[1]	The effective percentage of ownership is more than 50%. However, according to the shareholders’ agreement, all critical financial and operating decisions must be agreed to by all ownership parties and the Company can exercise same voting rights as other shareholders at the board of directors. Accordingly, the entities are classified as joint ventures.
[2]	The effective percentage of ownership is less than 50%. However, the entity is classified as a joint venture, because all consent was required to make decisions on related activities.
[3]	The Company is planning to sell its investment in SPC Power Corporation, KEPCO SPC Power Corporation, and KV Holdings, Inc. The timing of and proceeds from such sales transaction is not specified as of December 31, 2023.
[4]	The Company is planning to sell its investment in SPC Power Corporation, KEPCO SPC Power Corporation, and KV Holdings, Inc. The timing of and proceeds from such sales transaction is not specified as of December 31, 2022.
[5]	According to the shareholders’ agreement, the parties have joint control over all decisions related to finance and operation. Accordingly, the entity is classified as joint ventures.
[6]	The effective percentage of ownership increased due to the disproportionate capital reduction of financial investors during the year ended December 31, 2022.
[7]	The effective percentage of ownership is less than 20%. However, decisions in relevant activities must be agreed by ownership parties. Accordingly, the entity is classified as joint ventures.
[8]	Although the nominal percentage of ownership is 29%, the effective percentage of ownership is 54.24%, considering the interest of financial investors as a liability component.
[9]	The effective percentage of ownership is more than 50%. However, decisions in relevant activities must be agreed by all ownership parties. Accordingly, the entity is classified as a joint venture.
[10]	The effective percentage of ownership is less than 20%. However, according to the shareholders' agreement, decisions related principal operation must be agreed by all ownership parties. Accordingly, the Company can exercise significant influence.
[11]	The percentage of effective ownership is more than 20%. However, according to the shareholders’ agreement, decisions related principal operation must be agreed by all ownership parties. Accordingly, the entity is classified as a joint venture.
[12]	According to the Boim Combined Heat and Power Generation Co., Ltd. (formerly, Dayone Energy Co., Ltd.) Investment Agreement signed in March 2011, the Company has a commitment to guarantee principal and certain returns on shares of Boim Combined Heat and Power Generation Co., Ltd. (formerly, Dayone Energy Co., Ltd.). held by NH Power 2nd Co., Ltd. and the National Agricultural Cooperative Federation. Since NH Power 2nd Co., Ltd. and the National Agricultural Cooperative Federation have put option regarding their share of the entity, the Company was deemed to have acquired an additional 15.64% stake. As a result, the effective percentage of ownership is 46.3% in the current and prior period. In accordance with shareholders’ agreement signed during the current period, the Company has joint control with other investors in making important financial and operation decisions, so it has been reclassified from an associate to a joint venture.
[13]	According to the REC’s Innovation Co., Ltd. (formerly, Wang San Engineering. Co,. Ltd.). Investment Agreement signed in March 2011, the Company has a commitment to guarantee principal and certain returns on shares of REC’s Innovation Co., Ltd. (formerly, Wang San Engineering. Co,. Ltd.). held by NH Power 2nd Co., Ltd. and the National Agricultural Cooperative Federation. Since NH Power 2nd Co., Ltd. and the National Agricultural Cooperative Federation have put option regarding their share of the entity, the Company was deemed to have acquired an additional 15.64% stake. As a result, the effective percentage of ownership is 46.3% in the current and prior period. In accordance with shareholders' agreement signed during the current period, the Company has joint control with other investors in making important financial and operation decisions, so it has been reclassified from an associate to a joint venture.
[14]	The joint arrangement which the Company has joint control is structured through a separate company. The parties have joint control over the joint arrangement are classified as joint ventures, judging that they have rights to the net assets of the arrangement.
[15]	The nominal percentage of ownership is 75.29% and the effective percentage of ownership is 56.91%, as the Company has an obligation to provide excessive dividend income to Gunsan City when a certain rate of return defined in the shareholders’ agreement is met.
[16]	After additional acquisition of the shares, the effective percentage of ownership is more than 50%. However, decisions in relevant activities must be agreed by all members of the board of directors. Accordingly, the entity is classified as a joint venture.
[17]	The effective percentage of ownership is more than 50%. However, decisions in relevant activities must be agreed by all members of the board of directors. Accordingly, the entity is classified as a joint venture.
[18]	The effective percentage of ownership is 37%, considering potential common stock.
[19]	Due to the changes in the agreement, the Company lost its control over the entity. Accordingly, the entity is reclassified to a joint venture from a subsidiary. Although the effective percentage of ownership is more than 50%, decisions in relevant activities must be agreed by all members of the board of directors.
[20]	Although the Company’s effective percentage of ownership is more than 50%, the entity is reclassified as a joint venture since the entity’s material financial and operational decisions require unanimous agreement of members in the board of directors due to the shareholders’ agreement concluded during the year ended December 31, 2023.
[21]	Although the Company’s effective percentage of ownership is less than 20%, the entity is reclassified as a joint venture considering the Company can exercise significant influence on the entity due to the Company’s contractual right to appoint a director to the entity’s board of directors and the minimum number of the entity’s board of directors members required to agree for making decision on material financial and operational policies in accordance with the joint shareholders’ agreement .
[22]	Although the Company’s effective percentage of ownership is more than 50%, the entity is classified as a joint venture since the entity’s material financial and operational decisions require unanimous agreement of members in the board of directors.
[23]	Although the investment has not yet been paid, commitment to pay 35% of investment in the future has been made.