XML 25 R14.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT
v3.21.1

Commitments and Contingencies | 3 Months Ended
--- | ---
Mar. 31, 2021
Commitments and Contingencies |
Commitments and Contingencies | 8. Commitments and Contingencies Legal Proceedings From time to time, the Company is involved in disputes, litigation, and other legal actions, including those with respect to intellectual property, employment, testing and other matters. Such actions may include allegations of negligence, products/professional liability or other similar legal claims, and could involve claims for substantial compensatory and/or punitive damages or claims for indeterminate amounts of damages. The Company is aggressively defending and/or prosecuting its current litigation matters, but cannot provide any assurance as to the ultimate outcome or that an adverse resolution would not have a material adverse effect on its financial condition and results of operations. There are many uncertainties associated with any litigation and these actions or other third party claims against the Company, or by the Company against third parties, may cause the Company to incur costly litigation and/or substantial settlement charges. In addition, the resolution of any intellectual property litigation may require the Company to make royalty payments, which could adversely affect gross margins in future periods. If this were to occur, the Company's business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows could be adversely affected. The Company assesses legal contingencies to determine the degree of probability and range of possible loss for potential accrual in its financial statements. When evaluating legal contingencies, the Company may be unable to provide a meaningful estimate due to a number of factors, including the procedural status of the matter in question, the presence of complex or novel legal theories, and/or the ongoing discovery and development of information important to the matters. In addition, damage amounts claimed in litigation against it may be unsupported, exaggerated or unrelated to possible outcomes, and as such are not meaningful indicators of its potential liability. During the periods presented, the Company has not recorded any accrual for loss contingencies associated with such legal proceedings, determined that an unfavorable outcome is probable or reasonably possible, or determined that the amount or range of any possible loss is reasonably estimable. Intellectual Property Litigation Matters. The Company is involved in patent litigation against CareDx, Inc., or CareDx, in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware (“CareDx’s Patent Case”). CareDx alleges, in a complaint filed in March 2019 and amended in March 2020, that the Company infringed three patents. The complaint seeks unspecified damages and injunctive relief. The Company has also alleged that CareDx infringes two of Natera’s patents, seeking unspecified damages and injunctive relief. The Court has set a trial date of April 25, 2022. Natera is also opposing a European patent held by CareDx, with oral proceedings scheduled for May 11, 2021. ​ The Company is also the subject of a lawsuit filed by CareDx against the Company in April 2019 in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, alleging false advertising, trademark disparagement, unfair competition, and unfair or deceptive trade practices based on statements describing studies that concern the Company’s technology and CareDx’s technology (“CareDx’s Advertising Case”). The complaint seeks unspecified damages and injunctive relief. In May 2019, the Company filed a motion to dismiss the entirety of CareDx’s Advertising Case for failure to state a claim, following which in February 2020, CareDx filed an amended complaint withdrawing its trademark disparagement claim. Also in February 2020, the Company filed a counterclaim against CareDx in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, alleging false advertising, unfair competition and deceptive trade practices and seeking unspecified damages and injunctive relief. The parties cross-moved for partial summary judgment, which was denied in April 2021. A jury trial is set for July 23, 2021. The Company has filed suit against ArcherDX, Inc., or ArcherDX, in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, alleging, in complaints filed in January, April, and August of 2020, which cases were consolidated in September 2020, that certain ArcherDX DNA oncology products infringe four of Natera’s patents. In June 2020, ArcherDX filed a motion to dismiss aspects of the Company’s case, including to invalidate several of Natera’s asserted patents. That motion was denied in its entirety in October 2020. In January 2021, Company filed a second amended complaint naming an additional Archer DX entity, ArcherDx LLC, and Invitae Corp. as defendants. The Company is seeking unspecified monetary damages and injunctive relief. A jury trial is set for May 16, 2022. The Company is the subject of a lawsuit filed against it by Ravgen, Inc. in June 2020 in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, alleging infringement of two Ravgen patents. The complaint seeks monetary damages and injunctive relief. Trial is tentatively set for December 13, 2021. The Company filed suit against Progenity, Inc., or Progenity, in June 2020 in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas and in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, in each case alleging that Progenity’s NIPT test infringes six of Natera’s patents. The complaints seek treble damages and injunctive relief. In July 2020, Progenity filed suit against the Company in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, seeking declaratory judgment of non-infringement of Natera’s asserted patents. Progenity has petitioned the Patent Trial and Appeal Board of the United States Patent and Trademark Office for inter partes review of all of Natera’s asserted patents; decisions on Progenity’s petitions are expected in mid-2021. A jury trial is set for March 21, 2022. In October 2020, the Company filed suit against Genosity Inc., or Genosity, in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, alleging that various Genosity oncology products infringe a Natera patent and seeking unspecified monetary damages and injunctive relief. In March 2021, the Company filed a motion to dismiss certain of Genosity’s affirmative defenses and a counterclaim. ​ In January 2021, the Company filed suit against Inivata, Inc. and Inivata Ltd. (collectively “Inivata”) in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, alleging that various Inivata oncology products infringe two Natera patents. The complaint seeks unspecified monetary damages and injunctive relief. In April 2021, Inivata filed a motion to dismiss the Company’s complaint. Other Litigation Matters. In August 2019, a suit was filed against the Company in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois by a patient alleging claims relating to a discordant test result and seeking monetary damages. Director and Officer Indemnifications As permitted under Delaware law, and as set forth in the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation and its Bylaws, the Company indemnifies its directors, executive officers, other officers, employees and other agents for certain events or occurrences that may arise while in such capacity. The maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make under this indemnification is unlimited; however, the Company has insurance policies that may limit its exposure and may enable it to recover a portion of any future amounts paid. Assuming the applicability of coverage, the willingness of the insurer to assume coverage, and subject to certain retention, loss limits and other policy provisions, the Company believes any obligations under this indemnification would not be material, other than an initial $2.5 million for securities related claims. However, no assurances can be given that the covering insurers will not attempt to dispute the validity, applicability, or amount of coverage without expensive litigation against these insurers, in which case the Company may incur substantial liabilities as a result of these indemnification obligations. Third-Party Payer Reimbursement Audits From time to time, the Company receives recoupment requests from third-party payers for alleged overpayments. The Company disagrees with the contentions of pending requests and/or has recorded an estimated reserve for the alleged overpayments. Contractual Commitments The following table sets forth the material contractual commitments as of March 31, 2021 with a remaining term of at least one year: ​
​ | ​ | ​ | ​ | ​
Party | Commitments | ​ | Expiry Date
​ | ​ | (in thousands) | ​ | ​
Laboratory instruments supplier | $ | 217 | ​ | December 2021
Material supplier | ​ | 16,876 | ​ | June 2026
Application and other service providers | ​ | 34,605 | ​ | March 2026
Gene sequencing reagents and kits provider | ​ | 135 | ​ | April 2021
Software development provider | ​ | 1,766 | ​ | December 2024
Other material suppliers | ​ | 17,003 | ​ | Various
Total | $ | 70,602 | ​ | ​
​

X
- References No definition available. + Details
Name: | us-gaap_CommitmentsAndContingenciesDisclosureAbstract
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | xbrli:stringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition The entire disclosure for commitments and contingencies. + References Reference 1: http://fasb.org/us-gaap/role/ref/legacyRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 450 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/topic&trid=2127136 Reference 2: http://fasb.org/us-gaap/role/ref/legacyRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 440 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/topic&trid=2144648 + Details
Name: | us-gaap_CommitmentsAndContingenciesDisclosureTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | nonnum:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration