XML 98 R23.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT
v2.4.0.6

Employee Benefit Plans | 6 Months Ended
--- | ---
Dec. 31, 2012
Employee Benefit Plans [Abstract] |
Employee Benefit Plans | Note 16. Employee Benefit Plans The Company provides substantially all U.S. employees and em ployees at certain foreign subsidiaries with pension benefits. Eligible U.S. employees with five or more years of service prior to January 1, 2009 participate in a defined benefit pension plan. Eligible U.S. employees hired on or after January 1, 2009 and eligible salaried employees with less than five years of service prior to January 1, 2009 participate in a “cash balance” pension formula. The Company provides eligible U.S. employees who retire under qualifying conditions with access to postretirement health care, at full cost to the retiree (certain employees are “grandfathered” into subsidized coverage). On September 20, 2012, the Company amended its U.S. qualified pension plans and began notifying certain former employees of its offer to pay those employees’ pension benefit in a lump sum. This lump sum payment offer expired in December 2012. Former employees eligible for the voluntary lump sum payment option were generally those who were vested traditional formula participants of the U.S. qualified pension plans who terminated employments prior to August 1, 2012 and who had not started receiving monthly payments of their pension benefits. The voluntary lump sum payments which amounted to $134 million reduced the Company’s global projected benefit obligations by $174 million, resulting in a net improvement of its pension underfunding by $40 million. The Company incurred a non-cash pre-tax charge of $53 million as a result of the requirement to expense the unrealized actuarial losses recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) pertaining to the liabilities settled at December 31, 2012. Beginning in 2013, the Company expects a $4 million reduction in ongoing annual pre-tax pension expense directly attributable to this amendment. On November 16, 2012, the Company amended its U.S. postretirement benefit plan by providing participants with Health Care Reimbursement Accounts funded by credit s, based on years of service, to be used to access post-65 supplemental M edicare insurance markets. The credit indexes annually at the maximum rate of 3% per year. As a result of this amendment, the Company recognized a prior service credit of $109 million in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). The prior service credit will be amortized over 8 years starting in 2013. Beginning in 2013, the Company expects a $21 million reduction in ongoing annual pre-tax postretirement expense directly attributable to this amendment. The Company maintains 401(k) plans covering substantially all U.S. employees. The Company contributes cash to the plans to match qualifying employee contributions, and also provides a non-matching employer contribution of 1% of pay to eligible participants. Under an employee stock ownership component of the 401(k) plans, employees may choose to invest in ADM stock as part of their own investment elections. The employer contributions are expensed when paid. Assets of the Company’s 401(k) plans consist primarily of listed common stocks and pooled funds. The Company’s 401(k) plans held 15 million shares of Company common stock at December 3 1, 2012, with a market value of $412 million. Cash dividends received on shares of Company common stock by these plans during the six months ended December 31, 2012 were $5 million.
|  |  | Pension Benefits |  |  | Postretirement Benefits
(In millions) |  |  | Six Months Ended December 31 |  |  | Six Months Ended December 31
|  |  | 2012 |  | 2011 |  |  | 2012 |  | 2011
|  |  |  | (Unaudited) |  |  |  | (Unaudited)
Retirement plan expense |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Defined benefit plans: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Service cost (benefits earned during |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
the period) |  | $ | 44 | $ | 36 |  | $ | 4 | $ | 3
Interest cost |  |  | 61 |  | 65 |  |  | 6 |  | 6
Expected return on plan assets |  |  | (75) |  | (70) |  |  | - |  | -
Settlement charges |  |  | 68 |  | 0 |  |  | - |  | -
Amortization of actuarial loss |  |  | 42 |  | 24 |  |  | - |  | -
Other amortization |  |  | 2 |  | 2 |  |  | - |  | -
Net periodic defined benefit plan expense |  |  | 142 |  | 57 |  |  | 10 |  | 9
