(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation) | (Commission File Number) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | ||
Written communication pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) | ||
Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) | ||
Pre-commencement communication pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) | ||
Pre-commencement communication pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) | |||||
Title of each class | Trading Symbol(s) | Name of each exchange on which registered |
Item 5.03 | Amendments to Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws; Change in Fiscal Year. |
• | The voting standard for the election of directors in uncontested director elections was changed from a plurality voting standard to a majority voting standard so that a nominee for director will only be elected to the Board if the number of shares voted “for” a nominee’s election exceeds fifty percent (50%) of the number of votes cast with respect to that nominee’s election. With respect to any nominee’s election, votes cast for a nominee shall include a shareholder’s direction to withhold authority and shall exclude abstentions. |
• | The majority voting standard for the election of directors adopted by the Board has a plurality carve-out applicable to shareholder meetings where the election of directors is a contested election (as defined in the By-laws). As such, at any meeting of shareholders where the election of directors is a contested election, directors will be elected by a plurality of the votes cast rather than a majority of the votes cast. As a condition to being nominated to stand for election as director, a proposed nominee must deliver an irrevocable letter of resignation as a director, effective upon such person’s failure to receive the required vote for re-election at the next meeting of shareholders at which such person would face re-election. |
• | If a nominee for director is not elected and the nominee is an incumbent director, the Board’s Nominating, Governance, and Corporate Responsibility Committee (the “Committee”) will make a recommendation to the Board as to whether to accept or reject the tendered resignation, or whether other action should be taken. The Board will act on the tendered resignation, taking into account the Committee’s recommendation, and publicly disclose its decision regarding the tendered resignation and the rationale behind the decision within ninety (90) calendar days from the date of the certification of the voting results from the shareholders’ meeting at which directors were elected. The Committee, in making its recommendation, and the Board, in making its decision, may each consider any factors or other information that they consider appropriate and relevant. The director whose tendered resignation is being evaluated will not participate in the recommendation of the Committee or the decision of the Board with respect to his or her tender of resignation, but may |
• | In determining to adopt a majority voting standard for the election of directors in uncontested director elections, with a carve-out to provide for a plurality voting standard in contested director elections, the Board took into consideration that a majority voting standard has become the prevailing standard for the election of directors at U.S. public companies similar in size to the Company, particularly the S&P 500, which includes the Company. In this regard, the Board noted that, based on available data from Factset Research Systems, Inc., a majority voting standard for the election of directors in uncontested elections, with a carve-out to provide for a plurality voting standard in contested director elections, is currently in place at approximately ninety-one percent (91%) of the companies comprising the S&P 500. |
• | An eligible shareholder of the Company, or a group of up to twenty (20) eligible shareholders (an “Eligible Shareholder”), may submit a notice (a “Proxy Access Notice”) to the Company notifying the Company of its intent to submit a director nominee for inclusion in the Company’s proxy statement for an annual meeting of shareholders and may have its nominee included in such proxy statement, subject to the terms, conditions, and restrictions contained in the proxy access By-laws. |
• | An Eligible Shareholder must provide a Proxy Access Notice to the Company at least sixty (60) calendar days, but not more than ninety (90) calendar days, prior to the date of an annual meeting of shareholders, which is the same time period for which advance notices of nominations and other shareholder proposals not intended for inclusion in the Company’s proxy statement must be submitted to the Company under the By-laws. |
• | The Eligible Shareholder must have continuously owned at least three percent (3%) of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock for at least three (3) years as of the date that the Proxy Access Notice is received by the Company and thereafter through the date of the annual meeting. |
• | An Eligible Shareholder may use proxy access to nominate up to twenty-five percent (25%) of the total number of directors who are members of the Board as of the last day on which a Proxy Access Notice may be submitted, subject to the terms, conditions, and restrictions contained in the proxy access By-laws. |
• | An Eligible Shareholder is permitted to include with its Proxy Access Notice a statement, not to exceed five hundred (500) words, in support of the director nominee for inclusion in the Company’s proxy statement. |
• | The proxy access provisions that were adopted by the Board specifically allow investment funds under common management to be treated as a single shareholder and do not contain any post-meeting holding requirements. |
• | In connection with its adoption of a majority voting standard in uncontested director elections, the Board also approved an amendment to the By-laws to eliminate cumulative voting in director elections. In eliminating cumulative voting, the Board took into consideration, among other factors, |
• | In determining to eliminate cumulative voting, the Board also considered the fact that a system of one vote per share for each director nominee and no right to cumulate votes is the prevailing election standard at U.S. public companies similar in size to the Company, particularly the S&P 500, which includes the Company. In this regard, the Board noted that, based on available data from Factset Research Systems, Inc., the right to cumulate votes in director elections does not exist at approximately 97% of the companies comprising the S&P 500, and only three (3) of the twenty-seven (27) other companies that comprise the S&P Utility Index have cumulative voting. |
Item 9.01 | Financial Statements and Exhibits |
(d) Exhibits | |
See the Exhibit Index below, which is incorporated by reference herein. | |
EXHIBIT INDEX | |
Exhibit No. | Description |
3.1 | |
104 | Cover Page Interactive Data File (embedded within the Inline XBRL document). |
Evergy, Inc. | |
December 2, 2019 | /s/ Heather A. Humphrey |
Heather A. Humphrey | |
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary | |