Fair Value Measurements

12 Months Ended

Mar. 28, 2020

U.S. GAAP establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurements. The determination of the applicable level within the hierarchy for a particular asset or liability depends on the inputs used in its valuation as of the measurement date, notably the extent to which the inputs are market-based (observable) or internally-derived (unobservable). A financial instrument's categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The three levels are defined as follows:


•	Level 1 — inputs to the valuation methodology based on quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

•

Level 2 — inputs to the valuation methodology based on quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets for substantially the full term of the financial instrument; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active for substantially the full term of the financial instrument; and model-derived valuations whose inputs or significant value drivers are observable.


•	Level 3 — inputs to the valuation methodology based on unobservable prices or valuation techniques that are significant to the fair value measurement.

The following table summarizes the Company's financial assets and liabilities that are measured and recorded at fair value on a recurring basis, excluding accrued interest components:



	March 28, 2020		March 30, 2019
	(millions)
Investments in commercial paper^(a)(b)	$	243.6	$	290.7
Derivative assets^(a)	62.3		32.0
Derivative liabilities^(a)	6.9		15.5


^(a)	Based on Level 2 measurements.


^(b)	Amount as of March 28, 2020 was included within short-term investments in the consolidated balance sheet. As of March 30, 2019, $54.7 million was included within cash and cash equivalents and $236.0 million was included within short-term investments in the consolidated balance sheet.

The Company's investments in commercial paper are classified as available-for-sale and recorded at fair value in its consolidated balance sheets using external pricing data, based on interest rates and credit ratings for similar issuances with the same remaining term as the Company's investments. To the extent the Company invests in bonds, such investments are also classified as available-for-sale and recorded at fair value in its consolidated balance sheets based on quoted prices in active markets.

The Company's derivative financial instruments are recorded at fair value in its consolidated balance sheets and are valued using pricing models that are primarily based on market observable external inputs, including spot and forward currency exchange rates, benchmark interest rates, and discount rates consistent with the instrument's tenor, and consider the impact of the Company's own credit risk, if any. Changes in counterparty credit risk are also considered in the valuation of derivative financial instruments.

The Company's cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, and time deposits are recorded at carrying value, which generally approximates fair value based on Level 1 measurements.

The Company's debt instruments are recorded at their carrying values in its consolidated balance sheets, which may differ from their respective fair values. The fair values of the Senior Notes are estimated based on external pricing data, including available quoted market prices, and with reference to comparable debt instruments with similar interest rates, credit ratings, and trading frequency, among other factors. The fair values of the Company's commercial paper notes and borrowings outstanding under its credit facilities, if any, are estimated using external pricing data, based on interest rates and credit ratings for similar issuances with the same remaining term as the Company's outstanding borrowings. Due to their short-term nature, the fair values of the Company's commercial paper notes and borrowings outstanding under its credit facilities, if any, generally approximate their carrying values.

The following table summarizes the carrying values and the estimated fair values of the Company's debt instruments:



	March 28, 2020				March 30, 2019
	Carrying Value^(a)		Fair Value^(b)		Carrying Value^(a)		Fair Value^(b)
	(millions)
$300 million 2.625% Senior Notes	$	299.6	$	299.8	$	293.4	$	299.1
$400 million 3.750% Senior Notes	396.4		415.1		395.7		410.0
Borrowings outstanding under credit facilities	475.0		473.0		—		—


^(a)	See Note 11 for discussion of the carrying values of the Company's senior notes.


^(b)	Based on Level 2 measurements.

Unrealized gains or losses resulting from changes in the fair value of the Company's debt instruments do not result in the realization or expenditure of cash, unless the debt is retired prior to its maturity.

Non-financial Assets and Liabilities

The Company's non-financial assets, which primarily consist of goodwill, other intangible assets, property and equipment, and lease-related ROU assets, are not required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis, and instead are reported at carrying value in its consolidated balance sheet. However, on a periodic basis or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that they may not be fully recoverable (and at least annually for goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets), the respective carrying value of non-financial assets are assessed for impairment and, if ultimately considered impaired, are adjusted and written down to their fair value, as estimated based on consideration of external market participant assumptions.

During Fiscal 2020, Fiscal 2019, and Fiscal 2018, the Company recorded non-cash impairment charges to reduce the carrying values of certain long-lived assets to their estimated fair values. The fair values of these assets were determined based on Level 3 measurements, the related inputs of which included estimates of the amount and timing of the assets' net future discounted cash flows (including any potential sublease income for lease-related ROU assets), based on historical experience and consideration of current trends, market conditions, and comparable sales, as applicable.

The following tables summarize non-cash impairment charges recorded by the Company during the fiscal years presented in order to reduce the carrying values of certain long-lived assets to their estimated fair values as of the assessment date:



	Fiscal Years Ended
	March 28, 2020				March 30, 2019				March 31, 2018
Long-Lived Asset Category	Fair Value As of Impairment Date		Total Impairments^(a)		Fair Value As of Impairment Date		Total Impairments^(a)		Fair Value As of Impairment Date		Total Impairments^(a)
	(millions)
Property and equipment, net^(b)	$	2.4	$	16.8	$	20.8	$	25.8	$	—	$	41.2
Operating lease right-of-use assets^(c)	120.8		239.9		N/A		N/A		N/A		N/A
Intangible assets, net^(d)	N/A		—		N/A		—		2.9		8.8
Equity method investment	1.3		7.1		N/A		—		N/A		—


^(a)	Impairment of equity method investment is recorded within other income (expense), net in the consolidated statements of operations. All other impairment charges are recorded within impairments of assets in the consolidated statements of operations, unless otherwise noted.

^(b)

Total impairment charges for Fiscal 2019 includes $4.6 million recorded to reduce the carrying value of the Company's held-for-sale corporate jet to its estimated fair value less costs to sell of $20.8 million as of March 30, 2019. Balance was reclassified from property and equipment, net to prepaid expenses and other current assets in the consolidated balance sheet upon being classified as an asset held-for-sale. The asset was subsequently sold during Fiscal 2020 (see Note 7).


^(c)	Total impairment charges for Fiscal 2020 includes $225.1 million recorded in connection with the Company's adoption of ASC 2016-02 as of the beginning of Fiscal 2020 which, net of related income tax benefits, reduced its opening retained earnings balance by $169.4 million (see Note 4).


^(d)	Non-cash impairment charge recorded during Fiscal 2018 relates a change in the planned usage of a certain intangible asset.

See Note 8 for additional discussion regarding non-cash impairment charges recorded by the Company within the consolidated statements of operations during the fiscal years presented.

No goodwill impairment charges were recorded during any of the fiscal years presented. In Fiscal 2020, the Company performed its annual goodwill impairment assessment using a qualitative approach as of the beginning of the second quarter of the fiscal year. In performing the assessment, the Company identified and considered the significance of relevant key factors, events, and circumstances that affected the fair values and/or carrying amounts of its reporting units with allocated goodwill. These factors included external factors such as macroeconomic, industry, and market conditions, as well as entity-specific factors, such as the Company's actual and expected financial performance. Additionally, the results of the Company's then-most recent quantitative goodwill impairment test indicated that the fair values of these reporting units significantly exceeded their respective carrying values. Based on the results of its qualitative goodwill impairment assessment, the Company concluded that it is not more likely than not that the fair values of its reporting units are less than their respective carrying values, and there were no reporting units at risk of impairment.

Subsequent to performing its Fiscal 2020 annual goodwill impairment assessment, the Company determined that indicators of impairment were present during the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2020 as a result of adverse business disruptions related to the COVID-19 pandemic, including the temporary closure of its stores in North America, Europe, and Asia. As a result, the Company performed an interim assessment of the recoverability of goodwill assigned to its reporting units using a quantitative approach as of March 28, 2020. The estimated fair values of the Company's reporting units were determined with the assistance of an independent third-party valuation firm using discounted cash flows and market comparisons. Based on the results of the quantitative impairment assessment, the Company concluded that the fair values of its reporting units significantly exceeded their respective carrying values and were not at risk of impairment. Accordingly, no goodwill impairment charges were recorded.