legislation.
The Company believes there is a high level of assurance that the project will
receive all required approvals for development.

Some land acquisition will be required for the construction of the project. The
Drew claims located immediately north of the phase one open pit, for which the
surface rights are required for a waste rock disposal site, will have to be
acquired. The Tanager claims located on the eastern shore of the Three Nations
Lake for which the surface rights are required for relocation of Highway 101
will also have to be acquired. Negotiations for the acquisitions of these claims
have been initiated and the Company believes there is a high level of assurance
that they will be concluded successfully. A right of way will have to be
obtained for the haulage road from the Pamour mine to the Dome mine, for which
negotiations have not yet commenced.

ACCESSIBILITY, CLIMATE, LOCAL RESOURCES, INFRASTRUCTURE, AND PHYSIOGRAPHY

Access to the Hoyle Pond mine is via a five kilometer all weather gravel road
north of Highway 101. Services are generally acquired from vendors in the
Timmins area. Adequate process water is available from the clear water pond at
the tailings, while make up water and potable water comes from underground
supply.

The Bell Creek milling operation obtained its processing water from Bell creek,
located within the permitted property area. The existing land package includes
areas where additional tailings storage areas can be permitted. The current
tailings storage area has sufficient capacity for several years at planned
production throughout, however, the Bell Creek mill is currently not operating.
Power is provided to the mine and mill by Ontario Hydro.

Access to the Dome mine is by paved road from the town of South Porcupine, six
kilometers east of Timmins on Highway 101. Rail freight service is available
from the Falconbridge -- Kidd Creek metallurgical site eight kilometers east of
the mine.

The dominant suficial material in the Dome mine area is glacial till overlain by
glaciolacustrine silts and clays. Mine waste and tailings cover some areas
closer to the mine.

The Pamour mine is located two kilometers south of the Hoyle Pond mine and
accessible by an unpaved road. The Nighthawk lake mine is located 17 kilometers
southeast of the Hoyle Pond mine and accessible by 10 kilometers of paved roads
and seven kilometers of unpaved roads.

The area climate consists of cold winters and hot summers. Temperatures range
from below -40 degrees Celsius to above +30 degrees Celsius. Mean precipitation
is approximately 80 centimeters annually.

The topography of the area is typical of the Canadian Shield and consists of an
irregular surface with moderate relief. The topographic highs are the result of
bedrock outcrops and are surrounded by low lying areas of poorly drained
wetlands.

                                                                              35
<PAGE>

Vegetation includes spruce, pine, poplar and birch trees and various shrubs,
grasses and mosses. The elevation ranges from 200 meters to 300 meters.

HISTORY

Land was first staked in the vicinity of the present day Pamour mine in 1910.
Limited production was achieved from 1911 to 1914. The property remained idle
from 1914 to 1923. Between 1923 and 1935 several mining syndicates carried out
exploration work. In 1935 and 1936 the Pamour No. 3 shaft was sunk and a 650
tonnes per day mill was constructed. In 1938 the mill capacity was increased to
1,300 tonnes per day by installing new equipment. During the 1950's mill
throughput averaged 1,500 tonnes per day. In 1972, the mill was expanded to
treat 2,275 tonnes per day as production from the nearby Aunor mine was
processed at the Pamour mill. Open pit mining at the Pamour mine began in 1976
and continued until 1999.

Approximately 4.0 million ounces of gold were produced from the Pamour mine from
1936 to 1997. There has been no production at the Pamour mine since Kinross
acquired it in 1999.

The Hoyle Pond discovery hole was drilled by Texas Gulf in 1980. The deposit was
explored in 1980 to 1982. The deposit was developed by ramp in 1983 and 1984.
The first year of mining in 1985 yielded 64,400 tonnes at an average grade of
13.0 grams per tones of gold. The mine has been in continuous production since
then and was acquired by Kinross pursuant to the merger with FGC in 1993. Since
1993, Kinross has conducted exploration programs and underground development has
added significant additional mineralization. From 1994 to 1999 Kinross sunk an
815 meter shaft and developed a second ramp to access underground workings. The
Bell Creek mill has gone through a series of expansions with current capacity of
1,500 tonnes per day. The head grade for the Hoyle Pond mine is the highest of
any of the significant past, or present producing mines in Timmins.

The Dome deposit was discovered in 1909. Operations commented in 1910, producing
214 ounces of gold. Mining has been continuous at Dome since 1910. In 1984, the
mill capacity was increased from 2,000 to 3,000 tons per day. Part of the
extension included a new vertical shaft, the No. 8 shaft which was sunk from the
surface to a depth of 1,667 meters. In 1988, due to a skipping accident, No. 8
shaft was not producing and, therefore, open pit mining was commenced. From 1992
to 1996, Placer Dome produced from the Paymaster property. In 1995, an expansion
of the operations, which included an enlarged open pit and increase in milling
capacity, was completed. As a result, full production from the expanded open pit
was achieved and mine production increased from a nominal rate of 3,400 tonnes
per day in 1994 to 9,100 tonnes per day in 1995. In 1997, the Preston property
was purchased and the Dome open pit was expanded into the Preston land holdings.
Mining of open pit ore from the Preston was completed in 2000.

From its beginning in 1909 to December 31, 2001, the Dome mine has produced
14,537,596 ounces of gold and approximately 2,596,000 ounces of silver making it
the second largest gold producer of the Timmins camp.

GEOLOGY AND MINERALIZATION

REGIONAL GEOLOGY OF THE PORCUPINE GOLD CAMP

All of the properties comprising the Porcupine Joint Venture lie within the
Porcupine Gold Camp ("PGC"). The PGC, located in the Archean Abitibi greenstone
belt has been the most productive gold-producing field in North America. Total
historic production is in excess of 62 million ounces of gold. This production
has come from quartz-carbonate lode systems hosted within greenshist-facies
metamorphics. Lodes are found in a corridor up to 10 kilometers wide parallel to
the 200 kilometers Destor Porcupine Fault. At the regional scale, gold deposits
are spatially associated with regional fault zones. At the camp scale gold
deposits generally occur within five kilometers of, but not in, the regional
faults.

LOCAL GEOLOGY AND MINERALIZATION

HOYLE POND

The Hoyle Pond Main Zone and 1060 Zone deposits, both of which are in
production, occur on opposite limbs of an open, northeast plunging F2 antiformal
structure, hosted within carbonatized north-dipping sheared and metamorphosed
tholeiitic basalts. The 7 Vein system occurs as a series of stacked, flat to
gently northeast dipping veins at the nose of the antiformal structure.
Mineralization occurs as coarse, free gold in white to grey-white quartz veins
with variable ankerite, tourmaline, pyrite and local arsenopyrite. Alteration
halos are generally narrow, consisting of mainly grey zones (carbon, carbonate,
sericite, cubic pyrite) in the Hoyle Pond system, and carbonate-sericite, with
fuchsite, pyrite, arsenopyrite and trace chalcopyrite, sphalerite within the
1060 structure.

                                                                              36
<PAGE>

The Hoyle Pond Main Zone includes a series of generally northeast striking,
linked quartz vein zones (at least 11 veins of economic significance) folded on
a small scale with moderate west trending and northeast plunging fold axis. The
1060 Zone consists of at least five main vein structures (B1, B2, and B3 Zones,
A Zone and Porphyry Zone) with orientations ranging from north to northeast with
generally subvertical dips.

PAMOUR MINE

The Pamour mine is located approximately one kilometer north of the Destor --
Porcupine Fault Zone and overlies an east-west trending unconformity between
Tisdale Group volcanic rocks and Timiskaming Group sediments. Volcanic rocks
occupy the area north of the mine and the unconformity, and include interlayered
mafic to ultramafic units. Sedimentary rocks occupy the area south of the
unconformity and include greywacke, argillite and conglomerate. A distinct unit
of clastic sediments marks the unconformity itself. Gold mineralization is
hosted by both volcanic and sedimentary units and related to both individual
quartz veins and vein swarms, which trend mainly east-west. Volcanic-hosted ore
bodies include shallow north-dipping single vein structures within mafic
volcanics, as well as irregular shaped vein swarms along various lithologic
contacts within the volcanic sequence. Sedimentary hosted ore bodies include
irregular shaped vein swarms along the unconformity as well as narrow, steep
south-dipping veins in greywacke further to the south.

The Nighthawk Lake mine is located along the Nighthawk Lake Break, a branch
fault of the Destor Porcupine Fault Zone. Rocks in the vicinity of the Nighthawk
Lake mine consist of mafic to felsic volcanics, intruded by irregular masses of
albitite and syenite. Gold mineralization occurs both within the volcanic rocks
and intrusives, and generally shows a close spatial association with strong
carbonate alteration, brecciation, quartz veining and pyrite or arsenopyrite.
Based on past work, orebodies at the mine have been subdivided into six main
zones including the: Main Zone, No. 1 Zone, No. 4 Zone, Ramp Zone, "A" Zone and
Deadman Island Zone.

DOME MINE

The Dome mine lies on the south limb of the Porcupine syncline in an area where
the Keewatin volcanic rocks are overlain by the Timiskaming metasedimentary
slates and conglomerates.

Gold mineralization is found in a number of different rock types and in
association with a number of different structural settings. Mineralization in
the district is commonly associated with the northeasterly plunge of the
Porcupine syncline.

At the mine site, the local sequence of north dipping metavolcanics and
metasedimentary rocks have been folded to form a northeasterly plunging
structure, referred to as "Greenstone Nose". Sediments consisting of
conglomerates, slates and greywackes are draped around this structure and form
the "Sedimentary Trough" on the south side.

Mineralization occurs mainly in association with structurally controlled quartz
and quartz-ankerite veins. Principal orebodies can be classified into three main
types: Long narrow veins in shear zones parallel to the stratigraphic trend;
swarms of en-echelon veins and stockworks of veins; and disseminated
mineralization, in which the gold is associated with pyrite and/or pyrrhotite
and little or no vein material is present.

The Dome mine lies on the south limb of the Porcupine syncline in an area where
the Archean Metavolcanics are overlain by the metasedimentary rocks.

Mineralization occurs mainly in association with structurally controlled quartz
and quartz-ankerite veins. Principal orebodies can be classified into three main
types: Long narrow veins in shear zones parallel to the stratigraphic trend;
swarms of en-echelon veins and stockworks of veins; and disseminated
mineralization, in which the gold is associated with pyrite and/or pyrrhotite
and little or no vein material is present.

At the mine site, the local sequence of north dipping metavolcanics and
metasedimentary rocks have been folded to form a northeasterly plunging
structure, referred to as "Greenstone Nose". Sediments consisting of
conglomerates, slates and greywackes are draped around this structure and form
the "Sedimentary Trough" on the south side.

Immediately south of "Sedimentary Trough" lies an east-west striking, highly
strained zone in which magnesium rich, carbonatized rock occurs. This highly
altered zone corresponds to the trace of the ductile Dome Fault interpreted to
represent a branch off the main Destor-Porcupine Fault. To the west, the Dome
Fault Zone passes between two major porphyritic intrusive bodies -the Paymaster
and the Preston Porphyries. To the east, lenses of porphyry, similar
compositionally to the main porphyry bodies, occur within the Dome Fault Zone.
To the south of the Dome Fault Zone are the "Southern

                                                                              37
<PAGE>

Greenstones", a south-dipping sequence of basalts consisting of massive and
pillowed flows.

At the Paymaster property, historic mining operations extracted ore from
ankerite veins in mafic units and quartz veins in porphyry. The majority of
mineralization being targeted by current exploration is hosted by carbonated and
sulphidic greenstone adjacent to and within flexures in the mafic/ultramafic
contact (36 Zone).

EXPLORATION

The Company's regional exploration within the Timmins camp totalled $1.9 million
during 2002. The exploration budget for 2003 is $2.1 million.

DRILLING, SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS, AND SECURITY OF SAMPLES

The Company collects both exploration and production samples at it's operations
in Timmins. Samples are collected using industry standard sample collection
procedures that are well understood by the geological personnel collecting the
samples in the field.

The Company conducted both surface and underground diamond core drilling
operations for the period ending December 31, 2002. For resource estimation
purposes, drilling spacing ranges from a low of 8.0 meters to a high of 25.0
meters. Typically, drill holes are sampled honoring geological contacts while
maintaining a standard 1.5 meter sample length wherever possible. Typically the
core is not split prior to assay unless the hole is an exploration hole
targeting new mineralization.

Underground, sampling is conducted on a daily basis throughout the active
working faces. Chip samples, muck samples and sludge samples are collected to
provide daily grade control and to reconcile actual production to the estimated
reserves. At Hoyle Pond, ore development headings are typically sampled on 2-5
meter intervals using both chip samples and muck samples. Production stoping
areas are typically sampled at 5.0 meter intervals wherever practical and stope
muck is sampled at a frequency of 1 muck sample for every 20-40 tonnes of ore.

At the Dome mine, ore development is sampled at 2-3 meter intervals using both
chip samples and muck samples. Cut and fill stopes are sampled at a rate of one
sample for every 30 tonnes and long-hole and bulk mining zones are sampled at a
rate of one sample for every 60 tonnes.

Open pit samples are collected from blasthole cuttings on an approximate 10
meter sample spacing. In ore zones, a single sample is collected from each hole,
representing approximately 450 tonnes of ore. In waste, the sample frequency is
reduced with one sample collected from every four holes.

For the period ending December 31, 2002, samples were analyzed at the Bell Creek
lab, the Dome mine lab and at an independent assay labs. Prior to the completion
of the Porcupine Joint Venture, the Company's analytical work was carried out at
the Bell Creek lab with some exploration samples sent to an independent lab for
analysis.

Since finalizing the Porcupine Joint Venture Agreement, the Company's analytical
work is completed at the Dome mine lab with the Bell Creek lab placed on care
and maintenance.

At the Bell Creek lab, samples were analyzed using conventional fire assay
methods with gravimetric finish. The sampler, using a tag, identifies samples
known to contain coarse, visible gold. The tag alerted the lab of the
possibility of contamination and identifying these samples for modified analysis
where each sample was analyzed in triplicate. The analytical procedures at Bell
Creek included the insertion of two blanks, two checks and one standard in each
tray of 25 analyses. At the independent lab, the check assays were conducted at
a rate of one check for every 8-10 samples with a blank and a standard analyzed
with every 30 samples.

At the Dome mine lab, all gold analyses are completed using conventional fire
assay with an AA finish. Samples with visible gold are assayed using either a
gravimetric finish or pulp metallic assay. Each assay tray at the Dome mine lab
includes at least one standard, one check and one standard. The Dome mine lab
processes all surface and underground production and exploration samples. Check
assays are completed at the Dome mine lab or at external laboratories. All
multi-element analytical work is completed at external laboratories.

                                                                              38
<PAGE>

MINERAL RESERVE AND RESOURCE ESTIMATES

The following table sets forth the estimated proven and probable reserves for
the Porcupine Joint Venture as at December 31, 2002 and 2001 and represents 100%
of the joint venture's reserves, in which the Company has a 49% interest:

                       2002                                2001
         -----------------------------------------------------------------------
                     AVERAGE      GOLD                    AVERAGE       GOLD
          TONNES      GRADE      CONTENT       TONNES      GRADE      CONTENT
          ------      -----      -------       ------      -----      -------
          (000'S)     (GPT)     (000'S OZ)     (000'S)     (GPT)     (000'S OZ)
Proven    16,316       1.39         728           367      13.31          157
Probable  42,561       1.68       2,302        14,167       1.65          752
          ------       ----       -----        ------       ----          ---
Total     58,877       1.60       3,030        14,534       1.94          909
          ======       ====       =====        ======       ====          ===

In addition to proven and probable reserves, as at December 31, 2002, the
Porcupine Joint Venture has an estimated 13.9 million tonnes of measured and
indicated resources at an average grade of 1.76 grams of gold per tonne. For
more detail on reserves and resources see page 12 to 16.

MINING AND MILLING OPERATIONS

The Hoyle Pond operations consist of an underground mine serviced by two
declines and one shaft. The underground operations are comprised of 17 main
levels, with the shallowest at 40 meters below surface and the deepest at 720
meters below surface. The Hoyle Pond ramp extends down to the 280 meter level
and services the Hoyle Pond and seven vein zones. The 1060 ramp, which services
the 1060 Zone, extends below the 720 meter level. That is expected to reach the
860m level in 2003. Total production (ore and waste) is transported to the
loading pocket by means of an ore/waste pass system and hoisted to surface in
6.5 tonne skips. The surface infrastructure consists of administration
buildings, maintenance, compressed air, paste fill plant, and hoisting
facilities. Current life of mine plans based on proven and probable reserves and
measured and indicated resources have production ending in 2009.

The mineralized zones at Hoyle Pond are narrow high-grade veins, dipping from 30
to 90 degrees. Mining methods used are cut and fill, shrinkage, panel and
long-hole methods. The percentage of ore production by mining method for 2003 is
34% long-hole, 31% cut and fill, and 23% shrinkage. The balance of production is
made up by other development such as drifting (7%) and raising (2%).

The mining of the Hoyle Pond crown pillar will require significant
infrastructure including the installation of circular steel sheet pile (SSP)
cells, steel sheet pile walls, and dams to isolate the adjacent Falconbridge
tailings management area (TMA), berms to separate the pit from the Hoyle Pond
complex, relocation of the Hoyle Pond mine water settling ponds, relocation of
TMA utility and access road, and installation of underground bulkheads to
isolate the Hoyle Pond underground workings from the pit. The Hoyle Pond crown
pillar will be mined by conventional open-pit methods in 2004.

The Dome underground mine is in its final year of full production in 2003 after
93 years of operation that began in 1910. The mine consists of 37 levels
generally spaced at approximately 45 meter intervals extending over 1,500 meters
in depth. The main production and service shaft is the No. 8 shaft which extends
1,668 meters in depth. The former No. 3 shaft that extends 745 meters in depth
has been mined-through by the open-pit operation and is no longer in service.
Mining is predominantly by modified longhole methods that will provide 97% of
the tonnes produced in 2003. The balance of production is comprised of cut and
fill mining (1%) and development (2%). There are three cut and fill stopes
remaining that will be depleted in 2003.

As production of the Dome underground mine nears completion, attempts to extend
the mine life are being evaluated with on-going exploration of areas within and
peripheral to the mine. Extensions of the mine life will continue to rely on the
No. 8 shaft and associated infrastructure.

The Dome open pit is being mined in three stages. Development of the final stage
commenced in the summer of 1998. Mining is conducted using conventional open pit
mining methods. All mining is carried out on 9.1 meter benches. Pit wall
inter-ramp angles vary but average 52 degrees. Haulage ramp gradients are set to
10%. Conventional open pit mining equipment is used. The mining fleet includes
diesel powered drills, electric cable shovels, 136 tonne haulage trucks,
front-end loaders, dozers and support equipment.

Reserve estimates for the open pit include allowances for the presence of
mined-out underground workings. Open pit mining costs reflect the specialized
drilling, blasting and backfilling that is required to ensure that open pit
mining can proceed safely

                                                                              39
<PAGE>

through these underground workings. Overburden encountered in the upper portions
of the open pit is stockpiled for use in reclamation. Rock dumps are contoured
and re-vegetated on an ongoing basis as part of normal open pit operations. Open
pit mineral reserves are scheduled to be depleted in 2004. Stockpiled ore is
expected to sustain mill operations until 2007.

The Pamour mine and mill are currently shutdown. There is no plan to reopen the
mill at Pamour, as the ore will be processed at the Dome mill, the Pamour
facility is slated for dismantling and removal. The Pamour project feasibility
study and permitting process are scheduled for completion by the end of 2003.
Construction of the haul road and major infrastructure will be completed by late
2004. Stripping will begin in late 2004 and full-scale ore mining will be
achieved in mid 2005. Mining will be by a conventional method. Much of the
equipment required for the Pamour operation will be relocated from the Dome open
pit. The initial capital costs include the cost of new equipment not available
from the Dome operation as well as rebuild costs of some of the older units.

Ore from the Hoyle Pond mine was historically (prior to the Porcupine Joint
Venture) milled at the nearby Bell Creek mill, which is also owned by Kinross
(and is part of the Porcupine Joint Venture). Bell Creek is currently under care
and maintenance, and all ore mined at Hoyle Pond is transported via
over-the-road trucks to the Dome mill. Currently there is no plan to reactivate
the Bell Creek mill.

All ore mined by the Porcupine Joint Venture will be milled at the Dome mill.
Currently, the Dome mine and the Hoyle Pond mine provide feed to this mill. In
the future, the mill will be expanded to also accommodate production from the
Pamour mine, which is slated for production in 2005.

Gold is recovered at the Dome mill using a combination of gravity concentration
and cyanidation techniques. The flowsheet consists of primary crushing,
secondary crushing, rod/ball mill grinding, gravity concentration, cyanide
leaching, carbon-in-pulp gold recovery, stripping, electrowinning and refining.
The mill has a capacity of 12,000 tonnes per day and currently processes over
11,500 tonnes of ore per day.

Site restoration costs at the Hoyle Pond, Pamour and Bell Creek mines are
estimated to be $11.4 million of which $3.3 million has been accrued as a
long-term liability of the company. The balance will be accrued on a unit of
production basis over proven and probable reserves. The Company has posted
surety bonds and letters of credit totaling $2.6 million for site restoration
obligations with the provincial government. Site restoration costs at the Dome
mine are estimated to be $18.9 million.

SUMMARY OF PRODUCTION AND FINANCIAL DATA

The following table summarizes certain gold production, operating and financial
data relating to the Porcupine Joint Venture for the three years ended December
31, 2002. The results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2002 include
the Company's 49% share of the results of operations from the Porcupine Joint
Venture for the six month period ended December 31, 2002. All other historical
data pertains to the Hoyle Pond mine:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,                                                            2002            2001           2000
                                                                                    ----            ----           ----
SELECTED PRODUCTION AND OPERATING INFORMATION
<S>                                                                               <C>               <C>           <C>
Tonnes mined (000's) (100% basis)..........................................       10,821.9          635.8         790.8
Ore processed (000's) (100% basis).........................................        2,390.7          443.9         460.6
Gold grade (gpt)...........................................................           5.00          12.40         11.27
Average gold recovery (%)..................................................             91             88            84
Gold equivalent production(1)..............................................        189,464        156,581       140,441
Number of employees........................................................            756            379           419

SELECTED FINANCIAL INFORMATION (IN MILLIONS EXCEPT UNIT COSTS):

Revenue....................................................................      $    58.2      $    41.7      $   38.4
                                                                                 ---------      ---------      --------
Cost of production.........................................................           38.0           28.5          29.4
Inventory change...........................................................           (1.5)          (0.7)           --
Site restoration cost accruals.............................................            1.5            0.2           0.1
Depreciation, depletion and amortization...................................           16.4           13.2          13.1
Care and maintenance.......................................................            0.6            0.9           4.1
Exploration................................................................            1.9            0.3            --
                                                                                 ---------      ---------      --------
                                                                                      56.9           42.4          46.7
                                                                                 ---------      ---------      --------
</TABLE>
                                                                              40
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,                                                            2002            2001           2000
                                                                                    ----            ----           ----
<S>                                                                              <C>            <C>            <C>
Net earnings (loss)........................................................      $     1.3      $    (0.7)     $   (8.3)
                                                                                 =========      =========      ========
OTHER FINANCIAL INFORMATION:

Capital expenditures (millions) ...........................................      $     6.7      $     7.9      $   13.9
Unit costs:
  Total cash costs per gold equivalent ounce produced......................            201            182           209
  Total cash costs per tonne milled........................................             32             64            63
  Total production cost per gold equivalent ounce..........................            294            265           303
</TABLE>

- -------------
Note:
(1)  2002 gold equivalent production represents the Company's 49% ownership
     interest in the Porcupine Joint Venture commencing July 1, 2002. Prior gold
     equivalent production represents the Company's 100% interest in the Hoyle
     Pond Mine.

Total cash costs and total production costs are non-GAAP measures. For further
information on these non-GAAP measures, please refer to the disclosure under the
heading "Calculation of Cash Costs, Production Costs and Realized Revenue and
Reconciliation to the Statements of Operations".

For further information on the 2002, 2001 and 2000 results, refer to the
disclosure included under "Financial Results, Operations, Porcupine Joint
Venture" which is incorporated by reference in the Management's Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

PRODUCTION FORECAST, LIFE OF MINE AND CAPITAL EXPENDITURES

The Company's share of estimated gold equivalent production for 2003 is 219,000
ounces at estimated total cash costs of $210 per ounce.

The proven and probable reserves are sufficient for six years of production.
There is significant potential for additional reserves and resources in the
current property position controlled by the joint venture. Permitting activities
on the Pamour mine are under way.

The Company's share of capital expenditures at the Porcupine Joint Venture
operations in 2002 were $6.7 million compared to $7.9 million during 2001. The
majority of capital expenditures for 2002 were required to further advance the
1060 ramp at the Hoyle Pond mine, underground development drilling at the Hoyle
Pond mine, surface fleet additions and plant modifications. Planned capital
expenditures for 2003 are estimated to be $13.7 million of which the Company's
share is $6.8 million. The majority of the expenditures are on the Hoyle Pond
mine development, tailings dam and underground equipment.


                                                                              41
<PAGE>


                        TIMMINS GENERAL PROPERTY POSITION



                                [PICTURE OMITTED]


                     TIMMINS GENERAL PROPERTY LOCATION MAP.


                                                                              42
<PAGE>

KUBAKA MINE, RUSSIAN FEDERATION

The Company owns a 98.1% interest in the Omolon Gold Mining Company ("Omolon"),
a Russian joint stock company. Omolon is operated under a contractual agreement
whereby an indirect subsidiary of the Company is the operator and manager. The
major assets of the joint stock company are the Kubaka mine and the Birkichan
exploration project located in the Russian Far East. The majority of the
Company's prior 54.7% ownership interest in the Kubaka mine was acquired as a
result of the Kinam Merger on June 1, 1998.

On December 3, 2002, the Company entered into purchase agreements with four of
the five Russian shareholders of Omolon. The four shareholders' agreed to tender
their shares in Omolon and Omolon agreed to pay $44.7 million including certain
transaction costs for these shares. These transactions closed as at March 26,
2003, increasing the Company's interest in Omolon to 98.1% from 54.7%.

A report entitled "Technical Report on the Kubaka Project" dated February 2003
(the "Kubaka Report") has been prepared for the Company by Scott Anderson,
mining engineer. The following summaries of the Kubaka Project have been
prepared from the Kubaka Report and, in some cases, are extracts from the Kubaka
Report.

PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION

The Kubaka open pit mine, infrastructure and mining concession covers
approximately 897 hectares located 320 kilometers south of the Arctic Circle and
938 kilometers northeast of the major port city of Magadan. The Kubaka pit
operated for six years from 1997 to 2002, producing slightly more than 430,000
ounces of gold annually.

Currently, the Kubaka Project consists of mineralized stockpiles and three
small, undeveloped underground projects. The underground projects will be
exploited in 2003 and early 2004. Development of two of the underground projects
will start in early April, 2003 and development of the third is scheduled for
early third quarter 2003.

The Birkichan exploration project covers approximately 515 hectares and is
located 28 kilometers north of the Kubaka operations.

Omolon holds the license from the Russian government to operate the Kubaka mine
(the "Kubaka License"). The Kubaka License terminates in 2011, subject to
extension of up to an additional two years. The Kubaka License establishes
certain production requirements for the Kubaka mine and requires the payment of
a 3% royalty on the total value of the gold extracted. In 2002, the Kubaka mine
was subject to total royalty and production based taxes of 6.7%. The Company's
proportionate share of royalties and production based taxes were $4.8 million in
2002 compared to $5.3 million in 2001.

The original Kubaka mining license was granted on January 17, 1995, it was
extended on November 21, 2000 and expires in 2008.

The stockpiles, the Kubaka underground mining operations, and the Tsokol deposit
are located on the original land allotment for the Kubaka project. The "Right to
Use Mineral Resources" was issued in 1995 and expires in 2015. The original land
allotment covered 885 hectares; with the addition of the explosive storage area,
the airstrip, the access road to the airstrip, and other minor adjustments to
the land allotted near the overburden stockpiles, the land allotment currently
comprises 927.8 hectares.

The Birkichan project is not included in the Kubaka land allotment. A separate
license has been granted to Omolon allowing exploration and mining activities on
the Birkichan project.

All requisite permits have been obtained for the mining and continued operation
of the Kubaka open pit mine and are in good standing. The Company is in
compliance with the Kubaka and Birkichan permits in all material respects.

                                                                              43
<PAGE>

ACCESSIBILITY, CLIMATE, LOCAL RESOURCES, INFRASTRUCTURE, AND PHYSIOGRAPHY

Access to the Kubaka mine is by air from Magadan or by a 362-kilometer winter
road from Omsukchan, and a 576-kilometer all weather road from Magadan to
Omsukchan. The winter road is generally open from mid-December until April and
is primarily used to ship the materials and supplies necessary for the next
year's production.

The Birkichan project is located 28-kilometers north of the Kubaka project site.
Winter access to the Birkichan project is by two routes; a 53 kilometer
exploration trail from the Omolon winter road, or an alternate 45 kilometer
route which has ecological sensitivities along the river but is far superior
especially for heavier equipment. Helicopter access is required during spring
thaw, fall freeze-up and summer high water periods. During the dryer periods in
the summer months, access to the site is by 4 x 4 vehicles.

The climate at Kubaka is characterized by long cold winters, lasting six months
or more. Summers vary between rainy and cool to very warm and dry. Snow has
fallen in all 12 months of the year. The mine operates in Arctic conditions.
Daylight varies from four to 20 hours per day. Temperatures range from below -52
degrees Celsius to above 32 degrees Celsius. Mean precipitation is approximately
40 centimeters annually.

The area is described as mountainous with some rugged topography. The slopes
have gentle concavity with a steepness of between 10 and 30 degrees. The site is
situated in permafrost. The natural vegetation at the site consists of moss, low
shrubs and small larch trees. In the valley bottom the ground surface is
hummocky and grass covered. The elevation ranges from 500 to 932 meters.

Water utilized in the mill for processing the ore is obtained from four sources:
fresh water from a well 650 meters south of the mill complex, fresh water from
the Dukat tailings dam immediately south of the mill, reclaimed water from the
tailings dam facility, and waste water from the sewage treatment plant.

Electrical power at Kubaka is generated at site with seven 3516 Caterpillar
diesel generators, each producing 1,500 kilowatts. Generally, four of the
generators are utilized in the summer and five in the winter, providing power
for the crusher and mill complex, office, and maintenance shop. Three G72M
diesel generators, each producing 800 kilowatts, provide power for the man camp.
Typically only one of these is utilized at any time, with two on standby.

HISTORY

The Kubaka Deposit was discovered in 1979 during a geological survey conducted
by the State Geological Exploratory Expedition. While conducting a group
geological survey between 1983 and 1987, preliminary data on the parameters and
morphology of the ore bodies and on the scales of mineralization was obtained.
Between 1986 and 1992, the Central Ore Zone and Northern Ore Zones were explored
in detail and confirmed the economic merit of developing the project.

In 1987, a small open pit was operated with the ore being processed at the
Karamken and Omsukchan processing plants. In 1992, an 80,000 tonne per year
pilot process plant was constructed at the site and utilized a gravity /
flotation process.

In 1992, the comprehensive ore reserves of the Northern ore zones passed State
approval of reserves and were transferred to the Evensk stock society for
industrial development. Ore recovery began in 1993 with the ore processed at the
Karamken Processing Plant.

In 1992, ore reserves for the Kubaka Deposit were calculated and passed State
approval on July 19, 1993. In 1993, bidding was opened for commercial
development rights to the mineral resources of the Kubaka and Evenskoye
deposits. Omolon, a joint stock organization including five Russian partners and
Cyprus Amax won the bid and was issued the mining license for the Kubaka
deposit.

Construction of the mine and milling complex commenced in 1994 and was completed
at a total capital cost of approximately $242 million. This amount includes
certain financing costs, working capital and approximately $14 million in
capitalized interest. Commercial production was achieved at Kubaka on June 1,
1997. The mine and mill have continued operations since then except for a short
period in September 1998.

                                                                              44
<PAGE>

GEOLOGY AND MINERALIZATION

The Kubaka gold deposit is located in an area of highly weathered Paleozoic
volcanic rocks resting on a Precambrian crystalline basement. The Kubaka ore
deposit is an epithermal quartz-adularia vein system hosted by volcanic rocks
and their sedimentary derivatives. Kubaka is older than, but otherwise very
similar to, volcanic hosted epithermal gold deposits found in the North American
Western Cordillera.

The ore body was formed in the Devonian time period. It is located in a caldera
represented by a crest like depression about 2.5 kilometers in width and 4.2
kilometers in length. The strata are complex and consist of sedimentary tuffs
from the mid to late Devonian in age. Tuffs and sandy tuff units are the main
traps for the gold mineralization. These are a few meters to tens of meters
thick. The gold bearing fluids utilized the ignimbrites for conduits and are 40
to 60 meters thick.

The mineralization at Kubaka extends over a strike length of 3.5 kilometers with
the underground mining operation having a strike length of 2 kilometers. The
Birkichan project has a strike length of 2.5 kilometers and is open along strike
both to the northeast and the southwest.

Commercial grade mineralization is found in three steeply dipping veins: North,
Central, and Zokol. The main Kubaka vein is steeply dipping and outcrops at the
surface. The vein consists of massive to finely banded quartz. Gold and silver
(electrum and other minerals) occurs in quartz. The gold to silver ratio is
approximately one to one.

EXPLORATION

The Company will focus its exploration activities to identify resources that can
be quickly converted into reserves and provide mill feed for the Kubaka
processing plant in 2003 or 2004. Exploration expenditures in 2002 were $1.2
million. Planned exploration expenditures in 2003 are $2.5 million.

DRILLING, SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS AND SECURITY OF SAMPLES

The project area has been explored using reverse circulation and diamond core
drilling, with the majority being diamond core drilling. The resource at Kubaka
has been drilled on 20-meter sections, and in areas of complex geology or high
grade, drill density is increased to 10-meter sections. The majority of the
diamond drill holes are drilled at right angles to the vein (typically dipping
70 to 75 degrees). All of the exploration and reverse circulation infill data is
included in the geologic model.

Sample recovery for all the sampling methods is high. Very little water has been
encountered in both the diamond drilling and reverse circulation drilling.

Samples are delivered to the assay department under direct control of the
geology department. All information is checked and verified by the geological
staff prior to entry into the geological database that is used to create the
resource models.

The local geologists and the technical services departments of the Company have
developed the geological models. The reconciliation of the Kubaka geology models
with mining to date indicates a good (correlation between the resource model and
production) geological representation of the deposit by the block model.

Drill and other exploration samples collected for use for geological modeling
and resource estimation have been under the direct supervision of the geological
department and delivered to the assay laboratory under secure conditions. Ten to
fifteen percent of all samples are resubmitted to the site laboratory as check
samples. This includes all exploration, infill, and production samples. Also,
check samples are sent to labs in U.S.A, Canada and Irkutsk.

Over the last four years systematic but wide spaced exploration drilling at the
Birkichan gold prospect has partially identified a mineral deposit with narrow
high grade structures. Detailed drilling in the central Mezinitz valley has
outlined several near surface subparallel zones with potential for an open pit.
The low-grade mineralized zone hosting the higher-grade structures remains open
in two directions and the overall potential to expand resource is good.

MINERAL RESERVE AND RESOURCE ESTIMATES

The following table sets forth the estimated proven and probable reserves for
the Kubaka mine as at December 31, 2002 and 2001 and represents 100% of the
Kubaka deposit, in which the Company holds a 98.1% interest:

                                                                              45
<PAGE>
                       2002                                2001
         -----------------------------------------------------------------------
                     AVERAGE      GOLD                    AVERAGE       GOLD
          TONNES      GRADE      CONTENT       TONNES      GRADE      CONTENT
          ------      -----      -------       ------      -----      -------
          (000'S)     (GPT)     (000'S OZ)     (000'S)     (GPT)     (000'S OZ)

Proven     1,682       4.46         242         1,119        9.81         353
Probable      61      22.62          44           448       19.93         287
              --      -----          --           ---       -----         ---
Total      1,743       5.09         286         1,567       12.70         640
           =====       ====         ===         =====       =====         ===

In addition to proven and probable reserves, as at December 31, 2002, the Kubaka
deposit includes an estimated 0.3 million tonnes of measured and indicated
resources at an average grade of 11.05 grams of gold per tonne. For more details
on reserves and resources see pages 12 to 16.

MINING AND MILLING OPERATIONS

Open pit mining ended in October 2002. The Company has commenced processing the
low-grade stockpiles and will supplement this with underground ore from the
North High Wall, Center Zone, and North Vein at the beginning of the second
quarter of 2003. Approximately, 85% of the mill feed tonnes and 60% of the
ounces in 2003 will come from the stockpiles, with the remaining mill feed being
delivered from the three underground projects.

The underground projects represent extensions of the Kubaka ore zone that could
not be recovered through open pit mining. They will be mined with conventional
shrinkage and long-hole mining methods. These three underground mining areas
have ore mining widths ranging from one meter to six meters and contain grades
in excess of 10 grams per tonne.

The North High Wall underground mining operation will be partially accessed from
existing adits in the pit high wall. Two additional drifts will be driven on the
bottom of the ore allowing the ore to be mined via a long-hole mining method.
The Center Zone is located in the bottom of the pit and will be accessed with a
spiral ramp. The ore will be mined with a long-hole mining method. The North
Vein will be accessed from a existing drift and will be mined utilizing a shrink
stoping method. The existing drift and some of the other development will be
slashed to allow access by the load haul dump units. One stope is ready to be
mined and two additional stopes, along the strike, will be developed.

The mineralized stockpiles will be depleted in first quarter 2005. The Kubaka
underground operations, (the North High Wall, the Central Zone, and the North
Vein), will be exhausted by January 2004.

The mineralized stockpiles are located varying distances from the crusher yard.
Slightly less than half the mill feed for 2003 will come from stockpile 6,
located 1.1 kilometers from the crusher yard. The remaining feed derived from
stockpiles is located 1.9 kilometers from the crusher yard, in stockpile 3. Both
of these stockpiles will be transported to the crusher yard with existing
equipment at site. The stockpiles are frozen and require blasting to loosen the
material for mucking.

The processing facility at Kubaka is a standard CIP milling process. The mill
processes ore on a 24 hour per day, 365 day per year schedule. The stockpiled
ore is loaded into and crushed in the jaw crusher and conveyed to a crushed ore
stockpile. The crushed ore is reclaimed and ground in a semi-autogenous grinding
mill followed by a ball mill. The ground ore is thickened, and then leached in a
cyanidation circuit. The grind thickener overflow flows through a carbon column
circuit to recover any gold leached in the grinding circuit. The cyanidation
circuit has four stages of leaching, followed by a six stage CIP circuit. The
loaded carbon from the carbon circuits is stripped of the gold and silver in a
pressure stripping circuit. Gold and silver are then recovered in electrowinning
cells and smelted to produce dore bullion. As at December 31, 2002, the mill has
processed 4,505,217 tonnes resulting in 2,589,697 recovered gold ounces.

The Kubaka operations maintain the highest standards of environmental compliance
and monitoring. An environmental engineer supported by staff in the Magadan
office and in the Kinross Technical Services Department, conducts various daily,
weekly, and monthly monitoring activities in and around the project site to
assure environmental compliance.

Reclamation activities started in the second year of production, 1998. Areas are
actively reclaimed and seeded as mining progresses. Through 2002, 60 hectares
had been fully reclaimed and an additional 51.4 hectares have been partially
reclaimed (top soil is placed, but it has not been seeded). In 2003 the plan is
to fully reclaim an additional 30 hectares.

If the exploration is not successful, the tailings facility will be capped in
spring of 2005. The remainder of the reclamation activities will be completed in
the spring and summer of 2005.

                                                                              46
<PAGE>

The underground project returns an operating profit over the duration of the
project life.

Summary of Production and Financial Data

The following table summarizes certain gold production, operating and financial
information relating to the Kubaka mine for the three years ended December 31,
2002. The gold equivalent production is based on the Company's 54.7% interest in
the Kubaka Mine as at December 31, 2002.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,                                                             2002           2001           2000
                                                                                     ----           ----           ----
SELECTED PRODUCTION AND OPERATING INFORMATION
<S>                                                                                 <C>             <C>           <C>
Tonnes mined (000's) (100% basis)..........................................         6,227.5         9,938.9       11,510.9
Ore processed (000's) (100% basis).........................................           849.9           889.3          856.8
Gold grade (gpt)...........................................................           14.93           15.28          16.28
Average gold recovery (%)..................................................              98              98             98
Gold equivalent production(1)..............................................         220,972         237,162        244,641
Number of employees........................................................             374             466            441

SELECTED FINANCIAL INFORMATION (IN MILLIONS EXCEPT UNIT COSTS):

Revenue....................................................................       $    71.5       $    71.3      $    72.1
                                                                                  ---------       ---------      ---------
Cost of production.........................................................            29.3            33.1           34.0
Inventory change/other.....................................................            (1.5)            1.0           (1.1)
Site restoration cost accruals.............................................             0.8             0.4            0.8
Depreciation, depletion and amortization...................................            20.1            24.0           30.8
Interest expense...........................................................             0.3             2.0            3.5
Exploration................................................................             1.2             2.1            2.3
Other......................................................................              --              --           (0.4)
                                                                                  ---------       ---------      ---------
                                                                                       50.2            62.6           69.9
                                                                                  ---------       ---------      ---------
Earnings (loss) before taxes...............................................            21.3             8.7            2.2
Income and mining taxes....................................................             6.2             4.3            4.1
                                                                                  ---------       ---------      ---------
Net earnings (loss)........................................................       $    15.1       $     4.4      $    (1.9)
                                                                                  =========       =========      =========

OTHER FINANCIAL INFORMATION:

Capital expenditures (millions) ...........................................       $     0.1       $     0.4      $     0.1
Unit costs:
  Total cash costs per gold equivalent ounce produced                             $     133       $     140      $     139
  Total cash costs per tonne milled........................................       $      34       $      39      $      40
  Total production cost per gold equivalent ounce..........................       $     227       $     243      $     268
</TABLE>
- ---------------
Note:
(1)  Gold equivalent production represents the Company's 54.7% ownership
     interest in the Kubaka mine as at December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000.

Total cash costs and total production costs are non-GAAP measures. For further
information on these non-GAAP measures, please refer to the disclosure under the
heading "Calculation of Cash Costs, Production Costs and Realized Revenue and
Reconciliation to the Statements of Operations".

For further information on the 2002, 2001 and 2000 results, refer to the
disclosure included under "Financial Results, Operations, Kubaka Mine" which is
incorporated by reference in the Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

PRODUCTION FORECAST, LIFE OF MINE AND CAPITAL EXPENDITURES

The Company's share of estimated gold equivalent production for 2003 is 188,000
ounces at estimated total cash costs of $190 per ounce.

The Company's share of capital expenditures at the Kubaka operations in 2002 was
$0.1 million compared to $0.4 million during 2001. The Company's share of
planned capital expenditures for 2003 is $1.5 million.

                                                                              47
<PAGE>

The Kubaka underground project consists of three small independent underground
mining projects, two associated with the exhausted Kubaka pit, the Central Zone
and the North High Wall, with the third adjacent to the pit, the North Vein. The
capital cost of the underground project is estimated at approximately $2 million
to purchase and deliver equipment and supplies to start underground development.
Additionally, it is expected that operating expenditures of $3.3 million will be
incurred to mine and recover 79,165 gold equivalent ounces from the three
separate underground developments.

                                KUBAKA SITE PLAN



                      KUBAKA GENERAL PROPERTY LCOATION MAP.
                                [PICTURE OMITTED]





TVX PROPERTIES

LA COIPA MINE

A report entitled "Technical Report La Coipa Mine, Chile" dated May 5, 2003 (the
"La Coipa Report") has been prepared for the Company by AMEC E&C Services
Limited ("AMEC") and authored by Maryse Belanger, P.Geo. The following summaries
of the La Coipa mine have been prepared from the La Coipa Report and, in some
cases, are extracts from the La Coipa Report.

PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION

The La Coipa mine is located in the Atacam Region of northern Chile,
approximately 1,000 kilometers north of Santiago and 140 kilometers northwest of
the community of Copiapo, Chile. The mine is operated by a Chilean contractual
company, Compania Minera Mantos de Oro ("MDO"), a joint venture between a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Placer Dome Inc. ("Placer Dome") (50%) and the
Company (50%). There are three known deposits remaining within the
government-

                                                                              48
<PAGE>

approved La Coipa mining area: Coipa Norte and Brecha Norte are currently being
mined by open pit methods, and Can-can is planned for exploitation beginning in
2005. MDO is actively exploring in the district.

The La Coipa mine consists of approximately 7,500 hectares of mineral claims, of
which the principal ones are Indagua, Marta, Escondida, Candelaria, Eduardo and
Chimberos

MDO has obtained a series of permits that allow exploration and mining
activities to proceed in the La Coipa area. No other permits need to be
obtained. MDO's land position includes 57 exploitation concessions covering
14,827 hectares and 38 exploration permits covering 6,600 hectares.

The exploration permits are valid for a two-year period from the date they are
declared in force and can be renewed once for another two-year period.
Thereafter the size of the exploration permit area must be reduced by half. MDO
can elect to apply for mining concessions in areas where exploration concessions
are held.

The exploitation or mining concessions can be held indefinitely as long as the
annual fees are paid to keep the permits in good standing. The exploitation
permits covering the La Coipa area give MDO the right to extract the ore and to
sell the final products into the open market.

The corporate income tax rate is forecast at 16.5% in 2003 and 17% for
subsequent years. Depreciation and amortization of capital costs is allowed as a
deduction in the calculation of taxable income. Corporate taxes are estimated at
$2.4 million in 2003. An annual fee of $55,000 is also assessed to maintain the
mining claims in good standing.

No royalties are applicable on gold and silver produced from the mine, but an
annual preferred dividend of $1.8 million is payable. The joint venture partners
receive disbursements from the operation via common dividends from MDO. A 35%
withholding tax is applicable on all dividends disbursed to foreign
shareholders, less the corporate income tax already paid.

ACCESSIBILITY, CLIMATE, LOCAL RESOURCES, INFRASTRUCTURE, AND PHYSIOGRAPHY

The La Coipa mine is located approximately 1,000 kilometers north of Santiago in
Copiapo Province in the Atacama Region of the Chilean Andes. Access is by a 140
kilometer road of which 30 kilometers are paved, from the regional center of
Copiapo, which is served daily by commercial airline from Santiago. The nearest
port, Caldera is 80 kilometers west of Copiapo. The mine is connected to the
national power grid system.

The mine lies in the Domeyko Cordillera between at an elevation of 3,800 and
4,400 meters, the plant site being at 3,815 meters. Current and future mining
operations are at elevations ranging from 4,040 meters to 4,390 meters.

The climate is considered pre-arid Mediterranean, subject to low temperatures,
strong winds and some snow during the winter. Despite the adverse climate,
mining operations are performed year-round without interruption. Temperatures
range from a high of 25 degrees Celsius to a low of -10 degrees Celsius. Water
is scarce in the area, but the Maricunga Salar provides sufficient water to
fulfill industrial needs through a 40 kilometer pipeline. Vegetation is sparse.

HISTORY

The earliest written information about La Coipa as a precious metal prospect
dates back almost a century, when a small underground copper-silver mine was in
operation about 2 kilometers southeast of the present day operations. Regional
resources have been sporadically exploited since then, but the La Coipa area
itself did not receive any attention from exploration geologists until the late
1970's.

TVX acquired an initial indirect 49% interest in the La Coipa mine in June 1988
from companies controlled by Eike Batista, Roberto Hagemann Gerstmann and Jozsef
Ambrus, which at the time held the remaining 51% interest. Pursuant to the La
Coipa acquisition agreement dated January 25, 1989, Placer acquired a 50%
indirect interest in the La Coipa mine from both TVX and companies controlled by
Messrs. Batista, Gerstmann and Ambrus, pro rata as to their respective interests
in the La Coipa mine. The La Coipa acquisition agreement also provided for the
future operation of the La Coipa mine and the respective responsibilities of the
joint venture parties. As a result of this transaction, TVX's indirect interest
in the La Coipa mine was reduced to 24.5% and the indirect interests of Messrs.
Batista, Gerstmann and Ambrus was reduced to 25.5%. Between 1989 and 1994, TVX
increased its ownership in the La Coipa mine to 50%.

                                                                              49
<PAGE>

GEOLOGY AND MINERALIZATION

The La Coipa ore deposit forms part of a precious metal epithermal system,
located in the northern Chilean tertiary volcanic belt which is generally known
as the Maricunga belt. Three main mineralized zones are found at La Coipa,
Ladera-Farellon and Coipa Norte, about three kilometers apart, and the Chimberos
deposit approximately 25 kilometers northeast of the 15,000 tonnes per day
plant.

The eastern portion of Coipa Norte and Farellon show high gold grades associated
with advanced argillic alteration (alunite -- kaolinite -- dickite, quartz),
semi-tabular forms and ore hosted mainly in the triassic sedimentary rocks.
Ladera and western Coipa Norte have high silver-to-gold ratios, mushroom-like
shapes and are hosted in the tertiary pyroclastic unit. Ladera is mainly
associated with a vuggy-silica alteration and western Coipa Norte with
silicification.

The most common precious metal-bearing minerals are cerargyrite, several other
silver halide complexes, native silver, electrum and native gold as free
particles in the size range of 0.5 to 50 microns. Sulfides such as pyrite,
chalcopyrite, covellite, tennantite-tetrahedrite, enargite, galena and
sphalerite have also been detected by deep drilling in the unoxidized zone and
in some isolated cores included in the oxidized zone. Mercury is common in all
the deposits and occurs as calomel.

All the known reserves at La Coipa are found in oxidized zones. Both Ladera and
the silver orebody in Coipa Norte are located in the western and upper portions
of the mineralized zones. At Coipa Norte, the silver orebody outcrops are
closely associated with pervasively silicified rocks. The presence of bedded
outflow material and geyserites suggest that this area has not been subjected to
significant erosion. At Ladera, however, the upper portion of the host
pyroclastic sequence is strongly leached and practically barren, suggesting
secondary enrichment as the source of the high silver in the ore. The
mushroom-like part of the Ladera orebody is also broader and more lens-like than
the one at Coipa Norte.

EXPLORATION

Exploration work in the La Coipa district started in the late 1800s and has been
ongoing since, although the property ownership changed a number of times. Modern
exploration techniques have been implemented starting in the late 1970s to early
1980s. They included geological mapping, geochemistry, channel sampling,
drilling and 800 meters of underground development.

TVX's share of exploration expenditures totalled $0.7 million during 2002. The
Company's share of the exploration budget for 2003 is $0.6 million.

DRILLING, SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS AND SECURITY OF SAMPLES

Various drilling methods and sampling protocols have been used at La Coipa.
Diamond drill holes completed during the exploration phase were systematically
sampled in 2 meter intervals. Half the core was sent for assaying and the other
half stored in a warehouse near the camp. Reverse circulation holes for both
exploration and in-pit drilling are sampled in 2 meter long "runs". All drill
chips are also stored in the same location as the core.

Since 1984, a total of 97,225 meters in 2,002 holes has been completed in the La
Coipa mining area. Most of the exploration drilling was completed with reverse
circulation holes. All exploration holes are surveyed by the mining surveyors.
These holes have also been down-hole surveyed at about 20 meter intervals. Most
of the exploration holes are inclined holes.

Drill core is delivered to the exploration storage building located by the camp
at the mine complex. A geologist completes a written log for the hole that
includes geological and geotechnical information. The geological data include
identification of specific geological formations, colour, alterations, presence
and visual estimate of sulphide and oxide minerals, nature of fracture filling
and a detailed geological description of the core that includes textural and
lithologic characteristics, contact styles and mineralization. Geotechnical data
are also recorded. Structures are described with measurements to determine top,
bottom, orientations and dip angles.

Standards are inserted by the mine laboratory. Duplicate analyses are done from
time to time at independent labs, including pulp duplicates of selected samples.

The lab carefully monitors MDO's performance in all aspects of sample
preparation and assaying for exploration activities, the mine, the plant and the
refinery. Analyses are performed at the mine laboratory, with some exploration
samples sent to an outside laboratory. The La Coipa lab performs numerous
control checks when the drill or blast hole samples are received for

                                                                              50
<PAGE>

preparation and analysis. The lab department uses a set of quality assurance and
quality control protocols to monitor its own performance.

MINERAL RESERVES AND RESOURCES ESTIMATES

The following table sets forth the estimated proven and probable reserves for
the La Coipa mine as at December 31, 2002 and 2001 and represents 100% of the La
Coipa deposits, in which the Company holds a 50% interest:

                       2002                                2001
         -----------------------------------------------------------------------
                      GOLD       SILVER                    GOLD       SILVER
          TONNES      GRADE       GRADE        TONNES      GRADE       GRADE
          ------      -----      -------       ------      -----      -------
        (MILLIONS)    (GPT)       (GPT)      (MILLIONS)    (GPT)       (GPT)

Proven       28.1      1.15        58.3          34.3       1.14        57.5
Probable      7.5      1.05        47.4           7.4       1.43        54.5
Total        35.6      1.13        56.0          41.8       1.19        56.9

                    2002                             2001
               --------------------------------------------------------------
                    GOLD          SILVER             GOLD         SILVER
                   CONTENT        CONTENT           CONTENT       CONTENT
                   -------        -------           -------       -------
                 (000'S OZ)      (000'S OZ)        (000'S OZ)    (000'S OZ)

Proven             1,036          52,590             1,260         63,410
Probable             254          11,486               336         13,014
                     ---          ------               ---         ------
Total              1,290          64,076             1,596         76,424
                   =====          ======             =====         ======

In addition to proven and probable reserves, as at December 31, 2002, the La
Coipa mine has an estimated 0.8 million tonnes of measured and indicated
resources at an average grade of 0.53 grams of gold per tonne. For more detail
on reserves and resources see pages 12 to 16.

MINING AND PROCESSING

The La Coipa mine currently operates two conventional open pits: Coipa Norte,
and Brecha Norte, a third pit, Can-Can, is scheduled to commence in 2005.

The current pits are mined on 10 meter benches with the final highwall developed
in a double-bench configuration.

The decision was made during 1997 to develop the Chimberos high-grade silver
deposit and work commenced in the fourth quarter of 1997. Milling of the
Chimberos ore commenced in July, 1998 and was completed in August, 1999.
Following the completion of the milling of the Chimberos ore in August 1999,
production came from the reserves at La Coipa. In 2001, production from the
Ladera-Farellon open pit ceased and mining activities focused on the Coipa Norte
open pit which is to provide the majority of mill feed until 2007.

In the milling process, ore is crushed, then ground in a circuit incorporating a
semi-autogenous mill with a pebble crusher and two ball mills. A new crushing
system installed in October 1999 allows throughput of up to 17,000 tonnes per
day. The ground ore is leached, then filtered and washed to separate out the
tailings, and the solution is passed through a Merrill-Crowe plant. The
precipitate is then sent to the refinery.

Process plant gold and silver recoveries are forecast at approximately 80% and
60%, respectively. This compares to actual average recovery of 82.8% for gold
and 63% for silver over the past three years.

Water and power supplies are critical infrastructure aspects of the La Coipa
mine. Water requirements for the 15,000 tonnes per day plant are 100 litres per
second and are obtained from underground springs which feed the Salar de
Maricunga, a saltwater lake 38 kilometers from the mine site. The water is
pumped via a pipeline built by MDO from the springs to the plant site. Power for
the 15,000 tonnes per day plant is supplied by the National Power grid from a
tie-in approximately 88 kilometers from La Coipa. MDO has built a substation at
Carrera Pinto which ties the line from the mine site into the grid.

The dore produced at the mine is shipped to refineries in the United States and
England, with gold and silver credited to MDO metal accounts. The gold and
silver are sold into world markets at spot prices.

                                                                              51
<PAGE>

The La Coipa mine received an ISO 14001 certification in July 2002 and there are
comprehensive procedures in place in the event of a safety or environmental
incident. The most significant environmental issue at the mine is mercury
contamination of the Campamento Aquifer. A processing plant incident in 1995
resulted in mercury contaminated tailings being discharged at the tailings site.
Mercury-contaminated water has been detected in the aquifer since that time. The
mercury concentration in the water is adversely affected but the low aquifer
flow rates, estimated at 10 litres per second to 15 litres per second reduce the
rate of impact. This compares with 1,500 litres per second in the aquifer that
serves as the source of water for the mine.

As a remedial measure, MDO installed a fence of wells to intercept and divert
uncontaminated water through a pipeline around the problem area. Other wells
were also installed below the tailings area to collect contaminated water, which
was then pumped to the process plant for recycling. These measures were not
entirely successful, and so a water treatment plant was constructed further
downstream in 1999. The aquifer water is intercepted and passed through a resin
filter at the treatment plant where mercury is removed. It is not known how long
the plant, which is effective in removing mercury contamination, will have to
operate after mine closure.

Mine closure costs are estimated at $13.5 million. This includes costs to
demolish and remove plant site buildings, secure the pit area and prevent a
safety hazard to the public, and operate the water treatment facility for up to
20 years. Because of the lack of vegetation in the area no major revegetation or
resloping activities are currently proposed. Small-scale experimentation with
growing plants in the arid climate is currently underway, and further
field-testing is planned prior to closure.

SUMMARY OF PRODUCTION AND FINANCIAL DATA

The following table summarizes certain gold and silver production and operating
data relating to the La Coipa mine for the three years ended December 31, 2002:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,                                                           2002            2001           2000
                                                                                   ----            ----           ----
SELECTED PRODUCTION AND OPERATING INFORMATION:
<S>                                                                               <C>             <C>             <C>
Total tonnes mined (000's) (100% basis)....................................       31,734.0        34,001.0        30,342.0
Total tonnes processed (000's) (100% basis)................................        6,343.0         6,347.0         6,012.0
  Gold grade (gpt).........................................................            1.1             0.7             0.8
  Silver grade (gpt).......................................................          58.25           90.12           89.80
  Average gold recovery (%)................................................           84.7            82.4            83.4
  Average silver recovery (%)..............................................           60.5            65.9            63.3
Production (ounces)
  Gold(1)..................................................................         95,989          58,424          76,363
  Silver(1)................................................................      3,594,763       6,059,869       5,546,274
  Gold equivalent(1).......................................................        149,284         155,915         174,706
Number of employees........................................................            446             442             434

SELECTED FINANCIAL INFORMATION (IN MILLIONS EXCEPT UNIT COSTS):

Revenue....................................................................    $      46.3     $      41.4     $      48.9
                                                                               -----------     -----------     -----------
Cost of sales                                                                         33.6            32.1            37.2
Depletion and depreciation.................................................           12.7            16.3            13.9
Mining property write-down                                                              --            13.0              --
Interest expense...........................................................            0.2             0.3             0.4
Exploration................................................................            0.7             0.3             0.8
Other......................................................................           (0.5)            0.6             8.6
                                                                               -----------     -----------     -----------
                                                                                      46.7            62.6            60.9
                                                                               -----------     -----------     -----------
Earnings (loss) before the undernoted......................................           (0.4)          (21.2)          (12.0)
Income taxes (recovery)....................................................            0.8              --            (1.3)
Minority interests and participation rights................................           (0.6)          (10.6)           (5.4)
                                                                               -----------     -----------     -----------
Net (loss).................................................................    $      (0.6)    $     (10.6)    $      (5.3)
                                                                               ===========     ===========     ===========
</TABLE>

                                                                              52
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,                                                           2002            2001           2000
                                                                                   ----            ----           ----
<S>                                                                               <C>             <C>             <C>
OTHER FINANCIAL INFORMATION:

Capital expenditures (millions)............................................    $       0.8     $       6.0     $       6.1
Unit costs:
  Cash cost per gold equivalent ounce......................................    $       226     $       210     $       211
  Cash cost per tonne milled...............................................    $        11     $        10     $        12
  Total production cost per gold equivalent ounce..........................    $       312     $       317     $       290
</TABLE>
- ------------
Note:
(1)  Gold, silver and gold equivalent production represents 50% of the historic
     production at the La Coipa mine.

Cash costs and total production costs are non-GAAP measures. For further
information on these non-GAAP measures, please refer to the disclosure under the
heading "Calculation of Cash Costs, Production Costs and Realized Revenue and
Reconciliation to Statement of Operations".

PRODUCTION FORECAST, LIFE OF MINE AND CAPITAL EXPENDITURES

The Company's share of estimated gold equivalent production for 2003 is 133,000
ounces at estimated total cash costs of $255 per ounce.

The proven and probable reserves are sufficient for six years of production. The
mine is scheduled to cease production in 2008 if additional reserves are not
found, however, there is significant potential for additional reserves and
resources near the present mine site.

Capital expenditure at the La Coipa mine in 2002 were $0.8 million compared to
$6.0 million during 2001. The Company's share of planned capital expenditures
for 2003 is $0.9 million.


                                [PICTURE OMITTED]
                      LA COIPA MINE PROPERTY LOCATION MAP.


                                                                              53
<PAGE>

CRIXAS MINE

The Crixas mine is owned by Mineracao Serra Grande, S.A ("MSG"), which in turn
is 50% owned by Newinco Comercio e Participacoes Limitada, a Brazilian
corporation wholly owned by the Company, and 50% by Brazilian affiliates of
AngloGold.

A report entitled "Independent Technical Report for Crixas Mine, Brazil" dated
April 2003 (the "Crixas Report") has been prepared for the Company by Steffen,
Robertson and Kirsten (Canada) Inc. ("SRK Consulting") and authored by Dr. John
Arthur, CGeol FGS, CEng MIMM, consulting mining geologist, Ken S. Reipas, P.Eng,
principal mining engineer. The following summaries of the Crixas mine have been
prepared from the Crixas Report and, in some cases, are extracts from the Crixas
Report.

PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION

The Crixas mine is situated in central Goias State, Brazil, approximately 250
kilometers northwest of Goiania, the state capital, and three kilometers from
the town of Crixas. The Crixas mine constitutes two currently operating
underground gold mines accessed by decline, Mina III and Mina Nova; three
orebodies that have been accessed by underground development, Corpo SUL, Corpo
IV, and Corpo V; and two orebodies under evaluation, Forquilha and Palmeiras.
The maximum production capacity of the mining complex is 740,000 ore tonnes
treated per year, constrained by the single ball mill in the grinding circuit.

MSG has interests in mineral rights covering a total area of 15,488 hectares.
These interests include two mining leases covering a combined area of 1,947
hectares, 15 exploration licences over an area of 10,522 hectares and four
exploration applications awaiting renewal covering further areas totaling 3,019
hectares. Mining licences are renewable annually and have no expiry date.
Generally, exploration licences are valid for three years, extendable for
additional two years.

The Crixas mine is exposed to potential environmental liabilities related to the
tailings storage area; waste rock storage on surface; industrial plant site;
site water management; and mining lease MM2286/35 (area of historical mining by
Garimpeiros). Preventative measures have been taken to limit any potential
environmental liabilities.

With regards to the mining lease, there is an area where currently,
approximately 100 local miners, or Garimpeiros, are conducting small scale
mining operations. This mining is illegal under Brazilian law, and has been
ongoing for many years. Mercury has been used to recover gold, and there is
mercury contamination in this area. These conditions existed when MSG purchased
the mining rights. MSG has prepared a thorough report documenting the exiting
conditions in the area of the Garimpeiros. Current agreements state that MSG is
not responsible for the rehabilitation of the existing contamination. The cost
of rehabilitation has not been studied.

MSG's mining operation at Crixas is subject to a mining tax equal to 1% of net
sales and a tax on profit equal to the greater of: (a) 34% of actual profit and
(b) 3% of net sales. MSG is currently paying tax at a rate of 3% of net sales
from 2000 to 2004, when it will begin paying tax of 34% of profits.

ACCESSIBILITY, CLIMATE, LOCAL RESOURCES, INFRASTRUCTURE, AND PHYSIOGRAPHY

Access to the area is by a paved road which links the town of Crixas and the
Belem-Brasilia highway 120 kilometers to the southeast. There is an airstrip
suitable for small aircraft outside the town of Crixas.

In the area of the Crixas mine, the topography is slightly undulated with
vegetation close to savannah type ("cerrado") with medium to small trees. The
elevation of the mine office is 385 meters.

The climate is characterized by two well defined seasons; the rainy season with
heavy precipitation and the dry season with low humidity values. The rainy
season is from October to March, with the remaining months hot and dry. Annual
rainfall is approximately 1,500 millimeters. Operations run year round, with
minimal disruptions due to weather.

Most of the labour force resides in company houses located in Crixas, three
kilometers from the mine site. The mine employs a total of some 564 workers made
up of 445 direct employees and 119 contractors. Generally, the contracted
services include employee transportation (by road), housekeeping and meals,
backfill haulage, exploration and site security.

                                                                              54
<PAGE>

Domestic water for the mine is supplied from wells. These wells also supply the
small amount of process make up water that is required. Due to the high amount
of annual rainfall, water recycling practices, and system of water holding tanks
on surface and underground, very little make up water is needed for the process
plant or the underground mines. Electrical power is supplied to the site by a
135 kilometers power line connected to the national grid.

The mine has established surface areas for tailings disposal, waste disposal and
for mineral processing. These are all sufficient to meet the future needs as
defined by the life of mine plan. In the case of the tailings storage, the
impoundment dam will be raised an additional five vertical meters.

HISTORY

Inco first began geological, geochemical and geophysical reconnaissance work in
the Crixas region in 1973. Detailed geological mapping and ground magnetic
surveys were completed and diamond drilling was conducted from 1973 to 1976. In
1976, Inco discovered gold mineralization below a group of excavations known as
the Mina III Old Workings and began concentrating its effort in that area.

Subsequently, Inco decided to seek a partner to help fund further exploration
and development and, in April 1983, Kennecott Corporation signed an option
agreement to earn a 50% interest in the project. This agreement required the
submission of a feasibility study and the commitment to spend $21 million. In
1986, Kennecott Corporation sold its participation in the project to an
affiliate of Anglo American, which continued underground development and
exploration and completed a bankable feasibility study in 1987.

On October 16, 1987, the decision was made to proceed with the development of a
mine and associated processing facilities having an annual throughput of 400,000
tonnes at a total capital cost of $73 million. Mining started in 1987 with ore
being stockpiled on the surface. Development was largely completed by the end of
1989, enabling successful testing of the metallurgical circuit to take place
through the fourth quarter of 1989. Initial dore bullion associated with this
testing was poured on November 14, 1989. Initial gold sales from the project
occurred in January 1990.

In 1995, the annual site throughput was increased from 450,000 to 485,000
tonnes. The maximum annual throughput has subsequently been increased to 740,000
tonnes by feeding finer material to the ball mill.

GEOLOGY AND MINERALIZATION

The Crixas property is situated in the Crixas greenstone belt in the State of
Goias in central Brazil and forms part of a well-preserved tract of Archean
terrain which is composed of three slightly arcuate strips or belts of
volcano-sedimentary rocks trending in an approximately north-south direction. It
is intruded by granitic rocks and, in places, is partially covered by the Middle
Proterozoic Araxa Group.

The Mina III gold deposit occurs within folded metavolcanic and metasedimentary
rocks of the Ribeirao das Antas Formation of Archean age. These rocks are well
foliated, upper greenschist facies consisting largely of chlorite, biotite,
graphite, carbonate and feldspar plus minor chloritoid and garnet. Although
uniformly foliated, the schists do not commonly exhibit joints or shears.

The Mina III deposit is a stratabound deposit. Mineralization occurs within
three stratagraphic horizons referred to as the Upper, Intermediate and Lower
Ore Zones. The ore grade portions of the three horizons are markedly elongated
in a west-northwest direction and are stacked vertically above one another.
About 60 meters of barren rock separate each ore zone from the next overlying
zone.

The Upper Zone ore is geologically complex and includes massive sulphide ore,
chloritoid-garnet ore with lesser amounts of arsenopyrite, pyrrhotite and
magnetite and sericite ore, a quartz-sericite schist with minor disseminated
arsenopyrite and pyrrhotite. The Intermediate Zone ore is very similar to the
Upper Zone and is sandwiched within a dolomite unit. This zone is less
continuous than the other zones. The Lower Zone ore is associated with a very
persistent metachert horizon which has been traced by drilling for 1,800 meters
down plunge. Gold mineralization occurs within the metachert, at the footwall of
the chert and in the foot and hangingwall of the graphite schists.

The Mina Nova orebody lies two kilometers north of Mina III and occurs as a
series of elongate tabular bodies, horizontal in the east and dipping in the
west. Mineralization occurs as disseminated sulphides, predominantly Pyrrhotite,
hosted in graphitic schist. Abundant quartz mineralization occurs at the base of
the mineralized sequences. The hangingwall is well defined marked by a sharp
increase in the percentage of arsenopyrite present. The basal quartz
mineralization carries fine

                                                                              55
<PAGE>

grained free gold and during the mining process this unit is preferentially
mined as dilution over the hangingwall. Minor quartz carbonate veining occurs
with pyrrhotite and indicates areas of elevated grade.

EXPLORATION

TVX's share of exploration expenditures totaled $0.5 million during 2002. The
Company's share of the exploration budget for 2003 is $1.0 million.

DRILLING, SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS AND SECURITY OF SAMPLES

The sampling methodology at Crixas is dependent on the particular orebody being
investigated and has a direct influence on the classification category applied
to the resources and reserves. There are three primary sources of information,
surface and underground diamond drilling and underground chip sampling.

The surface drilling is used, primarily, for exploration and delineation of the
orebody at depth. Underground drilling is used for improving confidence in the
location and form of the orebody and for definition of inferred and indicated
resources. The chip sampling is used, along with the drilling results, for
calculation of grade of the measured and indicated resources and for locating
the hangingwall and footwall contacts for mining.

Surface drilling is carried out by conventional diamond core drilling using NQ
and BQ barrels. Drill samples are taken at 1 meter intervals with a 20% variance
in sample length to take account of significant geological contacts. The average
recovery is noted as being quite high in excess of 95%. Given the competency of
the rock and the general ground conditions it is unlikely that there would be
significant core loss when drilling in the vicinity of the orebody.

Surface drilling is carried out at 25-50 meters spaced intervals along drill
lines spaced approximately 100 meters apart. Drilling is generally carried out
with orientations to the east-southeast in order to provide the best
intersection with the orebodies. Downhole surveys are carried out at 15 meters
intervals using Sperry Sun and Tropari instruments. All core is sawn in half
with one half provided for assay and the remaining half retained for data
verification work.

AX core is obtained from underground drilling and is used for sampling of
indicated panels in order to bring them into the measured category. As with the
surface drilling, the sampling is carried out at one-meter intervals. The whole
core sample is crushed for sampling owing to the small diameter of the AX core
and therefore detailed geological logging is necessary prior to crushing.

At the Upper Zone in Mina III, the drilling is carried out in a 360 degree fan
pattern in order to define the lateral extent of the discontinuous lenticular
sulphide orebodies. Drill sections are spaced at 15-20 meter intervals along
development drives. The mineralization in the Lower Zone tends to be more
continuous and drilling is carried out on drill lines 30 meters apart. Drilling
is carried out from development drives parallel to the plunge direction.

The majority of the underground sampling is carried out using what is referred
to as channel sampling. The method would more accurately be described as chip
sampling. Chip samples are collected on two-meter intervals along development
drives and in raises developed through the orebody between levels. Samples are
collected in one-meter intervals starting approximately one-meter in the
footwall. The footwall can generally be defined visually in the drives and
stopes and the quartz orebodies, in particular, are easily identifiable. The
sampling is carried out along the circumference of the drive outline after the
rock face has been washed down and the sample line located by the survey.

Sampling occurs across the dip of the orebody and, where the full thickness of
the orebody is not exposed, short diamond holes are drilled horizontally into
the hangingwall and/or footwall to provide a full intersection.

All sample preparation and analysis is carried out at the Laboratory facilities
situated at the Crixas mine. The laboratory at Crixas is responsible for
analysis of all samples originating from the metallurgical plant, tailings and
underground sampling (drilling and channel samples). Exploration samples are
analyzed by an independent laboratory. Samples from the various sources are kept
separate and analyzed in separate batches and, in some cases, dedicated
equipment is reserved for particular sample types. Quality checks are carried
out internally and externally at other laboratories in Brazil.

                                                                              56
<PAGE>

MINERAL RESERVE AND RESOURCE ESTIMATES

The following table sets forth the estimated proven and probable reserves for
the Crixas mine as at December 31, 2002 and 2001 and represents 100% of the
Crixas deposits, in which the Company holds a 50% interest:

                         2002                             2001
          ---------------------------------------------------------------------
                       AVERAGE     GOLD                   AVERAGE     GOLD
           TONNES       GRADE     CONTENT       TONNES     GRADE     CONTENT
           ------       -----     -------       ------     -----     -------
           (000'S)      (GPT)    (000'S OZ)    (000'S)     (GPT)    (100'S OZ)

Proven      2,784        7.66        686        2,300     7.27        540
Probable    1,052        8.04        272        1,900     7.41        458
            -----        ----        ---        -----     ----        ---
Total       3,836        7.76        957        4,300     7.33        998
            =====        ====        ===        =====     ====        ===

The Crixas mine has no measured and indicated resources as of December 31, 2002.
For more details on reserves, please refer to pages 12 to 16.

MINING AND PROCESSING

The Crixas mine is an underground operation accessed from surface by means of a
decline ramp. The mining methods used are primarily mechanized cut-and-fill and
room-and-pillar with some slusher mucking. Ore is transported to surface by 25
tonne trucks. The life of mine plan is based on a combined production rate of
735,000 tonnes per year. For 2003, Mina III will contribute 456,000 tonnes (63%)
and Mina Nova 270,000 tonnes (37%). Both mines operate 24 hours per day, 7 days
per week, with a total of 341 operating days scheduled per year. At the Mina III
deposit, the overall mining sequence has been from the top, downward. The main
ramp has been advanced down to 550 meters level, while levels 350 to 450 meters
represent the current mining horizon.

Towards the end of 2001, a mechanized cut and fill stope trial was initiated on
the lower quartz-rich vein currently being exploited by manual room and pillar
methods. If successful, this method should result in increased productivity. To
date, tests are showing encouraging results.

The ore is processed at an on-site mill which had an initial 365,000 tonnes per
annum capacity. Following the completion in 1992 of an incremental expansion at
a cost of $2.8 million, the rated annual capacity increased to 450,000 tonnes. A
further increase in plant throughput to a rated annual capacity of 485,000
tonnes occurred in 1995. The mill operates 362 days per year and uses the
Merrill-Crowe zinc precipitation process to recover gold. In 1996, an additional
expansion to the plant occurred which increased capacity to 540,000 tonnes per
year which was subsequently increased. In 2000, the underground mines operated
at 365 days which allowed annual throughput to reach 725,000 tonnes. A
gravimetric circuit installed in September 2001, continued to recover about 40%
of the total gold production, reducing the inventory.

Mill tailings are deposited in a tailings area located in a natural valley
approximately two kilometers from the plant. A second dam, located down the
valley, acts as an overflow catchment area during periods of high rainfall.
Decanted solutions from the tailings area are recirculated as mill process
makeup water.

At the Mina III deposit, mine dewatering requirements average 80 cubic meters
per hour, increasing to 170 cubic meters per hour during backfilling. The main
sump on the 150 meter level is equipped with three 112 kilowatt slurry pumps in
series, capable of a total of 220 cubic meters per hour. Each main level has a
sump and 93 kilowatt slurry pump to deliver water to the main sump. The main
sump delivers water to one of the thickeners in the mill, used to clarify the
water. Water from the thickener is recycled to the mine.

The Mina Nova is a relatively shallow mine, and there is a river flowing over it
(Rio Vermelho). For this reason the geomechanical design of the mine is being
carefully engineered and monitored. No instability has been detected.
Hydrogeologic studies have been undertaken at Mina III and Mina Nova to
characterize the permeability of the rock. The hydraulic transmissibility is
very low due to the presence of schist type rocks.

In Brazil, electricity is predominantly (90%) sourced from hydro-electric power.
Low rainfalls in recent years caused serious energy shortfalls. In response to
this shortfall, all electricity users (both domestic and industrial) had been
ordered, as from June 1, 2000, to reduce electricity draw-down from the grid by
20%. The Crixas mine secured alternative electricity supplies from rented
generators and buying power on the market. All restrictions were lifted in the
first quarter of 2002.

                                                                              57
<PAGE>

MSG sells the refined gold from the Crixas mine at spot prices and provides a
dividend to the Company.

MSG has an up to date closure plan including a closure cost estimate. In July
2000, MSG prepared a reclamation cost estimate for CONAMA (Conselho Nacional de
Meio Ambiente), the Brazilian National Government Environmental Institution. At
that time, the cost estimate was $8.2 million, less $1.9 million residual value,
for a net closure cost of $6.3 million.

The reclamation cost estimate has since been updated in November 2002 to a
revised cost of $3.95 million. The reduction in the estimate is mainly due to
the devaluation of the Brazilian Real. Currently in Brazil there are no laws
requiring the posting of a reclamation bond.

SUMMARY OF PRODUCTION AND FINANCIAL DATA

The following table summarizes certain gold and silver production and operating
data relating to the Crixas mine for the three years ended December 31, 2002:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31                                                         2002             2001           2000
                                                                                ----             ----           ----
SELECTED PRODUCTION AND OPERATING INFORMATION:
<S>                                                                                <C>             <C>            <C>
Total tonnes mined (000's) (100% basis) ...................................        743.0           740.3          736.0
Total tonnes milled (000's) (100% basis) ..................................        743.0           740.3          736.0
Gold grade (gpt) ..........................................................          8.2             8.5            8.5
Average gold recovery rate (%).............................................         95.6            95.3           95.4
Production (ounces)(1).....................................................       93,660          96,157         96,413
Number of employees........................................................          445             451            434
SELECTED FINANCIAL INFORMATION (IN MILLIONS EXCEPT UNIT COSTS):

Revenue....................................................................     $   30.0        $   26.7       $   26.8
                                                                                --------        --------       --------
Cost of sales..............................................................          8.4            10.7           10.6
Depletion and depreciation.................................................          4.8             5.0            4.9
Interest expense...........................................................          0.2             0.5            1.1
Exploration................................................................          0.5             0.3            0.6
Other......................................................................            -            (0.2)          (0.5)
                                                                                --------        --------       --------
                                                                                    13.9            16.3           16.7
                                                                                --------        --------       --------
Earnings before the undernoted.............................................         16.1            10.4           10.1
Income taxes...............................................................          1.5             1.4            2.5
Minority interests and participation rights................................          7.3             4.5            3.8
                                                                                --------        --------       --------
Net earnings...............................................................     $    7.3        $    4.5       $    3.8
                                                                                ========        ========       ========

OTHER FINANCIAL INFORMATION:

Capital expenditures (millions) ...........................................     $    1.8        $    3.3       $    2.9
Unit costs:
  Cash cost per gold ounce.................................................     $     88        $    110       $    112
Cash cost per tonne milled.................................................     $     23        $     29       $     29
Total production cost per gold ounce.......................................     $    137        $    161       $    164
</TABLE>
- -----------
Note:
(1)  Gold equivalent production represents 50% of the historic production at the
     Crixas mine.

Cash costs and total production costs are non-GAAP measures. For further
information on these non-GAAP measures, please refer to the disclosure under the
heading "Calculation of Cash Costs, Production Costs and Realized Revenue and
Reconciliation to Statement of Operations".

PRODUCTION FORECAST, LIFE OF MINE AND CAPITAL EXPENDITURES

The Company's share of estimated gold equivalent production for 2003 is 85,000
ounces at estimated total cash costs of $125 per ounce.

                                                                              58
<PAGE>

The life of mine plan based on proven and probable mineral reserves indicates a
remaining mine life of five years with production ceasing in 2007.

The Company's share of capital expenditures at the Crixas mine in 2002 was $1.8
million compared to $3.3 million during 2001. The Company's share of planned
capital expenditures for 2003 is $2.2 million.



                       CRIXAS MINE PROPERTY LOCATION MAP.
                                [PICTURE OMITTED]



BRASILIA MINE

The Brasilia mine is held by Rio Paracatu Mineracao S.A. ("RPM") is 49% owned by
Kinross an 51% owned by a subsidiary of Rio Tinto.

A report entitled "Independent Technical Report for Morro do Ouro Mine, Brazil"
dated April 2003 (the "Morro do Ouro Report") has been prepared for the Company
by SRK Consulting and authored by Dr. John Arthur, CGeol FGS, CEng MIMM, senior
geologist, and Ken S. Reipas, P.Eng, principal mining engineer. The following
summaries of the Morro do Ouro mine have been prepared from the Morro do Ouro
Report and, in some cases, are extracts from the Morro do Ouro Report Report.

                                                                              59
<PAGE>

PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION

The large scale open pit mine is located less than two kilometers north of
Paracatu city, situated in the northwest part of Minas Gerais State, 230
kilometers from Brasilia, the capital of Brazil, on the paved highway connecting
Brasilia with Belo Horizonte, the state capital of Minas Gerais.

The mine site is comprised of an open pit mine, a mineral processing plant,
tailings storage facilities and related surface infrastructure, currently
operating at approximately 20 million tonnes per year. No waste stripping is
required, nor is drilling and blasting employed in the mine, as the weathered
ore is ripped by bulldozers prior to excavation. The open pit benching operation
measures approximately four kilometers by two kilometers, and it is located on a
gently sloping hillside. The elevation of the open pit and industrial plant area
ranges from approximately 720 to 820 meters.

RPM holds two mining licenses covering the area (approximately 1,253 hectares)
of the open pit mine. RPM also holds two exploration permits in the immediate
mine area know as "Alvara de Pesquisa". Generally, these permits are valid for
three years, extendable for an additional two years.

RPM must pay a third party royalty of 0.33% of net sales to a landholder.

The Morro do Ouro mine is exposed to limited environmental liabilities related
to the following: site water management; main tailings storage area; sulphide
tailings storage area; industrial plant site; and airborne dust. Environmental
liabilities are being minimized through good management practices.

RPM's mining operations at Paracatu are subject to a mining tax equal to 1% of
net sales and a tax on profit equal to the greater of: (a) 34% of actual profit;
and (b) 3% of net sales.

ACCESSIBILITY, CLIMATE, LOCAL RESOURCES, INFRASTRUCTURE, AND PHYSIOGRAPHY

Access to the Brasilia mine is by paved road, as the mine is located next to the
city of Paracatu, which lies on the main highway between Rio de Janeiro and
Brasilia, the national capital. There is also an airstrip suitable for small
aircraft in the city of Paracatu.

The local terrain is dominated by low rolling hills, largely cleared, and
supporting mixed agriculture of dairy and beef cattle farming and intensive
irrigated cropping, primarily soya beans.

The average rainfall varies between 1,800 and 2,000 millimeters per year
occurring in a distinct wet season between October and March.

Most of the labour force resides in Paracatu. As of January 2003, the mine
employed a total of 817 persons, 561 of which were direct employees of RPM and
256 of which were contractors.

Domestic water for the mine is obtained from the city of Paracatu, delivered by
truck. Process water is recycled from the tailings pond. Some make up water is
drawn from two rivers during the rainy season, as needed, to ensure that the
water level in the tailings pond is sufficient for the dry part of the year.
These are the Sao Domingos and Sao Pedro rivers. The mine also has access to
artesian wells as an emergency water supply.

The mine is connected to the national power grid, which relies mainly on
hydroelectric generation. Electricity is supplied in a free market with
consumers able to select their supplier of choice. RPM obtains electricity from
Centrais Electricias Minas Gerias (CEMIG). Some power supply outages have been
experienced during the rainy season due to water getting into high voltage
equipment, but these have not had a significant impact on production. The mine
has a small emergency power capability, used for critical process equipment that
cannot be suddenly stopped such as thickeners and CIL tanks.

HISTORY

Paracatu history is intimately linked to the Portuguese bandeirantes expeditions
prospecting for gold in the interior of Brazil. They arrived in the region in
1722 after the discovery of gold alluvial placers. The extractive activity had
its peak during the second half of the 18th century, when not only the alluvial
placers where mined but also the oxidized ore outcropping on the top of Morro do
Ouro hill (or "Hill of Gold"), at the time called Morro da Cruz das Almas; also
in this period there were mining activities on the alluvial terraces along Rico
river. With the gold occurrences becoming lean, production declined sharply
during the first decade of the 19th century. From this period only "garimpagem"
was practiced by Paracatu

                                                                              60
<PAGE>

inhabitants only for their subsistence. Various prospectors studied the region
but did not turn the extraction economically viable due to the low grade of gold
in the ore.

Beginning in 1970, Paracatu attracted some attention from the mineral
exploration companies that were interested mainly in Lead and Zinc. The interest
in the gold of Morro do Ouro was secondary, as the majority of the companies
were not attracted by the gold grade, which was considered to be uneconomic.

In 1980, Rio Tinto Zinc (currently Rio Tinto plc.) that operated in Brazil under
the name of Riofinex do Brasil, joined with Billiton in a partnership. Billiton
owned the Morro do Ouro area but had no interest in investing in the area. In
1984 Billiton sold the balance of its shares to Riofinex, and Riofinex became
the sole controller of the prospective area. At the end of 1984, based on the
data from hundreds of deep shafts (up to a 25 meter depth) and 44 drill holes, a
reserve of 97.5 Million tonnes at 0.587 grams per tonne of gold was estimated.
This estimate only included the superficial oxidized ore, currently categorized
as type CT. In spite of the low gold grade of the ore, the geologists
responsible for exploration (namely, Antonio Zini and Rubes Forlin) believed
that these exploration results could generate a profitable business, and in 1985
this was confirmed by financial viability studies. Total investment up to that
time was $7.3 million including ground acquisition costs, exploration costs, and
the cost of feasibility studies.

The holding company approved the initiation of a mining project at a capital
cost of approximately $65 million, on the condition that a Brazilian partner
could be secured for the venture. At the end of 1985, RTZ Mineracao (now Rio
Tinto Brasil), arranged with Autram Mineracao e Participacoes S.A. (now TVX
Participacoes S.A.) to joint venture the project through a new company, RPM,
with Rio Tinto Brasil having a 51% interest and TVX Participacoes S.A. a 49%
interest.

The mine began production in October 1987, treating oxidized ore. The first bar
of gold was produced in December 1987. Ore milled in the following year was 6.1
million tonnes averaging 0.652 grams per tonne of gold. In 1993 the milling rate
reached 13 million tonnes per year. Mill throughput in 2000 was 19.7 million
tonnes averaging 0.467 grams per tonne of gold.

Until 1997 the mill was fed exclusively with oxide ore. Since 1998 primary
sulphide mineralization has also been fed to the mill, without any drop in
grade, though that has required a series of investments in the beneficiation and
metallurgical circuits.

EXPLORATION

TVX did not incur any exploration expenditures in 2002 and 2001. The Company's
share of the exploration budget for 2003 is $1.0 million.

GEOLOGY AND MINERALIZATION

The host rock comprising the Morro do Ouro deposit lies within a sandstone-shale
succession known as the Paracatu Formation. These rocks are part of the central
Brazilian shield, are Proterozoic in age and form part of a marine sequence
containing carbonates, shales and sandstone.

The portion of the Paracatu Formation of economic interest is a very well
laminated, dark grey phyllite with thin lenses of carbonate and lenses or single
crystals of sulphides, and contains a thin but persistent band of quartzite and
other thinner and less consistent sandstone horizons. Quartz is present as
variably-sized occurrences up to 0.5 meters in size, called boudins. Gold is
present as the native metal, alloyed with minor amounts of silver, and tends to
occur around the quartz boudins particularly where the boudins are marked by
layers of iron carbonates and/or pyrrhotite. The weathered 40 meter thick
phyllite package was the object of the mining plan to the end of 1997 and has
been subdivided from top to bottom into ore types C, T, B1 and B2. Underlying
the B1 ore the mineralization extends for approximately 30 meters more, hosted
in a layer of partially weathered phyllite with visible sulphide (total sulphur
exceeds one per cent) and high graphitic content. The grade of this lower
phyllite layer, known as type B2 ore, is similar to the remainder of the
orebody.

The mineralization appears to be cut off to the north by a major normal fault
which trends east-northeast. The offset and true morphology of this fault are
not clearly understood but it is used as a hard boundary for the resource
estimation and it is assumed that the upthrow is to the north which would
indicate that the orebody on the north of the fault has been eroded. The western
boundary of the mineralization is also currently defined by a fault. Once again
the morphology of this fault is poorly understood and it is assumed that
downthrow occurs to the west. The western boundary fault strikes to the
north-northwest and is believed to follow a linear topographic low feature to
the west of the river valley, which forms the limit of the current mining
operation.

                                                                              61
<PAGE>

DRILLING, SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS AND SECURITY OF SAMPLES

In the 1970's the area was prospected extensively for lead and zinc and in 1984
Rio Tinto took over the Billiton share of the exploration licence over the Morro
do Ouro area. By the end of 1984 a reserve had been delineated based on 44 drill
holes and 458 surface pits (25 meter maximum depth). This reserve was stated to
be 97.5 million tonnes at 0.59 grams per tonne of gold and was exclusively
composed of C and T type ore.

Various drilling and pitting campaigns have been carried out over the years on a
grid spacing of between 50 meters and 400 meters. To date, the total sampling
consists of 1,129 drill holes 31,473 meters of drilling and 29,767 one-meter
samples. In 1989 a reverse circulation (RC) drill campaign was carried out with
67 holes drilled on a 400 meter by 200 meter grid. The results of this drilling
exhibited a 25-30% drop in grade when compared to the diamond core drilling
campaigns. However, the data from these RC holes is currently retained in the
drillhole database and is used for the resource calculations. Until 1993
drilling was restricted to the oxide capping, but since 1993 drilling has been
extended into the fresh sulphide material of the B2 horizon. The orebody is now
effectively covered with a 100 meter grid of drillholes. Definition of fault
boundaries has led to a better understanding of the boundaries of the deposit
and future drilling is planned to deepen existing holes rather than drill any
new areas around the periphery of the orebody. Currently, some 50% of the
drilling does not intersect the full thickness of the orebody. The plan does not
call for any drilling during 2003 but after this it is planned to drill some
2,000 meters a year and it is estimated that at least 13,000 meters of
additional drilling are required to complete all holes in the orebody footwall.

The current understanding is that the orebody boundaries are defined laterally.
The exception to this is in the west of the deposit on the western side of the
Corrego Rico river valley where a series of deep drillholes are planned to test
the down dip extension of the orebody. It is believed that the orebody may be up
to 160 meters deep in this area. The river currently forms the western boundary
of the mining operation.

Since the initial exploration campaign, virtually all sampling has been carried
out by diamond drilling. The majority of this has been through core drilling
with only a restricted RC campaign in 1989. Prior to 1999 all holes were drilled
with a 51 x 6 inch diameter barrel. However, since 1999 the core size has been
reduced to 3 inches.

Core recovery is reported to be high with a consistent recovery of greater than
95%. Prior to crushing, the core is photographed and logged.

Density measurements have been collected from the deposit at various times from
feasibility through to current production.

During evaluation drilling, samples of core are taken from one-meter intervals,
weighed and SG is determined using the water displacement method.

Assaying is carried out on 50 gram aliquots. A total of six separate assays for
gold are carried out from each 1 meter sample pulp. A sulphur assay value is
calculated for each sample. Additional elements assayed are arsenic, copper,
lead, zinc, manganese, cadmium and silver. The last two elements are not assayed
as a matter of course.

Interlaboratory check assay exercises are carried out between the RPM internal
laboratory and the laboratory at Lakefield Research in Canada. Additional check
assay work is carried out at the Phalabwora mine laboratory in South Africa. For
these checks the coarse reject is sent to the external facilities to allow
preparation of an independently produced pulp.

                                                                              62
<PAGE>

MINERAL RESERVE AND RESOURCE ESTIMATES

The following table sets forth the estimated proven and probable reserves for
the Brasilia mine as at December 31, 2002 and 2001 and represents 100% of the
Morro do Ouro deposit, in which the Company holds a 49% interest:

                        2002                                  2001
          ----------------------------------------------------------------------
                      AVERAGE      GOLD                    AVERAGE     GOLD
            TONNES     GRADE      CONTENT        TONNES     GRADE     CONTENT
            ------     -----      -------        ------     -----     -------
          (MILLIONS)   (GPT)     (000'S OZ)    (MILLIONS)   (GPT)    (000'S OZ)

Proven       319.3      0.43       4,414            320.7     0.43      4,413
Probable     49.8       0.43         688             49.1     0.43        671
Total        369.1      0.43       5,102            369.8     0.43      5,084

In addition to proven and probable reserves, as at December 31, 2002, the
Brasilia mine has an estimated 172 million tonnes of measured and indicated
resources at an average grade of 0.39 grams of gold per tonne. For more details
on reserves and resources, please refer to pages 12 to 16.

MINING AND MILLING OPERATIONS

The Brasilia mine is a high tonnage low-grade open pit operation. The mine is
unusual in that the entire pit is either free dug or utilizes ripping and dozing
with no drilling and blasting. Weathering has led to the development of an
oxidized mantle over the sulphide mineralization with thickness varying from 20
to 40 meters. The economic viability of this low-grade orebody has been partly
derived from the soft rock and free gold in the weathered mantle. Also, the mine
is situated on a gently sloping hillside and there are no waste stripping
requirements.

The ore, which is mined from surface and requires no drilling or stripping, and
minimal blasting, is loaded by front-end loaders into 85 and 100 tonne trucks
which transport the ore to the crushers. Exploration started in 1999 to evaluate
extensions of the orebody both laterally and at depth. The mill and mine operate
24 hours per day, 7 days per week. The nominal plant throughput is 1.6 million
tonnes per month. An ore stockpile of approximately 10 days production is
maintained near the processing plant. Its main purpose is to ensure
uninterrupted mill feed in the rainy season when some delays may be experience
in the pit during extreme rainfall. During the dry season the stockpile can be
used if the pit becomes too dusty. RPM is committed to controlling dust levels
on site and in the city.

One is crushed and ground prior to introduction into a flotation circuit. The
concentrate is treated by gravimetric methods first and the coarser gold is
recovered. The concentrate reject from the gravimetric plant is then treated by
a conventional cyanidation and carbon-in-leach circuit developed by Rio Tinto
Zinc.

The processing plant, subjected to several upgrades over the mine life,
currently processes 20 million tones per year. In 2001, a new grinding control
system was installed which should optimize plant operation and recoveries.
Significant repairs were required to all mills in 2001 due to the development of
extensive cracks in welds directly associated with the processing of harder ore.

Since start up, the mined grade has declined, but has stabilized since the
late-1990's near 0.43 grams per tonne of gold that is essentially reserve grade.
Despite the downward trend in grade, gold production has increased. This is due
to the fact that site production has significantly increased, more than
offsetting the reduction in head grade. Also, the total metallurgical gold
recovery achieved each year has remained relatively steady, despite the decrease
in head grade.

Rio Tinto Brasil sells the gold from the Brasilia mine at spot prices.

As at August 2000, the closure cost estimate was $32 million (excludes any
credits for salvage value). The mine currently has many years of life remaining,
and the estimated cost will very likely be affected by variances in the exchange
rate.

Currently in Brazil there are no laws requiring the posting of a reclamation
bond. RPM is making an annual financial provision for closure costs.

                                                                              63
<PAGE>

There is a plan to mine oxide ore only during the last year of production. This
will provide a cover for the main tailings pond, which will then be drained. The
closure plan involves placing a 1-meter thickness of cover materials on the
final pit floor, the top 0.8 meters being soil material.

SUMMARY OF PRODUCTION AND FINANCIAL DATA

The following table summarizes certain gold production and operating data
relating to the Brasilia mine for the three years December 31, 2002:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,                                                           2002            2001            2000
                                                                                   ----            ----            ----

SELECTED PRODUCTION AND OPERATING INFORMATION:
<S>                                                                               <C>             <C>             <C>
Total tonnes mined (000's) (100% basis) ...................................       18,400          16,500          19,700
Total tonnes milled (000's) (100% basis) ..................................       18,400          16,500          19,700
Gold grade (gpt)...........................................................         0.48            0.45            0.47
Average gold recovery rate (%).............................................         79.0            78.3            75.8
Production (ounces) (1)....................................................      110,035          91,588         112,104
Number of employees .......................................................          571             512             512

SELECTED FINANCIAL INFORMATION (IN MILLIONS EXCEPT UNIT COSTS):

Revenue...................................................................     $    33.5      $     25.4       $    30.4
                                                                               ---------      ----------       ---------
Cost of sales.............................................................          18.1            17.9            19.4
Depletion and depreciation................................................           5.5             5.1            8.1
Interest expense..........................................................           0.1             0.6            0.5
Other.....................................................................           2.4             0.6           (4.1)
                                                                               ---------      ----------       ---------
                                                                                    26.1            24.2            23.9
                                                                               ---------      ----------       ---------
Earnings (loss) before the undernoted.....................................           7.4             1.2             6.5
Income taxes (recovery)...................................................           0.8            (0.2)            0.3
Minority interests and participation rights...............................           3.3             0.7             3.1
                                                                               ---------      ----------       ---------
Net earnings (loss).......................................................     $     3.3      $      0.7       $     3.1
                                                                               =========      ==========       =========

OTHER FINANCIAL INFORMATION:

Capital expenditures (millions). .........................................     $     2.7      $      2.0       $     2.2
Unit costs:
  Cash cost per gold ounce................................................     $     167      $      191       $     179
  Cash cost per tonne milled..............................................     $    2.01      $     2.22       $    2.01
  Total production cost per gold ounce....................................     $     217      $      246       $     254
</TABLE>
- -----------
Note:
(1)  Gold equivalent production represents 49% of the historic production at the
     Brasilia mine.

Cash costs and total production costs are non-GAAP measures. For further
information on these non-GAAP measures, please refer to the disclosure under the
heading "Calculation of Cash Costs, Production Costs and Realized Revenue and
Reconciliation to Statement of Operations".

PRODUCTION FORECAST, LIFE OF MINE AND CAPITAL EXPENDITURES

The Company's share of estimated gold equivalent production for 2003 is 97,000
ounces at estimated total cash costs of $175 per ounce.

The Brasilia mine currently has a nominal capacity of about 20 million tonnes
per year with variations depending on the hardness of the ore, as it affects
grinding throughput. In general, ore hardness is expected to increase over the
remaining mine life as the pit is deepened. Under this scenario, the current
reserves will be exhausted by 2022.

RPM is in the process of studying a major expansion project that would
potentially increase the future capacity to approximately 30 million tonnes per
year. If the expansion were implemented, the current reserves would be exhausted
by year 2016.

                                                                              64
<PAGE>

Capital expenditures at the Brasilia mine in 2002 were $2.7 million compared to
$2.0 million during 2001. The Company's share of planned capital expenditures
for 2003 is $2.0 million.


                                [PICTURE OMITTED]
                      BRASILIA MINE PROPERTY LOCATION MAP.




MUSSELWHITE MINE

The Musselwhite property is operated as an unincorporated joint venture between
Placer Dome Canada Limited ("Placer Canada") (68.07%) and the Company (31.93%).
Each party is responsible for funding the expenses incurred in any work program
in proportion to its participating interest in the joint venture. Placer Canada
is designated as the operator of the joint venture, and thus is responsible for
preparing work programs and carrying out and supervising all work to be
performed under each work program. The management committee is comprised of four
members of whom two are the nominees of the Company. Decisions of the management
committee require the approval of nominees representing at least a majority
interest in the joint venture.

A report entitled "Independent Technical Report, Review of Musselwhite Mine
Operations, Ontario" dated April 4, 2003 (the "Musselwhite Report") has been
prepared for the Company by AMEC and authored by Steven Blower, P.Geo., and John
Kiernan, P.Eng. The following summaries of the Musselwhite mine have been
prepared from the Musselwhite Report and, in some cases, are extracts from the
Musselwhite Report.

PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION

The Musselwhite property is located in the Patricia Mining District of
northwestern Ontario. The mine lies in the Opapimiskan Lake area, approximately
76 kilometers southeast of the First Nations community of Round Lake (Weagamow),
130 kilometers north of the town of Pickle Lake, Ontario and 430 kilometers
northwest of Thunder Bay,

                                                                              65
<PAGE>

Ontario. The property consists of a total of 617 claims. There is a core holding
of 338 leased mining claims; except for 96 claims, for which only mining rights
are held, the joint venture holds mining and surface rights for all claims.
Surrounding this core holding are 279 contiguous unpatented mining claims. The
core holding and unpatented claims together span approximately 5,444 and 12,104
hectares, respectively, for a total of 17,548 hectares. The claims have
expiration dates ranging from January 28, 2004 to June 12, 2012.

The mine has recently renewed an impact benefit agreement with local First
Nations groups. In the new agreement, restrictions on daily mill throughput have
been removed, and revenue-sharing provisions have been incorporated to help
direct some of the mine's economic benefits directly into local communities.

As an unincorporated joint-venture, the mine does not pay income taxes directly,
and the Company and Placer Canada must pay taxes on a corporate level based on
their prorated shares of revenue. In Ontario, profits are taxed at the federal
and provincial levels. Federal taxes are levied on each partner's share of the
mine operations taxable income, which is net of direct operating expenses,
appropriate share of depreciation of capital and resource allowances, and
deductions for exploration and pre-production development. The net federal tax
rate is currently 29.12%. Ontario uses the federal taxable income, with some
minor adjustments to deductions and allowances, and taxes this at rate of 11%.
In addition, Ontario levies a small capital tax on the paid-up capital of the
mine above $5 million. Ontario also levies a mining tax after deductions,
including processing allowances, at a 2002 rate of about 14%; this is scheduled
to reduce to 10% by 2004.

ACCESSIBILITY, CLIMATE, LOCAL RESOURCES, INFRASTRUCTURE, AND PHYSIOGRAPHY

Access to the property is by a 45 kilometer road from Provincial Highway 808 or
by air from Pickle Lake.

The topography of the project area is relatively flat, with granite intrusions
associated with regional highlands. Local relief, which ranges from 5 meters to
45 meters, can be attributed to glacial deposits in the form of moraines, eskers
and drumlins. Extensive, low-lying swampy areas surround streams, ponds, and
lakes on the property. The elevation of Opapimiskan Lake is about 300 meters.
The Opapimiskan Lake area lies within the northern coniferous section of the
boreal forest. A forest fire destroyed most of the area south of Opapimiskan
Lake in 1979. Vegetation is slowly returning but currently has no economic
value.

The nearest permanent weather monitoring station is located in Pickle Lake.
Weather statistics for the period 1951-1980 indicate a mean daily temperature of
- -0.9 degrees Celsius. Temperatures range between 40 degrees Celsius and a
minimum of -51 degrees Celsius. The mean annual rainfall is recorded at 509
millimeters and the mean annual snowfall is 266 centimeters.

Five First Nations and two non-First Nation communities, consisting of a total
of about 3,000 inhabitants, live within the vicinity of the Musselwhite project.

The major infrastructure consists of the airstrip, bunkhouses, mill buildings, a
tailings pond, a portal and conveyor adits and various pump stations. Mining and
milling are carried out at approximately 1.2 million tonnes of ore per year. The
mine is a fly in, fly out operation and power is provided by a transmission line
connected to the provincial power grid at Pickle Lake.

HISTORY

In 1962, two Ontario prospectors, Harold and Allan Musselwhite, discovered a
gold-bearing quartz vein on the north shore of Lake Opapimiskan and in 1973,
they obtained sufficient financing to carry out exploration on a relatively
small scale. Exploration continued until 1980, during which time several small
zones of gold mineralization were discovered.

In 1980, a major drilling program resulted in the discovery of the West
Anticline Zone (1 million tonnes averaging 7.5 grams of gold per tonne) and the
Camp Zone (400,000 tonnes at 6.9 grams per tonne). Underground exploration of
the West Anticline Zone was carried out from an adit in 1984 but structural
complexities affected the calculated resource grade and activity moved elsewhere
on the property. The East Bay Zones (formerly Snoppy Pond Zones) were found in
1985.

In 1988 and 1989, a $17 million underground exploration program and a
feasibility study were carried out. Mine construction was postponed due to the
high cost of power and infrastructure.

By the end of 1992, 12 zones of gold mineralization had been identified. The
main Musselwhite deposit is a long narrow band that starts near the surface of
Snoppy Pond, then plunges northwest to about 200 meters below surface at the
edge of Lake Opapimiskan, reaching about 400 meters below surface under the
lake.

                                                                              66
<PAGE>

The 1993 work program focused on a new exploration strategy which was to improve
the tonnage rather than the grade of material, thereby creating a much larger
inventory of contained gold. In early 1993, this inventory amounted to 1.3
million ounces of gold.

In 1993, diamond drilling, including barge drilling, and geological compilations
were carried out. As a result of this exploration work, TVX and Placer Canada
agreed to accelerate the underground exploration program for the Musselwhite
project and to increase the 1994 expenditure from Cdn.$12 million to Cdn.$21.8
million. This increased expenditure was designed to complete exploration and to
advance the project to the feasibility stage.

The 1994 work program included infill surface drilling, dewatering the
underground workings, driving an access ramp to the T-Antiform Zone and
underground diamond drilling. Drifts and raises were positioned along the
mineralized zones to gather detailed geological and engineering information.
Construction of the ramp and related underground work were completed to enable
the detailed drilling and sampling necessary to upgrade the measured and
indicated resource estimate.

Total costs for the 1995 program were approximately $15 million and included the
construction of a 45-kilometer all-weather road to the property and a
feasibility study which was completed in the first quarter of 1996 when a
production decision was made.

Exploration work in 1997 identified additional resources. Of particular interest
was shallow-depth mineralization outlined at Snoppy Pond which was included in
the 1998 year end reserve statement for the first time.

GEOLOGY AND MINERALIZATION

The Musselwhite property ore zones are situated within the Weagamow-North
Caribou Greenstone Belt of the Sachigo sub-province of the Superior geologic
province. This belt consists of a narrow elongate swath of metavolcanic and
metasedimentary supracrustal assemblages that extend 160 kilometers in an
overall northwest direction. The belt is comprised of three linear segments,
east-west, north-northwest, and west-northwest. Another branch of the greenstone
belt extends to the southwest from the point where the west-northwest and
north-northwest segments join. This triple junction forms complex geometries and
is the locus of outcropping iron formation, known gold mineralization, and the
Musselwhite mine. Gold bearing mineralization is characteristically hosted in
folded oxide-silicate facies banded iron formations. The main deposits are
developed as a series of sub-vertical tabular bodies along the tightly-folded 15
to 18 degree northwesterly plunging T-Antiform structure. Gold mineralization in
the West Anticline zone occurs within quartz-pyrrhotite-albite- almandine
veinlets and lenses which parallel a secondary deformation axial planar
cleavage, and as stratabound disseminated mineralization. Other deposits are
developed along the limbs and subsidiary fold structures within the larger East
Bay Synform and West Anticline.

EXPLORATION

Recent exploration has been focused on defining the extent of mineralization
down-plunge along the T-Antiform and in the nearby PQ Deeps zone with diamond
drilling. Drilling down plunge on the T-Antiform has demonstrated that the
structure continues beyond the northernmost drill holes, but gold grades are
uneconomic to the north of 11800N. The reduction in grade in this area may be
due to the increasing distance away from the longitudinal fault zones that add
to the permeability in the better mineralized portions of the T-Antiform.
However, based on the persistence of the T-Antiform structure, and the presence
of gold occurrences at the Kenpat zone (stratigraphically above the down-plunge
projection of the T-Antiform), there is good potential for the discovery of
additional mineralization further along the structure in the down plunge
direction.

Mineralization in the PQ Deeps zone is currently being defined by deep surface
drilling beneath the ice of Opapimiskan Lake. Recent high-grade intersections in
the zone are encouraging and warrant further diamond drilling.

TVX's share of exploration expenditures totaled $0.8 million during 2002. The
Company's share of the exploration budget for 2003 is $1.5 million.

DRILLING, SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS AND SECURITY OF SAMPLES

All exploration and definition drilling conducted on the property to date has
been diamond drilling. By the end of 2002, a total of 3,261 diamond drill holes
with an aggregate length of 495,033 meters had been completed at Musselwhite.
Most of the core is NQ diameter. All drill hole collars are surveyed and most
holes have been surveyed using recognized down hole

                                                                              67
<PAGE>

survey methods. By the end of 2002, a total of 3,261 diamond drill holes with an
aggregate length of 495,033 meters had been completed at Musselwhite.

Diamond drill core is sampled by rotating the core perpendicular to the
foliation and halving it longitudinally with a diamond saw into intervals
selected by the geologist during core logging. One half of the core is collected
in sample bags for analysis, and the other half is retained for a permanent
record. Samples are constrained by geology to aid in the interpretation of gold
distribution. A nominal sample length of 0.5 - 1.0 meters is used.

Diamond drill core samples at Musselwhite have been prepared and analyzed at a
number of laboratories since exploration drilling began in 1974. Currently, the
samples are being prepared and analyzed at three different laboratories: the
mine lab and two independent labs in Thunder Bay, Ontario. All of the assays
completed on drill core have utilized a fire assay (FA) pre-concentration method
followed by an atomic absorption (AA) or gravimetric finish on a one assay ton
aliquot (~30 grams). The gravimetric finish is employed if the AA results are
greater than 20 grams per tonne of gold.

A large number of samples were analysed to develop the specific gravity of the
host rocks and mineralization. SG's range between 3.0 to 3.3 grams per cubic
centimeter and generally result from measurements collected using water
displacement field measurements.

The Geology Department at the Musselwhite mine uses a defined QA/QC (Qualify
Assurance/Quality Control) program to monitor accuracy and precision of all
results. Commercially prepared standards and blanks are routinely inserted into
the sample stream, both as part of the Geology Department's QA/QC program and by
the lab, as part of their own internal system of checks.

Sample contamination was monitored by inserting blank samples. Some
contamination issues were recognized during the equipment start-up phase and
remedial action was taken. The sample preparation protocols were altered and the
core intervals that may have been contaminated during this period were
re-sampled. Pulp and reject duplicate samples were inserted to monitor
analytical precision.

MINERAL RESERVE AND RESOURCE ESTIMATES

The following table sets forth the estimated proven and probable reserves for
the Musselwhite mine as at December 31, 2002 and 2001 and represents 100% of the
Musselwhite deposit, in which the Company holds a 31.93% interest:

                        2002                                 2001
          ----------------------------------------------------------------------
                      AVERAGE       GOLD                    AVERAGE    GOLD
            TONNES     GRADE       CONTENT        TONNES     GRADE    CONTENT
            ------     -----       -------        ------     -----    -------
          (MILLIONS)   (GPT)     (000'S OZ)     (MILLIONS)   (GPT)  (000'S OZ)

Proven        8.8       5.67        1,597          10.2      5.73      1,882
Probable      3.1       4.81          488           2.7      4.78        411
              ---       ----          ---           ---      ----        ---
Total        11.9       5.44        2,085          12.9      5.53      2,293
             ====       ====        =====          ====      ====      =====

In addition to proven and probable reserves, as at December 31, 2002, the
Musselwhite mine has an estimated 5.7 million tonnes of measured and indicated
resources at an average grade of 6.32 grams of gold per tonne. For more details
on reserves and resources see pages 12 to 16.

MINING AND MILLING OPERATIONS

The mining operations are accessed via a twin decline system extending from
surface. Men and material are transported via a 12.5% grade ramp. Emergency
access is via a 20% grade conveyor ramp extending from surface to the 460 meter
level.

Ventilation is provided by twin 375 kilowatt fans. Fresh air travels to the work
face by means of a ventilation raise which ties into the conveyor ramp at the
240 meter level and travels along it to the lower levels of the mine. Exhaust
air travels up the main access ramp to surface.

Mining is conducted using sublevel blasthole stoping methods with waste rock
backfill. Sublevels are established at 25 meter intervals.

                                                                              68
<PAGE>

The ore is drilled off using three-inch and four-inch production holes using
longhole drill rigs. Ore above the 200 meter level is direct hauled to surface.
Ore below the 200 meter level is hauled to the underground crusher. Stopes are
backfilled with either cemented or un-cemented rock backfill.

Most of the ore production has and will continue to come from underground
sources, with some production from open pits at the beginning and end of the
mine life. The mine currently plans to produce approximately 232,000 ounces of
gold per year.

The Musselwhite mill circuit uses a fairly standard approach with fine
crushing/rod milling/ball milling to prepare the ore to the correct size. For
the actual recovery of gold, gravity is used to scalp coarse gold from the ball
milling circuit into a intensive cyanide leach system. The gravity tails are
sent to conventional cyanide leaching which dissolves the remainder of the
recoverable gold. Carbon is used to recover gold from leaching and after the
stripping and electrowinning processes, a gold dore is produced. The dore bars
produced at the mine are shipped under contract to Johnson Matthey for refining.

The rated treatment capacity of the mill plant is 4,000 tonnes per day. It is
expected that this level will be achieved on a sustainable basis as the capital
updates completed in 2002 are optimized. In the short term, it appears that the
mine will be challenged to supply ore at this rate until planned capital
equipment replacements and operational improvements are completed in the latter
half of this year.

The current mining fleet is essentially the original mine equipment in
approximately its sixth year of use, generally considered the limit of
underground equipment life. The mine capital budget includes significant
equipment replacements, which should help reduce costs and improve productivity.
Commissioning of the new conveyor system in 2002 has reduced the long haul to
surface for most of the mine as it moves deeper and farther under the lake.
However, the truck fleet will have to be maintained at approximately current
levels to allow for longer backfill hauls in addition to ore haulage to the 400
level. This could change, depending on the outcome of an ongoing paste backfill
study.

The mine is also re-examining its production drilling requirements. There is a
plan to make less use of the older Tamrock Solo drills and perhaps replace them
with Boart drills. Boart contractors are currently working in the mine to test
the productive capacity of their drills; these drills will be used for the
majority of production drilling this year.

The Musselwhite mine operates under Placer Canada's sustainability policy, which
commits the operation to a high standard of environmental stewardship.
Sustainability is an important issue for every department. This involves
protecting human health, reducing the impact of mining on the ecosystem, and
returning the site to a state compatible with a healthy environment. Musselwhite
has implemented a series of management systems for maintenance, environmental
activities and occupational health and safety. Currently, operations at
Musselwhite appear to be in compliance with applicable corporate standards and
environmental regulations.

The closure plan involves progressive rehabilitation through an ongoing program
of grass seeding. Planning is also underway to conduct annual satellite Ikonos
imagery of the property to characterize the condition of the vegetation to
indicate the presence or lack of stress factors. This information will be a
useful start in compiling a chronological record of reclamation for use in the
closure plan to be presented to stakeholders at the end of the mine life.

Musselwhite is currently looking at various options for its tailings management
practices to mitigate the risks associated with tailings and waste rock. One
option is a paste backfill/tailings disposal system; another is to produce a
sulphide flotation product that would reduce the amount of potential acid
generating material. The potential for acid rock drainage from the tailings is
taken into account in the closure plan. Stockpiled open-pit waste rock has low
potential for acid drainage and will be transported underground for use as
rockfill.

At present, all tailings pass through a water treatment plant for destruction of
cyanide before discharge to the tailings pond. Additional remediation occurs
naturally in the tailings pond, polishing ponds, and wetlands.

Local First Nations communities monitor environmental issues through an
environmental working committee. First Nations issues are listened to,
documented, and addressed in this forum, and mine closure plans are periodically
reviewed and analyzed.

SUMMARY OF PRODUCTION AND FINANCIAL DATA

The following table summarizes certain gold production and operating data
relating to the Musselwhite mine for the three years ended December 31:

                                                                              69
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,                                                           2002            2001           2000
                                                                                   ----            ----           ----
SELECTED PRODUCTION AND OPERATING INFORMATION:
<S>                                                                               <C>             <C>            <C>
Total tonnes mined (000's) (100% basis)....................................       1,156.9         1,290.2        1,231.8
Total tonnes milled (000's) (100% basis)...................................       1,156.9         1,290.2        1,231.8
Gold grade (gpt)...........................................................           5.9             5.9            6.5
Average gold recovery rate (%).............................................          95.3            95.3           95.8
Production (ounces)(1).....................................................        66,879          74,577         78,283
Number of employees........................................................           273             319            262

SELECTED FINANCIAL INFORMATION (IN MILLIONS EXCEPT UNIT COSTS):

Revenue....................................................................     $    21.4      $     20.1     $     21.9
                                                                                ---------      ----------     ----------
Cost of sales..............................................................          15.5            14.3           12.5
Depletion and depreciation.................................................           4.9             5.9            5.9
Exploration................................................................           0.8             0.5            0.6
Other......................................................................           0.4              --            0.2
                                                                                ---------      ----------     ----------
                                                                                     21.6            20.7           19.2
                                                                                ---------      ----------     ----------
Earnings (loss) before the undernoted......................................          (0.2)            0.6            2.7
Income taxes...............................................................            --              --             --
Minority interests and participation rights................................          (0.1)           (0.3)           1.4
                                                                                ---------      ----------     ----------
Net earnings (loss)........................................................     $    (0.1)     $     (0.3)    $      1.3
                                                                                =========      ==========     ==========

OTHER FINANCIAL INFORMATION:

Capital expenditures (millions) ...........................................     $     3.7      $      4.0     $      1.1
Unit costs:
  Cash cost per gold ounce.................................................     $     228      $      192     $      161
  Cash cost per tonne milled...............................................     $      42      $       35     $       32
  Total production cost per gold ounce.....................................     $     299      $      272     $      237
</TABLE>
- ----------
Note:
(1)  Gold equivalent production represents 31.93% of the historic production at
     the Musselwhite mine.

Cash costs and total production costs are non-GAAP measures. For further
information on these non-GAAP measures, please refer to the disclosure under the
heading "Calculation of Cash Costs, Production Costs and Realized Revenue and
Reconciliation to Statement of Operations".

PRODUCTION FORECAST, LIFE OF MINE AND CAPITAL EXPENDITURES

The Company's share of estimated gold equivalent production for 2003 is 58,000
ounces at estimated total cash costs of $250 per ounce.

The Musselwhite mine has a projected mine life of 9 years at a mining rate of
4,000 tonnes per day.

Capital expenditures at the Musselwhite mine in 2002 were $3.7 million compared
to $4.0 million during 2001. The Company's share of planned capital expenditures
for 2003 is $2.9 million.

                                                                              70
<PAGE>




                    MURRENWHITE MINE PROPERTY LOCATION MAP.
                                [PICTURE OMITTED]





ECHO BAY PROPERTIES

ROUND MOUNTAIN

The Company owns an undivided 50% interest in and operates the Round Mountain
gold mine. An affiliate of Barrick Gold Corporation owns the remaining undivided
50% interest in the joint venture common operation.

A report entitled "Technical Report on the Round Mountain Gold Mine" dated March
21, 2003 (the "Round Mountain Report") has been prepared for the Company by
Frank K. Fenne, P.G., chief geologist and Daniel B. Moore, P.E., both of Round
Mountain Gold Corporation, a subsidiary of the Company. The following summaries
of the Round Mountain Gold mine have been prepared from the Round Mountain
Report and, in some cases, are extracts from the Round Mountain Report.

PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION

The Round Mountain gold mine is an open-pit mining operation located 60 miles
north of Tonopah in Nye County, Nevada. The property position consists of
contiguous patented and unpatented mining claims covering approximately 27,500
acres, while the active project boundary encompasses 7,263 acres. The Company
has received patents to convert mineable land to patented status. Patented
claims cover all of the current reserves in the ultimate pit.

The Smoky Valley Common Operation controls the mineral and surface rights of the
mine through the ownership of 84 patented lode claims and 1,453 unpatented lode
claims. The patented claims are held as private property and are legally
surveyed. All of the reserves are located on patented claims. The unpatented
claims are held under the 1872 Mining Law and are subject to normal annual
filing requirements and fees. The majority of the unpatented claims are located
on land administered by the Bureau of Land Management; the remainder are located
on land administered by the U. S. Forest Service.

Round Mountain mine production is subject to a net smelter return royalty
ranging from 3.53% at gold prices of $320 per ounce or less to 6.35% at gold
prices of $440 per ounce or more. During 2002, this royalty averaged 3.5%. Its
production is

                                                                              71
<PAGE>

lso subject to a gross revenue royalty of 3.0%, reduced to 1.5%
after $75.0 million has been paid. For the period from the date that the royalty
commenced through December 31, 2002, cumulative royalties of $33.1 million have
been paid.

All environmental permitting is up to date and in order.

The Round Mountain Gold mine is subject to the Nevada State and United States
Federal Employment taxes, Business License tax, Net Proceeds of Minerals Tax and
Properties Sales and Use tax.

ACCESSIBILITY, CLIMATE, LOCAL RESOURCES, INFRASTRUCTURE, AND PHYSIOGRAPHY

The mine site is accessed by State Highway 376, a paved two-lane paved highway
that connects U.S. Highway 6 in Tonopah to the south and U.S. Highway 50 to the
north. The mine is located approximately 250 miles from the major metropolitan
areas of Las Vegas and Reno, Nevada. The mine is supported by the local
communities of Hadley and Carvers, which provide most of the housing for mine
personnel. Sierra Pacific Power Co. provides electrical power to the mine. There
are sufficient surface and water rights to support all current and forecasted
mining at the site.

The mine area straddles the transition between the floor of the Big Smoky Valley
and the adjacent Toquima Range. Mine site elevations vary between 5,800 to 6,800
feet above sea level. Elevations in the Big Smoky Valley and Toquima Range vary
from 5,800 feet in the valley floor to 11,941 feet at the summit of Mount
Jefferson.

The oblong open-pit mine is over a mile at its longest dimension and currently
more than 1,200 feet from the highest working level to the bottom of the pit.

The Round Mountain mine lies within an arid, high desert setting. Average annual
precipitation in the Big Smoky Valley is approximately five to seven inches with
most of that total falling during the winter months. Snow is common at the
valley floor, but rarely remains on the ground for more than a few days. Local
rainfall can be extreme and flash flood events are not uncommon in the region.
Temperature range can be extreme, with average daily fluctuations exceeding 40
degrees Fahrenheit. Winter temperatures are typically 10 to 20 degrees
Fahrenheit at night and 30 to 50 degrees Fahrenheit during the day. Rarely
(typically less than 10 days per year), winter low temperatures can fall below 0
degrees Fahrenheit . Summer temperatures vary from 40 to 55 degrees Fahrenheit
at night to 90 to 105 degrees Fahrenheit during the day.

HISTORY

The first gold production from the Round Mountain District occurred in 1906.
Historic production from 1906 through 1969 based on U.S. Bureau of Mines records
was 346,376 ounces of gold and 362,355 ounces of silver. Actual unreported
production was probably significantly higher. Early important companies actively
mining in the district were the Round Mountain Mining Co., the Fairview Round
Mountain Mining Co., the Round Mountain Daisy Mining Co., the Round Mountain
Sphinx Co., the Round Mountain Red Top Co., and the Round Mountain Red Antelope
Mining Co. At some point prior to 1929, Nevada Porphyry Mines, Inc. consolidated
many of the claims and controlled most of the district. Nevada Porphyry Mines
and the A. O. Smith Corp. investigated the bulk tonnage potential of property in
1929 and 1936-1937, respectiviely. In 1946 through 1962, the Yuba Consolidated,
Fresnillo, and Consolidated Goldfields developed and mined the placer deposits
flanking Round Mountain and Stebbins Hill.

At some time between 1962 and 1969, the Ordrich Gold Resources Inc. acquired
control of the property from Nevada Porphyry Gold Mines. In 1969, Copper Range
Co. leased the property and developed a small reserve of 12 million tons at a
grade of 0.062 oz Au/ton. The Smoky Valley Common Operation was formed in 1975
to operate the mine. This was initially a joint venture in which Copper Range
held a 50 percent interest and Felmont Oil Co. and Case Pomeroy Co. each held a
25 percent interest.

Commercial production commenced in 1977. In 1984, Homestake Mining Company
acquired the Felmont Oil interest in the operation and, in 1985, Echo Bay Mines
Inc. acquired Copper Range interest. Effective July 1, 2000, Homestake increased
its interest in the Round Mountain mine from 25% to 50% when it acquired the
Case Pomeroy interest. Effective December 14, 2001 Barrick Gold Corporation
completed a merger with Homestake Mining Company thereby acquiring the Homestake
interest in the mine.

Since 1997, development drilling has continued and the reserve base has been
significantly expanded and refined. As a result, the total mining rate (ore and
waste) increased in a step-wise fashion from 6,000 tons per day in 1976 to an
average of 303,188 tons per day in 1999. The production rate for 2002 averaged
282,000 tons per day. The decision to construct a mill to process sulfide ores
resulted in a significant increase in reportable reserves in the early 1990's.

                                                                              72
<PAGE>

In 2002, total gold production was 755,494 ounces. Over 7.9 million ounces have
been produced since 1976.

GEOLOGY AND MINERALIZATION

The Round Mountain mine is located along the western flank of the southern
Toquima Range within the Great Basin sub-province of the Basin and Range
province of western North America. The Basin and Range physiographic province is
characterized by generally north-south trending block faulted mountain ranges,
separated by alluvium-filled valleys. The Great Basin sub-province is
specifically characterized by internal drainage. Topographic relief varies
across the Basin and Range, from 1,500 feet to in excess of 5,000 vertical feet.

The geology of the Round Mountain mine consists of a thick sequence of
intracaldera Oligocene ash-flow tuffs and volcaniclastic rocks resting upon
pre-Tertiary basement rocks. The caldera margin is mostly buried but in the pit
area is well defined by a progressively steeper dipping arcuate contact between
the volcanic rocks and older basement rocks. The caldera margin and caldera
related structures provided the structural ground preparation for the
hydrothermal system. The primary host rocks for gold mineralization are the
volcanic rocks. A minor amount of ore occurs in the Paleozoic rocks along the
caldera margin.

The Round Mountain Gold deposit is a large, epithermal, low-sulfidation,
volcanic-hosted, hot-springs type, precious metal deposit, located along the
margin of a buried volcanic caldera. The deposit genesis is intimately
associated with the Tertiary volcanism and caldera formation. Intra-caldera
collapse features and sympathetic faulting in the metasedimentary rocks provided
the major structural conduits for gold-bearing hydrothermal fluids. In the
volcanic units, these ascending fluids deposited gold along a broad
west-northwest trend

Gold mineralization at Round Mountain occurs as electrum in association with
quartz, adularia, pyrite and iron oxides. Shear zone fractures, veins and
disseminations within the more permeable units (typically open pumice sites)
host the mineralization. Primary sulfide mineralization consists of electrum
associated with or internal to pyrite grains. In oxidized zones, gold occurs as
electrum associated with iron oxides, or as disseminations along fractures.

Alteration of the volcanic units at Round Mountain can be characterized as a
continuum from fresh rock progressing through chlorite, clay, sericitic+quartz,
adularia+quartz+sericite, and quartz+adularia alteration assemblages. The
alteration is zoned outward from potassic at the center to propylitic on the
margin. There is a reasonable correlation between increasing gold grades and
increasing degrees of alteration. The central ore zone is characterized by
pervasive K-feldspar found replacing the rock groundmass, replacing primary
sanidine, or as crystal growths in open-space.

Ore zones within the metasediments are more subtle, largely defined by secondary
quartz overgrowths, pyrite, and adularia associated with narrow northwest
trending structures.

EXPLORATION

Echo Bay's share of exploration expenditures totaled $1.0 million during 2002.
The Company's share of the exploration budget for 2003 is $2.9 million.

DRILLING, SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS AND SECURITY OF SAMPLES

The current drill database for the open pit reserve contains a total of 4,089
drill hole records, of which 3,812 were established using reverse circulation
drilling and 277 were drilled using diamond core methods. A separate database is
maintained for dump drilling which contains an additional 1,293 drill hole
records.

The majority of the drilling is vertical with angle holes used where vertical
structures are anticipated. All dump holes are drilled vertical.

All holes are sampled on five-foot intervals and a "chipboard" constructed for
each drill hole with sample from each interval glued to a board representing the
complete hole.

Sample data for the reserve model is derived primarily from conventional,
reverse circulation rotary and HQ size core drilling. Holes are initially
drilled on +200 foot centers defining deposit limits. In-fill drilling is
completed on centers of 140 foot or less to develop reportable reserves used in
mine planning.

                                                                              73
<PAGE>

Reverse circulation drill cuttings are passed through a wet rotary splitter to
collect a 10-15 pound sample for each 5 foot interval. A sampling technique
which uses flocculent to settle drill cuttings has been employed to capture very
fine-grained material and assure sample integrity. This technique captures
nearly 100% of the rock material generated during the drilling process. Core
samples are split with a rock saw in 5 foot intervals, with half the sample
assayed, and the other half stored for reference.

All samples collected from drill holes are prepared and assayed by the Round
Mountain mine assay laboratory. All assay laboratory chemists and technicians
are employees of Round Mountain Gold Corporation. The laboratory is not
certified by any standards association. A mine geologist or mine geologic
technician delivers the drill samples to the assay laboratory.

The Round Mountain Deposit is noted for its coarse gold occurrences and high
nugget effect in assaying. In order to minimize the sampling variation, a
five-assay ton or 145.8 gram sample is used in the fire assay. To minimize
potential lead exposure of the laboratory staff, bismuth is used as the
collector of the gold and silver. After a 2-hour fusion, the samples are poured
into molds. The samples are slagged and are cupelled in the cupel room.
Following cupellation, the bead is smashed and parted with nitric acid, rinsed,
dried, and annealed. The fire assay is completed with a gravitimetric finish.

The assay laboratory maintains an internal assay quality control program.
Laboratory supervisors routinely conduct quality inspections of sample
preparation, equipment calibration, and assaying procedures. The lab regularly
participates in round robin assays with other mine labs to check internal
procedures. Five percent of all pulps are screened to verify that the pulps meet
specification. Because of the large crucibles used in the five assay-ton fire
assay, only 11 samples are fired per oven. Of these, one of the samples is
either a blank (barren silica sand) or a certified standard that is inserted
randomly by the lab computer system. The blank is inserted prior to the
preparation stage. The standard is inserted following sample preparation. If the
assay results exceed limits for either the blank or the standard, the entire
batch is re-assayed.

Assay results from blanks and standards are plotted and graphed daily. These
graphs are an integral tool used by the assayers and supervisors to continuously
monitor and improve lab procedures.

The sampling protocol, sample preparation, security and analytical procedures
and quality control program have been reviewed and it is the opinion of the
authors, that the laboratory procedures are adequate for an operating mine. This
is further supported by over 20 years of successful mine production with
reasonable production reconciliations.

MINERAL RESERVE AND RESOURCE ESTIMATES

The following table sets forth the estimated proven and probable reserves for
100% of the Round Mountain mine as at December 31, 2002 and 2001, in which the
Company holds a 50% interest:

                       2002                                2001
        -----------------------------------------------------------------------
                      AVERAGE     GOLD                    AVERAGE     GOLD
           TONNES      GRADE     CONTENT        TONNES     GRADE     CONTENT
           ------      -----     -------        ------     -----     -------
         (MILLIONS)    (GPT)    (000'S OZ)    (MILLIONS)   (GPT)    (000'S OZ)

Proven       85.8      0.59       1,630          159.6     0.56       3,173
Probable     88.5      0.75       2,120           55.3     0.68       1,315
             ----      ----       -----           ----     ----       -----
Total       174.3      0.67       3,750          218.9     0.59       4,488
            =====      ====       =====          =====     ====       =====

In addition to the estimated proven and probable reserves, as at December 31,
2002, the Round Mountain mine has an estimated 12.6 million tonnes of measured
and indicated resources at an average grade of 0.68 grams of gold per tonne. For
more detail on reserves and resources see pages 12 to 16.

MINING AND MILLING OPERATIONS

The Round Mountain mine currently operates a conventional open pit that is
approximately 8200 feet long in the north-west, south-east direction and 5000
feet wide (north-east to south-west). The mining is conducted on 35 foot benches
by electric shovels and front end loaders paired with 150, 190 and 240 ton haul
trucks.

Blasthole patterns are drilled on centers that range from 16 to 30 feet.
Blasthole samples are collected and assayed and provide the control for ore
segregation. Based upon these assays, blasted pit ore is determined to be
run-of-mine dedicated pad ore, crushed reusable pad ore, or waste. Sulfide
material greater than or equal to 0.018 opt of gold is shipped directly to the
mill or mill stockpile. Run-of-mine ore is delivered the dedicated pad.
Re-usuable pad ore is crushed and placed on

                                                                              74
<PAGE>

reusable leach pads and waste is delivered directly to the waste dumps. Placer
material encountered during normal stripping operations is sent to the dedicated
pad. High grade coarse gold bearing ore is handled in one of three ways: 1)
leached on the re-useable pad and offloaded to the mill; 2) sent directly to the
gravity plant with tails reporting to the mill; or 3) sent directly to the mill
or mill stockpile. Gold particle size distribution of high-grade ore determines
the processing method.

The Round Mountain operation uses conventional open-pit mining methods and
recovers gold using four independent processing operations. These include
crushed ore leaching (reusable pad), run-of-mine ore leaching (dedicated pad),
milling and the gravity concentration circuit. Most of the ore is heap leached,
with higher grade oxidized ores crushed and placed on the reusable pad. Lower
grade ore, ore removed from the reusable leach pad and stockpiled ore that was
previously leached are placed on the dedicated pad.

The reusable pad processed 26,987 tons of ore per day in 2002, compared to
23,601 tons per day in 2001. Reusable pad volume varies with ore release, which
is determined by the phases of the pit being mined. Reusable pad production
increased in 2002 to 242,808 ounces from 219,704 ounces in 2001 due to the
processing of higher grade ores and higher recoveries.

The dedicated pad processed 135,222 tons of ore per day in 2002, compared to
128,637 tons per day in 2001. Production in 2002 from the dedicated pad was
347,966 ounces, compared to 369,750 ounces in 2001, due to higher recoveries.

The mill processed 10,067 tons per day in 2002 producing 153,946 ounces,
compared to 10,171 tons per day in 2001 producing 156,854 ounces. The mill
facility achieved a recovery rate of 84.6% from both higher-grade oxide and
non-oxidized ores during 2001 by employing gravity concentration, fine grinding
and cyanide leaching.

Ore and waste rock were mined at a rate of approximately 174,920 tons per day in
2002 compared to 194,579 tons per day in 2001.

Mining at Round Mountain is expected to be complete during 2006 (assuming no
additions to reserves), with completion of stockpile processing in 2008. The
joint venture partners continue to support an aggressive exploration program in
the vicinity of the mine in order to add reserves and extend the mine life.

The finished dore bullion is shipped to refineries in North America for further
processing as per the agreements of established contracts of the participants of
the Smoky Valley Common Operation . Once the dore bullion leaves the mine site,
marketing and sales are the responsibility and discretion of the Joint Venture
partners.

The site Plan of Operations and Comprehensive Reclamation Plans filed with the
US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and Nevada
Division of Environmental Protection (NDEP) have been approved for all current
operational facilities. Annual updates of the Reclamation Plan are prepared to
adjust for cost inflation and to take credit for concurrent reclamation
activities and submitted to the above listed agencies. The current reclamation
cost estimate, approved in December 2002 by the BLM, USFS and NDEP totals
$36,794,776. Tentative plans for permanent closure activities have been approved
by the NDEP and BLM. Certain site restoration costs are expensed as production
costs on the unit-of-production method over the expected life-of-mine. Each
participant in the Common Operation is responsible for its own estimate of
reclamation costs in its own accounts.

SUMMARY OF PRODUCTION AND FINANCIAL DATA

The following table summarizes certain gold production and operating data
relating to the Round Mountain mine for the three years ended December 31:

                                                                              75
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,                                                            2002            2001           2000
                                                                                    ----            ----           ----
SELECTED PRODUCTION AND OPERATING INFORMATION:
<S>                                                                                 <C>            <C>             <C>
Gold produced (ounces)(1):
  Heap leached-- reusable pad..............................................         121,404        109,852         70,588
  Heap leached-- dedicated pad.............................................         173,983        184,875        176,066
  Milled...................................................................          76,973         78,427         69,935
  Other(2).................................................................           5,387            321          3,475
Total......................................................................         377,747        373,475        320,064

SELECTED FINANCIAL INFORMATION (IN MILLIONS EXCEPT UNIT COSTS):

Mining cost/ton of ore and waste...........................................    $       0.80      $    0.83      $    0.83
Heap leaching cost/ton of ore..............................................    $       0.84      $    0.82      $    0.68
Milling cost/ton of ore....................................................    $       3.18      $    3.07      $    2.80
PRODUCTION COST/OUNCE OF GOLD PRODUCED
  Direct mining expense....................................................    $        176      $     178      $     200
  Deferred stripping cost..................................................               9             14             (1)
  Inventory movements and other............................................              (2)            (2)            (4)
                                                                               ------------      ---------      ---------
Cash operating cost........................................................             183            190            195
  Royalties paid...........................................................              20             18             17
  Production taxes.........................................................               4              2              1
                                                                               ------------      ---------      ---------
Total cash cost............................................................             207            210            213
  Depreciation.............................................................              44             40             43
  Amortization.............................................................              15             15             18
  Reclamation and mine closure.............................................               9              9              9
                                                                               ------------      ---------      ---------
TOTAL PRODUCTION COSTS......................                                   $        275      $     274      $     283
                                                                               ------------      ---------      ---------

  Capital expenditures (millions)(3).......................................    $        8.6      $    15.0      $     4.6
  Deferred (applied) mining expenditures (millions)(3).....................    $       (3.4)     $    (5.3)     $     0.4

OTHER INFORMATION:
  Heap leached-reusable pad:
     Ore processed (tons/day)..............................................          26,987         23,601         24,335
     Total tons of ore processed (000's)...................................           9,742          8,520          8,785
     Grade (ounce/ton).....................................................           0.043          0.035          0.028
     Average gold recovery rate (%)........................................            61.3           77.4           61.6
  Heap leached-dedicated pad:
     Ore processed (tons/day) (100% basis).................................         135,222        128,637        141,047
     Total tons of ore processed (000's) (100% basis)......................          48,815         46,438         50,918
     Grade (ounce/ton).....................................................           0.011          0.011          0.011
     Average gold recovery rate (%)(4).....................................              (4)            (4)            (4)
  Milled:
     Ore processed (tons/day) (100% basis).................................          10,067         10,171          9,304
     Total ton of ore processed (000's) (100% basis).......................           3,664          3,702          3,387
     Gold grade (ounce/ton)................................................           0.050          0.050          0.045
     Average gold recovery rate (%)........................................            84.6           83.7           83.1
</TABLE>
- ------------
Notes:
(1)  Gold production represents 50% of the historic production at the Round
     Mountain Mine.
(2)  A high-grade occurrence was discovered in April 1992. A small gravity plant
     was constructed to recover these ounces.
(3)  Echo Bay's 50% share.
(4)  For dedicated leach pads, a gold recovery rate cannot be calculated until
     leaching is complete. Based on metallurgical test work completed during
     1994 and 1995, the eventual recovery rate is estimated to be approximately
     50%.

Cash operating costs and total production costs are non-GAAP measures. For
further information on these non-GAAP measures, please refer to the disclosure
under the heading "Calculation of Cash Operating Costs and Total Production
Costs".

                                                                              76
<PAGE>

PRODUCTION, LIFE OF MINE AND CAPITAL EXPENDITURES

The planned average production rate (total tons moved) for 2003 is 266,000 tons
per day. Of this 185,000 tons per day are ore production. The Round Mountain
mine forecast for 2003 uses proven and probable reserves. The annual mining
forecast for mill tons mined in 2003 will be 4.5 million tons containing 131,309
ounces. Dedicated pad feed mined from the pit will be 18.8 million tons
containing 230,626 ounces. Dedicated pad feed mined from the offload material
will be 18.3 million tons containing 208,407 ounces. Mined production for the
Reusable pad in 2003 will be 9.2 millions tons containing 325,560 ounces.

The Company's share of estimated gold equivalent production for 2003 is 330,000
ounces at total cash costs of $210 per ounce.

The completion date of open pit mining is scheduled for 2006. The mill is
currently scheduled to operate from stockpiles until 2007.

Capital expenditures at the Round Mountain mine in 2002 were $8.6 million
compared to $15.0 million during 2001. During 2003, capital expenditures of
$16.1 million are planned. These include payment for one 240-ton truck
(approximately $2 million), purchase of a new Caterpillar D11 Dozer
(approximately $1.5 million), Carbon Plant expansion including installation of
additional carbon columns (approximately $1 million), construction of phase 4 of
the west dedicated leach pad (approximately $6 million), completion of a mine
de-watering program (approximately $4 million) and general vehicle replacement.
The Company's share of planned capital expenditures for 2003 is $7.4 million.

                                                                              77
<PAGE>


                                [PICTURE OMITTED]
                  ROUND MOUNTAIN MINE PROPERTY LOCATION MAP.



                                                                              78

<PAGE>

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

THE COMPANY

DERIVATIVE ACTION

In October 1996, a shareholder derivative action was filed in the Court of
Chancery of Delaware on behalf of a shareholder of the Company, entitled HARRY
LEWIS V. MILTON H. WARD, ET AL., C.A. No. 15255-NC, against Cyprus Amax, the
directors of the Company and the Company as a nominal defendant. The complaint
alleges, among other things, that the defendants engaged in self-dealing in
connection with the Company's entry in March 1996 into a demand loan facility
provided by Cyprus Amax. The complaint seeks, among other things, a declaration
that the demand loan facility is not entirely fair to the Company and damages in
an unspecified amount. The Company believes that the complaint is without merit
and intends to defend the matter vigorously.

CLASS ACTION

The Company has been named as a defendant in a class action complaint filed on
or about April 26, 2002, entitled ROBERT A. BROWN, ET AL. V. KINROSS GOLD
U.S.A., INC., ET AL., Case No. CV-S-02-0605-KJD-RJJ, brought in the United
States District Court for the District of Nevada. The complaint names as
defendants the Company, its subsidiary, Kinross Gold U.S.A., Inc., its
subsidiary Kinam Gold Inc., and Robert M. Buchan. The complaint is brought on
behalf of two potential classes, those that tendered their Kinam preferred stock
into the tender offer for the Kinam $3.75 Series B Preferred Stock made by
Kinross Gold U.S.A. and those that did not. Plaintiffs argue, among other
things, that amounts historically advanced by the Company to Kinam should be
treated as capital contributions rather than loans, that the purchase of Kinam
preferred stock from institutional investors in July 2001 was a constructive
redemption of the preferred stock, an impermissible amendment to the conversion
rights of the preferred stock, or constituted the commencement of a tender
offer, that the Company and its subsidiaries have intentionally taken actions
for the purpose of minimizing the value of the Kinam preferred stock, and that
the amount offered in the tender offer of $16.00 per share was not a fair
valuation of the Kinam preferred stock. The complaint alleges breach of contract
based on the governing provisions of the Kinam preferred stock, breach of
fiduciary duties, violations of the "best price" rule under Section 13(e) of the
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, as amended, and the New York Stock Exchange
rules, violations of Section 10(b) and 14(e) of the SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934, as amended, and Rules 10b-5 and 14c-6(a) thereunder, common law fraud
based on the acts taken and information provided in connection with the tender
offer, violation of Nevada's anti-racketeering law, and control person liability
under Section 20A of the SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, as amended. The
complaint seeks damages ranging from $9.80 per share, plus accrued dividends, to
$39.25 per share of Kinam preferred stock or, in the alternative, the issuance
of 26.875 to 80.625 shares of the Company for each Kinam preferred share. It
also seeks triple damages under Nevada statutes.

The parties have exchanged initial disclosures, but there has not been any
further discovery to date in the litigation and a class has not been certified
in this action. A second action seeking certification as a class action and
based on the same allegations was also filed in the United States district Court
for the District of Nevada on or about May 22, 2002. It names the same parties
as defendants. This action has been consolidated into the BROWN case and the
BROWN plaintiffs have been designated as lead plaintiffs. Reginald H. Howe and
the firm of Berger & Montague, P.C., lawyers representing the BROWN plaintiffs,
have been appointed as co-lead counsel in the case. The defendants have answered
the complaints in both cases. The Company believes these claims are without
merit and plans to vigorously defend the litigation.

TVX

BRAZIL

In September 2001, Rio Tinto Brasil Ltda., a subsidiary of Rio Tinto plc,
purported to terminate the shareholders agreement relating to Rio Paracatu
Mineracao S.A. ("RPM"), the operating corporation which holds the Brasilia mine.
Rio Tinto Brasil also caused RPM to call a meeting of its shareholders to amend
its Articles of Association. The proposed amendments would permit Rio Tinto
Brasil to have sole decision-making authority over Rio Paracatu through its
51.0% interest. Rio Tinto Brasil alleged that the transaction resulting in the
formation of TVX Newmont J/V in June 1999 and the resignation of the former
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of TVX in April 2001 had triggered rights
of first refusal under the shareholders agreement in favour of Rio Tinto Brasil
and as such rights were not made available to Rio Tinto Brasil, it was permitted
to terminate the shareholders agreement.

                                                                              79
<PAGE>

The TVX Newmont J/V disagreed with Rio Tinto Brasil's interpretation of the
shareholders agreement and was successful in obtaining an injunction against Rio
Paracatu from holding the proposed shareholders meeting. Following the granting
of the injunction, in November 2001, the TVX Newmont J/V commenced a claim in
Brazil against Rio Tinto Brasil and RPM to declare that the shareholders
agreement continues to be valid. Rio Tinto Brasil and the TVX Newmont J/V each
filed pleadings with respect to this action. In October 2002, Rio Tinto Brasil
again caused RPM to call a meeting of its shareholders and the TVX Newmont J/V
was successful in obtaining another injunction. Subsequently, Rio Tinto Brasil
and TVX Newmont J/V agreed to freeze litigation activities until April 22, 2003.
On April 28, 2003, a TVX subsidiary received notification from Rio Tinto Brasil
stating that it had preserved its right to litigate in respect of the alleged
breach of the shareholders agreement and alleging that the combination also
breached the shareholders agreement. In the event the matter proceeds, the
Company anticipates that the decision of the court will be made within the next
year.

In the event that Rio Tinto Brasil is successful in having the court rule that
its termination of the shareholders agreement was valid, TVX would not be able
to exercise joint control of RPM under the terms of the agreement. In the event
of such outcome, the Company will evaluate other legal remedies with respect to
the management of RPM. If TVX is not able to retain joint control of RPM,
management of RPM and operation of the Brasilia mine would be subject to the
discretion of Rio Tinto Brasil. Further upon a loss of joint control, the
Company would no longer proportionately consolidate its interest in RPM and
would account for its interest using the equity method under Canadian and U.S.
GAAP. The termination of the shareholders agreement would not affect TVX's
current ownership interest in RPM and the amount of loss, if any, cannot be
determined at this time.

GREECE

On January 9, 2003, the Greek Ministry of Development ordered TVX Hellas S.A., a
subsidiary of TVX, to suspend mining beneath the village of Stratoniki. The
order was to be lifted upon the receipt of new mining permits signed by the five
relevant ministries of the Greek Government. Operations were suspended pursuant
to the order, but they were not re-commenced once the revised permits were
issued on February 18, 2003 as the Company attempted to negotiate a settlement
and possible exit strategy with the Greek Government. Pending the outcome of
these discussions, TVX Hellas lodged a petition for bankruptcy. The court
hearing confirming the bankruptcy has not yet been held.

The Greek Government has undertaken initiatives to create a viable long-term
ownership structure to facilitate the re-opening of the Stratoni mine.
Representatives of the new potential owners propose to meet in order to set in
motion the legal processes for the creation of the new structure. The proposed
ownership structure includes the Company, a Greek mining enterprise, a group of
Greek construction companies, local Prefectural and Municipal authorities and
the Alpha Group, which comprises three individuals with whom TVX has been
involved in litigation since 1995.

For the transitional period, the Company has agreed with the Greek Government
that it will maintain the operation of the water treatment plant for the
protection of the environment.

Since 1995, TVX's interest in the Hellenic Gold Properties has been the subject
of litigation brought by three individuals (the "Alpha Group") in the Ontario
courts. As a consequence, TVX holds a 12% carried interest and the right to
acquire an additional 12% participating interest in the Hellenic Gold Properties
as constructive trustee for the Alpha Group. TVX and the Alpha Group have asked
the court to clarify the award made in the earlier actions.

ECHO BAY

SUMMA

In September 1992, Summa Corporation ("Summa") commenced a lawsuit against Echo
Bay Exploration Inc. and Echo Bay Management Corporation (together, the
"Subsidiaries"), indirect subsidiaries of Echo Bay, alleging improper deductions
in the calculation of royalties payable over several years of production at
McCoy/Cove and another mine, which is no longer in operation. The matter was
tried in the Nevada State Court in April 1997, with Summa claiming more than $13
million in damages, and, in September 1997, judgment was rendered for the
Subsidiaries. The decision was appealed by Summa to the Supreme Court of Nevada,
which in April 2000 reversed the decision of the trial court and remanded the
case back to the trial court for "a calculation of the appropriate [royalties]
in a manner not inconsistent with this order." The case was decided by a panel
comprised of three of the seven Justices of the Supreme Court of Nevada and the
Subsidiaries petitioned that panel for a rehearing. The petition was denied by
the three member panel on May 15, 2000 and remanded to the lower court for
consideration of other defenses and arguments put forth by the Subsidiaries. The
Subsidiaries filed a petition for a hearing before the full Supreme Court and on
December 22, 2000, the Court recalled its previous decision. Both the
Subsidiaries and their counsel believe that grounds exist to modify or reverse
the decision. Echo Bay has $1.5 million accrued related to this

                                                                              80
<PAGE>

litigation. If the appellate reversal of the trial decision is maintained and
the trial court, on remand, were to dismiss all of the Subsidiaries' defenses,
the royalty calculation at McCoy/Cove would change and additional royalties
would be payable. Neither Echo Bay, nor counsel to the Subsidiaries, believe it
is possible to quantify the precise amount of liability pursuant to a revised
royalty calculation.

HANDY AND HARMAN

On March 29, 2000, Handy & Harman Refining Group, Inc., which operated a
facility used by the Echo Bay for the refinement of dore bars, filed for
protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. Echo Bay has filed a
claim for gold and silver accounts at this refining facility with an estimated
market value of approximately $2.2 million at the time the shipments were made.
Echo Bay has fully provided for this amount as unrecoverable. Further, in March
2002, the liquidating trustee for Handy & Harman commenced a series of adversary
proceedings against numerous creditors, including two of Echo Bay's
subsidiaries, alleging that certain creditors received preferential payments in
metal or otherwise. The preferential payment claims against the Echo Bay's
subsidiaries approximate $9.0 million. The ultimate amount recoverable or
payable will depend on the success or failure of the liquidating trustee in
prosecuting these claims. The ultimate percentage payout by the liquidating
trustee will also be affected by the success or failure of the trustee in
prosecuting preferential payment claims against all creditors. The trustee
currently projects the ultimate distribution of funds to be 50% to 60% of
amounts owed to creditors. Based on this range, the maximum liability to Echo
Bay would be $3.4 million assuming a 50% payout to creditors and no success in
defending any of the preferential payment claims while the maximum amount
recoverable would be $1.3 million assuming a 60% payout to creditors and success
in defending itself against all of the preferential payment claims. Echo Bay
intends to oppose the preferential payment claims vigorously. The outcome of
these proceedings is uncertain at this time. As such, the Echo Bay has not made
any provision with respect to the preferential payment claims.

OTHER

In November 2001, two former employees of Echo Bay brought a claim against Echo
Bay pursuant to the CLASS PROCEEDINGS ACT (British Columbia) as a result of the
temporary suspension of operations at Echo Bay's Lupin mine in the spring of
1998 and the layoff of employees at that time. Echo Bay does not know at this
time the amount being claimed by the former employees nor whether the claim is
appropriate for certification as a class action. On August 12, 2002, the Supreme
Court of British Columbia decided it had such jurisdiction. Echo Bay is
appealing the decision. No determination has been made by this Court as to
whether this action is suitable for certification as a class action and no
decision has been rendered with respect to the merits of the action.

The Company, TVX and Echo Bay are also involved in legal proceedings and claims
which arise in the ordinary course of their businesses. The Company is
vigorously defending these claims. In the opinion of management, the amount of
ultimate liability with respect to these actions will not materially affect the
financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.

                                                                              81
<PAGE>

GLOSSARY OF TECHNICAL TERMS USED IN THIS DOCUMENT

AA FINISH
     A method used to complete fire assaying where the bead produced by this
assay technique is dissolved in strong acids. The gold in the acid solution is
determined by a machine called an atomic adsorption spectrometer. This method is
used to accurately quantify small amounts of gold and other metals.

ADIT
     A nearly horizontal gallery or passage driven from the surface of the
ground to the ore body. The term "tunnel" is frequently used in place of adit,
but technically a tunnel is open to the surface on both ends.

ALBITITE
     A porphyritic igneous rock, containing phenocrysts of albite in a
groundmass chiefly consisting of albite. Muscovite, garnet, apatite, quartz, and
opaque oxides are common accessory minerals.

ALIQUOTS
     A small representative sample taken from a gold bar or article from assay
to determine its fine gold content.

ALLUVIAL
     Referring to material, which has been placed by the action of surface
water.

ALLUVIAL PLACER
     Gravel that has been transported and deposited by flowing waters, streams,
creeks, etc., depositing placer gold and other valuable minerals. Also called an
"alluvial deposit."

ALLUVIUM
     A general term for all detrital deposits resulting from the flow of present
waterways, thus including the sediments laid down in streambeds, flood plain,
lakes, fan at the foot of mountain slopes, and estuaries.

ALMANDINE
     An isometric mineral, 8[Fe32+Al2Si3O12]; pyralspilite subgroup of the
garnet group, with Fe replaced by Mg, Mn, and Ca; in red to brownish-black
dodecahedral and trapezohedral crystals, or massive; Mohs hardness, 7-1/2;
occurs in medium-grade metamorphic rock and felsic igneous rocks; used as a
gemstone and an abrasive.

ALUNITE
     1. A trigonal mineral, KAl3(OH)6(SO4)2; massive or disseminated; in pale
tints; formed from sulfuric acid acting on potassium feldspar in volcanic
regions (alunization), and around fumaroles. 2. A mineral group including
jarosite.

ANKERITE
     A trigonal mineral, Ca(Fe,Mg,Mn)(CO3)2; dolomite group; forms series with
dolomite and with kutnohorite; associated with iron ores; commonly forms thin
veins in some coal seams.

ANNEALING
     Heating to and holding at a suitable temperature and then cooling at a
suitable rate for such purposes as reducing hardness; improving machinability;
facilitating cold working; producing a desired microstructure; or obtaining
desired mechanical, physical, or other properties. When applied to ferrous
alloys, the term "annealing", without qualification, implies full annealing.
When applied to nonferrous alloys, annealing implies a heat treatment designed
to soften a cold-worked structure by recrystallization or subsequent grain
growth or to soften an age-hardened alloy by causing a nearly complete
precipitation of the second phase in relatively coarse form.

ARCUATE STRIPS OR BELT
     A geological term referring to a long narrow structure (i.e. reef) that
derives it name from the fact that it has a shape resembling an arc.

ARGILLIC
      Pertaining to clay or clay minerals; e.g., argillic alteration in which
certain minerals of a rock are converted to minerals of the clay group.

                                                                              82
<PAGE>

ARGILLITE
     A compact rock, derived either from mudstone (claystone or siltstone), or
shale, that has undergone a somewhat higher degree of induration than mudstone
or shale but is less clearly laminated and without its fissility, and that lacks
the cleavage distinctive of slate.

ARSENOPYRITE
     The most common arsenic mineral and principal ore of arsenic; occurs in
many sulfide ore deposits, particularly those containing lead, silver and gold.

ASSAY
     To determine the value of various elements within an ore sample, streambed
sample, or valuable metal sample.

AXIAL-PLANAR CLEAVAGE
     Cleavage that is closely related to the axial planes of folds in the rock,
either being rigidly parallel to the axes, or diverging slightly on each flank
(fan cleavage). Most axial-plane cleavage is closely related to the minor folds
seen in individual outcrops, but some is merely parallel to the regional fold
axes. Most axial-plane cleavage is also slaty cleavage.

B2 HORIZON
      A local geological term identifying a particular formation of rock.

BALL MILL
     A steel cylinder filled with steel balls into which crushed ore is fed. The
ball mill is rotated, causing the balls to cascade and grind the ore.

BASALT
     An extrusive volcanic rock composed primarily of plagioclase, pyroxene and
some olivine.

BASEMENT ROCKS
     A name commonly applied to metamorphic or igneous rocks underlying the
sedimentary sequence.

BIOTITE
     A common rock-forming mineral in crystalline rocks, either as an original
crystal in igneous rocks or as a metamorphic product in gneisses and schists; a
detrital constituent of sedimentary rocks.

BLOCK FAULTED
     A type of normal faulting in which the crust is divided into structural or
fault blocks of different elevations and orientations. It is the process by
which block mountains are formed.

BRECCIA
     A coarse-grained clastic rock, composed of angular broken rock fragments
held together by a mineral cement or in a fine-grained matrix; it differs from
conglomerate in that the fragments have sharp edges and unworn corners.

CALCMAGNESIAN
     A rock material with a calcium and magnesium component.

CALDERA
     A large, basin-shaped volcanic depression, more or less circular, the
diameter of which is many times greater than that of the included vent or vents,
no matter what the steepness of the walls or the form of the floor may be.

CALL OPTION
     A bullion option entitling, but not obliging, except upon exercise, the
buyer to purchase from the seller at the strike price a specified number of
ounces of bullion.

CALOMEL
     A tetragonal mineral, 2[Hg2Cl2]; a secondary alteration of mercury-bearing
minerals; horn quicksilver; mercurial horn ore.

                                                                              83
<PAGE>

CARBON-IN-LEACH
     A process step wherein granular activated carbon particles much larger than
the ground ore particles are introduced into the ore pulp. Cyanide leaching and
precious metals adsorption onto the activated carbon occur simultaneously. The
loaded activated carbon is mechanically screened to separate it from the barren
ore pulp and processed to remove the precious metals and prepare it for reuse.

CARBON-IN-PULP
     A process step wherein granular activated particles much larger than the
ground ore particles are introduced into the ore pulp after primary leaching in
cyanide. Precious metals adsorption occurs onto the activated carbon from the
pregnant cyanide solution.

CARBONACEOUS
     1. containing carbon or coal, especially shale or other rock containing
small particles of carbon distributed throughout the whole mass. 2. Carbonaceous
sediments include original organic tissues and subsequently produced derivatives
of which the composition is organic chemically.

CATHODE
     A rectangular plate of metal, produced by electrolytic refining, which is
melted into commercial shapes such as wire-bars, billets, ingots, etc.

CERARGYRITE
     A former name for chlorargyrite, which is an isometric mineral, 4[AgCl];
sectile; forms waxy white, yellow, or pearl-gray incrustations, darkening to
violet on exposure to light; a supergene mineral occurring in silver veins; an
important source of silver.

CHALCOPYRITE
     A copper mineral composed of copper, iron and sulphur. This mineral is very
similar to marcasite in its characteristics; it tarnishes easily; going from
bronze or brassy yellow to yellowish or grayish brown, has a dark streak, and
are lighter in weight and harder than gold.

CHIP SAMPLE
     A method of sampling of rock exposure whereby a regular series of small
chips of rock is broken off along a line across the face.

CHLORITE
     1. The mineral group chamosite, clinochlore, cookeite, gonyerite, nimite,
orthochamosite, pennantite, and sudoite. 2. Chlorites are associated with and
resemble micas (the tabular crystals of chlorites cleave into small, thin flakes
or scales that are flexible, but not elastic like those of micas); they may also
be considered as clay minerals when very fine grained. Chlorites are widely
distributed, esp. in low-grade metamorphic rocks, or as alteration products of
ferromagnesian minerals.

CHLORITOID
     A monoclinic or triclinic mineral, (Fe,Mg,Mn)2Al4Si2O10(OH)4; dull green to
gray-black; occurs in masses of brittle folia in metamorphosed argillaceous
sedimentary rocks. It is related to the brittle micas.

CLAY
     An extremely fine-grained natural earthy material composed primarily of
hydrous aluminum silicates. It may be a mixture of clay minerals and small
amounts of nonclay materials or it may be predominantly one clay mineral. The
type is determined by the predominant clay mineral. Clay is plastic when
sufficiently pulverized and wetted, rigid when dry, and vitreous when fired to a
sufficiently high temperature.

CONGLOMERATE
     Rounded, water-worn fragments of rock or pebbles, cemented together by
another mineral substance.

CONTANGO
     Contango on gold is the difference between the spot market gold price and
the forward market gold price. It is often expressed as an interest rate which
is the difference between the LIBOR deposit rate on dollars and gold lease
rates.

CORE
     The long cylindrical piece of rock, about an inch in diameter, brought to
surface by diamond drilling.

                                                                              84
<PAGE>

COVELLITE
     A copper mineral, CuS; metallic indigo blue with iridescent tarnish. It is
a mineral produced by supergene enrichment.

CRETACEOUS
     1. Applied to the third and final period of the Mesozoic Era. Extensive
marine chalk beds were deposited during this period. 2. Of the nature of chalk
or relating to chalk. 3. System of strata deposited in the Cretaceous Period.

CUPEL
     1. A small bone-ash cup used in gold or silver assaying with lead. 2. The
hearth of a small furnace used in refining metals.

CUT-OFF GRADE
     The lowest grade of mineral resources considered economic; used in the
calculation of reserves in a given deposit.

CYANIDATION
     A method of extracting exposed gold or silver grains from crushed or ground
ore by dissolving the contained gold and silver in a weak cyanide solution. May
be carried out in tanks inside a mill or in heaps of ore out of doors.

CYCLONE UNDERFLOW
     A coarser sized fraction, which leaves via apex aperture of hydrocyclone.

DECANTATION
     The settlement of a solid from a liquid, and removal of the clear liquid.

DEDICATED PAD
     An area of topography where gold ore will be placed in order to be leached.
The ore will remain permanently upon this pad upon the completion of the gold
extraction.

DEVONIAN
     The fourth period, in order of decreasing age, of the periods making up the
Paleozoic era. It followed the Silurian period and was succeeded by the
Mississippian period. Also, the system of strata deposited at that time.
Sometimes called the Age of Fishes.

DILUTION
     The effect of waste or low-grade ore being included unavoidably in the mine
ore, lowering the recovered grade.

DOLOMITE
     1. A trigonal mineral, [CaMg(CO3)2]; forms saddle-shaped rhombohedra having
rhombohedral cleavage; white to pale tints; in large beds as dolostone and
dolomitic marble, also in veins and in serpentinite; a source of magnesium and
dimension stone.; magnesian spar; rhomb spar. 2. The mineral group ankerite,
dolomite, kutnohorite, minrecordite, and norsethite. 3. A carbonate sedimentary
rock consisting of more than 50% to 90% mineral dolomite, depending upon
classifier, or having a Ca:Mg ratio in the range 1.5 to 1.7, or having an MgO
equivalent of 19.5% to 21.6%, or having a magnesium-carbonate equivalent of
41.0% to 45.4%. Dolomite beds are associated and interbedded with limestone,
commonly representing postdepositional replacement of limestone.

DORE
     Unrefined gold and silver bullion bars, which will be further, refined to
almost pure metal.

DRUSY
     Pertaining to an insoluble residue or encrostation, especially of quartz
crystals; e.g. a drusy oolith covered with subhedral quartz.

ECLOGITE
     A coarse-grained, deep-seated ultramafic rock, consisting essentially of
garnet (almandine-pyrope) and pyroxene (omphacite). Rutile, kyanite, and quartz
are typically present.

ELECTROWINNING
     Recovery of a metal from a solution by means of electro-chemical processes.

                                                                              85
<PAGE>

ENARGITE
     An orthorhombic mineral, Cu3AsS4; dimorphous with luzonite, metallic
gray-black; in vein and replacement copper deposits as small crystals or
granular masses; an important ore of copper and arsenic; may contain up to 7%
antimony.

EPITHERMAL
     Said of a hydrothermal mineral deposit formed within about 1 kilometer of
the Earth's surface and in the temperature range of 50 to 200 degrees C,
occurring mainly as veins. Also, said of that depositional environment.

FACIES
     A term of wide application, referring to such aspects of rock units as rock
type, mode of origin, composition, fossil content, or environment of deposition.

FAULT
     A fracture in the earth's crust accompanied by a displacement of one side
of the fracture with respect to the other and in a direction parallel to the
fracture.

FELDSPAR
     1. A monoclinic or triclinic mineral with the general formula XZ4O8where
(X= Ba,Ca,K,Na,NH4) and (Z= Al,B,Si); a group containing two high-temperature
series, plagioclase and alkali feldspar; colorless or white and clear to
translucent where pure; commonly twinned; 90 degrees or near 90 degrees
prismatic cleavage; Mohs hardness, 6. Constituting 60% of the Earth's crust,
feldspar occurs in all rock types and decomposes to form much of the clay in
soil, including kaolinite. 2. The mineral group albite, andesine, anorthite,
anorthoclase, banalsite, buddingtonite, bytownite, celsian, hyalophane,
labradorite, microcline, oligoclase, orthoclase, paracelsian, plagioclase,
reedmergnerite, sanidine, and slawsonite.

FELSIC
     A mnemonic adjective derived from (fe) for feldspar, (l) for lenad or
feldspathoid, and (s) for silica, and applied to light-colored rocks containing
an abundance of one or all of these constituents. Also applied to the minerals
themselves, the chief felsic minerals being quartz, feldspar, feldspathoid, and
muscovite.

FLOCCULENT
     A chemical used to promote the formation of denser slurries.

FLOTATION
     A separation process in which valuable mineral particles are induced to
become attached to bubbles and float, which the non-valuable minerals sink.

FOLD
     Any bending or wrinkling of rock strata.

GALENA
     A lead mineral, which occurs with sphalerite in hydrothermal veins, also in
sedimentary rocks as replacement deposits; an important source of lead and
silver.

GARNET
     1. A group of isometric minerals having the general formula
A3B2(SiO4)3-2Dx(OH)4xin which A=(Ca,Fe,Mg,Mn) and B=(Al,Cr,Fe,Mn,Si,Ti,V,Zr)
with Si partly replaced by (Al,Fe). 2. The silicate minerals almandine,
andradite, calderite, goldmanite, grossular, hibshite, katoite, kimzeyite,
knorringite, majorite, pyrope, schlorlomite, spessartine, and uvarovite.

GEYSERITES
     A type of rock associated with natural hot springs.

GLACIAL TILL
     Dominantly unsorted and unstratified drift, generally unconsolidated,
deposited directly by and underneath a glacier without subsequent reworking by
meltwater, and consisting of a heterogeneous mixture of clay, silt, sand,
gravel, and boulders ranging widely in size and shape; ice-laid drift.

                                                                              86
<PAGE>

GLACIOLACUSTRINE
     Pertaining to, derived from, or deposited in glacial lakes; especially said
of the deposits and landforms composed of suspended material brought by
meltwater streams flowing into lakes bordering the glacier, such as deltas, kame
deltas, and varved sediments.

GOLD
     A yellow malleable ductile high density metallic element resistant to
chemical reaction, often occurring naturally in quartz veins and gravel, and
precious as a monetary medium, in jewellery, etc. Symbol - Au.

GOLD EQUIVALENT PRODUCTION
     Gold equivalent production represents gold production plus silver
production computed into gold ounces using a market price ratios.

GRADE
     The amount of valuable metal in each tonne or ore, expressed as grams per
tonne for precious metals.

     CUT-OFF GRADE - is the minimum metal grade at which a tonne of rock can be
     processed on an economic basis.

     RECOVERED GRADE - is actual metal grade realized by the metallurgical
     process and treatment or ore, based on actual experience or laboratory
     testing.

GRAVIMETRIC FINISH
     A method used to complete fire assaying where the bead produced by this
assay technique is weighed upon an extremely sensitive weigh scale.

GRAVITY RECOVERY CIRCUIT
     Equipment used within a plant to recover gold from the ore using the
difference in specific gravity between the gold and the host rock. Typically
used are shaking tables, spirals, etc.

GREENSHIST
     A metamorphosed basic igneous rock, which owes its color and schistosity to
abundant chlorite.

GREYWACKLE
     A type of sandstone marked by large detrital quartz and feldspars in a clay
matrix. Generally tough and well indurated.

HALIDE
     A fluoride, chloride, bromide, or iodide.

HALOS
     A differentiated (lower) grade zone surrounding a central zone of higher
grade.

HEAP LEACHING
     A process whereby gold is extracted by "heaping" broken ore on sloping
impermeable pads and repeatedly spraying the heaps with a weak cyanide solution
which dissolves the gold content. The gold-laden solution is collected for gold
recovery.

HEDGING
     Taking a buy or sell position in a futures market opposite to a position
held in the cash market to minimize the risk of financial loss from an adverse
price change.

HIGH-GRADE
     Rich ore. As a verb, it refers to selective mining of the best ore in a
deposit.

HIGH RATE THICKENER
     A type of equipment used to perform solid liquid separation. Slurry (a
mixture of rock and water) is fed into this unit with a clear solution produced
in one stream and a moist solid produced in the second stream.

INTRUSIVE
     Rock which while molten, penetrated into or between other rocks but
solidified before reaching the surface.

                                                                              87
<PAGE>

IGNIMBRITES
     A silicic volcanic rock forming thick, massive, lavalike sheets. The rock
is chiefly a fine grained rhyolitic tuff.

INTRACALDERA OLIGOCENE ASH-FLOW TUFFS
     A geological term referring to a rock formation comprising ash-flow tuffs
existing inside a caldera. A Caldera is a crater formed from by the collapse of
the central part of a volcano. This particular formation dates back to the
Oligocene epoch.

JOINTS
     Natural cracks or fractures in rocks. They tend to occur in more or less
parallel systems, and when quarry walls are maintained parallel and at right
angles to them, they may be utilized as natural partings in the process of block
removal.

KAOLINITE
     1. A monoclinic mineral, 2[Al2Si2O5(OH)4]; kaolinite-serpentine group;
kaolinite structure consists of a sheet of tetrahedrally bonded silica and a
sheet of octahedrally bonded alumina with little tolerance for cation exchange
or expansive hydration; polymorphous with dickite, halloysite, and nacrite;
soft; white; formed by hydrothermal alteration or weathering of
aluminosilicates, esp. feldspars and feldspathoids; formerly called kaolin. 2.
Kandites in general. 3. Individual kandites not specifically designated.

K-FELDSPAR
     A potassium-bearing feldspar.

KLIPPE
     An isolated rock unit that is an erosional remnant or outlier of a nappe.

LEACH
     A method of extracting gold from ore by a chemical solution usually
containing cyanide.

LENSE
     Pyrite, round or oval in plan and lenticular in section, ranging up to 2 to
3 feet (0.6 to 0.9 meters) in thickness and several hundred feet in the greatest
lateral dimension, that is found in coalbeds.

LENTICULAR
     Resembling in shape the cross section of a lens. The term may be applied,
e.g., to a body of rock, a sedimentary structure, or a mineral habit.

LENTICULAR SULPHIDE OREBODIES
     Sulphide orebodies that are shaped approximately like a double convex lens.
When a rock mass thins out from the center to the edge all around it is said to
be lenticular in form.

LIBOR
     The London Inter-Bank Offered Rate.

LITHOLOGIES
     Refers to the physical characteristics of a rock, generally as determined
megascopically or with the aid of low-powered magnification.

LODE
     Vein of metal ore.

LOW-GRADE
     A term applied to ores relatively poor in the metal they are mined for;
lean ore.

MAFIC
     Igneous rocks composed mostly of dark, iron- and magnesium-rich minerals.

MAGMATIC DOMING
     Creation of a roughly symmetrical structure resembling a dome produced by
the actions of magma.

                                                                              88
<PAGE>

META
     1. In petrology, indicates a metamorphosed protolith. 2. In mineralogy,
indicates a mineral species that is a dehydration product of another mineral
species or is a polymorph.

METACHERT HORIZON
     Layers of compact siliceous rock formed of chalcedonic silica that has been
subjected to the forces of metamorphism.

METAMORPHISM
     The process by which the form or structure of rocks is changed by heat and
pressure.

METASEDIMENTARY SLATES
     Partially metamorphosed slate.

MICA
     1. A group of phyllosilicate minerals having the general composition,
X2Y4-6Z8O20(OH,F) where X=(Ba,Ca,Cs,H3O,K,Na,NH4), Y=(Al,Cr,Fe,Li,Mg,Mn,V,Zn),
and Z=(Al,Be,Fe,Si); may be monoclinic, pseudohexagonal or pseudo-orthorhombic;
soft; perfect basal (micaceous) cleavage yielding tough, elastic flakes and
sheets; colorless, white, yellow, green, brown, or black; excellent electrical
and thermal insulators (isinglass); common rock-forming minerals in igneous,
metamorphic, and sedimentary rocks. 2. The mineral group anandite, annite,
biotite, bityite, celadonite, chernykhite, clintonite, ephesite, ferri-annite,
glauconite, hendricksite, kinoshitalite, lepidolite, margarite, masutomilite,
montdorite, muscovite, nanpingite, norrishite, paragonite, phlogopite,
polylithionite, preiswerkite, roscoelite, siderophyllite, sodium phlogopite,
taeniolite, tobelite, wonesite, and zinnwaldite.

MICACEOUS
     Consisting of or containing mica; e.g., a micaceous sediment.

MILL
     A plant where ore is ground fine and undergoes physical or chemical
treatment to extract the valuable metals.

MINERAL RESERVES
     The economically mineable part of a measured or indicated mineral resource
demonstrated by at least a preliminary feasibility study. This study must
include adequate information on mining, processing metallurgical, economic and
other relevant factors that demonstrate, at the time of reporting, that economic
extraction can be justified. An mineral reserve includes diluting materials and
allowances for losses that may occur when the material is mined.

     PROVEN MINERAL RESERVE: The part of a deposit which is being mined, or
     which is being developed and for which there is a detailed mining plan, the
     estimated quantity and grade or quality of that part of a measured mineral
     resource for which the size, configuration and grade or quality and
     distribution of values are so well established, and for which economic
     viability has been demonstrated by adequate information on engineering,
     operating, economic and other relevant factors, that there is the highest
     degree of confidence in the estimate.

     PROBABLE MINERAL RESERVE: The estimated quantity and grade or quality of
     that part of an indicated mineral resource for which economic viability has
     been demonstrated by adequate information on engineering, operating,
     economic and other relevant factors, at a confidence level which would
     serve as a basis for decisions on major expenditures.

MINERAL RESOURCE
     A concentration or occurrence of natural, solid, inorganic or fossilized
organic material in or on the earth's crust in such form and quantity and of
such a grade or quality that it has reasonable prospects for economic
extraction. The location, quantity, grade, geological characteristics and
continuity of a mineral resource are known, estimated or interpreted from
specific geological evidence and knowledge.

     MEASURED MINERAL RESOURCES: A measured mineral resource is that part of a
     mineral resource for which quantity, grade or quality, densities, shape,
     physical characteristics are so well established that they can be estimated
     with confidence sufficient to allow the appropriate application of
     technical and economic parameters, to support production planning and
     evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit. The estimate is based
     on detailed and reliable exploraiton, sampling and testing information
     gathered through appropriate techniques from locations such as outcrops,
     trenches, pits, workings and drill holes that are spaced closely enough to
     confirm both geological and grade continuity.

     INDICATED MINERAL RESOURCES: An indicated mineral resource is that part of
     a mineral resource for which quantity, grade or quality, densities, shape
     and physical characteristics, can be estimated with a level of confidence
     sufficient to allow the appropriate

                                                                              89
<PAGE>

     application of technical and economic parameters, to support mine planning
     and evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit. The estimate is
     based on detailed and reliable exploration and test information gathered
     through appropriate techniques from location such as outcrops, trenches,
     pits, workings and drill holes that are spaced closely enough for
     geological and grade continuity to be reasonably assumed.

MINERALIZATION
     The process or processes by which a mineral or minerals are introduced into
a rock, resulting in a valuable or potentially valuable deposit. It is a general
term, incorporating various types; e.g., fissure filling, impregnation, and
replacement.

MISSISSIPPIAN
     Belonging to the geologic time, system of rocks or sedimentary deposits of
the fifth period of the Paleozoic Era, characterized by the submergence of
extensive land areas under shallow seas.

MUCK SAMPLE
     A representative piece of ore that is taken from a muck pile and then
assayed to determine the grade of the pile.

MUSCOVITE
     A monoclinic mineral, KAl2(Si3Al)O10(OH,F)2; mica group; pseudohexagonal;
perfect basal cleavage; forms large, transparent, strong, electrically and
thermally insulating, stable sheets; a common rock-forming mineral in silicic
plutonic rocks, mica schists, gneisses, and commercially in pegmatites; also a
hydrothermal and weathering product of feldspar and in detrital sediments. Also
spelled: moscovite.

NQ
     A letter name specifying the dimensions of bits, core barrels, and drill
rods in the N-size and Q-group wireline diamond drilling system having a core
diameter of 47.6 mm and a hole diameter of 75.7 mm.

OPEN PIT
     A mine that is entirely on surface. Also referred to as open-cut or
open-cast mine.

OLIGOCENE
     An epoch of the early Tertiary Period, after the Eocene and before the
Miocene; also, the corresponding worldwide series of rocks. It is considered to
be a period when the Tertiary is designated as an era.

OXIDATION
     A reaction where a material is reacted with an oxidizer such as pure oxygen
or air in order to alter the state of the material.

OXIDE CAPPING
     Is the part of the orebody, which is found on top of the original ore
material, but which has not been altered by climate and groundwater.

OXIDE-SILICATE FACIES BANDED IRON FORMATIONS
     A geological term referring to a part of a group of rocks that differs from
the whole formation in composition. In this instance the rock comprises
iron-bearing minerals of the oxide-silicate variety (i.e. hematite, magnetite).
These iron-bearing rocks exist in thin layers or bands hence the term "banded
iron formation".

PALEOZOIC
     The era of geologic time that includes the Cambrian, Ordovician, Silurian,
Devonian, Mississippian, Pennsylvanian and Permian periods and is characterized
by the appearance of marine invertebrates, primitive fishes, land plants and
primitive reptiles.

PEGMATITES
     Igneous rocks of coarse grain found usually as dikes associated with large
masses of plutonic rock.

                                                                              90
<PAGE>

PHYLLITE
     1. A metamorphic rock, intermediate in grade between slate and mica schist.
Minute crystals of sericite and chlorite impart a silky sheen to the surfaces of
cleavage (or schistosity). Phyllites commonly exhibit corrugated cleavage
surfaces. 2. A general term for minerals with a layered crystal structure. 3. A
general term used by some French authors for the scaly minerals, such as micas,
chlorites, clays, and vermiculites.

PLACER
     A place where gold is obtained by the washing of materials: rocks,
boulders, sand, clay, etc. containing gold or other valuable minerals by the
elements. These are deposits of valuable minerals, in our case, native gold, are
found in the form of dust, flakes, grains, and nuggets. In the United States
mining law, mineral deposits, not veins in place, are treated as placers as far
as locating, holding, and patenting are concerned. The term "placer" applies to
ancient (Tertiary) gravel as well as to recent deposits, and to underground
(drift mines) as well as surface deposits.

PLUNGING F2 ANTIFORMAL STRUCTURE
     An "n" shaped fold that plunges forward. "F2" refers to the deformational
phase of the fold - in this case the second phase.

PORPHYRY
     An igneous rock in which relatively large crystals, called phenocrysts, are
set in a fine-granted groundmass.

POLYMETAMORPHIC
     The property possessed by certain chemicals compounds of crystallizing in
several distinct forms.

POTASSIC
     Of, pertaining to, or containing potassium; relating to or containing
potash.

PRECAMBRIAN SHIELD
     The oldest, most stable regions of the Earth's crust, the largest of which
is the Canadian Shield.

PREMIUM
     An amount specified as such by the parties to a hedging agreement, which
amount is the purchase price of the bullion option and is payable by the buyer
to the seller on the premium payment date for value on such date.

PUT OPTION
     A bullion option entitling, but not obliging, except upon exercise, the
buyer to sell to the seller at the strike price a specified number of ounces of
bullion.

PULP METALLIC
     A type of assay method, which is used to handle the coarse gold component
of a sample to allow for its accurate determination.

PYRITE
      A yellow iron sulphide mineral, normally of little value. It is sometimes
referred to as "fool's gold."

PYROCLASTIC
     Produced by explosive or aerial ejection of ash, fragments, and glassy
material from a volcanic vent. Applied to the rocks and rock layers as well as
to the textures so formed.

QUALIFIED PERSON
     An individual who: (a) is an engineer or geoscientist with at least five
years of experience in mineral exploration, mine development or operation, or
mineral project assessment, or any combination of these; (b) has experience
relevant to the subject matter of the mineral project; and (c) is a member in
good standing of a professional association as defined by NI 43-101.

QUARTZ
     Common rock-forming mineral consisting of silicon and oxygen.

                                                                              91
<PAGE>

QUARTZITE
     1. A granoblastic metamorphic rock consisting mainly of quartz and formed
by recrystallization of sandstone or chert by either regional or thermal
metamorphism; metaquartzite. 2. A very hard but unmetamorphosed sandstone,
consisting chiefly of quartz grains that are so completely cemented with
secondary silica that the rock breaks across or through the grains rather than
around them; an orthoquartzite. 3. Stone composed of silica grains so firmly
cemented by silica that fracture occurs through the grains rather than around
them. 4. As used in a general sense by drillers, a very hard, dense sandstone.
5. A granulose metamorphic rock consisting essentially of quartz. 6. Sandstone
cemented by silica that has grown in optical continuity around each fragment.

QUARTZ-MUSCOVITE
     A mineral, a member of the mica group.

RECLAMATION
     The restoration of a site after mining or exploration activity is
completed.

RECOVERY
      A term used in process metallurgy to indicate the proportion of valuable
material obtained in the processing of an ore. It is generally stated as a
percentage of valuable metal in the ore that is recovered compared to the total
valuable metal present in the ore.

RUN-OF-MINE
     Said of ore in its natural, unprocessed state; pertaining to ore just as it
is mined.

REUSABLE PAD ORE
     Ore which is processed on a reusable pad. The reusable pad is an area where
heap leaching takes place on ore material temporarily placed onto it. Upon
completion of leaching, the ore is removed from the pad and sent to disposal.
New material is then applied.

SAMPLE
     A small portion of rock or a mineral deposit, taken so that the metal
content can be determined by assaying.

SANIDINE
     A monoclinic mineral, (K,Na)AlSi3O8; feldspar group; forms a series with
albite; prismatic cleavage; colorless; forms phenocrysts in felsic volcanic
rocks.

SCALP
     The process of removing oversize lumps on a continuous basis from a stream
of bulk material.

SCHIST
     A foliated metamorphic rock the grains of which have a roughly parallel
arrangement; generally developed by shearing.

SEDIMENTARY ROCKS
     Secondary rocks formed from material derived from other rocks and laid down
under water. Examples are limestone, shale and sandstone.

SEMI-AUTOGENOUS (SAG) MILL
     A steel cylinder with steel balls into which run-of-mine material is fed.
The ore is ground in the action of large lumps of rock and steel balls.

SEMI-TABULAR FORMS
     Geological formations that are somewhat flat or tabular in character.

SERICITE
     A white, fine-grained potassium mica occurring in small scales as an
alteration product of various aluminosilicate minerals, having a silky luster,
and found in various metamorphic rocks (especially in schists and phyllites) or
in the wall rocks, fault gouge, and vein fillings of many ore deposits. It is
commonly muscovite or very close to muscovite in composition, but may also
include paragonite and illite.

                                                                              92
<PAGE>

SHEAR ZONE
     A geological term to describe a geological area in which shearing has
occurred on a large scale.

SILICA
     The chemically resistant dioxide of silicon, SiO2; occurs naturally as five
crystalline polymorphs: trigonal and hexagonal quartz, orthorhombic and
hexagonal tridymite, tetragonal and isometric cristobalite, monoclinic coesite,
and tetragonal stishovite. Also occurs as cryptocrystalline chalcedony, hydrated
opal, the glass lechatelierite, skeletal material in diatoms and other living
organisms, and fossil skeletal material in diatomite and other siliceous
accumulations. Also occurs with other chemical elements in silicate minerals.

SILIFICATION
     1. The introduction of, or replacement by, silica, generally resulting in
the formation of fine-grained quartz, chalcedony, or opal, which may fill pores
and replace existing minerals. 2. A process of fossilization whereby the
original organic components of an organism are replaced by silica, as quartz,
chalcedony, or opal.

SILT
     Material passing the No. 200 U.S. standard sieve that is nonplastic or very
slightly plastic and that exhibits little or no strength when air-dried.
Material composes of fine rock components.

SKIP
     1. A guided steel hoppit, usually rectangular, with a capacity up to 50 st
(45.4 t), which is used in vertical or inclined shafts for hoisting coal or
minerals. It can also be adapted for personnel riding. 2. A large hoisting
bucket, constructed of boiler plate that slides between guides in a shaft, the
bail usually connecting at or near the bottom of the bucket so that it may be
automatically dumped at the surface. 3. An open iron vehicle or car on four
wheels, running on rails and used esp. on inclines or in inclined shafts. 4. A
truck used in a mine. 5. A small car that conveys the charge to the top of a
blast furnace.

SLAGGING
     Destructive chemical reaction between refractories and external agents at
high temperatures, resulting in the formation of a molten liquid.

SLURRY
     Fine rock particles are suspended in a stream of water.

SPHALERITE
     A zinc mineral, which is composed of zinc and sulphur. It has a specific
gravity of 3.9 to 4.1.

SPOT DEFERRED CONTRACT
     A forward sale of gold based on the spot gold price at the inception of the
contract plus contango that accrues until the future delivery date under the
contract. The underlying LIBOR based return and gold lease rate expense may be
fixed or left floating, at the option of the Company.

STIBNITE
     A mineral composed of antimony and sulphur often associated with other
sulphides.

STOCKPILE
     Broken ore heaped on surface, pending treatment or shipment.

STOCKWORK
     A mineral deposit consisting of a three-dimensional network of planar to
irregular veinlets closely enough spaced that the whole mass can be mined.

                                                                              93
<PAGE>

STOPES
     An underground opening in a mine from which ore is extracted.

STRATABOUND DEPOSIT
     An ore deposit, which is confined within a geological strata or layer.

STRATABOUND DISSEMINATED
     Disseminiated ore within a stratabound deposit.

STRIKE-SLIP MOVEMENT
     1. In a fault, the component of the movement or slip that is parallel to
the strike of the fault. 2. A horizontal component of the slip parallel with the
fault strike.

SUMP
     The lowest part of a mine shaft into which water drains.

SUPRACRUSTAL ASSEMBLAGES
     Referring to overlying or "last in the sequence" groups of rocks or
assemblages in the earth's crust.

SYENITE
     A group of plutonic rocks containing alkali feldspar (usually orthoclase,
microcline, or perthite), a small amount of plagioclase (less than in
"monzonite"), one or more mafic minerals (esp. hornblende), and quartz, if
present, only as an accessory; also, any rock in that group; the intrusive
equivalent of "trachyte." With an increase in the quartz content, syenite grades
into "granite."

SYMPATHETIC FAULTING
     A minor fault that has the same orientation as the major fault or some such
structure with which it is associated.

TAILINGS
     The material that remains after all metals considered economic have been
removed from ore during milling.

T-ANTIFORM STRUCTURE
     A local geological term identifying a particular formation of rock. In this
instance the structure is an antiform, which is an "n" shaped fold.

TENNANTITE
     An isometric mineral, (Cu,Fe)12As4S13; tetrahedrite group; forms a series
with tetrahedrite; may contain zinc, silver, or cobalt replacing copper; in
veins; an important source of copper.

TERIARY
     The earliest of the two geologic periods comprising the Cenozoic era, in
the classification generally used; up to a little over a million years ago.
Also, the system of strata deposited during that period.

TETRAHEDRITE
     1. An isometric mineral, (Cu,Fe)12Sb4S13, having copper replaced by zinc,
lead, mercury, cobalt, nickel, or silver; forms a series with tennantite and
freibergite; metallic; crystallizes in tetrahedra; occurs in hydrothermal veins
and contact metamorphic deposits; a source of copper and other metals. 2. The
mineral group freibergite, giraudite, goldfieldite, hakite, tennantite, and
tetrahedrite.

THOLEIITIC
     A silica-oversaturated (quartz-normative) basalt, characterized by the
presence of low-calcium pyroxenes (orthopyroxene and/or pigeonite) in addition
to clinopyroxene and calcic plagioclase.

TOURMALINE
     1. Any member of the trigonal mineral group, XY3Z6(BO3)3Si6O18(OH,F)4where
X is Na partially replaced by Ca, K, Mg, or a vacancy, Y is Mg, Fe2+, Li, or Al,
and Z is Al and Fe3+; forms prisms of three, six, or nine sides; commonly
vertically striated; varicolored; an accessory in granite pegmatites, felsic
igneous rocks, and metamorphic rocks. Transparent and flawless crystals may be
cut for gems. 2. The mineral group buergerite, dravite, elbaite, ferridravite,
liddicoatite, schorl, and uvite.

                                                                              94
<PAGE>

TRENDING FAULTS
     Faults that are similar in direction or bearing.

TRIASSIC
     Belonging to the geolic time, system of rocks or sedimentary deposits of
the first period of the Mesozoic Era, characterized by the diversification of
land life, the rise of dinosaurs and the appearance of the earliest mammals.

TUFF
     Rock composed of fine volcanic ash.

VEIN
     A fissure, fault or crack in a rock filled by minerals that have traveled
upwards from some deep source.

VOLCANICS
     A general collective term for extrusive igneous and pyroclastic material
and rocks.

VUG
     A small cavity in a rock, usually lined with crystals of a different
mineral composition than the enclosing rock.

VUGGY
     Pertaining to a vug or having numerous vugs.

ZONE
     An area of distinct mineralization.


                                      METRIC CONVERSION TABLE
             TO CONVERT           TO IMPERIAL MEASUREMENT UNITS     MULTIPLY BY
Tonnes                       Short tons                               1.10231
Tonnes                       Long tons                                0.98422
Tonnes                       Pounds                                   2204.62
Tonnes                       Ounces (troy)                             32,150
Kilograms                    Ounces (troy)                             32.150
Grams                        Ounces (troy)                            0.03215
Grams/tonne                  Ounces (troy)/short ton                  0.02917
Hectares                     Acres                                    2.47105
Kilometers                   Miles                                    0.62137
Meters                       Feet                                     3.28084


ITEM 5: SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Reference is made to the 2002 Annual Report to Shareholders, which is
incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 6: MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS AND CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS

Reference is made to the Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Results in the 2002 Annual Report to shareholders, which is incorporated herein
by reference. Reference is made to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the
2002 Annual Report to Shareholders, which are incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 7: MARKET FOR SECURITIES

The only issued shares of the Company are common shares and the redeemable
retractable preferred shares of the Company ("Kinross Preferred Shares"). The
common shares are listed and posted for trading on the TSX and the NYSE. In
addition, the Company has issued convertible debentures that are listed and
posted for trading on the TSX and Echo Bay has issued warrants that are listed
and posted for trading on the TSX and the American Stock Exchange. The warrants
are exercisable to acquire common shares of the Company.

                                                                              95
<PAGE>

No dividends on the common shares have been paid by the Company to date. For the
foreseeable future, it is anticipated that the Company will use earnings, if
any, to finance its growth and that dividends will not be paid to shareholders,
other than dividends payable to the holder of the Kinross Preferred Shares in
accordance with their terms.

ITEM 8: DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS

DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY

Reference is made to "Election of Directors" in the 2002 Management Information
Circular of the Company dated May 8, 2003 for information regarding the current
directors of the Company, the Committees of the Board and ownership of shares of
the Company, which information is incorporated herein by reference.

The following table sets forth the names of each of the officers of the Company
and all offices of the Company now held by each of them.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME                                     OFFICE HELD
- ----                                     -----------
<S>                                     <C>
Robert M. Buchan....................     President and Chief Executive Officer
Scott A. Caldwell...................     Executive Vice-President and Chief Operating Officer
Jerry W. Danni......................     Vice-President, Environmental Affairs
Christopher T. Hill.................     Vice-President and Treasurer
John W. Ivany.......................     Executive Vice-President
Gordon A. McCreary..................     Vice-President, Corporate Affairs
Brian W. Penny......................     Chief Financial Officer and Vice-President Finance
Shelley M. Riley....................     Corporate Secretary
Allan D. Schoening..................     Vice-President, Human Resources and Community Relations
Ronald W. Stewart...................     Vice-President, Exploration
John E. Oliver......................     Independent Chairman
Kevin C. Drover.....................     Vice-President, Underground Operations
</TABLE>

ROBERT M. BUCHAN has been Chief Executive Officer of the Company since May 1993.

SCOTT A. CALDWELL has been Executive Vice-President and Chief Operating Officer
since June 2002 and prior to that Mr. Caldwell was the Senior Vice-President of
Surface Operations from June 1998 to April 2002. Prior to joining Kinross, Mr.
Caldwell was Vice-President of Operations, Echo Bay Mines from 1996 to 1998 and
Vice-President of Operations of Compania Minera Dona Ines de Collahuasi from
1995 to 1996.

JERRY W. DANNI has been Vice President, Environmental Affairs since July 2000.
Prior to joining Kinross, Mr. Danni was Vice President of Environmental Affairs
for Cyprus Climax Metals Company from 1994 to 1999.

CHRISTOPHER T. HILL has been Vice-President, Treasurer since May 1998. Prior to
that he was Treasury Manager, Barrick Gold Corporation from September 1994 to
May 1998.

JOHN W. IVANY has been Executive Vice-President of the Company since July 1995.

BRIAN W. PENNY has been the Vice-President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
since May 1993.

SHELLEY M. RILEY has been the Corporate Secretary of the Company since June
1993.

ALLAN D. SCHOENING has been Vice-President, Human Resources and Community
Relations for the Company since July 1998. Prior to this he was Director, Human
Resources for Barrick Gold Corporation from May 1995 to June 1998.

RONALD W. STEWART has been the Vice-President, Exploration of Kinross since
March 2002. Prior to that date he was Director of Investor Relations for Placer
from January 2000 to March 2002, Manager Mine Exploration for Placer from
February 1998 to January 2000 and Country Exploration Manager, Indonesia for
Placer from March 1996 to February 1998.

JOHN E OLIVER has been Executive Managing Director and Co-Head of Scotia Capital
U.S., Bank of Nova Scotia since October 1999. From 1997 to 1999, Mr. Oliver was
Senior Vice-President, Corporate and Real Estate Banking of Bank of Nova Scotia.
Mr. Oliver was appointed Independent Chairman of the Company in August 2002.

                                                                              96
<PAGE>

KEVIN C. DROVER has been Vice-President, Underground Operations, since February
2003. Prior to that Mr. Drover was General Manager, Kubaka Mine, from December
1998. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Drover was General Manager of Keystone
Gold Mine, owned and operated by Black Hawk Mining Inc.

The number of common shares of the Company which were beneficially owned,
directly or indirectly, or over which control or direction was exercised by all
directors and officers of the Company as a group as at May 16, 2002, was 563,593
representing 0.18% of the outstanding common shares of the Company.

Other than the following, none of the directors or officers: (i) has been
subject to corporate cease trade order or similar order in the past ten years;
(ii) became bankrupt or was the director or officer of a company that became
bankrupt in the last ten years; or (iii) has been subject to penalties or
sanctions imposed by a court relating to Canadian securities legislation.

John Ivany, the Executive Vice President of the Company, was the subject of
enforcement proceedings by the Alberta Securities Commission In Re Cartaway
Resources Corp. In its order dated February 22, 2001, the Alberta Securities
Commission found that Mr. Ivany, as Chief Executive Officer of Cartaway
Resources Corp., had allowed the issuance of a press release that contained a
material factual error in violation of the securities laws of the Province of
Alberta. As a result, Mr. Ivany was prohibited from acting as a director or
officer of any "junior issuer" for a period of five years and ordered to pay
costs in the amount of CDN$20,000. The Company is not a junior issuer under the
applicable Alberta Securities Commission provisions.

ITEM 9: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

The Company will provide to any person, upon request to the Secretary of the
Company:

(a)  when the securities of the Company are in the course of a distribution
     pursuant to a short form prospectus or a preliminary short form prospectus
     has been filed in respect of a distribution of its securities:

     (i)   one copy of this Annual Information Form, together with one copy of
           any document incorporated by reference in this Annual Information
           Form;

     (ii)  one copy of the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company for
           its most recently completed financial year together with the
           accompanying report of the auditor and one copy of any interim
           consolidated financial statements of the Company subsequent to the
           Consolidated Financial Statements for its most recently completed
           financial year;

     (iii) one copy of the information circular of the Company in respect of its
           most recent annual meeting of shareholders that involved the election
           of directors or one copy of any annual filing prepared in lieu of
           that information circular, as appropriate; and

     (iv)  one copy of any other documents that are incorporated by reference
           into the preliminary short form prospectus or the short form
           prospectus and are not required to be provided under (i) to (iii)
           above; or

(b)  at any other time, one copy of any documents referred to in (a)(i), (ii)
     and (iii) above, provided the Company may require the payment of a
     reasonable charge if the request is made by a person who is not a security
     holder of the Company.

Additional information including directors' and officers' remuneration and
indebtedness, principal holders of the Company's securities, options to purchase
securities and interest of insiders in material transactions, where applicable,
is contained in the Company's information circular for its most recent annual
meeting of shareholders that involved the election of directors and additional
financial information is provided in the Company's consolidated financial
statements for its most recently completed financial year.

                                                                              97
<PAGE>

                                   APPENDIX A



                               COMPILATION REPORT


To the Directors of
KINROSS GOLD CORPORATION


     We have reviewed, as to compilation only, the accompanying unaudited pro
forma consolidated balance sheet as at December 31, 2002 and the unaudited pro
forma consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2002,
which have been prepared for inclusion in the Renewal Annual Information Form of
the Company. In our opinion, the unaudited pro forma consolidated balance as at
December 31, 2002 and the unaudited pro forma consolidated statement of
operations for the year ended December 31, 2002 have been properly compiled to
give effect to the transactions and assumptions described in the notes thereto.

(SIGNED) DELOITTE & Touche LLP
Chartered Accountants



Toronto, Canada
May 5, 2003





COMMENT FOR UNITED STATES READERS ON DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CANADIAN AND UNITED
STATES REPORTING STANDARDS

     The above opinion, provided solely pursuant to Canadian requirements, is
expressed in accordance with reporting standards generally accepted in Canada.
Such standards contemplate the expression of an opinion with respect to the
compilation of unaudited pro forma financial statements. U.S. standards do not
provide for the expression of an opinion on the compilation of unaudited pro
forma financial statements. To report in conformity with United States standards
on the reasonableness of the pro forma adjustments and their application to the
unaudited pro forma consolidated balance sheet and unaudited pro forma
consolidated statement of operations would require an examination or review
which would be substantially greater in scope than the review as to compilation
only that we have conducted. Consequently, under U.S. standards, we would be
unable to express any opinion with respect to the compilation of the
accompanying unaudited pro forma consolidated balance sheet and unaudited pro
forma consolidated statement of operations.

(SIGNED) DELOITTE & Touche LLP
Chartered Accountants


Toronto, Canada
May 5, 2003

                                                                             A-1
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                      KINROSS GOLD CORPORATION
                                                PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
                                                             (UNAUDITED)
                                               (EXPRESSED IN MILLIONS OF U.S. DOLLARS)
                                                       AS AT DECEMBER 31, 2002

                                                                                                         Pro Forma      Pro Forma
                                                Notes       Kinross         TVX           Echo Bay      Adjustments    Consolidated
                                               -------     ---------     ---------      ------------   -------------  --------------
<S>                                            <C>          <C>            <C>             <C>            <C>           <C>
Assets
   Current assets
     Cash and cash equivalents                              $170.6         $115.2          $23.0          $-            $92.6
                                                  2.3          -              -              -           (29.7)
                                                  2.4          -              -              -          (180.0)
                                                 2.11          -              -              -            (6.5)
     Restricted cash                                          21.1            -              -             -              9.0
                                                 2.11          -              -              -           (12.1)
     Accounts receivable and other assets                     15.5           21.6            6.1           -             46.5
                                                  2.2          -              -              -             0.4
                                                 2.11          -              -              -             2.9
     Inventories                                              38.9           16.5           20.8           -             92.4
                                                  2.1          -              -              -             2.6
                                                  2.2          -              -              -             1.3
                                                 2.11          -              -              -            12.3
     Marketable securities                                     0.1            1.5            7.2           -              8.1
                                                  2.1          -              -              -             0.1
                                                  2.2          -              -              -            (0.8)
                                                           -------       --------       --------       -------        --------
                                                             246.2          154.8           57.1        (209.5)         248.6
   Property, plant and equipment                             330.0          201.8          129.6           -            851.2
                                                  2.1          -              -              -           136.0
                                                  2.2          -              -              -            40.0
                                                 2.11          -              -              -            13.8
   Goodwill                                                    -              -              -             -            901.0
                                                  2.1          -              -              -           417.6
                                                  2.2          -              -              -           488.2
                                                  2.3          -              -              -            29.7
                                                  2.1          -              -              -             6.8
                                                  2.2          -              -              -            22.5
                                                  2.2          -              -              -           (63.8)
   Long-term investments                                      11.8            -              -             -             23.1
                                                  2.2          -              -              -            18.2
                                                  2.5          -              -              -            (6.9)
   Restricted cash                                             -              9.1            -             -             21.4
                                                  2.1          -              -              -             2.2
                                                  2.2          -              -              -            10.1
   Future income and mining taxes                              -             13.4            -             -             13.4
   Deferred charges and other assets                          10.0           18.9           37.0           -             23.0
                                                  2.1          -              -              -            (8.0)
                                                  2.2          -              -              -           (36.8)
                                                 2.11          -              -              -             1.9
                                                           -------       --------       --------       -------       --------
                                                            $598.0         $398.0         $223.7        $862.0       $2,081.7
                                                            ======         ======         ======        ======       ========

                                                                                                                                 A-2
</TABLE>

<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                                         Pro Forma      Pro Forma
                                                Notes       Kinross         TVX           Echo Bay      Adjustments    Consolidated
                                               -------     ---------     ---------      ------------   -------------  -------------
<S>                                            <C>          <C>            <C>             <C>            <C>           <C>
Liabilities
   Current liabilities
     Accounts payable and accrued liabilities                $35.5          $30.4          $28.6          $-              $99.2
                                                  2.1          -              -              -            (1.0)
                                                 2.11          -              -              -             5.7
     Current portion of long-term debt                        23.3            1.5            -             -               27.0
                                                 2.11          -              -              -             2.2
     Deferred revenue                                          -              6.4            -             -                0.1
                                                  2.1          -              -              -            (6.3)
     Current portion of site restoration                      15.0            -              4.6           -               18.8
      cost accruals
                                                  2.1          -              -              -             1.1
                                                  2.2          -              -              -            (2.1)
                                                 2.11          -              -              -             0.2
                                                           -------       --------       --------       -------        ---------
                                                              73.8           38.3           33.2          (0.2)           145.1

   Long-term debt                                             12.9            -              -             -               13.6
                                                  2.1          -              -              -             0.7
   Site restoration cost accruals                             42.0            -             46.5           -              100.5
                                                  2.1          -              -              -            12.9
                                                  2.2          -              -              -            (4.1)
                                                 2.11          -              -              -             3.2
   Future income and mining taxes                              3.3           20.4            0.9           -               46.8
                                                 2.13          -              -              -            22.2
   Deferred revenue                                            4.5            -              6.4           -                4.5
                                                  2.2          -              -              -            (6.4)
   Other long-term liabilities                                 5.5           24.4            -             -               15.0
                                                  2.1          -              -              -           (14.9)
   Debt component of convertible debentures                   21.7            -              -             -               21.7
   Redeemable retractable preferred shares                     2.5                                                          2.5
                                                           -------       --------       --------       -------        ---------
                                                             166.2           83.1           87.0          13.4            349.7
                                                           -------       --------       --------       -------        ---------

   Minority interests and participation                        -            124.2            -             -                1.0
    rights
                                                  2.1          -              -              -            55.8
                                                  2.4          -              -              -          (180.0)
                                                 2.11          -              -              -             1.0

                                                               -            124.2            -          (123.2)             1.0

   Convertible preferred shares of
      subsidiary company                                      12.9           -               -             -               12.9
                                                           -------       --------       --------       -------        ---------

   Common shareholders' equity                    3.0        418.9          190.7          136.7         971.8          1,718.1
                                                           -------       --------       --------       -------        ---------
                                                            $598.0         $398.0         $223.7        $862.0         $2,081.7
                                                            ======         ======         ======        ======         ========

                                                                                                                                 A-3
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                   KINROSS GOLD CORPORATION
                                        PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
                                                         (UNAUDITED)
                               (EXPRESSED IN MILLIONS OF U.S. DOLLARS EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
                                             FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002

                                                                                                      PRO FORMA     PRO FORMA
                                                       NOTES     KINROSS        TVX      ECHO BAY    ADJUSTMENTS   CONSOLIDATED
                                                      -------  -----------   ---------  ----------  ------------- --------------
REVENUE
<S>                                                           <C>         <C>         <C>               <C>        <C>
   Mining revenue                                              $  261.0      $  184.8   $  206.5          $-        $   656.8
                                                          2.10      -            -          -            (16.6)
                                                          2.9       -            -          -             (5.4)
                                                          2.9       -            -          -            (30.7)
                                                          2.11      -            -          -             57.2
   Interest and other income                                       16.9          4.3         0.4            -            16.2
                                                          2.6       -            -          -              (5.4)
   Mark to market loss on call options                             (2.7)         -          -               -            (2.7)
                                                               -----------   ---------  ----------  ------------- --------------
                                                                  275.2         189.1      206.9           (0.9)        670.3
                                                               -----------   ---------  ----------  ------------- --------------
EXPENSES
   Operating                                                      174.8         121.4      142.2            -           449.8
                                                          2.10      -            -           -            (13.0)
                                                          2.16      -            -           -              1.6
                                                          2.15      -            -           -             (2.3)
                                                          2.11      -            -           -             25.1
   General and administrative                                      11.3           6.3        9.1            -            26.7
   Exploration                                                     11.6           3.7        8.6            -            25.0
                                                          2.11      -            -           -              1.1
   Depreciation, depletion and amortization                        85.3          34.1       35.3            -           176.2
                                                          2.10      -            -           -             (4.5)
                                                          2.11      -            -           -             14.4
                                                          2.12      -            -           -              4.9
                                                          2.8       -            -           -              7.5
                                                          2.16      -            -           -             (0.8)
   Gain on sale of assets                                          (2.7)         -          (1.2)           -            (3.1)
                                                          2.9       -            -           -              0.8
   Loss on retirement of capital securities                         -            -           5.5            -             5.5
   Foreign exchange loss (gain)                                     4.3           7.3        -              -            11.6
   Interest expense on long-term liabilities                        5.0           0.6        2.0            -             7.8
                                                          2.11      -            -           -              0.2
   Writedown of  marketable securities and long-term
   investments                                                      0.2          -           -              -             0.2
   Write-down of property, plant and equipment and other
          non-cash charges                                          7.7          32.0       13.0            -            52.7
                                                               -----------   ---------  ----------  ------------- --------------
                                                                  297.5         205.4      214.5           35.0         752.4
                                                               -----------   ---------  ----------  ------------- --------------
                                                                  (22.3)        (16.3)      (7.6)         (35.9)        (82.1)
Share in loss of investee companies                                (0.6)         -           -              -            (0.6)
                                                               -----------   ---------  ----------  ------------- --------------

LOSS BEFORE TAXES AND DIVIDENDS ON CONVERTIBLE
   PREFERRED SHARES OF SUBSIDIARY COMPANY                         (22.9)        (16.3)      (7.6)         (35.9)        (82.7)

PROVISION FOR INCOME AND MINING TAXES                              (6.5)         (7.3)      (0.1)           -           (18.5)
                                                          2.11      -            -           -             (5.1)
                                                          2.13      -            -           -              0.5
MINORITY INTEREST AND PARTICIPATION RIGHTS                          -            (7.0)       -              -            (0.2)
                                                          2.7       -            -           -              7.0
                                                                   2.11          -           -              -            (0.2)
                                                               -----------   ---------  ----------  ------------- --------------

LOSS FOR THE YEAR BEFORE DIVIDENDS ON CONVERTIBLE
   PREFERRED SHARES OF SUBSIDIARY COMPANY                         (29.4)        (30.6)      (7.7)         (33.7)       (101.4)

DIVIDENDS ON CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED SHARES OF SUBSIDIARY
 COMPANY                                                           (1.5)         -             -              -          (1.5)
                                                               -----------   ---------  ----------  ------------- --------------

NET LOSS FOR THE PERIOD                                           (30.9)        (30.6)      (7.7)         (33.7)       (102.9)
                                                               -----------   ---------  ----------  ------------- --------------

INCREASE IN EQUITY COMPONENT OF CONVERTIBLE INSTRUMENTS            (7.3)       -           -               -             (7.3)
LOSS ON RETIREMENT OF CAPITAL SECURITIES, NET OF NIL TAX
  EFFECT                                                            -            -        (136.9)          -           (136.9)
                                                               -----------   ---------  ----------  ------------- --------------

NET LOSS FOR THE PERIOD ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON SHAREHOLDERS    $  (38.2)     $  (30.6)  $ (144.6)        $(33.7)    $  (247.1)
                                                               ===========   ========== ==========  ============= ==============

LOSS PER SHARE
Basic and diluted                                              $  (0.32)     $  (0.75)  $  (0.34)                   $   (0.80)

                                                                                                                          A-4
</TABLE>
<PAGE>

1.   Basis of Presentation

     The unaudited pro forma consolidated financial statements ("pro forma
     financial statements") have been prepared using the purchase method of
     accounting for the business combination of Kinross Gold Corporation (the
     "Company"), TVX Gold Inc. ("TVX) and Echo Bay Mines Ltd. ("Echo Bay"). The
     Company has been identified as the acquirer in accounting for the business
     combination. The purchase price will be allocated to the TVX and Echo Bay
     assets acquired and liabilities assumed, based on their respective fair
     values, with the remaining unallocated portion to goodwill. The allocation
     of the aggregate purchase price reflected in the pro forma financial
     statements is preliminary. The actual purchase adjustment to reflect the
     fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed will be based
     upon management's evaluation of such assets and liabilities and,
     accordingly , the adjustments that have been included in the pro forma
     financial statements may be subject to change. Such allocation may differ
     significantly from the preliminary allocation included herein.

     The accompanying unaudited pro forma financial statements as at and for the
     year ended December 31, 2002, have been prepared by the Company's
     management based on the audited consolidated financial statements of the
     Company, TVX and Echo Bay, both as at and for the year ended December 31,
     2002. The pro forma financial statements are presented as if the business
     combination had occurred on December 31, 2002 in respect of the pro forma
     consolidated balance sheet and on January 1, 2002 in respect of the pro
     forma consolidated statement of operations. The pro forma financial
     statements have been reclassified to reflect classifications consistent
     with the presentation adopted by the Company (Note 2).

     Accounting policies used in the preparation of the pro forma statements are
     those disclosed in the Company's consolidated financial statements. The
     financial statements of the Company, TVX and Echo Bay have been prepared in
     accordance with Canadian Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ("CDN
     GAAP"). Accordingly, the pro forma adjustments include only those
     adjustments necessary to conform the TVX and Echo Bay financial statements
     to the accounting policies used by the Company in the preparation of its
     consolidated financial statements in accordance with Canadian GAAP. In the
     opinion of management of the Company, these pro forma financial statements
     include all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation applicable to the
     preparation of pro forma financial statements.

     The pro forma financial statements are not necessarily indicative either of
     the results that actually would have been achieved if the transactions
     reflected therein had been completed on the dates indicated or the results
     which may be obtained in the future. In preparing these pro forma financial
     statements, other than described in Note 2 below, no adjustments have been
     made to reflect transactions which have occurred since the dates indicated
     or the operating synergies and general and administrative cost savings
     expected to result from combining the operations of the Company, TVX and
     Echo Bay.

     The pro forma financial statements should be read in conjunction with the
     audited consolidated financial statements of the Company as at and for the
     year ended December 31, 2002 and notes thereto.

     The combination is being accounted for by the Company using the purchase
     method of accounting in accordance with both Section 1581, "Business
     Combinations", of the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants Handbook
     ("CICA Handbook") for purposes of CDN GAAP and Statement of Accounting
     Standards ("SFAS") 141, "Business Combinations", for purposes of United
     States generally accepted accounting principles ("U.S. GAAP"). Pursuant to
     the purchase method of accounting under both CDN and U.S. GAAP, the TVX and
     Echo Bay assets acquired and liabilities assumed will be recorded at their
     fair values as of the effective date of the combination. The excess of the
     purchase price over such fair value will be recorded as goodwill. In
     accordance with Section 3062, "Goodwill and other Intangible Assets", of
     the CICA Handbook, for purposes of CDN GAAP, and SFAS 142, "Goodwill and
     Other Intangible Assets", for purposes of U.S. GAAP, goodwill will be
     assigned to specific reporting units and will not be amortized.

     The goodwill resulting from the preliminary purchase price is $901.0
     million. Goodwill is subject to a determination of fair value and will be
     reviewed for possible impairment at last annually or more frequently upon
     the occurrence of certain events or when circumstances indicate that a
     reporting unit's carrying value, including the goodwill which was allocated
     to it, is greater than its fair value. The Company has not determined if an
     impairment exists and expects to make that determination in 2004 in
     accordance with CDN and U.S. GAAP.

                                                                             A-5
<PAGE>

2.   PRO FORMA ASSUMPTIONS AND ADJUSTMENTS

     The pro forma financial statements incorporate the following assumptions:

     -    The business combination occurred immediately prior to the three for
          one consolidation of Kinross common shares.

     -    Completion of the acquisition of the Newmont interest in the TVX
          Newmont Americas Joint Venture.

     -    Completion of transactions resulting in the combination of the
          businesses of the Company, TVX and Echo Bay.

     -    Approval of the combination by the shareholders of the Company, TVX
          and Echo Bay.

     In respect of TVX and Echo Bay, certain adjustments as described more fully
     in 2.15 and 2.16 below, are required to achieve conformity with the
     accounting methods used by the Company and ultimately by the combined
     companies. These pro forma financial statements give effect to the above
     assumptions and the following adjustments:

     Transactions Giving Effect to the Business Combination and Agreements
     Related Thereto

2.1  TO ACCOUNT FOR THE ACQUISITION OF TVX.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                            IN MILLIONS
                                                                                                         EXCEPT SHARE PRICE
                                                                                                            AND NUMBER OF
                                                                                                                SHARES
                                                                                                           ACQUISITION OF
                                                                                                            100% OF TVX
<S>                                                                                                    <C>
       Calculation of preliminary allocation of purchase price:
       Common shares of the Company to be issued to the TVX shareholders                                      93,930,887
       The average closing market price of the Company's shares over the four trading days from June
       6 through June 11, 2002                                                                         $              7.14
                                                                                                       --------------------
       Fair value of the Company's common shares issued
                                                                                                                     670.7
       Plus - fair value of TVX warrants and options to be assumed by the Company (100% vested)                        6.8
                                                                                                       --------------------
       Total purchase price                                                                                          677.5
       Plus - fair value of liabilities assumed by the Company:
         Accounts payable and accrued liabilities                                                                     29.5
         Current portion of site restoration accruals                                                                  1.1
         Long-term debt (including current portion)                                                                    2.2
         Site restoration obligations                                                                                 12.9
         Future income tax liabilities                                                                                42.6
         Other long-term liabilities                                                                                   9.5
         Minority interest and participation rights                                                                  180.0
       Less - fair value of assets acquired by the Company
         Cash                                                                                                       (115.2)
         Short-term investments                                                                                       (1.6)
         Accounts receivable                                                                                         (21.6)
         Inventories                                                                                                 (19.1)
         Mineral property, plant and equipment                                                                      (337.8)
         Restricted cash                                                                                             (11.3)
         Future income tax assets                                                                                    (13.4)
         Purchased put options                                                                                        (0.9)
         Other non-current assets                                                                                    (10.0)
                                                                                                       --------------------
       Residual purchase price allocated to non-amortizable goodwill                                   $             424.4
                                                                                                       ====================
</TABLE>

                                                                             A-6
<PAGE>

2.2    TO ACCOUNT FOR THE ACQUISITION OF ECHO BAY.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                            IN MILLIONS
                                                                                                         EXCEPT SHARE PRICE
                                                                                                            AND NUMBER OF
                                                                                                                SHARES
                                                                                                           ACQUISITION OF
                                                                                                          100% OF ECHO BAY
<S>                                                                                                    <C>
        Calculation of preliminary allocation of purchase price:
        Common shares of the Company to be issued to the Echo Bay shareholders                                93,820,424
        The average closing market price of the Company's shares over the four trading days from
        June 6 through June 11, 2002                                                                   $              7.14
                                                                                                       --------------------
        Fair value of the Company's common shares issued                                                             669.9
        Plus - fair value of Echo Bay warrants and options to be assumed by the Company (100% vested)                 22.5
        Less - the Company's previous 10.6% ownership in Echo Bay                                                    (63.8)
                                                                                                       --------------------
        Total purchase price                                                                                         628.6
        Plus - fair value of liabilities assumed by the Company:
          Accounts payable and accrued liabilities                                                                    28.6
          Current portion of site restoration accruals                                                                 2.5
          Site restoration obligations                                                                                42.4
          Commodity derivative contracts                                                                               -
          Future income tax liabilities                                                                                0.9
        Less - fair value of assets acquired by the Company
          Cash                                                                                                       (23.0)
          Short-term investments                                                                                      (6.4)
          Interest and accounts receivable                                                                            (6.5)
          Inventories                                                                                                (22.1)
          Property, plant and equipment                                                                             (169.6)
          Long-term investments                                                                                      (18.2)
          Restricted cash                                                                                            (10.1)
          Other non-current assets                                                                                    (0.2)
                                                                                                       --------------------
        Residual purchase price allocated to non-amortizable goodwill                                  $             446.9
                                                                                                       ====================
</TABLE>

2.3  To record estimated future costs of $29.7 million associated with the
     combination transaction (including severance costs attributable to the
     departure of senior executives of TVX and Echo Bay of approximately $9.7
     million, investment banking fees of approximately $9.9 million and legal,
     accounting, printing, mailing and other charges of approximately $10.1
     million) which are included in the cost of the acquisition resulting in
     additional goodwill.

2.4  To account for the acquisition of Newmont's ownership interest in the TVX
     Newmont Americas Joint Venture for $180.0 million in cash.

2.5  To eliminate the Company's 10.6% ownership interest in Echo Bay at a
     recorded value of $6.9 million.

2.6  To reduce interest income by $5.4 million for the year ended December 31,
     2002 to reflect the net change in cash resources arising from the
     expenditure described in 2.3 and the acquisitions described in 2.4 and
     2.11.

2.7  To reduce minority interest and participation rights by $7.0 million for
     the year ended December 31, 2002 as a consequence of the acquisition of
     Newmont's interest in the TVX Newmont Americas Joint Venture described in
     2.4.

2.8  To increase depreciation, depletion and amortization expense by $7.5
     million for the year ended December 31, 2002 as a result of the preliminary
     allocation of the purchase price of the acquisitions described in 2.1. 2.2
     and 2.4. The revised depreciation, depletion and amortization are computed
     on a unit of production basis , based on the Company's accounting policies
     and the estimated mine lives. For proven and probable reserves of the
     Company, TVX and Echo Bay, see Mineral Reserves located on page 12.

2.9  To reduce mining revenue by $36.1 million (Echo Bay - $30.7, TVX - $5.4)
     for the year ended December 31, 2002 to reflect the elimination of deferred
     gains and losses on pro forma operations. The deferred gains and losses
     arise from

                                                                             A-7
<PAGE>

     derivative contracts that qualify for hedge accounting and have been
     realized as income over the original delivery schedule of the contracts. On
     fair valuing the deferred gains and losses, no value is allocated to these
     assets and liabilities as the cash has already been received by Echo Bay
     and TVX, respectively.

2.10 To reduce mining revenue, operating costs, depreciation, depletion and
     amortization and gain on sale of assets, by $16.6 million, $13.0 million,
     $4.5 million and $0.8 million, respectively, for the year ended December
     31, 2002 to reflect the pro forma sale of the McCoy Cove mine to Newmont
     concurrent with the Combination.

2.11 To account for the repurchase by Omolon Gold Mining Company ("Omolon"),
     pursuant to purchase agreements with four of its Russian shareholders, of
     44.17% of its outstanding common shares and the cancellation of such
     shares, as a result of which the Company will indirectly acquire an
     additional 43.4% interest in Omolon. All four of the repurchase
     transactions have closed by March 26, 2003 and the Company owns 98.1% of
     Omolon.

The fair values of the assets and liabilities of the 43.4% interest in Omolon
and the preliminary allocation of the purchase consideration are shown below, as
if the acquisition had occurred on December 31, 2002.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                     ACQUISITION OF
                                                                                    43.4% OF OMOLON
<S>                                                                               <C>
        Fair value of assets acquired by the Company
          Cash                                                                                  16.1
          Restricted cash                                                                       10.0
          Accounts receivable                                                                    2.9
          Inventories                                                                           12.3
          Property, plant and equipment                                                         13.8
          Other non-current assets                                                               1.9
        Less - fair value of assets acquired by the Company
          Accounts payable and accrued liabilities                                              (5.7)
          Current portion of site restoration accruals                                          (0.2)
          Long-term debt (including current portion)                                            (2.2)
          Site restoration obligations                                                          (3.2)
          Minority interest                                                                     (1.0)
                                                                                 -------------------
        Total cash consideration                                                 $              44.7
                                                                                 ===================

        Financed by:
          Cash (including cash acquired - $26.1 million)                         $              22.6
          Restricted cash                                                                       22.1
                                                                                 -------------------
        Residual purchase price allocated to non-amortizable goodwill            $              44.7
                                                                                 ===================
</TABLE>

The Company utilized the restricted cash in Omolon to partially finance the
acquisition of the Omolon shares as such cash was released on closing of the
acquisition.

The following adjustments are recorded in the statements of operations for the
following period to reflect the acquisition of 43.4% of Omolon as if it had
occurred effective January 1, 2002.

                                                                             A-8
<PAGE>

                                                               YEAR ENDED
                                                           DECEMBER 31, 2002
                                                           -----------------

        REVENUE
          Mining revenue                                  $              57.2
          Interest and other income                                         -
                                                          -------------------

        EXPENSES
          Operating                                                      25.1
          Exploration                                                     1.1
          Depreciation, depletion and amortization                       14.4
          Interest expense on long-term liabilities                       0.2
                                                          -------------------

        INCOME BEFORE TAXES                                              16.4

        PROVISION FOR INCOME AND MINING TAXES                            (5.1)
        MINORITY INTEREST                                                (0.2)
                                                          -------------------

        NET (LOSS) INCOME FOR THE PERIOD                  $              11.1
                                                          ===================

Consistent with its accounting policies, the Company will commence accounting
for its investment in Omolon on a consolidated basis for both CDN and U.S. GAAP.
The Company will now appoint the entire board of directors of Omolon, the
general director and all senior executive officers of Omolon. Since a
shareholder owning a 1.9% interest in a Russian open joint stock company has
limited rights as a minority shareholder under Russian law, neither the Magadan
State Property Committee, the only remaining Russian shareholder, nor the
Magadan Administration will have the ability to exert control over or have
substantive participation rights in Omolon's operations in the future. As a
consequence, the Company will be able to determine Omolon's strategic operating,
investing and financial policies without the cooperation of the minority
shareholder.

Given the political, legal and economic uncertainties that exist in Russia, the
Company will continue to monitor its ability to determine Omolon's strategic
operating, investing and financial policies without the cooperation of others.
If the Company concludes that it no longer has the ability to exercise the
requisite control over Omolon, it will cease consolidation and account for its
investment in Omolon either on the equity or cost basis, depending on its level
of control at that time. The risks of operating in Russia are more fully
disclosed in Note 22 to the 2002 audited financial statements of the Company.

2.12 To increase depreciation, depletion and amortization expense by $4.9
     million for the year ended December 31, 2002 as a result of the preliminary
     allocation of the purchase price of the acquisition described in 2.11. The
     revised depreciation, depletion and amortization is computed on a unit of
     production basis, based on the Company's accounting policies and the
     estimated mine life.

2.13 To record future tax liabilities of $22.2 million associated with the pro
     forma adjustments resulting from the impact of the purchase accounting of
     the acquisitions described in 2.1, 2.2 and 2.11 above. Future income taxes
     in respect of these adjustments have been recorded at the statutory rate
     that will be in force when the temporary differences reverse which are as
     follows: Ontario mining tax - 8%, Manitoba mining tax - 18%, Russia income
     tax - 24% and Brazil income tax - 34%. To record income tax recoveries of
     $0.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2002. The rates used for the
     pro forma condensed statement of operations are the enacted rates in each
     of the taxing jurisdictions as follows: Canada - 40%, USA - 35%, Chile -
     17%, Russia - 24%, Brazil - 34%, Ontario mining tax - 12%, Manitoba mining
     tax - 18% and Nunavut mining tax - 13%. For Canada and the USA, no
     recognition was given to tax losses for purposes of the calculation of
     current period tax expense and future tax liabilities.

2.14 To reflect a reduction in the common share capital of the Company which was
     approved at the special meeting of shareholders held in connection with the
     combination. For CDN GAAP purposes, the reduction in common share capital
     results in a reduction in the Company's deficit of the same amount. For
     U.S. GAAP purposes, this reclassification is not permitted and will require
     an increase in common share capital and an increase in deficit of $761.4
     million.

                                                                             A-9
<PAGE>

CONFORMING ADJUSTMENTS

2.15 To decrease Echo Bay operating costs by $2.3 million for the year ended
     December 31, 2002 to reflect the impact of expensing stripping costs as
     incurred, in accordance with the Company's accounting policies.

2.16 To increase TVX operating costs by $1.6 million and reduce amortization by
     $0.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2002 to reflect the impact of
     expensing stripping costs as incurred, in accordance with the Company's
     accounting policies.

3.   Common Shareholders' Equity and Common Shares

The components of the pro forma common shareholders' equity are:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                     PRO FORMA   PRO FORMA
                                                        NOTES   KINROSS         TVX       ECHO BAY  ADJUSTMENTS CONSOLIDATED
                                                        ---------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               (Note 1)      (Note 1)     (Note 1)   (Note 2)

<S>                                                     <C>   <C>          <C>         <C>          <C>          <C>
Common share capital                                          $ 1,058.5     $  641.5      $1,042.6               $1,567.0
                                                         2.1       -             -             -       (641.5)
                                                         2.1       -             -             -        670.7
                                                         2.2       -             -             -     (1,042.6)
                                                         2.2       -             -             -        669.9
                                                      2.2, 2.5     -             -             -        (70.7)

                                                        2.14       -             -             -       (761.4)
Common share purchase warrants and options                         -             -             -          -          29.3
                                                         2.1       -             -             -          6.8
                                                         2.2       -             -             -         22.5
Contributed surplus                                               12.9          36.2           -          -          12.9
                                                         2.1       -             -             -        (36.2)
Equity component of convertible debentures                       132.3           -             -          -         132.3
Deficit                                                         (761.4)       (487.0)       (879.2)       -           -
                                                         2.1       -             -             -        487.0
                                                         2.2       -             -             -        879.2

                                                        2.14       -             -             -        761.4
Cumulative translation adjustments                               (23.4)          -           (26.7)       -         (23.4)
                                                         2.2       -             -             -         26.7
                                                             ------------- ------------ ------------ ---------- -------------
                                                                $418.9        $190.7        $136.7     $971.8    $ 1,718.1
                                                             ============= ============ ============ ========== =============


The number of pro forma common shares outstanding after giving effect to the
transaction is:

Kinross                                                                                                              136.4
TVX shares converted to equivalent Kinross shares                                             43.4         2.17       93.9
Echo Bay shares converted to equivalent Kinross shares                                       541.3         0.17       93.8
Echo Bay shares adjusted pursuant to 2.6                                                     (57.1)        0.17       (9.9)
                                                                                                                -------------
                                                                                                                     314.2
                                                                                                                =============
</TABLE>

4.   Items Not Adjusted

     The pro forma statements do not give effect to operating efficiencies, cost
     savings and synergies that might result from the combination of the three
     companies, including potential cost savings at the corporate level and
     potential synergies in exploration efforts.

5.   Per Share Information

     The pro forma net loss per common share in the amount of $0.80 for the year
     ended December 31, 2002 has been calculated using the weighted average
     number of common shares of the Company outstanding during the year ended
     December 31, 2002 plus the additional common shares of the Company that
     will be issued to acquire TVX and Echo Bay. The number of additional shares
     was computed using the exchange ratios of 2.17 and .17, for TVX and Echo
     Bay respectively. The convertible debenture equity increase and dividends
     on convertible preferred shares of a subsidiary

                                                                            A-10
<PAGE>

     of the Company have been deducted in arriving at the net loss for the year
     attributable to common shares on the pro forma statement of operations in
     the determination of per share data.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                              YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002
                                                                                               (MILLIONS OF COMMON SHARES)
                                                                                               ---------------------------
<S>                                                                                                        <C>
Weighted average number of common shares of the Company outstanding during the period                      119.7
Additional common shares issued to acquire TVX                                                              93.9
Additional common shares issued to acquire Echo Bay                                                         93.8
                                                                                                         -------
                                                                                                           307.4
                                                                                                         =======
</TABLE>

6.   RECONCILIATION OF UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
     FROM CDN GAAP TO U.S. GAAP

     The tables below set out the material adjustments to pro forma consolidated
     net loss and shareholders' equity reflected in the unaudited pro forma
     consolidated financial information which would be required if U.S. GAAP had
     been applied. Under U.S. GAAP, the pro forma consolidated information only
     reflects the income (loss) from continuing operations, before nonrecurring
     charges or extraordinary items. These tables should be read in conjunction
     with Note 21 of the Company's audited consolidated financial statements,
     and with Notes 17 and 13 of TVX's and Echo Bay's audited consolidated
     financial statements, respectively.

                RECONCILIATION OF PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED NET LOSS
                      (AMOUNTS IN MILLIONS OF U.S. DOLLARS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                YEAR ENDED
                                                                                             DECEMBER 31, 2002
                                                                                             -----------------
<S>                                                                                           <C>
Pro forma net loss under CDN GAAP                                                             $    (102.9)
Adjustments for:
     Write-down of property, plant and equipment under U.S. GAAP (a)                                  9.9
     Reduction in depreciation, depletion and amortization under U.S. GAAP  (a)                      12.1
     Increase in convertible debenture interest (b)                                                  (9.2)
     Recognition of exchange gains (losses) on convertible debentures (b)                            (0.3)
     Change in market value of commodity and foreign exchange derivative contracts (c)               (0.4)
     Reclassification of realized earnings related to derivative contracts (f)                        0.4
     Income tax recovery (e)                                                                         (0.6)
     Minority interests and participation rights (d)                                                 (1.7)
     Recognition of gain on exchange for Echo Bay shares (g)                                         42.5
     Premium on flow through shares issued (h)                                                        1.1
     Loss on retirement of capital securities (i)                                                     5.5
                                                                                          -----------------------
Pro forma net loss under U. S. GAAP                                                               $ (43.6)
                                                                                          =======================
</TABLE>

                                                                            A-11
<PAGE>

          RECONCILIATION OF PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
                      (AMOUNTS IN MILLIONS OF U.S. DOLLARS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                  AS AT
                                                                                            DECEMBER 31, 2002
                                                                                            -----------------
<S>                                                                                                 <C>
Pro forma shareholders' equity under CDN GAAP $1,718.1 Adjustments for:
     Write-down of property, plant and equipment under U.S. GAAP (a)                                (60.5)
     Reduction in depreciation, depletion and amortization under U.S. GAAP  (a)                      26.0
     Convertible debentures (b)                                                                    (101.3)
     Premium on flow through shares issued (h)                                                       (0.5)
     Gains on marketable securities and long term investments (g)                                    77.9
     Change in market value of commodity and foreign exchange derivative contracts (c)              (16.6)
                                                                                          -----------------------
Pro forma shareholders' equity under U. S. GAAP                                                  $1,643.1
                                                                                          =======================
</TABLE>
(a)  In connection with an impairment evaluation, certain property, plant and
     equipment was written down to its fair value for the year ended December
     31, 2001 by TVX. The write-down was $9.9 million less under CDN GAAP than
     it was for U.S. GAAP. GAAP differences arise from the requirement to
     discount future cash flows from impaired properties under U.S. GAAP and
     from using proven and probable reserves only. Under CDN GAAP, future cash
     flows from impaired properties are not discounted and reserves are
     calculated to include current proven and probable reserves plus mineral
     resources expected to be converted to proven and probable reserves. The
     reduction to the net loss of $9.9 million in 2002 relates to that amount
     written down by TVX in 2001 under U.S. GAAP subsequently written off in
     2002 for CDN GAAP. The decrease to shareholders equity of $60.5 million
     arises from applying the U.S. GAAP approach to writedowns recognized by the
     Company.

     Under U.S. GAAP, depreciation, depletion and amortization would be reduced
     accordingly, as capitalized costs are amortized over proven and probable
     reserves only. The adjustment to the net loss comprises $8.1 million and
     $4.0 million in the year ended December 31, 2002 for the Company and TVX
     respectively. The adjustment of $26.0 million to shareholders' equity
     represents the cumulative difference created by applying this policy to the
     Company's property, plant and equipment at December 31, 2002.

(b)  Under CDN GAAP, convertible debentures are accounted for in accordance with
     their substance and, as such, are presented in the financial statements in
     accordance with their liability and equity component parts. Under U.S.
     GAAP, the entire principal amount of convertible debentures is treated as
     debt with interest expense based on the coupon rate of 5.5%. Adjustment to
     net loss to account for the interest expense amounted to $9.2 million of
     which $4.5 million and $4.7 million relates to the Company and Echo Bay,
     respectively for the year ended December 31, 2002.

     In addition, under CDN GAAP (prior to January 1, 2002), the unrealized
     foreign exchange gains and losses on the Canadian dollar denominated
     debentures are deferred and amortized over the term of the debentures.
     Effective January 1, 2002, CDN GAAP no longer permits the deferral of
     unrealized foreign exchange gains and losses on the debt component of the
     debentures. Under U.S. GAAP, these gains and losses are recognized in
     income along with exchange gains and losses related to the portion of the
     convertible debentures included in equity under CDN GAAP. Adjustments to
     the net loss to recognize the unrealized exchange gains and losses amounts
     in the Company are ($0.3) million for the year ended December 31, 2002.

     The adjustment of $101.3 million to the shareholders' equity relates to the
     Company.

(c)  On January 1, 2001, FASB Statement No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative
     Instruments and Hedging Activities" ("SFAS 133"), and the corresponding
     amendments under FASB Statement No. 138 ("SFAS 138") were adopted for
     purposes of U.S. GAAP. SFAS 133 requires that all derivative financial
     instruments be recognized in the financial statements and measured at fair
     value regardless of the purpose or intent for holding them. Changes in the
     fair value of derivative financial instruments are either recognized
     periodically in income or shareholders' equity (as a component of other
     comprehensive income), depending on whether the derivative is being used to
     hedge changes in fair value or cash flows. SFAS 138 amends certain
     provisions of SFAS 133 to clarify four areas causing difficulties in
     implementation. For derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, the
     effective portions of changes in fair value of the derivative are reported
     in other comprehensive income and are subsequently reclassified into other
     income when the

                                                                            A-12
<PAGE>

     hedged item affects other income. Changes in fair value of the derivative
     instruments used as economic instruments and ineffective portions of hedges
     are recognized in other income in the period incurred.

     Under CDN GAAP, unrealized gains, losses, revenues and expenses associated
     with derivative financial instruments designated as hedges of anticipated
     transactions are accounted for off balance sheet until recorded in income
     as an adjustment to the underlying hedged item and realized gains and
     losses on derivative financial instruments hedging anticipated transactions
     are deferred and recognized in income when the underlying hedged item is
     recorded. Option premiums for purchased options in hedging relationships
     are deferred and recognized in income as an adjustment to the underlying
     hedged item. Derivatives that are not designated in a hedging relationship
     are carried at fair value, consistent with U.S. GAAP requirements. U.S.
     GAAP differences relate primarily to the recognition of the balance sheet
     fair value of derivatives in hedging relationships and the associated other
     comprehensive income and ineffectiveness amounts for those same
     derivatives.

     The increase to the net loss of $0.4 million is comprised of an increase in
     fair value of derivative financial instruments in designated hedging
     relationships of $2.0 million in respect of the Company and $0.8 million in
     respect of Echo Bay and a decrease in fair value of $3.2 million for TVX
     for the year ended December 31, 2002.

     At December 31, 2002, $23.6 million of other comprehensive loss would have
     been recognized and $4.5 million of deferred revenue would have been
     reclassified as other comprehensive income ($2.8 million) and as a decrease
     to the deficit ($2.7 million) under U.S. GAAP in respect of the Company
     derivative financial instruments.

(d)  The effect of adjustments on minority interests and participation rights
     made to TVX's financial statements to comply with U.S. GAAP.

(e)  To account for the tax impact of adjustments made by TVX to comply with
     U.S. GAAP. Effective January 1, 2000, the liability method of accounting
     for income taxes was adopted for CDN GAAP.

(f)  In accordance with CDN GAAP, certain long-term foreign exchange contracts
     are considered to be hedges of the cost of goods to be purchased in foreign
     currencies in future periods. Gains and losses related to changes in market
     values of such contracts are recognized as a component of the cost of goods
     when the related hedged purchases occur. Under U.S. GAAP, foreign exchange
     contracts would be carried at market value and changes included in current
     earnings.

     The reduction in net loss of $0.4 million relates to Echo Bay for the year
     ended December 31,2002.

(g)  Under CDN GAAP, unrealized gains and losses on long-term investments and
     marketable securities are not recorded. Under U.S. GAAP, unrealized gains
     on long-term investments that are classified as available for sale of $35.4
     million and marketable securities of $0.3 million respectively at December
     31, 2002, are included as a component of comprehensive income (loss) in the
     current period. These adjustments represent the cumulative adjustment
     required to comply with U.S. GAAP and relates to the Company.

     Under CDN GAAP, the cost of the Echo Bay common shares acquired on the
     exchange is recorded at the values of the securities given up. Since the
     fair value of the capital securities given up approximated their carrying
     value, no gain was recorded under CDN GAAP. Under U.S. GAAP they are
     recorded at their fair value at the time of the exchange. As a result, a
     gain of $42.5 million was recorded under U.S. GAAP.

(h)  Under Canadian income tax legislation, a company is permitted to issue
     shares whereby the company agrees to incur qualifying expenditures and
     renounce the related income tax deductions to the investors. The Company
     has accounted for the issue of flow-through shares using the deferral
     method in accordance with CDN GAAP. At the time of issue the funds received
     are recorded as share capital. For U.S. GAAP purposes the premium paid in
     excess of the market. value is credited to other liabilities and included
     in income over the period in which the Company incurs the qualified
     expenditures. The adjustment made to income accordingly to comply with U.S.
     GAAP amounts to $1.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2002 and
     relates to the Company.

     Also, notwithstanding that there is not a specific requirement to segregate
     the funds pursuant to the flow-through share agreements, the flow-through
     funds which are unexpended at the consolidated balance sheet dates are
     considered to be restricted and are not considered to be cash or cash
     equivalents under U.S. GAAP.

     As at December 31, 2002 unexpended flow-through funds were $nil.

                                                                            A-13
<PAGE>

(i)  In accordance with CDN GAAP, the loss on the retirement of capital
     securities of Echo Bay was recorded proportionately between interest
     expense and deficit based on the debt and equity classifications of the
     capital securities. Under U.S. GAAP, the entire net loss of $136.9 million
     relating to Echo Bay would be recorded as an extraordinary expense item in
     2002.

     As this item would be treated as an extraordinary item under U.S. GAAP, it
     has been excluded from the determination of the pro forma net loss under
     U.S. GAAP in accordance with Rule 11-02 (a) of Regulation S - X which
     requires that extraordinary items be excluded from pro forma financial
     information.

                                                                            A-14
<PAGE>

                                   Appendix B

[LOGO] PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS

AUDITORS' REPORT

TO THE SHAREHOLDER OF                             PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
TVX GOLD INC.                                     CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS
                                                  PO Box 82
                                                  Royal Trust Tower Suite 3000
                                                  Toronto Dominion Centre
                                                  Toronto Ontario
                                                  Canada M5K 1G8
                                                  Telephone + 1 416 863 1133
                                                  Facsimile + 1 416 365 8215


We have audited the consolidated balance sheets of TVX Gold Inc. as at December
31, 2002 and 2001 and the consolidated statements of operations, deficit and
cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000. These
consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated
financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with Canadian and United States generally
accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform an
audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation.

In our opinion, these consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of TVX Gold Inc. as at December 31,
2002 and 2001 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years
ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 in accordance with Canadian generally
accepted accounting principles.


CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS

Toronto, Ontario
April 16, 2003, except for Note 19(c) which is as of April 28, 2003 and Note
19(b) which is as of May 5, 2003



(C) 2003 PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Canada. "PricewaterhouseCoopers" refers to
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Canada, an Ontario Limited liability partnership,
or, as the context requires, the network of member firms of
PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited, each of which is a separate and
independent legal entity.

                                                                             B-1
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                      TVX GOLD INC.

                                               CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
                                             AS AT DECEMBER 31, 2002 AND 2001
                                           (thousands of United States dollars)

                                                                                               2002               2001
                                                                                                 $                  $
                                                                                            ----------         ----------
                                                          ASSETS
<S>                                                                                           <C>                 <C>
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents..................................................................   115,212             16,568
Short-term investments.....................................................................     1,531             28,740
Accounts receivable........................................................................    21,576             25,739
Inventories (note 3).......................................................................    16,439             24,299
                                                                                            ----------         ----------
                                                                                              154,758             95,346
MINING PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT (note 4)..............................................   201,830            237,262
RESTRICTED CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS (notes 7(d), 11(f) and 16(c)).........................     9,123             16,615
EXPORT PREPAYMENT CONTRACTS (note 5).......................................................        --             66,983
DEFERRED CHARGES (note 11(d))..............................................................     6,579                182
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES (note 12(d)).........................................................    13,398             12,473
OTHER ASSETS (note 6)......................................................................    12,262             29,434
                                                                                            ----------         ----------
                                                                                              397,950            458,295
                                                                                            ==========         ==========
                                                       LIABILITIES
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities (notes 5 and 8(b)) ...............................    30,354             28,266
Current portion of long-term debt (note 7).................................................     1,500             15,401
Current portion of deferred revenue (note 11(d)) ..........................................     6,397              5,332
                                                                                            ----------         ----------
                                                                                                38,25             48,999
LONG-TERM DEBT (note 7)....................................................................        --             58,832
OTHER LIABILITIES (note 8).................................................................    24,423             22,943
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES (note 12(d)).........................................................    20,395             20,948
                                                                                            ----------         ----------
                                                                                               83,069            151,722

MINORITY INTERESTS AND PARTICIPATION RIGHTS................................................    24,157            132,088
                                                                                            ----------         ----------
                                                                                              207,226            283,810
                                                                                            ----------         ----------
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
CAPITAL STOCK (note 9).....................................................................   641,516            594,661
CONTRIBUTED SURPLUS (note 9(d))............................................................    36,255             36,255
DEFICIT....................................................................................  (487,047)          (456,431)
                                                                                            ----------         ----------
                                                                                              190,724            174,485
                                                                                            ----------         ----------
                                                                                              397,950            458,295
                                                                                            ==========         ==========
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (notes 7(d) and 16)



                 THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES FORM AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.



On behalf of the Board:                          "Brian W. Penny"                 "Scott A. Caldwell"

                                                     Director                           Director

                                                                                                                      B-2
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                    TVX GOLD INC.

                                        CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
                                FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002, 2001 AND 2000
                         (thousands of United States dollars except for per share amounts)

                                                                                    2002        2001        2000
                                                                                  --------     --------   ---------
                                                                                     $            $           $
<S>                                                                               <C>          <C>         <C>
REVENUE..........................................................................  184,757      158,340    170,030
                                                                                  --------     --------   ---------
MINE OPERATING COSTS
Cost of sales....................................................................  121,310      108,148    106,804
Depletion and depreciation.......................................................   34,149       40,243     38,000
                                                                                  --------     --------   ---------
                                                                                   155,459      148,391    144,804
                                                                                  --------     --------   ---------
EARNINGS FROM OPERATIONS BEFORE THE UNDERNOTED...................................   29,298        9,949     25,226
OTHER EXPENSES (INCOME)
Mining property, plant and equipment write-downs (note 4)........................    4,071       21,000         --
Non-operating asset write-downs (note 4).........................................   15,000      223,513         --
Other asset write-downs (notes 3 and 6)..........................................   12,903           --         --
Corporate administration.........................................................    6,297        8,123      6,597
Interest expense.................................................................      555        3,769      3,447
Exploration......................................................................    3,660        3,380      5,497
Transaction costs................................................................    3,217           --         --
Foreign exchange loss............................................................    7,345        3,293      2,015
Interest income..................................................................   (4,273)      (5,650)    (9,503)
Other, net.......................................................................   (3,118)      (3,883)     5,420
                                                                                  --------     --------   ---------
                                                                                    45,657      253,545     13,473
                                                                                  --------     --------   ---------
EARNINGS (LOSS) BEFORE THE UNDERNOTED............................................  (16,359)    (243,596)    11,753
INCOME TAX (RECOVERY) EXPENSE (note 12)..........................................    7,279       (5,634)      (179)
MINORITY INTERESTS AND PARTICIPATION RIGHTS .....................................    6,978      (10,034)      (496)
                                                                                  --------     --------   ---------
NET EARNINGS (LOSS) FOR THE YEAR.................................................  (30,616)    (227,928)    12,428
                                                                                  ========     ========   =========
EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE (notes 2(c) and 9(c))..................................    (0.75)      (10.58)      0.03


                 The accompanying notes form an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

                                                                                                                 B-3
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                    TVX GOLD INC.

                                         CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF DEFICIT
                                FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002, 2001 AND 2000
                                        (thousands of United States dollars)

                                                                                    2002         2001         2000
                                                                                 ---------    ---------    ---------
                                                                                      $            $            $
<S>                                                                               <C>          <C>          <C>
DEFICIT, BEGINNING OF YEAR-- as originally reported............................   (456,431)    (221,837)    (219,838)
Change in accounting for income taxes (note 2(d))..............................         --           --       (2,102)
                                                                                 ---------    ---------    ---------
DEFICIT, BEGINNING OF YEAR-- restated .........................................   (456,431)    (221,837)    (221,940)
NET EARNINGS (LOSS) FOR THE YEAR...............................................    (30,616)    (227,928)      12,428
Accretion of convertible notes (note 14).......................................         --       (6,666)     (12,325)
                                                                                 ---------    ---------    ---------
DEFICIT, END OF YEAR...........................................................   (487,047)    (456,431)    (221,837)
                                                                                 =========    =========    =========


                 THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES FORM AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

                                                                                                                 B-4
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                    TVX GOLD INC.

                                        CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
                                FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002, 2001 AND 2000
                                        (thousands of United States dollars)

                                                                                  2002        2001         2000
                                                                                --------    --------     --------
                                                                                    $           $            $
<S>                                                                              <C>        <C>            <C>
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net earnings (loss) for the year................................................ (30,616)   (227,928)      12,428
Non-cash items:
  Depletion and depreciation....................................................  34,149      40,243       38,000
  Gain on sale of other assets..................................................  (1,675)         --           --
  Deferred income taxes.........................................................  (1,469)    (10,919)      (4,022)
  Mining property, plant and equipment write-downs..............................   4,071      21,000           --
  Non-operating asset write-downs...............................................  15,000     223,513           --
  Other asset write-downs.......................................................  12,903          --           --
  Minority interests and participation rights...................................   6,978     (10,034)        (496)
  Change in reclamation provision...............................................      --      (2,771)          --
  Other.........................................................................   3,218       1,006          326
  Deferred revenue..............................................................  (5,332)     (4,608)     (11,020)
  Net proceeds from hedge book restructuring (note 11(e)).......................      --      16,801           --
                                                                                --------    --------     --------
                                                                                  37,227      46,303       35,216
Changes in non-cash working capital (note 17(e))................................   7,179        (520)      (2,659)
                                                                                --------    --------     --------
Cash provided by operating activities...........................................  44,406      45,783       32,557
                                                                                --------    --------     --------

INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Mining property, plant and equipment............................................ (15,166)    (25,552)    (48,746)
Payment of receivable from High River Gold Mines Ltd (note 6)...................   3,319       3,014        1,541
Purchases of short-term investments............................................. (30,279)    (51,931)    (130,562)
Sales and maturities of short-term investments..................................  57,488      81,152      136,612
Export prepayment contracts (note 5)............................................      --     (24,500)     (42,483)
Proceeds from sale of other assets..............................................   4,495          --           --
Decrease (increase) in restricted cash and cash equivalents.....................   7,492       1,255       (9,770)
Other...........................................................................     693      (1,495)      (2,569)
                                                                                --------    --------     --------
Cash (used for) provided by investing activities................................  28,042     (18,057)     (95,977)
                                                                                --------    --------     --------

FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Long-term debt borrowings.......................................................      --      26,944       45,133
Long-term debt repayments.......................................................  (5,750)    (26,470)     (25,622)
Debenture payable (note 13).....................................................     .--     (26,855)      26,855
Minority interest dividends......................................................(14,909)    (22,666)     (15,963)
Gold linked convertible notes...................................................      --      (9,173)     (10,501)
Contributed surplus.............................................................      --      (1,595)          --
Common shares...................................................................  46,855        (639)        (626)
                                                                                --------    --------     --------
Cash (used for) provided by financing activities................................  26,196     (60,454)      19,276
                                                                                --------    --------     --------
(DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS................................  98,644     (32,728)     (44,144)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF YEAR....................................  16,568      49,296       93,440
                                                                                --------    --------     --------
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF YEAR.......................................... 115,212      16,568       49,296
                                                                                ========    ========     ========


              THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES FORM AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

                                                                                                                 B-5
</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                  TVX GOLD INC.

                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
               Dollar amounts in thousands of U.S. dollars, except
            amounts per share and per ounce or unless otherwise noted

1.   SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

     These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance
     with accounting principles generally accepted in Canada which, in the
     Company's case, conform with accounting principles generally accepted in
     the United States ("US"), except as disclosed in note 17. The significant
     accounting policies followed by the Company and its incorporated and
     unincorporated joint ventures are summarized as follows:

A)   BASIS OF CONSOLIDATION

     These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company
     and its subsidiaries. Investments in incorporated and unincorporated joint
     ventures are accounted for by the proportionate consolidation method as
     substantially all of the Company's business is conducted through joint
     ventures.

B)   USE OF ESTIMATES

     The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with generally
     accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and
     assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
     disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the
     financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
     during the reporting period. The most significant estimates are related to
     the physical and economic lives and the recoverability of mining assets,
     mineral reserves, site restoration and related obligations, commodity
     contracts and financial instruments and income taxes. Actual results could
     differ from those estimates.

C)   TRANSLATION OF FOREIGN CURRENCIES

     The accounts of the Canadian operations and operations in foreign countries
     have been translated using the temporal method for foreign integrated
     operations. The functional currency of the Company is US dollars, as the
     Company considers the US dollar to be the principal currency of its
     operations. Under the temporal method, monetary assets and liabilities have
     been translated at the end of year exchange rates. Non-monetary assets,
     which primarily comprise mining property, plant and equipment, have been
     translated using historic rates of exchange. Revenues and expenses have
     been translated at the average rates of exchange during the years, except
     for depletion and depreciation, which have been translated at the same
     rates as the related assets. Foreign exchange gains and losses on
     translation are included in the determination of earnings.

D)   COMMODITY CONTRACTS AND FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

     In the normal course of business, the Company uses agreements with
     financial institutions, principally derivatives, to hedge its exposure to
     fluctuations in metal prices, foreign exchange rates and interest rates.
     The intent is to protect the Company against downside price risk on future
     metal sales and cash flow risk on interest rates and foreign exchange.

     The Company mitigates the counterparty credit risk exposure arising from
     these agreements by transacting with what it believes are financially sound
     institutions. Some derivative instruments entered into by the Company are
     subject to margin requirements, beyond varying threshold limits, in the
     event that values of the hedged instruments significantly change.

     Commodity derivative hedging transactions include forward sales and options
     contracts. Realized gains and losses, as well as premiums, are recognized
     in revenue as the designated production is delivered. If contracts are
     amended or closed out before the planned delivery of the designated
     production, recognition of any gains or losses is deferred until their
     original designation period. Commodity commitments not designated as hedges
     are marked to market and the resultant gains or losses are recorded in
     earnings in the period.

     The Company has periodically entered into lease rate swap agreements in
     conjunction with commodity contracts. Obligations under lease rate swap
     agreements, entered into expressly to finance options purchased, are marked
     to market at the balance sheet date and the resulting gains or losses are
     deferred until the related production is delivered.

     The Company has periodically entered into foreign exchange contracts to
     hedge the effect of exchange rates on a portion of its future currency
     requirements. Gains and losses are recognized and reported as a component
     of the related transactions.

     The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments,
     accounts receivable, restricted cash, export prepayment contracts, accounts
     payable and accrued liabilities and current and long-term debt approximates
     their fair value unless otherwise specified.

E)   REVENUE RECOGNITION

     Revenue from the sale of bullion and base metal concentrates is recognized
     when title passes to the purchaser.

                                                                             B-6
<PAGE>

                                  TVX GOLD INC.

                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
               Dollar amounts in thousands of U.S. dollars, except
            amounts per share and per ounce or unless otherwise noted

F)   INVENTORIES

     Gold and silver bullion inventories, dore, base metal concentrates,
     work-in-process and ore stockpiles are carried at the lower of average
     production cost and net realizable value. Materials and supplies
     inventories are stated at the lower of cost and replacement value.

G)   MINING PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

     Mining property, plant and equipment is recorded at cost including costs
     associated with acquisition and further development, including costs
     incurred to access ore, of mining properties. Mine development costs
     include costs incurred to expand reserves in existing ore bodies at
     development properties or operating mines. Depletable assets are amortized
     over the life of the mine on a unit-of-production basis. The current
     estimated gold mine lives range from 4 to 17 years with the average being 8
     years. Depreciable assets are also amortized over the life of the mine on a
     unit-of-production basis except where the useful life of a depreciable
     asset is less than the life of the mine, in which case depreciation is
     recorded on a straight-line basis over its useful life. Amortization on a
     unit-of-production basis is calculated using only proven and probable
     reserves.

     The Company carries out an impairment evaluation when conditions or events
     occur suggesting that an asset has been impaired. Mining assets are
     evaluated by comparing the undiscounted future net cash flows against their
     current carrying value. When the cash flows demonstrate an impairment, the
     Company will write down its value. Operational considerations include
     projected operating cost structures, future capital requirements, including
     mine closure costs, and estimates of mine life based on known reserves.
     Metal prices utilized for the 2002 evaluation were $300 per ounce (2001 --
     $300; 2000 -- $300) for gold and $4.75 per ounce (2001 -- $4.50; 2000 --
     $5.50) for silver. Lead prices utilized for the 2001 and 2000 evaluations
     were $475 per tonne and $550 per tonne respectively and zinc prices
     utilized for the 2001 and 2000 evaluations were $775 per tonne and $1,200
     per tonne, respectively. No lead or zinc prices were required for the 2002
     evaluations.

H)   EXPLORATION

     Exploration expenditures, excluding property acquisition costs, are charged
     to earnings as incurred. When it has been established that a mining
     property has development potential, further costs incurred prior to the
     start of mining operations, are recorded as deferred development costs and
     amortized in accordance with the policies described under note 1(g). The
     development potential of mining properties is established by the existence
     of proven and probable reserves, reasonable assurance that the property can
     be permitted as an operating mine and evidence that there are no
     metallurgical or other impediments to the production of saleable metals.

I)   RECLAMATION COSTS

     Expenditures relating to ongoing environmental and reclamation programs are
     charged against earnings as incurred or capitalized and amortized depending
     on their future economic benefit. Estimated future reclamation costs,
     including site restoration, where reasonably determinable are charged
     against earnings over the estimated useful life of the mine based on proven
     and probable reserves. These estimates are based on current standards or
     higher. These standards are subject to future legislative changes which
     will be reflected in the estimates when passed.

J)   FINANCING COSTS

     Debt issue costs are deferred and amortized over the term of the debt.
     Interest and debt issue costs, whether incurred directly or indirectly, are
     capitalized when they arise from indebtedness incurred to finance
     development activities on mining properties and are amortized to earnings
     when production commences.

K)   CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

     Cash and cash equivalents include short-term money market instruments
     which, on acquisition, have a term to maturity of three months or less.
     Short-term investments represent short-term money market instruments with
     maturities, on acquisition, greater than three months and less than one
     year.

L)   STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION PLAN (NOTE 2(A))

     The Company has a stock-based compensation plan which is described in note
     10. No compensation expense is recognized under the plan when stock or
     stock options are issued under the plan to directors, officers and
     employees. The fair value of options issued to consultants is recognized as
     an expense at the date of issue. Consideration received on exercise of
     stock options is credited to share capital.

2.   CHANGES IN ACCOUNTING POLICIES

a)   Effective January 1, 2002, the Company adopted a new accounting standard
     issued by the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants ("CICA") relating
     to stock-based compensation and other stock-based payments. This new
     standard requires either the recognition of compensation expense for grants
     of stock, stock options and other equity instruments to employees, or,
     alternatively, the disclosure of pro forma net earnings and net earnings
     per share data as if stock-based compensation had been recognized in
     earnings. The Company has elected to disclose pro forma net earnings and
     earnings per share data for options granted after January 1, 2002.
     Therefore, there is no effect of adopting this standard on the Company's
     results of operations and financial position.

b)   Effective January 1, 2002, the Company adopted retroactively a new CICA
     accounting standard in respect of foreign currency translation that
     eliminates the deferral and amortization of currency translation
     adjustments related to long-term monetary items with a fixed and
     ascertainable life. There is no impact on the Company's results of
     operations and financial position as a result of adoption of this new
     standard.

c)   Effective January 1, 2001, the Company adopted, retroactively, a new
     accounting standard issued by the CICA relating to earnings per share.

                                                                             B-7
<PAGE>

                                  TVX GOLD INC.

                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
               Dollar amounts in thousands of U.S. dollars, except
            amounts per share and per ounce or unless otherwise noted

     This standard modifies the method of calculating fully diluted earnings per
     share. Diluted earnings per share was unchanged as a result of adopting the
     new standard.

d)   In December 1997, the CICA issued Handbook section 3465, Income Taxes,
     which was effective January 1, 2000. The standard required a change from
     the deferral method of accounting to the asset and liability method of
     accounting for income taxes. Under the asset and liability method, future
     tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences
     attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying
     amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases.
     Future tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted or
     substantively enacted tax rates expected to apply when the asset is
     realized or the liability settled. The effect on future tax assets and
     liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period
     that substantive enactment or enactment occurs.

     The deficit as at January 1, 2000 was increased by $2,102 and earnings for
     the year ended December 31, 2000 increased by $3,232 as a result of this
     change.

3.   INVENTORIES

                                                               DECEMBER 31,
                                                             ----------------
                                                               2002     2001
                                                             -------  -------
                                                                 $        $
    Bullion and dore........................................   3,345    3,294
    Base metal concentrates (a).............................      --    4,199
    Work-in-process.........................................   2,461    2,257
    Ore stockpiles-- precious metals........................   1,649    2,693
    Materials and supplies (a)..............................   8,984   11,856
                                                             -------  -------
                                                              16,439   24,299
                                                             =======  =======

     a)   Base metal concentrates of $2,299 and warehouse inventory of $2,119,
          relating to the Stratoni mine, were written off at December 31, 2002.

4.   MINING PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

                                                                DECEMBER 31,
                                                            ------------------
                                                              2002      2001
                                                            --------  --------
                                                                 $         $
    Producing properties
      Mining property and deferred development.............  336,465   339,214
      Accumulated depletion................................ (240,226) (226,528)
                                                            --------  --------
                                                              96,239   112,686
                                                            --------  --------
      Mine plant and equipment.............................  271,323   265,562
      Accumulated depreciation............................. (167,837) (158,965)
                                                            --------  --------
                                                             103,486   106,597
                                                            --------  --------
      Equipment under capital lease........................    4,943     4,943
      Accumulated depreciation.............................   (2,838)   (1,964)
                                                            --------  --------
                                                               2,105     2,979
                                                            --------  --------
                                                             201,830   222,262
                                                            --------  --------
    Development properties
      Greek development projects...........................       --    15,000
                                                            --------  --------
    Total mining property, plant and equipment.............  201,830   237,262
                                                            ========  ========

    The Company wrote down the carrying value of certain assets as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                          FOR THE YEARS ENDED
                                                                                              DECEMBER 31,
                                                                              ---------------------------------------------
                                                                                   2002             2001           2000
                                                                                   ----             ----           ----
<S>                                                                            <C>                 <C>            <C>
    Reduction in carrying value of La Coipa Mine............................        --             13,000             --
    Reduction in carrying value of New Britannia Mine.......................        --              8,000             --
    Write-off of carrying value of Stratoni Mine ...........................     4,071                 --             --
                                                                               -------           --------          -----
    Mining property, plant and equipment write-downs........................     4,071             21,000             --
                                                                               =======           ========          =====

    Write-off of and reduction in carrying value of Skouries development
    project ................................................................    15,000             25,000             --
    Write-off of carrying value of Olympias development project (note 16(b)).       --            198,513             --
                                                                               -------           --------          -----
    Non-operating asset write-downs..........................................   15,000            223,513             --
                                                                               =======           ========          =====
</TABLE>

     Interest capitalized to the Greek development projects during 2002 is $nil
    (2001 -- $671; 2000 -- $1,996).

5.   EXPORT PREPAYMENT CONTRACTS

     A Brazilian Central Bank program enables exporters to borrow US dollars
     which are then immediately reinvested at rates in excess of those on the
     loans.

     The Company's Brasilia joint venture participates in this program and
     entered into contracts during 2000 and 2001 that were immediately assigned
     to a Brazilian bank holding the amounts put on deposit. The

                                                                             B-8
<PAGE>

                                  TVX GOLD INC.

                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
               Dollar amounts in thousands of U.S. dollars, except
            amounts per share and per ounce or unless otherwise noted

     amounts on deposit were referred to as export prepayment contracts on the
     balance sheet. The joint venture received a premium instead of a higher
     interest rate on the amounts on deposit. Under the terms of the related
     contracts, the bank would make all repayments of principal and interest on
     the export loans as they become due.

     The joint venture received a premium of $1,866 in 2001 and $1,782 in 2000.
     The premiums are included in accounts payable and recognized over the term
     of the corresponding commitment to conduct export activities. The premiums
     included in accounts payable total $1,817 as at December 31, 2002 (2001 --
     $2,540).

     During 2002, under an Amended and Restated Debt Assumption Agreement,
     long-term debt in an amount of $66,983 was legally extinguished.
     Consequently, the debt and the related export prepayment contract balances
     were removed from the consolidated balance sheet in a non-cash transaction
     (note 7).

6.   OTHER ASSETS

                                                                 DECEMBER 31,
                                                              -----------------
                                                                2002      2001
                                                              -------   -------
                                                                  $         $
    Receivable from High River Gold Mines Ltd.(a).............  9,790    14,867
    Pyrite concentrates (b)...................................     --     8,485
    Other.....................................................  2,472     6,082
                                                              -------   -------
                                                               12,262    29,434
                                                              =======   =======

     a)   The receivable from High River Gold Mines Ltd., a joint venture
          partner in the New Britannia Mine, bears interest at prime plus 0.625%
          and is repayable from their share of cash flow from the New Britannia
          Mine.

     b)   Pyrite concentrates were written off at December 31, 2002.

7.   LONG-TERM DEBT

                                                                DECEMBER 31,
                                                            -------------------
                                                              2002       2001
                                                            --------   --------
                                                                $          $
     Crixas export loans (a)................................  1,500      7,250
     Brasilia export loans (b)..............................     --     66,983
                                                            --------   --------
     Total debt.............................................  1,500     74,233
     Less: Current portion.................................. (1,500)   (15,401)
                                                            --------   --------
     Long-term debt.........................................     --     58,832
                                                            ========   ========

     a)   The Crixas mine received advances against future export commitments.
          These loans are denominated in US dollars and bear interest at a rate
          of 2.7%.

     b)   The Brasilia loan balance had corresponding deposits to match all
          maturities which were included in export prepayment contracts in 2001.
          During 2002, under an Amended and Restated Debt Assumption Agreement,
          long-term debt in an amount of $66,983 was legally extinguished (note
          5).

     c)   The Company has an unutilized $2.0 million revolving line of credit
          with Normandy Finance Limited. Amounts drawn on this facility are
          subject to interest at LIBOR plus 2.35% and are collateralized. This
          revolving line of credit was terminated in 2003.

     d)   Letters of credit have been issued against reclamation costs at the
          Mineral Hill mine which was closed in 1996. Cash in an amount of $8.6
          million is pledged against these letters of credit at December 31,
          2002 (2001 -- $8.6 million).

          An additional $0.9 million of letters of credit have been issued
          relating to the Musselwhite mine (2001 -- $0.9 million).

          See also note 16(c) regarding Hellenic Gold commitments.

     e)   Interest paid during 2002 amounted to $555 (2001 -- $13,615; 2000 --
          $18,170).

8.   OTHER LIABILITIES

                                                                 DECEMBER 31,
                                                              -----------------
                                                                2002      2001
                                                              -------   -------
                                                                  $         $
    Closure provisions-- operating properties (a)...........   23,554    19,742
    Closure provisions-- non-operating properties (b).......       --     1,000
    Capital lease (c).......................................      826     1,901
    Other...................................................       43       300
                                                              -------   -------
                                                               24,423    22,943
                                                              =======   =======

     a)   Included in closure provisions-- operating properties is $9,466
          (2001-- $6,960) relating to the Stratoni mine.

                                                                             B-9
<PAGE>

                                  TVX GOLD INC.

                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
               Dollar amounts in thousands of U.S. dollars, except
            amounts per share and per ounce or unless otherwise noted

     b)   An additional $2.1 million (2001 -- $2.9 million) of accrued
          reclamation costs, relating to the current portion of the reclamation
          accrual for the Mineral Hill mine, are included in accounts payable at
          December 31, 2002.

     c)   The total remaining capital lease obligation of $1,896 bears interest
          at 90 day LIBOR plus 1.5%. Future minimum lease payments are as
          follows:

                                                                       $
                                                                    -------
     2003.........................................................   1,131
     2004.........................................................     848
                                                                    -------
                                                                     1,979
     Less: Interest...............................................     (83)
                                                                    -------
                                                                     1,896
     Less Current portion.........................................  (1,070)
                                                                    -------
                                                                       826
                                                                    =======

9.   CAPITAL STOCK

     a)   Authorized

          Unlimited number of common shares without par value.

     b)   Issued

          The Company's issued and outstanding common shares are as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                NUMBER OF
                                                                  SHARES          $
                                                               -----------    ---------
<S>                                                            <C>           <C>
     Outstanding as at December 31, 1999......................   3,592,322     385,052
     Shares repurchased and cancelled.........................     (20,080)     (2,152)
     Fractional shares redeemed...............................          (7)         --
                                                               -----------    ---------
     Outstanding as at December 31, 2000......................   3,572,235     382,900
     Shares issued on conversion of the Notes (note 14).......  32,150,118     211,761
                                                               -----------    ---------
     Outstanding as at December 31, 2001......................  35,722,353     594,661
     Shares issued for cash ..................................   7,422,655      46,855
                                                               -----------    ---------
     Outstanding as at December 31, 2002......................  43,145,008     641,516
                                                               ===========    =========
</TABLE>

          Under a special resolution of the shareholders of the Company on June
          27, 2000, the shareholders authorized the consolidation of share
          capital on a five for one basis. Effective June 30, 2002, the Company
          further consolidated its common shares on a ten for one basis. All
          share capital, share and option data in the consolidated financial
          statements have been retroactively restated to reflect the share
          consolidations.

     c)   The earnings (loss) per share has been calculated using the weighted
          average number of shares outstanding during the year of 41,031,231
          shares (2001 -- 18,898,593; 2000 -- 3,581,370). For purposes of the
          calculation, the loss is adjusted for charges related to the Notes
          totaling $nil (2001 -- $6,666; 2000 -- $12,325) and the increase in
          contributed surplus resulting from the settlement of the Notes (note
          14). Diluted earnings (loss) per share has not been presented as it
          would not be dilutive. Diluted earnings (loss) per share would reflect
          the maximum possible dilution from the potential conversion of stock
          options.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                  2002             2001             2000
                                                               ----------       ----------      ----------
                                                                     $               $                $
<S>                                                               <C>             <C>               <C>
         BASIC EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
         Net earnings (loss)..................................    (30,616)        (227,928)         12,428
         Interest accretion on the Notes......................         --           (6,666)        (12,325)
         Increase from the settlement of the Notes............         --           34,729              --
                                                               ----------       ----------      ----------
         Net earnings (loss) applicable to common shares......    (30,616)        (199,865)            103
                                                               ==========       ==========      ==========
         Weighted average common shares outstanding........... 41,031,231       18,898,593       3,581,370
                                                               ==========       ==========      ==========
         Basic earnings (loss) per common share...............      (0.75)          (10.58)           0.03
                                                               ==========       ==========      ==========
</TABLE>

     d)   During 2000, under the terms of a normal course issuer bid, the
          Company repurchased 20,080 common shares at an average cost of
          CAN$46.00 per share. These transactions resulted in contributed
          surplus of $1,526. The restructuring of the Notes during 2001 (note
          14) resulted in additional contributed surplus of $34,729 in 2001.

     e)   The Company has issued 8,000 warrants outstanding to purchase common
          shares at CAN$66.50 per share expiring August 11, 2003.

10.  STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION PLAN

     The Company has granted common share options to certain directors,
     officers, employees and consultants to attract and retain key personnel.
     Under the Company's 1994 Stock Option Plan, as amended, up to 3.5 million
     common share options for terms up to ten years at a price no lower than the
     market price at the time of the grant are available to certain directors,
     officers, employees and consultants. The total number of shares which may
     be purchased under any options granted to insiders of the Company under the
     Stock Option Plan shall be less than a majority of the total number of
     shares available for issuance under the Stock Option Plan.

                                                                            B-10
<PAGE>

                                  TVX GOLD INC.

                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
               Dollar amounts in thousands of U.S. dollars, except
            amounts per share and per ounce or unless otherwise noted

     At the time of the grant, vesting is at the discretion of the Board of
     Directors. In the event of a fundamental change in the ownership and/or
     capital structure of the Company, all options outstanding will
     automatically vest and become fully exercisable and the options will
     continue until the end of the expiry period. All outstanding options vested
     upon completion of the business combination (note 19(a)). All options
     granted have five-year terms.

     A summary of the status of the stock option plan as at December 31, 2002,
     2001 and 2000 and changes during the years ending on those dates,
     reflecting the share consolidations referred to in note 9(b) is as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                             2002                  2001                 2000
                                                     --------------------  --------------------  -------------------
                                                                WEIGHTED-             WEIGHTED-            WEIGHTED-
                                                                 AVERAGE               AVERAGE              AVERAGE
                                                                EXERCISE              EXERCISE             EXERCISE
                                                       SHARES     PRICE      SHARES     PRICE     SHARES      PRICE
                                                     ---------- ---------  ---------- ---------  -------- ----------
                                                       (000S)     CAN$       (000S)     CAN$      (000S)      CAN$
<S>                                                  <C>        <C>          <C>     <C>           <C>    <C>
    Outstanding at beginning of year...............    1,242      30.10        267     155.50        328    191.00
    Granted........................................        --        --      1,016       8.50         --        --
    Exercised......................................     (273)      8.50         --         --         --        --
    Expired........................................      (62)    163.21        (41)    204.70        (61)   346.10
                                                     -------    -------    -------    -------    -------  --------
      Outstanding at end of year...................      907      27.46      1,242      30.10        267    155.50
                                                     =======    =======    =======    =======    =======  ========
      Options exercisable at year end..............      257      75.43        546      57.20        198    175.00
                                                     =======    =======    =======    =======    =======  ========

     The following table summarizes information on stock options outstanding at
     December 31, 2002:

                                                              OPTIONS OUTSTANDING            OPTIONS EXERCISABLE
                                                   --------------------------------------- -----------------------
                                                                    WEIGHTED
                                                        NUMBER       AVERAGE    WEIGHTED       NUMBER     WEIGHTED
                                                    OUTSTANDING AT  REMAINING    AVERAGE   EXERCISABLE AT  AVERAGE
                                                     DECEMBER 31,  CONTRACTUAL  EXERCISE    DECEMBER 31,  EXERCISE
     RANGE OF EXERCISE PRICES CAN$                       2002      LIFE YEARS     PRICE         2002        PRICE
    -------------------------------                --------------- -----------  --------   -------------- --------
                                                        (000S)                    CAN$         (000S)       CAN$
    194.00-- 229.50..............................          20         0.17       201.30          20        201.30
    138.00-- 162.50..............................          41         0.61       162.00          41        162.00
     66.50--  99.50..............................         122         1.61        66.50         122         66.50
      8.50--  12.50..............................         724         3.70         8.50          74          8.50
                                                      -------      -------      -------     -------      --------
      8.50-- 229.50..............................         907         3.20        27.46         257         75.43
                                                      =======      =======      =======     =======      ========
</TABLE>

11.  COMMODITY CONTRACTS AND FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTs

     The Company's consolidated precious metals hedging program and deferred
     revenue as at December 31, 2002 are presented below:

     a)   Gold

                                                                PUTS BOUGHT
                                                             ----------------
                                                              OUNCES    $/OZ
                                                             --------  ------
          2003.............................................   150,000    260
          2004.............................................   150,000    250
          2005.............................................   150,000    250
          2006.............................................   150,000    250
                                                              600,000    253

          The fair value of the gold put option contracts at December 31, 2002
          was $845.

     b)   Silver

                                                                 CALLS SOLD
                                                           --------------------
                                                             OUNCES       $/OZ
                                                           ----------    ------
          2003                                              2,000,000     6.00
                                                           ----------
                                                            2,000,000     6.00
                                                           ==========

          The silver calls sold are not considered to be a hedge and have been
          marked to market at December 31, 2002.

     c)   As at December 31, 2002, a joint venture of TVX had currency contracts
          outstanding up to May 2003 to fix the U.S. dollar amount for 14.9
          million Brazilian Reals at exchange rates prevailing at the inception
          of the contracts. These contract rates range from 2.3568 to 3.7535.
          The contracts have been marked to market as at December 31, 2002 and
          are included in short term investments.

                                                                            B-11
<PAGE>

                                  TVX GOLD INC.

                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
               Dollar amounts in thousands of U.S. dollars, except
            amounts per share and per ounce or unless otherwise noted

     d)   Deferred revenue and deferred charges comprise net premiums on open
          calls and put options as well as realized gains and losses on hedging
          transactions. Deferred revenue will be recognized as the originally
          designated hedged production is delivered, and reflected in earnings
          as follows:

                                                  DEFERRED   DEFERRED     NET
                                                  REVENUE    CHARGES     TOTAL
                                                  --------   --------    -----
                                                     $          $          $
          2003...................................   9,894    (3,497)     6,397
          2004...................................   9,873    (8,073)     1,800
          2005...................................   6,416    (8,819)    (2,403)
          2006...................................   5,624    (8,793)    (3,169)
          2007...................................      --    (2,807)    (2,807)
                                                  -------   -------    -------
                                                   31,807   (31,989)      (182)
                                                  =======   =======    =======
          Current portion of deferred revenue....                       (6,397)
                                                                       -------
          Deferred charges.......................                        6,579
                                                                       =======

     e)   In August 2001, the Company restructured its gold hedging program to
          replace 390,000 ounces of $360 put options financed by lease rate
          swaps with 550,000 ounces of $250 put options maturing from 2003 to
          2006. The lease rate swaps were repaid. In addition, the 129,600
          ounces of $280 per ounce put options previously financed by lease rate
          swaps were restructured to be puts. The effect of the restructuring
          was to reduce total debt by $17,626 and increase deferred revenue by
          $14,829. The total net cash cost of the restructuring was $825.

          The net gain of $3,658 resulting from the restructuring has been
          deferred to be recognized over the period of the originally designated
          production ending in 2006.

     f)   Certain commodity contracts entered into by the Company require a
          deposit with an intermediary to cover margin calls. This amount
          fluctuates with spot gold and silver prices and at December 31, 2002
          amounted to $523 (2001 -- $515) which is included in restricted cash.

12.  INCOME TAXES

     a)   Details of income tax (recovery) expense for the years ended December
          31 are as follows:

                                                    2002      2001      2000
                                                  -------    -------   -------
                                                      $         $         $
        Income taxes
          Current
            Foreign.............................    8,416      4,863     3,680
            Canada..............................      332        422       163
                                                  -------    -------   -------
                                                    8,748      5,285     3,843
                                                  -------    -------   -------
          Deferred
            Foreign.............................     (545)    (7,559)   (3,282)
            Canada..............................     (924)    (3,360)     (740)
                                                  -------    -------   -------
                                                   (1,469)   (10,919)   (4,022)
                                                  -------    -------   -------
                                                    7,279     (5,634)     (179)
                                                  =======    =======   =======

          Income taxes paid during 2002 amounted to $8,748 (2001 -- $5,285; 2000
          -- $3,843).

     b)   The reconciliation of the combined Canadian federal and provincial
          statutory income tax rates to the effective tax rate on earnings for
          the years ended December 31 is as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                 2002     2001     2000
                                                                                ------   ------   ------
                                                                                   %        %        %
<S>                                                                               <C>      <C>      <C>
          Combined Canadian federal and provincial statutory income tax rate...   38.6     41.7     44.0
          Impact of change in future tax rates.................................    3.0     (1.0)     2.5
          Non-temporary differences............................................   (4.5)     0.4      3.3
          Tax rates of other jurisdictions.....................................    1.3     (0.5)      --
          Unrecorded (realized) benefit of tax losses..........................  (82.9)   (38.3)   (51.3)
                                                                                 -----    -----    -----
            Effective tax rate.................................................  (44.5)     2.3     (1.5)
                                                                                 =====    =====    =====
</TABLE>

          The combined Canadian federal and provincial statutory income tax rate
          includes the weighted average of Canadian provincial income tax rates,
          including surtaxes.

          Cumulative withholding taxes of $8,559 (2001 -- $8,559) have been
          provided on unremitted foreign earnings.

                                                                            B-12
<PAGE>

                                  TVX GOLD INC.

                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
               Dollar amounts in thousands of U.S. dollars, except
            amounts per share and per ounce or unless otherwise noted

     c)   The Company has unutilized tax deductions in Canada totaling
          approximately $22,300 (2001 -- $26,700) which are available to be
          applied against future taxable income. There has been no recognition
          in the financial statements for these tax deductions. Of this amount,
          $10,100 will expire in 2008, $3,700 will expire in 2009 and the
          remainder is not subject to expiry.

     d)   Deferred income taxes are provided as a result of temporary
          differences that arise due to differences between the tax values and
          carrying amount of assets and liabilities. The sources of temporary
          differences and the related tax amounts are as follows:

                                                              DECEMBER 31,
                                                          -------------------
                                                            2002       2001
                                                          -------     -------
      ASSETS                                                   $          $

      Depletion and amortization.........................   2,978         307
      Deferred mining costs..............................  14,687      16,680
      Reclamation .......................................     467         344
      Net operating losses...............................  17,153      22,055
      Other..............................................   6,003       6,179
                                                          -------     -------
      Gross future tax assets............................  41,288      45,565
      Valuation allowance................................ (27,890)    (33,092)
                                                          -------     -------
      Net future tax assets..............................  13,398      12,473
                                                          =======     =======

      LIABILITIES

      Depletion and amortization.........................  (2,698)     (3,962)
      Deferred mining costs ............................. (11,685)    (11,962)
      Other, including accrued withholding taxes.........  (6,012)     (5,024)
                                                          -------     -------
      Future tax liabilities............................. (20,395)    (20,948)
                                                          =======     =======

13.  DEBENTURE PAYABLE

     A Brazilian subsidiary of the Company issued a short-term debenture in
     December 2000 in the amount of $26,855. The debenture bore interest at
     7.88% and was repaid on June 25, 2001.

14.  GOLD LINKED CONVERTIBLE NOTES

     On March 14, 1997, the Company issued $250 million of subordinated
     unsecured convertible notes ("Notes"). The Notes bore interest at 5% per
     annum which was payable semi-annually. The original maturity date of the
     Notes was March 28, 2002.

     On July 10, 2001, the Company completed the conversion of the Notes into
     32,150,118 common shares of the Company. The effect of the conversion was
     to increase capital stock by $211,761, increase contributed surplus by
     $34,729, reduce the current portion of long-term debt by $8,403, reduce
     deferred charges by $2,539 and reduce the equity component of gold linked
     convertible notes by $240,626. No gain or loss was recognized on the
     consolidated statement of operations.

     The Notes were accounted for in accordance with CICA Section 3860 whereby
     debt securities which have interest payable in cash and give the issuer the
     right to settle the principal amount in common shares are split into a
     liability and an equity component. The liability component of the debt was
     calculated as the present value of the interest payments discounted at a
     rate estimated to be equivalent to a similar non-convertible debt. The net
     proceeds received from the issuance of the Notes, less the liability
     component, were classified as equity.

     The liability component was reduced by semi-annual interest payments, net
     of changes in the present value of the liability component which were
     charged to earnings. The equity component was increased over time by
     charges to deficit for interest accretion and amortization of issuance
     costs so that at maturity, it would be equal to the face value of the
     Notes.

     During the year ended December 31, 2002, the charges to deficit were $nil
     (2001 -- $6,666; 2000 -- $12,325).

                                                                            B-13
<PAGE>

                                  TVX GOLD INC.

                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
               Dollar amounts in thousands of U.S. dollars, except
            amounts per share and per ounce or unless otherwise noted

15.  SEGMENTED INFORMATION

     The Company's industry segments are concentrated in the development and
     mining of precious metals in North and South America and in Europe. Gold
     and silver are currently the primary commodities produced. Details of the
     Company's financial information segmented operationally are as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                  FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002
                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                  MUSSEL-      NEW     STRATONI
                                    LA COIPA BRASILIA  CRIXAS      WHITE    BRITANNIA  OPERATIONS   GREECE     CORPORATE/
                                     (CHILE) (BRAZIL)  (BRAZIL)  (CANADA)   (CANADA)   (GREECE)   DEVELOPMENT     OTHER      TOTAL
                                    -------- --------  --------  --------   ---------  ---------- -----------  ----------  ---------
                                        $        $        $          $          $          $           $            $          $
<S>                                  <C>     <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>       <C>       <C>            <C>       <C>
    Revenue.....................     46,252  33,546     30,020     21,384     17,126    31,007          --       5,422     184,757
                                     ------  ------     ------     ------     ------    ------      ------      ------     -------
    Cost of sales...............     33,621  18,110      8,417     15,485     11,117    34,560          --          --     121,310
    Depletion and depreciation..     12,672   5,447      4,788      4,851      3,343     2,536          --         512      34,149
                                     ------  ------     ------     ------     ------    ------      ------      ------     -------
                                     46,293  23,557     13,205     20,336     14,460    37,096          --         512     155,459
                                     ------  ------     ------     ------     ------    ------      ------      ------     -------
    Earnings (loss) from
      operations before the             (41)  9,989     16,815      1,048      2,666    (6,089)         --       4,910      29,298
      undernoted................
    Mining property, plant and
      equipment  write-downs...          --      --         --         --         --      4,071         --          --       4,071
    Non-operating asset
      write-downs...............         --      --         --         --         --        --      15,000          --      15,000
    Other asset write-downs.....         --      --         --         --         --     4,418       8,485          --      12,903
    Corporate administration....         --      --         --         --         --        --          --       6,297       6,297
    Interest expense............        176      76        211         --         --        --          --          92         555
    Exploration.................        691      --        484        779      1,053        --          --         653       3,660
    Transaction costs............        --      --         --         --         --        --          --       3,217       3,217
    Foreign exchange loss.......       (238)  4,254        541        445        (27)      707          --       1,663       7,345
    Interest income.............        (35) (1,800)      (683)       (36)        --        --          --      (1,719)     (4,273)
    Other.......................       (195)    (15)       120         32         --        --          --      (3,060)     (3,118)
                                     ------  ------     ------     ------     ------    ------      ------      ------     -------
                                        399   2,515        673      1,220      1,026     9,196      23,485       7,143      45,657
                                     ------  ------     ------     ------     ------    ------      ------      ------     -------
    Earnings (loss) before the
      undernoted................       (440)  7,474     16,142       (172)     1,640   (15,285)    (23,485)     (2,233)    (16,359)
    Income taxes................        757     844      1,553         --         --        --          --       4,125       7,279
    Minority interests and
      participation rights......       (599)  3,315      7,295        (86)       820        --          --      (3,767)      6,978
                                     ------  ------     ------     ------     ------    ------      ------      ------     -------
    Net earnings (loss).........       (598)  3,315      7,294        (86)       820   (15,285)    (23,485)     (2,591)    (30,616)
                                     ======  ======     ======     ======     ======    ======      ======      ======     =======
    Cash and cash equivalents...      1,713   2,675      5,246         --        104       399          --     105,075     115,212
    Capital expenditures........        836   2,696      1,819      3,656      1,637     1,996          --       2,526      15,166
    Mining property, plant and
      equipment.................     62,437  62,206     23,623     45,497      7,927        --          --         140     201,830
    Total assets................     72,210  78,696     34,633     49,930     10,762     4,158          --     147,561     397,950

                                                                                                                              B-14
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                            TVX GOLD INC.

                                             NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                                         Dollar amounts in thousands of U.S. dollars, except
                                      amounts per share and per ounce or unless otherwise noted


                                                                  FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001
                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                  MUSSEL-      NEW     STRATONI
                                    LA COIPA BRASILIA  CRIXAS      WHITE    BRITANNIA  OPERATIONS   GREECE     CORPORATE/
                                     (CHILE) (BRAZIL)  (BRAZIL)  (CANADA)   (CANADA)   (GREECE)   DEVELOPMENT     OTHER      TOTAL
                                    -------- --------  --------  --------   ---------  ---------- -----------  ----------  ---------
                                        $        $        $          $          $          $           $            $          $
<S>                                  <C>     <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>       <C>     <C>            <C>       <C>
    Revenue......................    41,404  25,386     26,699     20,122     15,289    24,160         --        5,280     158,340
                                     ------  ------     ------     ------     ------    ------    -------       ------     -------
    Cost of sales................    32,128  17,953     10,719     14,281     10,537    22,530         --           --     108,148
    Depletion and depreciation...    16,260   5,091      5,007      5,904      5,916     1,871         --          194      40,243
                                     ------  ------     ------     ------     ------    ------    -------       ------     -------
                                     48,388  23,044     15,726     20,185     16,453    24,401         --          194     148,391
                                     ------  ------     ------     ------     ------    ------    -------       ------     -------
    Earnings (loss) from operations
      before the undernoted......    (6,984)  2,342     10,973        (63)    (1,164)     (241)        --        5,086       9,949
    Mining property, plant and
      equipment write-downs......    13,000      --         --         --      8,000        --         --           --      21,000
    Non-operating asset
      write-downs................        --      --         --         --         --        --    223,513           --     223,513
    Other asset write-downs......        --      --         --         --         --        --         --           --          --
    Corporate administration.....        --      --         --         --         --        --         --        8,123       8,123
    Interest expense.............       309     575        534         --         --        --         --        2,351       3,769
    Exploration..................       320      --        237        488        466        --         --        1,869       3,380
    Foreign exchange loss........        --   2,278        976         94         62        --         --         (117)      3,293
    Interest income..............       (28) (1,682)      (769)       (59)        --        --         --       (3,112)     (5,650)
    Other........................       623      (3)      (373)        12         --        --         --       (4,142)     (3,883)
                                     ------  ------     ------     ------     ------    ------    -------       ------     -------
                                     14,224   1,168        605        535      8,528        --    223,513        4,972     253,545
                                     ------  ------     ------     ------     ------    ------    -------       ------     -------
    Earnings (loss) before the
      undernoted.................   (21,208)  1,174     10,368       (598)    (9,692)     (241)  (223,513)         114    (243,596)
    Income taxes.................       (41)   (215)     1,325         --         --        --         --       (6,703)     (5,634)
    Minority interests and
      participation rights.......    (10,584)   695      4,522       (299)    (4,846)       --         --          478     (10,034)
                                     ------  ------     ------     ------     ------    ------    -------       ------     -------
    Net earnings (loss)..........    (10,583)   694      4,521       (299)    (4,846)     (241)  (223,513)       6,339    (227,928)
                                     ======  ======     ======     ======     ======    ======    =======       ======     =======
    Cash and cash equivalents....     1,133   1,021      5,980         --         14       574         --        7,846      16,568
    Capital expenditures.........     5,975   2,004      3,254      4,032      1,298     3,471      5,419           99      25,552
    Mining property, plant and
      equipment..................    72,379  63,955     25,503     46,539      9,546     4,111     15,000          229     237,262
    Total assets.................    82,639  151,147    35,616     50,490     12,416    13,990     23,485       88,512     458,295

                                                                                                                                B-15
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                            TVX GOLD INC.

                                             NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                                         Dollar amounts in thousands of U.S. dollars, except
                                      amounts per share and per ounce or unless otherwise noted

                                                                  FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000
                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                  MUSSEL-      NEW     STRATONI
                                    LA COIPA BRASILIA  CRIXAS      WHITE    BRITANNIA  OPERATIONS   GREECE     CORPORATE/
                                     (CHILE) (BRAZIL)  (BRAZIL)  (CANADA)   (CANADA)   (GREECE)   DEVELOPMENT     OTHER      TOTAL
                                    -------- --------  --------  --------   ---------  ---------- -----------  ----------  ---------
                                        $        $        $          $          $          $           $            $          $

<S>                                  <C>     <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>       <C>       <C>          <C>        <C>
    Revenue......................    48,902  30,361     26,774     21,892     14,552    16,081         --       11,468     170,030
                                     ------  ------     ------     ------     ------    ------    -------       ------     -------
    Cost of sales................    37,256  19,402     10,624     12,526     10,992    16,004         --           --     106,804
    Depletion and depreciation...    13,859   8,079      4,897      5,922      4,158     1,003         --           82      38,000
                                     ------  ------     ------     ------     ------    ------    -------       ------     -------
                                     51,115  27,481     15,521     18,448     15,150    17,007         --           82     144,804
                                     ------  ------     ------     ------     ------    ------    -------       ------     -------
    Earnings (loss) from
      operations before the          (2,213)  2,880     11,253      3,444       (598)     (926)        --       11,386      25,226
      undernoted.................
    Mining property, plant and
      equipment write-downs......        --      --         --         --         --        --         --           --          --
    Non-operating asset
      write-downs................        --      --         --         --         --        --         --           --          --
    Corporate administration.....        --      13         --         --         --        --         --        6,584       6,597
    Interest expense.............       426     505      1,131         --         --        --         --        1,385       3,447
    Exploration..................       768      --        584        555        515       146         --        2,929       5,497
    Foreign exchange loss........        --     993        539         45         16        --         --          422       2,015
    Interest income..............       (44) (1,872)      (618)        --         --        --         --       (6,969)     (9,503)
    Other........................     8,625  (3,194)      (420)       121         12        --         --          276       5,420
                                     ------  ------     ------     ------     ------    ------    -------       ------     -------
                                      9,775  (3,555)     1,216        721        543       146         --        4,627      13,473
                                     ------  ------     ------     ------     ------    ------    -------       ------     -------
    Earnings (loss) before the
      undernoted.................   (11,988)  6,435     10,037      2,723     (1,141)   (1,072)        --        6,759      11,753
    Income taxes.................    (1,298)    253      2,529         --         --        --         --       (1,663)       (179)
    Minority interests and
      participation rights.......    (5,345)  3,091      3,754      1,362       (571)       --         --       (2,787)       (496)
                                     ------  ------     ------     ------     ------    ------    -------       ------     -------
    Net earnings (loss)..........    (5,345)  3,091      3,754      1,361       (570)   (1,072)        --       11,209      12,428
                                     ======  ======     ======     ======     ======    ======    =======       ======     =======
    Cash and cash equivalents....        24   4,012      2,529        351         48     1,590         --       40,742      49,296
    Capital expenditures.........     6,053   2,171      2,912      1,076      1,612     3,258     31,616           48      48,746

</TABLE>

     Geographic segments are as follows:

                                                      FOR THE YEARS ENDED
                                                         DECEMBER 31,
                                               -------------------------------
                                                 2002        2001       2000
                                               --------    --------   --------
                                                   $           $           $
    Revenue
      Canada..................................   43,932      40,691     47,912
      Chile...................................   46,252      41,404     48,902
      Brazil..................................   63,566      52,085     57,135
      Greece..................................   31,007      24,160     16,081
                                               --------    --------   --------
                                                184,757     158,340    170,030
                                               ========    ========
    Identifiable assets
      Canada..................................  101,207     108,576
      Chile...................................   75,374      88,430
      Brazil..................................  113,944     188,148
      Greece..................................    4,158      37,475
      Other...................................  103,267      35,666
                                               --------    --------
                                                397,950     458,295
                                               ========    ========

16.  COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

     A)   ALPHA GROUP LITIGATION

          The Ontario Court (General Division) issued its judgement in
          connection with the claim against TVX Gold Inc. (TVX) by three
          individuals (collectively the "Alpha Group") on October 14, 1998
          relating to TVX's interest in the Hellenic Gold mining assets in
          Greece (the "Hellenic Gold Assets").

          The Court rejected full ownership and monetary damages claims but did
          award the Alpha Group a 12% carried interest and a right to acquire a
          further 12% participating interest in the Hellenic Gold Assets. TVX
          filed a notice to appeal and the Alpha Group filed a notice of
          cross-appeal.

          Subsequent to the trial decision, the Company received notification of
          two actions commenced by 1235866 Ontario Inc. ("1235866") the
          successor to Curragh Inc. ("Curragh"), Mineral Services Limited
          ("Mineral") and Curragh Limited ("Curragh Ltd.") against the Alpha
          Group, and others, in Ontario and English Courts, in relation to the
          claim by the Alpha Group against the Company for an interest in the
          Hellenic Gold Assets.

                                                                            B-16
<PAGE>

                                  TVX GOLD INC.

                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
               Dollar amounts in thousands of U.S. dollars, except
            amounts per share and per ounce or unless otherwise noted

     On July 28, 1999, the Company entered into an agreement with 1235866 to
     ensure that these new claims would not result in any additional diminution
     of the Company's interest in the Hellenic Gold Assets. 1235866 agreed not
     to pursue any claim against the Company for an interest in the Hellenic
     Gold Assets beyond the interest which had been awarded to the Alpha Group.
     In the event that 1235866 is successful in its claim against the Alpha
     Group, 1235866 would be entitled to a 12% carried interest as defined in
     the agreement (being an economic interest) and the right to acquire a 12%
     participating interest upon payment of 12% of the aggregate amounts
     expended by the Company and its subsidiaries in connection with the
     acquisition, exploration, development and operation of the Hellenic Gold
     Assets up to the date of exercise.

     The Company's appeal, the Alpha Group cross-appeal and the 1235866 motion
     were all heard on February 17, 18 and 25, 2000. By judgment released on
     June 1, 2000, the Court of Appeal, while partially granting the TVX appeal,
     essentially upheld the trial decision, rejected the Alpha Group
     cross-appeal and denied the 1235866 motion for a new trial. The result is
     that TVX holds, as constructive trustee, a 12% carried interest and a right
     to acquire a 12% participating interest in the Hellenic Gold Assets upon
     payment of costs associated with that interest. 1235866 continues its
     separate action against the Alpha Group.

     TVX and the Alpha Group have been unable to agree on the definition and
     application of the interests awarded in the trial judgment. Accordingly, in
     June, 2001, a new action was commenced between the Alpha Group and TVX to
     clarify the award. TVX anticipates that the hearing with respect to this
     matter may be held in 2004. The amount of a loss, if any, cannot be
     determined at this time.

B)   LITIGATION IN GREECE

     On March 1, 2002, the Conseil d'Etat, the Greek Supreme Court, issued its
     judgment which annulled the purportedly valid permits issued by the Greek
     Government to TVX Hellas with respect to the Olympias project. The Conseil
     D'Etat ruling effectively prohibits development of the Olympias project.
     TVX is reviewing its options, including legal remedies, with respect to
     recovery of its investment in Greece. As a result of the judgment, the
     Company wrote off the carrying value of Olympias in 2001 (note 4).

     On February 15, 2002, a new mining permit, allowing for the continuation of
     mining beneath the village of Stratoniki was issued to TVX Hellas. A local
     action group filed a Petition of Annulment against the Greek Government to
     have the new permit annulled. This action was heard on June 7, 2002. On
     December 9, 2002, the Conseil D'Etat released its decision on the challenge
     to the Stratoni mining permits. The Company was informed that the court
     ruled that TVX Hellas is not required to submit a new environmental impact
     study to support the relevant mine permits. The court also ruled, however,
     that the Greek Government had improperly issued the new mining permits
     because the Ministry of Development had not obtained a joint ministerial
     decision signed by five relevant ministries prior to issuing the permits.
     On January 9, 2003 the Company was informed by the Greek Ministry of
     Development instructing that mining beneath the village of Stratoniki be
     suspended until the new mining permits were signed by the five relevant
     ministries.

     Operations were suspended on January 9, 2003 and did not re-commence once
     the revised permits were issued on February 18, 2003. Kinross is currently
     assessing its future plans for the Stratoni base metal operations. The
     amount of a loss, if any, cannot be determined at this time (note 19(b)).

C)   HELLENIC GOLD COMMITMENTS

     Pursuant to the acquisition contract of the Hellenic Gold assets in 1995
     the Company has the obligation to fulfill the following: (1) Gold Plant
     Guarantee -- the Company is obligated to construct a gold plant within two
     years from receiving all applicable licences, which may be extended by a
     further eight months under certain circumstances. The Company pledged an
     amount of $7.5 million to satisfy a GRD2.6 billion guarantee; (2)
     employment must be offered by the construction contractor to 150 former
     employees of Hellenic Gold for a period of 18 months, during the
     construction of the gold plant. In 2002 the Greek State released the
     Company from the Gold Plant Guarantee and the relevant bank released the
     pledged amount; (3) the Company is also obligated to employ at least 477
     employees for a period of 10 years to maintain its eligibility for
     government grants.

D)   BRASILIA MINE

     In September 2001, Rio Tinto Brasil Ltda. ("Rio Tinto Brasil"), a
     subsidiary of Rio Tinto PLC, purported to terminate the shareholders
     agreement relating to Rio Paracatu Mineracao S.A., the operating
     corporation which holds the Brasilia mine. Rio Tinto Brasil also caused Rio
     Paracatu to call a meeting of its shareholders to amend its Articles of
     Association. The proposed amendments would permit Rio Tinto Brasil to have
     sole decision-making authority over Rio Paracatu through its 51% interest.
     Rio Tinto Brasil alleged that the transaction resulting in the formation of
     the TVX Newmont Americas joint venture (formerly TVX Normandy Americas
     joint venture) in June 1999 and the resignation of the former Chairman and
     Chief Executive Officer of TVX in April 2001 had triggered rights of first
     refusal under the shareholders agreement in favour of Rio Tinto Brasil and
     as such rights were not made available to Rio Tinto Brasil, it was
     permitted to terminate the shareholders agreement.

     The TVX Newmont Americas joint venture disagrees with Rio Tinto Brasil's
     interpretation of the shareholders agreement and was successful in
     obtaining an injunction against Rio Paracatu from holding the proposed
     shareholders meeting. Following the granting of the injunction in November
     2001, the TVX Newmont Americas joint venture commenced a claim in Brazil
     against Rio Tinto Brasil and Rio Paracatu to declare that the shareholders
     agreement continues to be valid. Rio Tinto Brasil and the TVX Newmont
     Americas joint venture have each filed pleadings with respect to this
     action. In October 2002, Rio Tinto Brasil again caused Rio Paracatu to call
     a meeting of its shareholders and TVX Newmont Americas was successful in
     obtaining another injunction. Subsequently, Rio Tinto Brasil and TVX
     Newmont Americas agreed to freeze litigation activities until the end of
     January 2003 which date coincides with the termination date specified in
     the combination agreement among Kinross, TVX and Echo Bay (note 19(c)).

                                                                            B-17
<PAGE>

                                  TVX GOLD INC.

                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
               Dollar amounts in thousands of U.S. dollars, except
            amounts per share and per ounce or unless otherwise noted

     In the event that Rio Tinto Brazil is successful in having the court rule
     that its termination of the shareholders agreement was valid, TVX would not
     be able to exercise joint control of Rio Paracatu under the terms of the
     agreement. In the event of such outcome, TVX will evaluate other legal
     remedies with respect to the management of Rio Paracatu. If TVX is not able
     to retain joint control of Rio Paracatu, management of Rio Paracatu, and
     operation of the Brasilia mine would be subject to the discretion of Rio
     Tinto Brasil. Further, upon a loss of joint control, TVX would no longer
     proportionately consolidate its interest in Rio Paracatu and would account
     for its interest using the equity method under Canadian and US GAAP. The
     termination of the shareholders agreement would not effect TVX's current
     ownership interest in Rio Paracatu and the amount of a loss, if any, cannot
     be determined at this time.

E)   NORMANDY INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS (PTY) LTD. ("NORMANDY") INDEMNIFICATION

     Effective July 1, 1999, the Company conveyed 50% of its interests in five
     operating mines to Normandy for net proceeds of $180,953. As part of the
     transaction, the Company agreed to indemnify Normandy until June 2005 for
     up to $15 million of unforeseen, pre-existing environmental liabilities
     associated with the assets transferred. These assets were reacquired under
     the terms of the transaction described in note 19(a).

F)   GENERAL

     Various lawsuits are pending against the Company. The actual liability with
     respect to these lawsuits is not determinable, but management believes,
     based on the opinion of counsel, that any liability will not materially
     affect the Company's consolidated financial position.


17.  DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CANADIAN AND UNITED STATES GENERALLY ACCEPTED
     ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES

     The Company prepares its financial statements in accordance with accounting
     principles generally accepted in Canada ("Canadian GAAP") which generally
     conform to generally accepted accounting principles in the United States
     ("US GAAP") except for the following significant differences that affect
     the Company:

     a)   (i)  Effective January 1, 2000, the Company adopted the asset and
               liability method of accounting for income taxes under Canadian
               GAAP (note 2(d)). This change was made without restatement of the
               1999 comparative figures.

               Prior to 2000, under Canadian GAAP, deferred income taxes were
               determined using the deferral method whereby deferred income
               taxes were provided for timing differences based on tax rates in
               effect when the timing difference arose. Under US GAAP, income
               taxes are determined using the liability method whereby deferred
               income taxes are provided for temporary differences using tax
               rates expected to apply when the differences reverse (notes 2(d)
               and 12).

          (ii) The income tax expense (recovery) adjustment results from the tax
               effects of US GAAP adjustments described in note 17 and the
               application of the accounting policy described in note 17(a)(i)
               for the period prior to January 1, 2000.

     b)   Under Canadian GAAP, the Notes (note 14) were accounted for under a
          components approach whereby the Notes were presented with both
          liability and equity components as explained in note 14. Under US
          GAAP, these Notes were treated as long-term debt and all interest
          amounts (to the extent not capitalized to development projects) and
          amortization of debt issue costs were included in income.

          On July 10, 2001, the Company completed the conversion of the Notes
          into 32,150,118 common shares of the Company valued at $211,761.

          As explained above, prior to the conversion, the Notes were accounted
          for under a components approach under Canadian GAAP. The effects of
          the conversion under Canadian GAAP are described in note 14.

          Under US GAAP, these Notes were treated as long-term debt. In
          accordance with US GAAP, an extraordinary gain of $34,181 net of
          income taxes of $nil, was recorded on this extinguishment of debt. The
          gain is comprised of the difference between the carrying value of the
          Notes and the value of the common shares issued less related
          transaction costs and the write-off of unamortized debt issue costs.

     c)   Under US GAAP, start-up costs are expensed as incurred. Under Canadian
          GAAP, start-up costs are deferred and amortized over the mine life.

     d)   Under Canadian GAAP, capital assets are written down to net
          recoverable amount when the expected undiscounted future cash flows
          from their use are less than the asset carrying amount (note 4). Under
          US GAAP, when the expected undiscounted future cash flows show a
          deficiency, the asset is written down to fair value. Fair value has
          been estimated using discounted expected future cash flows. In 2002
          under Canadian GAAP, the Company wrote down a capital asset which had
          already been written down under US GAAP. This resulted in a reduction
          in the write down recorded under US GAAP in 2002.

          An adjustment to the deferred tax liability resulted from the US GAAP
          adjustment.

     e)   Under US GAAP, the components of changes in non-cash working capital
          are to be disclosed. They are as follows:

                                                                            B-18
<PAGE>

                                  TVX GOLD INC.

                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
               Dollar amounts in thousands of U.S. dollars, except
            amounts per share and per ounce or unless otherwise noted

                                                    FOR THE YEAR ENDED
                                                       DECEMBER 31,
                                                       ------------
                                                2002       2001         2000
                                              --------   --------     --------
                                                  $          $            $
        Accounts receivable..................   4,163     (7,065)      (4,070)
        Inventories..........................   3,442      8,913        5,034
        Accounts payable.....................    (426)    (2,368)      (3,623)
                                              --------   --------     --------
                                                7,179       (520)      (2,659)
                                              ========   ========     ========

     f)   Effective January 1, 2001, the Company adopted Statement of Financial
          Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative
          Instruments and Hedging Activities", as amended by SFAS No. 138,
          "Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging
          Activities" ("the Standards"). These Standards require companies to
          record derivatives on the balance sheet as assets or liabilities,
          measured at their fair value. If the derivative is designated as a
          fair value hedge, the effective portions of the changes in the fair
          value of the derivative, and changes in the fair value of the hedged
          item attributable to the hedged risk, are recognized in the income
          statement. If the derivative is designated as a cash flow hedge, the
          effective portion of the changes in fair value of the derivative are
          recorded in other comprehensive income ("OCI") and are recognized in
          the income statement when the hedged item is recognized. Accordingly,
          ineffective portions of changes in the fair value of hedging
          instruments are recognized in earnings immediately. Gains or losses
          arising from hedging activities, including the ineffective portion,
          are reported in the same income statement caption as the hedged item.
          Gains or losses from derivative instruments for which hedge accounting
          is not applied are reported in other income.

          In accordance with the transition provisions of the Standards, the
          Company recorded the following after-tax cumulative adjustments on
          January 1, 2001 as a result of recording all derivative financial
          instruments on the consolidated balance sheet at fair value:

          o    an increase in OCI of $17.5 million, net of future income taxes
               of $nil;

          o    an increase in assets of $12.5 million; and

          o    a decrease in liabilities of $5 million.

          The Company has entered into the following types of derivative
          instruments:

          (See note 11 for details on the Company's commodity contracts and
          financial instruments).

          i)   Certain gold put options, lease rate swaps and lead and zinc
               forward contracts

               Prior to adoption of the Standards, these instruments were
               accounted for as cash flow hedges of future metals sales under
               both US and Canadian GAAP. On adoption of the Standards, the
               Company elected not to designate these contracts as hedges for US
               accounting purposes with the effect that the contracts were
               recognized at their fair value on January 1, 2001 with an
               offsetting amount in OCI. Changes in the fair value of these
               derivative instruments subsequent to January 1, 2001 have been
               reflected in current period earnings under US GAAP.

          ii)  Written silver call options and certain gold put options

               Prior to the adoption of the Standards, these derivative
               instruments were recorded at their fair value on the balance
               sheet with subsequent changes in fair value reflected in current
               period earnings. The adoption of the Standards did not result in
               any change in the accounting treatment for these derivative
               instruments and does not represent a US GAAP difference as the
               Company records these instruments at fair value for Canadian
               reporting purposes.

          iii) Foreign currency contracts

               Prior to the adoption of the Standards, these contracts were
               recorded at their fair value in the balance sheet with subsequent
               changes in fair value reflected in current period earnings. The
               adoption of the Standards did not result in any change in the US
               accounting treatment for the contracts. Under Canadian GAAP,
               foreign currency contracts are recorded when the corresponding
               hedge-designated period is reached.

               The Company estimates that $7.3 million of gains, net of future
               income taxes of $nil, will be reclassified from OCI to current
               period earnings within the next twelve months.

               A reconciliation of changes in OCI attributed to hedging
               activities is as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                                   December 31,
                                                                                                                  --------------
                                                                                                                   2002    2001
                                                                                                                  ------  ------
                                                                                                                    $       $
<S>                                                                                                                <C>     <C>
          Hedging gains, net of future income taxes of $nil, beginning of period...............................   10,985  17,544
          Hedging gains at beginning of period reclassified to earnings, net of future income taxes of $nil....    8,025   6,559
                                                                                                                  ------  ------
          Total hedging gains net of future income taxes of $nil...............................................    2,960  10,985
                                                                                                                  ======  ======
</TABLE>

     g)   The minority interests and participation rights adjustment arises from
          the minority interests and participation rights impacts of the US GAAP
          adjustments described in note 17.

                                                                            B-19
<PAGE>

                                  TVX GOLD INC.

                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
               Dollar amounts in thousands of U.S. dollars, except
            amounts per share and per ounce or unless otherwise noted

h)   The La Coipa, Brasilia and Crixas mines are proportionately consolidated
     under Canadian GAAP. These mines would be accounted for using the equity
     method under US GAAP. An accommodation is available under certain
     conditions pursuant to Item 17(c)(2)(vii) of SEC Form 20-F which permits
     the omission of differences in classification or display that result from
     using proportionate consolidation in the reconciliation to US GAAP. The
     Company has evaluated the criteria and has determined that the La Coipa,
     Brasilia and Crixas mines qualify for this accommodation as these joint
     ventures are operating entities, the significant financial and operating
     policies of which are, by contractual arrangement, jointly controlled by
     all parties having an equity interest in these entities.

i)   For purposes of this US GAAP reconciliation, the terms "proven and probable
     reserves", "exploration", "development", and "production" have the same
     meaning under both US and Canadian GAAP.

     Exploration costs incurred are expensed at the same point in time based on
     the same criteria under both US and Canadian GAAP. In addition, mining
     related costs are only capitalized after proven and probable reserves have
     been designated under both US and Canadian GAAP.

As a result of the above, the following would be US GAAP information for the
years ended December 31:

    INCOME STATEMENT

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                 2002       2001       2000
                                                                                                 ----       ----       ----
                                                                                                   $          $          $
<S>                                                                                              <C>       <C>         <C>
    Earnings (loss) in accordance with Canadian GAAP..........................................   (30,616)  (227,928)   12,428
    Mining property write-downs (d)...........................................................        --    (51,185)       --
    Depletion and depreciation (c)(d).........................................................     4,046      2,830     3,410
    Interest expense (b)......................................................................        --     (1,107)   (2,101)
    Income tax expense (recovery) (a).........................................................      (602)     3,650     2,092
    Minority interests and participation rights (g)...........................................    (1,722)     2,160    (1,705)
    Foreign exchange gain (loss) (f)(iii).....................................................        21     (1,821)    1,800
    Non-operating asset write-downs (d).......................................................     9,900         --        --
    Other income (f)(i).......................................................................    (3,235)       967        --
                                                                                                --------   --------   -------
    Earnings (loss) in accordance with US GAAP, before extraordinary gain.....................   (22,208)  (272,434)   15,924
    Extraordinary gain (net of tax) (b).......................................................        --     34,181        --
                                                                                                --------   --------   -------
    Earnings (loss) in accordance with US GAAP................................................   (22,208)  (238,253)   15,924
                                                                                                ========   ========   =======
    Earnings (loss) per share under US GAAP, before extraordinary gain........................    (0.54)     (14.42)     4.45
    Earnings (loss) per share under US GAAP...................................................    (0.54)     (12.61)     4.45

    BALANCE SHEET
                                                                                                           2002         2001
                                                                                                           ----         ----
                                                                                                             $            $
    Current assets (f).....................................................................................154,758       95,454
    Mining property, plant and equipment (b), (c), (d).....................................................198,511      219,997
    Deferred charges (f)...................................................................................  4,925        6,694
    Current liabilities (f)................................................................................ 35,906       43,688
    Deferred tax liability (a)............................................................................. 17,347       17,298
    Long-term debt (b).....................................................................................     --       58,832
    Minority interests and participation rights (g)........................................................120,002      126,211
    Contributed surplus (b)................................................................................  1,526        1,526
    Deficit...............................................................................................(450,702)    (428,494)
    Other comprehensive income (f).........................................................................  2,959       10,985

    STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
                                                                                                 2002      2001         2000
                                                                                                 ----      ----         ----
                                                                                                   $         $            $
    Cash provided from operations...............................................................44,406    45,783       32,557
    Cash used for investing activities (b)......................................................28,042   (27,230)    (106,478)
    Cash provided from (used for) financing activities (b)......................................26,196   (51,281)      29,777
    Net cash, end of year......................................................................115,212    16,568       49,296
</TABLE>

18.  COMPARATIVE FIGURES

     Certain comparative figures have been reclassified to conform to the
     presentation used in the current year.

                                                                            B-20
<PAGE>

                                  TVX GOLD INC.

                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
               Dollar amounts in thousands of U.S. dollars, except
            amounts per share and per ounce or unless otherwise noted


19.  SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

     A)   ACQUISITION AND MERGER

          TVX, Echo Bay Mines Ltd. ("Echo Bay") and Kinross Gold Corporation
          ("Kinross") entered into a combination agreement dated June 10, 2002,
          as amended as of July 12, 2002 and November 19, 2002, for the purpose
          of combining the ownership of their respective businesses. The
          combination was to be effected by way of a plan of arrangement under
          the Canada Business Corporations Act ("CBCA").

          In a separate transaction, TVX and a subsidiary of TVX entered into
          two agreements dated June 10, 2002, each as amended as of November 19,
          2002, with a subsidiary of Newmont Mining Corporation ("Newmont").
          Pursuant to these agreements, TVX acquired Newmont's 50%
          non-controlling interest in the TVX Newmont Americas joint ventures
          (shown as "Minority interests and participation rights" in the
          December 31, 2002 TVX balance sheet) for an aggregate price of $180
          million with an effective date of January 31, 2003.

          On January 31, 2003, the shareholders of TVX approved the Plan of
          Arrangement allowing the combination of the TVX, Echo Bay and Kinross
          businesses. Subsequent to this, on January 31, 2003, the Superior
          Court of Justice, Ontario approved the Plan of Arrangement.

          Upon completion, on January 31, 2003, of the Plan of Arrangement and
          the purchase of Newmont's interest in the TVX Newmont Americas joint
          venture, and taking into account the Kinross three old for one new
          share consolidation approved by Kinross shareholders at the January
          28, 2003 Special Meeting of Kinross Shareholders, TVX shareholders
          received 2.1667 shares of Kinross for each TVX share.

     B)   GREECE

          On January 9, 2003, the Greek Ministry of Development ordered TVX
          Hellas to suspend mining beneath the village of Stratoniki. The
          suspension at the Stratoni mine took immediate effect and would be
          released upon the receipt of new mining permits signed by the five
          relevant ministries of the Greek Government. Pursuant to the order,
          operations were suspended and did not re-commence once the revised
          permits were issued on February 18, 2003 as Kinross attempted to
          negotiate a settlement and possible exit strategy with the Greek
          Government.

          The Greek Government undertook initiatives to put together a viable
          long-term structure for the re-opening of the Stratoni mine.
          Representatives of the participants of the new plan will meet in order
          to set in motion the legal processes for the completion of the new
          structure.

          The new structure includes a major Greek mining enterprise, a group of
          Greek construction companies and Kinross, as well as local Prefectural
          and Municipal Authorities.

          As part of the overall agreement, and with Kinross' commitment of $10
          million for the support of the new plan, Kinross will retain the
          mineral rights at Skouries, with the prospect of conducting a
          systematic exploration and evaluation of the deposit.

          For the transitional period and until the undertaking of the mines by
          the new structure, Kinross has pledged to the Greek Government that it
          will maintain the operation of the water treatment plant for the
          protection of the environment, thus safeguarding public health and
          safety in the region. In the meantime, TVX Hellas, in order to protect
          its interest, has filed a petition for suspension of payments.

     C)   BRASILIA MINE

          With respect to the dispute between Rio Tinto Brasil and TVX Newmont
          Americas, as more fully described in note 16(d), the freeze date for
          litigation was extended to April 22, 2003. On April 28, 2003, a TVX
          subsidiary received notification from Rio Tinto Brasil stating that
          they preserve their right to litigate in respect of the alleged breach
          of the shareholders agreement and alleging that the combination (note
          19(a)) breached the shareholders agreement as well.

     D)   NEW CREDIT FACILITY

          In February 2003, Kinross and three of its wholly-owned subsidiaries
          ("the Borrowers") entered into a new syndicated credit facility. The
          new syndicated credit facility has a maturity date of December 31,
          2005 and a total committed amount of $125.0 million. The primary
          purpose of the credit facility is to enable the Borrowers to issue
          letters of credit to various regulatory agencies to satisfy financial
          assurance requirements. The shares of TVX Gold Inc. and 13 wholly
          owned subsidiaries have been pledged as collateral for this credit
          facility.

                                                                            B-21
<PAGE>

                                   APPENDIX C



REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS



The Board of Directors
Echo Bay Mines Ltd.

We have audited the consolidated balance sheets of Echo Bay Mines Ltd. as at
December 31, 2002 and 2001 and the consolidated statements of operations,
deficit and cash flow for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2002. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with Canadian and United States generally
accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform an
audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as at
December 31, 2002 and 2001 and the results of its operations and its cash flows
for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2002 in
accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles.



Edmonton, Canada                                /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
February 7, 2003, except for note 18(c),
as to which the date is March 26, 2003                  Chartered Accountants


                                                                             C-1
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                  ECHO BAY MINES LTD.

                                              CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

                                                      December 31

 (thousands of U.S. dollars)                                                     2002                   2001
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                                       <C>                    <C>
 ASSETS
 Current assets:
    Cash and cash equivalents                                             $    22,967            $    12,351
    Short-term investments                                                      7,183                  1,910
    Interest and accounts receivable                                            4,177                  3,645
    Inventories (note 2)                                                       20,834                 29,506
    Prepaid expenses and other assets                                           1,954                  3,725
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                               57,115                 51,137

 Plant and equipment (note 3)                                                 100,576                120,969
 Mining properties (note 3)                                                    29,017                 32,903
 Long-term investments and other assets (note 4)                               36,982                 55,795
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                          $   223,690            $   260,804
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
 Current liabilities:
    Accounts payable and accrued liabilities                              $    24,813            $    24,284
    Income and mining taxes payable                                             3,793                  3,570
    Debt and other financings (note 5)                                             --                 17,000
    Reclamation and mine closure liabilities (note 8)                           4,560                  3,841
    Deferred income (note 6)                                                       --                    876
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                               33,166                 49,571

 Debt and other financings (note 5)                                                --                  6,714
 Deferred income (note 6)                                                       6,393                 47,042
 Reclamation and mine closure liabilities (note 8)                             46,512                 49,726
 Deferred income taxes                                                            945                    925

 Commitments and contingencies (notes 8, 16 and 17)

 Shareholders' equity:
    Capital stock (note 12), no par value, unlimited number
 authorized; issued and outstanding - 541,272,675 shares                    1,042,571                713,343
    Capital securities (note 7)                                                    --                157,453
    Deficit                                                                  (879,238)              (734,665)
    Foreign currency translation                                              (26,659)               (29,305)
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                              136,674                106,826
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                          $   223,690            $   260,804
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

See accompanying notes.
On behalf of the Board:                     "Brian W. Penny"                    "Christopher T. Hill"
                                                Director                               Director
</TABLE>

                                                                             C-2
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                  ECHO BAY MINES LTD.

                                         CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

                                                Year ended December 31


 (thousands of U.S. dollars,
 except for per share data)                                                   2002             2001            2000
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                                   <C>              <C>             <C>
 Revenue                                                              $    206,529     $    237,684    $    280,976
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Expenses:
    Operating costs                                                        128,136          175,341         173,435
    Royalties (note 17)                                                      7,799            7,597           8,034
    Production taxes                                                         1,222              177           2,460
    Depreciation and amortization                                           35,271           42,101          50,664
    Reclamation and mine closure                                             5,066            6,098          10,572
    General and administrative                                               9,141            5,623           5,650
    Exploration and development                                              8,554            3,466          10,336
    Interest and other (note 9)                                             13,420            6,106           3,012
    Loss on retirement of capital securities (note 12)                       5,461               --              --
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                           214,070          246,509         264,163
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Earnings (loss) before income taxes                                        (7,541)          (8,825)         16,813
 Income tax expense (recovery) (note 10)                                       149           (3,147)         (1,748)
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Net earnings (loss)                                                 $     (7,690)    $      (5,678)  $      18,561
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 Net earnings (loss) attributable to common shareholders (note 7)    $    (144,573)   $     (22,985)  $       3,164
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 Earnings (loss) per share - basic and fully diluted                 $       (0.34)   $       (0.16)  $        0.02
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Weighted average number of shares outstanding (thousands)
    - basic and diluted                                                    429,783          140,607         140,607
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


                                          CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF DEFICIT

Year ended December 31


 (thousands of U.S. dollars)                                                  2002             2001            2000
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Balance, beginning of year                                          $    (734,665)   $    (711,680)  $    (714,844)
 Net earnings (loss)                                                        (7,690)          (5,678)         18,561

 Loss on retirement of capital securities, net of nil tax effect          (132,302)              --              --
 (note 7)
 Interest on capital securities, net of nil tax effect (note 7)             (4,581)         (17,307)        (15,397)
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Balance, end of year                                                $    (879,238)   $    (734,665)  $    (711,680)
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes.

                                                                             C-3
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                      ECHO BAY MINES LTD.

                                             CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW

                                                    Year ended December 31


(thousands of U.S. dollars)                                                           2002            2001            2000
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                                            <C>             <C>             <C>
CASH PROVIDED FROM (USED IN):
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net earnings (loss)                                                            $    (7,690)    $    (5,678)    $    18,561
Add (deduct):
   Depreciation                                                                     27,572          31,093          32,457
   Amortization                                                                      7,699          11,008          18,207
   Amortization of mining costs                                                      2,328           6,118           4,202
   Loss on retirement of capital securities                                          5,461              --              --
   Deferred income included in revenue (note 6)                                    (30,733)        (18,609)        (24,473)
   Deferred income included in operating costs (note 6)                                 --          (2,846)         (3,149)
   Deferral of gains on restructuring of hedge commitments                              --              --           4,287
   Deferred income taxes                                                                --          (3,358)         (2,400)
   Net gain on sale of other assets (note 9)                                        (1,242)           (700)           (432)
   Unrealized losses on share investments                                               --             150              28
   Provision for impaired assets (note 9)                                            7,000           4,384              --
   Provision for deferred gains and losses on modified hedge contracts               3,098              --              --
    (note 9)
   Allowance for bad debts (note 9)                                                  1,509              --              --
   Other                                                                               245             588          (1,084)
Change in cash invested in operating assets and liabilities:
   Interest and accounts receivable                                                 (2,035)           (648)            (85)
   Inventories                                                                       6,884           8,780          (2,869)
   Prepaid expenses and other assets                                                   (56)            166             (31)
   Accounts payable and accrued liabilities                                         (1,174)          3,304             496
   Income and mining taxes payable                                                     266          (2,174)          2,790
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                    19,132          31,578          46,505
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Mining properties, plant and equipment                                             (12,581)        (22,817)        (11,589)
Long-term investments and other assets                                              (4,518)         (1,879)           (524)
Proceeds on sale of plant and equipment                                              1,872             943             332
Other                                                                                1,194            (243)            894
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                   (14,033)        (23,996)        (10,887)
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Debt repayments                                                                    (17,000)         (9,500)        (36,750)
Debt borrowings                                                                         --              --          12,000
Units offering, net of issuance costs (note 12 )                                    25,513              --              --
Warrants exercised                                                                       4              --              --
Costs of capital securities retirement                                              (3,000)             --              --
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                     5,517          (9,500)        (24,750)
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents                                10,616          (1,918)         10,868
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year                                        12,351          14,269           3,401
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year                                         $    22,967     $    12,351     $    14,269
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes.

                                                                             C-4

<PAGE>

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

GENERAL
Echo Bay Mines Ltd. ("Echo Bay" or the "Company") is engaged in the production
of gold and silver and related activities including exploration, development,
mining and processing. These activities are conducted principally in the United
States and Canada. Gold accounted for 96% and silver 4% of 2002 revenue
respectively. The Company has two operating mines: Round Mountain in Nevada,
United States and Lupin in Nunavut Territory, Canada. The Company's Kettle River
mine in Washington, United States was placed on care and maintenance in October
2002. The Company operated a fourth mine, McCoy/Cove in Nevada, United States,
until March 31, 2002, at which date mining and processing activities were
completed. The Company holds a 100% interest in its Kettle River and Lupin mines
and a 50% interest in its Round Mountain, which it operates, with the remaining
50% interest held by affiliates of Barrick Gold Corporation. The Company's
McCoy/Cove mine was conveyed to a subsidiary of Newmont Mining Corporation
effective February 7, 2003 as described in note 18.

The Company's financial position and operating results are directly affected by
the market price of gold in relation to the Company's production costs. Silver
price fluctuations also affect the Company's financial position and operating
results, although to a lesser extent. Gold and silver prices fluctuate in
response to numerous factors beyond the Company's control.

The consolidated financial statements are prepared on the historical cost basis
in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in Canada and, in
all material respects, conform with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States, except as described in note 13. The statements are expressed
in U.S. dollars.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Certain of the comparative figures have been reclassified to conform to the
current year's presentation.

PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and
its subsidiaries. Interests in joint ventures, each of which by contractual
arrangement is jointly controlled by all parties having an equity interest in
the joint venture, are accounted for using the proportionate consolidation
method to consolidate the Company's share of the joint venture's assets,
liabilities, revenues and expenses.

                                                                             C-5
<PAGE>

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (cont'd.)

SHARE INVESTMENTS
Short-term investments, comprised of publicly traded common shares, are recorded
at the lower of cost or quoted market prices, with unrealized losses included in
income. Long-term common share investments are recorded at cost. A provision for
loss is recorded in income if there is a decline in the market value of a
long-term share investment that is other than temporary. If the Company's share
investment represents more than 20% ownership interest and the Company can
exercise significant influence over the investee, the equity method of
accounting is used. The equity method reports the investment at cost adjusted
for the Company's pro rata share of the investee's undistributed earnings or
losses since acquisition.

FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION
The Company's self-sustaining Canadian operations are translated into U.S.
dollars using the current-rate method, which translates assets and liabilities
at the year-end exchange rate and translates revenue and expenses at average
exchange rates. Exchange differences arising on translation are recorded as a
separate component of shareholders' equity. The change in the balance is
attributable to fluctuations in the exchange rate of U.S. dollars to Canadian
dollars.

REVENUE RECOGNITION
Revenue is recognized when title to delivered gold or silver and the risks and
rewards of ownership pass to the buyer.

EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
Earnings (loss) per share are calculated based on the weighted average number of
common shares outstanding during the year. For per share calculations, the
amount of capital securities interest and loss on conversion that is charged
directly to the deficit decreases the earnings, or increases the loss,
attributable to common shareholders. Fully diluted earnings (loss) per share are
the same as basic earnings (loss) per share because the Company's outstanding
options are not dilutive.

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
The Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with a
maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

                                                                             C-6
<PAGE>

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (cont'd.)

INVENTORIES
Precious metals and in-process inventories are valued at the lower of cost,
using the "first-in, first-out" method, or net realizable value. Materials and
supplies are valued at the lower of average cost or replacement cost.

PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Plant and equipment are recorded at cost. Plant and equipment that have useful
lives shorter than the mine life are depreciated using the straight-line method
over each asset's estimated remaining economic life to a current maximum of 4
years.

MINING PROPERTIES - PRODUCING MINES' ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT COSTS
Mining properties are recorded at cost of acquisition. Mine development costs
include expenditures incurred to develop new ore bodies, to define further
resources in existing ore bodies and to expand the capacity of operating mines.
These expenditures are amortized against earnings on the unit-of-production
method based on estimated recoverable ounces of gold. Estimated recoverable
ounces of gold include proven and probable reserves and non-reserve material
when sufficient objective evidence exists to support a conclusion that it is
probable the non-reserve material will be produced.

For the purpose of preparing financial information in accordance with United
States generally accepted accounting principles, only proven and probable
reserves are considered when applying the unit-of-production method. Non-reserve
material was not used in the periods covered by these financial statements when
applying the unit-of-production method under both Canadian and U.S. generally
accepted accounting standards.

                                                                             C-7
<PAGE>

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (cont'd.)

DEVELOPMENT PROPERTIES
At properties identified as having the potential to add to the Company's proven
and probable reserves, the direct costs of acquisition and development are
capitalized only if there is sufficient objective evidence to indicate that it
is probable that the property will become an operating mine. Factors considered
in making this assessment include the existence and nature of known resources
and proven and probable reserves, whether the proximity of the property to
existing mines and ore bodies increases the probability of developing an
operating mine, the results of recent drilling on the property and the existence
of feasibility studies or other analyses demonstrating the existence of
commercially recoverable ore. Capitalized costs are evaluated for recoverability
when events or circumstances indicate that investment in the property may be
impaired and are written off if it is determined that the project is not
commercially feasible in the period in which this determination is made. The
assessment of cost recoverability is based on proven and probable reserves on
the property, if any, as well as resources which do not meet the criteria for
classification as a proven or probable reserve. If production commences,
capitalized costs are transferred to "producing mines' acquisition and
development costs" and amortized as described above.

For the purpose of preparing financial information in accordance with United
States generally accepted accounting principles, all costs associated with a
property that has the potential to add to the Company's proven and probable
reserves are expensed until a final feasibility study demonstrating the
existence of proven and probable reserves is completed. No costs have been
capitalized in the periods covered by these financial statements that do not
meet the criteria for capitalization under both Canadian and U.S. generally
accepted accounting standards.

DEFERRED MINING COSTS
Mining costs incurred to remove ore and waste from an open pit and to access new
production areas in an underground mine are capitalized as long-term deferred
costs. These costs are deferred because they relate to gold that will be
produced in future years and they are charged to operating costs in the period
that the related production occurs.

For open pit operations, mining costs are capitalized on an individual mine
basis, using the ratio of total tons of waste and ore to be mined to total gold
ounces to be recovered over the life of the mine. Costs are capitalized in
periods when the ratio of tons mined to gold produced exceeds the expected
average for the mine. Amortization occurs in periods when the ratio is less than
the expected average. This accounting method considers variations in grade and
recovery in addition to waste-to-ore ratios and results in the recognition of
mining costs evenly over the life of the mine as gold is produced.

                                                                             C-8
<PAGE>

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (cont'd.)

FOR UNDERGROUND MINING OPERATIONS, THE COSTS OF ACCESSING AND DEVELOPING NEW
production areas are deferred and expensed as operating costs in the period in
which the related production occurs.

EXPLORATION COSTS
The costs of exploration programs are expensed as incurred.

RECLAMATION AND MINE CLOSURE COSTS
Estimated site restoration and closure costs for each producing mine are charged
against operating earnings on the unit-of-production method based on estimated
recoverable ounces of gold.

INCOME TAXES
The Company uses the liability method of accounting for income taxes whereby
deferred income taxes are based on applying statutory tax rates to the
differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for
accounting and tax purposes. A valuation adjustment is provided against deferred
income tax assets unless they are considered more likely than not to be
realized.

PROPERTY EVALUATIONS
The Company annually reviews detailed engineering life-of-mine plans for each
mine. Long-lived assets are evaluated for impairment when events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the related carrying amounts may not be recoverable.
Expected future undiscounted cash flows are calculated using estimated
recoverable ounces of gold (considering proven and probable mineral reserves and
mineral resources expected to be converted into mineral reserves), future sales
prices (considering current and historical prices, price trends and related
factors), operating costs, capital expenditures, reclamation and mine closure
costs. Reductions in the carrying amount of long-lived assets, with a
corresponding charge to earnings, are recorded to the extent that the estimated
future cash flows are less than the carrying amount.

The Company's estimates of future cash flows are subject to risks and
uncertainties. It is possible that changes may occur which could affect the
recoverability of the Company's long-lived assets.

For the purpose of preparing financial information in accordance with United
States generally accepted accounting principles, estimated recoverable ounces of
gold include proven and probable reserves. Impairment amounts reported in these
financial statements under Canadian or U.S. generally accepted accounting
standards are not affected by this difference.

                                                                             C-9
<PAGE>

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (cont'd.)

Reserve risks
If the Company were to determine that its reserves and future cash flows should
be calculated at a significantly lower gold price than the $300 per ounce price
used at December 31, 2002, there would likely be a material reduction in the
amount of gold reserves. In addition, if the price realized by the Company for
its gold or silver bullion were to decline substantially below the price at
which mineral reserves were calculated for a sustained period of time, the
Company potentially could experience material write-downs of its investment in
its mining properties. Under certain of such circumstances, the Company might
discontinue the development of a project or mining at one or more of its
properties or might temporarily suspend operations at a producing property and
place that property in a "care and maintenance" mode. Reserves could also be
materially and adversely affected by changes in operating and capital costs and
short-term operating factors such as the need for sequential development of ore
bodies and the processing of new or different ore grades and ore types.

Significant changes in the life-of-mine plans can occur as a result of mining
experience, new ore discoveries, changes in mining methods and rates, process
changes, investments in new equipment and technology, and other factors. Changes
in the significant assumptions underlying future cash flow estimates, including
assumptions regarding precious metals prices, may have a material effect on
future carrying values and operating results.

CAPITALIZATION OF INTEREST
Interest cost is capitalized on construction programs until the facilities are
ready for their intended use.

EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
Obligations and related costs under defined contribution employee benefit plans
are accrued as the benefits are earned by the employees. The Company does not
have any defined benefit plans.

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION PLANS
The Company has three stock-based compensation plans, which are described in
note 12. No compensation expense is recognized for these plans when the stock or
stock options are issued to employees. Any consideration paid by employees on
the exercise of stock options is credited to share capital.

                                                                            C-10
<PAGE>

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (cont'd.)

HEDGING ACTIVITIES
The Company's profitability is subject to changes in gold and silver prices,
exchange rates, interest rates and certain commodity prices. To reduce the
impact of such changes, the Company locks in the future value of certain of
these items through hedging transactions. These transactions are accomplished
through the use of derivative financial instruments, the value of which is
derived from movements in the underlying prices or rates.

The gold- and silver-related instruments used in these transactions include
forward sales contracts and options. These forward sales contracts obligate the
Company to sell gold or silver at a specific price on a future date. Call
options give the holder the right, but not the obligation to buy gold or silver
at a specific future date at a specific price. These tools reduce the risk of
gold and silver price declines, but also could limit the Company's participation
in increases of gold and silver prices. The Company engages in forward
currency-exchange contracts to reduce the impact on the Lupin mine's operating
costs caused by fluctuations in the exchange rate of U.S. dollars to Canadian
dollars.

Gains and losses resulting from hedging activities are recognized in earnings on
a basis consistent with the hedged item. When hedged production is sold, revenue
is recognized in amounts implicit in the commodity loan, delivery commitment or
option agreement. Gains or losses on foreign currency are recorded in operating
costs, or capitalized in the cost of assets, when the hedged Canadian dollar
transactions occur. Gains and losses on early termination of hedging contracts
are deferred until the formerly hedged items are recognized in earnings.
Premiums paid or received on gold and silver option contracts purchased or sold
are deferred and recognized in earnings on the option expiration dates. Call
options written after October 24, 2000 are carried at fair value in accordance
with Emerging Issues Committee Abstract 113, "Accounting by Commodity Producers
for Written Call Options."

                                                                            C-11
<PAGE>

2. INVENTORIES

                                                        2002              2001
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Precious metals bullion                        $      5,239      $     12,215
 In-process                                            4,332             5,720
 Materials and supplies                               11,263            11,571
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                $     20,834      $     29,506
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

3. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

 NET BOOK VALUE                                                                             2002             2001
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                   Plant and            Mining          Net Book         Net Book
 Property and percentage owned                     Equipment        Properties             Value            Value
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                             <C>               <C>               <C>              <C>
 Round Mountain (50%)                           $     48,868      $     14,149      $     63,017     $     76,001
 McCoy/Cove (100%)                                     7,507                --             7,507           10,104
 Lupin (100%)                                         13,914             1,925            15,839           22,193
 Aquarius (100%)                                      29,994            12,943            42,937           43,680
 Other                                                   293                --               293            1,894
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                $    100,576      $     29,017      $    129,593     $    153,872
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 PLANT AND EQUIPMENT                                                      2002                               2001
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                      Net Book                           Net Book
                                                        Cost             Value              Cost            Value
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Land improvements and utility systems          $     69,062      $      2,047      $     72,977     $      3,220
 Buildings                                           157,597            20,496           153,779           25,466
 Equipment                                           391,157            47,029           385,086           53,371
 Construction in progress                             37,005            31,004            43,337           38,912
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                $    654,821      $    100,576      $    655,179     $    120,969
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 MINING PROPERTIES                                                                          2002             2001
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Producing mines' acquisition and development costs                                 $    283,641     $    280,545
 Less accumulated amortization                                                           267,567          260,365
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                          16,074           20,180
 Development properties' acquisition and development costs                                12,943           12,723
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                    $     29,017     $     32,903
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>

During 2002, the Company wrote down the carrying values of the Lupin mine.
During 2001, the Company wrote down the carrying values of the Kettle River mine
(note 9).

                                                                            C-12
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
4. LONG-TERM INVESTMENTS AND OTHER ASSETS

                                                                               2002                2001
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                                    <C>                 <C>
 Modification of hedging contracts                                     $     16,291        $     29,305
 Deferred mining costs                                                       10,362              15,648
 Reclamation and other deposits                                              10,144              10,485
 Premiums paid on gold and silver option contracts                               --               1,871
 Other                                                                          185                 357
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                             36,982              57,666
 Less current portion included in prepaid expenses and other assets              --               1,871
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                       $     36,982        $     55,795
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

MODIFICATION OF HEDGING CONTRACTS
Losses on the early termination or other restructuring of gold and silver
hedging contracts are deferred until the formerly hedged items are recognized in
earnings. The remaining deferred losses relate to gold to be produced at the
Lupin mine and are expected to be recognized as follows: $5.2 million in 2003
and $11.1 million in 2004. Refer to note 6 for a discussion of the deferral of
gains on the modification of hedging contracts and note 9 for a discussion on
the provision for deferred losses previously relating to 2005 to 2008.

DEFERRED MINING COSTS
Deferred mining costs include $10.4 million (2001 - $13.8 million) in respect of
deferred stripping at the Round Mountain mine and $nil (2001 - $1.9 million) in
respect of underground costs at the Lupin mine. The deferred mining ratio for
the Round Mountain mine in 2002 was 95 tons per ounce recovered (2001 - 112
tons, 2000 - 127 tons). During 2002, the Company wrote off the remaining
deferred mining costs for the Lupin mine (note 9).

PREMIUMS PAID ON GOLD AND SILVER HEDGING CONTRACTS
Premiums paid on gold and silver hedging contracts are deferred and recognized
in earnings on their expiration dates. These deferred premiums were recognized
in 2002. Refer to note 6 for a discussion of the deferral of premiums received
on gold and silver option contracts sold.

5. DEBT AND OTHER FINANCINGS

                                                                 2002              2001
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Revolving credit facility                               $         --      $     17,000
 Capital securities (note 7)                                       --             6,714
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                   --            23,714
 Less current portion                                              --            17,000
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                         $         --      $      6,714
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>

CURRENCY LOANS
In May 2002, the Company repaid the remaining $17.0 million on its revolving
credit facility.

OTHER INFORMATION
The Company had $19.2 million in outstanding surety bonds and letters of credit
at December 31, 2002, primarily related to the bonding of future reclamation
obligations. At December 31, 2002, annual fees on the letters of credit range
from 0.5% to 1.25%.

Interest payments were $0.3 million in 2002, $1.8 million in 2001 and $4.3
million in 2000.


                                                                            C-13
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

6. DEFERRED INCOME
                                                                      2002              2001
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                           <C>               <C>
 Modification of hedging contracts                            $      6,393      $     47,042
 Premiums received on gold and silver hedging contracts                 --               876
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                     6,393            47,918
 Less current portion                                                   --               876
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              $      6,393      $     47,042
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>

MODIFICATION OF HEDGING CONTRACTS
Gains on the early termination or other restructuring of gold, silver and
foreign currency hedging contracts are deferred until the formerly hedged items
are recognized in earnings. The remaining deferred gains relate to gold to be
produced at the Lupin mine are expected to be recognized as follows: $2.5
million in 2003 and $3.9 million in 2004. Refer to note 4 for a discussion of
the deferral of losses on the modification of hedging contracts and note 9 for a
discussion on the provision for deferred gains previously relating to 2005 and
2006.

PREMIUMS RECEIVED ON GOLD AND SILVER OPTION CONTRACTS
Premiums received on gold and silver option contracts sold are deferred and
recognized in earnings on the option expiration dates. These deferred premiums
were recognized in 2002. Refer to note 4 for a discussion of the deferral of
premiums paid on gold and silver hedging contracts.

7. CAPITAL SECURITIES

In 1997, the Company issued $100.0 million of 11% capital securities due in
April 2027. The effective interest rate on the capital securities was 11%, or
12% compounded semi-annually during a period of interest deferral.

On April 3, 2002 the Company issued 361,561,230 common shares in exchange for
all of its capital securities (note 12). Prior to the exchange, the present
value of the capital securities' principal amount was classified as debt (note
5) and the present value of the future interest payments plus deferred accrued
interest was classified within a separate component of shareholders' equity.
Interest on the debt portion of the capital securities was classified as
interest expense on the consolidated statement of earnings and interest on the
equity portion of the capital securities was charged directly to deficit on the
consolidated balance sheet. The loss on conversion of the capital securities was
charged proportionately between earnings and deficit (note 12). For purposes of
per share calculations, the equity portions of interest and the loss on
conversion decreases the earnings attributable to common shareholders. See note
13 for a discussion of differences in treatment of the capital securities under
generally accepted accounting principles in the United States.

                                                                            C-14
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

8. RECLAMATION AND MINE CLOSURE LIABILITIES
                                                                                             2002             2001
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                                                  <C>              <C>
 Round Mountain                                                                      $     16,862     $     13,674
 McCoy/Cove                                                                                11,186           17,546
 Lupin                                                                                     11,405            9,584
 Kettle River                                                                               9,251            9,119
 Sunnyside                                                                                  2,368            3,644
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                           51,072           53,567
 Less current portion                                                                       4,560            3,841
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                     $     46,512     $     49,726
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

At December 31, 2002, the Company's estimate of future reclamation and mine
closure costs is $61.6 million, which it believes will meet current regulatory
requirements. The aggregate obligation accrued to December 31, 2002 was $51.1
million, including accruals of $5.1 million in 2002, $7.4 million in 2001, and
$10.6 million in 2000. Effective February 7, 2003, McCoy/Cove and its associated
reclamation obligation were conveyed to Newmont as described in note 18. Any
unused accrual will be taken into income at that time. Remaining requirements
including $14.5 million at Round Mountain and $3.1 million at Lupin, will be
accrued on the unit-of-production method over the remaining life of each mine.
In addition, the Company has posted bonds, cash deposits and letters of credit
totaling $30.6 million and corporate guarantees totaling $33.3 million as
required by various regulatory agencies. Assumptions used to estimate
reclamation and mine closure costs are based on the work that is required under
currently applicable permits, laws and regulations. These estimates may change
based on future changes in operations, cost of reclamation activities and
regulatory requirements.

9. INTEREST AND OTHER
                                                                                2002           2001           2000
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Interest income                                                        $       (441)   $      (760)    $     (964)
 Interest expense                                                                719          2,560          5,194
 Gain on sale of plant and equipment                                          (1,242)          (700)          (251)
 Reclamation provision (recovery)                                              1,424          1,338         (2,048)
 Provision for impaired assets                                                 7,000          3,046             --

 Provision for deferred gains and losses on modified hedge contracts           3,098             --             --
 Allowance for bad debts (note 17)                                             1,509             --             --
 Other                                                                         1,353            622          1,081
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                        $     13,420    $     6,106     $    3,012
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>

PROVISION FOR IMPAIRED ASSETS
The recoverability of the Company's carrying values of its operating and
development properties are assessed by comparing carrying values to estimated
future net cash flows from each property when conditions are present indicating
impairment may exist. In 2002, the Company recorded a $7.0 million provision for
impaired assets relating to its Lupin mine including $4.0 million of plant and
equipment and $3.0 million of deferred mining costs due to higher than
anticipated costs resulting from unexpected development challenges and changes
in future expectations of the strength of the Canadian dollar relative to the
United States dollar. In 2001, the Company recorded a $3.1 million provision for
impaired assets and a $1.3 million reclamation provision relating to its Kettle
River mine due to an unexpected decrease in reserves.

PROVISION FOR DEFERRED GAINS AND LOSSES ON MODIFIED HEDGE CONTRACTS
Gains and losses on the early termination or other restructuring of gold hedging
contracts are deferred until the formerly hedged items are recognized in
earnings to the extent that future mine production is available to meet the
original hedge commitments. Should circumstances change such that formerly
hedged anticipated future production is no longer considered likely to occur,
the related deferred gains and losses are recognized in earnings in the period
in which this determination is made. As a result, deferred losses of $4.6
million, $1.9 million, $0.7 million and $0.9 million relating to 2005, 2006,
2007 and 2008 respectively and deferred gains of $3.7 million and $1.3 million
relating to 2005 and 2006 respectively, have been recognized in 2002 with
respect to the Lupin mine.

                                                                            C-15
<PAGE>

10. INCOME TAX EXPENSE

GEOGRAPHIC COMPONENTS
The geographic components of earnings before income tax expense and income tax
expense were as follows.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                          2002              2001             2000
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                               <C>               <C>              <C>
 Earnings (loss) before income taxes:
    Canada                                                        $    (30,583)     $        952     $        637
    United States and other                                             23,042            (9,777)          16,176
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                  $     (7,541)     $     (8,825)    $     16,813
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Current income tax expense:
    Canada                                                        $        149      $        166     $        201
    United States and other                                                 --                45              451
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                           149               211              652
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Deferred income tax expense (recovery):
    Canada                                                                  --            (3,358)          (2,400)
    United States and other                                                 --                --               --
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                            --            (3,358)          (2,400)
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Income tax expense (recovery)                                    $        149      $     (3,147)    $     (1,748)
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

EFFECTIVE TAX RATE
The effective tax rate on the Company's earnings differed from the combined
Canadian federal and provincial corporate income tax rates of 41.2% for 2002 and
43.1% for 2001 and 2000 for the following reasons.
                                                                          2002              2001             2000
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Earnings (loss) before income taxes                              $     (7,541)     $     (8,825)    $     16,813
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Income tax effect of:
    Expected Canadian federal and provincial corporate
      income taxes                                                $     (8,679)     $     (3,805)    $      7,246
    Utilization of net operating loss                                       --                --           (5,760)
    Operating loss from which no tax benefit is derived                  8,650             3,964               --
    Canadian resource allowance and earned depletion                       304              (172)             113
    Foreign earnings subject to different income tax rates                  --               965           (1,326)
    Other items                                                           (126)           (4,099)          (2,021)
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Income tax expense (recovery)                                    $        149      $     (3,147)    $     (1,748)
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Effective tax rate (current and deferred)                               (2.0%)            35.7%           (10.4%)
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>

LOSS CARRYFORWARDS
At December 31, 2002, the Company had U.S. net operating loss carryforwards of
approximately $419 million to apply against future taxable income and $215
million to apply against future alternative minimum taxable income. These loss
carryforwards do not include the provisions for impaired assets, which have not
yet been recognized fully for income tax purposes. The net operating loss
carryforwards expire at various times from 2003 to 2022. Additionally, the
Company has Canadian non-capital loss carryforwards of approximately $89 million
and net capital loss carryforwards of approximately $204 million. The
non-capital loss carryforwards expire at various times from 2003 to 2009. The
net capital loss carryforwards have no expiration date.

                                                                            C-16
<PAGE>

10. INCOME TAX EXPENSE (cont'd.)

DEFERRED TAX LIABILITIES AND ASSETS
Significant components of the Company's deferred tax liabilities and assets are
as follows.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                              2002                                 2001
 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                U.S.                                 U.S.
 millions of U.S. dollars                          Canada  and other        Total       Canada   and other       Total
 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                              <C>         <C>         <C>          <C>         <C>         <C>
 Deferred tax liabilities:
    Tax over book depreciation and depletion     $     --    $    --     $     --     $    3.3    $    --     $    3.3
    Other tax liabilities                             0.9         --          0.9          2.7         --          2.7
 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Total deferred tax liabilities                       0.9         --          0.9          6.0         --          6.0
 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Deferred tax assets:
    Net operating loss and other carryforwards      120.7       148.7       269.4        120.3       147.9       268.2
    Book over tax depreciation and depletion         36.0        23.7        59.7         33.0        21.3        54.3
    Accrued liabilities                               5.7         8.3        14.0          5.1        17.6        22.7
    Other tax assets                                  3.1         4.7         7.8          1.8         4.7         6.5
 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Total deferred tax assets before allowance         165.5       185.4       350.9        160.2       191.5       351.7
 Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets       (165.5)     (185.4)     (350.9)      (155.1)     (191.5)     (346.6)
 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Total deferred tax assets                             --         --           --          5.1         --          5.1
 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Net deferred tax liabilities                    $    0.9    $    --     $    0.9     $    0.9    $    --     $    0.9
 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The net increase in the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets was $4.3
million for 2002 and $6.1 million for 2001.

INCOME TAX PAYMENTS
Income tax payments were $0.1 million in 2002, $0.7 million in 2001 and $0.2
million in 2000.

11. PREFERRED SHARES

The Company is authorized to issue an unlimited number of preferred shares,
issuable in series. Each series is to consist of such number of shares and to
have such designation, rights, privileges, restrictions and conditions as may be
determined by the directors. No preferred shares are currently issued.

12. CAPITAL STOCK

                                                                                Units                     Amount
 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Common shares
 Balance, December 31, 2001 and 2000                                      140,607,145             $      713,343
 Issued in exchange for capital securities and accrued                    361,561,230                    303,711
 interest
 Units offering, net of issuance costs                                     39,100,000                     23,236
 Issued upon exercise of warrants                                               4,300                          4
 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Balance, December 31, 2002                                               541,272,675             $    1,040,294
 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Warrants
 Balance, December 31, 2001                                                        --             $           --
 Units offering, net of issuance costs                                     39,100,000                      2,277
 Warrants exercised                                                            (4,300)                        --
 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Balance, December 31, 2002                                                39,095,700             $        2,277
 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>

                                                                            C-17
<PAGE>

12. CAPITAL STOCK (cont'd.)

CAPITAL SECURITIES RETIREMENT
On April 3, 2002 the Company issued 361,561,230 common shares, representing
approximately 72% of the outstanding common shares after giving effect to such
issuance, in exchange for all of its $100 million aggregate principal amount of
11% junior subordinated debentures due 2027, plus accrued and unpaid interest
thereon (the "capital securities").

Following this issuance of common shares, and as at April 3, 2002, the principal
holders of the Company's common shares and their respective ownership positions
in the Company were Newmont Mining Corporation of Canada Limited ("Newmont
Canada") (48.8%) and Kinross (11.4%). In connection with the completion of the
capital securities exchange, three directors of the Company resigned from the
board of directors. Two of the vacancies created by these resignations were
filled by executive officers of Newmont Canada.

As a result of eliminating the capital securities, the Company recorded an
increase to common shares of $303.7 million, based on their quoted market value
at the date of issue. The quoted market value of the common shares issued
exceeded the book value of the capital securities by $134.8 million. This
difference, along with transaction costs of $3.0 million, were recorded
proportionately between interest expense ($5.5 million) and deficit ($132.3
million) in the second quarter of 2002 based on the debt and equity
classifications of the capital securities.

UNITS OFFERING
In May 2002, the Company sold a total of 39,100,000 units at a price of $0.70
per unit for aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $27.4 million. Each unit
consisted of one common share and one share purchase warrant. The common shares
and the warrants comprising the units separated upon closing and trade
separately on the Toronto Stock Exchange and the American Stock Exchange. As a
consequence of the business combination described in note 18, each warrant,
previously entitling the holder to purchase one common share of the Company, now
entitles the holder to purchase 0.1733 of a post-consolidated Kinross common
share at a price of $0.90, at any time prior to November 14, 2003.

DELISTING OF COMMON SHARES
In connection with the business combination described in note 18, the common
shares of the Company were delisted from the Toronto Stock Exchange on February
5, 2003 and from the American Stock Exchange on January 31, 2003. Consequently,
all of the common shares of the Company are owned by Kinross. The warrants
continue to trade on both these exchanges until November 14, 2003.

DIVIDENDS
The Company has not paid dividends since 1996.

RESTRICTED SHARE GRANT PLAN
Effective February 1997, the Company adopted a restricted share grant plan to
provide incentive to officers of the Company. As at December 31, 2002, the
Company has reserved an aggregate of 750,000 common shares for issuance under
the plan, but no grants are outstanding. In connection with the business
combination described in note 18, no shares will be granted under this plan.

EMPLOYEE SHARE INCENTIVE PLAN AND DIRECTOR EQUITY PLAN
These plans provide for the granting of options to purchase common shares to
officers and employees (under the Employee Share Incentive Plan) and to eligible
directors (under the Director Equity Plan). Outstanding share options under the
plans are exercisable at prices equal to the market value on the date of grant.
The option holder may exercise each share option over a period of 10 years from
the date of grant. Options generally vest in 25% increments on the first,
second, third and fourth year anniversaries following the grant date. Option
prices are denominated in Canadian dollars. No more grants are to be made under
the Director Equity Plan.

                                                                            C-18
<PAGE>

12. CAPITAL STOCK (cont'd.)

EFFECT OF BUSINESS COMBINATION ON SHARE OPTIONS
In connection with the business combination described in note 18, no more grants
are to be made under the Employee Share Incentive Plan. All outstanding options
vested effective January 31, 2003, with each being converted into 0.1733 of a
Kinross share option. These Kinross share options are excercisable at prices
disclosed below multiplied by 5.7703 giving effect to the conversion ratio,
described in note 18, into common shares of Kinross. All options outstanding
under the Employee Share Incentive Plan expire on January 31, 2004 while options
outstanding under the Director Equity Plan remain outstanding in accordance with
the original terms of the plan. As at January 31, 2003, there were 584,854
Kinross share options outstanding and exercisable at a weighted average price of
$51.60 under the Employee Share Incentive Plan and 39,409 Kinross share options
outstanding and exercisable at a weighted average price of $66.00 under the
Director Equity Plan. Kinross share option prices are denominated in Canadian
dollars.

Changes in the number of options outstanding during the three years ended
December 31, 2002 were as follows.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                EMPLOYEE SHARE INCENTIVE PLAN                 DIRECTOR EQUITY PLAN
                                                -----------------------------                 --------------------
                                                                     Weighted                             Weighted
                                                   Number of          Average        Number of             Average
                                                      Shares   Exercise Price           Shares      Exercise Price
- --------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------- ----------------------------------
<S>                                                <C>               <C>               <C>              <C>
Options outstanding, December 31, 1999             5,493,686        C$    8.82         240,450         C$   11.14
2000:   Options granted                                   --                --              --                 --
        Options expired                             (100,458)            12.88              --                 --
        Options forfeited                         (1,021,417)             8.92         (13,000)              5.85
- --------------------------------------------- ----------------- ----------------- ---------------- -----------------
Options outstanding, December 31, 2000             4,371,811        C$    8.71         227,450         C$   11.44
2001:   Options granted                                   --                --              --                 --
        Options expired                              (64,655)             8.88              --                 --
        Options forfeited                           (666,589)             8.66         --                      --
- --------------------------------------------- ----------------- ----------------- ---------------- -----------------
Options outstanding, December 31, 2001             3,640,567        C$    8.72         227,450         C$   11.44
2002:   Options granted                                   --                --              --                 --
        Options expired                              (37,100)             5.75              --                 --
        Options forfeited                           (133,295)             5.10              --                 --
- --------------------------------------------- ----------------- ----------------- ---------------- -----------------
Options outstanding, December 31, 2002             3,470,172        C$    8.89         227,450         C$   11.44
- --------------------------------------------- ----------------- ----------------- ---------------- -----------------
</TABLE>

The number and weighted average price of shares exercisable under the Employee
Share Incentive Plan are 3,270,047 at C$9.27 at December 31, 2002; 3,076,154 at
C$9.80 at December 31, 2001; and 3,389,484 at C$10.41 at December 31, 2000. The
number and weighted average price of shares exercisable under the Director
Equity Plan are 227,450 at C$11.44 at December 31, 2002; 217,700 at C$11.78 at
December 31, 2001; and 196,575 at C$12.40 at December 31, 2000.

                                                                            C-19
<PAGE>

12. CAPITAL STOCK (cont'd.)

Options outstanding at December 31, 2002 had the following characteristics.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                     Weighted         Weighted                          Weighted
       Number of                             Average Exercise          Average     Number of    Average Exercise
          Shares                 Exercise     Price of Shares      Years Until        Shares     Price of Shares
     Outstanding              Price Range         Outstanding       Expiration   Exercisable         Exercisable
- -------------------- ---------------------- ------------------ --------------- --------------- --------------------
<S>    <C>             <C>          <C>             <C>                     <C>    <C>                 <C>
 EMPLOYEE SHARE INCENTIVE PLAN
       1,331,444      C$2.55   -   C$3.59          C$   2.94                6      1,131,319          C$    3.01
       1,391,815        6.75   -    13.75              10.49                4      1,391,815               10.49
         746,913       15.75   -    19.63              16.51                2        746,913               16.51
 DIRECTOR EQUITY PLAN
         143,000      C$3.70   -  C$12.50          C$   8.67                4        143,000          C$    8.67
          84,450       14.63   -    18.25              16.13                2         84,450               16.13
- -------------------- ---------------------- ------------------ --------------- --------------- --------------------
</TABLE>

13. DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CANADIAN AND U.S. GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING
PRINCIPLES (GAAP)

U.S. GAAP financial statements
The Company prepares its consolidated financial statements in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in Canada, which differ in some
respects from those in the United States, as described below.

In accordance with Canadian GAAP, the present value of the principal amount of
the capital securities issued in 1997 was classified as debt within gold and
other financings, while the present value of the future interest payments was
classified as a separate component of shareholders' equity (note 7). The
deferred accrued interest was classified within this equity component as the
Company had the option to satisfy the deferred interest by delivering common
shares. The related issuance costs were allocated proportionately to deferred
financing charges and retained earnings based on the debt and equity
classifications. Interest on the capital securities had been allocated
proportionately to interest expense and deficit based on the debt and equity
classifications. Under U.S. GAAP, the face value of the securities would be
classified entirely as debt within gold and other financings; the related
issuance costs would be classified as deferred financing charges within
long-term investments and other assets and would be amortized to interest
expense over the life of the securities; and the interest on the capital
securities would be classified entirely as interest expense. The loss on the
retirement of the capital securities was recorded proportionately between
interest expense and deficit under Canadian GAAP while the entire loss has been
presented as a current period extraordinary item for U.S. GAAP.

In accordance with Canadian GAAP, certain long-term foreign exchange contracts
are considered to be hedges of the cost of goods to be purchased in foreign
currencies in future periods. Gains and losses related to changes in market
values of such contracts are recognized as a component of the cost of goods when
the related hedged purchases occur. In 2001, the Company recognized $2.8 million
in deferred foreign exchange gains. Under U.S. GAAP, foreign exchange contracts
would be carried at market value and changes included in current earnings.

In accordance with Canadian GAAP, the Company's short-term share investments are
carried at the lower of cost or market based on quoted market prices. Under U.S.
GAAP, these investments would have been marked to market, with unrealized gains
or losses excluded from earnings and reported as accumulated other comprehensive
income in shareholders' equity, net of tax.

In accordance with U.S. GAAP, gold call options sold would not qualify for hedge
accounting and therefore would be marked to market at each period end. As a
result, the Company recorded a loss of $0.8 million in 2001 and a gain of $3.0
million in 2000 under U.S. GAAP.

                                                                            C-20
<PAGE>

13. DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CANADIAN AND U.S. GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING
PRINCIPLES (GAAP) (cont'd.)

In accordance with Canadian GAAP, capitalized mine development costs include
expenditures incurred to develop new ore bodies, to define further resources in
existing ore bodies and to expand the capacity of operating mines. The Company
capitalized development costs of $2.2 million in 2001 and $1.2 million in 2000
for the extension to the K-2 deposit at the Kettle River mine. Under U.S. GAAP,
development costs are capitalized only when converting mineralized material to
reserves or for further delineation of existing reserves. The development
expenditures resulted in additions to mineralized material but did not add to
mineral reserves. Therefore under U.S. GAAP, the expenditures would be
classified as exploration expense.

The effects on the consolidated statement of earnings of the above differences
would have been as follows.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                         2002               2001                2000
 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                              <C>                <C>                 <C>
 Net earnings (loss) under Canadian GAAP                         $     (7,690)      $     (5,678)       $     18,561
 Additional interest expense on capital securities                     (4,739)           (17,307)            (15,397)
 Loss on conversion of capital securities                               5,461                 --                  --
 Modification of derivative contracts realized in net                     814                 --                  --
 earnings
 Change in market value of foreign exchange contracts                     384                426                 948
 Amortization of deferred financing costs on capital                       --               (634)               (633)
 securities
 Change in market value of option contracts                                --             (1,291)              2,964
 Amortization of deferred foreign exchange gains                           --             (2,846)             (3,149)
 Transition adjustment on adoption of FAS 133                              --             (3,090)                 --
 Unrealized loss on short-term investments                                 --                150                  28
 Kettle River exploration expense                                          --             (2,234)             (1,229)
 Kettle River amortization expense                                         --              2,103                 163
 Provision for impaired Kettle River assets                                --              1,305                  --
 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Net earnings (loss) under U.S. GAAP before
    extraordinary loss                                           $     (5,770)      $    (29,096)       $      2,256
 Loss on retirement of capital securities, net of nil tax            (137,763)                --                  --
 effect
 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Net earnings (loss) under U.S. GAAP                             $   (143,533)      $    (29,096)       $      2,256
 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Earnings (loss) per share under U.S. GAAP
 - basic and diluted
    - before extraordinary loss                                  $      (0.01)      $      (0.21)       $       0.02
    - extraordinary loss                                                (0.32)             (0.21)               0.02
 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    - after extraordinary loss                                   $      (0.33)      $      (0.21)       $       0.02
 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Weighted average number  of shares outstanding (thousands)
    - basic                                                           429,783            140,607             140,607
    -diluted                                                          429,783            140,607             140,607
 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>

                                                                            C-21
<PAGE>

13. DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CANADIAN AND U.S. GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING
PRINCIPLES (GAAP) (cont'd.)

The effects of the GAAP differences on the consolidated balance sheet would have
been as follows.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                         Canadian     Short-term    Derivative                        U.S.
 December 31, 2002                           GAAP    Investments    Contracts       Other             GAAP
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                    <C>            <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>
 Short-term investments                $    7,183     $   17,490    $       --    $       --    $   24,673
 Long-term investments and other           36,982             --       (15,766)           --        21,216
 assets
 Deferred income                            6,393             --        (6,393)           --            --
 Common shares                          1,042,571             --            --        36,428     1,078,999
 Deficit                                 (879,238)           178        (2,224)      (36,428)     (917,712)
 Foreign currency translation             (26,659)            --            --        26,659            --
 Accumulated other comprehensive loss          --         17,312        (7,149)      (26,659)      (16,496)
 Shareholders' equity (deficit)           136,674         17,490        (9,373)           --       144,791
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                         Canadian      Capital      Derivative                        U.S.
 December 31, 2001                           GAAP     Securities    Contracts       Other             GAAP
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Short-term investments                $    1,910     $       --    $       --    $    2,636    $    4,546
 Long-term investments and other           55,795            158       (29,305)          141        26,789
 assets
 Accounts payable and accrued              24,284             --           691            --        24,975
 liabilities
 Debt and other financings                 23,714         93,286            --            --       117,000
 Deferred income                           47,918             --       (47,918)           --            --
 Accrued interest on capital                   --         64,167            --            --        64,167
 securities
 Common shares                            713,343             --            --        36,428       749,771
 Capital securities                       157,453       (157,453)           --            --            --
 Deficit                                 (734,665)           158        (3,563)      (36,109)     (774,179)
 Foreign currency translation             (29,305)            --            --        29,305            --
 Accumulated other comprehensive loss          --             --        21,485       (26,847)       (5,362)
 Shareholders' equity (deficit)           106,826       (157,295)       17,922         2,777       (29,770)
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The continuity of shareholders' equity (deficit) from December 31, 2001 to
December 31, 2002 under U.S. GAAP would have been as follows.

 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Balance, beginning of year                                           $    (29,770)
 Net loss                                                                 (143,533)
 Common shares issued in exchange for capital securities                   303,711
 Units offering, net of issuance costs                                      25,513
 Common shares issued upon exercise of warrants                                  4
 Other comprehensive loss                                                  (11,134)
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Balance, end of year                                                 $    144,791
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>

                                                                            C-22
<PAGE>

13. DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CANADIAN AND U.S. GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING
PRINCIPLES (GAAP) (cont'd.)

The following statement of comprehensive income (loss) would be disclosed in
accordance with U.S. GAAP.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                    200019982002             2001            2000
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                                <C>              <C>             <C>
 Net earnings (loss) under U.S. GAAP                               $    (143,533)   $     (29,096)  $       2,256
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Other comprehensive income (loss), after a nil income tax effect:
    Unrealized gain on share investments arising during period            14,854            1,726             732
    Foreign currency translation adjustments                               2,646           (4,351)         (2,940)
    Transition adjustment on adoption of FAS 133                              --           39,234              --
    Modification of derivative contracts realized in net income          (28,634)         (17,749)             --
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Other comprehensive income (loss)                                       (11,134)          18,860          (2,208)
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Comprehensive income (loss)                                       $    (154,667)   $     (10,236)  $          48
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Additionally, under U.S. GAAP, the equity section of the balance sheet would
present a subtotal for accumulated other comprehensive loss, as follows.

                                                               2002              2001
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Unrealized gain on share investments                  $     17,312      $      2,458
 Modification of derivative contracts                        (7,149)           21,485
 Foreign currency translation                               (26,659)          (29,305)
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Accumulated other comprehensive loss                  $    (16,496)     $     (5,362)
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement No. 123, "Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation," gives the option to either follow fair value
accounting or to follow Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, "Accounting
for Stock Issued to Employees" ("APB No. 25") and related Interpretations. The
Company has determined that it will elect to continue to follow APB No. 25 and
related Interpretations in accounting for its employee and director stock
options in financial information prepared in conformity with U.S. GAAP.

In accordance with Canadian GAAP and U.S. GAAP (under APB No. 25), the Company
does not recognize compensation expense for stock option grants in the earnings
statement, as the market prices of the underlying stock on the grant dates do
not exceed the exercise prices of the options granted.

                                                                            C-23
<PAGE>

13. DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CANADIAN AND U.S. GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING
PRINCIPLES (GAAP) (cont'd.)

Had the Company adopted Statement No. 123 for its U.S. GAAP disclosure, the
following net earnings and losses would have been reported.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                    2002               2001               2000
- -------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ ------------------ ------------------
<S>                                                         <C>                <C>                <C>
Net earnings (loss) under U.S. GAAP                         $   (143,533)      $    (29,096)      $      2,256
Pro forma stock compensation expense,
   after a nil income tax effect                                    (323)              (405)              (929)
- -------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ ------------------ ------------------
Pro forma net earnings (loss) under U.S. GAAP               $   (143,856)      $    (29,501)      $      1,327
- -------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ ------------------ ------------------
Pro forma earnings (loss) per share under U.S. GAAP         $      (0.33)      $      (0.21)      $       0.01
- -------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ ------------------ ------------------
</TABLE>

The Company has utilized the Black-Scholes option valuation model to estimate
the fair value of options granted, assuming a weighted average option life of
six years, a risk-free interest rate of 6.25%, a zero dividend yield and a
volatility factor of 60% for 1999 grants. The weighted average fair value of
options granted was estimated at $1.08 per share in 1999. There were no grants
in 2002, 2001 or 2000.

Derivative instruments and hedging activities
On January 1, 2001, the Company implemented FASB Statement No. 133, "Accounting
for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities" and Statement No. 138
"Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities."
The Company has designated its gold forward contracts as normal sales as defined
by Statement No. 138 and these contracts are therefore excluded from the scope
of Statement No. 133. Foreign exchange contracts and gold call options have not
been designated as hedges for U.S. GAAP purposes and are recognized at fair
value on the balance sheet with changes in fair value recorded in earnings.
Gains and losses on the early termination or other restructuring of gold, silver
and foreign currency hedging contracts are deferred in accumulated other
comprehensive income until the formerly hedged items are recorded in earnings.
The transition adjustment recorded under U.S. GAAP at January 1, 2001 decreased
assets by $18.3 million, liabilities by $54.4 million and net earnings by $3.1
million, and increased accumulated other comprehensive income by $39.2 million.

                                                                            C-24
<PAGE>

13. DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CANADIAN AND U.S. GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING
PRINCIPLES (GAAP) (cont'd.)

Recent accounting pronouncements
In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement
Obligations" ("SFAS 143"), which addresses financial accounting and reporting
for obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and
the associated asset retirement costs. It applies to legal obligations
associated with the retirement of long-lived assets that result from the
acquisition, construction, development and (or) the normal operation of a
long-lived asset, except for certain obligations of lessees. SFAS 143 amends
SFAS 19, "Financial Accounting and Reporting by Oil and Gas Producing
Companies", and requires entities to record the fair value of a liability for an
asset retirement obligation in the period in which it is incurred. When the
liability is initially recorded, an entity capitalizes the cost by increasing
the carrying amount of the related long-lived assets. Over time, the liability
is accreted to its present value each period, and the capitalized cost is
amortized over the useful life of the related asset. Upon settlement of the
liability, an entity either settles the obligation for its recorded amount or
incurs a gain or loss upon settlement. SFAS 143 is effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2002 with earlier
application encouraged. The Company will adopt SFAS 143 in 2003. The Company has
not yet determined the impact of this Statement on its financial statements.

In June 2002, the FASB issued Statement No. 146, "Accounting for Costs
Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities." This pronouncement is effective
for exit or disposal activities that are initiated after December 31, 2002 and
requires these costs to be recognized when the liability is incurred and not at
project initiation. The Company is reviewing the provisions of the Statement,
but has not yet determined the impact of this Statement on its financial
statements.

In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46, "Consolidation of
Variable Interest Entities" ("FIN 46"). FIN 46 clarifies the application of
Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51 - Consolidated Financial Statements to those
entities defined as "Variable Interest Entities" (more commonly referred to as
special purpose entities) in which equity investors do not have the
characteristics of a "controlling financial interest" or do not have sufficient
equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional
subordinated financial support from other parties. FIN 46 applies immediately to
all Variable Interest Entities created after January 31, 2003, and by the
beginning of the first interim or annual reporting period commencing after June
15, 2003 for Variable Interest Entities created prior to February 1, 2003. The
Company does not conduct any transactions through variable interest entities and
does not expect FIN 46 to have an impact on its financial statements.

In 2002, the CICA Handbook Sections 3063 - Impairment of Long Lived Assets and
3475 - Disposal of Long Lived Assets and Discontinued Operations were harmonized
with SFAS 144. The standards will require an impairment loss to be recognized
when the carrying amount of an asset held for use exceeds the sum of estimated
undiscounted future net cash flows. The impairment loss would be measured as the
amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the asset. An
asset held for sale is to be measured at the lower of carrying cost or fair
value less cost to sell. In addition, this guidance broadens the concept of a
discontinued operation and eliminates the ability to accrue operating losses
expected between the measurement date and the disposal date. Section 3063 is
effective for fiscal years beginning on or after April 1, 2003, and Section 3475
applies to disposal activities initiated by an enterprise's commitment to a plan
on or after May 1, 2003. The sections will be applied prospectively with early
adoption encouraged.

In 2002, the Accounting Standards Board of the CICA issued Accounting Guidelines
No. 13 that increases the documentation, designation and effectiveness criteria
to achieve hedge accounting. The guideline requires the discontinuance of hedge
accounting for hedging relationships established that do not meet the conditions
at the date it is first applied. It does not change the method of accounting for
derivatives in hedging relationships. The new guideline is applicable for fiscal
years commencing July 1, 2003. The Company is evaluating the impact this
standard might have on its results of operations and financial position.

In November 2002, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 45 "Guarantor's Accounting
and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of
Indebtedness of Others" ("FIN 45), which is effective for financial periods
ending after December 15, 2002. FIN 45 defines guarantees to include
indemnifications granted pursuant to contractual arrangements as well as
contingent consideration.

                                                                            C-25
<PAGE>

13. DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CANADIAN AND U.S. GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING
PRINCIPLES (GAAP) (cont'd.)

In 2003, the Accounting Standards Board of the CICA issued Accounting Guideline
No. 14 - Disclosure of Guarantee. The guideline requires the disclosure of
guarantees including indemnification pursuant to contractual arrangement. This
guideline is consistent with FIN 45 described above.

Other
The estimated fair values of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments
and currency loans approximate their book values. The fair values were
determined from quoted market prices or estimated using discounted cash flow
analysis. See note 16 for further disclosure regarding estimated fair values of
financial instruments.

14. JOINT VENTURES

Summarized below is the Company's 50% interest in the Round Mountain mine,
accounted for by the proportionate consolidation method.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                  2002                2001                 2000
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                       <C>                 <C>                  <C>
 Revenues                                                 $    114,297        $    105,450         $     90,633
 Expenses:
    Operating costs                                             68,323              72,049               60,231
    Royalties                                                    7,618               6,881                5,585
    Production taxes                                             1,653                 664                  470
    Depreciation and amortization                               21,579              20,570               18,978
    Reclamation and mine closure                                 3,400               3,361                2,880
    Exploration                                                  1,009                 663                  529
    Other                                                         (440)               (761)                (753)
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Earnings before income taxes                             $     11,155        $      2,023         $      2,713
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                                  2002                2001                 2000
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Current assets                                           $     40,371        $     40,224         $     33,425
 Non-current assets                                             96,555              96,376              109,211
 Current liabilities                                           (15,487)            (15,154)             (11,244)
 Non-current liabilities                                       (19,399)            (15,311)             (18,023)
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Equity                                                   $    102,100        $    106,135         $    113,369
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                                  2002                2001                 2000
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Net cash provided from (used in):
    Operating activities                                  $     15,578        $     15,146         $     10,849
    Investing activities                                        (8,584)            (15,046)              (4,664)
    Financing activities                                            --                  --                   --
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Net increase (decrease) in cash                          $      6,994        $        100         $      6,185
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>

                                                                            C-26
<PAGE>

15. SEGMENT INFORMATION

The Company's management regularly evaluates the performance of the Company by
reviewing operating results on a minesite by minesite basis. As such, the
Company considers each producing minesite to be an operating segment. The
Company has two operating mines: Round Mountain in Nevada, United States and
Lupin in Nunavut Territory, Canada. The Company ceased mining operations at its
Kettle River in Washington, United States in October 2002 and at its McCoy/Cove
mine in Nevada, United States at March 31, 2002. The Company recommenced
operations at its Lupin mine in the Nunavut Territory, Canada in April 2000. All
are 100% owned except for Round Mountain, which is 50% owned.

The Company's management generally monitors revenues on a consolidated basis.
Information regarding the Company's consolidated revenues is provided below.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                  2002                2001                 2000
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                       <C>                 <C>                  <C>
 Total gold and silver revenues                           $    206,529        $    237,684         $    280,976
 Average gold price realized per ounce                    $        361        $        305         $        319
 Average silver price realized per ounce                  $       4.36        $       4.70         $       5.28
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In making operating decisions and allocating resources, the Company's management
specifically focuses on the production levels and operating costs incurred by
each operating segment, as summarized in the following tables.

 Gold Production (ounces)                                               2002             2001              2000
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Round Mountain (50%)                                                377,747          373,475           320,064
 Lupin                                                               113,835          139,327           117,729
 Kettle River                                                         30,626           50,349            94,086
 McCoy/Cove                                                           16,501           94,633           162,784
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Total gold                                                          538,709          657,784           694,663
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 Silver Production (ounces)                                             2002             2001              2000
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Total silver-all from McCoy/Cove                                  1,470,094        6,451,425        12,328,297
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>

                                                                            C-27
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

15. SEGMENT INFORMATION (cont'd.)

 Operating costs                                                        2002             2001              2000
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                             <C>              <C>               <C>
 Round Mountain (50%)                                           $     68,323     $     72,049      $     60,501
 Lupin                                                                37,194           34,722            22,883
 Kettle River                                                          9,166           15,555            20,131
 McCoy/Cove                                                           13,453           53,015            69,920
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Total operating costs per financial statements                 $    128,136     $    175,341      $    173,435
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 Royalties                                                              2002             2001              2000
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Round Mountain (50%)                                           $      7,618     $      6,880      $      5,585
 Kettle River                                                            140              504             1,221
 McCoy/Cove                                                               41              213             1,228
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Total royalties per financial statements                       $      7,799     $      7,597      $      8,034
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


 Depreciation and amortization                                          2002             2001              2000
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Round Mountain (50%)                                           $     21,578     $     20,570     $      18,978
 Lupin                                                                 5,112            5,226             4,874
 Kettle River                                                          2,508            2,011             2,637
 McCoy/Cove                                                            4,519           12,638            21,539
 Depreciation of non-minesite assets                                   1,554            1,656             2,636
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Total depreciation and amortization per financial              $     35,271     $     42,101     $      50,664
 statements
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 Total assets                                                           2002             2001
 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Minesites:
      Round Mountain (50%)                                      $    101,633     $    110,864
      Lupin                                                           24,166           31,199
      Kettle River                                                     1,506            5,351
      McCoy/Cove                                                       7,832           21,256
 Development properties:
      Aquarius                                                        43,312           44,048
 Non-minesite assets                                                  45,241           48,086
 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Total assets                                                   $    223,690     $    260,804
 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>

                                                                            C-28
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

15. SEGMENT INFORMATION (cont'd.)

 Capital expenditures                                            2002              2001             2000
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                       <C>               <C>              <C>
 Round Mountain (50%)                                     $     8,589       $    15,033      $     4,620
 Lupin                                                          2,443             2,622            4,642
 Kettle River                                                   1,584             4,150            1,402
 McCoy/Cove                                                        12             1,002              670
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 Deferred (applied) mining expenditures                          2002              2001             2000
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Round Mountain (50%)                                     $    (3,419)      $    (5,323)     $       411
 Lupin                                                          1,091             1,452              449
 McCoy/Cove                                                        --            (2,247)          (5,062)
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Financial information regarding geographic areas is set out below.

                                                                 2002              2001             2000
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Revenue:
    Canada                                                $    41,420       $    53,160      $    44,370
    United States                                             165,109           184,524          236,606
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Total revenue                                            $   206,529       $   237,684      $   280,976
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                                 2002              2001
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Assets:
    Canada                                                $    88,679       $   108,824
    United States                                             134,686           150,089
    Other                                                         325             1,891
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Total assets                                             $   223,690       $   260,804
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>

                                                                            C-29
<PAGE>

16. HEDGING ACTIVITIES AND COMMITMENTS

The Company periodically reduces the risk of future gold price declines by
hedging a portion of its production. The principal hedging tools used are gold
forward sales contracts and options.

The Company assesses the exposure that may result from a hedging transaction
prior to entering into the commitment, and only enters into transactions which
it believes accurately hedge the underlying risk and could be safely held to
maturity. The Company does not engage in the practice of trading derivative
securities for profit. The Company regularly reviews its unrealized gains and
losses on hedging transactions.

Credit risk is the risk that a counterparty might fail to fulfill its
performance obligations under the terms of a derivative contract. The Company's
credit risk related to all hedging activities is limited to the unrealized gains
on outstanding contracts based on current market prices. The Company minimizes
its credit risk by entering into transactions with large credit-worthy financial
institutions, limiting the amount of its exposure to each counterparty, and
monitoring the financial condition of its counterparties. The counterparties for
the Company's current hedge positions do not require margin deposits. In
addition, the Company deals only in markets it considers highly liquid to allow
for situations where positions may need to be reversed. Gains and losses on the
early termination or other restructuring of gold, silver and foreign currency
hedging contracts are deferred until the formerly hedged items are recognized in
earnings (notes 4 and 6).

Premiums paid or received on gold and silver options contracts purchased or sold
are deferred and recognized in earnings on the option expiration dates (notes 4
and 6).

GOLD COMMITMENTS
As at December 31, 2002, the Company has no outstanding commitments relating to
precious metals.

CURRENCY POSITION
At December 31, 2002, the Company had an obligation under foreign currency
exchange contracts to purchase C$45.1 million in 2003 at an exchange rate of
C$1.61 to U.S.$1.00.

                                                                            C-30
<PAGE>

15. HEDGING ACTIVITIES AND COMMITMENTS (cont'd.)

Shown below are the carrying amounts and estimated fair values of the Company's
outstanding hedging instruments at December 31, 2002 and 2001.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                            December 31, 2002                    December 31, 2001
                                            -----------------------------------  ------------------------------------
                                                    Carrying         Estimated           Carrying         Estimated
                                                      Amount        Fair Value             Amount        Fair Value
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------  ------------------------------------
<S>                                             <C>               <C>                <C>               <C>
   Gold forward sales                           $         --      $         --       $         --      $      2,000
   Gold options - calls sold                              --                --               (630)             (700)
   Foreign currency contracts                             --               100                 --               100
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------  ------------------------------------
                                                                  $        100                         $      1,400
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------  ------------------------------------

Fair values are estimated for the contract settlement dates based on market
quotations of various input variables. These variables are used in valuation
models that estimate the fair market value.

The fair value of the Company's hedged position can be affected by market
conditions beyond the Company's control. The effect of a U.S.$ 0.01 change in
the exchange rate for Canadian would be approximately $0.5 million.

Hedging gains and losses represent the difference between spot or market prices
and realized amounts. The hedging gains (losses) recognized in earnings are as
follows.

                                                                  2002                2001                 2000
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Revenue:
    Gold loans and swaps                                    $       --          $      703           $    1,289
    Gold forward sales                                           7,119              22,245               25,754
    Silver forward sales                                            --               3,426                3,333
    Gold and silver options                                       (995)               (402)                (506)
 Operating costs:
    Foreign currency contracts                                    (824)             (2,113)              (1,179)
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            $    5,300          $   23,859           $   28,691
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>

17. OTHER COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Royalties
Round Mountain mine production is subject to a net smelter return royalty
ranging from 3.53% at gold prices of $320 per ounce or less to 6.35% at gold
prices of $440 per ounce or more. Its production is also subject to a gross
revenue royalty of 3.0%, reduced to 1.5% after $75.0 million has been paid. For
the period from the date that the royalty commenced through December 31, 2002,
cumulative royalties of $33.1 million have been paid.

A portion of production from the K-2 area production at Kettle River is subject
to a 5% gross proceeds royalty and a net smelter return royalty ranging from 2%
at gold prices of $300 per ounce or less to 3% at gold prices of $400 per ounce
or more.

OPERATING LEASE COMMITMENTS
The Company's principal lease commitments are for equipment and office premises.
The Company incurred $1.4 million in rental expense in 2002, net of $1.8 million
in rental income related to office subleases. The Company's commitments under
the remaining terms of the leases are approximately $4.7 million, payable as
follows: $1.6 million in 2003, $1.5 million in 2004, $1.0 million in 2005, $0.1
million in 2006, $0.1 million in 2007 and $0.4 million thereafter.

                                                                            C-31
<PAGE>

17. OTHER COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (cont'd.)

SUMMA
In September 1992, Summa Corporation commenced a lawsuit against two indirect
subsidiaries of the Company, Echo Bay Exploration Inc. and Echo Bay Management
Corporation (together the "Subsidiaries") alleging improper deductions in the
calculation of royalties payable over several years of production at McCoy/Cove
and another mine, which is no longer in operation. The matter was tried in the
Nevada State Court in April 1997, with Summa claiming more than $13 million in
damages, and, in September 1997, judgment was rendered for the Subsidiaries. The
decision was appealed by Summa to the Supreme Court of Nevada, which in April
2000 reversed the decision of the trial court and remanded the case back to the
trial court for "a calculation of the appropriate [royalties] in a manner not
inconsistent with this order." The case was decided by a panel comprised of
three of the seven Justices of the Supreme Court of Nevada and the Subsidiaries
petitioned that panel for a rehearing. The petition was denied by the three
member panel on May 15, 2000 and remanded to the lower court for consideration
of other defences and arguments put forth by the Subsidiaries. The Subsidiaries
filed a petition for a hearing before the full Supreme Court and on December 22,
2000, the Court recalled its previous decision.

Both the Subsidiaries and their counsel believe that grounds exist to modify or
reverse the decision. The Company has $1.5 million accrued related to this
litigation. If the appellate reversal of the trial decision is maintained and
the trial court, on remand, were to dismiss all of the Subsidiaries' defences,
the royalty calculation at McCoy/Cove would change and additional royalties
would be payable. Neither the Company, nor counsel to the Subsidiaries believe
it is possible to quantify the precise liability pursuant to a revised royalty
calculation.

HANDY AND HARMAN
On March 29, 2000, Handy & Harman Refining Group, Inc., which operated a
facility used by the Company for the refinement of dore bars, filed for
protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. The Company has filed a
claim for gold and silver accounts at this refining facility with an estimated
market value of approximately $2.2 million at the time the shipments were made.
The Company has fully provided for this amount as unrecoverable including a
charge of $1.5 million in 2002. Further, in March 2002, the liquidating trustee
for Handy & Harman commenced a series of adversary proceedings against numerous
creditors, including two Company subsidiaries, alleging that certain creditors
received preferential payments in metal or otherwise. The preferential payment
claims against the Company's subsidiaries approximate $9.0 million. The ultimate
amount recoverable or payable will depend on the success or failure of the
liquidating trustee in prosecuting these claims. The ultimate percentage payout
by the liquidating trustee will also be affected by the success or failure of
the trustee in prosecuting preferential payment claims against all creditors.
The trustee currently projects the ultimate distribution of funds to be 50% to
60% of amounts owed to creditors. Based on this range, the maximum liability to
the Company would be $3.4 million assuming a 50% payout to creditors and no
success in defending any of the preferential payment claims while the maximum
amount recoverable would be $1.3 million assuming a 60% payout to creditors and
success in defending itself against all of the preferential payment claims. The
Company intends to oppose the preferential payment claims vigorously. The
outcome of these proceedings is uncertain at this time. As such, the Company has
not made any provision with respect to the preferential payment claims.

OTHER
In November 2001, two former employees of the Corporation brought a claim
against the Company pursuant to the Class Proceedings Act (British Columbia) as
a result of the temporary suspension of operations at the Company's Lupin mine
in the spring of 1998 and the layoff of employees at that time. The Company does
not know at this time the amount being claimed by the former employees nor
whether the claim is appropriate for certification as a class action. On August
12, 2002, the Supreme Court of British Columbia decided it had such
jurisdiction. The Company is appealing the decision. No determination has been
made by this Court as to whether this action is suitable for certification as a
class action and no decision has been rendered with respect to the merits of the
action.

SECURITY FOR RECLAMATION
Certain of the Company's subsidiaries have provided corporate guarantees and
other forms of security to regulatory authorities in connection with future
reclamation activities. Early in 2001, regulators in Nevada called upon two of
the Company's subsidiaries to provide other security to replace corporate
guarantees that had been given in respect of the Round Mountain and McCoy/Cove
operations. The McCoy/Cove complex and the associated reclamation obligation was
conveyed to a subsidiary of Newmont on February 7, 2003 as described in note 18.
The regulatory request, relevant to operations at Round Mountain, seeks
replacement security of approximately $16 million to bring the total to
approximately $22 million, the Company's 50% share. The Company disagrees with
the regulators' position and believes that the subsidiary qualifies under the
criteria set out for corporate guarantees and will oppose the regulatory
position. Although the outcome cannot be predicted, the Company and their
counsel believe that the Company will prevail. 18.

                                                                            C-32
<PAGE>

SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

(A)  BUSINESS COMBINATION
On June 10, 2002, the Company, Kinross Gold Corporation ("Kinross") and TVX Gold
Inc. ("TVX") announced they had entered into an agreement providing for the
proposed combination of the companies (the "Kinross Combination"). In a
concurrent transaction, TVX agreed to acquire from Newmont Mining Corporation
("Newmont") the interest in the TVX Newmont Americas joint venture that it did
not already own. The combination of the companies was conditional upon the
completion of this purchase. On January 31, 2003 the purchase from Newmont and
the proposed combination were completed. As such, shareholders of Echo Bay
(other than Kinross) received 0.1733 of a Kinross common share for each Echo Bay
common share after giving effect to a one-for-three share consolidation of the
outstanding common shares of Kinross immediately prior to the combination. As a
result, the Company and its subsidiaries are now wholly-owned subsidiaries of
Kinross. Common shares of the Company were delisted from the Toronto and
American Stock Exchanges and outstanding warrants are exercisable for Kinross
common stock as described in note 12.

(B)  DISPOSITION OF MCCOY/COVE
On June 9, 2002, Echo Bay Exploration Inc. and Echo Bay Minerals Company, two
subsidiaries of the Company, entered into an asset purchase agreement with
Newmont USA, a subsidiary of Newmont, providing for the conveyance of the
McCoy/Cove complex in Nevada, U.S.A.. The agreement replaces a letter agreement
dated February 13, 2002 related to the conveyance of the McCoy/Cove complex
which called for a payment to the seller of $6 million and the assumption by
Newmont of all reclamation and closure obligations. Under the February 13, 2002
letter agreement, Newmont had no obligation to complete the transaction. Newmont
indicated it was willing to proceed with the conveyance of the McCoy/Cove
complex only if the Kinross Combination was completed and the cash payment was
eliminated. Accordingly, a new agreement was reached expressly containing these
two conditions. The closing of the transaction was subject to, among other
conditions, the completion of the Kinross Combination. The Kinross Combination
was completed January 31, 2003 and the McCoy/Cove assets were conveyed to
Newmont on February 7, 2003. In consideration, Newmont has agreed to assume all
liabilities and obligations relating to the reclamation or remediation required
for the McCoy/Cove complex.

(C)  NEW CREDIT FACILITY
On February 27, 2003, Round Mountain Gold Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary
of the Company along with Kinross and two of its wholly-owned subsidiaries ("the
Borrowers"), entered into a new syndicated credit facility. The new syndicated
credit facility has a maturity date of December 31, 2005 and a total committed
amount of $125.0 million. The primary purpose of the credit facility is to
enable the Borrowers to issue letters of credit to various regulatory agencies
to satisfy financial assurance requirements. Shares of Round Mountain Gold
Corporation along with various other assets of Kinross are pledged as collateral
for this facility.

                                                                            C-33

</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>EX-99.5
<SEQUENCE>4
<FILENAME>tex99_5-29727.txt
<DESCRIPTION>EX-99.5
<TEXT>
<PAGE>

                                     KINROSS
                                Gold Corporation

                                   Positioned











                               2002 Annual Report















<PAGE>

                                    CONTENTS

                  OVERVIEW
         2        President's Message to Shareholders
         7        Highlights: Production and Financial
         8        Our Global Assets

                  OPERATIONS
         12       Message from the Chief Operating Officer
         14       Fort Knox
         16       Porcupine
         18       Kubaka
         20       Refugio
         20       Blanket

                  ACQUIRED OPERATIONS
         22       Round Mountain
         22       La Coipa
         23       Brasilia
         23       Crixas
         23       Lupin
         24       Musselwhite
         24       New Britannia
         24       Kettle River

         25       EXPLORATION AND DEVELOPMENT

                  CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITIES
         27       Environment
         29       Health and Safety
         30       Social Responsibility

         31       CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

         33       MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION
                  AND ANALYSIS

                  FINANCIAL
         56       Management's Responsibility
         56       Auditors' Report
         57       Financial Statements
         61       Notes to the Financial Statements
         103      Reserves and Resources

         IBC      Corporate Information

<PAGE>

KINROSS IS:

o    The 7th largest primary gold producer in the world
o    Highly leveraged to changes in the price of gold
o    A strict non-hedger (approximately 3.5% of reserves hedged falling to zero
     by early 2005)

KINROSS INTENDS TO:

o    Produce approximately 1.75 million gold equivalent ounces in 2003 at a
     total cash cost of about $210 per ounce (11 months of combined production)
o    Maintain its high safety and environmental standards
o    Target 2.0 million ounces of gold equivalent in 2004 at a total cash cost
     of approximately $200 per ounce

Note: All dollar amounts contained in this report are expressed in U.S. dollars
unless otherwise specified.

<PAGE>

"TIMING IS EVERYTHING"

                                                                            2003
                                                                   OUR 10TH YEAR


2002 HIGHLIGHTS
(all dollar amounts, except per share and per ounce amounts expressed in US$
millions)

                                                  2002        2001      2000

Net Loss                                         $(30.9)     $(36.3)    $(125.4)
Net Loss per Share 1                             $(0.32)     $(0.42)    $(1.33)
Revenue                                          $275.2      $282.9     $289.3
Cash Flow Provided from Operating Activities     $62.9       $74.5      $47.8
               - per Share 1                     $0.53       $0.71      $0.48
Capital Expenditures                             $22.6       $30.4      $41.6
Gold Equivalent Production (ounces)              888,634     944,803    943,798
Average Realized Price
                 per Ounce of Gold Sold          $306        $296       $ 298
Average Spot Gold Price per Ounce                $310        $271       $279
Total Cash Costs per Ounce                       $201        $193       $ 202
Total Production Costs per Ounce                 $306        $289       $ 304

1    restated to reflect a three old for one new share consolidation which was
     completed on January 31, 2003

<PAGE>

PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S
MESSAGE TO SHAREHOLDERS

         The year just passed encompassed, unquestionably, the most significant
changes in the affairs of your Company since it was formed in 1993. Yes, it will
be ten years in June since we started out with a non-operating joint venture
interest in the Denton-Rawhide mine producing approximately 24,000 ounces of
gold per year for Kinross. Look how far we've come... since that time, largely
through well-timed transactions, you have seen unparalleled growth in your
Company as we now approach the two million ounce per year production level. The
2003 merger with Echo Bay and TVX, announced in June 2002, vaults the Company
into the category of senior producer, the seventh largest primary gold producer
in the world, and gives Kinross the platform with which to solidify its position
as a legitimate contender to bid for assets as they become available worldwide.
Why would I start with this statement to review the past year? Quite simply, the
lack of funds spent on exploration by the industry over the past five years has
come back to roost. There are very few projects of value out there and we have
to be able to compete on as level a footing as we can, against the other North
American majors, for investment opportunities. Legitimacy in the investment
world is defined, to a large extent, by size and asset performance and this
legitimacy should translate to a strong stock price giving us the currency to
bid for assets. I am confident that this merger gives us the legitimacy we want
and require to bring Kinross credibility. Credibility and integrity are the
tools that will bring the opportunities to allow your Company to continue to
become a more senior player in an ever-consolidating industry.

         While the motivation to do this transaction comes from the philosophy
espoused above, timing is everything. Without the restructuring of the Echo Bay
and TVX balance sheets that was accomplished by the previous managements of both
companies, a transaction would not have been possible. It is also doubtful that
it would have been possible following the significant run up in gold prices that
occurred in early 2003. As I said, timing is everything.

<PAGE>

         ACHIEVEMENTS AND GOALS

         For the last five years we have reported to shareholders with a review
of the previous year's stated goals and an outline of our goals for the
following year. I like this discipline, since it forces one to confront the
decisions that were taken as well as putting the shareholders on notice of what
the expectations should be for the coming year. This annual report will be no
different, other than the goals for 2003 are broader than you would have seen in
previous years.

         The first goal outlined in last year's report was the implementation of
a production strategy for the Kubaka mine in Russia. The plan was to allow the
Birkachan gold deposit to move into production in 2004 and thus allow the Kubaka
plant to continue operations uninterrupted. Events in Russia proved quite
stressful, as dissident shareholders of Omolon Gold Mining Company, the Russian
company that operates the Kubaka mine, launched a series of lawsuits. Although
it has taken longer than expected, we have now increased Kinross' ownership of
Omolon from 54.7% to 98.1%. Along the way, we were successful in defending
ourselves from the series of lawsuits and anticipate converting the Birkachan
exploration license to a mining license. Resolution of these issues has laid the
groundwork for the potential development of an open pit mining operation for a
portion of the Birkachan resource commencing in 2004. Underground mining of
remnant ore at the Kubaka mine will complement ore from stockpiles in 2003 and
underground mining could subsequently shift to the Tsokol vein located nearer
the mill on the Kubaka mining license. The goals have not changed they have just
been delayed, although probably not by much. While the perception in the minds
of some of our shareholders may be that Russia is a difficult place to work, our
experience has generally been good. The work force is outstanding, funds are
freely transferable out of the country and, when asked, we have found the
politicians at both the local and federal levels to be responsive to our needs.
Clearly the legal system has some flaws, but as I said earlier, notwithstanding
the perception of corruption that surrounds the process, we have found the
courts to ultimately be fair and reasonable in their application of the law. In
conclusion, we like Russia, we like the


                                [PICTURE OMITTED]

                     (TRUCKS BEING LOADED AT FORT KNOX MINE)
<PAGE>

Russian worker, and in particular, we like the potential Russia has for gold
exploration and development. We will maintain a presence in that country.

                                                                  PAGE 3 pullout

                                                                            1993
                         "ONJUNE 1ST 1993, THE NEWLY FORMED KINROSS LISTS ON THE
                           TORONTO STOCK EXCHANGE AND NASDAQ WITH A 24% INTEREST
                           IN THE DENTON-RAWHIDE MINE WITH ANNUALIZED PRODUCTION
                         OF 24,370 OUNCES OF GOLD AND 244,000 OUNCES OF SILVER".

         The second stated goal was to complete a consolidation strategy in
Timmins entailing the merger of our Porcupine area assets with those of Placer
Dome. This was completed in July 2002. While we are excited about the benefits
of the consolidation strategy, to date the operating costs and staffing levels
are inconsistent with the benefits that should have come from the integration of
the Hoyle Pond and Dome mine assets. We do however expect that Placer, 51% owner
and operator, will be able to effect the necessary changes that will see this
joint venture produce 450,000 to 500,000 ounces of gold a year and an operating
cost that reflects the synergies of the joint venture. We have been active in
the Timmins area almost since the inception of this Company and Timmins has
provided us with a base for growth. We anticipate that this transaction will
allow us to continue to be active in this region for many years to come.

<PAGE>

                                                                 Page 4 Pull Out

"OUR FINAL 2002 GOAL WAS GROWTH. I CAN EMPHATICALLY
STATE THAT WE HAVE DELIVERED ON THAT PROMISE".

         The third stated goal was to increase reserves at Fort Knox. Not only
to replace reserves mined during the year, but to develop additional reserves to
assure future supplemental ore feed beyond the completion of mining at the True
North deposit, anticipated in 2005. In both cases we were moderately successful.
Reserves consumed by production were replaced in the Fort Knox pit and, while
more work was completed on other properties, in particular the True North and
Gil, sufficient work was not completed to generate a developable reserve.
Clearly this work has to continue into 2003, and must be a priority. Exploration
drilling will continue at Fort Knox, True North and Gil and new drill programs
are planned for Ryan Lode and on the NOAA ground adjacent to the Fort Knox pit.

         In our fourth stated 2002 goal, we indicated we would focus on further
improving the balance sheet to position the Company for future growth. We
purchased $36.5 million book value of the outstanding Kinam preferred shares for
$11.4 million prior to the mood of the market turning more positive towards
gold. In addition, during the year we repaid $28.5 million of long-term debt
with cash flow provided from operating activities. The impact was a reduction in
the total net obligations 1 of the Company, above the common, to below $100
million for the first time in five years. This is down dramatically from a high
of $259 million at the end of 2000. We will continue to focus on this issue in
2003.

         Our final 2002 goal was GROWTH. I can emphatically state that we have
delivered on that promise. The merger with Echo Bay and TVX and the acquisition
of the TVX Newmont Americas assets, more than doubles the gold equivalent
production of Kinross and creates the seventh largest primary gold producer in
the world. Growth has been and will continue to be a focus for your Company.
Through acquisitions and exploration, we have grown your Company from a
24,000-ounce per year producer with one non-operating joint venture asset, to a
senior gold producer with annualized production approaching 2 million ounces
(1.75 million in 2003) from 12 operations in 6 countries.

<PAGE>

         So what makes the new Kinross different from the other senior gold
producers?

         o   First, we are committed to delivering to our shareholders superior
exposure to improvements in the gold price through a firm policy of no hedging.
At year-end we had approximately 3.5% of gold reserves hedged; this will drop to
zero in early 2005 by delivering into our small hedge position.

         o   Second, we are the only senior gold producer with approximately
two-thirds of our production in North America and, while we are not adverse to
working in other parts of the world as shown by our continued commitment to
Russia, there is comfort in knowing that the majority of our assets are in the
United States and Canada.

         o   Third, the merger has given us the financial and operational base
from which we can continue to grow. We have cornerstone gold mining operations
in the United States, Canada, Chile, Brazil and Russia and we will leverage off
these assets to continue to add shareholder value.

         o   Finally, we have an excellent portfolio of mining and exploration
assets, which give us the base to continue our growth into the future.

1   In this context, Kinross' obligations are defined as long-term debt
(including current portion) plus the face value of convertible debentures
converted into U.S. dollars at year-end exchange rates plus the book value of
the redeemable retractable preferred shares and the book value of the preferred
shares of subsidiary company, net of cash.

<PAGE>

                                                                  PAGE 5 pullout

                                                                            1993
      "WITH A "LOAD-SHOOT-RELOAD" MENTALITY, WE COMPLETED TWO MORE DEALS IN 1993
                        ENDING THE YEAR WITH INTERESTS IN SEVEN PRODUCING ASSETS
                                                 INCLUDING THE HOYLE POND MINE".

         Let's look ahead. The list of goals for 2003, while not much longer
than 2002, will be more complicated and will be a true test of the viability of
the merger. The key goals that we have to accomplish are fairly simple to
define:

         1.       Turn three operating styles into one...Kinross'.

         2.       Generate the kinds of cash flow, operating costs and
                  production that are expected of a senior producer.

         3.       Clearly indicate how the Company is going to maintain its
                  annual operating base of approximately two million ounces of
                  gold equivalent.

         4.       Lay out a strategy to indicate how the Company will take
                  advantage of growth opportunities through the benefits of this
                  merger.

         The first of the priorities listed above is the easiest to accomplish
since the integration of the three overheads into one has almost been completed.
Scott Caldwell, our Chief Operating Officer, continues to spend virtually all of
his time visiting the original Kinross mines, as well as the new operations.
While we have made some changes, we are confident that the current mine staff is
more than capable of delivering on the budget that is expected to produce
approximately 1.75 million ounces of gold equivalent (an annualized rate of
almost 1.85 million ounces).

         The merger has given us the assets to make sure that we are able to
deliver on the second priority. By having a significant portfolio of quality
mining assets, we can be assured that we can generate the cash flow that
investors expect from a senior producer.

         The third priority is definitely more challenging, but unquestionably
doable. With production declines expected at a few of the mines, most notably
Kubaka, a strategy must


                       [PICTURE OMITTED - CRIXAS MILLSITE)

                [PICTURE OMITTED - DORE BAR FROM FORT KNOX MINE)
<PAGE>

be laid out that will replace that lost production in 2004. To be of greatest
value to our shareholders this should come from existing developable assets
within the Company's portfolio. The most likely sources of new production will
come from Refugio, Birkachan and Kettle River in 2004, and potentially from
Aquarius in 2005 and possibly Gurupi in 2006. Added to this is minor production
growth that is expected to come from Brasilia, Musselwhite and La Coipa during
this period. Over the coming months these sweeping assertions have to be
defended with feasibility studies, production decisions and ultimately results.
Only in this way can you, the shareholder, assess whether we are living up to
the billing of being a major producer.

                                                                  Page 6 PULLOUT

"...LET ME SAY THAT THE PLATFORM WE HAVE CREATED THROUGH THIS MERGER
GIVES THE NEW KINROSS AN OPPORTUNITY TO BECOME ONE OF THE
KEY GOLD PRODUCERS IN THE WORLD".

Lastly, we have to prove that a plan both exists and can be executed to allow
the Company to compete for, and buy, logical gold assets to add to the
previously defined level of production. Undoubtedly this will be our greatest
challenge in 2003. It is, however, a challenge that I look forward to, since we
potentially have the currency to aggressively grow Kinross in an accretive
manner. To do this will still, however, require a fairly innovative strategy,
since, as I indicated at the beginning of my message to shareholders, the
opportunities are limited. I believe your Company has proven that it has
excelled in this area. I am confident we can continue to do so in the future.

         So in conclusion let me say that the platform we have created through
this merger gives the new Kinross an opportunity to become one of the key gold
producers in the world. While it is still difficult to see how this will occur,
even for me, I have never been more confident in the strength of our Company, in
the support of our shareholders and in the enthusiasm of your management team.
As a group we have gone through some very bleak days when analysts' comments
focused on our viability, not on our growth opportunities. Today we have emerged
strong and capable of accomplishing much. I look forward to telling you what in
fact we do accomplish.

<PAGE>

         I would be remiss if I did not say a few words about Art Ditto, a
retiring executive of the Company. Art is in fact the first of the core team
that started Kinross in 1993 to either leave or retire, which is testament, I
believe, to the strength of our management style. Art was the COO of the Company
from inception until he handed over the file to Scott Caldwell earlier this
year. He has been a tireless supporter of the Company's strategy and is the main
reason that Kinross consistently reports safety and environmental results that
are second to none. We thank him for his counsel over the years and wish him
well in his much deserved retirement. Additionally, in keeping with recent
corporate governance guidelines proposed by regulatory authorities regarding
Board of Directors' independence, Kinross appointed John E. Oliver as Chairman
of the Company on August 1, 2002. Mr. Oliver is Executive Managing Director and
Co-head Scotia Capital U.S., Bank of Nova Scotia. Mr. Oliver has been a member
of the Board of Directors of Kinross since 1995 and had been the Independent
Board Leader of Kinross since February 13, 2002.



         ROBERT M. BUCHAN
         President and Chief Executive Officer

         APRIL 22, 2003

<PAGE>

                                                                  PAGE 7 pullout

                                                                            1994
                                        "THE DELINEATION OF THE 1060 ZONE AT THE
                                           HOYLE POND MINE EXTENDS THE MINE LIFE
                                                AND INCREASES RESERVES BY 661%".

HIGHLIGHTS
PRODUCTION AND FINANCIAL

GOLD EQUIVALENT
PRODUCTION
(oz)

AVERAGE REALIZED GOLD PRICE
(US$/Au Eq oz)

TOTAL CASH
COST
(US$/Au Eq oz)

Au = gold
Au eq = gold equivalent
        calculated as gold plus silver
        converted to gold equivalent ounces


PROVEN AND PROBABLE RESERVES
(oz Au)

1   Pro-forma - assuming the Kinross-Echo Bay-TVX Gold
                combination was effective December 31, 2002.

CASH FLOW PROVIDED FROM
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
(in US$ millions)

TOTAL NET OBLIGATIONS
(in US$ millions)

2 In this context, Kinross' obligations are defined as long-term debt (including
current portion) plus the face value of convertible debentures converted into
U.S. dollars at year-end exchange rates plus the book value of the redeemable
retractable preferred shares and the book value of the preferred shares of
subsidiary company, net of cash.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Tables from Page 7

Table - Gold Equivalent Production, Average Realized Gold Price, Total Cash Cost
                                                1993       1994         1995        1996       1997       1998       1999
<S>                                           <C>       <C>          <C>         <C>        <C>        <C>      <C>
Gold Equivalent Production (Ounces)           83,468    245,005      342,368     524,725    499,025    874,447  1,012,408
Average Realized Gold Price (US$/Au eq oz)       388        384          388         388        344        309        300
Total Cash Cost  (US$/Au eq oz)                  233        219          250         255        268        214        196


Table - Proven and Probable Reserves
                                                1993       1994         1995        1996       1997       1998       1999
(ounces Au)                                1,597,000  2,000,000    5,740,000   5,878,000  3,693,000  8,435,000  7,220,000

                                                2000       2001         2002       2003

Gold Equivalent Production (Ounces)          943,798    944,803      888,634   1,750,000
Average Realized Gold Price (US$/Au eq oz)       298        296          306
Total Cash Cost  (US$/Au eq oz)                  202        193          201         210


Table - Proven and Probable Reserves
                                                2000       2001         2002
(ounces Au)                                2,043,000  5,661,000   13,153,000

Table - Cash Flow Provied from Operating Activities
                                                1998       1999         2000        2001       2002
(in US$ millions)                                102       69.5         47.8        74.5       62.9


Total Net Obligations
                                                1998       1999         2000        2001       2002

(in US$ millions)                              216.3      250.2        258.1       156.9       66.6
</TABLE>

<PAGE>

OUR GLOBAL ASSETS
A RESOURCE BASE EXCEEDING 20 MILLION OUNCES OF GOLD

OPERATIONS

FORT KNOX
ALASKA, USA
2002 Production: 410,519 oz Au
Cash Costs: $232/oz Au

ROUND MOUNTAIN 2
NEVADA, USA
2002 Production: 377,747 oz Au
Cash Costs: $207/oz Au

PORCUPINE 1
ONTARIO, CANADA
2002 Production: 189,464 oz Au
Cash Costs: $201/oz Au

KUBAKA 1
MAGADAN OBLAST, RUSSIA
2002 Production: 220,972 oz Au eq
Cash Costs: $133/oz Au eq

LA COIPA 2
CHILE
2002 Production: 149,284 oz Au eq
Cash Costs: $226/oz Au eq

BRASILIA 2
STATE OF MINAS GERAIS, BRAZIL
2002 Production: 110,035 oz Au
Cash Costs: $167/oz Au

CRIXAS 2
STATE OF GOIAS, BRAZIL
2002 Production: 93,660 oz Au
Cash Costs: $88/oz Au

LUPIN 2
NUNAVUT, CANADA
2002 Production: 113,835 oz Au
Cash Costs: $330/oz Au


 (PICTURE OMITTED - WORLD MAP SHOWING LOCATION OF KINROSS MINES AND PROJECTS.)
<PAGE>

MUSSELWHITE 2
ONTARIO, CANADA
2002 Production: 66,879 oz Au
Cash Costs: $228/oz Au

NEW BRITANNIA 2
MANITOBA, CANADA
2002 Production: 53,745 oz Au
Cash Costs: $202/oz Au

KETTLE RIVER 2
WASHINGTON, USA
2002 Production: 30,626 oz Au
Cash Costs: $283/oz Au

BLANKET
ZIMBABWE
2002 Production: 41,612 oz Au
Cash Costs: $243/oz Au

1    Production figures represent
     Kinross' share

2    Production figures represent
     Kinross' pro-forma share



2002 ATTRIBUTABLE GOLD EQUIVALENT PRODUCTION

         OPERATIONS                                           GOLD EQUIVALENT
                                                              PRODUCTION
                                                              (OUNCES)

         Fort Knox                                            410,519
         Porcupine                                            189,464
         Kubaka                                               220,972
         Blanket                                               41,612
         Refugio                                               13,047
         Residual Properties                                   13,020
         TOTAL                                                888,634

<PAGE>

                                                                  PAGE 9 pullout

                                                                            1995
                                            "INTEREST IN THE DENTON-RAWHIDE MINE
                                IS INCREASED TO 50%. OUR FIRST FORAY INTO RUSSIA
                                  IS MADE WITH THE ACQUISITION OF A 25% INTEREST
                                          IN THE AGINSKOE PROJECT IN KAMCHATKA".

EXPLORATION/ DEVELOPMENT
PROJECTS

AQUARIUS
ONTARIO, CANADA

BIRKACHAN
MAGADAN OBLAST, RUSSIA

GEORGE/GOOSE LAKE
NUNAVUT, CANADA

GURUPI
STATE OF MARANHAO, BRAZIL

REFUGIO
CHILE

RESERVE AND RESOURCE SUMMARY
PRO-FORMA SHARE OF GOLD OUNCES AS AT DECEMBER 31, 2002

Geographic                          Mineral                    Mineral
Region                              Reserves                   Resources
                                    (,000 ounces)              (,000 ounces)

North America                       8,388                      2,980
South America                       4,329                      4,415
Other                               436                        329
TOTAL                               13,153                     7,724

OPERATIONS

<PAGE>

MESSAGE
FROM THE CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER

         During the year, Kinross' Operations Team produced 888,634 ounces of
gold equivalent at a total cash cost of $201 per ounce while maintaining
excellent safety and environmental standards. Our employees worked in excess of
3.4 million hours with a lost time accident frequency rate of just 0.65 per
200,000 hours worked and, thankfully, zero fatalities. While there is always
room for improvement, this outstanding achievement positioned Kinross for yet
another year in the top quartile of the industry with respect to safety
performance. In addition, the operations' focus on environmental protection was
once again impressive.

         The Kubaka mine met yet another milestone during the year with the
successful completion of surface mining in October of 2002. I would be remiss
not to highlight that this group worked five years without a single lost time
accident, an achievement that is all too rarely accomplished in the mining
industry. Although it is sad to see the surface mining end, work has already
begun on the development of the underground portion of the Kubaka deposit. As
the year unfolds, we plan to not only mine the underground Kubaka ore, but also
develop and mine the Birkachan satellite deposit.

         The Porcupine Joint Venture was created and became operational in July
of 2002. Although Porcupine has yet to yield the results we expected, we are
confident that by working with our partner and operator, Placer Dome Inc., the
optimization process will continue and the performance will greatly improve in
2003.

         As you know, the Fort Knox mine struggled with a variety of complex
operating issues during the year. A new management team was installed mid-year
and moved quickly to implement a number of meaningful changes that addressed
these issues. We are expecting the mine to have a slow start in 2003 but finish
the year with much stronger performance.

<PAGE>

         I cannot leave 2002 without mentioning the Blanket mine in Zimbabwe.
Despite some extremely difficult economic and political challenges, the team at
the Blanket mine continues to safely produce gold with positive cash flow.

         The new year finds us all owning a piece of an exciting new company.
The merger of Kinross, TVX Gold Inc. and Echo Bay Mines Ltd. has created a gold
mining company with a very exciting combination of worldwide assets and a team
of talented and committed managers and employees who we know are dedicated to
operating to the highest standards while generating the best possible results.
The integration of the three management groups into one coherent, effective
management team is now largely complete.

                                                                 PAGE 13 pullout

                                                                            1996
                                   "GOLD EQUIVALENT PRODUCTION IN 1996 EXCEEDS A
                                 HALF MILLION OUNCES FROM EIGHT PRODUCING MINES.
                            WE COMPLIMENTED OUR OWNERSHIP OF THE HOYLE POND MINE
                                WITH THE ACQUISITION OF AN OUTSTANDING ROYALTY".

Looking forward, the 2003 goals for the operating group are simple.

1.    To safely and efficiently produce gold at reasonable operating costs, as
      expected of a senior gold producer, while maintaining the utmost respect
      for the environment we work in.

2.    To prepare for the future by completing sound, efficient development plans
      for Refugio, Birkachan, Emanuel Creek and other opportunities that arise.

3.    To focus on the Continuous Improvement Process. Our new Company is not
      only larger and stronger, but it also offers us greater potential to
      benefit from the Kinross Continuous Improvement Program. This program is
      designed to apply the disciplined, focused and measurable principles of
      continuous improvement to those core activities of the Company that can
      benefit most from the process. We are convinced this program will generate
      sustainable improvement in the way we do business, reducing costs, and
      ultimately improving the productivity of the Company.


                               [PICTURE OMITTED]

(1) Loading Truck at Round Mountain
(2) Mill Control Room at Round Mountain

<PAGE>

SCOTT A. CALDWELL
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER

APRIL 22, 2003




OPERATIONS
2002

FORT KNOX (100%)
USA

THE FORT KNOX OPERATION, LOCATED 40 KILOMETRES NORTHEAST OF FAIRBANKS, ALASKA,
HAS BEEN THE LARGEST CONTRIBUTOR TO KINROSS' ANNUAL GOLD EQUIVALENT PRODUCTION
SINCE IT WAS ACQUIRED IN MID-1998. IN 2001, THE TRUE NORTH OPEN PIT MINE,
LOCATED 15 KILOMETRES NORTHWEST OF FORT KNOX, WAS BROUGHT INTO PRODUCTION TO
SUPPLY HIGHER GRADE SUPPLEMENTAL ORE TO THE FORT KNOX MILL.

         In 2002, gold equivalent production totaled 410,519 ounces, essentially
unchanged compared to 2001 but 7% lower than the 440,000 ounces planned. Total
cash costs per gold equivalent ounce during 2002 were $232, a 12% increase
year-over-year and 10% higher than planned.

         Harder than anticipated ore from the True North mine combined with poor
equipment availability in the Fort Knox pit and unacceptable performance of the
True North haulage fleet, principally during the first half of 2002, negatively
impacted production and increased costs. The mechanical issues have largely been
addressed with the purchase of new haulage trucks and in-pit mining equipment.
The unexpected hardness of the True North ore will be more difficult to address,
however, it is anticipated

                                [PICTURE OMITTED]

(1) Diamond Drill Working at Fort Knox
(2) Grinding Mills at Fort Knox
<PAGE>

that rejecting the harder material from the crusher will alleviate the problem
resulting in increased mill throughput. Gold equivalent production for 2003 is
estimated to be 410,000 ounces at total cash costs of $220 per ounce.

         Capital expenditures at the Fort Knox operations in 2002 were $15.0
million compared to the $20.2 million incurred during 2001. The majority of 2002
expenditures were associated with the construction of the tailings thickener
($6.9 million), increasing the height of the tailings dam ($3.2 million) and
exploration costs at the Fort Knox and True North mines ($2.7 million). It is
estimated that capital expenditures will be $16.2 million in 2003.





                                    2002 Plan         2002 ACTUAL      2003 PLAN
Tonnes Milled (MILLIONS)            14.8              13.8             13.5
Grade (G/T AU)                      1.09              1.09             0.98
Recovery (%)                        84.8              84.4             86.5
Production (OZ AU EQ)               440,000           410,519          410,000
Total Cash Costs ($/OZ)             210               232              220
Production Costs ($/OZ)             319               343              330
Capital Expenditures ($ MILLIONS)   16.0              15.0             16.2
Number of Employees                 390               388              425

RESERVE RECONCILIATION              OUNCES
Reserves (Dec. 31, 2001)            3,083,000
Production Depletion                (489,000)
Reserve Reclassification*           (225,000)
Fort Knox Pit Redesign              (76,000)
Reserve Additions                   385,000
RESERVES (DEC. 31, 2002)            2,678,000

* Ryan Lode Deposit

<PAGE>

                                                                 PAGE 15 pullout

                                                                            1998
                               "KINROSS REACHED AN ANNUALIZED RATE EXCEEDING THE
                                 ONE MILLION OUNCE PRODUCTION LEVEL IN JUNE 1998
                     WHEN THE ACQUISITION OF AMAX GOLD INC. ADDED THE FORT KNOX,
                             KUBAKA AND REFUGIO MINES TO THE KINROSS PORTFOLIO".

EXPLORATION AND DEVELOPMENT

         The main focus of 2002 exploration activities in the Fairbanks district
was directed towards testing possible extensions of the Fort Knox mine and
completing the definition drilling at the True North mine. In total, 28,640
metres of drilling were completed, resulting in the successful replacement of
essentially all of the reserves mined from the Fort Knox mine as well as the
identification of some exciting new targets.

         One of the more interesting opportunities in the Fairbanks district is
the NOAA property, located immediately west of the Fort Knox mine. During 2002,
a geological mapping and soil-sampling program outlined exposures of granite,
the host of the Fort Knox mineralization, as well as two large gold soil
geochemical anomalies. A drilling program commenced at the site in March 2003.

         Diamond drilling at the True North deposit during 2002 was directed
towards defining the extensions of the main deposit and a satellite deposit
located north of the main pit. Drilling identified several zones of shallow
mineralization and three separate targets that could provide opportunities for
some modest expansions of the pit. Additionally, three soil geochemical
anomalies were identified along strike to the southwest of the deposit. The
planned True North drilling program for 2003 will further test these zones and
anomalies.

         Numerous other targets will be explored during the upcoming year. The
Gil project, which hosts a small gold resource, was the subject of a limited
drill program in 2002 and will be the site of follow-up testing in 2003. At Ryan
Lode, previous exploration activities outlined an indicated resource of three
million tonnes grading 2.37

                                [PICTURE OMITTED]

                       Course One Stock Pile at Fort Knox
<PAGE>

grams of gold per tonne. The focus during 2003 will be to extend the area of
known mineralization, which remains open.

         The goal for 2003 will be to upgrade previously identified resources to
reserve status and bring new, high quality prospects in the Fairbanks mining
district into our exploration portfolio. The ultimate objective of these
activities is to add additional sources of mill feed for the Fort Knox mill.


PORCUPINE (49%)
Canada

ON JULY 1, 2002, KINROSS AND A WHOLLY-OWNED SUBSIDIARY OF PLACER DOME INC.
FORMED A JOINT VENTURE COMBINING THE TWO COMPANIES' MINING OPERATIONS AND
PROPERTIES IN THE PORCUPINE DISTRICT AROUND TIMMINS, ONTARIO. KINROSS RETAINED A
49% INTEREST IN THE NEW PORCUPINE JOINT VENTURE ("PORCUPINE") CONTRIBUTING ITS
HOYLE POND, NIGHTHAWK LAKE AND PAMOUR MINES AND EXPLORATION PROPERTIES IN THE
DISTRICT, AS WELL AS THE BELL CREEK MILL. PLACER DOME CONTRIBUTED THE DOME MINE
AND MILL AND ITS EXPLORATION PROPERTIES, RETAINING A 51% INTEREST IN PORCUPINE.

         The Company's share of 2002 gold equivalent production increased 21%
year-over-year to 189,464 ounces while total cash costs increased 10% from 2001
to $201 per ounce. The 2002 plan was essentially made obsolete by the formation
of the joint venture: overall ore grades were lower than planned, however,
tonnage milled was six times more than planned due to the inclusion of
production from the Dome mine during the second half of the year. The Company's
share of estimated gold equivalent production for 2003 is 219,000 ounces at
total cash costs of approximately $210 per ounce.

         Kinross' share of gold equivalent production increased year-over-year
due to higher than planned ore grades processed at the Bell Creek mill during
the first half of 2002 combined with its 49% share of production from Porcupine
in the second half of

                                [PICTURE OMITTED]

(1) Aerial view of Hayle Pond Mine
(2) Gold pour at Porcupine Joint Venture

<PAGE>

2002. Operating costs were impacted by higher than planned second-quarter mining
equipment maintenance costs at the Dome mine open pit, higher than planned
reagent and grinding media consumption and unplanned costs associated with a new
collective bargaining agreement.

         The joint venture continues to assess the development of the Pamour
mineral properties, as they will form a significant part of the future
production once the current Dome mine open pit reserves have been depleted. A
feasibility study was completed in 2002 and the permitting process has been
initiated. It is anticipated that construction and pre-production development
will commence in 2004 after the required permits have been received.

         The Company's share of 2002 capital expenditures was $6.7 million
compared to the $7.9 million spent in 2001. The majority of expenditures were
required to advance the 1060 ramp, further underground development drilling at
Hoyle Pond, add to the surface fleet and make plant modifications. The Company's
share of planned capital expenditures for 2003 is estimated to be $6.8 million.


                                      2002 Plan        2002 Actual     2003 Plan
Tonnes Milled (MILLIONS)              0.4              2.4             4.1
Grade (G/T AU)                        12.30            5.02            3.70
Recovery (%)                          87.7             90.6            91.3
Production 1 (OZ AU EQ)               145,000          189,464         219,000
Total Cash Costs ($/OZ)               193              201             210
Production Costs ($/OZ)               295              294             280
Capital Expenditures 1 ($ MILLIONS)   8.6              6.7             6.8
Number of Employees                   391              756             700

1    Kinross' share


RESERVE RECONCILIATION 1              OUNCES
Reserves (Dec. 31, 2001)              1,160,000
Production Depletion                  (207,000)
Reserve Recalculations                (22,700)
Resource Conversion                   33,700
Transaction Additions                 521,000
RESERVES (Dec. 31, 2002)              1,485,000

<PAGE>

                                                                 PAGE 17 pullout

                                                                            1999
                                            "IN 1999, KINROSS MAKES A $5 MILLION
                                                 STRATEGIC ACQUISITION OF ASSETS
                                                    IN THE PORCUPINE GOLD CAMP".

EXPLORATION AND DEVELOPMENT

         Following the formation of the Porcupine joint venture, approximately
75,000 metres of drilling was completed on 12 surface and two underground target
areas. This work resulted in the replacement of most of the gold mined at the
Hoyle Pond mine along with discovery of the new 850 Zone on the 720 level of the
mine. Exploration and development activities were successful at increasing
reserves at the Pamour deposit and further defining the open pitable resource at
Owl Creek. In addition, a number of high-grade underground targets were advanced
including the McIntyre Central Porphyry Zone. These exploration efforts, offset
by production depletion and reserve recalculations, were the major factors in
increasing Kinross' share of reserves by 28% to almost 1.5 million ounces,
between the close of 2001 and 2002.

         Like many Archean vein deposits, year-over-year exploration has
routinely replaced the reserves mined at the Hoyle Pond mine. Upwards of 80% of
this replacement has come from the 1060 Zone, which includes the B Veins, and
Upper and Lower Porphyry Zones. Three years ago the Upper and Lower Porphyry
Zones were not recognized, yet last year, 50% of the mill feed from this mine
came from stoping on those structures. Obviously, an important component of the
exploration effort will be focused on the depth potential of these zones. The
1060 Zone has been traced 300 metres beneath the 720 level, the deepest level of
development and development work has been completed to allow for the drilling of
up to 700 metres below the 720 level. For the year ahead, over 35,000 metres of
underground drilling is planned at the Hoyle Pond mine.

                                [PICTURE OMITTED]

                    Diamond from barge on Pearl Lake drilling
<PAGE>

         At the Pamour deposit, a combination of drilling and re-engineering
resulted in a reserve increase of almost one million ounces of gold. Kinross'
share of the December 31, 2002 Pamour reserve, which stood at 17.7 million
tonnes grading 1.38 grams of gold per tonne, or 790,000 ounces of gold,
incorporated an additional 300-metre expansion to the east along the mineralized
system, which remains open. The current reserve models are being updated to
reflect new results and additional drilling is being considered.

KUBAKA (54.7%)
(Increased to 98.1% on March 1, 2003)
Russia

KINROSS ACQUIRED ITS INITIAL OWNERSHIP INTEREST IN THE KUBAKA OPEN PIT MINE,
LOCATED IN THE MAGADAN OBLAST IN FAR EASTERN RUSSIA, IN THREE TRANSACTIONS
DURING 1998 AND 1999. IN DECEMBER 2002, THE COMPANY ENTERED INTO PURCHASE
AGREEMENTS TO INCREASE ITS INTEREST IN OMOLON GOLD MINING COMPANY, WHICH OWNS
THE KUBAKA MINE, TO 98.1% BY OMOLON PAYING THE RUBLE EQUIVALENT OF $43.5
MILLION. THE TRANSACTION CLOSED ON MARCH 1, 2003 AND WILL ALLOW KINROSS THE
FLEXIBILITY TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES IN THE AREA, AS WELL
AS GIVE THE COMPANY A VEHICLE THROUGH WHICH TO EXAMINE POTENTIAL INVESTMENTS IN
THE REGION.

         The Kubaka mine continues to perform well, having achieved the lowest
total cash costs per ounce of the Company's primary operations. The Company's
share of 2002 gold equivalent production was 220,972, 4% lower than planned.
Lower than planned milled gold grades, partially offset by increased mill
throughput, resulted in the variance. Total cash costs declined to $133 per
ounce from the $140 per ounce achieved in 2001, as open pit operations ended in
October 2002 and the processing of stockpiled ore began.

         Based on current plans, the majority of the lower grade stockpiled ore
will be processed in 2003 and will be supplemented with underground ore from the
North High Wall, Centre Zone and the North Vein in 2003. The Company continues
to actively

                                [PICTURE OMITTED]

                  Helicopter transporting personnel at Kubaka
                           Open-pit mining at Kubaka
<PAGE>

explore the nearby Tsokol gold deposit and is encouraged that the life of the
operation will extend into 2005 and beyond by development of the Birkachan
deposit and potentially the Tsokol deposit. Gold equivalent production for the
Company from the Kubaka mine in 2003 is estimated at 188,000 ounces at total
cash costs of approximately $190 per ounce.

         The Company's share of 2002 capital expenditures were $0.1 million
compared to $0.4 million during 2001. The Company's share of planned capital
expenditures for 2003 is estimated to be $1.5 million, which will be used to
acquire mining equipment for the underground mining operations.

                                      2002 Plan       2002 Actual      2003 Plan

Tonnes Milled (MILLIONS)              0.82            0.85             0.86
Grade (G/T AU)                        15.90           14.93            7.30
Recovery (%)                          97.5            97.7             97.0
Production 1 (OZ AU EQ)               230,000         220,972          188,000
Total Cash Costs ($/OZ)               130             133              190
Production Costs ($/OZ)               238             227              320
Capital Expenditures 1 ($ MILLIONS)   1.5             0.1              1.5
Number of Employees                   427             374              428

1    Kinross' share


RESERVE RECONCILIATION 1              OUNCES
Reserves (Dec. 31, 2001)              350,000
Production Depletion                  (226,000)
Reserve Additions                     32,000
Reserves (Dec. 31, 2002)              156,000

<PAGE>

                                                                 PAGE 19 pullout

                                                                            2002
                                     "IN JULY 2002, KINROSS AND PLACER DOME INC.
                                CONSOLIDATE THEIR INTERESTS IN TIMMINS TO CREATE
                                                  THE PORCUPINE JOINT  VENTURE".

EXPLORATION AND DEVELOPMENT

         Over the past couple of years, the Birkachan gold deposit, located
approximately 28 kilometres north of the Kubaka mine, has been the focus of
considerable exploration efforts. To the beginning of last year, drilling had
outlined a large low-grade zone averaging about 0.5 grams of gold per tonne over
a 2.5 kilometre length. Within the zone, a number of high-grade zones have been
identified, which are characteristic of the upper levels of an epithermal
system. Through the first half of last year, 17,500 metres of in-fill drilling
was completed confirming the continuity of the high-grade mineralization. Field
work was suspended mid-year and an application for a mining license was made.
Once a license has been secured, permitting will begin with the goal of
commencing mining from an open pit during next winter.

         Adjacent to the Kubaka mill, diamond drilling has outlined an inferred
resource of 600,000 tonnes grading 10.50 grams of gold per tonne or
approximately 200,000 ounces at the Tsokol vein. To date, the vein has been
traced for nearly one kilometre and the 2003 exploration campaign is designed to
increase confidence in the resource to justify underground development. Drilling
will also address the at-depth potential of the eastern portion of Tsokol vein,
where the deposit remains open.

                                [PICTURE OMITTED]

                            Infrastructure at Kubaka


REFUGIO (50%)
Chile

KINROSS ACQUIRED ITS 50% INTEREST IN THE REFUGIO MINE, LOCATED 120 KILOMETRES
NORTHEAST OF COPIAPO, CHILE, IN 1998 AS PART OF ITS LARGER ACQUISITION OF AMAX
GOLD INC.
         In 2001, in light of lower gold prices, mining activities at the open
pit were suspended and the operation was placed on care and maintenance. No
further ore was

                                [PICTURE OMITTED]

                              Truck shop at Refugio
<PAGE>

placed on the leach pads, however, residual leaching continued. In 2002,
Kinross' share of gold equivalent production totaled 13,047 ounces at total cash
costs of $186 per ounce compared to 2001 production of 67,211 ounces at total
cash costs of $242 per ounce. No gold production had been planned for the
operation in 2002.

         In late 2002, Kinross began a multi-phase exploration program at
Refugio with the goal of increasing the reserve base prior to examining the
viability of reopening the mine in light of the recent higher spot gold prices.
Initial drilling results have been very encouraging and will be reviewed during
2003, with the expectation of making a production decision during the latter
part of the year. If the decision is positive, production could resume in 2004.

BLANKET (100%)
Zimbabwe

THE BLANKET MINE, LOCATED IN ZIMBABWE, COMPRISES A SMALL UNDERGROUND MINING
OPERATION IN COMBINATION WITH A TAILINGS REPROCESSING FACILITY THAT EXPLOITS THE
GOLD-BEARING TAILINGS FROM HISTORIC MINING OPERATIONS IN THE AREA.

         In 2002, the mine produced 41,612 ounces of gold, compared to a planned
production of 39,000 ounces, at total cash costs of $243 per ounce. During 2001,
the operation produced 39,592 ounces at total cash costs of $279 per ounce.

         In light of the economic and political conditions, the Company fully
wrote down its investment in the Blanket mine in 2001. Extreme inflationary
pressures continue to negatively impact the operation, however, the mine remains
in operation and is self-sustaining at present. Estimated gold production for
2003 is 35,000 ounces at costs similar to those achieved in 2002.


OUR NEWLY ACQUIRED MINING OPERATIONS
An Introduction

                                [PICTURE OMITTED]

                            Grinding mill at Blanket
<PAGE>

MINE

LOCATION

OWNERSHIP 1


TYPE OF OPERATION

RECOVERY METHOD 2

OVERVIEW






2002 PRODUCTION
Tonnes Processed (000s)
Grade (g/t Au)
Recovery (%)
Production 3 (ounces)
Total Cash Costs (per ounce)

HIGHLIGHTS

2003 PLAN 4
Production (ounces)
Total Cash Costs (per ounce)




1       as of January 31, 2003
2       CIL - Carbon-in-leach
        CIP - Carbon-in-pulp
3       Production represents
        Kinross' pro-forma share
4       Kinross' 12 month
        pro-forma share

ROUND MOUNTAIN
Nevada, USA

                                [PICTURE OMITTED]

(1) Open pit mining at Round Mountain
(2) Open pit mine at La Couipa

<PAGE>

50% Kinross (operator)
50% Barrick

Open Pit

Heap leach, CIL, Gravity

The Round Mountain mine is located 95 kilometres north of Tonopah in Nye County,
Nevada. The property covers approximately 2,950 hectares with contiguous
patented and unpatented mining claims covering approximately 11,125 hectares.

56,400
0.65
64.0
377,747
$207

o    Gold production increased for the fifth consecutive year
o    The mine is unique in that it uses four independent process operations:
     crushed ore leaching, run-of-mine ore leaching, gravity concentration and
     conventional milling
o    2003 drill program will continue to test the potential of the nearby Gold
     Hill deposit


360,000
$210

LA COIPA*
Northern Chile

50% Kinross
50% Placer Dome (operator)

Open Pit

CIL, Merrill Crowe

The La Coipa mine is located in the Atacama desert, 140 kilometres northeast of
the city of Copiapo, at an altitude of 3,800 metres above sea level.

6,342
1.98
74.2

<PAGE>

149,284
$226

o    Mining activities focused on the Coipa Norte open pit

o    Exploration successful in identify a significant zone of mineralization

o    Gold equivalent production included

     3.6 million ounces silver (50% basis)

* Grade and per ounce figures represent gold equivalent

145,000
$255


                                                                 PAGE 23 pullout

                                                                            2002
                                           "IN JUNE 2002, KINROSS, TVX GOLD INC.
                                                         AND ECHO BAY MINES LTD.
                                                ANNOUNCED THEIR PLANS TO MERGE".


BRASILIA
State of Minas Gerais, Brazil

49% Kinross
51% RTZ (operator)

Open Pit

CIL, hydrometallurgy

The Brasilia mine is a large tonnage, open pit operation. Located 200 kilometres
southeast of Brasilia, Brazil's capital city, the mine is the country's second
largest gold producer.

18,364
0.48
78.7
110,035
$167

                                [PICTURE OMITTED]

(1) Processing plant at Brasilia
(2) Crixas mill
(3) Lupin headframe and mill
<PAGE>

o    2002 production increased 20% year-over-year

o    Decision to undertake a plant expansion to increase milling rates by 50%
     anticipated during 2003.

106,000
$175

CRIXAS
State of Goias, Brazil

50% Kinross
50% AngloGold (operator)

Underground

CIL, Merrill Crowe

The Crixas underground mining operation, located approximately 260 kilometres
northwest of Brasilia, is a consistent, low-cost producer. Production is derived
from the Mina III and Mina Nova orebodies, which are mined from decline ramps.

743
8.22
95.4
93,660
$88

o    Introduction of mechanized cut-and-fill mining method reduced costs

o    Mine achieved record low annual total mining costs

o    Production from 2 deposits, Mina III and Mina Nova

92,000
$125

LUPIN
Nunavut Territory, Canada

100% Kinross

Underground

CIL

<PAGE>

The Lupin mine is located 400 kilometres northeast of Yellowknife in the Nunavut
Territory of Canada, 90 kilometres south of the Arctic Circle. The Lupin mining
lease covers 2,825 hectares.

565
6.75
92.6
113,835
$330

o    The mining of narrower portions of the orebody combined with the depth of
     operations impacted 2002 production and costs

o    The potential of extending the mine life beyond 2005 by processing
     mineralization from other gold deposits is being examined.

142,000
$275

MUSSELWHITE
Ontario, Canada

32% Kinross
68% Placer Dome (operator)

Underground

CIP, Gravity

The Musselwhite mine is located at Opapimiskan Lake, 430 kilometres north of the
city of Thunder Bay in Ontario.

1,157
5.91
95.3
66,879
$228

o    Underground conveyor and crusher system commissioned

o    Negotiations with local First Nations communities removed all limits on
     daily mill throughput

                                [PICTURE OMITTED]

Musselwhite mill
New Britannia mill and headframe
Kettle River mill
<PAGE>

77,000
$190

NEW BRITANNIA
Manitoba, Canada

50% Kinross (operator)
50% High River Gold

Underground

CIP

The New Britannia mine is located in the town of Snow Lake in Northern Manitoba,
700 kilometres north of Winnipeg.

751
4.73
94.0
53,745
$202

o    Introduction of Alimak mining method allows for the mining of narrower
     portions of the orebody

o    3000' Level exploration drift initiated to allow for exploration drilling
     to 4000' level

o    Examining options to extend mining operations below the 4000' Level

46,000
$255

KETTLE RIVER
Washington, USA

100% Kinross


Underground

CIL

The Kettle River properties are located in Ferry County in the State of
Washington

<PAGE>

and cover approximately 3,075 hectares through patented and unpatented mining
claims and fee lands.

193
5.86
84.0
30,626
$283

o    Mining of the K2 deposit ceased during 2002

o    Underground development program initiated to allow for access to the newly
     discovered high-grade Emanuel Creek deposit

Production from Emanuel Creek anticipated in 2004.




                                                                 PAGE 25 pullout

                                                                            2003
                                        "UPON COMPLETION OF THE MERGER ANNOUNCED
                                         IN 2002, WE WERE VAULTED INTO THE RANKS
                                         OF THE TOP TIER PRIMARY GOLD PRODUCERS.
                               KINROSS IS LISTED ON THE NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE,
                              SYMBOL KGC, AND IS ADDED TO THE S&P TSX 60 INDEX".

EXPLORATION AND DEVELOPMENT
Integral to our Growth

EXPLORATION ACTIVITIES FORM AN INTEGRAL COMPONENT OF KINROSS' GROWTH STRATEGY AS
THE COMPANY ATTAINS ITS ANNUAL PRODUCTION PROFILE OF APPROXIMATELY TWO MILLION
GOLD EQUIVALENT OUNCES. THE COMPANY IS FOCUSED ON NOT ONLY REPLACING RESERVES
CONSUMED BY ANNUAL PRODUCTION BUT ALSO ON EXPANDING ITS RESERVE BASE AT ITS
EXISTING OPERATIONS.

         In light of the recent merger, Kinross plans to increase exploration
spending to $21 million including capitalized exploration, up substantially from
the $12 million spent in 2002. Approximately $14.5 million of the total 2003
exploration budget is planned to

<PAGE>

be spent on mine exploration activities with the remainder of the funds
earmarked for greenfields exploration.

         The following details some of the advanced exploration and development
projects acquired as part of the merger.

         ROUND MOUNTAIN

The Round Mountain mine in Nevada, USA, a 50:50 joint venture between Kinross,
operator, and Barrick Gold Corporation, has been in continuous operation since
1977 and has produced over seven million ounces of gold. A large, low-grade
disseminated gold deposit, the mine is noted for spectacular high-grade gold
occurrences located in fractures and veins. A number of these high-grade targets
were the focus of drilling activities during 2002, including the Deep Northwest,
Northwest Pit and South Pit Wall targets. Drilling results from 2002 include six
metres grading 73.0 grams per tonne from the Deep Northwest target, some 330
metres west and 100 metres below the planned pit bottom. To date, the goal has
been to define the extent of the mineralization, and as such, hole spacing has
been inadequate for defining an underground reserve. During 2003, exploration
will continue outlining these targets with the goal of identifying a high-grade
underground reserve.

         Elsewhere, approximately eight kilometres north of the Round Mountain
mine, exploration drilling has discovered a large area of gold mineralization,
known as the Gold Hill deposit. The limits of the deposit have not been fully
defined and there is potential for higher grade mineralization along the caldera
margin. Approximately 27,100 metres of drilling is planned for 2003, with the
goal of converting as much of the more than two million ounce inferred resource
into the measured and indicated resource categories. Metallurgical test work is
currently in progress and additional metallurgical testing is planned for 2003.
Environmental baseline studies and hydrologic studies have been initiated.


PAGE 26  PULL-OUT

<PAGE>

"TO THE END OF 2002, JUST OVER 20,000 METRES
OF REVERSE CIRCULATION DRILLING HAD BEEN COMPLETED
AT THE PUREN DISCOVERY".

         LA COIPA

         At the La Coipa mine in Chile, a 50:50 joint venture between Kinross
and operator Placer Dome Inc., a new zone of mineralization was identified last
year by drilling on a structural trend where a low level gold and pathfinder
soil anomaly was identified. Called the Puren discovery, the property is
currently the subject of a farm in agreement between La Coipa and Codelco. La
Coipa currently has the right to earn a 65% share in the property by making
expenditures of $1.75 million at which point Codelco will have the opportunity
to participate. If Codelco elects not to participate, La Coipa has the right to
earn an additional 30% interest by making expenditures of $8.4 million which
would bring its interest in the property to 95%. By the end of 2002, just over
20,000 metres of reverse circulation drilling had been completed at the Puren
discovery. Results to this point have been very encouraging, and additional
drilling is underway. Elsewhere in the district, the La Coipa joint venture is
actively reviewing other projects and investment opportunities to provide
long-term growth. Approximately $1.4 million in exploration expenditures have
been earmarked for 2003, however, this amount could increase if results warrant.

         AQUARIUS

         The wholly-owned Aquarius project is located roughly 40 kilometres east
of downtown Timmins, immediately adjacent to the eastern boundary of the
Porcupine property. The project was acquired during the recent merger and had
been the focus of a bankable feasibility study completed in 2000 with a reserve
of 1.2 million ounces. That study is currently being reviewed and updated and,
as part of the review, advanced targets, such as the Pominex deposit, located
2.5 kilometres east of the Aquarius deposit, are being examined. Diamond
drilling on the Pominex deposit has outlined a mineralized quartz-feldspar
porphyry. The deposit, which has potential for open pit mining, is open in
virtually all directions providing an excellent opportunity to expand the
existing resource.

                                [PICTURE OMITTED]

(1) Exploration in the Andes Mountains
(2) Surveyor taking readings
<PAGE>

         KETTLE RIVER

         At the wholly-owned Kettle River operation, the Company is advancing
the Emanuel Creek deposit. Emanuel Creek is the seventh and highest grade
discovery in a long line of exploration successes within its large land holdings
across the Republic Graben in northeast Washington State, USA. Since 1989,
production from open pit and underground mines has exceeded 1.37 million ounces
of gold. The current focus of exploration is located near the past-producing K2
and Kettle mines. During 2002, 41 diamond drill holes outlined a zone of gold
mineralization between 10 and 20 metres wide. The vein system, which is host to
the gold mineralization, remains open along strike and to depth. Currently,
development crews are ramping from the K2 mine to provide access for definition
diamond drilling and production. Over 6,100 metres of diamond drilling is
planned for 2003. It is anticipated that, if results warrant, production could
commence in 2004.



                                                                 PAGE 27 pullout

                                                                            2003
                                            "KINROSS ANTICIPATES ACHIEVING A NEW
                                              MILESTONE AS PRODUCTION APPROACHES
                                            THE TWO MILLION OUNCE MARK IN 2003".

CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITIES

ENVIRONMENT

A PROVEN COMMITMENT TO EFFECTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP IS A KEY ELEMENT OF
THE ONGOING SUCCESS OF KINROSS GOLD CORPORATION. AT KINROSS, A STRONG
ENVIRONMENTAL ETHIC AND SOUND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM HAVE BEEN
INTEGRATED WITH CORE BUSINESS FUNCTIONS AT ALL LEVELS, AND AT ALL LOCATIONS
THROUGHOUT THE ORGANIZATION. KINROSS BELIEVES THAT SOUND ENVIRONMENTAL
MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ARE NOT DIFFERENT FROM GOOD MANAGEMENT PRINCIPLES.

                                [PICTURE OMITTED]

(1) Environmental sampling being performed by personnel
(2) Concurrent reclamation
<PAGE>

         LEADERSHIP

         Kinross has become a recognized leader in environmental management.
During 2002, Kinross was named by Corporate Knights as one of "Canada's Most
Environmentally Responsible Companies". However, Kinross is not content with the
status quo and has continued to build on and improve the Environmental Policy
and Framework implemented by the Company in 2000. Key initiatives during 2002
included:

     o    development of environmental standards and objectives, applied at all
          Company locations worldwide;

     o    implementation of site specific Environmental Management Plans;

     o    comprehensive environmental compliance audits, that not only evaluate
          compliance with regulatory requirements but also with best management
          practices;

     o    risk assessments for all engineered mine facilities;

     o    a comprehensive environmental performance measurement system; and

     o    evaluation and feedback processes to support continuous environmental
          improvement.

         There were no significant environmental incidents during 2002 and
Kinross did not receive any notices of violation of the requirements of the
literally hundreds of environmental licenses, permits and approvals that apply
to its operations worldwide. Environmental performance is continuously monitored
and reported quarterly to Kinross' management and the Board. During 2002, all
closed sites were operated with zero lost time accidents. Hayden Hill, a mine
being reclaimed in California, was recognized for its safety achievement by
being presented with the Joseph A. Holmes Certificate of Honor by the U.S.
Department of Labor.

<PAGE>

         Kinross continued to be an active participant in a multi-stakeholder
initiative to develop industry codes of practice for cyanide management.
Implementation of the code is anticipated to commence during 2003.







PAGE 28 PULL OUT

"DURING 2002, KINROSS WAS NAMED BY CORPORATE
KNIGHTS AS ONE OF CANADA'S MOST
 ENVIRONMENTALLY RESPONSIBLE COMPANIES".

          An evaluation and integration of the TVX and Echo Bay environmental
management programs was a priority during the latter part of 2002. By drawing
from the best of each of the respective company's environmental management
systems, and by implementing a process to ensure that a high standard of
environmental performance will be met by the merged company, Kinross will
continue to establish itself in an environmental leadership role.

RESPONSIBILITY

         Kinross accepts the responsibility that modern mining practices must
address concerns for protection of the environment, while at the same time
producing the minerals that are essential to the existence of our civilization
as we know it today. The company has set a high standard for environmental
performance at its operations globally, which includes concurrent reclamation at
operating facilities and the timely reclamation of closed facilities. For
example at the Kubaka mine, reclamation of the open pit mine and waste rock
dumps was completed during the active life of the facility. The Company also
accepts the responsibility for the restoration of historic mine sites that

                                [PICTURE OMITTED]

                        Environmental photo showing moose
<PAGE>

have been acquired as a part of mergers and acquisitions over the years. During
2002, Kinross formed a Reclamation Operations Business Unit with dedicated staff
and resources to aggressively campaign the reclamation and closure of these
legacy sites, working in concert with regulatory authorities and the public. A
total of $9.8 million was spent during 2002 for closure activities at these
sites. The total life of mine reclamation and closure cost estimate for all of
Kinross operating and legacy sites totaled $70.4 million at the end of 2002.
Reclamation and closure costs are evaluated on an ongoing basis at all Kinross
properties. Kinross intends to continue a program of concurrent reclamation at
operating facilities and the aggressive reclamation and closure of inactive
mines. Reclamation expenditures of $19 million are forecast for 2003, confirming
the Company's commitment to responsible and sustainable restoration of mined
lands.

         COMMITMENT

         Kinross is committed to achieving a high standard of environmental
performance that meets or exceeds North American standards at all of its
operations worldwide. The Kinross environmental commitment applies to all stages
of the mining life cycle, from exploration to mine closure, and places
accountability for environmental stewardship at all levels throughout the
organization. For Kinross, this commitment to environmental excellence goes hand
in hand with corporate responsibility, and is just good business practice.

                                                                 PAGE 29 pullout

                                                                            2003
                                    "IN MARCH 2003, WE INCREASE OUR OWNERSHIP IN
                            OMOLON GOLD MINING COMPANY, THE RUSSIAN COMPANY THAT
                              OPERATES THE KUBAKA MINE, TO 98.1%, AND ANTICIPATE
                        FURTHER INCREASING THE OWNERSHIP TO 100% LATER IN 2003".

HEALTH AND SAFETY

                                [PICTURE OMITTED]

- - open pit blast pattern
- - gold pour
<PAGE>

AT KINROSS, THE EFFECTIVE MANAGEMENT OF THE HEALTH AND SAFETY OF OUR EMPLOYEES,
CONTRACTORS AND VISITORS TO OUR OPERATIONS IS ONE OF THE CORNERSTONES OF OUR
SUCCESS. WE ENDEAVOUR TO PROVIDE A SAFE AND HEALTHY WORKPLACE AT ALL OF OUR
OPERATIONS.

         In order to achieve our goal of eliminating work place injuries,
employees are active and involved in the development of stringent safety
practices and management shows prudent leadership in the implementation of these
best practices.

         This is not a static process. Regular reviews and consultations
designed to provide feedback to further the objective of eliminating workplace
injuries are standard practice at all Kinross operations. We do this not only
for the benefit of our employees and their families but also for the benefit of
our Company and shareholders. What's good for improving the health and safety at
our operations is good for our business.

         We are pleased with the many health and safety achievements made at our
operations in 2002. Our safety performance, as shown in the graphs below,
positions Kinross again in the best performing quartile of the industry.
Recognizing there is always room for improvement, ongoing efforts will remain
focused on identifying and implementing safer, better ways to conduct our
business.

         KEY SAFETY STATISTICS
         (Kinross operated mines)

Medical Aid Frequency*


TYPE IN Numbers and Years


Ontario, Canada average
2002 Lost Time Accident
Frequency for total mining
was 1.26


*   Frequency statistics represent
    number of Medical Aids/

<PAGE>

    Lost Time Accidents
    per 200,000 hours worked.


Page 30 Pull out

"BE A `GOOD NEIGHBOUR' IN EVERYTHING WE DO".


SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY

KINROSS HAS ENDEAVOURED TO KEEP THE FOUNDATION OF ITS SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
PLATFORM SIMPLE BY FOCUSING OUR EFFORTS ON THE FOLLOWING VERY SIMPLE PRINCIPLES.


         1.   Give back to the communities where we operate through local
              employment and purchasing initiatives and supporting meaningful
              community development initiatives and charity not-for-profit
              projects.

         2.   Target our fund raising support and contribution efforts to a few,
              well-chosen areas to maximize effectiveness. Youth and health care
              causes are our chosen path.

         3.   Be a "good neighbour" in everything we do.

         So, how did we do in 2002? Overall, 2002 was much the same as 2001 and
that, for some, spells no progress but for others, sends a much different
message. The fact that Kinross had another year of steady, continued dedication
and commitment to the same principles governing social responsibility that we
have stood by since the Company's founding, although not terribly exciting, in
our view, made 2002, another very good year.

                  At the end of the day, we all know talk is cheap. Here are
three noteworthy initiatives that we're particularly proud of that translated
words into action during 2002.

                  o     At Fort Knox, our operation near Fairbanks, Alaska,
Kinross co-funded an education program (at the Alaska Indigenous Peoples
Academy) that focused on educating native youths on environmental awareness
issues. In addition to Kinross

<PAGE>

contributing financial resources to the program, our staff played an active
hands-on role in course facilitation and teacher training sessions.

                  o     In Zimbabwe, where Kinross operates the Blanket mine,
2002 was a year characterized by political and economic turmoil. Severe drought
conditions throughout the country were complicated by the growing AIDS epidemic.
In an effort to minimize the ongoing impact of these conditions, local
management built a distribution system to make potable water available to people
living in the general vicinity of the mine. Efforts to support industry and
government-led initiatives aimed at AIDS awareness and prevention were continued
throughout 2002.

                  o     In Russia, our joint venture company, Omolon Gold Mining
Company, continued its support of long-standing outreach efforts within the
communities of Evensk, Omsukchan and Magadan. Beyond financial contributions and
donations made throughout the year that exceeded one million dollars, Kinross
extended assistance in the building of roads, providing emergency air travel for
the sick and injured and supported other community assistance programs too
numerous to mention.

                  As Kinross is now a much larger company, our larger presence
will increase the number of communities and individuals we touch. This, however,
will not change our views on, nor our approach to, social responsibility. We're
proud of that, both as employees and shareholders.




                                                                 PAGE 31 pullout

                                                                            2003
                                     "THE CHALLENGE OF COMPETING FOR, AND BUYING
                                       LOGICAL GOLD ASSETS WILL BE THE COMPANY'S
                                                    GREATEST CHALLENGE IN 2003."

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
BUILDING ON INTEGRITY

<PAGE>

KINROSS GOLD CORPORATION IS COMMITTED TO THE HIGHEST STANDARDS OF CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE PRACTICES AND ADHERES TO GUIDELINES FOR EFFECTIVE CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE AS PUBLISHED BY THE TORONTO STOCK EXCHANGE. WE BELIEVE THAT ENSURING
AND MAINTAINING SHAREHOLDER CONFIDENCE IS A PRIORITY AND THAT THE BEST INTERESTS
OF OUR SHAREHOLDERS ARE PROPERLY REPRESENTED THROUGH THE COMPOSITION OF OUR
BOARD, BOARD COMMITTEES AND MANAGEMENT TEAM. WITH THIS IN MIND KINROSS HAS
ADOPTED A STATEMENT OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRACTICES, WHICH CAN BE VIEWED IN
OUR 2003 MANAGEMENT INFORMATION CIRCULAR AND ON OUR WEBSITE AT WWW.KINROSS.COM.

         As a foreign registrant with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission, Kinross is required to comply with certain provisions of the United
States Sarbanes-Oxley Act, as they come into effect, including the provision
requiring the CEO and CFO to prepare a statement to accompany the audit report
to certify the "appropriateness of the financial statements and disclosures
contained in the periodic report, and that those financial statements and
disclosures fairly present, in all material respects, the operations and
financial condition of the issuer". The Corporate Governance Committee
continuously reviews the corporate governance practices to ensure that our
standards are in compliance.

         COMPOSITION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

         The Toronto Stock Exchange recommends that, "The Board of Directors of
every corporation should be constituted with a majority of individuals who
qualify as unrelated directors. An unrelated director is a director who is
independent of management and is free from any interest and any business or
other relationship which could, or reasonably could be perceived to, materially
interfere with the director's ability to act with a view to the best interest of
the corporation, other than interests and relationships arising from the
shareholding". The Board of Kinross is composed of ten directors, each with a
unique skill set giving the Board the diverse background necessary for effective
governance of the Corporation. Of the ten directors, six, including the Chairman
of the Board, qualify as unrelated directors.

<PAGE>

         As stewards of the Corporation, the Board of Directors has the role of
directing the Company with the view of the best interests of its shareholders.
The Board meets on a regularly scheduled basis, unless otherwise called.

         COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD

         The Board of Directors has delegated certain aspects of its
responsibilities to five committees, the Audit, Compensation, Environmental and
Health and Safety, Corporate Governance, and Nominating Committees, all of which
are composed of a majority of unrelated directors. Committee meetings take place
on a regularly scheduled basis, unless otherwise called. To view the charters of
all the Committees, please visit our website at www.kinross.com.





CONTENTS

33       MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION
         AND ANALYSIS
33       Overview
34       Mergers and Acquisitions
35       Financial Results
35       Revenues
36       Costs and Expenses
38       Operations
46       Liquidity and Financial Resources
48       Critical Accounting Policies
48       Business Risks and Management
55       Strategy
55       Outlook

FINANCIAL

56       Management's Responsibility

<PAGE>

56       Auditors' Report
57       Financial Statements
61       Notes to the Financial Statements
103      Reserves and Resources

IBC      Corporate Information

</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>EX-99.6
<SEQUENCE>5
<FILENAME>tex99_6-29727.txt
<DESCRIPTION>EX-99.6
<TEXT>
<PAGE>

                            KINROSS GOLD CORPORATION
                            52ND FLOOR, SCOTIA PLAZA
                                40 KING ST. WEST
                                TORONTO, ONTARIO
                                     M5H 3Y2

                         MANAGEMENT INFORMATION CIRCULAR

                             SOLICITATION OF PROXIES


         The information contained in this management information circular (the
"Circular") is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies to be
used at the annual general meeting of shareholders (the "Meeting") of Kinross
Gold Corporation (the "Corporation") to be held in the Ballroom at the Royal
York Hotel, 100 Front Street West, Toronto, Ontario at 10:00 a.m. (Toronto time)
on Thursday, June 12, 2003 or any adjournment thereof, for the purposes set
forth in the accompanying Notice of Meeting. It is expected that the
solicitation will be made primarily by mail but the proxies may also be
solicited personally by directors, officers or regular employees of the
Corporation. THE SOLICITATION OF PROXIES BY THIS CIRCULAR IS BEING MADE BY OR ON
BEHALF OF THE MANAGEMENT OF THE CORPORATION. The total cost of the solicitation
will be borne by the Corporation.


                      APPOINTMENT AND REVOCATION OF PROXIES

         The persons named in the enclosed form of proxy accompanying this
Circular are directors and/or officers of the Corporation. A shareholder of the
Corporation has the right to appoint a person other than the persons specified
on such form of proxy and who need not be a shareholder of the Corporation to
attend and act for him and on his behalf at the Meeting or any adjournment
thereof. Such rights may be exercised by striking out the names of the persons
specified in the form of proxy, inserting the name of the person to be appointed
in the blank space provided in the form of proxy, signing the form of proxy and
returning it in the reply envelope in the manner set forth in the accompanying
Notice of Meeting.

         A SHAREHOLDER WHO HAS GIVEN A PROXY MAY REVOKE IT BY AN INSTRUMENT IN
WRITING, INCLUDING ANOTHER COMPLETED FORM OF PROXY, EXECUTED BY HIM OR HIS
ATTORNEY AUTHORIZED IN WRITING, DEPOSITED AT THE REGISTERED OFFICE OF THE
CORPORATION, OR AT THE OFFICES OF COMPUTERSHARE TRUST COMPANY OF CANADA, 100
UNIVERSITY AVENUE, 11TH FLOOR, TORONTO, ONTARIO M5J 2Y1 UP TO 4:30 P.M. (TORONTO
TIME) ON THE BUSINESS DAY PRECEDING THE DATE OF THE MEETING, OR ANY ADJOURNMENT
THEREOF, AND WITH THE CHAIRMAN OF THE MEETING PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF THE
MEETING ON THE DAY OF THE MEETING OR ANY ADJOURNMENT THEREOF OR IN ANY OTHER
MANNER PERMITTED BY LAW.


                          VOTING OF SHARES REPRESENTED
                              BY MANAGEMENT PROXIES

         The person named in the enclosed form of proxy will vote the common
shares of the Corporation (the "Common Shares") in respect of which they are
appointed by proxy on any ballot that may be called for in accordance with the
instructions therein. IN THE ABSENCE OF SUCH SPECIFICATION, SUCH COMMON SHARES
WILL BE VOTED ON EACH OF THE MATTERS REFERRED TO HEREIN.

<PAGE>

         The enclosed form of proxy confers discretionary authority upon the
persons named therein with respect to amendments to or variations of matters
identified in the Notice of Meeting and with respect to other matters, if any,
which may properly come before the Meeting. At the date of this Circular, the
management of the Corporation knows of no such amendments, variations or other
matters to come before the Meeting. However, if any other matters which are not
known to management should properly come before the Meeting, the proxy will be
voted on such matters in accordance with the best judgment of the named proxy.

                                VOTING OF SHARES

         A holder of Common Shares may own such shares in one or both of the
following ways. If a shareholder is in possession of a physical share
certificate, such shareholder is a "registered" shareholder and his or her name
and address are maintained by Kinross through its transfer agent, Computershare
Trust Company of Canada. If a shareholder owns shares through a bank, broker or
other nominee, such shareholder is a "beneficial" shareholder and he or she will
not have a physical share certificate. Such shareholder will have an account
statement from his or her bank or broker as evidence of his or her share
ownership.

         A registered shareholder may vote a proxy in his or her own name at any
time by telephone, internet or by mail, in accordance with the instruction
appearing on the enclosed form of proxy and/or a registered shareholder may
attend the Meeting and cast a ballot. Because a registered shareholder is known
to Kinross and its transfer agent, his or her account can be confirmed and his
or her vote recorded or changed if such registered shareholder has previously
voted. This procedure prevents a shareholder from voting his or her shares more
than once. Only the registered shareholder's latest dated proxy card will be
valid.

         For beneficial shareholders, neither Kinross nor its transfer agent
maintain any records or account information about such shareholders. A
beneficial shareholder's shares are held in the name of his or her bank or
broker. Only such beneficial shareholder's bank or broker has the authority to
vote the shares held in his or her name and, for the purposes of the Meeting,
will only vote such beneficial shareholder's shares after receiving his or her
specific instructions. There are securities law rules (Canadian, U.S. and other
foreign governments) and national stock exchange rules (the Toronto Stock
Exchange and New York Stock Exchange) governing the granting of a proxy on a
beneficial shareholder's behalf and those rules differ for Canadian and foreign
holders. Canadian and foreign banks and brokers (with the exception of those in
the U.S.) do NOT have the authority to vote on behalf of a beneficial
shareholder without receiving his or her specific instructions. In some cases,
although NOT in this case, U.S. brokers have the authority to vote on behalf of
a beneficial shareholder. Every vote cast on behalf of a beneficial shareholder,
either by proxy or ballot at the Meeting, will require specific instructions
from the beneficial shareholder.

         In addition, many banks and brokers use a service agency to mail proxy
material and tabulate the responses from beneficial shareholders. The largest of
these service providers in Canada is ADP Investor Communications and in the U.S.
is ADP Investor Communication Services (collectively, "ADP"). Because ADP mails
and tabulates hundreds of millions of proxies on behalf of its clients, the
banks and brokers, for thousands of annual and special meetings throughout the
year, ADP standardizes the proxy card and reproduces the text on its own form
called a Voter Instruction Form ("VIF"). A VIF is NOT a proxy card and CANNOT be
used by a beneficial shareholder to vote at the Meeting. The VIF is intended
only to relay a beneficial shareholder's specific voting instructions to his or
her bank or broker so they may execute a proxy on his or her behalf.

       A beneficial shareholder who plans to attend the Meeting and vote his or
her Common Shares as a beneficial shareholder MUST contact his or her bank or
broker and obtain a legal proxy. This proxy is evidence of the beneficial
shareholder's ownership through a bank or broker and MUST be attached

                                      -2-
<PAGE>

to the shareholder's ballot cast at the Meeting. Only a legal proxy may be voted
by a beneficial shareholder at the Meeting. Obtaining a legal proxy will
invalidate any proxy or VIF previously executed by a beneficial shareholder, and
therefore, beneficial shareholders are urged not to request a legal proxy unless
they are planning to attend the Meeting and cast a ballot.


                         VOTING SECURITIES AND PRINCIPAL
                                 HOLDERS THEREOF

       As at the date hereof, the Corporation had 314,696,852 Common Shares
issued and outstanding, each carrying one vote. Each holder of a Common Share of
record at the close of business on April 23, 2003, the record date established
for notice of the meeting, will, unless otherwise specified herein, be entitled
to one vote for each Common Share held by such holder on all matters proposed to
come before the Meeting, except to the extent that such holder has transferred
any such shares after the record date and the transferee of such shares
establishes ownership thereof and makes a written demand, not later than 10 days
before the Meeting, to be included in the list of shareholders entitled to vote
at the Meeting, in which case the transferee will be entitled to vote such
shares at the Meeting.

       To the knowledge of the directors and senior officers of the Corporation,
as of the date hereof, the only persons, firms or corporations who beneficially
own, directly or indirectly, or exercise control or direction over voting
securities of the Corporation carrying more than 10% of the voting rights
attached to any class of voting securities of the Corporation are as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                               NUMBER OF              PERCENTAGE OF OUTSTANDING
NAME                                                         COMMON SHARES                   COMMON SHARES
- ----                                                         -------------                   -------------
<S>                                                          <C>                             <C>
Fidelity Management & Research Company and its affiliates      36,740,743                        11.67

Newmont Mining Corporation and its affiliates                  43,238,427                        13.7
</TABLE>

                                 DOLLAR FIGURES

         Unless expressly stated to the contrary, all "$" figures contained in
this Circular refer to United States dollars.

                              ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

         At the Meeting ten directors will be elected. All directors so elected
will hold office until the next annual meeting of shareholders of the
Corporation or until their successors are elected or appointed. THE PERSONS
NAMED IN THE ENCLOSED FORM OF PROXY INTEND TO CAST THE VOTES TO WHICH THE COMMON
SHARES REPRESENTED BY SUCH PROXY ARE ENTITLED FOR THE ELECTION OF THE NOMINEES
WHOSE NAMES ARE SET FORTH BELOW, UNLESS THE SHAREHOLDER WHO HAS GIVEN SUCH PROXY
HAS DIRECTED THAT THE SHARES BE WITHHELD FROM VOTING IN THE ELECTION OF
DIRECTORS. Management of the Corporation does not contemplate that any of the
nominees will be unable to serve as a director, but if that should occur for any
reason at or prior to the Meeting, the persons named in the enclosed form of
proxy reserve the right to vote for another nominee in their discretion.

         The following table sets forth certain information with respect to all
persons proposed to be nominated by management for election as directors.

                                      -3-
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                    <C>                 <C>               <C>             <C>                <C>
====================== =================== ================= =============== ================== ========================
NAME AND  PLACE OF     PRINCIPAL           DIRECTOR SINCE        COMMON           CURRENT        MEETINGS ATTENDED (3)
RESIDENCE              OCCUPATION                             SHARES OWNED,    COMMITTEES (3)   ----------- ------------
                                                              CONTROLLED OR                     BOARD       COMMITTEES
                                                               DIRECTED (1)                     (TOTAL 11)
- ---------------------- ------------------- ----------------- --------------- ------------------ ----------- ------------
                                                                                                            A -  7 of 7
John A. Brough         President,          January 19, 1994      1,166            A, C, N       11 of 11    C -  3 of 3
Vero Beach, Florida    Torwest Inc.
                       (real estate
                       development
                       company)
- ---------------------- ------------------- ----------------- --------------- ------------------ ----------- ------------

Robert M. Buchan (2)   President and       May 31, 1993         136,936            None         11 of 11
Toronto, Ontario       Chief Executive
                       Officer of the
                       Corporation
- ---------------------- ------------------- ----------------- --------------- ------------------ ----------- ------------

Scott A. Caldwell (3)  Executive Vice      March 3, 2003         46,516            None
Toronto, Ontario       President and
                       Chief Operating
                       Officer
- ---------------------- ------------------- ----------------- --------------- ------------------ ----------- ------------

Arthur H. Ditto        Retired Mining      May 31, 1993         178,131            None         10 of 11
Toronto, Ontario       Executive
- ---------------------- ------------------- ----------------- --------------- ------------------ ----------- ------------
                                                                                                            CG - 2 of 2
John A. Keyes          Retired Mining      March 3, 2003         11,666              E          10 of 11    E - 3 of 3
The Woodlands, Texas   Executive
- ---------------------- ------------------- ----------------- --------------- ------------------ ----------- ------------

David Harquail (3)     President and       January 31, 2003       NIL                E
Denver, Colorado       Managing
                       Director, Newmont
                       Capital Limited
                       (merchant bank)
- ---------------------- ------------------- ----------------- --------------- ------------------ ----------- ------------
                                                                                                            A - 6 of 7
John M.H. Huxley       Principal,          May 31, 1993          41,603           A, C, N       10 of 11    C - 3 of 3
Toronto, Ontario       Algonquin
                       Management Inc.
                       (management
                       company)
- ---------------------- ------------------- ----------------- --------------- ------------------ ----------- ------------

George A. Michals(3)   President,          January 31, 2003      27,083            A, CG
Orangeville, Ontario   Baymont Capital
                       Resources Inc.
                       (investment
                       holding company)
- ---------------------- ------------------- ----------------- --------------- ------------------ ----------- ------------
Cameron A. Mingay      Partner, Cassels    January 12, 2001      1,666             CG, E        11 of 11    A - 7 of 7
Toronto, Ontario       Brock & Blackwell                                                                    CG - 2 of 2
                       LLP (law firm)                                                                       E - 3 of 3
- ---------------------- ------------------- ----------------- --------------- ------------------ ----------- ------------

John E. Oliver (4)     Executive           March 7, 1995         7,360           C, CG, N       11 of 11    C - 3 of 3
San Francisco,         Managing Director                                                                    CG - 2 of 2
California             and Co-Head                                                                          E - 3 of 3
                       Scotia Capital
                       U.S., Bank  of
                       Nova Scotia
                       (financial
                       institution)
====================== =================== ================= =============== ================== =========== ============
</TABLE>

(1)      Information respecting holdings of Common Shares has been provided by
         individual directors.
(2)      Mr. Buchan also holds 384,613 convertible preferred shares of the
         Corporation which are convertible into 1,058,390 Common Shares.
(3)      Committees: A-Audit, C-Compensation, CG-Corporate Governance,
         E-Environmental, N-Nominating (the Nominating Committee was formed in
         November, 2002 and did not meet during fiscal 2002.)
         (a)      Messrs. Harquail and Michals were appointed to the board on
                  January 31, 2003 following the business combination of the
                  Corporation, Echo Bay Mines Ltd. and TVX Gold Inc.
         (b)      Mr. Caldwell was appointed to the board on March 3, 2003.
(4)      Mr. Oliver was appointed as Independent Chairman on August 1, 2002.

      Each of the directors has held the principal occupation set forth opposite
his name, or other executive offices with the same firm or its affiliates, for
the past five years, with the exception of Messrs. David Harquail, Cameron A.
Mingay, John A. Keyes. Prior to May 15, 2002, Mr. Harquail was Senior Vice
President of Newmont Mining Corporation of Canada Limited (formerly
Franco-Nevada Mining

                                      -4-
<PAGE>

Corporation Limited). Mr. Mingay, prior to June 1999, was a Partner with Smith
Lyons LLP and Mr. Keyes, prior to January 2001, was President and Chief
Operating Officer of Battle Mountain Gold Company and prior thereto was Senior
Vice President of Battle Mountain Gold Company.

      Below is a biography of each of the individuals nominated to serve as a
director of the Corporation at the Meeting:

         JOHN A. BROUGH

         Mr. Brough has been President of Torwest Inc., a real estate
development company, since 1998. Prior to 1998, Mr Brough held the position of
Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer of iStar Internet Inc.
Prior to 1997, Mr. Brough was Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
of Markborough Properties Limited. He holds a Bachelor of Arts degree and is a
Chartered Accountant.

         ROBERT M. BUCHAN

         Mr. Buchan has been Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation since
May 1993. Prior to that he was Vice Chairman of Dundee Bancorp Inc. Mr. Buchan
is a director of Pacific Rim Mining Corporation and also sits on the Board of
the Art Gallery of Ontario. He has a degree in Mining Engineering and a Masters
in Mineral Economics.

         SCOTT A. CALDWELL

         Mr. Caldwell has been Executive Vice President and Chief Operating
Officer of the Corporation since June 2002. Prior to that Mr. Caldwell was
Senior Vice President of Mine Operations of the Corporation from 2001 to 2002
and he was and Senior Vice President of Surface Operations of the Corporation
from 1998 to 2001. Prior to joining the Corporation, he was Vice President of
Operations for Echo Bay Mines Ltd. from 1996 to 1998. Mr. Caldwell has a
Bachelor of Science (Mining) degree.

         ARTHUR H. DITTO

         Mr. Ditto previously held the position of the Vice Chairman of the
Corporation from April 2002 to January 2003. Prior to that, from 1993 to 2002,
he was Chief Operating Officer of the Corporation and from 1996 to 2002, he was
the President of the Corporation. Mr. Ditto is currently retired and sits on the
Board of Montana Tech Foundation. He holds a Bachelor of Science degree, is a
registered Professional Engineer and has completed the executive development
program at the University of Illinois.

         DAVID HARQUAIL

         Mr. Harquail has been President and Managing Director of Newmont
Capital Limited since May 2002. Mr. Harquail was previously with Franco-Nevada
Mining Corporation for 15 years serving most recently as Senior Vice President
responsible for the metals royalty division and corporate development. He also
held roles as President and CEO of Redstone Resources Inc., as a director of
Inco Limited and Echo Bay Mines Ltd., as a task force advisor to the Toronto
Stock Exchange and in portfolio management. He continues to serve on the board
of the Prospectors and Developers Association of Canada. Mr. Harquail is a
Geological Engineer (University of Toronto) and MBA (McGill University).

                                      -5-
<PAGE>

         JOHN M.H. HUXLEY

         Mr. Huxley has been a principal of Algonquin Management Inc., the
manager of the Algonquin Power Income Fund, since 1997. Prior to that he was
President of Algonquin Power Corporation, a builder, developer and operator of
hydroelectric generating facilities in Canada and the United States. He holds a
Bachelor of Laws degree.

         JOHN A. KEYES

         Mr. Keyes most recently held the position of President and Chief
Operating Officer of Battle Mountain Gold Company until 2001. Mr. Keyes has a
Bachelor of Science degree (honours) and has completed an executive MBA course.
He is currently retired but remains on the board of several non-profit
organizations as well as serving as an advisor to The Haileybury School of
Mines.

         GEORGE F. MICHALS

         Mr. Michals is President of Baymont Capital Resources Inc., an
investment holding company. Mr. Michals has also served as an active member on
the Boards of a number of private and public companies. From 1987 to 1990, he
held the position of Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer of
Canadian Pacific Limited. He holds a Bachelor of Commerce degree and is a
Chartered Accountant.

         CAMERON A. MINGAY

         Mr. Mingay has been a partner of Cassels, Brock & Blackwell LLP, a law
firm, since 1999. Prior to 1999 he was a partner of Smith Lyons LLP. He is a
director of Waverider Communications Inc. and the Canadian Parapalegic
Association (Ontario). Mr. Mingay holds a Bachelor of Laws degree and is a
member of the Law Society of Upper Canada.

         JOHN E. OLIVER

         Mr. Oliver has been Executive Managing Director and Co-Head of Scotia
Capital U.S., Bank of Nova Scotia since October 1999. From 1997 to 1999 Mr.
Oliver was Senior Vice-President, Corporate and Real Estate Banking of Bank of
Nova Scotia and prior thereto, he was Senior Vice-President of Real Estate
Banking of Bank of Nova Scotia. Mr. Oliver was appointed the Independent
Chairman of the Corporation in August 2002.


                             APPOINTMENT OF AUDITORS

         Deloitte & Touche LLP, independent chartered public accountants, were
first appointed auditors of the Corporation on May 31, 1993.

         The Board of Directors of the Corporation proposes that Deloitte &
Touche LLP be appointed as the Corporation's independent auditors for the year
ended December 31, 2003, and that the Corporation's directors be authorized to
fix their remuneration. A majority of the votes, voted by the shareholders
represented at the Meeting, is required for approval of the appointment of the
Corporation's auditors.

         For the year ended December 31, 2002, the Corporation paid Deloitte &
Touche LLP total fees of Cdn.$3,250,000. These fees comprised Cdn.$2,945,000 for
audit related services and Cdn.$305,000 for tax compliance and advisory
services. Audit related fees include fees relating to the preparation of

                                      -6-
<PAGE>

prospectuses and registration statements and consultations regarding financial
accounting and reporting standards.

         UNLESS THE SHAREHOLDER HAS SPECIFIED IN THE ENCLOSED FORM OF PROXY THAT
SHARES REPRESENTED BY SUCH PROXY ARE TO BE WITHHELD FROM VOTING IN THE
APPOINTMENT OF AUDITORS, THE PERSONS NAMED IN THE ENCLOSED FORM OF PROXY INTEND
TO VOTE IN FAVOUR OF THE REAPPOINTMENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP, AS AUDITORS OF
THE CORPORATION TO HOLD OFFICE UNTIL THE NEXT ANNUAL MEETING SHAREHOLDERS, AND
TO AUTHORIZE THE DIRECTORS TO FIX THE REMUNERATION OF THE AUDITORS.


                             EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

         The following table sets forth all annual and long-term compensation
for services in all capacities to the Corporation and its subsidiaries for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 in respect of each of the individuals who
were, at December 31, 2002, the Chief Executive Officer and the four senior
executive officers, whose total salary exceeded $100,000 (the "Named Executive
Officers").

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                             <C>                                <C>                            <C>
=============================== ================================== ============================== =====================
                                             ANNUAL                   LONG TERM COMPENSATION           ALL OTHER
                                                                                                      COMPENSATION
                                ------- ------------ ------------- ---------------- -------------
 NAME AND PRINCIPAL POSITION     YEAR     SALARY        BONUS       COMMON SHARE     RESTRICTED
                                             $            $        OPTIONS GRANTED     SHARES
                                                                          #            RIGHTS
                                                                                      GRANTED
                                                                                         #
- ------------------------------- ------- ------------ ------------- ---------------- ------------- ---------------------
Robert M. Buchan                 2002     420,479       296,121         124,117           -               50,367
President and CEO                2001     387,360        64,650 (2)      66,667           -               52,534
                                 2000     403,932             -         333,333           -               79,183
- ------------------------------- ------- ------------ ------------- ---------------- ------------- ---------------------
Scott A. Caldwell                2002     203,351        98,704          42,105           -               66,787 (3)
Senior Vice-President            2001     172,892        63,527          26,667           -               35,341 (3)
Mining Operations                2000     175,037        26,929          33,333         24,000            17,371
- ------------------------------- ------- ------------ ------------- ---------------- ------------- ---------------------
Arthur H. Ditto (4)              2002     247,274       196,078 (5)           -           -               23,758
Vice Chairman                    2001     228,421        32,900 (5)      41,667           -               23,398
                                 2000     232,183             -         145,000           -               43,380
- ------------------------------- ------- ------------ ------------- ---------------- ------------- ---------------------
John W. Ivany                    2002     197,726        98,704          38,916           -               22,199
Exec. Vice President             2001     193,680        64,560          26,667           -               22,055
                                 2000     185,135             -          93,333           -               21,933
- ------------------------------- ------- ------------ ------------- ---------------- ------------- ---------------------
Brian W. Penny                   2002     171,936        74,028          33,835           -               13,109
Vice President Finance and CFO   2001     159,592        47,904          23,333           -               30,613 (3)
                                 2000     161,573        16,830          36,667         9,333             13,775
=============================== ======= ============ ============= ================ ============= =====================
</TABLE>

(1)      Compensation, which is paid in Canadian dollars, is reported in the
         financial statements in United States dollars. The rates of exchange
         used to convert Canadian dollars to United States dollars are: 2000 -
         1.4854, 2001 - 1.5489, 2002 - 1.5703.
(2)      Paid in January 2002.
(3)      Included in all other compensation is the value of the Common Shares
         granted under the restricted share plan in 2000.
(4)      Mr. Ditto retired on January 31, 2003.
(5)      Paid in February 2003.

For the period January 1 to December 31, 2002, the five senior executives of the
Corporation received salaries, bonuses and other compensation totalling
$2,180,621 in respect of services rendered to the Corporation and its
subsidiaries.

                                      -7-
<PAGE>

OPTION GRANTS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR

         The following table sets forth stock options granted under the
Corporation's Stock Option Plan during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002
to each of the Named Executive Officers.

         In the case of Messrs. Buchan and Ditto, the options become exercisable
as to 33 1/3% on each of the first, second and third anniversary of the date of
grant. In the case of Messrs. Caldwell, Ivany and Penny the options become
exercisable as to 50% on each of the first and second anniversary of the date of
grant. The exercise price of the option is the market value (as defined in the
Share Incentive Plan) of the Common Shares on the date of grant. All references
to number of shares and share price reflect the consolidation of the common
shares of the Corporation on a three for one basis on January 31, 2003.

                        OPTION GRANTS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                   <C>                <C>                 <C>                <C>                  <C>
===================== ================== =================== ================== ==================== =================
        NAME               NUMBER                %                AVERAGE         MARKET VALUE ON        DATE OF
                                                              EXERCISE PRICE        GRANT (CDN.           EXPIRY
                                                              (CDN. $/SHARE)         $/SHARE)
- --------------------- ------------------ ------------------- ------------------ -------------------- -----------------
Robert M. Buchan           124,117               24                8.96                8.96              12/12/07
- --------------------- ------------------ ------------------- ------------------ -------------------- -----------------
Scott A. Caldwell           42,105               8                 8.96                8.96              12/12/07
- --------------------- ------------------ ------------------- ------------------ -------------------- -----------------
Arthur H. Ditto                  -               -                 8.96                8.96              12/12/07
- --------------------- ------------------ ------------------- ------------------ -------------------- -----------------
John W. Ivany               38,916               7                 8.96                8.96              12/12/07
- --------------------- ------------------ ------------------- ------------------ -------------------- -----------------
Brian W. Penny              33,835               6                 8.96                8.96              12/12/07
===================== ================== =================== ================== ==================== =================


AGGREGATED OPTION EXERCISES IN LAST FISCAL YEAR AND FISCAL YEAR END OPTION VALUES

         The following table sets forth details of exercised stock options
during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 by each of the Named Executive
Officers and the fiscal year end value of unexercised options on an aggregate
basis.

               AGGREGATED OPTION EXERCISES IN LAST FISCAL YEAR AND
                          FISCAL YEAR END OPTION VALUES

======================== ============ ====================== ============================= ===========================
         NAME              COMMON        AGGREGATE VALUE        UNEXERCISED AT FISCAL         VALUE OF UNEXERCISED
                           SHARES         REALIZED ($)                 YEAR-END                     IN-THE-
                         ACQUIRED ON                          EXERCISABLE/UNEXERCISABLE     MONEY OPTIONS AT FISCAL
                          EXERCISE                                                                   YEAR-
                                                                                                 END (CDN$)(1)
                                                                                           EXERCISABLE/UNEXERCISABLE
- ------------------------ ------------ ---------------------- ----------------------------- ---------------------------
Robert M. Buchan              -                 -                  605,555/168,562             3,550,997/665,739
- ------------------------ ------------ ---------------------- ----------------------------- ---------------------------
Scott A. Caldwell             -                 -                   196,665/55,439              679,094,/213,604
- ------------------------ ------------ ---------------------- ----------------------------- ---------------------------
Arthur H. Ditto               -                 -                   292,222/27,778             1,618,950/195,002
- ------------------------ ------------ ---------------------- ----------------------------- ---------------------------
John W. Ivany                 -                 -                   223,332/52,250             1,177,694/204,515
- ------------------------ ------------ ---------------------- ----------------------------- ---------------------------
Brian W. Penny                -                 -                   114,999/45,502              519,597/178,332
======================== ============ ====================== ============================= ===========================
</TABLE>

(1)      Value of unexercised-in-the-money options calculated using the closing
         price of Cdn.$11.61 of the Common Shares of the Corporation on the
         Toronto Stock Exchange (the "TSX") on December 31, 2002, less the
         exercise price of in-the-money stock options.

                                      -8-
<PAGE>

PENSION AND OTHER BENEFIT PLANS

         CANADA

         In 1997, the Corporation established a deferred profit sharing plan and
a registered retirement savings plan covering all of the Canadian non-unionized
employees. The deferred profit sharing plan provides for basic contributions by
the Corporation (which cannot be less than 4% of the member's compensation). In
addition, there is an annual profit sharing contribution based on the
Corporation's financial performance. The Corporation contributed an aggregate of
$62,721 to the deferred profit sharing plan on behalf of the Named Executive
Officers during the year ended December 31, 2002.

         The registered retirement savings plan is available to all Canadian
employees and allows for the minimum contribution of Cdn.$60 per month with the
Corporation matching 100% of this amount with any additional contributions being
matched by 50% up to a maximum of Cdn.$30. The Corporation contributed $2,788 to
the registered retirement savings plan on behalf of each of Messrs. Buchan,
Caldwell, Ivany and Penny during the year ended December 31, 2002.

         UNITED STATES

         The Corporation's subsidiary, Kinross Gold U.S.A., Inc., has various
pension plans in which one executive officer is eligible to participate. The
Corporation is required to make certain contributions to the pension plans on
behalf of Arthur H. Ditto.

         Employees are allowed to make contributions to the 401(k) Savings Plan
from salary deductions each year subject to certain limitations. The Corporation
has in past years made matching contributions of 50% of each employee's
contributions, but subject to a maximum contribution of 3% of the employee's
annual compensation. Employees are always fully vested in their own salary
deferral contributions and become fully vested (in 33 1/3% increments) in any
contribution by the Corporation after three years. Participants are allowed to
direct the investment of their account within a group of designated investment
funds. The Corporation contributed $4,591 to the 401(k) Savings Plan on behalf
of Arthur H. Ditto during the year ended December 31, 2002.

         The Corporation established a defined contribution money purchase plan
(the "Money Purchase Plan") in which substantially all of the employees in the
United States participate. The Money Purchase Plan is funded entirely by the
Corporation. The Corporation contributes 5% of the employees' annual wages to
this plan. The Corporation is required to make contributions to this plan such
that no unfunded pension benefit obligations exist. Participants are allowed to
direct the investment of the pension plan account balances. The Corporation
contributed $7,652 to the Money Purchase Plan on behalf of Arthur H. Ditto
during the year ended December 31, 2002.

EMPLOYMENT CONTRACTS

         The Corporation has entered into a severance agreement with each of the
Named Executive Officers. Each of the severance agreements provides for a
severance payment equal to two (in the case of Messrs. Ivany, Caldwell and
Penny) or 2.5 (in the case of Messrs. Buchan and Ditto) multiplied by the sum of
the Named Executive Officer's annual compensation (annual base salary and
benefits) and target bonus. In the case of Messrs. Buchan and Ditto, the
severance payment may be paid to the Named Executive Officer following a change
of control of the Corporation, at the option of the Named Executive Officer. On
January 31, 2003, Mr. Ditto retired as Vice Chairman of the Corporation and
received payments in consideration of the grant of a release of his entitlement
under his severance agreement. In

                                      -9-
<PAGE>

the case of Messrs. Caldwell, Ivany and Penny, the severance is paid to the
Named Executive Officer if a triggering event occurs following a change of
control. A triggering event includes: (i) an adverse change in the employment
terms of the executive, (ii) a diminution of the title of the executive; (iii) a
change in the person to whom the executive reports (subject to certain
exceptions); and (iv) a change in the location at which the executive is
required to work (subject to certain exceptions). The severance amount is
payable at the option of Messrs. Ivany, Caldwell and Penny provided the exercise
of such option occurs within 18 months following the change of control and
within six months of the triggering event.

         Other than as described above, the Corporation (and its subsidiaries)
have no employment contracts in place with the Named Executive Officers and no
compensatory plans or arrangements with respect to the Named Executive Officers
that results or will result from the resignation, retirement or any other
termination of employment of such officers' employment with the Corporation (and
its subsidiaries), from a change of control of the Corporation (and its
subsidiaries) or a change in the Named Executive Officers' responsibilities
following a change of control.

DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS' INSURANCE

         The Corporation has purchased an insurance policy which covers actions
against its directors and officers. The policy covers judgements and defence
costs of up to $25,000,000 per lawsuit, with a maximum coverage of $25,000,000
per year and a deductible of $1,000,000 per claim. The total premium paid for
this policy for the period February 1, 2003 to February 1, 2004 is $687,500.

COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS

         For the year ended December 31, 2002 each director who is not a
salaried employee of the Corporation or any of its subsidiaries was paid
Cdn.$15,000 per annum for his services as a director. Directors were also paid a
fee of Cdn.$1,250 for attendance at meetings of the Board of Directors of the
Corporation. The remuneration provided above is paid quarterly in arrears. In
addition, such directors are entitled to the reimbursement of their expenses.
Additionally, members of the Audit, Compensation, Corporate Governance and
Environmental Committees received a fee of Cdn.$1,250 per meeting and the
Chairman of each of these committees received Cdn.$2,000 for acting in this
capacity.

ACTIVITIES OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

         The Compensation Committee members are Messrs. Huxley (Chairman),
Brough and Oliver, all of whom are unrelated directors, as defined in the
corporate governance guidelines of the TSX (the "TSX Guidelines"). In carrying
out its mandate, the Compensation Committee met three times during the year
ended December 31, 2002. In addition to the activities reported below, the
Compensation Committee developed a written charter for the Compensation
Committee and recommended the adoption of the charter to the Board of Directors.

REPORT ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

         EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM

         The executive compensation program of the Corporation is designed to
encourage, compensate and reward employees on the basis of individual and
corporate performance, both in the short and long term. Base salaries are set at
levels which are competitive with the base salaries paid by similar corporations
within the mining industry. Compensation is directly tied to corporate and
individual performance. Bonuses are directly tied to the performance of the
Corporation. Share ownership

                                      -10-
<PAGE>

opportunities are provided as an incentive to align the interests of senior
officers with the longer term interests of shareholders and to reward past
performance.

         Compensation for Named Executive Officers, as well as for the senior
officers as a whole, consists of a base salary, bonus, stock options and
restricted share rights.

         During the year ended December 31, 2002, the Compensation Committee
determined that it was desirable to obtain professional advice regarding the
compensation of the senior officers of the Corporation and for a review to be
conducted generally in relation to compensation matters that are properly within
the purview of the Committee. Mercer Human Resources Consulting LLC ("Mercer")
was retained to work with the Compensation Committee on executive compensation
and related governance requirements, including in particular:

         (a)      conducting interviews with senior management and the Board of
                  Directors to review the performance management process;

         (b)      executive compensation benchmarking;

         (c)      studying director compensation;

         (d)      the CEO evaluation process; and

         (e)      the appropriate quantum of transaction bonuses.

Reports were then prepared by Mercer pertaining to transaction bonuses, director
compensation, corporate governance considerations and executive compensation.
These reports were discussed in detail with the Compensation Committee.

         BASE SALARY

         Corporate office base salaries are established at a competitive level.
The level of base salary for each senior officer of the Corporation is
determined by the level of responsibility and the importance of the position to
the Corporation.

         For 2002, the President and Chief Executive Officer presented salary
recommendations to the Compensation Committee with respect to the senior
officers of the Corporation. The Compensation Committee's recommendations for
the base salaries for the senior officers were then submitted for approval by
the Board of Directors of the Corporation.

         PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

         The Chairman of the Compensation Committee presents recommendations to
the Compensation Committee with respect to the President and Chief Executive
Officer. In setting the President and Chief Executive Officer's salary for 2002,
the Compensation Committee reviewed salaries paid to other senior officers in
the Corporation, salaries paid to other chief executive officers in the industry
and the President and Chief Executive Officer's impact on the achievement of the
Corporation's objectives for the previous financial year. The Compensation
Committee's recommendation for the base salary for the President and Chief
Executive Officer was submitted for approval to the Board of Directors.

                                      -11-
<PAGE>

         BONUS

         The Committee set the proposed bonuses for the 2002 fiscal year of the
Corporation for the Named Executives Officers based on the performance of the
Chief Executive Officer and the senior executives with reference to the Mercer
reports discussed above with particular emphasis on the following performance
metrics:

         (a) shareholder value creation;

         (b) corporate financial performance; and

         (c) implementation of strategic goals.

         The Committee also reviewed comparator groups to determine that bonuses
were in line with market expectations.

         SHARE INCENTIVE PLAN

         The Share Incentive Plan of the Corporation is designed to advance the
interests of the Corporation by encouraging employees to acquire equity
participation in the Corporation through the acquisition of Common Shares. The
Share Incentive Plan consists of a stock option plan (the "Stock Option Plan")
and a share purchase plan (the "Share Purchase Plan"). Currently the maximum
number of Common Shares issuable pursuant to the Share Incentive Plan is
6,833,332, representing approximately 2.1% of the number of Common Shares
currently issued and outstanding.

         OPTIONS

         The Stock Option Plan of the Corporation is administered by the
Compensation Committee and forms part of the Corporation's Share Incentive Plan.
The Stock Option Plan is designed to give each holder of an option an interest
in preserving and maximizing shareholder value in the longer term, to enable the
Corporation to attract and retain individuals with experience and ability and to
reward individuals for current and future performance. The Compensation
Committee considers option grants when reviewing key employee compensation
packages. Any grant recommendations made by the Compensation Committee requires
approval by the Board of Directors of the Corporation. In determining the number
of options to be granted, the Compensation Committee gives consideration to an
individual's present and potential contribution to the success of the
Corporation.

         The number of options which may be issued under the Stock Option Plan
in the aggregate and in respect of any fiscal year is limited under the terms of
the Stock Option Plan and cannot be increased without shareholder and regulatory
approval. The exercise price per share is not less than the closing price of the
Common Shares on the TSX on the trading day preceding the day on which the
option is granted. Each option is for a term of five years and have various
vesting periods.

         The maximum number of Common Shares issuable under the Stock Option
Plan is currently set at 4,166,666 in the aggregate, representing 1.3% of the
outstanding number of Common Shares. The maximum number of Common Shares
reserved for issue to any one person under the Stock Option Plan is limited to
5% of the outstanding number of Common Shares from time to time.

         The initial grants of options to directors, officers and employees of
the Corporation and options granted by and inherited from the Corporation's
predecessor companies were ratified by the full Board of Directors of the
Corporation. All subsequent grants were reviewed by the Compensation Committee
and recommended to and approved by the Board of Directors of the Corporation.

                                      -12-
<PAGE>

         SHARE PURCHASE PLAN

         Employees of the Corporation or designated affiliates are entitled to
contribute up to 10% of their annual basic salary to the Share Purchase Plan.
The Corporation matches the participant's contribution on a quarterly basis and
each participant is then issued Common Shares having a value equal to the
aggregate amount contributed to the Share Purchase Plan by the participant and
by the Corporation. The purchase price per share is the weighted average trading
price or the average of the high and low board lot trading prices of the Common
Shares on the TSX, for participants resident in Canada, or the NYSE, for
participants resident in the United States, for the 20 consecutive trading day
period prior to the end of the calendar quarter in respect of which the Common
Shares are issued. Such Common Shares are delivered to participants 12 months
following their date of issue. In the event of termination of employment or
death of an employee, any portion of the participant's contribution then held in
trust shall be paid to the participant or his or her estate and any portion of
the Corporation's contribution shall be returned to the Corporation. In
addition, any Common Shares held in safekeeping will be purchased for
cancellation at an amount equal to the participant's contribution and the
proceeds will be paid to the participant. The maximum number of Common Shares
issuable under the Kinross Purchase Plan is currently set at 2,666,666 Common
Shares in the aggregate.

         RESTRICTED SHARE RIGHTS

         The Restricted Share Plan of the Corporation is administrated by the
Compensation Committee. The purpose of the Restricted Share Plan is to advance
the interests of the Corporation through the motivation, attraction and
retention of employees, directors and consultants of the Corporation and to
secure for the Corporation and its shareholders the benefits inherent in the
ownership of Common Shares to key employees, directors and consultants of the
Corporation. Restricted share rights ("Restricted Share Rights") may be granted
by the Compensation Committee to employees, officers, directors and consultants
of the Corporation as a discretionary payment in consideration of past services
to the Corporation. In determining the eligibility of participants to the
Restricted Share Plan, the Compensation Committee considers the present and
potential contributions and the services rendered by each particular participant
to the success of the Corporation.

         A Restricted Share Right is exercisable into one Common Share for a
certain period of time in accordance with the terms of the Restricted Share
Plan. The maximum number of Common Shares issuable under the Restricted Share
Plan is currently set at 333,333. The maximum number of Common Shares issuable
to insiders pursuant to the Restricted Share Plan, with a one-year period, is
limited to 10% of the total number of Common Shares then outstanding. The
maximum number of Common Shares issuable to any one insider and such insider's
associates pursuant to the Restricted Share Plan, within a one-year year period,
is limited to 5% of the total number of Common Shares then outstanding. The
maximum number of Common Shares reserved for issue to any one person under the
Restricted Share Plan is limited to 5% of the total number of Common Shares then
outstanding. The maximum number of Common Shares reserved for issue to any one
person under the Restricted Share Plan is limited to 5% of the number of Common
Shares outstanding from time to time.

         The grant of a Restricted Share Right is evidenced by a Restricted
Share Rights agreement between a participant and the Corporation which is
subject to the Restricted Share Plan and may be subject to other terms and
conditions that are not inconsistent with the Restricted Share Plan and which
the Compensation Committee deems appropriate.

                                      -13-
<PAGE>

         The foregoing report dated May 8, 2003 has been furnished by the
Chairman of Compensation Committee on the Committee's behalf.

         (Signed) John E. Oliver

SHAREHOLDER RETURN PERFORMANCE GRAPH

         The following chart compares the yearly percentage changes in the
cumulative total shareholder return on the Common Shares against the cumulative
total shareholder return of the TSX 300 Index and the TSX Gold and Silver Index
for the period December 31, 1997 to December 31, 2002.

     COMPARISON OF CUMULATIVE TOTAL SHAREHOLDER RETURN ON THE COMMON SHARES,
               THE TSX 300 INDEX AND THE TSX GOLD AND SILVER INDEX


                               [PERFORMANCE GRAPH]

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                           1997     1998     1999     2000     2001     2002
<S>                                      <C>       <C>      <C>      <C>      <C>      <C>
Kinross Gold Corporation                 100.00    72.78    57.94    17.51    25.73    83.66
S&P/TSX Composite Index                  100.00    98.42   129.63   139.23   121.73   106.59
TSX Gold and Precious Minerals Index     100.00    93.46    77.58    69.82    82.58   105.01
</TABLE>

                                      -14-
<PAGE>

                              CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

         In 2001, the Board of Directors of the Corporation developed, through
the Corporate Governance Committee, with input from the other committees,
management and legal counsel, a corporate governance regime the ("Corporate
Governance Regime") based on the recommendations of the Final Report of the
Joint Committee on Corporate Governance chaired by Ms. Guylaine Saucier (the
"Saucier Report") and the Toronto Stock Exchange ("TSX") Guidelines.
Specifically, the Board of Directors adopted a Charter of the Board of
Directors, a Charter for each of the Corporate Governance Committee, the Audit
Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Environmental Committee and an
Independent Board Leader Role Description. Recently, the Board of Directors
adopted a revised Corporate Governance Regime which meets the applicable
requirements of the United States SARBANES-OXLEY ACT. Kinross' revised Corporate
Governance Regime also reflects the proposed guidelines of the TSX published in
November 2002 (the "TSX Proposal"). Finally, the proposed Corporate Governance
Rules adopted by the Board of Directors of the New York Stock Exchange (the
"NYSE") in August 2002 (the "NYSE Proposed Rules") have been incorporated where
possible.

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

         BOARD CHARTER

         The Corporation's Board of Directors' mandate has been formalized in a
written charter. The Board of Directors discharges its responsibilities directly
and through committees of the Board of Directors, currently consisting of the
Corporate Governance Committee, Audit Committee, Compensation Committee,
Nominating Committee and Environmental and Health and Safety Committee. The
Board of Directors meets regularly to review the business operations, corporate
governance and financial results of the Corporation. Meetings of the Board of
Directors include regular meetings with management to discuss specific aspects
of the operations of the Corporation and meetings of the Board of Directors are
held on a regular basis without management present. The Charter of the Board of
Directors sets out specific responsibilities, which include, without limitation:

o        Appointing the Independent Chairman who will be responsible for the
         leadership of the Board of Directors for specific functions to ensure
         the independence of the Board of Directors.

o        The adoption of a strategic planning process, approval of strategic
         plans and monitoring the performance against such plans.

o        The review and approval of corporate objectives and goals applicable to
         senior management of the Corporation.

o        Defining major corporate decisions requiring Board approval and
         approving such decisions as they arise from time to time.

o        Obtaining periodic reports from management on the Corporation's
         operations including reports on security issues surrounding the
         Corporation's assets (property and employees) and the relevant
         mechanisms that management has in place.

         Additional functions of the Board are included in its Charter or have
been delegated to its committees. A complete copy of the Charter of the Board of
Directors of the Corporation is available upon request to the Corporate
Secretary of the Corporation and on the Corporation's website at
www.Kinross.com.

                                      -15-
<PAGE>

         REPORT ON BOARD ACTIVITIES

         Currently, the Board of Directors of the Corporation consists of ten
persons of which six are unrelated: Messrs. Brough, Harquail, Huxley, Keyes,
Michals and Oliver. An "unrelated" director, under the Corporate Governance
Regime, is a director who is (a) not a member of management and is free from any
interest and any business, family or other relationship which could reasonably
be perceived to materially interfere with the director's ability to act with a
view to the best interests of Kinross, other than interests and relationships
arising solely from holdings in Kinross, (b) not currently, or has not been (and
who does not have an immediate family member who is currently or has been)
within the last five years, an officer, employee of or material service provider
(which includes, without limitation, the Auditors of Kinross) to Kinross or any
of its subsidiaries or affiliates; and (c) not a director (or similarly situated
individual) officer, employee or significant shareholder of an entity that has a
material business relationship with Kinross.

         In carrying out its mandate, the Board of Directors met 11 times during
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002. At such meetings and pursuant to
written resolutions, the Board of Directors reviewed and approved or ratified
various corporate decisions, such as entering into the business combination with
TVX Gold Inc. and Echo Bay Mines Ltd. and the issuances of securities of the
Corporation; appointed or reappointed the officers of the Corporation and the
members of each of the committees of the Board of Directors; reviewed and
approved the consolidated financial statements for the fourth quarter and the
annual consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2001,
as well as the consolidated financial statements for the first, second and third
quarter of the year ended December 31, 2002, reviewed with management on a
quarterly basis, the mining operations and exploration activities of the
Corporation, including its lost time incident rates, its number of active and
inactive employees and environmental compliance; received reports from the
chairman of each of the committees regarding their activities; received regular
reports on the Corporation's hedging activities; and conducted an assessment of
the board as a whole and of each director individually;

         The Board of Directors appointed an independent Chairman in August
2002. (See "Independent Chairman") and a Nominating Committee in November 2002
(see "Board Committees - Nominating Committee").

         The foregoing report dated this 8th day of May, 2003 has been furnished
by the Independent Chairman on behalf of the Board of Directors:

         (Signed) John E. Oliver

INDEPENDENT CHAIRMAN

         POSITION DESCRIPTION

         The Chairman of the Board (also referred to as the Independent
Chairman) is an outside and unrelated director who has been designated by the
full Board to assume the leadership of the Board and enhance and protect, with
the Corporate Governance Committee and the other committees of the Board, the
independence of the Board of Directors of the Corporation. The responsibilities
of the Independent Chairman are set out in the Position Description for the
Independent Chairman adopted by the Board of Directors on May 8, 2003. These
responsibilities may be delegated or shared with the Corporate Governance
Committee and/or any other independent committee of the Board and include
responsibilities such as chairing all meetings of directors; providing
leadership to the Board to enhance the Board's effectiveness; managing the
Board; acting as a liaison between the Board and management;

                                      -16-
<PAGE>

and representing the Corporation to certain external groups. A copy of the role
description of the Independent Chairman is available upon request to Corporate
Secretary of the Corporation and on the Corporation's website at
www.Kinross.com.

         REPORT ON INDEPENDENT CHAIRMAN ACTIVITIES

         Mr. John E. Oliver was appointed by the Board of Directors as
Independent Chairman in August 2002. Prior to that time, Mr. Oliver had acted as
Independent Board Leader since February 2002. Mr. Oliver is an outside and
unrelated director. Mr. Oliver chaired all of the board meetings after his
appointment as Independent Chairman and he provided guidance to the Board on
various corporate governance issues which led to the adoption of the revised
Corporate Governance Regime.

         (Signed) John E. Oliver

BOARD COMMITTEES

         CORPORATE GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE

         CORPORATE GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE CHARTER

         The mandate of the Corporate Governance Committee has been formalized
in its written charter. Generally, its mandate is to assume the responsibility
for developing the Corporation's approach to matters of corporate governance,
including, assisting the Independent Chairman in carrying out his
responsibilities; supervising the Corporation's securities compliance
procedures; recommending procedures to permit the Board to meet on a regular
basis without management; and dealing with succession planning issues relating
to senior management.

         The Corporate Governance Committee is to be comprised of at least three
directors, a majority of whom are unrelated directors. All members should have
skills that are relevant to the mandate of the Committee. A copy of the
Corporate Governance Committee Charter is available upon request to the
Corporate Secretary and on the Corporation's website at www.Kinross.com.

         REPORT ON ACTIVITIES OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE

         The Corporate Governance Committee members are Messrs. Oliver
(Chairman), Michals and Mingay, two of whom are unrelated directors. In carrying
out its mandate, the Corporate Governance Committee met twice during the year
ended December 31, 2002, on April 30 and August 1, 2002.

         At its April 30, 2002 meeting, the Corporate Governance Committee
developed a formal assessment process for the Board, the individual members of
the Board and of the Chief Executive Officer, through the adoption of evaluation
forms tailored to the size of the Board and the Corporation. The Committee also
discussed the proper approach to the development and adoption of a strategic
planning process by the Chief Executive Officer. The Committee also discussed
the appropriateness of the level of detail presented at and the length of Board
meetings and the necessity for Board meetings without management. The Committee
also recommended improvements to be made to the recruitment process of new Board
nominees.

         At a meeting held on August 1, 2002, the Committee received a report
from the Corporate Secretary on securities compliance matters in accordance with
the Corporation's Securities Compliance Policy. The Committee also discussed and
made recommendations on the corporate governance

                                      -17-
<PAGE>

requirements of the NYSE as a result of Kinross' then upcoming listing on the
NYSE. It was also agreed by the Committee that the related member of the Audit
Committee would resign from the Audit Committee as soon as an unrelated director
could be found.

         Attached as Schedule A is the Statement of Corporate Governance
Practices of Kinross incorporating the guidelines of the TSX Proposal.

         The foregoing report dated this 8th day of May, 2003 has been furnished
by the Chairman of the Corporate Governance Committee on the Committee's behalf.

         (Signed) John E. Oliver

         AUDIT COMMITTEE

         AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER

         The mandate of the Audit Committee has been formalized in a written
charter. Generally the mandate of the Audit Committee is to provide assistance
to the Board of Directors of the Corporation in fulfilling its financial
reporting and control responsibilities to the shareholders of the Corporation
and the investment community. Its primary duties and responsibilities are the
oversight of the integrity of Kinross' financial statements, the Corporation's
compliance with legal and regulatory requirements and the auditors'
qualification and independence, as well as to serve as an independent and
objective party to monitor the Corporation's financial reporting process and
control systems; review and appraise the audit activities of the Corporation's
independent auditors and the internal audit function; and provide open lines of
communication among the independent auditors, financial and senior management,
and the Board of Directors for financial reporting and control matters. The
Audit Committee is also responsible for, among other things, the identification
of significant business, political, financial and control risks and exposure and
assessing the steps management has taken to minimize such risks to the
Corporation.

         The Audit Committee is to be comprised of at least three directors.
Each of the Committee members must be an unrelated director. In addition, a
director will not be qualified to be a member of the Audit Committee if such
director is an "affiliated person" (as stipulated in the SARBANES-OXLEY ACT) to
the Corporation, receives any consulting, advisory, or other compensation from
Kinross other than fees for serving in his or her capacity as member of the
Board and as a member of Board committees. All members shall, to the
satisfaction of the Board of Directors, be financially literate and at least one
member shall be a financial expert. The Board has determined that Mr. Brough,
the Chairman of the Audit Committee, is a financial expert and that Messrs.
Huxley and Michals are financially literate. A copy of the Amended Charter of
the Audit Committee is available upon request to the Corporate Secretary of the
Corporation and on the Corporation's website at www.Kinross.com.

         REPORT ON ACTIVITIES OF AUDIT COMMITTEE

         Currently the members of the Audit Committee members are Messrs. Brough
(Chairman), Huxley and Michals, all of whom are unrelated directors. Mr. Mingay
served as a member of the Audit Committee during the year ended December 31,
2002. Mr. Michals was appointed in May 2003. In carrying out its mandate, the
Audit Committee met seven times during the year ended December 31, 2002, on
February 12, April 29, June 6, July 5, July 31, November 12 and December 16,
2002. The Audit Committee reviewed, with the Vice-President, Finance and Chief
Financial Officer and the auditors of the Corporation, the consolidated
financial statements for the fourth quarter and the annual consolidated
financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2001, as well as the
consolidated

                                      -18-
<PAGE>

financial statements for the first, second and third quarters of the year ended
December 31, 2002. The Committee also reviewed the PRO FORMA financial
statements prepared in connection with the business combination with TVX Gold
Inc. and Echo Bay Mines Ltd. and monitored the comments received from the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the financial statements included in the
management information circular relating to the combination. For each of the
financial statements reviewed by the Audit Committee, the Audit Committee
received the input and comments of the Corporation's auditors, which included
among other things, confirmation of the cooperation of the management of the
Corporation in conducting their audit and of the independence of the auditors
from the Corporation.

         The foregoing report dated this 8th day of May, 2003 has been furnished
by the Chairman of the Audit Committee on the Committee's behalf.

         (Signed) John A. Brough

         COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

         COMPENSATION COMMITTEE CHARTER

         The mandate of the Compensation Committee has been formalized in a
written charter. Generally, it is responsible for making recommendations to the
Board of Directors on all matters relating to the compensation of directors, the
members of the various committees of the Board, the Independent Chairman and the
senior officers of the Corporation. For the purpose of its mandate, the
Compensation Committee reviews all aspects of compensation paid to directors,
committee members, the Independent Chairman, management and employees of other
mining companies to ensure the Corporation's compensation programs are
competitive so that the Corporation will be in a position to attract, motivate
and retain high calibre individuals.

         The Compensation Committee is to be comprised of at least three
directors, a majority of whom must be unrelated directors. All members should
have skills that are relevant to the mandate of the Committee. A copy of the
Compensation Committee Charter is available upon request to the Corporate
Secretary and on the Corporation's website at www.Kinross.com and for the report
of such committee for the year ended December 31, 2002, see "Executive
Compensation".

         NOMINATING COMMITTEE

         NOMINATING COMMITTEE CHARTER

         The mandate of the Nominating Committee has been formalized in a
written charter. Generally, it is responsible for proposing new nominees to the
full Board and for assessing directors on an on-going basis. Among the duties
under its mandate, the Nominating Committee reviews the composition of the Board
to ensure that an appropriate number of unrelated directors sit on the Board;
analyzes the needs of the Board when vacancies arise; ensures that an
appropriate selection process for new board nominees is in place; and makes
recommendations to the Board for the election of nominees to the Board of
Directors.

         The Nominating Committee is to be comprised of at least three
directors, all of whom shall be outside directors and a majority of whom must be
unrelated directors. All members should have skills that are relevant to the
mandate of the Committee. A copy of the Nominating Committee Charter is
available upon request to the Corporate Secretary and on the Corporation's
website at WWW.KINROSS.COM.

                                      -19-
<PAGE>

         As the Nominating Committee was appointed in November 2002, the
Committee did not meet in 2002, and therefore there is no activity to be
reported with regard to the Nominating Committee.

         ENVIRONMENTAL AND HEALTH AND SAFETY COMMITTEE

         ENVIRONMENTAL AND HEALTH AND SAFETY COMMITTEE CHARTER

         The mandate of the Environmental Committee was recently amended to
include health and safety matters. The mandate of the Environmental and Health
and Safety Committee has been formalized in its written charter. Generally, the
mandate of the Environmental and Health and Safety Committee is to oversee the
development and implementation of policies and best practices of the Corporation
relating to environmental and health and safety issues in order to ensure
compliance with applicable laws and to ensure the safety of its employees. This
includes assisting the Vice-President, Environmental Affairs and management in
reaching the objectives set out in the Kinross Gold Corporation Environmental
Policy and Framework, monitoring its effectiveness and discussing with
management any necessary improvements to such policy and its framework of
implementation and assisting the Vice-President, Human Resources and management
implementing and maintaining appropriate health and safety programs and to
obtain periodic reports on such programs.

         The Environmental and Health and Safety Committee is to be comprised of
at least three directors, a majority of whom must be unrelated directors. All
members should have skills that are relevant to the mandate of the Committee. A
copy of the Environmental and Health and Safety Committee Charter is available
upon request to the Corporate Secretary and on the Corporation's website at
www.Kinross.com.

         REPORT ON ACTIVITIES OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITTEE

         Currently the members of the Environmental and Health and Safety
Committee members are Messrs. Keyes (Chairman), Harquail and Mingay, two of whom
are unrelated directors. Mr. Oliver served as a member of the Environmental
Committee for the year ended December 31, 2002. In order to carry out its
mandate, the Environmental Committee met three times during the year ended
December 31, 2002, on April 30, August 1 and November 13, 2002.

         On April 30, 2002, the Environmental Committee considered the quarterly
environmental performance report received from the Vice-President, Environmental
Affairs and provided comments to him on such report.

         On August 1, 2002, the Environmental Committee considered the quarterly
environmental performance report received from the Vice-President, Environmental
Affairs. The Committee also received a report from the Vice-President, Treasurer
on financial assurance requirements for mine closures with various regulatory
authorities. The Vice-President, Human Resources provided a report on the health
and safety program and reviewed the three lost injuries recorded during the
quarter. The Committee requested that management evaluate the company-wide
emergency response preparedness plans and crisis communications program.

         On November 13, 2002, the Environmental Committee considered the
quarterly environmental performance report received from the Vice-President,
Environmental Affairs. The Committee also received a status report on site
environmental audits and corrective action plans; conducted a review of closure
and reclamation costs; and received from the Vice-President, Human Resources a
report on

                                      -20-
<PAGE>

health and safety issues for the quarter and the status of the company-wide
emergency response preparedness plans and crisis communications program.

         The foregoing report dated this 8th day of May, 2003 has been furnished
by the Chairman of the Environmental Committee on the Committee's behalf.

         (Signed) John A. Keyes

                       CODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT AND ETHICS

         A Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that will apply to the directors,
officers and employees of the Corporation is in the process of being developed.
Once approved, the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics will be available upon
request to the Corporate Secretary and will be posted on the Corporation's
website at www.Kinross.com.

SHAREHOLDER FEEDBACK

         The Corporation has a Vice-President, Corporate Affairs as well as two
investor relations officers who handle inquiries from the investment community.
All shareholder inquiries should be directed to the Corporate Secretary of the
Corporation. Shareholder inquiries are responded to promptly by the appropriate
individual within the Corporation.


           INTERESTS OF MANAGEMENT AND OTHERS IN MATERIAL TRANSACTIONS

         Since the commencement of the Corporation's last financial year, no
director, senior officer or principal shareholder of the Corporation, nor any
affiliate or associate thereof, has had any material interest, direct or
indirect, in any transaction which has or will materially affect the
Corporation.

         The Corporation is prohibited from, directly or indirectly, including
through a subsidiary, extending credit in the form of a personal loan to or for
any director or executive officer of the Corporation. As a consequence, no
director, executive officer or senior officer of the Corporation is or, at any
time since January 1, 2002, was indebted to the Corporation or any of its
subsidiaries.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

         Copies of the Corporation's latest annual information form, together
with any document incorporated therein by reference, annual report and financial
statements and management proxy circular may be obtained upon request to the
Corporate Secretary of the Corporation. The Corporation may require the payment
of a reasonable charge if the request is made by a person who is not a
shareholder of the Corporation.

                                      -21-
<PAGE>

DIRECTORS' APPROVAL

         The Board of Directors of the Corporation has approved the contents and
the sending of this Circular.

         The foregoing contains no untrue statement of a material fact and does
not omit to state a material fact that is required to be stated or that is
necessary to make a statement not misleading in the light of the circumstances
in which it was made.



(Signed) Robert M. Buchan               (Signed) Brian W. Penny
President and Chief                     Vice President, Finance and
Executive Officer                       Chief Financial Officer


                                      -22-

<PAGE>

                                   SCHEDULE A

                  COMPARISON OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRACTICES

                             WITH THE TSX PROPOSALS

         In November 2002, the Toronto Stock Exchange published revised
guidelines (the "TSX Proposals") with respect to the corporate governance of
listed companies. The TSX Proposal contains a set of guidelines which are
intended to assist listed companies in their approach to corporate governance
but does not require listed companies to comply with these guidelines. However,
pursuant to the TSX Proposal, listed companies must annually disclose their
approach to corporate governance.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                                             <C>
TSX PROPOSAL                                                    COMMENTS
- ------------                                                    --------
(1)      The board of every listed issuer must have             Kinross' Audit Committee is composed of
         an audit committee composed of a majority of           three directors, Messrs. Brough (Chairman),
         unrelated directors. The board must adopt a            Michals and Huxley, all of whom are
         formal charter for the audit committee which           unrelated directors. The Board of Directors
         sets out its roles and responsibilities,               has adopted a charter of the Audit Committee
         specifically defined to provide appropriate            which sets out the committee's role and
         guidance to audit committee members as to              responsibilities. Kinross has published its
         their duties. The charter must be (i)                  Audit Committee Charter at www.Kinross.com.
         published in the listed issuer's annual
         report or information circular once every
         three years or following a material
         amendment to it, or (ii) be posted in an
         up-to-date format on the listed issuer's
         website.

(2)      The board of every listed issuer must at all           The Board of Directors of Kinross consist of
         times be comprised of at least two unrelated           10 directors, 6 of whom are unrelated.
         directors

(3)      The board of every listed issuer must adopt            A Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for
         a formal code of business ethics or business           its directors, officers and employees is
         conduct for the listed issuer that governs             being developed and, once approved, will be
         the behaviour of directors, officers and               published on Kinross' website at
         employees. The code must be (i) published in           www.Kinross.com. Kinross' Code of Business
         the listed issuer's annual report or                   Conduct and Ethics will be drafted to comply
         information circular once every three years            with the TSX Proposals and the
         or following a material amendment to it, or            SARBANES-OXLEY ACT and, to the greatest
         (ii) be                                                extent possible, the NYSE Proposed Rules.

</TABLE>

<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                                             <C>
TSX PROPOSAL                                                    COMMENTS
- ------------                                                    --------
         in an up-to-date format on the listed
         issuer's website. The board of directors
         must monitor compliance with the code and
         must be responsible for the granting of any
         waivers from compliance with the code for
         directors and officers. Disclosure of any
         waivers granted to directors or officers
         must be made in the listed issuer's next
         quarterly report and must include the
         circumstances and rationale for granting the
         waiver.

(4)      The board of directors of every corporation            The Board of Directors has adopted the
         should explicitly assume responsibility for            Charter of the Board of Directors pursuant
         the stewardship of the corporation and adopt           to which the Board has explicitly assumed
         a formal mandate setting out the board's               the stewardship of Kinross. The Board's
         stewardship responsibilities, and as part of           charter is available at www.Kinross.com.
         the overall stewardship responsibility, the
         board should assume responsibility for the
         following matters:

         (a)      adoption of a strategic planning              The Charter of the Board of Directors
                  process and the approval and                  provides that the Board is responsible for
                  review, on at least an annual                 (i) the adoption of a strategic planning
                  basis, of a strategic plan which              process; (ii) the approval and review on an
                  takes into account, among other               annual basis of a strategic plan that takes
                  things, the opportunities and risks           into account business opportunities and
                  of the business;                              business risks, and (iii) monitoring
                                                                performance against the plan.

         (b)      the identification of the principal           The Charter of the Board of Directors
                  risks of the corporation's business           provides that the Board is responsible, with
                  and overseeing the implementation             the assistance of the Audit Committee, to
                  of appropriate systems to manage              identify the principal risks of Kinross'
                  these risks;                                  business and to ensure that appropriate
                                                                systems are in place to manage these risks.
                                                                In addition, these responsibilities are also
                                                                embedded in the Charter of the Audit
                                                                Committee.
</TABLE>

                                      -A2-
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                                             <C>
TSX PROPOSAL                                                    COMMENTS
- ------------                                                    --------
         (c)      succession planning, including                The Charters of the Board of Directors and
                  appointing, training and monitoring           the Corporate Governance Committee both
                  senior management and the CEO in              provide that the Board and the Corporate
                  particular;                                   Governance Committee are responsible for the
                                                                selection, appointment, monitoring,
                                                                evaluation and, if necessary, the
                                                                replacement of the Chief Executive Officer.
                                                                During the last fiscal year, the Board has
                                                                adopted an evaluation procedure for the
                                                                Chief Executive Officer, which procedure is
                                                                now used by the Board in the carrying out of
                                                                its annual evaluation process of the Chief
                                                                Executive Officer.

         (d)      communication policies for the                Kinross' Board of Directors has adopted the
                  corporation, which policies should            Kinross Securities Compliance Policy &
                  (i) address how the corporation               Framework which among other procedures,
                  interacts with analysts, investors,           contain comprehensive procedures on Timely
                  other key stakeholders and the                Disclosure of Material Information,
                  public; (ii) contain measures for             Procedures on Selective Disclosure and
                  the corporation to comply with its            Electronic Communications, as well as
                  continuous and timely disclosure              specific Procedures on Mineral Disclosure.
                  obligations and to avoid selective
                  disclosure; and (iii) be reviewed
                  at least annually; and

         (e)      the integrity of the corporation's            Pursuant to the charters of the Board of
                  internal control and management               Directors and the Audit Committee, the Board
                  information systems.                          and the Audit Committee are responsible for
                                                                ensuring the integrity of Kinross' internal
                                                                control and management information systems.
                                                                This responsibility is more predominantly
                                                                carried out by the Audit Committee, which in
                                                                addition is responsible to establish
                                                                procedures for (i) receiving and handling
                                                                complaints received by Kinross regarding
                                                                accounting, internal controls or auditing
                                                                matters and (ii) for employees to submit
                                                                confidential anonymous concerns regarding
                                                                questionable accounting or auditing matters.
                                                                The Audit Committee will also assist the
                                                                Board in ensuring compliance with laws and
                                                                regulations.
</TABLE>

                                      -A3-
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                                             <C>
TSX PROPOSAL                                                    COMMENTS
- ------------                                                    --------
(5)      The board of directors of every corporation            As of the date hereof, the Board is composed
         should be constituted with a majority of               of 10 members, 6 of whom are unrelated
         individuals who qualify as unrelated                   directors.
         directors. If the corporation has a
         significant shareholder, in addition to a
         majority of unrelated directors, the board
         should include a number of directors who do
         not have interests in or relationships with
         either the corporation or the significant
         shareholder and which fairly reflects the
         investment in the corporation by
         shareholders other than the significant
         shareholder.

(6)      The application of the definition of                   Based on information provided by directors
         "unrelated director" to the circumstances of           as to their individual circumstances, the
         each individual director should be the                 Board has determined that 4 Board members
         responsibility of the board which is                   are "related" directors, namely, Messrs.
         required to disclose whether the board has a           Buchan, Caldwell, Ditto and Mingay. Messrs.
         majority of unrelated directors or, in the             Buchan and Caldwell in their capacity as
         case of a corporation with a significant               members of management are considered
         shareholder, whether the board is                      "related". Mr. Ditto, by virtue of the fact
         constituted with the appropriate number of             that he was an officer of the Corporation
         directors which are not related to either              within the last 5 years is considered to be
         the corporation or the significant                     "related". Mr. Mingay, who is a partner at
         shareholder. The board is also required to             Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP, the law firm
         disclose the analysis supporting this                  which acts as legal counsel to the
         conclusion, identify which directors are               Corporation is a related director due to the
         related or unrelated and provide a                     percentage of time he spends in his legal
         description of the business, family, direct            practice on matters relating to the
         and indirect shareholding or other                     Corporation. All other directors are
         relationship between each director and the             considered to be sufficiently independent of
         corporation.                                           management and free of any interest or
                                                                business relationship that may interfere
                                                                with their ability to act with a view to the
                                                                best interest of the Corporation.

(7)      The board of directors of every corporation            The Charter of the Nominating Committee
         should appoint a committee of directors                includes responsibility to identify
         composed solely of non-management directors,           individuals qualified to become board
         a majority of whom are unrelated directors,            members and making recommendations to the
         with the responsibility for proposing to the           full Board for election of director nominees
         full board new nominees to the board and for           to the Board of Directors. The Nominating
         assessing directors on an ongoing basis.               Committee is composed solely of unrelated
                                                                directors.
</TABLE>

                                      -A4-
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                                             <C>
TSX PROPOSAL                                                    COMMENTS
- ------------                                                    --------
(8)      Every board of directors should implement a            The Board of Directors and the Nominating
         process to be carried out by the nominating            Committee have the responsibility to
         committee or other appropriate committee for           continuously assess the effectiveness of the
         assessing the effectiveness of the board as            Board and its committees and the
         a whole, the committees of the board and the           contribution of individual directors. As a
         contribution of individual directors.                  result, changes were made last year to the
                                                                composition of the Board and certain
                                                                committees thereof. On a more formal basis,
                                                                Evaluation and Board Member Evaluation Forms
                                                                are distributed to, and completed by, all
                                                                directors annually to assist the Board in
                                                                its self evaluation process.

(9)      Every corporation, as an integral element of           While no formal program is in place, when
         the process for appointing new directors,              new members of the Board are appointed, such
         should provide an orientation and education            individuals meet with management and other
         program for new recruits to the board. In              members of the Board to familiarize
         addition, every corporation should provide             themselves with the business of the
         continuing education for all directors.                Corporation and their responsibilities as
                                                                members of the Board.

(10)     Every board of directors should examine its            Assessment of the composition of the Board
         size and composition and undertake, where              and its effectiveness is the responsibility
         appropriate, a program to establish a board            of the Nominating Committee. As the Board is
         comprised of members who facilitate                    presently constituted, the skills,
         effective decision-making.                             backgrounds and attitudes of the members
                                                                allow for diverse representation while the
                                                                number of members of the Board is small
                                                                enough to allow for effective deliberation.

(11)     A committee of the board of directors                  The Compensation Committee is composed of
         comprised solely of unrelated directors                Messrs. Oliver (Chairman), Huxley and
         should review the adequacy and form of the             Brough, all of whom are unrelated directors.
         compensation of senior management and                  In accordance with its Charter, the
         directors, with such compensation                      Compensation Committee reviews the adequacy
         realistically reflecting the                           and form of compensation of senior
         responsibilities and risks of such                     management, Board members and committee
         positions.                                             members.
</TABLE>

                                      -A5-
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                                             <C>
TSX PROPOSAL                                                    COMMENTS
- ------------                                                    --------
(12)     Committees of the board of directors should            All the committees of the Board are
         generally be composed solely of                        comprised exclusively of outside directors.
         non-management directors, a majority of whom           Except for the Corporate Governance
         are unrelated directors.                               Committee and the Environmental and Health
                                                                and Safety Committee, the committees of the
                                                                Board are exclusively constituted of
                                                                unrelated directors. The Corporate
                                                                Governance Committee and the Environmental
                                                                and Health and Safety Committee are,
                                                                however, comprised of a majority of
                                                                unrelated directors.

(13)     Every board of directors should expressly              The Corporate Governance Committee is
         assume responsibility for, or assign to a              responsible for, among other things,
         committee of directors the general                     overseeing and making recommendations to the
         responsibility for, developing the                     Board in developing the approach to the
         corporation's approach to governance issues.           Corporation's corporate governance issues.
         This committee would, among other things, be           The carrying out of this responsibility has
         responsible for the corporation's response             led the Corporate Governance Committee to
         to these governance guidelines.                        develop and the Board of Directors to adopt
                                                                the Kinross Corporate Governance Regime.


(14)     The board of directors, together with the              Pursuant to its Charter, the Board of
         CEO, should develop position descriptions              Directors is responsible for the approval of
         for the board and for the CEO, including the           corporate objectives and goals applicable to
         definition of the limits to management's               senior management. The scope of management's
         responsibilities. In addition, the board               responsibilities and the objectives that the
         should approve or develop the corporate                Chief Executive Officer is expected to
         objectives that the CEO is responsible for             attain are discussed annually by the Board
         meeting and assess the CEO against these               and the Chief Executive Officer and such
         objectives.                                            objectives form the basis for the assessment
                                                                of the Chief Executive Officer every year.
</TABLE>

                                      -A6-
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                                             <C>
TSX PROPOSAL                                                    COMMENTS
- ------------                                                    --------
(15)     Every board of directors should implement              The Board has formally appointed a Chairman
         structures and procedures that ensure that             who is independent from management. As part
         the board can function independently of                of the position description of the
         management. An appropriate structure would             Independent Chairman adopted by the Board,
         be to (i) appoint a chair of the board who             the Chairman has the responsibility, among
         is not a member of management with                     other things, to oversee that the Board
         responsibility to oversee that the board               discharges its responsibilities effectively.
         discharges its responsibilities or (ii)                The Chairman acts as a liaison between the
         assign this responsibility to a                        Board and the Chief Executive Officer. The
         non-management director, sometimes referred            Chairman chairs every Board meeting and
         to as the "lead director". The chair or lead           ensures that the non-management members of
         director should oversee the board in                   the Board can meet on a regular basis
         carrying out its responsibilities                      without management being present.
         effectively which will involve the board
         meeting on a regular basis without
         management present and may involve assigning
         the responsibility for administering the
         board's relationship to management to a
         committee of the board.

(16)     The audit committee should be composed                 The Audit Committee is composed solely of
         solely of unrelated directors. All of the              unrelated directors. All the members of the
         members of the audit committee should be               Committee are financially literate and the
         financially literate and at least one member           Chairman has accounting or related financial
         should have accounting or related financial            experience. The Board has adopted
         experience. Each board shall determine the             definitions for financial literacy and
         definition of and criteria for "financial              accounting or related financial expertise as
         literacy" and "accounting or related                   reflected in the Audit Committee Charter.
         financial experience" and such definitions
         shall form part of the disclosure required             The Audit Committee meets (with and without
         under the TSX Proposal.                                management) with the Auditors and discusses
                                                                with them various aspects of the Committee's
                                                                responsibilities.
</TABLE>

                                      -A7-
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                                             <C>
TSX PROPOSAL                                                    COMMENTS
- ------------                                                    --------

         The audit committee should have direct                 As required by its Charter, the Audit
         communication channels with the internal and           Committee is responsible to ensure the
         external auditors to discuss and review                adequacy and effectiveness of the
         specific issues as appropriate. The audit              Corporation's internal control. The
         committee duties should include oversight              Committee approves the Corporation's
         responsibility for management reporting on             internal control policy and the Auditors'
         internal control. While it is management's             mandates.
         responsibility to design and implement an
         effective system of internal control, it is
         the responsibility of the audit committee to
         oversee this responsibility.

(17)     The audit committee charter should set out             The Audit Committee Charter includes all of
         explicitly the role and oversight                      these responsibilities and additional. It is
         responsibility of the audit committee with             available on the Corporation's website at
         respect to:                                            www.Kinross.com. The Audit Committee reviews
                                                                and reassesses its Charter annually and make
                                                                recommendations to the Board as to the
                                                                required amendments.
</TABLE>

o        its relationship with and expectation of the
         external auditors including the
         establishment of the independence of the
         external auditor and the approval of any
         non-audit mandates of the external auditor;

o        the determination of which non-audit
         services the external auditor is prohibited
         from providing;

o        the engagement, evaluation, remuneration and
         termination of the external auditor;

o        appropriate funding for payment of the
         auditor's compensation and for any advisors
         retained by the audit committee;

o        its relationship with and expectation of the
         internal auditor function;

o        its oversight of internal control;

o        disclosure of financial and related
         information; and

                                      -A8-
<PAGE>

o        any other matters that the audit committee
         feels are important to its mandate or that
         the board chooses to delegate to it.

         Even though the audit committee has a
         specific mandate and its members may have
         financial experience, they do not have the
         obligation to act as auditors or to perform
         auditing, or to determine that the issuer's
         financial statements are complete and
         accurate.

         The audit committee charter should specify
         that the external auditor is accountable to
         the board of directors and the audit
         committee as representatives of
         shareholders. The board of directors should
         review and reassess the adequacy of the
         audit committee charter on at least an
         annual basis.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                                             <C>
(18)     The board of directors should implement a              It is a specific responsibility of the
         system which enables an individual director            Corporate Governance Committee pursuant to
         to engage an external adviser at the expense           its Charter to consider and approve any
         of the company in appropriate circumstances.           requests from directors or committees of
         The engagement of the external advisor                 directors for the engagement of special
         should be subject to the approval of an                external advisers from time to time. Upon
         appropriate committee of the board.                    such requests being made, the Corporate
                                                                Governance Committee makes recommendations
                                                                to the Board as to the appropriate external
                                                                advisers required and the funds of the
                                                                Corporation that should be allocated for
                                                                this purpose.
</TABLE>

                                      -A9-

</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>EX-99.7
<SEQUENCE>6
<FILENAME>tex99_7-29727.txt
<DESCRIPTION>EX-99.7
<TEXT>
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.7

                        CONSENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP,
           INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS FOR KINROSS GOLD CORPORATION


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the use of our report dated March 3, 2003, except as to note 23
(b) which is as of March 26, 2003 appearing in the Annual Report on Form 40-F of
Kinross Gold Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2002.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
on Form F-10, Registration No. 333-102660, and the Registration Statements on
Form S-8 (Registration Statement Nos.333-05776, 033-93926, 033-82450, 333-08936,
333-09004, 333-12662, 333-13744 and 333-13742) of Kinross Gold Corporation of
our report dated March 3, 2003, except as to note 23(b) which is as of March 26,
2003.



/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Chartered Accountants


Toronto, Ontario, Canada
May 16, 2003



</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>EX-99.8
<SEQUENCE>7
<FILENAME>tex99_8-29727.txt
<DESCRIPTION>EX-99.8
<TEXT>
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.8


CONSENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP,
INDEPENDENT CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS FOR TVX GOLD, INC.

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference into the Annual Report on Form 40-F
and the Registration Statement on Form F-10, Registration No. 333-102660, and
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-05776, 033-93926, 033-82450,
333-08936, 333-09004, 333-12662, 333-13744 and 333-13742) of Kinross Gold
Corporation of our report dated April 16, 2003 (except as to Note 19(c) which is
as of April 28, 2003 and Note 19(b) which is as of May 5, 2003), on the
consolidated financial statements of TVX Gold Inc., as of December 31, 2002 and
2001, and for each of the three years ended December 31, 2002.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Chartered Accountants


Toronto, Canada
May 15, 2003



</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>EX-99.9
<SEQUENCE>8
<FILENAME>tex99_9-29727.txt
<DESCRIPTION>EX-99.9
<TEXT>
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.9

                                   CONSENT OF
                        INDEPENDENT CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS




We consent to the use, in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of Kinross Gold
Corporation, of our report dated February 7, 2003 except for note 18(c), as to
which the date is March 26, 2003 with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Echo Bay Mines Ltd. for the year ended December 31, 2002.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
on Form S-8 (No. 333-05776, 033-93926, 033-82450, 333-08936, 333-09004,
333-12662, 333-13744 and 333-13742) and the Registration Statement on Form F-10,
Registration No. 333-102660, of Kinross Gold Corporation, of our report dated
February 7, 2003 except for note 18(c), as to which the date is March 26, 2003,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Echo Bay Mines Ltd.
included in the Annual Report on Form 40-F of Kinross Gold Corporation for the
year ended December 31, 2002.






                                                    /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Vancouver, Canada
May 20, 2003.                                       Chartered Accountants

</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>EX-99.10
<SEQUENCE>9
<FILENAME>tex99_10-29727.txt
<DESCRIPTION>EX-99.10
<TEXT>
<PAGE>
                               CONSENT OF EXPERTS

We hereby consent to the reliance in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of Kinross
Gold Corporation ("Kinross") on our report dated April, 2003 which Kinross used,
or directly quoted from, in preparing summaries, including ore reserve and
mineral estimates, in the Annual Report of the Crixas Mine.


Steffen Robertson and Kirsten (Canada) Inc.


By: Ken Reipas
    -----------------------------
         [Name of Signatory]

Title: Principal Mining Engineer

Date: May 14                     , 2003
      ---------------------------

</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>EX-99.11
<SEQUENCE>10
<FILENAME>tex99_11-29727.txt
<DESCRIPTION>EX-99.11
<TEXT>
<PAGE>

                               CONSENT OF EXPERTS

We hereby consent to the reliance in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of Kinross
Gold Corporation ("Kinross") on our report dated April 4, 2003 which Kinross
used, or directly quoted from, in preparing summaries, including ore reserve and
mineral estimates, in the Annual Report of the Fort Knox and True North
Deposits.


Victor J. Miller


- ------------------------------------

Title: Sr. Planning Engineer

Date:  May 13                       , 2003
     -------------------------------

</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>EX-99.12
<SEQUENCE>11
<FILENAME>tex99_12-29727.txt
<DESCRIPTION>EX-99.12
<TEXT>
<PAGE>

                               CONSENT OF EXPERTS

We hereby consent to the reliance in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of Kinross
Gold Corporation ("Kinross") on our report dated April 4, 2003 which Kinross
used, or directly quoted from, in preparing summaries, including ore reserve and
mineral estimates, in the Annual Report of the Fort Knox and True North
Deposits.


Dean T. Wilton


- ------------------------------------

Title: Technical Services Manager

Date:  May 13                       , 2003
     -------------------------------

</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>EX-99.13
<SEQUENCE>12
<FILENAME>tex99_13-29727.txt
<DESCRIPTION>EX-99.13
<TEXT>
<PAGE>

                               CONSENT OF EXPERTS

We hereby consent to the reliance in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of Kinross
Gold Corporation ("Kinross") on our report dated February, 2003 which Kinross
used, or directly quoted from, in preparing summaries, including ore reserve and
mineral estimates, in the Annual Report of the Kubaka Mine.


Scott Anderson (to be provided by amendment)


- ------------------------------------

Title: Kubaka Operation

Date:  May 14                       , 2003
     -------------------------------

</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>EX-99.14
<SEQUENCE>13
<FILENAME>tex99_14-29727.txt
<DESCRIPTION>EX-99.14
<TEXT>
<PAGE>

                               CONSENT OF EXPERTS

We hereby consent to the reliance in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of Kinross
Gold Corporation ("Kinross") on our report dated May 5, 2003 which Kinross used,
or directly quoted from, in preparing summaries, including ore reserve and
mineral estimates, in the Annual Report of the La Coipa Mine.


AMEC E&C Services Limited


By: Maryse Belanger
   ---------------------------------
             [Name of Signatory]

Title: P. GEO

Date: May 14                        , 2003
     -------------------------------

</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>EX-99.15
<SEQUENCE>14
<FILENAME>tex99_15-29727.txt
<DESCRIPTION>EX-99.15
<TEXT>
<PAGE>

                               CONSENT OF EXPERTS

We hereby consent to the reliance in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of Kinross
Gold Corporation ("Kinross") on our report dated April, 2003 which Kinross used,
or directly quoted from, in preparing summaries, including ore reserve and
mineral estimates, in the Annual Report of the Morro do Ouro Mine.


Steffen Robertson and Kirsten (Canada) Inc.


By: Ken Reipas
    --------------------------------
          [Name of Signatory]

Title: Principal Mining Engineer

Date:  May 14                       , 2003
     -------------------------------

</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>EX-99.16
<SEQUENCE>15
<FILENAME>tex99_16-29727.txt
<DESCRIPTION>EX-99.16
<TEXT>
<PAGE>

                               CONSENT OF EXPERTS

We hereby consent to the reliance in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of Kinross
Gold Corporation ("Kinross") on our report dated April 4, 2003 which Kinross
used, or directly quoted from, in preparing summaries, including ore reserve and
mineral estimates, in the Annual Report of the Musselwhite Mine.


AMEC E&C Services Limited


By: John Klerman
   ---------------------------------
          [Name of Signatory]

Title: Sr. Mining Engineer

Date: May 13                        , 2003
     -------------------------------

</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>EX-99.17
<SEQUENCE>16
<FILENAME>tex99_17-29727.txt
<DESCRIPTION>EX-99.17
<TEXT>
<PAGE>

                               CONSENT OF EXPERTS

We hereby consent to the reliance in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of Kinross
Gold Corporation ("Kinross") on our report dated March, 2003 which Kinross used,
or directly quoted from, in preparing summaries, including ore reserve and
mineral estimates, in the Annual Report of the Porcupine Joint Venture which
includes the Hoyle Pond Mine, the Pamour Mine and the Dome Mine.


Steffen Robertson and Kirsten (Canada) Inc.


By: Jean Francois Couture
   ---------------------------------
           [Name of Signatory]

Title: Principal Geologist

Date: May 14                        , 2003
     -------------------------------

</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>EX-99.18
<SEQUENCE>17
<FILENAME>tex99_18-29727.txt
<DESCRIPTION>EX-99.18
<TEXT>
<PAGE>

                               CONSENT OF EXPERTS

We hereby consent to the reliance in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of Kinross
Gold Corporation ("Kinross") on our report dated March 21, 2003 which Kinross
used, or directly quoted from, in preparing summaries, including ore reserve and
mineral estimates, in the Annual Report of the Round Mountain Gold Mine.


Frank K. Fenne


____________________________________

Title: Chief Geologist

Date: May 20                        , 2003
     -------------------------------

</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>EX-99.19
<SEQUENCE>18
<FILENAME>tex99_19-29727.txt
<DESCRIPTION>EX-99.19
<TEXT>
<PAGE>

                               CONSENT OF EXPERTS

We hereby consent to the reliance in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of Kinross
Gold Corporation ("Kinross") on our report dated March 21, 2003 which Kinross
used, or directly quoted from, in preparing summaries, including ore reserve and
mineral estimates, in the Annual Report of the Round Mountain Gold Mine.


Daniel B. Moore


____________________________________

Title: Engineering Superintendent

Date: May 19                        , 2003
     -------------------------------

</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>EX-99.20
<SEQUENCE>19
<FILENAME>tex99_20-29727.txt
<DESCRIPTION>EX-99.20
<TEXT>
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.20


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES - OXLEY ACT OF 2002


          In connection with the annual report of Kinross Gold Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2002, Robert M. Buchan
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his
knowledge:

          1.  The annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section
              13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2.  The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in
              all material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.



May 20, 2003                    /s/ Robert M. Buchan
   (Date)                       -----------------------------------------------
                                Robert M. Buchan (principal executive officer)

</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>EX-99.21
<SEQUENCE>20
<FILENAME>tex99_21-29727.txt
<DESCRIPTION>EX-99.21
<TEXT>
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.21


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES - OXLEY ACT OF 2002


          In connection with the annual report of Kinross Gold Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2002, Brian W. Penny
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his
knowledge:

          1.  The annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section
              13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2.  The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in
              all material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.



May 20, 2003                                /s/ Brian W. Penny
   (Date)                                   ------------------------------------
                                            Brian W. Penny
                                            Chief Financial Officer (principal
                                            financial and accounting officer)


</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>
</SEC-DOCUMENT>
-----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----
