|
CONTRACTUAL COMMITMENTS, CONTINGENCIES, AND OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
|
12 Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Jun. 30, 2012
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CONTRACTUAL COMMITMENTS, CONTINGENCIES, AND OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS | NOTE 17. CONTRACTUAL COMMITMENTS, CONTINGENCIES, AND OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS In the normal course of business, the Company is subject to various claims and litigation. While the outcome of any claim or litigation is inherently unpredictable, and with the exception of the matter described in the following paragraph, the Company believes that the ultimate resolution of these matters will not, individually or in the aggregate, result in a material impact on its financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. On January 28, 2010, the Company filed a declaratory action in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware (the “Delaware District Court”) against Inveshare, Inc. (the “Defendant”) seeking a declaration by the court that Broadridge does not infringe two U.S. patents owned by the Defendant that included claims related to the delivery and distribution of an electronic solicitation. The Company’s complaint also alleged that the Defendant’s patents are invalid and/or are unenforceable due to inequitable conduct. On March 22, 2010, the Defendant answered the Company’s complaint and filed a counterclaim against the Company alleging that Broadridge uses a process that infringes one of the patents in the action. In its counterclaim, Defendant is seeking injunctive relief and unspecified damages. This lawsuit is in an early procedural stage, with the Delaware District Court recently issuing its claim construction ruling on April 11, 2012; however, due to the limited scope of this matter, the Company believes that the outcome of this litigation would not result in a material adverse impact on its consolidated financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows. The Company entered into a data center outsourcing services agreement with Automatic Data Processing, Inc. (“ADP”) before its spin-off from ADP in March 2007 under which ADP provided the Company with data center services consistent with the services provided to the Company immediately before the spin-off, provided that the operation of the data center is the sole responsibility of ADP. Among the principal services provided by the data center are information technology services and service delivery network services. The agreement with ADP provided for increasing volumes and the addition of new services over the term. Under the agreement, ADP was responsible for hosting the mainframe, midrange, open systems, and networks. Additionally, systems engineering, network engineering, hardware engineering, network operations, data center operations, application change management, and data center disaster recovery services were managed by ADP. The March 2007 agreement expired on June 30, 2012. The Company entered into a short-term extension of the agreement which expires on August 31, 2012. The Company expects to incur $6.3 million in costs in connection with the services to be provided during this term extension. For the fiscal years ended June 30, 2012, 2011 and 2010, the Company recorded expenses of $111.4 million, $110.4 million and $104.8 million, respectively, in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings related to the March 2007 agreement. In March 2010, the Company and International Business Machines Corporation (“IBM”) entered into an Information Technology Services Agreement (the “IT Services Agreement”), under which IBM is providing certain aspects of the Company’s information technology infrastructure that are currently provided under a data center outsourcing services agreement with ADP. Under the IT Services Agreement, IBM provides a broad range of technology services to the Company including supporting its mainframe, midrange, server, network and data center operations, as well as providing disaster recovery services. The Company has the option of incorporating additional services into the agreement over time. The migration of the data center processing from ADP to IBM was substantially completed in June 2012, and is expected to be complete by August 31, 2012. The IT Services Agreement expires on June 30, 2022. The Company has the right to renew the initial term of the IT Services Agreement for up to one additional 12-month term. Commitments remaining under this agreement are $552.6 million through fiscal year 2022, the final year of the contract. For the fiscal years ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company recorded expenses of $24.6 million and $6.3 million, respectively, in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings related to this agreement. The Company capitalized $47.0 million and $5.7 million of costs related to the build out of the IBM data center in Other non-current assets in fiscal years 2012 and 2011, respectively. The Company has obligations under various facilities and equipment leases, software license agreements and data center outsourcing services agreements. Total expense under the above agreements was approximately $203.4 million, $181.3 million and $162.1 million in fiscal years 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively, with minimum commitments under these obligations at June 30, 2012 as follows:
In addition to fixed rentals, certain leases require payment of maintenance and real estate taxes and contain escalation provisions based on future adjustments in price indices. As of June 30, 2012, the Company had purchase commitments of approximately $2.9 million comprised primarily of maintenance contracts, the majority of which relate to fiscal year 2013. As of June 30, 2012, the Company had an outstanding letter of credit for $0.7 million. This letter of credit was issued in May 2007 to guarantee certain claim payments to a third-party insurance company in the event the Company does not pay its portion of the claims. No amounts were drawn on this letter of credit. In addition, the Company has obligations under various facilities and equipment leases and software license agreements. It is not the Company’s business practice to enter into off-balance sheet arrangements. However, the Company is exposed to market risk from changes in foreign currency exchange rates that could impact its financial position, results of operations, and cash flows. The Company manages its exposure to these market risks through its regular operating and financing activities and, when deemed appropriate, through the use of derivative financial instruments. The Company may use derivative financial instruments as risk management tools and not for trading purposes. The Company was not a party to any derivative financial instruments as of June 30, 2012 and June 30, 2011, respectively. In the normal course of business, the Company also enters into contracts in which it makes representations and warranties that relate to the performance of the Company’s products and services. The Company does not expect any material losses related to such representations and warranties, or collateral arrangements. Our operations outsourcing and mutual fund processing services are performed by registered broker-dealers. As registered broker-dealers and members of FINRA, they are subject to regulations concerning many aspects of their business, including trade practices, capital requirements, record retention, money laundering prevention, the protection of customer funds and customer securities, and the supervision of the conduct of directors, officers and employees. A failure to comply with any of these laws, rules or regulations could result in censure, fine, the issuance of cease-and-desist orders, or the suspension or revocation of SEC or FINRA authorization granted to allow the operation of their businesses or disqualification of their directors, officers or employees. In addition, as registered broker-dealers, they are required to participate in the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (“SIPC”) for the benefit of customers. In addition, MG Trust Company, LLC (“MG Trust”), a subsidiary of Matrix, is a Colorado State non-depository trust company whose primary business is to provide cash agent, custodial and directed or non-discretionary trust services to institutional customers. MG Trust operates pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Colorado Division of Banking. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||