XML 28 R12.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT
v3.23.2

Loans Held for Investment and Allowance for Credit Losses | 12 Months Ended
--- | ---
Jun. 30, 2023
Receivables [Abstract] |
Loans Held for Investment and Allowance for Credit Losses | Loans Held for Investment and Allowance for Credit Losses Loans held for investment consisted of the following (in thousands):
|  | June 30, 2023 |  | June 30, 2022
Unpaid principal balance |  | $ | 4,451,324 |  |  | $ | 2,516,733 |
Accrued interest receivable |  | 41,079 |  |  | 20,697 |
Premiums on loans held for investment |  | 7,135 |  |  | 8,911 |
Less: Discount due to loss on loan purchase commitment |  | (51,190) |  |  | (20,692) |
Less: Discount due to loss on directly originated loans |  | (45,145) |  |  | (20,443) |
Less: Fair value adjustment on loans acquired through business combination |  | (241) |  |  | (1,645) |
Total loans held for investment |  | $ | 4,402,962 |  |  | $ | 2,503,561 |
Loans held for investment includes loans originated through our originating bank partners and directly originated loans. The majority of the loans that are underwritten using our technology platform and originated by our originating bank partners are later purchased by us. We purchased loans from our originating bank partners in the amount of $16.2 billion, $12.1 billion, and $7.9 billion for the years ended June 30, 2023, 2022, and 2021, respectively. We directly originated $3.7 billion, $3.3 billion, and $0.6 billion of loans for the years ended June 30, 2023, 2022, and 2021, respectively. These loans have a variety of lending terms as well as maturities ranging from one to sixty months. Given that our loan portfolio focuses on one product segment, point-of-sale unsecured installment loans, we generally evaluate the entire portfolio as a single homogeneous loan portfolio and make merchant or program specific adjustments as necessary. We closely monitor credit quality for our loan receivables to manage and evaluate our related exposure to credit risk. Credit risk management begins with initial underwriting, where loan applications are assessed against the credit underwriting policy and procedures for our directly originated loans and originating bank partner loans, and continues through to full repayment of a loan. To assess a consumer who requests a loan, we use, among other indicators, internally developed risk models using detailed information from external sources, such as credit bureaus where available, and internal historical experience, including the consumer’s prior repayment history on our platform as well as other measures. We combine these factors to establish a proprietary score as a credit quality indicator. Our proprietary score (“ITACs”) is assigned to most loans facilitated through our technology platform, ranging from zero to 100, with 100 representing the highest credit quality and therefore the lowest likelihood of loss. The ITACs model analyzes the characteristics of a consumer's attributes that are shown to be predictive of both willingness and ability to repay including, but not limited to: basic features of a consumer's credit profile, a consumer's prior repayment performance with other creditors, current credit utilization, and legal and policy changes. When a consumer passes both fraud and credit policy checks, the application is assigned an ITACs score. ITACs is also used for portfolio performance monitoring. Our credit risk team closely tracks the distribution of ITACs at the portfolio level, as well as ITACs at the individual loan level to monitor for signs of a changing credit profile within the portfolio. Repayment performance within each ITACs band is also monitored to support both the integrity of the risk scoring models and to measure possible changes in consumer behavior amongst various credit tiers. The following table presents an analysis of the credit quality, by ITACs score, of the amortized cost basis excluding accrued interest receivable, by fiscal year of origination on loans held for investment and loans held for sale as of June 30, 2023 (in thousands):
June 30, 2023
|  | Amortized Costs Basis by Fiscal Year of Origination |  |
|  | 2023 |  | 2022 |  | 2021 |  | 2020 |  | 2019 |  | Prior |  | Total
96+ |  | $ | 2,628,060 |  |  | $ | 39,428 |  |  | $ | 18,910 |  |  | $ | 3,439 |  |  | $ | 9 |  |  | $ | 1 |  |  | $ | 2,689,847 |
94 – 96 |  | 1,104,553 |  |  | 7,755 |  |  | 439 |  |  | 77 |  |  | 6 |  |  | 2 |  |  | 1,112,832 |
90 – 94 |  | 133,940 |  |  | 3,116 |  |  | 26 |  |  | 2 |  |  | 4 |  |  | — |  |  | 137,088 |
<90 |  | 13,363 |  |  | 1,623 |  |  | 4 |  |  | 2 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 14,992 |
No score(1) |  | 335,690 |  |  | 59,204 |  |  | 11,562 |  |  | 489 |  |  | 252 |  |  | 9 |  |  | 407,206 |
Total amortized cost basis |  | $ | 4,215,606 |  |  | $ | 111,126 |  |  | $ | 30,941 |  |  | $ | 4,009 |  |  | $ | 271 |  |  | $ | 12 |  |  | $ | 4,361,965 |
(1)This balance represents loan receivables in markets without sufficient data currently available for use by the Affirm scoring methodology including loan receivables originated in Canada. The following table presents net charge-offs by fiscal year of origination for the year ended June 30, 2023 (in thousands):
|  | Net Charge-offs by Fiscal Year of Origination |  |
|  | 2023 |  | 2022 |  | 2021 |  | 2020 |  | 2019 |  | Prior |  | Total
Current period charge-offs |  | (119,520) |  |  | (173,345) |  |  | (6,482) |  |  | (586) |  |  | (89) |  |  | (36) |  |  | (300,058) |
Current period recoveries |  | 5,997 |  |  | 17,719 |  |  | 4,653 |  |  | 1,259 |  |  | 794 |  |  | 587 |  |  | 31,009 |
Current period net charge-offs |  | $ | (113,523) |  |  | $ | (155,626) |  |  | $ | (1,829) |  |  | $ | 673 |  |  | $ | 705 |  |  | $ | 551 |  |  | $ | (269,049) |
The following table presents an analysis of the credit quality, by ITACS score, of the amortized cost basis excluding accrued interest receivable, by fiscal year of origination on loans held for investment and loans held for sale as of June 30, 2022 (in thousands):
June 30, 2022
|  | Amortized Costs Basis by Fiscal Year of Origination |  |
|  | 2022 |  | 2021 |  | 2020 |  | 2019 |  | 2018 |  | Prior |  | Total
96+ |  | $ | 1,218,104 |  |  | $ | 122,503 |  |  | $ | 33,458 |  |  | $ | 157 |  |  | $ | 1 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 1,374,223 |
94 – 96 |  | 620,403 |  |  | 11,240 |  |  | 773 |  |  | 13 |  |  | 2 |  |  | — |  |  | 632,431 |
90 – 94 |  | 220,056 |  |  | 3,886 |  |  | 6 |  |  | 4 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 223,952 |
<90 |  | 44,300 |  |  | 135 |  |  | 2 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 44,437 |
No score(1) |  | 186,044 |  |  | 20,554 |  |  | 3,368 |  |  | 444 |  |  | 79 |  |  | 2 |  |  | 210,491 |
Total amortized cost basis |  | $ | 2,288,907 |  |  | $ | 158,318 |  |  | $ | 37,607 |  |  | $ | 618 |  |  | $ | 82 |  |  | $ | 2 |  |  | $ | 2,485,534 |
(1)This balance represents loan receivables in markets without sufficient data currently available for use by the Affirm scoring methodology including loan receivables originated in Canada. Loan receivables are defined as past due if either the principal or interest have not been received within four calendars days of when they are due in accordance with the agreed upon contractual terms. The following table presents an aging analysis of the amortized cost basis excluding accrued interest receivable of loans held for investment and loans held for sale by delinquency status (in thousands):
|  | June 30, 2023 |  | June 30, 2022
Non-delinquent loans |  | $ | 4,183,248 |  |  | $ | 2,322,919 |
4 – 29 calendar days past due |  | 92,876 |  |  | 77,963 |
30 – 59 calendar days past due |  | 36,399 |  |  | 34,669 |
60 – 89 calendar days past due |  | 28,171 |  |  | 26,919 |
90 – 119 calendar days past due(1) |  | 21,271 |  |  | 23,064 |
Total amortized cost basis |  | $ | 4,361,965 |  |  | $ | 2,485,534 |
(1)Includes $20.9 million and $22.7 million of loan receivables as of June 30, 2023 and June 30, 2022, respectively, that are 90 days or more past due, but are not on nonaccrual status. We maintain an allowance for credit losses at a level sufficient to absorb expected credit losses based on evaluating known and inherent risks in our loan portfolio. The allowance for credit losses is determined based on our current estimate of expected credit losses over the remaining contractual term, historical credit losses, consumer payment trends, estimates of recoveries, and future expectations as of each balance sheet date. Adjustments to the allowance each period for changes in our estimate of lifetime expected credit losses are recognized in earnings through the provision for credit losses presented on our consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. When available information confirms that specific loans or portions thereof are uncollectible, identified amounts are charged against the allowance for credit losses. Loans are charged-off in accordance with our charge-off policy, as the contractual principal becomes 120 days past due. Subsequent recoveries of the unpaid principal balance, if any, are credited to the allowance for credit losses. The following table details activity in the allowance for credit losses, including charge-offs, recoveries and provision for loan losses (in thousands):
|  | Year ended June 30,
|  | 2023 |  | 2022 |  | 2021
Balance at beginning of period |  | $ | 155,392 |  |  | $ | 117,760 |  |  | $ | 95,137 |
Adjustment due to adoption of new accounting standard |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 10,083 |
Provision for credit losses |  | 318,188 |  |  | 240,804 |  |  | 63,755 |
Charge-offs |  | (300,058) |  |  | (227,770) |  |  | (65,149) |
Recoveries of charged-off receivables |  | 31,009 |  |  | 24,598 |  |  | 13,934 |
Balance at end of period |  | $ | 204,531 |  |  | $ | 155,392 |  |  | $ | 117,760 |

X
- Definition The entire disclosure for financing receivable. + References Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/disclosureRef -Topic 310 -SubTopic 10 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Section 50 -Paragraph 42 -Subparagraph (a)(2) -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org//1943274/2147481962/310-10-50-42 Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/exampleRef -Topic 310 -SubTopic 10 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Section 55 -Paragraph 12A -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org//1943274/2147481933/310-10-55-12A Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/disclosureRef -Topic 310 -SubTopic 10 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Section 50 -Paragraph 44 -Subparagraph (a)(1) -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org//1943274/2147481962/310-10-50-44 Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/disclosureRef -Topic 310 -SubTopic 10 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org//310-10/tableOfContent Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/disclosureRef -Topic 310 -SubTopic 20 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org//310-20/tableOfContent + Details
Name: | us-gaap_FinancingReceivablesTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | dtr-types:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- References No definition available. + Details
Name: | us-gaap_ReceivablesAbstract
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | xbrli:stringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration