XML 19 R7.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.22.1
Basis of Preparation
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2021
Basis of Preparation [Abstract]  
Basis of Preparation
2.
Basis of Preparation
The consolidated financial statements of KEPCO and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) were approved by the Board of Directors of KEPCO on February 24, 2022 and authorized on April 22, 2022 for the purpose of Form
20-F
filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
 
(1)
Statement of compliance
These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”).
 
(2)
Basis of measurement
These consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the historical cost basis, except for the following material items in the consolidated statements of financial position:
 
   
financial assets at fair value through profit or loss
 
   
financial assets at fair value through other comprehensive income
 
   
derivative financial instruments are measured at fair value
 
   
liabilities for defined benefit plans are recognized at the net of the total present value of defined benefit obligations less the fair value of plan assets
 
(3)
Functional and presentation currency
These consolidated financial statements are presented in Korean won (presented as “won” or “KRW”), which is also the functional currency of KEPCO and most of the significant operating subsidiaries.
 
(4)
Use of estimates and judgments
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with IFRS requires management to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of accounting policies and the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expenses. Actual results may differ from these estimates.
Estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognized in the period in which the estimates are revised and in any future periods affected.
The followings are the key assumptions and other key sources of estimation uncertainty at the end of the reporting period, that have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next financial year.
 
  (i)
Useful lives of property, plant and equipment, and estimations on provision for decommissioning costs
The Company reviews the estimated useful lives of property, plant and equipment at the end of each annual reporting period. Management’s assumptions could affect the determination of estimated economic useful lives.
The Company records the fair value of estimated decommissioning costs as a liability in the period in which the Company incurs a legal obligation associated with the retirement of long-lived assets that result from acquisition, construction, development and/or normal use of the assets. The Company is required to record a liability for the dismantling (demolition) of nuclear power plants and disposal of spent fuel and low and intermediate radioactive wastes. The measurement of such liability is subject to change based on change in estimated cash flow, inflation rate, discount rate, and expected timing of decommissioning.
 
  (ii)
Deferred tax
The Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and liabilities of each consolidated taxpaying entity. However, the amount of deferred tax assets may be different if the Company determines the estimated future taxable income is not sufficient to realize the deferred tax assets recognized.
 
  (iii)
Valuations of financial instruments at fair values
The Company’s accounting policies and disclosures require the measurement of fair values, for both financial and
non-financial
assets and liabilities. The Company has established control framework with respect to the measurement of fair values. The valuation team regularly reviews significant unobservable inputs and valuation adjustments.
If third party information, such as broker quotes or pricing services, is used to measure fair values, then the valuation team assesses the evidence obtained from the third parties to support the conclusion that such valuations meet the requirements of IFRS including the level in the fair value hierarchy in which such valuation techniques should be classified.
When measuring the fair value of an asset or a liability, the Company uses market observable data as far as possible. Fair values are categorized into different levels in a fair value hierarchy based on the inputs used in the valuation techniques as follows.
If the inputs used to measure the fair value of an asset or a liability might be categorized in different levels of the fair value hierarchy, then the fair value measurement is categorized in its entirety in the same level of the fair value hierarchy as the lowest level input that is significant to the entire measurement. The Company recognizes transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy at the end of the reporting period during which the change has occurred.
 
  (iv)
Defined employee benefit liabilities
The Company offers its employees defined benefit plans. The cost of providing benefits is determined using the Projected Unit Credit Method, with actuarial valuations being carried out at the end of each reporting period. For actuarial valuations, certain inputs such as discount rates and future salary increases are estimated. Defined benefit plans contain significant uncertainties in estimations due to its long-term nature (refer to Note 25).
  (v)
Unbilled revenue
Electricity delivered but neither metered nor billed is estimated at the reporting date based on the volume of electricity delivered which can vary significantly as a result of customer usage patterns, customer mix, meter reading schedules, weather, and etc. Unbilled revenue recognized as of December 31, 2020 and 2021 are ₩1,691,294 million and ₩1,725,444 million, respectively.
 
  (vi)
Construction contracts
The Company recognizes revenue over time using the cost-based input method which represents a faithful depiction of the Company’s progress towards complete satisfaction of providing the power plant construction, which has been identified as a single performance obligation. In applying the cost-based input method, it is necessary to use estimates and assumptions related to the Company’s efforts or inputs expected to be incurred. Costs incurred towards contract completion include costs associated with direct materials, labor, and other indirect costs related to contract performance. Judgment is required in estimating the costs expected to incur in completing the construction projects which involves estimating future materials, labor, contingencies and other related costs. Revenue is estimated based on the contractual amount; however, it can also be affected by uncertainties resulting from unexpected future events.
 
 
(vii)
Early shutdown of the Wolsong Unit 1 nuclear power plant and changes in new nuclear power plants construction
The
30-year
design life of the Wolsong Unit 1 nuclear power plant of the Company expired on November 20, 2012. On February 27, 2015, however, approval from the Nuclear Safety and Security Commission (NSSC) was received to continue its operation until November 20, 2022.
According to the Eighth Basic Plan for Electricity Supply and Demand announced by the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy in 2017, the Wolsong Unit 1 nuclear power plant was expected to go through a comprehensive evaluation for the feasibility of continuous operation including economic efficiency and acceptability of household and community in 2018 in order to decide whether to shut down early. On June 15, 2018, the board of directors of Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power Co., Ltd. (“KHNP”), a subsidiary of KEPCO, decided to shut down the Wolsong Unit 1 on the grounds that its deficit was increasing and its economic efficiency was low due to the nonoptimal utilization rate. On December 24, 2019, the NSSC approved permanent shutdown of the Wolsong Unit 1.
In addition, the Company has also decided to discontinue the construction of the Cheonji Unit 1 and 2 and Daejin Unit 1 and 2 pursuant to the Korean government’s energy transformation policy. Accordingly, the Company recognized impairment loss and other expenses during the year ended December 31, 2018.
Among the new nuclear power plants under construction, the Shin-Hanwool Unit 3 and 4, for which approval for power generation business was previously obtained, are not included in the list of construction suspension as determined by the board of directors of KHNP. However, it is highly likely that the construction of the Shin-Hanwool Unit 3 and 4 will be suspended according to the government’s policy. Accordingly, the Company recognized impairment loss during the year ended December 31, 2018, as the Company believed that there was a significant change in its operating environment.
In relation to the Korean government’s nuclear phase-out plan pursuant to its energy transformation policy, the Korean government has established a legal basis and relevant procedures to make up for the Company’s losses relating to the decommissioning of the nuclear power plants to be achieved in stages.
As of December 31, 2021, there is no indication that the above-mentioned impairment has ceased to exist or reduced.
 
Information about critical judgments in applying accounting policies that have the most significant effect on the amounts recognized in the consolidated financial statements is included in the following notes:
 
 
Note 17 – Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures
 
Note 18 – Property, Plant and Equipment
 
Note 20 – Construction Contracts
 
Note 45 – Risk Management
Information about assumptions and estimation uncertainties that have a significant risk of resulting in a material adjustment within the next financial year is included in the following notes:
 
 
Note 25 – Employment Benefits
 
Note 41 – Income Taxes
 
(5)
Changes in accounting policies
Changes in accounting standards effective from January 1, 2021 are as follows. The Company believes that these amendments have no significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The Company has not applied the new and revised standards in issue but not yet effective for the periods starting from January 1, 2021, even though the early adoption of these standards is possible.
Amendments to IFRS 9 ’Financial Instruments’, IAS 39 ‘Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement’, IFRS 7 ‘Financial Instruments: Disclosures’, IFRS 4 ‘Insurance Contracts’ and IFRS 16 ‘
Leases’
—Interest Rate Benchmark Reform Phase II.
The amendments provide temporary reliefs which address the financial reporting effects when an interbank offered rate (IBOR) is replaced with an alternative nearly risk-free interest rate (RFR). The amendments include the following practical expedients:
 
   
A practical expedient to require contractual changes, or changes to cash flows that are directly required by the reform, to be treated as changes to a floating interest rate, equivalent to a movement in a market rate of interest
 
   
Permit changes required by IBOR reform to be made to hedge designations and hedge documentation without the hedging relationship being discontinued
 
   
Provide temporary relief to entities from having to meet the separately identifiable requirement when an RFR instrument is designated as a hedge of a risk component