UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
| |
|
|
| (Mark One) |
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
| |
| |
|
For the quarterly period ended July 29, 2005 |
| |
|
or |
| |
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
| |
| |
|
For the transition period
from to |
Commission file number 0-27130
Network Appliance, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| |
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
77-0307520 |
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(IRS Employer |
|
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
495 East Java Drive,
Sunnyvale, California 94089
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip
code)
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
(408) 822-6000
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated
filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Act). Yes o No þ
Number of shares outstanding of the registrants common
stock, $0.001 par value, as of the latest practicable date.
| |
|
|
| Class |
|
Outstanding at July 29, 2005 |
| |
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
367,932,522 |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
| Item 1. |
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited) |
NETWORK APPLIANCE, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands unaudited)
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
July 29, | |
|
April 30, | |
| |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
ASSETS |
|
Current Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
231,585 |
|
|
$ |
193,542 |
|
| |
Short-term investments
|
|
|
983,153 |
|
|
|
976,423 |
|
| |
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $5,037 at
July 29, 2005 and $5,445 at April 30, 2005
|
|
|
239,015 |
|
|
|
296,885 |
|
| |
Inventories
|
|
|
40,343 |
|
|
|
38,983 |
|
| |
Prepaid expenses and other
|
|
|
32,663 |
|
|
|
32,472 |
|
| |
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
35,558 |
|
|
|
37,584 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
1,562,317 |
|
|
|
1,575,889 |
|
|
Property and Equipment, net
|
|
|
443,760 |
|
|
|
418,749 |
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
297,661 |
|
|
|
291,816 |
|
|
Intangible Assets, net
|
|
|
23,982 |
|
|
|
21,448 |
|
|
Other Assets
|
|
|
68,943 |
|
|
|
64,745 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
$ |
2,396,663 |
|
|
$ |
2,372,647 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
Current Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Accounts payable
|
|
$ |
80,579 |
|
|
$ |
83,572 |
|
| |
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
14,251 |
|
|
|
20,823 |
|
| |
Accrued compensation and related benefits
|
|
|
66,839 |
|
|
|
100,534 |
|
| |
Other accrued liabilities
|
|
|
55,414 |
|
|
|
53,262 |
|
| |
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
278,705 |
|
|
|
261,998 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
495,788 |
|
|
|
520,189 |
|
|
Long-Term Deferred Revenue
|
|
|
206,705 |
|
|
|
187,180 |
|
|
Long-Term Obligations
|
|
|
3,340 |
|
|
|
4,474 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
705,833 |
|
|
|
711,843 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Common stock (385,761 shares at July 29, 2005 and
381,509 shares at April 30, 2005)
|
|
|
386 |
|
|
|
381 |
|
| |
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
1,418,974 |
|
|
|
1,347,352 |
|
| |
Deferred stock compensation
|
|
|
(17,633 |
) |
|
|
(15,782 |
) |
| |
Treasury stock (17,828 shares at July 29, 2005 and
14,566 shares at April 30, 2005)
|
|
|
(424,618 |
) |
|
|
(329,075 |
) |
| |
Retained earnings
|
|
|
722,098 |
|
|
|
661,978 |
|
| |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(8,377 |
) |
|
|
(4,050 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
1,690,830 |
|
|
|
1,660,804 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
$ |
2,396,663 |
|
|
$ |
2,372,647 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements.
3
NETWORK APPLIANCE, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In thousands, except per share amounts
unaudited)
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Three Months Ended | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
July 29, | |
|
July 30, | |
| |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Product revenue
|
|
$ |
394,630 |
|
|
$ |
324,627 |
|
| |
Service revenue
|
|
|
53,773 |
|
|
|
33,794 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
448,403 |
|
|
|
358,421 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Cost of product revenue
|
|
|
133,755 |
|
|
|
114,215 |
|
| |
Cost of service revenue
|
|
|
41,162 |
|
|
|
29,248 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Total cost of revenues
|
|
|
174,917 |
|
|
|
143,463 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Gross margin
|
|
|
273,486 |
|
|
|
214,958 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
137,299 |
|
|
|
103,311 |
|
| |
Research and development
|
|
|
50,802 |
|
|
|
38,703 |
|
| |
General and administrative
|
|
|
21,041 |
|
|
|
16,882 |
|
| |
Stock compensation(1)
|
|
|
2,028 |
|
|
|
2,104 |
|
| |
Restructuring recoveries
|
|
|
(1,256 |
) |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
209,914 |
|
|
|
161,000 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from Operations
|
|
|
63,572 |
|
|
|
53,958 |
|
|
Other Income (Expense), net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Interest income
|
|
|
9,048 |
|
|
|
4,082 |
|
| |
Other expenses, net
|
|
|
(272 |
) |
|
|
(912 |
) |
| |
Net gain on investments
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Total other income, net
|
|
|
8,809 |
|
|
|
3,170 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before Income Taxes
|
|
|
72,381 |
|
|
|
57,128 |
|
|
Provision for Income Taxes
|
|
|
12,261 |
|
|
|
10,266 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
$ |
60,120 |
|
|
$ |
46,862 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income per Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Basic
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Diluted
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Used in per Share Calculations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Basic
|
|
|
367,438 |
|
|
|
356,743 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Diluted
|
|
|
386,383 |
|
|
|
372,974 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Stock compensation includes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
$ |
515 |
|
|
$ |
510 |
|
| |
|
Research and development
|
|
|
1,358 |
|
|
|
1,384 |
|
| |
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
$ |
2,028 |
|
|
$ |
2,104 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements.
4
NETWORK APPLIANCE, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands unaudited)
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Three Months Ended | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
July 29, | |
|
July 30, | |
| |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Net income
|
|
$ |
60,120 |
|
|
$ |
46,862 |
|
| |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
14,756 |
|
|
|
13,242 |
|
| |
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
2,671 |
|
|
|
2,333 |
|
| |
|
Amortization of patents
|
|
|
495 |
|
|
|
450 |
|
| |
|
Stock compensation
|
|
|
2,028 |
|
|
|
2,104 |
|
| |
|
Net gain on investments
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
(29 |
) |
| |
|
Net loss on disposal of equipment
|
|
|
404 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
| |
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
(379 |
) |
|
|
(154 |
) |
| |
|
Deferred rent
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
| |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
57,892 |
|
|
|
(5,757 |
) |
| |
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(4,998 |
) |
|
|
(3,331 |
) |
| |
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
(3,997 |
) |
|
|
(1,429 |
) |
| |
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(2,691 |
) |
|
|
(1,075 |
) |
| |
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
9,648 |
|
|
|
4,851 |
|
| |
|
|
Accrued compensation and related benefits
|
|
|
(32,418 |
) |
|
|
(14,535 |
) |
| |
|
|
Other accrued liabilities
|
|
|
(1,302 |
) |
|
|
2,697 |
|
| |
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
36,716 |
|
|
|
30,342 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
138,960 |
|
|
|
76,668 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Purchases of investments
|
|
|
(222,787 |
) |
|
|
(148,646 |
) |
| |
Redemptions of investments
|
|
|
213,977 |
|
|
|
139,045 |
|
| |
Increase in restricted cash
|
|
|
(1,504 |
) |
|
|
|
|
| |
Purchases of property and equipment
|
|
|
(33,538 |
) |
|
|
(32,265 |
) |
| |
Proceeds from sales of investments
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
298 |
|
| |
Purchases of equity securities
|
|
|
(275 |
) |
|
|
|
|
| |
Purchase of business, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(11,831 |
) |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(55,896 |
) |
|
|
(41,568 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Proceeds from sale of common stock related to employee stock
transactions
|
|
|
50,763 |
|
|
|
23,202 |
|
| |
Tax withholding payments reimbursed by restricted stock
|
|
|
(419 |
) |
|
|
|
|
| |
Repurchases of common stock
|
|
|
(95,543 |
) |
|
|
(47,742 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(45,199 |
) |
|
|
(24,540 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash and Cash
Equivalents
|
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
334 |
|
|
Net Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
|
|
38,043 |
|
|
|
10,894 |
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Beginning of period
|
|
|
193,542 |
|
|
|
92,328 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
End of period
|
|
$ |
231,585 |
|
|
$ |
103,222 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncash Investing and Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Conversion of evaluation inventory to fixed assets
|
|
$ |
3,638 |
|
|
$ |
2,729 |
|
| |
Deferred stock compensation, net of reversals
|
|
$ |
2,634 |
|
|
$ |
(546 |
) |
| |
Income tax benefit from employee stock transactions
|
|
$ |
16,289 |
|
|
$ |
5,692 |
|
| |
Acquisition of property and equipment on account
|
|
$ |
3,561 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
| |
Options assumed for acquired business
|
|
$ |
2,314 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Income taxes paid
|
|
$ |
2,014 |
|
|
$ |
6,826 |
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements.
5
NETWORK APPLIANCE, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
(Dollar and share amounts in thousands, except per-share
data)
(Unaudited)
Based in Sunnyvale, California, Network Appliance was
incorporated in California in April 1992 and reincorporated in
Delaware in November 2001. Network Appliance, Inc. is a leading
supplier of enterprise storage and data management software and
hardware products and services. Our solutions help global
enterprises meet major information technology challenges such as
managing storage growth, assuring secure and timely information
access, protecting data and controlling costs by providing
innovative solutions that simplify the complexity associated
with managing corporate data. Network Appliance solutions are
the data management and storage foundation for many of the
worlds leading corporations and government agencies.
|
|
| 2. |
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements |
The accompanying interim unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements have been prepared by Network Appliance,
Inc. without audit and reflect all adjustments, consisting only
of normal recurring adjustments which are, in the opinion of
management, necessary for a fair presentation of our financial
position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim
periods presented. The statements have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America (generally accepted accounting
principles) for interim financial information and in
accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and
Article 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do
not include all information and footnotes required by generally
accepted accounting principles for annual consolidated financial
statements. Certain prior period balances have been reclassified
to conform with the current period presentation.
We operate on a 52-week or 53-week year ending on the last
Friday in April. For presentation purposes we have indicated in
the accompanying interim unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements that our fiscal year end is April 30.
The first quarters of fiscal 2006 and 2005 were both 13-week
fiscal periods.
These financial statements should be read in conjunction with
the audited consolidated financial statements and accompanying
notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended April 30, 2005. The results of operations for
the three-month period ended July 29, 2005 are not
necessarily indicative of the operating results to be expected
for the full fiscal year or future operating periods. In the
following notes to our interim condensed consolidated financial
statements, Network Appliance Inc. is also referred to as
we, our and us.
The preparation of the condensed consolidated financial
statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the condensed consolidated financial statements and the reported
amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
Such estimates include, but are not limited to, revenue
recognition and allowances; valuation of goodwill and
intangibles; accounting for income taxes; inventory reserves and
write-down; restructuring accruals; impairment losses on
investments; accounting for stock-based compensation; and loss
contingencies. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
We account for stock-based compensation in accordance with the
provisions of Accounting Principle Board Opinion
(APB) No. 25, Accounting for Stock
Issued to Employees, and comply with the disclosure
provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 123. Deferred compensation
6
NETWORK APPLIANCE, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
recognized under APB No. 25 is amortized ratably to expense
over the vesting periods. We account for stock options issued to
non-employees in accordance with the provisions of
SFAS No. 123 under the fair value based method.
We amortize deferred stock-based compensation ratably over the
vesting periods of the applicable stock purchase rights,
restricted stocks and stock options, generally four years.
Deferred stock compensation under APB No. 25 and pro forma
net income under the provisions of SFAS No. 123 are
adjusted to reflect cancellations and forfeitures due to
employee terminations as they occur.
We recorded $1,982 and $2,027 of deferred compensation expense
for the three-month periods ended July 29, 2005 and
July 30, 2004, respectively, primarily related to the
amortization of deferred stock compensation from unvested
options assumed in the acquisitions, the retention escrow shares
relative to Spinnaker, the grant of stock options to certain
highly compensated employees below fair value at the date of
grant (discontinued as of December 31, 2004) and the award
of restricted stock to certain employees.
Based on deferred stock compensation recorded at July 29,
2005, estimated future deferred stock compensation amortization
for the remainder of fiscal year 2006, fiscal years 2007, 2008
and 2009 are expected to be $5,981, $6,550, $4,385 and $718,
respectively, and none thereafter.
We recorded $46 and $77 in compensation expense in the
three-month periods ending July 29, 2005 and July 30,
2004, for the fair value of options granted to a member of the
Board of Directors in recognition for services performed outside
of the normal capacity of a board member.
Had compensation expense been determined based on the fair value
at the grant date for awards, consistent with the provisions of
SFAS No. 123, the impact on net income and net income
per share would be as follows:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Three Months Ended | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
July 29, | |
|
July 30, | |
| |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Net income as reported
|
|
$ |
60,120 |
|
|
$ |
46,862 |
|
|
Add: stock based employee compensation expense included in
reported net income under APB No. 25, net of related tax
effects
|
|
|
1,217 |
|
|
|
1,216 |
|
|
Deduct: total stock based compensation determined under fair
value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects
|
|
|
(24,648 |
) |
|
|
(18,551 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Pro forma net income
|
|
$ |
36,689 |
|
|
$ |
29,527 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per share, as reported
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per share, as reported
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per share, pro forma
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per share, pro forma
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
NETWORK APPLIANCE, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out
basis) or market. Inventories consist of the following:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
July 29, | |
|
April 30, | |
| |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Purchased components
|
|
$ |
18,642 |
|
|
$ |
15,784 |
|
|
Work in process
|
|
|
1,063 |
|
|
|
686 |
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
20,638 |
|
|
|
22,513 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
$ |
40,343 |
|
|
$ |
38,983 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 6. |
Goodwill and Intangible Assets |
Goodwill is reviewed annually for impairment (or more frequently
if indicators of impairment arise). We completed our annual
impairment assessment in fiscal 2005 and concluded that goodwill
was not impaired. In the first quarter of fiscal 2006, there
were no indicators that would suggest the impairment of goodwill
and intangible assets.
During May 2005, we acquired Alacritus Inc.
(Alacritus) and recorded goodwill of $5,845 and
intangible assets of $5,700 resulting from the allocation of the
purchase price. See Note 14, Business
Combination.
Balances as of July 29, 2005 and April 30, 2005 are
summarized as follows:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
July 29, 2005 | |
|
April 30, 2005 | |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
Amortization Period | |
|
Gross | |
|
Accumulated | |
|
|
|
Gross | |
|
Accumulated | |
|
Net | |
| |
|
(Years) | |
|
Assets | |
|
Amortization | |
|
Net Assets | |
|
Assets | |
|
Amortization | |
|
Assets | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Intangible Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Patents
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
$ |
10,040 |
|
|
$ |
(3,962 |
) |
|
$ |
6,078 |
|
|
$ |
10,040 |
|
|
$ |
(3,467 |
) |
|
$ |
6,573 |
|
| |
Existing technology
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
38,525 |
|
|
|
(21,620 |
) |
|
|
16,905 |
|
|
|
33,525 |
|
|
|
(20,512 |
) |
|
|
13,013 |
|
| |
Trademarks/tradenames
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
(134 |
) |
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
(111 |
) |
|
|
169 |
|
| |
Customer Contracts/ relationships
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
1,100 |
|
|
|
(1,069 |
) |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
1,100 |
|
|
|
(885 |
) |
|
|
215 |
|
| |
Covenants Not to Compete
|
|
|
1.5 2 |
|
|
|
8,310 |
|
|
|
(7,488 |
) |
|
|
822 |
|
|
|
7,610 |
|
|
|
(6,132 |
) |
|
|
1,478 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Intangible Assets, Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
58,255 |
|
|
$ |
(34,273 |
) |
|
$ |
23,982 |
|
|
$ |
52,555 |
|
|
$ |
(31,107 |
) |
|
$ |
21,448 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense for identified intangible assets is
summarized below:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Three Months Ended | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
July 29, | |
|
July 30, | |
| |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Patents
|
|
$ |
495 |
|
|
$ |
450 |
|
|
Existing technology
|
|
|
1,108 |
|
|
|
858 |
|
|
Other identified intangibles
|
|
|
1,563 |
|
|
|
1,475 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
$ |
3,166 |
|
|
$ |
2,783 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
NETWORK APPLIANCE, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Based on the identified intangible assets recorded at
July 29, 2005, the future amortization expense of
identified intangibles for the remainder of fiscal 2006 and the
next four fiscal years and thereafter is as follows:
| |
|
|
|
|
| Year Ending April, |
|
Amount | |
| |
|
| |
|
Remainder of Fiscal 2006
|
|
$ |
5,385 |
|
|
2007
|
|
|
6,838 |
|
|
2008
|
|
|
6,414 |
|
|
2009
|
|
|
4,196 |
|
|
2010
|
|
|
1,149 |
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
23,982 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| 7. |
Derivative Instruments |
As a result of our significant international operations, we are
subject to risks associated with fluctuating exchange rates. We
use derivative financial instruments, principally currency
forward contracts and currency options, to attempt to minimize
the impact of exchange rate movements on our balance sheet and
operating results. Factors that could have an impact on the
effectiveness of our hedging program include the accuracy of
forecasts and the volatility of foreign currency markets. These
programs reduce, but do not always entirely eliminate, the
impact of currency exchange movements. The maturities of these
instruments are generally less than one year.
Currently, we do not enter into any foreign exchange forward
contracts to hedge exposures related to firm commitments or
equity investments. Our major foreign currency exchange
exposures and related hedging programs are described below:
|
|
| |
Balance Sheet Exposures. We utilize foreign currency
forward and options contracts to hedge exchange rate
fluctuations related to certain foreign assets and liabilities.
Gains and losses on these derivatives offset gains and losses on
the assets and liabilities being hedged and the net amount is
included in earnings. For the three-month period ended
July 29, 2005, net gains generated by hedged assets and
liabilities totaled $3,450 and were offset by losses on the
related derivative instruments of $3,713. For the three-month
period ended July 30, 2004, net gains generated by hedged
assets and liabilities totaled $1,288, and were offset by losses
on the related derivative instruments of $2,216. |
| |
| |
The premiums paid on the foreign currency option contracts are
recognized as a reduction to other income when the contract is
entered into. Other than the risk associated with the financial
condition of the counterparties, our maximum exposure related to
foreign currency options is limited to the premiums paid. |
| |
| |
Forecasted Transactions. We use currency forward
contracts to hedge exposures related to forecasted sales and
operating expenses denominated in certain foreign currencies.
These contracts are designated as cash flow hedges and in
general closely match the underlying forecasted transactions in
duration. The contracts are carried on the balance sheet at fair
value and the effective portion of the contracts gains and
losses is recorded as other comprehensive income until the
forecasted transaction occurs. |
| |
| |
If the underlying forecasted transactions do not occur, or it
becomes probable that they will not occur, the gain or loss on
the related cash flow hedge is recognized immediately in
earnings. For the three-month periods ended July 29, 2005
and July 30, 2004, we did not record any gains or losses
related to forecasted transactions that did not occur or became
improbable. |
9
NETWORK APPLIANCE, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
As of July 29, 2005, our notional fair values of foreign
exchange forward and foreign currency option contracts totaled
$224,220. We do not believe that these derivatives present
significant credit risks, because the counterparties to the
derivatives consist of major financial institutions, and we
manage the notional amount of contracts entered into with any
one counterparty. We do not enter into derivative financial
instruments for speculative or trading purposes. Other than the
risk associated with the financial condition of the
counterparties, our maximum exposure related to foreign currency
forward and option contracts is limited to the premiums paid.
Basic net income per share is computed by dividing income
available to common stockholders by the weighted average number
of common shares outstanding excluding unvested restricted stock
for that period. Diluted net income per share is computed giving
effect to all dilutive potential shares that were outstanding
during the period. Dilutive potential common shares consist of
incremental common shares subject to repurchase, common shares
issuable upon exercise of stock options and restricted stock
awards.
During all periods presented, we had certain options
outstanding, which could potentially dilute basic earnings per
share in the future, but were excluded in the computation of
diluted earnings per share in such periods, as their effect
would have been antidilutive. These certain options were
antidilutive in the three-month periods ended July 29, 2005
and July 30, 2004 as these options exercise prices
were above the average market prices in such periods. For the
three-month periods ended July 29, 2005 and July 30,
2004, 17,969 and 27,992 shares of common stock options with
a weighted average exercise price of $49.80 and $38.88,
respectively, were excluded from the diluted net income per
share computation.
The following is a reconciliation of the numerators and
denominators of the basic and diluted net income per share
computations for the periods presented:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Three Months Ended | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
July 29, | |
|
July 30, | |
| |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Net Income (Numerator):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Net income, basic and diluted
|
|
$ |
60,120 |
|
|
$ |
46,862 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares (Denominator):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
367,842 |
|
|
|
357,290 |
|
| |
Weighted average common shares outstanding subject to repurchase
|
|
|
(404 |
) |
|
|
(547 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Shares used in basic computation
|
|
|
367,438 |
|
|
|
356,743 |
|
| |
Weighted average common shares outstanding subject to repurchase
|
|
|
404 |
|
|
|
547 |
|
| |
Common shares issuable upon exercise of stock options
|
|
|
18,541 |
|
|
|
15,684 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Shares used in diluted computation
|
|
|
386,383 |
|
|
|
372,974 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income Per Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Basic
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Diluted
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
NETWORK APPLIANCE, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
In the first quarter of fiscal 2006, our Board of Directors
approved an increase in the amount authorized to be used to
repurchase common shares from $350,000 to $650,000. Share
repurchase activities for the first quarters of fiscal 2006 and
2005, were as follows:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Three Months Ended | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
July 29, | |
|
July 30, | |
| |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Shares repurchased
|
|
|
3,262 |
|
|
|
2,460 |
|
|
Cost of shares repurchased
|
|
$ |
95,543 |
|
|
$ |
47,742 |
|
|
Average price per share
|
|
$ |
29.29 |
|
|
$ |
19.41 |
|
Since the inception of the stock repurchase program through
July 29, 2005, we have purchased a total of
17,828 shares of our common stock at an average price of
$23.82 per share for an aggregate purchase price of
$424,618. At July 29, 2005, $225,382 remained available for
repurchases under the plan.
The components of comprehensive income, were as follows:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Three Months Ended | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
July 29, | |
|
July 30, | |
| |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
60,120 |
|
|
$ |
46,862 |
|
|
Currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
(1,838 |
) |
|
|
(1,363 |
) |
|
Unrealized loss on investments
|
|
|
(4,106 |
) |
|
|
(1,307 |
) |
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives
|
|
|
1,617 |
|
|
|
(656 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
$ |
55,793 |
|
|
$ |
43,536 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss were as
follows:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
July 29, | |
|
April 30, | |
| |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Accumulated translation adjustments
|
|
$ |
(556 |
) |
|
$ |
1,283 |
|
|
Accumulated unrealized loss on available-for-sale investments
|
|
|
(9,549 |
) |
|
|
(5,444 |
) |
|
Accumulated realized gain on derivatives
|
|
|
1,728 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
$ |
(8,377 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,050 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 10. |
Restructuring Charges |
In fiscal 2002, as a result of continuing unfavorable economic
conditions and a reduction in IT spending rates, we implemented
two restructuring plans, which included reductions in workforce
and consolidations of facilities. As of July 29, 2005, we
have no outstanding balance in our restructuring liability for
the first restructuring. The second restructuring related to the
closure of an engineering facility and consolidation of
resources to the Sunnyvale headquarters. As a result of this
restructuring, we incurred a charge of $5,850. The restructuring
charge included $813 of severance-related amounts, $4,564 of
committed excess facilities and facility closure expenses, and
$473 in fixed assets write-offs. Of the restructuring reserve
balance at July 29,
11
NETWORK APPLIANCE, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
2005, $566 was included in other accrued liabilities and the
remaining $2,591 was classified as long-term obligations, all
relating to the facility charges for the second restructuring.
Our restructuring estimates are reviewed and revised
periodically and may result in a substantial charge to
restructuring expense should different conditions prevail than
were anticipated in previous management estimates. Such
estimates included various assumptions such as the time period
over which the facilities will be vacant, expected sublease
terms, and expected sublease rates. During the first quarter of
fiscal 2006, we recorded a reduction in restructuring reserve of
$1,256 resulting from the execution of new sublease agreement
for our Tewksbury facility.
The following analysis sets forth the changes in the
restructuring reserve for the three months ended July 29,
2005 (in thousands):
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Facility | |
| |
|
Accrual | |
| |
|
| |
|
Reserve balance at April 30, 2004
|
|
$ |
5,208 |
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(705 |
) |
|
Reserve balance at April 30, 2005
|
|
|
4,503 |
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(90 |
) |
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
(1,256 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
Reserve balance at July 29, 2005
|
|
$ |
3,157 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| 11. |
Short-Term Investments |
All our investments are classified as available for sale at
July 29, 2005 and April 30, 2005. Available-for-sale
investments with original maturities of greater than three
months are classified as short-term investments, as these
investments generally consist of highly marketable securities
that are intended to be available to meet current cash
requirements. Investment securities classified as
available-for-sale are reported at fair market value, and net
unrealized gains or losses are recorded in accumulated other
comprehensive loss, a separate component of stockholders
equity. Realized gains or losses on sales of investments are
computed based upon specific identification and are included in
interest income and other, net. For all periods presented,
realized gains and losses on available-for-sale investments were
not material. Management evaluates investments on a regular
basis to determine if an other-than-temporary impairment has
occurred and there were none as of July 29, 2005. The
unrealized losses on these investments at July 29, 2005
were primarily due to interest rate fluctuations. We have the
ability and intent to hold these investments until recovery of
their carrying values. We also believe that we will be able to
collect all principal and interest amounts due to us at maturity
given the high credit quality of these investments. Accordingly,
we do not consider these investments to be
other-than-temporarily impaired at July 29, 2005.
Beginning in the third quarter of fiscal 2005, we have
classified all investments in auction rate securities as
short-term investments. To conform to current period
presentation, we have reclassified $124,823 of auction rate
securities from cash equivalents to short-term investments for
the first quarter of fiscal 2005. The impact on the Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows was a decrease in cash used for
investing activities of $25,019 for the first quarter of fiscal
2005. The reclassification had no impact on the Consolidated
Statements of Income or Cash Flows from Operations for any of
the periods presented.
|
|
| 12. |
New Accounting Pronouncements |
In March 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued Interpretation No. 47,
Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement
Obligations. Interpretation No. 47 clarifies that
an entity must record a liability for a conditional
asset retirement obligation if the fair value of the obligation
can be
12
NETWORK APPLIANCE, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
reasonably estimated. Interpretation No. 47 also clarifies
when an entity would have sufficient information to reasonably
estimate the fair value of an asset retirement obligation.
Interpretation No. 47 is effective no later than the end of
the fiscal year ending after December 15, 2005. We are
currently evaluating the provision and do not expect that our
adoption in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006 will have a
material impact on our results of operations or financial
condition.
In March 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) issued Staff Accounting Bulletin
(SAB) No. 107, which provides guidance on the
implementation of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 123R, Share-Based
Payments (see discussion below). In particular,
SAB No. 107 provides key guidance related to valuation
methods (including assumptions such as expected volatility and
expected term), the accounting for income tax effects of
share-based payment arrangements upon adoption of
SFAS No. 123R, the modification of employee share
options prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, the
classification of compensation expense, capitalization of
compensation cost related to share-based payment arrangements,
first-time adoption of SFAS No. 123R in an interim
period, and disclosures in Managements Discussion and
Analysis subsequent to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R.
SAB No. 107 became effective on March 29, 2005.
It did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial
statements.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS 123R,
Share-Based Payments. Generally, the
requirements of SFAS 123R are similar to those of
SFAS 123. However, SFAS 123R requires companies to now
recognize all share-based payments to employees, including
grants of employee stock options, in their statements of
operations based on the fair value of the payments. Pro forma
disclosure will no longer be an alternative. The effective date
of the new standard for our consolidated financial statements is
the first fiscal quarter of fiscal 2007, which begins on
May 1, 2006.
SFAS 123R permits public companies to adopt its
requirements using one of two methods: (1) a modified
prospective method under which compensation cost is
recognized beginning with the effective date based on the
requirements of SFAS 123R for all share-based payments
granted after the effective date and based on the requirements
of SFAS 123 for all awards granted to employees prior to
the effective date of SFAS 123R that are unvested on the
effective date; or (2) a modified retrospective
method which includes the requirements of the modified
prospective method and also permits companies to restate either
all prior periods presented or prior interim periods of the year
of adoption using the amounts previously calculated for pro
forma disclosure under SFAS 123. We have not yet determined
which method we will select for our adoption of SFAS 123R.
As permitted by SFAS 123, we currently account for
share-based payments to employees using APB 25s
intrinsic value method and, as such, generally recognizes no
compensation cost for employee stock options through our
consolidated statements of operations but rather, discloses the
effect in its consolidated financial statement footnotes.
Accordingly, the adoption of SFAS 123Rs fair value
method will have a significant impact on our reported results of
operations. However, the impact of the adoption of
SFAS 123R cannot be quantified at this time because it will
depend on levels of share-based payments granted in the future
as well as other variables that effect the fair market value
estimates, which cannot be forecasted at this time.
In January 2005, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position
(FSP) No. FAS 109-1, Application
of SFAS No. 109 to the Tax Deduction on Qualified
Production Activities Provided by the American Jobs Creation Act
of 2004. This FSP provides guidance for the accounting
of a deduction provided to U.S. manufacturing companies and
is effective immediately. We believe the adoption of this
position currently will not have a material effect of its
financial position or results of operations. However, there is
no assurance that there will not be a material impact in the
future.
In December 2004, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position
(FSP) No. 109-2, Accounting and Disclosure
Guidance for the Foreign Earnings Repatriation Provision within
the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004.
13
NETWORK APPLIANCE, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The American Jobs Creation Act introduces a special one-time
dividends received deduction on the repatriation of certain
foreign earnings to U.S. companies, provided certain
criteria are met. FSP No. 109-2 provides accounting and
disclosure guidance on the impact of the repatriation provision
on a companys income tax expense and deferred tax
liability. We are currently studying the impact of the one-time
favorable foreign dividend provision and intend to complete the
analysis during the third quarter of fiscal 2006. Accordingly,
we have not adjusted income tax expense or deferred tax
liability to reflect the tax impact of any repatriation of
non-U.S. earnings.
In November 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued SFAS No. 151 Inventory Costs
(SFAS 151). This statement amends the guidance in ARB
No. 43, Chapter 4, Inventory Pricing, to
clarify the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility
expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted material
(spoilage). SFAS 151 requires that those items be
recognized as current-period charges. In addition, this
Statement requires that allocation of fixed production overhead
to costs of conversion be based upon the normal capacity of the
production facilities. The provisions of SFAS 151 are
effective for inventory cost incurred in fiscal years beginning
after June 15, 2005. As such, we are required to adopt
these provisions at the beginning of fiscal 2007, which begins
on May 1, 2006. We do not expect the adoption of
SFAS No. 151 to have a material impact on our
consolidated financial statements.
In March 2004, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF)
reached a consensus on Issue No. 03-01, The
Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application
to Certain Investments. EITF Issue No. 03-01
provides guidance on evaluating and recording impairment losses
on debt and equity investments and requires additional
disclosures for those investments. In September 2004, the FASB
delayed the measurement and recognition provisions of EITF Issue
No. 03-01; however, the disclosure requirements remain
effective. We will evaluate the impact of EITF Issue
No. 03-01 once final guidance is issued.
|
|
| 13. |
Commitments and Contingencies |
The following summarizes our commitments and contingencies at
July 29, 2005, and the effect such obligations may have on
our future periods:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Contractual Obligations: |
|
2006 | |
|
2007 | |
|
2008 | |
|
2009 | |
|
2010 | |
|
Thereafter | |
|
Total | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Rent operating lease payments(1)
|
|
$ |
11,480 |
|
|
$ |
12,367 |
|
|
$ |
12,399 |
|
|
$ |
12,149 |
|
|
$ |
9,691 |
|
|
$ |
30,075 |
|
|
$ |
88,161 |
|
|
Equipment operating lease payments
|
|
|
3,778 |
|
|
|
3,628 |
|
|
|
2,674 |
|
|
|
1,291 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,381 |
|
|
Venture capital funding commitments(2)
|
|
|
389 |
|
|
|
519 |
|
|
|
507 |
|
|
|
494 |
|
|
|
482 |
|
|
|
508 |
|
|
|
2,899 |
|
|
Purchase commitments and other(3)
|
|
|
552 |
|
|
|
605 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,164 |
|
|
Capital Expenditures(4)
|
|
|
14,291 |
|
|
|
319 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,610 |
|
|
Communications & Maintenance(5)
|
|
|
4,383 |
|
|
|
1,716 |
|
|
|
675 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,870 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Contractual Cash Obligations
|
|
$ |
34,873 |
|
|
$ |
19,154 |
|
|
$ |
16,260 |
|
|
$ |
14,003 |
|
|
$ |
10,212 |
|
|
$ |
30,583 |
|
|
$ |
125,085 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Other Commercial Commitments: |
|
2006 | |
|
2007 | |
|
2008 | |
|
2009 | |
|
2010 | |
|
Thereafter | |
|
Total | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Lines of Credit(6)
|
|
$ |
450 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
337 |
|
|
$ |
787 |
|
|
Restricted Cash(7)
|
|
|
1,674 |
|
|
|
532 |
|
|
|
642 |
|
|
|
455 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
2,224 |
|
|
|
5,569 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Commercial Commitments
|
|
$ |
2,124 |
|
|
$ |
532 |
|
|
$ |
642 |
|
|
$ |
455 |
|
|
$ |
42 |
|
|
$ |
2,561 |
|
|
$ |
6,356 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (1) |
We lease sales offices and research and development facilities
throughout the U.S. and internationally. These sales offices are
also leased under operating leases which expire through fiscal
2015. We are |
14
NETWORK APPLIANCE, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
responsible for certain maintenance costs, taxes, and insurance
under these leases. Substantially all lease agreements have
fixed payment terms based on the passage of time. Some lease
agreements provide us with the option to renew or terminate the
lease. Our future operating lease obligations would change if we
were to exercise these options and if we were to enter into
additional operating lease agreements. Sublease income of $120
has been included as a reduction of the payment amounts shown in
the table. Rent operating lease payments in the table exclude
lease payments which are accrued as part of our 2002
restructurings and include only rent lease commitments that are
over one year. |
| |
| (2) |
Venture capital funding commitments includes a quarterly
committed management fee based on a percentage of our committed
funding to be payable through June 2011. |
| |
| (3) |
Purchase commitments and other represent agreements to purchase
component inventory from our suppliers and/or contract
manufacturers that are enforceable and legally binding against
us. Other examples include minimum cash commitments relating to
facilities and utilities. Purchase commitments and other
excludes (a) purchases of goods and services we expect to
consume in the ordinary course of business in the next
12 months; (b) open purchase orders that represent an
authorization to purchase rather than a binding agreement;
(c) agreements that are cancelable without penalty and
costs that are not reasonably estimable at this time. |
| |
| (4) |
Capital expenditures include worldwide contractual commitments
to purchase equipment and to construct building and leasehold
improvements, which will be recorded as Property and Equipment. |
| |
| (5) |
Under certain communications contracts with major telephone
companies as well as maintenance contracts with multiple
vendors, we are required to pay based on a minimum volume. Such
obligations expire in April 2010. |
| |
| (6) |
The amounts outstanding under these letters of credit relate to
workers compensation, a customs guarantee, a corporate
credit card program, and a foreign lease. |
| |
| (7) |
Restricted cash arrangements relate to facility lease
requirements, service performance guarantees, customs and duties
guarantees, and VAT requirements, and are included under Prepaid
Expenses and Other and Other Assets on our Consolidated Balance
Sheets. |
From time to time, we have committed to purchase various key
components used in the manufacture of our products. We establish
accruals for estimated losses on purchased components for which
we believe it is probable that they will not be utilized in
future operations. To the extent that such forecasts are not
achieved, our commitments and associated accruals may change.
We are subject to various legal proceedings and claims which may
arise in the normal course of business. While the outcome of
these legal matters is currently not determinable, we do not
believe that any current litigation or claims will have a
material adverse effect on our business, cash flow, operating
results, or financial condition.
|
|
| 14. |
Business Combinations |
On May 2, 2005, we acquired Alacritus, Inc., a privately
held company based in Pleasanton, California, that develops and
sells disk-based data protection software solutions. Under terms
of the agreement, we paid Alacritus $11,000 in cash and assumed
options to acquire 79 shares of common stock at an average
price of $26.37 per share and 43 shares of restricted
stock units at $0 per share. We also incurred certain
transaction costs and assumed certain operating assets and
liabilities. The historical operations of Alacritus were not
significant.
In accordance with FASB Interpretation No. 44,
Accounting for Certain Transactions involving Stock
Compensation, we recorded the intrinsic value, measured as
the difference between the grant price and fair market value on
the acquisition consummation date, of unvested options and
restricted stock units assumed in
15
NETWORK APPLIANCE, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
the Alacritus acquisition as deferred stock compensation. Such
deferred stock compensation which aggregated $1,199, is recorded
as a separate component of stockholders equity in the
accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet and will be
amortized over the vesting term of the related options.
The acquisition was accounted for under the purchase method of
accounting. The total purchase price for Alacritus is summarized
below:
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Alacritus | |
| |
|
| |
|
Total Purchase Price:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash consideration
|
|
$ |
11,000 |
|
|
Value of options assumed
|
|
|
2,314 |
|
|
Transaction costs
|
|
|
337 |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
$ |
13,651 |
|
| |
|
|
|
The total purchase price was allocated to the estimated fair
value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on
independent appraisals and management estimates as follows:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Amortization | |
| |
|
|
|
Period (Years) | |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
Purchase Price Allocation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of tangible assets acquired
|
|
$ |
67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Existing/ Core Technology
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
| |
Covenants Not to Compete
|
|
|
700 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
5,844 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(810 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred stock compensation
|
|
|
1,199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
1,651 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
$ |
13,651 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
On August 26, 2005, Network Appliance, Inc. completed its
acquisition of Decru, Inc. (Decru), a Delaware
corporation that develops and sells encryption software and
appliances to secure network data storage, pursuant to an
Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization, by and among
Network Appliance Inc., Decru, Dolphin Acquisition Corp., a
wholly-owned subsidiary of the Registrant, and certain other
parties, dated June 15, 2005 (the Merger).
In connection with the closing of the Merger, we issued to the
stockholders of Decru 8,245 shares of Common Stock, par
value $0.001 per share, and assumed all options to purchase
Decru common stock granted under the Decru, Inc. 2001 Equity
Incentive Plan that were outstanding at the closing of the
Merger, which options shall be exercisable for an aggregate of
1,926 shares of our Common Stock. In addition, we paid to
the Decru stockholders approximately $54,480 in cash, of which
approximately $34,049 has been placed in escrow to secure the
Decru stockholders indemnification obligations to us
pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization.
16
|
|
| Item 2. |
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations |
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking
statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange
Act), and are subject to the safe harbor provisions set
forth in the Exchange Act. Forward-looking statements usually
contain the words estimate, intend,
plan, predict, seek,
may, will, should,
would, anticipate, expect,
believe, or similar expressions and variations or
negatives of these words. In addition, any statements that refer
to expectations, projections or other characterizations of
future events or circumstances, including any underlying
assumptions, are forward-looking statements. All forward-looking
statements, including, but not limited to, (1) our belief
that our new FAS3000 will be a very competitive product;
(2) our expectation that units shipped of the FAS3000 will
increase and FAS960 and R200 units will continue to
decline; (3) our expectation that the FAS960 and R200
products will be gradually replaced by the FAS3000 series and
next-generation products for the remainder of fiscal 2006;
(4) our expectation to see growth in the number of units
shipped for our next-generation R210 NearStore products;
(5) our belief in the competitiveness of our products and
our ability to grow our business; (6) our belief that our
products continue to offer the best price-performance value in
the industry; (7) our expectation to continue to introduce
new products and to deliver our next-generation operating
systems and data protection solutions; (8) our plan to
invest in the people, processes and systems necessary to best
optimize our revenue growth; (9) our expectation that
higher discount associated with high-end storage systems will
negatively affect our gross margin; (10) our estimates of
future intangibles and stock compensation amortization expense
relating to our acquisitions; (11) our expectation that
service margins will vary over time; (12) our expectation
that we will continue to add sales capacity; (13) our
expectation that we will increase sales and marketing expenses
commensurate with future revenue growth; (14) our intention
to continuously broaden our existing product offerings and
introduce new products; (15) our estimates regarding future
capitalized patents amortization expenses and future
amortization of existing technology; (16) our expectation
that we will continuously support current and future product
development and enhancement efforts and incur corresponding
charges; (17) our belief that our research and development
expenses will increase in absolute dollars for the remainder of
fiscal 2006; (18) our belief that our general and
administrative expenses will increase in absolute terms in the
remainder of fiscal 2006; (19) our expectation that we may
repatriate foreign earnings and pay taxes under the Jobs Act;
(20) our expectation regarding estimated future deferred
stock compensation amortization expenses and future covenants
not to compete; (21) our expectation that interest income
will increase for the remainder of fiscal 2006; (22) our
expectations regarding our contractual cash obligations and
other commercial commitments at July 29, 2005 for the
remainder of fiscal 2006 and fiscal years 2007 through 2010 and
thereafter, which we anticipate will be approximately
$134.6 million in the aggregate; (23) our expectation
that capital expenditures will increase consistent with our
business growth; (24) our expectation that our existing
facilities and those currently being developed, will be
sufficient for our needs for at least the next two years and
that our contractual commitments, including operating leases,
and any required capital expenditures over the next few years
will be funded through cash from operations and existing cash
and investments; (25) our belief that our existing
liquidity and capital resources are sufficient to fund our
operations for at least the next twelve months; (26) our
belief that foreign currency hedging contracts will not subject
us to significant credit risk; (27) our belief that we have
been able to compete successfully with our principal competitors
based on the superior technology of our products; (28) our
intent to regularly introduce new products and product
enhancements; (29) the possibility that we may need to
increase our materials purchases, contract manufacturing
capacity and internal test and quality functions to meet
anticipated demand; (30) our intention to continue to
establish and maintain business relationships with technology
companies; (31) the possibility that we will continue to
engage in future acquisitions; (32) our expectation that we
will increasingly rely on our indirect sales channel for a
significant portion of our revenue; (33) our expectation
that the ultimate costs to resolve any outstanding legal claims
or proceedings will not be material to our business;
(34) our expectation that companies in the appliance market
will increasingly be subject to infringement claims as the
industry grows; (35) our expectation that the value of our
investments will not decline significantly because of changes in
market interest rates, (36) our expectation regarding
ATAs future impact on the storage market; (37) our
expectation that our investments in emerging technologies will
contribute to our long term growth; (38) cash
17
from operating activities may fluctuate in future periods, and
(39) our expectation that we will acquire products and
businesses complementary to our business, are inherently
uncertain as they are based on managements current
expectations and assumptions concerning future events, and they
are subject to numerous known and unknown risks and
uncertainties. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance
on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the
date hereof and are based upon information available to us at
this time. These statements are not guarantees of future
performance. We disclaim any obligation to update information in
any forward-looking statement.
First Quarter Fiscal 2006 Overview
Revenues for the first quarter of fiscal 2006 were
$448.4 million, which grew 25.1% year over year and
decreased 0.8% sequentially over the previous quarter. We
experienced a revenue shortfall relative to the targets we
stated on our May 25, 2005 earnings conference call. We
believe the principal factor impacting our revenue was the
product transition to our new midrange FAS3000 series. The
launch of our new midrange products impacted our revenues in two
main ways. First, the May 23, 2005 introduction of the
FAS3000 products caused evaluation periods for many of our sales
engagements to be extended. We experienced delays in customer
purchase decisions while our customers evaluated these new
products, both competitively and compared to our other product
lines. Approximately 90% of the FAS3000 Series orders came in
the last month of the quarter, with a significant number of
orders for the FAS3000 series received in the last few days of
the quarter. As a result, many of these orders could not be
recognized before the quarter ended, causing a large
concentration of FAS3000 units in our backlog coming into
the second quarter of fiscal 2006. Secondly, the FAS3000 caused
a greater decline in units shipped of both our FAS960 and
NearStore products than we had anticipated, which also
contributed to the shortfall.
Our new FAS3000 series delivers the best value and cost per
megabyte to our customers by utilizing lower-cost ATA drives
combined with our patented RAID-DP protection and our
FlexVoltm
technology. This combination allows more cost-effective Advanced
Technology Attachment (ATA) drives to be used safely
in primary storage applications, which we believe will be a
competitive product in the marketplace.
As a result, we expect units shipped of the FAS3000 to increase
and units of the FAS960 and Nearstore R200 to continue to
decline in the second quarter of fiscal 2006. We expect the
FAS960 and low-capacity NearStore products to be gradually
replaced by the FAS3000 series products. However, this shift to
the FAS3000 may continue to negatively impact our revenue in the
near term as the dollar value of deals will be lower compared to
the FAS960 and R200 products. We expect to see growth in the
number of NearStore units shipped when we introduce the
next-generation R210 with a lower entry price and upgradeability
to cluster failover capabilities later in fiscal 2006.
Despite the revenue shortfall resulting from transitional issues
affecting our short-term performance, we believe our business
fundamentals remain intact. We remain confident in the
competitiveness of our products and in our ability to grow our
business over the long term. We continue to make progress across
many areas of the organization, including broadening and
enhancing our enterprise solutions, supporting our
channel/partners, and deepening our professional services
coverage. We believe our products continue to offer the best
price-performance value in the industry, and we further extended
our ability to help customers do more-with-less with
the introduction of our FAS 3000 midrange series.
Continued revenue growth is dependent on the introduction and
market acceptance of our new products. In fiscal 2006, we expect
to continue to introduce new products, deliver our
next-generation operating system with enhanced storage grid
functionality and offer a comprehensive suite of data protection
solutions. If we fail to timely introduce new products or
successfully integrate acquired technology into our existing
architecture, or if there is no or reduced demand for these or
our current products, we may experience a decline in revenue. We
plan to invest in the people, processes, and systems necessary
to best optimize our revenue growth and long-term profitability.
However, we cannot assure you that such investments will achieve
our financial objectives.
18
First Quarter Fiscal 2006 Financial Performance
|
|
|
| |
|
Our revenues for the first quarter of fiscal 2005 were
$448.4 million, a 25.1% increase over the same period a
year ago. This represented a decrease of 0.8% sequentially over
the last quarter. This year-over-year increase in revenue from
our new mid-range FAS3020, FAS3050 products, FAS980 and FAS270
products was partially offset by a decline in revenue of our
FAS960, FAS940 and NearStore R200 products compared to the same
quarter a year ago. |
| |
| |
|
Our overall gross margins improved to 61.0% in the three-month
period ended July 29, 2005 from 60.0% in the same period a
year ago. The improvement in our gross margin was primarily
attributable to a favorable change in product and add-on
software mix and improved services margin. |
| |
| |
|
Net income for the first quarter of fiscal 2005 increased 28.3%
to $60.1 million compared to net income of
$46.9 million for the same period a year ago. |
| |
| |
|
With the exception of long-term restructuring and deferred rent
liabilities totaling $3.3 million, our balance sheet as of
July 29, 2005 remains debt-free, with cash, cash
equivalents and investments of $1,214.7 million due
primarily to our net income and the related cash generated from
operations partially offset by cash repurchases of our common
stock of $95.5 million. Days Sales Outstanding decreased to
49 days as of July 29, 2005 compared to 60 days
as of April 30, 2005. Inventory turns were 17.2 times and
17.9 times as of July 29, 2005 and April 30, 2005,
respectively. Deferred revenue increased to $485.4 million
as of July 29, 2005 from $449.2 million reported as of
April 30, 2005 due to higher software subscription and
service billings attributable to our continuing shift toward
larger enterprise customers. Capital purchases of plant,
property and equipment for the three-month period ended
July 29, 2005 were $33.5 million. |
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth certain consolidated statements
of income data as a percentage of total revenues for the periods
indicated:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Three Months | |
| |
|
Ended | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
July 29, | |
|
July 30, | |
| |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
| |
Product revenue
|
|
|
88.0 |
|
|
|
90.6 |
|
| |
Service revenue
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
Cost of Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Cost of product revenue
|
|
|
29.8 |
|
|
|
31.8 |
|
| |
Cost of service revenue
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
61.0 |
|
|
|
60.0 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
30.6 |
|
|
|
28.8 |
|
| |
Research and development
|
|
|
11.3 |
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
| |
General and administrative
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
| |
Stock compensation
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
| |
Restructuring recoveries
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
46.8 |
|
|
|
44.9 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Three Months | |
| |
|
Ended | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
July 29, | |
|
July 30, | |
| |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Income from Operations
|
|
|
14.2 |
|
|
|
15.1 |
|
|
Other Income (Expense), net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Interest income
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
| |
Other expenses, net
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
| |
Net gain on investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Total other income, net
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before Income Taxes
|
|
|
16.1 |
|
|
|
16.0 |
|
|
Provision for Income Taxes
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
13.4 |
% |
|
|
13.1 |
% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations |
Product Revenues Product revenues increased
by 21.6% to $394.6 million for the first quarter of fiscal
2006, from $324.6 million for the first quarter of fiscal
2005. Product revenues growth was primarily in the U.S. and
Europe. The increase in product revenues year over year was
specifically attributable to increased software licenses and
software subscriptions partially offset by lower average selling
prices caused by a mix shift towards ATA in primary storage,
enabled by our new mid-range FAS3000 series compared to our
FAS960 and R200 products.
Product revenues were favorably impacted by the following
factors:
|
|
|
| |
|
increased revenues from our new and current product portfolio,
such as: FAS3020 and FAS3050, FAS980, and FAS270 filer products
and add-on software; |
| |
| |
|
increased sales of software subscriptions representing 12.0% and
10.2% of total revenues for the three-month periods ended
July 29, 2005 and July 30, 2004, respectively; and |
| |
| |
|
increased sales through indirect channels in absolute dollars,
including sales through our resellers, distributors and OEM
partners, representing 50.4% and 45.9% of total revenues for the
three-month periods ended July 29, 2005 and July 30,
2004, respectively. |
Product revenues were negatively impacted by the following
factors:
|
|
|
| |
|
a mix shift to ATA in primary storage enabled by our new
midrange FAS 3000 series, driving down units shipped and
revenues from our FAS960, FAS940 and NearStore R200 products; |
| |
| |
|
longer evaluation periods with our new mid-range products
causing delays in customer purchase decisions; |
| |
| |
|
lower average selling prices associated with the new FAS3000
series using a mix of ATA and fibre channel drives; |
| |
| |
|
lower-cost-per-megabyte disks; and |
| |
| |
|
declining average selling prices and unit sales of our older
products. |
We cannot assure you that we will be able to maintain or
increase market demand for our products.
Service Revenues Service revenues, which
include hardware support, professional services, and educational
services, increased by 59.1% to $53.8 million in the first
quarter of fiscal 2006, from $33.8 million in the first
quarter of fiscal 2005.
The increase in absolute dollars was due to the following
factors:
|
|
|
| |
|
an increasing number of enterprise customers, which typically
purchase more complete and generally longer-term service
packages than our non-enterprise customers; |
20
|
|
|
| |
|
a growing installed base resulting in new customer support
contracts in addition to support contract renewals by existing
customers; and |
| |
| |
|
growth in professional services revenue. |
While it is an element of our strategy to expand and offer a
more comprehensive, global enterprise support and service
solution, we cannot assure you that service revenue will grow at
the current rate in the remainder of fiscal 2006.
Service revenues are generally deferred and, in most cases,
recognized ratably over the service obligation periods, which
are typically one to three years. Service revenues represented
12.0% and 9.4% of total revenues for the three-month periods
ended July 29, 2005 and July 30, 2004, respectively.
International total revenues International
total revenues (including United States exports) increased by
21.7% for the three-month period ended July 29, 2005 as
compared to the same period in fiscal 2005. International total
revenues were $181.6 million, or 40.5% of total revenues
for the three-month periods ended July 29, 2005.
International total revenues were $149.3 million, or 41.6%
of total revenues for the three-month period ended July 30,
2004. The increase in international sales was primarily a result
of European net revenues growth, driven by increased demand for
our solutions portfolio, new customers and higher storage
spending in certain geographic regions, as compared to the same
periods in the prior fiscal year. We cannot assure you that we
will be able to maintain or increase international revenues in
the remainder of fiscal 2006.
Product Gross Margin Product gross margin
increased to 66.1% for the first quarter of fiscal 2006, from
64.8% for the first quarter of fiscal 2005.
Product gross margin was favorably impacted by:
|
|
|
| |
|
favorable product and add-on software mix; |
| |
| |
|
growth in software subscription upgrades and software licenses
due primarily to a larger installed base and an increasing
number of new enterprise customers. |
Product gross margin was negatively impacted by:
|
|
|
| |
|
higher disk content with an expanded storage capacity for the
higher-end filers and NearStore systems, as resale of disk
drives generates lower gross margin; |
| |
| |
|
sales price reductions due to competitive pricing pressure and
selective pricing discounts; and |
| |
| |
|
lower average selling price of certain add-on software options. |
We expect higher disk content associated with high-end storage
systems will negatively affect our gross margin in the future if
not offset by increases in software revenue and new
higher-margin products.
Amortization of existing technology included in cost of product
revenues was $1.1 million and $0.9 million for the
three-month periods ended July 29, 2005 and July 30,
2004, respectively. Estimated future amortization of existing
technology to cost of product revenues relating to our Spinnaker
and Alacritus acquisitions will be $3.3 million for the
remainder of fiscal 2006, $4.4 million for fiscal years
2007 and 2008, $3.7 million for fiscal year 2009;
$1.0 million for fiscal year 2010; and none thereafter.
Service Gross Margin Service gross margin
increased to 23.5% in the first quarter of fiscal 2006 as
compared to 13.5% in the first quarter of fiscal 2005. Cost of
service revenue increased by 40.7% to $41.2 million in the
first quarter of fiscal 2006, from $29.2 million in the
first quarter of fiscal 2005.
The improvement in service gross margin for the first quarter of
fiscal 2006 compared to the same quarter in fiscal 2005 was
primarily due to an increase in services revenue and improved
headcount utilization partially offset by the continued spending
in our service infrastructure to support our increasing
enterprise customer base. This spending included additional
professional support engineers, increased support center
activities, and global service partnership programs. Service
gross margin will typically experience some variability over
time due to the timing of technical support service initiations
and renewals and additional investments in our customer support
infrastructure. In fiscal 2006, we expect service margin to be
in the mid 20% range, as we
21
continue to build out our service capability and capacity to
support our growing enterprise customers and new products.
Sales and Marketing Sales and marketing
expenses consist primarily of salaries, commissions, advertising
and promotional expenses, and certain customer service and
support costs. Sales and marketing expenses increased 32.9% to
$137.3 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2006, from
$103.3 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2005. These
expenses were 30.6% and 28.8% of total revenues for the first
quarters of fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005, respectively. The
increase in absolute dollars was attributed to increased
commission expenses resulting from increased revenues, higher
performance-based payroll expenses due to higher profitability,
higher partner program expenses, and the continued worldwide
investment in our sales and global service organizations
associated with selling complete enterprise solutions.
Amortization of Spinnaker trademarks/tradenames and customer
contracts/relationships included in sales and marketing expenses
was $0.2 million for both three-month periods ended
July 29, 2005 and July 30, 2004. Estimated future
amortization of trademarks, tradenames, customer contracts and
relationships relating to the Spinnaker acquisition and included
in sales and marketing expenses will be $0.1 million for
the remainder of fiscal 2006, and $0.1 million for fiscal
2007 and none thereafter.
Sales and marketing headcount increased to 2,010 at
July 29, 2005 from 1,515 at July 30, 2004. We expect
to continue to selectively add sales capacity in an effort to
expand domestic and international markets, introduce new
products, establish and expand new distribution channels, and
increase product and company awareness. We expect to increase
our sales and marketing expenses commensurate with future
revenue growth.
Research and Development Research and
development expenses consist primarily of salaries and benefits,
prototype expenses, non-recurring engineering charges, fees paid
to outside consultants and amortization of capitalized patents.
Research and development expenses increased 31.3% to
$50.8 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2006 from
$38.7 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2005. These
expenses represented 11.3% and 10.8% of total revenues for the
first quarters of fiscal 2006 and 2005, respectively. The
increase in research and development expenses was primarily a
result of increased headcount, ongoing operating impact of the
acquisitions, ongoing support of current and future product
development and enhancement efforts, higher performance-based
payroll expenses due to higher profitability, partially offset
by cost control, and reduction in discretionary spending
efforts. Research and development headcount increased to 886 as
of July 29, 2005 compared to 687 as of July 30, 2004.
For both the three-month periods ended July 29, 2005 and
July 30, 2004, no software development costs were
capitalized.
Included in research and development expenses is capitalized
patents amortization of $0.5 million for both the
three-month periods ended July 29, 2005 and July 30,
2004, respectively. Based on capitalized patents recorded at
July 29, 2005, estimated future capitalized patents
amortization expenses for the remainder of fiscal 2006 will be
$1.5 million, $2.0 million for fiscal years 2007,
2008, $0.5 million in fiscal 2009, $0.2 million in
fiscal 2010, and none thereafter.
We believe that our future performance will depend in large part
on our ability to maintain and enhance our current product line,
develop new products that achieve market acceptance, maintain
technological competitiveness, and meet an expanding range of
customer requirements. We expect to continuously support current
and future product development and enhancement efforts, and
incur prototyping expenses and nonrecurring engineering charges
associated with the development of new products and
technologies. We intend to continuously broaden our existing
product offerings and introduce new products that expand our
solutions portfolio.
We believe that our research and development expenses will
increase in absolute dollars for fiscal 2006, primarily due to
ongoing costs associated with the development of new products
and technologies, projected headcount growth and the operating
impact of potential future acquisitions as compared to fiscal
2005.
22
General and Administrative General and
administrative expenses increased 24.6% to $21.0 million
for the first quarter of fiscal 2006, from $16.9 million
for the first quarter of fiscal 2005. These expenses represented
4.7% of total revenues for both the first quarters of fiscal
2006 and 2005. This increase in absolute dollars was primarily
due to higher legal expenses and professional fees for general
corporate matters including patents, higher performance-based
payroll expenses due to higher profitability and higher
headcount growth.
General and administrative headcount increased to 457 at
July 29, 2005 from 348 at July 30, 2004. We believe
that our general and administrative expenses will increase in
absolute dollars for fiscal 2006 due to projected general and
administrative headcount growth. Amortization of covenants not
to compete included in general and administrative expenses was
$1.4 million and $1.3 million for the three-month
periods ended July 29, 2005 and July 30, 2004,
respectively. Estimated future amortization of covenants not to
compete relating to our acquisitions will be $0.5 million
in the remainder of fiscal 2006 and $0.4 million for fiscal
year 2007, and none thereafter.
Stock Compensation Stock compensation
expenses were $2.0 million and $2.1 million in the
three-month periods ended July 29, 2005 and July 30,
2004, respectively. The net decrease in deferred compensation
expense year over year reflected deferred compensation expenses
amortization from WebManage and the deferred salary compensation
program recorded in the first quarter of fiscal 2005 that were
fully amortized by the first quarter of fiscal 2006 partially
offset by higher stock compensation relating to newly issued
restricted stock awards and assumed options from the Alacritus
acquisition in the first quarter of fiscal 2006. Based on
deferred stock compensation recorded at July 29, 2005,
estimated future deferred stock compensation amortization
expenses are $6.0 million in the remainder of fiscal 2006,
$6.5 million in fiscal 2007, $4.4 million in fiscal
2008 and $0.7 million in fiscal 2009 and none thereafter.
Restructuring Charges In fiscal 2002, as a
result of continuing unfavorable economic conditions and a
reduction in IT spending rates, we implemented two restructuring
plans, which included reductions in workforce and consolidations
of facilities. As of July 29, 2005, we have no outstanding
balance in our restructuring liability for the first
restructuring. The second restructuring related to the closure
of an engineering facility and consolidation of resources to the
Sunnyvale headquarters. As a result of this restructuring, we
incurred a charge of $5.9 million. The restructuring charge
included $0.8 million of severance-related amounts,
$4.6 million of committed excess facilities and facility
closure expenses, and $0.5 million in fixed assets
write-offs. Of the reserve balance at July 29, 2005,
$0.6 million was included in other accrued liabilities and
the remaining $2.6 million was classified as long-term
obligations, all relating to the facility charge for the second
restructuring.
Our restructuring estimates are reviewed and revised
periodically and may result in a substantial charge to
restructuring expense should different conditions prevail than
were anticipated in previous management estimates. Such
estimates included various assumptions such as the time period
over which the facilities will be vacant, expected sublease
terms, and expected sublease rates. During the first quarter of
fiscal 2006, we recorded a reduction in restructuring reserve of
$1.3 million resulting from the execution of new sublease
agreement for our Tewksbury facility.
The following analysis sets forth the changes in the
restructuring reserve for the three months ended July 29,
2005 (in thousands):
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Facility | |
| |
|
Accrual | |
| |
|
| |
|
Reserve balance at April 30, 2004
|
|
$ |
5,208 |
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(705 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
Reserve balance at April 30, 2005
|
|
|
4,503 |
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(90 |
) |
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
(1,256 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
Reserve balance at July 29, 2005
|
|
$ |
3,157 |
|
| |
|
|
|
23
Interest Income Interest income was
$9.0 million and $4.1 million for the first quarters
of fiscal 2006 and 2005, respectively. The increase in interest
income was primarily driven by higher cash and investment
balances provided by operating activities and higher average
interest rates on our investment portfolio. We expect interest
income to increase for fiscal 2006 as a result of rising average
interest rates and higher cash and invested balances in a higher
interest-rate portfolio environment.
Other Income (Expense), Net Other Income
(Expense), Net, included net exchange losses from foreign
currency transactions of $0.3 million and $0.9 million
in the three-month periods ended July 29, 2005 and
July 30, 2004, respectively. We believe that
period-to-period changes in foreign exchange gain or losses will
continue to be impacted by hedging costs associated with our
forward and option activities and forecast variance.
Provision for Income Taxes For the
three-month period ended July 29, 2005, we applied an
annual tax rate of 16.9% to pretax income versus 18.0% for the
comparable period in the prior year. These rates reflect a
favorable foreign tax ruling for our principal European
subsidiary. Our estimate is based on existing tax laws and our
current projections of income (loss) and distributions of income
(loss) among different entities and tax jurisdictions, and is
subject to change, based primarily on varying levels of
profitability.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The following sections discuss the effects of changes in our
balance sheet and cash flow, contractual obligations and other
commercial commitments, stock repurchase program, capital
commitments, other sources and uses of cash flow and potential
tax opportunities on our liquidity and capital resources.
|
|
|
Balance Sheet and Other Cash Flows |
As of July 29, 2005, as compared to April 30, 2005,
our cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments increased
by $44.8 million to $1,214.7 million. We derive our
liquidity and capital resources primarily from our cash flow
from operations and from working capital. Working capital
increased by $10.8 million to $1,066.5 million as of
July 29, 2005, compared to $1,055.7 million as of
April 30, 2005.
During the three-month period ended July 29, 2005, we
generated cash flows from operating activities of
$139.0 million as compared with $76.7 million in the
same period in fiscal 2005. The largest driver of this increase
was the first quarter fiscal 2006 net income of
$60.1 million as compared to $46.9 million in the same
period in fiscal 2005. In addition to higher net income and
noncash adjustments in the first quarter of fiscal 2006, the
primary factors that impacted the period-to-period change in
cash flows relating to operating activities included the
following:
|
|
|
| |
|
An increase in deferred revenues from higher software
subscription and service billings attributable to our continuing
shift toward larger enterprise customers, as well as renewals of
existing maintenance agreements; |
| |
| |
|
Increased income taxes payable, primarily reflecting higher
profitability in the three-month period ended July 29, 2005
as compared to the same period in the prior year and lower tax
payments compared to the same period in the prior year; and |
| |
| |
|
Decreased accounts receivable balances due primarily to more
linear shipments in the first quarter of fiscal 2006. |
The above factors were partially offset by the effects of:
|
|
|
| |
|
Decreased accrued compensation and related benefits due to
payout of higher commission and higher performance-based payroll
expenses accrued in fiscal 2005 and paid in the first quarter of
fiscal 2006 as compared the same period a year ago; |
| |
| |
|
An increase in inventories due primarily to ramping up of
purchased components in anticipation of revenue growth. |
24
We expect that cash provided by operating activities may
fluctuate in future periods as a result of a number of factors,
including fluctuations in our operating results, shipment
linearity, accounts receivable collections, inventory
management, and the timing of tax and other payments.
Capital expenditures for the three-month period ended
July 29, 2005 were $33.5 million as compared to
$32.3 million in the same period a year ago. We used net
proceeds of $8.8 million and $9.6 million in the
three-month periods ended July 29, 2005 and July 30,
2004, respectively, for net purchases/redemptions of short-term
investments. Investing activities in the three-month period
ended July 29, 2005 also included new investments in
privately held companies of $0.3 million. In the first
quarter of fiscal 2006, we acquired Alacritus for a purchase
price of approximately $13.7 million, including assumed
options, cash payments of $11.0 million and related
transaction costs.
We received $45.2 million and $24.5 million in the
three-month periods ended July 29, 2005 and July 30,
2004, respectively, from net financing activities, which
included sales of common stock related to employee stock
transactions net of common stock repurchases. We repurchased
3.3 million and 2.5 million shares of common stock at
a total of $95.5 million and $47.7 million during
three-month periods ended July 29, 2005 and July 30,
2004, respectively. Other financing activities provided
$50.8 million and $23.2 million in the three-month
periods ended July 29, 2005 and July 30, 2004,
respectively, which related to sales of common stock related to
employee stock transactions. During the three-month period ended
July 29, 2005, we withheld $0.4 million from certain
employees exercised shares of their restricted stock to
reimburse for federal, state, and local withholding taxes
obligations.
The change in cash flow from financing was primarily due to the
effects of higher common stock repurchases partially offset by
proceeds from issuance of common stock under employee programs
compared to the same period in the prior year. Net proceeds from
the issuance of common stock related to employee participation
in employee stock programs have historically been a significant
component of our liquidity. The extent to which our employees
participate in these programs generally increases or decreases
based upon changes in the market price of our common stock. As a
result, our cash flow resulting from the issuance of common
stock related to employee participation in employee stock
programs will vary.
|
|
|
Other Sources and Uses of Cash and Tax
Opportunities |
The American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the Jobs
Act) created a temporary incentive for
U.S. corporations to repatriate accumulated income earned
abroad by providing an 85% dividend-received deduction for
certain dividends from certain non-U.S. subsidiaries. The
deduction is subject to a number of limitations, and we are
currently considering recently issued Treasury and IRS guidance
on the application of the deduction. We are not yet in a
position to decide whether, and to what extent, foreign earnings
that have not yet been remitted to the U.S. might be
repatriated. Based on the analysis to date, however, it is
reasonably possible that as much as $355.0 million might be
repatriated, with a respective tax liability of up to
$15.0 million. We expect to be in a position to finalize
our analysis during our third quarter of fiscal 2006.
For the three-month periods ended July 29, 2005 and
July 30, 2004, we recorded tax benefits, in the form of
reduced payments, of $16.3 million and $5.7 million,
respectively, associated with disqualifying dispositions of
employee stock options. If stock option exercise patterns
change, we may receive less cash from stock option exercises and
may not receive the same level of tax benefits in the future,
which could cause our cash payments for income taxes to increase.
25
|
|
|
Contractual Cash Obligations and Other Commercial
Commitments |
The following summarizes our contractual cash obligations and
commercial commitments at July 29, 2005, and the effect
such obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash
flow in future periods, (in thousands):
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Contractual Obligations: |
|
2006 | |
|
2007 | |
|
2008 | |
|
2009 | |
|
2010 | |
|
Thereafter | |
|
Total | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Rent operating lease payments(1)
|
|
$ |
11,480 |
|
|
$ |
12,367 |
|
|
$ |
12,399 |
|
|
$ |
12,149 |
|
|
$ |
9,691 |
|
|
$ |
30,075 |
|
|
$ |
88,161 |
|
|
Equipment operating lease payments
|
|
|
3,778 |
|
|
|
3,628 |
|
|
|
2,674 |
|
|
|
1,291 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,381 |
|
|
Venture capital funding commitments(2)
|
|
|
389 |
|
|
|
519 |
|
|
|
507 |
|
|
|
494 |
|
|
|
482 |
|
|
|
508 |
|
|
|
2,899 |
|
|
Purchase commitments and other(3)
|
|
|
552 |
|
|
|
605 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,164 |
|
|
Capital Expenditures(4)
|
|
|
14,291 |
|
|
|
319 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,610 |
|
|
Communications & Maintenance(5)
|
|
|
4,383 |
|
|
|
1,716 |
|
|
|
675 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,870 |
|
|
Restructuring Charges(6)
|
|
|
424 |
|
|
|
565 |
|
|
|
579 |
|
|
|
604 |
|
|
|
637 |
|
|
|
348 |
|
|
|
3,157 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Contractual Cash Obligations
|
|
$ |
35,297 |
|
|
$ |
19,719 |
|
|
$ |
16,839 |
|
|
$ |
14,607 |
|
|
$ |
10,849 |
|
|
$ |
30,931 |
|
|
$ |
128,242 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For purposes of the above table, contractual obligations for the
purchase of goods and services are defined as agreements that
are enforceable, legally binding on us, and subject us to
penalties if we cancel the agreement. Some of the figures we
include in this table are based on managements estimates
and assumptions about these obligations, including their
duration, the possibility of renewal or termination, anticipated
actions by third parties, and other factors. Because these
estimates and assumptions are necessarily subjective, the
enforceable and legally binding obligations we will actually pay
in future periods may vary from those reflected in the table.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Other Commercial Commitments: |
|
2006 | |
|
2007 | |
|
2008 | |
|
2009 | |
|
2010 | |
|
Thereafter | |
|
Total | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Lines of Credit(7)
|
|
$ |
450 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
337 |
|
|
$ |
787 |
|
|
Restricted Cash(8)
|
|
|
1,674 |
|
|
|
532 |
|
|
|
642 |
|
|
|
455 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
2,224 |
|
|
|
5,569 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Commercial Commitments
|
|
$ |
2,124 |
|
|
$ |
532 |
|
|
$ |
642 |
|
|
$ |
455 |
|
|
$ |
42 |
|
|
$ |
2,561 |
|
|
$ |
6,356 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (1) |
We enter into operating leases in the normal course of business.
We lease sales offices, research and development facilities, and
other property and equipment under operating leases throughout
the U.S. and internationally, which expire through fiscal 2015.
Substantially all lease agreements have fixed payment terms
based on the passage of time and contain escalation clauses.
Some lease agreements provide us with the option to renew the
lease or to terminate the lease. Our future operating lease
obligations would change if we were to exercise these options
and if we were to enter into additional operating lease
agreements. Sublease income of $0.1 million has been
included as a reduction of the payment amounts shown in the
table. Facilities operating lease payments exclude the leases
impacted by the restructurings. The amounts for the leases
impacted by the restructurings are included in
subparagraph (6) below. |
| |
| (2) |
Venture capital funding commitments includes a quarterly
committed management fee based on a percentage of our committed
funding to be payable through June 2011. |
| |
| (3) |
Purchase commitments and other represent agreements to purchase
component inventory from our suppliers and/or contract
manufacturers that are enforceable and legally binding against
us. Other examples include minimum cash commitments related to
facilities and utilities. Purchase commitments and other
excludes (a) purchases of goods and services we expect to
consume in the ordinary course of business in the next
12 months; (b) open purchase orders that represent an
authorization to purchase |
26
|
|
|
rather than a binding agreement; (c) agreements that are
cancelable without penalty and costs that are not reasonably
estimable at this time. |
| |
| (4) |
Capital expenditures include worldwide contractual commitments
to purchase equipment and to construct building and leasehold
improvements, which will be recorded as Property and Equipment. |
| |
| (5) |
Under certain communication contracts with major
telecommunication companies as well as maintenance contracts
with multiple vendors, we are required to pay based on a minimum
volume. Such obligations expire in April 2010. |
| |
| (6) |
These amounts are included on our Consolidated Balance Sheets
under Long-term Obligations and Other Accrued Liabilities, which
is comprised of committed lease payments and operating expenses
net of committed and estimated sublease income. The
restructuring estimated sublease income included various
assumptions such as the time period over which the facilities
will be vacant, expected sublease terms, and expected sublease
rates. |
| |
| (7) |
The amounts outstanding under these letters of credit relate to
workers compensation, a customs guarantee, a corporate
credit card program, and a foreign lease. |
| |
| (8) |
Restricted cash arrangements relate to facility lease
requirements, service performance guarantees, customs and duties
guarantees, and VAT requirements, and are included under Prepaid
Expenses and Other and Other Assets on our Consolidated Balance
Sheets. |
|
|
|
Capital Expenditure Requirements |
We expect capital expenditures to increase in the future
consistent with the growth in our business, as we continue to
invest in people, land, buildings, capital equipment and
enhancements to our worldwide infrastructure. We expect that our
existing facilities and those being developed in Sunnyvale,
California, Research Triangle Park (RTP), North
Carolina and worldwide are adequate for our requirements over at
least the next two years and that additional space will be
available as needed. We expect to finance all our construction
projects, including our contractual commitments, operating
leases, and any required capital expenditures over the next few
years through cash from operations and existing cash and
investments.
|
|
|
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements |
As of July 29, 2005, our financial guarantees of
$1.7 million that were not recorded on our balance sheet
consisted of standby letters of credit related to workers
compensation, a customs guarantee, a corporate credit card
program, and a foreign lease.
As of July 29, 2005, our notional fair values of foreign
exchange forward and foreign currency option contracts totaled
$224.2 million. We do not believe that these derivatives
present significant credit risks, because the counterparties to
the derivatives consist of major financial institutions, and we
manage the notional amount of contracts entered into with any
one counterparty. We do not enter into derivative financial
instruments for speculative or trading purposes. Other than the
risk associated with the financial condition of the
counterparties, our maximum exposure related to foreign currency
forward and option contracts is limited to the premiums paid.
We offer both recourse and nonrecourse lease financing
arrangements to our customers. Under the terms of recourse
leases, which are generally three years or less, we remain
liable for the aggregate unpaid remaining lease payments to the
third-party leasing company in the event that any customers were
to default. We initially defer 100% of the recourse lease
receivable and recognize revenue over the term of the lease as
the lease payments become due. As of July 29, 2005, and
April 30, 2005, the maximum recourse exposure under such
leases totaled approximately $8.3 million and
$7.0 million, respectively. Under the terms of the
nonrecourse leases we do not have any continuing obligations or
liabilities. To date, we have not experienced significant losses
under this lease financing program.
We have entered into indemnification agreements with third
parties in the ordinary course of business. Generally, these
indemnification agreements require us to reimburse losses
suffered by the third party due to various events, such as
lawsuits arising from patent or copyright infringement. These
indemnification
27
obligations are considered off-balance sheet arrangements in
accordance with FASB, Interpretation 45, of FIN 45,
Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements
for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of
Others.
As of July 29, 2005, except for operating leases and other
contractual obligations outlined under the Contractual
Cash Obligations table, we do not have any off-balance
sheet financing arrangements or liabilities, retained or
contingent interests in transferred assets, or any obligation
arising out of a material variable interest in an unconsolidated
entity. We also do not have any majority-owned subsidiaries that
are not included in the consolidated financial statements.
Additionally, we do not have any interest in or relationship
with, any special purpose entities.
|
|
|
Liquidity and Capital Resource Requirements |
Key factors affecting our cash flows include our ability to
effectively manage our working capital, in particular, accounts
receivable and inventories and future demand for our products
and related pricing. We expect to incur higher capital
expenditures in the near future to expand our operations. We
will from time to time acquire products and businesses
complementary to our business. In the future, we may continue to
repurchase our common stock, which would reduce cash, cash
equivalents, and/or short-term investments available to fund
future operations and meet other liquidity requirements. Based
on past performance and current expectations, we believe that
our cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, and cash
generated from operations will satisfy our working capital
needs, capital expenditures, stock repurchases, contractual
obligations, and other liquidity requirements associated with
our operations through at least the next 12 months.
Critical Accounting Estimates and Policies
Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America. The preparation of such statements
requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
period and the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of
the date of the financial statements. Our estimates are based on
historical experience and other assumptions that we consider to
be appropriate in the circumstances. However, actual future
results may vary from our estimates.
We believe that the following accounting policies are
critical as defined by the Securities and Exchange
Commission, in that they are both highly important to the
portrayal of our financial condition and results, and require
difficult management judgments and assumptions about matters
that are inherently uncertain. We also have other important
policies, including those related to derivative instruments and
concentration of credit risk. However, these policies do not
meet the definition of critical accounting policies because they
do not generally require us to make estimates or judgments that
are difficult or subjective. These policies are discussed in the
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, which are
included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended April 30, 2005.
We believe the accounting policies described below are the ones
that most frequently require us to make estimates and judgments,
and therefore are critical to the understanding of our results
of operations:
|
|
|
| |
|
revenue recognition and allowances; |
| |
| |
|
valuation of goodwill and intangibles; |
| |
| |
|
accounting for income taxes; |
| |
| |
|
inventory write-down and reserves; |
| |
| |
|
restructuring accruals; |
| |
| |
|
impairment losses on investments; |
| |
| |
|
accounting for stock-based compensation; and |
| |
| |
|
loss contingencies. |
28
These accounting estimates and policies should be read in
conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements
and accompanying notes included in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, 2005.
New Accounting Standards
See Note 12 of the Consolidated Condensed Financial
Statements for a full description of recent accounting
pronouncements including the respective expected dates of
adoption and effects on results of operations and financial
condition.
Risk Factors
The following risk factors and other information included in
this Form 10-Q should be carefully considered. The risks
and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face.
Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or
that we presently deem less significant may also impair our
business operations. If any of the following risks actually
occur, our business, operating results, and financial condition
could be materially adversely affected.
|
|
|
Factors beyond our control could cause our quarterly
results to fluctuate. |
We believe that period-to-period comparisons of our results of
operations are not necessarily meaningful and should not be
relied upon as indicators of future performance. Many of the
factors that could cause our quarterly operating results to
fluctuate significantly in the future are beyond our control and
include, but are not limited to, the following:
|
|
|
| |
|
Changes in general economic conditions and specific economic
conditions in the computer, storage, and networking industries |
| |
| |
|
General decrease in global corporate spending on information
technology leading to a decline in demand for our products |
| |
| |
|
A shift in federal government spending pattern |
| |
| |
|
The effects of terrorist activity and international conflicts,
which could lead to business interruptions and difficulty in
forecasting |
| |
| |
|
The level of competition in our target product markets |
| |
| |
|
The size, timing, and cancellation of significant orders |
| |
| |
|
Product configuration and mix |
| |
| |
|
The extent to which our customers renew their service and
maintenance contracts with us |
| |
| |
|
Market acceptance of new products and product enhancements |
| |
| |
|
Announcements, introductions, and transitions of new products by
us or our competitors |
| |
| |
|
Deferrals of customer orders in anticipation of new products or
product enhancements introduced by us or our competitors |
| |
| |
|
Changes in pricing by us in response to competitive pricing
actions |
| |
| |
|
Our ability to develop, introduce, and market new products and
enhancements in a timely manner |
| |
| |
|
Supply constraints |
| |
| |
|
Technological changes in our target product markets |
| |
| |
|
The levels of expenditure on research and development and sales
and marketing programs |
| |
| |
|
Our ability to achieve targeted cost reductions |
29
|
|
|
| |
|
Excess facilities |
| |
| |
|
Future accounting pronouncements and changes in accounting
policies |
| |
| |
|
Seasonality |
In addition, sales for any future quarter may vary and
accordingly be inconsistent with our plans. We manufacture
products based on a combination of specific order requirements
and forecasts of our customer demands. Products are typically
shipped within one to four weeks following receipt of an order.
In certain circumstances, customers may cancel or reschedule
orders without penalty. Product sales are also difficult to
forecast because the network storage market is rapidly evolving
and our sales cycle varies substantially from customer to
customer.
The majority of revenue in any given quarter is derived from
orders booked in the same quarter. Bookings typically follow
intra-quarter seasonality patterns weighted towards the back-end
of the quarter. If bookings in the latter part of a quarter are
not achieved, there is a potential impact to revenue.
Due to all of the foregoing factors, it is possible that in one
or more future quarters our results may fall below the
expectations of public market analysts and investors. In such
event, the trading price of our common stock would likely
decrease.
|
|
|
An increase in competition could materially adversely
affect our operating results. |
The storage and content delivery markets are intensely
competitive and are characterized by rapidly changing technology.
In the storage market, our primary and nearline storage system
products and our associated storage software portfolio competes
primarily with storage system products and data management
software from EMC Corporation, Hitachi Data Systems,
Hewlett-Packard Company, IBM Corporation, and Sun Microsystems,
Inc. We also see Dell, Inc. as an emerging competitor in the
storage marketplace, primarily due to a business partnership
that has been established between Dell and EMC, allowing Dell to
resell EMC storage hardware and software products. We have also
historically encountered less-frequent competition from
companies including Engenio Information Technologies, Inc.
(formerly the Storage Systems Group of LSI Logic Corp.),
StorageTek Technology Corporation, Dot Hill Systems Corporation,
and Xiotech Corporation. In the nearline storage market, which
includes the disk-to-disk backup and regulated data storage
segments, our NearStore appliances compete primarily against
products from EMC and StorageTek. Our NearStore appliances also
compete indirectly with traditional tape backup solutions in the
broader data backup/recovery space.
In the content delivery market, our NetCache appliances and
content delivery software compete against caching appliance and
content delivery software vendors including BlueCoat Systems
(formerly CacheFlow, Inc.) and Cisco Systems, Inc. Our NetCache
business is also subject to indirect competition from content
delivery service products such as those offered by Akamai
Technologies.
Additionally, a number of new, privately held companies are
currently attempting to enter the storage systems and data
management software markets, the nearline storage market, and
the caching and content delivery markets, some of which may
become significant competitors in the future.
We believe that the principal competitive factors affecting the
storage and content delivery markets include product benefits
such as response time, reliability, data availability,
scalability, ease of use, price, multiprotocol capabilities, and
global service and support. We must continue to maintain and
enhance this technological advantage over our competitors.
Otherwise, if those competitors with greater financial,
marketing, service, support, technical, and other resources were
able to offer products that matched or surpassed the
technological capabilities of our products, these competitors
would, by virtue of these greater resources, gain a competitive
advantage over us that could lead to greater sales for these
competitors at the expense of our own market share, which would
have a material adverse affect on our business, financial
condition, and results of operations.
30
Increased competition could also result in price reductions,
reduced gross margins, and loss of market share, any of which
could materially adversely affect our operating results. Our
competitors may be able to respond more quickly than we can to
new or emerging technologies and changes in customer
requirements or devote greater resources to the development,
promotion, sale, and support of their products. In addition,
current and potential competitors have established or may
establish cooperative relationships among themselves or with
third parties. Accordingly, it is possible that new competitors
or alliances among competitors may emerge and rapidly acquire
significant market share. We cannot assure you that we will be
able to compete successfully against current or future
competitors. Competitive pressures we face could materially
adversely affect our operating results.
|
|
|
We rely on a limited number of suppliers, and any
disruption or termination of these supply arrangements could
delay shipment of our products and could materially and
adversely affect our operating results. |
We rely on a limited number of suppliers of several key
components utilized in the assembly of our products. We purchase
most of our disk drives through a single supplier. We purchase
computer boards and microprocessors from a limited number of
suppliers. Our reliance on a limited number of suppliers
involves several risks, including:
|
|
|
| |
|
A potential inability to obtain an adequate supply of required
components because we do not have long-term supply commitments |
| |
| |
|
Supplier capacity constraints |
| |
| |
|
Price increases |
| |
| |
|
Timely delivery |
| |
| |
|
Component quality |
Component quality is particularly significant with respect to
our suppliers of disk drives. In order to meet product
performance requirements, we must obtain disk drives of
extremely high quality and capacity. In addition, there are
periodic supply-and-demand issues for disk drives,
microprocessors, and semiconductor memory components, which
could result in component shortages, selective supply
allocations, and increased prices of such components. We cannot
assure you that we will be able to obtain our full requirements
of such components in the future or that prices of such
components will not increase. In addition, problems with respect
to yield and quality of such components and timeliness of
deliveries could occur. Disruption or termination of the supply
of these components could delay shipments of our products and
could materially adversely affect our operating results. Such
delays could also damage relationships with current and
prospective customers.
In addition, we license certain technology and software from
third parties that is incorporated into our products. If we are
unable to obtain or license the technology and software on a
timely basis, we will not be able to deliver products to our
customers in a timely manner.
|
|
|
The loss of any contract manufacturers or the failure to
accurately forecast demand for our products or successfully
manage our relationships with our contract manufacturers could
negatively impact our ability to manufacture and sell our
products. |
We currently rely on several contract manufacturers to
manufacture most of our products. Our reliance on our
third-party contract manufacturers reduces our control over the
manufacturing process, exposing us to risks, including reduced
control over quality assurance, production costs, and product
supply. If we should fail to effectively manage our
relationships with our contract manufacturers, or if our
contract manufacturers experience delays, disruptions, capacity
constraints, or quality control problems in their manufacturing
operations, our ability to ship products to our customers could
be impaired and our competitive position and reputation could be
harmed. Qualifying a new contract manufacturer and commencing
volume production are expensive and time-consuming. If we are
required to change contract manufacturers or assume internal
31
manufacturing operations, we may lose revenue and damage our
customer relationships. If we inaccurately forecast demand for
our products, we may have excess or inadequate inventory or
incur cancellation charges or penalties, which could adversely
impact our operating results. As of April 30, 2005, we have
no purchase commitment under these agreements.
We intend to regularly introduce new products and product
enhancements, which will require us to rapidly achieve volume
production by coordinating with our contract manufacturers and
suppliers. We may need to increase our material purchases,
contract manufacturing capacity, and internal test and quality
functions to meet anticipated demand. The inability of our
contract manufacturers to provide us with adequate supplies of
high-quality products, or the inability to obtain raw materials,
could cause a delay in our ability to fulfill orders.
|
|
|
Our future financial performance depends on growth in the
network storage and content delivery markets. If these markets
do not continue to grow at the rates at which we forecast
growth, our operating results will be materially and adversely
impacted. |
All of our products address the storage and content delivery
markets. Accordingly, our future financial performance will
depend in large part on continued growth in the storage and
content delivery markets and on our ability to adapt to emerging
standards in these markets. We cannot assure you that the
markets for storage and content delivery will continue to grow
or that emerging standards in these markets will not adversely
affect the growth of UNIX, Windows, and the World Wide Web
server markets upon which we depend.
For example, we provide our open access data retention solutions
to customers within the financial services, healthcare,
pharmaceuticals, and government market segments, industries that
are subject to various evolving governmental regulations with
respect to data access, reliability, and permanence (such as
Rule 17(a)(4) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended) in the United States and in the other countries in
which we operate. If our products do not meet, and continue to
comply with, these evolving governmental regulations in this
regard, customers in these market and geographical segments will
not purchase our products, and, therefore, we will not be able
to expand our product offerings in these market and geographical
segments at the rates for which we have forecast.
In addition, our business also depends on general economic and
business conditions. A reduction in demand for network storage
and content delivery caused by weakening economic conditions and
decreases in corporate spending will result in decreased
revenues and lower revenue growth rates. The network storage and
content delivery market growth declined significantly beginning
in the third quarter of fiscal 2001, causing both our revenues
and operating results to decline. If the network storage and
content delivery markets grow more slowly than anticipated or if
emerging standards other than those adopted by us become
increasingly accepted by these markets, our operating results
could be materially adversely affected.
|
|
|
If we are unable to develop and introduce new products and
respond to technological change, if our new products do not
achieve market acceptance, or if we fail to manage the
transition between our new and old products, our operating
results could be materially and adversely affected. |
Our future growth depends upon the successful development and
introduction of new hardware and software products. Due to the
complexity of storage subsystems and Internet caching devices,
and the difficulty in gauging the engineering effort required to
produce new products, such products are subject to significant
technical risks. However, we cannot assure you that any of our
new products will achieve market acceptance. Additional product
introductions in future periods may also impact our sales of
existing products. In addition, our new products must respond to
technological changes and evolving industry standards. If we are
unable, for technological or other reasons, to develop and
introduce new products in a timely manner in response to
changing market conditions or customer requirements, or if such
products do not achieve market acceptance, our operating results
could be materially adversely affected.
In particular, in conjunction with the introduction of our
product offerings in the fabric-attached storage market, we
introduced products with new features and functionality that
address the storage area network market. We face risks relating
to these product introductions, including risks relating to
forecasting of demand
32
for such products, as well as possible product and software
defects and a potentially different sales and support
environment associated with selling these new systems. If any of
the foregoing occurs, our operating results could be adversely
affected.
As new or enhanced products are introduced, we must successfully
manage the transition from older products in order to minimize
disruption in customers ordering patterns, avoid excessive
levels of older product inventories, and ensure that enough
supplies of new products can be delivered to meet
customers demands.
|
|
|
Our gross margins may vary based on the configuration of
our product and service solutions, and such variation may make
it more difficult to forecast our earnings. |
We derive a significant portion of our sales from the resale of
disk drives as components of our storage systems, and the resale
market for hard disk drives is highly competitive and subject to
intense pricing pressures. Our sales of disk drives generate
lower gross margin percentages than those of our storage
systems. As a result, as we sell more highly configured systems
with greater disk drive content, overall gross margin
percentages may be negatively affected.
Our gross margins have been and may continue to be affected by a
variety of other factors, including:
|
|
|
| |
|
Demand for storage and content delivery products |
| |
| |
|
Discount levels and price competition |
| |
| |
|
Direct versus indirect sales |
| |
| |
|
Product and add-on software mix |
| |
| |
|
The mix of services as a percentage of revenue |
| |
| |
|
The mix and average selling prices of products |
| |
| |
|
The mix of disk content |
| |
| |
|
New product introductions and enhancements |
| |
| |
|
Excess inventory purchase commitments as a result of changes in
demand forecasts and possible product and software defects as we
transition our products |
| |
| |
|
The cost of components, manufacturing labor, and quality |
Changes in service gross margin may result from various factors
such as continued investments in our customer support
infrastructure, changes in the mix between technical support
services and professional services, as well as the timing of
technical support service contract initiations and renewals.
|
|
|
We may incur problems with current or future acquisitions
and equity investments, and these investments may not achieve
our objectives. |
As part of our strategy, we are continuously evaluating
opportunities to buy other businesses or technologies that would
complement our current products, expand the breadth of our
markets, or enhance our technical capabilities. We may engage in
future acquisitions that dilute our stockholders
investments and cause us to use cash, to incur debt, or to
assume contingent liabilities.
Acquisitions of companies entail numerous risks, and we may not
be able to successfully integrate acquired operations and
products or realize anticipated synergies, economies of scale,
or other value. Integration risks and issues may include, but
not limited to, key personnel retention and assimilation,
management distraction, technical development, and unexpected
costs and liabilities, including goodwill impairment charges. In
addition, we may experience a diversion of managements
attention, the loss of key employees of acquired operations, or
the inability to recover strategic investments in development
stage entities. Any such problems could have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition, and results of
operation.
33
From time to time, we make equity investments for the promotion
of business and strategic objectives. We have already made
strategic investments in a number of network storage-related
technology companies. Equity investments may result in the loss
of investment capital. The market price and valuation of our
equity investments in these companies may fluctuate due to
market conditions and other circumstances over which we have
little or no control. To the extent that the fair value of these
securities is less than our cost over an extended period of
time, our results of operations and financial position could be
negatively impacted.
|
|
|
Our ability to increase our revenues depends on expanding
our direct sales operations and reseller distribution channels
and continuing to provide excellent global service and support.
If we are unable to effectively develop, retain, and expand our
global sales and service workforce or to establish and cultivate
relationships with our indirect reseller and distribution
channels, our ability to grow and increase revenue could be
harmed. |
In an effort to gain market share and support our global
customers, we will need to expand our worldwide direct sales
operations and global service and support infrastructure to
support new and existing enterprise customers. Expansion of our
direct sales operations, reseller/distribution channels, and
global service and support operations may not be successfully
implemented, and the cost of any expansion may exceed the
revenues generated.
We market and sell our storage solutions directly through our
worldwide sales force and indirectly through channels such as
value-added resellers (VARs), systems integrators,
distributors, and strategic business partners and derive a
significant portion of our revenue from these indirect channel
partners. However, in order for us to maintain our current
revenue sources and grow our revenue as we have forecasted, we
must effectively manage our relationships with these indirect
channel partners. To do so, we must attract and retain a
sufficient number of qualified channel partners to successfully
market our products. However, because we also sell our products
directly to customers through our sales force, on occasion we
compete with our indirect channels for sales of our products to
our end customers, competition that could result in conflicts
with these indirect channel partners and make it harder for us
to attract and retain these indirect channel partners. At the
same time, our indirect channel partners may develop and offer
products of their own that are competitive to ours. Or, because
our reseller partners generally offer products from several
different companies, including products of our competitors,
these resellers may give higher priority to the marketing,
sales, and support of our competitors products than ours.
If we fail to manage effectively our relationships with these
indirect channel partners to minimize channel conflict and
continue to evaluate and meet our indirect sales partners
needs with respect to our products, we will not be able to
maintain or increase our revenue as we have forecasted, which
would have a materially adverse affect on our business,
financial condition, and results of operations. Additionally, if
we do not manage distribution of our products and services and
support effectively, or if our resellers financial
conditions or operations weaken, our revenues and gross margins
could be adversely affected.
|
|
|
Risks inherent in our international operations could have
a material adverse effect on our operating results. |
We conduct business internationally. For the first quarter of
fiscal year 2006, 40.5% of our total revenues was from
international customers (including U.S. exports).
Accordingly, our future operating results could be materially
adversely affected by a variety of factors, some of which are
beyond our control, including regulatory, political, or economic
conditions in a specific country or region, trade protection
measures and other regulatory requirements, government spending
patterns, and acts of terrorism and international conflicts.
Our international sales are denominated in U.S. dollars and
in foreign currencies. An increase in the value of the
U.S. dollar relative to foreign currencies could make our
products more expensive and, therefore, potentially less
competitive in foreign markets. For international sales and
expenditures denominated in foreign currencies, we are subject
to risks associated with currency fluctuations. We utilize
forward and option contracts to hedge our foreign currency
exposure associated with certain assets and liabilities as well
as anticipated foreign currency cash flow. All balance sheet
hedges are marked to market through earnings every period, while
gains and losses on cash flow hedges are recorded in other
comprehensive income. These hedges
34
attempt to reduce, but do not always entirely eliminate, the
impact of currency exchange movements. Factors that could have
an impact on the effectiveness of our hedging program include
the accuracy of forecasts and the volatility of foreign currency
markets. There can be no assurance that such hedging strategies
will be successful and that currency exchange rate fluctuations
will not have a material adverse effect on our operating results.
Additional risks inherent in our international business
activities generally include, among others, longer accounts
receivable payment cycles and difficulties in managing
international operations. Such factors could materially
adversely affect our future international sales and,
consequently, our operating results.
Potentially adverse tax consequences could also negatively
impact the operating and financial results from international
operations. International operations currently benefit from a
tax ruling concluded in the Netherlands.
Additional risks inherent in our international business
activities generally include, among others, longer accounts
receivable payment cycles, difficulties in managing
international operations, and potentially adverse tax
consequences. Such factors could materially adversely affect our
future international sales and, consequently, our operating
results.
Although operating results have not been materially adversely
affected by seasonality in the past, because of the significant
seasonal effects experienced within the industry, particularly
in Europe, our future operating results could be materially
adversely affected by seasonality.
We cannot assure you that we will be able to maintain or
increase international market demand for our products.
|
|
|
If we are unable to maintain our existing relationships
and develop new relationships with major strategic partners, our
revenue may be impacted negatively. |
An element of our strategy to increase revenue is to
strategically partner with major third-party software and
hardware vendors that integrate our products into their products
and also comarket our products with these vendors. A number of
these strategic partners are industry leaders that offer us
expanded access to segments of the storage market. There is
intense competition for attractive strategic partners, and even
if we can establish strategic relationships with these partners,
we cannot assure you that these partnerships will generate
significant revenue or that the partnerships will continue to be
in effect for any specific period of time.
We intend to continue to establish and maintain business
relationships with technology companies to accelerate the
development and marketing of our storage solutions. To the
extent we are unsuccessful in developing new relationships and
maintaining our existing relationships, our future revenue and
operating results could be impacted negatively. In addition, the
loss of a strategic partner could have a material adverse effect
on the progress of our new products under development with that
partner.
|
|
|
A significant percentage of our expenses are fixed, which
could materially and adversely affect our net income. |
Our expense levels are based in part on our expectations as to
future sales, and a significant percentage of our expenses are
fixed. As a result, if sales levels are below expectations or
previously higher levels, net income will be disproportionately
affected in a material and adverse manner.
|
|
|
If we fail to manage our expanding business effectively,
our operating results could be materially adversely
affected. |
We have experienced growth in fiscal 2005 and 2004. Our future
operating results depend to a large extent on managements
ability to successfully manage expansion and growth, including
but not limited to expanding international operations,
forecasting revenues, addressing new markets, controlling
expenses, implementing infrastructure and systems, and managing
our assets. In addition, an unexpected decline in the
35
growth rate of revenues without a corresponding and timely
reduction in expense growth or a failure to manage other aspects
of growth could materially adversely affect our operating
results.
|
|
|
The market price for our common stock has fluctuated
significantly in the past and will likely continue to do so in
the future. |
The market price for our common stock has experienced
substantial volatility in the past, and several factors could
cause the price to fluctuate substantially in the future. These
factors include but are not limited to:
|
|
|
| |
|
Fluctuations in our operating results |
| |
| |
|
Fluctuations in the valuation of companies perceived by
investors to be comparable to us |
| |
| |
|
Economic developments in the network storage market as a whole |
| |
| |
|
International conflicts and acts of terrorism |
| |
| |
|
A shortfall in revenues or earnings compared to securities
analysts expectations |
| |
| |
|
Changes in analysts recommendations or projections |
| |
| |
|
Announcements of new products, applications, or product
enhancements by us or our competitors |
| |
| |
|
Changes in our relationships with our suppliers, customers, and
channel and strategic partners |
| |
| |
|
General market conditions |
In addition, the stock market has experienced volatility that
has particularly affected the market prices of equity securities
of many technology companies. Additionally, certain
macroeconomic factors such as changes in interest rates, the
market climate for the technology sector, and levels of
corporate spending on information technology could also have an
impact on the trading price of our stock. As a result, the
market price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly in
the future, and any broad market decline, as well as our own
operating results, may materially and adversely affect the
market price of our common stock.
|
|
|
Our business could be materially adversely affected as a
result of a natural disaster, terrorist acts, or other
catastrophic events. |
Our operations, including our suppliers and contract
manufacturers operations, are susceptible to outages due
to fire, floods, power loss, power shortages, telecommunications
failures, break-ins, and similar events. In addition, our
headquarters are located in Northern California, an area
susceptible to earthquakes. If any significant disaster were to
occur, our ability to operate our business could be impaired.
Weak economic conditions or terrorist actions could lead to
significant business interruptions. If such disruptions result
in cancellations of customer orders, a general decrease in
corporate spending on information technology, or direct impacts
on our marketing, manufacturing, financial functions or our
suppliers logistics function, our results of operations
and financial condition could be adversely affected.
|
|
|
We depend on attracting and retaining qualified technical
and sales personnel. If we are unable to attract and retain such
personnel, our operating results could be materially and
adversely impacted. |
Our continued success depends, in part, on our ability to
identify, attract, motivate, and retain qualified technical and
sales personnel. Because our future success is dependent on our
ability to continue to enhance and introduce new products, we
are particularly dependent on our ability to identify, attract,
motivate, and retain qualified engineers with the requisite
education, backgrounds, and industry experience. Competition for
qualified engineers, particularly in Silicon Valley, can be
intense. The loss of the services of a significant number of our
engineers or salespeople could be disruptive to our development
efforts or business relationships and could materially adversely
affect our operating results.
36
|
|
|
Undetected software, hardware errors, or failures found in
new products may result in loss of or delay in market acceptance
of our products, which could increase our costs and reduce our
revenues. |
Our products may contain undetected software, hardware errors,
or failures when first introduced or as new versions are
released. Despite testing by us and by current and potential
customers, errors may not be found in new products until after
commencement of commercial shipments, resulting in loss of or
delay in market acceptance, which could materially adversely
affect our operating results.
|
|
|
If we are unable to protect our intellectual property, we
may be subject to increased competition that could materially
adversely affect our operating results. |
Our success depends significantly upon our proprietary
technology. We rely on a combination of copyright and trademark
laws, trade secrets, confidentiality procedures, contractual
provisions, and patents to protect our proprietary rights. We
seek to protect our software, documentation, and other written
materials under trade secret, copyright, and patent laws, which
afford only limited protection. Some U.S. trademarks and
some U.S.-registered trademarks are registered internationally
as well. We will continue to evaluate the registration of
additional trademarks as appropriate. We generally enter into
confidentiality agreements with our employees and with our
resellers, strategic partners, and customers. We currently have
multiple U.S. and international patent applications pending and
multiple U.S. patents issued. The pending applications may
not be approved, and if patents are issued, such patents may be
challenged. If such challenges are brought, the patents may be
invalidated. We cannot assure you that we will develop
proprietary products or technologies that are patentable, that
any issued patent will provide us with any competitive
advantages or will not be challenged by third parties, or that
the patents of others will not materially adversely affect our
ability to do business.
Litigation may be necessary to protect our proprietary
technology. Any such litigation may be time-consuming and
costly. Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights,
unauthorized parties may attempt to copy aspects of our products
or to obtain and use information that we regard as proprietary.
In addition, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect
proprietary rights to as great an extent as do the laws of the
United States. We cannot assure you that our means of protecting
our proprietary rights will be adequate or that our competitors
will not independently develop similar technology, duplicate our
products, or design around patents issued to us or other
intellectual property rights of ours.
We are subject to intellectual property infringement claims. We
may, from time to time, receive claims that we are infringing
third parties intellectual property rights. Third parties
may in the future claim infringement by us with respect to
current or future products, patents, trademarks, or other
proprietary rights. We expect that companies in the appliance
market will increasingly be subject to infringement claims as
the number of products and competitors in our industry segment
grows and the functionality of products in different industry
segments overlaps. Any such claims could be time-consuming,
result in costly litigation, cause product shipment delays,
require us to redesign our products, or require us to enter into
royalty or licensing agreements, any of which could materially
adversely affect our operating results. Such royalty or
licensing agreements, if required, may not be available on terms
acceptable to us or at all.
|
|
|
Our business is subject to changing laws and regulations
and public disclosure that has increased both our costs and the
risk of noncompliance. Failure to comply with these new
regulations could have an adverse effect on our business and
stock price. |
Because our common stock is publicly traded, we are subject to
certain rules and regulations of federal, state, and financial
market exchange entities charged with the protection of
investors and the oversight of companies whose securities are
publicly traded. These entities, including the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board, the SEC, and NASDAQ, have
implemented new requirements and regulations and continue
developing additional regulations and requirements in response
to recent corporate scandals and laws enacted by Congress, most
notably the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Our efforts to comply
with these new regulations have resulted in, and are likely to
continue resulting in, increased general and administrative
expenses and diversion of management time and attention from
revenue-generating activities to compliance activities.
37
We have recently completed our evaluation of our internal
controls over financial reporting as required by
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Although our
assessment, testing, and evaluation resulted in our conclusion
that as of April 30, 2005, our internal controls over
financial reporting were effective, we cannot predict the
outcome of our testing in future periods. If our internal
controls are ineffective in future periods, our business and
reputation could be harmed. We may incur additional expenses and
commitment of managements time in connection with further
evaluations, either of which could materially increase our
operating expenses and accordingly reduce our net income.
We also face increasing complexity in our product design and
procurement operations as we adjust to new and upcoming
requirements relating to the materials composition of many of
our products. The European Union (EU) has adopted
two directives to facilitate the recycling of electrical and
electronic equipment sold in the EU. The first of these is the
Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) directive,
which directs EU member states to enact laws, regulations, and
administrative provisions to ensure that producers of electrical
and electronic equipment are financially responsible for
specified collection, recycling, treatment, and environmentally
sound disposal of products placed on the market after
August 13, 2005, and from products in use prior to that
date that are being replaced. The EU has also adopted the
Restriction on the Use of Certain Hazardous Substances in
Electrical and Electronic Equipment (RoHS)
directive. The RoHS directive restricts the use of lead,
mercury, and certain other substances in electrical and
electronic products placed on the market in the European Union
after July 1, 2006.
Similar laws and regulations have been or may be enacted in
other regions, including in the United States, China, and
Japan. Other environmental regulations may require us to
reengineer our products to utilize components that are more
environmentally compatible, and such reengineering and component
substitution may result in additional costs to us. Although we
do not anticipate any material adverse effects based on the
nature of our operations and the effect of such laws, there is
no assurance that such existing laws or future laws will not
have a material adverse effect on our business.
|
|
|
Changes in financial accounting standards or practices may
cause adverse unexpected fluctuations and affect our reported
business and financial results. |
In December 2004 the FASB issued SFAS No. 123R
(revised 2004), which will require us, beginning in the first
quarter of fiscal 2007, to expense employee stock options for
financial reporting purposes. Adoption of
SFAS No. 123R will result in lower reported earnings
per share, which could negatively impact our future stock price.
In addition, this could also impact our ability or future
practice of utilizing broad-based employee stock plans to
attract, reward, and retain employees, which could also
adversely impact our operations.
In addition, the FASB requires certain valuation models to
estimate the fair value of employee stock options. These models,
including the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, use varying
methods, inputs, and assumptions selected across companies. If
another party asserts that the fair value of our employee stock
options is misstated, securities class action litigation could
be brought against us, or the market price of our common stock
could decline, or both could occur. As a result of these
changes, we could incur losses, and our operating results and
gross margins may be below our expectations and those of
investors and stock market analysts.
|
|
|
The U.S. government has contributed to our revenue
growth and become an important customer for us. However,
government demand is unpredictable, and there is no guarantee of
future revenue growth from the U.S. government. |
The U.S. government has become an important customer for
the storage market and for us. Government agencies are subject
to budgetary processes and expenditure constraints that could
lead to delays or decreased capital expenditures in IT spending
on infrastructures. If the government or individual agencies
within the government reduce or shift their capital spending
pattern, our financial results may be harmed. We cannot assure
you that revenue from the U.S. government will continue to
grow in the future.
38
|
|
| Item 3. |
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk |
We are exposed to market risk related to fluctuations in
interest rates, market prices and foreign currency exchange
rates. We use certain derivative financial instruments to manage
these risks. We do not use derivative financial instruments for
speculative or trading purposes. All financial instruments are
used in accordance with management-approved policies.
Market Interest and Interest Income Risk
Interest and Investment Income As of
July 29, 2005, we had short-term investments of
$983.2 million. Our investment portfolio primarily consists
of highly liquid investments with original maturities at the
date of purchase of greater than three months, which are
classified as available-for-sale and investment in marketable
equity securities in primarily technology companies. These
highly liquid investments, consisting primarily of government
and corporate debt securities, and auction-rate securities, are
subject to interest rate and interest income risk and will
decrease in value if market interest rates increase. A
hypothetical 10 percent increase in market interest rates
from levels at July 29, 2005 would cause the fair value of
these short-term investments to decline by approximately $2.9
million. Because we have the ability to hold these investments
until maturity we would not expect any significant decline in
value of our investments caused by market interest rate changes.
Declines in interest rates over time will, however, reduce our
interest income. We do not use derivative financial instruments
in our investment portfolio.
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk
We hedge risks associated with foreign currency transactions in
order to minimize the impact of changes in foreign currency
exchange rates on earnings. We utilize forward and option
contracts to hedge against the short-term impact of foreign
currency fluctuations on certain assets and liabilities
denominated in foreign currencies. All balance sheet hedges are
marked to market through earnings every period. We also use
foreign exchange forward contracts to hedge foreign currency
forecasted transactions related to certain sales and operating
expenses. These derivatives are designated as cash flow hedges
under SFAS No. 133. For cash flow hedges outstanding
at July 29, 2005, the gains or losses were included in
other comprehensive income.
We do not enter into foreign exchange contracts for speculative
or trading purposes. In entering into forward and option foreign
exchange contracts, we have assumed the risk that might arise
from the possible inability of counterparties to meet the terms
of their contracts. We attempt to limit our exposure to credit
risk by executing foreign exchange contracts with creditworthy
multinational commercial banks. All contracts have a maturity of
less than one year.
39
The following table provides information about our foreign
exchange forward and option contracts outstanding on
July 29, 2005 (in thousands):
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Foreign | |
|
Contract Value | |
|
Fair Value | |
| Currency |
|
Buy/Sell | |
|
Currency Amount | |
|
USD | |
|
in USD | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Forward contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
CAD
|
|
|
Sell |
|
|
|
7,784 |
|
|
$ |
6,358 |
|
|
$ |
6,359 |
|
| |
ILS
|
|
|
Sell |
|
|
|
10,648 |
|
|
$ |
2,354 |
|
|
$ |
2,354 |
|
| |
EUR
|
|
|
Sell |
|
|
|
115,360 |
|
|
$ |
140,179 |
|
|
$ |
139,985 |
|
| |
GBP
|
|
|
Sell |
|
|
|
19,333 |
|
|
$ |
33,991 |
|
|
$ |
33,912 |
|
| |
ZAR
|
|
|
Sell |
|
|
|
20,021 |
|
|
$ |
3,030 |
|
|
$ |
3,030 |
|
| |
AUD
|
|
|
Buy |
|
|
|
12,578 |
|
|
$ |
9,504 |
|
|
$ |
9,504 |
|
| |
CHF
|
|
|
Buy |
|
|
|
585 |
|
|
$ |
455 |
|
|
$ |
455 |
|
| |
DKK
|
|
|
Buy |
|
|
|
11,963 |
|
|
$ |
1,949 |
|
|
$ |
1,949 |
|
| |
EUR
|
|
|
Buy |
|
|
|
9,316 |
|
|
$ |
11,272 |
|
|
$ |
11,304 |
|
| |
GBP
|
|
|
Buy |
|
|
|
2,282 |
|
|
$ |
3,992 |
|
|
$ |
4,003 |
|
| |
SEK
|
|
|
Buy |
|
|
|
10,558 |
|
|
$ |
1,364 |
|
|
$ |
1,364 |
|
|
Option contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
EUR
|
|
|
Sell |
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
$ |
7,276 |
|
|
$ |
7,344 |
|
| |
GBP
|
|
|
Sell |
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
$ |
2,633 |
|
|
$ |
2,657 |
|
|
|
| Item 4. |
Controls and Procedures |
Disclosure controls are controls and procedures designed to
ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports
filed under the Exchange Act, such as this Quarterly Report, is
recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commissions rules and forms. Disclosure controls and
procedures are also designed to ensure that such information is
accumulated and communicated to our management, including the
CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding
required disclosure.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our
management, including our principal executive officer and
principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the
effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure
controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
as of July 29, 2005, the end of the fiscal period covered
by this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date).
Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and
principal financial officer concluded as of the Evaluation Date
that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective such
that the information relating to Network Appliance, including
our consolidated subsidiaries, required to be disclosed in our
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) reports
(i) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within
the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms, and
(ii) is accumulated and communicated to Network
Appliances management, including our principal executive
officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow
timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
There was no change in our internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the period covered by this
Quarterly Report that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
40
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
| Item 1. |
Legal Proceedings |
None
|
|
| Item 2. |
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of
Proceeds |
The table below sets forth activity in the first quarter of
fiscal 2006:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of | |
|
Approximate Dollar | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased | |
|
Value of Shares | |
| |
|
|
|
Average | |
|
as Part of the | |
|
That May yet be | |
| |
|
Shares | |
|
Price Paid | |
|
Repurchase | |
|
Purchased Under the | |
| Period |
|
Purchased | |
|
per Share | |
|
Program(1) | |
|
Repurchase Program(2) | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
May 1, 2005 May 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
14,566,101 |
|
|
$ |
320,925,379 |
|
|
June 1, 2005 June 30, 2005
|
|
|
3,261,950 |
|
|
$ |
29.29 |
|
|
|
17,828,051 |
|
|
$ |
225,382,165 |
|
|
July 1, 2005 July 29, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
17,828,051 |
|
|
$ |
225,382,165 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
3,261,950 |
|
|
$ |
29.29 |
|
|
|
17,828,051 |
|
|
$ |
225,382,165 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (1) |
This amount represented total number of shares purchased under
our publicly announced repurchase programs since inception. |
| |
| (2) |
On May 24, 2005, our Board approved a new, incremental
stock repurchase program in which up to $300.0 million of
additional shares of our outstanding common stock may be
purchased. The stock repurchase program may be suspended or
discontinued at any time. |
|
|
| Item 3. |
Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
None
|
|
| Item 4. |
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
None
|
|
| Item 5. |
Other Information |
The information required by this item is incorporated by
reference from our Proxy Statement for the 2005 Annual Meeting
of Stockholders.
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
2 |
.1(3) |
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of November 3, 2003,
by and among Network Appliance, Inc., Nagano Sub, Inc., and
Spinnaker Networks, Inc. |
| |
| |
2 |
.2(3) |
|
Amendment to Merger Agreement, dated as of February 9,
2004, by and among Network Appliance, Inc., Nagano Sub, Inc.,
and Spinnaker Networks, Inc. |
| |
| |
2 |
.3 |
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization, dated as of
June 15, 2005, by and among Network Appliance, Inc.,
Dolphin Acquisition Corp., and Decru, Inc. |
| |
| |
3 |
.1(1) |
|
Certificate of Incorporation of the Company. |
| |
| |
3 |
.2(1) |
|
Bylaws of the Company. |
| |
| |
3 |
.3(6) |
|
Certificate of Amendment to the Bylaws of the Company. |
| |
| |
4 |
.1(1) |
|
Reference is made to Exhibits 3.1 and 3.2. |
| |
| |
4 |
.2(4) |
|
Spinnaker Networks, Inc. 2000 Stock Plan. |
| |
| |
4 |
.3(7) |
|
Form of Stock Option Grant Notice and Option Agreement under the
Decru, Inc. Amended and Restated 2001 Equity Incentive Plan. |
41
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
4 |
.4(7) |
|
Form of Stock Option Grant Notice and Option Agreement under the
Decru, Inc. 2001 Equity Incentive Plan |
| |
| |
4 |
.5(7) |
|
Form of Early Exercise Stock Purchase Agreement under the Decru,
Inc. 2001 Equity Incentive Plan. |
| |
| |
4 |
.6(7) |
|
Form of Restricted Stock Bonus Grant Notice and Agreement under
the Decru, Inc. 2001 Equity Incentive Plan. |
| |
| |
10 |
.1(2) |
|
Asset Purchase Agreement dated June 20, 2003, by and
between Auspex Systems, Inc. and the Company. |
| |
| |
10 |
.2(5) |
|
Purchase and Sale Agreement dated July 27, 2004 by and
between Cisco Systems, Inc. and the Company. |
| |
| |
31 |
.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Securities
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) as adopted
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
dated September 2, 2005. |
| |
| |
31 |
.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Securities
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) as adopted
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
dated September 2, 2005. |
| |
| |
32 |
.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U .S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated September 2, 2005. |
| |
| |
32 |
.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated
September 2, 2005. |
|
|
| (1) |
Previously filed as an exhibit with the Companys Current
Report on Form 8-K dated December 4, 2001. |
| |
| (2) |
Previously filed as an exhibit with the Companys Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q dated September 3, 2003. |
| |
| (3) |
Previously filed as an exhibit with the Companys Current
Report on Form 8-K dated February 27, 2004. |
| |
| (4) |
Previously filed as an exhibit with the Companys
Form S-8 registration statement dated March 1, 2004. |
| |
| (5) |
Previously filed as an exhibit with the Companys Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q dated August 31, 2004. |
| |
| (6) |
Previously filed as an exhibit with the Companys Current
Report on Form 8-K dated May 4, 2005. |
| |
| (7) |
Previously filed as an exhibit with the Companys
Form S-8 registration statement dated September 2,
2005. |
42
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to
be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly
authorized.
|
|
| |
NETWORK APPLIANCE INC. |
| |
(Registrant) |
| |
| |
/s/ STEVEN J. GOMO |
| |
|
| |
Steven J. Gomo |
| |
Executive Vice President of Finance and |
| |
Chief Financial Officer |
Date: September 2, 2005
43
EXHIBIT INDEX
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
2 |
.1(3) |
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of November 3, 2003,
by and among Network Appliance, Inc., Nagano Sub, Inc., and
Spinnaker Networks, Inc. |
| |
| |
2 |
.2(3) |
|
Amendment to Merger Agreement, dated as of February 9,
2004, by and among Network Appliance, Inc., Nagano Sub, Inc.,
and Spinnaker Networks, Inc. |
| |
| |
2 |
.3 |
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization, dated as of
June 15, 2005, by and among Network Appliance, Inc.,
Dolphin Acquisition Corp., and Decru, Inc. |
| |
| |
3 |
.1(1) |
|
Certificate of Incorporation of the Company. |
| |
| |
3 |
.2(1) |
|
Bylaws of the Company. |
| |
| |
3 |
.3(6) |
|
Certificate of Amendment to the Bylaws of the Company. |
| |
| |
4 |
.1(1) |
|
Reference is made to Exhibits 3.1 and 3.2. |
| |
| |
4 |
.2(4) |
|
Spinnaker Networks, Inc. 2000 Stock Plan. |
| |
| |
4 |
.3(7) |
|
Form of Stock Option Grant Notice and Option Agreement under the
Decru, Inc. Amended and Restated 2001 Equity Incentive Plan. |
| |
| |
4 |
.4(7) |
|
Form of Stock Option Grant Notice and Option Agreement under the
Decru, Inc. 2001 Equity Incentive Plan. |
| |
| |
4 |
.5(7) |
|
Form of Early Exercise Stock Purchase Agreement under the Decru,
Inc. 2001 Equity Incentive Plan. |
| |
| |
4 |
.6(7) |
|
Form of Restricted Stock Bonus Grant Notice and Agreement under
the Decru, Inc. 2001 Equity Incentive Plan. |
| |
| |
10 |
.1(2) |
|
Asset Purchase Agreement dated June 20, 2003, by and
between Auspex Systems, Inc. and the Company. |
| |
| |
10 |
.2(5) |
|
Purchase and Sale Agreement dated July 27, 2004 by and
between Cisco Systems, Inc. and the Company. |
| |
| |
31 |
.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Securities
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) as adopted
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
dated September 2, 2005. |
| |
| |
31 |
.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Securities
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) as adopted
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
dated September 2, 2005. |
| |
| |
32 |
.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U .S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated September 2, 2005. |
| |
| |
32 |
.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated
September 2, 2005. |
|
|
| (1) |
Previously filed as an exhibit with the Companys Current
Report on Form 8-K dated December 4, 2001. |
| |
| (2) |
Previously filed as an exhibit with the Companys Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q dated September 3, 2003. |
| |
| (3) |
Previously filed as an exhibit with the Companys Current
Report on Form 8-K dated February 27, 2004. |
| |
| (4) |
Previously filed as an exhibit with the Companys
Form S-8 registration statement dated March 1, 2004. |
| |
| (5) |
Previously filed as an exhibit with the Companys Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q dated August 31, 2004. |
| |
| (6) |
Previously filed as an exhibit with the Companys Current
Report on Form 8-K dated May 4, 2005. |
| |
| (7) |
Previously filed as an exhibit with the Companys
Form S-8 registration statement dated September 2,
2005. |