Defined contribution plans |  |  | 23 |  | 23 |  |  | - |  | -
Total retirement plan expense |  | $ | 165 | $ | 80 |  | $ | 10 | $ | 9
|  | Pension Benefits |  | Postretirement Benefits
|  | Year Ended June 30, |  | Year Ended June 30,
(In millions) |  | 2012 |  | 2011 |  | 2010 |  | 2012 |  | 2011 |  | 2010
Retirement plan expense |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Defined benefit plans: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Service cost (benefits earned during |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
the period) |  | $ | 71 | $ | 71 | $ | 58 |  | $ | 7 | $ | 8 | $ | 9
Interest cost |  |  | 130 |  | 120 |  | 119 |  |  | 12 |  | 13 |  | 16
Expected return on plan assets |  |  | (141) |  | (132) |  | (117) |  |  | - |  | - |  | -
Remeasurement charge(1) |  |  | 30 |  | - |  | - |  |  | 4 |  | - |  | -
Amortization of actuarial loss |  |  | 52 |  | 59 |  | 31 |  |  | - |  | - |  | 5
Other amortization |  |  | 5 |  | 5 |  | 6 |  |  | (2) |  | (1) |  | (1)
Net periodic defined benefit plan expense |  |  | 147 |  | 123 |  | 97 |  |  | 21 |  | 20 |  | 29
Defined contribution plans |  |  | 45 |  | 43 |  | 40 |  |  | - |  | - |  | -
Total retirement plan expense |  | $ | 192 | $ | 166 | $ | 137 |  | $ | 21 | $ | 20 | $ | 29
(1) | See Note 19
Prior to December 31, 2012, the Company used a June 30 measurement date for all defined benefit plans. As a result of the change in fiscal year end (see Note 1), the Company changed its measurement date for all defined benefit plans to December 31 effective the transition period ended December 31, 2012. The following tables set forth changes in the defined benefit obligation and the fair value of defined benefit plan assets:
|  | Pension Benefits |  | Postretirement Benefits
|  | December 31 | June 30 | June 30 |  | December 31 | June 30 | June 30
|  | 2012 | 2012 |  | 2011 |  | 2012 | 2012 |  | 2011
|  | (In millions) |  | (In millions)
Benefit obligation, beginning |  | $ | 3,095 | $ | 2,470 | $ | 2,299 |  | $ | 305 | $ | 229 | $ | 224
Service cost |  |  | 44 |  | 71 |  | 71 |  |  | 4 |  | 7 |  | 8
Interest cost |  |  | 61 |  | 130 |  | 120 |  |  | 6 |  | 12 |  | 13
Actuarial loss (gain) |  |  | (4) |  | 569 |  | (63) |  |  | 7 |  | 74 |  | (32)
Employee contributions |  |  | 1 |  | 2 |  | 2 |  |  | - |  | - |  | -
Curtailments |  |  | (12) |  | - |  | - |  |  | - |  | - |  | -
Settlements |  |  | (204) |  | - |  | - |  |  | - |  | - |  | -
Remeasurement charge |  |  | - |  | 30 |  | - |  |  | - |  | 4 |  | -
Business combinations |  |  | - |  | - |  | 36 |  |  | - |  | - |  | 22
Benefits paid |  |  | (53) |  | (102) |  | (90) |  |  | (5) |  | (8) |  | (6)
Plan amendments |  |  | - |  | 2 |  | (9) |  |  | (109) |  | (13) |  | -
Actual expenses |  |  | (1) |  | - |  | - |  |  | - |  | - |  | -
Foreign currency effects |  |  | 27 |  | (77) |  | 104 |  |  | - |  | - |  | -
Benefit obligation, ending |  | $ | 2,954 | $ | 3,095 | $ | 2,470 |  | $ | 208 | $ | 305 | $ | 229
Fair value of plan assets, beginning |  | $ | 2,236 | $ | 2,134 |  | 1,721 |  | $ | - | $ | - |  | -
Actual return on plan assets |  |  | 161 |  | 140 |  | 283 |  |  | - |  | - |  | -
Employer contributions |  |  | 31 |  | 123 |  | 116 |  |  | 5 |  | 8 |  | 6
Employee contributions |  |  | 1 |  | 2 |  | 2 |  |  | - |  | - |  | -
Settlements |  |  | (224) |  | - |  | - |  |  | - |  | - |  | -
Business combinations |  |  | - |  | - |  | 22 |  |  | - |  | - |  | -
Benefits paid |  |  | (53) |  | (102) |  | (90) |  |  | (5) |  | (8) |  | (6)
Actual expenses |  |  | (1) |  | - |  | - |  |  | - |  | - |  | -
Foreign currency effects |  |  | 23 |  | (61) |  | 80 |  |  | - |  | - |  | -
Fair value of plan assets, ending |  | $ | 2,174 | $ | 2,236 | $ | 2,134 |  | $ | - | $ | - | $ | -
Funded status |  | $ | (780) | $ | (859) | $ | (336) |  | $ | (208) | $ | (305) | $ | (229)
Prepaid benefit cost |  | $ | 52 | $ | 25 | $ | 51 |  | $ | - | $ | - | $ | -
Accrued benefit liability – current |  |  | (14) |  | (14) |  | (16) |  |  | (13) |  | (11) |  | (8)
Accrued benefit liability – long-term |  |  | (818) |  | (870) |  | (371) |  |  | (195) |  | (294) |  | (221)
Net amount recognized in the balance sheet |  | $ | (780) | $ | (859) | $ | (336) |  | $ | (208) | $ | (305) | $ | (229)
Included in accumulated other comprehensive income for pension benefits at December 31, 2012, are the following amounts that have not yet been recognized in net periodic pension cost: unrecognized transition obligation of ($1) million, unrecognized prior service cost of $10 million, and unrecognized actuarial loss of $975 m illion. The prior service cost and actuarial loss included in accumulated other comprehensive income expected to be recognized in net periodic pension c ost during 2013 is $3 million and $70 million, respectively. Included in accumulated other comprehensive income for po stretirement benefits at December 31, 2012, are the following amounts that have not yet been recognized in net periodic pension cost: unrecognized prior service credit of ($123) million and unrecognized actuarial loss of $67 million. The prior service credit and actuarial loss included in accumulated other comprehensive income expected to be recognized in net periodic be nefit cost during 2013 is ($18) million and $6 million, respectively. The following table sets forth the principal assumptions used in developing net periodic pension cost:
| Pension Benefits |  | Postretirement Benefits
| December 31 |  | June 30 |  | June 30 |  | December 31 |  | June 30 |  | June 30
| 2012 |  | 2012 |  | 2011 |  | 2012 |  | 2012 |  | 2011
Discount rate | 4.0 | % |  | 5.5 | % |  | 5.2 | % |  | 4.0 | % |  | 5.5 | % |  | 5.4 | %
Expected return on plan assets | 7.0 | % |  | 7.1 | % |  | 7.1 | % |  | N/A |  |  | N/A |  |  | N/A |
Rate of compensation increase | 3.9 | % |  | 3.9 | % |  | 3.9 | % |  | N/A |  |  | N/A |  |  | N/A |
The following table sets forth the principal assumptions used in developing the year-end actuarial present value of the projected benefit obligations:
| Pension Benefits |  | Postretirement Benefits
| December 31 |  | June 30 |  | June 30 |  | December 31 |  | June 30 |  | June 30
| 2012 |  | 2012 |  | 2011 |  |  | 2012 |  | 2012 |  | 2011 |
Discount rate | 3.9 | % |  | 4.0 | % |  | 5.5 | % |  | 3.6 | % |  | 4.0 | % |  | 5.5 | %
Rate of compensation increase | 3.9 | % |  | 4.0 | % |  | 3.9 | % |  | N/A |  |  | N/A |  |  | N/A |
The projected benefit obligation, accumulated benefit obligation, and fair value of plan assets for the pension plans with projected benefit obligations in excess of plan assets were $2.4 million, $2.2 billion, and $1.6 billion, respectively, as of December 31, 2012, $2.8 billion, $2.5 billion, and $1.9 bill ion, respectively, as of June 3 0, 2012, and $2.1 billion, $1.9 billion, and $1.7 billion, respectively, as of June 30, 2011. The projected benefit obligation, accumulated benefit obligation, and fair value of plan assets for the pension plans with accumulated benefit obligations in excess of plan assets were $2.4 billion, $2.2 billion, and $1.6 billion, respectively, as of December 31, 2012, $2.7 billion, $2.5 billion, and $1.8 billion, respectively, as of June 30, 2012, and $671 million, $657 million, and $425 million, respectively, as of June 30, 2011. The accumulated benefit obligation for all pension plans as of December 31, 2012 and June 30, 2012 and 2011, was $2.7 billion, $2.7 billion, and $ 2.3 billion, respectively. For postretirement benefit measurement purposes, a 7.25% annual rate of increase in the per capita cost of covered health care benefits was assumed for the transition period ended December 31, 2012. The rate was assumed to decrease gradually to 5% by 2022 and remain at that level thereafter. A 1% change in assumed health care cost trend rates would have the following effects:
|  | 1% Increase |  | 1% Decrease
|  | (In millions)
Effect on combined service and interest cost components |  | $ | - |  | $ | -
Effect on accumulated postretirement benefit obligations |  | $ | 5 |  | $ | (5)
Plan Assets The Company’s employee benefit plan assets are principally comprised of the following types of investments: Common stock: Equity securities are valued based on quoted exchange prices and are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. Mutual funds: Mutual funds are valued at the closing price reported on the active market on which they are traded and are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. Common collective trust (CCT) funds: The fair values of the CCTs are based on the cumulative net asset value (NAV) of their underlying investments. The investments in CCTs are comprised of international equity funds, a small cap U.S. equity fund, large cap U.S. equity funds, fixed income funds, and other funds. The fund units are valued at NAV based on the closing market value of the units bought or sold as of the valuation date and are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. The CCTs seek primarily to provide investment results approximating the aggregate price, dividend performance, total return, and income stream of underlying investments of the funds. Issuances and redemptions of certain of the CCT investments may be restricted by date and/or amount. Corporate debt instruments: Corporate debt instruments are valued at the closing price reported on the active market on which they are traded and are classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy. U.S. Treasury instruments: U.S. Treasury instruments are valued at the closing price reported on the active market on which they are traded and are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. U.S. government agency, state, and local government bonds: U.S. government agency obligations and state and municipal debt securities are valued using third-party pricing services and are classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy. The methods described above may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. Furthermore, while the Company believes its valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other market participants’ methods, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different fair value measurement at the reporting date. The following tables set forth, by level within the fair value hierarchy, the fair value of plan assets as of December 31, 2012 and June 30, 2012 and 2011.
|  | Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2012
|  | Quoted Prices in |  |  |  |  |  |
|  | Active Markets |  | Significant Other |  | Significant |  |
|  | for Identical |  | Observable |  | Unobservable |  |
|  | Assets |  | Inputs |  | Inputs |  |
|  | (Level 1) |  | (Level 2) |  | (Level 3) |  | Total
|  | (In millions)
Common stock |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
U.S. companies |  | $ | 182 |  | $ | - |  | $ | - |  | $ | 182
International companies |  |  | 1 |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | 1
Equity mutual funds |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Emerging markets |  |  | 81 |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | 81
International |  |  | 110 |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | 110
Large cap U.S. |  |  | 386 |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | 386
Other |  |  | 1 |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | 1
Common collective trust |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
funds |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
International equity |  |  | - |  |  | 406 |  |  | - |  |  | 406
Large cap U.S. equity |  |  | - |  |  | 17 |  |  | - |  |  | 17
Fixed income |  |  | - |  |  | 373 |  |  | - |  |  | 373
Other |  |  | - |  |  | 47 |  |  | - |  |  | 47
Debt instruments |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Corporate bonds |  |  | - |  |  | 437 |  |  | - |  |  | 437
U.S. Treasury |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
instruments |  |  | 90 |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | 90
U.S. government agency, |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
state and local |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
government bonds |  |  | - |  |  | 39 |  |  | - |  |  | 39
Other |  |  | - |  |  | 4 |  |  | - |  |  | 4
Total assets at fair value |  | $ | 851 |  | $ | 1,323 |  | $ | - |  | $ | 2,174
|  | Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2012
|  | Quoted Prices in |  |  |  |  |  |
|  | Active Markets |  | Significant Other |  | Significant |  |
|  | for Identical |  | Observable |  | Unobservable |  |
|  | Assets |  | Inputs |  | Inputs |  |
|  | (Level 1) |  | (Level 2) |  | (Level 3) |  | Total
|  | (In millions)
Common stock |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
U.S. companies |  | $ | 184 |  | $ | - |  | $ | - |  | $ | 184
International companies |  |  | 2 |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | 2
Equity mutual funds |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Emerging markets |  |  | 77 |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | 77
International |  |  | 109 |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | 109
Large cap U.S. |  |  | 415 |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | 415
Common collective trust |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
funds |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
International equity |  |  | - |  |  | 372 |  |  | - |  |  | 372
Large cap U.S. equity |  |  | - |  |  | 16 |  |  | - |  |  | 16
Fixed income |  |  | - |  |  | 409 |  |  | - |  |  | 409
Other |  |  | - |  |  | 59 |  |  | - |  |  | 59
Debt instruments |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Corporate bonds |  |  | - |  |  | 447 |  |  | - |  |  | 447
U.S. Treasury instruments |  |  | 108 |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | 108
U.S. government agency, |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
state and local government |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
bonds |  |  | - |  |  | 33 |  |  | - |  |  | 33
Other |  |  | - |  |  | 5 |  |  | - |  |  | 5
Total assets at fair value |  | $ | 895 |  | $ | 1,341 |  | $ | - |  | $ | 2,236
|  | Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2011
|  | Quoted Prices in |  |  |  |  |  |
|  | Active Markets |  | Significant Other |  | Significant |  |
|  | for Identical |  | Observable |  | Unobservable |  |
|  | Assets |  | Inputs |  | Inputs |  |
|  | (Level 1) |  | (Level 2) |  | (Level 3) |  | Total
|  | (In millions)
Common stock |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
U.S. companies |  | $ | 180 |  | $ | - |  | $ | - |  | $ | 180
International companies |  |  | 5 |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | 5
Equity mutual funds |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Emerging markets |  |  | 70 |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | 70
International |  |  | 99 |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | 99
Large cap U.S. |  |  | 378 |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | 378
Other |  |  | 1 |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | 1
Common collective trust funds |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
International equity |  |  | - |  |  | 341 |  |  | - |  |  | 341
Large cap U.S. equity |  |  | - |  |  | 24 |  |  | - |  |  | 24
Fixed income |  |  | - |  |  | 444 |  |  | - |  |  | 444
Other |  |  | - |  |  | 60 |  |  | - |  |  | 60
Debt instruments |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Corporate bonds |  |  | - |  |  | 442 |  |  | - |  |  | 442
U.S. Treasury instruments |  |  | 49 |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | 49
U.S. government agency, |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
state and local government |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
bonds |  |  | - |  |  | 35 |  |  | - |  |  | 35
Other |  |  | - |  |  | 6 |  |  | - |  |  | 6
Total assets at fair value |  | $ | 782 |  | $ | 1,352 |  | $ | - |  | $ | 2,134
Level 3 Gains and Losses: There are no Plan assets classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy; therefore there are no gains or losses associated with Level 3 assets. The following table sets forth the actual asset allocation for the Company’s global pension plan assets as of the measurement date:
|  | December 31 | June 30 |  | June 30
|  | 2012(1)(2) |  | 2012(2) |  | 2011(2)
Equity securities |  | 52 | % |  | 51 | % |  | 52 | %
Debt securities |  | 47 | % |  | 48 | % |  | 47 | %
Other |  | 1 | % |  | 1 | % |  | 1 | %
Total |  | 100 | % |  | 100 | % |  | 100 | %
(1) The Company’s U.S. pension plans contain approximately 67% of the Company’s global pension plan assets. The actual asset allocation for the Company’s U.S. pension plans as of the measurement date consists of 60% equity securities and 40% debt securities. The target asset allocation for the Company’s U.S. pension plans is the same as the actual asset allocation. The actual a sset allocation for the Company’s foreign pension plans as of the measurement date consists of 36% equity securities, 61% debt securities, and 3% in other investments. The target asset allocation for the Company’s foreign pension plans is approximately the same as the actual asset allocation. (2) The Company’s pension plans did not hold any shares of Company common stock as of the December 31, 2012 and June 30, 2012 and 2011 measurement dates. Cash dividends received on shares of Company common stock by these plans during the six-month period ended December 31, 2012 and twelve-month period ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, were $0, $0, and $0.1 million, respectively. Investment objectives for the Company’s plan assets are to:
· | Optimize the long-term return on plan assets at an acceptable level of risk.
· | Maintain a broad diversification across asset classes and among investment managers.
· | Maintain careful control of the risk level within each asset class.
Asset allocation targets promote optimal expected return and volatility characteristics given the long-term time horizon for fulfilling the obligations of the pension plans. Selection of the targeted asset allocation for plan assets was based upon a review of the expected return and risk characteristics of each asset class, as well as the correlation of returns among asset classes. The U.S. pension plans target asset allocation is also based on an asset and liability study that is updated periodically. Investment guidelines are established with each investment manager. These guidelines provide the parameters within which the investment managers agree to operate, including criteria that determine eligible and ineligible securities, diversification requirements, and credit quality standards, where applicable. In some countries, derivatives may be used to gain market exposure in an efficient and timely manner; however, derivatives may not be used to leverage the portfolio beyond the market value of underlying investments. The Company uses external consultants to assist in monitoring the investment strategy and asset mix for the Company’s plan assets. To develop the Company’s expected long-term rate of return assumption on plan assets, the Company generally uses long-term historical return information for the targeted asset mix identified in asset and liability studies. Adjustments are made to the expected long-term rate of return assumption when deemed necessary based upon revised expectations of future investment performance of the overall investment markets. Contributions and Expected Future Benefit Payments Based on actuarial calculations, the Company expects to contribute $37 million to the pension plans and $13 million to the postret irement benefit plan during 201 3. The Company may elect to make additional discretionary contributions during this period. The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, are expected to be paid by the benefit plans:
| Pension |  | Postretirement
| Benefits |  | Benefits
| (In millions)
2013 | $ | 112 |  | $ | 13
2014 |  | 115 |  |  | 11
2015 |  | 118 |  |  | 11
2016 |  | 121 |  |  | 12
2017 |  | 125 |  |  | 12
2018-2022 |  | 696 |  |  | 65

X
- Details
Name: | us-gaap_CompensationAndRetirementDisclosureAbstract
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | xbrli:stringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition The entire disclosure for pension and other postretirement benefits. + References Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS) -Number 158 -Paragraph 7, 21, 22 -LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy. Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name FASB Staff Position (FSP) -Number FAS106-2 -Paragraph 20, 21, 22 -LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy. Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Implementation Guide (Q and A) -Number FAS88 -Paragraph 63 -LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy. Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS) -Number 106 -Paragraph 518 -LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy. Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 715 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/topic&trid=2235017 Reference 6: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS) -Number 132R -Paragraph 5, 6, 7, 8 -LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy. Reference 7: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS) -Number 132R -Paragraph 5 -Subparagraph b -LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy. Reference 8: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS) -Number 132R -Paragraph 8 -Subparagraph m -LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy. Reference 9: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS) -Number 87 -Paragraph 264 -LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy. Reference 10: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher AICPA -Name Accounting Principles Board Opinion (APB) -Number 30 -Paragraph 26 -LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy. Reference 11: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) -Number 03-2 -Paragraph 8 -LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy. Reference 12: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS) -Number 132R -Paragraph 5 -Subparagraph h -LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy. Reference 13: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS) -Number 132R -Paragraph 5 -Subparagraph a -LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy. Reference 14: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS) -Number 132R -Paragraph 5 -Subparagraph q -LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy. + Details
Name: | us-gaap_PensionAndOtherPostretirementBenefitsDisclosureTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | nonnum:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration