XML 159 R20.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT
v2.4.0.6

Pension Plans | 12 Months Ended
--- | ---
Dec. 29, 2012
Pension Plans | Note 11: Pension Plans Snap-on has several non-contributory defined benefit pension plans covering most U.S. employees and certain employees in foreign countries. Snap-on also has foreign contributory defined benefit pension plans covering certain foreign employees. Retirement benefits are generally provided based on employees’ years of service and average earnings or stated amounts for years of service. Normal retirement age is 65, with provisions for earlier retirement. In 2012, the company settled a Canadian pension plan following the 2011 closure of its former Newmarket, Canada, facility. The status of Snap-on’s pension plans as of 2012 and 2011 year end are as follows:
(Amounts in millions) |  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |
Change in projected benefit obligation: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Benefit obligation at beginning of year |  | $ | 1,169.7 |  |  | $ | 1,037.4 |
Service cost |  |  | 21.1 |  |  |  | 19.1 |
Interest cost |  |  | 52.0 |  |  |  | 53.9 |
Plan participants’ contributions |  |  | 1.3 |  |  |  | 1.4 |
Plan settlements |  |  | (13.6) |  |  |  | – |
Plan curtailments |  |  | (0.1) |  |  |  | – |
Benefits paid |  |  | (55.8) |  |  |  | (53.5) |
Plan amendments |  |  | (10.2) |  |  |  | 0.9 |
Actuarial loss |  |  | 57.9 |  |  |  | 112.3 |
Foreign currency impact |  |  | 7.0 |  |  |  | (1.8) |
Benefit obligation at end of year |  | $ | 1,229.3 |  |  | $ | 1,169.7 |
Change in plan assets: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year |  | $ | 846.1 |  |  | $ | 793.0 |
Actual return on plan assets |  |  | 94.3 |  |  |  | 45.4 |
Plan participants’ contributions |  |  | 1.3 |  |  |  | 1.4 |
Employer contributions |  |  | 87.5 |  |  |  | 61.0 |
Benefits paid |  |  | (55.8) |  |  |  | (53.5) |
Plan settlements |  |  | (13.6) |  |  |  | – |
Foreign currency impact |  |  | 4.2 |  |  |  | (1.2) |
Fair value of plan assets at end of year |  | $ | 964.0 |  |  | $ | 846.1 |
Unfunded status at end of year |  | $ | (265.3) |  |  | $ | (323.6) |
Amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of 2012 and 2011 year end are as follows:
(Amounts in millions) |  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |
Other assets |  | $ | – |  |  | $ | 0.1 |
Accrued benefits |  |  | (4.6) |  |  |  | (6.0) |
Pension liabilities |  |  | (260.7) |  |  |  | (317.7) |
Net liability |  | $ | (265.3) |  |  | $ | (323.6) |
Amounts included in Accumulated OCI on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets as of 2012 and 2011 year end are as follows:
(Amounts in millions) |  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  |  |
Net loss, net of tax of $147.1 million and $155.6 million, respectively |  | $ | (260.4) |  |  | $ | (268.0) |  |
Prior service credit (cost), net of tax of $2.5 million and $1.9 million, respectively |  |  | 4.0 |  |  |  | (3.0) |  |
|  | $ | (256.4) |  |  | $ | (271.0) |  |
The accumulated benefit obligation for Snap-on’s pension plans as of 2012 and 2011 year end was $1,170.6 million and $1,123.1 million, respectively. The projected benefit obligation, accumulated benefit obligation and fair value of plan assets for Snap-on’s pension plans in which the accumulated benefit obligation exceeds the fair value of plan assets as of 2012 and 2011 year end are as follows: |
(Amounts in millions) |  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  |  |
Projected benefit obligation |  | $ | 1,229.3 |  |  | $ | 1,116.4 |  |
Accumulated benefit obligation |  |  | 1,170.6 |  |  |  | 1,074.1 |  |
Fair value of plan assets |  |  | 964.0 |  |  |  | 796.0 |  |
The components of net periodic benefit cost and changes recognized in “Other comprehensive income (loss)” (“OCI”) are as follows: |
(Amounts in millions) |  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |
Net periodic benefit cost: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Service cost |  | $ | 21.1 |  |  | $ | 19.1 |  |  | $ | 16.5 |
Interest cost |  |  | 52.0 |  |  |  | 53.9 |  |  |  | 54.2 |
Expected return on plan assets |  |  | (66.6) |  |  |  | (58.7) |  |  |  | (57.9) |
Amortization of prior service cost |  |  | 1.2 |  |  |  | 1.1 |  |  |  | 1.2 |
Amortization of unrecognized loss |  |  | 41.4 |  |  |  | 31.1 |  |  |  | 19.4 |
Settlement loss recognized |  |  | 6.8 |  |  |  | – |  |  |  | – |
Curtailment loss recognized |  |  | – |  |  |  | – |  |  |  | 0.9 |
Net periodic benefit cost |  | $ | 55.9 |  |  | $ | 46.5 |  |  | $ | 34.3 |
Changes in benefit obligations recognized in OCI, net of tax: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Prior service cost |  | $ | (7.0) |  |  | $ | (0.2) |  |  | $ | (1.4) |
Net loss |  |  | (7.6) |  |  |  | 61.1 |  |  |  | 13.5 |
Total recognized in OCI |  | $ | (14.6) |  |  | $ | 60.9 |  |  | $ | 12.1 |
Amounts in Accumulated OCI that are expected to be amortized as net expense during 2013 are as follows:
(Amounts in millions) |  | Amount |
Amortization of prior service credit |  | $ | (0.7) |
Amortization of unrecognized loss |  |  | 39.0 |
Total to be recognized in net periodic benefit cost |  | $ | 38.3 |
The worldwide weighted-average assumptions used to determine Snap-on’s full-year pension costs are as follows:
|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |
Discount rate |  |  | 4.5% |  |  |  | 5.3% |  |  |  | 5.9% |
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets |  |  | 7.7% |  |  |  | 7.8% |  |  |  | 7.8% |
Rate of compensation increase |  |  | 3.6% |  |  |  | 3.6% |  |  |  | 3.6% |
The worldwide weighted-average assumptions used to determine Snap-on’s projected benefit obligation as of 2012 and 2011 year end are as follows: |
|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  |  |
Discount rate |  |  | 4.3% |  |  |  | 4.5% |  |
Rate of compensation increase |  |  | 3.6% |  |  |  | 3.6% |  |
The objective of Snap-on’s discount rate assumption is to reflect the rate at which the pension benefits could be effectively settled. In making this determination, the company takes into account the timing and amount of benefits that would be available under the plans. The discount rate assumption used to determine the December 29, 2012 projected benefit obligation was based on a cash flow matching methodology developed by the company’s outside actuaries and which incorporates a review of current economic conditions. The methodology for selecting the 4.3% weighted-average discount rate as of 2012 year end for the company’s domestic pension plans was to match the plans’ yearly projected benefit cash flows to those of hypothetical bond portfolios using high-quality, AA rated or better, corporate bonds from either Moody’s Investors Service or Standard & Poor’s credit rating agencies available at the measurement date. This technique calculates bond portfolios that produce adequate cash flows to pay the plans’ projected yearly benefits and then selects the portfolio with the highest yield and uses that yield as the recommended discount rate. Previously the company’s discount rate assumption, which was also based on a cash flow methodology developed by the company’s outside actuaries and which incorporated a review of current economic conditions, used a theoretical bond portfolio yield curve that provided the equivalent yields on zero-coupon bonds with an AA rating or better for each maturity. Had the company continued using this methodology, the weighted-average discount rate for Snap-on’s domestic pension plans as of 2012 year end would have been 3.7% and its projected benefit obligation would have increased by $73.3 million. The weighted-average discount rate for Snap-on’s domestic pension plans of 4.3% represents the single rate that produces the same present value of cash flows as the estimated benefit plan payments. Lowering Snap-on’s domestic discount rate assumption by 50 basis points (100 basis points equals 1.0 percent) would have increased Snap-on’s 2012 domestic pension expense and projected benefit obligation by approximately $6.3 million and $60.5 million, respectively. As of 2012 year end, Snap-on’s domestic projected benefit obligation comprised approximately 82% of Snap-on’s worldwide projected benefit obligation. The weighted-average discount rate for Snap-on’s foreign pension plans of 4.1% represents the single rate that produces the same present value of cash flows as the estimated benefit plan payments. Lowering Snap-on’s foreign discount rate assumption by 50 basis points would have increased Snap-on’s 2012 foreign pension expense and projected benefit obligation by approximately $1.6 million and $21.6 million, respectively. Actuarial gains and losses in excess of 10 percent of the greater of the projected benefit obligation or market-related value of assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over the average remaining service period of active participants. Prior service costs resulting from plan amendments are amortized in equal annual amounts over the average remaining service period of affected active participants or over the remaining life expectancy of affected retired participants. Snap-on uses the last day of its fiscal year end as the measurement date for its plans. Snap-on funds its pension plans as required by governmental regulation and may consider discretionary contributions as conditions warrant. Snap-on intends to make contributions of $10.2 million to its foreign pension plans and $1.6 million to its domestic pension plans in 2013, as required by law. Depending on market and other conditions, Snap-on may elect to make discretionary cash contributions to its domestic pension plans in 2013. The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, are expected to be paid as follows:
(Amounts in millions) |  | Amount |
Year: |  |  |  |
2013 |  | $ | 61.1 |
2014 |  |  | 63.3 |
2015 |  |  | 65.5 |
2016 |  |  | 67.7 |
2017 |  |  | 70.1 |
2018 – 2022 |  |  | 381.5 |
Snap-on’s domestic pension plans have a long-term investment horizon and a total return strategy that emphasizes a capital growth objective. The long-term investment performance objective for Snap-on’s domestic plans’ assets is to achieve net of expense returns that meet or exceed the 7.8% domestic long-term, rate-of-return-on-assets assumption used for reporting purposes. Snap-on uses a three-year, market-related value asset method of amortizing the difference between actual and expected returns on its domestic plans’ assets. The basis for determining the overall expected long-term, rate-of-return-on-assets assumption is a nominal returns forecasting method. For each asset class, future returns are estimated by identifying the premium of riskier asset classes over lower risk alternatives. The methodology constructs expected returns using a “building block” approach to the individual components of total return. These forecasts are stated in both nominal and real (after inflation) terms. This process first considers the long-term historical return premium based on the longest set of data available for each asset class. These premiums are then adjusted based on current relative valuation levels and macro-economic conditions. For risk and correlation assumptions, the actual experience for each asset class is reviewed for the longest time period available. Expected relationships for a 10 to 20 year time horizon are determined based upon historical results, with adjustments made for material changes. Investments are diversified to attempt to minimize the risk of large losses. Since asset allocation is a key determinant of expected investment returns, assets are periodically rebalanced to the targeted allocation to correct significant deviations from the asset allocation policy that are caused by market fluctuations and cash flow. Asset/liability studies are conducted periodically to determine if any revisions to the strategic asset allocation policy are necessary. Snap-on’s domestic pension plans’ target allocation and actual weighted-average asset allocation by asset category and fair value of plan assets as of 2012 and 2011 year end are as follows:
|  | Target |  |  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |
Asset category: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Equity securities |  |  | 48% |  |  |  | 48% |  |  |  | 46% |
Debt securities and cash |  |  | 34% |  |  |  | 37% |  |  |  | 38% |
Real estate and other real assets |  |  | 8% |  |  |  | 6% |  |  |  | 6% |
Hedge funds |  |  | 10% |  |  |  | 9% |  |  |  | 10% |
Total |  |  | 100% |  |  |  | 100% |  |  |  | 100% |
Fair value of plan assets (Amounts in millions) |  |  |  |  |  | $ | 830.6 |  |  | $ | 720.8 |
The fair value measurement hierarchy prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority (“Level 1”) to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities and the lowest priority (“Level 3”) to unobservable inputs. Fair value measurements primarily based on observable market information are given a “Level 2” priority. Shares of certain equity and debt securities and real estate and other real assets valued at quoted market prices for which an official close or last trade pricing on an active exchange is available are categorized as Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy. Shares of commingled equity and debt fund securities, commingled multi-strategy funds and insurance contracts are valued at the net asset value (“NAV”) as reported by the fund managers based on the value of the underlying assets less liabilities, with this NAV divided by the number of units outstanding. The unit price is quoted on a private market and based on the value of the underlying investment, which is primarily based on observable inputs; such investments are categorized as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. Private equity partnership funds, hedge funds, and certain real estate and other real assets are stated at estimated fair value as reported by the fund manager based on the fair market value of the underlying investments and are classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. Management regularly reviews fund performance for Level 3 plan assets and performs qualitative analysis to corroborate the reasonableness of the reported fair market values. The following is a summary, by asset category, of the fair value and the level within the fair value hierarchy of Snap-on’s domestic pension plans’ assets as of 2012 year end:
(Amounts in millions) |  | Quoted Prices for Identical Assets |  |  | Significant Other Observable Inputs |  |  | Significant Unobservable Inputs |  |  |  |
| (Level 1) |  |  | (Level 2) |  |  | (Level 3) |  |  | Total |
Asset category: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Cash and cash equivalents |  | $ | 25.5 |  |  | $ | – |  |  | $ | – |  |  | $ | 25.5 |
Equity securities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Domestic |  |  | 108.5 |  |  |  | – |  |  |  | – |  |  |  | 108.5 |
Commingled funds – domestic |  |  | – |  |  |  | 172.2 |  |  |  | – |  |  |  | 172.2 |
Commingled funds – foreign |  |  | – |  |  |  | 64.8 |  |  |  | – |  |  |  | 64.8 |
Private equity partnerships |  |  | – |  |  |  | – |  |  |  | 49.6 |  |  |  | 49.6 |
Debt securities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Government |  |  | 91.9 |  |  |  | – |  |  |  | – |  |  |  | 91.9 |
Corporate bonds |  |  | 192.5 |  |  |  | – |  |  |  | – |  |  |  | 192.5 |
Real estate and other real assets |  |  | 11.6 |  |  |  | – |  |  |  | 39.0 |  |  |  | 50.6 |
Hedge funds |  |  | – |  |  |  | – |  |  |  | 75.0 |  |  |  | 75.0 |
Total |  | $ | 430.0 |  |  | $ | 237.0 |  |  | $ | 163.6 |  |  | $ | 830.6 |
The following is a summary of the fiscal 2012 changes in fair value of the domestic plans’ assets with Level 3 inputs:
(Amounts in millions) |  | Hedge Fund Interests |  |  | Private Equity Partnership Interests |  |  | Real Estate Interests |  |  | Total |
Balance as of 2011 year end |  | $ | 68.6 |  |  | $ | 49.9 |  |  | $ | 33.9 |  |  | $ | 152.4 |
Realized gains on assets sold |  |  | 1.0 |  |  |  | 4.0 |  |  |  | 0.2 |  |  |  | 5.2 |
Unrealized gains (losses) attributable to assets held |  |  | 5.0 |  |  |  | (5.1) |  |  |  | 3.4 |  |  |  | 3.3 |
Net purchases and settlements |  |  | 0.4 |  |  |  | 0.8 |  |  |  | 1.5 |  |  |  | 2.7 |
Balance as of 2012 year end |  | $ | 75.0 |  |  | $ | 49.6 |  |  | $ | 39.0 |  |  | $ | 163.6 |
The following is a summary, by asset category, of the fair value and the level within the fair value hierarchy of Snap-on’s domestic pension plans’ assets as of 2011 year end:
(Amounts in millions) |  | Quoted Prices for Identical Assets |  |  | Significant Other Observable Inputs |  |  | Significant Unobservable Inputs |  |  |  |
| (Level 1) |  |  | (Level 2) |  |  | (Level 3) |  |  | Total |
Asset category: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Cash and cash equivalents |  | $ | 9.2 |  |  | $ | – |  |  | $ | – |  |  | $ | 9.2 |
Equity securities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Domestic |  |  | 150.7 |  |  |  | – |  |  |  | – |  |  |  | 150.7 |
Foreign |  |  | 17.7 |  |  |  | – |  |  |  | – |  |  |  | 17.7 |
Commingled funds - foreign |  |  | – |  |  |  | 112.3 |  |  |  | – |  |  |  | 112.3 |
Private equity partnerships |  |  | – |  |  |  | – |  |  |  | 49.9 |  |  |  | 49.9 |
Debt securities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Government |  |  | 81.0 |  |  |  | – |  |  |  | – |  |  |  | 81.0 |
Corporate bonds |  |  | 160.4 |  |  |  | – |  |  |  | – |  |  |  | 160.4 |
Commingled funds |  |  | 6.4 |  |  |  | 21.5 |  |  |  | – |  |  |  | 27.9 |
Real estate and other real assets |  |  | 9.2 |  |  |  | – |  |  |  | 33.9 |  |  |  | 43.1 |
Hedge funds |  |  | – |  |  |  | – |  |  |  | 68.6 |  |  |  | 68.6 |
Total |  | $ | 434.6 |  |  | $ | 133.8 |  |  | $ | 152.4 |  |  | $ | 720.8 |
The following is a summary of the fiscal 2011 changes in fair value of the domestic plans’ assets with Level 3 inputs:
(Amounts in millions) |  | Hedge Fund Interests |  |  | Private Equity Partnership Interests |  |  | Real Estate Interests |  |  | Total |
Balance as of 2010 year end |  | $ | 73.5 |  |  | $ | 41.4 |  |  | $ | 29.7 |  |  | $ | 144.6 |
Realized gains on assets sold |  |  | 0.5 |  |  |  | 3.3 |  |  |  | 0.2 |  |  |  | 4.0 |
Unrealized gains (losses) attributable to assets held |  |  | (1.8) |  |  |  | 1.0 |  |  |  | 3.4 |  |  |  | 2.6 |
Net purchases and settlements |  |  | (3.6) |  |  |  | 4.2 |  |  |  | 0.6 |  |  |  | 1.2 |
Balance as of 2011 year end |  | $ | 68.6 |  |  | $ | 49.9 |  |  | $ | 33.9 |  |  | $ | 152.4 |
Snap-on’s primary investment objective for its foreign pension plans’ assets is to meet the projected obligations to the beneficiaries over a long period of time, and to do so in a manner that is consistent with the company’s risk tolerance. The foreign asset allocation policies consider the company’s financial strength and long-term asset class risk/return expectations, since the obligations are long term in nature. The company believes the foreign pension plans’ assets, which are managed locally by professional investment firms, are well diversified. The expected long-term rate of return on foreign plans’ assets reflects management’s expectations of long-term average rates of return on funds invested to provide benefits included in the projected benefit obligation. The expected return is based on the outlook for inflation, fixed income returns and equity returns, while also considering historical returns, asset allocation and investment strategy. Differences between actual and expected returns on foreign pension plans’ assets are recorded as an actuarial gain or loss and are amortized over the average remaining service period of active plan participants. Snap-on’s foreign pension plans’ target allocation and actual weighted-average asset allocation by asset category and fair value of plan assets as of 2012 and 2011 year end are as follows:
|  | Target |  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |
Asset category: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Equity securities* |  | 33% |  |  | 35% |  |  |  | 31% |
Debt securities and cash* |  | 46% |  |  | 47% |  |  |  | 53% |
Insurance contracts and hedge funds |  | 21% |  |  | 18% |  |  |  | 16% |
Total |  | 100% |  |  | 100% |  |  |  | 100% |
Fair value of plan assets (Amounts in millions) |  |  |  | $ | 133.4 |  |  | $ | 125.3 |
* Includes commingled funds – multi-strategy The following is a summary, by asset category, of the fair value and the level within the fair value hierarchy of Snap-on’s foreign pension plans’ assets as of 2012 year end:
(Amounts in millions) |  | Quoted Prices for Identical Assets (Level 1) |  |  | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) |  |  | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |  |  | Total |
Asset category: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Cash and cash equivalents |  | $ | 3.9 |  |  | $ | – |  |  | $ | – |  |  | $ | 3.9 |
Equity securities |  |  | 11.6 |  |  |  | – |  |  |  | – |  |  |  | 11.6 |
Commingled funds – multi-strategy |  |  | – |  |  |  | 94.1 |  |  |  | – |  |  |  | 94.1 |
Insurance contracts |  |  | – |  |  |  | 3.8 |  |  |  | – |  |  |  | 3.8 |
Hedge funds |  |  | – |  |  |  | – |  |  |  | 20.0 |  |  |  | 20.0 |
Total |  | $ | 15.5 |  |  | $ | 97.9 |  |  | $ | 20.0 |  |  | $ | 133.4 |
The following is a summary of the fiscal 2012 changes in fair value of the foreign plans’ assets with Level 3 inputs:
(Amounts in millions) |  | Hedge Fund Interests |
Balance as of 2011 year end |  | $ | 16.5 |
Unrealized gains attributable to assets held |  |  | 2.0 |
Net purchases and settlements |  |  | 1.5 |
Balance as of 2012 year end |  | $ | 20.0 |
The following is a summary, by asset category, of the fair value and the level within the fair value hierarchy of Snap-on’s foreign pension plans’ assets as of 2011 year end:
(Amounts in millions) |  | Quoted Prices for Identical Assets (Level 1) |  |  | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) |  |  | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |  |  | Total |
Asset category: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Cash and cash equivalents |  | $ | 11.2 |  |  | $ | – |  |  | $ | – |  |  | $ | 11.2 |
Equity securities |  |  | 10.1 |  |  |  | – |  |  |  | – |  |  |  | 10.1 |
Commingled funds – multi-strategy |  |  | – |  |  |  | 83.4 |  |  |  | – |  |  |  | 83.4 |
Insurance contracts |  |  | – |  |  |  | 4.1 |  |  |  | – |  |  |  | 4.1 |
Hedge funds |  |  | – |  |  |  | – |  |  |  | 16.5 |  |  |  | 16.5 |
Total |  | $ | 21.3 |  |  | $ | 87.5 |  |  | $ | 16.5 |  |  | $ | 125.3 |
The following is a summary of the fiscal 2011 changes in fair value of the foreign plans’ assets with Level 3 inputs:
(Amounts in millions) |  | Hedge Fund Interests |
Balance as of 2010 year end |  | $ | 16.2 |
Unrealized gains attributable to assets held |  |  | 0.3 |
Balance as of 2011 year end |  | $ | 16.5 |
Snap-on has several 401(k) plans covering certain U.S. employees. Snap-on’s employer match to the 401(k) plans is made with cash contributions. For 2012, 2011 and 2010, Snap-on recognized $5.7 million, $5.2 million and $4.3 million, respectively, of expense related to its 401(k) plans.

X
- Definition The entire disclosure for pension and other postretirement benefits. + References Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS) -Number 158 -Paragraph 7, 21, 22 -LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy. Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name FASB Staff Position (FSP) -Number FAS106-2 -Paragraph 20, 21, 22 -LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy. Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Implementation Guide (Q and A) -Number FAS88 -Paragraph 63 -LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy. Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS) -Number 106 -Paragraph 518 -LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy. Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 715 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/topic&trid=2235017 Reference 6: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS) -Number 132R -Paragraph 5, 6, 7, 8 -LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy. Reference 7: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS) -Number 132R -Paragraph 5 -Subparagraph b -LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy. Reference 8: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS) -Number 132R -Paragraph 8 -Subparagraph m -LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy. Reference 9: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS) -Number 87 -Paragraph 264 -LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy. Reference 10: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher AICPA -Name Accounting Principles Board Opinion (APB) -Number 30 -Paragraph 26 -LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy. Reference 11: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) -Number 03-2 -Paragraph 8 -LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy. Reference 12: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS) -Number 132R -Paragraph 5 -Subparagraph h -LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy. Reference 13: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS) -Number 132R -Paragraph 5 -Subparagraph a -LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy. Reference 14: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS) -Number 132R -Paragraph 5 -Subparagraph q -LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy. + Details
Name: | us-gaap_PensionAndOtherPostretirementBenefitsDisclosureTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | nonnum:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration