Litigation	12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2018
Loss Contingency, Information about Litigation Matters [Abstract]
Litigation	Litigation We are currently involved in various claims and legal proceedings, including the matters described below. For information as to our accounting policies relating to claims and legal proceedings, including use of estimates and contingencies, please read Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, to these consolidated financial statements. With respect to some loss contingencies, an estimate of the possible loss or range of loss cannot be made until management has further information, including, for example, (i) which claims, if any, will survive dispositive motion practice; (ii) information to be obtained through discovery; (iii) information as to the parties' damages claims and supporting evidence; (iv) the parties’ legal theories; and (v) the parties' settlement positions. The claims and legal proceedings in which we are involved also include challenges to the scope, validity or enforceability of the patents relating to our products, pipeline or processes, and challenges to the scope, validity or enforceability of the patents held by others. These include claims by third parties that we infringe their patents. An adverse outcome in any of these proceedings could result in one or more of the following and have a material impact on our business or consolidated results of operations and financial position: (i) loss of patent protection; (ii) inability to continue to engage in certain activities; and (iii) payment of significant damages, royalties, penalties and/or license fees to third parties. Loss Contingencies IMRALDI Patent Matters In September 2018 Fresenius Kabi Deutschland GmbH (Fresenius Kabi) commenced proceedings for damages and injunctive relief against Biogen France SAS in the Tribunal de Grande Instance de Paris, alleging that IMRALDI, the adalimumab biosimilar product of Samsung Bioepis UK Limited that Biogen has commercialized in Europe, infringes the French counterpart of European Patent No. 3 148 510 (the '510 Patent), which was issued in June 2018 and expires in March 2035. In October 2018 Fresenius Kabi commenced preliminary injunction proceedings against Biogen (Denmark) Manufacturing ApS and Biogen Denmark A/S in Denmark's Maritime and Commercial High Court alleging infringement of Danish Utility Models. In November 2018 Fresenius Kabi commenced infringement proceedings for damages and injunctive relief against Biogen Italia S.R.L. in the District Court of Milan relating to the Italian counterpart of the ‘510 Patent, and against Biogen GmbH in the Dusseldorf Regional Court relating to the German counterpart of the ‘510 Patent. No hearing has yet been set in these proceedings. In August 2018 Biogen Idec Ltd. (Biogen UK) and Samsung Bioepis UK Limited filed an action in the United Kingdom Patents Court to revoke the United Kingdom counterpart of the '510 Patent. Fresenius Kabi has filed a counterclaim asserting infringement of the '510 Patent and seeking damages and an injunction to restrain infringement if the patent is found valid and infringed. A trial has been set for July 2019. In December 2018 Biogen B.V. and Samsung Bioepis UK Limited filed an action in the District Court of the Hague, Netherlands to revoke the Dutch counterpart of the ‘510 Patent. A trial has been set for October 2019. An estimate of the possible loss or range of loss in the above matters cannot be made at this time. In October 2018 Gedeon Richter PLC asserted to Biogen and Samsung Bioepis UK Limited that IMRALDI infringes European Patent No. 3 212 667, which was issued in September 2018 and expires in October 2035. We dispute the assertion. An estimate of the possible loss or range of loss cannot be made at this time. Qui Tam Litigation In July 2015 a qui tam action filed by Michael Bawduniak on behalf of the U.S. and certain states was unsealed by the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts. The action alleges sales and promotional activities in violation of the federal False Claims Act and state law counterparts and seeks single and treble damages, civil penalties, interest, attorneys’ fees and costs. Our motion to dismiss was denied in part. No trial date has been set. The U.S. has not made an intervention decision. An estimate of the possible loss or range of loss cannot be made at this time. In May 2018 we were served with a qui tam action filed by SMSF, LLC on behalf of the U.S. and certain states in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts alleging activities by nurse-educators in violation of the federal False Claims Act and state law counterparts. The government declined to intervene, and we, other defendants and the U.S. moved to dismiss. In December 2018 the court dismissed the case with prejudice against the relator and without prejudice as to the U.S. and states. The period for an appeal has lapsed and we consider the matter closed. In July 2018 we and certain other drug manufacturers and pharmacy benefit managers were served with a qui tam action filed by John Borzilleri on behalf of the U.S. and certain states in the U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island. The case alleges agreements with pharmacy benefit managers in violation of the Federal False Claims Act and state law counterparts and seeks single and treble damages, civil penalties, interest, attorneys' fees and costs. We, the other defendants and the U.S. have moved to dismiss the case and the motions are pending. No trial date has been set. An estimate of the possible loss or range of loss cannot be made at this time. Securities Litigation We and certain current and former officers are defendants in an action filed by a shareholder in October 2016 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts alleging violations of federal securities laws under 15 U.S.C §78j(b) and §78t(a) and 17 C.F.R. §240.10b-5 and seeking a declaration of the action as a class action and an award of damages, interest and attorneys' fees. In March 2018 the court dismissed the complaint with prejudice. The plaintiff's appeal is pending. An estimate of the possible loss or range of loss cannot be made at this time. Other Matters Hatch-Waxman Act Litigation relating to TECFIDERA Orange-Book Listed Patents In June and July 2017, January, March, April, August and December 2018 and January 2019 we initiated patent infringement proceedings against multiple parties pursuant to the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984, commonly known as the Hatch-Waxman Act, in the U.S. District Courts. Patent infringement proceedings pursuant to the Hatch-Waxman Act are pending against Accord Healthcare Inc., Alkem Laboratories Ltd., Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC, Aurobindo Pharma U.S.A., Inc., Banner Life Sciences LLC, Caribe Holdings (Cayman) Co. Ltd. DBA Puracap Caribe, Cipla Limited, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Graviti Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd., Hetero USA, Inc., Lupin Atlantis Holdings SA, Macleods Pharmaceuticals, Ltd., MSN Laboratories Pvt. Ltd., Pharmathen S.A., Prinston Pharmaceutical Inc., Sandoz Inc., Sawai USA, Inc., Shipla Medicare Limited, Slayback Pharma LLC, Sun Pharma Global FZE, Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd., TWi Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Windlas Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. and Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware and against Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia. A trial has been set for December 2019 in the Delaware actions, and a trial date has been set for February 2020 in the West Virginia action. A trial date has not been set in the case against Banner Life Sciences LLC or the case against Hetero USA Inc. that was filed in January 2019. Petition for Inter Partes Review filed by Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. In July 2018 Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. filed a petition with the U.S. Patent Trial and Appeal Board seeking inter partes review of our U.S. Patent No. 8,399,514 (the '514 Patent). The '514 Patent includes claims covering the treatment of MS with 480 mg of dimethyl fumarate per day as provided for in our TECFIDERA label. The petition is pending. February 6, 2019, the U.S. Patent Trial and Appeal Board instituted inter partes review of the '514 Patent. Interference Proceeding with Forward Pharma In April 2015 the USPTO declared an interference between Forward Pharma’s U.S. Patent Application No. 11,576,871 and the '514 Patent. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the March 2017 ruling of the USPTO in favor of Biogen and in January 2019 denied Forward Pharma's petition for rehearing. For additional information regarding this matter, please read Note 7, Intangible Assets and Goodwill, to these consolidated financial statements. European Patent Office Oppositions In 2016 the EPO revoked our European patent number 2 137 537 (the '537 Patent). We have appealed to the Technical Boards of Appeal of the EPO and the appeal is pending. The '537 Patent includes claims covering the treatment of MS with 480 mg of dimethyl fumarate as provided for in our TECFIDERA label. In March 2018 the EPO revoked Forward Pharma’s European Patent No. 2 801 355, which was issued in May 2015 and expires in October 2025. Forward Pharma has filed an appeal to the Technical Boards of Appeal of the EPO and the appeal is pending. The settlement and license agreement that we entered into with Forward Pharma in January 2017 did not resolve the issues pending in this proceeding and we and Forward Pharma intend to permit the Technical Boards of Appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal, if applicable, to make a final determination. For additional information regarding this matter, please read Note 7, Intangible Assets and Goodwill, to these consolidated financial statements. TYSABRI Patent Revocation Matters In November 2017 Bioeq GMBH, affiliated with the Polpharma Group, brought an action to the Polish Patent Office seeking to revoke Polish Patent Number 215263 (the Polish '263 Patent), the Polish patent corresponding to our European Patent Number 1 485 127 (the EU '127 Patent) ("Administration of agents to treat inflammation"). The Polish '263 Patent concerns administration of natalizumab (TYSABRI) to treat MS. The Polish '263 Patent was issued in 2013 and expires in February 2023. Swiss Pharma International AG, also affiliated with the Polpharma Group, filed actions in the District Court of The Hague (January 2016), the German Patents Court (March 2016) and the Commercial Court of Rome (November 2017) seeking to invalidate the Dutch, German and Italian counterparts of the EU '127 Patent, which was issued in 2011 and also concerns administration of natalizumab (TYSABRI) to treat MS. The EU '127 Patent expires in February 2023. The Dutch and German counterparts were ruled invalid and we have appealed. No date for a hearing on the merits has been set in the Polish and Italian actions. '755 Patent Litigation In May 2010 Biogen MA Inc. (formerly Biogen Idec MA Inc.) filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey alleging infringement by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. (Bayer) (manufacturer, marketer and seller of BETASERON and manufacturer of EXTAVIA), EMD Serono, Inc. (EMD Serono) (manufacturer, marketer and seller of REBIF), Pfizer (co-marketer of REBIF) and Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. (Novartis) (marketer and seller of EXTAVIA) of our U.S. Patent No. 7,588,755 ('755 Patent), which claims the use of interferon beta for immunomodulation or treating a viral condition, viral disease, cancers or tumors. The complaint seeks monetary damages, including lost profits and royalties. Bayer had previously filed a complaint against us in the same court, on May 27, 2010, seeking a declaratory judgment that it does not infringe the '755 Patent and that the '755 Patent is invalid, and seeking monetary relief in the form of attorneys' fees, costs and expenses. Bayer, Pfizer, Novartis and EMD Serono all filed counterclaims seeking declaratory judgments of patent invalidity and non-infringement, and seeking monetary relief in the form of costs and attorneys' fees. In September 2018, following a trial against EMD Serono and Pfizer, the court granted Biogen's motion for judgment as a matter of law that the '755 Patent is infringed and valid and ordered a new trial on all damages issues. The court has not yet scheduled the trial on damages or a trial against Bayer and Novartis. In October 2018 EMD Serono and Pfizer filed an appeal from the judgment in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which is pending. Government Matters We have learned that state and federal governmental authorities are investigating our sales and promotional practices and have received related subpoenas. We are cooperating with the government. We have received subpoenas and other requests from the federal government for documents and information relating to our relationship with non-profit organizations that assist patients taking drugs sold by Biogen and Biogen's co-pay assistance programs. We are cooperating with the government. In July 2016 we received civil investigative demands from the federal government for documents and information relating to our treatment of certain service agreements with wholesalers when calculating and reporting Average Manufacturer Prices in connection with the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program. We are cooperating with the government. In July 2017 we learned that the Prosecution Office of Milan is investigating our interactions with certain healthcare providers in Italy. We are cooperating with the government. Tax Matter In the second quarter of 2018 the State Treasury of Goias, Brazil issued tax assessments for the period 2013 through February 2018 relating to tax on the circulation of goods and totaling approximately $70.0 million including interest and penalties. We dispute the assessments and have filed defenses with the Administrative Court of Appeals for the State of Goias, which are pending. We have not formed an opinion that an unfavorable outcome of the dispute is either probable or remote. Product Liability and Other Legal Proceedings We are also involved in product liability claims and other legal proceedings generally incidental to our normal business activities. While the outcome of any of these proceedings cannot be accurately predicted, we do not believe the ultimate resolution of any of these existing matters would have a material adverse effect on our business or financial condition.

Litigation

We are currently involved in various claims and legal proceedings, including the matters described below. For information as to our accounting policies relating to claims and legal proceedings, including use of estimates and contingencies, please read Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, to these consolidated financial statements.

With respect to some loss contingencies, an estimate of the possible loss or range of loss cannot be made until management has further information, including, for example, (i) which claims, if any, will survive dispositive motion practice; (ii) information to be obtained through discovery; (iii) information as to the parties' damages claims and supporting evidence; (iv) the parties’ legal theories; and (v) the parties' settlement positions.

The claims and legal proceedings in which we are involved also include challenges to the scope, validity or enforceability of the patents relating to our products, pipeline or processes, and challenges to the scope, validity or enforceability of the patents held by others. These include claims by third parties that we infringe their patents. An adverse outcome in any of these proceedings could result in one or more of the following and have a material impact on our business or consolidated results of operations and financial position: (i) loss of patent protection; (ii) inability to continue to engage in certain activities; and (iii) payment of significant damages, royalties, penalties and/or license fees to third parties.

Loss Contingencies

IMRALDI Patent Matters

In September 2018 Fresenius Kabi Deutschland GmbH (Fresenius Kabi) commenced proceedings for damages and injunctive relief against Biogen France SAS in the Tribunal de Grande Instance de Paris, alleging that IMRALDI, the adalimumab biosimilar product of Samsung Bioepis UK Limited that Biogen has commercialized in Europe, infringes the French counterpart of European Patent No. 3 148 510 (the '510 Patent), which was issued in June 2018 and expires in March 2035. In October 2018 Fresenius Kabi commenced preliminary injunction proceedings against Biogen (Denmark) Manufacturing ApS and Biogen Denmark A/S in Denmark's Maritime and Commercial High Court alleging infringement of Danish Utility Models. In November 2018 Fresenius Kabi commenced infringement proceedings for damages and injunctive relief against Biogen Italia S.R.L. in the District Court of Milan relating to the Italian counterpart of the ‘510 Patent, and against Biogen GmbH in the Dusseldorf Regional Court relating to the German counterpart of the ‘510 Patent. No hearing has yet been set in these proceedings.

In August 2018 Biogen Idec Ltd. (Biogen UK) and Samsung Bioepis UK Limited filed an action in the United Kingdom Patents Court to revoke the United Kingdom counterpart of the '510 Patent. Fresenius Kabi has filed a counterclaim asserting infringement of the '510 Patent and seeking damages and an injunction to restrain infringement if the patent is found valid and infringed. A trial has been set for July 2019. In December 2018 Biogen B.V. and Samsung Bioepis UK Limited filed an action in the District Court of the Hague, Netherlands to revoke the Dutch counterpart of the ‘510 Patent. A trial has been set for October 2019. An estimate of the possible loss or range of loss in the above matters cannot be made at this time.

In October 2018 Gedeon Richter PLC asserted to Biogen and Samsung Bioepis UK Limited that IMRALDI infringes European Patent No. 3 212 667, which was issued in September 2018 and expires in October 2035. We dispute the assertion. An estimate of the possible loss or range of loss cannot be made at this time.

Qui Tam Litigation

In July 2015 a qui tam action filed by Michael Bawduniak on behalf of the U.S. and certain states was unsealed by the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts. The action alleges sales and promotional activities in violation of the federal False Claims Act and state law counterparts and seeks single and treble damages, civil penalties, interest, attorneys’ fees and costs. Our motion to dismiss was denied in part. No trial date has been set. The U.S. has not made an intervention decision. An estimate of the possible loss or range of loss cannot be made at this time.

In May 2018 we were served with a qui tam action filed by SMSF, LLC on behalf of the U.S. and certain states in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts alleging activities by nurse-educators in violation of the federal False Claims Act and state law counterparts. The government declined to intervene, and we, other defendants and the U.S. moved to dismiss. In December 2018 the court dismissed the case with prejudice against the relator and without prejudice as to the U.S. and states. The period for an appeal has lapsed and we consider the matter closed.

In July 2018 we and certain other drug manufacturers and pharmacy benefit managers were served with a qui tam action filed by John Borzilleri on behalf of the U.S. and certain states in the U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island. The case alleges agreements with pharmacy benefit managers in violation of the Federal False Claims Act and state law counterparts and seeks single and treble damages, civil penalties, interest, attorneys' fees and costs. We, the other defendants and the U.S. have moved to dismiss the case and the motions are pending. No trial date has been set. An estimate of the possible loss or range of loss cannot be made at this time.

Securities Litigation

We and certain current and former officers are defendants in an action filed by a shareholder in October 2016 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts alleging violations of federal securities laws under 15 U.S.C §78j(b) and §78t(a) and 17 C.F.R. §240.10b-5 and seeking a declaration of the action as a class action and an award of damages, interest and attorneys' fees. In March 2018 the court dismissed the complaint with prejudice. The plaintiff's appeal is pending. An estimate of the possible loss or range of loss cannot be made at this time.

Other Matters

Hatch-Waxman Act Litigation relating to TECFIDERA Orange-Book Listed Patents

In June and July 2017, January, March, April, August and December 2018 and January 2019 we initiated patent infringement proceedings against multiple parties pursuant to the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984, commonly known as the Hatch-Waxman Act, in the U.S. District Courts.

Patent infringement proceedings pursuant to the Hatch-Waxman Act are pending against Accord Healthcare Inc., Alkem Laboratories Ltd., Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC, Aurobindo Pharma U.S.A., Inc., Banner Life Sciences LLC, Caribe Holdings (Cayman) Co. Ltd. DBA Puracap Caribe, Cipla Limited, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Graviti Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd., Hetero USA, Inc., Lupin Atlantis Holdings SA, Macleods Pharmaceuticals, Ltd., MSN Laboratories Pvt. Ltd., Pharmathen S.A., Prinston Pharmaceutical Inc., Sandoz Inc., Sawai USA, Inc., Shipla Medicare Limited, Slayback Pharma LLC, Sun Pharma Global FZE, Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd., TWi Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Windlas Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. and Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware and against Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia.

A trial has been set for December 2019 in the Delaware actions, and a trial date has been set for February 2020 in the West Virginia action. A trial date has not been set in the case against Banner Life Sciences LLC or the case against Hetero USA Inc. that was filed in January 2019.

Petition for Inter Partes Review filed by Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

In July 2018 Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. filed a petition with the U.S. Patent Trial and Appeal Board seeking inter partes review of our U.S. Patent No. 8,399,514 (the '514 Patent). The '514 Patent includes claims covering the treatment of MS with 480 mg of dimethyl fumarate per day as provided for in our TECFIDERA label. The petition is pending. February 6, 2019, the U.S. Patent Trial and Appeal Board instituted inter partes review of the '514 Patent.

Interference Proceeding with Forward Pharma

In April 2015 the USPTO declared an interference between Forward Pharma’s U.S. Patent Application No. 11,576,871 and the '514 Patent. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the March 2017 ruling of the USPTO in favor of Biogen and in January 2019 denied Forward Pharma's petition for rehearing. For additional information regarding this matter, please read Note 7, Intangible Assets and Goodwill, to these consolidated financial statements.

European Patent Office Oppositions

In 2016 the EPO revoked our European patent number 2 137 537 (the '537 Patent). We have appealed to the Technical Boards of Appeal of the EPO and the appeal is pending. The '537 Patent includes claims covering the treatment of MS with 480 mg of dimethyl fumarate as provided for in our TECFIDERA label.

In March 2018 the EPO revoked Forward Pharma’s European Patent No. 2 801 355, which was issued in May 2015 and expires in October 2025. Forward Pharma has filed an appeal to the Technical Boards of Appeal of the EPO and the appeal is pending. The settlement and license agreement that we entered into with Forward Pharma in January 2017 did not resolve the issues pending in this proceeding and we and Forward Pharma intend to permit the Technical Boards of Appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal, if applicable, to make a final determination. For additional information regarding this matter, please read Note 7, Intangible Assets and Goodwill, to these consolidated financial statements.

TYSABRI Patent Revocation Matters

In November 2017 Bioeq GMBH, affiliated with the Polpharma Group, brought an action to the Polish Patent Office seeking to revoke Polish Patent Number 215263 (the Polish '263 Patent), the Polish patent corresponding to our European Patent Number 1 485 127 (the EU '127 Patent) ("Administration of agents to treat inflammation"). The Polish '263 Patent concerns administration of natalizumab (TYSABRI) to treat MS. The Polish '263 Patent was issued in 2013 and expires in February 2023. Swiss Pharma International AG, also affiliated with the Polpharma Group, filed actions in the District Court of The Hague (January 2016), the German Patents Court (March 2016) and the Commercial Court of Rome (November 2017) seeking to invalidate the Dutch, German and Italian counterparts of the EU '127 Patent, which was issued in 2011 and also concerns administration of natalizumab (TYSABRI) to treat MS. The EU '127 Patent expires in February 2023. The Dutch and German counterparts were ruled invalid and we have appealed. No date for a hearing on the merits has been set in the Polish and Italian actions.

'755 Patent Litigation

In May 2010 Biogen MA Inc. (formerly Biogen Idec MA Inc.) filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey alleging infringement by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. (Bayer) (manufacturer, marketer and seller of BETASERON and manufacturer of EXTAVIA), EMD Serono, Inc. (EMD Serono) (manufacturer, marketer and seller of REBIF), Pfizer (co-marketer of REBIF) and Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. (Novartis) (marketer and seller of EXTAVIA) of our U.S. Patent No. 7,588,755 ('755 Patent), which claims the use of interferon beta for immunomodulation or treating a viral condition, viral disease, cancers or tumors. The complaint seeks monetary damages, including lost profits and royalties. Bayer had previously filed a complaint against us in the same court, on May 27, 2010, seeking a declaratory judgment that it does not infringe the '755 Patent and that the '755 Patent is invalid, and seeking monetary relief in the form of attorneys' fees, costs and expenses.

Bayer, Pfizer, Novartis and EMD Serono all filed counterclaims seeking declaratory judgments of patent invalidity and non-infringement, and seeking monetary relief in the form of costs and attorneys' fees.

In September 2018, following a trial against EMD Serono and Pfizer, the court granted Biogen's motion for judgment as a matter of law that the '755 Patent is infringed and valid and ordered a new trial on all damages issues. The court has not yet scheduled the trial on damages or a trial against Bayer and Novartis. In October 2018 EMD Serono and Pfizer filed an appeal from the judgment in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which is pending.

Government Matters

We have learned that state and federal governmental authorities are investigating our sales and promotional practices and have received related subpoenas. We are cooperating with the government.

We have received subpoenas and other requests from the federal government for documents and information relating to our relationship with non-profit organizations that assist patients taking drugs sold by Biogen and Biogen's co-pay assistance programs. We are cooperating with the government.

In July 2016 we received civil investigative demands from the federal government for documents and information relating to our treatment of certain service agreements with wholesalers when calculating and reporting Average Manufacturer Prices in connection with the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program. We are cooperating with the government.

In July 2017 we learned that the Prosecution Office of Milan is investigating our interactions with certain healthcare providers in Italy. We are cooperating with the government.

Tax Matter

In the second quarter of 2018 the State Treasury of Goias, Brazil issued tax assessments for the period 2013 through February 2018 relating to tax on the circulation of goods and totaling approximately $70.0 million including interest and penalties. We dispute the assessments and have filed defenses with the Administrative Court of Appeals for the State of Goias, which are pending. We have not formed an opinion that an unfavorable outcome of the dispute is either probable or remote.

Product Liability and Other Legal Proceedings

We are also involved in product liability claims and other legal proceedings generally incidental to our normal business activities. While the outcome of any of these proceedings cannot be accurately predicted, we do not believe the ultimate resolution of any of these existing matters would have a material adverse effect on our business or financial condition.