Income Taxes	3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2016
Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]
Income Taxes	Income Taxes The Company’s effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 was 30.7% and 29.2%, respectively. The Company’s income tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 differed from the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35.0% principally due to certain foreign income tax rate differentials, state and local income taxes, the production activities deduction, certain other permanent differences and changes in the Company’s uncertain tax positions. The Company has received income tax assessments from SKAT with respect to the tax years 2001 through 2008 relating to the royalty paid by a U.S. subsidiary of Tempur Sealy International to a Danish subsidiary. The royalty is paid by the U.S. subsidiary for the right to utilize certain intangible assets owned by the Danish subsidiary in the U.S. production processes. In its assessment, SKAT asserts that the amount of royalty rate paid by the U.S. subsidiary to the Danish subsidiary is not reflective of an arms-length transaction. Accordingly, the tax assessment received from SKAT is based, in part, on a 20% royalty rate, which is substantially higher than that historically used or deemed appropriate by the Company. The cumulative total tax assessment at March 31, 2016 for all years for which an assessment has been received (2001 - 2008) is approximately Danish Krone ("DKK") 1,479.0 million, including interest and penalties ($224.4 million, based on the DKK to USD exchange rate on March 31, 2016). The cumulative total tax assessment at December 31, 2015 for all years for which an assessment had been received up through that date (2001 - 2008) including interest and penalties was approximately DKK 1,363.1 million ($199.6 million, based on the DKK to USD exchange rate on December 31, 2015). If SKAT continues to issue assessments for each year not currently assessed, the Company expects the aggregate assessments for such years (2009 - 2015) to be in excess of the amounts described above as assessed for the years 2001 - 2008. From June 2012 through March 31, 2016, SKAT withheld Value Added Tax refunds otherwise owed to the Company, pending resolution of this matter. Total withheld refunds at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 are approximately $30.0 million and $26.0 million, respectively. These amounts are included as a receivable within other non-current assets in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. In April 2016, the Company and its advisors met with SKAT to continue the discussion initiated during a meeting with SKAT in November 2015. The purpose of the April 2016 meeting was to continue to develop a framework to resolve this matter through a negotiated settlement. The Company and SKAT have agreed to continue negotiations to resolve the matter. The Company's case is pending before the Danish National Tax Tribunal (the "Tribunal"), the appellate division of SKAT. During the fourth quarter of 2015 the Company and its third-party advisors prepared an additional analysis of the Company’s positions related to this matter. Further, the Company also evaluated the increased risk of tax litigation in Denmark. The Company had updated its analysis of this uncertain tax position at December 31, 2015 and recorded a change in estimate to increase the uncertain tax liability for this item by approximately $59.7 million, from $18.9 million recorded at December 31, 2014 to $78.6 million recorded at December 31, 2015. The amount of the uncertain tax liability for this matter remains at $78.6 million at March 31, 2016. The uncertain tax liability reflects the Company’s best judgment of the facts, circumstances and information available through March 31, 2016. If the Company is not successful in defending its position before the Tribunal or in the Danish courts or in negotiating a mutually acceptable settlement, there is significant risk that the Company could be required to pay significant amounts to SKAT in excess of any related reserve. Such an outcome could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s profitability and liquidity. In addition, prior to any ultimate resolution of this issue before the Tribunal or the Danish courts, based on a change in facts and circumstances, the Company may be required to further increase its uncertain tax liability associated with this matter, which could have a material impact on the Company's reported earnings. The amount of unrecognized tax benefits that would impact the effective tax rate if recognized at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 would be $67.9 and $67.7 million (exclusive of interest and penalties), respectively. Interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits are recorded in income tax expense. It is reasonably possible that there could be material changes to the amount of uncertain tax positions due to activities of the taxing authorities, settlement of audit issues, reassessment of existing uncertain tax positions, including the Danish tax matter, or the expiration of applicable statute of limitations; however, the Company is not able to estimate the impact of these items at this time. There were no significant changes to the liability for unrecognized tax benefits during the three months ended March 31, 2016.

Income Taxes

The Company’s effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 was 30.7% and 29.2%, respectively. The Company’s income tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 differed from the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35.0% principally due to certain foreign income tax rate differentials, state and local income taxes, the production activities deduction, certain other permanent differences and changes in the Company’s uncertain tax positions.

The Company has received income tax assessments from SKAT with respect to the tax years 2001 through 2008 relating to the royalty paid by a U.S. subsidiary of Tempur Sealy International to a Danish subsidiary. The royalty is paid by the U.S. subsidiary for the right to utilize certain intangible assets owned by the Danish subsidiary in the U.S. production processes. In its assessment, SKAT asserts that the amount of royalty rate paid by the U.S. subsidiary to the Danish subsidiary is not reflective of an arms-length transaction. Accordingly, the tax assessment received from SKAT is based, in part, on a 20% royalty rate, which is substantially higher than that historically used or deemed appropriate by the Company.

The cumulative total tax assessment at March 31, 2016 for all years for which an assessment has been received (2001 - 2008) is approximately Danish Krone ("DKK") 1,479.0 million, including interest and penalties ($224.4 million, based on the DKK to USD exchange rate on March 31, 2016). The cumulative total tax assessment at December 31, 2015 for all years for which an assessment had been received up through that date (2001 - 2008) including interest and penalties was approximately DKK 1,363.1 million ($199.6 million, based on the DKK to USD exchange rate on December 31, 2015). If SKAT continues to issue assessments for each year not currently assessed, the Company expects the aggregate assessments for such years (2009 - 2015) to be in excess of the amounts described above as assessed for the years 2001 - 2008.

From June 2012 through March 31, 2016, SKAT withheld Value Added Tax refunds otherwise owed to the Company, pending resolution of this matter. Total withheld refunds at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 are approximately $30.0 million and $26.0 million, respectively. These amounts are included as a receivable within other non-current assets in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

In April 2016, the Company and its advisors met with SKAT to continue the discussion initiated during a meeting with SKAT in November 2015. The purpose of the April 2016 meeting was to continue to develop a framework to resolve this matter through a negotiated settlement. The Company and SKAT have agreed to continue negotiations to resolve the matter.

The Company's case is pending before the Danish National Tax Tribunal (the "Tribunal"), the appellate division of SKAT. During the fourth quarter of 2015 the Company and its third-party advisors prepared an additional analysis of the Company’s positions related to this matter. Further, the Company also evaluated the increased risk of tax litigation in Denmark. The Company had updated its analysis of this uncertain tax position at December 31, 2015 and recorded a change in estimate to increase the uncertain tax liability for this item by approximately $59.7 million, from $18.9 million recorded at December 31, 2014 to $78.6 million recorded at December 31, 2015. The amount of the uncertain tax liability for this matter remains at $78.6 million at March 31, 2016. The uncertain tax liability reflects the Company’s best judgment of the facts, circumstances and information available through March 31, 2016.

If the Company is not successful in defending its position before the Tribunal or in the Danish courts or in negotiating a mutually acceptable settlement, there is significant risk that the Company could be required to pay significant amounts to SKAT in excess of any related reserve. Such an outcome could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s profitability and liquidity. In addition, prior to any ultimate resolution of this issue before the Tribunal or the Danish courts, based on a change in facts and circumstances, the Company may be required to further increase its uncertain tax liability associated with this matter, which could have a material impact on the Company's reported earnings.

The amount of unrecognized tax benefits that would impact the effective tax rate if recognized at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 would be $67.9 and $67.7 million (exclusive of interest and penalties), respectively. Interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits are recorded in income tax expense. It is reasonably possible that there could be material changes to the amount of uncertain tax positions due to activities of the taxing authorities, settlement of audit issues, reassessment of existing uncertain tax positions, including the Danish tax matter, or the expiration of applicable statute of limitations; however, the Company is not able to estimate the impact of these items at this time. There were no significant changes to the liability for unrecognized tax benefits during the three months ended March 31, 2016.