XML 23 R11.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT
v3.25.3

Summary of Reserve for Title Claim Losses | 9 Months Ended
--- | ---
Sep. 30, 2025
Insurance [Abstract] |
Summary of Reserve for Title Claim Losses | Summary of Reserve for Title Claim Losses A summary of the reserve for title claim losses follows:
| Nine months ended September 30,
| 2025 |  | 2024
| (In millions)
Beginning balance | $ | 1,713 |  |  | $ | 1,770 |
Change in insurance recoverable | (6) |  |  | (14) |
Claim loss provision related to: |  |  |
Current year | 190 |  |  | 168 |
Total title claim loss provision | 190 |  |  | 168 |
Claims paid, net of recoupments related to: |  |  |
Current year | (12) |  |  | (13) |
Prior years | (177) |  |  | (191) |
Total title claims paid, net of recoupments | (189) |  |  | (204) |
Ending balance of claim loss reserve for title insurance | $ | 1,708 |  |  | $ | 1,720 |
Provision for title insurance claim losses as a percentage of title insurance premiums | 4.5 | % |  | 4.5 | %
Several lawsuits were filed by various parties against Chicago Title Company and Chicago Title Insurance Company as its principal (collectively, the “Named Companies”) by plaintiffs claiming they were investors who were solicited by Gina Champion-Cain through her former company, ANI Development LLC (“ANI”), or other affiliates to provide funds placed in an escrow account that purportedly were to be used for high-interest, short-term loans to parties seeking to acquire California alcoholic beverage licenses. Plaintiffs further alleged that employees of Chicago Title Company assisted Ms. Champion-Cain and her entities in diverting the funds placed into an escrow account maintained by Chicago Title Company into which some of the plaintiffs’ funds were deposited. In connection with the alcoholic beverage license scheme, the SEC filed a civil enforcement proceeding asserting claims for securities fraud against Champion-Cain and ANI in a lawsuit styled, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Gina Champion-Cain and ANI Development, LLC, pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. The receiver, who was appointed by the court to preserve the assets of the defendant affiliated entities, then filed a lawsuit in San Diego County Superior Court against the Named Companies seeking damages in a lawsuit styled, Krista Freitag v. Chicago Title Co. and Chicago Title Ins. Co. The Named Companies reached a global settlement with the receiver and several other investor claimants and jointly sought court approval of the global settlement and entry of an order barring any claims against the Named Companies related to the alcoholic beverage license scheme. On November 23, 2022, the federal court overruled any objections by non-joining investors and entered an order approving the global settlement barring further claims against the Named Companies, among others (“Settlement and Bar Orders”). After her receipt of the settlement funds, the receiver dismissed the lawsuit against the Named Companies. Some of the investor claimants who objected to the entry of the Settlement and Bar Orders appealed the decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (Cases 22-56206, 22-56208, and 23-55083). On February 20, 2025, the Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court’s Settlement and Bar Orders, barring all ongoing and future litigation against CTC, among others, stemming from the scheme operated by Ms. Champion-Cain. On April 10, 2025, the appellants filed a petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc requesting the Ninth Circuit to reconsider its decision, but the petition was denied. The investor claimants who unsuccessfully appealed the entry of the Settlement and Bar Orders to the Ninth Circuit filed petitions for writ of certiorari requesting that the U.S. Supreme Court review the lower court decisions (U.S. Supreme Court Cases 24-1192 and 25-151). Their petitions argue that conflicting rulings among U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeal exist regarding the appropriateness of bar orders in equitable receiverships. The U.S. Supreme Court has directed CTC to file a brief in response to the petitions by December 3, 2025. The Court has not yet rendered a decision regarding whether it will grant certiorari and hear the cases. The remaining lawsuits pending in the Superior Court of San Diego County for the State of California involving claimants/investors who objected to the Settlement and Bar Orders are stayed pending the conclusion of the appellate process. Chicago Title Company has also resolved a number of other pre-suit claims and previously disclosed lawsuits from both individual and groups of alleged investors under confidential terms. Based on the facts and circumstances of the remaining claims, including the settlements already reached, we have recorded reserves included in our Reserve for title claim losses, which we believe are adequate to cover losses related to this matter, and believe that our reserves for title claim losses are adequate. We continually upda te loss reserve estimates as new information becomes known, new loss patterns emerge, or as other contributing factors are considered and incorporated into the analysis of reserve for claim losses. Estimating future title loss payments is difficult because of the complex nature of title claims, the long periods of time over which claims are paid, significantly varying dollar amounts of individual claims, and other factors. Due to the uncertainty inherent in the process and to the judgment used by management, the ultimate liability may be greater or less than our current reserves. If actual claims loss development varies from what is currently expected and is not offset by other factors, additional reserve adjustments may be required in future periods to maintain our recorded reserve within a reasonable range of our actuary's central estimate. F&G Insurance Subsidiary Financial Information and Regulatory Matters Our U.S. insurance subsidiaries, FGL Insurance, FGL NY Insurance, Raven Re and Corbeau Re, file financial statements with state insurance regulatory authorities and, except for Raven Re, with the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (“NAIC”) that are prepared in accordance with Statutory Accounting Principles (“SAP”) prescribed or permitted by such authorities. Prescribed SAP includes the Accounting Practices and Procedures Manual of the NAIC as well as state laws, regulations, and administrative rules. Permitted SAP encompasses all accounting practices not prescribed but approved by state regulators. The principal differences between SAP financial statements and financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP are that SAP financial statements do not reflect VOBA, DAC, and DSI, some bond portfolios may be carried at amortized cost, assets and liabilities are presented net of reinsurance, contractholder liabilities are generally valued using more conservative assumptions, and certain assets are non-admitted. Accordingly, SAP operating results and SAP capital and surplus may differ substantially from amounts reported in the GAAP basis financial statements for comparable items. Our non-U.S. insurance subsidiaries, F&G Cayman Re Ltd (“F&G Cayman Re”), a Cayman Islands entity, and F&G Life Re Ltd (“F&G Life Re”), a Bermuda entity, file financial statements with their respective regulators. U.S. Companies Our principal insurance subsidiaries' audited statutory financial statements are based on a December 31 year end. Statutory net income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, and statutory capital and surplus as of September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, of our wholly owned U.S. regulated insurance subsidiaries, were as follows:
| Subsidiary (state of domicile) (a)
| FGL Insurance (IA) |  | FGL NY Insurance (NY) |  | Raven Re (VT) |  | Corbeau Re (VT)
Statutory Net income (loss): | (In millions)
For the three months ended September 30, 2025 | $ | (13) |  |  | $ | 1 |  |  | $ | 8 |  |  | $ | (70) |
For the three months ended September 30, 2024 | (6) |  |  | 1 |  |  | 13 |  |  | 5 |
For the nine months ended September 30, 2025 | $ | (216) |  |  | 7 |  |  | 28 |  |  | (168) |
For the nine months ended September 30, 2024 | 71 |  |  | 7 |  |  | 41 |  |  | (394) |
Statutory Capital and Surplus: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
September 30, 2025 | $ | 1,229 |  |  | $ | 102 |  |  | $ | 172 |  |  | $ | 207 |
December 31, 2024 | 1,654 |  |  | 97 |  |  | 168 |  |  | 178 |
(a) FGL NY Insurance, Raven Re, and Corbeau Re are subsidiaries of FGL Insurance, and the columns should not be added together. Prescribed and permitted practices FGL Insurance - FGL Insurance applies Iowa-prescribed accounting practices prescribed by Iowa Administrative Code 191 Chapter 97, “Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments Used to Hedge the Growth in Interest Credited for Indexed Insurance Products and Accounting for the Indexed Insurance Products Reserve,” for its indexed annuities and IUL products. Under these alternative accounting practices, the equity option derivative instruments that hedge the growth in interest credited on index products are accounted for at amortized cost with the corresponding amortization recorded as a decrease to net investment income and indexed annuity reserves are calculated based on Standard Valuation Law and Actuarial Guideline XXXV assuming the market value of the equity options associated with the current index term is zero regardless of the observable market value for such options. In addition, based on a permitted practice received from the Iowa Insurance Division, FGL Insurance carries one of its limited partnership interests, which qualifies for accounting under SSAP No. 48, “Investments in Joint Ventures, Partnerships and Limited Liability Companies,” on a net asset value per share basis. This is a departure from SSAP No. 48, which requires such investments to be carried based on the investees underlying GAAP equity (prior to any impairment considerations). In addition, the financial statements of Raven Re and Corbeau Re include certain permitted practices approved by the Vermont Department of Financial Regulation. Without such permitted statutory accounting practices, Raven Re’s risk-based capital would have been above the minimum regulatory requirements at September 30, 2025, but would have fallen below the minimum regulatory requirements at December 31, 2024. Without such permitted statutory accounting practices, Corbeau Re’s risk-based capital would have fallen below the minimum regulatory requirements as of September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024. The prescribed and permitted practices resulted in increases to statutory capital and surplus of $213 million and $454 million at September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, respectively. There have been no material changes to the prescribed and permitted practices for our U.S. insurance subsidiaries, which were detailed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, and no other significant changes in the regulatory status of our insurance subsidiaries as of September 30, 2025. Non-U.S. Companies Our non-U.S. insurance subsidiaries, F&G Cayman Re and F&G Life Re, file financial statements with their respective regulators. F&G Cayman Re files financial statements that are prepared in accordance with SAP prescribed or permitted by such authorities, which may vary materially from GAAP. Accordingly, SAP operating results and SAP capital and surplus may differ substantially from amounts reported in the GAAP basis financial statements for comparable items. F&G Cayman Re has two permitted practices, which have been approved by the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority (“CIMA”). F&G Cayman Re has a permitted practice approved by CIMA to include, as an admitted asset, the value of the letters of credit (“LOCs”) acquired to support reinsurance transactions. Also, F&G Cayman Re has a permitted practice, approved by CIMA, for PRT reinsurance transactions to use U.S. statutory book value adjusted for best estimate reserve calculations (consistent with GAAP prior to ASU 2018-12, Financial Services-Insurance (Topic 944), Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Long-Duration Contracts). These reserve calculations will be subject to annual assumption reviews consistent with other GAAP liability balances. If F&G Cayman Re had not been permitted to calculate PRT assumed reserves using best estimate reserve calculations or include the value of the LOCs as an admitted asset, statutory surplus would be $93 million and $(64) million as of September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, respectively. Without such permitted statutory accounting practices, F&G Cayman Re’s risk-based capital would have fallen below the minimum regulatory requirements as of September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024. F&G Life Re files financial statements based on GAAP. Net income and capital and surplus of our wholly owned Cayman Islands and Bermuda regulated insurance subsidiaries under SAP and GAAP, respectively, were as follows:
| Subsidiary (country of domicile)
| F&G Cayman Re (Cayman Islands) |  | F&G Life Re (Bermuda)
| (In millions)
Statutory Net income (loss): |  |  |
For the three months ended September 30, 2025 | $ | (19) |  |  | $ | 46 |
For the three months ended September 30, 2024 | (11) |  |  | 102 |
For the nine months ended September 30, 2025 | $ | — |  |  | $ | 95 |
For the nine months ended September 30, 2024 | (27) |  |  | 181 |
Statutory Capital and Surplus: |  |  |
September 30, 2025 | $ | 1,096 |  |  | $ | 218 |
December 31, 2024 | 734 |  | 123
The prescribed and permitted statutory accounting practices have no impact on our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, which are prepared in accordance with GAAP.

X
- References No definition available. + Details
Name: | us-gaap_InsuranceAbstract
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | xbrli:stringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition The entire disclosure for the types of coverages and products sold, and the assets, obligations, recorded liabilities, revenues and expenses arising therefrom, and the amounts of and methodologies and assumptions used in determining the amounts of such items. + References Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/disclosureRef -Topic 944 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org/944/tableOfContent Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/exampleRef -Topic 944 -SubTopic 505 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Section 55 -Paragraph 2 -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org/1943274/2147478420/944-505-55-2 Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/exampleRef -Topic 944 -SubTopic 505 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Section 55 -Paragraph 1 -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org/1943274/2147478420/944-505-55-1 Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/disclosureRef -Topic 944 -SubTopic 505 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Section 50 -Paragraph 5 -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org/1943274/2147477908/944-505-50-5 Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/disclosureRef -Topic 944 -SubTopic 470 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Section 50 -Paragraph 1 -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org/1943274/2147477845/944-470-50-1 Reference 6: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/disclosureRef -Topic 944 -SubTopic 20 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Section 50 -Paragraph 7 -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org/1943274/2147479838/944-20-50-7 Reference 7: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/disclosureRef -Topic 944 -SubTopic 310 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Section 50 -Paragraph 3 -Subparagraph (c)(4)(ii) -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org/1943274/2147477363/944-310-50-3 Reference 8: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/disclosureRef -Topic 944 -SubTopic 310 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Section 50 -Paragraph 3 -Subparagraph (c)(4)(iv) -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org/1943274/2147477363/944-310-50-3 + Details
Name: | us-gaap_InsuranceDisclosureTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | dtr-types:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration